Jun 08, 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission on 2021-06-08 6:00 PM

ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING AT SIX P. AND WELCOME TO THE CITY, MCKINNEY'S PLANNING AND ZONING

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:07]

WHEN YOU BEGIN YOUR PRESENTATION, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO STATE. YOUR CASE SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS. YOUR CONCERNS. WHEN YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS LEFT, YOU'LL SEE A YELLOW LIGHT. AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE THREE MINUTES IS UP, YOU'LL HEAR A BUZZER. WE DO APPRECIATE YOUR STICKING WITH THAT SCHEDULE. IF WE DO THAT, WE'LL ALL GET HOME AT A DECENT HOUR TONIGHT. WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE TO OUR AGENDA IN THE FIRST ITEM WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON AN ITEM. ARE A SUBJECT THAT IS NOT ONLY AGENDA. IF YOU'VE COME AND I DIDN'T HAVE SOMETHING. WEIGHING HEAVY ON YOUR MIND. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.

ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE. THE NEXT ITEM WILL BE A CHANCE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST PNC MEETING. SO IS THERE ANYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE. WE'LL MOVE TO ARKANSAS, AN AGENDA WHICH IS ON

[CONSENT ITEMS]

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary-Final Plat for the James Pitts Multifamily Addition, Located Approximately 2075 Feet North of Wilmeth Road and on the West Side of James Pitts Drive]

THANK YOU. JAIL QUESTIONS, EVERYBODY GOOD. WE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. HAVE TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS AS NOTED IN STAFF REPORT. SURE, MAN. MR. MAN'S OUT OF PER THE ATOM. A FIRST STAFF FOR THE STAFF REPORT. SECOND BY MR MCCALL IS OR ANY DISCUSSION.

CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES THE, UH, PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED. NEXT PLAN IS TO

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary-Final Plat for Trinity Falls Planning Unit 7 Phase 8, Located Approximately 1,500 Feet North of Olympic Crossing and on the West Side of Trinity Falls Parkway]

QUESTIONS. SCOTLAND DOES THE APPLICANT NO, THAT THAT'S A NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION.

RECOMMENDATION OF DISAPPROVAL. OKAY, VERY GOOD. MEMBERS. ANY DISCUSSION. OCEANS. I'LL MAKE A MOTION. WE, UH. DISPROVED THE PRELIMINARY FINAL PLATE IS RECOMMENDED BY STUFF. OCEAN MAN, MR HECKLER TO DISAPPROVE THE. UM UH, BUT ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND BY

[00:05:08]

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan for a Multifamily Development (Pitts Community Multifamily) Located on the Southeast Corner of James Pitts Drive and Community Avenue]

TOGETHER IN HIS ONE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SITE PLAN.

VARIANTS UM, THAT RECORD FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS PROVIDE A SIX FT MASONRY SCREENING WALL ON THE REAR AND SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. UM. GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHERE THEY'RE ASKING HERE, UM. THIS AREA HERE. THEY'RE ASKING FOR. TO WAIVE THAT SCREENING REQUIREMENT AS WELL AS ALONG THIS HALLIE WAY HERE. AND THE AREA IS SHOWN HERE. AND HERE ARE LONG PROPOSE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY SO THOSE WOULD NOT HAVE A SCREENING REQUIREMENT. AND THEN THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING SCREENING ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY. AS WELL AS THIS HERE, WHICH IS AND IT SAYS WITH, UH, BEING PROVIDED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT NEXT DOOR. UM. IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCE. UM THE SCREENING THAT WOULD BE NORMALLY REQUIRED WOULD INHIBIT ACCESS AS WELL AS INTEGRATION OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. AND WOULD ONLY SERVE TO SCREEN THE DEVELOPMENT. THE DEVELOPMENT INTERNALLY. GIVEN THESE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST AND DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL. I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. GENERAL QUESTIONS, CHRIS. MR MARCIN, YOU MENTIONED THE TOP LEFT CORNER IS WHERE THE VARIANCES REQUESTED IS YES. SO THESE. THIS AREA HERE AND IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED A SIDE SO IT WOULD NEED IT WOULD NEED A SCREENING WALL AS WELL AS ALONG THIS AREA HERE. SO THE ONE ON THE BOTTOM I CAN UNDERSTAND BETWEEN THE TWO DEVELOPMENTS AND ONE ON THE TOP. IS THAT NOT PART OF THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DEVELOPMENT? SO THIS OUTER LOT HERE IS PART OF THE TRACK A OF THE GOVERNING ZONING DISTRICT AND SO ZONE FOR TOWN HOME USES. THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO POTENTIALLY BUILD AN AMENITY CENTRE ON THAT LOCATION. AND SO IF THAT WAS THE CASE AGAIN, YOU WOULD JUST BE SCREENING THE AMENITY CENTRE FROM THE EXISTING FOR THE MULTI FAMILY THERE. OKAY, SO IN THE WHITE AREA, THERE'S DEVELOPMENT PLAN THERE. IT'S JUST NOT SHOWN IN THIS FIGURE. CORRECT THAT THAT WOULD BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY USES ON THE TRACK DAY. UNDERSTAND? THANK YOU. MY FIRST CONCERN WAS. I MEAN THE LETTER OF 10 REVERENCE THAT THEY INTEND TO HOLD BOTH. ONE IS ACTUALLY. TOWN HOMES OWNING NOT MULTI FAMILIES OWNING NOTHING WITHIN OUR ZONING WOULD KEEP THEM FROM SELLING THAT OFF. AS FAR AS INDIVIDUAL TOWN HOMES IN THE FUTURE OR SELLING THAT LAND AND LETTING SOMEONE ELSE DEVELOP IT OVERALL. THE OFFSET IS THIS IS M F THREE AND THEY'RE GOING IN WITH A MUCH LESS DENSE PRODUCT WITHIN THE TRACK. BE IF I'M. RIGHT THAT'S CORRECT. YEAH, THEY'RE PROPOSING A MAXIMUM OF YOU KNOW, THEY THINK THEIR SIGHTLINE HERE IS YOU HAVE 78 UNITS. UM SO THAT'S CONSIDERABLY LESS DENSE THAN A TRADITIONAL MULTI FAMILY PRODUCT. GIVEN THE KIND OF SIMILAR SCALE AND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN THIS SORT OF STYLE, YOU KNOW. KIND OF LESSON SOME OF STAFF'S CONCERNS WITH POTENTIAL DOWN THE ROAD THAT WAY. OTHER QUESTIONS. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? YES. THANK YOU.

[00:10:09]

AND. FIVE PUTTING A REQUIREMENT WALL TO GO BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM. IT KIND OF RUINS THE WHOLE FLOW AND FEELING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. UM WE'RE FINE WITH PUTTING THE SCREEN WALL DOWN THE SOUTH SIDE WHERE IT BELONGS. WE HOPE THAT YOU COULD SUPPORT BOTH OUR REQUESTS AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION NOT TO REQUIRE IT BETWEEN THERE ARE TWO PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT. WE JUST HAVE AN UNLUCKY ACCIDENT OF HAVING TWO SEPARATE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY. THAT'S WHAT TRIGGERED THIS BECAUSE WE HAVE BOTH TOWN HOME PD WITH THE TOWN HOME DESIGNATION IN PD WITH THE MULTI FAMILY DESIGNATION, AND THAT'S WHAT'S TRIGGERING THE, UH, SCREENING REQUIREMENT. SO WE'D LIKE TO, UH, GET YOUR SUPPORT NOT HAVE TO PUT THE WALLS WHERE JOE SHOWED HIM. JUST SO IT LOOKS LIKE A UNIFIED NEIGHBORHOOD AND NOT A WALLED OFF SECTION OF ONE HALF VERSUS THE OTHER. STAFF HAS DETERMINED IT MEETS ALL THE COMMENTS AND FINDINGS THAT YOU HAVE TO MAKE AND I HOPE YOU CAN SUPPORT IT. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE ALSO HAVE THE CIVIL ENGINEER HERE WITH US THIS EVENING IF YOU HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS. BOTH. AHEAD. YOU'RE GOOD. BOTH PRODUCTS TOWN HOME, AND THESE ARE FOR RENT OR THEY'RE ALL GONNA BE FOR RENT, BUT SOME WILL BE ATTACHED IN THE TOWN HOMES, ONLY THEY HAVE TO BE ATTACHED. IN THE MULTI FAMILIES OWNING WHAT YOU SEE ON PLAN RIGHT OVER THERE THAT IS GOING TO BE THERE GOING TO BE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED WITH PRIVATE YARD, SO THEY'RE GOING TO LOOK LIKE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME. BUT THERE WILL ALL BE ON ONE LOT, SO WILL TECHNICALLY BE MULTI FAMILY. THEIR HORIZON FOR THE TOWN HOMES. AND YOU SAID THAT IT IS ALL RENT FOR RENT. YES SIR. THEY WILL. THEY WILL ALL BE OWNED AND RENTED BY THE SAME COMPANY AND MEAN SO ALL COMMON AREAS MAINTAINED BY THE SAME COMPANY AS WEALTH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. VERY GOOD, MR BALDWIN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. ADAM. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE TONIGHT. THEY WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONED. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. OCEANS. CONVERSATION. MOVE WHERE YOU APPROVED THE SITE PLAN WITH THE VARIANCE OF THE SCREEN WALL. SECOND MOTION. MR MAN'S EYE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. PUBLIC HEARING. MHM. HEARD HIM SAY, OKAY, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ANONYMOUS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING THE VARIANCE. AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND REQUESTED BY. THE APPLICANT SECOND BY MR HECKLER.

IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? THESE CAST YOUR VOTES. THE MOTION CARRIES AND THE CYCLING. HAS BEEN APPROVED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR BALDWIN FOR BEING HERE. TWO. VERY MR

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards and to Allow for Single Family Residential, Multi-Family Residential, and Commercial Uses, Located on the Southeast Corner of Bloomdale Road and Lake Forest Drive]

THIS IS TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. AND TO ALLOW FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, MULTI FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. THIS IS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOOMINGDALE ROAD IN LAKE FOREST DRIVE. THANK YOU. RIGHT SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO ZONE APPROXIMATELY 613 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY FOR SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL, MULTI FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. AND I DO WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT AN ASSOCIATED VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION REQUEST. UM FOR THIS PROPERTY WILL ALSO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE JULY 6TH MEETING. THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A ZONING EXHIBIT. UM AND SUBDIVIDED THE PROPERTY WITHIN FIVE TRACKS. SO I'LL LABEL THOSE FOR YOU HERE. WE ARE SO TRACKS ONE AND TWO ARE GENERALLY LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE CENTER OF THE SUBJECT.

[00:15:03]

AND IN ORDER TO ALLOW A GREATER MIX OF PRODUCTS AND LOCK TYPES. APPLICANTS PROPOSING DEVELOPMENT ON THESE TRACKS WITH SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT FOR YOU AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. AND THE PROPOSED USES A MODIFIED SETBACKS DO ALIGN WITH SIMILAR DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, INCLUDING THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE OVERALL PENETRATE MASTER PLAN THAT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED EARLIER THIS YEAR. TO THE SOUTH. AS PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY LOTS SHOULD BLEND IN ADJACENT WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND INTEGRATE TO THE LARGER DEVELOPMENT. FOR ATTRACT THREE LOCATED NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAKE FORCE DRIVE AND FUTURE WILMOTH ROAD. THAT IS APPROXIMATELY 33 A HALF ACRES IN SIZE, AND THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST HAS DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MF THREE. MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM HIDES IN CITY DISTRICT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING IF YOU MODIFY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AS WELL OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND PROPOSED AS OUR DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. STAFF'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHOULD PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN THE HARD CORNER OF TWO MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. AND THOSE PROPOSING YOUR FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. GIVEN THE SIZE AND SCALE AND SCOPE OF THE OVERALL ZONING REQUEST IN THE VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL USES, AS WELL AS THE MULTI FAMILY TRACKED LINING WITH THE URBAN LIVING PLACE TYPE STAFF IS SUPPORTED OF MULTI FAMILY ON THIS TRACK. FOR ATTRACT FOUR AND THAT IS THE FLUX USE DISTRICT THAT IS LOCATED, UM, GENERALLY, LAKE FORCE DRIVE IN SOUTH OF BLOOMINGDALE ROAD. IT IS ALSO APPROXIMATELY 32 ACRES IN SIZE. THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING THE ABILITY TO EITHER DEVELOPED THEY ATTRACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY S F FIVE DISTRICT. OR C TWO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WITH THIS PROPOSAL, THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEVELOP AT LEAST A MINIMUM OF FIVE ACRES OF COMMERCIAL ON THIS TRACT. GIVEN THAT THE APPLICANT HAS, UM. EXCUSE ME HAS PROPOSED. THIS HAS PROPOSED THIS WITH THE COMMERCIAL USES. WE ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THE ALLOWABLE DEVELOP ABILITY OF THE MARKET. TRACKED FIVE IS GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF BLOOMINGDALE AND EXTENDS DOWN TO COUNTY ROAD 9 42. THIS TRACK IS APPROXIMATELY 230 ACRES IN SIZE AND THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO DEVELOP THE TRACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GC GOVERNMENTAL COMPLEX DISTRICT IN AN A PROS AND. EXCUSE ME IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THIS ANNEXATION. THIS TRACT IS INTENDED TO SET ASIDE FOR FUTURE OPEN SPACE AND PARKLAND.

SO BASED ON THE APPLICANTS, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, INSTATED VISIONS AND GOALS FOR THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY STAFF FEELS THAT THE PROPOSED ZONING REQUEST SHOULD CREATE A COHESIVE, INTEGRATED COMMUNITY. GIVEN THE SIZE AND SCALE AGAIN AS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH, THE OVERALL PAINTED TREE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT SHOULD MAKE A SIGNIFICANT POSITIVE IMPACT AND ACHIEVING ACHIEVING DIFFERENT HOUSING PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE CITY. AS SUCH STAFF IS OF THE OPINION THAT PROS REZONING REQUEST. WELL. CREATE EQUALITY, DEVELOPMENT AND BLEND IN WITH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS ON THE GROUND AS SUCH STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE POST REQUESTS AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN. EXCELLENT JOB QUESTIONS. ONE YES, SIR. DOES THE GOVERNMENT COMPLEX COMPLEX DISTRICT. IT'S PART DEDICATION. DOES IT COVER THE SOUTH? PORTION OF THE PROPERTY AS WELL. NO, SIR. SO THE GOVERNMENT COMPLEX IS GENERALLY LOCATED IN THIS AREA HERE. I MEAN, DOES IT MEET THEIR THEIR REQUIREMENT? THE SOUTHERN PORTION PAINTED TREE FOR THE PARKLAND. DEDICATION JUST SEEMED LIKE A BIG 200 LARGE TRACTS. SO WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ANNEXATION REQUEST, I BELIEVE JENNIFER THAT DOES THAT WOULD SATISFY THE PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIRED FOR BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH. MHM. IS MORE OF OUR CODE AND JUST HAD A QUESTION. WHY IS HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE SALES UNDER GC? UM YEAH. WAS THAT YOUR OFFICIAL ANSWER, MR ARNOLD, YOUR GUESS IS MINE. CHARGE. IT'S OTHER QUESTIONS. ENGLAND THANK YOU WAS OUR APPLICATION

[00:20:11]

OXYGEN ADVISORS. UM. THAT CAITLIN DID A GREAT JOB EXPLAINING, SO IT'S BEEN I GUESS SINCE DECEMBER SINCE I WAS BACK IN FRONT OF YOU GUYS, SO REALLY, THIS IS JUST A MIRROR OF WHAT YOU KNOW. WE ZONED ON THE SOUTH SIDE AS WE SHOWED TO YOU BACK IN DECEMBER.

SINCE THEN, WE'VE ACQUIRED A COUPLE PARCELS THAT WE ADDED TO THIS AND. WE'VE BEEN WORKING LEVY RECENTLY IN THE LAST SIX MONTHS, WORKING WITH STAFF AND. GOING BACK AND FORTH ON SEVERAL ITEMS WITH THE PROPOSED ZONING IN FRONT OF YOU. AND, AS CAITLYN MENTIONED WILL BE BACK IN FRONT OF COUNCIL HERE IN THE SIX WITH OUR ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, SO I'M REALLY HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY UPDATES ON THE PROJECT.

HAPPY TO DO SO. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. WE CAN GET AN UPDATE ON THE PROJECT WINS THE FIRST HOUSES GO ON THE GROUND. WHY WOULD IT JENNIFER AND STAFF CAN PROBABLY TELL YOU HOW MANY PLOTS IN ENGINEERING DRAWINGS WE HAVE, AND THERE'S A LOT ER. BUT I THINK WE HAVE FIRST HOUSES, UH EARLY NEXT YEAR. UM WE SHOULD HOPE THAT THE WEATHER IS NOT HELPING. NO. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. SAYS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THEM IF YOU COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED MM. SITE PLAN. FREE ZONE. ZONING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. YES, SIR. JUST A CLARIFICATION BECAUSE IT'S HARD TO SEE FROM THERE. UM FROM THE MAP. THE INTERSECTIONS, EVERYTHING. WE'LL GET A CAR TEARING SEVEN. UH UM AT THE BOTTOM IS THAT WILMOTH? OKAY, CAITLIN, CAN YOU HELP? CAN YOU JUST TRYING TO VERIFY SO WENT OUT WHAT WE'RE DOING. THANKS. THIS IS FUTURE WELLNESS. OKAY.

THIS IS LIKE FOURTH AS YOU MENTIONED HERE. THIS IS BLOOMINGDALE ROAD UP HERE. THEN THERE IS COUNTY ROAD, 9 43 KIND OF WIGGLE, VERY TOUCHING, NAMING IT AND THEN THE COMMERCIAL, UM, PROPOSED COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FIVE ACRES WOULD BE HERE. MULTI FAMILY HERE. SINGLE FAMILY AND THESE TRACKS AND THEN THIS WOULD BE THE GOVERNMENT COMPLEX. OKAY? GOOD THANKS FOR CLARIFYING BEFORE YOU LEAVE. GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS GEORGE LLEWELLYN 28 42 READY TO DRIVE. IN MCKINNEY, OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT. WILL BE CLOSE TO PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY MR MAN'S EYE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, MY MR MCCALL. DISCUSSION ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT MOTION CARRIES OF PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. I MEAN, I'VE BEEN EXCITED ABOUT THE SOUTHERN PART OF. ENTRY DEVELOPING IN THIS AS FAR AS EXTENDING NORTH AND BECOMING PART OF THE CITY. WITH THE ANNEXATION. THEY'VE DONE A BALANCED JOB IN THE PRESENTATIONS OF. GREEN SPACE, ALONG WITH SINGLE FAMILY LIVING, THE MULTI FAMILY PORTION OF THIS IS. 10% COMPARED TO THE SINGLE FAMILY AND 5% OF THE TOTAL OVERALL ZONING TRACK. WHOLE, SO I FEEL IT'S BALANCED AND FORWARD TO WHEN COMING INTO MCCAIN. ECHO THOSE COMMENTS. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED ZONING REQUESTS WITH THE SPECIAL ORDINANCE PROVISIONS LISTED AND THE STAFF REPORT. HAVE EMOTION MANAGED TO DOCK TO IMPROVE THE ANIMUS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING THE SPECIAL ORDINANCE PROVISIONS. SECOND BY MR MCCALL. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION IS APPROVED AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. FOR FINAL ACTION WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AT THE JULY 6TH 2021 MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM TO ONE. 0058 C CONDUCT A PUBLIC

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider / Discuss / Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “BG” - General Business District, “AG” - Agricultural District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “C2” - Local Commercial District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Located at Southwest Corner of U.S. Highway 380 (University Drive) and Bois D’Arc Road]

[00:25:05]

RIGHT? IS THERE ANYONE HERE TONIGHT? THAT THAT, UH, HAS MADE THE EFFORT TO SHOW UP AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. OKAY? MOTION MINUS KIRKENDALL TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UNTIL THE ADAM TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED PLANNING HIS OWN COMMISSION MEETING, WHICH IS WHEN MISS ARNOLD. JUNE 22ND 2021. SECOND BY MR MAN'S EYES THERE ANY DISCUSSION? THIS CAST YOUR VOTE. AIRBOAT EYES, NOT LETTING ME UM YEAH. THE MOTION CARRIES THE ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED. THAT CONCLUDES OUR REGULAR AGENDA NOW WOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY YET ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE TO SPEAK ON A NIGHT AND NOT ON THE AGENDA. ALL RIGHT STAFF COMMENTS. GREATLY. SO LIKE I MENTIONED LAST TIME WE WERE IN THE MIDST OF HIRING TWO NEW

[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]

DO YOU RECOMMEND STAYING UP QUICK? THANK YOU, AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE OUR NEW PLANNER ONCE AND YOU GUYS ARE GONNA BE SEEING A LOT MORE OF THEM. SO WE'RE JUST SUPER EXCITED.

THEY'RE HERE. WELCOME. WE'LL PUT YOU TO WORK IMMEDIATELY. NO ONE ELSE. MR. ARNOLD, YOU HAVE SOME MIC TIME. NOTHING FOR ME TONIGHT, OKAY? MEMBERS, ANYTHING. RIGHT? NOTHING GOOD.

ALL RIGHT. WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN, MR CLUTTER GERMS, SECOND BY MR TAYLOR. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. OH SAME SIGN WHERE ARE ADJOURNED?

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.