[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
WE'LL CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER, SAY. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL THE SIXTH OF THE YEAR. 2021 WE WERE AT COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 2 22 NORTH TENNESSEE STREET. IN THE GREAT CITY OF MCKINNEY. IT IS THREE O'CLOCK IN THE AFTERNOON. AND OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE AGENDA ITEMS. I DO NOT SEE ANY. WILL NOW MOVE ON TO DISCUSS THE
[DISCUSS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS for the City Council Regular Meeting to be held Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 6:00p.m. ]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING THAT WOULD BE HELD TONIGHT AT SIX O'CLOCK. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT? I'LL POINT SOMETHING OUT BEFORE WE START. THERE IS AN ITEM THAT HAS BEEN REQUESTED BE TABLED. IT WAS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IT IS ITEM. IF SOMEBODY HAPPENS TO KNOW THE NUMBER OFF HAND UM. 2100 Z FIVE THAT HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO BE TABLED BY THE APPLICANT. THEY ARE DESIROUS OF GOING BACK IN WORKING WITH THE RESIDENTS IN THAT COMMUNITY MORE AND SEE IF THERE IS SOME WAY. THEO TO FIND A SITUATION THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED A WIN WIN. SO IF YOU ARE. WATCHING THIS YEAR PLAN ON COMING DOWN TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. YOU'RE STILL WELCOME TO DO THAT, BUT KNOW THAT THEY HAVE REQUESTED TO BE TABLED. AND, UH, IT FOLKS INVOLVED WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. AND THERE WE WELCOME TOO, OF COURSE. SO WE WILL MOVE OR ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS ON OTHER ITEMS. THE REGULAR AGENDA.YEAH. WE WILL MOVE ON TO OUR WORK SESSION ITEM. WHICH IS 210265 UPDATE ON THE NEW CODE,
[Update on the New Code McKinney Initiative (Development Regulations Update), Specifically Related to Proposed Improvements to the Uses and Districts Sections of the Zoning Ordinance]
MCKINNEY INITIATIVE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS UPDATE SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE USES AND DISTRICT'S SECTION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCES. AND I BELIEVE THIS WILL BE JENNIFER FIRST AND AARON IS GONNA BE INVOLVED. I THINK. IT'S GOING TO ATTACK TEAM EFFORT BETWEEN MYSELF, AARON AND THEN MATT GOBLE WITH CLARY ON AND ASSOCIATES. THIS IS I'M GONNA APOLOGIZE UP FRONT. THIS IS WE'RE HOPING THIS FOR THIS TO BE A ROBUST DISCUSSION WITH THE COUNCIL ON THIS SECTION OF THE NEW CODE, SO I PUT MY GLASSES ON SO THAT I COULD MAKE SURE I COULD SEE EVERYTHING AS WE WENT THROUGH IT NORMALLY DON'T WEAR THESE UP HERE. BUT AS YOU NOTED, THIS IS A DISCUSSION. I DON'T TOMO REVIEW THE PROPOSED NEW ZONING, DISTRICT'S AND ASSOCIATED LAND USES AND PERMISSION. SCHEDULE FOR THOSE IS PART OF THAT NEW CODE. MCKINNEY UPDATE. SO I'M GOING TO START OFF JUST BY GIVING A LITTLE BIT OF FRAMEWORK ON WHERE WE'VE BEEN TO DATE AND I'M GONNA TURN IT OVER TO MATT GLOBAL WITH CLARY ON AND ASSOCIATES. THAT'S THE PRIMARY CONSULTANT FIRM. THAT'S HELPING US DO THIS CODE OVERHAUL. HE'S GOING TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE DISTRICT SOME MINUTES UP BACK IN ON THE BACK INTO THE PRESENTATION AND TAKE US HOME. HOPEFULLY SO FOR TODAY, REALLY? ALL WE WANT TO DO IS GET FEEDBACK FROM THE COUNCIL. ANY MAJOR PIVOT POINTS THAT WE MIGHT NEED TO BE MAKING HER TAKING WITH THIS POTENTIAL NEW CODE. IN PARTICULAR THIS SECTION, WHICH AGAIN ZONING DISTRICT'S AND ZONING USES THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED IN EACH ONE OF THOSE DISTRICT'S. I DID WANT TO TAKE A MINUTE TO HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE DON'T PLAN ON TALKING ABOUT TODAY WITH THIS SORT OF. DRAFT THAT WE'RE PRESENTING ONE IS THERE ARE DEFINITELY SOME VERY NUANCED HOUSING TOPICS THAT WE KNOW ARE IMPORTANT FOR THE CITY RATHER THAN BUNDLING THOSE AS PART OF THIS LARGER DISCUSSION. WE DO INTEND TO COME BACK TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL. TALK ABOUT THOSE MORE SPECIFICALLY WITH YOU ALL UNDER THAT HOUSING CATEGORY, SO THINGS LIKE NEW POTENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS THAT WE'RE STARTING TO SEE SOME OF THAT SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT OR WHAT WE CALL CLUSTER HOUSING OR FOUR PACK HOUSING AND THE TOPIC OF MULTI FAMILY IN PARTICULAR.THOSE THINGS WE WILL BE COMING BACK TO DISCUSS WITH YOU ALL MORE SPECIFICALLY PLAYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT'S PDS KNOW THEM AND LOVE THEM QUITE A BIT HERE IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY.
UNTIL WE'RE ABLE TO GET THROUGH SOME OF THESE OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CODE. WE DID WANT TO HOLD OFF ON HAVING THAT SPECIFIC DISCUSSION ON WHAT HAPPENS TO PD'S WITH THESE WITH THIS NEW CODE UNTIL WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO PROGRESS A LITTLE BIT FURTHER. AND THEN THERE'S SOME OTHER WORD, NUANCED LAND USES LIKE SHORT TERM RENTALS, AIRBNB. HE'S THAT WE ALSO WANTED TO SORT OF UNBUNDLE FROM THIS LARGER DISCUSSION AND SPEAK WITH YOU ALL ABOUT THAT MORE SPECIFICALLY AT A LATER DATE. SO YOU WON'T SEE IT HERE TODAY, BUT PLEASE REST ASSURED THAT WE HAVEN'T FORGOTTEN ABOUT THEM AND THEY WILL BE BACK BEFORE YOU. JUST ALWAYS LIKE TO START WITH A BRIEF REMINDER OF WHY WE'RE DOING THIS CODE OVERHAUL. OBVIOUSLY OUR GOAL IS TO MAKE OUR DEVELOPMENT CODES MORE USER FRIENDLY, MORE ADMINISTRATIVELY FRIENDLY. I MEAN EASIER TO NAVIGATE FOR THOSE WHO MAY BE USING THEM TO DEVELOP IN THE CITY OR IF YOUR RESIDENT JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S ACTUALLY GOING ON. A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT MIGHT BE CLOSE TO YOUR HOME. THIS IS ALL BUNDLED UNDER IMPLEMENTATION OF OUR ONE MCKINNEY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS A POLICY DOCUMENT THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY HAVE RULES AND REGULATIONS IN IT. THAT'S WHERE OUR ZONING ORDINANCE IN OUR DEVELOPMENT CODES COME IN, AND THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS
[00:05:01]
WE WANTED TO BETTER ALIGN THOSE CODES WITH THAT ONE MCKINNEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO TODAY, WE'VE DONE QUITE A BIT OF WORK ON THIS INITIATIVE, A DATING BACK TO MID 2019. WE OBVIOUSLY LAUNCHED BY DOING A LOT OF ASSESSMENT AND OUTREACH JUST TO GET A GAUGE FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY ON HOW OUR CODE HAS BEEN WORKING THUS FAR. SO THAT WILL REALLY HELP TO INFORM HOW WE ADDRESSED THE POTENTIAL NEW CODE. YOU MAY REMEMBER THAT BACK IN THE SEPTEMBER OCTOBER TIME FRAME WE WERE IN FRONT OF YOU TALKING ABOUT OUR ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES SECTION. THAT DRAFT IS AVAILABLE AND ONLINE PUBLICLY, ONDAS ASSED. FAR AS WE'RE CONCERNED THAT PUBLIC DRAFT IS NEAR READY TO GO, AND WE HAVE NOW SHIFTED OUR FOCUS ONTO THIS NEXT SECTION. WHICH IS ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE HERE TO TALK ABOUT TONIGHT. ONCE WE ARE. THROUGH WITH THE ZONING USES AND DISTRICT'S COMPONENT WILL THEN START TO SHIFT GEARS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. WHAT THINGS LOOK LIKE WHEN THEY ACTUALLY GET BUILT. THIS IS JUST A DEEPER DIVE INTO THAT SCHEDULE. ALL OF THE ELEMENTS THAT ARE SORT OF BUNDLED WITHIN EACH ONE OF THOSE STEPS. YOU CAN SEE THAT GREEN STAR WITH WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW WE'VE GOT THAT PUBLIC DRAFT OF ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES AVAILABLE ARE MINE. WE ARE MAKING THE ROUNDS THROUGH BOARDS, COMMISSIONS OUTREACH EFFORTS TO MAKE SURE THAT FOLKS ARE AWARE THAT IT'S AVAILABLE TO REVIEW AND PROVIDE COMMENT ON AND THAT'S THE HEART OF OUR DISCUSSION WITH YOU ALL TONIGHT. YES, SIR. JUST JUST FOREST THAT ZONING DISTRICT AND USES YOU. REZONING ANYTHING WITH ALL THIS. WEEK. WELL, THAT'S YET TO BE DETERMINED. AND THAT'LL BE THE LAST THING THAT WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT WITH YOU ALL TONIGHT IS WHAT IS THE APPROACH THAT THE CITY WANTS TO TAKE TO TRANSITION FROM THE OLD CODE TO THE NEW CODE, AND WE'VE GOT A FEW SLIDES IN THIS PRESENTATION THAT GIVES HIM OPTIONS FOR HELP US TO DO THAT. AND THAT SOME OF THE FEEDBACK WE'RE HOPING TO GET FROM YOU ALL TONIGHT BECAUSE THAT IS AN OPTION, BUT IT'S ONE OF SEVERAL OPTIONS THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED. I DID WANT TO LINGER ON THIS. JUST A MOMENT TO SAY WE DID HAVE AN ONLINE SURVEY AVAILABLE WITH THIS SECTION OF THE CODE. IT WAS AVAILABLE THROUGH THE MONTH OF MARCH JUST CLOSED LAST WEEK. SO WE ARE COMPILING SOME OF THE FEEDBACK THAT WE'VE RECEIVED FROM THAT. S SO THAT WE'LL HAVE THAT INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO YOU ALL AND TO HELP INFORM ASANA THURSTON CHANGES THAT WE MIGHT NEED TO INCORPORATE BASED ON THOSE COMMENTS, SO WE DID HAVE AH DRAT THE DRAFT IN THE SURVEY AVAILABLE THROUGH THE MONTH OF MARCH ON D, HOPEFULLY WE WE'VE GARNERED SOME GOOD FEEDBACK FROM THAT. COME ON, GUY KIND OF STOLE MY OWN THUNDER ON THIS NEXT TIME, WHICH IS PUBLIC OUTREACH TODAY, WHICH IS THAT SURVEY? WE'VE DONE A LOT OF SMALL GROUP SESSIONS OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS INTERNALLY AND WITH THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY. ANY TIME WE HAVE A DRAFT AVAILABLE IS PART OF THIS INITIATIVE. WE'RE TAKING THAT DRAFT FORMALLY TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO YOU ALL CITY COUNCIL INTO OUR MCKINNEY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ROUTING IT THROUGH THEM FOR FEEDBACK AND COMMENTS. IT IS. THESE DRAFTS ARE ALSO ALL ALWAYS PUBLISHED ONLINE. SO THAT ANYBODY CAN ACCESS IT AT ANY POINT IN TIME TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK. ASK QUESTIONS. JUST LEARN WHAT'S GOING ON. WE DO ANTICIPATE RAMPING UP SOME OF THOSE EFFORTS AS WE RAMP UP. INTO THE HEART OF THIS CODE OVERHAUL, WHICH IS REALLY GETTING INTO THE ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES WHAT'S THE TRANSITION STRATEGY TO THE NEW CODE? WHAT DOES THAT FINAL NEW CODE LOOK LIKE? WE KNOW THAT THOSE OUTREACH EFFORTS WILL NEED TO RAMP UP TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE REALIZE. HOPEFULLY GETTING CLOSE TO THE END AND STARTING TO LOOK AT A NEW CONSOLIDATED CODE FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AND WITH THAT, I'M GONNA TURN IT OVER TO MATT GLOBAL. HE'S GONNA TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE NEW LINEUP OF ZONING DISTRICT'S THAT ARE CONSIDERED WITH THE NEW CODE. ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GOT FROM THAT AND THEN I'LL POP BACK UP HERE IN A FEW MINUTES. ALL RIGHT. THANKS JENNIFER.GOOD TO SEE YOU ALL AGAIN IN PERSON. LET HER BE HERE. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY, SO I WANT TO JUMP IN AND NOW START TALKING ABOUT THE SUBSTANCE OF THIS MODULE, WHICH IS IN A LOT OF WAYS THE HEART OF HIS OWN ACCORDANCE. WHEN PEOPLE THINK ABOUT ZONING THEY THINK ABOUT THE DISTRICT'S THAT THE CITY IS DIVIDED INTO. AND THE STARTING POINT IS WHAT JENNIFER TALKED ABOUT. FIRST OF ALL, IT'S Y'ALL'S PLAN. IT'S THE ONE MCKINNEY PLAN THAT IDENTIFIED I THINK 14 DIFFERENT PLACE TYPES FOR MCKINNEY. YOU KNOW, THERE'S TOWN CENTER, THIS COLIN SINTERKLAAS CROSSING. AND IT'S VERY THOUGHTFUL, KIND OF ABOUT THE APPROPRIATE USES FOR THOSE DIFFERENT PLACES AND WHAT THEY SHOULD LOOK LIKE, GENERALLY SO ONE OF OUR KEY CHARGES FROM YOU WAS TO LOOK AT THAT PLAN AND HOLD IT UP AGAINST THE ZONING DISTRICT AND SAY, DO YOU ALL HAVE THE APPROPRIATE ZONING TOOLS TO MATCH THOSE THINGS UP? SO THAT'S REALLY WHERE WE STARTED WITH THE PLAN. AND AS WE CREATED THE NEW DRAFT ZONING DISTRICT LINE UP FOR YOU TO LOOK AT, WE REALLY FOCUSED FIRST OF ALL ON CREATING PURPOSE STATEMENTS EARLIER ZONE DISTRICT'S AND JUST TYING THOSE PURPOSES BACK TO THE INDIVIDUAL'S OWN DISTRICT'S.
YOU'VE GOT A LINKAGE BETWEEN THE PLAN AND THE CODE. THAT'S THAT'S RIGHT THERE IN THIS IN
[00:10:02]
THOSE. PRESSURE COMING HERE AS IT WE'RE ADDING A COUNSELOR. HE HEARD YOU WERE HERE AND WANTED TO CALL IN. NO, WE'RE GOOD. APPRECIATE THAT. ALL RIGHT, UM. JUST BRIEFLY. THERE'S A SCREENSHOT AN EXCERPT ON THIS SLIDE OF THE C ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND YOU CAN SEE AT THE END OF THAT INTENSE STATEMENT. THIS DISTRICT IS GENERALLY APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE FOLLOWING PLACE TYPES IN THE ONE MCKINNEY PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL IN HISTORIC TOWN CENTER. SO WE ACTUALLY JUST HAVE SOME CLEAR DIRECT TEXT LINKAGES NOW BETWEEN YOUR PLANET, YOUR COAT, WHICH CAN HELP IN THE FUTURE. AS YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT WHERE THOSE DISTRICTS MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE. THIS EXCERPT ALSO SHOWS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW WE HAVE A TABLE OF THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS THAT APPLIED TO ALL THE DIFFERENT ZONE DISTRICT'S, AND THEN WE'RE GONNA HAVE LINKS TO OTHER KEY STANDARDS IN THE ORDINANCE. SO MAYBE YOU JUST JUMP OVER THE PARKING STANDARDS JUMP OVER THE LANDSCAPING STANDARDS. THERE'S GONNA BE A LOT OF HYPERLINKS IN HERE THAT MAKING IT MUCH EASIER DOCUMENT TO USE. I THINK THIS SLIDE HERE GIVES YOU A GOOD ILLUSTRATION OF HOW IT'S MORE USER FRIENDLY ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE SLIDE, YOU CAN SEE A SCREENSHOT FROM YOUR CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE. AND IT'S PRETTY LEGALISTIC. YOU KNOW, IT'S PRETTY TEXT HEAVY, NOT MANY ILLUSTRATIONS, LOT OF LEGAL REFERENCES TO ADOPTION DATES. THERE'S A LOT OF FLIPPING THAT'S REQUIRED AND YOUR CURRENT ORDINANCE TO FIGURE OUT REALLY WHAT'S REQUIRED. WHEN WE INTERVIEWED PEOPLE THAT USE THE CODE. THAT'S ONE OF THE KEY THINGS THAT WE HEARD. IT'S JUST THE DOCUMENT IS CHALLENGING TO USE AND FIGURE OUT. ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE SLIDE IS A PAGE FROM THE CURRENT DRAFT OF THE NEW CODE. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE OF ONE DISTRICT WHERE YOU'VE GOT A ONE STOP SHOP FOR THIS PROPOSED ARE 12 DISTRICT. WHERE YOU GOT THE INTENSE STATEMENT. YOU'VE GOT THE CLEAR STANDARDS FOR THOSE DISTRICT'S OUTLINED. YOU'VE GOT QI STANDARDS THAT ARE CROSS REFERENCED. YOU'VE GOT A GRAPHIC THAT SHOWS GENERALLY WHAT THE DEVELOPMENT STYLE WILL LOOK LIKE IN THAT DISTRICT. SO YOU'RE GONNA HAVE ONE OF THESE FOR EACH OF THE EACH OF THE NEW DISTRICT? YOU'VE SEEN THAT IN YOUR YOUR PACKET, AND IN THE PLACES THAT WE WORKED IN THE PAST, THIS TYPE OF FORMAT CAN REALLY BE HELPFUL. YOU CAN ACTUALLY JUST XEROX THIS PAGE AND JUST PUT IT ON ONLINE. IT'S PART OF AN F A Q AND A. IT'S A REALLY HELPFUL ONE STOP SHOP FOR THAT DISTRICT. YOU'RE ALSO GONNA HAVE TOOLS LIKE THIS ON THIS SLIDE THAT SHOW YOU ALL THE DISTRICT STANDARDS AT ONCE IN ONE PLACE. SO THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE CURRENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT STANDARDS COMPARED. IN ONE GRAPHIC, AND IF I WANTED TO INVEST IN MCKINNEY AND I'M LOOKING TO JUST UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT DISTRICT'S I'VE GOT AN OPPORTUNITY HERE TO REALLY COMPARE AT A GLANCE ALL THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS YOU'LL SEE A SIMILAR TABLE FOR USES LATER ON IN THE PRESENTATION FROM JENNIFER, BUT THIS IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS COMPARED. NOW THERE'S A FEW THINGS TO EMPHASIZE ON THIS SLIDE AS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE LINEUP OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE REMOVED FROM THE CODE THAT WE DIDN'T THINK WAS NECESSARY IS. MAXIMUM DENSITY STANDARDS AND YOU'RE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT'S ALL THE OTHER STANDARDS. GENERAL AIR STAYING THE SAME, BUT YOU'RE NOT BASED ON WHAT WE HEARD TALKING WITH STAFF. YOU'RE NOT USING THAT DENSITY STANDARD IN THE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT HAS A REALLY EFFECTIVE TOOL JUST WASN'T NECESSARY.YOU'VE GOT OTHER TOOLS IN PLACE TO CONTROL. SCALE ON THE LOOK OF THAT DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE DONE SOME UPDATING OF THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND SOME UPDATING OF THE NAMES OF THE DISTRICT'S JUST TO CREATE A MORE CLEAR LINEAR SPECTRUM THAT ILLUSTRATES THE DIFFERENT INTENSITIES OF THE DISTRICT. NOW THE NUMBER OF THE MINIMUM LOT AREA IS IN THE DISTRICT APPROPRIATION. SO ARE 12 IS 12,000 SQUARE FROM MINIMUM LOT, ETCETERA. UM. WE HAVE DONE A LITTLE BIT OF JUST RATIONALIZING IN THE MINIMUM LOT AREAS TO CREATE A MORE EVEN SEPARATION THAN WHAT YOU HAD IN YOUR CURRENT CODE PRETTY PRETTY MODEST CHANGES. THERE ARE SOME NEW DISTRICT'S THAT AIR INTRODUCED IN THE LINEUP. PARTLY THAT'S ALSO JUST TO CREATE A FULLY FLESHED OUT STALE RESPECT FROM OF DISTRICT'S THAT GIVE YOU THE FULL RANGE OF OPTIONS. SO ARE 21 IS AN EXAMPLE OF A NEW DISTRICT. THAT IS INTENDED FOR MORE LARGE LOT, HALF ACRE SITES. IT KIND OF FILLS THE GAP BETWEEN THOSE MINIMUM ONE ACRE SITES AND THEN THE MINIMUMS ACRES THAT ARE SMALLER. HALF ACRE. ARE YOU AND YOU TH OR PROPOSED NEW DISTRICT'S THEIR INTENDED FORM OR MORE DENSE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING FORMS. YOU KNOW, TOWN HOMES, THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THOSE ARE GOING TO BE PART OF THAT DISCUSSION THAT JENNIFER MENTIONED LATER ON WHEN YOU'LL COME BACK AND HAVE A FOCUS DISCUSSION ON MULTI FAMILY ON THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT'S GENERALLY THE LINEUP HAS BEEN CLEANED UP FROM AN ADMINISTRATION STANDPOINT, IT'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT EASIER TO ADMINISTER, NOT A LOT OF MAJOR CHANGES HERE. THIS IS THE NON RESIDENTIAL TABLE ON THIS SLIDE, AND GENERALLY I WOULD I
[00:15:01]
WOULD MAKE THE SAME COMMENT GENERALLY STAYING THE SAME. ONE OF THE STANDARDS THAT WE HEARD WAS NOT BEING USED MUCH IN THE CURRENT CODE WAS THE. MAXIMUM WHAT COVERAGE STANDARDS ON THE NON RESIDENTIAL AND SO THAT'S NOT BEING CARRIED FORWARD. YOU'RE GONNA HAVE OTHER STANDARDS IN THE CODE. THAT EFFECT LOT COVERAGE ON THE SITE, YOU KNOW. MAYBE IT'S REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. MAYBE IT'S REQUIRED PARKING, BUT YOU'VE GOT OTHER TOOLS THAT GET IT. THOSE LIVE COVERAGE ISSUES. UH STANDARDS SET BACK IS NOW IN PLACE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. SO ALL THESE DISTRICT'S BASICALLY IF YOU'RE GONNA HAVE NEW DEVELOPMENT COMING IN, AND IT'S IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL, THERE'S A STANDARD SET BACK.THAT MIGHT BE ADDITIONAL TO THE BASE SETBACK THAT'S IN THESE DRAFTS. I WOULD KIND OF PUT I WOULD PARK THAT IN THE FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED COLUMN BECAUSE I THINK WHEN WE COME BACK FOR THAT THIRD MODULE IN THE CODE, ONE OF THE CONCEPTS THAT WILL EXPLORE IN SOME MORE DETAIL IS RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY. AND WHAT IS YOUR TOOLBOX FOR NON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHEN IT COMES IN ADJACENT TO NEIGHBORHOODS, ONE OF THE TOOLS YOU HAVEN'T ZONING CODE TO PROTECT NEIGHBORHOODS, SO WE'RE GONNA BE TALKING MORE ABOUT THAT IN THE THIRD MODULE, BUT THIS IS A FIRST CUT AT THAT ADJACENCY ISSUE. FLOOR AREA RATIO AGAIN. I WOULD PUT THAT IN THAT CATEGORY OF A TOOL THAT YOU'VE GOT NOW IN YOUR CODE THAT YOU HAVEN'T BEEN MRS EARLY, NEEDING OR USING, AND SO THAT'S JUST NOT PROPOSED TO BE CARRIED FORWARD. VERY MINOR POINT. YOU'VE GOT A ONE NON RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT GOVERNMENT COMPLEX DISTRICT THAT'S BEING ELIMINATED. IT'S BEING REPLACED BY A PARTICULAR USE TYPE FOR CITY FACILITIES, AND THOSE COULD BE USED IN DIFFERENT DISTRICT'S IN THE CITY. SO RANGE OF CHANGES THERE. I YOU KNOW, WAY DO WORK ON A LOT OF CODES AROUND TEXAS AND AROUND THE COUNTRY, UH, THESE AIR VERY MUCH IN THE CATEGORY OF HOUSEKEEPING. I WOULD SAY THESE ARE THESE ARE PRETTY MODEST. IN THE SCHEME OF THINGS. I THINK THERE HAS BEEN A GOOD, THOROUGH LOOK TO ENSURE THAT YOU'VE GOT THE FULL RANGE OF TOOLS YOU NEED. IMPLEMENT YOUR PLAN, BUT NO MAJOR CHANGES HERE. WE WILL COME BACK LATER IN THE PRESENTATION, THOUGH, AND HAD THAT CONVERSATION ABOUT TRANSITION, JENNIFER MENTIONED. OVERLY DISTRICT'S THESE AIR IMPORTANT THESE THIEVES.
THEY'RE ON TOP OF THE BASE DISTRICT'S THAT YOU HAVE. THE THREE DISTRICTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SLIDE OR PROPOSED TO BE CARRIED FORWARD. THE HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT IS COMBINING TWO OF THE OVERLAYS THAT YOU'VE GOT NOW THAT ARE VERY SIMILAR IN THEIR STANDARDS. HBO IN THE CHT. STORE PRESERVATION OVERLAY AND COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. QUARTER OF COMMERCIAL AND TRADITIONAL MCKINNON NEIGHBORHOOD OF PROPOSED TO BE CARRIED FORWARD. ORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER. EYES TO PROPOSE IS PROPOSED TO BE A LEGACY DISTRICT AND SO YOU'RE BASICALLY NOT GOING TO ALLOW FUTURE REZONING IS TO THOSE DISTRICT BUT THOSE STANDARDS WILL STAY IN PLACE. THAT'S ALL I HAD MAINLY TO SAY ABOUT THE DISTRICT'S, UM. WE GONNA TALK NOW ABOUT ALL THE USES ALLOWED WITHIN THE DISTRICT, BUT JUST WANT TO PAUSE HERE BRIEFLY AND SEE IF YOU ALL HAD ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT ANYTHING I'VE COVERED SO FAR, KNOWING AGAIN THAT WE ARE GOING TO COME BACK AND HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT TRANSITION TO DISTRICT'S. LATER IN THIS PRESENTATION. GREAT INFORMATION. THANKS. TO SEE THINGS BEING ELIMINATED. ALL RIGHT. SO MATT WALKED THROUGH, SORT OF WHAT WE CALL THE NEW LINEUP OF DISTRICT'S AND ONE THING I WANTED TO UNDERSCORE, PARTICULARLY ON THE RESIDENTIAL LINE UP IS OUR APPROACH. WHEN WE STARTED WORKING ON THIS WITH CLARY ON. FOR RESIDENTIAL LINUS WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAD A GOOD RANGE OF RESIDENTIAL BASE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS THAT FOLKS WHO MAY WANT TO DO SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT MORE NUANCED WORD ALWAYS FORCED INTO A PD TO DO THAT, SO. THAT URBAN TOWN HOME OR THAT URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT THAT SOME SMALLER LOTS I'M RIGHT NOW.
THOSE ARE ACCOMMODATED BY PDS AND WE DO WE HAVE FOUND THAT THERE'S A LOT OF COMMONALITIES BETWEEN THOSE PD'S THAT WE'VE HAD HISTORICALLY FOR THOSE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS. ON DSA FOLDING THOSE NEW FOLDING THOSE THINGS INTO A NEW DISTRICT WITH THIS CODE, WE FELT WOULD REALLY HELP ELIMINATE THAT NEED FOR A P D. WE HAVE A BASE STANDARD. IT MAKES A LITTLE BIT EASIER FOR FOLKS TO BE ABLE TO COME IN AND SAY OK. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS THAT I'M LOOKING TO DO. I CAN. IT COULD BE ACCOMMODATED WITH YOUR STANDARD CODE. SO NOW WE'RE GONNA TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE LAND USES THAT ARE WITHIN EACH ONE OF THOSE ZONING DISTRICTS. AND I WILL TELL YOU UP FRONT. WE DON'T HAVE EIGHT HOURS DURING WORK SESSION TODAY TO GO THROUGH EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE USES IN OUR SCHEDULE OF USES, BUT THEY ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET FOR REVIEW AGAIN. THEY'RE AVAILABLE ON LINE, ONE OF THE REASONS THAT WERE BEING THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS NOW IS BECAUSE WE'RE STILL YOU KNOW, 6 TO 8 MONTHS AWAY FROM CONSIDERATION OF CODE ADOPTION. AND SO HAVING THAT AVAILABLE TO THE MASSES NOW GIVES PLENTY OF TIME FOR FOLKS TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT IT YOURSELVES INCLUDED. YOU MAY HAVE AH, RANDOM SUNDAY AFTERNOON WHERE YOU START FLIPPING THROUGH IT. YOU REALIZE YOU'VE GOT A QUESTION AND WE'RE HAPPY TO HELP WALK THROUGH THAT. ON BRAKE ADJUSTMENTS AS WE NEED TO. BUT
[00:20:05]
FOR TODAY, WHAT I REALLY WANTED TO DO WAS HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE STAYING THE SAME WITH THE SCHEDULE OF USES SOME OF THE NEW THINGS THAT WE ARE PROPOSING WITH A SCHEDULE OF USES, AND A COUPLE OF THOSE HIGHLIGHTED. USES ON THAT CHART THAT MAY BE OF INTEREST TO YOU ALL BUT THE DETAILS THE MINUTIA OF THE 100, SOME ODD USES THAT ARE ON THEIR AVAILABLE TO YOU ONLINE AND IN YOUR PACKET. S O. THOSE OF US THAT ARE LIVING AND BREATHING IN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE TODAY, WE KNOW AND LOVE THAT SCHEDULE THAT YOU SEE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF YOUR SCREEN WITH THE RED AND GRAY ON IT. THAT IS WHAT OUR CURRENT SCHEDULE ABUSES LOOKS LIKE. IT IS ABOUT 5.5 PAGES OF CHART THAT HAS LETTERS LIKE P AND TEA ON BLANKS AND S IS ON THEM. AND THAT IS WHAT WE LOOK AT. WHEN WE TRIED TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER OR NOT A PROPOSED USES ACTUALLY PERMITTED WITHIN A GIVEN ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF USES LOOKS VERY SIMILAR. BUT THERE ARE A COUPLE OF KEY CHANGES THAT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE WALKED THROUGH FIRST IN TERMS OF FUNCTIONALITY AND THEN SECOND IN TERMS OF WHAT THAT MEANS FOR ALLOWANCES, SO. WITH THE PROPOSED CODE, THE NEW SCHEDULE OF USES. IT INCLUDES SORT OF THIS KEY ON THE TOP LEFT, YOU'LL STILL SEE SOME OF THOSE SAME LETTERS ON THE SCHEDULE OF USES. HE MEANS IT'S A PERMITTED USE AND ASKED MEANS IT'S AN S U PIERRE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ALL THINGS THAT WERE USED TO SEEING THERE IS A NEW LETTER ON OUR SCHEDULE ABUSES, WHICH IS A C AND THAT IS PERMITTED BY CRITERIA. ON DAT IS SOMETHING WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT HERE IN A FEW MORE SLIDES, BUT OTHERWISE THE FORM AND FUNCTION OF THAT SCHEDULE OF USES REMAINS PREDOMINANTLY THE SAME. BECAUSE WE ARE IN MORE OF A DIGITAL AGE TODAY ARE ZONING ORDINANCES BEING DESIGNED NOW SO THAT THERE ARE HYPERLINKS WITHIN THE CODE WHEN YOU ACCESS IT ONLINE SO THAT YOU CAN AUTOMATICALLY BE SENT TO THE SECTION THAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR SO WHAT YOU'LL SEE UNDER THAT USE DEFINITION. YOU SEE THAT? 2.3 POINT THREE POINT C. 1123 THOSE WILL BE HYPERLINKED THAT TAKE A USER DIRECTLY TO THE DEFINITION OF THAT USE ON THE START. LEAVE IT OR NOT, WITH OUR CURRENT SCHEDULE OF USES NOT EVER USE ON THEIR HAS A DEFINITION, AND THAT COULD BE CHALLENGING FOR US AS A STAFF BECAUSE A LOT OF TIMES IF THERE IS NO DEFINITION, AND WE HAVE SOMETHING THAT COMES IN THAT. MAY FIT, BUT MAY NOT. WE'RE HAVING TO MAKE JUDGMENT CALLS QUITE A BIT OF TIME. AND SO WE FELT IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT WITH THIS NEW CODE THAT WE HAD A DEFINITION FOR EVERYTHING THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THAT SCHEDULE AND THAT IS PROPOSED HERE TODAY. THERE'S A NICE, EASY LINK FOR FOLKS TO BE ABLE TODT EXACTLY WHAT THAT IS. SOME OF THE BROADER CATEGORIES OF CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULE OF USE USES ARE SHOWN HERE. FIRST AND FOREMOST, WE TRIED TO CONSOLIDATE USED TYPES THAT WERE VERY NUANCED. IN OUR EXISTING CODE, THINGS LIKE A FLORIST OR HARDWARE STORE ARE CALLED OUT SPECIFICALLY ON THAT SCHEDULE. HOWEVER THEY'RE JUST REALLY A RETAIL, A GENERAL RETAIL SERVICE AND SO TRYING TO GET RID OF SOME OF THOSE MORE NUANCED USES SO THAT THEY CAN FUNNEL CLEARLY UNDER A RETAIL CATEGORY. NUMBER ONE. IT SHORTENS THE NEED FOR A LONG LIST OF SCHEDULE OF USES, BUT IT ALLOWS A LITTLE BIT MORE LATITUDE ON WHAT ACTUALLY GOES UNDERNEATH THAT RETAIL CATEGORY WITHOUT HAVING TO BE A FLORIST OR PAINT SHOP OR HARDWARE STORE. SAME THING FOR THINGS LIKE A BARBER OR A DRY, CLEANER BEAUTY SALON. THOSE ARE ALL LISTED SPECIFICALLY RIGHT NOW, HOWEVER, THEY COULD VERY EASILY FALL UNDER WHAT WE CONSIDER PERSONAL SERVICE AND SO SOME OF THE CATEGORIES OF CHANGES YOU'LL SEE. FALL UNDER THAT CONSOLIDATION, UMBRELLA. WE'VE ALSO TRIED TO ELIMINATE ARCHAIC USES SO THINGS LIKE SERVANTS QUARTERS MY MCGRATH SHOP. FROZEN FOOD LOCKERS, HALFWAY HOUSES. NO LONGER REALLY A PREVALENT LAND USE IN TODAY'S MARKET, SO OPTING TO REMOVE THOSE FROM THE SCHEDULE AND INTEGRATE SOME OF THESE NEWER USES THAT WE'VE SEEN A DATA CENTER. FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN OUR EXISTING CODE WAS. CREATED DATA CENTERS WERE NOT A THING AND THEY ARE VERY PREVALENT NOW AND SO MAKING SURE THAT THOSE DATA CENTERS WERE INCLUDED IN THAT SCHEDULE WE THOUGHT WAS IMPORTANT THINGS LIKE GHOST KITCHENS, MICROBREWERIES. YES, SIR. YES, SIR. YES. SO THE GHOST KITCHEN IS WHAT WE COULD WOULD CLASSIFY AS A RESTAURANT THAT IS CARRY OUT AND DELIVERY ONLY. SO YOU ARE IN A SPACE WHERE YOU ARE PRODUCING FOOD THAT IS ONLY BEING IT'S NOT ABLE TO BE EATEN ON SITE. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE, UM. BUSINESS TO BUSINESS. IT IS BUSINESS DIRECT TO A CONSUMER SO I COULD GO. I COULD GO IN MY OWN PERSONAL CAR. PICK UP FOOD ON CARRY IT OUT, OR SOMEBODY COULD HAVE THEIR OWN DELIVERY SERVICE. WHOEVER EATS DOOR DASH, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO GO GET THE FOOD FROM THAT GHOST KITCHEN AND DELIVER IT TO YOU AT HOME. DOES MAKE US FEEL OLD. WHEN YOU PRONOUNCE MANY A GRAPH IS MY MCGRATH. I'M JUST SAYING,[00:25:01]
I'M JUST SORRY, E GUESS THAT ALMOST PROVED MY POINT THAT WE JUST DON'T SEE IT. WE DON'T SEE IT THESE DAYS. ONTO TRYING TO CLEAN THOSE THINGS UP. THERE HAVE DEFINITELY BEEN SOME USES THAT WE'VE SEEN MORE PREVALENT HERE IN RECENT YEARS TO TRYING TO INTEGRATE THOSE SO THAT WE'RE NOT HAVING TO EITHER WRITE A PD TO ALLOW FOR THEM SPECIFICALLY. AND WE'RE ACTUALLY ABLE TO LOOK AT IT MORE HOLISTICALLY. WHAT ZONING DISTRICT THEY MAY OR MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE IN. ON BEN. CATEGORICALLY WE'VE JUST LOOKED AT EVERY SINGLE USE AND EVERY SINGLE ZONING DISTRICT ON DECOMP ARISON TO THAT ONE. MCKINNEY 2040 PLAN IN COMPARISON TO THE EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WE HAVE IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, AND WE'VE ALSO COMPARED THEM TONTO. SOME OF OUR SISTER CITIES AND WHERE THEY ALLOW CERTAIN USES.I WILL TELL YOU. WE SPENT PAINSTAKING AMOUNT OF HOURS GOING THROUGH THIS OVER FIRST OF ABOUT TWO MONTHS, AND IT WAS A TEAM OF 6 TO 8 PEOPLE SPENDING HOURS EACH WEEK. IN A TEAM CALL REVIEWING IT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HIT JUST THE RIGHT NOTES. WE DEFINITELY RECOGNIZE THAT CHANGING WHERE USES ARE ALLOWED IS A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN OUR ZONING CODE, AND WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE VERY INTENTIONAL ON WHERE CHANGES WERE MADE. OUR APPROACH AND LOOKING AT IT WAS. WELL, LET ME BACK UP OUR APPROACH AND LOOKING AT THIS NEW CODE OVERALL IS TO MAKE IT MORE DESIRABLE FOR FOLKS TO WANT TO BE ABLE TO DEVELOP UNDER. WE DO NOT WANT IT TO BE PERCEIVED OR TAKEN AS A DOWN ZONING OR. BACK STEP ON THE ZONING THAT SOMEBODY MIGHT HAVE ON THEIR PROPERTY. WE WANT IT TO BE SEEN AS MORE BENEFICIAL, MORE MODERN ON BOER PERMISSIVE IN AREAS WHERE WE CAN SO THERE MAY BE SOME SMALL AREAS WHERE WE DID THINK SCALING BACK ON HERE. THERE WAS APPROPRIATE. BY AND LARGE OR GOAL WAS TO KEEP WHAT WE HAD IN PLACE AND MAKE IT BETTER AND MORE MODERN. SO THAT WAS THAT WAS HOW WE LOOKED AT THIS YOU SCHEDULE AS WELL. OKAY, SO LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE LETTERS THAT WE SEE ON OUR SCHEDULE OF USES. FIRST ISN'T S. WE'RE ALL VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE S U P SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ON THAT PROCESS. WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO CHANGE THAT PROCESS. THERE ARE DEFINITELY CERTAIN USES THAT MAY BE ACCEPTABLE IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS UNDER A SPECIFIC SET OF CRITERIA, ONE OF THE CHANGES THAT WE ARE PROPOSING WITH S U P IS OBVIOUSLY MODERNIZING THAT DECISION MAKING CRITERIA. WE'RE IN S U P AND THEN ALSO ADDING NUANCED CRITERIA BASED ON A SPECIFIC USE. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, OUR BASE SCP CRITERIA ARE THESE THREE ROMAN NUMERALS THAT YOU SEE. IN FRONT OF YOU. IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USES IS THE MASSING AND FORM COMPATIBLE WITH THE JASON AND EXISTING LIAN YU SAYS ON. TAKING ANY STRIDE THEIR MEASURES TO TRY TO MITIGATE SOME OF THOSE POTENTIAL IMPACTS THE FLOOR FOR ANY STP REQUEST WOULD BE THOSE THREE ROMAN NUMERALS. HOWEVER, FOR EXAMPLE, A GAS STATION THE 4TH 4TH STP EVALUATION CRITERIA MIGHT BE. THE NUMBER OF PUMPS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED AND WHETHER OR NOT IF THEY'RE ASKING FOR 2028 PUMPS VERSUS EIGHT PUMPS. THAT MAY BE A FACTOR THAT WE WANT TO INCLUDE IN THAT DECISION MAKING CRITERIA FOR AN SUV. TRYING TO INCLUDE THOSE NUANCED CRITERIA FOR SOME OF THOSE SPECIFIC USES. SO HERE YOU'LL SEE. THIS IS COMPARABLE TO WHAT WE HAVE IN PLACE TODAY FOR A CAR WASH. ON DAY, SEE TO SEE THREE SCENARIO A KARMA CARWASH SHOULD BE PERMITTED BY RIGHT THOSE ARE OUR HEAVIER INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT'S. BUT IN THAT C ONE, WHICH IS OUR MORE NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE COMMERCIAL, IT COULD BE APPROPRIATE. BUT THAT S U P LAYER IS IN PLACE TO ALLOW SOME ALICIA ADDITIONAL LEVEL OF DISCRETION BASED ON WHERE THAT PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY LOCATED. THE SEAS IS NEW FOR THE NEW CODE. IT'S AGAIN ALLOWED BASED ON CRITERIA AND THIS IS NOT IF I COULD GO BACK REAL QUICK ON THE S U P. HAS COME BEFORE YOU ALL IS THE COUNCIL. IT IS A DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL. IT IS SEEN AS A ZONING EVENT WHEN THOSE S UPS ARE CONSIDERED. THIS SEA IS NOT WOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE A DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL, IT WOULD NOT NEED TO GO THROUGH A PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. IT IS IF THESE MINIMUM CRITERIA ARE MET FOR THIS PARTICULAR USE, IT WOULD BE ALLOWED BY RIGHT. AND WHAT THAT DOES IS IT ALLOWS THE CITY AND CITY STAFF IN PARTICULAR TO ENSURE THAT A MINIMUM STANDARD HAS MET FOR A SPECIFIC USE. THAT MAKES IT. OKAY TO DEVELOP IN A CERTAIN LOCATION, AND THAT'S WHAT THAT C REALLY IS INTENDED TO CAPTURE ITS THAT MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN YOUR PERMITTED BY RIGHT JUST MEET OUR STANDARDS VERSUS YOU NEED IN SCP, WHICH REQUIRES.
PUBLIC HEARING AND A PUBLIC PROCESS. THIS SEA IS THAT SORT OF SWEET SPOT IN THE MIDDLE THAT SAYS, SO LONG AS THESE CERTAIN THINGS ARE MET THIS YOU SHOULD ALMOST ALWAYS BE OKAY.
AND WE'RE WILLING TO ALLOW THAT WITH THAT CRITERIA BEING MET ON THE EXAMPLE THAT WE HAVE HERE FOR A DAY CARE CENTER. YOU CAN SEE THE ROMAN NUMERALS SEE CATEGORY AS LONG AS IT'S.
[00:30:02]
NOT LOCATED WITHIN 300 FT OF A GAS PUMP. IT'S PERMITTED IN THAT C THREE AND INDUSTRIAL USES. THEY SHOULD BE PERMITTED AS LONG AS THEY'RE IN CONCERT OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN OFFICE BUILDING. AND SO FOR US IS A STAFF WERE ABLE TO SAY, LOOK, THEY MEET THESE THRESHOLDS. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE YOUR USES PERMITTED AND YOU CAN MOVE ON TO YOUR SITE PLANNING PROCESS WITHOUT THE NEED TO GO THROUGH A PUBLIC HEARING. FOR DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL. THEY'RE GOING TO BE SOME LOCATIONS THAT HAVE AN S U P REQUIREMENT THAT ALSO HAVE THAT SEE REQUIREMENT AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS YOU WOULD STILL HAVE THAT DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL FOR THE S U P. WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE COMPARING HOW WELL THAT S U P MEETS THE CONDITIONS THAT WE WOULD OTHERWISE REQUIRED FOR THAT PARTICULAR USE. SO THE EXAMPLE THAT YOU SEE IN FRONT OF YOU IS THAT INDOOR GUN RANGE? THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S BECOME MUCH MORE RECREATIONAL IN MODERN DAY. ON BUT IN OUR CURRENT CODE, INDOOR GUN RANGES ARE ONLY PERMITTED AN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS AND WE'VE SEEN IN MCKINNEY AND ANOTHER PLACES WHERE THERE ARE CERTAIN HIGHER INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT'S WERE UNENDURABLE IN RANGE WHEN TREATED PROPERLY. IS VERY MUCH APPROPRIATE. AND THAT'S WHERE THIS S U P AND THAT C BUNDLE REALLY COME INTO PLAY. IT ALLOWS US TO ENSURE THAT THE MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR ANY INDOOR GUN RANGE NO MATTER WHAT DISTRICT URINE IS MAINTAINED. STILL ADD THAT LAYER OF DISCRETIONARY CONSIDERATION FOR THE COUNCIL VIA NSTP PROCESS AND CERTAIN LOCATIONS. SO WHAT YOU'LL SEE UP HERE IS A STAFF SHOT OF THOSE. THEY USED THOSE USE PERMISSIONS SO. INDOOR GUN RANGE IN OUR HIGHEST INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND IN OUR INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WOULD STILL BE PERMITTED BY RIGHT IN A C TWO, WHICH IS OUR LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. AND AGAIN I SEE TWO IS TYPICALLY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TWO ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. WHERE THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED. IF THERE IS A. CRITERIA THAT'S MET FOR THAT PARTICULAR USE, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT CRITERIA HERE. IT CAN'T BE WITHIN 500 FT OF A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SO AS LONG AS THAT SEA TO DISTRICT IS NOT WITHIN 500 FT OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT THEY WOULD BE PERMITTED BY RIGHT. DATA CENTER. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE OF ONE OF THOSE NEWER USES. YOU CAN SEE THE CLEANUP OR THE INTEGRATION OF THAT DEFINITION FOR THAT LAND USE IN PARTICULAR ON D BECAUSE THIS IS A NEW USE. THERE ARE NO ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WE HAVE ON THE BOOKS RIGHT NOW THAT ALLOW FOR THOSE PERMISSIONS THAT WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING. FOR THE NEW CODE IS HERE ON THE SCREEN. A DATA CENTER COULD VERY MUCH BE APPROPRIATE IN A HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BY S U P. AND THEN OBVIOUSLY IN ANY OF OUR OFFICER INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT'S, WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT IT WOULD BE PERMITTED BY RIGHT UM. CATEGORICALLY I FEEL AS THOUGH THE CLEANUP OF DEFINITIONS FOR ALL OF THE LAND USES ARE MUCH MORE MODERNIZED TO TODAY STANDARDS, AND I DO THINK THAT THEY WILL BE A GOOD BENEFIT TO THE CITY WITH THIS NEW CODE. ON DATA CENTER IS AN EXAMPLE OF THAT. IT WAS JUST MISSING FROM OUR CURRENT CODE, SO THE INTEGRATION OF THAT IS SOMETHING WE DEFINITELY SEE IS A FORWARD STEP FOR THE CITY.LIKE JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE. HERE. MICROBREWERY NEW USE NEW DEFINITION NEW DISTRICTS WHERE THEY COULD BE PERMITTED A MICROBREWERY FOR US IN THE EYES OF THE STATE. THERE ARE DEFINITE PERMITS. AND DEFINITIONS THAT A PRIVATE USER WOULD HAVE TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED A MICROBREWERY. AS A CITY. WE HAVE FOUND THAT IT IS REALLY DIFFICULTY TO BE IN CHARGE OF ADMINISTERING OR. QUALIFYING A LAND USE BASED ON SOME SORT OF A STATE PERMITTING REQUIREMENT ON BY A MICRO BREWERY IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF THAT THE PORTION OF SALES ON WHATEVER LIQUOR AND NON LIQUOR LICENSE THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE STATE TO BE CONSIDERED A MICROBREWERY. NOT REALLY OUR BUSINESS, BUT WHAT WE DO CARE ABOUT IS HOW DOES IT DEVELOP? WHAT IS THE SCALE? IS IT APPROPRIATE IS THE IS THE SCOPE OF USES FOR THIS MICROBREWERY IN PARTICULAR, ARE AS A PARTICULAR EXAMPLE. IS IT APPROPRIATE AND GIVEN LAND USE AND THAT IS REALLY WHAT WE WANTED TO TRY AND CAPTURE WITH SOME OF THESE NEW USES. NOT REALLY POINTING TO A STATE DEFINITION OR STATE PERMITTING REQUIREMENT TO DEFINE THOSE LADIES IS PUTTING INTO THINGS THAT IS A COMMUNITY IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. WHAT DO WE CARE ABOUT? MICROBREWERY IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF THAT SCALE AND SCOPE OF THEIR SERVICES ARE WHAT MATTER THE MOST TO US IN TERMS OF IS THIS LAND IS COMPATIBLE IN A PARTICULAR AREA SO YOU CAN SEE HERE A MICROBREWERY CAN'T EXCEED 20,000 SQUARE FEET, AND IT CANNOT. OR IT COULD BE INCREASED IN SIZE IF IT'S AN ASSOCIATION OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT COMPONENT. TALKED ALREADY A LITTLE BIT ABOUT ENHANCED DEFINITIONS. I DON'T WANNA BE THAT DEAD HORSE WITH YOU ALL TODAY, BUT THIS IS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF RESTAURANTS. THIS IDEA OF OUTDOOR DINING IN PATIO DINING AT OUR CURRENT CODE. SOMEWHAT ALLOWS FOR IT, BUT NOT BASED ON WHAT WE SEE IN TODAY'S MARKET. SO CLEANING UP WHAT THOSE
[00:35:03]
DEFINITIONS ARE FOR RESTAURANTS CLEANING UP THE ALLOWANCES FOR THOSE PADDOCK, PATIOS AND OUTDOOR COMPONENTS, WHICH ARE NOT REALLY. WELL INTEGRATED WITHIN OUR CURRENT CODE IS SOMETHING THAT WE LOOKED AT AS WELL. I WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT AUTO RELATED USES ON LEE, BECAUSE I KNOW THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE TALKED A LOT ABOUT WITH THE COUNCIL OVER THE LAST YEAR OR TWO AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE LOOKED AT WITH THIS NEW CODE WAS. NOT ONLY WHERE AUTO RELATED USES MOST APPROPRIATE AND WHAT DISTRICT'S BUT ALSO TRYING TO CLEAN UP THE DEFINITIONS AND USE CATEGORIES THAT WE SEE IN OUR CURRENT CODE. WE HAVE FOUR USES. THAT GET IT. THE FLAVOR OF AUTO RELATED REPAIR OR AUTO RELATED SALES. WE HAVE A SERVICE STATION, A GARAGE, AUTO REPAIR, AUTO PAINTING OR BODY SHOP, AUTOMOBILE REPAIR BOAT SAILS, REPAIR OR STORAGE. AND OVER THE YEARS WE'VE DEFINITELY HAD FOLKS COME IN WHO HAVE POINTED TO ONE AND THEN POINTED TO ANOTHER OR WE'RE LOOKING AT ONE, AND THEN WE REALIZED WE NEED TO LOOK AT ANOTHER AND THE FACT THAT MATTER IS IT BECAME VERY BURDENSOME TO TRY AND BEST CATEGORIZE. SCALES OF AUTO REPAIR AND AUTO USES. S O WITH THE PROPOSED CODE. WE'RE RECOMMENDING TO SIMPLIFY THAT A GREAT DEAL BY CLASSIFYING AUTO REPAIR IN TWO CATEGORIES. MAJOR OR MINOR. AND THEN AUTO SALES, REMOVING THAT WORD REPAIR OUT OF IT, BECAUSE, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WE HAVE HAD FOLKS COME IN WHO WANT TO TRY AND USE THAT AUTO SALES. USED CURRENTLY IN ORDER TO BUILD AN AUTO REPAIR. DEVELOPMENT AND SO THIS IS JUST A NOD TO THAT TO KIND OF HIGHLIGHT THAT CHANGE. WE THINK IT BECOMES A LOT MORE CLEAR IN THE CODE. IT TAKES A LOT OF THE INTERPRETATION THAT AN INTERNAL MEMOS THAT WE'RE HAVING TO DRAFT AND TAKE CARE OF ON THE STAFF SIDE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE BEING CONSISTENT WITH THAT. SO MAJOR MINOR AND THEN CLEANING UP THE DEFINITION FOR AUTO AUTO SALES. AND WHERE YOU CAN SEE ON THE TOP OF THIS SLIDE OR CURRENT CODE. THIS IS JUST A SNAPSHOT OF WHERE THOSE AUTO RELATED USES AIR CURRENTLY PERMITTED ON DWYER. WE'RE PROPOSING THEM AS PART OF THE NEW CODE. LET YOU TAKE THAT END, BUT BY AND LARGE, WE'RE NOT RECOMMENDING TO MAKE MANY CHANGES TO WHERE THEY'RE PROVIDED. WE DO RECOMMEND THAT THEY STILL FOLLOW THAT S U P PROCESS. GIVEN AUTO REPAIR AND AUTO SALES ON BY THE HEAVY OUTDOOR COMPONENTS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH BOTH. WE DID STILL FEEL LIKE THAT S U P PROCESS WAS THE BEST PROCESS TO USE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE IN ANY GIVEN LOCATION. UM I THINK I BELIEVE THIS IS MY LAST FLIGHT ON THE USE CATEGORY ON. THAT IS JUST TO HIGHLIGHT THAT WITHIN OUR CURRENT CODE, WE'VE GOT SOME VERY SPECIAL USES THAT ARE SORT OF SCATTERED THROUGHOUT OUR CODE. SO. BED AND BREAKFAST. DONATION COLLECTION CONTAINER PRIVATE CLUBS, SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES, MOBILE HOME PARKS, OIL AND NATURAL GAS, FOOD, TRUCK OPERATIONS AND FOOD.TRUCK COURTS ON THOSE WERE ALL IN OUR CURRENT CODE UNDER A VERY SPECIAL CHAPTER CHAPTER, 1 38. WE ARE RECOMMENDING WITH THE CODE OVERHAUL THAT SOME OF THE USES THAT AARON CHAPTER 1 38 CURRENTLY GET MIGRATED INTO THE NEW CODE, AND SOME OF THOSE SUPER SPECIAL USES LIKE ESSO BEES AND THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS. REMAIN IN THAT CHAPTER. 1 38. THEY DO DEFINITELY.
SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES. THEY DO DEFINITELY HAVE AN EXTRA LAYER OF GOVERNANCE ON THEM. AND THAT IS WHY CHAPTER 1 38 IS STILL RECOMMENDED. BUT THINGS LIKE PRIVATE CLUBS, DONATION COLLECTION CONTAINERS AND BED AND BREAKFASTS. REALLY IS NOT A WHOLE LOT OF REASON NOT TO MIGRATE THEM INTO THE CURRENT CODE, BECAUSE AS SOMEBODY IS DEVELOPING, THAT'S THE NATURAL PLACE THAT THEY'RE GONNA LOOK. COULD YOU GIVE JUST FOR ANYONE WATCHING? SAMPLE OF A PRIVATE CLUB, SO THEY KNOW. ABSOLUTELY SO. AH PRIVATE CLUB IS, IN ESSENCE, IT Z ALLOWANCES LIKE A BAR, BUT WITHIN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, A PRIVATE CLUB DOES REQUIRE AN S U P AND IT DOES REQUIRE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF YOUR RECEIPT SALES TO BE SPLIT BETWEEN FOOD.
AND YOUR DRINKING ALCOHOL SALES, SO IT ALLOWS A LOT OF PLACES THAT MAY NOT MEET THAT SALES.
THEY MAY NOT BE HEAVIER ON THE FOOD SALES. IT ALLOWS THEM TO OPERATE OUT OF THAT PRIVATE CLUB ESTABLISHMENT. SO. UM, IT'S SORT OF A ROUNDABOUT WAY OF GETTING AT A BAR WITH SOME ADDITIONAL DISCRETION AND PARAMETERS THAT. PUNCH IT INTO THAT PRIVATE CLUB CATEGORY IS THAT REQUIRE SOME TYPE OF MEMBER. YES IF THEY WANT TO DO LIQUOR, IT DEFINITELY DOES. SO I WAS RIGHT. THAT WAS MY LAST SLIDE, SO A LOT OF HIGHLIGHTS ON THE USE SCHEDULE AND I KNOW I TALKED A LOT, AND I APOLOGIZE THAT THIS PRESENTATION IS A BIT LENGTHY, BUT I THINK MATT MENTIONED THIS REALLY IS THE HEART OF THE ZONING CODE ON DIT IS. THE ONE THAT I THINK
[00:40:01]
IMPACTS ON THE CODE THE MOST AND SO WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE GAVE IT ITS DUE TIME IN FRONT OF YOU ALL. BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THE USES AND THE SCHEDULE OF USES.WOULD WELCOME THAT AND ANY DIRECTION CHANGES OR CONCERNS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. JUST A QUICK ONE BACK ON THEM. MICROBREWERY DISTILLERY WINERY CENTURY. NO SURGERY WAS A WORD SO YEAH. LIKE MIMEOGRAPH, BUT I'LL NEVER LIVE THAT DOWN. HEY IT'S A MINDS ARE VERY CLOSE TO MEAN. ANYWAY. UM, I MEAN, THIS IS THE STATE. TODAY'S TIME COULD STEP IN AND. OH I MEAN, JUST IN ESSENCE, THAT'S CORRECT. ALMOST SCRAPPED THIS, BUT I MEAN, WE'RE TRYING. WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE IT FIT US. THAT'S GOING THE ABSENCE OF ANY FURTHER. DELINEATION FROM THE STATE. THAT'S CORRECT. IS THAT A FAIR STATEMENT? THAT'S CORRECT. I THINK THAT'S GREAT.
JUST GOES IN THERE, OKAY? THEN WE AND THEN WE GET. LET'S SAY THAT YOU STEP IN. THEY MAKE SOME DEFINITION. THERE'S JUST ABSOLUTELY COUNTER TO. WHAT WE'VE DONE. IS THAT IMMEDIATELY INVALIDATE THE SECTION OR DO WE HAVE. NO. BECAUSE THE DEFINITION OF A MICROBREW AND I'LL FOCUS A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE MICROBREWERY IF THE STATE STEPPED INTO A PARTICULAR BUSINESS AND SAID YOU WERE NOT MEETING THE QUALIFICATIONS OF YOUR PERMIT TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A MICROBREWERY. WE'RE GONNA PULL YOUR PERMIT. THEY WOULD BE CLOSED BY THE STATE OR THEY WOULD BE IN AND OUT OF OPERATION BY THE STATE. THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ANOTHER MICROBREWERY THAT MEETS THE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE COULDN'T COME IN AND OPERATE THE EXACT SAME WAY. ALSO DOESN'T MEAN THAT A RESTAURANT COULDN'T COME IN AND TAKE THIS SPACE AS WELL. AND THAT'S REALLY IS THE CHALLENGES FOR US TO HANG OUR DEFINITIONS ON THOSE STATE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. REQUIRES US TO GET THAT INFORMATION FROM THE STATE THAT THEY'RE MEETING THOSE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ON DATS. JUST QUITE FRANKLY, NOT E THINK I SAID IT BEFORE. IT'S NOT REALLY THE BUSINESS THAT WE'RE IN, AND IT ADDS A LAYER OF REPORTING THAT ON A LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT. IT'S REALLY NOT AS PROMINENT OF A CONCERN FOR US IS A STAFF. OUR CONCERN IS THE USE BASED ON THE DEFINITION, OR IS IT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DEFINITION THAT WE CONSIDER. IS IT SCALED AND COMPATIBLE WITH YOU USES AND PROPERTIES THAT ARE AROUND IT AND SO LONG AS IT'S OPERATING IN THOSE MANNERS THAT'S REALLY AT THE HEART OF WHAT WE CARE ABOUT FROM ALONE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT. WE HAVE IT. WE HITCHED OUR WAGON TO THEIRS. I MEAN OVERNIGHT, SOMETHING COULD.
AND ARE QUITE HONESTLY THAT'S WHAT WE'VE SEEN, EVEN WITH THE PRIVATE CLUBS. YOU KNOW THE PERCENTAGE AND I'M GONNA MAKE THIS MICHAEL MAKE CHIME IN, BUT THE PERCENTAGE OF SALES AND RECEIPTS FOR A PRIVATE CLUB. USED TO BE 35% AND NOW THEY'RE 50% BUT OUR CODE, SAID 35% SO WE HAVE TO GO BACK IN AND AMEND THE DEFINITION OF OUR CODE TO MATCH THAT AND TOW US. THE PRIVATE CLUB IS A PRIVATE CLUB. REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU'RE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ARE WITH THE STATE. WE'RE NOT EXACTLY SAYING MAKE MY DAY, BUT WE'RE SAYING WE HAVEN'T WE HAVEN'T WAKEN TAKE CARE AROUND, RIGHT? OKAY. THANKS, JEFFREY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS.
DIRECTION CHANGES ON THE PROPOSED USE HIGH WHITE SO WE'RE COVERED. EXACTLY WHAT I THINK I'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR. COUNSEL SO WELL DONE. THANKS IT'S BEEN. I MEAN, IT'S BEEN A LOT OF WORK, BUT IT'S BEEN A LOT OF FUN TO GO THROUGH BECAUSE IT REALLY IT WAS JUST FOR AS A PLANNER. THIS IS WHAT WE ENJOY DOING SO GREAT BETWEEN HAVING TO REALLY DO ALL THIS.
DOING ALL THE STUFF THE OLD WAY. YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TONS OF TIME. OH E CAN CAN'T WAIT FOREVER, UGO BECAUSE YOU'LL HAVE TO BE SO EASY. WE'LL FIND OTHER THINGS. I PROMISE. OKAY JUST CHECKING, E. YOU KNOW ALL KIDDING ASIDE, IT'S TOUGH TO MAINTAIN ENTHUSIASM. EVEN IF IT IS FUN. IT'S TOUGH TO MAINTAIN ENTHUSIASM FOR A MULTI YEAR PROJECT. SO KUDOS TO YOU ALL FOR STILL. HAVING THE SAME ENTHUSIASM A YEAR PLUS INTO IT THAN YOU DID WHEN YOU STARTED.
SO APPRECIATE IT. MAY I MAKE A COMMENT? YES SIR. I JUST HAVE A CONCERN THAT YOU'RE TAKING A LOT OF BURBAGE OUT. AND I THINK THAT'S GREAT. I THINK THE WORK YOU'VE DONE IS GREAT, BUT I SEE A PROBLEM AND IMPLEMENTATION WHEN YOU SWITCH OVER, THERE'S GOING TO BE THOSE CASES THAT SAY, WELL, WAIT A MINUTE. I COULD HAVE DONE THIS. UNDER ALL THIS BURBAGE, AND IT'S NO LONGER THERE, RIGHT? AND I THINK WE'LL SEE THAT. AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT YOU COULD ELIMINATE IT IN ANY WAY, BUT IT'S A CONCERN THAT I SEE HAVING THAT THOSE ISSUES IN THE FUTURE. I THINK THAT IS SUCH A FANTASTIC SEGWAY INTO THE NEXT PART OF OUR PRESENTATION, WHICH IS THE TRANSITION STRATEGY AND EVERYTHING THAT MATT AND I JUST COVERED WAS THIS IS THIS IS THE BLANK SLATE NEW CODE, BUT IT IS ABSENT OF. HOW DOES OUR EXISTING CODE SORT OF CONVERT
[00:45:05]
OR ROLL INTO THESE NEW STANDARDS? AND THEY'RE A COUPLE OF WAYS THAT WE CAN CONSIDER DOING THAT, AND THAT IS. THAT IS THE NEXT PART OF THE DISCUSSION AND HONESTLY, FOR ME, IS A STAFF MEMBER. IT'S THE MOST MEANINGFUL PART BECAUSE IT REALLY WILL SET THE DIRECTION FOR HOW WE MOVE INTO THAT CONSOLIDATED CODE. AND HOW WE MESSAGE THE NEW CODE WITH THE PUBLIC AT LARGE, EH? SO I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO TURN IT BACK OVER TO MATT. HE'S GOING TO TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE OPTIONS THAT WE HAVE TO ADDRESS. YOUR VERY CONCERN. I MEAN, HOW DO WE MARRY AT THE OLD COAT WITH THE NEW ONE? COUNCIL MEMBER. THAT WAS ABOUT THE BEST SEGUE WAY WE COULD HAVE ASKED FOR. SO THANKS FOR THAT POINT, AND YOU'RE GONNA EXPLAIN IT UP PROBABLY WOULD HAVE ASKED SO I. REALLY QUICKLY ON THIS. JUST THIS LAST SLIDE. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THE POINT ON THE USER FRIENDLINESS IN THE ORGANIZATION. I THINK THERE'S A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF VALUE THERE TO THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY TO THE PUBLIC AT LARGE AND. WE'RE GOING TO BE PRESENTING THE CODE DRAFT ALL THIS MATERIAL TO THE M D. C I THINK IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS, AND WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO GETTING THEIR FEEDBACK ON THAT STUFF, AND I THINK IN PARTICULAR THEY'RE THEY'RE REALLY GONNA RESPOND WELL TO JUST THE MANAGEMENT OF THE DOCUMENT. UM WE'RE ONLY. WE'RE ONLY WITH THIS PIECE, THE MCKINNEY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. WE'RE ONLY WITH THIS PIECE OF THE CODE. TWO THIRDS OF THE WAY THERE WITH THE DRAFT. YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT THE GOT THE PROCEDURES WHICH YOU SAW BACK IN THE FALL. WE'VE GOT THE DISTRICT'S IN THE USES HERE. YOU STILL HAVE AN IMPORTANT PIECE OF THE PUZZLE THAT STILL TO COME, WHICH IS GONNA BE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, THE DEVELOPMENT QUALITY STANDARDS THAT GET IT THINGS LIKE PARKING OR LANDSCAPING OR BUILDING DESIGN. TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU CAN STILL DO THAT. SO. THAT MEANS THAT YOU CAN'T REALLY ANSWER A QUESTION AT THIS POINT. WHAT DID THE IMPACTS OF THIS NEW CODE ON MY PROJECT ONE OF THE IMPACTS ON MY PROPERTY? YOU CAN'T ANSWER THAT QUESTION UNTIL WE GET EVERYTHING ON THE TABLE. THAT BEING SAID, WE OFTEN FIND IT'S REALLY HELPFUL AT THIS STAGE OF THE PROJECT.ONCE WE'RE STARTING TO TALK ABOUT DISTRICT'S AND USES TO START TO LOOK AHEAD AND ANSWER THESE LOOK AT THESE IMPLEMENTATION QUESTIONS AND TO SAY, HOW IS THIS GOING TO APPLY? AGAIN. WE CAN'T GIVE A FULL ANSWER WHAT THE CHANGE WILL LOOK LIKE, BUT IT'S BUT WE NEED TO START PLANTING THE SEED FOR WHAT THIS CONVERSATION WILL LOOK LIKE. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THIS BUILT INTO THIS PRESENTATION THIS AFTERNOON. UM. JUST A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY, THAT MANY OF YOU ALL FAMILIAR WITH MAYBE PEOPLE THAT ARE WATCHING ARE NOT, YOU KNOW, MCKINNEY HAS A LOT OF ZONE DISTRICT'S PRIOR TO 2014. THIS WAS THE FULL LINEUP THAT WAS IN PLACE. IN 2014. THERE WAS AN EFFORT AT SIMPLIFYING THE CODE THAT RESULTED IN SOME NEW DISTRICT'S THAT HAS SHOWN AT THE TOP. UM. THAT ULTIMATELY ENDED UP WITH A BIT OF A HYBRID STRUCTURE THAT YOU SEE ILLUSTRATED WITH THE GRAPHIC AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SLIDE THAT YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH IT. Z FROM JENNIFER'S USE TABLE. BUT IT'S GOT THESE THREE DIFFERENT COLORS AND BASICALLY YOU'VE GOT THIS COMBINATION OF OBSOLETE DISTRICT'S LEGACY DISTRICT'S AND CURRENT DISTRICT'S AND THE RED DISTRICTS WERE. I'VE GOT TO ALWAYS REMEMBER THIS, BUT THE RED DISTRICTS WERE THE PRE 2014 WHERE YOU CAN NO LONGER HAVE ANY REZONING IS TO THOSE DISTRICT'S THE GRAY OR THE PRE 2014 WHERE YOU CAN HAVE REZONING IS TO THIS DISTRICT STILL IN THE GREEN WERE THE ONES THAT WERE INTRODUCED IN 2014. BUT FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE COMING IN, WE UNDERSTOOD THE HISTORY. WE UNDERSTOOD THE STORY, BUT IT'S A COMPLEX THING WHICH ENDED UP WITH AND ONE OF THE CHARGES THAT WE WERE GIVEN AT THE START OF THE PROJECT WAS, CAN WE SIMPLIFY THE STRUCTURE OF IT? SO MOVING FORWARD INTO THE DRAFT CODE THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT. WE HAVE INTRODUCED A LINE UP OF DISTRICT'S THAT'S SIMPLER. THAT INTRODUCES SOME DISTRICT CONSOLIDATIONS AND SOME DISTRICT ELIMINATIONS OF THINGS. AND SO THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF THIS IS AN EXCERPT OF WHAT WE CALL A CORRESPONDENCE TABLE. THAT'S IN THE DRAFT MATERIALS THAT YOU HAVE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE.
IT'S HIS CURRENT ZONE DISTRICT'S. THAT'S CURRENT THAT'S WRITTEN IN THE TERMS OF THE DRAFT ZONING CODE, SO THESE WILL BE THE NEW DISTRICTS IN THE NEW CODE. PRIOR ZONE.
DISTRICT'S IS WHAT YOU HAVE ON THE BOOKS NOW. SO THIS IS A CORRESPONDENT STABLE THAT SHOWS WHICH WHAT'S YOUR CURRENT DISTRICT ON THE RIGHT WILL LOOK LIKE IF THESE CHANGES ARE OR ADOPTED IF YOU MOVE INTO THE FULL CODE, AND SO YOU CAN SEE JUST ON THE TOP LINE. YOUR CURRENT SF 12 AND YOUR RS 1 20 VERY SIMILAR AND USES IN A TENT AND ITS STANDARDS WOULD BE CONSOLIDATED INTO THAT ARE 12 SF 10 IS A SIMPLE RENAME. CARTOON, AS IF A FOREST 84 SIMILAR CONSOLIDATION IN THE ORANGE, ETCETERA. NOW THE CONSOLIDATIONS AND THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS UPDATES THAT I TALKED ABOUT EARLIER THAN PRESENTATION THEY WOULD FLOW IN. THEY WOULD BE PART OF THAT NEW DISTRICT. AND THE CONSOLIDATIONS THAT JENNIFER TALKED ABOUT IN THE USE TABLE. THEY WOULD ALSO FLOW IN SO THEY WOULD APPLY TO THOSE NEW
[00:50:01]
DISTRICT AS WELL. THE GENERAL POINT THAT I WANT TO MAKE HERE. THINK WE'VE BOTH MADE THIS SEVERAL TIMES IS THAT THE CHANGES HAVE ALL BEEN IN THE DIRECTION OF MORE FLEXIBILITY, MORE FLEXIBILITY IN TERMS OF DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, MORE FLEXIBILITY IN TERMS OF. USES ALLOWED, AND SO IF I'M SEEING A CHANGE ON MY PROPERTY IN TERMS OF THE NAME THAT'S APPLIED IN THIS DOCUMENT. PROBABLY GETTING MORE. IN THIS NEW CODE. THAT IS A GENERALIZATION. NOW THERE MIGHT BE PARTICULAR INSTANCES WHERE THAT'S NOT TRUE, BUT THE STAFF IN PARTICULAR IS ON A REALLY THOROUGH JOB OF SITTING DOWN AND COMPARING ALL THESE CONSOLIDATIONS AND THEY CONSERVE THAT VERY FEW THINGS WOULD SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS THAT IT'S ALWAYS IN THE DIRECTION OF MORE MORE FLEXIBILITY. MORE CHANGE, AND SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT POINT. RIGHT UP FRONT. THAT WAS THAT WAS A PHILOSOPHICAL GOAL THE WHOLE TIME. WAS THAT THESE CONSOLIDATIONS WERE. WE'RE MOVING IN THAT DIRECTION, SO THERE'S NO GRANDFATHERING OF ANYTHING. IT'S BASICALLY IF THIS IS THE IF THIS IS THE CODE. THIS IS E MEAN WE BASICALLY ARE CHANGING A LITTLE BIT OF THE DEFINITE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS YOU WERE CHANGING THE DEFINITION. PROBABLY GOING TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY WITH THEM THE OTHER CODE, BUT WE'RE NOT GRANDFATHER RING IT, SAYING. YOU CAN HAVE THIS OR THIS. IT'S THIS IS THE NEW ONE. THAT IS A POTENTIAL OPTION THAT ALL LAYOUT ON THIS SLIDE, SO BUT I'M NOT QUITE THERE YET. SO IF. WHAT I'VE PROPOSED ON THIS SLIDE. IS THIS THIS TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE THAT'S LINING UP WITH THIS OPTION ONE HERE. SO WHAT I WANT TO LAY OUT AND THIS SLIDE HERE IS JUST A COUPLE OF OPTIONS OF KIND OF. ASSERTIVENESS TO THINK ABOUT AS WE MOVE FORWARD, THE FIRST OPTION THAT I'LL TALK ABOUT IS JUST A TEXT AMENDMENT. THE NEXT OPTION IS A LITTLE BIT MORE AGGRESSIVE AND WE ACTUALLY GO IN AND LOOK AT THE ZONING MAP AND CHANGE SOME OF THE SOME OF THE DESIGNATIONS ON THAT. IF WE GET THERE, THEN WE'LL START TALKING ABOUT OPPORTUNITIES FOR GRANDFATHER RING, SO I'M GONNA GET TO THAT IN A COUPLE OF SLIDES FOR CUT, BUT I'LL JUST I'LL JUST KIND OF LAY OUT THE STORY FIRST TO GET THERE. UM. THESE AIR THE STRATEGIES THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT COLLECTIVELY AS A TEAM TO MOVE KIND OF FROM POINT A TO POINT B FROM FOR YOUR CURRENT ORDNANCE TOWARD THERE NOW. OPTION ONE IS THE TEXT AMENDMENT. SO THAT INCLUDES ADOPTING THAT THE NEW CODE WITH THAT TABLE OF DISTRICT CORRESPONDENTS THAT I TALKED ABOUT, SO THE PREVIOUS DISTRICT'S REMAIN ON THE ZONING MAP. THEY WOULD BE ALIGNED TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF THE NEW DISTRICT IN THE CODE. YOU WOULD HAVE THAT TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE. SO. BASICALLY IF I'LL GO BACK TO THE SLIDE. ZONING MAP IS GOING TO KEEP THOSE NAMES THAT ARE ON THE RIGHT. IF I WANT TO KNOW WHAT MY STANDARDS ARE THAT APPLY TO MY PROPERTY. I'LL LOOK AT THIS TABLE. AND SO IF I'M ZONED SF EIGHT ON THE ZONING MAP, ALL LOOK AT THIS TABLE AND THE STANDARDS OF OUR AIN'T WOULD APPLY. SO THAT'S THE INTENT OF THIS FIRST OPTION. AND THE PURPOSE BEHIND THAT OPTION. IS THAT THE MAPS NOT CHANGING. THE MAP IS NOT CHANGING. THERE'S NOT A REZONING. WE'RE NOT RESENTING. WE'RE JUST WE'RE CHANGING THE DEFINITIONS OF THE STANDARDS AND THE WHOLE KIND OF COLLECTION OF STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO THOSE NAMES. DOES THAT HELP YOU JUST MEAN HISTORY OF WHAT WAS. WHAT DID IT USED TO BE, INSTEAD OF ACTUALLY GOING TO CHANGING HIS OWN HERE? REASONS. I THINK THE REASONS ARE PRIMARILY TO AVOID HAVING TO GO THROUGH THE LOGISTICS OF A CITYWIDE MAP. UPDATE. WHICH IS OPTION TWO. OPTION TWO IS SO WE HAVE THAT WE HAVE THE CODE. WE HAVE THE ZONING MAP, AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO JUST KIND OF THINK ABOUT THOSE IS TO SEPARATE THINGS THAT ULTIMATELY WOULD NEED TO BE CHANGED INDEPENDENTLY, AND THEY WOULD REQUIRE TWO SEPARATE VOTES. AND SO OPTION ONE IS BASICALLY JUST VOTING. TO ADOPT. JUST JUST UPDATING THE DOCUMENT ITSELF.BUT THE MAPS STAYS THE SAME, AND WE HAVE KIND OF THIS CONVERSION TABLE THAT HELPS DRAW THAT LINKAGE. OPTION TWO IS LET'S GO AHEAD AND UPDATE THE MAP AT THE SAME TIME. AND THAT IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE HIM LINE UP EVEN MORE. THAT'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE ALL THOSE NAMES THAT YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT ON THE MAP ACTUALLY LINE UP WITH THE NAMES THAT YOU SEE ON THE LEFT. NOW. WE I THINK AS A COLLECTIVELY AS A TEAM UNDERSTAND THAT'S A BIG EXERCISE THAT REALLY INVOLVES A LOT OF EDUCATION AND DIALOGUE WITH THE PUBLIC TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY UNDERSTAND. EXACTLY WHAT'S INVOLVED WITH THAT. AND, UM FROM A. ADMINISTRATION POINT OF VIEW, IT'S CLEANER, YOU KNOW, DEFINITELY. IT ENDS UP WITH A CODE AND A MAP THAT ARE ALIGNED MORE. YOU DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF DECODER RING. I CALL IT WHICH IS THE WHICH IS THE TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE. BUT BUT YOU'RE REALLY AVOIDING. IT'S A SIGNIFICANT UNDERTAKING, WHICH IS THAT CITY WIDE ZONE. HE MIGHT CHANGE COMMUNITIES DO THAT, YOU KNOW, WE WORK ON CODE UPDATES WHERE THAT'S DONE ALL THE TIME. BUT IT YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES REQUIRES, YOU KNOW SOME EXPENDITURES, YOU MIGHT HAVE TO DO A CITYWIDE MAILING, YOU KNOW, FOR EVERYONE TO T NOTIFY THEM OF THAT REZONING. YOU NEED TO SIT DOWN INTO OFFICE HOURS OR TALK WITH LANDOWNERS JUST TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND MAKE THEM UNDERSTAND. IN OUR EXPERIENCE
[00:55:05]
FOR A PROJECT LIKE THIS. ULTIMATELY YOU CAN GET THROUGH THAT PROCESS. YOU KNOW WHEN YOU COMMUNICATE TO PEOPLE, CLEARLY THE DIRECTION THAT JENNIFER AND I DESCRIBED. IN TERMS OF MORE MORE FLEXIBILITY. MORE USES. PEOPLE ARE GENERALLY HAPPY WITH THAT, BUT THEY WILL HAVE QUESTIONS AND THEY WILL WANT TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION AND YOU'VE GOT TO DEDICATE RESOURCES TO HAVING THAT CONVERSATION. SO THERE'S A LOT OF RESOURCE IS INVOLVED IN THAT ZONING MAP CHANGE. WE UNDERSTAND THAT. THAT'S WHY THE ZONING MAP JUST JUST JUST THE TEXT AMENDMENT IS THERE'S ONE AT THE TOP. SO THOSE WERE KIND OF JUST VERY BROADLY. TWO OPTIONS TO LAY OUT THERE AND A COUPLE OF ADDITIONAL POINTS JUST TO LAY OUT HERE BEFORE WE HAVE THE CONVERSATION. PEOPLE NEED TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO WEIGH IN ON THIS AND TO KIND OF UNDERSTAND AND ASK QUESTIONS. AND SO WERE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFYING A COUPLE OF PLACES IN THE CONVERSATION WHERE PEOPLE CAN ASK QUESTIONS AND TALK TO YOU ALL FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING ON. PRIOR TO ADOPTION. YOU KNOW THIS WOULD THAT THAT TABLE OF CLASS TABLE OF CORRESPONDENTS WOULD BE PUBLICIZED. YOU KNOW, THEY WOULD YOU MAKE A BIG EFFORT TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE UNDERSTOOD THAT AND LET PEOPLE ASK QUESTIONS AND SAY, HEY, I KNOW I DON'T THINK THAT APPLIES TO MY PROPERTY AND. THERE. I DO HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THAT CORRESPONDENTS. IT'S NOT AS STRAIGHTFORWARD AS YOU'RE CLAIMING IT TO BEING SO THAT PROCESS, I THINK COULD BE REALLY HELPFUL. THAT WOULD HELP. MAYBE HIGHLIGHTS SOME SOME NUANCES THAT MIGHT NEED TO BE LOOKED AT. AND IN THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW CODE, BUT THERE WOULD BE A THIRD FOR THOROUGH OPTION PRIOR TO STAFF A THOROUGH OPPORTUNITY PRIOR TO ADOPTION TO CONTACT STAFF AND TALK ABOUT THOSE THINGS BEFORE THE CODES ADOPTED. AND THEN POST ADOPTION. THE MECHANISM THAT'S BEING PROPOSED, IS THAT THERE'LL BE A TIME PERIOD.BASICALLY, ANYBODY COULD COME IN AND SAY, HEY, I DON'T AGREE WITH MY NEW CHANGE. I WANT TO GO BACK AND PLAY INTO THE RULES OF THE OLD CODE. I DON'T. I DON'T AGREE WITH WHAT WAS PROPOSED, SO THIS COULD BE TERMED A GRANDFATHER. BUT THIS IS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SAY FOR A YEAR AND THE TIME PERIOD IS UP FOR DISCUSSION. BUT FOR THAT FIRST YEAR. YOU KNOW IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO COME IN AND JUST SAY, HEY, I WANNA I WANNA PLAY INTO THE RULES OF THE OLD CODE. THAT'S THAT'S FINE. THAT'S THEIR RIGHT. NOW THEY CAN'T PICK AND CHOOSE BETWEEN PIECES OF THE NEW CODE IN THE OLD COAT, SO THAT'S THAT'S NOT WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. AND SO YOU EITHER WANT THIS CURRENT CODE THAT YOU HAVE, OR YOU WANT THE NUKE? BUT THAT OPPORTUNITY WOULD BE GIVEN TO THEM FOR A YEAR. AND MAYBE THAT'S NOT ENOUGH TIME. MAYBE IT NEEDS TO BE TWO YEARS. MAYBE IT NEEDS TO BE OPEN ENDED. WE FLOATED THAT QUESTION IN THE SURVEY. THE JENNIFER MENTIONED EARLY ON AND WE GOT PEOPLE. SOME PEOPLE SAID. THAT'S FINE.
THAT YOU'RE IS FINE. JUST MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT IT. OTHER PEOPLE SAID IT SHOULD BE OPEN ENDED, SOME PEOPLE SAID I'LL GIVE IT TO SO THERE'S DEFINITELY SOME FEEDBACK ON THAT, BUT THAT'S THE LOSER KIND OF THE MECHANISMS TO ALLOW FEEDBACK. MAN ASKED SERVICERS.
ARE YOU SAYING THAT. IF I OWN A PIECE OF PROPERTY HERE, AND IN THE FIRST YEAR I AM GOING TO SAY NO, I DON'T LIKE THE WAY YOU'VE REDEFINED IT. I WANT TO KEEP WHAT I HAD SAID. I MEAN, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO KEEP OUR OLD CODE VALID FOR 30 YEARS UNTIL THAT DEVELOPS YOURSELF.
AND ARE WE NOT COMPLICATING THINGS BY DOING THAT? WELL ESSENTIALLY, WE ARE POTENTIALLY, WE ARE THAT THE LONGER YOU EXTEND THOSE GRANDFATHER PROGRAMS OR THOSE OPPORTUNITIES. MORE WORK THAT IS FOR YOUR STAFF TO HAVE TO MAINTAIN THOSE DIFFERENT DOCUMENTS AND THOSE KIND OF JUST LEGACY RULES ON MY CONCERN IS THAT 10 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, MOST OF OUR STAFFS NOT GOING TO REMEMBER THAT COACH AND IT'S GONNA BE A NEW RESEARCH PROBLEM. WHAT WE DID BACK THEN. GENERALLY SPEAKING, THAT'S WHY OUR RECOMMENDATION USUALLY IS TO TRY TO DO AS MUCH CLEAN UP AS YOU CAN. TRY TO GO AHEAD AND JUST MOVE FORWARD AND. DO THAT COMMUNITY OUTREACH TO THE EDUCATION. EXPLAIN TO PEOPLE WHAT YOU'VE DONE AND WHY YOU'VE DONE IT, BUT HOPEFULLY MOVE THE WHOLE BALL FORWARD. THAT'S NOT ALWAYS THE BEST APPROACH. I'M NOT SAYING THAT SO FAULT IN THE SYSTEM. I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK THROUGH WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN AND SOMETHING'S GOING TO HAPPEN. YEAH. BUT PART OF WHAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT MAY I WAS THAT YOU PART. THAT COULD BE THAT, OKAY? IT'S NOT NECESSARILY GRANDFATHER AND THAT YOU'RE GIVING SOMEONE SOME PERIOD OF TIME TO DEVELOP UNDER THE OLD RULES. CHILD GRANDFATHER FOREVER. BUT YOU KNOW, GIVE SOMEONE A YEAR TO TWO. DO SOMETHING WITH THEIR PROPERTY THAT MATCHES THE ALL RIGHT? OKAY IT WOULD BE GRANDFATHER FOREVER. IF. YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT RUN RESPONDED THE SURVEY, I THINK SAID, WELL, IT DOES. IT SHOULDN'T BE A YEAR. YOU SHOULD ALWAYS HAVE THAT OPTION. THAT WOULD BE A GRANDFATHER AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE DOING IT. SO ALL THESE DIFFERENT PIECES YOU'RE SAYING, OKAY, HERE'S THIS OPTION HERE IS THIS OPTION, DO WE? DO YOU WANT A METER? ITS STAFF LOOKING FOR FEEDBACK WITH THIS OR I MEAN, BECAUSE WE'VE GONE OVER A LOT OF STUFF THAT COULD BE EITHER OR BUT WE'VE NEVER WAY DON'T HAVE CONSENSUS. WE DON'T REALLY I MEAN, SO HOW HOW IS THE STAFF TO KNOW WHICH DIRECTION WE WANT TO GO. I MIGHT BE ABLE TO TAKE A FIRST CUT IT THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION.
AND THEN JENNIFER MIGHT WANNA WIN AS WELL. BUT I WOULD SAY RIGHT NOW. GIVING BACK TO MY
[01:00:05]
FIRST COMMENT. IT'S TOO EARLY TO SAY. YOU DON'T YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE FULL CODE. WE REALLY ARE INTRODUCING THIS TO GIVE YOU ALL A SENSE OF WHAT SOME OF YOUR OPTIONS WILL BE ULTIMATELY. IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO HAVE A GUT CHECK. YOU KNOW IF ANY OF THOSE FEEL ESPECIALLY WRONG WERE SOUND ESPECIALLY INTRIGUING. THAT'S THAT'S HELPFUL FEEDBACK TO HAVE RIGHT NOW, AND THAT MIGHT TAYLOR THINGS AS THEY MOVE FORWARD, YOU KNOW, FOR THE NEXT SIX MONTHS AS WE MOVE FORWARD IT, BUT I DON'T THINK YOU'RE COMMITTED TO MAKING A DECISION.I KNOW, BUT I THINK THAT. BUT I THINK IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR US TO JUST KIND OF TALK ABOUT WHEN THERE IS A THIS OR THAT. YOU COULD SAY OK, WHAT DO YOU PREFER AS A COUNCIL? WHAT DIRECT WHAT'S YOUR DIRECTION, SO AT LEAST THEY COULD BE IN A TWIST? NO. BECAUSE BECAUSE I WOULD THINK YOU'D GIVE SOMEBODY TWO OR THREE YEARS ON THAT THING. AND THEN IF THEY HAVEN'T BUILT IN TWO OR THREE YEARS, THEN THEY'RE STUCK WITH THE NEW ONE. I MEAN, SO THAT'S THAT WOULD BE MY. CONSIDERATION AND WHAT WOULD THE COUNCIL SAYING? HERE'S MY CONCERN IN ASKING THESE VERY QUESTIONS? IS THAT INEVITABLY SOMEONE IS GOING TO COME IN AND SAY THIS WAS A PROPERTY. RIGHT THAT WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM ME BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW CAREFUL YOU ARE, AND I JUST WANT THIS COUNCIL AND FUTURE COUNSELS TO BE AWARE OF THAT. THERE ARE GOING TO BE LAWSUITS AND SOMEONE ALLEGING THAT WE TOOK THEIR PROPERTY RIGHTS WHEN WE CHANGE THE ZONING. I DON'T SEE THAT YOU CAN AVOID IT.
SOMEONE IS GOING TO FILE THAT SUIT. IT MAY BE MORE THAN ONE. AND THERE'S NO EASY WAY AROUND IT. JUST BE READY FOR THAT. BUT MARK TO WEAKEN. WE CAN CHANGE THE CODE. CORRECT I MEAN, SOMEONE COULD COME IN FOR A VARIANCE IF THEY IF THEY FELT LIKE THEY HAD A. CHARLIE'S POINT, A RIGHT YEARS AGO, THEY WOULD PROCESS WOULD FIRST. OF COURSE, COME IN. DO ATTEMPT FOR A VARIANCE AND THEN BE MY GUESTS, AND I'M IN NO WAY SAYING DON'T CHANGE THE CODE. I THINK IT'S GREAT WHAT YOU'RE DOING. I'M JUST TRYING TO SAY HEY, WHEN THIS HAPPENS NO, NO, THAT IT WAS EXPECTED. RIGHT? AND UNDERSTANDABLY. UNDERSTANDABLY MY PROPERTY AL HAS DIMINISHED VALUE. I MEAN, HEY! OH, THE TRIER. YEAH. YEAH. AND ALL. I'M TRYING TO SET THE BAR. REALLY LOVE SO YOUR EXPECTATIONS ARE OUT THERE JUST LIKE I TELL MY DIVORCE CLIENTS.
YOU'RE GONNA SPEND THE REST OF YOUR LIFE IN JAIL WHEN THEY WALK OUT THE COURTHOUSE. THEY THINK I'M GREAT. ACTUALLY. RIGHT WHAT'S NEXT YEAR? IT'S PROBABLY SEEN THE SPLIT. YOU KNOW HOW MANY WHAT PERCENTAGE OF. YOU NEED TO TAKE OPTION ONE VERSUS TWO. YOU HAVE A BALLPARK BACK ON THIS SLIDE. I'LL GIVE YOU A RECENT EXAMPLE FROM JUST DOWN THE ROAD, DENTON. WE WORKED WITH DENTON FOR SEVERAL YEARS ON THEIR UPDATED THEIR CODE, AND THEY ULTIMATELY YOU KNOW THEY HAVE THESE SAME CONVERSATIONS. I WOULD SAY THAT THEY'RE CHANGES IN THEIR ZONING DISTRICT LINE UP. WE'RE PROBABLY MORE SIGNIFICANT. BECAUSE THEIR CODE WAS MORE OUTDATED, AND THEY HAD MORE UPDATES THEY NEEDED TO MAKE, AND THEY ALSO REMEMBER THE OPTION TO THEY JUST DECIDED TO WELL, I DON'T WANNA BE LIVING IF YOU DON'T KILL OFF THE BANDITS AND JUST DO IT AND THEY WENT AHEAD AND SET ASIDE THE FUNDING FOR THE FOR THE CITYWIDE NOTIFICATION OF THOSE REASONINGS. THEY PUT IN PLACE A PRETTY ROBUST. PUBLIC OUTREACH PROGRAM, YOU KNOW, WITHOUT REED WITH OFFICE HOURS FOR THEIR STAFF, OPEN HOUSES, THINGS LIKE THAT. SOME OF THOSE VERY FIRST MEETINGS. THEY GOT A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT SHOWED UP. NUMBER OF PEOPLE DROPPED OFF REALLY FAST ASSED PEOPLE STARTED TO REALIZE THE NATURE OF THE CHANGE IS ULTIMATELY IT WAS ENDED UP BEING A FAIRLY FAIRLY SMOOTH SAILING. AND THEY GOT THEIR ZONING MAP CLEANED UP AT THE SAME TIME AS THEY'RE COMING. DID THAT HAPPEN, MAN? THEIR CODE WAS FINALLY ADOPTED AT THE END OF 2018. I BELIEVE UM. AND THEY HAD A VERY STRONG STAFF BUT WAS WAS REALLY YOU KNOW? AWFUL ABOUT THIS CONVERSATION AND ABOUT HELPING THE PUBLIC, YOU KNOW, TRYING TO UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE, I THINK, YOU KNOW. IT WASN'T A ONCE IT WASN'T THE CITY TRYING TO IMPOSE A ONE SIZE FITS ALL SET OF RULES ON THE PUBLIC. THEY WERE SAYING GENERALLY, THESE ARE THE RULES THAT WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE EVERYBODY ABIDE BY. THEN AGAIN, THEY'VE GOT A RELIEF ELF. SO THIS THIS THE SECOND PART OF THIS SLIDE? THAT'S A RELIEF FOUND. THAT'S IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO COME IN
[01:05:01]
AND SUE AND SAY YOU'RE TAKING MY PROP YOU GUYS, YOU'VE GOT A PARTICULAR MECHANISM IN PLACE TO SAY, JUST NO, WE'RE NOT TAKING ANYTHING. YOU CAN USE THE EXACT CODE THAT YOU HAD IN PLACE, SO THAT SPECIFICALLY THE INTENT OF THAT OPTION. DO YOU HAVE? AH, UM, IDEA OF HOW OUR STAFF FEELS ABOUT. ZONING MAP CHANGING RIGHT? I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS IN ABOUT E DO HAVE NOTHING. EVERY O, UM. MIXED ON THE QUITE FRANKLY, I WAS ANXIOUSLY AWAITING THIS CONVERSATION JUST TO REALLY GET A FEEL IN FLAVOR FROM THE COUNCIL IS WELL, I AGREE WITH A LOT OF THINGS, MATT SAID. MATH AMENDMENT IS IT IS THE CLEANEST WAY TO GET A NEW CODE. YOU ARE SIMULTANEOUSLY ADOPTING A NEW CODE AND REZONING PROPERTIES TO ALIGN WITH THAT CODE, BUT IT COMES WITH A LOT OF HAIR IF YOU WILL NOTIFICATIONS THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH IT. I KNOW THAT MATT TALKED A LOT ABOUT THE ROBUST OUTREACH AND I WOULD I WOULD SUBMIT THAT REGARDLESS OF WHAT OPTION WE TAKE. WE IS, THE STAFF ARE GOING TO BE DOING THAT ANYWAYS, BECAUSE THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO THE CODE, SO WHETHER OR NOT WE PICK OPTION ONE OPTION TWO OR SOME OPTION THAT HASN'T BEEN CONSIDERED YET. THAT OUTREACH IS STILL GOING TO OCCUR. THE TEXT AMENDMENT OPTION IS ALWAYS ONE THAT IS AVAILABLE IS WELL, IT HAS A LITTLE BIT LESS HAIR FROM THE REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THAT WOULD ASSOCIATE WITH THE MAP AMENDMENT ON BY. I'LL GIVE YOU THE EXAMPLE WIN WIN THE CITY COUNCIL MODIFIED SCHEDULE OF USES TO REMOVE RESIDENTIAL USES FROM OUR COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT'S BACK IN 2018. THAT WAS WHEN WE REMOVED THE ABILITY FOR MULTI FAMILY TO GO INTO BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT THAT HAD BEEN THERE FOR YEARS AND YEARS. OKAY THAT'S CORRECT. THAT WAS A TEXT AMENDMENT. WE DID NOT RE ZONE ANY PROPERTY. WE MODIFIED THE ALLOWANCES WITHIN THOSE EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS HAD ALREADY OCCUR WHEN WE RAN THE PARKIN G AMENDMENTS A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO WITH YOU ALL THAT WAS A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDNANCE WOULDN'T REZONE ANYBODY'S PROPERTY. BUT THE RULES FOR CERTAIN ELEMENTS OF THAT VOTING CHANGED AND THAT THAT IS AN OPTION THAT WE USE QUITE A BIT. NEVER DO THIS SCALE. OF COURSE, BUT IT IS. IT IS SOMETHING THAT'S AVAILABLE TO US. SO IT'S A MIXED BAG. I THINK THERE'S PROS AND CONS TO EACH. IT IS ONE OF THE REASONS THAT WHAT WE CALL THE RELIEF VALVE SEEMS APPEALING AND LONG TERM. MAINTENANCE OF THAT COULD BE SOMEWHAT ADMINISTRATIVELY CUMBERSOME, BUT THE GOAL WAS TO HAVE THAT RELIEF VALVE TO ADDRESS EXACTLY WHAT YOUR CONCERN WAS MR PHILLIPS AND THAT WAS SOMEBODY COMING IN AND SAYING YOU'VE DOWNS ON MY PROPERTY. YOU'VE MODIFIED MY VESTED WRITER, PROPERTY INTEREST, RIGHT? AND I WANT TO SEE YOU WELL. SORT OF SUING US. HEY, MAYBE MAYBE TAKE A LOOK AT THIS OTHER OPTION THAT YOU HAVE TO MAINTAIN THAT RIGHT UNDER THE CURRENT CODE. I DO WANT TO, AND I DON'T WANT TO TAKE US BACKWARDS BECAUSE I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING FOR A WHILE. BUT I DID WANT TO HIGHLIGHT HERE THE WAY THAT WE LOOKED AT THAT THIS TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE ON BY, I'LL USE THIS ARE FIVE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT OUR GOAL IS TO MAKE IT MORE PERMISSIVE AND MORE DESIRABLE. THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THAT. SO THE TWO ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WE HAVE ON THE BOOKS RIGHT NOW ARE RS 60 AND RS. 60 IS A. STANDARD SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT, EVEN MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 6000 SQUARE FEET. ARRESTED FIVE ZONING DISTRICT IS ALSO OUR MODERN, SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT. YOU'VE BEEN MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 5000 SQUARE FEET, WHICH OF A MEAN AND MEDIUM LOT SIZE OF 7200. SQUARE FEET. THAT MEANS FOR EVERY SMALL LOT, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A LARGE LOT, AND SO WITHIN THOSE TWO ZONING DISTRICT'S WITH THE NEW CODE, WE WOULD ROLL IT INTO THE R FIVE, WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR THE SMALLER LOT SIZE AND I REDUCED MEAN AND MEDIUM LOT SIZE. SO FOR THE TWO EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ARE ON THE BOOK ROLLING INTO THAT NEWER ARE FIVE DISTRICT ACTUALLY ELIMINATES DENSITY PRODUCES THAT MEAN IMMEDIATE LOT SIZE AND ALLOWS FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY ON THE VARIATION OF LOT SIZES THAT YOU COULD HAVE, AND THAT WAS OUR GOAL, AND IT'S EASIER TO HIGHLIGHT THAT OBVIOUSLY ON A RESIDENTIAL ZONING COMPARISON, AN IT WOULD BE ON COMMERCIAL DISTRICT'S, FOR EXAMPLE, BUT THERE IS ALWAYS A FEAR WHEN YOU RE ZONED PROPERTY OR TEXT AMENDMENT THAT YOU'RE IMPACTING PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND YOU'RE TAKING SOMETHING AWAY. THIS NEW CODE. OUR GOAL IS TO ADD TO WHAT YOU HAVE MODERNIZED IT AND MAKE IT MORE APPROPRIATE. SO I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT AS AN EXAMPLE, BECAUSE WE WE'VE ALREADY STARTED TO HEAR THE. YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE MY PROPERTY RIGHTS. I HAVE THOSE RIGHTS. I WANT TO KEEP THEM AND WE RESPECT THAT. WE WANT TO HELP EDUCATE FOLKS THAT. IT OUR EYES, MOST OF GOT ALL OF THE CHANGES THAT WERE PROPOSING ARE TO THE BENEFIT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. YEAH WHAT'S YOUR THOUGHT ON THE MAP. AND WHILE YOU WALK UP HERE, MICHAEL ASKED THAT QUESTION BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE A WHOLE LOT OF WORK TO REDO THAT ENTIRE MOUTH. YEAH. THE MAP AMENDMENT FOR ME A SCARY I'LL BE HONEST. THERE IS A LOT[01:10:04]
OF WORK THERE. THE TECHS, AMENDMENTS ARE DEFINITELY EASIER TO ADMINISTER, ESPECIALLY IF THE RELIEF VALVE IS LIMITED. I'LL BE. JENNIFER IS WAY MORE POLISHED THAN I AM.I'LL BE BLUNT WITH THE COUNCIL AND I'LL TELL YOU MY FEAR IS IF WE DON'T MODIFY THE CODE, THE LONG TERM ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON STAFF WILL BE FAR WORSE THAN ADMINISTERING A RELIEF CALVERT FOR TWO OR THREE YEARS. I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF JENNIFER AND HER STAFF, BUT I WOULD MUCH RATHER DEAL WITH PAIN FOR TWO OR THREE YEARS, THEN DEAL WITH PAIN INDEFINITELY BY NOT MODIFYING THIS CODE IN ONE WAY, SHAPE OR FORM. I'M NOT AT ALL SUGGESTING THAT WE DON'T MODIFY IT. I'M JUST TRYING TO LOOK OUT FOR THE NEXT THAT WE'RE GONNA SEE ON ONE OF THEM WOULD BE YOU GUYS HAVE TO REDO THE WHOLE MAP BECAUSE I CAN SEE ALL COMING TO ME SAYING YOU NEED 10 MORE EMPLOYEES FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS TO REDO THIS MAP. WELL, I'LL SUBMIT TO YOU I'M GOING TO PUT IN FREE OVERTIME. TO GO THE MAP OF MOUNT A MAP AMENDMENT IF THAT'S THROUGHOUT THE COUNCIL WANTS TO GO, BUT I WILL TELL YOU, I THINK IF YOU GO A MAP AMENDMENT IF I'M MEETING WITH EVERY PROPERTY OWNER OR JENNIFER IS MEETING WITH EVERY PROPERTY OWNER IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, THEY'RE GOING TO BE A LOT MORE CONVERSATIONS. THERE'S GONNA BE A LOT MORE FINANCIAL EXPENSE IN TERMS OF PUBLIC REQUIRED NOTIFICATION. THERE'S GONNA BE A LOT MORE CONCERNS ABOUT PROPERTY RIGHTS BECAUSE I'M PHYSICALLY TALKING TO YOU, MR PHILLIPS ABOUT YOUR PROPERTY. WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH EVERYTHING THAT YOU CURRENTLY HAVE. AND. NOT TO SAY THAT WE CAN'T DO IT. WE TOTALLY CAN. AND MATT AND JENNIFER ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. IT'S PROBABLY THE CLEANEST WAY TO TRANSITION FROM THE OLD CODE TO THE NEW CODE, BUT PROBABLY NOT THE EASIEST WAY AND MATT DO YOU WANT TO CHIME IN PLEASE. GO AHEAD. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY ONE THING. A MAP AMENDMENT DOES NOT MEAN GOING BACK AND MAKING A PARCEL BY PARCEL RECONSIDERATION OF THE APPROPRIATENESS OF DIFFERENT CATEGORIES. IT SHOULDN'T TAKE A LONG TIME. IT'S A G I S EXERCISE. YOU KNOW YOU'RE CHANGING NAMES BASED ON OBJECTIVE RULES. RIGHT NOW, IF YOUR RS 72, YOU'RE JUST GOING TO GET CONVERTED IN THE G I S SHAPED FILES ARE AS 6.5 SO IT'S NOT A TIME CONSUMING THING IN TERMS OF THE TECHNICAL EXERCISE. IT'S JUST A CONVERSION. THERE'S A TIME AND A PLACE LATER ON TOE. LOOK AT REZONING, YOU KNOW, BASED ON POLICY CONSIDERATIONS. THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS IS. THIS IS AN OBJECTIVE CHANGE. THE TIME INVOLVED IS JUST, YOU KNOW, EXPLAINING IT TO THE PUBLIC WHEN THEY COME IN AND HAVE QUESTIONS. THAT'S THAT'S THE PIECE, BUT I DIDN'T WANT ANY SENSE TO GET OUT THAT THIS WAS A LOT BY LOT RECONSIDERATION OF ZONING. I THINK THE CONFLICT MATTERS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THE COMPLICATING FACTORS PDS, THE CITY MCKINNEY IS 70% ISH PDS AND WHAT MATT'S TALKING ABOUT FOR THE EXISTING STRAIGHT ZONING GOING TO THE NEW STRAIGHT ZONING. SUPER EASY, NOT A PROBLEM WHEN YOU HAVE 75% OF THE CITY, 75% OF 68 SQUARE MILES ZONE PD THERE'S NO EASY WAY TO DO THAT. THEY DON'T STAY IN THE SAME PD. THEORETICALLY IT WILL, BUT THAT'S WHERE WE GO BACK TO THE WAY WE'VE WRITTEN PDS AND AGAIN. THIS IS A LARGER PROBLEM WITH PDS THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT IN THE FUTURE, BUT THE WAY THAT WE CURRENTLY STRUCTURED PEDIS RIGHT NOW IS WILL HAVE A PD. WITH A BASE OF C TWO. OKAY, WELL, THAT BASE OF C TWO IS GOING TO THE EXISTING SEE TWO STANDARDS. AND WHEN WE ADOPT THIS TRANSITION CHART, WHAT I'LL CALL. WE'RE STILL USING IT. EVEN THOUGH WE'RE DOING THE OPTION TO WHICH IS THE MAP AMENDMENT, AND WE'RE GETTING WAY TOO IN THE WEEDS ON HOW THIS WORKS, BUT IF WE GO MAP AMENDMENT WE'RE NOT GOING TOE. REZONE OR CHANGE THE ZONING OF THOSE PDS. BUT IN IN THIS. THE WAY WE ARE, BECAUSE WE'RE STILL MODIFYING THE NEW CODE. WE STILL HAVE THIS TRANSITION CHART, AND YOU STILL ARE MODIFYING. UNDERLYING ENTITLEMENTS OF THAT ZONING, EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVEN'T CHANGED ZONING DISTRICT FROM PD TO PD.
THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OPTION ONE AND OPTION TO AN OPTION ONE. YOU WOULD DO WHAT I JUST DESCRIBED FOR THE PD. YOU'RE DOING THAT FOR EVERYBODY. SO IF MY PROPERTY RIGHT NOW HIS OWN SF A SET OF 7.2. DOESN'T MATTER. YOU'RE ZONING STAYS. SF 7.2 FOREVER. BUT WHEN I COME IN FOR WHAT USES AIR ALLOWED THERE OR WHAT ARE MY SETBACKS OR WHAT'S MY ALLOWABLE DENSITY? I'M NOW LOOKING AT OUR 6.5. SO THAT. THAT HAPPENS IN A OPTION ONE THAT HAPPENS FOR PD, AS HAVE TO ALL OF THOSE THAT'S THE WAY WE'RE GOING TO ADDRESS IT WHEN WE GO OPTION TWO. WE MODIFIES PEOPLE ZONING. THAT IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THOSE PROPERTIES THAT ARE CURRENTLY
[01:15:04]
ZONED SF TWO WILL NOW BE ZONED R 6.5, SO THERE'S NO NEED TO REFERENCE HIS CHART ANYMORE.THEY'LL JUST GO STRAIGHT TO OUR. 6.5 BUT THOSE PROPERTIES OWN PD WITH A BASE OF SF 7.2. WE'RE STILL GOING TO THIS CHART. THERE'S STILL HAVING TO LOOK UP OUR 6.5. SEVEN. IT'S REALLY TECHNICAL GUYS. SO HIS SUPER CRITICAL THAT WE UNDERSTAND THIS. I DON'T WANT TO GET TOO FAR INTO THE WEEDS. SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS. WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO GO BACK TO EACH INDIVIDUAL LANDOWNER AND CAN'T EXPLAIN WHAT WE'RE DOING. WHAT IT'S GOING TO HOW IT'S GONNA AFFECT HIS PROPERTY. I THINK WE NEED TO MAKE OURSELVES AVAILABLE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. IF THE DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL IS TO GO ROUTE TO WHERE WE MODIFY THE MAP, BECAUSE INEVITABLY IF. IF I GO TO YOU, COUNCILMAN FRANKLIN AND SAY YOUR PROPERTY IS NO LONGER GOING TO BE ZONED SF 7.2. IT'S GONNA BE OUR 6.5. YOU GONNA HAVE QUESTIONS? INEVITABLY YOU'RE GONNA HAVE QUESTIONS BECAUSE WHAT YOU THOUGHT YOU HAD IS NO LONGER THERE ANYMORE.
WHAT? I'M SUBMITTING TO YOU ON PDS. IT'S NOT AS EASY OF A PHONE CALL FOR YOU AND I DON'T HAVE TO SAY OH, MR FRANKLIN. THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. IF YOU JUST WANT TO LOOK AT THE R SIX ARE 6.5. I CAN TELL YOU ALL THE STANDARDS ALL THE USES THAT ARE ALLOWED. YOU COME TO ME SAYING MICHAEL, MY PROPERTY IS PETEY. I'VE NOW GOT TO DIG THROUGH YOUR PROPERTY, AND I PRAY THAT YOUR PROPERTY DOESN'T HAVE SEVEN LAYERS OF PENNIES. AND I'VE GOT TO DO THROUGH BECAUSE YOU AND I ARE GOING TO TUCK ZONING FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. YES. MR HAUSER. WHAT ONE IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON A PROPERTY TAKING BY THE GOVERNMENT AND AS A DISCOVERY RULE APPLICABLE? THAT MIGHT SOLVE A LOT OF MY PROBLEMS. OH, THANKS. QUESTION. HOPE FOR A YEAR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM STAFF. YEAH. WHICH IS GONNA CARRY US HOME. SO UM. LIKE MATT SAID. WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE. WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR A DECISION TODAY, BUT WE DO WANT TO START GETTING YOUR BRAINS TURNING ON WHERE THERE MIGHT BE AN APPETITE FOR ONE OR THE OTHER.
AGAIN CONSIDERABLE OUTREACH IS GOING TO BE INCLUDED, REGARDLESS OF WHAT OPTION. THE CITY DECIDES TO PURSUE ONE QUESTION. I DID WANT TO GET SOME MORE DIRECT FEEDBACK ON WAS THE RELIEF VALVE OR THE APPEALS PROCESS. IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS UTILIZED WITH THE TRANSITION TO THE NEW CODE. IS THERE A GENERAL CONSENSUS THAT THAT IS FOR A FIXED PERIOD OF TIME OR OPEN ENDED? EXPERIENCE. EXPERIENCE TIME, OKAY? I WOULD THINK FIXED PERIOD OF TIME WITH, OF COURSE, THE CAVEAT THAT THE ABILITY COME IN FRONT OF COUNCIL'S ALWAYS AVAILABLE TO MAKE THAT CASE. ABSOLUTELY. CERTAINLY, BEAN. VERY, VERY COGNIZANT OF PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUE. UNLIKE THE FIXED PERIOD OF TIME TO EQUAL THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS GOD WE'LL GET WITH HOUSE AROUND THAT FOR SURE. OKAY, WELL, I APPRECIATE IT. I KNOW THIS WAS A LONG DISCUSSION IN THE LONG PRESENTATION, AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF KEY TRIGGER POINTS OF DECISION POINTS THAT WE WERE ABLE TO GLEAN FROM IT, SO I APPRECIATED IT WILL REALLY HELP US AS WE MOVE INTO. THE NEXT PHASE OF THE CODE UPDATE AND ULTIMATELY INTO OUR CONSOLIDATED CODE, AND THAT'S REALLY WHERE I JUST WANT TO END ON THIS LITTLE SLIDE HERE WHILE WE'RE PUBLICLY MAKING THE ROUNDS WITH THE USES AND DISTRICT STUFF INTERNALLY, WE'RE MEETING ON THOSE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT MATT MENTIONED. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIREMENTS. I'M RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY CONSIDERATIONS, SO WE'RE STILL DIGGING THROUGH THOSE THINGS OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL MONTHS, AND OUR GOAL IS TO BE BACK IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL AROUND THE SUMMER TIME TO PRESENT. A DRAFT OF THOSE FOR THE SAME TYPE OF DISCUSSION. THE ROAD IS LONG PAST MY TIME HERE. REMAINING TIME HERE, BUT IF WE COME BACK, THE NEW COUNCIL COMES BACK AND SAYS, HEY, YOU KNOW, THOUGHT THOUGHTFUL OPTION TWO WITH A RELIEF OUT THAT SOMETHING IS THAT SOME TYPE OF DIRECTION THAT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO YOU GUYS. THAT WAS VERY HELPFUL DIRECTION, AND I APPRECIATE THAT. S O. THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT JUST A LITTLE LAUNDRY LIST THERE OF SOME OF WHAT'S INCLUDED IN THAT, ANDRE. JUST A REMINDER TO YOU ALL IS A COUNCIL AND ANYBODY WHO MIGHT BE WATCHING ONLINE OR BEHIND ME.
WE DO HAVE A PROJECT WEBSITE. EXCUSE ME. NEW CODE MCKINNEY .COM. DRAFTS DIFFERENT SECTIONS ARE CONTACT INFORMATION. PUBLIC SURVEYS. ALL OF THOSE THINGS ARE AVAILABLE IN ANYBODY'S
[01:20:02]
FINGERTIPS TO GO THROUGH AND LOOK AT THAT. WE ARE AS WE MOVE INTO THESE FINAL STEPS ARE STAGES OF THE CODE OVERHAUL, LOOKING TO EXPAND THAT PUBLIC VISIBILITY COMPONENT. UM AND SO HOPEFULLY FOLKS WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THIS EVEN MORE. BUT PLEASE, PLEASE, IF YOU ARE VISITING WITH YOUR CONSTITUENTS, MEMBERS, THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY. PLEASE LET THEM KNOW THAT THIS IS AVAILABLE FOR THEM TO START TAKING A LOOK AT BECAUSE WE DO MEAN IT WHEN WE SAY WE WANT TO GET THE FEEDBACK. THE WEEKEND ENSURE WHAT GETS PRESENTED FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION. HITS HITS THE MARK THAT IT NEEDS TO JENNIFER, I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I UNDERSTAND WHAT A MASSIVE UNDERTAKING THAT ALL OF YOU HAVE GOTTEN INTO HERE AND I ADMIRE YOUR COURAGE TO STAND UP IN ATTEMPT TO DO THIS. GOOD LUCK GETTING THROUGH IT. WELL, THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE THE VERY, VERY HARD WORK YOU'RE DOING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND I THINK I'D BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T SAY WE'VE GOT MEMBERS FROM ALMOST EVERY DEVELOPMENT RELATED DEPARTMENT IN THE CITY. DEDICATING A LOT OF HOURS TO IT, SO I WILL SHARE THAT WITH THEM AS WELL, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT IT'S WELL DESERVED FOR THEM TO YOU. EVER THANK YOU AND OFTEN, OBVIOUSLY NO, THERE'S ALWAYS THAT TALK OUT THERE. WHAT THAT'S GOTTEN FAIRLY OLD. BUT THE MCKINNEY AND TOUGH TO DEAL WITH WHAT OFTEN THAT TRANSLATES INTO.WHAT IT REALLY IS, IS 30 AND 40 YEARS OF OVERLAYS AND CODES AND PEDIS OVER PIECE OF A PDS AND JUST STAFF, LET'S PRIOR TO ALL THIS. EVERYONE THAT'S HERE TODAY, BUT WHAT YOU GUYS WERE DOING HAVE SPENT YEARS NOW WORKING ON OF LAST SEVERAL YEARS IS CLEANING ALL THAT UP, MAKING IT SO USER FRIENDLY. I MEAN, RIGHT NOW, I'VE TURNED. A LOT OF PEOPLE ONTO THE TO THE SITE ON JOHN BLACK OF THEM, BUT I LIKE ASKED SAM, BUT IT'S CALLED THE DNA'S YES, EDNA NAME OR ASK THEM, BUT IT Z. IT'S SO EVIDENT THE WORK IN THE TRANSITION THAT'S TAKEN PLACE OVER THE LAST NUMBER OF YEARS, AND IT'S ALL DUE TO STAFF AND THANK YOU. IT'S WELL RECOGNIZED OUT THERE BY THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. RIGHT.
THAT IS OUR ONLY ITEM ON A COUNCIL LIAISON. UPDATES REGARDING BOARDS AND
[COUNCIL LIAISON UPDATES REGARDING THE VARIOUS MCKINNEY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS]
COMMISSIONS. YES, SIR. APOLOGIZE TO VISIT MCKINNEY. I HAD NOTES EMAIL LEFT HIM ALL OF MY OFFICE. WHAT. VISIT MCKINNEY IS PROBABLY JUST THE COUNCIL MEMBERS YOU'RE GONNA HEAR FROM A GROUP THAT IT'S HELPING THEM WITH THEIR STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASK WHAT YOUR DESIRES WOULD BE GOING FORWARD. YOU KNOW THAT THEY BRING A LOT OF FOLKS INTO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY FOR ONE TIME EVENTS, SOME OF OUR WEDDINGS AND OTHER THINGS LIKE THAT, BUT IT'S A GREAT WAY TO INTRODUCE PEOPLE TO MCKINNEY. THEY MAY BE CONTACTING YOU GET YOUR INPUT. WHAT DIRECTION THEY WANT AHEAD WITH THAT THE BEST NEWS THAT I TOOK AWAY FROM OUR MEETING WITH THEM EYES THAT ARE HOTELS ARE BACK, AND THEY'RE STARTING TO THRIVE ONCE AGAIN, AND THE NUMBERS ARE WAY UP, AND IT WAS TREMENDOUSLY. GOOD TO HEAR. THAT FOLKS FOR COMING BACK TO MCKINNEY AND THAT THE NUMBERS ARE GOING UP. THEY WENT UP FROM FEBRUARY TO MARCH, AND WE DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS FOR MARKS YET, BUT I EXPECT IT'S STILL ON THE RISE. AND SO THINGS WERE COMING BACK TO NORMAL. AND I THOUGHT THAT WAS GREAT NEWS FROM VISIT MCKINNEY GREAT BOARD. ENJOY WORKING WITH HIM. THEY DO A TREMENDOUS JOB FOR ALL OF US. AWESOME. NOTHING THERE. PRETEND I HAVE NOTHING.I HAVE NOTHING. I'LL JUST THROW IN SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. I DID FIND THE NOTES, RIGHT? HOTEL OCCUPANCY IN THE FIRST THREE WEEKS OF MARCH WAS UP 73. COMPARED TO OTHER CITIES.
THAT'S THAT'S AWAY. ALMOST DOUBLE OTHER CITIES. UM. SALES TAX WAS 12% OF DOWNTOWN FOR DECEMBER, WHICH IS GREAT NEWS. ON THEN DON'T FORGET WE HAVE ARCHING BLAMES THIS WEEKEND.
RIGHT DOWNTOWN. ON THEIR FULL GO. THERE'LL BE 100 ARTISTS THERE. IT'LL BE. YES, I OPENED AS MUCH AS YOU COULD BE OPEN AND COVET. AND THEN WE GET THE TEXAS MUSIC REVOLUTION COMING UP, WHICH IS 4000 TICKETS. FOUR STAGES. AND IT'LL BE RIGHT EVENT, TOO. ABSOLUTELY.
COUNCILMAN FRASER. I APOLOGIZE. I'M I'M STUCK IN AN AIRPORT. IF YOU HEAR A LOT OF BACKGROUND NOISE THAT PICTURE HEARING BUT I THINK JENNIFER GREAT JOB ON THE PRESENTATION. RIGHT NOW. I THINK TRAIL AND I WISH WE HAD DISTRICT NOT AT LARGE. AFTER DOING ALL THAT. E DON'T HAVE
[01:25:03]
ANY HELPFUL, BUT IF YOU GET PREGNANT. THANKS SIR. MERRYL, ACTUALLY, LIKE TOE MAKE JUST ONE QUICK ANNOUNCEMENT BOTH HERE AND ALSO MAKE SOME ANNOUNCEMENT TONIGHT. SO ON APRIL 29TH FROM 6 TO 8 P.M. AND AT IMPACT EMPTY BOWLS. MCKINNEY 2021 IS OCCURRING AND SO. IT DIDN'T JUST OPEN TODAY, ADMITTING JUST OPENED ON BOWLS AND MY INITIAL BID ON ANGIE'S COUNCILMAN, CUTS ONE WOODS. HMM. ALWAYS JUST SHOT DOWN AND JUST BLOWN AWAY, SO I'M NOT GONNA GET A BIG YOU HAVE TO BE. OH I'M NOT GONNA GET A BOWL ANYWAY. ELECTABLE YOU CAN YOU CAN BID MORE MONEY. I MEAN, LIKE YOU. AND SPECIFICALLY, DON'T GIVE UP YET. IT'S ONLY THE FIRST DAY THERE'S A COUPLE THEY'RE ORIEL CIRCULATION, BUT ANYWAY EMPTY BOWLS MCKINNEY DOT COM IS WHERE YOU CAN GO TO GET TICKETS FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS IS. THIS IS A ANNUAL EVENT. TO EMPHASIZE THOSE WHO DO NOT HAVE BOWLS FULL OF FOOD, AND SO WE HAVE SEVERAL RESTAURANTS SHOWING OFF THEIR SOUPS AND DESSERTS AND OTHER THINGS. AND SO THAT TICKET WILL GET YOU ADMISSION TO TRY ALL THAT FOOD. LET'S ALSO TAKE A BOWL HOME WITH YOU AND RECOGNITION THE FOLKS THAT DON'T HAVE AND SO CLC HAS BEEN THE RECIPIENT OF EMPTY BOWLS.THIS IS THE 10TH YEAR AND I JUST ALSO WANTED WELCOME COMMUNITY GARDEN KITCHEN THIS YEAR, AS ALSO IS A RECIPIENT OF FUNDS FROM EMPTY BOWLS. AND I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T SAY JUST A HUGE THANK YOU. THANK YOU, TOO. JAMIE ST CLAIR. IF YOU'RE OUT THERE, LISTENING, JAMIE. SHE STARTED THIS AND I THINK THERE'S 102 100 PEOPLE THE FIRST YEAR AND HAS TURNED INTO ARGUABLY ONE OF THE LARGER. GASTRONOMIC EVENTS IN DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN WITH KENNY. SHE IS SHE IS THIS IS HER LAST YEAR, THE LURE OF KIDS AND GRANDKIDS OR TOO STRONG AND SO. JAMIE WILL MISS YOU, BUT WE WELCOME ONBOARD TAMMY SNIDELY, WHO IS TAKING OVER FOR HER AND WORKING ALONGSIDE HER THIS YEAR. SO LONG A LONG INTRODUCTION, BUT AGAIN EMPTY BOWLS. APRIL 29 6 TO 8 P.M. AND PEOPLE'S MCKINNEY .COM. COME HERE. I FORGOT TO MENTION IT UNDER THE LIBRARY COMMITTEE THAT LISA BAGLEY HAS WORKED FOR THE LIBRARY SYSTEM FOR 21 YEARS AND SHE IS RETIRING. AND WANTED SAY THANKS FOR HER 21 YEARS GIVEN TO THE. PEOPLE OF MCKINNEY ON THEY'RE LOOKING FOR A REPLACEMENT FOR HER. THEY PROBABLY WILL NOT FIND SOMEONE OF HER CALIBER ARE HER DURATION WITH CITY. BUT CERTAINLY WANT TO HONOR HER AS SHE HEADS OUT FOR RETIREMENT.
SO THANKS TO LISA BAILEY AND ALL THE FOLKS AT THE LIBRARIES THANK YOU, MR MANNIX. GOODSON.
RIGHT WELL WITH NO FURTHER ADO, WE WILL MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AND COURTS THE TEXAS
[EXECUTIVE SESSION]
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551, WHO SAID ONE PENDING A KIND OF CONTEMPLATING LITIGATION, DICKY BAKER VERSUS CITY IN MCKINNEY, TEXAS. CIVIL ACTION 4 TO 1 CV 00176 EASTERN DISTRICT, TEXAS.SECTION 551 OH, SEVEN TO DELIBERATION ABOUT REAL PROPERTY, MISSILE FACILITIES SECTION 551074 PERSONNEL MATTERS. ASSOCIATE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE AND SECTION 551. OH 87 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MATTERS PROJECT BLUE SKY. SO CAN YOU GET US BACK LIVE AND. OKAY, THE MOTION THAT WE ADJOURN. HELLO. WE'RE BACK IN THE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION. DOES ANYBODY HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. I'LL SECOND MAYOR PROGRAM A MOTION BY. CHARLIE, COUNCILMAN PHILLIPS AND SECONDED BY AUSTRALIA ALL IN FAVOR. HI. JOHN
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.