[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary-Final Plat for Hardin Lake Estates, Located approximately 180 Feet North of Albany Drive and on the East Side of Sorrell Road]

UM FIVE CONSIDERATION FOR TWO ZERO DASH. 0130 PF TO CONSIDER. LUMINARY FINAL PLANT FOR HARDEN LIKES THE STATES. THIS IS 180 FT. NORTH OF ALBANY DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE OF SORE ROAD. GOOD EVENING, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 41 POINT ACRES INTO 94 LOTS AND APPROXIMATELY SIX COMMON AREAS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. PRIOR TO THE MEETING. I DID PASS OUT A PACKET OF CITIZEN COMMENTS AND EMAILS THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED FROM ADJACENT RESIDENCES AND WE HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE RESIDENCES, ANSWERING THOSE CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS HERE. MM, WITH THE PART WAS PREVIOUSLY BROUGHT BEFORE AND DID NOT MEET THE ENGINEERING DESIGN ME AND YOU'LL OR THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. THAT PLOT WAS CONSIDERED FOR DENIAL. THE APPLICANT HAS SINCE REVISED THE PLOT TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS,

[00:10:04]

AND WE ARE NOW RECOMMENDING I'M APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

MEMBERS OF THEIR QUESTIONS, OKAY? SCOTLAND JUST TO REITERATE WHAT YOU SAID. WE DO HAVE A INFORMATION THAT WAS RECEIVED TODAY AND THIS WILL BE INCLUDED IN IN THE PACKAGE AS THIS MOVES THROUGH THE PROCESS, SO THE PLANT WILL BE CONSIDERED TONIGHT AND IT WILL NOT BE MOVING FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION APPROVES THE PLATTE TONIGHT WE'LL MOVE FORWARD IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS WITH THE MIDDLE OF THE CIVIL PLANS WITH ENGINEERING, RIGHT? WELL THESE EMAILS THAT ARE ADDRESSING DECIDING WILL REMAIN WITH THE ITEM AS IT GOES THROUGH THE ENGINEERING AND APPROVAL PROCESS AND PLATING PROCESS. THANK YOU. THE QUESTIONS MEMBERS MOTIONS. THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THAT POSED PRELIMINARY PLAQUE.

CONDITIONS NOTED IN STAFF REPORT MOTION MY MISSION MAN'S ON TO APPROVE THE ATOM. EXPERT STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING, UM THE ITEMS IN THE STAFF REPORT. SECOND THANK YOU, MR TAYLOR.

RUNNING DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN MOTION CARRIES. IN PER SEVEN IN FAVOR ZERO AGAINST. NOW MOVE TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. THESE WILL BE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “C1” - Neighborhood Commercial District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards and to Allow Multi-Family and Commercial Uses, Located on the Northwest Corner of Carlisle Street and Virginia Parkway]

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to allow for Single Family Residential and Commercial Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 265 Feet North of Plateau Drive and]

THE ITEMS THAT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. THE FIRST ITEM WILL BE 21. 0006 Z TO A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REQUESTS TO REZONE A SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM C ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO PD. TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND TO ALLOW MULTI FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL USES. THIS IS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER. OF CARLISLE STREET AND VIRGINIA PARKWAY. THANK YOU. SO APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND LAUGH WORK COMMERCIAL USES. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ON TRACK TO A MULTI FAMILY USE IS ON TRACK TO BE, AS I'VE NOTED. THE COMMERCIAL USES ON THIS SITE FOR TRACKED A ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FOUND IN THE SEA TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED A DESIRE TO DEVELOP MULTI FAMILY ON TRACK TO BE WITH THE MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY LIMITS THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 35 FT. AND THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED IN THE CITY'S TYPICAL MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS IS ALSO 35 FT OR TWO STORIES. AND APPLICANTS REQUESTING A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF FOUR STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 55 FT. AND THE APPLICANTS ALSO PROPOSING SIMILAR SPACE LIMITS REQUIRED TO THE MF THREE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY DISTRICT WITH AN INCREASE OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY FROM 20 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS SEEKER. 2 34 DRILLING UNITS PER GROSS SEEKER. STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE PROPOSED FOUR STORY BUILDING HEIGHT INTENSITY FOR THE 34 UNITS PER ACRE ME RESULTS. IN THE DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT THAT'S NOT COMPATIBLE WITH YOU. LOWER INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS IN THE AREA. GIVEN THESE CONCERNS, STAFF IS NOT SUPPORTIVE OF THE ZONING REQUEST TO NOT STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN. THEIR QUESTIONS OF STAFF. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? MR CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOB ROTOR 1700 RED BUD SUITE 300 IN MCKINNEY ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. UM THIS IS A TRACT OF LAND THAT'S LIKE FALLOW. FOR AS LONG AS VIRGINIA STREET HAS BEE.

AS THE STAFF REPORT NOTED, THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT TRACK. MM. TWO. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT CITIES PLAN IN THE CURRENT ZONING THIS TRACK HAS A VERY POOR. STEPS TO FRONTAGE RATIO. UM IT IS LOCATED BASICALLY MID BLOCK. THE CURRENT ZONING IS FOR THE ENTIRE FIVE ACRES TO BE COMMERCIAL, LOW DENSITY COMMERCIAL. UM. IN LOOKING AT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TRACK. I THINK EVEN STAFFS REPORTING KNOWLEDGE IS THAT IT WOULD BE HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT THE ENTIRE FIVE ACRES WOULD DEVELOP FOR A COMMERCIAL USE OR RETAIL USER AND OFFICE USE. ACCORDINGLY WHEN MY CLIENT CAME FORWARD TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, WE TOOK A LOOK AT WHAT WOULD YOU DO? AH WITH ATTRACT WERE. AND SO WE HAVE COME FORWARD, AND WE HAVE

[00:15:06]

PROPOSED A PLAN. THAT SORT OF HONORS THAT RETAIL ALONG VIRGINIA PARKWAY THAT IS IN THIS IMMEDIATE AREA. WE HAVE DEDICATED CLOSE TO AN ICON AND A HALF OF THAT. HARD, DENSE DISTANCES OFF THE STREET OR 275 TO 300 FT, WHICH ARE PRETTY COMMON FOR THE RETAIL THAT YOU'VE SEEN ALONG VIRGINIA STREET, ESPECIALLY ON THE NORTH SIDE BACK TO THE WEST. WHAT THAT LEAVES IS ABOUT 3.7 ACRES OF THE TRACT. NOT CONDUCIVE TO A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. IT'S IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO A. AN APARTMENT. SEVERAL APARTMENT COMPLEXES. YOU'VE GOT SOME CHURCHES AND INSTITUTIONAL USES AS NEIGHBORS. YOU HAVE NO IMMEDIATE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE AREA. AND SO MY CLIENT HAS COME FORWARD AND WE'RE PROPOSING TO DO MULTI FAMILY ON THE 3.7 ACRES, WHICH IS SHOWN UP HERE AS TRACKED ME. WE'VE SPENT A LOT OF TIME OVER THE YEARS IN FRONT OF THIS COMMISSION AND IN FRONT OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN WE TALK ABOUT MULTI FAMILY ABOUT TALKING ABOUT SUSTAINABLE, MULTI FAMILY, MULTI FAMILY THAT'S NOT JUST BUILT. TO SIT THERE AND DETERIORATE OVER TIME, BUT MULTI FAMILY THAT IS SUSTAINABLE THAT HAS HAS A LONG LIFE. AND THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ELEMENTS THAT GO INTO THAT. OBVIOUSLY THAT CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES OR ONE OF THOSE, AND THE CITY HAS VERY HIGH STANDARDS FOR THAT. ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE IS HAVING A CRITICAL MASS OF UNITS. AND A SO THAT YOU CAN GENERATE ENOUGH REVENUE IN THAT COMPLEX TO PAY FOR MANAGEMENT AND PAY FOR MAINTENANCE AND UPKEEP. AND ACCORDING TO MY CLIENT'S EXPERIENCE, 120 UNITS HIS RIGHT ON THAT BORDERLINE. UM AND SO WHAT WE'RE SEEKING TO PUT HERE ARE 120 MULTI FAMILY UNITS. ON THIS 3.7 ACRES. NOW WE HAVE PARKING. WE HAVE TO ADDRESS. WE'VE GOT OPEN SPACE WE HAVE TO ADDRESS. WE HAVE A NUMBER OF THINGS WE HAVE TO ADDRESS AND IN ORDER TO CREATE THAT ENVIRONMENT WHERE WE HAVE THE KIND OF HMM.

SPACE THE KIND OF PLACE THAT WE ARE USED TO IN MCKINNEY. IT REQUIRES US TO GO HIGHER WITH OUR UNITS THAN THREE STORIES, WHICH HAS BECOME PRETTY MUCH THE NORM FOR THIS FOR THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT. AND SO IN THIS INSTANCE , WE'RE SEEKING PERMISSION TO GO TO FOUR STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 55 FT IN HEIGHT. I WOULD TELL YOU THAT IT'S MORE EXPENSIVE TO GO. FOUR STORIES NUMBER OF YOU ON THE COMMISSION HAVE EXPERIENCED WITH THAT COST MORE MONEY. YOU HAVE TO COST MORE TO BUILD THE FOURTH STORY THAN IT DOES THE FIRST THREE. YOU HAVE TO HAVE ELEVATORS IN MOST INSTANCES, SO THIS IS NOT AN OPERATIVE. THIS IS NOT, UH, A SITUATION WHERE MY CLIENTS TRYING TO CHEAP OUT ON YOU. IT'S A SITUATION WHERE MY CLIENT FEELS LIKE. IT'S A GOOD LOCATION FOR ITS PRODUCT. HE'S WILLING TO BUILD A FIRST CLASS PRODUCT WANTS TO BUILD A FIRST CLASS PRODUCT ALWAYS BUILDS THE FIRST PLAN CLASS PRODUCT. BUT NEEDS FOUR STORIES IN ORDER TO GET IT ACCOMPLISHED. SO I WOULD ASK FOR YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. I THINK ALL OF THE OTHER CONDITIONS THAT PARKING REQUIREMENT RATIOS THE LANDSCAPING. I THINK THE STAFF REPORT HAS INDICATED THAT WE'VE MET EVERYTHING ON THOSE ISSUES TO THE STAFF SATISFACTION. AND LITERALLY. THE FOURTH STORY IS THE ONLY ISSUE IN DISPUTE HERE. CHILD ASK THAT YOU YOU ALLOW US TO GO FORWARD THE CITY COUNCIL WITH IT. RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR OUR FOURTH STORY.

PRODUCT AS WE HAVE PROPOSED IN OUR DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THIS, PD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR ROEDER. THEIR QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. YOU WANT. VERY GOOD.

THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON ME FOR COMING ON AND WOULD LIKE TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS ITEM. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. YOU WANT? YES. TOM HOW'S PRESIDENT CEO CLINTON USA 1 34 55. NOW, WHILE WE'RE OLD DALLAS, TEXAS, I JUST WANT TO SAY I'M FULL SUPPORT OF THIS REZONING REQUEST. THANK YOU. PERHAPS THE BRIEFEST PUBLIC COMMENT WE'VE EVER HAD. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? ANYONE ELSE? AND MOVE. WE CLOSED THE

[00:20:02]

PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY MR ME . ANXIETY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING 2ND 2ND MANAGED TO WALLY'S OR IN DISCUSSION. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU'RE IN SUPPORT. OPPOSE SAME SIGN.

IMPRISONED MOTION CARRIES SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST MEMBERS QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR THE APPLICANT OR STAFF. QUESTION FOR STAFF. YES, SIR. I LOOK AT THE POSED TRACK A AND TRACK B. AIDS LEFT FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL. IT'S REALLY GOT ABOUT 100. 116 170 FT OF DEPTH. UM. TO LOOK AT THE BASIC RETAIL. PROBABLY NOT GOING TO MEET THAT NEED. YOU'RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT OFFICE BUILDINGS, POTENTIALLY THAT WE COULD BUILD HERE. WAS THERE ANY DISCUSSION THAT WENT BACK AND FORTH? WITH THE APPLICANT. TRYING TO SAY WHEN WE COMBINE A AND B AND LET THEM BUILD THE MULTI FAMILY. ON ALL OF IT, THEN WE CAN BRING IT DOWN FROM FOUR STORIES DOWN TO THREE STORIES. WAS THERE ANY CONVERSATION THAT ALONG THOSE LINES, OR WE WERE TRYING TO PRESERVE THE RETAIL. UM SO WE DID DISCUSS THAT. UM UM FOR THIS PROPOSED SITE, SO THE WE AS A STAFF WERE LOOKING AT THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS CURRENTLY ON AROUND THIS PROPERTY. AND AS YOU CAN SEE HERE UM. THERE IS THIS BLOCK RIGHT HERE THAT IS ALL FOR COMMERCIAL OFFICE TYPE DEVELOPMENTS IN A SIMILAR PATTERN TO THE SOUTH OF THIS PROPERTY AS WELL. JUST EAST. OF THIS TRACT OR TWO MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS HERE, AND SO STAFF FELT THAT THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL WAS IN LINE WITH THE DEVELOP BUILT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT, AND THE MULTI FAMILY TRACKED WAS, UM WAS ADJACENT, MULTI FAMILY WAS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT MULTI FAMILY TO THE EAST. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF.

YOU WANT. YOU THINK OF THE APPLICANT. GREAT. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE LOCATION. AS FAR AS APARTMENTS GO, WE HAVE APARTMENTS BACK TO THE EAST. I GUESS THE ONLY QUESTION REMAINS IN HEIGHT THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL. DO CONSIDER COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF'S COMMENTS VIABLE OF WHETHER I'D RATHER SEE MAYBE A LOWER STORY AND ACTUALLY GET RID OF THE COMMERCIAL FRONT, MUCH. THE COMMERCIAL ON VIRGINIA'S JUST ENDED UP AS SOME GARAGES AND WE'VE GOT STUFF TO THE SOUTH. IT'S NOT REALLY SOLD FOR OFFICES AND MOSTLY OFFICERS THAT WERE DEVELOPED IN THAT AREA ON VIRGINIA HAVE BEEN 20 YEARS PASSED SINCE THEY WERE ACTUALLY PUT ON THE GROUND OR CLOSE TO IT, SO UM IT'S NOT PERFECT THE WAY I WOULD WANT IT RIGHT NOW, WITH THE HEIGHT THAT WOULD PREFER PROBABLY THE WHOLE THING AT A LOWER HEIGHT, BUT CONSIDERING THE SURROUNDING USES AND NOT A BUDDING ANY RESIDENTIAL AND THE NEED FOR ITS I'M SUPPORTIVE. ANYONE ELSE? I AGREE WITH. OUR VICE CHAIR. I DON'T LIKE THE 55 FT. I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE APARTMENTS. I THINK WHAT COMMISSIONER WOULD DRIFT AND AS I HAVE SAID, IS ACTUALLY PRETTY SMART. I WISH THAT THIS PERHAPS WOULD HAVE LEFT OUT THE COMMERCIAL. UM BUT WITH THAT BEING SAID, I WOULD BE IN AGREEMENT WITH IT, TOO. I THINK IT'S A THAT'S A GOOD USE OF THE SPACE. ALL RIGHT. OTHERS. YOU WON'T WANT TO WEIGH IN. ALL RIGHT. I MEAN, I'M AN AGREEMENT.

THESE TWO GENTLEMEN, SO. I'LL MAKE THEM AS WELL. I'M NOT CRAZY ABOUT THE HYPE ON THIS ONE. IN THE HARD TIME WITH THAT. THANKS. OR MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE. THE ITEM. SECOND FOR THE SECOND MOTION, MR DOPE TO APPROVE THE UNANIMOUS FOR APPLICANT REQUEST. UM, SECOND BY MR TAYLOR. SO THERE IS TO CLARIFY. A VOTE IN FAVOR IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE APPLICANT. NEGATIVE VOTE IS ITS SUPPORT OF THE CITY STAFF. AFTER WHAT? ENSURE IN OUR. PACKAGE IF WE APPROVE IT, THERE WAS SOME STIPULATIONS FROM STAFF, AND I THINK THAT IS CORRECT. SIR. THERE WERE FOLLOWING THAT WE'RE GIVING ON THIS SPECIAL PROVISION HERE. MR DUCK WAS YOUR INTENT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION MOTION TO

[00:25:01]

APPROVE THE ITEM, INCLUDING. THE SPECIAL ORDERS PROVISION HAS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. I WILL AMEND THAT MR TAYLOR, YOU'RE GOOD WITH THAT. LIKE ANYTHING. ANY DISCUSSION.

FINLAND, YOU HAVE SOMETHING? NO I WAS JUST GOING TO CLARIFY THAT THE ORDINANCE PROVISIONS IS TO FOLLOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE APPLICANT MAKING THAT MOTION WOULD AGREE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRESENTED. OKAY? THE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED TO SAME SIGN. EMPRESS EMOTION CARRIES FIVE IN FAVOR, TOO, AGAINST AN ASYLUM WILL BE SENT. I'M SORRY, KIRKENDALL AND WHAT LEE? AND THIS ITEM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL, WHERE THEY FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION. AT THE FEBRUARY 15 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. TO GO OVER HERE, ALL RIGHT? NEXT AND

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “RS-60” - Single Family Residence District, “H” - Historic Preservation Overlay District, and “TMN” - Traditional McKinney Neighborhood Overlay District to “PD” - Planned Development District, “H” - Historic Preservation Overlay District, and “TMN” - Traditional McKinney Neighborhood Overlay District, Generally to Allow for Single Family Residential Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located on the Southeast Corner of College Street and Howell Street]

WAS TO ONE DAY 0129 Z TO PUBLIC CARING REQUEST. TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM PD PD TO MODIFY TO ALLOW SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES INTO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS 265 FT NORTH OF PLATEAU DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY FIVE MCDONALDS STREET.

RIGHT? THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 17.9 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY F IN COMMERCIAL USE IS CURRENTLY THE SITE IS OWNED A PD THAT HAS A BASIS ZONING OF OFFICE DISTRICT.

PG GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IN ML LIKE MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED THE ZONING REQUEST TO KEEP THE CURRENT COMMERCIAL USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ON THE 3.3 ACRE TRACT. A AS I'VE SHOWN AND ALLOW FOR SINGLE FAMILY USES ON THE MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE 14.6 TRACKED ATTRACT B A COMPLETE LIST OF THOSE USES IN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THESE TRUCKS ARE IN THE STAFF REPORT FOR YOUR REFERENCE. ALL THOSE STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF KEEPING THE COMMERCIAL USES ON TRACKED ALONG HIGHWAY FIVE. WE'RE NOT SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROPOSED FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON TRACK TO BE BECAUSE SUCH USAGE WAS NOT ALIGNED WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLACE TYPE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND USES NOT IN STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAY STILL BE CONSIDERED APPROPRIATE AND SUDDENLY LOCATIONS. HOWEVER THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL USES THAT GENERALLY ALIGNED WITH THE PROPOSED PLACE TYPE. STAFF FEARS THAT INTRODUCING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY MIGHT CREATE AN ISOLATED NEIGHBORHOOD IN AN AREA THAT IS OTHERWISE AMBITION FOR NON RESIDENTIAL USES. I'M STAFF ALSO HAS CONCERNS WITH THE PROPOSED EAST LIMIT IN LOS STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY THE SINGLE FAMILY USES, ALTHOUGH THE REDUCED SPACE LIMITS AND LOSS CENTERS MAY BE APPROPRIATE IN SOME LOCATIONS. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSED STANDARDS ARE TYPICALLY SEEN IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS WHERE THE SITE IS NOT INHERENTLY URBAN. AND WITH THESE THINGS IN MIND STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE REQUEST PROPOSED FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, SIR. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. MR CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MARTIN SANCHEZ, 2000 NORTH MCDONALD'S SWEET ONE HAD 2 100 MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75071. THANK YOU VERY MUCH . I'M GLAD TO BE BACK HERE WITH YOU TODAY, MISS. SHEFFIELD DID A WONDERFUL JOB EXPLAINING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AH WE'VE WORKED REALLY HARD WITH THEM WITH STAFF AND IT'S USUALLY STAFF HAS DONE A FANTASTIC JOB.

WE JUST GET DOWN TO PLACES LIKE IN THIS INSTANCE WHERE IT'S AN INTERPRETATION ULTIMATELY OF THE LAND USE PATTERNS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. AND SOME REALITY CHECKS, I SUPPOSE OF WHAT COULD ACTUALLY GO THERE FROM MY HIGHEST AND BEST USE PERSPECTIVE. WHEN WE LOOKED AT THIS SITE, UM, WE REALLY HAD A CHALLENGE WITH HIM. FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TO THE SOUTH. WE HAVE MULTI FAMILY. THAT IS ADRIA'S STRICT ID, YOU KNOW, ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES, ET CETERA. SO THOSE ARE THAT'S A SOLID FOUNDATIONAL LAND USE INTO THE NORTH. WE'VE GOT A TEXT DOT FACILITY. AND TEXT THAT FACILITIES AS THEY GO. DON'T MOVE VERY OFTEN. BECAUSE NEXT

[00:30:04]

THAT DOESN'T WANT TO GO BUY MORE PROPERTY FROM ANYBODY. AND SO WE'VE GOT A PROPERTY THAT HAS AN ODD GEOMETRY. AND YET IT'S SANDWICHED IN BETWEEN THESE OTHER TWO USES. AND SO THE REAL QUESTION IS. SO WHAT DO YOU WHAT DO WE DO WITH IT? AH YOU KNOW, ADMIT AS AN EXAMPLE, MR WATLEY, YOU HEAR ME UP HERE ALL THE TIME TALKING ABOUT EXACTLY THAT THE REALITY CHECK. AND WHAT DO YOU DO WITH SOME OF THESE PARTICLES? WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT INFILL DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS A LOT OF WHAT'S GOING ON SOUTH OF 3 80. WE'RE ALL TRYING TO FIND HOW DO WE CONTINUE TO DEVELOP SOME OF THESE PARTIALS IN THESE DISTRICTS THAT ARE THE PARCELS THAT ARE LITTLE ODD AND HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF COMPLEXITY TO IT. UM. YOU KNOW, I LOOKED AT IT AND MY FIRST THOUGHT WHEN I LOOKED AT IT WITH WITH ARE THE INVESTORS CLIENTS PARTNERS, ETCETERA WAS MAKES FOR PERFECT MULTI FAMILY SITE. AND THEN I STARTED THINKING, BUT DO WE REALLY WANT TO DO ANOTHER APARTMENT COMPLEX THERE? THERE'S SOME ACROSS THE STREET. MAYBE THAT'S JUST A LITTLE TOO MUCH.

SO THEN YOU GO DOWN THE LIST OF WHAT MAKES SENSE ON A TRACK LIKE THIS, AND WE WENT TO A STORAGE AND RV STORAGE AND DIFFERENT KIND OF PATTERNS THAT WE COULD USE IN THIS GEOMETRY. THAT'S A LITTLE STRANGE. AND ULTIMATELY YOU KNOW, WE CAME AROUND TO THE IDEA OF KEEP THE COMMERCIAL UP ON HIGHWAY FIVE. WE STILL THINK THAT'S THE APPROPRIATE USE, BUT ON THE BALANCE OF IT, UH, WE FOCUSED IN ON A SINGLE FAMILY COMPONENT AND IT PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH. YOU KNOW, I STARTED THINKING ABOUT IT. I'LL GIVE YOU THE PERSONAL EXAMPLE OF WHAT CAME TO MY BRAIN. WHEN I STARTED THINKING ABOUT IT. MY FATHER, WHO PASSED AWAY A COUPLE YEARS AGO WAS IN AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. AND MY MOM. BLESS HER SOUL WITTEN AND VISITED WITH HER WITH HIM EVERY DAY. EVERY DAY FOR ABOUT TWO YEARS. AND ULTIMATELY, WHAT WE DID IS WE BOUGHT HER A LITTLE BUNGALOW NEXT TO MY FATHER'S ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY SO THAT IT WAS EASIER FOR HER TO GO AND GO VISIT DAD AND COME BACK AND NOT HAVE TO DRIVE ACROSS TOWN. THEY WERE BOTH IN THEIR EIGHTIES AT THE TIME. AND SO WHAT? WE THOUGHT WHAT MADE SENSE FROM A SINGLE FAMILY PERSPECTIVE THERE WAS TO PLAY OFF OF THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES THAT IS THERE IN SOME FASHION. BUT ULTIMATELY IT IS ALSO A BUSINESS DECISION AS TO WHAT ACTUALLY CAN GO THERE. WHAT MAKES SENSE AND SO THAT'S REALLY KIND OF HOW WE APPROACHED IT. AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE PROPOSING THE SINGLE FAMILY COMPONENT. RELATIVE TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. WHAT WE DID WERE TRIED TO IMPLEMENT THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE NEW ZONING CODE THAT'S COMING.

AS OPPOSED TO THE ONE THAT'S EXISTING NOW AND TRY TO APPLY IT HERE, AND THAT'S WHY THEY'RE DIFFERENT, BUT IT'S TRYING TO REALLY KIND OF TIE INTO IT. WE'RE ABOUT TO ADOPT HERE IN A FEW MONTHS, HOPEFULLY MRS ARNOLD. AH IF AND WHEN WE DO THAT, IT REALLY WOULD BE CONSISTENT, AND THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY REASON WHY WE HAVE TO DO A P. D. SO WITH THAT I WOULD ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT OUR LOGIC AND HOW WE GOT HERE, BUT WE BELIEVE IT'S COMPATIBLE USED TO THE SOUTH. LIKE I SAID, IT'S ALL URBAN LIVING ACROSS THE HIGHWAY. IT'S ALL BEEN LIVING.

THE PROBABILITIES OF THIS BEING A PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS OFFICE OF SOME SORT. JUST DOESN'T SEEM LIKE IT'S EVER GOING TO HAPPEN. SO UNFORTUNATELY, THIS IS ONE WHERE YOU KNOW WHERE THE POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OR ARE OR IDEALISTIC, AND WE TRY TO FOLLOW IT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE TO ROADMAP. JUST NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE. SO WITH THAT I WOULD STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND I WOULD REQUEST RESPECTFULLY YOUR APPROVAL. THE COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ THE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. AT THIS TIME. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING OUT. UM, IF YOU'VE COME TO NINE, IT WOULD LIKE TO SURE YOUR THOUGHTS. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. WE WOULD CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING EMOTIONAL MEMORIES TO ME INSIDE A CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING, 2ND 2ND MANAGED TO WONDER ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. AND I SUPPOSE SAME SIGN. AND PERCENT MOTION CARRIES. SEVEN IN FAVOR.

ZERO AGAINST THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. NOW WE'LL HAVE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS. FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT ANYONE? I THINK I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH STAFF ON THIS.

THIS JUST DOESN'T SEEM TO SPOT FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, AND THERE'S SOME MULTI FAMILY TO IT, BUT THE WAY IN COMPARISON CHART I THINK THERE'S OTHER ITEMS THAT ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THIS LAND USE THAT ARE BETTER SUITABLE CONSIDERING THE NEIGHBORING BUSINESSES TO THE NORTH. OVER. MAKING IT SINGLE FAMILY STANDING OUT BY ITSELF ALONG HIGHWAY FIVE. IT'S

[00:35:05]

INTERESTING, THOUGH. WE REALLY LOOK AT AN AERIAL EVERYTHING TO THE SOUTH. AND I DIDN'T GET THE CHANCE TO GO DRIVE BACK THROUGH THERE, BUT CURIOUS OTHER ROADS BACK HERE SOUTH OF B. THIS RESIDENTIAL BACK HERE. THAT'S ALL IN THE PD TODAY. BOOK. SURE THE B IS AND YOU COME ON DOWN.

WE'VE GOT QUITE A BIT OF RESIDENTIAL. THEN IT COMES OVER TO OBVIOUSLY THE WAY THIS FAIRVIEW GUESSES. STOMACH ANY, UM ALMOST BACKING UP TO THE HERD MUSEUM AS WELL. YES THE USES TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY OF PRIMARILY MEMORY CARE FACILITIES , RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES IN THIS IN THE CLUSTER TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY. SOPHIE KEPT.

EXISTING ZONING IN PLACE WITH THE CITY'S VISION. WITH THE DEPTH THAT WE HAVE HERE.

PIECEWISE. SO FOR PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS POLICE TYPE. UM WHAT THAT CALLS FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS, UM OFFICE DEVELOPMENTS. THAT ARE SUPPORTIVE. EXCUSE ME, UM, PROFESSIONAL CENTERS, PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLACE TYPE. IT IS OFFICE OR JOBS THAT KEEP PEOPLE IN THE CITY. UM CAN INCLUDE SMALL GENERAL OFFICE COMPLEXES WHERE THIS SITE MAY BE COMPATIBLE FOR THAT TYPE OF USE.

PROFESSIONAL CENTER ALSO WOULD COVER YOUR LARGER OFFICE COMPLEXES SIMILAR TO ONES THAT WE SEE ON 70 EARTH. 1 21. THAT'S THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS. I'M QUESTIONING, COMMENT. I MEAN, I STRUGGLE, SAYING THIS IS A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AS LIMITED ACCESS. IT'S RIGHT THERE AT THE SPUR. WE DO HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF SENIOR LIVING TO THE SOUTH OF IT AND THEN SINGLE FAMILY ACROSS THE STREET. WE HAVE THE THAT'S THE SINGLE FAMILY RENTAL UNITS IS I BELIEVE IS BEING DEVELOPED. ON THAT HARD CORNER. BUT ALSO THEN YOU LOOK TO THE NORTH AND YOU SEE THAT TEXT ART FACILITY AND WE KNOW THEY'RE NOT GOING ANYWHERE. I AS STRUGGLE, SEEING THIS AS A COMMERCIAL PIECE OF PROPERTY. GOD, I DON'T SEE AN ISSUE WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY. OF. THIS IS A DEEP IT'S A TOUGH SIDE. DEEP. NEVER SEE OFFICE GOING THERE. I'M IN SUPPORT OF THE SINGLE FAMILY. OTHERS. ANYONE ELSE? THIS SIDE IS A TOUGH SITE. UM IN THE APPLICANT. EXPLAIN SEVERAL OPTIONS THAT NONE ARE REALLY VIABLE. GIVEN THE DEPTH OF THE SITE, GIVEN THE. OTHER OPPORTUNITIES TO FIX THE CONCERN ABOUT THE EXCESS TO THE PROPERTY. PERHAPS THERE'S ANOTHER WAY TO GET ANOTHER DRIVEWAY FROM, UM THE ADJACENT TRACK TO THE WEST. UM SUPPORT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST. ANYONE ELSE? OCEANS. I MAKE A MOTION WE AGAIN UNDER STAFFS RECOMMENDING DENIAL. I WILL MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE THIS AGENDA ITEM. POST WELL, NOW THEY'RE RECOMMENDING THAT NIGHT THERE WAS SOME STIPULATIONS AGAIN. I THINK IT WAS. HOW TO SAY THAT? YEAH. HOW WOULD WE MOTION. MR PROVED THE ANIMUS. PERHAPS, RICK REQUEST, INCLUDING THE SPECIAL ORDERS PROVISIONS. INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. YOU GOT IT, SO WE AND OUR STAFF REPORTS WHEN WE'RE EVEN WHEN WE'RE RECOMMENDING DENIAL. WE ALWAYS ATTACH THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS FROM THE APPLICANT. SO WHEN YOU'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR THE APPLICANTS REQUEST IT INCLUDES ALL OF THE REGULATIONS THAT ARE ATTACHED. SALT MAKING MOTION. WE APPROVE THE ITEM WITH THE SPECIAL RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE ATTACHED. SECOND. MOTION AND MR DUNCAN A SECOND BANDAGE TO WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? THESE RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU VOTE YES. OKAY, THOSE AGAINST SAME SIGN. WE HAVE TWO AGAINST MR MENZIES. MR KIRKENDALL. THE MOTION IS APPROVED FIVE IN

[00:40:02]

FAVOR, TOO, AGAINST. WE'RE GOING TO COUNSELING AS WELL. THE SIGN OF WORSE TODAY WE HAVE A COUNCIL DATE. BESIDE HIM WAS SENT THEY SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AT THE FEBRUARY 15. EVERY 15 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THANK YOU, CAITLIN. THE NEXT ITEM. TO ONE DAY 01930 PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM RS 60. HISTORIC PRESERVATION, OVERLY AND TRADITIONAL MCKINNEY NEIGHBORHOOD TO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. HISTORIC PRESERVATION. OVERLAY DISTRICT AND TM IN TRADITIONAL MCKINNEY NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AND MODIFYING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COLLEGE. STREET AND HOWELL STREET. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY A LITTLE OVER FOUR ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY FOR COMMERCIAL USES IN MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING. STRUCTURES CURRENTLY THE SITE IS ZONE RS 61 OF OUR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS DISTRICTS. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED THE ZONING REQUEST TO FOLLOW THE EXACT SAME BUILDING SETBACKS AND STANDARDS. UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING AND BUT TO MODIFY THOSE ACCESSORY BUILDING STRUCTURES FOR DETACHED GARAGES. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST AGAINST THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODES. EFFORTS UNDERWAY IN THE NEW CODE MCKINNEY INITIATIVE. IN COMPARING COMPARISONS WITH SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES. IN THIS REVIEW, WE FOUND OUT THE APPLICANTS REQUESTS ALLOWS FOR THAT ADDITIONAL FLEXIBILITY AND LOCATION OF THESE ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. VOLUNTEERING ADEQUATE SEPARATION FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES AND AGAIN, SO THE CURRENT ZONING IS RS 61ST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS. THIS ZONING REQUEST IS TO FOLLOW THE EXACT SAME STANDARDS AS OUR 60 BUT TO ALLOW FOR A FIVE FT BUILDING SEPARATION. HAVE FOR THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FOR THE DETACHED GARAGES. I HAVE PASSED OUT A NUMBER OF CITIZEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE MEETING IN OPPOSITION. AND SO THOSE ARE BEFORE YOU. THOSE WILL BE FORWARDED ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THEIR PACKET. UM GIVEN THIS THAT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST ALIGNS WITH, UM THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES ALLOWS THE ACCESS STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE ZONING REQUEST IN AUSTIN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF CRACKLING ON THIS PROPOSED ZONE. PEOPLE AND I KNOW YOU SAID THAT THE NUMBER OF TIMES BUT THIS IS ALREADY RS 60. THAT'S CORRECT. THEN MOST OF THE HISTORICAL DISTRICT IS RS 60. THAT'S CORRECT. MANY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES MY BILL, SEE IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER HERE. SO MANY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE THE SAME ZONING FOR THE RS, 60 AND AGAIN THIS ZONING REQUEST IS JUST TO MODIFY THE DETACHED GARAGE STANDARDS. THAT'S THE ONLY THING WE'RE GIVING OVER CURRENT ZONING AND CAN LOOKING AT THE LAND COMPARISON CHART WERE ACTUALLY TAKEN AWAY, A LOT OF PERMITTED USES. THAT ARE ON IT. CURRENTLY THAT'S CORRECT. SO THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO HAVE DEVELOPED A SINGLE FAMILY USES RS 60 WOULD ALLOW FOR, UM MORE MODERATE OR. OR A 60 IS ONE OF OUR OLDER ZONING DISTRICTS REQUEST WOULD JUST ALLOW FOR THOSE SINGLE FAMILY USES. OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF. THANK YOU VERY MUCH IS OUR APPLICANT NINE.

HI. IF YOU'LL COME UP AND GIVE US A SUMMARY FROM FROM YOUR CHAIR. WE APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. HI GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS JENNIFER JOHNSON WITH OLIVIA CLARK HOMES AND WE, UM ARE EXCITED TO BUILD ON THIS SITE. WE DON'T WANT TO CHANGE ANYTHING ABOUT THE RS 60 DISTRICT MORE EXCITED TO COME IN AND CONTINUE THE HISTORIC NATURE OF MCKINNEY AND BE A PART OF IT. WE HONESTLY JUST WANT TO BUILD DETACHED GARAGES. UM AS ARE FOUND ALL AROUND. THE SITE. BUT GIVEN THE 50 FT LOTS THAT WE HAVE. WE JUST NEED THE ABILITY TO AND THE TO HAVE THE SEPARATE SETBACKS REQUIRED THAT ARE GIVEN IN THE NEW ORDINANCE FOR THE DETACHED GARAGES. SO THAT'S ALL WE'RE DISCUSSING. NOTHING ELSE WOULD BE CONTEMPLATED TO BE CHANGED WHATSOEVER. REGARDING THE ZONING OR THE HISTORIC FEATURES REGARDING THE HOMES. SO WE DON'T WANT TO TOUCH ANYTHING ELSE. AND

[00:45:06]

I THINK IT'S GOING TO GIVE A BETTER LOOK. SO INSTEAD OF DOING A FRONT ENTRY GARAGE, WHICH WHAT IS WHAT WILL BE LEFT DOING SO IT'S STRAIGHT IN SEEING THE GARAGES FROM THE STREET. WE THINK WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE A BETTER LOOK BY DOING THE DETACHED GARAGE HAVING IT IN THE BACK KIND OF HIDDEN BY THE HOUSE AND THEN PROVIDING A BEAUTIFUL FRONT PORCH ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE HOME. SO ROGERS WILL COME IN FROM THAT STREET, A EXHIBIT.

THIS IS. PROPOSED ZONING EXHIBIT. YES. YEP. YES YOU'LL COME IN FROM THE FRONT AND DRIVE TO THE BACK OF THE LOT, AND THE GARAGE WILL BE AT THE BACK. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT.

ANYONE. IS JOHNSON. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IF YOU'VE COME IN ON IT WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE, UM POLICE COME TO THE PODIUM. I DO HAVE TWO CARDS. THROUGH YOUR HEAD IN THIS DIRECTION. LOCK UP HERE. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION RUN LESS TAKE 208 SOUTH BENCH STREET. I LIVE IN DOWNTOWN MCKINNEY WERE SMALL BUILDER DEVELOPER WE'VE DONE IN FILL IN THE AREA AND AROUND THIS THIS PARCEL COMMENTS ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PLAN WE BUILT THE BOMB BE RESIDENTS THAT HE JOINS US 5 14 WEST STANDARD FOR THE WAY THIS PROPERTY SITS. IT'S A DIFFICULT PIECE OF PROPERTY ALONG STANDARD FOR BETWEEN THE EAST END OF THE PROPERTY, UM TO THE WEST END. IT'S ALMOST A 20 FT DROP IN THERE. SO WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS PROPERTY TO MAKE TO CREATE A LOT? YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO BUILD SIGNIFICANT RETAINING WALLS IN HERE. SO IT MEANS ALONG COLLEGE, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE DROP OFFS INTO THE BACKYARDS OVER THERE. DEPENDING ON HOW THEY DO THEIR CUT AND FILLS THE TAKE BETTER AND THEN MOVE IT TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, SO WE HAVE A STREAM OR CHANNEL FOR WATER RUNOFF OVER THERE. THE OTHER COMMON ABOUT IT IS PART OF THAT IN A FLOOD ZONE AID. IT REALLY NEEDS TO BE STUDIED BEFORE YOU DO ANYTHING. YOU CAN'T JUST BUILD THEIR AND IT'S ALSO PART OF A BIGGER PROBLEM. THE BIGGER PROBLEM IS DRAINAGE IN THE DOWNTOWN. THERE NEEDS TO BE A COMPREHENSIVE RANGE PROGRAM DONE IN THE DOWNTOWN, NUMEROUS STREETS DRAIN INTO COLLEGE THAT SHE TRAINED THERE. THERE'S NO CATCH BASINS RCP THERE TO CATCH IT. AND SO IT'S HAPPENED BEFORE THE WATER COMES OFF THE STREETS TO THE WEST COME ACROSS COLLEGE SHE TRAINED ACROSS THERE. THERE NEEDS TO BE A PLAN. THERE'S BEEN FLOODING ON HOW, AND THERE'S ALSO BEEN FLOODING ON STANDARD FOR BEFORE MY OWN HOUSE DRAINS INTO THAT CREEK ON THE BACK SIDE , SO I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE QUITE A BIT OF STUDY BEFORE THIS PROCEEDS. THE OTHER COMMENT ABOUT IT IS THE WAY IT'S SET UP.

IT REALLY DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. YOU DON'T HAVE HOUSES FACING THE STREET THROUGHOUT FACING INWARDS. THERE'S NO WAY TO RELATE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE HAVE HOUSES.

GOING INTO THE STREETS. THEY'VE CREATED THEIR OWN STREETS AND VERY INWARD LOOKING THAT'S IT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR LAST GIG. WE APPRECIATE IT. WE HAVE ANOTHER CARD FROM ALAN, ARE BOBBY. COMMISSION MEMBERS. THANKS FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TODAY, UM, LIVED ON THE PROPERTY FOR ALMOST 10 YEARS AND THE HAVE THE BENEFIT OF OPENING UP MY BACKDOOR AND SEEING FOUR ACRES IN DOWNTOWN MCKINNEY, WHICH HAS BEEN AMAZING EXPERIENCE, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT PROPERTY HAS BEEN PURCHASED AND DON'T WANT TO LIMIT NECESSARILY WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT TO DO WITH THEIR WITH THE PROPERTY BECAUSE I THINK THIS, JOHNSON NOTED THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A GREAT HOUSING EDITION. I DON'T DOUBT THAT WHATSOEVER. THE THINGS THAT I'M WORRIED ABOUT. ARE THE FLOODING THAT POTENTIALLY HAVE COULD HAPPEN SO CURRENTLY ABOUT 6 TO 8 DAYS A YEAR WHEN THE FLASH FLOODS OCCURRED. MY BACKYARD IS FLOODED IT THE WATER WILL GO OVER THE CREST OF THE CREEK.

THAT'S THEIR 6 TO 8 TIMES A YEAR. IT ALSO WILL COME TO THE, UM WEST SIDE OF MY PROPERTY ABOUT SIX INCHES UP MY FENCE. IF I DIDN'T HAVE THAT WOULD STOCKADE FENCE THERE WOULD RUSH ONTO MY TO MY HOUSE. SO MY CONCERN IS WHEN YOU PUT MORE WHEN YOU PUT A STREET IN WHEN YOU PUT MORE ROOFTOPS IN, UM THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE MORE WATER GOING INTO THAT CREEK.

I'VE HAD SOME GREAT CONVERSATION WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS, MEMBERS AND ALSO WITH MM. WITH MATT RICHARDSON. PEOPLE HAVE BEEN VERY, VERY HELPFUL TO LISTEN TO US. I JUST WANT TO MAKE. I JUST WANT TO UNDERSTAND AND MAKE SURE THAT THE COMMISSION AND THE CITY HAVE LOOKED INTO HOW MUCH MORE WATER IS GOING TO GO INTO THAT CREEK BECAUSE IF IT'S FLOODING MY BACKYARD IS FLOODING 6 TO 8

[00:50:04]

TIMES. A YEAR. ADDING MORE WATER TO THE CREEK BEHIND OUR HOUSE IS GOING TO MAKE THAT FLOODING A BIGGER PROBLEM THAT COULD POTENTIALLY OVERTAKE MY BACK PORCH AND ACTUALLY GO INTO MY INTO MY LIVING ROOM. SO THAT'S MY BIGGEST CONCERN. I'M NOT HERE TO STOP ANY TYPE OF BUILDING WHATSOEVER BECAUSE I THINK, UM, THAT'S GONNA BE A NICE PIECE OF PROPERTY BUILT SOME HOMES ON.

I'M JUST REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE RUNOFF WATER. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IT'S A VERY THE ECOSYSTEM ONLY ALLOWS FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF WATER. EVEN WITH THAT. ABOUT 68 DAYS A YEAR. IT FLOODS. I THINK THAT WHEN YOU HAVE THE BUILDINGS THERE POTENTIALLY COULD FLOOD MORE. SO THAT'S MY CONCERN AS A HOMEOWNER. IT'S ALL QUESTIONS THAT THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR ABOUT ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM. YES, THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. EXCUSE ME. I'M JIM HIGH SLIT AT 601 PARKER STREET RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE TRACK AND WE'RE ACTUALLY A BIG SUPPORTERS OF REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. OUR BIGGEST CONCERN, THOUGH, IS LOT DENSITY IF YOU LOOK AT THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES SURROUNDING IT. THERE ARE 2 TO 3 TIMES THE SIZE AND TRYING TO KEEP THE CHARACTER OF HISTORIC DISTRICT IS INTACT AS WE CAN. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF WORK THAT'S GONE ON BY CURRENT HOMEOWNERS, TOO. MAKE SURE THAT THE HISTORICAL INTEGRITY OF OUR HOMES ARE KEPT.

AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ORIGINAL CONDITION AND WE DO APPRECIATE THE BUILDER TALKING ABOUT RETAINING THAT CHARACTER IN THE BUILD, BUT THE LOT SIZES FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE JUST DON'T MATCH WHAT THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS LOOK LIKE. AND FOR THAT WE JUST WANTED TO MAKE OUR THOUGHTS. NO, THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH OTHERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED RESULTS. HI, TOM. PENCE, FIVE OR SIX WEST HUNT, UM AND LOOKING AT THIS, UM, AS OTHERS HAVE SAID. MY CHIEF CONCERN IS HOW THIS WILL APPEAR IN TERMS OF THE CONTEXT, THE HISTORIC DISTRICT I'VE ONLY BEEN DOWN HERE A COUPLE YEARS, BUT IT LOOKS VERY MUCH LIKE STUMBLING, WHICH I CAME FROM. MY BIGGEST CONCERN. THEY'RE NOT TAKING NOTE OF ANY OF THE. THE FLOOD PLAIN AREA, BUT THAT WOULD BE PRIMARILY MY CONCERN HERE. I'M CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE IN THE CONTEXT OF HISTORIC DISTRICT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THING, MR PARENTS WHO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED RESUME. WHEN WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS ALISON VEST. AND I JUST KIND OF WANT TO MIRROR THE LAST FEW COMMENTS THAT YOU'VE HEARD. AND THAT EVEN JUST LOOKING AT THE LOT SIZES HERE. UM, AS A RESIDENT WHO LIVES JUST DOWN. HOW STREET I JUST DON'T THINK IT FITS IN THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THE HISTORIC DISTRICT IS DEFINITELY TREASURE. AND.

ALTHOUGH I AGREE WITH THE DEVELOPER IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY WANT THIS TO BE BEAUTIFUL, BUT I THINK THE DENSITY IS A TYPICAL THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS FIRST. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ANYONE ELSE WHICH WISH TO ADDRESS THIS PROPOSED REASON. OR MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION AND MR MANZANO CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING SECOND BY MR WOODRUFF. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. ARE THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. THIS MOTION CARRIES SEVEN IN FAVOR. ZERO AGAINST NOW. WILL HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS WERE RAISED REGARDING DRAINAGE. SO THERE WILL BE A TIME WE'LL HAVE MR RICHARDSON COME UP AND CAITLYN, SO OTHER THAN THAT, THEY WILL HAVE QUESTIONS. OF THE APPLICANT OR OF STAFF. IT'S A CLARIFICATION FROM CAITLIN. SO THERE'S ZONING THEY'RE GOING FOR TODAY. THE TRUTH OF THEIR ZONING IS IN PLACE. SO THE DENSITY IS THERE WHAT THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS WITH THE APPLICANTS ASKING FOR IS IF WE DON'T GRANT THIS GARAGES WOULD BE ON THE OUTSIDE. YOU GRANT US THEN UNDER STREET A ALL THE GARAGES GOING INSIDE. THAT'S CORRECT. BASED ON OUR CURRENT STANDARDS WITH ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, THEY COULD POTENTIALLY DO A DETACHED GARAGE . IT WOULD FOLLOW THE SAME

[00:55:03]

SETBACKS AS OUR AS THE RS 60 TO THE REAR AND THE SIDE YARDS. UM BUT YOU'RE CORRECT. THE ZONING IN PLACE TODAY ALLOWS FOR THE RS 60 DEVELOPMENT WITH THE CURRENT DENSITY, AS SHOWN THE ZONING REQUEST IS JUST TO MODIFY THE SETBACKS FOR THE DETACHED GARAGE COMPONENT. THANK YOU. OTHERS.

MATT COULD YOU COME UP AND ADDRESS THE DRAINAGE AND WHEN IS THE APPROPRIATE TIME FOR THAT TO BE WORKED OUT AS IT DURING A REZONE? IS IT AT A LATER DATE? WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE.

NO PROBLEM. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. UM WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, THE. THE DRAINAGE , FLOOD STUDIES THINGS LIKE THAT THAT IS TYPICALLY LOOKED AT.

TYPICALLY LOOKED AT. AT A PRELIMINARY LEVEL WITH THE CLADDING. WE HAVE ACTUALLY ALREADY SEEN A PLAT ON THIS PROPERTY. I BELIEVE IT IS PROVED. CORRECT CAITLIN. YEAH IT IS ALREADY THE PLAT ON THIS PROPERTY IS ALREADY APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. UM THE CITY HAS ACTUALLY TAKEN IT UPON ITSELF EVEN BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAME FORWARD TO LOOK AT THE MAPPING OF THE TO LOOK AT THE FLOODPLAIN MAPPING OF THE CREEK THAT RUNS ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THIS PROPERTY THAT WRAPS AROUND YOUR HOUSE. UM. WORK WE'RE STILL WORKING ON FINALIZING THAT MAPPING, BUT WE FOUND THAT NUMBER ONE. ANY ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON THIS TRACK ISN'T GOING TO INCREASE THE FLOODING WITHIN THAT CREEK. AND THAT THERE ARE SOME FLOODWATERS IN THAT CREEK, AND THEY DO REACH UP ONTO THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. BUT THEY DO NOT IMPACT THE HOME ON THE PROPERTY. THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE WAY IT'S BEEN. FOR SOME TIME, YOU KNOW THAT'S JUST A MORE ACCURATE MAPPING OF THE FLOODPLAIN IS WHAT WE WERE LOOKING TO DO WITH THAT PROJECT.

IS ANYTHING ELSE OF MEN. GIVE US YOUR TITLE AGAIN. FOR SURPRISINGLY, SOMEONE MAY NOT KNOW WHO YOU ARE. THANK YOU. I AM I AM THE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING MANAGER FOR THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. AND IF SOMEONE HAD QUESTIONS, OR THEY WELCOME TO EMAIL YOU CONTACT OUT TO ME. I ACTUALLY SPOKE TO MR BOBBY ORR EARLIER TODAY, OKAY, MR MORTENSEN SAID EARLIER IN THE MEETING. I'VE SPOKEN TO HIM SEVERAL TIMES. HAPPY TO HAPPY TO SPEAK TO RESIDENTS, BUT ANY ENGINEERING CONCERNS THEY MAY HAVE ON THESE PROJECTS. TYPICALLY AFTER YOU SEE THESE PROJECTS THEY GO THROUGH. ANOTHER. THREE MONTHS MINIMUM OF PERMITTING ENGINEERING REVIEW.

WE'RE LOOKING AT A LOT MORE. DETAIL BEFORE WE ACTUALLY ISSUE ANY ANY ANY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS TO THEM TO ACTUALLY START WORK, SO VERY GOOD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. BUT WE HAVE THE APPLICANT COME BACK UP. PLEASE. COMMENT. I WAS GOING TO CLARIFY MAY I GUESS SO. WE CURRENTLY CAN DO BUILD DETACHED GARAGES ON THIS SITE. WE HAVE THE ABILITY UNDER THOSE ONI. HOWEVER WITH THIS SETBACKS AND PLACE WE HAVE TO BUILD THEM 10 FT OFF THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. THE REASON YOU HAVE TO DO THAT, BECAUSE THE ZONING CONTEMPLATES THAT YOU WOULD HAVE HOUSES. LET'S SAY THERE'S NO ALLEY BACKING UP. YOU WOULD HAVE HOUSES ADJOINING ARE LOT ADJOINING EACH OTHER IN THE BACK SO YOU WOULD NEED ENOUGH SPACE IN BETWEEN THE LOTS. FOR FIRE ACCESS. YOU WOULDN'T WANT TO LET'S SAY DETACHED GARAGES TO CLOSE TO ONE ANOTHER AND FOR FIRE REASONS. WE DON'T HAVE A LOT TO LOT. ACCESS HERE. WE BASICALLY FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES HAVE BECAUSE WE HAVE SEPARATION BETWEEN COLLEGE STREET AND THEN WE HAVE SEPARATION OF THE CREEK. SO THEREFORE IT WOULD BE AS IF YOU HAD AN ALLEY SEPARATION. SO WE WENT UNDER THE ZONING OF THE ALLEY SEPARATION, WHICH WOULD ALLOW YOU TO HAVE THE FIVE FT ACCESS. THE FIVE FT. SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE 10. THAT'S WHY WE ARE UNDER THE PDR, ASKING FOR THE FIVE FT SETBACK. INSTEAD OF THE 10. IT WOULD BE AS IF YOU HAD AN ALLEY SEPARATION. BECAUSE OF THE FIRE ACCESS, SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE ASKING FOR THIS. THE REASON WE NEED THAT. IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE FIVE FT REAR SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE 10. I DON'T HAVE THE DEPTH ON THE LOT IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE DETACHED GARAGE. BECAUSE THE LOTS ARE SHALLOW AND I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO NAVIGATE A CAR GETTING BEHIND THE HOUSE PARKING GETTING INTO THE GARAGE OUT OF THE GARAGE. AND I'LL BE FORCED

[01:00:02]

TO DO ALL FRONT ENTRY. GARAGES ON THIS SITE. THEREFORE HAVING THAT EXTRA FIVE FT. TO MOVE THE DETACHED GARAGE BACK MAKES IT FEASIBLE. TO PULL YOU KNOW TO ACCOMMODATE THAT. AND DELIVER WHAT I THINK IS A SUPERIOR PRODUCT. UM, SUPERIOR HOME. FOR HISTORICAL HOME IN THIS COMMUNITY. SO THAT FIVE FT REALLY MAKES IT POSSIBLE FOR US TO DO THIS. GIVEN THIS A LOT OF THOUGHT. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING OTHER THE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. SORRY. I DIDN'T SAY THAT FIRST OFF FIRST ROUND. THANK YOU. ANYTHING FOR ME. WE'RE THROUGH WITH YOUR REVIEW. THANK YOU. UM. ANYTHING ELSE MEMBERS. QUESTIONS OF STAFF COMMENTS. MOTIONS. I THINK THE CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT FLOODING AND OLD MCKINNEY MCKINNEY HISTORIC MCKINNEY. ARE VALID. UM, JUST DUE TO THE LACK OF HISTORICALLY CIVIL ENGINEERING TOWN FIRST DEVELOPED I DO HAVE FAITH IN OUR ENGINEERING GROUP THAT WE HAVE WITH THE CITY NOW. AND BEING ABLE TO DETERMINED WATER RUNOFF AND PROTECT CITIZENS. NEIGHBORING AND FURTHER DOWNSTREAM AS THEY APPROACH IT. THE CURRENT ZONING ORI ALLOWS FOR THIS. THE APPLICANT IS TRYING TO MM. DO BETTER PRODUCT OVERALL. UM SO I THINK I'M SUPPORTIVE. OF THAT A NOTE THE CITIZENS CONCERNS IT WILL LOOK DIFFERENT THAN HISTORIC MCKINNEY BECAUSE IT IS NEW. BUT ANYTHING BUILT IN HISTORIC MCKINNEY THAT HIS NEW LOOKS DIFFERENT THAN HISTORIC. MCKINNEY. THAT'S JUST WHAT IT IS WITH AN INFIELD LOT, SO I'M IN FAVOR.

SO WHAT MR ARNOLD WAS SAYING THERE IS A PROCESS FOR REVIEW BY THE CITY STAFF OF THE ELEVATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENTS OR YOU SIMPLY WOULD NOT HAVE SOMETHING THAT APPEARED OUT OF CHARACTER OR OR OUT OF LINE WITH THE AREA. TO MR PENCE'S POINT. THIS IS A DIFFERENT PART OF MCKINNEY. SOME CHOOSE TO LIVE WEST AND SOME JEWS TO LIVE DOWN HERE AND DOWNTOWN. AND THE HISTORIC AREAS VERY SPECIAL TO A LOT OF PEOPLE AND THE CITY STAFF WANTS TO KEEP IT THAT WAY, JUST LIKE PLANNING AND ZONING AND CITY COUNCIL DOES. OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONSO MAKE A MOTION? YEAH GLADLY MAKE A MOTION. BUT I SEEM TO BE MESSING HIM UP TONIGHT. PRETTY WELL, HAVEN'T I GOT YOUR BACK ON THIS ONE? I'LL MAKE EMOTION. WER STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL ORDINANCE PROVISIONS. 2ND 2ND NOTION BY MR DOPE TO PROVE THE ANONYMOUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION SECOND KIRKENDALL. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALMOST IN FAVOR.

RAISE YOUR HAND. AND THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. THIS MOTION CARRIES. INTEREST WAS SEVEN IN FAVOR ZERO AGAINST THIS WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ELECTION AT THE FEBRUARY 15 2022 MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS TO ONE DAY 0154

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “RS-120” - Single Family Residential District to "PD" - Planned Development District, Generally for Single Family Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located at 616 Finch Avenue]

Z TO PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. FREE ZONE IS SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM MARIUS 1 22 P D PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. IT'S THAT YOU ALLOW SINGLE FAMILY USES AND TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS IT 616 FINCH AVENUE. RIGHT. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TEREZIN APPROXIMATELY POINTS. 62 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AND TO MODIFY THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS. THE STAFF DID HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THE PACKET FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING SINCE THEN , OF THE POPE. SINCE PUBLISHING THE PACKET, THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE PROPOSED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. TO REQUEST A FIVE FT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK FOR THE PROPOSED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT INTO, UM FOLLOW THE SF 12 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT STANDARDS.

AND THE COPY OF THE REVISED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN PASSED OUT PRIOR TO THE MEETING FOR YOU WITH THESE CHANGES, STAFF STAFF'S CONCERNS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND WE ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THE REQUEST. I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. SORRY, CAITLIN, CAN YOU REPEAT THAT LAST PART? YES THANK YOU. SO THE APPLICANTS PROPOSED NOW PROPOSING TO DO A FIVE FT.

SEPARATION FROM THE PROPERTY LINE SO WEIRD INSIDE FOOT. SETBACK OF FIVE FT AND THEN

[01:05:02]