Aug 24, 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission on 2021-08-24 6:00 PM

[00:00:08]

HIS OWN COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY AUGUST 24TH 2021 THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU. HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT I WILL ADVISE THE AUDIENCE IF AN ITEM HAS A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED OR IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT SIMPLY IS A. RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING HIS ONLY COMMISSION MEETING. IF YOU ARE HERE TONIGHT IN PLAN ON PARTICIPATING IN THE MEETING. MEANING COMING AND SPEAKING AT THE PODIUM. BEFORE YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, POLICE FILL OUT ONE OF THE YELLOW CARDS. WITH YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS IN THE ITEM NUMBER THAT YOU ARE SPEAKING ON. WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS. ON THE ITEM. WE DO HAVE A FOUR ROOM. YES THAT YOU TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT FOCUS ON THE ISSUES AND BE CONCISE IN YOUR COMMENTS. HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS AND. WITH US AND WHEN YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS LEFT THE. SCREEN WILL TURN YELLOW WHEN YOU'RE THREE MINUTES IS UP. YOU WILL HEAR A BUZZER. FIRST THINGS FIRST WOODLAND, YOU'RE HERE WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS. YOU HERE FOR A REASON, AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS. WITH THAT WE WILL START IN OUR AGENDA AND THE FIRST ITEM. WOULD BE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE. MEANING SPEAK ON ANY NON PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM TONIGHT THAT WOULD MEAN THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST MEETING. OR ONE OF THE PLANTS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE CONSIDERING TONIGHT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ONE OF THOSE ITEMS, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. I AIN'T SAYING NO WILL MOVE TO OUR CONCERN AGENDA.

[CONSENT ITEMS]

IT'S NOT LETTING ME LONG ANYWAY, YOU GOT ME. MR. THERE WE GO. OKAY. THE MOTION IS APPROVED. THE CONSENT AGENDA HAS BEEN APPROVED NEXT ITEM. THE CONSIDERATION OF PLATT

[PLAT CONSIDERATION UNDER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 212]

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to "C3" - Regional Commercial District, Located on the Northwest Corner of State Highway 121 (Sam Rayburn Tollway) and Tina Drive]

[00:05:22]

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Industrial Uses, Located on the East Side of County Road 317 and Approximately 2,000 Feet South of Harry McKillop Boulevard (FM 546)]

MR CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I'M BOB ROTOR 1700 RED BUD SUITE 300 MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. HAS BEEN, SHEFFIELD SAID. THIS IS A. ZONING CASES COMING BEFORE YOU BUT IT IS GOING IN COMPANION WITH AN ANNEXATION CASE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. IN SEPTEMBER. I THINK THE STAFF HAS DONE A THOROUGH JOB OF EVALUATING THE SITE REQUEST. WE HAVE ADDED THE ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE USE OF THE PROPERTY FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSES AND HAVE AGREED TO GO WITH LIGHT INDUSTRIAL RATHER THAN HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. SO THAT WE CAN ELIMINATE MANY OF THE OTHER USES THAT WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR THIS SITE. SO I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, BUT I WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. ANYONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AUTUMN IF YOU'VE COME TO NINE, EVEN LIKE TO ADDRESSED PLANNING HIS ONLY REGARDING THIS PROPOSED REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSIONERS DAVID CRAIG 68 50 TPC DRIVE. MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75070. I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT NORTH TEXAS NATURAL SELECT HAS BEEN TRYING TO FIND A SITE.

IN OUR GOOD CITY SINCE. 2019 WE'VE WE'VE LOOKED AT MANY. AND I WILL SAY JENNIFER HAS NIXED AT LEAST THREE OF THEM. AND YOU KNOW WHAT? AT THE END OF THE DAY WE FOUND THE RIGHT SITE AND I THINK IT'S IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY AS AS WELL AS UM, NORTH TEXAS NATURAL SELECT. JUST SO YOU KNOW THAT THEY'RE CONCRETE RECYCLING AND IT'S SMART COST EFFECTIVE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY IN A WAY TO REUSE AGGREGATE LEFT BEHIND WHEN STRUCTURES ARE DEMOLISHED OR HEAVILY RENOVATED. AND I JUST THINK IT'S AN ASSET TO THE COMMUNITY

[00:10:01]

210073 Z THREE PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. TWO REASONS. SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM. P D TWO C THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER. STATE HIGHWAY 1 21 IN TINA DRIVE SHUFFLE THANK YOU. SO THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TERESA IN APPROXIMATELY 45 ACRES FROM PD PLANE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THAT HAS A BASIS ZONING OF SEAPLANE CENTER COMMERCIAL USES APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE TO SEE THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ALTHOUGH THE SITES CURRENTLY ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL USES UNDER THE EXISTING ZONING. THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED DESIRE TO REZONE TO OBEY STONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE CITY. GIVEN THE SIGHTS LOCATION ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 1 21 IN THE VISION ESTABLISHED FOR THIS AREA AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND STAFF AS OF THE PROFESSIONAL PREGNANT THE REASONING REQUEST IS APPROPRIATE TO HELP DEVELOP THIS AREA. WHILE NOT PARTICULARLY THIS ITEM, BUT DIRECTLY RELATED THE FOLLOWING ITEM FOR THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE COMPONENT HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT. SO THIS WOULD JUST BE THE REZONING REQUEST TO SEE THREE AND THE S U P SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS NO LONGER BEING, UM, SORT OUT.

GIVEN THESE ITEMS STAFF HAS RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUESTS AND I'LL SOON FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF MISS SHEFFIELD. YOU REFERENCED THE SECOND ITEM HERE SO THE FIRST ITEM WE'RE LOOKING AT HERE IS C THREE ONLY FOR THIS. TRACK OF LAND YES WE WILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO THAT. WILL HAVE THE NEXT ITEM WHICH IS GOING TO BE WITHDRAWN THAT IS CORRECT SO THE ZONING REQUEST IS STILL BEING IS STILL MOVING FORWARD AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST SO THIS WOULD BE THE ZONING EVENT FOR THE C THREE ZONING DISTRICT. THE FOLLOWING ITEM WILL BE THAT SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUESTS FOR THE OFFICE AND A WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT THAT CASE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT. EVEN WITH WITHDRAWN THERE WILL STILL BE HOLDING PUBLIC COMMENT. THE PUBLIC HEARING WOULD STILL HAPPEN IN THE PUBLIC HEARING WOULD NEED TO BE CLOSED AND TABLED INDEFINITELY BUT AS OF NOW THE APPLICANT HAS WITHDRAWN THAT REQUEST. VERY GOOD. YOU HIGHLIGHT WHAT IS INCLUDED WITH A C THREE. FOR THE DIFFERENT USES THIS MAN. SO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SEAPLANE CENTER IN C THREE DISTRICT IS VERY SIMILAR THERE'S ACTUALLY HANDFUL OF ITEMS THAT WOULD BE ACTUALLY PERMITTED IN THE SEAPLANE CENTER THAT IS NOW REQUIRED WITH A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. SO. SOME OF THOSE ITEMS ARE AUTO PART SALES, AUTO TRAILER TRUCK AND RENTAL UM GARAGE AUTO REPAIR SERVICE STATION GAS STATION CAR WASH. ALL THOSE THINGS ARE CURRENTLY PERMITTED IN THE ZONING. AND WITH THE C THREE THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED IN A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. THERE ARE SOME OTHER ITEMS AS WELL. THAT IS. UM CURRENTLY NOT PERMITTED THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED NOW WITH THE C THREE THAT INCLUDES WHOLESALE BAKERY WHOLESALE ESTABLISHMENTS HEAD STORES BOARDING VETERINARY WITH OUTDOOR RUNS. IN AN OFFICE WITH SHOWROOMS. OKAY? OTHER QUESTIONS, MISS SHEFFIELD ONE. THANK YOU. THEIR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. MR CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF

[00:15:17]

ITS REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR OFFICE WAREHOUSE ON THIS TRACK. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON THEM. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE SIDE AND PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. MAYBE THIS WILL HELP.

WHAT WE'VE SAID IS THE NEXT ITEM WHICH IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE USES HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. WHICH MEANS THAT CASE WILL NOT BE HEARD THIS IS THE STRAIGHT ZONING CASE IS THEY'RE TWO DIFFERENT ITEMS. CERTAINLY WELCOME TO SPEAK ON BOTH. WE'VE GOT ONE TURN BACK, UM. YES, SO THIS IS, UM. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE. REASON REQUEST OTHER ONES ALSO WENT OUT FOR THIS TOPIC, OKAY? ERIN HAAS 4500 BRIGHT AND DRIVE. UM BUT I LOOK AT WHAT C THREE IS THERE'S SOME AREA FOR SOME LOOPHOLES TO BE ABLE TO ALLOW FOR. IT'S STILL THE WAREHOUSE TO GO IN. YOU LOOK AT THE DEFINITION WHAT C THREE IS, IT SAYS FOR HEAVY COMMERCIAL USE? NON RETAIL NATURE SOME WHICH BE REQUIRED FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE. THAT STILL WAS IN LINE WITH THE WAREHOUSE. SO I ASKED THE COMMITTEE. RE EVALUATE WHAT YOU WANTED TO PUT I HAVE DESIGNED AND BUILT WAREHOUSES. I UNDERSTAND THE FULL TRAFFIC THAT GOES THROUGH THERE. YOU SAY IT COULD BE A STABLE ENVIRONMENT OF JUST THE FIRST SHIFT. YEAH. GOT A STABLE ASIAN PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. ONCE YOU GET THE SYSTEM WORKING THE EMPLOYEES, BUT THERE SEEMS TO BE DOING. INCREASES TO A SECOND TO THIRD SHIFT. NOW YOU'RE TALKING INCREASE INBOUND SHIPMENTS. GPS AESTHETICS. SEA CONTAINERS, FLATBEDS. WHAT GOES IN MUST COME OUT. THEN THERE'S THE ADDED TRASH. EDIT PARKING. PLUS I'VE SEEN THIS IN MULTIPLE FACILITIES THROUGHOUT THE U. S. AND AROUND THE WORLD. THEY BRING IN GANG MEMBERS. THEY COME IN. THEY CASE THE JOINT AND I'VE SEEN ROBBERIES TAKE PLACE 2016 TOWARDS CALIFORNIA THERE WAS $3 MILLION OF THE LAPTOP STOLEN. ALL DONE FROM INSIDE JOB. 2017 AIRBORNE.

FAIRBURN, GEORGIA. SAME THING HAPPENED. SO I ASK YOU TO CONSIDER IS THIS SOMETHING YOU'D WANT TO HAVE IN YOUR BACKYARD? THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WE JUST SPEAKING OF YOU KNOW WHAT WE'LL DO, WE'LL OFFER THOSE OPPORTUNITIES GENTLEMEN TO SPEAK HERE IF WE CAN KEEP THE AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION. AT ZERO. YOU'RE WELCOME TO COME TO THE PODIUM AND SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS AND CONCERNS. YOU'RE NEXT. THANK YOU EDWARD HARPER I RESIDE AT 46 20. WHITEHALL CORE MCKINNEY TEXAS. IT'S AVALON IS A DEVELOPMENT JUST NORTH OF THE PROPOSED AREA FOR THE REZONING.

UM. I'M NOT HERE FOR APPLAUSE I'M NOT HERE FOR ATTENTION. I'M ACTUALLY A NEW RESIDENT. JUST

[00:20:04]

LAST THING I NEED IS TO DEAL WITH CRIME IN MY BACKYARD SO AGAIN. I JUST ASKED FOR THE COMMITTEE TO RECONSIDER USING THAT SPACE FOR SOMETHING MORE PRODUCTIVE THAN, UH, SERIES OF WAREHOUSES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR HARPER. WE APPRECIATE YOUR SERVICE AND YOUR BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT. JIM KIRBY 46 17 WORK CHESTER LANE MCKINNEY, TEXAS 7570 I AM A HOMEOWNER ON WORCHESTER LANE WHICH IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY. MIGHT FIGURE IS THAT WHEN THIS WAS BROUGHT UP BACK IN FEBRUARY I BELIEVE IN THE ORIGINAL MEETING THAT THE DEVELOPER SAID THEY WERE GOING TO DISCUSS THIS PROJECT. WITH THE HOMEOWNERS AND THE AREA AROUND AVALON. NO SUCH MEETING EVER OCCURRED SO MY FEARS WE CHANGE THE ZONING ON THIS. THE DEVELOPER HAS PULLED IT S U P NOW BUT WILL RESUBMIT LATER FOR EXACTLY WHAT HE'S TRYING TO DO NOW. I BELIEVE MR ROEDER THAT'S THE PLAN THAT HE HAS FOR THAT DEVELOPMENT SO THERE'S NOTHING TO SAY. IF WE CHANGE THE ZONING FROM PD THE C THREE THIS WON'T HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE SO THE HOPE OF MR ROEDER AND HIS, UH DEVELOPER IS THAT THEY'LL JUST.

SLIDE UNDER THE NEXT TIME THEY SUBMIT THIS AND WE WON'T KNOW ABOUT IT. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE WHOLE AUDIENCE IS FULL HERE TONIGHT BECAUSE OF CONCERN HOMEOWNERS AND THE AVALANCHE SUBDIVISION. ALSO THIS PROJECT NORMALLY IS DIRECTED IF MOST OF YOU WILL KNOW THESE THINGS ARE CARRIED THROUGH BY CIVIL ENGINEERS NOT ATTORNEYS THIS IS A REALLY ODD SITUATION. AND I FEEL LIKE THIS HAS BEEN A WAY TO DECEIVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE COMMUNITY AND MCKINNEY AND IT'S TRULY NOT GOING TO BE UNIQUE BY NATURE IF WE CHANGE THIS TO A C THREE THANK YOU.

JIM, UM. KAITLYN COULD YOU? I'M SORRY. COME UP ONE MORE TIME. SO THE IN ORDER TO BUILD WAREHOUSES. THE S U P THAT IF THEY WAITED AT A LATER DATE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE THE SAME. THE SAME REQUEST. YES. SO SHOULD BE ZONING REQUEST FOR C THREE MOVE FORWARD TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL THAN IN ORDER TO DEVELOP WAREHOUSE ON THIS PROPERTY IN OTHER SPECIFIC USE PERMIT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. AND THAT WOULD GO THROUGH THE SAME PUBLIC HEARINGS PNC AND COUNCIL PROCESS THAT WOULD GO THROUGH ALSO THE READ NOTIFICATION TO

[00:25:04]

THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE GIVING UP. GIVING UP THE ABUSES IN ORDER TO GET THAT FLEXIBILITY. YES, SIR. ISLAND SORT OF PULL YOU OUT OF ORDER. UM OKAY THIS IS STILL THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO, UH COME ADDRESSED THE PLANNING AND ZONING. THANK YOU. SCOTT CASE ELEMENT. 4405 WEMBLEY COURT. I'D LIKE TO RISE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PARTICULAR THING AS WELL AS THE WAREHOUSE. I'D ALSO LIKE TO NOTE THAT YOUR LITTLE DOTTED BLUE LINE THERE GOES THROUGH AN H O A. IF YOU'RE GOING TO INCLUDE ANY OF THE HOMES IN RH AWAY, I WOULD OFFER THAT YOU NEED TO INCLUDE US ALL. WE ARE A MEMBER OF AN H AWAY WE PAY OUR DUES. WHAT AFFECTS THE PEOPLE ON THAT PARTICULAR RESTRAINT AFFECTS US ALL. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT REDUCING OUR PROPERTY VALUES. SOME OF US ARE APPROACHING RETIREMENT AGE, AND THAT'S KIND OF OUR RETIREMENT. YOU'RE TAKING MONEY OUT OF OUR POCKETS. THE PLANS THAT WE'VE BEEN HEARING ABOUT, AND I JUST LEARNED ABOUT TONIGHT THEY'VE BEEN SLIPPING AND SLIDING IN AND OUT FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS NOW. YOU'RE GOING TO GO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE WITH THIS IT'S THE GENTLEMAN BACK HERE JUST LOOKED AT YOUR OWN C THREE. RULES AND REGULATION ALLOWS FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL NEWS. SO WHAT IS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE? IS IT A WAREHOUSE JUST UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME? AT THIS POINT IN TIME AFTER ALL THE THINGS THAT HAVE GONE ON THERE AIN'T A PERSON IN THIS AUDIENCE THAT BELIEVES THIS GUY AT ALL. HE KEEPS TRYING DIFFERENT WAYS TO GET AROUND US. SO WE'RE PRETTY SOUGHT IN SOLIDARITY HERE. WE DON'T WANT IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE YES, SIR. YOU LIKE TO COME UP? THANK YOU. YEAH. MY NAME IS TIM MARTINELLI 45. OH ONE DEVONSHIRE WAY. 75070. I'M DEFINITELY AGAINST THIS BEING ZONED ANYTHING BUT PD. I'D LIKE TO GO OVER THAT S U P A COUPLE OF ITEMS YOU'LL NEED TO LOOK AT THIS LITTLE CAREFULLY. THEY SAY THAT. THE PROPERTY IS NOT GOOD FOR PD BECAUSE IT HAS NO DIRECT ACCESS TO HARDEN AND, LIKE FOUR. WELL, I'VE BEEN WAITING

[00:30:02]

WELL I'VE BEEN DRIVING THIS FOR 16 YEARS IT'S MORE ACCESSIBLE THAN YOU WOULD THINK IF SOMEBODY REALLY WANTED TO GO TO SOMETHING ON THIS PROPERTY. IT'S WORTH GOING TO IT WOULD CREATE REVENUE JUST LIKE A WAREHOUSE. WOULD IT WOULDN'T RUN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. UM. OH, YEAH. I WANT TO MENTION THAT THEY USE THAT. UM. ENERGY EXCHANGE ENTERTAIN ANYONE CALL IT THEIR 70 GRAND. AS A REASON NOT. TO DO THIS, EXCEPT FOR C THREE. WE'LL GO DOWN THE ROAD IN FRISCO AND LOOK AT DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY. AT 1 21. I MEAN, THAT IS COMPLETELY FILLED WITH RETAIL. AND CAN OUR ENGINEERS FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO THAT? ALL I GOT THANK YOU. AND NEXT? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. WILLIAM WHALING 46 9 WIMBLEY COURT. UH, HAPPEN TO BE A MEMBER. BOARD OF AVALON. AND. AS A BOARD MEMBER. I TRIED TO ASSIST. THE MEMBERS WE HAVE 373 HOMES IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE TRY TO FACILITATE THOSE MEMBERS NEEDS AND DESIRES. AS A GENTLEMAN SPOKE ON EARLIER. AS A PREDOMINANT. MAINSTAY OF INDIVIDUALS. WEALTH IS THEIR HOME. IT IS WIDELY UNDERSTOOD THAT YOU KNOW THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD DECREASE THE VALUE OF THE HOMES. UM NOTWITHSTANDING, THAT. I SUPPOSE I WOULD WISH TO SPEAK TO THE INTEGRITY AND THE VALIDITY OF THE ARGUMENTS THAT ARE BEING PUT FORWARD. BYE. MR ROEDER AND HIS CLIENT. WE HAD A MEETING SET UP WITH THE BOARD OF AVALON LAST YEAR. THAT MEETING WAS CANCELED. 15 MINUTES BEFORE THE SCHEDULED MEETING. SO WE HAD SEVERAL OF OUR BOARD MEMBERS ACTUALLY SITTING IN THEIR LOT. AS THEY'RE CANCELING THE MEETING THE EMAIL SO I JUST QUESTIONED MM. UM. VALIDITY IN THE GENEROSITY THE GENUINENESS OF THEIR ARGUMENTS AND HOW THEY HAVE PUT THIS FORWARD. YOU HAVE ENUMERATED HERE THIS THIS BLUE LINE AND YOU INDICATED EARLIER.

BROUGHT THIS YOUNG LADY UP TO SPEAK INQUIRE TO HER AS FAR AS MAILING. INDIVIDUALS WERE NOT DID NOT RECEIVE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS MEETING. SIGNS THAT I BELIEVE ARE REQUIRED. I DON'T KNOW ALL THE DETAILS ABOUT THEM TO BE POSTED. UM. THOSE HAVE BEEN UP FOR APPROACHING A YEAR NOW. THEY'RE FADED. A LOT OF THEM HAVE BLOWN OFF. OUR LORD OUR YARD LANDSCAPE COMPANY HAS HAD TO PICK HIM UP AND DISPOSE OF THEM. SO, UM, I GUESS MY QUESTION IS OR WHAT I'M ALLUDING TO HERE IS. IF THE INTEGRITY OF THE LANDLORD UP TO THIS POINT RIGHT THE DEVELOPER HAS HAS BEEN THIS DISINGENUOUS. HOW ARE THEY GOING TO BE MOVING FORWARD AS A NEIGHBOR? AND DOES THAT SUPPORT THE COMMUNITY? IS NOT 75 1 21 THE GATEWAY TO MCKINNEY. DOES THIS FULFILL THE GATEWAY, A WAREHOUSE THAT OPERATES 24 HOURS A DAY HAS VEHICLES RUNNING IN IN THIS CLOSE PROXIMITY TO CHILDREN IN AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. NEIGHBORHOOD. ADDITIONALLY WHEN WE DID SO I'LL FOLLOW UP WITH WHEN WE DID ACTUALLY HAVE A MEETING WITH THEM. ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONSTITUENTS THE NEIGHBORHOOD. MEMBERS CONCERNS. AND THEY'RE ENUMERATED ORIGINAL PLAN HAD ENTRANCE IS THE LARGEST OF WHICH WAS ON TINA. RIGHT, WHICH IS AN ANCILLARY DRIVE TO 1 21. IT WAS ONLY. BELIEVE A 30 FT OR 35 FT WIDE ENTRANCE OFF OF 1 21 1 SINGLE ENTRANCE OFF OF 1 21 WHICH IS, OF COURSE, THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S LIMITATIONS FROM THE STATE. LIMIT THE ENTRANCES AND ACCESS POINTS OFF OF STATE HIGHWAY BUT THE CONCERN FOR US AND WHAT WE PRESENTED TO THEM WAS ADJUSTING IF I MAY PROCEED.

[00:35:04]

I LIVE AT 4300 CANNOT DRIVE. UM. YOU WERE ONE OF THE ORIGINAL LANDOWNERS IN THE PHASE TWO OF THE AVALON DEVELOPMENT. BACK IN 2000 AND THREE MY WIFE AND I MOVED IN THERE WITH OUR THREE KIDS. UM, MY OPPOSITION TO UM. ANY KIND OF WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT IN THIS ZONE IS AND, UH IT MAY ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE OPPOSITION PACKAGE THAT YOU RECEIVED.

WROTE A LETTER TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS WELL AS TO MISS SHEFFIELD. AND IN THAT LETTER I DESCRIBED. SOME OF THE POINTS THAT I WAS OPPOSED TO THIS FOR ONE OF WHICH WAS. THAT THE PROPOSED LAND USE FOR THE WAREHOUSES WERE NOT COMPATIBLE. WITH THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CALLS FOR THIS AREA TO BE ZONED TO SAY. UM. COLLIN MCKINNEY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHICH CALLS FOR ENTERTAINMENT COMMERCIAL. MIXED USE CENTER URBAN LIVING AND PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS LAND USES. WAREHOUSE DISTRICT. TYPE USES, LIKE THE PROPOSED LAND USE. ARE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR MANUFACTURING WAREHOUSE ZONE DISTRICT LIKE THE AREA OVER BY THE AIRPORT. IT'S ALSO INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ENTERTAINMENT CENTER PLACE TYPE THAT WAS PROPOSED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESCRIBES LANGUAGE OR CONTAINS LANGUAGE DESCRIBING AN ENTERTAINMENT CENTER AS BEING A COMMERCIAL CENTER PLANNED OR DEVELOPED LARGE SCALE MASTER PLAN. CENTERS INCLUDE A HORIZONTAL MIX OF USES INCLUDING DESTINATION RETAIL RESTAURANTS EMPLOYMENT CENTERS COMMERCIAL USES THAT OFFER OR SERVE A REGIONAL SCALE. RESIDENTIAL USES SUPPORT THESE DESTINATION DEVELOPMENTS THE KEYWORD THERE DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT. UM. AND IT'S ALSO REINFORCES THAT USED TO CREATE AN EXPERIENCE FOR VISITORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND OUR SAME ENTERTAINMENT CENTER MAY HAVE SHOPPING CENTRE LIFESTYLE AREA OR SOMETHING SIMILAR IS A PROMINENT FEATURE.

SO IF THAT'S WHAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANE SAYS WAS SUPPOSED TO GO IN THIS AREA.

WHY ARE WE DEVIATING FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND EVEN CONSIDERING THE IDEA OF PUTTING IN SOME SORT OF WAREHOUSE USE? ISN'T THAT THE PURPOSE OF DOING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE FIRST PLACE? SO I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT AS AN OPPOSITION TO THE COMMERCIAL ZONING MAY ALLOW FOR THAT KIND OF USED TO TAKE PLACE BUT ANY KIND OF WAREHOUSE USE IN THIS DISTRICT IS COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MUCH ANYONE ELSE WAS TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM ANYONE ELSE? YES, MA'AM. MY NAME IS SUSIE WEST I LIVE AT 4500 DEVONSHIRE WAY. MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75070. I'VE LIVED THERE TWO YEARS I BOUGHT AND 2000 AND FIVE ON BRIGHT AND DR LIVED THERE UP UNTIL WE BOUGHT THIS HOUSE. AND BEFORE I BOUGHT, I CAME TO THE I SAT DOWN WITH A MEMBER OF THE ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION AND SAID, WHAT'S GOING TO GO IN HERE AND WAS TOLD BASICALLY WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID THAT THIS MIGHT BE. LIGHT RETAIL LITTLE SHOPS MAYBE MEDICAL OFFICE SOMETHING LIKE THAT SOMETHING THAT WOULD ENHANCE THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND NOT DETRACT FROM IT. AND EVERYTHING THAT I'VE SEEN FROM THIS HERE WOULD DETRACT FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD, LOWER OUR PROPERTY VALUES. AS EVERYONE ELSE HAS SAID. AND. I'D LIKE TO REITERATE THAT NOTIFYING THE JUST THE. MOST SOUTHERN EDGE OF WORCHESTER DRIVE IS. RIDICULOUS THEY NEED TO NOTIFY THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT AFFECTS US ALL. WE'RE ALL A UNIT. AND WE ALL WANT TO BE NOTIFIED WHEN SOMETHING LIKE THIS IS HAPPENING. SO PLEASE. KEEP THAT IN MIND. WAREHOUSES BELONGING THE ADDRESSED YOUR PART OF TOWN, NOT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

[00:40:05]

I'LL ASK IF THERE'S OTHERS IF YOU WILL FILL OUT A CARD PRIOR TO COMING TO THE PODIUM THAT WOULD UP THE PROCESS. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING MY NAME IS AARON NORRIS FOR 7 TO 8 BRIGHTON DRIVE. AS MANY OF MY NEIGHBORS HAVE POINTED OUT. THIS WOULD AFFECT US GREATLY.

NOT JUST IN THE PROPERTY VALUE. IN THE SAFETY. IT'S ALSO UNSIGHTLY. OR THE POLLUTION THAT WAS SPOKEN ABOUT EARLIER. AND NOT JUST TRASH AND WASTE BUT THERE'S LIGHT SOUND. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS FULL OF FAMILIES AND IF THIS WAREHOUSE IF THEY HAVE SHIFTS COULD END UP AFFECTING. THE CHILDREN THAT ARE CONSIDERED AND JUST THAT BORDER. WHICH THEY COULD AND FACT I SAID EVERYBODY ELSE. THE SAFETY OF THE CHILDREN IS ALSO A MATTER. BECAUSE I KNOW I SEE PEOPLE WALKING THEIR CHILDREN ALL THE TIME. NOW THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL THINGS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP ABOUT HOW IT'S ISOLATED. IT'S BEEN ISOLATED FOR 16 YEARS. AND NOW THEY WANT TO DEVELOP IT. TO MAKE IT NOT ISOLATED FOR THIS VENTURE SO IT COULD BE DEVELOPED. FOUR. NOT A C THREE. BUT MORE OF THE PD. THAT IS BEING, UH, TALKED ABOUT RIGHT NOW. AS ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS ALSO MENTIONED IT'S A NATURE WAY. THIS DOES NOT JUST AFFECT THE PEOPLE THAT IT'S BORDERING. IT'S AFFECTING ALL OF US. THERE'S A SCHOOL RIGHT THERE. THAT WOULD SCREW UP BUS SCHEDULES. IT COULD AFFECT TEACHERS BEING ABLE TO ARRIVE ON TIME. THERE ARE MANY DIFFERENT THINGS THAT COULD BE AFFECTED. BY MAKING THIS A WAREHOUSE DISTRICT. THE TRAFFIC WILL INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY. AND NOT. MOTOR VEHICLES THAT WE DRIVE NORMALLY. I'M TALKING SEMIS. I'M TALKING BOX TRUCKS. WORK. AS A PROJECT MANAGER. DEALING WITH LOGISTICS. THERE'S NOTHING EASY ABOUT MOVING THOSE VEHICLES AROUND. ANY KIND OF WAREHOUSE. IS GOING TO HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON EVERYTHING. THEN YOU CAN LOOK AT THE SURROUNDING AREA. EVERYTHING ELSE IS PD. EVERYTHING ELSE IS DESTINATION COMMERCIAL. WHY WOULD WE WANT THIS LITTLE SECTION TWO B A. C THREE. THAT WILL ACTUALLY DRIVE AWAY OTHER. UH SORRY OTHER INVESTORS WHO WANT TO INVEST IN COMMERCIAL DESTINATION COMMERCIAL. MY VOTE. OR NOT. MY VOTE BY MY OPINION IS WE SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE DESIGNATION. FROM PD. TO SEE EITHER. THANK YOU MISS NORTH. WE HAVE A LETTER FROM RODERICK WILLIAMS ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM? THANK YOU. HAS COME FORWARD. INTO WILLIAM EVANS I LIVE IN 4400 CIVIL LANE, JUST NORTH OF THIS DEVELOPMENT HERE. HAVE LIVED HERE SINCE 2000 AND TWO UM I WATCHED WHEN I WAS A KID, THE AIRLINE BEING BUILT BEEN DEVELOPED. WE WERE PROMISED WHEN WE WERE MOVED HERE THAT ALL THIS AREA NEXT YEAR 1 21. HAS WON 21 BUILT UP COMMERCIAL WOULD BE BUILT. AND EXPAND. OVER THE YEARS WE'VE SEEN BASICALLY NONE OF THAT OCCUR. WE HAD THE STADIUM BUILT JUST TO THE SOUTHEAST. UM. AND YOU WOULD EXPECT WHEN YOU HAVE THE STADIUM $70 MILLION STADIUM THAT WE PAID FOR. YOU WOULD EXPECT PEOPLE TO WANT TO BUILD COMMERCIAL NEAR THAT AREA.

HAVEN'T SEEN IT. AS SOON AS YOU PUT IN A WAREHOUSE OR ANYTHING SIMILAR TO THAT NEAR. THAT NEIGHBORHOOD RIGHT THERE. IT IS GOING TO EXPAND THAT THE AREA JUST TO THE LEFT. THAT'LL TURN

[00:45:02]

THERE ARE. ALREADY AND THINKING ABOUT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN TO, UH. PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO CONSIDER COMING TO MCKINNEY AND WHAT WE WANT MCKINNEY TO REMAIN AS WE MOVE TO MCKINNEY BECAUSE WE WANTED A SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE PLACE TO RAISE OUR FAMILY AND WE WANTED A COMMUNITY THAT WE CAN INVEST IN. IN THOSE 10 YEARS. QUITE FRANKLY THE CITY OF MCKINNEY HAS NOT DONE THIS NEIGHBORHOOD A TON OF FAVORS ALONG OF OUR GREEN BELT TO THE NORTHWEST A LARGE PUBLIC STORAGE UNIT WAS BUILT. A PUBLIC STORAGE WAS BUILT RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE STADIUM ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE. UM. THEN, OF COURSE, THE STADIUM WAS BUILT. AND UM, JUST ON AN ASIDE.

PEOPLE AREN'T HAVING ANY TROUBLE GETTING TO THOSE GAMES SO IF SOMEBODY BUILT SOMETHING ELSE OTHER THAN A WAREHOUSE THEY HAVE PLENTY OF ACCESS THERE. UM BUT THEN ALSO SECTION EIGHT HOUSING HAS GONE IN NEAR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WHICH IN TURN HAS, UM. MADE THAT, UH, ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THERE BECOME TITLE ONE. MY WIFE SERVES ON THE BOARD OF THAT TO ALREADY THEY'VE SEEN THE DIFFERENCE THAT THAT HAS MADE UM IN TERMS OF BEING ABLE TO FIND FAMILIES THAT WANT TO INVEST IN THE SCHOOLS VOLUNTEERS FOR THE PITA. UM AND JUST IT'S BECOME A STRUGGLE. AND, UM. SO I JUST WANT TO, I WOULD ASK FOR YOU TO CONSIDER. AS WE MOVE FORWARD THAT WE WANT THIS TO BE A PART OF MCKINNEY AND WE WANT THIS TO BE AN ATTRACTIVE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE'RE PROUD OF. WE WANT SCHOOLS THAT WE'RE PROUD OF. WE WANT MCKINNEY TO REMAIN A PLACE. UM YOU KNOW, THAT DOESN'T TURN INTO A PLACE THAT PEOPLE LOOK AT AND GO. YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED HERE? WHAT IS WHAT IS DETERIORATED HERE. AND I'M AFRAID THAT AND OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS DAILY BOMBARDED BY INVESTORS WHO WANT TO COME IN AND INVEST AND TAKE HOMEOWNERS OUT OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO ARE WANTING TO INVEST IN THE COMMUNITY, SO WE'RE FIGHTING BATTLES ON ALL FRONTS. AND I THINK A GREAT POINT WAS MADE. UM JUST IF EACH OF YOU WOULD LOOK AND GO, OKAY IF ALL THAT WAS AROUND WOULD YOU PUT YOUR FAMILY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND IF THERE WAS THAT WAREHOUSE THERE WOULD YOU MOVE YOUR FAMILY IN. AND I WOULD JUST ASK YOU TO CONSIDER THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR SPENCER ANYONE ELSE? UH, SECOND ROW BS. MIGHT HAVE TO TAKE A WHOLE LOT OF TIME. UM I REALIZED THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE HERE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE S U P THAT HAS BEEN GENEROUSLY. REMOVED OR

[00:50:01]

AND I WILL SIMPLY POINT OUT. THIS IS KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD. THAT WE WILL BE HERE AGAIN. IF WE ALLOW THIS REZONING, THANK YOU. YOU, MR STEVENSON APPRECIATE YOUR BRIEF COMMENT. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT? YES, SIR. UH MY NAME IS DR ESCOVEDO. I'M AT 45 17. EVAN SHARE AWAY. AND. MYSELF I AM A TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS OWNER AND I HAVE 18 WHEELERS. AND SO I UNDERSTAND THE LOUD NOISES THAT THEY MAKE AND I UNDERSTAND HOW THEY CAN BE. DETERIORATING TO THE PULLED SOUND POLLUTION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. MY FIANCE AND I ARE NEED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. RECENTLY BOUGHT THE HOUSE. AND YEAH I MEAN, I'M JUST OPPOSING WITH THESE GENTLEMEN HERE HAVE TO. THEY'RE PROPOSING FOR BUILDING HERE. I USED TO BE A GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. AND I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND. THAT THEY WANT TO COME AND DO BUSINESS. BUT THEY ALSO HAVE TO CONSIDER US. WE JUST CAN BE SOMETHING THAT THE OVERLOOK. AND I THINK. THE WHOLE OTHER NEIGHBORS ALREADY MADE A POINT SO THAT'S MINE AND APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH ANYONE ELSE WE SHOULD SPEAK TONIGHT ANYONE THAT HASN'T HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH A PLEASE COME FORWARD. THAT WOULD MEAN NO FOR YOU. YEAH. HI DESTIN APPLE IN 32 OH, FIVE JUNIPER DRIVE I'M NOT IN AVALON. I'M AN E H ONE. HOWEVER THE NOISE POLLUTION THAT WE HEAR JUST FROM 1 21 IN 75. I CAN ONLY IMAGINE THE INCREASE THAT A WAREHOUSE WOULD PROVIDE OUR AREA. THANK YOU. VERY MUCH.

ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT? ANYONE ELSE WISH TO COME FORWARD? YES, MA'AM.

SUBMIT THE CARD AND THEN I AM YEAH. MY NAME IS CECILIA WIN AND I LIVE IN 45. QUALIFIED. 45 37 GO, CHESTER. AND WE HAVE WE HAVE LIKE FAMILY HOUSE. UH, MY MOM. AND BROTHER SISTER. SO WE LIVE IN ROCHESTER. FOR 15 YEARS. IN THE HOW OF YOU? SO MY KIDS GO TO LAST. UM UM, SCHOOL SO QUIET EVERYTHING LIKE THE NEIGHBOR IS NINE NEIGHBOR SO. DOWN NEIGHBOR OR ADDRESS THE ISSUE ABOUT THE REASON SO I THINK THAT YOU ALREADY HAD. JUST ASK THE COMMUNITY TO CONCEDE. OH, THE RESULT. OF MY NEIGHBOR ALREADY ADDRESSED THE POINT. THAT'S ALL THAT WE HAD THREE HOW FAMILY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, NINE NEIGHBORHOODS. THAT'S ALL.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MISS WIN WE HAVE CARDS FROM CECILIA. READ THEM INTO THE RECORD TO SYRIA. WHEN UH, DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK. IN OPPOSITION. THE ADDRESS YOU GAVE 4537 YOUR T R A C. WHICH DO KNOWLEDGE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION. AND THEN THE LAST CARD. AND. YES, 46 13 EVAN SHIRE DO NOT ALWAYS TO SPEAK THAT I'M AN OPPOSITION THOSE WILL BE READ INTO THE RECORD ANYONE ELSE HERE TONIGHT THAT HAS NOT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME TO THE PODIUM. PLEASE DO SO. ANYONE ELSE? YES. UM WE'LL GET THAT BEFORE WE FINISH THIS ITEM. IT WAS MORE THAN THREE. I HAVE HERE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT? DO YOU WANT? MHM.

OPPOSITION ORDERS. THE ISSUE CLOSED OF EMOTION. YOU FILL OUT A CARD MOTION. LOOKING. THAT FOR THIS ITEM. ARE THEY SPEAKING AT? OR ANOTHER ITEM. NO. OKAY WE HAVE EMOTIONS CLOSED. THE PUBLIC HEARING BY MR MCCALL IN THE SECOND BY MR MEN'S EYES OR ANY DISCUSSION,

[00:55:02]

OKAY. THE MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. WHAT WE'LL DO NOW IS TALK ABOUT WILL HAVE MEMBERS. HMM. OKAY, SO WHAT WE WHAT WE DID THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE AUDIENCE TO PARTICIPATE. WE JUST CLOSE THAT. UM YEAH, WE REQUESTED OTHER MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO COME DO SO WE HAD A MOTION AND A SECOND AND ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY SO WHAT WE'VE DONE WE HAVE CLOSED THAT PORTION. WILL NOW HAVE CONVERSATION WITH THE STAFF AND WITH THE APPLICANT AND THEN WE WILL. WE WILL OR WILL NOT TAKE AN ACTION SO MEMBERS DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF FOR THE APPLICANT? I DO HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF. UM.

LET'S JUST BE CLEAR SO IN THE CURRENT ZONING PD. WHAT IS ALLOWED. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE P D AND THE C THREE? ZONING BECAUSE THERE STILL SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF CONFUSION BY THE RESIDENTS ABSOLUTELY SO, PD FOLLOWS C PLANT CENTER, WHICH IS A LEGACY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THE ZONING REQUEST IS FOR C THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHICH IS THE MODERN DAY EQUIVALENT UM AND SO SOME OF THE USES THAT ARE DIFFERENT THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED IN THE CURRENT ZONING WOULD THEN REQUIRE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT WITH THE C THREE.

WAREHOUSE IS NOT A PERMITTED USE IN THE CURRENT ZONING WAREHOUSE IS NOT A PERMITTED USE IN THE PROPOSED ZONING WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, WHICH IS AN EXTRA ZONING EVENT. GOES FORWARD TO THE BLEEDING IS ONLY COMMISSION. PROPERTY UNDER NOTIFICATIONS CITY COUNCIL. ULTIMATE ACTION UM SO THAT'S THE BIG DIFFERENCE IT'S COMMERCIAL ZONING C THREE. LEGACY DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL ZONING OR EXCUSE ME SEAPLANE CENTER. LEGACY DISTRICT TO SEE THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND THAT'S FOR BOTH PD AND. C THREE. SO THE PD S U P HAS TO BE BOTH ZONING. FOR WHITE HOUSE OR JUST C THREE.

THE CURRENT ZONING DOES NOT PERMIT WAREHOUSE AT ALL. SO NOW AS YOU SEE THREE WOULD REQUIRE THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, WHICH IS AN ADDITIONAL ZONING EVENT. NO, YOU'RE GOOD AND THEN THE CORNER OF HARDEN IN 1 21 IT IS JUST WEST OF THE PORCH SERVICE CENTRE. WHAT IS THE ZONING THERE BUT THAT ON OUR MAP IT SHOWING A C. FOR ME. SEE HERE, THIS PROPERTY RIGHT HERE.

CORRECT SO THAT IS AS WELL AS THE IT'S UH PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH A BASE ZONING OF THE C THREE. C THREE IS ALREADY I'M SORRY. C PLAN CENTER YES, THIS IS HE PLANNING SOMETHING THAT'S CORRECT, OK? SO THAT PROPERTY THIS PROPERTY THIS PROPERTY ARE ALL BASED ZONING OF THE CITY PLANS IN HER AND THEN I HAVE JUST ONE FURTHER QUESTION SINCE IT SEEMED TO BE A HOT TOPIC ABOUT THE DOTTED LINE GOING INTO THE H O A. PERHAPS SO THE AUDIENCE IS AWARE. UM WHAT IS THE LAW OF STATE AND WHY WE HAVE TO DO IT THE WAY WE DO IT AND NOTIFICATIONS RIGHT? SO ANY TIME WE HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT WE MAIL OUT A PROPERTY OWNER WRITTEN NOTIFICATION UH TWO PROPERTIES WITHIN A 200 FT BUFFER BELIEVE WE ACTUALLY, UM CUSHION OURSELVES A LITTLE BIT FOR 215 FT. JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE ALL THOSE PROPERTIES IN MIND. THAT IS BASED ON THE, UH THE ADDRESS ON YOUR TAX RECORD.

UM SO IF YOU ARE RENTING A PROPERTY IT'S GOING TO GO TO THE PERSON WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THE PROPERTY. UM, SO THAT'S THE. WHY WE REQUIRE THE PROPER UNIFICATION FOR STATE LAW.

OKAY? OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF. SO AND THIS MIGHT BE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT. BUT AS SOMEBODY BROUGHT UP. EARLIER UM THEIR CONCERN IS THAT. THE NEXT ITEM WAS PULLED DOWN. IT'S JUST KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD DID THE APPLICANT. SAY WHY THE SECOND ITEM WAS PULLED DOWN.

I'LL DEFER THAT TO THE APPLICANTS SO THEY CAN SEE THAT UM, THEY CAN SUBMIT ANOTHER SPECIFIC USE PERMITS IT WILL GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS PUBLIC HEARING. IN THE INDIAN COUNCIL JUST FOR CLARIFICATION AND I HAD ASKED THIS EARLIER AND MAYBE THIS IS SOMETHING AGAIN FOR THE APPLICANT BUT I HAD ASKED IF THIS WAS TO JUST MODERNIZED BUT FROM WHAT I'M HEARING FROM WHAT YOU JUST SAID. ULTIMATELY THE APPLICANT IS TRYING TO BUILD A WAREHOUSE AND IT'S NOT REMITTED UNDER THE CURRENT BUT IT WOULD BE UNDER THE SEA THREE. SO IT'S NOT. SO IT'S NOT PERMITTED IT'S PERMITTED WITH A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT APPROVAL SO IT WOULD BE UNDER THE NEW IF THE NEW ZONING IS THAT'S CORRECT APPROVED IT'S NOT ALLOWABLE UNDER ITS CURRENT

[01:00:05]

10TH. WE DID MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE PLAN BASED UPON UH THEIR REQUEST. WE CHANGED.

THREE INFERENCES ON COLLIN MCKINNEY TO CHANGE THE TWO INSTANCES ON PENA DRIVE TO ONE.

WE HAVE ADDED SOME RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT ADDRESS THE HEIGHT. ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AS LIGHT AS OR OR UP SOMETIME AT THE END OF LAST YEAR, AND I HAVE TO GO BACK AND CHECK MY RECORDS. THINK WAS OCTOBER. PROBABLY I SENT. EMAILS TO THESE INDIVIDUALS.

THESE ARE THE ONLY CONTACT PEOPLE I HAD. BY THE WAY I THINK WHEN WE STARTED THE PROCESS THE H O A ADMINISTRATOR. WAS EITHER CHANGED OR SOMETHING BECAUSE IT TOOK US A LONG TIME TO FIND OUT WHO THE OFFICERS WERE. BUT SINCE THAT POINT IN TIME TO THE PRESENCE WE SENT OUT INFORMATION. WE'RE NOT. WE DIDN'T HEAR BACK. THANK YOU. YOU KNOW THE QUESTIONS? THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND. WE APPRECIATE THE CITIZENS INVOLVEMENT WITHIN IT, AND EVERYBODY HAS A RIGHT TO VOICE THERE'S AND EVERYBODY KNOWS THE CONCERNS THAT ANYONE HAS WHAT DEVELOPMENT AROUND THEIR HOUSE AND HAVE EFFECTIVE LONG TERM. I THINK THE ISSUE P THAT WAS GOING TO FOLLOW THIS THAT'S BEEN WITHDRAWN IS TOTALLY CONFUSED THE SITUATION OVERALL.

AND THE WAREHOUSE IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IF C THREE'S APPROVED AS OF THIS DATE AND FORWARD TO SLIDE THROUGH IN THE FUTURE, IN ANY WAY WOULD MEAN AND HAVE TO SLIDE THROUGH A WHOLE P N. Z. RE NOTIFICATION AND A CITY COUNCIL VOTE STILL NEVER GET THERE. AND SO I HAVE THIS FEELING THAT THE CITIZENS WILL TAKE A LOSS IF C THREE IS APPROVED WHEN THEY SHOULD KNOW THAT THEY HAVE STOPPED THE WAREHOUSE UM AS FAR AS THAT GOES, IT'S NOT HAPPENING TONIGHT IN THIS SITUATION. IS ANYTHING POSSIBLE FUTURE? YES THIS WOULD COME BACK THROUGH ABUSE OWNED HEAVY INDUSTRIAL YOU'LL HAVE YOUR NOTIFICATION YOU HAVE YOUR CHANCE TO HAVE A BOYS ALONG THE WAY AS FAR AS BRINGING IT UP TO DATE. C THREE BRINGS THIS UP TO DATE. HAVE A PLAN DEVELOPMENT WHICH YOU'VE GOT TO PLOT OUT THE WHOLE LARGE TRACK AS THIS ANYTIME. YOU WANT TO DO ANYTHING. KIND OF ARCHAIC AND WON'T HAPPEN WITH THIS PIECE OF DIRT, CONSIDERING THE ACCESS THE SIZE THE DEPTH ALONG THE WAY. UM I'M IN FAVOR OF THE C THREE REZONE TO IT FOR COMMERCIAL AREA ON 1 21 I THINK IT PROTECTS THE I THINK IT PROTECTS. THE CITIZENS AS MUCH AS THE PD DOES. I THINK THE SPECIAL USE PERMITS IN THERE

[01:05:04]

YOU CAN THINK IT'S NOT. IT IS A WIN. UM YOU HAVE PUT DOWN THE DISTRIBUTION CENTER THIS IS COMING FROM SOMEONE WHO'S RAN 32 MILLION SQUARE FOOT DISTRIBUTION CENTERS. I KNOW THE TRAFFIC SO YOU HAVE ONE THAT YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GET THAT WAREHOUSE. THERE IS NO WAY THAT THIS WILL GET SNUCK PAST THE PNC IT'S NOT GOING TO GET SNUCK PAST YOU. FOR CITY COUNCIL. SO DO YOU BRING IS OPENING UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS. I THINK C THREE IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS WE HAVE ALREADY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING IN THOSE HANDS YOU'VE GIVEN YOU'VE HAD A CHANCE TO SPEAK WE'LL GET YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED WHEN WE GET THROUGH. I PROMISE. WE'LL GET YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED WE WILL HAVE ANY OTHER PDS ARE THERE. WHAT WHY WHY WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH WITH THIS ITEM, AND THEN WE'LL ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. I LIVE WITHIN 200. FORGOTTEN OVER. WELL, YEAH, WE'LL FIGURE OUT THE WHY PART BECAUSE WE'LL FIGURE OUT WHY YOU DIDN'T WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD NOW ANY OTHER ANYONE ELSE HAVE A COMMENT? LET'S GO ANYONE ELSE? SO. HERE'S HERE'S WHERE I'M AT ON THIS ONE. I DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE I'M OPPOSED. TO IF WE WERE EVEN CONSIDERING BASED ON WHAT I KNOW I WOULD BE OPPOSED TO IT, BUT I'M ALSO HEARING. THE NEIGHBORS COME OUT AND BEING OPPOSED TO THIS PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM WE'VE HAD I CAN SEE IN HERE. LETTERS OF OPPOSITION AND I GUESS THIS IS A QUESTION FOR STAFF. HOW MANY. REGISTERED MEMBERS OF OPPOSITION. WE HAD ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. ARE YOU SO FOR THE ZONING SPECIFICALLY AND THAT'S WHEN THEY SPECIFICALLY PUT THIS AGENDA ITEM IN THE BOX WE'VE RECEIVED ABOUT 49. BUT I THINK ALSO THAT'S. WITH THE MISCOMMUNICATION THAT THE ZONING EVENT IS FOR THE WAREHOUSE THE ZONING EVENT FOR THE COMMERCIAL TO COMMERCIAL NOT THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE WAREHOUSE COMPONENT.

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS. MOTIONS. ANYONE. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION SECOND EMOTIONAL MR DOCTOR APPROVED THE ANIMUS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS SECOND BY MR MAN'S EYE. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. THIS MOTION CARRIES BY VOTED SIX IN FAVOR ONE AGAINST AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE SEPTEMBER 21. CITY COUNCIL MEETING THE NEXT ITEM. 2100 Z THREE PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. TO ONE DAY 00 SORRY. TERRY 06 S U P THREE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit to Allow for Warehouse Uses, Located on the Northwest Corner of State Highway 121 (Sam Rayburn Tollway) and Tina Drive]

SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

QUESTIONS OF STAFF. WE MOVE FORWARD. RIGHT? YEAH, YOU CAN HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD I'M SORRY, WOULD WE BE CLOSING INDEFINITELY? INDEFINITELY OKAY WITHDRAWN AND CLOSED INDEFINITELY. THANK YOU. EMOTION. WOULD. YEAH. YEAH. SO THIS IS A DESIGNER DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. THIS S U P REQUEST. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. EVERYONE THANK YOU. UM MY NAME'S CHIHIRO CARACALLA 4313 CANNOT DRIVE. SO ONE QUESTION I HAVE FROM MISS SHEFFIELD IS HOW MANY LETTERS OF OPPOSITION THERE WERE FOR THIS PARTICULAR ITEM BECAUSE THAT WAS OUR GENERAL UNDERSTANDING. THIS IS WHAT WE

[01:10:01]

UM, WHY INSIST UPON BUILDING SOMETHING THAT DRIVES THIS MANY PEOPLE TO SHOW UP TO A UH, CITY MEETING? YOU KNOW, AT SIX P.M. ON A WEEKNIGHT. THAT I THINK REALLY IS. IS A KIND OF FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION. LIKE WHY? WHY DO WE EVEN WANT TO BUILD? THIS THING HERE? IS THERE NOT HIRE BETTER USE FOR THIS LAND. SO MM. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM THEY ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IS HOW MANY? HOW MANY SPECIFIC LETTERS OF OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM? IT WAS 187. THAT'S THE NUMBER OF ITEMS SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING THIS PROPOSED S U P THERE RUN OPPOSITION ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM.

MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE SIDE, UM, INDEFINITELY. HAVE EMOTIONAL MISS KIRK NOT TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TERRIBLY ADAM INDEFINITELY.

SECOND, MR MCCALL. ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE ITEM HAS BEEN APPROVED IN THE MOTION WAS APPROVED IN EUROPE HAS BEEN TABLED INDEFINITELY. OKAY. THE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request by the City of McKinney to Amend Chapter 146 (Zoning Regulations), Section 146-135 (Landscape Requirements) of the Code of Ordinances]

WELL, THEY. THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT. TO THE NEW. MS ARNOLD WE'RE READY ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU, MR CHAIRMAN, JENNIFER ARNOLD, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING. UH, LET'S SEE IF I CAN'T THERE WE GO. SO I'M I'M TRYING TO GAIN MY COMPOSURE AT THIS POINT I'M SORRY. ALL RIGHT, SO THE TRADE I'M SORRY. THERE'S BEEN A LOT HAPPENING TODAY. UM SO THIS LAST ITEM IS A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO OUR LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS UM WE ARE PROPOSING TO SORT OF REORGANIZED THE WAY THAT OUR ZONING ORDINANCE OR I'M SORRY. TRY TO REORGANIZE THE WAY THAT OUR LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ADDRESS, LANDSCAPING AND PARKING LOTS. AND ALSO ADD AND INTRODUCED A NEW ALTERNATE COMPLIANCE COMPONENT AND THEN CLARIFY A FEW THINGS THIS IS REALLY COMING FORWARD, GIVEN SOME OF THE WORK THAT WE'VE BEEN DOING ON THE WHAT OUR NEW CODE MCKINNEY, UM. INITIATIVE AS WE WERE MEETING AT TO TALK ABOUT HOW TO HELP IMPROVE OUR DEVELOPMENT CODES. THIS WAS ONE OF THOSE SORT OF LOW HANGING FRUIT OPPORTUNITIES THAT WE SAW, AND WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE STARTED BRINGING THIS FORWARD. SO THAT WE CAN SLOWLY CLEAN UP SOME OF THESE EASIER ITEMS IF YOU WILL IN ADVANCE OF THE MAJOR, UM, NEW CODE SO REAL QUICKLY I'LL WALK THROUGH THIS.

OUR CURRENT ORDINANCE IS LAID OUT ALMOST LIKE A LAUNDRY LIST. IT'S JUST ITEMS. A THROUGH Z WITH ALL OF THESE SUBSETS WHICH HAS BEEN FINE FOR YEARS AND YEARS BUT WHEN IT COMES TO FIGURING OUT WHAT APPLIES WHERE AS SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO PARKING LOT DESIGN WE WANTED TO TAKE A STAB AT REORIENTING IT A LITTLE BIT SO THAT IT'S A LITTLE BIT MORE ORGANIZED. SO WITH THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WE WOULD GROUP ALL OF THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING LOT DESIGN UNDER ONE SUBSET AND THEN WE WOULD INTRODUCE SOMETHING CALLED ALTERNATE COMPLIANCE AND REALLY, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF WAYS THAT A PARKING LOT MIGHT BE ABLE TO BE DESIGNED THAT WOULD MEET THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT HAVING TO MEET VERY SPECIFIC. STANDARDS AND SO WITH THIS ALTERNATE COMPLIANCE AND APPLICANT WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO AN INNOVATIVE DESIGN OR A SLIGHTLY MODIFIED DESIGN UNDER A CERTAIN THRESHOLD WHICH ARE THESE ITEMS THAT YOU SEE HERE ONE THROUGH SIX. AND WE WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY OF A STAFF LEVEL TO APPROVE THAT. UM IF THERE'S

[01:15:02]

QUESTIONS OF MISS ARNOLD. I JUST WANT TO SAY GREATLY APPRECIATE. STAFF WORK YOUR WORK IN BRINGING, UH, ALWAYS REFRESHING NEEDS AND TAKING A LOOK AT HIM. YOU KNOW THE PLATES QUITE FOR WITH EVERYTHING ELSE THAT GOES ON IN TOWN AND THAT'S DEVELOPING AS FAST AND TO ACTUALLY PICK UP AND REVISE THINGS AS QUICKLY AS YOU GUYS HAVE HAD HAS BEEN OUTSTANDING OVER THE PAST YEAR, SO. NO ONE ELSE. CAN YOU EXPLAIN IT WELL, THANKS. YEAH I'VE BEEN PRACTICING. YEAH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON HIM. IF ANYONE'S HERE TONIGHT, I WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THESE PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 1 46. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVE THIS ITEM MOTION BY MR MANN ZAIN TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVE THE AUTUMN. 2ND 2ND BY MR MCCALL. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? THIS CAST YOUR VOTE. YEAH. THE MOTION CARRIES THE ISLAND WHAT WE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ELECTION THE SEPTEMBER 21 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM WOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. IN ANY

[PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA]

[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]