Feb 01, 2022 City Council Work Session on 2022-02-01 3:00 PM

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:05]

RIGHT. WE'LL CALL CALL TO ORDER OR CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING. THIS IS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY, 1ST. WE'RE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 2 22, NORTH TENNESSEE STREET, GREAT CITY OF MCKINNEY. OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS. FIRST I MENTIONED THAT COUNCILMAN RICK FRANKLIN IS NOT HERE. HE IS TESTING POSITIVE FOR COVID. TRYING TO SET A NEW RECORD. I THINK IT'S BEEN SEVEN WEEKS. RIGHT? NO. UM BUT HE WILL . HE IS NOT ABLE TO JOIN US TODAY. WORK SESSION ITEM. PUBLIC COMMENTS. I DO NOT SHOW ANY JUST YOU HAVE ANY TO MOVE RIGHT TO WORK SESSION PRESENTATION. YOU KNOW WHETHER WE BACKTRACK. I'M SORRY. IS THERE ANY REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS THAT ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS BEFORE WE JUMP INTO WORK SESSION? I WOULD TELL YOU THAT TEXT, RICK. NICE NOTE AND STUFF LIKE THAT. BUT HE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO ANSWER IT. SO JUST DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME ON

[Presentation on Pavement Management Plan]

RYAN WILL NAVIGATE THROUGH THE SLIDES. RYAN IS OUR DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. HE'LL INTRODUCE HIMSELF AT THAT TIME WHEN HE COMES UP TO SPEAK. SO THANK YOU . UM WE'RE GOING TO THIS IS NOW THE THIRD OF A SERIES OF DISCUSSIONS WORK SESSION ITEMS THAT WE HAVE NOW HAD WITH THE CITY COUNCIL. UM RYAN, DO YOU MIND JUST GOING AHEAD AND SHOWING THE NEXT ERIC. THERE WE GO. OUR FIRST MEETING WAS BACK ON AUGUST 3RD. AT THAT TIME WE BROACHED THE TOPIC. WE RAISED THE ISSUE OF OUR PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX ARE THEIR STATUS OF OUR CURRENT ROADWAYS. WE TALKED ABOUT THE TYPE OF DATA WE USE HOW WE USE THAT DATA COST OF REPAIRS AND SOME FUNDING SCENARIOS. VERY BROADLY, UM, COUNCIL ASKED US TO COME BACK WITH A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAILS, SO WE CAME BACK WITH A LITTLE BIT MORE. UM MEAT TO THE BONES, SO TO SPEAK OF THE FUNDING SCENARIOS, AND WE PRESENTED THOSE TO YOU. I THINK YOU KNOW THE COUNCIL'S DIRECTION AT THAT TIME IS WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO NOTHING. WE'RE GOING TO DO SOMETHING AND GO BACK AND REFINE A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THOSE FUNDING SCENARIOS AND LET US EVALUATE THOSE. AND WE JUST WE'RE GOING OFF OF MEMORY HERE ANYWAY. THAT WAS ON OCTOBER 19TH . THERE WE GO. OCTOBER 19TH, THEN, UM, THE COUNCIL AS THIS COME BACK AGAIN, WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE DOING TONIGHT. WITH THAT REFINEMENT AND A LITTLE BIT MORE DRILLING DOWN AND BECOME A LITTLE BIT MORE GRANULAR AND THOSE FUNDING SCENARIOS. BUT I WANT TO JUST EMPHASIZE THESE ARE STILL VERY BROAD SCENARIOS.

WITHIN EACH OF THESE. FRANKLY YOU COULD COME UP WITH SOME DIFFERENT DERIVATIONS. SO I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT FROM THE BEGINNING THE WE THINK ALL THREE OF THE OPTIONS THAT WILL BE OUTLINING FOR YOU ARE LEGITIMATE OPTIONS. THEIR LEGITIMATE OPTIONS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER FROM A POLICY STANDPOINT OF COMING UP WITH A LONG TERM FUNDING. PLAN A LONG TERM STRATEGY THAT DOES NOT EXIST TODAY, AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO REDRESS IS A LONG TERM FUNDING SCENARIO. THE OTHER THING I WOULD EMPHASIZE BEFORE WE GET STARTED IN. THIS IS THAT WE HAVE TIME. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT HAS TO BE DECIDED TONIGHT. WE DON'T. WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY DECISION TONIGHT, OTHER THAN PERHAPS FURTHER GUIDANCE. FROM WHAT YOU THINK YOU WANT TO DO OR PURSUE AND WHAT YOU MAY NOT, BUT ULTIMATELY, THE DECISION DOESN'T IS NEEDS TO MEET THE RIGOR OF DELIBERATION. THIS IS A STRATEGIC DECISION THE COUNCIL WILL MAKE AND HOW DO WE CALIBRATE OUR FUNDING SOURCES ARE REVENUE SOURCES TO MEET ALL THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY SO I WANTED TO EMPHASIZE THAT AS WELL . SO WITH THAT NEXT SLIDE, RYAN, PLEASE. SO WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT CAPITAL MAINTENANCE LIABILITY AS A BIGGER PICTURE, THEN WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT ROADWAYS. ROADWAYS ARE THE SINGLE BIGGEST COMPONENT OF OUR CAPITAL MAINTENANCE LIABILITY. AND THEN REVENUE SOURCES THAT WE'VE BEEN AND THEN FINALLY, THE DEFUNDING OPTIONS THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT. SO OUR CAPITAL ASSETS ARE APPROACHING $1 BILLION. THIS NUMBER COMES FROM OUR ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. THE MOST RECENT ONE, SO WE'RE ABOUT A NEAR NEARLY A BILLION DOLLARS OF CAPITAL ASSETS. 61% OF OUR CAPITAL ASSETS ARE FOUND IN OUR STREETS AND ROADS. $556 MILLION. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. SO WHAT? WHAT HAPPENS IS YOU HAVE TO DEPRECIATE YOUR ASSETS FROM AN ACCOUNTING STANDPOINT, AND YOU GENERALLY HAVE DEPRECIATED TO SCHEDULE. THAT'S YOU KNOW? BEST PRACTICES OR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTED THAT THE GOVERNMENT GADSBY STANDARDS GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD FOR

[00:05:03]

[00:10:01]

BUT GENERALLY THESE ARE ALL ROADWAYS THAT ARE MCKINNEY ROADWAYS THAT WE MAINTAIN. OKAY.

OKAY. THANK YOU. SO THIS IS NOT THE FIRST PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX REPORT THAT THE CITY HAS DONE. THE FIRST REPORT WAS DONE IN 2012 AND THE AVERAGE PAYMENT CONDITION INDEX SCORE IN 2012 AND 87. SO IF YOU TAKE AN AVERAGE OF EVERY ST SEGMENT SCORERS IN 87 AGAIN IN 2015. THE CITY DID ANOTHER PAYMENT CONDITION REPORT AND THAT AVERAGE SCORE WAS IN 82. THEN, AS I SAID EARLIER THE REPORT FROM LAST YEAR. THE AVERAGE SCORE WAS 71. WE'VE OVER LAID THAT INFORMATION AGAINST THE SUBJECTIVE DESCRIPTIONS THAT YOU CAN SEE THERE IN THE RANGES FROM GOOD, SATISFACTORY FIRM POOR. AND SO WHAT YOU CAN SEE IS OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS, THE SCORES, THE AVERAGE SCORE HAS GONE DOWN. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS SLIDE IS THAT THE RATE OF DETERIORATION FOR MCKINNEY'S RAILWAYS EXCEEDS THE RATE OF REINVESTMENT. SO NOW THIS SLIDE IS LOOKING AT THE HISTORICAL ASPECT, SO IT'S LOOKING BACKWARDS. THIS NEXT SLIDE HERE IS GOING TO BE LOOKING INTO THE FUTURE. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DID WITH THE CONSULTANTS WORK IS THROUGH THEIR MODEL. WE WERE ABLE TO LOOK AT VARIOUS FUNDING SCENARIOS TO PREDICT WHAT THE SCORE WOULD BE. UNDER UNDER THOSE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS . SO IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING THE MORE MONEY THAT YOU INVEST IN YOUR ROADWAYS, THE HIGHER THE PC SCORE. SO THE FIRST SCENARIO THAT YOU'LL SEE IS THE ONE THAT'S REPRESENTED BY THE RED LINE. SO THAT'S NOT THE NO FUNDING OPTION IF THE CITY WERE NOT TO PUT ANY MONEY INTO ITS ROADWAYS, YOU CAN SEE IT QUICKLY GOES FROM THE FAIR CATEGORY TO THE POOR CATEGORY. THE NEXT OPTION TO LOOK AT IS THE BLACK LINE. THE BLACKER LINE REPRESENTS THE CITY'S EXISTING FUNDING. SO THIS IS THE $9.3 MILLION PER YEAR AND YOU CAN SEE HOW THE ROAD THE PEACE CORPS CONTINUES TO GO ON A DOWNWARD TRAJECTORY. THE TOP TWO LINES REPRESENTS FUNDING SCENARIOS THAT ARE ABOUT $20 MILLION PER YEAR EACH AND SO YOU CAN SEE THAT REMAINS FLATTENED STARTS TO GO DOWN A LITTLE BIT AFTER ABOUT FIVE YEARS. YOU GO BACK, GO BACK TO SLIDES. ONE MORE. SO WE HAVE AN ASSESSMENT DONE IN 2012, ANOTHER ONE DONE THREE YEARS LATER. THEN WE HAVE A SIX YEAR GAP. HOW OFTEN SHOULD THESE ASSESSMENTS BE DONE? STAFF IS RECOMMENDING EVERY 3 TO 5 YEARS AND THAT WAY, IT GIVES US A GOOD IDEA. THE REASON WE RECOMMEND THAT IS BECAUSE IT WE FEEL THAT THAT'S ABOUT THE RIGHT TIME PERIOD TO BE ABLE TO SEE THE EFFECT OF PC SCORES ON THE CITY'S INVESTMENT INTO ITS ROADWAYS. BUT WHAT DOES IT COST US TO DO THAT ASSESSMENT? JUST CURIOSITY WAS ABOUT 202 $100,000. SO POTENTIAL REVENUE SOURCES FOR ROADWAYS. SO GENERALLY, THERE ARE THREE MAIN BUCKETS OF FUNDS THAT CAN BE USED TO FUND ROADWAYS, PROPERTY TAX SALES TAX AND A BUCKET THAT I'M CALLING OTHER SO PROPERTY TAX. THOSE CAN BE FUNDS GENERAL FUNDS THAT GO TOWARDS MAINTENANCE. IT CAN ALSO BE FUNDS THAT ARE USED TO SUPPORT BONDS. SALES TAX. THERE IS AN OPTION AVAILABLE TO THE CITY FOR A MAINTENANCE TAX UNDERNEATH THE SALES TAX. YOU CAN SEE THE CURRENT BREAKDOWN OF HOW THE CITY SALES TAX IS CALCULATED. 1% STATE AUTHORIZED AND THEN A HALF A PERCENT OF THE IMMEDIACY AND HALF A PERCENT OF THE CBC. AND THEN THE OTHER POCKETS, GRANTS STATE AND FEDERAL. THESE FUNDS CAN BE INTERMITTENT AND ARE USUALLY COMPETITIVE WATER AND WASTE WATER FUND SO THOSE COULD BE CAN BE USED FOR ROADWAYS. IF THERE ARE IF THEY'RE ASSOCIATED WITH WATER OR WASTEWATER PROJECT. HOWEVER THOUGH THERE ARE MANY NEEDS EXISTING NEEDS IN THE WATER AND WASTEWATER AREAS, AND THEN THE LAST ONE IS A STREET MAINTENANCE FEES. SO THINK ABOUT PUTTING A $4 FEE ON YOUR WATER BILL. SO THE NEXT THING WE DID IS WE LOOKED AT EQUIVALENT FUNDING OPTIONS. SO IF YOU REMEMBER THE CHART EARLIER WE TALKED ABOUT, UM, AN APPROXIMATE INVESTMENT OF $20 MILLION PER YEAR, SO WE WANTED TO LOOK AT THREE OPTIONS. THAT ACHIEVED THAT $20 MILLION INVESTMENT PER YEAR. SO THE FIRST OPTION AND WE'RE GOING TO GET INTO MORE DETAILS ABOUT EACH ONE OF THESE OPTIONS AND A LITTLE BIT. IS THE PROPERTY TAX OPTIONS. THIS WOULD BE $100 MILLION BOND $10 MILLION PER YEAR FOR 10 YEARS AND THAT REQUIRES VOTER AUTHORIZATION. THE SECOND WOULD BE TO, UM, ADJUST THE SALES TAX BREAKDOWN AS YOU SEE THERE, SO THERE WOULD BE A QUARTER CENT SALES TAX THAT WILL GO TOWARDS WORLD MAINTENANCE AND THERE WOULD BE A REDUCTION OF 1/8 SENT TO THE CDC AND THE CDC. BUT THE SALES TAX WOULD REMAIN AT 2. AND THEN THE THIRD OPTION WOULD BE A COMMITMENT OF EXISTING IMMEDIACY

[00:15:08]

UM BACK THERE, BUT YOU NEVER PUT A NUMBER TO IT, AND THAT WAS THE $4 TO ADD INTO YOUR WATER BILL.

WHAT WOULD THAT WHAT WOULD THAT CREATE? THAT CREATES BACK. OTHER THAN IT WAS JUST A COMMENT YOU MADE RIGHT, SO THAT WOULD BE SCENARIO FOR EXCUSE ME SCENARIO THREE, THE ROAD LEAFY $13.5 MILLION PER YEAR. SO ABOUT ABOUT THE $4, WHICH WE'RE ASSUMING THAT RIGHT NOW WOULD BE VERY SIMILAR TO THE DRAINAGE FEE THAT THE CITY COLLECTS IN TERMS OF THE AMOUNT SO FOR PURPOSE OF THE SLIDE, WE ASSUME WILL BE ABOUT $4 MILLION PER YEAR, PLUS THE OTHER TO THE EXISTING BOND, PLUS THE GENERAL FUNDS TO GET TO ABOUT $13.5 MILLION. THAT'S KEY . THAT'S NOT NEW REVENUE. THAT'S THE COMBINE THAT SUMMIT OF 13.5 MILLION. IT'S THE GOODS WHAT WE'RE CURRENTLY DOING THE 9.3 PLUS NEW REVENUE FROM A FEE, WHICH IS ABOUT THREE OR FOUR MILLION, DEPENDING ON WHAT THAT FEE WOULD BE. I SAID, SO IT'S SO IF YOU SO DO YOU HAVE THAT NUMBER. WHAT'S WHAT'S WHAT'S SO $4 PER DOLLARS PER PER MONTH. SO THAT'S $4800 PER HOUSEHOLD. YOU HAD 68 UP THERE WITH PROPERTY TAX. AND SO IT WOULD BE TO 3/4 OF A SO THAT THAT NUMBER FOR A SCENARIO THREE WOULD BE $4 PER MONTH. WOULD YIELD ABOUT $4 MILLION PER YEAR TOWARDS EXISTING ROADWAYS. AND I'M VERY ACTUALLY HAD RUN THAT THIS AFTERNOON, BUT GO AHEAD. SO AS OF TODAY, WE HAVE ABOUT 64,000 WATER ACCOUNTS BASED OFF OF THAT $4 A MONTH TIMES 12 MONTHS COMES TO ABOUT $3.1 MILLION A YEAR. UM I DID IT BASED ALSO OF VALUATION OF ABOUT $26 BILLION, WHICH IS THE CURRENT VALUATION OF THE CITY. THAT WOULD BE ABOUT 1.1 CENT EQUIVALENT ON THE TAX RATE. SO THAT'S THAT'S ON THE PROPERTY TAX. NO YOU DON'T RAISING PROPERTY TAXES. I WAS JUST TRYING TO PUT IN PERSPECTIVE OF THE OF THE TAX RATE. WOULD BE EQUAL TO RAISE THE TAX RATE ONE CENT CORRECT. AND ON THAT QUESTION, MR MAYOR, PRO TEM WOULD NEED TO BE A LITTLE BIT OF ANALYSIS OF WHAT TO CHARGE COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS. BUT ONCE WE WOULD DO THAT ANALYSIS, WE CAN IMPLEMENT THAT RIGHT AWAY.

BASICALLY. FAIRLY QUICKLY. THANK YOU. TRY MARK. WHEN YOU SAID THE WATER METER ACCOUNTS. WAS THAT.

[00:20:13]

YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE ARE THERE WERE 274, TEXAS CITIES OF IMPLEMENTING THE RATE. THE FAR MAJORITY OF THOSE CITIES HAVE IMPLEMENTED THE QUARTER CENT SALES TAX. AND THERE'S OTHER SOME OTHER EXAMPLES OF DFW CITIES THAT HAVE RECENTLY IMPLEMENTED THAT TAX. THIS NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THE SALES TAX THAT HAS BEEN COLLECTED BY THE CDC, THE CDC AND THEN OVERLAYS THE SCENARIO OF THE ROADWAY SALES TAX OPTION ON FUTURE SALES TAX COLLECTION. UM SO YOU CAN SEE THAT IT WOULD TAKE APPROXIMATELY 7 TO 8 YEARS TO RETURN TO THE SAME LOVE SAME FUNNY LEVEL MEDICINE OUM THAT THE ROADWAY TAX WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN FISCAL YEAR 23. THEN THE COLLECTION WOULD OCCUR AND STARTING IN 2024. WHAT GROWTH RATE. ARE WE ASSUMING ON THAT REVENUE? 4% OR IN IT, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT LAST YEAR E. D, C AND CDC WERE 16% SOMETHING LIKE THAT. YEAH. CAN. AND AN OPTION THREE. THIS IS THE COMMITMENT FROM THE IMMEDIACY NAME CDC. THIS REQUIRES COLLABORATION WITH THESE TWO CORPORATIONS ON THE FUNDING AMOUNTS AGAIN AS WE TALKED ABOUT NO INCREASE IN FEES OR TAXES, AS THESE ARE EXISTING FUNDS THAT ARE BEING COLLECTED. UM DIFFERENT FROM OPTION TO THESE FUNDS CAN ONLY BE USED FOR ROADWAYS THAT SUPPORT ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. SO WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN IS THOSE FUNDS WOULD THEN GO GO FROM ROADWAYS FOR TOWARDS THOSE NEW ROADWAYS. THE CITY'S FUNDS THAT WERE DESIGNATED FOR THOSE WOULD THEN HAVE TO BE SWITCHED TO EXISTING ROADWAYS, SO IT DOES REQUIRE THAT THERE'S SUFFICIENT NEW ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TO BE AVAILABLE. IN ORDER FOR THIS TO WORK, SO IT DOES COMPLICATE THE ROADWAY FUNDING PROCESS ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, YOU CAN SEE GENERALLY MAP SHOWING THE ROADWAY ARTERIALS WITHIN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, AND THOSE ARE GENERALLY ROADWAYS. IT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR THESE FUNDS. AND SO NOW I'LL TURN IT BACK TO PAUL FOR ANALYSIS OF FUTURE REVENUES. THANK YOU, RYAN SO AND UNFORTUNATELY YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO READ THE GREEN FONT. VERY WELL, I THINK ON YOUR MONITORS HERE, YOU CAN PROBABLY READ A LITTLE BIT BETTER. IN THE BOXES. SO THIS GRAPHIC SHOWS US WHAT'S WHAT'S THE LONG TERM. ALL. ULTIMATELY WHAT'S OUR LONG TERM REVENUE? UM LOOK LIKE AND SO THERE'S A LOT HAPPENING HERE IS I WOULD KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH IT. THE BLUE BARS BASICALLY ARE THE. PER CAPITA REVENUES THAT WE HAVE COLLECTED, UM, ON A ANNUAL SALES SO ANNUAL SALES TAXES ON A PER CAPITA BASIS. THE GREEN ONE. EXCUSE ME IS THE TOTAL SALES COLLECTED ANNUALLY, SO THAT'S

[00:25:06]

UM OUR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT WM WIDE IN THE GREEN, BUT TO BE FAIR SYSTEM WIDE TO MAINTAIN OUR ROADWAYS. OUR GOAL SHOULD BE TO KEEP IT IN THE FAIR CATEGORY OR ABOVE. THERE'S A THERE'S A CONCEPT IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT CALLED GOLD PLATED BENEFITS. OFTENTIMES COMMUNITIES WANT TO HAVE THE BEST THEY SAY, WELL, WE WANT TO BE 80 OR ABOVE. YOU'RE GOING TO PAY FOR THAT, AND IT'S VERY EXPENSIVE AND YOU REALLY DON'T HAVE TO UNLESS YOU MAKE A CONSCIOUS DECISION TO DO IT OUR RECOMMENDATIONS FAIR CATEGORY OR ABOVE SYSTEM WIDE. AND THEN, UM , WE RECOMMEND SOME FUNDING STRATEGIES TO SUPPORT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEXT 5 TO 10 YEARS. WE NEED A FIRM FUNDING SOURCE. RIGHT NOW. WE'RE KIND OF USING VARIABLE FUNDS. AND HOWEVER, THAT IS AGAIN THESE THREE OPTIONS THAT WE PRESENTED TO. YOU ARE VERY LEGITIMATE OPTIONS. AND YOU CAN ARGUE ABOUT WHICH ONE YOU THINK IS BETTER, BUT THEY'RE ALL UHH, VERY LEGITIMATE AND VIABLE. UM AND THEN. WE DO THINK THAT WE NEED TO CONTINUE WITH AN EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE PRESENTATION SERIES SO THAT THE COUNCIL IS AWARE OF OUR INFRASTRUCTURE SORT OF MAYBE AN ANNUAL BASIS THAT YOU'RE UP TO DATE ON ALL OF OUR INFRASTRUCTURE AND WHERE THOSE CHALLENGES ARE. IN MEETING THOSE NEEDS. THE OTHER THING I WOULD POINT OUT IS THAT, UM, WE HAD A COUPLE COUNCIL LIAISONS AT THE MEETINGS. BUT LAST WEEK WE DID PRE BRIEF, UM, A FINANCE COMMITTEE OF BOTH THE CDC AND E.

D. C. THEY SAW THIS VERY SAME PRESENTATION. SO THEY'VE BEEN A FINANCE COMMITTEES OF EACH OF THOSE ENTITIES WERE PRE BRIEFED ON THIS ARE OUR GOALS, NOT TO HAVE ANY SURPRISES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. WE'RE BEING AS TRANSPARENT WITH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE. I THINK BOTH PETER

[00:30:06]

OTHERWISE BEFORE WE HEAR FROM NBC AND CBC, I'VE GOT SOME THAT JUST KIND OF RELATE. I THINK WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HIM THE LAST TIME BUT CAN WE GO BACK TO THE MAP? THE WITH THE PC SCORES. WE TALKED ABOUT LIKE THERE'S A. PC SCORE THAT IT HITS WHERE MAINTENANCE DOESN'T ISN'T THE ANSWER. AND YOU'VE GOT IT IN THAT SLIDE THANKS BEFORE THIS, BUT LIKE FROM THE STANDPOINT OF DOLLARS NEEDED TO ADDRESS THAT MAP BECAUSE I LOOK AT THAT MAP, AND I SEE A LOT OF RED AND A LOT OF GRAY. THAT'S KIND OF HIDDEN IN THAT MAP. THAT'S HARD TO SEE BECAUSE IT'S THE SAME COLOR AS THE HIGHWAYS. BUT THERE'S A LOT OF GREAT THAT IS BELOW 10% FAILED. DOES THE MAINTENANCE DOLLARS AND THE 2022 23 BUDGET DEAL WITH THAT, OR IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO BE FOCUSED ON? MORE BONDING CAPACITY FOR IN THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE AND THE OBVIOUSLY THE MAINTENANCE FEE TO GO ALONG WITH IT. BUT ARE WE GOING TO BE ABLE TO DEAL WITH THE DARK REDS AND GRAYS ON THIS MAP? IMMEDIATELY LET ME ANSWER YOUR SECOND QUESTION FIRST, UM THE ANSWER.

YOUR QUESTION IS NO. THE CURRENT FUNDING MAINTENANCE FUNDING THAT THE CITY RECEIVES DOES NOT KEEP UP WITH THE NEEDED MAINTENANCE AND YOU CAN SEE THAT PIE THAT CONTINUE DOWNWARD TRAJECTORY OF THE PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX SCORES. YOUR FIRST QUESTION WAS , WHAT'S THE VALUE OF ALL OF THE, UH IDENTIFIED MAINTENANCE OF IF YOU ADDED UP ALL THE STREETS. WE DO HAVE THAT NUMBER AND IT'S SIGNIFICANT, RIGHT. SO IF YOU LOOKED AT A UM, STREET THAT'S IN THE FAIR CATEGORY. THE MODEL ASSUMES THAT THERE WOULD BE, UM, PAVEMENT, PATCHING OR CRACK SEALING. AND SO THERE'S LESS OF A COST WITH THAT TYPE OF STREET VERSUS A STREET THAT IS DARK, YOU KNOW, LIKE THE RED OR THE GRAY WOULD REQUIRE REPLACEMENT. IF YOU ADD ALL THOSE UP, THE TOTAL IS ABOUT $312 MILLION FOR ALL OF THE WHAT I'LL CALL BACKLOG OF MAINTENANCE . IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT ALL NEEDS TO BE DONE NOW. BUT AS PAUL TALKED ABOUT THERE NEEDS TO BE A LONG TERM FUNDING STRATEGY TO ADDRESS ALL OF THOSE MAINTENANCE NEEDS. 300. DO YOU HAVE THAT BROKEN DOWN BY OUR PC RATINGS ARE INDEX SCORES. THEY'RE LIKE HOW MANY STREETS DO WE HAVE? THAT WE CATEGORIZE US FAILED. WE DO HAVE THAT INFORMATION JUST NOT NOT IN FRONT OF ME, BUT THAT'S HOW WE CALCULATED BY WAS BY LOOKING AT EACH OF THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF STREETS MAKING ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE PC SCORE. OF WHAT THE COST WOULD BE TO GET TO THE RELATIVE BALLPARK. FIGURE OF THIS IS THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT'S NEEDED TO REBUILD ROADWAYS. REPAIR EXISTING REMOTE PLACE. THANK YOU. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO COME UP FIRST. SAID HE WANTS TO BE.

MR MAYOR, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, MR GRIMES. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO, UM BE HERE WITH YOU TONIGHT. MR GRIMES MENTIONED THAT LAST WEEK. OUR FINANCE COMMITTEE WAS BRIEFED ON THIS PLAN AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT BOTH CDC AND ABC. AND I THINK THAT THOSE BOARD MEMBERS RECOGNIZED THAT IN VIEW OF ESPECIALLY WHAT WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO SUPPORT RECENTLY, AND THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT HAVE COME TO THE CITY THAT IT WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR COUNSELING, EVERYBODY TO BE THINKING ABOUT HOW MOVING IN THE DIRECTION OF ALLOCATING SOME PORTION OF NBC AND CBC SALES TAX REVENUE TO ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM COULD IMPACT OUR BUSINESS. SO JUST EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS. BUT JUST IN TERMS OF BACKGROUND CDC WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1996, APPROVED BY THE VOTERS HAVE SOME SALES TAX TO BE ASSESSED TO INVEST IN QUALITY OF LIFE ENHANCEMENTS IN MCKINNEY. SO LAST YEAR WE CELEBRATED OUR 25TH ANNIVERSARY. AND HAD BEEN ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH.

I THINK QUITE A LOT IN 25 YEARS , THE MISSION IS TO WORK PROACTIVELY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH

[00:35:03]

SO THAT ALLIANCE WITH BUDGETING FOR THE COMING FISCAL YEAR. SO IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY IMPACT OUT OF THE 200,000,004 0.3 HAS GONE TO COMMUNITY PROJECTS JUST UNDER FOUR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PARTNERED WITH THE CITY ON ABOUT $40 MILLION WORTH OF PROJECTS. PARKS BY FAR RECEIVED THE LION'S SHARE OF CDC FUNDS. 125 MILLION OVER THE 25 YEARS. AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY 250.3. WE'VE DONE SOME RECREATION PROJECTS, NOT WITH PARKS, THINGS LIKE THE BARNEY ME BOXING FACILITY, AND THEN WE ALSO DID A PROJECT WITH MISTY YEARS AGO THAT FELL INTO THAT CATEGORY. MUSEUM AND TOURIST. DESTINATIONS ENTERTAINMENT DESTINATIONS AND WE'VE DONE JUST A SMALL AMOUNT FOR TRANSIT. AND THEN IN ADDITION TO THE GRANTS, THERE ARE A COUPLE OF PROJECTS. I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT THAT REALLY FALL OUTSIDE OF A STRAIGHT GRANT SORT OF SCENARIO. TUBBS IS BY FAR THE LARGEST, AND THAT'S WHEN WE'RE WE'RE INVESTING 16 MILLION IN THAT PROJECT, BUT THOSE FUNDS WILL BE RECOVERED OVER TIME, FROM LEAST AND THEN PERCENTAGE OF ANNUAL REVENUE. AND THEN PS.

PSA WAS ANOTHER ONE THAT WAS ALONE, AS OPPOSED TO GRANT THE BOARD APPROVED 3.2 MILLION. THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY NEED THAT MUCH THEY BORROWED ABOUT 2.7 FOR MOST AND REPAID THAT WITHIN 2.5 YEARS. AND THEN THE RETAIL INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM IS PRETTY SMALL. SO FAR, WE'RE CONTINUING THAT AND THEN TWO THINGS THAT FELL OUTSIDE OF THE REGULAR GRANT PROGRAM. WE DID PARTNER WITH THE CITY. TO MAKE THE COMMITMENT TO BRING THE VIRUS NELSON GOLF TOURNAMENT TO MCKINNEY, UM, WITH THE CONTRIBUTION OVER FIVE YEARS, AND WHEN EVERYTHING WAS SHUT DOWN DUE TO COVID CDC WORKED WITH THE CITY TO CREATE SMALL GREEN. PROGRAM RELIEF FOR SMALL BUSINESSES IN MCKINNEY, AND WE WENT THROUGH TWO CYCLES OF GRANTS AND AWARDED ABOUT 525,000 AND CONNECTION WITH THAT PROGRAM. SO THIS IS THE SAME INFORMATION THAT I JUST WENT THROUGH, JUST PROVIDED IN A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE, PARKS ON THE RIGHT CITY PROJECTS AND YOU CAN SEE GRAY'S ENTERTAINMENT DESTINATION. AFFORDABLE HOUSING. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. MUSEUM AND TOURIST FACILITIES AND THEN TRANSIT JUST A SMALL PART. TO DATE. SO JUST TO SUM IT UP. WE REALLY I THINK THE BOARD MEMBERS AFTER HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE PRESENTATION LAST WEEK AND VISIT WITH COUNCIL AND MAYOR FULLER AND MAYOR PRO TEM BRAINS. UNDERSTAND THE MAGNITUDE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FINDING A SOLUTION TO THE TO THE CHALLENGE WITH RESPECT TO STREET MAINTENANCE.

UM WE JUST ENCOURAGE COUNCIL TO KEEP IN MIND. THESE THINGS AS AS YOU MOVE FORWARD, BECAUSE THERE WILL BE AN IMPACT ON WHAT WE'RE ABLE TO DO IN THE FUTURE. THERE'S BEEN INCREASING DEMAND ON OUR ALLOCATION FOR COMMUNITY PROJECTS. WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO INCREASE OUR TOTAL ALLOCATION BY ABOUT 40% CUMULATIVELY OVER THE PAST FOUR YEARS, AND WE CALCULATE THAT IT'S 10% OF TOTAL SALES TAX REVENUE. SO THIS YEAR JUST UNDER 1.8 MILLION IS ALLOCATED FOR COMMUNITY PROJECTS. THOSE PROJECTS HAVE GROWN IN SIZE. OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS. IF YOU LOOK AT, UM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AND THEIR COTTON GROUP PROJECT. THAT'S OVER A MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT AND INVESTMENT FROM CDC 800,000 FOR THE FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER. SO THOSE KINDS OF COMMUNITY COMMUNITY PROJECTS USED TO BE RELATIVELY SMALL AND SOME STILL ARE BUT SOME HAVE

[00:40:04]

WE LOOK FORWARD. TO SEEING HOW THE CONVERSATIONS GO AND BEING A PART OF THE DISCUSSION GOING FORWARD, BECAUSE I THINK THERE PROBABLY ARE SOME THINGS THAT THEY MAY FALL WITHIN THE GENERAL CATEGORIES HAVE BEEN PRESENTED. BUT MAYBE THINGS THAT COULD BE, UM. MAYBE WE CAN BE CREATIVE IN FINDING SOME ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS TO ADDRESS THIS SITUATION. SO AGAIN. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY AND THAT'S CERTAINLY THE INTENT OF THIS MEETING AND THE. THE ADDITIONAL MEDIUMS. I'M SURE WE'LL BE HAVING JUST GET ALL THE BRAIN TRUST IN ONE ROOM AND AT THE END OF THE DAY. WE'RE ALL CITY OF MCKINNEY AND ON THE SAME TEAM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, HMM.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR. HEALTH MEMBERS, MR GRIMES. UM AGAIN. I DON'T WANT TO. LOT OF WHAT I SAY IS GOING TO BE VERY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT HE JUST SAID, SO I'LL TRY TO SKIP AHEAD SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS BUT AGAIN, WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME AND SHOW YOU UM YOU KNOW THE IMPACT THAT THIS PROPOSITION WOULD HAVE, AND, UM, KIND OF INTENDED PERCENT AND WE CERTAINLY CAN APPRECIATE THE POSITION THAT YOU'RE IN AND THAT THE CITIES IN WHEN FACING AN ISSUE LIKE THIS AND THAT WE DEFINITELY WOULD LIKE TO BE PART OF THE SOLUTION. AS YOU KNOW, THIS AFFECTS HOW EVERYTHING WORKS IN THE CITY, SO WE DEFINITELY DON'T WANT TO YOU TO CONSIDER THIS. THAT WERE UNDERSELLING THE POSITION THAT THEY'RE IN. WE DO REALIZE THAT

[00:45:02]

SO E. D. C WILL HAVE GIVEN 30 YEARS OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT AND INVESTMENT TO MCKINNEY, AND WE'RE VERY PROUD OF THAT. THE PURPOSE OF OUR ORGANIZATION SET UP BY THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE.

TAIPEI SALES TAX IS INTENDED FOR MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDICES, BEINGS TYPE OF REVENUE FROM LAND BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT FACILITIES EXPENDITURES TARGETED INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECTS. UM AGAIN, OUR MISSION IS TO CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT WHICH COMMUNITY ORANGES, BUSINESSES CAN THRIVE HERE IN THE CITY. AND OF COURSE, OUR VISION IS TO MAKE THE MOST DESIRABLE LOCATION ALL OF NORTH TEXAS FOR BUSINESSES, AND WE HOPE TO DO THAT BY INVESTING IN CORPORATE EXPANSIONS OR RELOCATIONS HERE WITHIN THE CITY. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO REALIZE IS THE E D C OF YESTERDAY IS NOT THE CASE HERE TODAY WHILE WE'RE APPROACHING OUR 30 YEAR BIRTHDAY. 2018 WAS A BIG YEAR FOR THE THIS IS WHEN THERE WAS A VERY STRATEGIC REALIGNMENT OF PRIORITIES. THE BOARD OF THE C DECIDED TO, UM. LOOK TO THE FUTURE AND SEE HOW WE CAN DO THINGS DIFFERENTLY FROM AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE , THE LANDSCAPE AROUND US WAS QUICKLY DEVELOPING AND WE WERE LOOKING FOR A WAY. HOW DO WE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SOME OF THOSE OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE COMING UP 1 21 CORRIDOR INTO NORTH TEXAS, SO THERE WAS A RENEWED RENEWAL PRIORITIES SET WITHIN THE BOARD , AND THAT'S LARGELY TO INNOVATE. THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS TO DO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIFFERENTLY THAN HAS BEEN DONE ANYWHERE ELSE TO SET MCKINNEY APART KIND OF LIVE UP TO THAT UNIQUE BY NATURE MONITOR. IN ALL ASPECTS OF THE CITY. TO DIFFERENTIATE MCKINNEY , UM, LANDSCAPE AND LOOK BORN TOWARDS A TECH CENTRIC, HEADQUARTER BASED LOCATION FOR BUSINESS. UTILIZE THE NEWLY ACQUIRED ASSETS THAT THE PURCHASED, UM. PREVIOUSLY THAT HAS HAD BEEN FORTUNATE TO HAVE A LARGE AMOUNT OF CAPITAL RESERVES THAT, UM, I THINK I JOKED ABOUT TWO MONTHS BEFORE I STARTED TO SPEND IT. SO I WAS LIKE, OH, GREAT. THEY JUST SPENT ON BUT BUT VERY STRATEGICALLY AND SOME CAPITAL ASSETS AND LAND FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO POSITION THE CITY THE BEST BECAUSE THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. AND THEN THE FUND THE CREATION OF AN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM THAT SUPPORTS DEVELOPMENT, RECRUITMENT OF HIGH TECH INDUSTRIES AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. LOOKING AT THAT AS A FUTURE STRATEGY FOR HOW WE INTEND TO GROW IN THE FUTURE, AND HOW WE INTEND TO WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESSES WE INTEND TO RECRUIT AND HOW WE GO ABOUT RECRUITING THEM. SO SOME OF THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS THAT WE'VE BEEN VERY SINCE 2018. WE'VE BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL AS AN E. D. C, BUT SOME OF THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS THAT LED TO THAT WHERE AGAIN I MENTIONED THE LAND ACQUISITION.

WERE PREVIOUSLY LOOKS AT CAPITAL INTENSIVE, BUT WE SPENT AROUND $60 MILLION, SECURING SOME PRIME DEVELOPMENT SITES ALONG THE TOLLWAY AND AT SOUTHGATE. AND THIS THIS, BUT THIS STRATEGY CHANGED THE FINANCIAL POSITION OF THE ORGANIZATION AS WELL. WE WENT FROM HAVING A LARGE AMOUNT OF CAPITAL RESERVES TO REALLY ALMOST HAVING DONE WE'VE BEEN REBUILDING OUR FUND BALANCE LITTLE BY LITTLE OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS. AGAIN WITH THE STRATEGIC DIRECTION DIRECTION.

REFOCUS, UM. BOARD WENT OUT WENT OUT SORT OUT AN EXECUTIVE. THANKFULLY THEY PICKED ME APPRECIATE THAT. UM BUT WE'VE INVOKED NEW STRATEGY, NEW STRATEGIC DIRECTION AND PRIORITIES FOR INVESTMENT. THAT ARE A LOT MORE AGGRESSIVE THAN HAD BEEN DONE IN THE PAST. SO WITH MORE AGGRESSIVE STRATEGY OBVIOUSLY COMES MORE AGGRESSIVE USE OF OUR RESOURCES AS WELL. SO MUCH, THOUGH THAT IN 2020 WOULD WE WERE ANALYZING OUR BUDGET, LOOKING AT A COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE WILL GET AROUND US LOOKING AT THE RESOURCES THAT THAT IT TOOK TO WIN SOME OF THE BIGGER PROJECTS IN THE AREA TO WIN. TOYOTA TO WIN PG AMERICA'S TO WIN JPMORGAN CHASE IN OUR COMPETING COMMUNITIES LOOKING AT WELL, WHAT LEVEL OF INVESTMENT WAS REQUIRED TO WIN THOSE PROJECTS. AND WE DECIDED THAT WE WERE SOMEWHAT UNDER ALLOCATING OUR PROJECTS BUDGET EVERY YEAR IN THE FORM OF THE AVAILABLE RESOURCES THAT WE HAD TO POTENTIALLY USED TO WIN. BIG DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TO WIN. ALL PROJECTS AND SO. YOU KNOW, WORKING WITH THE CITY? WE WERE

[00:50:03]

ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, SIR. BUT IF YOU GO BACK TO THAT SLIDE, SURE AND I WAS. THE TIP PARTICIPATED. WITNESS WHATEVER CONVERSATIONS ON THE LAND ACQUISITION. WHAT IS THE THOUGHT? MAYBE. MAYBE I'M GOING TO THIS QUESTION WOULD DIGRESS FROM WHERE WE ARE SO FEEL IT DOES THEN. TELL ME THAT, BUT JUST IN KIND OF LOOKING AT RESOURCES, THE I KNOW THE MOTIVATION BACK IN 17 18 PURCHASE LAND WAS REALLY ABOUT ABOUT ZONING AND THINGS HAD.

IT'S A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT WE'RE CHANGING LEGISLATIVELY ANN AND START CHANGING ZONING ON PROPERTY OWNERS UNILATERALLY, SO THE THOUGHT WAS WE WOULD PURCHASE THE LAND. WE'D BE ABLE TO ZONE THAT LAND THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF BEING ABLE TO PROTECT WHAT HAPPENED. I'M ON THE 1 21 CORRIDOR. HAS THERE BEEN THOUGHT TO, UM, ZONING THAT PROPERTY BEING THAT WAS THE INITIAL MOTIVATION. ZONING IT, PROTECTING IT FOR THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT, WANT AND THEN SELLING THAT LAND. AND RECOUPING THOSE RESOURCES WITHIN THE SEA IS THOUGHT TO THAT, OR ABSOLUTELY THAT, THAT THAT IS A VERY VIABLE STRATEGY FOR THOSE TRACTS OF LAND. UM WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE LAST FOUR YEARS OF THAT. WHAT WE SAW INITIALLY AFTER PURCHASING IS THAT ALMOST IMMEDIATELY WHEN WE CHANGED OUR STRATEGY, AND WE WERE OUT MARKETING FOR DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES, WE HAD ALMOST IMMEDIATE INTEREST. I THINK THE FIRST SIX MONTHS I WAS HERE WE MET WITH THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP OUT OF DUBAI THAT WAS IMMEDIATELY INTERESTED IN OUR NEWLY ACQUIRED ASSET TO DO DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT KIND OF I THINK BELIEVE CHANGED. A LITTLE BIT OF THE DIRECTION OF THAT FROM JUST DOING A STRICT REASON AND FLIP TO. WELL MAYBE WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE TO USE THIS LAND AS AN INCENTIVE. TO GET THE QUALIFIED DEVELOPMENT THAT WE WANT. AND SO WE'RE EXPLORERS STILL EXPLORING THOSE OPPORTUNITIES? WE DON'T COME UP WITH FOUR OR FIVE DIFFERENT OPPORTUNITIES THAT DEVELOPERS ARE CALLING. THEY'RE STILL CALLING US EVERY DAY. WE HAVE THREE DEVELOPERS CURRENTLY LOOKING AT THE ONE PARCEL THAT WE DON'T THAT WE ARE NOT ENGAGED IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH FOR A DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NOW. SO THAT IS A VERY VIABLE STRATEGY, AND WE MAY END UP WANTING TO DO THAT . UM BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE FIELDING SO MANY ENQUIRIES ON THOSE PROPERTIES THAT WE HAVE THE CHANCE TO GET WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR. BY LEVERAGING THOSE ASSETS AS PART OF OUR INCENTIVE PACKAGE, SO WE'RE PURSUING THOSE OPTIONS RIGHT NOW. BUT THERE'S NOTHING TO BE TO YOUR POINT. THERE'S NOTHING TO PREVENT US FROM DOING THAT. YOU'RE RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. OKAY SO OUR PERFORMANCE. SO HOW HAS THIS NEW STRATEGY OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS? UM AND WHAT THEY ARE. I KNEW STRATEGY. SO. WE'RE DOING A LOT OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION RIGHT NOW TO TRY TO GET A HOLISTIC LOOK. IT WOULD BE NICE FOR A 30 YEAR ANNIVERSARY TO BE ABLE TO SHOW THE 30 YEAR IMPACT OF OUR ORGANIZATION. UM FORTUNATELY, A LOT OF THE DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO 2010 OR PAPER AND IN BOXES IN STORAGE, SO WE'RE SORTING THROUGH A LOT OF PAPER RIGHT NOW , BUT WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY GO BACK TO 2010 AND LOOK AT OUR PROJECT HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE. AND WHAT YOU'LL NOTICE IS THAT FROM 2010 TO 2017 , THE ORGANIZATION GENERATED A LITTLE OVER $370 MILLION IN TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT. BUT SPENT ABOUT $33 MILLION INCENTIVES TO GENERATE THAT OVER SEVEN YEARS. IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS, OPERATING UNDER NEW, MORE AGGRESSIVE STRATEGY, WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO ALMOST DOUBLE THAT AND CREATE $650 MILLION IN TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT BY ONLY UTILIZING $30 MILLION OF INCENTIVES. UM WHICH, ON PAPER? IT LOOKS LIKE WE SPENT LESS, BUT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SPENDING $30 MILLION IN FOUR YEARS VERSUS 33 7. SO IF YOU WOULD THAT REALLY EQUATES TO IS WE'RE GETTING BETTER PROJECTS, BUT WE'RE HAVING TO SPEND A LITTLE BIT MORE FOR THEM, OR WE'RE INCREASING OUR INVESTMENT IN SOME WAY. UM SO ARE ARE IS GOING UP, BUT THE PRICE OF POKER IS GOING UP AS WELL. UM EVERYONE AROUND US IS GETTING MORE COMPETITIVE. UM PROJECTS ARE GETTING MORE COMPETITIVE. IT'S TAKING MORE RESOURCES TO WIN THE

[00:55:04]

SO THIS KIND OF SHOWS THAT THIS HISTORICAL DISTRIBUTION BY DISTRICT OF WHERE OUR MONEY IS GOING FOR THE PROJECTS. SO THE FUTURE IMPACT SO THAT'S REALLY WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY. YOU KNOW, THERE'S A UM. YOU KNOW FROM FROM THE PRIOR PRESENTATION, UM THAT REPRESENTED. OUR LONG TERM SALES TAX OUT SALES TAX OUTLOOK IS VERY POSITIVE, UM IN AND THAT IS A GOOD THING TO SEE. UM I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S IMPORTANT IN THAT YOU KNOW, THE ET SEEN CITIES ARE TRYING TO SHOWCASE HERE TODAY IS THAT WHILE UM THE LONG TERM OUTLOOK IS VERY POSITIVE. IT'S THAT LITTLE DIP RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING. THAT WHERE THERE IS A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO THE CDC ORGANIZATION THAT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED. AND AGAIN, WE RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROJECT OF THE REDDAWAY IMPACT, AND WE WANT TO BE PART OF THE SOLUTION WE WANT TO, YOU KNOW, ECHOES THE SENTIMENTS THAT WE WANT TO BE A PART OF THE CREATIVE SOLUTION. TO THIS ISSUE. BUT THERE WAS ONE SIDE WITHIN THEIR THEY SAID. YOU KNOW, THERE. THE FISCAL IMPACTS TO THE RESIDENTS OF MCKINNEY. UM WE'RE SO OBVIOUSLY, ANY TYPE OF BOND HAS A FISCAL IMPACT TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE KENNY. BUT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT BOTH THE FISCAL IMPACT OF ANY DECISION, PLUS BEING THE CAUSE THE SIDE EFFECTS OF THOSE DECISIONS AS WELL. SO WHILE THERE MAY BE A NO FISCAL IMPACT TO THE CITY MCKINNEY BY UTILIZING E DCC DCC REVENUES, UM AS CINDY CLEARLY POINTED OUT, THE CDC HAS BEEN INVESTING IN COMMUNITY AMENITIES FOR VERY LONG TIME AND HAS DONE A FANTASTIC JOB PROVIDING QUALITY OF LIFE AMENITIES FOR THE CITY. AND LIKEWISE, THE E D. C R DOLLARS GO TOWARDS OUR PRIMARY GOAL IS TO CREATE NEW FORMS OF REVENUE FOR THE CITY IN THE FORM OF ADVIL AND PROPERTY TAX, AND THE GOAL OF DOING THAT IS TO REDUCE THE PROPERTY TAX BURDEN OF THE RESIDENTS OF MCKINNEY. UM, ARE REDUCING. OUR ABILITY TO CREATE NEW FORMS OF REVENUE HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE RESIDENTS OF ONE FORM OR ANOTHER, SO IT MAY NOT BE A DIRECT FISCAL IMPACT.

BUT THERE ARE THERE IS A DUAL CITIZEN HARDSHIP THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE. AND REALLY, WHAT IT COMES DOWN TO IS THE OPPORTUNITY COST AND ALL REFERENCE WEBSTER HERE SINCE HE'S SMARTER THAN I AM. SO UH, OPPORTUNITY COST IS DEFINED ITS LOSS OF POTENTIAL GAIN FROM OTHER ALTERNATIVES WHEN ONE ALTERNATIVE IS CHOSEN. PUT SIMPLY THE RESULT OF CHOOSING ONE ALTERNATIVE AND FOREGOING ANOTHER. AND SO WHAT IS THAT ALREADY? OPPORTUNITY COST WHAT IS THE DOLLARS AND CENTS? AND THIS IS REALLY, REALLY WHERE DEFINITIONS COME INTO PLAY. SO UM, ABSOLUTELY ROADS ARE VERY IMPORTANT IN ROADS ARE ELIGIBLE USES OF SALES TAX DOLLARS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DOLLARS. IT IS A ELIGIBLE USE. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT DOLLARS, BUT RE APPROPRIATE THOSE DOLLARS AND WHAT'S THE IMPACT FROM TAKING THAT FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING? YOU KNOW, LOOKING AT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A ELIGIBLE USE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DOLLARS VERSUS USING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DOLLARS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT, AND I THINK THIS IS WHAT THAT OPPORTUNITY COST IS SO AGAIN THE HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN THE LAST AH! WELL SINCE 2010 WE'VE DONE WE FUNDED. LITTLE OVER A

[01:00:02]

$80 MILLION LOST IN CAPITAL INVESTMENT PER YEAR, WHICH GOES SORTS, GENERATING THAT WARM TAX REVENUE AND CREATING JOBS. FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, SO THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY COSTS THAT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED HERE AS WELL. AND THEN FINALLY, THE. COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVENESS ELEMENT. UM WE'VE DONE A VERY WE'VE WORKED VERY HARD TO REPOSITION MCKINNEY TO START WINNING PROJECTS AND FROM THE PREVIOUS SLIDE WE'VE BEEN DOING SO WE'VE BEEN WINNING, AND WE'RE REALLY STARTING TO HIT OUR STRIDE NOW. UM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE SALES TAX OUTLOOK THAT WAS PRESENTED IS AGAIN VERY FAVORABLE, BUT IF IT'S FAVORABLE FOR US, IT'S GOING TO BE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS AS WELL. SO WHILE MIKE COMPETING IN, UH WE'LL CONTINUE TO HAVE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES AT THEIR HAND TO PUT TOWARDS PROJECTS. THAT IS ALSO A SITUATION WHERE WE NEED TO BE CONSCIOUS OF THAT. UM WE MAY BE LESS COMPETITIVE FOR PROJECTS MOVING FORWARD IF WE DON'T HAVE THE OPERA AT LEAST THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN MAKING AN OFFER FOR SOME OF THOSE LARGER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. AND AGAIN, JUST LIKE CINDY. WE PROVIDED YOU KIND OF AN OUTLOOK OF THE BUDGETARY IMPACTS HOW IT ACTUALLY AFFECTS THE BUDGET. UM FOR THE FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS, LOOKING AT BOTH DIFFERENT SCENARIOS. FOR YOU JUST TO DIGEST AND TAKING AS PART OF YOUR DECISION MAKING PROCESS FOR THIS PROPOSITION. AND AGAIN, I JUST FINALLY JUST SAY WE AGAIN WE REALLY WANT TO BE A PART OF THE SOLUTION. UM AND WE WANT TO FIND A CREATIVE WAY. WE WANT TO LOOK AT DERIVATIVES OF THE THREE OPTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN PRESENTED AND I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT YOU KNOW, WE CAN FIND A WAY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. TO WHERE PROVIDES THE MAXIMUM BENEFIT FOR THE CITY WITH THE LEAST BOTTOM IMPACT ACROSS THE BOARD. HAPPY ANSWERING QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. DON'T KNOW IF I CAN FORM THIS INTO QUESTION, BUT FEEL FREE TO TELL ME IF I'M WRONG. IS THAT OKAY? PETER ON ANYONE ABOUT SAYING OUR NEW AT THIS SEAT. I SPENT MY LAST THREE YEARS ON THE KEYBOARD, AND SO I WAS ALONG FOR THE RIDE FOR A LOT OF IT. UM YOU'VE DONE GREAT JOB. YOUR CURRENT BOARD IS GREAT. YOUR STAFF IS GREAT. IT STRIKES ME THAT WHEN I STARTED MY CAMPAIGN, I HAD TO REALLY THINK. WHAT DO I WANT? I WANT MCKINNEY TO BE A SAFE CITY WHERE FAMILIES CAN LIVE PLAYING WORK. I'VE BEEN VERY FORTUNATE TO BE ABLE TO LIVE AND WORK HERE FOR MANY YEARS AND WHAT THE EDC HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO. IN THE LAST FEW YEARS IS DO THE KAIZEN BUILDING RIGHT, THE ONE THAT ALMOND 1 21 , WHICH IS A SPEC OFFICE BUILDING, MORE MOMS AND DADS ARE GOING TO GET TO WORK HERE AND LIVE HERE. BUT ONE PROJECT THAT YOU DIDN'T MENTION THAT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO MENTION IS THAT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, RAYTHEON CAME AT US QUICK. AND THEY NEEDED DECISION AND INCENTIVES. QUICK TO DO AN EXPANSION HERE THAT MY RECOLLECTION WAS ABOUT $200 MILLION. IS MY RECOLLECTION RIGHT ON THAT, OR IS THAT WRONG? ROUGHLY BETWEEN YES. OKAY ENOUGH , AND IT'S REALLY IT'S RHETORICAL. AT THIS POINT, WE CAN'T GO BACK AND RELITIGATE IT TO DO WE GET THAT IF YOUR BUDGET WAS REDUCED, AND THAT'S NOT VERY VISIBLE PROJECT TO MOST OF US BECAUSE RAYTHEON IS BEHIND THOSE WALLS, WE DON'T NECESSARILY SEE IT. BUT WE'RE CERTAINLY FEELING IT IS AN IMPACT IN OUR HOUSING MARKET, RIGHT? YOU KNOW, WE JUST DON'T HAVE HOUSES ON THE MARKET RIGHT NOW. SO I ALSO WANT TO MENTION SOMETHING IN CINDY. I DIDN'T MENTION THIS WHEN YOU WERE UP HERE, BUT WITH RESPECT TO THE CDC AND PETER, THIS GOES TO YOU TWO WE WANT TO RETREAT, STRATEGIC PLANNING SITUATION A YEAR TWO AGO, TOO. BUDDY OF YOURS WAS THE FACILITATOR, AND HE HAD SPENT SOME TIME IN KANSAS CITY. I RECALL AND THIS IS A THIS ANECDOTE ALWAYS STUCK WITH ME. THEY HAD A BIG LUCENT PLANT IN KANSAS CITY, AND THE THING WAS BUILT SOMETIME IN THE NINETIES, WHEN LUCENT WAS EVERYWHERE AND THEN LOOSEN WENT AWAY ON WHATEVER LEVEL AND THEN IT WAS THIS BIG WHITE ELEPHANT.

WELL SOME SWEDISH OR SWISS COMPANY IS COMING TO LOOK AT IT. AND, OF COURSE, KANSAS CITY'S PUTTING UP THEIR BEST. DEAL, YOU KNOW, AND THEY DROVE BY A PARK. IN THE PARK HAD A SPLASH PAD.

THAT'S WHAT SOLD. THAT COMPANY. ONCOMING WAS THAT SPLASH PAD AND IN MY DISCUSSIONS WITH RESIDENTS IN MY VERY BRIEF TENURE HERE ON COUNCIL OUR PARKS OR A MAGNIFICENT SOURCE OF PRIDE. AND

[01:05:03]

ABSOLUTELY IN THIS, YOU KNOW ONCE YOU ONCE YOU SHIFT AWAY FROM BONDING TOWARDS TOWARDS SALES TAXES, IT WOULD WOULD YOU KNOW YOU COULD THEN CHOOSE WHETHER YOU WANTED TO BOND FOR MORE NEW ROADS AT THAT POINT, INSTEAD OF HAVING TO BOND FOR STREET MAINTENANCE, SO IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE HEADED TOWARDS ASSUME THAT'S WHAT YOUR HEAD TOWARDS SO WE'RE GONNA WE'RE GONNA BE HAVING A STRATEGIC WORK SESSION IN A FEW WEEKS AND. AND I KNOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OBVIOUSLY A LOT MORE DIALOGUE AND AGAIN AS WE STAYED ON THE FRONT SIDE. THIS ISN'T SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO RUSH. I THINK IT WAS GREAT TO HEAR FROM BOTH CINDY AND PETER. REMIND US. YOU KNOW WHAT NUMBER ONE WOULD OBLIGATIONS. YOU HAVE THE IMPACTS THAT THOSE THINGS HAVE HAD, UM BOTH ENTITIES HAVE HAD INVESTMENTS IN THE COMMUNITY AND THE RETURNS ON THOSE INVESTMENTS

[01:10:02]

DOUBLE OR TRIPLE THAT FOR COMMERCIAL, JUST KIND OF SEE WHAT YOU CAN COME UP WITH IN SOMETHING LIKE THAT, TOO. GETTING CLOSER AND, UM AND I THINK, UM GRADUAL, YOU KNOW, SO WE DO A COUPLE MILLION FOR ONE OR TWO YEARS AND THEN BRING UP TO THREE MILLION AND THEN GRADUALLY GET UP TO FOUR MILLION . YOU KNOW, IN FOUR OR FIVE YEARS TO WHERE THEY CAN HAVE TIME TO ABSORB IT. THEY CAN HAVE TIME TO WORK WITH IT. I THINK I THINK CERTAINLY THAT'S THAT'S THE KIND OF THINGS WE'RE GOING TO BE DISCUSSING MORE WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT JUST KIND OF COMING FROM THE CITY. I MEAN , WE HAVE OUR OWN CELLS TAX TO BE ABLE TO PULL FROM THAT. AND OCCASIONALLY WE DO A LOT BETTER THAN WE DOING SO WE HAVE SOME ROOM IN THE BUDGET TO SAY OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO A MILLION DOLLARS. THEY'RE A MILLION AND A HALF. IN THE CELLS FROM THE CITY SELLS TAX OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO THAT'S WHAT MY THOUGHT IS. MY THOUGHT, IS THAT. I WOULD ALSO AGREE THAT I DON'T AT LEAST AT THIS MOMENT MY WOULD NOT BE IN FAVOR OF JUST A, UH. BABY ALL IN STARTING DAY ONE. I WANT TO LOOK AT WHAT THEIR BUDGET IS NOW . WHAT WAS THE WHAT WAS BUDGETED ? WHAT IS THE INCREASE THAT'S HAPPENING AND CAN WE GROW INTO WHAT WE ULTIMATELY IS A SUSTAINABLE FUNDING SOURCE OVER TIME AS WE GROW THAT DOESN'T THAT DOESN'T IMPEDE WHAT THEY YOU KNOW, FROM THIS BUDGET. BUT WHAT THEY PLAN MOVING FORWARD. TODAY AS WE GROW IN EXCESS OF WHAT WAS PROJECTED, AND MAYBE SOME AMOUNT BEFORE THAT, BUT. ONE THING ONE DIRECTION WE COULD GIVE IF EVERYONE WAS IN FAVOR, AND I THINK YOU JUST STATED YOU ARE AND I AM AS WELL. I WOULD NOT BE IN FAVOR OF PURSUING A AN ELECTION THAT HAD TO BE REFORM AFFIRMED IT BEFORE YEARS ONE. IT WOULD ENTAIL TAKING 25% RIGHT NOW. SO THAT GOES TO YOUR POINT TO. IT HAS TO BE REAFFIRMED EVERY FOUR YEARS AND IF IT WAS NOT THAT MONEY WAS BEGUN JUST DOESN'T REVERT BACK TO THE SIDE HERE, RIGHT? SO IS THERE CONSENSUS TO NOT PURSUE A REFERENDUM GROUP? EARLY. SO JUST IS THERE CONSENSUS TO NOT PURSUE A REFERENDUM WHERE THERE'D BE A VOTE TO TAKE 25. OF THE DC AND CDC FUNDING THIS MOMENT FORWARD MOMENT FOR BEING WHEN THE ELECTION WAS. BUT LOOK AT THE OTHER TWO OPTIONS AND MANY EFFECTS. MANY, MANY COMBINATIONS MAYBE WHAT'S BEEN DISCUSSED SINCE SOME OTHER IDEAS. I THINK WE HAVE. WE HAVE CENSUS TO NOT PURSUE THE ELECTION SO WE CAN IF I CAN MAKE A REMARK, MR MAYOR, IT STRIKES ME THAT IT'S NOT A SUSTAINABLE PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCES. SOURCE OF IT'S GOT TO GO TO REFERENDUM EVERY FOUR YEARS. IT'S JUST ONE THING AND IT WOULD BE A IT WOULD IT WOULD BE TAKING THAT 25% FROM DAY ONE, WHICH WOULD SO BUT TO ME THAT DOESN'T MEET THE DEFINITION OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO NOW. THE COUNTER ARGUMENT IS THAT WE HAVE TO GET COOPERATION FROM CDC NEEDY. SEE I'VE KNOWN BOTH THESE PEOPLE ON THE BOARDS AND THE PEOPLE THERE. THEY BOTH EXPRESSED GREAT EAGERNESS TO WORK WITH US ON THIS AND IT'S IN THEIR BEST INTEREST TO GROW AND DEVELOP THE CITY, SO I DON'T THINK THE REFERENDUM GIVEN THE RULES AND THE CONSTRAINTS THAT ARE THERE IS A WISE MOVE. CERTAINLY WE'RE NOT SAYING SLAMMING DOORS SHUT OUT, LOCKING THE KEY THROWING AWAY THE KEY, BUT IT'S NOT WISE MOVE. IF WE WANT TO SUSTAINABLE THING, I'LL MAKE ONE OTHER REMARKS THAT CONCERNS ME. THE I'M NOT AGAINST

[01:15:01]

WHAT WE AGREE ON THAT. THAT WE MUST HAVE SUSTAINABLE FUNDING SOURCE. WE'VE GOT TO TAKE CARE OF OUR ROADS. SURE, ABSOLUTELY. ABSOLUTELY. NO OPTION, SO THAT'S THE BEST YOU'RE GONNA GET DIRECTIONS. I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY SOME RELIEF IN SOME QUARTERS, SO THAT'S VERY HELPFUL. AND ONE THING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THIS IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SCALING UP OR YOU KNOW, KIND OF GROWING INTO THESE THINGS. I THINK BACK TO THE QUESTION. I WAS ASKING.

THERE'S A LOT OF ROADS ON THAT. PC LIST. WHERE A MAINTENANCE FUND IS NOT NECESSARILY THE ANSWER TO IMPROVING THE OUTCOME OF THE ROADWAYS. AND SO WHETHER IT IS, IF WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW TO GET $10 MILLION IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR IF THAT IS COUPLING SOME DETERMINED SHARE OF THAT BURDEN OUT OF THE SALES TAX AND SOME ADDITIONAL BONDING CAPACITY SO THAT WE ULTIMATELY GET TO THAT $10 MILLION AND START FOCUSING ON THOSE FAILED ROADWAYS THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED.

BECAUSE I. I SEE THAT AS SOMETHING THAT IF WE JUST KICKED THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD AND WE'RE GOING TO BE EVEN FURTHER BEHIND . I UNDERSTAND. I APPRECIATE THAT. THAT'S THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT WE WILL BE PREPARING. IS A ARRANGEMENT. SO TO SPEAK OF TOOLS AND TO LAY ALONGSIDE EACH OTHER AND SAY, WELL, IF WE COME UP WITH A GAME PLAN WHERE WE GROW INTO THAT MONEY FROM THE SALES TAX REVENUES THAT WE MAY NEED TO DO A BOND LEE ABOUT THE BOND ISSUANCE ALONGSIDE FOR THE EARLIER YEARS, PRODUCE IT. IF YOU WANT TO PRIME, THE PRIVATE FUND DIDN'T GET IT GET TO WORK ON RIGHT, AND I GUESS WHAT I WOULD WANT TO SEE IS LIKE THE PRIORITY PROJECTS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. I THINK THAT YOU WOULD IDENTIFY A PORTION OF THOSE WOULD BE THE BONDABLE PROJECTS AND IT PROBABLY A SMALLER BOND. IT WOULD BE AS A RESULT OF THIS, BUT THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WILL BRING BACK TO YOU, AND WE'LL REFINE THOSE AND COME UP WITH SOME SCENARIOS FOR THE COUNCIL TO CHEW ON AND DELIBERATE ON AND THEN YOU'LL PICK ONE, OKAY? RIGHT MOVING ON

[Request of Support for North Central Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Autonomous Vehicle Project, as proposed by Feonix Mobility Rising]

[01:20:01]

JUST KIND OF GOING TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW A LITTLE BACKGROUND ABOUT PHOENIX. UM THE PROGRAM OLD REVIEW WHAT KIND OF SERVICES ? WE'RE LOOKING TO BRING THE PROGRAM PARTNERS THAT ARE ENGAGED AT A LETTER OF SUPPORT AND RESOURCES. UM WHAT OPPORTUNITIES WE'RE LOOKING FOR THE CITY TO ENGAGE AND THEN TIMELINE AND NEXT STEPS. SO PHOENIX IS A FIVE OH ONE C THREE ORGANIZATION WHERE NONPROFITS SPECIFICALLY FOCUSED ON PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS FOR THE HEALTH AND WELL BEING OF EVERY PERSON IN EVERY COMMUNITY. WE'RE COMING UP ON OUR FOURTH BIRTHDAY. WE HAVE DEPLOYED PROJECTS IN NINE DIFFERENT STATES SO FAR, JUST IN OUR SHORT TENURE, AND WE WORK WITH NATIONALLY LEADERS LIKE AARP, THE TOYOTA NORTH AMERICA.

WE ALSO WORK WITH 17 CORPORATION. THIS MAJOR ORGANIZATIONS. BREAKING DOWN BARRIERS IN WHEN IT COMES TO ACCESS TO CARE, ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT ACCESS TO HEALTHY FOOD AND SO ON AND SO FORTH, AND SO WE'RE REALLY HONORED AND IT HAS A PLEASURE TO TAKE IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL WITH AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY. SO UM AS KIM AND SHARED. THIS IS A PROJECT WITH THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REALLY LOOKING AT AUTOMATED VEHICLE FUNDING. UM THAT'S COMING FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OUT $5 MILLION WITH THAT THERE'S ABOUT $250,000 IN MATCHING FUNDS WERE NOT ASKING ANY MONEY FROM THE CITY JUST IN KIND SUPPORT FROM STAFF. AND THAT MATCHING FUNDS WILL COME FROM FOUNDATIONS AND OTHER SPONSORS FOR THE PROJECT.

UM THE EMPHASIS OF THIS PROGRAM WITH AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES IS REALLY LOOKING AT HEALTH EQUITY.

THERE'S A LOT OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE PROGRAMS OUT THERE AROUND, UM, TRANSPORTATION ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES, TRANSPORTATION FOR MAYBE COMMUTING. BUT WHEN IT COMES TO SAYING, HOW ARE WE USING THE MOST ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ON EARTH? TO BREAK DOWN SOME OF THESE BARRIERS WHEN IT WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT MOBILITY. THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES WITH IT WITH A SINCERE FOCUS ON HEALTH EQUITY. AND SO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO DO IS FOR UNDERSERVED COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN THE MCKINNEY AREA, BUT ALSO SOUTH DALLAS, FOCUSING ON BRIDGING THE GAP FOR FAMILIES WHO ARE LIVING IN POVERTY, FACING BARRIERS AND ACCESS TO CARE. INDIVIDUALS HAVE DISABILITIES AND SENIORS. SO UM, WE ARE PART OF THESE SERVICES, INCREASING ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE PRESCRIPTIONS AND HEALTHY FOOD THROUGH AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE THAT WE HAVE INFORMALLY DUBBED THE WELLNESS WAGON, AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE TELE, OPERATIONALLY DRIVEN. SO THESE WELLNESS WAGON AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SERVICES CAN BE PARKED AT THE RESIDENTS IN THE DRIVEWAY OR IN THE APARTMENT . COMPLEX PARKING LOT. UM, IN ADDITION TO THAT, IT ALSO CAN BE PARKED OUTSIDE OF A QUICK SIGN UP LOCATION OR AND IT DON'T SENIOR DAY CARE. TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO CARE. UM THERE'S ALSO THE VILLAGE AVAILABILITY TO MAXIMIZE THE IMPACT ON THIS PROGRAM FOR DELIVERY OF MEDICATIONS AND ALSO DELIVERY OF HEALTHY AND FRESH FOOD. SO THIS KIND OF DUBBED THE DIGITAL HOUSE CALL IF YOU WILL, SO IT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE TAKING BACK A MODEL THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, PRESENT IN THE FORTIES, AND BEFORE THEN, WHEN THE DOCTOR ACTUALLY CAME TO YOUR HOUSE, SO IN THIS CASE, WE'RE REALLY ENABLING INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES OR OLDER ADULTS WHO MAYBE THEY DON'T HAVE INTERNET ACCESSIBILITY IN THEIR HOME. MAYBE THEY DON'T HAVE A DEVICE THAT CONNECTS WITH THE MY CHART AND TO REALLY SAY WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DOCTOR CAN SEE YOU AND YOU CAN SEE THE DOCTOR WHEN YOU RECEIVING THOSE THOSE TELEHEALTH SERVICES. WE HAVE AN INCREDIBLE PARTNERSHIP AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, WHICH CHILDREN'S HEALTH, PARKLAND HOSPITAL, DALLAS COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SUPERIOR HEALTH PLAN AND RESTORATIVE FARMS RELEASED WHAT EVERYBODY COMING TOGETHER TO BREAK DOWN THESE AREAS. AS PART OF THIS

[01:25:03]

SO WE WANT TO GET AS MANY VISITS AND PURPOSES AND USES OF THESE SERVICES AND THAT THIS WELLNESS WAGON CAN PROVIDE. WE HAVE AN INCREDIBLE LINEUP OF PROGRAM PARTNERS THAT HAVE COME TOGETHER AROUND THIS PROPOSAL RANGING FROM ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS LIKE TEXAS A AND M AND S, M U 20 YOUNG. WE'VE GOT BOTH SUPPORT FROM TOYOTA AND FORTH. WE HAVE NATIONALLY DERS LIKE THE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE ALLIANCE ACCESSIBLE MOBILITY COLLABORATIVE, AS WELL AS ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND AND REACH THAT ARE ALL REALLY COMING TOGETHER TO SAY WE BELIEVE THAT AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH, EQUITY AND MOBILITY REALLY NEED TO COME. TOGETHER IN TERMS OF A PURPOSE VERSUS KIND OF SAYING WELL, HEALTH CARE IS OVER HERE AND TRACY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES ARE OVER HERE. WE NEED TO BRIDGE THOSE TWO INDUSTRIES.

ALL OF THESE PROGRAM PARTNERS COMING TOGETHER AND ADDITION. REALLY BRIDGES AND SHOWS THE CITY OF KENNY AS A NATIONAL LEADER IN THIS PROGRAM, SO I'M CURRENTLY ON THE AMERICA, UM, AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE COMMITTEE AND CHAIR OF THE HEALTH, EQUITY AND POLICY COMMITTEE. AND THIS IS REALLY ONE OF THE FIRST PROGRAMS ALMOST GLOBALLY ADDRESSING THIS KIND OF A BARRIER WITH THIS BENCH OF INCREDIBLE PARTNERS COMING TOGETHER. IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS PILOT IS GOING TO FLOOR A TON OF VEHICLES ON A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT ROADS. SO I GREW UP IN A DAIRY FARM IN A VERY RURAL AREA, AND I FIRMLY BELIEVE THESE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES SHOULD NOT BE LIMITED TO CHRISTINE STREETS WITH PERFECT LANE MARKINGS. WE NEED THESE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TO BE ABLE TO OPERATE ON ANY TYPE OF ROADS THAT ARE ON OUR CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE. SO WE'RE DEPLOYING TWO VEHICLES AND MCKINNEY LOOKING AT SUBURBAN AND SEMI RURAL BUT ALSO LOOKING IN DALLAS IN SOUTH DALLAS, LOOKING I HIGHLY URBAN AS WELL AS AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. AND SO WE'RE GOING TO BE FACING TWO VEHICLES IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY OF THESE WELLNESS WAGONS AND TWO SPECIFICALLY INTO SOUTH DALLAS. AND THE TOTAL AUTOMATION AND KIND OF HOW THIS PLAYS OUT IS WE'RE GOING TO START WITH TELE OPERATION WITH THE SAFETY DRIVER, REALLY FOCUSING JUST ON THOSE RESIDENTIAL AND GIRL ROUTES. WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE THE TELL OPERATION WITH THE SAFETY DRIVER IN HIGH DENSITY TRAFFIC OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. MOVIES GET STARTED, DEPENDING HOW THAT GOES. THE NEXT STEP IS THEN TO INTEGRATE URBAN ROUTES AND DELIVERIES WITH THE SAFETY DRIVER. AND FINALLY THAT FINAL LEVEL OF SOPHISTICATION IS LOOKING AT THAT ON SAYING ARE THERE COMMON AREAS OR COMMON ROUTES WHERE WE HAVE COMMON DROP OFFS WHERE WE'VE TAKEN THIS RIDE WITH THE SAFETY DRIVER 100 TIMES AND WE'VE HAD SUCCESSFUL RESULTS.

AND SEE IF THAT'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT. EVEN MORE TELL OPERATIONALLY, UM, WHILE THE SAFETY DRIVERS IN THE VEHICLE, IT WILL FREE THEM UP WITH THE TELE OPERATION TO MAKE PHONE CALLS AND CHECK IN WITH PATIENTS THINGS OF THAT NATURE, BUT THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A SAFETY DRIVER IN THE VEHICLE. WHAT WE'RE ASKING FROM THE CITY IS REALLY TO SUPPORT THE GREAT OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT WITH THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL GOVERNMENTS TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE ON THE SERVICE AREA, SO WE'RE GOING TO BE WORKING HAND IN HAND WITH THE CITY DETERMINED WHERE THIS VEHICLE IS ELIGIBLE TO GO AND WHAT MAKES SENSE AND THEN THEN WORKING BACKWARDS WITH THE HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS TO IDENTIFY PATIENTS THAT ARE IN NEED IN THOSE AREAS.

INTRODUCTIONS AND COLLABORATION FOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH. WHILE WE HAVE AN INCREDIBLE LIST OF PARTNERS, WE KNOW THATDIBLE AMOG PARTNERS IN THE CITY THAT WOULD PERHAPS BE INTERESTED TO JOIN US IN THIS INITIATIVE AND CONTINUE TO HELP US BRAINSTORM AND COORDINATION WITH THE LOCAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT, MAKING SURE THAT ANYWHERE. THIS VEHICLE IS GOING THE CITY IS AWARE AND IT HAS ALL THE RIGHT NECESSARY. UM PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AT ANY TIME.

THE TIMELINE, SO WE HAVE ALMOST A YEAR OF PAPERWORK BETWEEN NOW AND THE VEHICLE, UM, BACKGROUND OR AND EVEN GETTING STARTED. SO IN QUARTER WANTED 2023 WAS WHEN WE WOULD BE HIRING DRIVERS. SO THIS THIS OPPORTUNITY WILL BRING JOBS TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, UM, FOR THESE WELLNESS WAGONS AND THEN WORKING WITH THE CITY TO LOOK AT WHERE I SHOULD. WHERE CAN WE OPERATE THE VEHICLE? WHAT

[01:30:03]

FOR THOSE AGREEMENTS, SO IT'S THERE'S LIKE A SET OF ABOUT A YEAR OF JUST MAKING SURE WE'RE WALKING THROUGH EACH STEP OF THIS PROCESS WITH THE PARTNERS AND THE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES THAT ARE ENGAGED. AND WITH THAT I KNOW I WENT THROUGH THAT VERY QUICKLY BUT WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. I THINK IT'S AN EXCITING PROGRAM LOVE THAT MCKINNEY HAS BEEN INVOLVED. SOMETHING SO INNOVATIVE AND PROGRESSIVE FOR WELL BEING OF OUR COMMUNITY COMMUNITY. KILL. SO YOU NEED A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT. WELL THAT'S COME IN. THE NEXT MEETING WILL COME IN NEXT MEETING, BUT THAT'S WHAT YOU WILL NEED FROM FROM US. AS A CITY. THAT IS CORRECT, RIGHT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HOPEFULLY WE'LL GET IT TO YOU. SO GOOD LUCK. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. 220093 CONSIDERED GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSION MEMBER

[Consider/Discuss Guiding Principles for Boards & Commissions Member Appointments]

[01:35:05]

YOU CAN JUST BE INTERESTED IN LEARNING ABOUT IT AND HOW SOME TYPE OF CONTRIBUTION OR INTEREST TO COMPUTE CONTRIBUTE IN THAT AREA. THERE ARE SOME REQUIREMENTS IN TERMS OF RELATIONSHIPS IN TERMS OF COUNCIL AND FAMILY MEMBERS SERVING ON THOSE BOARDS AS A PART OF POLICY THAT IS NOT GENERALLY AN ISSUE OF CONFLICT AS MEMBERS ARE, APPLICANTS ARE REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE ANY TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP THAT MIGHT FALL INTO CONFLICT WHEN THEY APPLY.

CANDIDATES SHOULD HAVE A RECENT APPLICATION ON FILE WITH US. WE PROVIDE AN ONLINE APPLICATION PORTAL. THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE PEOPLE MIGHT SUBMIT A PAPER APPLICATION. THAT'S ALSO A POSSIBILITY AS WELL BUT PRIMARILY THROUGH ONLINE SERVICES, AND WE MAINTAIN APPLICATIONS FOR ONE YEAR, SO WE DO ASK THAT MEMBERS AS WELL AS NEW APPLICANTS UPDATE THE INFORMATION SO WE CAN HAVE REALLY, YOU KNOW, SOLID BASIS OF UNDERSTANDING WHO ARE APPLICANTS ARE AND THEN THERE'S A ULTIMATELY AN INTERVIEW EVENT WILL ALSO TALK ABOUT THAT PROCESS. AS WE'VE MADE CHANGES TO THAT OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. SO WE HAVE FIVE MAJOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONS THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS TODAY I WOULD ASK YOU TO INDULGE ME AND GIVING A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THOSE BEFORE WE DIVE INTO THE DISCUSSION AS THAT WAS, MIGHT GET A LITTLE BIT. INDIA. SO THE FIRST ONE IS TERM LIMITS. THERE'S BEEN A LITTLE BIT OF DISCUSSION IN PAST MEETINGS IN TERMS OF HOW HOW COUNTS. HEALTH APPOINTMENTS ARE. CONDUCTED RIGHT NOW. SO RIGHT NOW, THE MEMBERS ARE ALLOWED TO BE APPOINTED FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE TERMS, SO THAT WOULD BE A TOTAL OF SIX YEARS FOR ONE PERSON WHO MIGHT GET APPOINTED THREE CONSECUTIVE TIMES. WHEN THERE ARE POINTED TO PARTIAL TERM THAT DOESN'T COUNT. SO LET'S SAY YOU GET APPOINTED FOR A YEAR OR LESS THAN THAT YOU'D BE ELIGIBLE TO SERVE THREE CONSECUTIVE TIMES AFTER THAT, AND THAT'S THAT'S AT THE COUNCIL'S DISCRETION. WE DON'T WANT MEMBERS TO ASSUME THAT JUST BECAUSE YOU'VE BEEN APPOINTED ONCE THAT YOU WILL BE APPOINTED TO 2ND AND 3RD TIME.

APPOINTMENTS FOR ALTERNATE MEMBERS THAT'S NOT COUNTED AGAINST THEIR MEMBERSHIP, AS THEY DO NOT TYPICALLY SERVED IN A REGULAR MEMBERS CAPACITY. THEY DON'T TAKE ACTION OR BE ENGAGED

[01:40:02]

THE DISCUSSION HAS BEEN POINTED OUT IN TERMS OF WHAT DO WHAT DOES THE COUNCIL WANT TO DO? IN TERMS OF DETERMINING HOW DO WE MOVE FORWARD FROM THERE? SO THAT WILL BE A DISCUSSION POINT THAT WILL CIRCLE BACK TO DISTRICT REPRESENTATION ON THE POLICY DOES STATE THAT THE COUNCIL WILL STRIVE TO IDENTIFY AND APPOINT REPRESENTATION FROM EACH DISTRICT. WE DO WE WANT TO JUST TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT TYPES OF METHODS ARE THERE ANYTHING DIFFERENT OR NEW IN THE PROCESS THAT GOES INTO CONSIDERING DISTRICT REPRESENTATION? AND THAT'S REALLY ASK OF US TO THE COUNCIL TO PROVIDE US DIRECTION OF WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE AS FAR AS POLICY AND OPERATIONS. WITH THE INTERVIEW PROCESS AND COUNCIL LIAISONS. I'LL START WITH. PRIOR TO RECENTLY, THE COUNCIL. SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER THAT BOARD LIAISONS GENERALLY CONDUCTED INTERVIEWS PACIFIC TO PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO SERVE ON THOSE BOARDS . WHEN WE IDENTIFIED THAT THAT WAS NOT ALWAYS EFFICIENT IN THE COUNCIL DIDN'T GENERALLY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE A FULL RANGE OF THE CANDIDATES. SO OVER TIME IN THE LAST SEVERAL CYCLES, WE HAVE GONE TO A FORMAT THAT ALLOWS ALL APPLICANTS TO COME BEFORE THE COUNCIL. I'M OVER A SERIES OF SESSIONS AND THAT SEEMS TO PRODUCE BETTER RESULTS IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU'RE ABLE TO GLEAN FROM UNDERSTANDING ABOUT THE COUNT CANDIDATES PARTICULAR PROCESSES WERE CONDUCTED ME TODAY IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES. SO IN THIS CASE, WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR GUIDANCE ON WHETHER YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE US MOVE TO A FORMAL POLICY THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH HOW WE'RE OPERATING NOW. WITH THAT SOMETHING TO CONSIDER WOULD BE THAT EVEN THOUGH THE HAZAN'S WOULD NOT BE SPECIFICALLY CONDUCTING INTERVIEWS FOR THOSE RESPECTIVE BOARDS, THERE ARE RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES THAT PERTAIN TO LIAISONS OUTSIDE OF THIS, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE MINDFUL OF THOSE THINGS AS WELL. AND THEN WITH THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PREFERENCE NG WE'VE ALL EXPERIENCED THE EXCITEMENT AND HOOPLA OF THE APPOINTMENTS DAY. I THINK MAYOR FULLER HAS KIND OF REFER TO IT AS KIND OF LIKE A DRAFT DAY NFL DRAFT, SO A LOT OF INFORMATION THAT'S FLOATING AROUND. SOMETIMES THERE ARE FACTS AND DATA THAT YOU MIGHT REQUEST THAT WE'RE NOT ABLE TO PRESENT TO YOU ON THE FLY. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CREATE OPPORTUNITIES TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR PREFERENCES ARE AND KIND OF COMPILE INFORMATION THAT SUPPORTS YOUR DISCUSSION ON THOSE MEETING DATES, SO A COUPLE OF RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE HAVE OR TO PROVIDE YOUR PREFERENCES LIST PRIOR TO OUR APPOINTMENT DAY SO WE CAN KIND OF START CATEGORIZING THINGS AND AGAIN PROVIDE DATA THAT MIGHT SUPPORT YOUR DECISION MAKING AND DISCUSSIONS AS WELL AS A POTENTIAL WORK SESSION IS SPECIFIC TO PROCESS REVIEW. IN PREVIEW OF WHAT THAT ACTUAL APPOINTMENT DATE. YES SO THOSE ARE THE RECOMMENDATIONS AGAIN.

WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GO THROUGH THIS KIND OF GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF EVERYTHING AND THEN CIRCLED BACK AND THEN THE FINAL ONE IS JUST TO KIND OF BRING TWO TO YOUR MEMORY THAT WE DO HAVE A DIGITAL HANDBOOK THAT'S AVAILABLE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. IT'S A DATABASE OF INFORMATION THAT IS UPDATED. IN REAL TIME. CURRENTLY WE GENERALLY PROVIDE TO YOU A PAPER DOCUMENT OR ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THAT A LITTLE BIT AFTER THE APPLICATIONS DEADLINE. WHERE WE'RE COMPILING INFORMATION AND TRANSLATING IT INTO SOMETHING THAT'S A LITTLE MORE DIGESTIBLE THAN A READABLE FORM. BUT YOU DO HAVE ACCESS TO A TOOL THAT YOU CAN LOOK AT ANY DAY AND THE INFORMATION IS GOING TO BE AS CONSISTENT AS WHEN IT WAS ENTERED BY ALL OF OUR APPLICANTS , SO WE DO WANT TO OFFER THAT IN TERMS OF PROVIDING EXECUTIVE SESSION TRAINING SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS INFORMATION IN THERE THAT'S OBVIOUSLY NOT ACCESSIBLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR PRIVACY ISSUES, BUT WE'RE NOT. WE DO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU UNDERSTAND HOW TO USE THAT TOOL, BUT WILL ALSO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THE REPORT VERSION OF THAT AS WELL. IF YOU SEE FIT. SO THAT IS BASICALLY THOSE HIGH POINTS IN THE NUTSHELL. SO WHAT I'LL DO IS GO BACK TO THE FIRST ITEM OF DISCUSSION AND TAKE ANY INPUT FROM YOU. IF YOU HAVE ANY GENERAL COMMENTS AT THAT TIME, I'LL TAKE THEM NOW. TAKE HIM NOW. IF YOU HAVE EMPERORS, GREAT JOB, AND FOR PATRICK, WHO HASN'T BEEN IN THIS PROCESS, YET THIS IS COME UP FURTHER BEEN A COUPLE

[01:45:02]

WE'RE GETTING TO THE END OF THAT , SO I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE'S THAT WE'RE YEAH, WE'RE IN 22 OR 17. WE'RE GETTING TO THE END. SO FOR ME, I THINK THERE'S SO MANY THINGS THAT WE DO NEED TO ADDRESS THAT. THAT COULD BE ONE. WE NOT FOR ME, ANYWAY. ANYONE HAVE AN OPPOSING VIEW TO THAT. I WOULD JUST SAY FROM A TERM LIMIT STANDPOINT. UM YOU KNOW, THEY THESE. APPOINTMENTS TEND TO LAG AND THAT ULTIMATELY YOU KNOW, CREATE AN EFFECTIVENESS ON OUR PART, SO IT IT'LL BE THREE YEARS INTO MY TERM BEFORE STATISTICALLY, I WILL HAVE A ROLE IN APPOINTING TOWARDS AND COMMISSION MEMBERS THAT EXCEED MY PREDECESSORS. SO IF YOU'RE IF YOU'RE REPLACING 1/6 OF YOUR ROSTER EVERY YEAR. AND THE PREDECESSOR HAS. FOUR YEARS, AND IT WILL TAKE THREE YEARS INTO MY TERM BEFORE I EQUAL THAT AND SO IT'S JUST I THINK, I THINK IN TERMS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS CREATES A LAGGING EFFECT THAT I THINK IS AND OF COURSE WE CERTAINLY DON'T . THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE THREE TERMS. NO I KNOW. I'M JUST SAYING THAT THE WAY IT WORKS OUT IS STATISTICALLY IF 1/6 TURNS OVER IT. AS WE ILLUSTRATED RIGHT FEW MONTHS AGO. IT WAS NOT AN EASY PROCESS TO REMOVE SOMEBODY , SO IT IS LIKELY THAT SOMEONE STAYS ON FOR THEIR FULL SIX YEARS. BECAUSE THE OTHER THING IS IT CREATES ANIMOSITY TOWARDS THE COUNCIL, LIKE OH, THEY DIDN'T CHOOSE ME A LOT OF TIMES. IT'S NOT THE FACT THAT WHEN THEY WERE FIVE YEARS. THAT COULD HAVE BEEN, YOU KNOW, SIX AND WE DON'T YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IT WAS NOTHING PERSONAL. IT WAS JUST WE'RE TRYING TO GET OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BOARD. AND SO I ACTUALLY WOULD LIKE TO SEE A FOUR YEAR AND I'VE ALWAYS HEARD I'LL YOU KNOW, TAKES YEARS TO KIND OF GET TO KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING AND STUFF LIKE THAT. AND I'M LIKE WE'RE ON HERE FOR FOUR YEARS, AND I'M GOING TO GET REELECTED AGAIN. SO YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT JUST SERVE ON THE COUNCIL FOR FOUR YEARS. AND SO I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM. SAYING THAT A BOARD MEMBER MAXIMUM THEY CAN COUNT. I'D LIKE TO SEE TWO THINGS ON TERM LIMITS. ONE IS UM. FOUR YEARS AND NO MORE THAN TWO BOARDS.

WITHIN A EIGHT YEAR PERIOD TYPE OF THING. YOU KNOW WHERE THEY CAN'T JUST KEEP. YOU KNOW I'M GOING TO DO THIS BOARD NOW. I'M GOING TO GO TO THIS BOARD. WELL, UM YOU KNOW WHAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE A CHILD OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE. I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE GOING BEFORE. I WAS MORE SPECIFICALLY TALKING ABOUT JUST THE SIX YEAR WE'RE AT FIVE YEAR . UM SO I WAS. I WAS JUST REFERRING TO THAT STARTING AT ZERO BECAUSE THERE'S FIVE YEARS AGO, BUT I HAVE NO ISSUE GOING TO A FOUR YEAR TERM WITH THAT SOLVE OR GREATER, WELL, THAT THAT'S EXACTLY SOLD YOUR PROBLEM . I'M A I'M A COUPLE OF MINE WITH ANOTHER PROBLEM, BUT WHEN WE GET INTO TALKING ABOUT

[01:50:01]

[01:55:04]

[02:00:02]

CAUSE IF FOR 2016. 416 16 SORRY , BUT BUT I LOOK AT THE DC AND DC PEOPLE WHO ARE ON THAT ONE ARE OR WHO ACTUALLY GET, YOU KNOW, PUT ON THE BOARD. THOSE GUYS ARE ENGAGED AND THAT'S WHAT WE NEED. WE CAN'T HAVE SOMEBODY WHO SITS BACK AND DOESN'T IS NOT IN THE COMMUNITY ON A REGULAR BASIS TO BE ON THAT PARTICULAR COMMITTEE BECAUSE THAT'S ALSO SOMETHING I NOTICED CDC AS WELL . I MEAN, BOTH BOTH OF THOSE MONEY BOARDS OF YOU. YOU NEED THAT ENGAGEMENT. AND WHEN WE SEE THESE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE ENGAGED IN AND THERE THEY STEP RIGHT IN AND THEY START DOING IT, BUT NOT NOT TO BE ARGUMENTATIVE. BUT I THINK ONE OF THE COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE IT WAS THAT WITH THE D. C. NOT HAVING A MEMBER, THERE'S NOT SOMEBODY FROM THAT DISTRICT, FIGHTING FOR PROJECTS AND WHATNOT IN THAT DISTRICT AND SURPRISED TO SEE THAT DISTRICT ONE HAD THE MOST MONEY INVESTED BY CDC OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS. SO I THINK I THINK THAT NEVER COMES UP IN BDC AT LEAST FOUR TIMES. IT DOESN'T. BUT I WOULD JUST SAY SO. I THINK WE HAVE SOME. WE HAVE ANECDOTAL. DISCUSSION AND THEN WE HAVE EMPIRICAL DATA THAT WOULD SUGGEST SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN THE ANECDOTAL. I MEAN, I THINK THAT THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE SIZE OF DISTRICT ONE. THE PLACEMENT OF DISTRICT ONE IN THE AIRPORT AND IN TERMS OF INVESTMENT FROM THE DC IT WAS THIRD, IT WAS FIRST AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. BUT IT WAS BEHIND TWO AND THREE IN TERMS OF INVESTMENT FROM THE D. C. THEY WERE VERY CLOSE. IT WAS THE 20 MILLION WAS 29 9 MILLION ON INVESTMENT VERSUS THE NEXT WAS 28. I DID NOTICE BY THE WAY DISTRICT FOR RILEY HAVE HAD $1.9 MILLION INVESTED BY THE SEA, WHICH FOR YEARS, SO I JUST WANTED TO TALK ABOUT EVIDENCE AND EMPIRICAL DATA, BUT IT'S IN THE ABC. IT'S NOT JUST NOW. I MEAN, THAT NUMBER THAT I'VE SAID ON THE ABC WAS A 10 YEAR PERIOD . THAT WAS A FOUR YEAR PERIOD.

I'M SAYING THAT THAT THAT DISTRICT ONE HASN'T HAD A REPRESENTATIVE. ON THE ABC FOR 10 YEARS. BY THE WAY, I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT THERE'S NOT A REPRESENT THAT WE SHOULDN'T HAVE A REPRESENT THAT THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M SUGGESTING. I'M JUST POINTING OUT THAT ONE OF THE THOUGHTS AND I AND I HAD A CONCERN ABOUT AND THEN I SAW DATA THAT SAID THAT THAT'S NOT BEEN A FACTOR. NOT THAT IT COULDN'T BE. BUT IT HASN'T BEEN HISTORICALLY BE THRILLED TO HAVE A DISTRICT ONE REPRESENTED DC AND YOU KNOW THE BUT TO THE POINT THAT WAS MADE A MOMENT AGO . YOU KNOW THOSE GUYS IN THAT GAL DO WORK VERY HARD. IT DOES CARVE OUT FROM THE TRADITIONAL 40 HOUR WORK WEEK. TO THE EXTENT THERE'S PEOPLE IN DISTRICT ONE THAT HAVE THE BANDWIDTH AND DESIRE TO DO THAT AND SERVE. I AM ALL EARS AND READY TO GO ON THAT, AND THEY EXIST. AND I WOULD JUST SAY THAT THAT ALL I'M THE ARGUMENT OR THE WHAT I'M TRYING TO CONVEY IS THERE ARE STEPS IN OUR PROCESS. THAT HAVE PRECLUDED THAT FROM, YOU KNOW HAPPENING, AND I WANT TO EVALUATE THOSE STEPS AND THOSE STEPS ARE RECRUITING. THOSE STEPS ARE REPRESENTATIONAL HERE.

THOSE STEPS THERE'S LOTS OF FACTORS IN THAT. BUT HOW DO WE GET TO BETTER OUTCOMES TO WHERE OUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ARE MORE REPRESENTATION OF OUR CITY? AND THAT'S NOT JUST GEOGRAPHICALLY THAT ALSO HAS TO DO WITH YOU KNOW ANY OTHER DEMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT FROM AND I WOULD SUGGEST THAT BEING THAT THEY'RE APPOINTED BY THE COUNCIL THE FIRST STEP IN MAKING PROGRESS AND THAT IS HAVING QUALITY PEOPLE SITTING IN THAT SEAT, AND THAT'S HAPPENED.

THAT'S HAPPENING NOW. BUT I MEAN, LIKE WHEN SOMEBODY ELSE WAS ON POLICY OR PROCESS SHOULD SHOULD BE THE THING THAT MAKES THAT CONSISTENT, REGARDLESS ANGRY AND SO YES, BUT SO TO MAKE HEADWAY ON THIS, UM ARE YOU SUGGESTING A. POLICY CHANGE THAT THAT THAT REQUIRED HAD READ SOME REQUIREMENT AND DISTRICT OR. WE'RE NOT, AND I THINK FOR ME STEPPING INTO THIS POLICY CHANGE THAT GIVES ME MORE INPUT INTO THE TIMES THAT THOSE AREN'T, UH, REPRESENTED IN THOSE IN THOSE AREAS. AND SO WHETHER THAT IS A REQUIREMENT FOR SOMEBODY FROM THAT DISTRICT. WHETHER I MEAN THE THING THAT I CAME UP WITH THAT I MENTIONED WAS THAT WE AS AS COUNCIL MEMBERS. PUT A NOMINATION FORWARD AND THE NOMINATION EXISTS. EVERY YEAR, AND THE COUNCIL VOTES ON IT, BUT ULTIMATELY IT CREATES INPUT ON MY PART INTO EVERY BOARD AND YOU KNOW, THERE'S OTHER IMPACTS TO

[02:05:02]

YOU KNOW FOR ME? I THINK IF WE ADDED THAT INFORMATION, AND WE HAD DISTRICT, UH, INFORMATION ON EACH OF THE APPLICATIONS, AND EACH DISTRICT WAS WAS REALLY INK AND FINDING GOOD CANDIDATES FROM THEIR DISTRICT. I THINK THAT THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM AND I DON'T FEEL THAT WE NEED A POLICY CHANGES AT THE MOMENT. ACQUIRING A DISTRICT BUT. TRANSPARENCY THOUGH OF PUTTING UP AND I'M GOING TO PICK UP MY FRIENDS AT GDC, BUT PUTTING UP WHEN WE HAVE SOMEONE NEW. HERE'S THE GUYS THAT ARE ON THERE NOW. HERE'S THEIR DISTRICT. HERE'S THE CANDIDATES WE HAVE HERE IS THEIR DISTRICT, SO IT PRETTY MUCH ILLUMINATES EVERYTHING IS TO IS TO QUALIFY OR BUT IT DOESN'T MANDATE US TO DO ANYTHING, BUT IT ILLUMINATES IT IS THAT IS THAT FAIR? I MEAN FROM FROM MY STANDPOINT, I WANT BETTER OUTCOMES. AND SO BUT DOESN'T THAT SET US UP FOR A BETTER OUTCOME? POTENTIALLY YEAH . ARE WE COULD WE AGREE THAT WE TRY THAT? BECAUSE AGAIN, HERE'S THE GREAT NEWS. WE CAN COME BACK IN 60 DAYS OR WHENEVER AFTER OUR NEXT THING AND HENRY AND VISIT THIS AGAIN IF WE FIND THAT ALL THIS, YOU KNOW WHAT WE'VE DONE IN THE TRANSPARENCY. THAT WE'VE PUT FORTH IS NOT CREATING THE OUTCOME. WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE THIS DISCUSSION AGAIN. SO COULD WE TRY THAT? WHERE WE WHERE WE HAVE ALL THAT INFORMATION WHO'S ON THE BOARD? WHAT DISTRICT ARE THEY FROM? ALONG WITH OF COURSE TERMS. I'M GOING TO GOING TO CIRCLE BACK IN A MINUTE, TWO TERM LIMIT OF THAT'S FOUR YEARS OR SIX YEARS. UM BECAUSE I THINK EVERYBODY IS SYMPATHETIC TO THAT TOTAL. TOTALLY NOBODY SAYS OH, WE DON'T NEED NO, I THINK I THINK EVERYBODY SYMPATHETIC TO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. SO WE WILL ABSOLUTELY TO ME. I THINK IT WILL BE EASY TO IDENTIFY. WELL I'M NOT. BUT JUST SAY, WELL, IDENTIFY AND MAKE SURE THAT THAT AND THAT INFORMATION UP THERE ON EVERY APPOINTMENT RIGHT THERE. YOU KNOW, IT WOULD BE, I THINK WILL PROBABLY SOLVE THE PROBLEM. MR MAYOR ALONG THOSE LINES. MAYBE JUST SUGGESTING THAT PROCEDURALLY WHEN YOU THE BOARDS COME UP TO YOU. IT'S A QUICK SEQUENCE. YOU. HAVE A PROCEDURE WHERE THE DISTRICT MEMBERS. GET TO ADDRESS. THE COMPOSITION. JUST. BUT THE DISTRICT MEMBERS SAY OKAY, HERE'S OUR LIST. WHO'S WHO. IS ON THE BOARD. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY? DOCTOR FELTUS REGARDING DISTRICT THREE. I KNOW THAT YOU WOULD DO THAT ANYWAY, BUT JUST MAYBE A INPUT AT THE TIME OF SELECTION BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE PREFERENCE HAVE NOMINATIONS, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LIST, HOPEFULLY, A MORE COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF PEOPLE THAT ARE NOMINATED. SO YOU HAVE YOU HAVE STUDIED IT BEFORE THE MEETING, BUT THAT YOU HAVE A PAUSE SO THAT THE MEMBER OF THE DISTRICT MEMBERS COULD AT LEAST EXPRESS HEY, I HAVE TO AND THERE'S NO YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THE CONVERSATION IS JUST JUST A THOUGHT. I HAVE AN OPENING ON THE LIBRARY BOARD. I'VE GOT ONE FROM DISTRICT ONE. BUT WE HAVE A DISTRICT ONE REPRESENTATIVE IN THE LIBRARY PART. IT WAS ONE THAT WE WENT FROM. OR 92 ARE NOW WE HAVE ONLY UNFORTUNATELY GENERAL FIVE THAT WE ADDED. MR AMERICA, GO DISTRICT THREE. I'M GOOD DISTRICT TWO I NEED TO TALK ABOUT IT. DISTRICT ONE. YOU

[02:10:06]

WHAT DISTRICT AND YOU KNOW. ALONG WITH THEIR GOING BACK TO TERMS. WHERE IS EVERYONE SIT ON FOUR AND SIX. I'M I'M GOOD WITH FOUR. IF THAT'S THE CONSENSUS, I THINK FOUR IS THE ANSWER WITH A . YOU KNOW, WE ALWAYS HAVE THE DISCRETION TO GO TO SIX. IF WE FEEL LIKE, YOU KNOW, IT'S LIKE WE DID IN THIS LAST TIME WHERE SOMEONE IS EXPERTISE IS VALUABLE. AND WE'RE APPROACHING SOMETHING LIKE A DOES THAT WORK FOR? EVERYONE WILL GO TO FOUR AGAIN. WE ALWAYS HAVE THE DISCRETION. THIS IS JUST A POLICY. OKAY SO WHERE DOES THAT BEGIN? SO ANYBODY WITH THAT HAS FOUR GOING FORWARD? WELL, SO THESE YOU KNOW, GOING FORWARD FROM HERE ON OUT? ARE WE GOING TO JUST LOOK AT FOR YOU? THAT'S AN IMPLEMENTATION. YOU ALL SAY THIS. I'M GOING THE OTHER WAY AGAIN. I THINK THIS IS A SOLUTION. SEARCH FOR PROBLEM ON THE BOARDS. I'VE SERVED ON THOSE. THOSE THAT ARE THEIR 5TH AND 6TH YEAR DO A LOT OF HEAVY LIFTING AND I'M AWFULLY GRATEFUL FOR THEM AND I WANT THE CITY TO HAVE THE BEST POSSIBLE PEOPLE. SO I DON'T SEE ANY REASON TO RESTRICT COUNCIL ON THIS AT ALL. YOU MEAN THE FIRST TERMS CORRECT. SO WHAT ARE THE PEOPLE EXPECT? PEOPLE EXPECT THAT IF YOU'RE DOING A GOOD JOB, YOU'RE GOING TO STAY FOR SIX BECAUSE I'M IN IT FOR IT'S BEST FOR THE CITY MCKINNEY. I'M NOT. SO WHAT IS SIX? WHY NOT EIGHT. SIX IS WHERE WE ARE. I CAN LIVE WITH THAT. I'M NOT GOING TO MAKE A CASE FOR CHANGING IT. THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. LIKE I UNDERSTAND YOU ARE MAKING A CASE FOR CHANGING IT AND AUSPICIOUSLY THAT'S IN FAIRNESS TO THE POPULATION TO GIVE EVERYBODY A CHANCE. I'M LESS CONCERNED WITH GIVING EVERYBODY A CHANCE THAT I AM HAVING THE PROPER WORK DONE ON THE CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. THAT CAN'T BE DONE WITH NEW MEMBERS. I THINK THAT THERE IS SOMETHING AND THIS IS NOT EASY TO DO, BUT I THINK I DON'T DISAGREE WITH YOU. IN TERMS OF EXPERIENCE AND LONGEVITY AND TENURE THAT HAS REACHED I ALSO WOULD SAY THAT THE NEW MEMBERS HAVE A HARD TIME GETTING RENT RAMPED UP AND THE ONE MONTH OVERLAP THAT WE CREATE IN THIS, I THINK IS A. HAVE TO THROW SOMEBODY INTO YOU KNOW YOU GET APPOINTED. YOU SHOW UP NEXT MONTH AND HIT THE GROUND RUNNING AND THAT THERE COULD BE YOU KNOW , SOME SORT OF, UH, MENTORSHIP OR SOMETHING FOR THOSE ROLLING OFF THE BOARD TO HELP THOSE THAT ARE COMING ON THE BOARD, SO THAT EXPERTISE DOESN'T LEAVE THAT

[02:15:04]

222 YEAR TERMS LESS FOR MAKING AN EXCEPTION, WHICH THEN SOUNDS LIKE WE HAVE TO DEFEND OURSELVES. I GET THAT THERE MAY BE A CONSENSUS TO GO FOR 22 YEAR TERMS. IT'S JUST NOT RESONATING WITHIN YOUR DEFENDING YOURSELF. WHEN YOU LET SOMEBODY GO, WHO HAD HIS END OF FOUR AND NOW NOW THEY'RE UPSET. THEY COULD BE UPSET BECAUSE THERE'S BUT THERE'S A REASON COUNCIL. LET HIM GO. THERE'S A REASON COUNCIL DIDN'T RENEW FOR FIFTH AND SIX YEARS ON THE DEAL. THEY THAT THAT REASON IS THAT THERE IS A CANDIDATE WHO WE THOUGHT WAS BETTER TO SERVE THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. GOOD LUCK WITH THAT. GOOD LUCK WITH EXPLAINING THAT TO THE CANDIDATE. SOUNDS REALLY EASY. I'M NOT SAYING I'M NOT SAYING THERE'S AN INSTANCE WHERE EVER DO IT. I'M JUST SAYING THAT THAT THE COUNTER IS WE DO 22 YEAR TERMS UNLESS WE FEEL DIFFERENTLY. THEN WE'LL GIVE YOU THIRD YEAR. WELL, WHITE OR THIRD TERM THAT WHY THIS GUY GET A THIRD TERM? WELL, THAT'S A BOARD THAT WE THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT WERE DEFENDING IT EITHER WAY, IF WE DO THAT I'M SOLELY INTERESTED IN THE BENEFIT FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY WITH THE BEST PEOPLE MOVING FORWARD, AND, UM TO ME.

THE CURRENT STRATEGY WORKS BEST . BUT YOUR THIS IS THE THING IS THAT YOU HAVE GOOD PEOPLE ALWAYS IN THERE. I MEAN, THAT'S THE THING AND THEY COULD STAY THERE FOR EIGHT YEARS. THEY BUT AS AS COUNCILMAN, BELLER SAID, IS THAT HALF OF THESE GUYS IF THEY'RE GOING FOR SIX, THEIR LAST THEIR OUTLASTING SOME OF THE COUNCIL AND SO THE COUNCIL'S NEVER REALLY HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO BECAUSE EVERYBODY KEEPS THINKING WHILE YOU KNOW HE'S UP FOR RENEWAL, AND IT'S AND YOU SAY, OH, IT'S WE'RE GOING TO CHOOSE THE BEST KNOW TYPICALLY. IT JUST THEY GET REAPPOINTED. WHY BECAUSE THEY'RE THEY'RE GHAZI. EITHER WAY, IT'S AGAIN. IT'S JUST A POLICY. SO YOU GUYS WANT TO DO WE CAN. WE CAN MAKE AN EXCEPTION. SAY THIS PERSON IS INVALUABLE. WE NEED TO KEEP MOM FOR ANOTHER. TURN OR ONE YEAR OR OR ANOTHER FULL TERM OR TWO YEARS, OR IF IT'S THE OTHER WAY, AND THEY'RE NOT DOING THE JOB. WE THINK THERE'S SOMEBODY BETTER WE CAN SAY NOT GOING TO BE DOING IT TO YOU. SO REALLY, WE HAVE THE WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO WHAT EVERYONE APPEAR DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS WANT SO JUST WHICH WAY? WHAT DO WE WANT TO SET AS THE POLICY AND THEN GO FROM THERE, SO I JUST I LIKE NUMBERS , LIKE LOOKING AT NUMBERS AND SEEING OUTCOMES, BUT THIS COUNCIL. OUTSIDE OF PATRICK, WITH FREDERICK HERE, THIS COUNCIL AS IT'S MADE UP HAS ABOUT THE SAME NUMBER OF APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AS THE COUNCIL THAT EXISTED WITH LOCK MILLER AND DAY AND EVERY OTHER RECORD. THE RAINY WAS THE ONLY ONE HERE.

IT'S ABOUT, EVEN WHEN YOU LOOK AT OUR TOTAL NUMBER OF APPOINTMENTS. THAT COUNCIL HAS ABOUT THE SAME NUMBER AS THIS COUNCIL HAS AND INITIAL APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND THAT'S WHAT I MEAN BY LAGGING. IMPACT OKAY, EVERYONE GET BEHIND THEM FOUR YEAR TERM, KNOWING

[02:20:07]

YOU GUYS GOOD WITH FOUR. I'M RATHER NONCOMMITTAL THIS EVENING , RIGHT? BUT I WOULD BE FINE WITH FOUR. OKAY. THERE YOU GO. YOU HAVE THE MAJORITY. MOVE ON. LET'S JUST LET'S MOVE. LET'S MOVE TO THE NEXT ITEM. SO FOUR YEAR NOT TO NOT TO DIGRESS. IS IT STARTING FROM NOW? LIKE A COMMENT? EMPERORS I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THE TREMENDOUS JOB YOU DO KEEP THEM UP WITH ALL THESE PORTION COMMISSIONS THAT WE CAN'T KEEP UP WITH IS DETERMINED ISJUST OB THAT YOU DO . THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOU DO DO A WONDERFUL JOB. THANK YOU. WANT TO LET IN A LITTLE SECRET. IT'S HARD TO KEEP UP WITH Y'ALL AND KEEPING UP. OKAY SO WE ARE NUMBER ONE, AND I WAS GOING TO GO TO YOUR TERMS AGAIN. JUST A POLICY. OKAY WE'RE FINE WITH THAT, RIGHT. SOMEONE'S PARTIAL TERM THE STILL HAVE TO FOLK TERMS AVAILABLE TO THEM APPOINTMENTS TO ALTER MEMBERSHIP OR NOT COUNT TOWARD THAT. WE ALL AGREE TO THAT, RIGHT? ANYONE POSTED THAT. AND THEN TURN POLICY UPDATE. 2017 IT'S A MOOT POINT. REALLY NOW BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO FORD SOME MOOT POINT.

GO TO PAGE TWO, OKAY? AND WE DID TACKLE A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WELL, QUITE A BIT ABOUT DISTRICT REPRESENTATION. I THINK THE SECOND SENTENCE IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THAT DATA THAT DATA WILL BE MORE VISIBLE. AND IT WILL BE ON THE FOREFRONT OF OUR MINDS FOR FRONT OF THE CITY'S MINDS THAT ARE WATCHING AND WHATNOT, AND WE'LL START THERE AND WE CAN ALWAYS REVISIT IF WE FEEL WE'RE NOT ACHIEVING WHAT WE NEED TO ACHIEVE. AND THEN WITH THE INTERVIEW PROCESS AGAIN THE STAFF WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO JUST IMPLEMENT THE PRACTICE THAT WE ALREADY HAVE. AND JUST SO I DON'T FORGET. I WOULD LIKE AND THERE'S CONSENSUS ON THIS. JUST THAT YOU CAN PROVIDE US A WORKSHEET, WOULD YOU HOW MUCH EFFORT WOULD IT BE TO GIVE US THE MAKEUP OF ALL OUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS? WHEN I SAY MAKEUP? I'M LOOKING TO CONTRAST THAT WITH THE MAKEUP OF OUR COMMUNITY. IN TERMS OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATION, DISTRICT REPRESENTATION, RACE, GENDER EVERYTHING. ABSOLUTELY NOW WITH THAT BEING SAID, THOSE ETHNICITY ALL THE DEMOGRAPHICS ARE NOT. ELEMENTS THAT WE ASK FOR. SO LISTEN, SO WE DON'T HAVE DATA. WE DON'T HAVE THEM HERE.

YOU KNOW, HE HAS 10 YEARS BACK, SO JUST USE GOT IT. THERE'S A COUPLE. I'M NOT SURE ABOUT. BUT I'VE GOT A GENERAL BECAUSE I THINK I THINK IT'S ALL OF OUR GOAL WE WANT. WE WANT THE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TO REPRESENT THE COMMUNITY. SO I THINK TO HAVE THAT INFORMATION HELPS US, YOU KNOW, TO MAKE SURE WE'RE MAKING THE RIGHT WE HAVE THE GUIDANCE IN THOSE DECISIONS, BUT WE DON'T HAVE THINGS LIKE GENDER, ETHNICITY RACE. WE CAN PUT THAT WE CAN'T PUT THAT AS AN OPTIONAL SELF REPORTED PIECE OF DATA. OKAY SO JUST JUST SO WE HAVE IT, SO WE THINK IT'S ALL OF OUR GOAL. TO HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE REPRESENTATION OF THE COMMUNITY. UM. THAT WILL THAT WILL HELP KEEP US ACCOUNTABLE TO THAT GOAL. WHAT IS WHAT'S UP HERE? UPDATE INTERVIEW FORMAT FROM LIAISON TEAMS TO CANCEL PANEL. WHAT DO WE THINK ABOUT THAT? FROM FROM FROM Y'ALL'S INPUT. IT'S BEEN A VERY POSITIVE PROCESS WHERE YOU HAVE ACCESS TO MORE INFORMATION. SO AGAIN, THERE'S NOT REALLY MUCH CONTROVERSIAL HERE EXCEPT YOU UPDATE THE LANGUAGE OF THE POLICY AS IT'S WRITTEN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT YOU'RE DOING NOW. SO YOU SEE WHAT YOU KNOW. AT ONE POINT IT WAS LIAISONS, MET AND INTERVIEWED FOR THOSE BOARDS. THEN WE CHANGED IT TO COUNSEL. INTERVIEWING IS EVERYONE COMFORTABLE STAYING WITH THAT? I LIKE THE COUNCIL BECAUSE IT LETS EVERYBODY MEET THE CANDIDATES. SO WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THEM, THEY KNOW WHO YOU'RE ESPECIALLY. IT'LL BECOME IMPORTANT. I THINK THIS ONE WILL PROBABLY BE THE MOST CHANGES. WE ARE, SO WE REALLY NEED TO KNOW. PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT, SO I THINK THAT THEY WERE FINED ON THE NEXT ITEM, RIGHT? NOTHING IN TERMS OF PREFACE NG METHODS. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO DIFFERENTLY? YOUR WORK SESSION SUGGESTION, I THINK IS REALLY, REALLY GOOD. THAT WOULD DEFINITELY BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO KIND OF THAT'S WHERE WE WOULD HASH OUT ALL THOSE THINGS WHEN WHAT DOES THE MAKEUP OF THOSE BOARDS WHEREAS THE DISTRICT MAKEUP OF THOSE BOARDS? WHAT IS THAT? YEAH. EVERY MAKEUP OF THE BOARD. IS THAT IS THAT SATISFY? EVERYONE WILL GO DOWN THIS ROAD AND SEE HOW IT WORKS AND THEN RECOMMENDATIONS. SORRY. PROVIDED THAT'S THAT'S GOOD. YEAH, CONSISTENT WITH THE WORK SESSION AS WELL. WHAT YOU PROVIDE US WHAT YOU HAVE PROVIDED US IN THE IN THE TERM OF JUST ONE SHEET WITH EVERYBODY'S NAME ON IT. AND THEN BACK WHERE THERE'S JUST THAT TWO PAGE. THAT'S GREAT.

THAT'S PERFECT. THAT'S THAT'S REALLY GOOD AND IT'S EASY TO MAKE NOTES. IT'S REALLY EASY TO

[02:25:03]

INPUT FROM DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS. REMEMBER THE GIRL WHO CAME AND TALKED ABOUT YOUTH CITY COUNCIL BUT HAVING SOME SORT OF GROUPS THAT WOULD EITHER ASSIST WITH SOME OF THESE BOARDS LIKE MHM.

YOUTH COUNCIL THAT WOULD LOOK AT KIND OF THE SERVICES THAT THEY END UP GETTING WHETHER IT'S PART OF THE PARKS BOARD OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND THEN ALSO A SENIORS ADVISORY BOARD THAT LOOKS AT DIFFERENT THINGS FROM PERSPECTIVES THAT WE MAY NOT GET. ULTIMATELY IN THIS PROCESS.

I THINK THOSE WOULD BE INTERESTING THINGS TO LOOK AT TO ENSURE THAT IS DECISION MAKING BODIES HAVE THE INPUT THEY NEED FROM THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF OUR CITY. RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. UM, I'M GOING TO HOPE THAT I CAN SKIP COUNCIL LIAISON UPDATES RIGHT NOW AS WE ARE RUNNING VERY LATE. THAT WORK FOR EVERYONE AND WHAT GOES TO THIS SESSION? BUT I DO WANT TO SAY GUN. HEY FAT CHOY, WHICH IS HAPPY NEW YEAR IN CHINESE. I BELIEVE HE'S NOT HERE. HE'S NOT HERE TO RECEIVE THAT, OR I'M NOT SHAKING HER HEAD SAYING THAT WASN'T EVEN CLOSE WITH. I THINK

[EXECUTIVE SESSION]

CITY. MCKINNEY VERSUS ALLEGIANCE BENEFIT PLAN MANAGEMENT THANK YOU AND CIVIL ACTION FILE NUMBER 4 TO 1 CV 00271 LM EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AND 55187 DELIBERATIONS REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MATTERS. PROJECT DLV PR EXACTLY. MOTION TO ADJOURN. SO MOVING SECOND ON FAVOR, ALL R

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.