[CONSENT ITEMS]
[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary-Final Plat for Goodman Ranch Addition, Located Approximately 1650 Feet North of FM-1461 and Approximately 1 Mile West of County Road 166]
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for a Personal Service Use (Authentic Thai Massage Therapy), Located at 8751 Collin McKinney Parkway, Suite 203]
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards and to Allow for a Telecommunications Tower, Located 3109 South Custer Road]
[00:18:54]
MEETINGS WITH THOSE THOSE FOLKS, AND THIS IS THE END RESULT OF THEIR APPROVAL. WHAT THEY WANTED
[00:19:00]
US TO DO. COMMISSIONERS IS LOOK AT I THINK I SPELLED IT RIGHT ARCADIA STRUCTURE OVER THERE AND[00:19:07]
KIND OF EMULATE THAT SO AGAIN. I'M GOING TO BRING THIS UP IN A LITTLE BIT. WE'LL GET BACK TO[00:19:13]
THAT. I WANTED YOU TO SEE WHERE VERIZON IS. THE SEARCH RING IS IN THE CENTER CIRCLE. THE NEW SITE IS A RED RED THUMBTACK, BUT IT IS NOT APPROXIMATE. I MEAN, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT HEIGHT AND WHERE YOU'RE SERVING. WE'RE ON MULTIPLE WATER TOWERS WERE ON THE TAP WATER TOWER AT THE PARK TO OUR EAST. WATER TOWER AND FRISCO TO OUR NORTHWEST. WATER TOWER TOUR NORTH. WE'RE A COAL OVER THEIR WAY OFF DOWN ON THE BOTTOM. AH SO YOU CAN SEE ONE I THINK ON VIRGINIA PARKWAY.THAT'S THE VERIZON CHURCH TOWER THAT YOU'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH. UM I JUST LOOKED AT THAT AGAIN TODAY. CLOSE UP OF THE RING. THERE'S A CANDIDATE SEARCH STUDY IN YOUR BACKUP. UH BACK UP
[00:20:01]
CANADA SEARCH RING STUDYING YOUR BACKUP, BUT YOU CAN SEE THE CENTER OF THE RING IS AT KROGER CENTER WHERE WE REALLY WOULD HAVE LIKED TO GO ON. THEY DON'T. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY SPACE FOR US. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO LET US TAKE UP ABOUT TENS PARKING SPACES IN THERE, SO THEY DENIED US THE SAME THING. WITH THE RETAIL CENTER BELOW US. THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY SPACE. PLUS, WE WOULDN'T MEET THE SETBACKS FROM RESIDENTIAL THERE'S A SITE PLAN. THAT EXISTING RETAILS IN FRONT OF US NOW. AND THE OWNERS PROPOSED MEDICAL CENTER IS I THINK IT'S GOING THROUGH SITE PLAN REVIEW RIGHT THERE SO YOU CAN SEE WHERE WE ARE STUCK RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT IN THE FLOODPLAIN. NOT THE PARTICULAR GREAT LOCATION, BUT WE HAVE TO DO WHAT WE HAVE TO DO. OKAY THIS IS WHAT I WAS REFERRING TO IN YOUR BACKUP INFORMATION. YOU HAVE A THOROUGH CANDIDATE SEARCH STUDY THAT GOES THROUGH ALL THESE, SO I DON'T REALLY NEED TO DO THAT.OBVIOUSLY, RESIDENTIAL IS OFF LIMITS. HB PURCHASE THAT PARCEL TO OUR NORTH. THEY HAVE SEEN MY LONG HISTORY IN THIS AND NEVER SIGNED A WIRELESS LEASE. UM AND THEN THE GLOBAL LIFE WAS WAS NOT CONSIDERING IT AT ALL. HERE'S THE SURGEON. I'M SORRY THEY ARE F PROPAGATION MAPS AND THE COVERAGE IS SHOWN AND BEST INDOOR COVERAGE THAT EXISTING COVERAGE. THAT'S A SITE SHOWN.
GREEN IS GOOD, BEST INDOOR COVERAGE. THAT'S BEFORE. AND THAT'S AFTER SO IT REALLY HITS THE TARGET. WELL EVEN THOUGH WE'RE ON THE BACKSIDE OF THAT SEARCH RING, JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS ON THE REGULATIONS. WE COMPLY WITH THE ZONING CODE. WE ONLY HAVE WERE 321 WERE LOCATED.
AGAIN. WE MET WITH THE STONE BRIDGE, FOLKS. WE ONLY HAVE ONE LITTLE ISSUE AND THAT THAT'S THAT SET BACK FROM THE FLAG LOT . THEY TOOK THAT 10 ACRE COMMERCIAL AND KIND OF CUT.
CARVED OUT. THIS PIECE IS SO WE'RE NOT 100 FT HERSELF FROM THAT FRONT SETBACK, BUT THAT'S A TECHNICALITY. OH, THE PHONES. THEY'RE DRIVING THE INFRASTRUCTURE CRAZY, SO I MEAN , WE'RE RUNNING MULTIPLE APPS. YOU GUYS KNOW WHAT YOU'RE RUNNING. I KNOW WHAT I'M RUNNING, SO IT'S REALLY TAKEN UP A LOT OF TRAFFIC IN OUR F POWER ON EACH SIDE. I WAS OUT THERE EARLIER TODAY. AND I AM GETTING ONE BAR OUTSIDE. SO AND I'M A VERIZON CUSTOMER. LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS REAL QUICK. WE HAVE WE DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN BUILD THIS. IT'S THE DETAIL THAT THE STONEBRIDGE RANCH PEOPLE GOT US INTO HIS. WAY OVER OVERBOARD. I NOTICED THAT THERE WAS A COMMENT FROM CAITLYN AND STAFF ABOUT MAYBE WE CAN DUMB THIS DOWN A LITTLE BIT. IT'S TOO OBVIOUS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. WHAT I PUT IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY WAS AN EXAMPLE OF A JUST A STANDARD.
JUST STEALTH BELL TOWER FOR A CHURCH IN AUSTIN, ST MICHAEL'S, AND ALSO A GOOD EXAMPLE OF WHAT WE COULD DO WOULD BE THAT CROWN SIDE AT TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH THERE ON VIRGINIA PARKWAY. WE WOULD HAVE TO AND I KNOW IT'S I DON'T KNOW WHO TRUMP'S WHO I KNOW YOU GUYS CAN'T GET INTO THEIR HOU ASSOCIATION AND THEIR DESIGN CRITERIA, BUT I'M PRETTY SURE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GO BACK TO THEM. SEE IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT'S MORE AFFORDABLE THAT WE CAN DESIGN, BUT I HAVE TO PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION TO YOU. SO THAT YOU CAN SEE WHAT THEY APPROVED. UM YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME AND BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM? I KNOW YOU'VE GONE THROUGH THIS A FEW TIMES BEFORE IN THE LAST FEW YEARS, BUT MM. WE DESPERATELY NEED TO COVERAGE OVER THERE AND APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. I GUESS MY QUESTION WOULD BE. WHY DID YOU PRESENT THIS SYSTEM REGION THIS CONFIGURATION AND THEN SHOW UP HERE SAYING THAT YOU UNOBTAINABLE TO BUILD IT THAT WAY. WE WENT THROUGH A VERY GOOD QUESTION. COMMISSIONER. WE WENT THROUGH FOUR MEETINGS OF STARTING WITH THE STANDARD.
MONACO THEN WENT TO A FLAGPOLE THEN WENT TO A VERY BASIC DESIGN, WHICH YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU. AND THEY KEPT POINTING TO THEIR DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL EVEN THOUGH THE VIRGINIA PARKWAY SITE IS ALSO IN THEIR IN THEIR JURISDICTION, SO WE HAD TO KEEP MOVING FORWARD TO GET THAT HURDLE AWAY. TO GET HERE AND THEN THE CONCERN WITH THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM IS I DON'T KNOW WHICH IS GOING TO COST. SO I'M JUST PLANNING THAT SEED WITH, YOU KNOW. WE WEREN'T CONTROLLING THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. THEY WERE. QUICK QUESTION FOR STAFF. BECAUSE. WE APPROVING, AND THIS IS LIKE THAT SHOULD BE TECHNICALLY, BUT WE APPROVING ALSO THE ELEVATION AS PART OF THIS PACKAGE RIGHT NOW. NO SO THE ZONING REQUESTS BEFORE YOU IS FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER USE ANY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCREENING BRILLIANCE. KEEPING IN THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. UM SO WITH APPLICANTS, CONVERSATION OF SOME BRIDGE AND THEIR REQUIREMENTS, I
[00:25:02]
BELIEVE THE CITY IS NOT ABLE TO OVERRIDE THEM IF YOU WILL, BASED ON THEIR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, BUT IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO GO BACK TO SWIM BRIDGE AND PROPOSE AN ALTERNATE ELEVATION, AND THEY CAN CERTAINLY DO SO. MM AND EVEN IF IT WAS A 55 POOR, MULTIPLE DESIGN THAT ITS STAFF IS MORE FAVORABLE OF THAT JUST BECAUSE IT'S A LITTLE BIT LESS NOTICEABLE IN THE DISTANCE. NATURAL. OKAY, THANK YOU. DURING THE BIG QUESTION. VERY QUESTION YOU OFF AND COME BACK UP THE QUESTIONS. YEAH, WE'RE THINKING IF WE COULD JUST ON THAT RENDERING, TAKE OFF THAT STONE ELEMENT AND MAKE IT ALL ONE EVEN KEEP THE WINDOWS AND STUFF LIKE THAT. MAYBE EVEN WORK BETTER AND BE LESS EXPENSIVE, BUT OR MAYBE LESS EXPENSIVE, BUT FROM A VISUAL PERSPECTIVE AND LOOKING AT YOUR, UM, MOCK UPS. IT STANDS OUT VERY. OBVIOUS I MEAN, IT IS EXTREMELY OBVIOUS HOW FAR THAT STANDS OUT. IT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS THAT I NOTICED IN REVIEWING THE PACKAGE. IF YOU TAKE IT TO JUST STRAIGHT STONE EITHER GET PERHAPS IT'S GOING TO LOOK EVEN MORE. STANDING OUT THROUGH. DO YOU HAVE THE GOOD? THE GOOD THING IS THAT MOST OF THOSE BUILDINGS ARE IN THE WAY THE TREES ARE IN THE WAY YOU'RE GOING TO HIDE ABOUT ONE THIRD OF IT, SO I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY. THE BOTTOM SECTION IS REALLY CONCERNED. BUT THERE WAS THERE.CONCERN AND WE HAD TO GO THROUGH THE MOTIONS. SO IF WE APPROVE THIS ITEM FOR YOU, AND YOU GO BACK TO THE WAY AND THEY'RE NOT OPEN TO ANY KIND OF NEGOTIATION TO ALLOW YOU TO CHANGE UP. THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN. WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE YOU? WE HAVE TO. WELL, IF YOU APPROVE THIS, I THINK I'M THINKING LIKE THE CITY PLANNER. NOW YOU PROVE THIS. YOU'RE APPROVING THE ACTUAL.
CELL TOWER, NOT THE ELEVATION. SO IT GOES, GOES WITHOUT SAYING THAT IF YOU RECOMMENDATION OR EVEN COUNCIL, WE GO TO COUNCIL. THEY SAY WE RECOMMEND YOU DOWNPLAY THIS A LITTLE BIT, SO IT'S NO NOT OBVIOUS THEN. WE HAVE TO GO BACK AND FORTH TO STONEBRIDGE AND SAY, OKAY, LOOK , LET'S TRY TO WORK THIS THING OUT. I THINK THEY'RE ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THEY WERE VERY EXCITED ABOUT HAVING BETTER COVERAGE IN THIS AREA. RIGHT. UM, WE JUST HAD TO GET THROUGH. FOR MEETINGS WITH THEIR THEIR BOARD AND THEIR ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMUNITY TO GET HERE. SO I'D LIKE TO GO BACK TO THEM AND SEE IF WE CAN WORK SOMETHING OUT. JUST ANOTHER QUICK QUESTION FOR STAFF.
BECAUSE READING IN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. 12. MENTIONED STEALTH. SO IF THEY COME BACK, AND THEY'RE ABLE TO GET APPROVED MONO POLE WITHOUT US STRUCTURE, DO WE THAT OKAY, BECAUSE IT READS TARA PAUL AND THE WORD STUFF BEING IN THERE THAT WOULD THAT WOULD CONFORM TO THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS PROPOSED. SO AGAIN. THE PROPOSAL TONIGHT IS FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER. WHAT'S WRAPPING THE TOWER? IF YOU WILL, IS THE CONVERSATION WITH THE STONEBRIDGE REVIEW COMMITTEE. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN.
THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING OUT OF IF YOU COME IN ON OVER LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED ISSUE P FOR A CELL TOWER. LEAST COME TO THE PODIUM. MOTION CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING THE MOTION MEMBERS TO MEN'S AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND ROUND, MR DOCKING DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR ABOUT. MODI. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED MEMBERS QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT WAR OF STAFF. PROMOTIONS. I MEAN, IT'S. THERE'S NO DOUBT WE'RE ALL RELIABLE, RELYING ON CELL PHONES AND MORE DATA USE AND EVERYTHING THAT WE DO AND THEY'VE GOT EXISTED PLACES AND USUALLY WE RUN INTO THE ISSUE WITH HIM A BUDDING RESIDENTIAL AND THIS IS ABOUT AS FAR AS WE HAVE SEEN ONE AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL AS FAR AS IT INCOME BY DRIVING DOWN CUSTER . I THINK ACTUALLY BUILDING THE TOWER PROBABLY CATCHES MORE ATTENTION INSTEAD OF JUST PLAYING POLE, AND WE'VE ALREADY GOT UTILITY POLES, AND THE OTHER THING IS, YOU JUST SIMPLY CAN'T HIDE EVERY UTILITY OUT THERE AND WERE HIGHLY DEPENDABLE ON THEM. SO I'M SUPPORTIVE OF IT. I APPRECIATE THE APPLICANT SAYING THAT THERE POTENTIALLY STILL WORKING WITH STONE RIDGE AND THEIR HOU AND THEIR STANDARDS ON IT, BUT IT'S NEEDED AND IT'S FURTHER AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL AND UHH ABOUT IT. LOCATION AS WE
[00:30:01]
CAN HAVE WITHOUT RESIDENTIAL CONCERNS. WELL PUT MR MEN'S I OUTPUT. OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. MR TAYLOR. YOU HAVE ANYTHING? I'M IN SUPPORT OF IT. VERY GOOD. OCEANS. MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE THE ITEM. WELL, LET ME MENTION WHERE THERE'S A SPECIAL ORDINANCE PROVISIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT MOTION AND MR DOE TO APPROVE THE ANIMUS FIRST STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING SPECIAL ORDINANCE PROVISIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, SO I CAN BUY MR KIRKENDALL. REALLY SLOW TONIGHT. I AM JUST LIKE MAD TO DRINK HIS OWN GAME BEFORE I COME. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE ATOM. ANY DISCUSSION PLEASE CAST YOUR ABOUT ABOUT THAT. THIS MOTION CARRIES SEVEN IN FAVOR OF ZERO AGAINST IT WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 5TH 2022 MEETING. IT'S THEREFORE THE 5TH 2022 THE NEXT ITEM. WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC.TWO. COME TO THE PODIUM FOR ANY ITEM THAT IS NOT ONARAN AGENDA TONIGHT. HERE TONIGHT, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS OR CONCERNS. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT SAYING THAT NEXT TIME WILL BE A CHANCE FOR MISS ARNOLD TO WEIGH IN ON HER THOUGHTS OF THE DAY. IT'S TOO
[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]
COLD OUTSIDE FOR MARCH, BUT THAT'S ALL I'VE GOT. MEMBERS, ANYTHING. STEPH THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CAITLIN. I THINK WE'RE GOOD. DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MAKE A MOTION. WE ADJOURNED. MR WOODRUFF MOTION COULD SECOND BY MR WHITLEY'S OR ANY DISCUSSION. WAS IN FAVOR OF RAISE YOUR HAND. THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. IT IS 6 34, AND WE ARE ADJOURNE* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.