Aug 10, 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission on 2021-08-10 6:00 PM

GOOD? GOOD EVENING AT SIX P, AND WELCOME TO THE STATE OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING HIS OWN

[00:00:04]

WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS, YOUR CONCERNS ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO SHARE SPECIFIC TO THE AGENDA ITEM WHEN YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS LEFT, THE LIGHT WILL BE YELLOW.

AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE THREE MINUTES IS UP. YOU WILL HEAR A BUZZARD. WE WILL STICK CLOSELY TO THAT THREE MINUTES SCHEDULE. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT WE ARE HERE AND TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT TO FOCUS ON THE ISSUES. AND WE'LL GET HOME AT A DECENT HOUR TONIGHT. SO WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE TO OUR AGENDA. THE FIRST ITEM. WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE TO SPEAK ON A NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM THAT IS ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT. EXAMPLE OF THAT WOULD BE THE MINUTES. OF THE LAST JOINT MEETING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING IS ONLY COMMISSION OR THE REGULAR MINUTES. MINUTES OF OUR REGULAR MEETING. TWO WEEKS AGO. SO IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON ONE OF THOSE ITEMS PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT, THEN WE'LL

[CONSENT ITEMS]

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for Addison Wilson Addition, Lots 2R, and 3, Block A, and Lot 1, Block B, Located on the Northwest Corner of U.S. Highway 75 and Laud Howell Parkway]

CONVENIENCE A PLANT FOR THE ADDISON WILSON H ADDITIONAL TWO R AND THREE BLOCK A AND A LOT ONE BLOCK B. THIS IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF U. S HIGHWAY. 3, 80 LORD HOWELL PARKWAY. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. SOFIA SYRUP UNDER ONE. THIS IS A CONVENIENCE PLAID FOR ADDISON AND WILSON EDITION. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 111.61 ACRES INTO THREE LOTS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OF THE PROPOSED CONVINCED PLOT AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PLANT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE HAVE A MOTION. WE APPROVE THE ITEM OF CONDITIONS OF STAFF REPORT. MOTION AMOUNTS OF MAN'S AFTER APPROVED THE ITEM. WITH CONDITIONS CONTAINING THE STAFF REPORT. 2ND 2ND BY MR HECKLER. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. MOTION CARRIES WILL NOW MOVE TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. THESE ITEMS WILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. THE FIRST ITEM IS 21. DEC 0006 ISSUE P TO A PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. TO CONSIDER AN

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit to Allow for Warehouse Uses, Located on the Northwest Corner of State Highway 121 (Sam Rayburn Tollway) and Tina Drive (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)]

[00:05:05]

YES, SIR. JIM KIRBY WAS AVALON. HOMEOWNER IN THE AVALON ASSOCIATION. ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY THAT'S ASKING TO BE REZONED AS PART OF WHAT I UNDERSTAND THE ONE MCKINNEY 2040 PLAN WAS TO ENSURE THAT ALL. NEIGHBORHOODS WOULD HAVE A SUFFICIENT BUFFER BETWEEN ANY KIND OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS DIRECTLY BEHIND OUR PROPERTY ON WORCHESTER LANE AT 4617. UH THE PLAN WOULD ALSO IN LARGE AND WIDENING MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY, WHICH IS DIRECTLY BEHIND OUR HOUSE. WHICH WOULD NOT IN MY INFORMATION ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT BUFFER BETWEEN SAID COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROPERTY SO ALSO LEADING INTO THE PROPERTY FROM TINA. TO MCKINNEY RANCH PROPERTY WOULD GREATLY INCREASE THE TRAFFIC FLOW FOR THIS AREA AND SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED THE ROAD STRUCTURE AND ALSO IN DANGER AND THE LARGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN THAT LIVE WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. HAPPEN TO WRITE BICYCLES AND OTHER VEHICLES IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THANK YOU, MR KIRBY. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. I APOLOGIZE FOR MAKING LIGHT OF THAT PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE ELSE TONIGHT.

CARE TO SPEAK ON THIS PROPOSED ISSUE. P. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM TO THE AUGUST 24TH 2021 PNC ME HAVE EMOTIONAL, MR HECKLER. TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ADAM UNTIL THE NEXT PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 24TH 2021. SECOND BY MR TAYLOR. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. MOTION CARRIES THE ITEM. HAS BEEN TABLED. THE NEXT ITEM IS 20. 0073 Z TWO. PUBLIC

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to "C3" - Regional Commercial District, Located on the Northwest Corner of State Highway 121 (Sam Rayburn Tollway) and Tina Drive (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)]

AND TINA. DR SHEFFIELD. THANK YOU SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS ITEMS. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CONTINUED THE ITEMS TABLE TO THE AUGUST 24TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DUE TO THOSE NOTIFICATION SIGNS IN THAT AFFIDAVIT BEING SUBMITTED.

AGAIN WE DID RECEIVE SIX LETTERS OF OPPOSITION THAT WERE PASSED OUT BEFORE YOU THAT WERE SUBMITTED AFTER THE PACKET WAS POSTED. THOSE WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE PACKET WHEN IT BECOMES WHEN IT COMES BEFORE YOU ON THE 24TH. STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF STAFF. HIS TEAM ARE GOING TO BE WIDENED. I CANNOT SPEAK TO TINA DRIVE. I BELIEVE IT WON'T STAY AS IS AND I DO KNOW THAT CALLED MCKINNEY WHICH IS THE NORTH RIGHT AWAY THAT TOUCHES THE PROPERTY THAT'S ON OUR MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN IS EXPECTED TO BE A FOUR LANE ARTERIAL.

THOSE TWO ADDITIONAL LANES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY. OTHER QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, CAITLIN. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AT HIM. IF YOU HAVE, UH, COME TONIGHT. IT

[00:10:02]

ALRIGHT THAT EMOTION CARRIES ADAM HAS BEEN TABLED. AUGUST 24TH THE NEXT ITEM. WAS 21 DAY

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan for a Car Wash (Take 5 Express Car Wash) Located at 4950 McKinney Ranch Parkway]

COMMISSION. RIGHT? YES. TAKE FIVE EXPRESS CAR WASH. IS PROPOSED AT 4950. MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY PER THE ZONING CAR WASHES ARE ALLOWED BY RIGHT TYPICALLY, SITE PLANS ARE APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. HOWEVER, THEY ARE ASKING FOR A VARIANCE ON THIS SITE. UH THAT IS WHY STAFF HAS BROUGHT THIS VARIANCE REQUEST BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO HERE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCTIVE 4400 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH AT LOCATED AT THE CORNER. I'M SORRY. RIGHT HERE AT 4950 MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY. IT'S LOCATED ON 2.41 ACRES. THE NORTH SIDE. UM AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSED ORIENT. SORRY. HERE'S LOOKING SOUTH ON MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY. UM AND ALL OF THE OTHER. DIFFERENT UM, ANGLES THAT YOU MAY HAVE LIKED TO SEE. UM THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED TO ORIENT AND OVERHEAD DOOR AT THE END OF THE CAR WASHED TOWARDS. GRAVE STREET AND MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY. THE OVERHEAD DOOR IS PROPOSED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 100 FT. AWAY FROM THE STREET. WITH THE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING THAT YOU CAN SEE HERE. UM WITHIN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN, UM, STAFF HAS REVIEWED AND THE SCREENING WILL BE COMPOSED OF WAX MYRTLES. THREE FT IN HEIGHT AT THE TIME OF PLANTING AND SPACED, UH, REPEAT FEET APART ON CENTER STAFF IS OF THE OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ALONG THE EDGE OF THE TUNNEL, AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ALONG THE ST UH AND THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL PROVIDE A LEVEL OF SCREENING. THAT MEETS THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE FOR OB SCREENING OF THAT OVERHEAD DOOR AS SUCH STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANCE, AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU MIND HIGHLIGHTING THE DOOR JUST FOR THE RECORD AND PROPOSED SCREENING, SO THE DOOR IS GOING TO BE RIGHT HERE. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THESE, UH. SCREENING RIGHT HERE. ALL THOSE ADDITIONAL SHRUBS THAT ARE GONNA BE RIGHT THERE. AND THEN THERE'S ALSO GOING TO BE THE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY SCREENING RIGHT HERE. MHM. THE SCREENING THAT IS PROPOSED RIGHT OUTSIDE THE DOOR. THAT'S CLOSE TO THE OPERATION. I GUESS THERE'S NO CONCERN FROM THAT KIND OF IMPACTING ITS ABILITY TO OPERATE AND AS FAR AS MAINTAINING THAT SCREENING NO CONCERNS THERE. I WILL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT. UM, HOWEVER, WE HAVE REVIEWED IT FROM BOTH ENGINEERING AND FIRES PERSPECTIVE, AND THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY ISSUES IN REGARDS TO THE INGRESS AND EGRESS. OF ANYBODY COMING OUT OF THERE. THANK YOU. FAR TO THE NORTH OF THIS, WHICH WOULD, UM THIS BACKS UP TO ANOTHER COMMERCIAL TRACK, HIS FIRST DIRECT AND TO THE SOUTH. IT'S ACROSS MCKINNEY RANCHES OF PD. THAT COMMERCIAL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TRACK TO THE SOUTH, SO IT IS ZONED PD.

AND IT DOES ALLOW FOR, UM. RESIDENTIAL USES ON THAT TRACKED. UM, BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW, THERE HASN'T BEEN ANYTHING SUBMITTED, BUT IT DOES ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL USES. AND THERE'S KURT. RESIDENTIAL BACK TO THE EAST COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST OF THIS CORRECT SO ON THIS SIDE HERE THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL USES THIS WAY. AND THEN EVERYTHING

[00:15:02]

SECOND MAN. MR MCCALL, YOU NEED DISCUSSION. THIS CAST YOUR VOTE. ALONG THE MOTION CARE EASING, ADAM UM. HAS BEEN APPROVED SO WHEN THE APPLICANT TO SHOW UP OR IF THEY DO, HOPEFULLY, THINGS ARE OKAY. LET HIM KNOW. OKAY? OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS 21-0 ISSUE. P THIS IS

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit to Allow for a Private Club (Barons Creek Vineyard), Located at 301 W Louisiana Street]

[00:20:01]

LOCATION OKAY, SO THE PATIOS TO THE FRONT ON LOUISIANA ACROSS FROM PART TO THE SOUTH IS TO OLDER BUILDINGS THAT ARE NOW COMMERCIAL. YARDS A BLOCK AWAY. CT PROVISION A HALF A BLOCK AWAY, CORRECT. IT WILL ALSO HAVE TO GO THROUGH, UH, DIFFERENT HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ITEMS WITH OUR HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PLANNER. SO UH, THAT WILL ALSO HAVE TO BE AN ADDITIONAL REVIEWED ITEM. IN THE CONTEXT OF A PRIVATE CLUB IS ENOUGH TO DO WITH THE PERCENT OF ALCOHOL CELLS OR WHAT PUSHES IT TO A PRIVATE CLUB. IT IS THE PERCENTAGE OF ALCOHOL SALES TO FOOD CONSUMPTION CONSUMPTION, OKAY. THIS WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC IS NOT A MEMBERSHIP THING. WE'RE USING IT AS A PRIVATE CLUB IN THE CONTEXT OF A. ALCOHOL SO IT'S GOING TO BE AN OPEN BUSINESS FOR ANYONE. IT HAS TO DO MORE OF THE ALCOHOL CONTENT OR ALCOHOL PERCENT OF CELLS THAT IS CORRECT BASED OFF OF THE ZONING IN THIS AREA.

THIS TYPE OF USE WAS CLASSIFIED MORE CLOSELY AS A PRIVATE CLUB IF IT HAD BEEN ON THE OTHER SIDE OF MITCHELL PARK, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED BY WRITING WITHOUT AN SCP. AND JUST TO CLARIFY THE PATIO BECAUSE I'VE SEEN THIS BUILDING. IT'S GLASSED ON THE FRONT. THE PATIO IS NOT GOING TO BE OPENED UP WHERE THE GLASS IS REMOVED, IS IT WHAT CONTEXT IS IN A PATIO? I WILL HAVE TO LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT. AS FAR AS THE. ORDINANCE FOR PRIVATE CLUB GOES WITH THE CITY. MCKINNEY, UM. IS THERE ANY ALLOWANCE TO STRIP A ZONING OF A PRIVATE CLUB SHOULD BE BECOME A NUISANCE TO THE TOWN OR SOMETHING OF THAT SORT, OR IS IT ONGOING ONCE IT'S ISSUED? CLOSURE. SO THAT MIGHT BE BETTER ANSWERED BY JENNIFER, BUT NORMALLY THEY WOULD HAVE TO NO LONGER STATUTORILY MEET THE. HOME THE CODE OF THOSE S UPS AND THAT ARE SET FORTH WITHIN OUR CODE OF ORDINANCES. BUT I AM NOT SURE IF THEY'RE IN ANY EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES. THERE'S NO RENEWAL PROCESS FOR THIS ONE. SOME CORRECT. IT'S VERY MUCH LIKE ZONING ONCE YOU ALLOW FOR THE S AND P AS LONG AS THEY DON'T BREAK THAT ZONING IT CONTINUES ON. OTHER QUESTIONS. I'M SORRY. CHRIS GOT ONE MORE IF THEY PLAN TO EXPAND IT TO UTILIZE THE OTHER SPACE DO THEY HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE PNC FOR ANOTHER WOULD. AND THERE IS A REFERENCE TO IN THE STAFF REPORT TO A, UM CHURCH. CAN YOU IDENTIFY THE CLOSEST CHURCH. TWO WE ACTUALLY MADE SURE TO MEASURE THAT AND PER THE ORDINANCE REQUIRED MINT. IT

[00:25:05]

MEASURING FROM DOOR TO DOOR, I'D HAVE TO LOOK UP THE EXACT CHURCH NAME, BUT WE DID ENSURE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT DID MEET THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS TO BE, UM 300 FT AWAY FROM A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION.

IS IT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHWEST CORNER? WHAT'S IT CLOSE TO? IT IS AT THE CORNER OF WEST DAVIS AND SOUTH CHURCH STREET, AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS V LIFE CHURCH INCORPORATED. SO CAN YOU. WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR IS TO PUT A DOT ON THE CHURCH COMPARED TO WHERE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS. I DO NOT HAVE OKAY RIGHT THERE. SO RIGHT HERE, SO IF YOU MEASURE FROM THE OPENING OF THE DOOR. DOWN TO WHERE THIS PROPOSED CHURCH IS. IT IS ABOUT 342 350. FT, OKAY? THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE? IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. YES, THERE. WILL COME UP AND GIVE US UM FROM YOUR SEAT. SOME OF THE DETAILS OF NO, NO, FROM YOUR FROM YOUR POSITION IN THIS CASE, OKAY. HELLO, EVERYONE. MY NAME IS ANTHONY MACKIE. UM TO 60.

EAST DAVIS. THE STREET. I LIVE IN THE APARTMENTS OVER THERE. JUST MOVED. WHO MOVED HERE? I AM THE GENERAL MANAGER AND CERTIFIED SOMMELIER AT BARON'S CREEK VINEYARDS. AND UM, SO THIS IS KIND OF WERE VERY EDUCATION BASED WINERY. UM AND IT IS MY JOB TO INSTILL A LOT OF THAT. WE'RE NOT JUST ABOUT HOW COME IN AND BUY WINE. WE WANT YOU TO BE PART OF THE FAMILY. WE WANT YOU TO LEARN ABOUT LINE. I DO ONE EDUCATION CLASSES EVERY WEEK. FOOD AND WINE PAIRING. UM WE JUST CREATE A REAL, UH. FRIENDLY KIND OF LIKE A WAY TO MEET UP OTHER OTHER PEOPLE THAT ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN FOOD AND WINE. AND SO IT'S KIND OF MY JOB TO KEEP THAT, UM. EDUCATION ELEMENT PRESENT IN ALL OF OUR LITTLE SATELLITE LOCATIONS. WE HAVE ONE ON THE SQUARE IN GEORGETOWN. WE HAVE ONE ON THE SQUARE IN GRANBURY. AND THIS WOULD BE OUR THIRD AND. HOURS WISE, WE'RE LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, TWO O'CLOCK TO NINE O'CLOCK. WE'RE NOT A NIGHTTIME BAR. KIND OF AN ENVIRONMENT. UM LIKE I SAID, OUR TYPICAL CUSTOMER BASE IS SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 40 AND 75. PEOPLE THAT APPRECIATE WINE AND FOOD AND NOT. PEOPLE LOOKING TO STAND. WAIT AND HAVE A GREAT TIME. UM. AND YES, SOMEWHAT UNIQUE IN THAT. IN THAT SENSE, IT'S. TRYING TO EDUCATE THE TEXAS ONE PERSON AT A TIME AND THE ENJOYMENT OF, UH OF WINE. I DO A LOT OF SEMINARS, VIRTUAL IN PERSON, AND IT'S MEANT TO BE.

VERY EDUCATIONAL PLACE TO ENJOY FRIENDS, MEET NEW FRIENDS AND, UM, YOU KNOW, HAVE A GLASS OF WINE, SOME INTERESTING CHEESES AND CHARCUTERIE. SO IT'S. MORE MATURE IF YOU WILL, UH ENVIRONMENT. AND DINOSAUR. I THINK YOUR QUESTIONS ARE THE PATIO AUDIO. YEAH. THERE. IT IS OUR INTENT TO REMOVE THE FRONT. I THINK IT'S LIKE 30 FT. ON THE EAST LOUISIANA IN 20 FT. ON CHURCH. AND IT WOULD BE A COVERED PATIO SHOULD BE A LITTLE GATE A LITTLE LITTLE THREE. FT GATE. IT WALKING MUCH LIKE HARVEST IS OKAY, LITTLE MASON COVERED LITTLE PATIO AND THEN ACTUAL DOOR. 20 FT, UM, IN OKAY? THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS. I DO HAVE ONE ARE YOU GIVING. EDUCATION CLASSES ON WINE OR YOUR WINE TASTING. OR ARE YOU BOTH? I AM BOTH I WHAT WE DO. WINE TASTING IS, OF COURSE, BUT THEN ONCE YOU'VE VISITED YOU HAD YOUR WINE TASTING. YOU KNOW WHAT YOU LIKE? AND I HAVE. I DO CLASSES. I DO A WINE 11. AND THEN I DO WINES OF THE WORLD SO WE DON'T HAVE THE WINES OF THE WORLD. BUT THAT'S PART OF OUR WE WANT TO BE MORE THAN JUST A PLACE TO GET A GLASS OF WINE. SO YOU WANT TO KNOW I'M DOING WINDS OF

[00:30:02]

THERE IS A BACK ENTRANCE SO YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO WALK ALL THE WAY AROUND TO THE FRONT AND COME IN. THERE WOULD BE A DOOR BECAUSE THAT'S THE SAME DOOR THAT WE NEED TO GET. POUNDS OF WINE THROUGH SO THERE, YOU KNOW THE ENTRANCE IS THERE. AS FAR AS SEEDING. THERE'S NO SEATING IN THAT AREA. WHERE AM I GOING? WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE TO THE SOUTH OF THIS BUILDING? SEE, THEN TT NOW. WILL THERE BE CUSTOMER SITTING IN CHAIRS AND TABLES? IN THAT ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE BUILDING, SO NOT NOT THIS AND NOT AT THIS POINT. IT WOULD BE A EXCEPT A PLACE TO DELIVER THE WINE AND A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN ENTER IN SERVICE INTERESTS. OKAY? FORGET. NO ONE ELSE. THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT SO MUCH. WE MAY HAVE SOME QUESTIONS AFTER THIS PUBLIC HEARING, SO IF YOU'LL PAY ATTENTION, AND WE MAY CALL YOU BACK UP, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS PROPOSED S U P AT THREE OR ONE LOUISIANA POLICE COME TO THE PODIUM.

GOOD EVENING. UM EA VON BERGEN AND. I LIVE ADJACENT TO, UH, THIS PLOT RIGHT HERE. MY. I'VE BEEN HOMESTEADED IN THAT LOCATION AT ONE OF FIVE STAFF BENCH FOR 14 YEARS. AND. THE WEST FENCE OF THE PARKING LOT FOR THIS. THE PROJECT IS ABOUT. 23 FT FROM MY BEDROOM AND ABOUT UM. 30 FT FROM MY BACK DOOR. SO I HAVE GRAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT. HOW THIS IS GOING TO AFFECT MY QUALITY OF LIFE. AND IN TURN, UH. ACTUALLY RE SALE OF MY PROPERTY DOWN THE LINE. AND I KNOW THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION ON WHETHER THAT BACK PARKING LOT. IS GOING TO BE JUST TO SERVE. WINES INTO THE BUILDING OR WHETHER THERE IS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE SOME. TABLES AND CHAIRS OUT THERE WITH PEOPLE DRINKING WINE IN HEAVEN. GOOD TIME. SO I'M NOT SURE. BUT THERE'S ALSO, UH, QUESTION I HAVE. THERE'S UH, YOU KNOW. SEVERE TRAFFIC CONGESTION OR PARKING PROBLEMS. IN THE AREA ALREADY, AND THAT'S JUST GOING TO BRING MORE OF THAT ON AND I HAVE ALREADY. PEOPLE TRYING TO PARK ON MY PROPERTY THERE. IT'S LONG CLOYD STREET. WHERE I HAVE. A PLACE THAT PEOPLE TRY TO PARK IN. AND IT'S JUST ALL RIGHT. THERE'S A LOT OF QUESTIONS I HAVE. ON THIS PROJECT. I KNOW THAT THERE'S OVER 300 FT FROM DOOR TO DOOR FROM THE CHURCH TO THE BUILDING, BUT FROM THE BACK DOOR, IT'S OBVIOUSLY LESS THAN 300 FT. SO ANYWAY. I FEEL LIKE, UM. IT'S A PROJECT THAT'S GOING TO AFFECT MY QUALITY OF LIFE. VERY POSSIBLY, UH, DAMAGE THE RESALE OF MY PROPERTY, TOO.

[00:35:03]

TABLES AND CHAIRS. MHM. WHAT WE'RE ATTEMPTING TO DO WITH THIS BUILDING THAT'S AT THE CORNER OF LOUISIANA AND CHURCH. THERE IS CARVE OUT AN OPENING. INTO THIS BUILDING. THAT'S ABOUT 18 OR 20. FT TALL, WE WANNA CARVE OUT THAT GLASS IS THERE RIGHT NOW? SO KIND OF LIKE LANDON'S DOWN THE STREET. HAVE TABLES AND SHARES THEIR THEIR COVERED. WE'RE NOT CHOPPING OUT THE ENTIRE BUILDING OR JUST PULLING OFF SOME OF THAT FACADE. SOME OF THAT FRONT ELEVATION THERE. TO MAKE THAT AVAILABLE AND OPEN AND BE PART OF THE CULTURE THAT'S HAPPENING UP AND DOWN TENNESSEE. THEY'RE MUCH, MUCH LIKE. WAS THAT DID YOU SAY HARVEST THE HARVEST RESTAURANT? YEAH, THE HARVEST THEIR MUCH LIKE THAT, UH, SO THAT PART OF THE BUILDING WERE ABOUT THE TOP OF THE WINDOWS WERE TAKING THAT WALL DOWN. AND THEN AS YOU STEP INTO THIS COVERED PATIO AREA WILL BE ANOTHER. THERE'S BE MORE GLASS OR STOREFRONT THERE AS YOU STEP INDOORS THERE WHICH YOU CAN DINE OUTSIDE ON A NICE NIGHT. EVENING. THINK THAT WAS REALLY ALL I HAD TO SAY IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR KING.

WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? MAKE COMMISSION WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HERE. OF EMOTION, AND MISS KIRKENDALL CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. 2ND 2ND BY MR MAN'S EYES OR ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. WHAT WE'LL DO NOW IS HAVE. A CONVERSATION AND QUESTIONS AMONGST THE COMMISSION MEMBERS AND STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST, ANYONE. I JUST HAVE A REALLY QUICK QUESTION FOR STAFF. CAN YOU ADDRESS THE NOISE CONCERNS? COURSE SO VERY SIMILARLY TO WHAT Y'ALL SAW WITH THE TOPS BREWERY, SO WE ALREADY HAVE A PRETTY STRICT NOISE ORDINANCE THAT IS SET IN PLACE. SHOULD NOISE EVER BECOME AN ISSUE OF WE HAVE THAT ORDINANCE THAT IS ALREADY SET FORTH FOR US TO BE ABLE TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES. SO DO YOU MIND POINTING TO THE PARKING LOT AND THAT WAS BROUGHT UP AND WOULD THERE BE ANY SPECIAL PERMIT REQUIRED FOR OUTDOOR SEATING, OR THEY CAN JUST GO OUT THERE AND PUT DOORS, TABLES AND CHAIRS IN THIS PARKING LOT? CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT AND POINT TO IT? SURE. SO UH, THE SITE AND QUESTION AS YOU CAN SEE IS LABELLED IN THE BLUE. UH, HERE IS WHERE THE ACTUAL BUILDING LIGHT ENDS. AND THIS LITTLE HASH PIECE IS GOING TO BE, UH, THAT ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE I WOULD NEED TO SPEAK WITH THE APPLICANT BECAUSE. IF THEY ARE GOING TO ADD ANYTHING ADDITIONAL BECAUSE THE SNP IS BASED OFF OF THE INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SEATING THAT WE'VE ALREADY ALLOWED WE THEY WOULD PROBABLY END UP BY PROBABLY THEY WOULD NEED TO UPDATE THEIR SCP ACCORDINGLY. YES. YEAH, SO AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW, THE S U P IN FRONT OF US WOULD NOT ALLOW THE TABLES AND CHAIRS IN THE PARKED SCP THAT YOU WERE SEEING CURRENTLY IS FOR THIS OUTDOOR SEATING HIGHLIGHTED IN PINK AND THEN FOR THE INDOOR USES. HERE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF CAITLIN MAY NEED TO GET THE OUTER COME BACK UP. SO MAKE

[00:40:02]

YOU'RE SAYING THAT THIS SPECIFIC S U P. DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY SUCH BACKYARD, SO I.

INCLUDES THE RECEDING IN THE FRONT AT THE NORTH AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. THAT'S IF THAT'S THE CASE, THEN THAT'S YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO COME BACK AND. AND I ASKED THE QUESTION ABOUT USE OF THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. UM OKAY? ALL RIGHT. SO AS OF SO AS OF NOW, UM. IT IS SIMPLY A COMPANY USE. ACCESS IN AND OUT, BUT NOT A AN OUTDOOR. SEATING AREA AND CANNOT BE. ADDED. AT THIS TIME, IT NEEDS TO BE A SEPARATE. CAITLYN. YOU WANT TO ADDRESS THAT? THE ANSWER IS YES. OKAY. THE ANSWER IS YES. SO, UH, AT THIS TIME, THE S U P IN FRONT OF US IS FOR THIS OUTDOOR PATIO HERE THAT IS ALONG WEST LOUISIANA. SHOULD YOU DECIDE THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT OUTDOOR SEATING IN THE BACK? YOU WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK WITH AN ADDITIONAL US SPECIFIC USE PERMANENT WITH US. MHM. SORRY. WE JUST NEED THE EXHIBIT TO BE UPDATED TO INCLUDE THAT AREA CORRECT. OKAY. UNDERSTAND? WE HAVE LIVE MUSIC. OH, WE ARE HAVING BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EXIST IN THE IN INTERIOR BREAKDOWN. WE MAY BUT IT WOULD BE VERY ONE MAN GUITAR KIND OF A MAN ACOUSTIC. IT WOULD BE FOR MORE ATMOSPHERE NOT FOR. LIVE BAND. OH IT WOULD IT WOULDN'T WORK WITH CEILINGS AND ALL LIKE THE PLACE WE HAVE NOW AND GEORGETOWN HAVE A WOMAN WHO PLAYS THE PIANO. I HAVE A GUY WHO PLAYS GUITAR AND YOU KNOW IT TOOK NO DIFFERENT THAN HAVING YOU KNOW. RADIO OR MUSIC, YOU KNOW, AND IT'S NOT.

ROCK AND ROLL TIME. IT'S DON'T DISTURB THEIR HAIR TO TALK, OKAY? YEAH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS OF. AFRICAN OR STAFF. RIGHT? OCEANS I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE. THIS AGENDA ITEM. EMOTION MEMBERS KIRKENDALL TO APPROVE THE ANIMUS. FIRST STAFF RECOMMENDATION. I JUST WANT TO MAKE 11.2 TO CLEAR ALL WE'RE DOING IS EVALUATING WHAT'S INSIDE THE BUILDING, SO NOTHING BEHIND NO OUTDOOR SEATING ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT'S WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE BUILDING. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THAT. JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S. TO CLEAR SECOND. THE MOTION. MHM. MHM. JUST TO CLARIFY THIS HERE WOULD BE. TECHNICALLY AN OUTDOOR PATIO, BUT THIS IS ALONG WEST LOUISIANA. OKAY? YEAH, THE PATIO SEATING THERE AND THEN THE BUILDING ITSELF FOR THE PRIVATE CLUB. NOTHING EXTERIOR BEHIND THE BUILDING CORRUPT THAT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED SO YEAH. MS ARNOLD, YOU'RE GOOD WITH THAT.

COMMISSION IS GOOD WITH IT. YES. OTHER QUESTIONS. I DO HAVE A REQUESTER IN THIS IS MAYBE OF STAFF. I KNOW WE'VE GOT A PENDING MOTION. BUT IF WE COULD PROVIDE THE RESIDENT WITH WHAT THE NOISE ORDINANCE IS, IN CASE THAT'S EVER AN ISSUE. SO THEY'RE AWARE OF HOW THEY COULD REMEDY THAT SITUATION. IF THAT'S I CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT, OKAY? THANK YOU. OKAY. WOULD YOU HAVE A MOTION BY MS KIRK AND ALL TO APPROVE THE ANIMALS? FIRST STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.

SECOND MAN, MR HACKLER ANY MORE DISCUSSION? THIS CASE YOU ABOUT. OKAY. THE MOTION CARRIES YEAR, ADAM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE SEPTEMBER 7 2021. COUNCIL MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM WE HAVE TONIGHT IS TO ONE DEATH

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider / Discuss / Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC”- Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Generally to Modify the Uses and Development Standards, Located on the South Side of U.S. Highway 380 (University Drive) and approximately 500 Feet East of Custer Road]

[00:45:04]

ZONING DISTRICT TO BE ALLOWED IN THE BACK. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DO ABOUT 28 UNITS PER GROSS ACRE MAXIMUM NOT TO EXCEED 420 BUILDING HEIGHT WILL NOT EXCEED THREE STORIES AND NOT TO EXCEED 45 FT. UM. STAFF IS OF THE OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED REZONE REQUEST WILL CREATE EQUALITY, COMMERCIAL DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE WORKED WITH THE DEVELOPER IN REGARDS TO A COMMERCIAL PARKWAY THAT WILL COMBINE TRACKED ONE AND TRACK TO FOR AN OPEN SPACE. UH THAT WILL ALLOW FOR THE COMMERCIAL AND MULTI FAMILY TOO. TRULY INTEGRATE TOGETHER, UM, PER COUNCIL DIRECTIVE THERE. THEY ASK THAT WE TRY TO PRESERVE AS MUCH COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IS PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE. THIS TRACT WHILE IT IS BEING REZONED FROM COMMERCIAL TO COMMERCIAL AND MULTI FAMILY, UH, 65% IS STILL GOING TO BE COMMERCIAL, SO WE ARE STILL. CAPTURING THAT, UH, COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENT PER COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. UM. THAT IS THE WITH THE PROPOSED REZONE BEING POSITIONED APPROXIMATELY 630 FT OFF 3 80. IT IS ALSO BEHIND THE COMMERCIAL. THERE'S ALSO AN ADDITIONAL, UM. FLOODPLAIN HERE BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES HERE AND HERE THAT ALLOWS FOR AN ADDITIONAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE MULTI FAMILY AND THAT RESIDENTIAL PIECE. UH. THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE WILL BE PROGRAMMED IN A WAY THAT IT'S GOING TO INTEGRATE THE MULTI FAMILY TO THE COMMERCIAL. NOT INTO THAT FLOODPLAIN, SO MULTI FAMILY WILL GO. THIS WAY FOR ALL INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL USES AS SUCH STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST, AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT ARE WITHIN THE. DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STAFF REPORT. YEAH. QUESTION OF FLOOD PLAINS, SO THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY IS IT THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY, SO THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY IS ACTUALLY ALL GOING TO USE A DIFFERENT COLOUR WILL USE BLUE. THE FLOODPLAIN IS ACTUALLY HERE. THERE AND THERE IS A SMALL PORTION THAT. DOES GO OVER TO TRAPPED ONE. THEY WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH ANY FLOODPLAIN EITHER RECLAMATION OR THEY HAVE TO DO AN UPDATED LOMER IN THAT AREA. UM. SHOULD THEY WANT TO DEVELOP OVER THERE? IF NOT, IT IS A NON DISTURBANCE AREA AND THE FLOODPLAIN WILL NOT BE AFFECTED. THE FLOODPLAIN CURRENTLY IS SECTION 404 WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. AND WAS DESIGNED FOR FULL BUILD OUT OF THIS AREA. SO THIS FLOODPLAIN HAS ALREADY BEEN STUDIED IN SUCH A WAY THAT MHM.

THEY WERE PLANNING THAT THIS TRACT WAS GOING TO BE DEVELOPED. THEY WEREN'T GOING TO PLAN AS IF NOTHING WAS EVER GOING TO BE TOUCHED. BUT JUST TO MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR THE BLUE LINE IS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. SO ALL THE FLOOD PLAIN TO THE SOUTH OF THE MULTI FAMILY NORTH YET. IS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES SO THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TOUCH THAT. ANYWAYS THERE'S NOT FLOODPLAIN WITHIN THEIR PROPERTY THEY CAN MITIGATE FOR REDEFINED THE BOUNDARY, TRY TO CUT DOWN THE TREES AND UTILIZE THAT SPACE. IT'S ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. SO THEY WOULDN'T BE TOUCHING THAT FLOODPLAIN. ANYWAYS THAT IS CORRECT. THEY WON'T BE TOUCHING ANY OF THE FLOODPLAIN THAT IS WITHIN THE. THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY. OKAY DO YOU WANT TO PULL UP THE AERIAL EXHIBIT? YOU CAN SEE THE LINE ON THERE. IT'S A LOT EASIER TO SEE WITH THAT AREA THAT NOT WITH THAT, YES. WHAT'S THE DISTANCE BETWEEN? THE PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IN THE.

[00:50:11]

NOTIFICATION BUFFER AREA, SO THAT'S PRETTY GOOD GAUGE OF THAT PRETTY GOOD. IN MY CORRECTOR. REMEMBER, THEY'RE PROPOSING A LIVING SCREENING ON THE FLOODPLAIN PORTION. THAT IS CORRECT, SO THEY ARE PROPOSING A LIVING SCREENING ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION TO ADD TO THAT ADDITIONAL THAT GREEN BELT FIELD. OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF. PALIN. THANK YOU, THEIR APPLICANT. TONIGHT? YES, THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOB ROTOR 1700 RED BUDS. WE 300 MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. THIS IS ONE OF THE, UH THIS PARTICULAR TRACK IS ONE OF THOSE TRACKS THAT A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WAS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS BEING A PRIME LOCATION FOR, UM, STIMULATION FOR EATERIES AND DRINK REEVES THE KINDS OF THINGS THAT CREATE A LOT OF SALES TAX REVENUE FOR THE CITY.

THIS WAS ONE OF THOSE AREAS THAT WAS DESIGNATED ALONG WITH AN AREA AND CRAIG RANCH THAT WE'VE ALL INTERACTED WITH. ON THE DEVELOPMENTS DOWN THERE. BECAUSE OF THE DEPTH OF THIS TRACK NUMBER ONE. IT'S HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT IT WOULD EVER DEVELOPED COMMERCIAL ALL THE WAY TO THE SOUTH. BUT ON TOP OF THAT MY CLIENT HAS HAS ATTRACTED IN HIS, UH IN THE FINAL STAGES OF NEGOTIATION WITH A AN ENTERTAINMENT VENUE OR. VENUE THAT HAS, UH, RESTAURANTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CALLED THE HUB. THIS IS OPINION OUT OF FLORIDA. THAT IS NOW COME INTO THIS PART OF TEXAS. I THINK THEY HAVE. THEY'RE NEGOTIATING FOR A SPOT IN ALLEN. AND THIS IS THEIR PICK OF THE LOCATION IN MCKINNEY. THAT PARTICULAR VENUE IS NOT AN OUTDOOR CONCERT VENUE. IT IS A FAMILY ORIENTED. GREEN OPEN SPACE THAT HAS RESTAURANT SURROUNDED IN THAT KIND OF THING. IT DOES HAVE. PROGRAMMED ACTIVITIES THERE. YOGA AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF, BUT IT'S PRIMARILY FAMILY ORIENTED. ATTRACT ALSO IS BIG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT A LARGE GROCER WHEN THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATING WITH THAT. AND A LOT OF OTHER SIGNIFICANT COMMERCIAL ASPECTS. BOTH THE HUB AND SOME OF THE OTHER COMMERCIAL. UM. TENANTS THAT WE'RE TALKING TO FEEL THAT IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO HAVE A MIXED USE ENVIRONMENT THERE TO HAVE. ON SITE RESIDENTIAL SO THAT IN THE EVENINGS YOU'LL HAVE PEOPLE THERE TO SUPPORT THOSE ACTIVITIES, ESPECIALLY IN THE RESTAURANTS AND ESPECIALLY IN THE IN THE DRINK, REESE. AND SO I THINK I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S IN YOUR PACKET MOVIE CERTAINLY PROVIDED TO THE. TO THE STAFF, STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL A LETTER FROM THE HUB. DEVELOPER OWNER THAT ENCOURAGES THE CITY TO FAVORABLY LOOK AT. HAVING A MIX CHEESE NOW WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING THERE. IN TERMS OF THAT MIXED USE WOULD BE NO MORE THAN 420 UNITS, NO HIGHER THAN THREE STORIES PROBABLY END UP BEING A UH, MIXTURE OF TWO AND THREE STORIES TO KNOW THAT PLANNING IS STILL UNDERWAY, BUT WE HAVE KEPT THE NUMBER OF UNITS OF 420 UNITS. AS MR ECKER, UH, BROUGHT UP. WE ARE. ABIDING BY THE CITY'S SCREENING REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, ELECTING TO GO WITH A LIVING SCREEN, RATHER THAN THE SIX FT WALL, WHICH CREATES A REAL BARRIER. TO BE ABLE TO ENJOY THE OPEN SPACE THAT IS THERE. AMONG THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE THAT YOU HAVE NOTICED. AS YOU READ YOUR STAFF REPORT IS IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THIS TRULY IS A MIXED USE PROJECT. MY CLIENT HAS AGREED THAT. WE WON'T BE ABLE TO PULL A BUILDING PERMIT FOR ANY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE UNTIL WE HAVE, UH, AT LEAST THREE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES THAT ARE UNDERWAY. NOT BE ABLE TO OCCUPY A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE THERE UNTIL WE HAVE TEMPORARY CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FROM AT LEAST TWO RESTAURANTS IN ANOTHER COMMERCIAL ENDEAVOR.

AND WE ALSO HAVE THAT GREEN SPACE THAT PART THAT STITCHES THE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL

[00:55:01]

THAT THE. WAY IN WHICH YOU WILL GET TO THE OR THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK FOR THE SOUTHERN PORTION IS ALL GOING TO BE PRIVATE STREET. THERE WILL NOT BEING PUBLIC STREETS ON THE INTERIOR OF THIS TRACK. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S THAT'S ALLOWED US TO DO IS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF OR THE SPACING OF THE TREES ALONG THE. THE COMMON PROPERTY LAND BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTH AND THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH, WHICH AGAIN HELPS STITCH THOSE TWO TRACKS TOGETHER, YOU KNOW? IN A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY WAY. UM THINK I'LL STOP THERE. YOU HAVE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REQUESTS YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. TRACKS NOT WITHIN THE STONEBRIDGE RANCH DEVELOPMENT. GREAT. IT IS NOT. SO YOU SAID YOU MET WITH ISTANBUL DRINKER WITH THE ASSOCIATION. WHAT WAS THE OUTCOME OF THAT? ARE THEY IN SUPPORT OF IT? OR DID THEY JUST HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS THAT YOU ANSWERED? WELL, THERE WERE A LOT OF QUESTIONS. UH THAT WE ANSWERED, UM I WOULD SAY GENERALLY, THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THAT TRACK. THE MAIN CONCERNS THAT THAT I HEARD WAS THEY'D RATHER HAVE TWO STOREY MULTI FAMILY RATHER THAN THREE. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A FINANCIAL. MARKER THAT WE'VE GOT TO MEET. WE'VE GOT TO HAVE ENOUGH RESIDENTIAL UNITS THERE TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD TO DEVELOP THAT AREA. SO. THAT'S THAT'S WHY WE KEPT IT AT 4 20, BUT THERE WILL BE SOME THREE STORY THERE. SO I UNDERSTAND WANTING TO RATHER THAN THREE. BUT DID THEY WANT THE MULTI FAMILY AT ALL? YOU KNOW, WE DIDN'T I DIDN'T HEAR ANY OPPOSITION TO THE MULTI FAMILY. THE OPPOSITION. I HEARD AND IT WAS. NOT OVERWHELMING, BUT THE CONVERSATION I HEARD WAS, WE PREFER FOR IT TO BE TWO STORY IF IT HAS TO BE THREE STORY JUST TO MAKE THE ECONOMICS WORK. IT HAS TO BE. OTHER QUESTIONS. JUST TO VERIFY THE HEIGHT. UM THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL WAS WHAT 50 IF I REMEMBER FROM YESTERDAY. 58 58 FT AND WE'RE GOING DOWN TO 35 IS THAT. THAT THERE WAS SOME CONCERN ABOUT STAFF ABOUT THE HEIGHT. NOW THAT THAT'S IN ANOTHER CASE IS THAT IN ANOTHER ONE, OKAY. ALL RIGHT, OKAY. LOT, OKAY? YES. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON HIM. IF YOU COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. YEAH. UH GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE AND RESTOCK. UM, A RESIDENT OF THE AREA IN QUESTION. AND I HADN'T HEARD ABOUT THIS UNTIL JUST THIS MORNING. IT'S NOT TO SAY THAT. THE CONVERSATIONS WERE HAD, AND I'M SURE THAT THE A BACK I CAN'T REMEMBER THAT THEY DID DISCUSS IT WITH THOSE THAT WERE IN THE ROOM. WHAT I CAN SAY IS THAT THERE IS SOME CONCERN AT THE CURRENT TIME. FOR THE RESIDENTS IN THE STONERIDGE RANCH AREA. UH MY WIFE AND I FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS AND JUST STARTED TALKING WITH NEIGHBORS. AND I WOULD SAY THAT THE. NOTION THAT THERE'S NO PUSHBACK AND CONCERN ABOUT THERE BEING A MULTI FAMILY ESTABLISHMENT THERE IS INACCURATE. I THINK THERE IS SOME CONCERN FOR THE 2ND AND 3RD EFFECTS THAT GO ALONG. WITH A 400 PLUS MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS THAT CLOSE. TWO SIGNIFICANT HOUSING. HERE IS YOU KNOW, I DON'T LIVE NECESSARILY RIGHT HERE. I'M A LITTLE MORE IN THIS DIRECTION. BUT I WOULD I WOULD SPEAK FOR THEM AND SAY THOSE RESIDENTS WOULD WOULD NOT BE. VERY UH, OPEN TO MULTI FAMILY IF THEY WERE ABLE TO BE HERE AND SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES. SO MY CONCERN AS A AS A CITIZEN OF MCKINNEY, AND EVERYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES IS THAT WHEN WE WERE LOOKING FOR A HOME, MY WIFE AND

[01:00:03]

I STRONGLY URGE THE COUNCIL TO, UM. THINK IN TERMS OF, UM JUST BEING A PRESERVATION, WATERCOURSE, AND AGAIN, IT WON'T WORK. IF YOU JUST HAVE ONE SIDE OF IT, UM, SERVING.

THE ANIMAL POPULATIONS, WHICH IS PRETTY DIVERSE. A LOT OF VARIETIES OF SNAKE AMPHIBIANS, RODENTS, BOBCATS, COYOTES ARE BACK THERE. DEER WILD TURKEY, UH, THEY SIMPLY ARE GOING TO DISAPPEAR FROM THAT VENUE. AND FINALLY, UM FROM THE, UH, PRIVACY PERSPECTIVE. UM. THEY CAN EITHER REMOVE THEM DOWN TO TWO STORIES OR THERE IS A GREEN BELT THAT THEY PUT IN BETWEEN

[01:05:03]

AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO SOME KIND OF TRAIL THROUGH THERE WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GO IN. TEAR UP A LOT OF THE, UH, THE WILDLIFE REFUGE THAT. IS SUPPOSED TO BE AN AREA THAT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE TOUCHED, OR WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO CUT ANY OF IT. ARE REMOVED ANY OF IT SO I THINK, UM, I THINK THEY'RE REALLY NEEDS TO BE MORE. MORE ANALYSIS OF WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE WATERSHED OFF OF THAT, TOO. THAT IS GOING TO BE CRITICAL IN THIS WATERSHED THAT WE'RE ON NOW. IS THERE ARE PARTS OF IT ARE IN A FLOODPLAIN, AND WE WERE. TOLD THAT WHEN WE BOUGHT THE HOUSE, AND SO I THINK THAT IT REALLY IS GOING TO TAKE SOME MORE STUDY AND HAVE NO OTHER. NO OTHER WAY OF TELLING YOU THAT THIS IS GOING TO CHANGE THE DYNAMICS THAT WE CAN BARELY GET OUT OF OFF OF STONE BRIDGE NOW AND COME DOWN, WATCH HILL AND GO TO STONEBRIDGE AND GET, UH, EITHER DIRECTION. ACROSS THE STREET THERE BECAUSE OF THE OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES THAT ARE ALREADY OVER THERE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF STONE BRIDGE, JUST RIGHT AT 3 80. THAT'S WHERE THE CIRCLE K IS AND A NUMBER OF RESTAURANTS. SO IT IS A DIFFICULTY WOULD BE NICE IF YOU COULD TABLE THIS UNTIL AFTER THE BYPASS IS DONE AROUND 3 80. SOMETHING LIKE THAT, BECAUSE. THIS IS JUST GOING TO ADD MORSE JUST MORE TRAFFIC.

DIFFICULT ENOUGH AS IT IS. THANKS. THANK YOU, MR FENDER. ANYONE ELSE HAVE WOULD LIKE, YES, TEAR IF YOU'LL CHECK YOUR TIME OR IT'S NOT WORKING. CAR. JUST GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. YOU KNOW, MY NAME IS GREG REMUS, 7 85 OR FIVE GRAND HAVEN LANE. I LIVE ACROSS THE STREET FROM TWO GENTLEMEN HERE. BUT. THERE. THERE THERE. THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION TO ANYONE ON OUR STREET IS TO YOU KNOW WHAT THE PLAN IS THAT WE'VE HEARD? MAYBE WRONGLY BEFORE. MAYBE IT'S STILL UNKNOWN BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO CUT AND PASS FROM THE SOUTH OR EXCUSE ME FROM THE NORTH, WHERE THE PROPERTY IS GOING TO BE BUILT INTO. I'M CONNECTING INTO OUR SIDEWALKS IN OUR AREAS AND TO BE TO BE PERFECTLY FRANK, REPAY IT. H O A FEE EVERY YEAR, AND WHEN WE. I CAME TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD 13 YEARS AGO, AND WE PAID A HIGH PREMIUM IN ORDER TO LIVE THERE. AND WE HAVE THE AMENITIES. WE HAVE THE ACCESS TO THE WATER INTO THE OTHER AREAS AND. STONEBRIDGE AND NOW YOU'RE GOING TO PUT 400 PEOPLE THERE. YEAH. I ASSUME ARE GOING TO PAY ANY KIND OF. FEES OR ANYTHING TO ACCESS THE SAME COMMITTEES THAT WORK WE'RE PAYING. AND THAT'S WHAT IT MIGHT BE CONCERNS AS YOU AGAIN. YOU'RE HEADING ADDITIONAL 400

[01:10:01]

WITHOUT ANY FINAL WARNING. I THINK THE DEVELOPERS NEEDED MAYBE COME OUT AND HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH US. MM. WOULD BE WILLING TO LISTEN TO THEM. BUT WHATEVER REASON, THEY DON'T WANT TO HAVE THAT DISCUSSION. THANKS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GET A CAR, TERRY. THANK YOU, UM, ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? ANYONE ELSE HERE TO TALK ON THIS? PROPOSED REASON. ALL RIGHT. I'M LIKE EMOTIONALLY. STEREO. MAKE EMOTIONALLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU, MR HECKLER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. AGAIN, OKAY? SECOND BY MR MCCALL. ANY DISCUSSION ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT THE MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED WHEN NOT HAVE, UH, QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AND OR THE APPLICANT WHO WANTS TO GO FIRST. I'LL START WITH STAFF. THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME CONVERSATION AROUND THESE PONDS. UM. THESE PROBLEMS ARE RETENTION PONDS CORRECT TIED TO THE FLOODPLAIN AND JUST RUN OFF. ARE THEY OWNED BY STONEBRIDGE H AWAY? THAT IS YES, SIR. SO THEY ARE ALL WITHIN A PLOTTED AND STUDIED FLOODPLAIN. THAT IS THE PROPERTY OF THE STONE BRIDGE. H AWAY. THIS PROPERTY DOESN'T HAVE ANY PEACE. I GUESS I'M DONE. DOESN'T HAVE ANY PIECE OF THE ACTUAL FLOODPLAIN OR GREEN BELT ALONG THIS PORTION HERE, THERE'S A SMALL SLIVER HERE THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO, UH TO WORK WITHIN THEIR OWN FLOODPLAIN RECLAMATION OR LOWER PROCESS, BUT THEY ARE NOT PART OF THAT. GREEN BELT AT ALL IN THE BACK. SO THE GREEN BELT THAT IS IN THE BACK. IS OWNED BY STONE BRIDGE, SO THE DEVELOPER CANNOT GO IN THERE AND TAKE THOSE TREES OUT. WHAT THAT IS CORRECT. THEY CANNOT GO ONTO STONE BRIDGES, PROPERTY AND OPEN PATHWAYS, AND I'LL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK IF THEY'VE HAD ANY. CONVERSATIONS WITH THAT H AWAY, BUT WE HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT A STONE BRIDGE INTEGRATION OF THIS PROJECT. GROSS. RIGHT? WE CURRENTLY HAVE ON RECORD WHERE WE APPROVED A CONCEPT PLAYING AT ONE TIME WHICH HAD THIS WITH. LARGE AMOUNT OF RETAIL BACKING ALL THE WAY UP TO THE GREEN BELT. THAT IS CORRECT. SO WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THAT POTENTIALLY DEVELOPING AS THEY HAVE RIGHTS UNDER THE PD TO DEVELOP THAT CONCEPT PLAN THAT EXISTS THERE? THAT IS CORRECT.

SO THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY PER OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS CORNER IS ACTUALLY DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL USE. AND WITH THAT CONCEPT PLAN THAT THEY ALREADY HAVE IN PLACE. IT COULD BE DEVELOPED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE ENTIRE TRACKED WAS COMMERCIAL ALL THE WAY. TO THE BACK HALF OF THAT PROPERTY. BUT NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO, THEY CANNOT TOUCH THE FLOODPLAIN BECAUSE THAT IS OUTSIDE THEIR PROPERTY. THAT IS CORRECT. ISLAND. CAN YOU COVER ONE MORE TIME? THE. HAS THERE BEEN TALK TO HAVE YOU SEEN ANY PROPOSED LAYOUTS THAT SHOW A PATH OR ANY CONNECTION? TO THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY. I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY PATHWAYS THAT ARE CONNECTING TO THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY. THE ONLY. MENTION OF OPEN SPACE IS TO COMBINE, TRACKED ONE IN TRACK TWO OF THIS PARCEL ITSELF. WHICH WOULD BE AN OPEN SPACE APPROXIMATELY HERE. THERE HAS BEEN NO TALKS ABOUT ANY KIND OF STONE BRIDGE OR INTEGRATION PROJECT WITH THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. I CAN LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT, IN CASE THEY HAVEN'T HAD OTHER CONVERSATIONS. ANYONE ELSE? I'VE GOT A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE, SO I'M LOOKING AT THE STAFF REPORT IN A COUPLE OF AREAS AND. YOU MENTIONED STAFF HAS NO ISSUE WITH THIS BECAUSE WE'VE SEEN THIS BEFORE RECENTLY. SO IS THERE. IS THERE A REASON WHY IT'S OKAY FOR THEM TO CIRCUMVENT. IT'S IN PLACES WHAT IN IS CURRENTLY IN PLACE AND REQUIRED TOO MUCH. THERE'S THEY'RE REQUESTING. LOT OF DIFFERENT MODIFICATIONS HERE, AND SOME OF IT JUST SAYS STAFF HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO IT. SO WHY WOULD STEPH NOT HOLD THEM TO THE REQUIREMENT? SO I HAVE. I

[01:15:09]

THAT'S RIGHT. AND SO THE REQUIREMENT OF THE ORDINANCE RIGHT NOW FOR MULTI FAMILY REQUIRES 50% OF MULTI FAMILY USES TO BE AN ENCLOSED SPACES. NOW THAT'S NOT A CARPORT. CAR CARPORT IS OPEN AIR AND CLOSED MEANS IT'S ENCLOSED ON ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE DOOR. UM HOWEVER, THE OUR ZONING ORDINANCE ALSO ALLOWS FOR REDUCTION OF THAT TO A 30 20. SUCH THAT ONLY 30% OF THE SPACES COULD BE AN ENCLOSED SPACE AGE AND THE REMAINING 20% COULD BE IN A CARPORT, SO IT IS VERY COMMON FOR APPLICANTS. THIS PART OF THE PD PROCESS TO GO AHEAD AND REQUEST FOR THAT 30 20 SPLIT. AS PART OF THE PD, AS OPPOSED TO MODIFICATION OR I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S A SPECIFIC VARIANCE. REQUEST SPORT THAT ALLOWANCE TO REDUCE IT PER THE STANDARD OF THE ORDINANCE.

OKAY, SO STAFF FEELS THAT THAT THE INTENT HAS BEEN MET AS LONG AS COVERED SPACING IS AS LONG AS IT'S AT 30 20 SO AS LONG AS A TOTAL OF 50% OR EITHER ENCLOSED OR COVERED. WE FEEL COMFORTABLE THAT THAT'S MEETING THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE. QUESTION FOR YOU. HOW FAR WHAT'S THE DISTANCE BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTI FAMILY? THREE STORY. THE FAMILY. HOW FAR DOES IT HAVE TO BE AWAY FROM? SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, SO THAT'S GOING TO BE LOOKED AT IN TWO DIFFERENT WAYS. SO RIGHT NOW, ONE OF THE WAYS IT'S GOING TO BE THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS SO IT AND I'M GONNA LOOK AT KATE OR CAITLIN TO FACT CHECK MATES EITHER 20 FT OR 30 FT AT THE PERIMETER. SO IT'S GOING TO BE A STANDARD. YES 2020 SO WHEN IT'S STANDARD SCENARIO, I JUST LEANED RIGHT INTO THAT PODIUM. SORRY AND A STANDARD SCENARIO WOULD BE 20 FT. HOWEVER ORDINANCE ALSO HAS THAT 150 FT. ROLL THAT WINDOWS. FOR THREE OR TWO OR HIGHER CANNOT BE ORIENTED TOWARDS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. UNFORTUNATELY THAT PROVISION OF OUR ORDINANCE IS NOT APPLICABLE OUTSIDE OF OUR HISTORIC AREA. BECAUSE OF THE CHANGES IN STATE LAW TO REDUCE OUR ABILITY TO GOVERN ARCHITECTURAL SO. IN THE OLD DAYS, WE WOULD LOOK AT THAT 150 FT ROLE TO SAY WINDOWS CAN'T BE ORIENTED WITHIN 150 FT. OF SINGLE FAMILY. WE CAN'T WE CAN'T REQUIRE THAT HERE. UM, SO THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD REALLY BE LOOKING AT IS THAT 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT'S TYPICALLY REQUIRED. IN THIS CASE YOU CAN SEE OR SO YOU WOULD GO. THE 20 FT. PLUS THE 200 FT OF FLOODPLAIN. AND THEN WHATEVER I MEAN, WOULD YOU CONSIDER THE PROPERTY LINE THE FLOODPLAIN OR THE. THAT'S RIGHT FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, SO THEY'D BE MEASURING FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. AND THEN THERE'S ABOUT 200 TO 250 FT. SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE IN THIS AREA THAT'S NOT. SO YOU'RE CONSIDERING THE PROPERTY LINE, NOT THE STRUCTURE OF A SINGLE FAMILY OR THE CONCRETE YOU'RE LOOKING IF THAT'S CORRECT. I'LL LET KATE TAKE BACK OVER. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF, UH, STAFF. YOU

[01:20:10]

UNIVERSITY. CAN YOU GET THIS OVER TO THAT? IF YOU'VE GOT IF YOU'VE DEVELOPED THAT MUCH OF IT, OKAY. ME. THANK YOU FOR THAT QUESTION, MR MCCALL. THE ENTRANCE INTO THIS PROPERTY WILL BE PRIMARILY OFF OF CUSTER ROAD. THERE'LL BE A THERE'LL BE A ROAD OR A PRIVATE DRIVE THAT SEPARATES TRACK ONE TRACK. TWO BUT THERE WILL ALSO BE ENTRANCES INTO THE PROPERTY COMING IN OFFICE, 3 80 AS IT GOES THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL, OKAY? UM AND IN THE IN THAT SAME. SCHEME I WANTED TO DEBUNK A FEW. PIECES OF MISINFORMATION THAT APPARENTLY HAVE GOTTEN AROUND. WE DID HAVE A MEETING WITH THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. IT WAS ADVERTISED. JOHN DEL ANTONIO PUT IT TOGETHER. IT WAS ON THEIR WEBSITES. WE HAD OVER 50 PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE. I CAN'T EXPLAIN WHY SOME PEOPLE DIDN'T GET THE INVITATION WHILE OTHERS DID. BUT IT WAS A VERY ROBUST MEETING. ONE OF THE THINGS I ASKED THAT WE ENSURE AT THAT MEETING WAS THAT THERE WOULD BE NO CONNECTION PEDESTRIAN OR OTHERWISE BETWEEN THE STONE BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT THERE. AND THIS DEVELOPMENT AND WE ARE NOT PROVIDING ANY. WE DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROVIDE ANY BECAUSE WE WE'D HAVE TO CROSS THAT. THAT GREEN BELT AREA THAT FLOODPLAIN AREA AND WE CAN'T DO THAT. WE DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO CUT DOWN ANY TREES, BUT WE ARE DOING WE ARE ENHANCING THE SCREENING BY USING A LIVING SCREEN THERE. WE'VE GOT A MINIMUM OF A 20. FT BUFFER. WE'VE GOT TREES ON 30 FT CENTERS. AND SO WE'RE TRYING. TO RECOGNIZE THE PRIVACY THAT STONEBRIDGE RANCH WANTS TO RETAIN. AND THEN DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY, WHICH THE OWNER HAS THE RIGHT TO DEVELOP. SO, UM, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR EVERYBODY NOW. NO CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE TWO. THERE'S NOT THE ABILITY TO WALK DOWN AND USE THE COMMON AREA OF STONEBRIDGE RANCH. MY CLIENT HAS NO RIGHTS TO DO THAT. THIS WILL BE A FULLY SELF CONTAINED DEVELOPMENT. THE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. ONE. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. UM. WE'RE ON FOR THE APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM. THE REASONING BASED ON. CONCEPT PLAN THAT'S ON FILE WITH THE AMOUNT OF RETAIL THAT COULD BE POTENTIALLY DEVELOP. THERE WOULD BRING. LIKELY MORE TRAFFIC. MORE TRASH TO THAT CORNER THAN WHAT THIS WOULD BE OVER OLD. THERE IS NO CONNECTIVITY TO THE RESIDENTS TO THE SOUTH. AS FAR AS THOSE ISSUES TRAFFIC IS DIRECTED TO THE MAIN THOROUGHFARES IN THE AREA, AND NOT TO STONEBRIDGE IN ORDER TO EXIT AND ENTRY.

THEY'RE LIVING SCREEN, I THINK GOES WITH THE. AREA UM, MORE THAN ANY OTHER SCREENING THAT WE HAVE, AS FAR AS WITH THE POND AND EVERYTHING. AS FAR AS THE THREE STORIES CURRENTLY WITHIN STONE BRIDGE. YOU'VE GOT A FOUR STORY. APARTMENT THAT'S IN ADRIATIC TO HAVE A THREE STORY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIRGINIA AND DOWN BRIDGE. YOU HAVE A FOUR STORY. ASSISTED LIVING JUST OFFICE. STONEBRIDGE IN VIRGINIA, YOU HAVE A THREE STOREY APARTMENT BEHIND ALBERTSONS AND STONE BRIDGE. UM SO I DON'T FEEL THE THREE STORIES, ESPECIALLY WITH THE AMOUNT OF DISTANCE FROM THE RESIDENCE IS AN ISSUE HERE. IN THAT AREA, AND I DO LIVE IN STONEBRIDGE AND DID RECEIVE AN INVITATION TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN WHICH I DID NOT ATTEND. SO ANYONE ELSE? ROBERT ECHO. WHAT MR MAINS? I SAID, UM, HE. COVERED A FEW OF THE THINGS THAT I HAD DONE. RESEARCH ON. THERE ARE A LOT OF THREE STORY DEVELOPMENT IN STONEBRIDGE. THIS ONE BEING AT THE FARTHEST REACH, I WOULDN'T EVEN TRULY CALL THAT STONE BRIDGE. UM I DON'T SEE WHERE IT UH IT INFRINGES ON ANYBODY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S TO THE SOUTH OF IT. THERE'S A GREAT DEAL OF DISTANCE TO IT. I BELIEVE IT'S A GOOD USE OF LAND

[01:25:06]

WITHOUT THAT GREEN BELT. WOULD HAVE REALLY BEEN CONCERNED WITH IT, BUT I THINK WITH THAT GREEN BELT HAVING 200 PLUS THE US TO 20 FT. PRETTY COMFORTABLE VOTING. THIS IS A ZONE CASE NOT YEAH. ANYONE ELSE? MAKE A LOT OF THE SAME SAME COMMENTS. ONE OF MY CONCERNS COMING IN WAS THE GREEN OF FLOODPLAIN ALWAYS LIKE TO PROTECT THE FLOODPLAIN, BUT IT'S ONLY ADJACENT PROPERTY. THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING TO IT. SO. NO PLANS TO CONNECT TO IT. NO PLACE CONNECT TO THE TRAIL, WHICH IS SOME OF THE CONCERNS. SO I'M IN SUPPORTIVE. LET'S SAY, I THINK WE'RE REASONING FOR A LOT OF APARTMENTS. WE HEAR A LOT OF THESE CASES SO I WILL BE IN SUPPORT OF THIS ONE. ANYONE ELSE? SUPPORT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST. I THINK THEY'VE DONE EXCELLENT WORK WORKING WITH THE STAFF. IT IS NOT A CONNECTION TO OR AN EXTENSION OF THE STONE BRIDGE. PROPERTY IT'S A STANDALONE PROPERLY WITH THE TWO STANDALONE ENTRANCES. IT'S A GOOD PLAN. NOW SUPPORT IT. MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE THIS ITEM PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

BERNIE. SPECIAL ORDERS PROVISIONS. ALONG WITH THE SPECIAL ORDINANCES. MOTION BY MR MCCARTER PROVED THE ANIMUS PER START RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING THE SPECIAL ORDER ITS PROVISIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT ON SECOND. SECOND BY MR DUCK. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? THIS QUESTION ABOUT. THANKS, GUYS. THE MOTION CARRIES ABOUT A SIX IN FAVOR AND ONE AGAINST THE MOTION WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. OUR FINAL ACTION TO SEPTEMBER 7TH 2021 MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM IS TO

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “AG” - Agricultural District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, to Allow Multi-Family Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located on the West Side of Bois D’Arc Road and Approximately 540 Feet South of U.S. Highway 380 (University Drive)]

DARK ROAD, 540 FT. SOUTH OF US HIGHWAY 3 80, MISS SHEFFIELD. THANK YOU. APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES OF LAND FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO PD PLANE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THIS WOULD HAVE A BIG ZONING OF MF THREE. MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY DISTRICT GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR THE USE OF MULTI FAMILY AND TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST MODIFIES THE HEIGHT, DENSITY AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTI FAMILY USES FURTHER OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT, BEEN SEEN IN SIMILAR MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT REQUESTS. WITH PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REQUESTS PROJECTS MUST PROVIDE FEATURES TO ENSURE EXCEPTIONAL QUALITY OR DEMONSTRATE DEMONSTRATE INNOVATION. WITH THIS REQUEST APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO INCREASE THE REQUIRED AMENITIES BY TWO SO BASED ON THE UNIT COUNT, THE APPLICANT WILL BE PROVIDING TWO ADDITIONAL AMENITIES THAN WHAT WAS REQUIRED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE ZONING REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THIS PROPOSAL DOES ALIGN WITH THE URBAN LIVING PLACE TYPE DOESN'T DESIGNATED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE USE OF MULTI FAMILIES SHOULD PROVIDE A BUFFER FOR LOWER, INTENSE DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH AND THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR ALONG US HIGHWAY 3 80. AND HARDEN BOULEVARD. AFTER THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING PACKET WAS PUBLISHED IN PRIOR TO THE START OF TONIGHT'S MEETING, THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED TO STAFF THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO REMOVE THE FOUR STOREY REQUEST. IN DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THREE STORIES. GIVEN THIS MODIFICATION. STAFFORD DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THAT WAS OWNING REQUEST. UM AND THE ABOVE MENTIONED AND I'LL STAY IN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. I'VE GOT A QUESTION. YES, SIR. ON THESE SOUTHERN END OF IT. HOW MUCH IS THE BUFFER BETWEEN THEIR LOOKS LIKE SINGLE FAMILY. THERE'S A PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS MEAN THIS BUFFER HERE? IS THERE, THERE'S A LITTLE STRIP BETWEEN THE BLUE YEAH. YES, SIR. SO THAT BUFFER IT RANGES BETWEEN

[01:30:06]

THIS IS THE PUBLIC KING IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONED. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. YES, MA'AM. MHM. OKAY SO A COUPLE OF THINGS. SO I LIVE BACKING UP TO THIS PROPERTY. AND ANGELINA. OH I'M SORRY. I DIDN'T INTRODUCE MYSELF AND DAVIS 40 24 ANGELINA DRIVE. SO I LIVE BACKING UP TO THIS PROPERTY. PROBABLY ABOUT RIGHT THERE. SO FIRST OF ALL THE WIDTH OF THAT IS NOT 115 FT. THE LENGTH OF IT IS PROBABLY 100 AND 15 FT. THE WIDTH OF THAT TO THE EDGE OF THE PROPERTIES, PROBABLY 20 OR 30. FT. SO MY BACK FENCE BACKS UP TO THIS AREA. I WILL ALSO ADD THIS STRIP OF LAND RIGHT BEHIND US IS A NUISANCE. SO WE'VE CALLED CODE ENFORCEMENT AT MULTIPLE TIMES TO HAVE IT MODE. CODE ENFORCEMENT TELLS ME EVERY TIME THEY DON'T KNOW WHO OWNS THIS STRIP OF LAND RIGHT BEHIND US. THIS LAST TIME WE CALLED SINCE MADE OUT MODE THEY JUST NOTED ABOUT TWO WEEKS AGO.

SO THIS STRIP OF LAND BEHIND US IS A NUISANCE AS IT IS, UM, FURTHERMORE, I WOULD SAY TRAFFIC SO PEOPLE ALREADY CUT DOWN. IS IT, BOB? DARK I DON'T PRONOUNCE IT. THEY ALREADY CUT DOWN THAT STREET TO AVOID TRAFFIC ON 3 80. THEY FLY ON THAT STREET IN TERMS OF SPEED BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO GO UP TO THE CORNER OF THREE DAYS. THREE CAN BRING HARDENED DOWN.

I THINK IF YOU BRING IN MULTI FAMILY UNITS THERE THAT'S JUST GOING TO EVEN EVEN MAKE THAT TRAFFIC PROBLEM WORSE ON BROAD ARC AS WELL AS 3 80. SO IF YOU'VE EVER DRIVEN 3 80 ON A FRIDAY OR A SATURDAY IN THIS AREA. IT PROBABLY BACKS UP CLOSE TO LAKE FOREST. IT'S RIDICULOUS IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC, I WOULD ALSO SAY WHEN I PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY. UM I WAS TOLD THAT THIS THE MCKINNEY I SD OWNED IT AND THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BUILD A MAINTENANCE FACILITY. ON THIS LAND, AND IT WAS ONE OF THE PRIMARY FACTORS OF WHY PURCHASE WHERE I DID WE HAVE A REALLY NICE GREEN BELT TO THE WEST, AS YOU CAN SEE WITH TREES, AND I THINK CROWDING THAT WITH MULTI USE WOULD JUST BE THE WRONG DECISION. I THINK THE QUESTION YOU HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF AS IF YOU LIVED WHERE I DID. WOULD YOU WANT ALL THAT MULTI FAMILY PROPERTY? 20 FT OFF OF YOUR FENCE LINE, SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS DAVIS. I'D LIKE TO APOLOGIZE FOR THE AIR, BUT I CAN'T DO THAT. MHM. ANYONE ELSE WISH? YES, MA'AM. I'M ALSO

[01:35:08]

TO AVOID THE LIGHT AT HARDEN AND 3 80 THAT PUTS OUR KIDS WHO DO RIDE BIKES THERE AND RUN AND PLAY. SON WHO WALKS THE 7 11 LIKE JUST IN HARM'S WAY, AND I CAN'T IMAGINE IF ALMOST 15 ACRES THERE AN ADDITIONAL LET'S SAY CONSERVATIVE THREE D 350 UNITS, WHICH COULD BE AROUND 500 ADDITIONAL CARS. IS ON THAT ROAD THAT TERRIFIES ME. UM RIGHT THERE AS FAR AS TRAFFIC IN WHAT'S COMING, AS WELL AS A GUARD AND, UM, SAFETY AND CRIME. UM I THINK I ECHO WHAT MISS COOKING, DOLL SAID EARLIER, LIKE FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERMS. GOOD LORD. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. LIKE WE JUST APPROVED SO MANY MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN THAT THREES. ALL OF THIS VERY OFFICIAL TERMINOLOGY THAT I WAS WELL, FIRST, AFTER LISTENING TO ALL THESE PEOPLE GO BEFORE ME. WHETHER THAT'S GENEROUS THAT IT'S THREE STORIES HIGH AS THEY ARE LOOKING DOWN RIGHT INTO OUR BACKYARDS, UM, FOR PROPERTY THAT WE WERE SOLD AND BOUGHT.

AND IF YOU'RE LIKE MY FAMILY SAVED UP FORWARD MOVED TO MCKINNEY BECAUSE YOU'RE EXCITED TO COME TO A PLACE LIKE THIS, AND NOW IT FEELS LIKE. WE'RE NOT REALLY VALUING THE REASONS I FEEL LIKE MCKINNEY IS SO ATTRACTIVE TO A LOT OF RESIDENTS. THEY'RE LOOKING TO BETTER THEIR LIVES AND THEIR KIDS LIVES. UM AND THE GENTLEMAN THAT SPOKE ON THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT AS FAR AS QUALITY OF LIFE AND JUST CONCERNS ABOUT PROPERTY VALUE.

I THINK WE ALL ECHO HERE. AS FAR AS REPRESENTATION AND I GET IF IT WAS ALREADY ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL OR WE WERE JUST LOOKING TO MAKE AMENDMENTS, BUT. THIS IS NOT AND THE FACT THAT WE JUST FEEL LIKE AS MCKINNEY RESIDENTS EVERY SPACE, IT'S JUST BEING FILLED WITH APARTMENT COMPLEXES ENDURE SO MANY ARTI ZONE DOWN 3 80 EVEN DOWN WHITE AVENUE. I MEAN, I CAN TELL YOU HOW MANY MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS ARE WITHIN FIVE MILES. OF OUR HOUSE OR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY, AND IT JUST SEEMS LIKE MY MAIN CONCERN. ESPECIALLY AFTER GOING TONIGHT. IT'S JUST THE OVERCROWDING, OVERPOPULATION, THE SCHOOL ZONING AND LIKE, WHAT ARE WE EVEN FACTORING THINGS LIKE THAT IN I WOULD SAY, YOU KNOW. DON'T KNOW WHAT THE NUMBER IS. I'VE HEARD 28 PER ACRE, RIGHT? WE'RE TALKING UNDER 15 ACRES BUT 300 UNITS, LET'S SAY A THIRD OF THEM ARE FAMILIES. 100 KIDS GOING TO SCHOOLS THAT ARE ALREADY OVERPOPULATED AND ALREADY A LOWER INCOME, OLDER SCHOOL AND THAT JUST REALLY CONCERNS ME.

SO I HOPE YOU TAKE OUR CONCERNS INTO CONSIDERATION YOUR DECISION. THANK YOU, MR DAVIDSON. HI. MY NAME IS TIFFANY. TOSH. I'M JUST A FEW HOUSES DOWN ON ANGELINA. NEXT TO THIS, UM PINK CIRCLE. I JUST WANTED TO ECHO WHAT MY NEIGHBORS HAD SAID, UM THAT WITH THE LAND. IS MAYBE THE LENGTH OF THIS ROOM SO I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT COULD BE. THE DISTANCE OF 150 FT. UM THERE IS ALSO I KNOW, PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED. THREE AND FOUR STORY BUILDINGS COMMON NEAR THE STONE BRIDGE AREA. WE ARE NOT NEAR THAT AREA. THERE IS NOTHING.

ABOVE TWO STORIES ARE IN OUR AREA, SO I DON'T FEEL LIKE THIS IS IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF OUR CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD. UM. ALL OF THE HOUSING UNITS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD OR ONE OR TWO STORIES. AS MY NEIGHBORS HAD MENTIONED, IT'S THIS BODYGUARD.

ONE LEAN IN EACH DIRECTION. THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC FROM THE JUNIOR HIGH ALREADY. AND THEN THE MALL THAT IS RIGHT ACROSS THE WAY, SO I I'M JUST CONCERNED ABOUT THE CONGESTION.

THE IMPACT THIS WILL HAVE ON OUR PROPERTY VALUE AND PROPERTY TAXES. BUT THAT IS SECONDARY. I THINK TO THE CONCERN ABOUT THE CONGESTION AND THEN ALSO JUST HAVING THIS LARGE STRUCTURE THAT'S JUST NOT IN KEEPING WITH WHAT WE HAVE AROUND US. WE HAVE A LOT OF GREEN AREA SCHOOL, UM.

AND I JUST I FEEL LIKE THIS WOULD BE JUST NOT IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER FOR THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK? TONIGHT? YES, MA'AM. HI. I'M DEBBIE TASH, AND I'M TIFFANY'S MOM. WHEN WE MOVED INTO THIS COMPLEX A YEAR

[01:40:05]

BECAUSE THE 3 80 JUST GETS TOO CONGESTED FAR TOO OFTEN, SO THOSE ARE MY CONCERNS AND I WOULD ASK YOU PLEASE, TO NOT APPROVE THIS ZONING CHANGE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR ASH.

ANYONE ELSE? SIR. RODNEY HUTCHINSON. 40 40 ANGELINA DRIVE. WE ALL LIVE ON THE SAME STRETCH. UM, AND THIS PROJECT IS, UH. SAID TO BE RIGHT IN OUR BACKYARDS. I DON'T EVEN THINK 100 AND 30 FT IS ENOUGH ROOM BETWEEN MY BACKYARD AND THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING MHM. WE MOVED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. KNOWING THAT MCKINNEY I ASKED WAS GOING TO BUILD A MAINTENANCE FACILITY HERE. I THINK THAT'S WHY WE ALL CHOSE TO BUILD OUR HOMES WHERE WE HAVE BUILT THEM BECAUSE. WE KNEW THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE NEIGHBORS IN OUR BACKYARD NOW IN THIS PROPOSAL IS GOING TO HAVE NEIGHBORS IN THAT BACKYARD. HUNDREDS OF THEM AND HUNDREDS, OF COURSE. AND THE TRAFFIC IS A MAJOR CONCERN ALREADY WITH THE BUSES, ESPECIALLY DURING SCHOOL TIME. SO, UM MY CONCERN IS THE SAME WITH MY NEIGHBORS. INTO YEAH.

WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER NOT PASSING THIS DEVELOPED. THANK YOU, MR HUTCHESON. MY NAME IS JUDY. FOR LONG. I'M A LIFELONG RAISED IT IN MCKINNEY, TEXAS. I MY MOTHER IN LAW OWNS THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. WHEN SHE WAS LIVING. SHE OWNED THE SINGLE. FAMILY RESIDENCE RIGHT THERE. UH THERE ARE BOTH DARK ROAD. HER ADDRESS WAS 50 TO 1 ABOUT OUR GROWED.

AND I CAN TELL YOU THE FOR SURE. THE. ACREAGE BETWEEN THERE IS NOT WHAT THEY HAVE BRUSHED HOGGED IT MYSELF. DRIVING THE TRACTOR AND I TAKE ABOUT TWO SWAPS THROUGH THERE WHEN SHE LIVED THERE IN 2016, SO I DON'T THINK THE BUFFER IS THERE THAT THEY INTENDED. AND BEING A LIFELONG RESIDENT OF MCKINNEY. REMEMBER WHEN HIGHWAY 38 HE WAS HIGHWAY 24. ONE LANE GOING WEST AND ONE LETTING GO IN EAST. AND WE THOUGHT THE TRAFFIC WAS BAD, THEN. NOW. 15 2025 YEARS LATER. AS 3 80 HAS DEVELOPED. THROUGH THERE WE CAN'T EVEN HARDLY GET INTO OUR PIECE OF PROPERTY THERE. UM. AND WE I DRIVE A BIG TRUCK THROUGH THERE. AND IT IS ATROCIOUS. SO I'M SO BEING. LIFELONG RESIDENT AND KNOWING WHAT THOSE ROADS LOOK LIKE AND WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE NOW AND WHAT THEY MAY LOOK LIKE IN THE. FUTURE I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S ANY WAY THAT THOSE ROADS CAN CONTAIN. THE AMOUNT OF VEHICLES. THAT WOULD BE ENTERING AND EXITING THAT APARTMENT COMPLEX. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR FOR LONG. ANYONE ELSE THAT HASN'T HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. PLEASE COME UP. TWO SECONDS IS PRETTY SURE SOMETHING YOU FORGOT A WRITTEN PROTEST THAT IS NOTARIZED THAT HAS SIGNATURES AND RESIDENTS OF NINE OUT OF THE 10 THAT ARE OCCUPIED OUTSIDE OF THEY GET LOST WITHIN THAT AFFECTED, SO IF YOU WOULD LIKE THAT, AS WELL. SO I'LL TAKE IT. WE'LL HAVE TO GET IT THROUGH OUR CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE, BUT WE'LL GO AHEAD AND TAKE IT JUST SO THAT YOU KNOW, WRITTEN PROTEST FORMS AFFECT THE CITY COUNCIL ACTION, SO THIS WILL BE INCLUDED. WE'LL WALK TO VERIFY

[01:45:02]

ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT DURING THIS PUBLIC HEARING? SO I THINK IF. YOU'RE CONSIDERING ANYTHING YOU NEED TO FIGURE OUT WHO OWNS THIS PARCEL OF LAND. BETWEEN OUR BACKYARDS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE AGAIN, THAT'S JUST GOING TO CONTINUE TO BE A NUISANCE PROPERTY OF WHICH WE DON'T KNOW WHO OWNS IT. AND SO I WOULD JUST SAY. I THINK YOU NEED TO CONSIDER THE PROPERTY ALSO DIRECTLY BEHIND US. IN THIS DECISION TO SAY THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. ANYONE THAT HAS NOT HAD A CHANCE TO SPEAK. UM. AND IF YOU'D LIKE TO PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, ALL RIGHT. WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. HIS EMOTIONAL MISTER MAYNES AT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND BY MR MCCALL. ANY DISCUSSION JUST SO THE AUDIENCE KNOWS WHAT WE'LL DO. WE WILL NOT TAKE ANY MORE PUBLIC COMMENT WILL HAVE. DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT IN THE STEP AND PNC. AND IF YOUR QUESTION HAS NOT BEEN ANSWERED AFTER THE MEETING WILL ADDRESS YOUR QUESTION ONE ON ONE WITH YOU SO YOU WON'T WALK AWAY WITH NO ANSWERS. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. MHM. OKAY. THE MOTION CARRIES THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. NOW WE'LL HAVE, UH. THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT COME FORWARD. WANTS TO GO FIRST. ONE. I'VE GOT A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR STAFF REALLY QUICK. SO, UM. THE DISTANCE. CAN YOU? CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT? BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE. CAN SO ON AS WE WERE DISCUSSING EARLIER.

THERE'S THIS TREE IN THIS HOUSE RIGHT HERE. THAT PROPERTY AND THEN THERE IS A LITTLE SLIVER OF UNCLAIMED LAND BETWEEN THAT PROPERTY WITH THE HOUSE AND THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTS. OF THAT SUBDIVISION, SO. THERE IS AN EXISTING FENCE. AND SO THAT'S WHERE IT SEEMS THAT THERE'S ONLY THE 5 15 FT IN BETWEEN THIS HOUSE, VINCE AND THE FENCE OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. BUT THE TOTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLINED IN BLUE IN THE BOLD BLACK LINE WHERE THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ARE. IS THAT 115 TO 130 FT, AND SOMEBODY WENT OUT THERE AND MEASURED IT. YES I HAVE MEASURED IT. I HAVEN'T MEASURED IT ON THE GROUND, BUT I'VE MEASURED IT NUMEROUS TIMES, UM ON MAPS. OKAY SO HOW DOES THAT THEN? THAT LITTLE PIECE THERE? THAT'S NOT HOW DOES THAT AFFECT. SO IT'S VERY SMALL.

IT'S NOT EVEN PULLING UP ON OUR MAPS HERE. IT MAY BE EASIER TO SEE A LITTLE BIT BETTER HERE, SO AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S THE THICK BLUE LINE. THERE'S A SLIVER RECTANGULAR PIECE, AND THEN THERE'S THIS KIND OF TRIANGULAR PIECE. THAT IS THE UNCLAIMED PROPERTY. WHERE THAT, UM, THE HOMES. FENCE LINE IS THE HOME THAT'S EXISTING BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. SO THAT'S THE DISTANCE THAT I BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT'S REFERRING TO WHERE IT'S VERY SMALL FIVE FT OR SO BUT INCLUDING THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME THAT'S IN BETWEEN THIS LITTLE SLIVER, THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. IT'S 115 TO 100. SO IN THE PIECE THAT I GUESS THAT THEY'RE QUESTIONING THEN DO YOU JUST DISMISS THAT? DISMISS IT.

HOWARD MAY I ASK HIM? WELL, YOU'RE SAYING THAT IT'S NOT AN ISSUE, SO THERE MAY BE MAINTENANCE ISSUES AND WE CAN CERTAINLY NOTIFIED OUR CODE ENFORCEMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT TEAM. TO TAKE CARE OF THOSE THOSE ISSUES ON THEIR. UH WHERE THE BUFFER IS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY AND SINGLE FAMILY. IS THAT 1 15 TO 1 30. SO WHAT WE HAVE IS WE HAVE A SINGLE FAMILY LAW. WITH A HOUSE ON IT WITH THE CHAIN LINK FENCE TO THE SOUTH OF IT. WE HAVE A 5 TO 10 FT, RIGHT AWAY FOR SOME POWER LINES. THAT IS THE AREA THAT NO ONE KNOWS WHO OWNS OR WHO CLEANS. THAT IS SOUTH OF WHAT IS ALREADY THE SINGLE FAMILY LIFE. CORRECT SO AS FAR AS THE BUFFER FOR APARTMENTS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT STARTING 20 FT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. SO THE FIVE OR 15 FT RIGHT AWAY FOR THE ELECTRIC POLES ARE THERE. DO NOT MATTER BECAUSE OUR BUFFER STARTS FROM THE NORTH SIDE. THE RESIDENTIAL THAT IS CORRECT, AS WELL AS THE BUILDING SETBACK LINES AS WELL. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE OTHER PICTURE, THOUGH, BECAUSE THIS PICTURE DOESN'T REFLECT WITH THAT. SO THIS THE AERIALS SHOW THE ZONING BOUNDARY LINES, SO THAT'S WHERE YOU SEE THE THICK BLACK LINES, WHEREAS THE.

LOCATION MAP. YOU CAN SEE THOSE FAINT GREY LINES WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES ARE

[01:50:04]

SINCE THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE SOUTH. THE MENTION OF THE 1, 15 AND 1 30 WAS JUST A REFERENCE POINT WITH THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TWO DEVELOPMENTS WOULD BE. OTHER QUESTIONS. OKAY, WE'LL HAVE HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. PLEASE. ANYONE. DID HAVE A QUESTION THE SO WE'VE KIND OF LOCKED IN ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY HERE. UM. AND YOU ADDRESS THE FROM YOUR SEAT. THE PROXIMITY OF. THE FIRST APARTMENT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY AND MAYBE CLARIFY THIS DISTANCE BETWEEN. WHAT COULD BE TWO OR THREE ADJOINING PROPERTIES.

I'VE NEVER MEASURED THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF WHAT I THINK IS CALLED HARDEN VILLAGE. IN THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. I THINK IT'S BEEN WELL DISCUSSED, AND I'M WILLING TO ACCEPT IT SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 121 150 FT.

FROM FROM THE SEPARATE FROM THE BUFFER WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. YOU WILL RECALL. WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO PUT A MINIMUM OF A SIX FT TALL MASONRY FENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES ALL AROUND THE BUILDING. WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION. TO PROVIDE A 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH CANOPY TREES ON 30 FT CENTERS ALL THE WAY AROUND. THE IN ADDITION, WE'VE GOT A 45 FT SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK THAT WE'VE GOT OFF THAT PROPERTY LINE. AS AND I CAN'T SPEAK BECAUSE I HAVEN'T SEEN AN EXACT CONCEPT PLAN. AN ENGINEERED CONCEPT PLAN HERE. BUT MOST OF THESE TYPES OF.

APARTMENT DEVELOPMENTS HAVE PARKING. BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IN THIS CASE ON THE SOUTH. AND THE BUILDING ITSELF. AND THAT PARKING IS TYPICALLY DOUBLE SIDED. SO IT'S A MINIMUM OF 18 FT. DEEP PARKING ON BOTH SIDES WITH A MINIMUM OF 24 TO 26 FT FIRE LANE. SO YOU COULD HAVE AND YOU PROBABLY WILL, BUT I CAN'T GUARANTEE IT BECAUSE I HAVEN'T SEEN THE CONCEPT PLAN.

YOU'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE 20 FT OFF THE PROPERTY LINE. THEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE SOMETHING IN THE IN THE MAGNITUDE AND THE ORDER OF. 45 TO 46 FT. AND THEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE LAWN AREA AND THEN YOU'RE BUILDING. SO YOU'RE GOING TO BE THE FIRST BUILDING IS GOING TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY BACK. REMEMBER, WE ALSO WELL WE DON'T HAVE 150 FT. YEAH.

RESTRICTION ON WINDOWS, BUT THAT'S GOING TO EASILY OCCUR HERE SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. UM, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. GOING TO HAVE. LOT MORE THAN 200 FT BRIDGES. THANK YOU OTHER QUESTIONS. HAS BEEN HIS OWN IN CASES OUTSIDE THE QUESTION. MANY UNITS ARE YOU ALL PLAYING INTO PUT HERE? WELL, I THINK YOU'VE GOT 15. ACRES TIMES 28 UNITS, BUT I THINK IT'S SOMEWHERE AROUND 400 UNITS 420 YEARS. LET ME ALSO MENTIONED, UH, YOU KNOW, BO,

[01:55:03]

RIGHT ANYONE ELSE? I AGREE WITH MR MEN'S, UH, TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY WILL ADDRESS THE ROAD CONCERNS ON BOARD ARC. STAFF HAS REVIEWED IN THE APPLICANT HAS ANSWERED THE QUESTIONS AND I SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION FROM STAFF NINE OF THE 10 RESIDENTS THAT BACK UP TO THIS OR THAT WOULD BE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED HAVE WRITTEN IN OPPOSITION. BELIEVE THEY HAVE SIGNED A WRITTEN PROTEST FOR PETITION AS JENNIFER STATED, WILL NEED TO TAKE THOSE EVALUATE THE SIGNATURES, MAKING SURE THAT THOSE ARE FOR THE RESIDENTS. UM AND SEE WHAT THAT PERCENTAGE IS. SO I'M GOING TO BE OPPOSED TO THIS JUST IN, UM. YES. AND IF YOU WILL, IN SUPPORT OF THOSE RESIDENTS THAT BACK UP TO THIS THAT HAVE OPPOSED TO THIS.

I, UH. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE WIDTH OF THE PROPERTY THAT'S BETWEEN. AND THEN YOU TAKE THE SETBACK THE LANDSCAPE. 45 FT YOUR YOUR 200 FT. IT MEETS. I'M GOING TO VOTE FOR. ANYONE ELSE? YOU KNOW, I LIKE THE PROJECT. MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS THE TRAFFIC. IT'S THIS IS WHERE I'M REALLY STRUGGLING WITH THIS AND I DO UNDERSTAND WE'RE GOING TO DO A TRAFFIC STUDY ON IT. UM WOULD RELATE. WOULD'VE LIKED TO SEEN SOMETHING ON THE FRONT SIDE OF THIS, TOO. BEFORE WE VOTED TO ALLOW MULTI FAMILY THERE. UM. THAT IS MY ONLY CONCERN. IT IS A VERY HIGH

[02:00:02]

I THINK MCKINNEY NEEDS BUT. LOOKING AT LOCATION, LOCATION LOCATION. IT'S IN A MEETING THE OTHER NIGHT. THIS IS ABOVE HER FOR COMMERCIAL OF SINGLE FAMILY. UM. FAMILY THERE COULD BE SOMETHING ELSE. IF THIS DOESN'T PASS, SOMETHING ELSE COULD COME EVEN WORSE THAN THIS. AND WE'LL BE BACK HERE IF FOR THEM. THIS IS A. CITY APPROVED BUFFER THAT MM. I THINK IS BEST BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE FAMILY. I. I WILL BE IN SUPPORT OF THIS.

GET TIRED OF SINGLE OR MULTI FAMILY. COMING THROUGH HERE, BUT. THAT'S ALRIGHT, THAT'S ALRIGHT. COURT. ANYONE ELSE? YOU KNOW ANYTHING TO I'VE COVERED IT PRETTY WELL.

WHENEVER MOTION OR MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. YEAH. TO PROVE THIS REZONING, UH, WITH THE SPECIAL ORDINANCE PROVISIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, MOTION MAN, MR DOPE TO APPROVE THE ADEMAS FIRST TIME RECOMMENDATION AND INCLUDE THE SPECIAL ORDER ITS PROVISIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. 2ND 2ND MEMBERS TO TAILOR YOUR ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES ABOUT SIX IN FAVOR. ONE AGAINST US WILL BE SENT TO CITY COUNCIL.

WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ELECTION AT THE SEPTEMBER 7 2021 MEETING. OKAY, THE NEXT, UH, THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS NEXT, UM, ITEM WOULD BE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE TO SPEAK. ON AN ITEM THAT IS NOT ONLY AGENDA ANYONE HERE TONIGHT.

THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE NIGHT OF NOT ON THE AGENDA. ALL RIGHT. STRICKLAND. DO YOU HAVE

[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]