Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:03]

WELCOME TO THE CITY OF MCCAIN IS PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. TUESDAY MARCH 23RD 2021 THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SITTING BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. AND WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THEY SAID THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT IF THERE IS AN ITEM ON OUR AGENDA THAT WILL GO ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL, I WILL LET THE AUDIENCE KNOW.

WITH UNLIKELY IT HAS A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED IF YOU HERE TONIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS AND SPEAK DURING ONE OF OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS, ONE WORD LIGHT YOU'RE HERE. IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE CITIZENS TO BE INVOLVED. IN THIS PROCESS. LITTLE HOUSEKEEPING FOR YOU WHEN YOU. FOR YOU COME TO THE PODIUM IF YOU FILL OUT THE YELLOW CARD. GIVE THAT TO MR REMY. RIGHT HERE. EITHER BEFORE THE ITEM OR AS YOU WANT TO THE PODIUM. YOU GO TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. ON AT THE PODIUM. AND THEN WHEN YOU START SPEAKING, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS. YOUR CONCERNS. WE HAVE A FOUR ROOM IF YOU WILL STICK TO THE THREE MINUTE SCHEDULE, BE CONCISE AND YOUR COMMENTS FIRST TREATY SCHROEDER WITH RESPECT. AND WE'LL ALL GET HOME AT A DECENT HOUR TONIGHT WITH THAT WE WILL START OUR AGENDA IN THE FIRST ITEM. WOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SOMEONE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. IT WOULD BE SOMETHING ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA. LOCK UP PLATT OR SOMETHING. THE MINUTES PERHAPS. ALL RIGHT, THEN WE'LL MOVE TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA. THE

[CONSENT ITEMS]

FIRST ITEM WILL BE. ITEM TO ONE DAY ZERO TOO FULL FOR THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH TO 9 2021 MEMBERS QUESTIONS ON THE MINUTES MOTIONS. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED SECOND OF EMOTIONAL MR DOCTOR APPROVED THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED SECOND BY MR MCCALL'S OR ANY DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT MOTION CARRIES THE NEXT ITEM. TO ONE DAY 0021 PF CONSIDER A

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary-Final Plat for Painted Tree Lakeside West Phases 2 & 3, Located Approximately 350 Feet East of Lake Forest Drive and on North Side of Summit View Drive]

PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANT FOR PAINTED TREE LAKESIDE WEST. PHASES TWO AND THREE. THIS IS.

300 FT EAST OF LAKE FOREST TO DRIVE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUMMIT VIEW DRIVE. IT'S CUBAN.

RIGHT? GOOD EVENING APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 100 ACRES FOR 445 SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND FIVE COMMON AREAS STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS FOR THIS PROPOSED PULMONARY FINAL PLATZ, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY, LEARN THEIR QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. MISS ARNOLD. YOU WON'T TAKE THE SEPARATELY OR TOGETHER. YOU GOT ONE? YEA, AND WHEN THEY HEAR YOU UNDER. OKAY. WHY DON'T WE TAKE HIM SEPARATE SINCE THE OTHER MAY HAVE SOME DISCUSSION ATTACHED TO IT. WAIT, ENTERTAINING MOTION.

SHOULD IMPROVE FOR STAFF REPORT WITH CONDITIONS, THOUGH, SO I'M MR MANZANO IMPROVE THE AUTUMN.

WITH STAFF CONDITIONS 2ND 2ND BOMBERS TO WARD OFF ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION CARRIES THAT, TOO. ONE DAY 0021 PF HAS BEEN APPROVED THE NEXT PLAN. TO ONE

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary-Final Plat for Trinity Falls Planning Unit 8 East, Located on the Northeast Corner of Olympic Crossing (County Road 228) and County Road 227 (Future Hardin Boulevard)]

DAY 0091. I'M SORRY THERE WAS THERE. 19 P F. CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANT FOR TRINITY FALLS. PLANNING UNIT EAST. THIS IS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF OLYMPIC CROSSING COUNTY ROAD TO WAIT AND COUNTY ROAD 2 TO 7 FUTURE HARDENED BOULEVARD. GOOD EVENING APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 60 ACRES FOR 241 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN 25 COMMON AREAS, STACK STAFF IS RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED PLENARY FINAL. PLATT. DUE TO LACK OF CONFORMANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION OR NETS IN THE ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL ON I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. HEY, LINDSAY, AFRICAN AWARE OF THE DENIAL RECOMMENDATION. YES SIR. I HAVE COMMUNICATED WITH THE APPLICANTS ON THE COMMENTS FOR DENIAL. HER DISAPPROVAL IS THE AFRICAN HERE TONIGHT. I DON'T BELIEVE SO. NO, SIR. OKAY, VERY GOOD. QUESTIONS ON THE IN THIS PLANT. CERTAINLY LOOKING FOR EMOTION. WOULD DISAPPROVE THE PROPOSED PLAN MERRICK FINAL PLANTS. FISHERMAN MR MAN'S I

[00:05:07]

HAD TO DISAPPROVE OF THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANT SAY COMMAND, MR MCCALL IS RUNNING DISCUSSION. HE'S CAST A VOTE. OKAY. THIS EMOTION CARRIES THAT CONCLUDES OUR CONSIDER GENDER WILL NOW MOVE INTO THOSE ITEMS THAT WOULD HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING A TEXT

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District, “RS 60” - Single Family Residence District and “TMN” - Traditional McKinney Neighborhood Overlay District to “PD” - Planned Development District and “TMN” - Traditional McKinney Neighborhood Overlay District, to Allow for Commercial and Industrial Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located on the Southwest corner of Coleman Street and Berry Avenue]

FIRST ITEM. 20-0. Z, A PUBLIC CREAM REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD. LAND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ARTIST, 60 SINGLE FAMILY AND TRADITIONAL MCKINNEY NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY DISTRICT PD. AND TM AND TRADITIONAL MCKINNEY NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES IN TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COLEMAN STREET AND VERY AVENUE, MISS. GIVEN GOOD EVENING, THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.5 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY TILL AFTER THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL USES. CURRENTLY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OWNED OUR 60 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT MPD PLANE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR FOUR PLEX RESIDENTIAL USE THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO PD. WITH A BASE STONING OF C ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH THAT ALLOWED USE OF A WAREHOUSE COMPONENT. STAFF APPRECIATES AFRICANS PROPOSAL AND PROPOSE ENHANCEMENT FOR THE SITE. HOWEVER THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND ADDED WAREHOUSE USED IS NOT ALIGNED WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE PLACE TYPE OF THE HISTORIC TOWN CENTER RESIDENTIAL. AS DOESN'T EVEN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THESE PHOTOS HERE THE TOP PHOTO IS LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER IN THE BOTTOM PHOTO IS LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY FROM THE SOUTH EAST CORNER. SAYS HE'S ONLY EXHIBIT FOR YOU TO SEE THIS NORTH. RIGHT AWAY RIGHT HERE. VERY AVENUE. VERY AVENUE TO THE NORTH OF THE SEPARATE PROPERTY SERVES AS A DISTINCT LINE FROM THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES THAT FRONT ONTO US HIGHWAY 3 80 IN THE ALREADY ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL BLOCK TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. GIVEN THESE FACTORS, STAFF IS UNABLE TO SUPPORT THE REQUESTS AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. OCEANS OF MISS CUBAN. THANK YOU. CAN'T WE MADE HAVE QUESTIONS? I'LL BE LATER AFTER WE HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.

AFTER THAT HERE YES, SIR.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, MY NAME IS T. J LANE. OFFICE AT 503, NORTH, KENTUCKY, STRAIGHT AND MCKINNEY. HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE LANDOWNERS AND THE APPLICANTS. DONNY AND PATTY BURNSIDE. UM. IF I COULD GET THE YES, THANK YOU. THIS IS TAIL. OF THE SEVEN LOCKS. LEFT BEHIND. SEVEN LOTS AND BLOCK A OF THE MILLION USE ADDITION TO THE CITY OF MECHANIC. REALLY MEANS SUBDIVIDED HER LAND IN 1946. AND IN THE PROCESS OF DOING SO, SHE LAID OUT. SEVERAL STREETS AND ALLEYS. AND THOSE INCLUDED BURIED AVENUE. 40 FT WIDE, STRAIGHT RUNNING EAST AND WEST BETWEEN COLLEGE STREET AND COLEMAN STREET. UM. ON THE PLANT THAT'S UP ON THE SCREEN.

THIS IS THE 1946 PLANTS. NORTH IS TO THE RIGHT. VERY AVENUE IS WHAT I'VE COLORED YELLOW THAT STARTS UP IT. COLLEGE AT THE TOP. IT RUNS DOWN TO COLEMAN STREET. IN THE 19 SIXTIES, PIGGLY WIGGLY WAS LOOKING FOR A PLACE TO BUILD. IN A GROCERY STORE IN THE KIDNEY. AND THEY END UP BUYING AND COMBINED COMBINING SEVERAL LOTS IN THE MILLION USE TRADITION. AND THEY BUILT THE GROCERY STORE HERE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE IN STATE HIGHWAY 24. AND COLLEGE STRAIGHT. IT ONLY AFTER THE CITY OF MCKINNEY ABANDONED AND TURNED OVER TO PIGGLY WIGGLY PORTION OF VERY AVENUE THAT'S SHOWN IN THE RED CROSS HATCH THERE ON THE OLD PLANT. A PARTIALLY ABANDONED VERY AVENUE. CITY DAMAGED SEVEN LATTES. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF

[00:10:05]

THAT STREET BACK BEHIND THE GROCERY STORE. SAME SEVEN LOTS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF TONIGHT'S APPLICATION FOR REZONING, AND THOSE LATTES ARE SHOWN IN THE BLUE CROSS HATCH UP THERE. WITH VERY AVENUE PARTIALLY ABANDONED IN THE GROCERY STORE BILL. THESE SEVEN LOTS WERE LEFT WITH IMPAIRED ACCESS, LIMITED UTILITY. AND A CLOSE UP VIEW OF A SOLID BRICK WALL. OVER TIME, THE LAND SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DEVELOPED OUT ALL SORTS OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES. BUT THE LAND COMPRISING THE SEVEN LOCKS THAT LAND HAS SIT VACANT AND LARGELY UNUSED FOR 75 YEARS. SEVEN LATTES OR NOW OWNED BY MY CLIENTS WHO WANT TO COMBINE, IMPROVE AND PUT THEM TO PRODUCTIVE USE. THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR WHAT THEY PROPOSE TO DO WITH THIS PROPERTY IS LAID OUT IN THE LETTER OF INTENT, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS AND THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN. AND COMPARED AND CONTRASTED. WITH THE LAND THAT HAS IT NOW SETS WHICH IS VACANT. PROPOSED PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BETTER SECURITY. ENHANCED SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING. AND IMPROVED FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS. I WANT TO TOUCH BRIEFLY UPON AND DISCUSS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR ZONING ORDINANCE AS IT RELATES TO THIS APPLICATION. ZONING ORDINANCE TELLS US VERY SPECIFICALLY. WHAT IT IS DESIGNED TO ACCOMPLISH. IT CONTAINS A LIST OF OBJECTIVES.

THAT INCLUDES LAST THING, CONGESTION IN THE STREETS. PREVENTING THE OVERCROWDING OF LAND. BOARDING UNDUE CONCENTRATION OF POPULATION. AND FACILITATING THE ADEQUATE ADEQUATE PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION, WATER, SEWAGE SCHOOLS, PARKS. ANOTHER PUBLIC AMENITIES AND SERVICES. CONSIDER THE TWO COMPETING VISIONS FOR THIS PIECE OF LAND WITH THE BURN SIDES PROPOSES A SMALL, UNOBTRUSIVE. HEAVILY LANDSCAPED OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING. THE OTHER. IS AN APARTMENT COMPLEX. DID I ASK YOURSELF, WHICH ONE? YOU THINK IT'S LIKELY TO GENERATE MORE TRAFFIC? WHICH ONE IS MORE LIKELY TO RESULT IN OVERCROWDING. WHICH ONE DO YOU THINK WOULD PUT A GREATER STRAIN? ON WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS, SCHOOLS, PARKS. ANOTHER PUBLIC COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES. FINALLY, IT'S IMPORTANT NOTE IS I HAVE IN OUR LETTER OF INTENT. THE APPLICANTS LONG HISTORY WITH COMMUNITY AS GOOD EMPLOYERS AND GOOD CITIZENS. NO ONE HAD TO GO OUT AND RECRUIT MY CLIENTS TO BRING THEIR BUSINESS AND THE GOOD JOBS IT PROVIDES TO MCKINNEY. THEY WANT TO BE HERE, AND THEY HOPE TO REMAIN HERE. BURN SIDES HAVE NEVER ASKED THE CITY FOR A GRANT OR FINANCIAL INCENTIVE. THEY'RE NOT ASKING FOR ONE TONIGHT. WHAT THEY ARE ASKING OF YOU IS TO TAKE NOTICE OF THE UNIQUE FAX AND CIRCUMSTANCES THAT EXIST HERE ON THE GROUND. RECOGNIZED THE PROBLEMS THAT HAS KEPT THIS LAND FAKING AN UNUSED FOR SO MANY YEARS. ADJUST THE CURRENT ZONING AND THOUGHTFUL AND MEASURED WAY SO THAT DONNIE AND PATTY BURNSIDE CAN PUT THIS LAND OF PRODUCTIVE USE IN A WAY THAT BENEFITS EVERYONE INVOLVED. DONNIE BURNSIDE IS HERE WITH ME THIS EVENING AND WE STAND READY DANCE OR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE CONCERNING OUR APPLICATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR LINE OF THEIR QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT ANYONE? DESCRIBE THE ROAD BEHIND BLAM, A CHICANO THAT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE LOT. YOU SAID THAT IT. WAS ABANDONED OR PARTIALLY ABANDONED AT SOME POINT IN THE CITY ARE LOOKING AT A REAL SO JUST TRYING TO GET AN UNDERSTANDING. DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THIS. THE CROSS HAS RED IS GOING AWAY. YES, SIR. THAT WAS ABANDONED. I BELIEVE I'M SPECULATING HERE WHEN PICCOLI WIGGLY WAS IN TOWN, AND THEY SAID WE'D LIKE TO BUILD HERE, BUT WE JUST DON'T HAVE ENOUGH. THAT BACK OFF OF HIGHWAY 24. AND IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE THE CITY ABANDONED ONE HALF OF THE RIGHT AWAY. IT'S A 40 FT RIGHT AWAY THROUGH THERE, AND IT APPEARS TO MAKE THE CITY ABANDONED. THE 20 FT NORTH HALF. FROM THAT POINT, WHICH IS KIND OF THE CORNER OF THE GROCERY STORE BACK OUT TO COLLEGE STREET. RACHEL. YOU HEADING DISCUSSIONS WITH THE NEIGHBORS. THE BORDER THIS PROPERTY WE HAVE NOT. OTHER QUESTIONS. FOR

[00:15:07]

YOU TO FEEL TAKE COPIOUS NOTES. WE MAY HAVE SOME SHORTLY. THANKS THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE TONIGHT. THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ANYONE. OKAY? WHAT'S YOUR PLEASURE WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING? MOVE WITH CLOTHES, A PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY MR MAN'S I'D CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ALL 2ND 2ND BY MR DOKE. ANY DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. NOW MEMBERS, QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT. ONE. QUESTION OF CAITLIN. SO IN YOUR STAFF REPORT. RECOMMENDING DENIAL. HOWARD HOWEVER, IF THE APPLICANTS OF REQUEST IS APPROVED, THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL PROVISION SHALL APPLY, CAN YOU.

EXPLAIN BRIEFLY WITH THOSE SPECIAL PROVISIONS MIGHT BE CERTAINLY. SO IF THE COMMISSION IN THE CITY COUNTY COUNCIL ULTIMATELY APPROVES THE ZONING REQUEST, THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS ARE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED BE FOLLOWED FOR THE ZONING REQUEST. HMM. SO THOSE ARE THE SPECIAL REVISIONS THAT SO IF THE APPLICANT.

THAT'S WHAT HE SAYS HE'LL DO STAFFS, NOT AGAINST THE APPLICATION. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE SITE ENHANCEMENTS THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING WITH DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. STAFF IS NOT SUPPORTIVE OF THE WAREHOUSE IN THE COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS, GIVEN THAT IT DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION. UNDERSTOOD. THE QUESTIONS OF STAFF. THE QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU. THE LINE IF YOU COULD COME BACK UP. YES. SO. YOU HEARD MISS GIVEN TALK ABOUT THOSE DEVELOPMENTS STANDARDS ARE YOU IN AGREEMENT? WITH. ADHERING TO THAT LIST OF REQUIREMENTS. YES, SIR. OKAY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. LAVERY. QUESTION FOR YOU. MR LANE. WHEN DID YOUR CLIENT BY THE PROPERTY? 20 35 YEARS. IT'S ONLY FOR A LONG TIME. THANK YOU. NO ONE ELSE. GO. I THINK THE. MR LANE'S LETTER OF INTENT, EXPLAINED A LOT OF WHAT WE'RE HERE ABOUT. YOU'VE GOT AN EXISTING BUSINESS WHOSE OWN THE PROPERTY. A LONG TIME. THEY PAID A LOT OF SOUR REASON.

TEXAS. AND THEY'RE LOOKING TO DEVELOP THEIR SITE. THEY HAVE INCREASED THE LANDSCAPING ALL AROUND THE PROPERTY. THEY HAVE AGREED TO FOLLOW THE SPECIAL OR ITS PROVISIONS. OF WHICH STAFF IF THE ITEM IS APPROVED, IS SUPPORTIVE OF. LIKE IT. I'M IN SUPPORT OF THE BURN SIZE AND WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING TO DO. UM. SHARE MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM WAS STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND YEAH. OR LET ME GO BACK. SO CURRENTLY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS DENIAL, SO STAFF. SOCIAL ORDERS FOR APPLICANT REQUEST. ON ORDINANCE PROVISIONS. MR MCCALL, IF I IF I COULD CLARIFY A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW THAT'S HOW THAT'S WRITTEN IN OUR STAFF REPORT, SO STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS DENIAL BECAUSE IT DOESN'T ALIGN WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HOWEVER IF THE COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL ULTIMATELY RECOMMEND TO APPROVE IT OR CHOOSE TO APPROVE IT. THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED TO SET OF DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SO THAT STATEMENT IN THE STAFF REPORTERS JUST NOTING THAT APPROVAL WOULD BE APPROVING THOSE REGULATIONS WITH THOSE REGULATIONS. YES THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR THE C ONE AND WAREHOUSE USE AND ALL THE ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS THAT ARE INCLUDED. REGULATIONS. DON'T THINK THE PROJECTS OF BAD PROJECT BUT HOWEVER, WITH LACK OF OUTREACH TO THE NEIGHBORING

[00:20:01]

RESIDENTIAL AND GOING FROM RESIDENTIAL USED TO COMMERCIAL USE. WOULDN'T IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL. I WOULDN'T BEFORE AT THIS TIME TILL THE CLIENT ACTUALLY REACHED OUT TO THE NEIGHBORING RESIDENTS, BUT I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST THE PROJECT ITSELF. SO.

HAVING DRIVEN THE PROPERTY TODAY THAT ROAD. ON THE NORTH SIDE THAT HAS BEEN CUT IN HALF 40 FT. TO 20 FT REALLY MAKES IT IT WAS DIFFICULT. I DROVE BACK BEHIND THERE, AND IT'S SOME PEOPLE ARE USING IT AS A BACK ALLEY TO COME, TURN ON IT. BASED ON WITH THAT. AND IF I WAS A LITTLE MEAT YUKON AND THEY CAME FORWARD TO US TODAY. I WANTED TO EXPAND I BEFORE THAT. SO THIS IS AN EXPANSION TO THE HAPPY TO THE EAST INSTEAD OF TO THE NORTH. I THINK I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS. THINK IT'S A ON ALL THE GOOD THING FOR THE. THE PROPERTY THIS BECAUSE I THINK IT'S GONNA BE HARD TO DEVELOP HIS RESIDENTIAL AND GET THE ROADS BACK THERE AS WE NEED. NOT TO INTERRUPT. BUT MR RECALL YOU HAD A MOTION THAT YOU WERE. I'M CRAFTING. GET SHUT DOWN BY THE STAFF. S SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM. WITH REGULATION PROVISIONS PROPOSED BY THE OPPONENT. OKAY? THANK YOU, MR ARNOLD. SECOND. MOTION MOM, MR MCCALL TO APPROVE THE APPLICANTS REQUEST INCLUDING THE SPECIAL ORDER TO PROVISION. SECOND BY MR DOAKES. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION DIDN'T MEAN TO CUT THE WEST INTO THE TABLE OFF. I WILL SAY I TRADITIONALLY DON'T LIKE TO GO AGAINST WHAT'S GOTTEN STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS BUT I FEEL LIKE THIS IS A VERY NICK SITUATION. OR ANYONE.

OTHER COMMENTS. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. THE MOTION CARRIES A VOTE OF SIX IN FAVOR. ONE AGAINST THE ITEM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE AIRPORT 2020 21 MEETING. NEXT ITEM IS

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards, Located South of Pearson Avenue and Heritage Drive, and Approximately 160 Feet East of Redbud Boulevard]

SINEM TO ONE DASH. 0019 Z, A PUBLIC HEARING. TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PED PED TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS, UM. SELF PEARSON AVENUE AND HERITAGE DRIVE, 160 FT EAST OF RED BUD BOULEVARD.

YOU, TERRY. EVENING COMMISSIONERS FOR THE RECORD, DANIEL MATTHEWS PLAN OR TWO AT THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AND TONIGHT I PRESENT YOU CASE 21 DEXTER'S AIR ONE AND SEE FOR THE HERITAGE. AND YOU DID YOU MOVE A LITTLE CLOSER OR IF YOU'RE COMFORTABLE REMOVE YOUR MASKS, SO WE GET HERE. THEN THE AUDIENCE. GOOD. YEAH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OR THE HERITAGE. MURANO MULTI FAMILY. EFFECT. CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY IS SOUND AND DEVELOPMENT FOR M FT USES AND ABUTS PD ZONING DISTRICT TO THE EAST AND THE WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE PD ZONING DISTRICT ALSO, BUT THE SIDE ALONG WITH AN RD 13 ZONING DISTRICT. AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY SHOWS THAT THE SITE IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. QUICK PHOTO TOUR THIS. THE FIRST PICTURE SHOWS THE STREET VIEW THE SIDE AGAIN SHOWING IT'S UNDEVELOPED TO THE NORTH EAR'S AND, UM, RUSSIAN OFFICE COMPLEX. TO THE WEST. WE HAVE THE OFFICE FOR THE AMERICAN RED CROSS AND TO THE EAST. WE HAVE A NEW EXISTING NURSING HOME.

APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ONLY AN EXHIBIT. IF THIS LOOKS FAMILIAR IT SHOULD YOU RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ON THIS APPLICATION ON NOVEMBER 10TH OF 2020. AND THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THEIR APPLICATION IN DECEMBER. SINCE THEN, A SITE PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THE MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND DURING THAT REVIEW THE THREE ISSUES FOR NOTED THAT NOW REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. SO I'M GONNA CAPTURE THAT FOR YOU. THE FIRST IS THAT THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF MF TO REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 2700 SQUARE FEET. THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING A MINIMUM REQUIRED OVER 1008 SQUARE FEET. THE SECOND IS THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING SCREENING DEVIATIONS

[00:25:01]

ALONG THE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN PROPERTY LINES. WHICH WILL PROVIDE FOR THE FOLLOWING.

ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. THEY PROPOSE A SIX FT TALL, ORNAMENTAL IRON FENCE.

WITH MASONRY COLUMN SPACE TO MAXIMUM 20 FT. ON CENTER WITH EVERGREEN LAST GRADE EVERY BEAN LANDSCAPING AS WELL. ON THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AN EVERGREEN LIVING SCREEN THAT MEETS THE INTENT OF OUR ORDINANCE AND COMPLIES WITH ENCORES REQUIREMENTS AS WELL. GIVEN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT STUFF. IT'S NOT AN OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSAL. THE. UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE ALSO PROVIDE A BUFFER TO THE EXISTING USES. ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. WE HAVE INSTITUTIONAL AND MULTI FAMILY USES AS WELL. SO. UM, STAFF AGAIN IS NOT AN OBJECTION. FINALLY, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO PROVIDE ONE TREE WITHIN 80 FT OF EVERY PARKING SPACE AND BLEW THE REQUIRED 65 FT. AGAIN. STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED FOR. OH, NOT YET. ALL RIGHT? UM I SAID, I STAFF STANDS FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS THAT THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS STAFF. AND YOU'LL THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? YES, SIR. CASEY GREGORY SANCHEZ ASSOCIATES, 2000 NORTH MCDONALD STREET HERE IN MCKINNEY. THANK YOU. THE STAFF FOR THAT EXPLANATION. I WOULD CLARIFY ON ONE OF THOSE POINTS, SHE SAID. THE REDUCTION IN THE DISTANCE FROM A TREE WAS TO BE FOR THE TANDEM SPACES IN FRONT OF A GARAGE SPOT ON LEE. THAT'S ON LEE. REALLY EFFECTS THAT CENTER DR. SO. IF THAT REGULATION WASN'T EFFECT, WE LOSE A COUPLE OF GARAGE SPOTS FOR OUR UH, FUTURE TENANTS. AND AGAIN. THIS IS SOMETHING YOU'VE SEEN. WE'RE NOT CHANGING ANY LAND USES.

WE'RE NOT INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF UNITS PER ACRE WEAKEN. DO. THIS IS SOLELY TO CLEAN UP SOME OF THE OVERSIGHTS THE LAST STONING. AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS SITE. YOU MIGHT HAVE. QUESTIONS. MR GREGORY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS ITEM. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVED. ADAM FIRST F RECOMMENDATION MOTION MOMENTS TO MAN'S EYE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE AUTUMN. AS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION, SECOND MIND, MR WOODRUFF. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HE'S CAST HER VOTE. RIGHT. THIS MOTION IS APPROVED AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 2020 21 MEETING APRIL 2020 24 2020 21. ALL RIGHT. HERE WE GO. NEXT

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District and "REC" - Regional Employment Center Overlay District to "C2" - Local Commercial District, Located on the Northeast Corner of Collin McKinney Parkway and Piper Glen Road]

TIME IS TO ONE DAY 0034 Z, A PUBLIC HEARING. REQUEST TO REZONE A SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD AND R. E C TO SEE TWO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COLIN MCKENZIE PARKWAY AND PIPER GLEN ROAD. GOOD EVENING FOR I GET STARTED HERE WITH THIS ITEM. I DID WANNA LET YOU KNOW THAT WE DID RECEIVE 22 LETTERS OF OPPOSITION THAT I'VE PASSED UP FOR THE MEETING. S SO THEY'RE ON THE DIETS FOR YOU. THOSE LETTERS OF OPPOSITION WILL ALSO BE INCLUDED WITH THE CITY COUNCIL PACKET WHEN THAT GETS POSTED. FOR THIS ITEM THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 4.8 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY FOR COMMERCIAL USES.

THE CURRENT PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOLLOWS THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF B G. GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATION OF A MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF TWO STORIES. APPLICANT HAS INDICATED A DESIRE TO REZONE TO SEE TWO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL USES ITS NOT BE REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT THAT TWO STORY DEVELOPMENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IN THE LETTERS SUBMITTED OF OPPOSITION THAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU THERE QUITE A FEW OF RESIDENTS THAT HAVE CONCERNS REGARDING THE RESTAURANT DAYCARE USE AS WELL AS THE TRAFFIC IMPACT TO THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE SUBJECT.

PROPERTY DOES PERMIT RESTAURANT DAYCARE USED BY RIGHT WITH REQUIREMENT TO BUILD THE TWO STORY DEVELOPMENTS. I MEAN, IN REGARDS TO THE TRAFFIC CONCERN THAT WILL BE EVALUATED AT THE

[00:30:03]

SITE PLAN STAGE AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FOR THAT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. STAFF IS OF THE PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE LEGACY DISTRICT B G GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND SEE TWO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ARE COMPATIBLE. ZONING DISTRICT'S STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE REDUCTION OF THE MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF TWO STORIES TO BE ALLOWED DEVELOPED ONE STORY GIVEN THAT THIS PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. GIVEN THESE FACTORS STAFF IS SUPPORTED OVER THE REQUESTS AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. CAITLYN OF QUESTIONS MEMBERS. QUESTIONS OF CAITLIN. IN EVALUATING THE USES HERE WAS THE USES EVALUATED DURING THE ANALYSIS OF GOING TO SEE SEE, TOO. YES, SIR.

CERTAINLY. ESSO WITH THE USES OF B VERSUS THE SEA TO DISTRICT STAFF FOUND THAT THE SEA TO DISTRICT ACTUALLY REQUIRES MORE. SPECIFIC USE PERMITS FOR USES SIMILAR TO THE AUTOMOTIVE GARAGE. AUTO REPAIR CAR WASH. DEALERSHIP USES LIKE THAT. SO EVEN. THE B G AND THE C TWO ARE COMPATIBLE FROM OUR LEGACY TO THE MODERN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STAFF FELT THAT CT WAS APPROPRIATE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE CURRENT ZONING. ZARINA LOOK AT THIS IS NOT OUR TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT AS FAR AS WHAT'S WITHIN THE LETTER OF INTENT WITH THE. RESTAURANT I GUESS IS WHAT WAS THE DISCUSSIONS AND EVALUATING THE AMOUNT OF. TRAFFIC FROM GOING AND COMING TO THAT, AND ITS FLOW THROUGH CRAIG RANGE. CERTAINLY SO AS I MENTIONED, THE TRAFFICKED IMPACT WILL BE EVALUATED ONCE WE DO THAT SITE PLANS THE MIDDLE IN TERMS OF FIFTH H TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. YOUR ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. WITH THAT SITE PLANTS MIDDLE IN TERMS OF THE USE, GIVEN THAT THE CURRENT PROPERTY CURRENTLY ALLOWS THAT RESTAURANT COMPONENT ON IN THAT HIGHER LEVEL OF INTENSITY OF A USE STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THE COMPARISON FROM C ONE TO HURT BG TO SEE TO. TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE ZONING CHANGE. MAYBE I'M MISSING SOMETHING. CERTAINLY SO THE MAIN DRIVE FOR THE ZONING CHANGES BECAUSE OF THAT THE CURRENT PD REQUIRES THAT TWO STORY MINIMUM HEIGHT. SO IT'S ABOUT HIGH TO THE THREE STORY, MAXIM. YES, SIR. SO THIS MORNING REQUEST WAS DRIVEN TONTO, THE SEA TO ZONING DISTRICT THAT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO DEVELOP A ONE STORY BUILDING. SO THE CURRENT RESTAURANT UNDERLAY WITH ALLOW FOR JUST A FULL DELIVERY SERVICE, NOT A WALK IN RESTAURANTS. YES, SIR. SO IT COULD BE THE CARRY OUT ONLY STYLE RESTAURANTS OR A RESTAURANT THAT HAD A DINE IN SERVICE. BOTH OF THOSE ARE CURRENTLY LOUD IN THE ZONING, CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT. DAYCARE IS THAT PERMITTED UNDER THEIR USES, OR THAT S U P. THE DAYCARE WOULD BE PERMITTED UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING AND WOULD ALSO BE PERMITTED UNDER THE SEA TO SHINING THE REQUEST. YOU. THERE'S. FEELING JUST TO CLARIFY THE. OTHER THAN THE HEIGHT WITH THE EXISTING USE RECORD WITH THE RESTAURANT USED REQUIRING S U P UNDER THE CURRENT SONY. NO, SIR. OKAY LET'S TRY USE IS PERMITTED. OTHER THAN THE APPLICANT IS CLOSE. BEING EVER DO WHAT THEY WANT TO DO. ONE OF THE CURRENT ZONING YES, SIR. OKAY. GOOD.

OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, SIR. AFRICAN HERE TONIGHT? YES, SIR. RIGHT. AND WE DO ALSO HAVE THE DEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVE ON THE PHONE. IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR CRAVE, OKAY? THEIR APPLICANT HERE. MAYBE. RIGHT? THEY COULD NOT MAKE IT. BUT THERE IS SOMEONE ON THE PHONE THAT CAN HELP YOU. OKAY, SO WE HAVE CRAY WITH THE GRAVE ON THE PHONE, OKAY? TODAY HERE.

SHANNON. SHANNON. YOU. OKAY? SO YOU'RE. ENGINEER ARCHITECT IS NOT HERE. SO YOU HAVE THE FLOOR. I SAID YOU, ENGINEER HOLD ON ONE SECOND, OKAY? I MEAN, IT WAS CHRIS ROGERS AND WITH KIDNEY OR ASSOCIATES OUT DALLAS CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING PROJECT. I'M SORRY. WE WERE EXPECTING THE LANDOWNER TO BE HERE TOE DO ALL THE TALKING SOMETHING. SO WE'RE NOT SURE WHAT HAPPENED. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. BUT THIS WOULD BE THE APPLICANT OR CRAVE ON THE PHONE, BUT TELL US ABOUT THIS BUSINESS MODEL BECAUSE. TRYING TO WRAP AROUND WHAT THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS AND A REGULAR RESTAURANT CONSIDERING HOW MANY RESTAURANTS WHO WILL

[00:35:03]

BE SERVING OUT THIS MODEL COMPARED TO LIKE A SINGLE. RESTAURANT WITH ONLY A COUPLE OF DELIVERY SYSTEMS. SO THIS IS ACTUALLY A VIRTUAL FOOD HALL IS THE COMBINATION OF SEVERAL DIFFERENT KITCHENS BUT THEIR CO LOCATED TOGETHER ON BY APOLOGIZE, WE WERE. THAT THIS WAS JUST FOR THE ZONING CHANGE, AND WE DON'T ACTUALLY OWN THIS PROPERTY. YET THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY WAS. MEAN THERE TO ADVOCATE FOR THE CHANGE, AND WE STILL HAVE A WHOLE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE WHERE YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN YOU KNOW WHAT THEY PROPOSE USES BAND OF THE DESIGN IMPLICATIONS, LANDSCAPING THINGS LIKE THAT WOULD HAVE SORT OF DISCUSSED ALL THIS. I APOLOGIZE THAT YOU DON'T HAVE MORE INFORMATION IN FRONT OF YOU, BUT BUT WE WERE TOLD THAT THIS WAS A ZONING CHANGE FROM ONE STORY TO A TWO STORY AND THAT THAT WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE A PARENT OF A BUSINESS MODEL FOR DO YOU? OKAY? UNDERSTOOD DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ABOUT YOUR BUSINESS YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE OR WOULD YOU LIKE US TO PROCEED WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING? I MEAN, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BUSINESS. LIKE I SAID, IT'S A 14,000 SQUARE FOOT FACILITY. WE HAVE WON. OUR FLAGSHIP LOCATION IS IN BOISE, IDAHO. THERE'S A NUMBER OF JAMES BYRD AWARD WINNING CHEFS THAT ARE PART OF OUR RESTAURANT COLLECTIVE. THEY ALL SORT OF SHARE KITCHEN SPACE AND WE DO DELIVERY AND PICK UP FROM THERE, SO IT'S ALL VERY HIGH END FOOD. THERE IS NO DRIVE THROUGH. IT'S NOT FAST FOOD OR EVEN FAST, CASUAL. SO THIS IS ALL VERY UPSCALE, WHICH WE FELT WAS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND CERTAINLY TO THE TOWN OF SECURITY. BOND WHEN WE SAW THIS SIDE AND WORKED WITH THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IT JUST LOOKS LIKE A GOOD USE CASE VOICE THAT WAS ZONED FOR RESTAURANT USED, WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE BRINGING. WE FEEL LIKE IT'S GONNA BE A GREAT ADDITION TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. WHAT HOURS DO YOU DELIVER BETWEEN AND TYPICALLY.

HOW MANY FLEETS OF VEHICLES DO YOU HAVE FOR US, COMING AND GOING? YES SO WE DON'T. WE DON'T HAVE FLEETS OF VEHICLES, THEIR INDIVIDUAL DRIVERS. THEY'RE ALL EMPLOYEES OF OURS.

WE DO HAVE SOME OWNED CARS THAT ARE BRANDED WITH OUR VEHICLES, BUT NOT BANDS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. RIGHT NOW. WE DO OFFER PICK UP FOR BREAKFAST AND LUNCH, BUT DELIVERY IS AROUND THE DINNER TIME HOURS. SO 4 32 ROUGHLY 8 30. SAID. THERE'S MULTIPLE KITCHENS. IT IT JUST CURIOSITIES FOR VISUAL PURPOSES IN MY MIND YOU HAVING LIKE 12 DISTINCT KITCHENS WITHIN THIS FACILITY, OR IS IT A SHARED COOKED UP BETWEEN THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT COMPANIES? HOW DOES THAT WORK. IT'S A GOOD QUESTION. SO IF YOU PICTURE A RECTANGLE THAT HAS SORT OF KITCHENS ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF THE RECTANGLE, THERE'S A CONVEYOR BELT SYSTEM THAT RUNS DOWN THE MIDDLE. AND SOME OF THE KITCHENS ARE LARGER, AND THEY'LL HAVE TO THE SAME OWNER MIGHT HAVE THREE DIFFERENT RESTAURANT CONCEPTS THAT THEY RUN OUT OF ONE KITCHEN, WHEREAS FACE ISSUES KITCHEN MIGHT BE JUST THAT THAT AWARD WINNING SUSHI KITCHEN, ALL INDEPENDENT, SO A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT, DEPENDING ON THE RESTAURANT GROUP CONFIGURATION, BUT. THESE ARE ALL THE SAME RESTAURANTS THAT WE BRING THAT ACROSS THE COUNTRY THAT NUMBER DIFFERENT LOCATIONS THAT WERE WERE COMING TO. AND THEN THERE IS A SECTION AT THE END OF IT. WHERE AT THE END OF THE CONVEYOR BELT, WE WILL TAKE IF YOU HAD ORDERED SUSHI AND ALSO. THEY CHICKEN CICADAS, AND YOU WOULD HAVE BOTH OF THOSE THAT WERE PACKAGED TOGETHER AND THEN DELIVERED TO YOU. NO ALLOWS PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO CHOOSE FROM A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT RESTAURANT CONCEPTS. THERE'S A RECORD 14 DIFFERENT CONCEPTS, NOT NECESSARILY 14 INDEPENDENT KITCHEN SENSITIVE. THE SMALLER.

AND SO TYPICALLY WHENEVER WE HAVE A FULL CHAMBER OF OPPOSITION AND LOTS OF LETTERS.

I'D LIKE TO ASK THE QUESTION. WHAT KIND OF CONVERSATIONS HAVE BEEN HAD WITH THE SURROUNDING.

RESIDENTS SO CAN YOU SPEAK TO WHAT CONVERSATIONS YOU'VE HAD? NEIGHBORS. YEAH, LIKE I SAID, I APOLOGIZE. WE HAVEN'T EVEN BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY YET. WE'RE JUST AT THE BEGINNING STAGES AND WE'RE TOLD THAT WE WOULD NEED THAT. WE WERE, UM, THAT WE WOULD FIT INTO THIS USE CASE, THE C ONE ZONING, BUT THAT WE WOULD NEED A SECOND STORY AND IN COOPERATING WITH OWNER OF THE PROPERTY WHO WAS SURPRISED THAT THERE WAS THIS SECOND STORY OVERLAY. I SAID, OH, THAT'S REALLY NOT PRACTICAL, AND PROBABLY PEOPLE WOULD NOT WANT YOU TO HAVE A TWO STORY BUILDING THERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, SO WE NEEDED TO DO THIS ZONING. THE RE ZONING APPLICATION FIRST. S SO THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW. WE STILL

[00:40:02]

HAVEN'T EVEN DONE THE DESIGNS FOR THE SIDES OR SUBMITTED ANYTHING WITH CITY REALLY JUST HAD SOME PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS WITH THE PLANNERS. ANDRE HAVE RECOMMENDED THAT WE APPLY FOR A ZONING CHANGE BEFORE WE DID ANY OF THAT OTHER WORK. THAT MAKES SENSE. I BELIEVE THAT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY STILL WOULD WANT THIS ZONING CHANGE, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE SELLS THE PROPERTY TO US OR NOT. THE QUESTIONS OF. SHANNON CHANNEL. PRONOUNCE YOUR LAST NAME, PLEASE. YEAH, IT'S A CLUNKER FEEL O E. M K R. AND AGAIN. I'M REALLY SORRY. YOU GUYS DON'T HAVE THE VISUALS AND THE WHOLE PACKAGE THAT WE NORMALLY WOULD HAVE PUT IN FRONT OF YOU. WE WERE JUST. QUIET BECAUSE THIS WAS WAS NOT OUR APPLICATION. RIGHT, UNDERSTOOD. THE QUESTIONS. YOU WANT. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE INTO. THANK YOU. YOU CAN YEAH. MOVE TO THE PUBLIC HEARING A COUPLE OF THINGS IF YOU SUBMITTED A LETTER. UM, WE DO HAVE THOSE LETTERS AND THEY WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL IS PART OF OUR MINUTES. WE WILL NOT READ THE LETTERS. BUT IF YOU DID SEND IT. WE HAVE IT HERE. WE WILL NOT READ THEIR LETTER INTO THE RECORD, BUT IT WILL BE SUBMITTED. WITH HER. RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE A NUMBER OF CARS. I'LL READ THEM IN THE ORDER. THEY WERE GIVEN TO ME IF I MISPRONOUNCED YOUR NAME, I APOLOGIZE. THAT MEANS YOU HAVE BAD HANDWRITING. IF WE HAVE A NUMBER OF CARDS IF YOU CONCUR WITH THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER, YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO SAY I CONCUR WITH THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER. IF YOU DO THE MATH THREE TIMES COULDN'T GET UP THERE. PRETTY GOOD.

YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS AND CONCERNS. NOT AN EFFORT TO SPEED THE PROCESS. JUST AN EFFORT FOR YOU, TOO. I FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE ANOTHER OPTION.

OKAY LET'S START. THE FIRST CARD IS FROM THOMAS MIDDLETON, SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION. GOOD EVENING, SIR. PRESSURE GOING FIRST STARTED. MY NAME IS THOMAS MIDDLETON. I'M ARISEN OF THE ESTATES THAT CRAIG RANCH AND I STRONGLY APPROVED OPPOSED THE AGENDA ITEM CHANGING THE ZONING FROM C ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO SEE TWO LOCAL COMMERCIAL TO ACCOMMODATE WHAT I CONCERNED AN INDUSTRIAL FOOD PREPARATION FACILITY. AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY IS WHOLLY INCONSISTENT WITH. THE LOCATION AND THE CURRENT ZONING REQUIREMENTS. CRAVES BUSINESS MODEL IS TO BUILD IN MY OPINIONS TO BUILD A FACILITY THAT HANDLES FOOD PREPARATION FOR 10, PLUS RESTAURANT KITCHENS. I GHOST KITCHEN AND THEN DISTRIBUTE THE FOOD VIA DELIVERY DRIVERS LARGELY THROUGH DELIVERY DRIVERS. INDUSTRIAL GHOST KITCHEN DELIVERY DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND A SENIOR CITIZEN FACILITY SEEMS OUT OF PLACE AND NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL ZONING INTENT. THE CURRENT ZONING OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD LAYOUT OF MATURITY LEVEL. I WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT I DO NOT BELIEVE CRAVES.

BUSINESS MODEL MEETS THE STANDARD DEFINITION OF A RESTAURANT, WHICH FALLS UNDER C ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. IF A TRULY LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESTAURANT THAT HAD A CHARACTER AND SPIRIT TO THE COMMUNITY OPENED IN THE SAME LOCATION, I WOULD BE HAPPY. INSTEAD, I'M WORRIED THAT ACCOMMODATIONS ARE BEING PROPOSED TO ALLOW A NON LOCAL FOOD PREPARATION AND DELIVERY COMPANY BUILD A DISTRIBUTION HUB IN THE SUBJECT LOCATION. ADDITIONAL ISSUES FROM THE DELIVERY BUSINESS MAY INCLUDE IT REQUIRES INDUSTRIAL KITCHEN SUPPLIES. THAT MEANS LARGE DELIVERY TRUCKS THAT IDOL FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME, CONTRIBUTING TO AIR AND NOISE QUALITY ISSUES. TRAFFIC ISSUES CAUSED BY BUSINESS THAT ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY RELIES ON CONSTANT VEHICLE TRAFFIC FROM DELIVERY DRIVERS. THEY'RE USUALLY IN A RUSH, UNFAMILIAR WITH THE AREA AND FREQUENTLY DO NOT OBEY SAFETY LAWS. THE LETTER OF INTENT SPECIFICALLY REFERENCES PORTICO SHARES ON EACH SIDE OF THE BUILDING, CONFIRMING THAT THE PLAINEST ESSENTIALLY LOAD A CONSTANT STREAM OF DELIVERY WORKERS PICK UPS ETCETERA, NO DIFFERENT FROM LOADING TRUCKS AT A WAREHOUSE TYPE FACILITY. MY ADDITIONAL POINTS. I JUST WANT TO BRING UP OR IF PARKING IS ALLOWED ON PIPER DYLAN. AS YOU SEE, IT'S A SHARP RIGHT ANGLE THERE. SO TO TURN IN FROM COLUMN, MCKINNEY IS HOW I BELIEVE MOST OF THE PEOPLE HERE ENTER AND THROUGH THE GATE, WHICH IS THAT THE. THE CORNER RIGHT THERE, SO IT'S A SHARP RIGHT ANGLE ON A NARROW STREET.

INCREASE IN TRAFFIC WOULD MAKE AN ALREADY DANGEROUS SITUATION WORSE FOR ANY EMERGENCY VEHICLES ENTERING THE ESTATES OF CRAIG RANCH, THE ROAD WOULD HAVE TO BE WIDENED THEIR PARKING RESTRICTION. I KNOW WE'RE GETTING AHEAD BASED ON WHAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDED, BUT JUST FOLLOW POINT AND THEN DO TO INCREASE TRAFFIC FROM CRAVE A TRAFFIC LIGHT WOULD PROBABLY NEED TO BE REQUIRED OF PIPER GLENNON COLUMN MCKINNEY AESTHETIC ALONG CALL. MCKINNEY IS A MAJOR ENTRYWAY TO CRAIG RANCH AND THE TPC RANCHERIA CLUTTERING THOROUGHFARE WITH DELIVERY DRIVERS DRIVERS TWO TRACKS FROM A PEACEFUL RESIDENTIAL AESTHETIC. ALSO THERE. NO BUSINESSES ALONG THIS BLOCK OF COLUMN KENNY THAT FALL STANDARD NIGHTTIME RESTAURANT HOURS. I'M UNCLEAR ON THIS BEING THE EXCEPTION. AND THEN IN CLOSING THIS ZONING REQUEST

[00:45:02]

DOESN'T SEEM MUCH DIFFERENT FROM DREAMING THE SAME ACCOMMODATION TO ANY OTHER WAREHOUSE TYPE DELIVERY SERVICE AND CONCEPT IN PRACTICE. IT'S THE SAME MODEL BOTH OF RECEIVING GOODS FROM A WHOLESALE MANUFACTURER. PACKAGING FOR A THIRD PARTY, AND THEY'RE RELYING ON THE DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OF DRIVERS TO PICK UP THE PRODUCT AND DELIVER. MORE TYPICAL WAREHOUSES LIKE AMAZON OR COULD CLEARLY REGULATED TO INDUSTRIAL OR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREAS GOES KITCHENS LIKE CRAVES SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME WAY.

RESTRICTIVE ZONING INTERPRETATIONS AND HONEST CONVERSATIONS ABOUT BUSINESS MODELS AND TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. TAKE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, MR MIDDLETON. THE NEXT CARD MARY AND MILL HERE IN BOTH. SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION. I AM. YES SIR. MARIANNE BOWLER NORMAN 86 2. 86 09 WAKEFIELD, DR. MY HOME BACKS UP TO THIS PROPERTY. MY HUSBAND AND I MOVED HERE.

AFTER WE RE RETIRED, AND SO THIS IS OUR RETIREMENT HOME. AND, UM. I AM CONCERNED FOR ALL OF THE REASONS THAT MR MILTON VOICED, AND IN ADDITION TO THAT I CAN'T EMPHASIZE ENOUGH. HOW NARROW AND SHORT PIPER GLENN IS. SO IF THIS FACILITY. IS GOING TO BE FEEDING OUT ONTO PIPER GLENN. THIS IS GOING TO BE AN ABSOLUTE NIGHTMARE. AND, UM, EMERGENCY VEHICLES WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET THROUGH. PEOPLE ARE PARKED ON EITHER SIDE OF, UH, PART OF PIPER GLAND. SO THAT IS A CONCERN. I KIND OF RESENT THE FACT THAT THEY'RE CALLING THIS A RESTAURANT. THIS IS NOT A RESTAURANT. DEFINITION OF A RESTAURANT THAT I LOOKED UP, SAID. A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE PAY TO SIT AND EAT MEALS THAT ARE COOKED AND SERVED ON THE PREMISES. AND THIS DOES NOT FIT THAT DEFINITION BY ANY MEANS. MM. THAT IS PRETTY MUCH ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT IT, AND I CONCUR WITH WHAT MR MIDDLETON SAID. AND I WOULD ALSO. ASK ALL OF YOU TO CONSIDER IF YOU WOULD WANT THIS IN YOUR BACKYARD. IN YOUR RETIREMENT HOME, OR WOULD YOU WANT YOUR PARENTS RETURN? EXCUSE ME RETIREMENT HOME INTRUDED UPON, BUT IN THIS NATURE. JUST KEEP THAT IN MIND THAT MOST OF THE COMMUNITY OUR RETIREMENT. AND WE RESENT BEING IMPOSED PARTNER. THIS WAY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MM HMM. NEXT CARD IS DAVE KASMAN SPEAKING AN OPPOSITION. CONCUR WITH IT. I'M DAVE KASMAN LOVETT 62 09 HERE IN BAY LANE AND I CONCUR WITH WITH EVERYTHING THAT HAS JUST BEEN SAID. I WILL LIMIT MY COMMENTS BECAUSE I THINK A LOT OF WHAT I WOULD SAY IT WOULD JUST BE REPETITIOUS. I DO WANT TO GET ON THE RECORD THAT FOR SOME REASON, I DID NOT RECEIVE DONENESS OF THIS HEARING. IT WAS ONLY BY HAPPENSTANCE THAT I FOUND OUT ABOUT IT. I TALKED TO FOUR OTHER RESIDENTS IN THE 200 FT NOTIFICATION AREA, AND ONLY ONE OUT OF THE FOUR SAID THAT THEY HAD RECEIVED NOTICE. SO I THINK SOME STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO CORRECT THIS SO. THAT ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE AFFORDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THEIR THOUGHTS KNOWN. UM. YOU KNOW, I IN MY MIND, IT'S THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN COVERED. BUT I BELIEVE THE SEE WHETHER IT'S C ONE OR SEE TO. IT IS IRRELEVANT BECAUSE. CRAVE DELIVERY DOESN'T REALLY FIT IN EITHER ONE. IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS IT'S A DISTRIBUTION CENTER. IN FACT, I THINK IF YOU LOOK AT FDA GUIDELINES IS TOE WHAT A KITCHEN IS. YOU'LL FIND THAT THIS PROBABLY WOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS A CENTRAL KITCHEN. AND BY BY DEFINITION, IT IS THEREFORE NOT A RESTAURANT. SO I REALLY THINK THAT WE SHOULD BE LOOKING AT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREAS. FINALLY I DID GO ONLINE AND LOOKED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF. APP THAT IDENTIFIES APPROPRIATE ZONING FOR FOOD PROCESSING ACTIVITY. THERE ARE SEVERAL SITES THAT ARE RELATIVELY CLOSE TO THIS ONE. THAT IN SOME ACTUALLY IN CRAIG RANCH THAT DO NOT IMPACT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, AND IT'S MY FEELING THAT. APPLICANT SHOULD BE ADVISED TO PURSUE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES. THANK YOU. MR GASSMAN. DISCARDED SOME DAVE DAVID HAMMER SPEAKING AND OPPOSITION. GOOD EVENING. I ASK THAT MY PREPARED REMARKS BE PUT

[00:50:09]

INTO THE RECORD FOR THIS MEETING. THANK YOU. I'M DAVID BEAMER. I ALSO LIVE IN CRAIG GRANTS. UM. THE STATE SECTION, WHICH IS JUST TO THE NORTH SIDE, THE GATED COMMUNITY AND ON WAKEFIELD DRIVING I'M HERE TONIGHT, SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION. WITH SEVERAL POINTS THAT ARE OUT LATE HERE IN THE NEXT FEW MINUTES. FIRST I DISAGREE WITH THE CURRENT STAFFS. UNDERSTANDING THAT CRATE DELIVERY IS A RESTAURANT AND A VAST ON THE STAFF TO BRING FORWARD THE CRITERIA THAT THEY USED IN DETERMINING THAT IT IS A RESTAURANT VIA. EMAIL EARLIER TODAY. IN MY OPINION, THIS IS A FOOD PRODUCTION PROCESSING AND DELIVERY OPERATION BELONGS IN A COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE SPACE. IT BRINGS NO INTEREST, INTRINSIC VALUE TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. BELIEVE IT BE SIMILAR TO PUTTING A TYSON FOODS SMALL PRODUCTION FACILITY IN A ALREADY DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY, THE LOCATION OF THIS TYPE OF FACILITY IS NEXT TO A VERY ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY THAT SHOULD. GIVEN THIS IT SHOULD NOT BE SUPPORTED BY CITY STAFF AND LEADERS SUPPORT CHOICE OF THE PROPERTY THAT CAN GO ALMOST IN ANY PARCEL ON MCKINNEY THAT'S NOT BOARDING ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY IS MY OPINION THAT IS SIMILAR DISTRIBUTION CENTER WOULD BE LIKE AN AMAZON WITH HIGH FREQUENCY OF ACTIVITY AND DELIVERY. FOR GLENN IS CURRENTLY IN THERE A ROAD IT'S INCREASED PARKING AND TRAFFIC WOULD PUT RESIDENTS OF CRAIG GRANTED STATES AND THE ARTISTRY RESIDENTS AT AN INCREASED RISK OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS.

INCREASED NUMBER. DELIVERY VEHICLES, FOOD TRUCKS, TRACE TRUCKS HAULING TRUCK IF THIS GOES THROUGH, AS PREVIOUSLY SAID THE ROAD WOULD NEED TO BE WIDENED AND ALLEVIATE THESE ISSUES. WITH THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC BROUGHT OWNED BY THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. TRAFFIC LIGHT ALSO SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. IF THIS PROCESS IF THIS PROPOSAL DOES GO THROUGH AT PIPER GLEN AND THE COLUM MACKENZIE PARK WAY INTERSECTION. THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS THE REAL POTENTIAL TO CREATE A NUISANCE TO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORS THREW SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED LIGHT POLLUTION, NOISE POLLUTION, THE POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED ROTEN ISSUES DUE TO THE FOOD WASTE FROM A GHOST FOOD KITCHEN. SUPPORTING 12 TO 16 RESTAURANTS AGAIN, THIS TYPE OF PRODUCTION FACILITY DOES NOT BELONG IN ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. THIS PROPOSAL ALSO DOES NOT CONFORM WITH THE CURRENT STANDARD SET FORTH BY CRAIG RANCH IN THE AREA THAT MANY RESIDENTS HAVE SPENT HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS INVESTING IN THEIR HOMES. WHY WOULD THE CITY AND CITY LEADERS DIVIDED THE PROPERTY OF THE CITIZENS IN THIS AREA BY APPROVING A NON CONFORMING FOOD PRODUCTION FACILITY? OF THIS NATURE, THE CITY OF MCKINNEY HAS JUST RECENTLY SCORED A MAJOR VICTORY WITH THE BYRON NELSON COMING TO CRAIG RANCH. GIVEN THAT COLIN MCKINNEY IS ONE OF OUR MAJOR ACCESS POINTS INTO THE COMMUNITY, WHY WOULD YOU HAVE A FOOD PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION? FACILITIES SITTING RIGHT AT THE ENTRY TO A MAJOR ACCESS POINT INTO CRAIG RANCH. GIVEN THESE POINTS, I STRONGLY OPPOSE THE REZONING REQUEST. I ASKED THE CITY TO RECONSIDER THAT THIS IS A RESTAURANT BECAUSE IT IS NOT.

IT'S A FOOD PRODUCTION PROCESSING FACILITY THAT DESERVES TO BE IN A COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSING DISTRICT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT. THANK YOU, MR HUMOR, AND WE WILL HAVE YOUR COMMENTS. FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IS PART OF OUR MINUTES AS WELL. EX CARD. IT'S UM JIM BROWN. I DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT IN OPPOSITION TO BROWN. THAT'S STILL THE CASE.

NEXT CARD IS FROM NANCY BROWN. I DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK. IN OPPOSITION. SMITH. I'VE GOT TO BE VERY LONG. NOBODY HAS BROUGHT UP THE FACT ABOUT THE DAYCARE. WHICH WILL. IF THE ENTRANCE OR EXIT IS ON PIPER GLENN. FORGET IT BECAUSE THOSE CARS LINED UP, PICK UP THEIR KIDS JUST DROPPED HIM OFF IN THE MORNING. PICK ME UP IN THE AFTERNOON. THERE IS NO WAY WE'RE GONNA BE ABLE TO GET IN AND OUT WITH A STREET THAT WITH THAT IT IS AND HE'S ABSOLUTELY WILL HAVE TO BE WIDENED. OR DO THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT ON COLIN MCKINNEY. THAT'S MY CONCERN.

ALONG WITH THE OTHERS. THANK YOU, MR BROWN. NEXT CARD IS JAMES SCOOCH TO DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT I AM AN OPPOSITION. EX CARDISS STEVE ALDERMAN. DO NOT ALWAYS TO SPEAK BUT IN OPPOSITION. EX CARD MARKED DIAMOND DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION. EX CARD, FRANK L.

ROD. DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT I AM AN OPPOSITION. GEORGE SCOTT. DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT IN OPPOSITION. NEXTCARD MICHAEL, I'M YOUR HAIR MULHERIN MICHAEL MOORE HERE AND DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION. LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING. YES, SIR. YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME. TO SPARKED

[00:55:04]

MULHERN ON 11 86 WHOLE NINE WAKEFIELD DRIVE. MY HOUSE BACKS UP TO THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY. MY WIFE SPOKE EARLIER. AND I SUPPORT EVERYTHING. BUT I WANTED IN MY COMMENTS THAT I SUBMITTED ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO, MAYBE THREE YEARS AGO, A WOMAN ACROSS THE STREET. FROM MY HOUSE, AND, UH, TIM L. ROD'S HOUSE. WAS YOUR HUSBAND THOUGHT SHE WAS DYING. AND THE EMERGENCY SQUAD. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ALL CONVERGED ON THE HOUSE. THEY COULDN'T GET UP THE STREET. BECAUSE THE VEHICLES ARE TOO WIDE. WITH A NARROW STREET. IT IS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I THINK THAT HAVING A FOOD PROCESSING LOCATION, IT WILL JUST COMPLICATE. EXACERBATE THE ISSUE WE HAVE WITH STREET SIZE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WILL HAVE STAFF COMEBACK WIN AN ADDRESS THE. STREET WITH OKAY, MAYBE WE CAN SHED SOME LIGHT ON THAT TONIGHT. EXC ARTIST TYLER AND ELLEN DAWSON DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT IN OUR POSITION.

YES, SIR. MY NAME IS TYLER DAWSON. I LIVED 62 OF FIVE. HERE IN BAY. I'M WITHIN THE 200.

FT. UH LOOK, NOTIFICATION AREA POINT OF CLARIFICATION. HYPER. GLENN I WENT OUT AND PASTE IT OFF TODAY. IT'S 25. IT'S A 25 FT WIDE. APPROXIMATELY. SO WHEN TWO CARS TRYING TO PASS THEY CAN PASS ON THAT CORNER, USUALLY ONE STOPS TO LET THE OTHER ONE AROUND. IF YOU CUT THE CORNER DOLLARS, NOT SPACE, SO THIS DRAWING IS NOT REALLY QUITE THE SCALE WHEN YOU COMPARE THAT TO COLIN MCKINNEY. SECOND POINT OF CLARIFICATION, EVEN IF YOU BRING IN A RESTAURANT. TALKING WITH THE RESTAURANT OWNER. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS ABOUT THE ODORS COMING FROM A RESTAURANT AS WELL AS ATOMIZED GREECE. PARTICLES THAT CAN BE EXHAUSTED OUT. AND GUESS WHERE THOSE AIR GONNA LAND. SINCE WE HAVE A SOUTH WIND MOST THE TIME. INTO OUR WINDOWS ON OUR ROOMS. THOSE AREAS SO WE HAVE SOME, SO I THINK IT'S ANOTHER CONCERN.

JUST TWO QUICK POINTS. CLARIFICATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR DAWSON. NEXT CARD.

BOBBY AND SUSAN HOPED IN OPPOSITION. SPEAK. I'LL SPEAK. OKAY. THANK YOU. THE NEXT CARD.

ROGER JONES DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK. BUT IN OPPOSITION, MR JONES. NEXTCARD SURELY ANGLIN DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT IN OPPOSITION. YEAH. DAVID ANGLIN DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION. SIR. DAY WITH ENGLAND 86 THE WAY WAKEFIELD DRIVE AND I LIVE IN THE PROGRAM TO STATES THE FOLKS BEHIND ME OR HERE BECAUSE THEY GOT WORD YOU HEARD ONE PERSON MENTIONED THAT THEY GOT. ONE PERSON MENTIONED IT IN THREE OR FOUR PEOPLE, ALL OF THESE FOLKS BACK HERE HERE IN THE LAST 34 DAYS OF HEARING ABOUT THIS THEY'RE TWO SIGNS ON THIS PROPERTY PROPOSING REZONING AND THEY'RE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE WHERE ALL THE RESIDENTS LIVE. THERE WAS NO ONE GOING IN AND OUT OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD EVER SEE US ON UNLESS YOU TURNED AND DID A U TURN AND CAME BACK DOWN COLIN MCKENZIE PARKWAY. THERE'S NO WAY THAT THERE WAS ADEQUATE NOTICE. AND IF YOU WERE TO READ OUT, IS IT TODAY YOU WOULD GET THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

THAT'S NOT IN THIS ROOM. TODAY WE APPEAR OPPOSING IT AS WELL. SO THERE NEEDS TO BE BETTER.

ADMINISTRATION TO YOUR ZONING NOTIFICATION BECAUSE NO ONE WAS MAILED ANYTHING COMMUNICATED WITH IN ANY WAY OTHER THAN ONE PERSON SEEING A SIGN AND RAISING IT TO THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORS. THANK YOU, MR ANGLIN. ON NEXT CARD IS SOCKO HUMOR. DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION. YEAH. NEXTCARD JOSEPH CONRAD DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK BUT IN OPPOSITION. THE NEXT CARD CAN ARE GOING OR DAWN. DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK. BUT IN OPPOSITION, THANK YOU.

SCARRED JAMES MASSEY WERE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION, MR MASSEY. JAMES MASSEY LIVING 59 12 HERE IN BAY, JUST RIGHT UP THE STREET FROM THE LAND IN QUESTION. UH, FIRST CONCUR WITH ALL THE STATEMENT SAID BEFORE, BUT I WOULD JUST ECHO AND ADD ON TO THE COMMENT ABOUT THE NOTICE THAT AND. MY OPINION IS BORDERED ON UNETHICAL AND CERTAINLY SPEAKS TO THE KIND OF NEIGHBOR THAT THIS BUSINESS INTENDS TO BE IF THEY'RE GOING TO SNEAK AROUND BEHIND HER BACK

[01:00:02]

AND TRY TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS HERE. THIS IS NOT THE KIND OF PERSON I WANT LIVING NEAR MAY OR WORKING NEAR ME. BUT IN ADDITION TO ALL THE CONCERNS RAISED, I'D LIKE IF WE CAN PUT UP THE SLIDE THAT HAS THE ROAD NETWORK AROUND THIS AREA ON THIS CORNER OF CRAIG RANCH, IF YOU CAN FIND THAT OVERHEAD, PLEASE. NO. THEY'RE IN THE IN THE DOCUMENTS THERE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT YOU, YOU COULD LOOK AT THIS PROPERTY HERE AND YOU COULD SEE IMMEDIATELY SOUTH.

THOSE AIR SMALL OFFICE BUILDINGS AND THEN, OF COURSE, WE HAVE THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY THERE IF YOU LOOK ON CUSTER ROAD, THEY'RE LOW IMPACT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS AND LIGHT RETAIL ALL THINGS THAT ARE LOW IMPACT TO A RESIDENTIAL AND WELL SUITED FOR THESE LOCATIONS. WHEN YOU LOOK AT AT WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO DO. THIS IS NOT A GOOD FIT FOR THIS.

NOT ONLY THAT YOU HAVE THE NARROW ROADS IN AND OUT THEIR OWN COLUMN IN KENNY. WE'VE ALREADY COVERED PIPER. GLENN, IF YOU GO TO THE EAST ON COLIN MCKENNEY. IF YOU LOOK AT THE LABYRINTH, AND I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY GOTTA PROVE ROAD NETWORK THROUGH CRAIG RANCH, YOU CANNOT GET THROUGH THERE. IT IS CERTAINLY NOT CONDUCIVE TO A HIGH DELIVERY VOLUME. AREA. SO THERE'S NO PART OF THIS THAT FITS THAT KIND OF BUSINESS MODEL. FURTHER I WOULD ARGUE THAT THE FACT THAT THIS REQUIRES A TWO STORY A FACILITY ON THIS. WAS INTENDED TO PREVENT THIS VERY KIND OF USE. THERE'S EVERYTHING AROUND THIS. THEY'VE TRIED TO BE FAIR AND OPEN THE DOOR TO VALID COMMERCIAL USES. AND I DON'T THINK ANYBODY IN THIS ROOM IS OPPOSED TO A BUSINESS THAT IS, THEY WOULD MAKE A GOOD NEIGHBOR BUT THE WHOLE PURPOSE, I WOULD ARGUE FOR REQUIRING A TWO STORY FACILITY IS SO THAT WE CAN STOP THINGS LIKE THIS. THIS WAS NEVER IN ANYBODY'S INTENTION. THE ROAD NETWORK NEVER INTENDED ANY KIND OF USE IN THIS MANNER.

AND FURTHERMORE, THERE ARE RESTRICTIONS INTENTIONAL IN MY WOULD ARGUE TO STOP THIS KIND OF THING. SO AGAIN VERY MUCH OPPOSED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU, MR MASSEY. NEXT CARD IS CYNTHIA BROWN. I DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT I AM IN OPPOSITION. ROUND.

THANK YOU. THAT IS THE LAST OF THE CARDS. YOU CERTAINLY ARE. WELCOME TO SPEAK. IF YOU HAVE BEEN HANDED OPPORTUNITY, ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. NO ONE ELSE. YEAH. THAT HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE THE REGIONAL CRIME BRANCH. AGE TO THIS SOMEWHERE ALONG THE LINE.

WE NEVER HEARD OF IT. WE'LL HAVE STAFF ANSWER THAT QUESTION. WE HAVE TWO OTHER QUESTIONS AS WELL. HOLD ON, MR ARNOLD DO ANYONE ELSE THAT HASN'T HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO YOU LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? YES, MA'AM. GOOD EVENING AND THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TO YOU. MY NAME IS JOANNE POND. I LIVE AT 86. 17 WAKEFIELD DRIVE. I AM THE LAST HOUSE IN THE COLDEST SACK. IT BACKS UP TO THE TOWER WHERE THIS PROPERTY IS WHEN WE BUILT OUR HOME 10 YEARS AGO, ALMOST 10 YEARS AGO TODAY IT WAS OWNED FOR DAY CARE. THAT'S WHAT WE WERE EXPECTING. UM I AM VERY MUCH OPPOSED TO THIS BEING A MASS PRODUCTION KITCHEN. I KNOW WHAT THAT ENTAILS. I DON'T WANT THAT EXHAUST. I DON'T WANT TO BREATHE IN ALL OF THOSE EXHAUST FUMES FROM COOKING THOSE MANY MEALS. I THINK IT LOWERS MY PROPERTY VALUE, AND IT LOWERS MY QUALITY OF LIFE. WHICH IS VERY, VERY IMPORTANT TO ME AT MY AGE, SO I REALLY AM OPPOSED TO THIS. EVERYTHING THAT MY NEIGHBORS HAVE SAID. I CONCUR WITH AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO STRONGLY CONSIDER. THIS PROPOSAL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. IF YOU WILL, ON YOUR WAY OUT, FILL OUT A YELLOW CARD ON THE TABLE. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WOULD HAVE NOT HAS NOT SPOKEN TONIGHT. CARE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT, WHEN WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SO EMOTIONAL, MR MAN'S ON CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO SECOND BY MR WOODRUFF. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. WHAT WE'LL DO NOW IS HAVE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS AND ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS. THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING PARTICIPANTS HAD WOULD LIKE TO GO FOR US DOING ABOUT STAFF FOR THE APPLICANT OR I GUESS HE'S ON THE PHONE. HAVE A COUPLE OF HAVE MORE LATER, BUT UM, PERCENT. OKAY, UM SO. I THINK ONE OF THE POINTS OF CONTENTION HERE IS WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS FROM WHAT I HEAR FROM THE PRESIDENT. IS THAT THIS ISN'T NECESSARILY. RESTAURANT IT'S MORE OF A PRODUCTION FACILITY, SO. YOU SPEAK TO HOW IT HOW. WHAT WOULD SEPARATE THIS FROM

[01:05:03]

ANOTHER FACILITY THAT PRE PACKAGES FOOD AND SHIPS IT OUT? HOW DO YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN? CERTAINLY SO FOR THIS PARTICULARLY USE THAT WE'VE SPOKE WITH CRAVE ABOUT IN ARE THE DEFINITIONS AND OUR ORDINANCE. SO THE DEFINITION OUR ORDNANCE FOR A RESTAURANT, A CAFETERIA THAT HAS TO CARRY OUT SERVICE. MEANS AN ESTABLISHMENT WHERE FOOD IS PREPARED FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC, BUT WHERE THERE ARE NO DESIGNATED AREAS FOR DINING ON THE PREMISES. INDOOR OUTDOOR S O STAFF WAS LOOKING AT THAT. THAT DEFINITION AND OUR ORDINANCE. THERE'S ALSO THE ORDINANCE FOR THE DRIVE THRU COMPONENTS IF CRAVED, IT PROPOSED DRIVE THROUGH, WHICH MEANS AN ESTABLISHMENT WERE PREPARED FOOD OR DRINK. IT'S SERVED OR CONSUMED BY CUSTOMERS. UM IN MOTOR VEHICLES THROUGH A DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW OFF FOR OFF PREMISES CONSUMPTION. IN TERMS OF THE NATURE OF THE CRAVE PROPOSAL STAFF FEELS THAT THIS IS NOT AN INDUSTRIAL TYPE NATURE. IT IS A RESTAURANT WITH A KITCHEN THAT IS PREPARING FOOD. FOR SOMEONE THAT IS STILL DRINKING VIA AN APP FOR THE WEBSITE. JENNIFER, IF YOU WANT TO JUMP IN. THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION OVER THE DELIVERY COMPONENT ON BEAR IS A DISTINCTION BASED ON THE DEFINITION THAT WE HAVE IN OUR CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE, AND I KNOW THAT THEIR DEFINITIONS OF WHAT A RESTAURANT A CARRY OUT IS ALL OVER THE PLACE. BUT OUR ORDNANCE ACTUALLY HAS THAT DEFINITION IN IT, WHICH IS WHAT WE WOULD LOOK TOO. THE DELIVERY COMPONENT IS NOT A WHOLESALE OR MANUFACTURER DELIVERY. SO YOU HEARD THE CRAVE REPRESENTATIVE. TALK ABOUT THIS WOULD BE IN IN THE CAR DELIVERY DRIVER SIMILAR TO HOW WE WOULD EVALUATE A DOMINO'S PIZZA OR PAPA JOHN'S, WHERE THEY HAVE A KITCHEN ON SITE THERE. THEY HAVE DELIVERY DRIVERS THAT ARE GOING OUT AND DELIVERING THOSE PIZZAS TO HOLMES. THIS IS THAT A SIMILAR OPERATION AS WE LOOK AT OUR ZONING ORDINANCE DEFINITION IF THEY WERE DOING LARGE VEHICLES, AND THEY WERE MASS DISTRIBUTING TO OTHER RESTAURANTS OR.

GROCERY STORES OR WHATNOT. I WOULD ACTUALLY ARGUE THAT YES, THAT WOULD THEN FALL UNDER THAT WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT, BUT BECAUSE THIS IS A BUSINESS TO PATRON DIRECT DELIVERY, IT DOES FALL UNDER THAT CATEGORY OF RESTAURANT PER OUR DEFINITION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. WE'VE ALSO AGAIN KIND OF LOOKED AT THAT. PIZZA DELIVERY, A BAKERY. EXCUSE ME, A BAKERY AND THINGS OF THE LIGHT, WHICH IS WHERE WE LANDED ON THAT INTERPRETATION OR HER DEFINITION CALL. WERE YOU NOT INTERPRET, INTERPRET, EVEN RETURN, CANADIAN KING SAID.

BASED ON THE CURRENT ZONING. WITHIN THE WORK SESSION. WE JUST HAD YOUR EVEN ADDING A NEW CATEGORY FOR GHOST KITCHENS BECAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S OUTGROWN A CURRENT SONY SO THIS IS NOT JUST A DOMINO'S BECAUSE WE SEE THERE'S GONNA INVOLVE ITS OWN CATEGORY IN THE FUTURE, AGREED AND I WILL TELL YOU AND I RECOGNIZE THAT THE NEW CODE, MCKINNEY IS STILL IN DRAFT FORM, BUT WE DEFINITELY LOOKED AT THIS. THESE THINGS KIND OF MARRIED UP TOGETHER.

WHAT YOU'LL SEE IN THAT DRAFT CODE IS THESE GHOST KITCHENS AS THEY'RE CALLED, WOULD MIRROR THE SAME ALLOWANCES AS A RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE THRU SO KNOWING THAT OUR CURRENT CODE.

CLASSIFIES THIS IS A CARRY OUT RESTAURANT BASED ON THAT DEFINITION ON BASED ON THE DEFINITION THAT WAS PROPOSED, OR IS BEING PROPOSED WITH THAT NEW CODE. THOSE USE ALLOWANCES WOULD STILL MARRY UP VERY SIMILARLY. SO WE IS THE STAFF FOR TRYING TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT. ULTIMATELY YOU KNOW, WE ARE THE ULTIMATE DECISION MAKERS WERE THE RECOMMENDING BODY IN THIS IN THIS SENSE, BUT THAT'S WE DID WANT TO MAKE SURE WE WERE ALIGNED WITH THAT, BECAUSE IF WE FELT LIKE THERE WAS SOME. SIGNIFICANT CHANGE OR INFORMATION THAT CAME OUT WITH THIS THAT WOULD STEER IT AWAY FROM THAT CARRY OUT RESTAURANT OR GHOST KITCHEN CONCEPT. WE DEFINITELY WOULD HAVE PAUSED ON THAT REZONING TO EVALUATE THE RECOMMENDATION, BUT WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT ANY SIZE CAP, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF I'M SURE. BUT I THOUGHT I HEARD 14,000 SQUARE FEET OF GLORIA'S 7200 SQUARE FEET. I DON'T. NO, BUT WE'RE TALKING 16 RESTAURANTS WITHIN ONE BUILDING. 13 WELL AGAIN, I'LL DEFER THAT BACK TO THE AFRICAN AT MY UNDERSTANDING WASN'T THAT IT WAS SPECIFICALLY 16 RESTAURANTS, BUT IT WAS 16 CONCEPTS AND AGAIN, I'LL DEFER THAT TO THEM. I THINK I THINK YOU'RE BRINGING UP A KNISH YOU I'M HAVING WITH THIS IS THAT I HAVEN'T I HEAR THE CITY COMMUNICATING THAT TEST, BUT I HAVEN'T NECESSARILY SEEN THE APPLICANTS SAY. SPECIFICALLY SO I CAN KIND OF READ A LITTLE BIT, BUT I'M TRYING TO GO WITHOUT SAYING ANYTHING FROM THEM ABOUT WHAT THEIR CONCEPT IS. THINK THAT'S THE IMPORTANT THING IS AROUND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PRODUCTION FACILITY WHERE IT'S PRE PACKAGED GOODS THAT ARE BEING SHIPPED OUT AS OPPOSED TO YOU LIKE A PIZZA STORE THAT YOU GO IN AND YOU PICK UP YOUR FOOD, AND THAT'S THE BIG PIECE RIGHT. IT'S BUSINESS TO CONSUMER VERSUS BUSINESS. THE BUSINESS SO WHAT? I GET THAT, BUT I HAVEN'T ACTUALLY SEEN THEIR CONS. AND IF I COULD, IF I COULD RESPOND TO THAT, TONTO. AS WELL. THIS IS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A REZONING. SO WHEN I

[01:10:05]

RECOGNIZE THAT WE HAVE THE OWNER AND THE POTENTIAL BUSINESS THAT HERE THAT SORT OF NECESSITATING THAT REZONE. THE REZONE TRULY IS FROM THAT PD WITH THE TWO STORY REQUIREMENT TO SEE TWO BASED ON WHAT THEY'VE DESCRIBED TO US AND THE DISCUSSIONS THAT WE'VE HAD. IT WOULD FALL UNDER THAT RESTAURANT CARRY OUT DEFINITION. WE AGAIN A SHE'D MENTIONED WE DON'T HAVE THE FULL PACKAGE FROM THEM ON BECAUSE THAT SITE PLANNING PROCESS COMES AFTER THE ZONING. ON DSA. OH, IF THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT CAME IN WITH THAT SITE PLAN, WHERE THERE WAS A COMPONENT OF THAT BUSINESS MODEL WHERE IT IS. BUSINESS TO BUSINESS OR WHOLESALE COMPONENT AND NOT DIRECT TO CONSUMER. WE WOULD HAVE TO QUESTION THAT DURING THE SITE PLANNING PROCESS AS WELL. SO AGAIN THAT RESTAURANT WITH CARRY OUT AS THE DEFINITION RED. IF THEIR PROPOSED USE CAME IN TODAY, WITH TWO STORIES, AND IT MET THAT DEFINITION THEY WOULD BE PERMITTED TO DO WITHOUT THE REZONING REQUEST, BUT THE REZONING QUEST IS ALLOWING IT EASIER AND WHAT THEY WANT. IT WOULD ALLOW IT EASIER IN THE FACT THAT IT WOULD ONLY REQUIRE A ONE STORY NOT TWO STORY BUT THE USE CATEGORY THAT RESTAURANT DEFINITION WOULD BE UNCHANGED REGARDLESS OF WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE ZONING. I THINK WE'VE HAD TO LOOK AT ESPECIALLY THE NEW CODE. WHAT WE DEFINE THE GHOST KITCHEN AS BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THE RESIDENTS ARE GOING TO DO PICTURE A GHOST KITCHEN AND A RESTAURANT IS THE SAME THING. EVEN IF WE PICTURE BUSINESS TO CONSUMER BUSINESS TO BUSINESS TO DEFINING MOMENT. PICTURE IS CAN GO SIT DOWN IN MY CORNER RESTAURANT OR NOT. COMPARED TO A FLEET OF VEHICLES COMING AND GOING FROM MY NEIGHBORHOOD, FOR SURE, FOR SURE. AND FOR US IS A STAFF WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THAT DEFINITION OF RESTAURANT CARRY OUT IT IS. IT IS DEFINED FOR US IN OUR ORDINANCE AND WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. BASED ON THE CONVERSATIONS WE'VE HAD WOULD WOULD MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. SO ARE AT THAT POINT, IF IT IS A ON I DON'T HAVE THE DEFINITION TOE BE ABLE. THERE IT IS. THANK YOU, UM. YOU KNOW, RESTAURANT OR CAFETERIA CARRY OUT ONLY IS AN ESTABLISHMENT WHERE FOOD IS PREPARED FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC, WHERE THERE ARE NO DESIGNATED AREAS FOR DINING ON THE PREMISES, WHICH BASED ON. WHAT THEY'RE PRESENTING ITS CARRY OUT WHETHER IT'S AN INDEPENDENT PERSON COMING UP OR A DELIVERY DRIVER THAT'S COMING IN TO TAKE THE ORDER AND. AND DELIVER IT OUT. THAT DEFINITION FOR US IS NON DISCRETIONARY. IT IS IF YOU MEET THIS THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE TO THEM. WHERE IS THE LINE BECAUSE AGAIN THE WAY HAVE FOLKS THAT ARE WAITING AND SAYING. THEY'RE CONCERNED. THIS IS MORE OF A PRODUCTION FACILITY AS OPPOSED TO. SO WHERE DO YOU DRAW THE LINE THAT THIS BECOMES? BECAUSE YOU YOU'VE GOT 16 DIFFERENT AND SEES THAT ARE ALL IN AS OPPOSED TO STAND ALONE. RESTAURANT THAT'S RUNNING OUT OF ONE SMALL SPACE. NOW YOU'VE GOT 16 THAT ARE ALL. NEVER. THAT MODEL LOOKS LIKE RIGHT. WHAT'S THE DEFINING POINT WHERE IT DOES BECOME A PRODUCTION FACILITY WHEN IT WHEN THAT DELIVERY IS NOW A. BUSINESS TO BUSINESS. IT IS NOT DIRECT TO CONSUMER THAT THERE CAN'T BE CATERING. OUT OF. WHEN WELL, CATERING. I. EVEN RESTAURANTS DO THE CATERING WHERE THEY'VE GOT THEIR KITCHEN WITH THEIR RESTAURANT, AND THEN THEY'VE GOT A CATER VAN THAT SENDS IT OUT. CATERING WOULD BE PERMITTED UNDER A RESTAURANT USED RIGHT NOW. AND I KNOW THIS IS A REZONING. BUT WHEN WE GET FURTHER ALONG IF THIS PASSES WILL. THE STAFF CONSIDER THE ROADS AND LIGHTS AND. ALL THAT. I MEAN, THE PIPER PIPER GLEN ROAD COULD THAT EXPAND I MEAN, WOULD THAT BE ALL BE ON THE TABLE AS FAR AS. YES ABSOLUTELY.

AND I LIKE CAITLIN'S WORK MORE CLOSELY WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ON THAT, SO I'LL LET HER SPEAK TO SOME OF THE SPECIFIC CONVERSATION SHE HAD. BUT. AS AS PART OF THE SITE. SO ZONING IS YOU KNOW YOUR NO, THE OWNERS SO YOU KNOW, ONCE A ZONING IS IN PLACE, OR THE ZONING IS IN PLACE, THEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THAT SITE PLANNING PROCESS WHERE WE'RE ACTUALLY ABLE TO SEE. WHAT THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING IS HOW THE OPERATION'S GONNA WORK AND OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT THAT POINT IS GONNA LOOK AT THE ROADWAY NETWORK WERE DRIVEWAYS BEING PROPOSED ENTRANCE AND ENTRANCES AND EXITS TO ENSURE THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE'S THERE I JUST THAT WAS STILL A COUPLE STEPS DOWN THE LINE. YEAH. AND THEN, UH, PD IS IN YOU SAID THIS COUPLE TIMES P. D IS FOR TWO STORY WHERE THERE WANT TO SEE TWO FOR ONE THERE. JUST ONE IN A ONE STORY BUILDING. CORRECT, OKAY? QUESTION FOR YOU ON THAT, UM THERE'S A LOT OF CONCEPTS COMING INTO TOWN NOW. 1 51 COFFEE, ETCETERA THAT ARE TWO STORY BUILDINGS BUT REALLY

[01:15:03]

ONLY OPERATING IN ONE THERE, FOLKS. SAME STORY. HOW DOES THE DEFINITION WORK? WE ARE CODE TODAY. IT'S NOT CLEARLY DEFINED ON GUY THINK THAT THERE IS THERE IS OPPORTUNITY WE HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST. WHERE IF YOU HAVE A POST STORY AND THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING LOOKS AND FEELS LIKE IT'S TWO STORY, I'M IT REALLY IS UP TO STAFFS INTERPRETATION THAT THAT SATISFIED THAT TWO STORY REQUIREMENT WHETHER IT'S A MEZZANINE OR A FAUX SECOND STORY. UM, THE INTERNAL USAGE OF THAT BUILDING. IS NOT NECESSARILY SOMETHING THAT IS GERMAINE TOW US MORE SO THAN HOW IT LOOKS AND FEELS FROM THE EXTERIOR. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF. QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT. OKAY, UM THE ONE ON THE PHONE. SHANNON THAT YOU SO WHAT DO YOU THINK? NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS VOLUME HER NIGHT. ON A BUSY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY THAT YOU CURRENTLY HAVE IN YOUR. RESTORE THAT YOU HAVE THAT KIND OF VOLUME. DO YOU SEE GOING OUT ON A NIGHTLY BASIS? AROUND 100 DELIVERIES OVER FOR FOUR HOUR PERIOD. 25 YOU LOOK AT 25. 25 AN HOUR ON AVERAGE DURING YOUR PEAK TIMES. YEAH. SUCH TRULY NO MORE THAN A DOMINO'S PIZZA? YES. I AM. I APOLOGIZE AGAIN. THIS WAS REALLY JUST A ZONING AND WE WERE NOT ACTUALLY THE APPLICANT. IT WAS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY ON DO WE HAVE A WHOLE PACKAGE THAT WE WOULD HAVE PREPARED THAT THIS IS VERY HIGH END FOOD DELIVERY AND NOTHING LIKE. ON ARBY'S OR A CHICKS AWAY. IT JUST DOESN'T HAVE ANYWHERE NEAR THAT KIND OF VOLUME. IT'S NOT AWARD WINNING FOOD. I MEAN, THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE ONE MICHELIN STARS AND JAMES BEARD AWARDS. RECIPIENT, SO. WHAT IS THE AVERAGE TICKET. QUESTION MS CAREFULLY NOW. UM COURSEWORK. WITH YOU. YOU. YOU.

CRAP. AGAIN. BUY WITH ALL OF THAT. ME SQUARE FEET. 14,000. DOES THAT ALSO INCLUDE THE DAYCARE THE 14,000 SQUARE FEET. NO, AND I'M NOT SURE WHY THEY'RE NOT HERE. I MEAN THEY HALF OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROCESS DECIDE THAT IS ON THE EASTERN PORTION THAT THAT'S ALL THERE IS. OKAY? WHAT IS YOUR AVERAGE TICKET? RIGHT? AROUND $70.72. LITTLE LEFT FOR LUNCH.

SHANNON PART OF YOUR TEAM IS UP AT THE PODIUM, AND IT LOOKS LIKE HE WANTS TO SHARE SOMETHING WITH US. SO. I HOPE HE DOES. MAY I? YES, I MEAN, IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT WAS 14,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. THAT'S LESS THAN IT WAS A RESTAURANT OF FULL ON RESTAURANT, WHICH IS ALLOWED. THERE'LL BE A LOT MORE THAN 100 DELIVERIES COMING OUT THERE ONE NIGHT. THAT'S WHY EVERY 100 PATRONS PER NIGHT. I HAVE A HARD TIME BELIEVING THERE'S ONLY 100 DELIVERIES, CONSIDERING SOME 14,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WHERE RESTAURANTS 7200 AND A DOMINO'S WOULD BE A LITTLE LESS THAN 2000 AT BEST, AS FAR AS 1800 FROM S O TO SAY THAT WE NEED 14,000. WE'RE ONLY GONNA DELIVER THAT. IT'S JUST HARD FOR ME TO WRAP MY HEAD AROUND THOSE NUMBERS COMPARED TO WHAT THIS COST OF THIS LAND THIS COST OF THIS BUILDING AND WHAT IT'LL TAKE THE OPERATING HISTORY. YEAH, BUT IF YOU HAVE, THERE'S ALSO CARRY OUT SO SORRY. YOU GOT IT TURNS OUT I'M NOT A PEEP. TO COME. UP AND PICK UP THEIR FOOD. ANOTHER SET. A LOT OF PEOPLE MAY BE ON THEIR WAY BACK HOME OR PICK UP DINNER FOR THE FAMILY. SO I MEAN, THE VOLUME IS SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN WHAT I'M SUGGESTING ALSO THE NUMBER OF DELIVERIES IS NOT THE SAME. AS THE NUMBER OF ORDERS, HE SAYS. THEY GET PATCHED. USUALLY THERE'S ■LIKE E WE TRAINED CLUSTER WHERE THE DELIVERIES AGO. MOST OF THEM ARE PREORDERED, SO WE KNOW EXACTLY WHEN PEOPLE ARE EXPECTING TO HAVE THEIR FOOD. AND THEN IT DOESN'T AGAIN ACCOUNT FOR BREAKFAST AND LUNCH, WHICH IS ALSO A PART OF THE PICKUP VALUES. $100 CUSTOMERS A DAY 75 BUCKS A TICKET. LOOKING ABOUT 2.6 MILLION, WHICH IS HIGH FOR A RESTAURANT WRITES A GREAT NUMBER. HOW MUCH IS THAT IT? OKAY IT'S NOT 100 CUSTOMERS. YES, I JUST TAKE 100 DELIVERY, WHICH PEOPLE 300 ORDERS? SURE SO, WITH THE AVERAGE TICKET 70 BUCKS YOU LOOK ABOUT 2.6

[01:20:03]

MILLION. IT IS A GREAT NUMBER. HOW MUCH OF THAT IS ALCOHOL SALES? IS IT? PERCENTAGE AS WELL. ABOUT THE SAME AS A RESTAURANT SO TYPICAL RESTAURANT WOULD HAVE ABOUT 13% IN BEVERAGE SALES. OURS IS CLOSER TIP 18. SOLUTION IT, FELLAS. WE'RE HAVING A HARD TIME HEARING UP HERE. IF YOU COULD KEEP THE CHATTER DOWN, WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU.

SHANNON, I'M SORRY. THAT'S THAT'S OKAY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU HEARD WHAT I WOULD SAY. SO DRILLING THIS BACK DOWN WHERE WE WERE KIND OF BACK UP AND GO BACK TO THE ZONING. I THINK THAT THE SPIRIT OF NOTICING AND LETTING FOLKS KNOW WHAT'S COMING INTO THE AREAS TO BEGIN THAT CONVERSATION TO GET BOOKS AND OPPORTUNITY TO WEIGH IN. I WOULD FOR ME PERSONALLY, I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF POTENTIALLY TABLE NG THIS TO GIVE THE APPLICANT AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE RESIDENTS. AND MAYBE YOU LET THEM KNOW MORE ABOUT WHAT IS HOW THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY. ZONE AND WHAT IS WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO DO WITH THE AREA. IN THOSE CONVERSATIONS. THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I'M OUT RIGHT NOW. DON'T. DON'T BELIEVE THAT SHANE AND I APOLOGIZE FOR YOU GETTING PUT ON THE SPOT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S YOUR PLACE HERE. I THINK THE OWNER KIND OF ABANDONED YOU PUT YOU IN A HARD POSITION, BUT NOT BEING HERE. NOT TALKING TO THE RESIDENTS BECAUSE OUTSIDE THIS. UM, YOU KNOW, I LOOK FORWARD TO THE BUSINESS BEING IN MCKINNEY. I DON'T NECESSARILY THINK THIS IS THE SPOT. I DON'T THINK A GHOST KITCHEN. IS A RESTAURANT PER SE IS FAR IS THE IMPACT THE NEIGHBORHOOD NOR WILL THE NEIGHBORS OR THE RESIDENTS OF MCKINNEY SEE IT? IT'S THE SAME AS A RESTAURANT, SO, HOWEVER, YOU WANTED TO FIND IT WITH BUSINESS CONSUMER BUSINESS TO BUSINESS. UM. I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE DEFINITION. I THINK WHEN SOMEBODY LOOKS AT IT, THEY CAN EITHER SEE THAT IT'S A RESTAURANT OR NOT SAY THAT SORT OF STRONGEST ABOUT IT'S EASIER TO GET I WOULD BE IN FAVOR. HAVE A TABLE TO ALLOW. I WOULD HOPE THE OWNER DOUBT REACH OUT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND DISCUSS IT. AND MAYBE THE NEIGHBORS BE EDUCATED WITH THE MODEL FOR CRAVE, SO THEY CAN GET MORE COMFORTABLE. AT THIS POINT, THE DELIVERY SYSTEM THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF CRAIG RANCH AND ITS ROADS. UM. AND THIS CLOSE OF A LARGE FACILITY TO RESIDENTIAL I JUST CAN'T GET COMFORTABLE WITH MAKING IT EASIER TO DEVELOP.

TAKE THE OPPOSITE SIDE. I THINK THIS IS A PERFECT USE FOR IT. GHOST KITCHEN OR NOT, IT'S STILL A KITCHEN AND IT'S NO DIFFERENT THAN THE DOMINOES IF WE TAKE SIDES IN THE CONSIDERATION NOW SUDDENLY WERE DICTATING AND MAKING CHOICES ON WHAT IS IT RUSH? DROPPING? WHAT IT'S NOT. STAFF DOES HAVE A DEFINITION IN THE BOOK, AND THIS IS INSIDE THAT DEFINITION.

I DON'T THINK IT'S GONNA LOOK LIKE A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN. SHANNON CAN YOU CAN YOU AND AGAIN WE'RE PUTTING YOU ON THE SPOT. THIS IS A ZONING HEARING, AND NOW WE'RE WAY DOWN IN THE WEEDS. I E CAN'T APOLOGIZE ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT THIS WAS GOING TO GO. I WOULD HAVE. AND THERE AND I WOULD HAVE BROUGHT ALL OF OUR VISUAL AIDS. YOU HAVE SEEN THE LANDSCAPING. YOU HAVE SEEN THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN A LOT CLEAR. THIS IS JUST SORT OF BROAD THAT AND I HOPE THAT YOU DON'T TABLE THE ZONING REQUEST ONLY BECAUSE I'M NOT. ACTUALLY THE APPLICANT IS THE OWNER OF THE. PROPERTY AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT'S THE THAT COMES IN. I THINK HE STILL WANTS TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THAT ZONE BEFORE ONE STORY BUILDINGS LIKE DAYCARE DOESN'T WANT TO BE TWO STORIES, EITHER. SO I. I DON'T. IT'S NOT MY PLACE TO GET INTO THAT, BUT I THINK YOU WERE GONNA ASK ME WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE. IT IS A REALLY NICE LOOKING BUILDING AND HAVE BEAUTIFUL WINDOWS THAT HAS A BEAUTIFUL PICKUP AREA IN THE FRONT OF THE MODERN DAY. STARBUCKS STOREFRONT WOULD KNOW IT. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO EXPLAIN IT WITHOUT HAVING A PICTURE FOR YOU. AND I ARE THAT I DON'T HAVE THAT SHINY. YOU DON'T KNOW THAT'S AN APOLOGY IS YOU YOU'RE BEING PUT ON THE SPOT, BUT WITH THAT BEING SAID. SO TO JUST KIND OF CAPSULE IT THAT THIS WILL HAVE A RESTAURANT. LOOK FROM THE OUTSIDE. THIS WILL LOOK LIKE A RESTAURANT. OKAY THAT LOOKS LIKE A RESTAURANT. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS. ISLAND OR MISS ARNOLD, COULD YOU LET'S REVISIT AGAIN? WHAT THE QUESTION BEFORE US IS TONIGHT. I'M SAYING IS, THIS IS NOT A SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SAYS THE ZONING REQUEST AND THIS USE HAPPENS TO FIT INSIDE THAT ZONING REQUEST. YES SIR. OKAY AND WE'RE, AS HAMILTON SAID, WE'RE SLIPPED OFF INTO THE WEEDS. ON A PARTICULARLY, YOU SAID HAS BEEN PROPOSED, WHICH ARE VALID QUESTIONS, VALID CONCERNS AND SHANNON. I DO AGREE WITH YOU.

YOU WERE PUT ON THE SPOT. WITHOUT ALL OF YOUR TOOLS TO MAKE THIS PRESENTATION. BUT TO

[01:25:05]

REITERATE TO EVERYONE THAT ZONING REQUEST VERSUS SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THAT'S CORRECT. HIS ONLY REQUEST WITH A. ROOM FULL OF AFRICA ARE RESIDENTS THAT HAVE QUESTIONS AND NO APPLICANT. DOING? DO IT UNWISE FOR INFORMATION. I MEAN, I THINK THEY'RE TOTALLY UNPREPARED. MAKE A MOTION. OKAY? I'M I'LL MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE TABLE THIS ITEM TWO.

NEXT. AND ZOOMING IN ARE WE ABLE TO STIPULATE THAT MEET WITH THE APPLICANT. ENCOURAGED THE APPLICANT TO ME. INCIDENT. WE CAN, IF THAT IS THE DESIRE FOR THE COMMISSION TO TABLE THE ITEM IN HAVE THE APPLICANTS MEET WITH THE RESIDENTS RECOMMEND THAT WE MEET THAT THE APPLICANT MEETS WITH THE RESIDENTS. YOU COULD CERTAINLY DO THAT. SO WE NEED TO CONTINUE. RIGHT? CONTINUE OUR CLOTHES. WE'VE ALREADY CLOSED BUT WE'RE HEARING YET. WE NOTIFY OPEN. OKAY? I CAN GET MY MOTION BE TO RE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE. THE ITEMS. PUT IT ALL IN ONE. SURE. MAKE THAT MY MUCH OKAY? NO. NOT BEING A SMART ALEC, BUT NO. BUT WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. YEAH, WE WILL GET TO YOUR QUESTION. IF WE ADDRESS THIS MOTION, WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING BACK UP IN TOBA THE ATOM FOR NEXT TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED PUB PILL ENDING ZONING COMMITTEE, RIGHT. TWO WEEKS. HEY. MOTION. MAMA'S KIRKENDALL IS OUR 2ND 2ND 2ND MY MYSTERY MAN'S EYES EARNING DISCUSSION. HE'S CAST YOUR VOTES. MOTION CARRIES THE ITEM. HAS BEEN THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN REOPENED AND THE ITEM TABLE TO THE NEXT SCHEDULE. PLANNING'S UNDER COMMISSION MEETING. YOUR POINT OF ORDER WILL TAKE WHEN WE GET THROUGH WITH STAFF WILL GET YOUR QUESTION. ANSWERED. LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA. I HAVE 20 DAY 0012 S U P TO PUBLIC CURING

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit to Allow for a Car Wash, Located on the Southwest Corner of Collin McKinney Parkway and Lake Forest Drive]

REQUEST TO CONSIDER A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. ALLOW FOR A CAR WASH. THIS IS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COLUM MACKENZIE PARK, WAYNE LIKE FOREST DRIVE. GOOD EVENING. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A CAR WASH. UM LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER, CALL MCKINNEY PARKWAY AND LIKE FORCE, DR. THE ZONING FOR THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY WAS JUST RECENTLY ZONE TO SEE ONE COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT ON REQUIRES THAT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT BE GRANTED AN ORDER FOR A CAR WASH TO BE OPERATED ON THE SUBJECT.

PROPERTY STAFF HAS EVALUATED. THE REQUEST AND FEELS THE SITE IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE PROPOSED USING HIS COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING LAND USES OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. AND AS SUCH, I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. ON. OKAY. IT'S AROUND CLICKING HERE TONIGHT. YES, YES, THANK YOU. DOUG GALLOWAY 35 WAIT. EDGEWATER IN DALLAS. THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF FOR THE TIME TO PRESENT THIS TO YOU WERE PREVIOUSLY HERE ON DAD.

OUR SITE PLAN PUT TOGETHER FOR THE REZONING TO ALLOW FOR THIS S U P TO MOVE FORWARD. WE'VE ADVANCED OUR PLANS SOMEWHAT. SEE HERE. UM, TO BE A REALLY HIGH END CAR WASH. WE'RE HOPEFUL TO BRING SOMETHING THAT OFFERS A REAL ROUNDED GUEST EXPERIENCE. WE PLAN TO HAVE DETAILS, SERVICES, EVEN A DOG WASH FACILITY. AS PART OF THE PROJECT. UM. WE BELIEVE THAT OUR BUILDING WE WORK CLOSELY WITH STAFF, AND WE BELIEVE THAT OUR BUILDING ACTUALLY EXCEEDS THE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS OF THE SITE. ON WE BELIEVE IT'S QUALITY DEVELOPMENT THAT WE HOPE THE CITIZENS OF THE CANDY WOULD WELCOME US HERE. THE ACTUAL OWNERS OF THE CAR. WATCH THE BROOKS FAMILY HERE IS WELL SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MYSELF FOR THEM? GLAD TO ANSWER ANYTHING YOU MIGHT HAVE. SECTIONS OF THE APPLICAHENT ANYONE VERY GOOD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. ADAM. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE TONIGHT. THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK REGARDING THIS PROPOSED ISSUE. P FOR CAR WASH. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.

[01:30:10]

RIGHT BUT YOU'RE GOOD. LIKE, HMM, YOU'RE GONNA BE OH, DO IT. MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED BESIDE HIM. OCEAN BY MR A CALLED CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE ADAMIS FIRST STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS LIKE SECOND, MY MR DOKE, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? HE'S CAST A VOTE. MOTION CARRIES THE HONOR WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE. APRIL 6TH 2021. CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOW, UH BLOOM CARNOT, SHE COULD HANG UP. I'M SO SORRY. HEY SHANNON, YOU CAN ACTUALLY HANG UP IF YOU WOULD SO LIKE TO STILL THERE. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. WAY SHE'S NOT HANGING OUT WITH US FOR ANOTHER 20 MINUTES OR SO. NEXT ITEM WOULD BE PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ANY ITEM THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA YOU DOING HERE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA. GREAT. UM. STRICKLAND. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FOR US? NO, I DON'T BELIEVE THIS ANIMAL DOES, EITHER, SIR ARNOLD, NOTHING MEMBERS, ANYTHING.

WELL, WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN MIKE EMOTIONALLY, JOHN MOTION, MY MR DOKE TO ADJOURN SECOND BY. SECOND MR MCCALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE, AND THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. IT IS 7 35, AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.