Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:04]

BUT HOW DO THEY COST ORDER? TODAY IS WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 22ND 2021, IT'S 40. SEVEN IN THE AFTERNOON. WE'RE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THIS IS OUR MCKINNEY URBAN TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARD MEETING AND FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS PUBLIC COMMENTS. WE HAVE ANYONE THAT SIGNED UP TO

[CONSENT ITEMS]

SPEAK. WE DO NOT. AND CONSENT ITEMS. 210800 MINUTES AND MCKINNEY URBAN TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF AUGUST 18TH 2021. MAKE THE MOTION. WE APPROVED CONCERN AGENDA SECOND.

[Consider/Discuss/Act on Interlocal Agreements with Dallas Area Rapid Transit Mobility Service Local Government Corporation and Dallas Area Rapid Transit (“DART”) for Transit Services and a related License for use of the “GoPass” Subscription]

ALL IN FAVOUR. FINE. MOST. REGULAR AGENDA 21080 AND CONSIDER AN ACT INTER LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT MOBILITY SERVICE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT. UH CORPORATION AND DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, DARK FOR TRANSIT SERVICES AND RELATED LICENSE FOR USE OF THE GOAT PASS SUBSCRIPTION. YES I WANT TO THANK THANKS SO MUCH TO EVERYONE FOR COMING TO THIS MEETING. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE HAVE THIS MEETING AT THIS SHORT TIMELINE BECAUSE WE ONLY HAVE A FEW MORE DAYS UNTIL THIS GOES TO THE DART BOARD FOR APPROVAL SO WE NEEDED TO HAVE A PIECE OF THE PUZZLE DONE FIRST. SO WE'RE LOOKING AT TWO INTER LOCAL AGREEMENTS. YOU HAVE DRAFTS OF THOSE TWO DOCUMENTS IN FRONT OF YOU. THIS IS JUST THE AGREEMENT FOR TRANSIT SERVICES AND THEN A SEPARATE AGREEMENT FOR THE APP LICENCE.

BOTH LEGAL TEAMS ARE STILL WORKING ON THESE DOCUMENTS OF THESE THINGS ARE NOT FINAL THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT. BUT. NONE OF THE BUSINESS TERMS HAVE CHANGED FROM THE PROPOSAL THAT YOU GUYS APPROVED LAST MONTH. UM WE'RE REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THESE AGREEMENTS SUBJECT TO REVISIONS, AS REQUIRED BY THE RESPECTIVE LEGAL TEAMS. ANY REVISIONS THAT WOULD CHANGE ANY BUSINESS TERMS WITH, OF COURSE, COME BACK TO THE BOARD FOR CONVERSATION. SHOULD ANY INSTANCES ARISE WERE LEGAL TEAMS CAN'T AGREE. WE WOULD COME BACK TO THE BOARD AGAIN. SO. REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR THESE DOCUMENTS, AND THE TERM WOULDN'T CHANGE OTHER THAN FOR MATERIAL CORRECT. ONE HAVE QUESTION OR ISSUE. THOUGHT THERE WAS GOOD DISCUSSION. MAYOR LAST MEETING. I THOUGHT WE WENT THROUGH IT PRETTY THOROUGHLY AND KNOW YOU WANT TO LOOK IN THE FUTURE COUPLE ACCOUNTS MIGHT WANT TO LOOK AT WHO MIGHT QUALIFY HOW WE CAN EXPAND IT, BUT I THINK OVERALL, THE AGREEMENT WAS OUTSTANDING. AND I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROACH I'LL SAY. ALL IN FAVOR. OKAY, ALRIGHT POST. RIGHT IN SECOND ITEM 21080 TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON A REVISION

[Consider/Discuss/Act on revisions to the Title VI Program for Transit Services]

ON PROVISIONS TO THE TITLE SIX PROGRAM FOR TRANSIT SERVICES. YES SO THE CITY WAS ASKED TO CHANGE OR UPDATE SOME OF THE LANGUAGE THAT WITHIN THE PROGRAM, SO WE JUST MADE A MINIMAL UPDATES AS REQUIRED BY FDA GUIDELINES. SENT THAT TO LEGAL AND, UH THAT IS WHAT WE'RE PROVING TODAY. WE'RE REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR TODAY. QUESTIONS. THEY ARE IN MOTION.

I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE HAVE PROVED THAT. ADAM REFERRING TO TRANSIT SERVICES. SECOND ALL IN FAVOUR, HIGH POST. I'M ASSUMING THAT WE DON'T HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING MATTERS NOT

[BOARD OR COMMISSIONER COMMENTS]

ON THE AGENDA FOR COMMISSION COMMENTS. I HAD TO LEAVE IN THE LAST MEETING BEFORE I WAS ABLE TO DISCUSS THIS. I THINK RAINY MAY HAVE BROUGHT IT UP. DID HE ABOUT THE HEALTH CLINIC? AND THEN SINCE THAT MEETING, I'VE TALKED TO SOME OF THE OTHER. PROVIDERS. UH, NONPROFITS AND WHATNOT. AND WHAT IS THE BIGGEST ISSUES? THEY ARE THE LARGEST ISSUE THEY TELL ME.

THEY HAVE NEXT TO CONSISTENT FUNDING. WHICH IS THE PERPETUAL, YOU KNOW, ISSUE THAT ALL NON PROFIT TAX. IS TRANSPORTATION FOR THEIR PATIENTS. AND IT'S NOT ENOUGH THAT THERE'S THE M UTD AND A VOUCHER SYSTEM. A LOT OF PATIENTS DON'T HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL OR KNOWLEDGE OR RESOURCES NECESSARILY. GET ON EVEN A COMPUTER. BUT THAT SERVICE AND GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS OR THE SAVVINESS TO DO IT SO. AND SPEAKING WITH THE DIRECTORS OF SEVERAL OF THEM.

THEY OF COURSE ALL HAVE THAT. THEY DO THAT NOW THEY HAVE TO QUALIFY. IN ESSENCE, THE SAME CRITERIA TO RECEIVE THE CARE THAT THEY'RE RECEIVING. THAT WE WOULD BE REQUIRING, AND MAYBE THERE'S SOME SMALL VARIANCES. BUT I'D LIKE TO GET ON THE AGENDA OUR NEXT MEETING TO TALK ABOUT HOW TO EMPOWER, UH, HAVE WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE FOR THE PROVIDER OF THE FAMILY HEALTH.

SENATOR. OVER ON THE EAST SIDE. UH EMPOWERED THEM TO ACT AS THE, UH DO YOU WANT TO GET THE PROCESSOR? YOU KNOW FOR TRANSPORTATION RIDES FOR PATIENTS, UM, SOMEHOW FIGURE

[00:05:02]

OUT HOW HOW THEY'RE. QUALIFYING THOSE PATIENTS FOR THE SERVICE AND IS CONCURRENTLY QUALIFYING THEM FOR THE TRANSIT SYSTEM AND THEN TALKED ABOUT EVEN FOR MANY OF THOSE PATIENTS. THE MATCH.

YOU KNOW THEY DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO MATCH WOULD BE 100. BUT IF EVERYONE IS UP FOR THAT DISCUSSION, LOVE TO DO THAT. WE CERTAINLY HAVE THE FUNDS AND IT SEEMS LIKE THAT'S A NEED.

THAT'S BEEN THEY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO. BEAT THAT. EVEN I THINK WE'VE GOT THE WHEREWITHAL THE ABILITY. THAT I'M LIKE SOMETHING WE COULD DO WHATEVER TO BE INTERESTED IN THAT. I WOULD SECOND THAT IF YOU NEED IT TO GET IT ON OUR AGENDA FOR MEXICO AROUND. DECADES EVERYONE. YEAH, WE'LL HAVE THAT DISCUSSION AND I HAVE I HAVE SOME FORMAL REQUESTS OR. I'LL CALL AND REQUEST RIGHT NOW, BUT I'LL HAVE THOSE BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING, RIGHT AND YOU GET THEM TO EVERYBODY FROM THESE VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS THAT. ARE MAKING THE ARGUMENT THAT PLEA THE REQUEST THAT YOU WANT TO CALL. THE OTHER COMMENTS. MOTION TO ADJOURN. SOMEONE. ON SECOND FAVOR. HI.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.