Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request to Allow for a Self-Storage Facility (Davis Group Storage), Located 900 Feet North of White Avenue and Approximately 270 Feet East of Hardin Boulevard, and Accompanying Ordinance

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request to Allow for a Self-Storage Facility (Davis Group Storage), Located 900 Feet North of White Avenue and Approximately 270 Feet East of Hardin Boulevard, and Accompanying Ordinance]

NEXT ITEM. REGULAR GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS THIS PORTION AGENDA CONSISTS OF ITEMS REQUIRING THE INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY THE COUNCIL. THE FIRST IS 2000 S U P THREE CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A SELF STORAGE FACILITY, LOCATED 900 FT NORTH OF WHITE AVENUE IN APPROXIMATELY 270 FT. EAST OF HARDENED BOULEVARD AND ACCOMPANYING ORDINANCE. JENNIFER ARNOLD, HOW ARE YOU? GOOD. THANK YOU. MR MAYOR. AGAIN JENNIFER ARNOLD, DR. CLEANING ON AS YOU READ IN THE DESCRIPTION. THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A SELF STORAGE FACILITY OVER OFF OF THE HARDENED AND THREE A T INTERSECTION. THE UNDERLINING ZONING ON THE PROPERTY IS FOR COMMERCIAL USES. IT DOES REQUIRE THAT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT BE CONSIDERED IN ORDER TO OPERATE THAT FACILITY ON THE SITE. THEATRIC UNT FLIP OVER HERE TO BE. PREDICTED IT. THEO AFGHAN HAS PROVIDED THE ATTACHED PROPOSED EXHIBIT FOR THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST.

STAFFS EVALUATED THE SITE. IT IS CHECKED OFF OF THE ROADWAY FRONTAGE. IT'S GOT SOME ADJACENT SEAT TO THE RACING ON CAMPUS. AND SO WE DO FEEL AS THOUGH THE LOCATION IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS PARTICULAR USE. THE AFRICAN IS MEETING ALL OF THESE STANDARDS OF THE CITY.

SUCH WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. WAITING AND ZONING COMMISSION ALSO CONSIDERED THE ITEM AND IS ALSO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. QUESTIONS. COME AND I AGREE WITH THAT EXACT SENTIMENT THAT'S IN THE RIGHT PLACE ON THIS PARCEL. RIGHT IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT. I BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE THE AFRICAN LIKE SPEAK. WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IF YOU LIKE. HI. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. I'M GONNA BE VERY BRIEF BECAUSE I BELIEVE IN THIS ARNOLD NAME AND ADDRESS.

GRAVE READ. WE ARE LOCATED AT SHOPS LEGACY. TOWN CENTER. IS OUR OFFICE IT HERE IN TEXAS. I REALLY JUST WANTED T GET UP IN AND THANK YOU GUYS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO HOPEFULLY DO THIS DEVELOPMENT DAVIS GROUP IS A NOT ONLY A BUILDER, BUT WE'RE ALSO DEVELOPER OWNER OPERATOR FOR THIS FACILITY, AND WE'VE DEVELOPED OVER TWO MILLION SQUARE FEET. IN GEORGIA, TEXAS, SAYING ACTUALLY JUST EXPANDED IN FLORIDA, SO I'M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT. AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU'RE ROSE. QUESTIONS FOR THE AFGHAN. THANK

[00:20:05]

YOU, SIR. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYBODY HERE THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. I DON'T SHOW ANY SPEAKERS. BUT IF YOU WERE HERE AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE YOURSELF KNOWN. SEEN NONE ENTERTAIN A MOTION. YOU'RE ALL MOVED TO APPROVE THE ITEMS PRESENTED. HE CLOSED THE PUBLIC AREA CLOSE BOTH KERRY SECOND CASTRO VOTES.

RIGHT? SO IT IS WRITTEN. THE MOTION PASSES. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 200011 S U P

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit to Allow for Automobile Sales, Repair, and Storage Uses (McKinney Dodge), Located at the Northwest Corner of Rockhill Road and U.S. Highway 75, and Accompanying Ordinance]

TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE SALES REPAIR AND STORED JUICES. MCKINNEY DODGE LOCATED THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCK HILL ROAD AND U. S HIGHWAY 75. THE COMPANY IN ORDINANCE, JENNIFER THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. AGAIN.

JENNIFER ARNOLD, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING A ZOO. YOU READ. THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR AUTOMOTIVE SALES ON THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY THIS IS LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF US 75 IN VIRGINIA PARKWAY. THIS SITE MAY LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU ALL. IT'S BEEN BEFORE YOU A COUPLE OF TIMES IN THE LAST FEW YEARS. MOST RECENTLY WE DID PROCESS THE REZONING REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM MEDICAL IN OFFICE USES TO SEE THREE, WHICH IS THE HIGHEST INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USE. DISTRICT IN THE CITY. UM THE APPLICANT IS COMING FORWARD TODAY. THAT TO REQUEST A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR CAR DEALERSHIP ON THE SITE. THIS S U P REQUEST. IT'S SIMILAR TO ONE THAT YOU ALL HEARD ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO. ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO, WE HAD A SIMILAR REQUEST FOR ONLY A SMALLER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY STUFF WAS IN SUPPORT OF THAT REQUEST BACK IN THE 2019 TIMES BRAIN, HOWEVER, WITH THIS NEW REQUEST, THE SPP IS ACTUALLY LOOKING TO EXPAND ITS AREA AND SIZE. BY ABOUT SIX ACRES. SO WHAT WAS CONSIDERED BACK IN 2019 WAS ABOUT SEVEN ACRES IN SIZE. WITH THIS NEW REQUEST IT WOULD EXPAND TO ABOUT 13 ACRES IN TOTAL SIZE. BECAUSE OF THAT STAFF DOES HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE AUTOMOTIVE USES ON A TRACK THAT WAS JUST REZONED FOR HIGH COMMERCIAL USES. UNFORTUNATELY WE ARE UNABLE TO OFFER FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION THERE. I DO KNOW THAT THE AFRICAN IS HERE TO SPEAK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE REQUEST. WE DID TAKE THIS ITEM TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THEY HAVE OFFERED A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION ON THE REQUEST. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND AGAIN, SO IS THE APPLICANT. THE QUESTIONS FOR JENNIFER. RIGHT. THANK YOU, JENNIFER. WITH THE AFRICAN PLEASE COME UP STATE YOUR NAME. NAH, JUST FOR THE RECORD. GOOD EVENING MAYOR COUNCIL MATT MAURY CLAYMORE ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH COLEMAN PROSPER, TEXAS.

HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF MCKINNEY, DODGE, JENNIFER ALLUDED. WE WERE HERE BEFORE YOU ABOUT 18 MONTHS AGO FOR THE ORIGINAL S U P FOR A STATE ALONE JEEP DEALERSHIP. WHAT HAS CHANGED OVER THE LAST 18 MONTHS IS MCKINNEY DOLLARS, IS STILL UNDER A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CHRYSLER AND THEIR EXISTING FACILITY WITH THE WIFE'S ON CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT. THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO POTENTIALLY ACQUIRE ANOTHER SIX ACRES. TO EXPAND THAT TO GET THEIR ENTIRE OPERATION UNDER ONE ROOF, AND THAT'S REALLY WHAT THEIR GOAL IS SO THEY CAN CONTROL THEIR OWN DESTINY AND NOT BE TIED TO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CHRYSLER. AZIZ JENNIFER NOTED THE C THREE REASONING THAT WE PROCESSED A FEW MONTHS AGO. WAS PRETTY ENTIRE WYSONG HOSPITAL CAMPUS, THE PROPERTY THAT WEAVE INCLUDED IN THIS JEEP MCKINNEY DODGE ISSUE. P WAS A LOT OF THE REAR PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CREEK. IT WASN'T A LOT OF THE FRONTAGE ON THERE WAS NONE OF THE FRONTAGE ON VIRGINIA. IT WAS ROUGHLY AN ACRE OF FRONTAGE ALONG 75 THAT GOT ADDED INTO THE REQUEST, SO THE BULK OF THE PROPERTY ACTUALLY SITS AT KIND OF THE REAR OF THE HOSPITAL CAMPUS ALONG THE CREEK. AND SO WE FELT LIKE THIS WAS A GOOD SOLUTION FOR SOME OF THAT REAR PROPERTY THAT OTHERWISE WOULDN'T BE SUITED FOR A HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USE. OTHER NET. IT'S A VERY SIMILAR OPERATION, WHAT THEY HAVE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROCK HILL.

AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE APPROVAL OF THIS S U. P HAS PRESENTED. CAME OUT BECAUSE THEY WON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MATT. UH, I'M GOING. SO THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CHRYSLER'S NEXT DOOR THERE, OBVIOUSLY WANTING THIS PIECE TO MOVE. WHAT HAPPENS AT LEAST A GREAT AGREEMENT WITH CHRYSLER AS THEY MOVE AGAIN. THEY'VE GOT THE RIGHT FOR THE MENU FOR THE POINT FOR THE DEALERSHIP POINT. THAT OPERATIONAL MOVE TO THEIR NEW FACILITY THAT THEY CONTROL

[00:25:04]

AND THEN CHRIST WAS LEFT WITH REAL ESTATE. AND THEY PUT ANOTHER CHRYSLER DODGE DEALER SISTER. I BELIEVE THEY WOULD HAVE TO REQUIRE TO THE RESCUE P IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN. BECAUSE MY QUESTION OK WAY GONNA HAVE TWO COMPETING DODGE DEALERSHIPS NEXT DOOR TO EACH OTHER. THAT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED BY MANUFACTURER. THERE'S A SEPARATION REQUIREMENT THAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE. QUICK QUESTION. WHAT'S THE VALUE OF THE BUILDING AND ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THAT SIDE? GET A BALLPARK FIGURE. WE'RE PROBABLY GETTING CLOSE TO 15 MILLION. WITH THIS ADDITIONAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE OF PARKING SO FORTH, OKAY? OKAY? OTHER QUESTIONS WERE HAPPENING JUST REAL QUICK ON THE CORNER, OF VIRGINIAN 75.

WHAT IS THE MAGIC MAKERS WERE LEFT? I BELIEVE WE'RE RIGHT AROUND 5.5 ACRES LEFT BETWEEN THE VIRGINIA FRONTAGE, AND THEN IT KIND OF L'S ALONG 75. S O. THERE'S ROUGHLY, I THINK THREE PAD SITES ALONG 75. THEN I'LL BE TO PAD SITES ALONG VIRGINIA. THAT'S THE THAT'S WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE. YEAH, WE CAN GO BACK TO THAT, ARIEL. THAT'S STACY. THREE MUCH FOR ME, CORRECT? THAT'S RIGHT. AND SO. C THREE SHONI LET'S CLOSE THE BUILDING WAS ALL RIGHT THROUGH HERE AND THEN WITH THE RE STP REQUEST BE. WE CAN SEE THAT GREEN, CAN YOU WOULD BE THIS AREA HERE. THAT WOULD BE THE S E P FOR THE CAR DEALERSHIP. IN AN A FOR SKILLFUL USE OF COLORS.

SHE DID A LOT BETTER THAN I DID. I'M REACHING OVER MY HAND WAS SHAKING A LITTLE BIT. SORRY ABOUT THIS. I'M IMPRESSED THE THREE LINES OR FOUR LINES, SO THE LIKE, LIKELY USAGE OF THAT FIVE ACRES. YEAH, I THINK IT'S GONNA BE KIND OF YOUR TRADITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. YOU'D SEE IT ANY OTHER INTERSECTION LIKE THIS? THERE'S NO SPECIFIC USERS THAT HAVE BEEN AIN'T AT THIS POINT. UM YOU KNOW, THE PROSPECTIVE BUYER, THE HOSPITAL CAMPUSES AND PROCESS OF FINALIZING ALL HIS DUE DILIGENCE AND HE HASN'T CLOSED JUST QUITE YET. I BELIEVE THAT. IS IT ACCURATE TO SAY THAT, UM THIS S U. P IS GONNA INFLUENCE WHETHER OR NOT THAT CAMPUSES PURCHASED AND THERE'S COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT HAPPENS ON THAT CORNER.

ABSOLUTELY. ANYONE ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS? THANKS SIR. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING'SY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE ADAM MAY DO SO NOW. SEEN NONE ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MAKE A MOTION WE CLOSED PUBLIC URINE AND PREVIOUS ITEM. WE TALKED. OKAY, JUST CLOSE THE PUBLIC HERE. UM. SO WHEN THIS THING CAME BEFORE US, WHAT ABOUT 16? 17 MONTHS AGO, WELL, LET'S CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, THOUGH. OH JUST SOCIAL 2ND 2ND, OKAY? EXTRA VOTE ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. YEAH. WAY ALREADY HERE. IT'S TRUE. I DON'T LIKE THIS. PRETENDING. SO WHEN WE, WEIGH LOOK AT THIS. BASICALLY. GAVE HIM THAT PROPERTY THAT BEFORE WE TALKED ABOUT. YOU KNOW OUR LEAST I MENTIONED THAT THE FACT THAT I DIDN'T THINK THEY WERE VERY GOOD NEIGHBORS BECAUSE THEY CONTINUE TO CLOG THE STREETS WITH THEIR WITH THEIR CARS UP AND DOWN THE STREETS, AND WE GET COMPLAINTS FROM THE OTHER NEIGHBORS. UH, WAY CONTINUE TO BUILD, YOU KNOW, CAR DEALERSHIPS ON THAT 75. LET'S TAKE UP MORE MORE PROPERTY THAT MIA HASN'T CHANGED. UM. AND YOU KNOW, AND WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO HERE IS WE'RE GONNA APPROVE THIS ITEM PROBABLY AND AGAIN. JUST TAKE AWAY ANY OPPORTUNITY. WE HAVE TO MAKE A GOOD YOU KNOW, I'M IN A REAL NICE THING ON THAT CORNER AND ON THAT PROPERTY. BUT THAT'S WHAT MCKINNEY DOES SO MANY TIMES IS THAT WE WEIGH MORTGAGE YOUR FUTURE BECAUSE WE THINK ALL WE NEEDED NOW, AND THIS IS ONLY THING WE CAN DO RIGHT NOW. BUT. AND SO I JUST THINK THAT WE'RE FOOLISH WHEN WE WHEN WE CONTINUE THIS EXTEND THE AUTOMOTIVE FOOTPRINT HERE.

THAT'S JUST WHAT I HAVE TO SAY. THE COMMENTS. QUESTION OF STAFF COULD, MR MERRICK. START ON

[00:30:01]

GOING BY MEMORY, WHICH IS FAILING, BUT I SEEM TO RECALL IS COMING BEFORE THE COUNCIL BEFORE IN AMAZEMENT, JUST P NZ WHEN I'M SITTING IN LISTENING TO THAT, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME THAT WE GRANTED ESPECIALLY USED PERMIT. FOR A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY AND IF THEY WANTED TO, THEY COULD BUILD THAT RIGHT NOW. THAT'S CORRECT AND ALL KIND OF NOTE THAT AREA HERE FOR YOU OFTEN SEE IF I CAN'T FIND A COLOR. EXISTING SPP IS GENERALLY GOES UP TO ABOUT THIS LINE HERE, SO THAT AREA AND THINK, GENTLEMEN, I JUST SPOKE ON IT SAID HE'S JUST TAKING ANOTHER ACRE OF FRONTAGE ON THERE. AND THEN ANYTHING ELSE IS TOOK BACK BEHIND. COMMERCIAL USES. CORRECT YES, I CAN'T. I CAN'T VOUCH FOR THE ACREAGE. BUT YOU ARE CORRECT. IT'S OFF OF THAT FRONTAGE. YEAH, AND IT APPEARS TO ME THAT. RIGHT NOW, EVEN IF WE VOTED AGAINST THIS, THEY COULD GO BACK AND BUILD IT THE WAY ITWAS CORRECT. YES ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION, AND THEY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO THAT RADIO. IT'S WHAT I NEEDED. THE OTHER QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION.

RIGHT? SO, YOU KNOW, I GUESS I'M JUST GONNA SURMISE WHAT I'M SEEING HERE IS WE'RE. THE DEALERSHIP IS MOVING FROM ONE LOCATION TOGETHER. CRESTED DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO OPEN ANOTHER DEALERSHIP THERE. MANY ONE WANTED TO COME IN AND DO ANOTHER DEALERSHIP WOULD HAVE TO HAVE AN S U P FROM US BECAUSE IT WOULD NO LONGER BE A RESIDENT TENANT OF BUSINESS OWNERSHIP DEALERSHIP OWNERSHIP. UM. THEY ARE REALLY TAKING A SMALL PORTION ON FRONTAGE. I AM SPEAKING TO THE POTENTIAL BUYER OF THE WYSONG PROPERTY, WHICH HAS BEEN A PROPERTY. A LONG, LONG LONG AVAILABLE AND. NOT MANY PEOPLE NOT HAD SUCCESS OR NO ONE'S HAD SUCCESS TO DATE.

FOR THEM TO MAKE THIS WORK. I KNOW THAT THEY FEEL IT IS WELL, THEY DON'T FEEL THEY HAVE SAID IT IS DEPENDENT ON THIS HAPPENING. THE WAY THEY NEGOTIATE. IT WAS TO KEEP MOST OF THAT ALONG THE BACK, WHICH THEY DON'T FEEL THEY CAN DEVELOPED WITH ANY KIND OF SUCCESS COMMERCIAL, BUT THEY'RE WILLING TO TAKE A STAB AT THE FRONTAGE. SO WHERE WE ARE GIVING UP PORTION UP THERE. THAT'S ABOVE THAT BLACK LINE ROUGHLY OF FRONTAGE AND THE BACK PIECE. WHAT WE'RE GETTING IN RETURN IS THE LOSS OF THE DEALERSHIP BELOW ROCKHILL. AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE WEISSMAN PROPER THAT WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND REBUILT AS COMMERCIAL. JUST PUT IT IN A SUMMARY. QUESTION THAT HAPPENED. JENNIFER I'M NOT TRYING TO INCREASE YOUR STEPS TODAY. BUT, UH. IS IT EVEN POSSIBLE TO REASONABLY GUESS AT THE FOOTPRINT? LET'S SAY SOMEONE WANTED TO TAKE THAT. HARD CORNER. IS IT? WHAT'S A REASONABLE GUESS AS TO WHETHER FOOTPRINT OF A SINGULAR BUILDING WOULD BE THERE, AND I ACTUALLY THINK THAT THE APPLICANT MIGHT BE ABLE TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION BETTER THAN I COULD. SO I'M GONNA DEFER THAT TO THEM. THINK THAT TOMO MAN? THAT WAY. WOW. YEAH. IF I UNDERSTOOD THE QUESTION IT WAS, WHAT WOULD POTENTIALLY DEVELOP AT THE CORNER. SO, YEAH, SO YOU KNOW, BECAUSE MAYOR PRETEND WAS TALKING ABOUT YOU KNOW WAY HAVE WE HAVE THE LOSS OF ACREAGE? IT'S GOT TO AFFECT WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO THERE AND I'M NOT DEVELOPER AND THAT'S I'M JUST YOU KNOW IF THEY A ORGANIZATION WANT TO COME IN. AND SAY, LISTEN, WE'RE GONNA BUILD, YOU KNOW, X A BUILDING A STRUCTURE. WHAT KIND OF A FOOTPRINT COULD THEY ACTUALLY HAVE? OBVIOUSLY GOT MULTIPLE STORIES. BUT WHAT WOULD A REASONABLE FOOTPRINT BE FOR THAT SPACE THAT'S LEFT WELL, THE SPACE IS GIVING HIS ROUGHLY 5.5 ACRES. IT'S BASICALLY GOT 300 FT OF DEATH. OFF OF 75 OFF OF VIRGINIA, AND THAT BASICALLY ALLOWS US THE ABILITY TO KIND OF DO YOUR TRADITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT AN INTERSECTION. SO PAD SITES OR AN OUTLAW WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL HIM. THAT WAY. WE'VE GOT THIS THING LAID OUT AFFORDS US THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO YOUR TRADITIONAL AL PARTIAL TIME DEVELOPING. TOE VENTURE A GUESS ON A SINGULAR BUILDING THAT MIGHT GO. IT'S HARD TO SAY ON 5.5 ACRES BECAUSE I TRULY THINK THAT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE SOME SMALLER USERS. THAT'S MY CONCERN HERE IS THAT YOU KNOW WHAT DO WE LOSE? WHAT'S THE OPPORTUNITY THAT WE LOSE ON A DARK CORNER? NO WAY HAVE. THAT'S NOT TO SAY THAT PAD SITES AND SMALLER BUSINESSES ARE WRONG, BUT THAT'S PART OF WHAT WE'RE GIVING OUT. MAYBE LARGER BUSINESS EFFECTIVELY AND I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT DIMENSION. BUT WE'VE GOT

[00:35:01]

BASICALLY. A COUPLE 100 FT. MAYBE IF THAT ALONG THE CREEK THAT WE HAVE THAT TO DEVELOP A BULL. THERE'S ALSO A LOT OF ACREAGE. IT'S IN THE FLOODPLAIN IN THE EROSION HAZARD SETBACK THAT THE CITY WILL REQUIRE. AND SO YOU KNOW THE EFFECT OF DEVELOPMENT AREA IS ONLY A COUPLE 100 FT WHERE WE'VE GOT ADDITIONAL PARKING TO SUPPORT THE DODGE DEALERSHIP. THAT'S ANOTHER THING THAT PROBABLY FELL TO SAY IN MY INITIAL PRESENTATION IS WHAT WE ARE ACQUIRING SIX ACRES, THERE'S PROBABLY A COUPLE OF ACRES OF FLOOD PLAIN. THAT'S INCLUDED IN THIS THAT IS NOT DEVELOP A BLE FOR ANY KIND OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. SAYING SURE PICKED UP FROM THE SERVICE ROAD. 200 FT. SORRY BUT THAT'S ROUGHLY PROBABLY A COUPLE 100 FT OF DEATH. THANK YOU. I HAD A QUICK QUESTION. WHERE YOU HERE, MR. MOORE. UH WE TALKED ABOUT THE PARKING. AND THE PARKING ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE DEALERSHIP. YOU DROPPED OUT THERE AND IT USED TO BE PARKED ON BOTH SIDES. AND SO DIFFICULT TO GET UP AND DOWN. IT SEEMS LIKE. THERE'S GONNA BE A LOT MORE PARKING ON THIS THAN THERE WAS ON THE ONE ACROSS THE STREET. CORRECT OKAY. I THINK THE ACREAGE IS DOUBLING ALMOST FROM HIM SAYING NUMBER ONE. I'D LIKE TO FIND OUT WHO WAS PART WAS IT THE. EMPLOYEE PARKING IS THAT WHEN IT WASIT WAS, IS IT LOOKED LIKE SOMEONE WERE NEW CARS. BUT I CAN'T SAY EXACTLY. I MEAN, I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY BEEN IN THE PAST SOME EMPLOYEE PARKING. THERE'S SOME OFFLOADING OF NEW INVENTORY THAT I KNOW HAS OCCURRED OUT THERE, RIGHT AND I KNOW THAT AFTER THE LAST GO AROUND, YOU KNOW THERE WAS CONVERSATION OF THE PATH OF WHERE THEY WERE TEST DRIVING CARS, AND ALL THAT YOU KNOW WAS PURPOSELY MOVED OUT TOWARDS THE FRONTAGE ROAD AND NOT BACK TOWARDS THE NEIGHBORHOOD. OKAY? SO ARE THERE GOING TO BE ABLE TO HIM? PARK, THE EMPLOYEES ON SIDE AND BE ABLE TO PARK THE CARS THAT THEY GOT ON SITE WHERE THEY DON'T HAVE TO USE THE. THE ROAD.

WHY MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS. IT DOES AFFORD THEM THAT OPPORTUNITY, OKAY? MOTHER.

QUESTION NOTHING. QUICKLY. GOODBYE STREET ORDER. UNNECESSARILY TIED TO THIS. I THINK THAT WAS MY HIGH SCHOOL. COULD COME BACK AND MAKE THAT NO PARKING STREET. WITH QUESTIONS. JUST MAKE A COMMENT IF A GOOD MR MAYOR. TRYING TO DRAW SOMETHING. BUT 1ST MAY THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS SECTION RIGHT HERE. IN A COMMERCIAL CORNER. I AM SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR WITH, UM. AND WE'RE PRESERVING THAT AND TUCKING THE REST OF THIS CAR DEALERSHIP BACK IN BEHIND THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. AND THE REASON FOR MY QUESTION EARLIER IS IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THESE FOLKS IF THEY WANTED TO COULD COME BUILD THERE. RIGHT THERE, AND SO THERE ARE ONLY ASKING FOR A PORTION THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE IN THE PLAIN VIEW OF THE STREETS. THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO THAT ALREADY. HUH? AND SINCE THEY ALREADY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO IT, I DON'T SEE AS MUCH HARM AND GRANTING THIS SINCE THEY ALREADY HAVE THAT RIGHT TO EXTEND ONE PORTION OF IT BEHIND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. WANTED MR ROGERS UNDERSTAND WHY I WOULD SUPPORT THIS BECAUSE I DO AGREE WITH HIM THAT WE DO NOT NEED MORE CAR DEALERSHIPS OUT THERE, BUT THEY ALREADY HAD THEIR RIGHT. I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH MAYOR PRO TEM SENTIMENT AND IF THEY DIDN'T ALREADY HAVE THAT ONE S U P. I HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION. AND MUCH OF THAT, ON THE BACK IS IN FLOOD PLAIN. TWO ACRES IS 2.5 FISH. AND WE'RE LOSING THE CAR DEALERSHIP ON THIS OUTSIDE. IF WE APPROVE THIS I THINK THERE'S A FORTHCOMING ORDINANCE ON STREET PARKING. THE OTHER COMMENTS OR. IF NOT ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOTION THAT WAY CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE AUTUMN AT PRESENT. ONE SECOND EXTRA VOTES. I HAVE NOTHING. I HAVE NOTHING. ACTUALLY. OKAY? NOTHING ON MY SCREEN. COUNCILMAN COACH WOULD BE MY

[00:40:10]

SECOND ON MATTERS. PARKING ORDINANCE TO ADDRESS. SO ALL RIGHT WE BROUGHT OUT FINDING.

I'M THINKING THAT BEING ON OUR AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER 20012. 72 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards and to Allow for Multi-Family and Commercial Uses, Located on the Northwest Corner of Frisco Road and State Highway 5 (McDonald Street), and on the Southwest corner of Spur 399 and State Highway 5 (McDonald Street)]

CONSIDER AN ACT ON REQUEST TO REZONE SUBJECT PROPERTY PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PD ONLY TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INTO ALLOWED FOR MULTI FAMILY COMMERCIAL USE IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRISCO ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY FIVE AND ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SPUR 3 99 AND STATE HIGHWAY FIVE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. JENNIFER ARNOLD, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING. THIS IS AN APPROXIMATELY 28 ACRE TRACT ON THE SORT OF SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. RIGHT. WHERE U S 75 1 21, 3, 99 AND HIGHWAY FIVE ALL SORT OF SPUR TOGETHER. FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE INTERSECTION POINTS. THE PROPERTY ITSELF IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN WHAT YOU MIGHT BE USED TO SEEING AS WE DO HAVE TWO DISTINCT TRACKS. AS PART OF THIS REZONING REQUEST IS YOU CAN SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN. UM.

IN BETWEEN THESE TWO INDIVIDUAL TRACKS. WE DO HAVE SOME EXISTING MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. ONE IS ALREADY EXISTING. THE OTHER ONE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW.

ON GWIL SORT OF SEPARATE THESE TWO TRACKS FROM ONE ANOTHER. HOWEVER THE SITE ITSELF IS UNCOVERED BY THE SAME ZONING DISTRICT, SO THEREFORE THE APPLICANT IS COMING TO REQUEST TO REZONE OF THE 28 ACRE TRACT. TO MODIFY THE USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. AS PROPOSED. STILL AERIAL EXHIBIT IN PICTURES. AS PROPOSED. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TOL REZONE TO A PD. AND AS PART OF THAT PD, THERE WOULD BE THREE DISTINCT TRACKS. I APOLOGIZE IF THIS IS AN ORIENTED NORTH SOUTH, HOWEVER, TRACKED. ONE IS THIS TRACT RIGHT HERE, WHICH IS ALONG THE 1 21 FRONTAGE LANES TRACKED TO IS RIGHT THERE. IT'S ABOUT 18 ACRES IN SIZE AND TRACKED THREE IS THAT SMALL LITTLE TRACT THERE TUCKED AWAY ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE. WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR ACRES IN SIZE, AS REQUESTED, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TONTO INCLUDE FOR TRACKED ONE COMMERCIAL USES ON DFA ATTRACTS TWO AND THREE THE AFRICAN IS REQUESTING THE ALLOWANCE OF MULTI FAMILY USES ON THOSE PROPERTIES. AS PART OF THE REZONING REQUEST THEY HAVE PROVIDED AN INFORMATIONAL EXHIBIT TO HELP ILLUSTRATE WHAT THEIR DESIRED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN MIGHT LOOK LIKE FOR THEIR PROPOSED MULTI FAMILY USES. SOME OF THE NEWER STOP, MULTI FAMILY THAT YOU'VE ALL SEEN US BRING FORWARD HERE RECENTLY, IS THAT WITH PEOPLE CALL SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT, WHICH IS MULTI FAMILY THAT LOOKS AND FEELS MORE LIKE SINGLE FAMILY USES SO WELL, YOU CAN SEE HER ON THIS ILLUSTRATION IS THAT CONCEPT SORT OF IN PICTURES. THE STAFF IS EVALUATED THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST. WE DO HAVE CONCERNS WITH INTRODUCING MULTI FAMILY USES ON THIS TRACT, GIVEN THE VISIBILITY OR HIGH VISIBILITY AND ADJACENCY TO SOME OF THESE MAJOR ROADWAYS IN THE CITY. WE ALSO HAVE CONCERNS WITH THE INTENSITY OF MULTI FAMILY THAT'S BEING PROPOSED. THIS IS A LOWER IMPACT, MULTI FAMILY PRODUCT AND IN A LOCATION SUCH AS THIS, WE DON'T REALLY FEEL THAT IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ROADWAYS AND THE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT THAT'S CURRENTLY OUT THERE. AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS AREA IS ENVISIONED TO BE MORE FOR OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS USES. WE DO HAVE CONCERNS THAT INTRODUCING MULTI FAMILY ON THESE TRACKS COULD INHIBIT THAT, OR WOULD OBVIOUSLY INHIBIT THAT. OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY IN THE FUTURE. WE ARE UNABLE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM. IT DID GO BEFORE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN A VOTE OF FIVE TO THE PNC DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE ABOUT SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT THEY MIGHT BE ASKING FOR. I KNOW WHERE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE, AND IT'S HAPPENING. ANSWER QUESTIONS AS WELL. MAN. YEAH PLEASE, MR ARNOLD. SEEM TO RECALL A PROJECT COMING TO US BEFORE AND I THOUGHT IT WAS ON THE SAME TRACK WERE THEY'RE PROPOSING TO DO. HIS URBAN LIVING WITH OFFICE ON THE LOWER SON AND APARTMENTS UP ABOVE. IS THAT THIS TRACT OF LAND, NOT MY RECOLLECTION THAT LIKE YOURS. MINE IS ALSO FADING. HOWEVER I DON'T I DON'T BELIEVE WE'VE PROCESSED ANYTHING FORMALLY THROUGH PNC, YOUR COUNSEL FOR THAT ON THIS TRACT. AND. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS. ALSO A FAMILY THAT LOOKS LIKE SINGLE FAMILY. IS THAT GOING TO BE AN ACTUAL PART OF THE. ZONING IS IT GOING TO BE LIMITED TO THAT? OR IS THAT JUST SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN DO UNDER THAT ZONING? I BELIEVE THAT THE ANSWER IS

[00:45:07]

THAT IT IS TIED DOWN IN THE ZONING. LET ME CONFIRM THAT REAL QUICKLY BEFORE THE BIG SWITCH COME INTO THAT THAT WAS GONNA BE MY QUESTION AND IMPORTANT ONE ME. GET TO MY STANDARDS HERE JUST TO MAKE SURE. AND MR ARNOLD, AND SHE WOULD LIKE SOME TIME TO SIT DOWN, AND I THINK THE APPLICANTS PROBABLY GOT TO SPEAK TO US FOR A FEW MINUTES AND YOU COULD TAKE A LOOK AT THAT AND COME BACK UP. I HAVE FOUND IT S SO I'M HAPPY TO HELP ME INTO THAT. SO WITH THE REQUESTED REZONING, THEY COULD DO A TRADITIONAL MULTI FAMILY ESQUE STYLE. HOWEVER, SOME OF THE STANDARDS THAT ARE BUILT IN WOULD REALLY PROHIBIT THEM FROM DOING ANYTHING THAT'S MORE TRADITIONAL. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, AS REQUESTED WITH E M F ONE BASE ZONING DISTRICT, IT WOULD BE LIMITED IN HEIGHT TO TWO STORIES, WHICH TRADITIONAL MULTI FAMILY THAT WE'RE SEEING TODAY IS GENERALLY AT THE THREE STORY RANGE. THEY'RE ALSO ADDING SOME LIMITS THAT NO MORE THAN SIX DWELLING UNITS WOULD BE PERMITTED AND WITHIN A SINGLE BUILDING, WHICH WOULD ALSO BE VERY LIMITING ON BEING ABLE TO DO SORT OF A MORE TRADITIONAL STYLE WILL TAKE FAMILY SO BECAUSE OF SOME OF THOSE STANDARDS THAT ARE IN THERE, IT WOULD BE HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT THEY COULD DEVELOP SOMETHING OTHER THAN THIS CONCEPT THAT YOU'RE SEEING APPEAR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MISS EARL, JUST FROM A GLOSSARY STANDPOINT. UH, IT WOULD BE THE OFFICIAL DEFINITION OF A CLUSTER HOME. CLUSTER HOMER CLUSTER. HOW'S IT IMPOSES THAT SOMETHING IN OUR ZONING OR IS THAT JUST SOMETHING THAT SO IT'S A REAL THING IT WE DO HAVE SOME REFERENCES TO IT IN PLANNING TERMINOLOGY CLUSTER CLUSTER HOUSING REALLY IS MORE GEARED TOWARDS SINGLE FAMILY AND SO REALLY WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE DEFINITION OF CLUSTER HOUSING, IT'S A LOT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT ARE CLUSTERED CLOSE TOGETHER. NOT NECESSARILY SINGLE FAMILY LOOKING HOMES ON THE SAME LOT, AND THAT REALLY DOES IS WHAT PUSHES YOU OVER INTO THAT MULTI FAMILY CATEGORY. WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MULTIPLE UNITS ON A SINGLE LOT. ON YOU'RE OWNING THE STRUCTURE AND THE LAND THAT'S UNDERNEATH IT AS AN INDIVIDUAL THING. YOU'RE VERY WELCOME. GOTTA QUESTION, HMM.

SO. THERE ZONING THESE TWO PIECES OF PROPERTY KIND OF LIKE IT'S ONE, BUT IT'S TWO SEPARATE, COMPLETELY SEPARATE, DIFFERENT PROPERTIES. CORRECT? YES, SIR. SO. WHAT IF WHAT IF I DON'T MIND THIS, BUT I DON'T WANT THIS. WHAT IS. YOU KNOW, I THINK WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT COMMERCIAL CAN CONTINUE TO BE BUILT THERE? WHY? WHY WHY ARE WE GONNA PUT MULTI FAMILY ANYTIME FROM HOUSE AND WHY CAN'T WE JUST DO THIS? AND SO WHY? WHY DON'T WE JUST. DO THE WHOLE THING, YOU KNOW, DO I VOTE AGAINST THE WHOLE THING? BECAUSE I THINK. THIS THIS MAKES SENSE BECAUSE IT'S HARD CORNER TO GET THROUGH WITH THIS ONE. I THINK STILL COULD BE A COMMERCIAL. ABSOLUTELY AND SO I MEAN, I THINK THE APPLICANT I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR THE AFRICAN, BUT I THINK THEIR PREFERENCE WOULD BE NOT TOL. NECESSARILY DENIED OR TAKE ACTION. IF THAT'S YOUR CONCERN AND ALLOW THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER OR NOT THEY COULD COME BACK AND JUST REQUEST THAT SMALL PORTION, SO IT'S NOT NECESSARILY AN ALL OR NOTHING DEAL, HOWEVER, THAT IS WHAT'S ON THE TABLE TONIGHT FOR THE APPLICANTS, SO IF THE COUNCIL WANTS TO REQUEST SOME SHIFTS AND CHANGES. I'M SURE THAT THE AFRICAN WOULD BE HAPPY TO DISCUSS THOSE AND TALK ABOUT VIABILITY OF THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. EVER GO BACK TO THAT. WHAT? SO WHAT? WHAT DOES THIS SOUND FOR RIGHT THERE, SO THIS ENTIRE TRACKED AND I'M GONNA KNOW. SUPERIORS REAL QUICK. THERE WAS A HORRIBLE NO, YOU'RE ALL GOOD. YOU COULD JUST SAY IT. THOSE WERE NO. THOSE WERE GREAT CIRCLE, GREAT CIRCLES, SO THIS ENTIRE TRACT IS CURRENTLY ENCUMBERED UNDER ONE ZONING, AND THAT ZONING DOES ALLOW FOR MULTI FAMILY.

HOWEVER IT CAPPED THE NUMBER OF UNITS OF MULTI FAMILY 500 OR 700 UNITS. I CAN REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. AND SO THESE TWO CIRCLES THAT YOU JUST THREW THOSE AIR WHAT ARE CURRENTLY ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ZONING, AND SO THAT CAPPED OUT THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT WERE ALLOWED ON THE TRACT. AND THAT'S WHY THE APPLICANTS COMING BACK AND REQUESTING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT COULD BE ALLOWED ON THAT ZONING S O THESE AIR ALL UNDER THE SAME ZONING, THOSE MULTI FAMILY UNITS ARE ALREADY THERE ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION AS PART OF THAT ZONING. TAPPING IT OUT, WHICH IS WHAT'S NECESSITATING US TONIGHT. SO I MIGHT UNDERSTAND, THEN ZONING ACTUALLY ALLOWS FOR, BUT IT'S THAT THE NUMBER OF YEARS SO THE REQUEST IS TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF UNITS NOT CHANGED. THERE'S ONLY WELL IN MODIFY A LOT OF THE DEVELOPMENT. YES SO AS PART OF THE MODIFIED THEM SO THEY COULDN'T BE STANDARD MULTI FAMILY. CORRECT. I'M TRULY ASKING THAT OUT OF IGNORANCE, SO GET NO. WITH YOU. UNDER

[00:50:05]

UNDER THE ZONING. AS IT SITS, WE ALLOWED TO DO COMMERCIAL IF THEY CHANGE THE ZONING NOW, WOULD YOU STILL BE ABLE TO DO COMMERCIAL ON THE SOUTH END? YEAH. I HAVE A QUESTION. IS THIS THE ONLY TYPE OF HOUSING PRODUCT I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT? MAYBE THE SINGLE FAMILY IS THERE IS THIS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO REZONE IT FOR A DIFFERENT HOUSING PRODUCT? BECAUSE YOU KNOW, WE OFTEN HAVE TALKED ABOUT IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. OF CREATING SOME MORE. MORE SINGLE VAMP AFFORDABLE HOUSING. FOR IT IS THERE EVER IS THAT CLASSIFICATION? YEAH. SO YOU KNOW, THAT COULD BE SOMETHING TO DEVELOP HER. CAN SHARE. IS THERE ANY OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING OTHER THAN MULTI FAMILY HOUSING IF WE EVEN REZONED IT TO SOMETHING ELSE BECAUSE WE REALLY NEED MORE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING OPTIONS, AFFORDABLE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING OPTIONS, GEORGE SO I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THE AFRICAN ON THE OPPORTUNITIES FROM FROM THE PRIVATE SIDE. I WILL. IF I COULD BE CANDID WITH YOU FROM STAFFS PERSPECTIVE, WE HAVE A STRONG CONCERN WITH ANY RESIDENTIAL HERE BECAUSE IT'S MULTI FAMILY. ONE PART, BUT RESIDENTIAL IN GENERAL IS THE OTHER CONSIDERING THE FACT TONIGHT DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE TO GO BACK TO THIS AERIAL. HE HERE AND SEE IF I CAN'T KIND OF SHOW THIS SO I WENT TOO FAR. OKAY, SO WHEN WE LOOK AT THIS AT THIS PROPERTY, EVEN THE VICINITY MAP. I THINK IT'S GREAT. IT'S REALLY IS THIS CONVERGENCE OF SOME PRETTY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAYS, AND THAT'S THAT'S REALLY WHAT FOUNDS A LOT OF OUR CONCERNS ABOUT RESIDENTIAL IN THE TRACT. BECAUSE WE'RE NOW TALKING ABOUT INTRODUCING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND USES RIGHT WHERE WE HAVE, YOU KNOW. THREE PRETTY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAYS COMING TOGETHER, AND IT'S NOT SHOWN HERE, BUT UM, YOU KNOW, WITH SOME OF THE HIGHWAY 3 80 FEASIBILITY STUDY AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE BEING CONSIDERED FROM TEX DOT AND WITH SOME OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF HIGHWAY FIVE ON SOME OF THE PROJECTS THEY'VE GOT. WE DO FEEL LIKE THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THESE ROADWAYS ARE GOING TO INCREASE QUITE A BIT. WHICH COULD ULTIMATELY INCREASE COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL ON THESE TRACKS ABOVE AND BEYOND A RESIDENTIAL PRODUCT. THANK YOU. RIGHT? YES, THAT'S CHECK UP YOU LOWER LEFT. SAY THAT AGAIN. ON HIGHER EDUCATION. YES, I KNOW THIS RIGHT HERE WELL TO THE LEFT. YES THIS IS THE CHECK.

AND THEN THIS IS THE HOSPITAL RIGHT HERE. AND THESE ARE SOME OFFSPRING MEDICAL OFFICERS.

YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT. QUESTIONS. THE AFGHAN COME UP.

MR MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ON BOB ROTOR 1700 RED BUDS SUITE 300 MCKINNEY HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANTS. UM I'D LIKE TO SORT OF START BY ADDRESSING SOME OF THE QUESTIONS AND THEN I'LL GIVE YOU THE OVERVIEW OF MY MIND. I THINK ONE OF THE BASIC. ISSUES HERE FROM WHICH THE QUESTIONS STEM IS WE'RE USING THE TERM MULTI FAMILY.

FOR THIS FOR A LOT OF THIS PROJECT. WE USE THE TERM MULTI FAMILY BECAUSE OF MCKINNEY. ANY PROJECT ON WHICH THEREFORE MORE DWELLINGS. IT'S ON A SINGLE LOT IS A MULTI FAMILY PROJECT. AND SO WE'RE STUCK WITH OUR EXISTING ZONING. AND WE'RE DOING A PD TO TRY TO MAKE IT ALL WORK. THIS IS MR RICHARDSON WOODS. THIS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY. FOR PEOPLE THAT DON'T HAVE THE DOWN PAYMENT TO BUY $400,000 HOME AND MCKINNEY I LIVE IN A RENTAL PROPERTY THAT LOOKS LIKE AND ACTS LIKE AND FEELS LIKE A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. SO I THINK WE'RE ADDING TO THE INVENTORY OF HOUSING OPTIONS IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY WITH THIS PROJECT. NOW THE FACT THAT IT'S CALLED MULTI FAMILY, MR PHILLIPS. WE HAVE PUT LIMITATIONS IN THE PD. AS HIS ARNOLD REFERENCED. WE HAVE A HYPE LIMITATION NO MORE THAN 35 FT. WE HAVE A DENSITY LIMITATION ACROSS THE ENTIRE TRACK. OF 10 UNITS PER ACRE OR LESS. WE HAVE A REQUIREMENT

[00:55:09]

THAT NO MORE THAN SIX LIVING UNITS CAN BE IN A SINGLE STRUCTURE. AND SO GIVEN THAT YOU COULD CONCEIVABLY HAVE TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT. BUT YOU WOULD NOT, THE MARKET WOULD NOT SUPPORT AND NOBODY WOULD BUILD A TRADITIONAL MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THERE. WE PUT THOSE IN PLACE SPECIFICALLY TO ENSURE THAT THIS PROJECT EITHER. GO AS IT IS, OR FOR SOME REASON, IT DOESN'T MAKE. YOU WILL NOT SEE TRADITIONAL MULTI FAMILY ON THIS PROPERTY.

I WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE USE HERE BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN QUITE A BIT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT. THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION IN THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTIES LAID FALLOW FOR I CAME HERE IN 1974. AND IT HADN'T CHANGED SINCE THEN. THE ACCESS OFFICE FOR 3 99. IS ONE POINT JUST TO THE SOUTH EAST OF MEDICAL CITY DRY. THAT ONE POINT IS THE ONLY ACCESS ONTO THIS PROPERTY ALONG SPUR 3 99. AND SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MY CLIENT HAS DONE IN THIS PD IS IT HAS SENT ASIDE SEVEN. I MEAN 4.7 ACRES. THAT YOU SEE AS TRACKED ONE FOR COMMERCIAL USES. THAT HIM? OUR OPINION IS THE ONLY THING THAT IS SUSTAINABLE, GIVEN THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION OF THE ROAD SYSTEM. TECH STOCK HAS YOU MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT KNOW AS A.

VERY HIGH LEVEL SCHEMATIC FOR FUTURE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS OUT HERE. THAT COULD BE EASILY 20 OR 30. YEARS AWAY. NOBODY KNOWS WHEN THAT WILL HAPPEN. IT'S NOT ON ANY TECH STOCK PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION. AND THE BEST IT WOULD DO WAS BE TO CREATE HER EXTEND THAT ACCESS ROAD IN A SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG A LOT OF THAT FRONTAGE. NOW YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE VERY SOUTHERN SOUTHEASTERN TIP. THERE'S A POND OR A DRAGGING STRUCTURE. THAT'S THERE BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE ALL THE WATER FLOWS THAT'S ALWAYS BEEN UPON, IT WILL CONTINUE TO BE UPON YOU CAN'T RECLAIM IT. ON SO YOU'RE REALLY NOT TALKING ABOUT THAT MUCH FRONTAGE ON SPUR THREE DINING NINE THAT WE HAVEN'T ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR. IN THE 4.7 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL. THIS PARTICULAR PRODUCT IS INTENDED TO HIT A COUPLE OF POPULATIONS THAT ARE UNDERSERVED IN MCKINNEY. ONE IS THE. THE YOUNGER MILLENNIALS OR THE MID MILLENNIALS THAT AIR WANTING TO MOVE OUT OF AN APARTMENT. I WANT TO GET INTO A SINGLE FAMILY STYLE DEVELOPMENT. I DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY THE $30,000 OR WHATEVER IT TAKES FOR A DOWN PAYMENT FOR A HOUSE.

SO THIS IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO THEM FOR THEM TO MOVE INTO. THESE STRUCTURES, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A FEW TOWN HOMES. YEAH. THERE'S NOBODY LIVING ABOVE YOU AND THERE'S NOBODY LIVING BELOW YOU. SO YOU'VE GOT YARDS. YOU'VE GOT FENCES. YOU'VE GOT COMMON AREAS, SO THIS IS GONNA LOOK AND FEEL TO THAT POPULATION. AS A REALLY NICE, HIGHLY A MINUTE EYES, SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. OTHER POPULATION THAT THIS TARGETS ARE THE OLDER BABY BOOMERS. THOSE FOLKS THAT EITHER WANNA LOCK AND LEAVE OPPORTUNITY WHERE THEY DON'T HAVE TO MAINTAIN ANYTHING THAT CAN BE TAKEN LIVE THERE. THERE PEOPLE THAT DON'T CARE ABOUT HAVING HOME OWNERSHIP. THERE. THEY TAKEN THEIR EQUITY OUT OF THEIR HOME AND THEY WANT TO SPEND THAT EQUITY ON THINGS OTHER THAN HOUSING, AND THAT'S THE OTHER POPULATION THAT THIS IS AIMED AT. UM THESE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS ARE VERY POPULAR IN MANY PARTS OF THE UNITED STATES. WE'RE JUST NOW STARTING TO SEE HIM. IN TEXAS. BUT THIS IS A HIGHLY A MINUTE IZED.

PROJECT. AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THERE WERE A NUMBER OF ISSUES THAT STAFF RAISED WITH REGARD TO OUR DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. AND WE HAVE SATISFIED. I THINK ALL OF THOSE AS AS YOU SAW IN YOUR STAFF REPORT THAT YOU READ, SO WE ARE TREATING EACH ONE OF TRACK TWO AND TRACK THREE. FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE REQUIRED AMENITIES FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ALL OF THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF A DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE TREATING THOSE AS SEPARATE, ALTHOUGH THERE UNDER A SINGLE OWNERSHIP. AND THEY'RE GONNA BE MANAGED UNDER A SINGLE OWNERSHIP. BUT, UH, IF THE NUMBER OF UNITS ON THAT FAR SOUTH TRACK WHICH IS ON OUR PAR

[01:00:04]

LEFT, REQUIRES SHE HAD TWO OR THREE AMENITIES WITHIN THAT GEOGRAPHICAL AREA. WE HAVE PROVIDED IN THE SAME IS TRUE FOR THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE. UM. AS MISS ARNOLD REFLECTED THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION ON THIS AND I WOULD REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. LET ME ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. ISN'T. I HAVE A QUESTION. SO YOU YOU YOU'VE PUT THE COMMERCIAL A COUPLE OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN THERE.

WHEN DO THEY GET STARTED? THEY STARTED AFTER THE HOUSES ARE BUILT HER BEFORE OR DURING THE.

MISTER ROGERS MAC LINE IS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPER THOSE PROPERTIES. THOSE TRACKS WILL BE FOR SALE. MAC MY CLIENT WILL NOT DEVELOP THOSE. WE DON'T KNOW THAT THEY'RE EVER GOING TO BE DEVELOPED. WELL, UM. YOU'RE IN A YURT IN AN AREA OF MCKINNEY THAT I WOULD SAY THAT IS PROBABLY THE RULE. NOT THE EXCEPTION. YOU HAVE SOUTHGATE. WHICH ALL HAVE PROMOTED FOR TWO DECADES. WE'RE NOT GETTING ANY DEVELOPMENT ON AND CLEARLY THAT IS BETTER SITUATED FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THIS PROPERTY IS HERE, SO I CAN'T ANSWER YOUR QUESTION OTHER THAN TO SAY, LOOK AROUND. SO WHY DO YOU NEED? WHAT? WHERE WHERE? WHAT IS THE NEED FOR TAKING UP THE OTHER? THE SOUTH SIDE THAT LITTLE SOUTH AREA? WHY WHY? WHY SHOULDN'T WE JUST LEAVE THAT COMMERCIAL AND LET COMMERCIAL DEVELOPED THERE? IT'S PRESENTLY ZONE FOR ASSISTED LIVING.

ADDITIONALLY AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE INTENDED USE IS THERE UH, THIS SOUTHERN PEACE SORT OF CREATES. UH THE MASS THAT YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THE AMENITIES MANAGE THE PROPERTY THE WAY YOU WOULD IT CREATES THE CRITICAL MASS. MAKES IT MORE PROFITABLE WELL. WERE PROFIT DRIVEN, RIGHT? I MEAN, YOU DON'T WANT TO DO SOMETHING FOR A LOSS, SO YEAH, DOES MAKE IT PROFITABLE. IT'S BOUNDED BY FRISCO ROAD AND, YOU KNOW FRISCO ROAD IS GOING TO DEVELOP AS THE AS THE CITY OF FAIRVIEW DEVELOPS, BUT RIGHT NOW THAT'S NOT A HIGHLY TRAVELED ROOM. I WILL SAY TO YOU THAT IN A NUMBER OF YOU MIGHT HAVE TALKED TO HIM, MR LYNCH. THAT MEDICAL CITY. MCKINNEY VISITED WITH HIM ABOUT THIS. I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS IN HIS MOUTH, BUT HE WAS SUPPORTIVE OF IT. HEY FELT LIKE THIS WOULD HELP BRING MORE ACTIVITY TO HIS SECTOR OF THE CITY. THAT THE, UM. ECONOMICS OF WHAT IT WOULD TAKE TO LIVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROPERTY, LITTLE BIT HIGHER RENTS AND IN A TRADITIONAL MULTI FAMILY PROPERTY, BUT THIS WOULD PROBABLY HIT THE SWEET SPOT FOR A LOT OF THE STAFF OF THE HOSPITAL. UH AND CLEARLY IF WE GET CRITICAL MASS OF PEOPLE THERE, THEN THE CHANCES OF THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPING FOR RESTAURANTS, HOTEL WHATNOT INCREASES, ALL OF WHICH BENEFITS THE WORK POPULATION AT THE HOSPITAL. SO ASIDE, LOOK AT THIS. THIS LITTLE IMAGE AT THE BOTTOM RIGHT HERE. OF IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S SOME REALLY TINY LITTLE HOMES AND SOME BIGGER HOMES. IS THAT CORRECT IS HOW MANY TYPES OF HOMES WHAT HOW MANY, ONE OF THE SIZE, ACTUALLY NOT WHAT THE SIZES. HOW MANY TYPES OF HOMES ARE THERE? WELL, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT. SIZES OF SINGLE FAMILY ONE STORE, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE SOME TWO STORY AND YOU'RE GONNA HAVE SOME TOWN HOMES.

THERE. THEY'RE GONNA BE TWO STORY. SO THE SIZE OF THE UNITS RANGE FROM SOMETHING A SMALL IS 800 FT, OR 900 FT, WHICH WOULD BE SORT OF LIKE A BUNGALOW. DO A HOME. THAT'S PROBABLY 2500 SQUARE FEET. SO IS THERE ANYTHING IN THIS THAT ALLOWS THAT THESE THINGS ARE INDIVIDUALLY SOLD LATER ON, THERE'S THAT CANNOT HAPPEN. CORRECT CANNOT HAPPEN UNDER THIS BECAUSE IN ORDER TO DO THAT, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO PLANT HIM. HIS INDIVIDUAL LOTS, OKAY? AND IF YOU HAVE OTHER SUGGESTIONS ABOUT HOW TO LOCK THIS DOWN, SO IT DOESN'T MORPH INTO SOMETHING ELSE. WE'RE HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN THAT WE'VE WORKED REALLY HARD ON TRYING TO THINK OF THOSE KINDS OF RESTRICTIONS WE CAN PUT IN THERE WITHOUT HAVING TO GIVE YOU A LOCKED DOWN. SITE PLAN BECAUSE, AS YOU KNOW WHEN YOU GET OUT THERE AND START MOVING DIRT LITTLE LINES, CHANGE IN STREETS MOVE A LITTLE BIT AND SO. I NEVER RECOMMENDED THE SNAP STAFF NEVER RECOMMENDS THAT WE INCLUDE IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE REALLY LOCKED DOWN.

PLAN. THANK YOU. WILL SAY SINCE YOU SAID YOU DON'T KNOW IF SOME OF US HAVE SPOKEN TO MR LYNCH.

[01:05:08]

MR. LYNCH'S CEO, I BELIEVE OF MEDICAL CITY HOSPITAL. I DID SPEAK WITH MR LYNCH CALLED HIM TWO REASONS. ONE WANTED NO. WAS HE WOULD HE BE OPPOSED TO IT? I'M NOT BEING COMMERCIAL, AND SECONDLY, DID HE FEEL THAT WOULD BE A BENEFIT. RESIDENTIAL SOUND LIKE THE SAME QUESTION, BUT NOT NECESSARILY AND SPECIFICALLY THIS TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL I WILL SAY THAT MR LYNCH. SAID VERY MUCH SO THIS WOULD BE A BENEFICIAL PRODUCT FOR HIS STAFF FOR THE HOSPITAL.

HE FEELS IT WOULD BE AN ATTRACTIVE OPTION AS A SINGLE FAMILY. ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT IT'S BEING RENTED, WHICH, OF COURSE, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, A TURKEY HEAVILY PLATTER SINGULARLY PLANTED CAN ALSO BE GRANTED. OF COURSE, AS WE ALL KNOW. BUT HE DID SPEAK FAVORABLY. I WASN'T SURE WHAT RESPONSE I WOULD GET FROM HIM.

BUT THAT WAS THE RESPONSE. SO I THINK IT'S WORTH NOTING. I JUST SPOKE TO MR LYNCH. AND HAD A GREAT CONVERSATION WITH HIM. ON THIS. HE WAS HE WAS SAID THIS WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR HIM.

BUT WE HAD A BETTER IDEA. HE'S ALL LEADERS. AND SO THAT'S HOW WE KIND OF LEFT IT. SO WE'RE LOOKING AT 572 UNITS IN HERE IS THAT IS THAT A NUMBER 212. OKAY? STUDENT TRIP. HOW MUCH WOULD THE OKAY S SO HOW MANY OF THE TOWN HOMES ACTUALLY WILL BE BUILT? DON'T THINK THAT WE'VE SPECIFIED THAT HOW MANY OR TOWN HOME AND HOW MANY OR NOT, I WOULD SAY THEY'RE MIXED TYPICALLY IS I'M GOING SAY $50. SO SIX. ABOUT A THIRD E THINK THEY'RE PLAYING ON 80 TOWN HOMES FOR ABOUT A THIRD. OF THE TOTAL NUMBER WOULD BE A PAN HOME. OR SLIDES DOWN. THERE'S.

WHERE? WHERE IS THAT WHERE IT SHOWS THE NUMBERS? VERY TINY FRIENDS. OKAY. I'M SORRY, MR AFTER THE SEVEN DIFFERENT YEAH. UH WHAT BRAND ARE WE LOOKING AT HERE? MR FRAZIER, THE I'M TOLD THAT THE RENTS ARE GONNA BE INCENSE TOE 15 CENTS A FOOT HIGHER ON AN ANNUAL RENT CALCULATION THAN YOUR AVERAGE MULTI FAMILY AND MCKINNEY. SO IF SO, I GUESS UNEXAMINED WOULD BE IF YOU'RE PAYING. $1000 A MONTH FOR A. 700 SQUARE FOOT APARTMENT. IT'S GOING TO COST YOU 1112 $100 IN THERE. SHH. LADIES. YOU DON'T HAVE ACTUALLY, I. YOU DON'T KNOW BECAUSE, REMEMBER, THIS IS AN ALL INCLUSIVE. THIS IS NOT INDIVIDUALLY OWN STRUCTURE DEAL, THOUGH. IT'S JUST ONE FEE AND THAT TAKES HIM. IT WAS JUST LIKE IT'S WRITTEN. THAT'S RIGHT. ONE SAY, THIS IS AS I MENTIONED LOCK AND LEAVE. THE INTENT HERE IS FOR THIS TO BE MAINTAINED UNIVERSALLY BY THE MANAGEMENT. UM SO IT'S. WELL, I APPRECIATE THE COMPARISON TO THE MULTI FAMILY. THERE'S FIVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESIDENCES. JUST CURIOUS WHAT THE APPROPRIATE APPROXIMATE RANT FOR EACH ONE TO COUNCILMAN FRASER'S FOLLOWING. WHAT WERE THE APPROXIMATE RENT BE ON THOSE FIVE TYPES OF HOMES. HARRY. ME INTRODUCE ISAAC CAR PAY. HE'S WITH THE ACTUAL DEVELOPER. GOOD EVENING. CANCEL ON NAMES, EITHER. CARPET RESIDE AT 115, SANDRA MORITA WAY. AUSTIN, TEXAS AND I'M WITH THE APPLICANT. NEW GRAPH LIVING. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH YOU. SO PART OF OUR SITE PLANNING EFFORT. WE REALLY PRIORITIZED DIVERSITY OF PRODUCT WITHIN A GIVEN COMMUNITY. TAVIS SQUARE FOOT RANGE THAT KIND OF IT'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT DEMOGRAPHICS. YOU CAN MEET A LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLES NEEDS. SO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE WE HAVE DESIGNED RIGHT NOW WOULD RANGE FROM ABOUT 675 SQUARE FOOT ONE BEDROOM UP TO A 1700 SQUARE FOOT, THREE BEDROOM. AND ATTACHED IN DETACHED PRODUCT AND ONE IN TWO STORY AND THE RENT RANGE BECAUSE THEY'RE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS WOULD BE BETWEEN RIGHT NOW LOOKING AT IT. $1300 A MONTH UP TO 2700 A MONTH WHEN YOU LOOK AT EMPIRICAL, RIGHT, AND THERE'S NO H O I ON TOP OF THAT, OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S UTILITIES AND SMALLER, OTHER EXPENSES. BUT THAT'S. THE PLAN IS DESIGNED WOULD ATTRACT AND KIND OF MEET A LOT OF DIFFERENT MARKETS BECAUSE OF THAT DIVERSITY IN PRODUCT IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, SIZES, SO THAT'S PART OF THE VALUE PROPOSITION. AND WHAT WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT WHAT THE DESIGN AS A CURRENTLY STANDS. THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTIONS IF YOU APPRECIATE IT. THE QUESTIONS. YOU, SIR. OKAY. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. SHOW. BUDDY.

[01:10:17]

NOBODY ON MY LIST. IS THERE ANYBODY HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE ITEM THAT HAS NOT SEND A CARD. SEE NONE ENTERTAIN A MOTION. REMOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND.

CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY? RIGHT? DISCUSSION. WHAT IS THE CURRENT ZONING ALLOWED RIGHT NOW? I'M STILL HIDING OVER THERE. I'LL BRING YOU BACK UP. SO WELL. THAT LITTLE SPOT HE SAID WAS ZONE FOR SENIOR LIVING. SO RIGHT, THE ZONING ON THE PROPERTY RIGHT NOW ALLOWS FOR A MIX THAT SORT OF COMMERCIAL OFFICE USES. THERE'S INDEPENDENT LIVING ON A SMALL PORTION OF IT ON THE ON THE SORT OF SOUTHERN SIDE. AND THE MULTI FAMILY AND I DID WANT TO CLARIFY THIS BECAUSE I DIDN'T SPEAK EARLIER, THE ZONING THAT ALLOWS FOR THE MULTI FAMILY CAPS A MULTI FAMILY AT 500 UNITS, AND IT ALSO DOES LIMIT THE MULTI FAMILY TO THAT CENTRAL PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. SO THE AREAS AROUND IT ARE WHERE WE'RE SEEING THAT COMMERCIAL IN OFFICE USES. ARE YOU SAYING? PERHAPS IT 500. CLUED THE TWO AND THE CENTER.

THAT IS THE TWO IN THE CENTER, SO THE TWO IN THE CENTER ARE HITTING THAT 500 CAP. YEAH, THAT'S CORRECT. AND SO. OUR RIGHT OF THE SCREEN IS I'M LOOKING AT IT. WE'RE YES, MA'AM. YES, SIR. WHAT IS ALLOWABLE IN THAT AREA. SO THAT'S GOING TO BE THAT'S WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THE MORE THE COMMERCIAL IN OFFICE USES. UNDER THE CURRENT PD. THAT'S CORRECT. MISSIONS. COMMENTS. RIGHT? YOUR EMOTION. MOTION ON THE TABLE. MIKE EMOTION. WE APPROVE THIS ITEM. SECOND. I WILL. SECOND THE ITEM. I BELIEVE THAT THIS PROVIDES A DIVERSE PRODUCT IN OUR LARGEST LARGE HOSPITAL PARTNER. HAS. SAID THIS WOULD BE A BENEFIT TO HIM IN HIS BUSINESS AND WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. CAST YOUR VOTES.

MOTION PASSES. I MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER. 20014 Z TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “C2” - Local Commercial District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards and to Allow Multi-Family Uses, Located on the Southeast Corner of Hardin Boulevard and Virginia Parkway, and Accompanying Ordinance]

CONSIDER AN ACT ON REQUEST TO RES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SEA TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT GENERALLY TO MODIFY DEVELOPING STANDARDS AND TO ALLOW MULTI FAMILY USES, LOOKING IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. HARDENED BOULEVARD IN VIRGINIA PARKWAY AND ACCOMPANYING ORDNANCE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. WE DID RECEIVE WORD FROM THE APPLICANTS YESTERDAY THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING TO TABLE THIS ITEM TO THE MARCH. 2ND CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO COORDINATE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. THE ITEM. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS WELCOME TO BE OPENED, BUT STAFF DOES WORK OF RECOMMEND. TABLE IN THE ITEM. CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND WE WILL RE NOTICE BEFORE THE THREE TO COUNCIL MEETING. SO I WOULD. FOR ASK IF THERE'S A MOTION TO DO THAT SAY THAT I AM FAIRLY CONFIDENT THAT IF. IF THE APPLICANT WISHES TOO. TO GET THIS ZONING APPROVED. IT WILL BE BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND ARE IN FAVOR OF IT. UM MY GUESS IS THAT THIS UNIT? THIS REQUEST IS NOT GOING TO PASS UNLESS THERE IS BUY IN AND DESIRE FROM THE ADJOINING PROPERTY. SO I'D SAY THAT JUST TO ENCOURAGE THE APP CANTO. EITHER. GET THAT. GET THAT CONSENT. WORK OF THEM. DO YOU HAVE IT? AND IF YOU DON'T

[01:15:03]

MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO WITHDRAW. BUT THAT'S OF COURSE, JUST ONE OF SEVEN VOTES.

COLONEL, IS THIS BEEN TABLE BEFORE? JUST LISTEN THE FIRST TIME WE'VE SEEN THIS LOOK SO THIS YES. SO WE DID SEE THIS REQUEST ABOUT 6 TO 9 MONTHS AGO, IT WAS WITHDRAWN AT THAT POINT IN TIME. SO THIS ISN'T TECHNICALLY A NEW REQUEST, BUT IT IT'S SAME SAME TRACKED A LOT OF THE SAME STANDARDS. WILL AGREE WITH WHAT MR MARRIAGES SAID. I'M ANNOYED THAT. WAS HAVING THE SAME THING COME BACK MULTIPLE TIMES. DOES THAT MEAN JUST TO BE JUST BE FRANK. YES.

THAT YOU NEED PROTECTING JENNIFER OR YOUR STAFF. BUT EVERY TIME THIS COMES BACK IT'S KNOWS HOW MANY HOURS WORTH OF WORK. AND IT'S JUST ANNOYING. I'LL HAVE ENOUGH TO DO WITHOUT HAVING SOMETHING COME BACK LIKE. ZOMBIE REQUEST. IT'S JUST YOU KNOW, THE WALKING DEAD. NOT TO MENTION THE EMAILS THAT WE HAVE TO KEEP ANSWERING, THAT NOT TO MENTION THE RESIDENTS HAVING TO IF THEY HAVE, THEN THEY DO A STRONG FEELING ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. THEY LIVE ON. THE NEEDLE'S RELATIVELY WAITING FOR WINS THE NEXT YOU GONNA DRIVE? ANNOYED GO FROM CITY STAFF STANDPOINT AND FROM A RESIDENT'S NAME. NO, JUST, UH YOUR STATE ANYMORE. ELOQUENTLY THAN I WOULD. LIKE, SAY SOMETHING POSITIVE. I THINK THIS IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST VOCAL AND WELL ORGANIZED NEIGHBORHOODS AGAINST THE PROJECT I'VE EVER SEEN. AND I RATHER DOUBT THAT. ANYONE'S GOING TO COME BACK IN HERE AND GET APPROVAL OF APARTMENTS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HARDEN AND VIRGINIA. AND CONGRATULATIONS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I THINK I'VE ANSWERED EMAIL FROM EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM AT THIS POINT IN TIME, AS WELL AS EACH OF MY SIX COUNTERPARTS. THERE IS STRONG OPPOSITION TO THIS PROJECT. I CONCUR. OH, MOTION TO TABLE THIS DOES THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL MARCH. 6TH IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. WORKED SIX. I'M SORRY FOR JUST A SECOND, YES, THANK YOU.

DIRECTION THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT. DID JENNIFER MAKE YOU THINK OF JENNIFER? THANK YOU. CAST YOUR VOTES. RIGHT MOTION PASSES. EXCITE HIM. THE MP 201265 CONSIDERING ACT ON THE

[Consider/Discuss/Act on the Throckmorton Statue Ad Hoc Advisory Board Research and Findings]

THROAT BORN STATUE AD HOC ADVISORY BOARD RESEARCH AND FINDINGS. FROM. GOOD EVENING, MR MAYOR. GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. CAN BRING YOU BACK A LITTLE BIT TOE LAST SUMMER. YOU MAY REMEMBER THAT WE HAD SEVERAL DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE THROCKMORTON STATUE ON THE IMPACT SQUARE. IN RESPONSE TO THAT THE COUNCIL FORMED AN ADVISORY BOARD TO GIVE THE ISSUE SOME MUCH NEEDED TIME AND SPACE FOR RESEARCH AND DISCUSSION AND THAT BOARD OF 11 COMMUNITY MEMBERS WORKED REALLY HARD TO GAIN COMMUNITY INPUT AND ALSO PUT A FULL PICTURE OF THE STATUE HISTORY TOGETHER. WE PRESENTED A SUMMARY OF THAT A SUMMARY OF THE PUBLIC INPUT SOME OF A SUMMARY OF THE RESEARCH FINDINGS AND EVERYTHING TO YOU IN OCTOBER.

DEFINITELY RECOGNIZED THAT IT WAS A LOT OF INFORMATION, SO WE TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THAT YOU NEED TO BE SOME TIME TO PROCESS THAT WE ALSO WELCOME TO NEW COUNCIL PERSON AND THAT MIDST BUT HERE WE ARE AGAIN TODAY TO TALK ABOUT IT. TO GET YOU STARTED MARKED OD IS GOING TO GET JUST A VERY QUICK OVERVIEW OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FINDINGS AND THE MEETINGS THAT WE HAD OVER TIME JUST FOR A QUICK REFRESH. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS MARKED OD, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING THANK YOU. KIM FOR THE INTRODUCTION. I CAN'T GIVE YOU ALL REALLY QUICK BACKGROUND. WHAT WE DID LAST YEAR S O WAY BACK IN SUMMER.

JULY, 7TH. WE BRIEFED THIS COUNCIL ABOUT CARTMAN STATUE LOCATED AT IMPACT WERE DIRECTED THAT TIME TO BRING BACK A PLANE A PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR YOU TO DISCUSS. YOU CREATED A HAWK ADVISORY BOARD ON JULY 21ST WITH 11 MEMBERS. TOTAL APPOINTED SEVEN BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL AND THEN ONE APPOINTED FROM EACH DARKS COMMISSION. H P A. B. MYSTERY BOARD IN THE COLLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION. THE PURPOSE OF THE AD HOC ADVISORY BOARD WAS TOO OVER THE COURSE OF THREE OR FOUR MEETINGS WAS TO ADVISE THE STAFF. IN PERFORMING RESEARCH RELATED THE CONTEXT, APPROPRIATENESS AND RELEVANCY THAT THROCKMORTON

[01:20:03]