[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:03]
ST T ORDER OF BUSINESS IS PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS DO NOT
[DISCUSS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS for the City Council Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. ]
SHOW ANY SPEAKERS SIGNED UP. WE'LL MOVE ON TO DISCUSSING THE REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS. IF THERE IS ANY ITEM THAT COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS WITH STAFF PRIOR TO THE MEETING TONIGHT.THAT WOULD BE THE TIME TO DO SO. HONORABLE NUMBER 22 345 THAT'S DEALING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING SIMULATOR. AND I WOULD MOVE THAT THAT GETS APPROVED LATER SUBJECT TO THE COUNCIL GETTING TO GIVE THAT A TRY OUT IF WE, IN FACT OBTAINED THE GRANT TO GET THAT PROGRAM SWAN. MAKE SURE WE DO THAT OF THAT. EXACTLY IT DOESN'T HURT TO ASK. WE WOULD CERTAINLY , COUNCILMAN BE HAPPY TO HAVE YOU COME OUT AND TRY IT OUT. ONCE WE GET IT, IT'S BECAUSE YOU CAN ACTUALLY ENTER IN AS PARTNERS IN THIS AND GO INTO SCENARIO. YOU CAN SEE EACH OTHER IN THE TRAINING. AND YEAH, SO WE ALSO WITH IT WILL PROBABLY RUN OUR TASER RE QUALIFICATION. SO TRY THAT OUT TO WE COULD DO THAT AS WELL. SUPPORT OH, NO. SHOOT, CHARLIE. WE'RE IN WANT TO BE IN TO GO. CRASH TEST DUMMY. ALL RIGHT. WE WILL THEN MOVE TO HOLD ON. MOVED TO PROCLAMATION. UM
[Proclamation for Administrative Professionals Day & Week]
INFORMATION SHARING 22034 A PROCLAMATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS DAY AND WEEK.HERE. WHO IS GOING TO COME UP. EVERYBODY SHOULD COME UP AND ALL OF THEM. WE WERE WONDERING WHO THAT GROUP OF LADIES WERE SO. AND WE THOUGHT YOU WERE ALL HERE JUST BECAUSE YOU REALLY ENGAGED IN WHAT WE'RE DOING. EXACTLY RIGHT. SEXIST. CYNTHIA MCKINNEY PROCLAMATION, WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS WEEK AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS DAY HAVE BEEN RECOGNIZED ANNUALLY SINCE THE POST WORLD WAR, TWO ERA BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS IN THE UNITED STATES. SECRETARY OF COMMERCE WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS OR THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS FOR SUPPORTING AN OFFICE ENVIRONMENT AND FOR FURTHER IN THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANY GIVEN PROFESSION. WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE WORK INCLUDES A WIDE VARIETY OF DUTIES, INCLUDING OFFICE MANAGEMENT, RECEPTION SERVICES AND CLIENT ENGAGEMENT, CLERICAL WORK AND RECORDS, MAINTENANCE AND DIFFERENT JOB TITLES AT ALL LEVELS OF AN ORGANIZATION. ME FALL UNDER THE CATEGORY OR INCORPORATE SIGNIFICANT ELEMENTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALISM WITHIN THEIR ROLES. WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS CONTRIBUTE TO TEAM ORIENTED WORK ENVIRONMENTS AND ARE NATURAL FRONTLINE AMBASSADORS PROUDLY ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR EFFORTS IN SUPPORTING THE CITY OF MCKINNEY ORGANIZATIONAL VISION, VALUES AND GOALS AND PROVIDING EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE TO OUR RESIDENTS. NOW THEREFORE, I GEORGE FULLER, BY THE POWER VESTED IN ME AS THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS WEEK BEING APRIL 25TH THROUGH 29TH 2022. AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS. DAY APRIL 27TH 2022. IN MCKINNEY , TEXAS, WITNESSED MY HAND AND SEAL THIS DAY OF APRIL 19TH 2022 SO LET IT BE PROCLAIMED. YOU'RE THE I THINK YOU'RE THE SPOKES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR WHAT YOU DO. HOLD ON EDITH HOLDEN, EDITH EDITH. HERE SHE COMES. WAS LIKE BLOCKER GET IN THEIR CENTER CENTER. TAKE THIS PICTURE DAY. GEORGE, GET IN THE PICTURE. YEAH. UNIT ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL. WAS CLAPPING WITH TODAY. I NOTICED THAT. PHILIPS CHIEF CONNOLLY, COULD YOU COME UP TO THE PODIUM,
[00:05:04]
PLEASE? YEAH. NO I'M NOT VOLUNTEERING TO TRY OUT YOUR TASERS SOUND CAN I WANTED TO CALL ATTENTION TO RECENT SURVEY THAT CAME OUT THAT LISTED MCKINNEY AS THE SECOND SAFEST CITY IN THE UNITED STATES. WITH FRISCO BEING THE FIRST AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I'M EXTREMELY PROUD OF YOU GUYS AND ALL THAT YOUR DEPARTMENT DOES AND WANT THE COUNCIL TO KNOW THAT I SENT AN EMAIL TO THE CHIEF DIRECTLY, AND HE IMMEDIATELY DEFLECTED TO HIS MEN AND WOMEN. I WOULDN'T TAKE ANY OF THE CREDIT, UH, FOR BEING THE SAFEST CITY. UH TYPICAL CHIEF CONNOLLY FASHION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR EMAIL. ITTY IS YOU DO THAT ONE THING OCCURRED TO ME, CHIEF AND I REACHED OUT TO THE PEOPLE WHO CONDUCTED THAT SURVEY IS THAT WHERE THE SECOND SAFEST CITY, FRISCO'S FIRST AND PLAYING OUT THE NINTH. BUT WHEN PLAIN HILL MAKES A AND ARREST OF CLASS BEER HIGHER, OR FRISCO, MIXING ARREST, CLASS BEER HIGHER OR ANY CITY IN COLLIN COUNTY, INCLUDING THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE THAT THEY BRING THOSE ACCUSED PEOPLE TO COLLIN COUNTY JAIL HERE IN MCKINNEY, TEXAS, AND DROPPED THEM OFF AND SO YOU'RE KIND OF PLAYING WITH A STACKED DECK BECAUSE WHEN THEY LEAVE HERE ON BOND IF THEY MAKE BOND, OR THEY SERVE THEIR TIME AND ARE RELEASED THEIR RELEASED ONTO THE STREETS OF MCKINNEY AND SO NOT ONLY ARE YOU DEALING WITH THE, UH, GOOD AND BAD IN MCKINNEY ITSELF, BUT YOU'RE GETTING THE WORST FROM EVERY ONE OF OUR SURROUNDING CITIES WHO ARE BEING RELEASED INTO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AND I DON'T THINK THAT WAS APPARENT TO EVERYBODY SO YOU MAY NOT BE THE SAFEST ORGANIZATION. UH IN THE U. S BUT YOU MUST BE THE MOST EFFICIENT ORGANIZATION. IF YOU'RE PLAYING WITH A STACKED DECK AGAINST YOU, AND I WANTED TO CALL THAT OUT. AND IF I HEAR BACK FROM THE FOLKS WHO DID THAT SURVEY ALL CERTAINLY SHARE IT WITH YOU. BUT THAT OCCURRED TO ME AND I WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT TO YOU AND EVERYBODY ELSE BECAUSE YOU DO A TREMENDOUS JOB WITH OUR POLICE FORCE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.THANK YOU, SIR. VERY. VERY PROUD OF ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND AS I MENTIONED TO YOU IN THE EMAIL, REALLY THE WHOLE COMMUNITY. UM YOU KNOW, THE SAFETY OF A COMMUNITY IS A JOINT EFFORT. IT'S THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. WORKING TOGETHER WITH OUR CITIZENS BUILDING THOSE RELATIONSHIPS, AND I THINK ALL OF US WORKING TOGETHER REALLY HAVE SERVED TO MAKE MCKINNEY THE GREAT CITY THAT IT IS SO THANK YOU. THANKS. OKAY ALRIGHT. WORK SESSION ITEM 2 TO 0349 DISCUSSED
[Discuss Data Obtained through Public Engagement Efforts on the Renaming of Throckmorton Street and Throckmorton Place]
THAT OBTAINED THROUGH PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EFFORTS ON THE REMAINING RENAMING OF THROCKMORTON STREET AND THROCKMORTON PLACE. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL. KIM FLAM, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER SIMILAR TO LAST TIME, I'LL GIVE A QUICK OVERVIEW ON THIS ITEM AND MISS ROBIN WILL GO THROUGH THE DETAILS. IF YOU REMEMBER. I HAVE TO TURN IT ON, DON'T I? I DO THIS EVERY TIME EVERY TIME. IF YOU REMEMBER THE COUNCIL ASKED US TO LOOK AT THE RENAMING OF THROCKMORTON STREET IN PLACE IN JUNE OF LAST YEAR THAN IN DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR, WE BROUGHT YOU THE RESULTS OF THE INFORMATION WE RECEIVED FROM THE STAKEHOLDERS. AND THE RESULTS WERE SOMEWHAT INCONCLUSIVE, DEPENDING ON HOW YOU LOOKED AT THE DATA FROM THE DIFFERENT GROUPS, AND THE COUNCIL ASKED US TO DO ONE MORE ENGAGEMENT EFFORT. THIS WAS AT THE TIME PARTICULARLY TIMELY BECAUSE WE HAD OUR EAST MCKINNEY COMMUNITY CONVERSATIONS SCHEDULED FOR EARLY IN 2022, HOWEVER, WITH COVID AND SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WAS ACTUALLY PUSHED BACK, SO WE DID NOT HAVE THAT UNTIL LATE MARCH, BUT WE DID RECEIVE SOME ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE HERE TO SHARE WITH YOU TODAY. QUICK REFRESH ON THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA HERE. YOU CAN SEE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES IN THE FUTURE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX. AND IF YOU NOTES OVERALL, ROBIN IS GOING TO GO THROUGH THE DETAILED RESULTS FROM THE STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE AND STAKEHOLDER IS DEFINED AS SOMEONE WHO OWNS PROPERTY ON THE STREET ON THE BUSINESS ON THE STREET OR LIVES ON THE STREETS, SOMEONE WHO HAS AN INTEREST ON THE STREET. THE YEARS THERE IS ALMOST NO CHANGE IN ANY OF THE DATA. WE DID RECEIVE A FEW EXTRA SUBMITTED ALS FROM THOSE FOLKS, BUT IT REALLY DOESN'T CHANGE THE DATA AND YOU WILL SEE THAT AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS WE'RE IN A SIMILAR BOAT TO LAST TIME. SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FOLKS WHO ARE WHO OWN HOMES AND LIVE ON EITHER THROCKMORTON STREET OR PLACE, GENERALLY OVERWHELMINGLY, THEY DO NOT SUPPORT A NAME CHANGE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT PROPERTY OWNERS[00:10:02]
THAT MAYBE DON'T LIVE ON THE STREET, BUT THEY OWN PROPERTY ON THE STREET. THERE IS SUPPORT FOR RENAMING THE STREET AND PUT THAT INTO CONTEXT WITH THE FACT THAT WE HAVE ABOUT 48% RESPONSE RATE, SO THERE ARE 51% OF THE STAKEHOLDERS ON THE STREET THAT WE DID NOT HEAR FROM ADDITIONALLY, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT COUNCIL ASKED US AND DECEMBER WAS TO BROADEN OUR REACH A LITTLE BIT. INITIALLY WE WERE REALLY FOCUSED ON FOLKS WHO LIVED THEIR OWN PROPERTY AND THROCKMORTON BECAUSE THOSE ARE THE ONES WHO ARE IMPACTED. THEY HAVE TO CHANGE THEIR ADDRESS.THEY HAVE TO CHANGE THEIR DRIVER'S LICENSE, THE BULK OF THE WORK AND A STREET NAME.
CHANGE IS ON THEM, BUT WE DID GO OUT FOR ADDITIONAL OUTSIDE OF THROCKMORTON STREET STAKEHOLDER CONNECTION. AFTER DECEMBER, WE RECEIVED 18 RESPONSES AND OF THOSE 18 15 OF THEM, SO SUPPORTED A NAME CHANGE. SO WHEN YOU'RE OUT OUTSIDE OF THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP, THERE WAS SOME SUPPORT FOR A NAME CHANGE. WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO ROBIN, WHO GO THROUGH SOME OF THE DETAILS. WE GO. ALL RIGHT. WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE STAKEHOLDERS RESPONSE, AND AS SHE SAID THAT WE'VE GOT, UM A FEW EXTRA OUT OF THE 95 65 30 TENANTS, AND WE GOT FOUR MORE RESPONSES FROM DECEMBER. SO WHICH IS NOT A LOT, BUT WE DID GET FOUR MORE RESPONSES. AND SO IT ENDS UP BEING 48% NOW AND THE 2021. THAT WAS THE PIECE THAT I HAD SHARED WITH YOU BEFORE. THE 21, WHEREAS IT WAS 44% AND NOW WE'RE AT 48 52 56. AND THIS HAS ALL THE STAKEHOLDERS. UM THIS WAS WE HAD. TWO OPPOSED AND 24. SO WE HAD FOUR ADDITIONAL RESPONSES, BUT HERE AGAIN. WE DID NOT HAVE AN ADDITIONAL WHERE WE HAD 32% 32 OR 34. NOW WE HAVE 34, YOU KNOW, VERSUS THE 10 THAT YOU HAVE A 10. AND NOW YOU'RE AT 12. AND AGAIN THIS IS THE 95 STAKEHOLDERS. THIS IS 65.
HOMEOWNERS AND 30 TENANTS. AND THIS IS JUST LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY OWNERS. THIS IS JUST THE DIFFERENCE IS IN 2021. WE HAVE ONE MORE PROPERTY OWNER. WE DID HAVE THREE TENANTS THAT RESPONDED OUT OF THE 30, SO THIS IS JUST SHOWING THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WE HAVE, UM SO WE HAVE 10. SHOWN AS AND SEVEN THAT DID NOT. AND THIS IS WE HAVE NOT HEARD ANY DIFFERENCE IN THE 16 PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE ON THE PROPERTY. AND WE HAD 10 AND SIXS AND SUPPORT WAS ONE AND FIVE WAS AGAINST AND THEN HERE AGAIN. THIS IS WHERE WE HAD THE. FROM EVERYTHING THAT WE HAD THE 15 THAT WERE 83% AND 17% IS THREE AND THIS WAS FROM THE EAST. MCKINNEY PROJECT OUTREACH THAT THE LITTLE THING THAT WE HAD I THINK IF ANYBODY EVEN STOPPED LONG ENOUGH IN THE AREA, I ASKED THEM IF THEY WOULD BE INTERESTED IN DOING, YOU KNOW, DOING A SURVEY SO THIS IS WE GOT 18 RESPONSES FROM THAT. SO AND THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT. I DO HAVE THE ADDITIONAL ONES THAT WE YOU KNOW, JUST LIKE PREVIOUSLY THAT WE DID LOOK AT I DID HAVE THOSE AS WELL, SO THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT SO IT'S BACK OVER THE Y'ALL. DEFINITELY LIKE TO GET TO A PLACE WHERE WE GIVE SPECIFIC DIRECTION SO WE DON'T KEEP JUST COME BACK. MOVE ON IT. YES. I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. IF YOU GO BACK TO THE SLIDE, THERE'S 17. OWNERS OF OR I'M SORRY, 40. DECIDE THE OWNERS OWNERSHIP OF THE NUMBER OF BUSINESSES. YOU YOU. YOU GOT TO GO FORWARD NOW. YOU ALREADY PASSED IT. THAT'S ALL OF THE BUSINESSES. YES 17 17 PROPERTY OWNERS COLLECTIVELY OWNED 43 65 PROPERTIES. UM SO OF THE 17 PROPERTY OWNERS, 43. SUPPORT IT. SEE, I WANT TO STAND. THIS IS JUST BASED ON THE
[00:15:08]
17. OF COURSE, IT'S NOT BROKEN DOWN BY THE NUMBER OF PROPERTIES THAT'S CORRECT. THAT IS JUST WHO RESPONDED. IN SUPPORT OF THE NAME, CHANGE 10 OR OPPOSED TO THE NAME THAT'S CORRECT. AND THAT IS. WHEN YOU HAVE, LIKE MCKINNEY HOUSING AUTHORITY, FOR EXAMPLE, OWNED 16 PROPERTIES.AND SO THAT IS ONE PERSON, SO THEY HAVE ONE VOTE FOR THE POSITIVE. EVEN THOUGH THEY OWN 16 PROPERTIES. SO IT IS. ONE RESPONDED PER RECEIVED ONE VOTE. THE ONLY MULTIPLE PROPERTIES.
THAT'S CORRECT. THEY ARE NOT. UM WE HAVE SEVERAL THAT ARE THAT OWN MULTIPLE PROPERTIES AND OTHER HOMEOWNER THAT OWNS SEVEN PROPERTIES THAT ARE ON THAT PARTICULAR STREET. SO. THE ONE THAT IS OWNED THAT APARTMENT COMPLEX. THEY GOT THE ONE VOTE. THEY'RE NOT EVEN ON THROCKMORTON STREET. SO WHAT YOU'VE DONE IS YOU'VE COMBINED THEM. THEY JUST YOU SO YOU COMBINE THEM. WHEN WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT THROCKMORTON STREET. RIGHT THERE PLANTED ON THROCKMORTON STREET AND THROCKMORTON PLACE THEIR PLANTERS, DUPLEXES. HOW DO I GET TO IT? HEY, THERE YOU GO. AND SEE AND THIS IS A PROPERTY OWNERS BY THE PROPERTY BY THE ANIMALS THEMSELVES. THIS IS NO TENANTS. THIS IS WITH TENANTS. AND I THINK. COUNCIL MEMBER BALLARD. THIS IS WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT WHEN YOU HAVE 43 OF THEM. IF YOU PUT THEM ALL IN ONE SPOT THAT 30 32 I'M JUST SAYING THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITIES. PROPERTIES ARE LISTED AS HEADDRESSES ON THROCKMORTON STREET. THROUGHOUT MORE THAN PLACE. DREXEL CENTER STREET. I THINK THAT'S ALL BUT THERE WE'RE INCLUDING THE ONES ON THROCKMORTON STREET AND THROWING MORE THAN PLACE, NOT THE ONES ON DREXEL, OR CENTER STREET. THEY ALL HAVE INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSES. SO TO ME WHAT THIS IS ALL THE DATA AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WOULD IT REALLY REPRESENTS IS THE FACT THAT THERE REALLY ISN'T A BIG THEIR MOVEMENT THAT WE NEED TO GET THIS. IT'S BENIGN . BASICALLY IT'S OKAY. YEAH, IF YOU DO IT GREAT. IF YOU DON'T IT'S NOT A PROBLEM. THERE'S NO PUSH FOR THIS. AND MAYBE IT'S JUST THE COUNCIL THAT'S TRYING TO PUSH THIS THING. BUT I DON'T SEE A PUSH FROM AN AND I MEAN IT'S CERTAINLY NOT FROM THIS. YOU KNOW THIS. THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE. IT'S THIS COUNCIL, FOR SOME REASON THINKS THAT WE NEED TO CHANGE. YOU KNOW, WE MIGHT NEED TO CHANGE THIS, BUT THERE'S NOT A CRY OUT THERE TO GET THIS THING CHANGED. AND SO I THINK IT'S I WOULD TEND TO AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN ROGERS. ALWAYS CONSIDERED THE EFFECTS OF DOING THIS. AND IF YOU CHANGE THE NAME OF THE STREET UH, WHAT'S THAT GOING TO ACTUALLY DO TO THE HOMEOWNERS THAT ARE THERE BECAUSE I CURRENTLY LIVE IN THE 75072 AREA ZIP CODE. IT WAS CREATED ON JULY 1, 2000 AND 18.
AND ALTHOUGH I DO NOT ENJOY HAVING PURCHASED THINGS ON THE INTERNET AND DESPISED THE INTERNET ALTOGETHER THE INTERNET DOES NOT RECOGNIZE 75072 AND THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO RECOGNIZE IT OR THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN 75 072. SO IF THE POST OFFICE THOUGHT THEY WERE DOING THOSE FOLKS A FAVOR, THEY DID NOT. OR AT LEAST NOT FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS. UM AND SO I THINK IF WE TOOK ACTION ON THIS AND ACTUALLY CHANGED THE NAME THAT WE WOULD BE ACTUALLY DOING A DISSERVICE TO THE RESIDENTS WHO LIVED THERE. TRYING TO STRAIGHTEN IT OUT, AND THEY'RE GOING TO WIND UP IN A LONG CONVERSATION OF HOW I USED TO LIVE ON THROCKMORTON STREET, BUT NOW IT'S CALLED SOMETHING
[00:20:01]
ELSE. AND SO KNOWING THAT THAT'S THE. AND RESULT I WOULD NOT SUPPORT CHANGING IT BASED ON THE LACK OF RESPONSE FROM THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE. THE COMMENTS. WELL, I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY YOU KNOW, THIS CAME OUT OF THE THROCKMORTON STATUE DISCUSSION. I WAS ON THAT COMMITTEE. BECAUSE IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS BROUGHT UP. AT THAT TIME. AND BUT I THINK THAT THE MEAN WE CAN LOOK AT NUMBERS. UM I THINK THAT THERE, THIS DOES SHOW THAT THE COMMUNITY IS ASKING FOR IT. WE WERE VERY STRINGENTLY TIED OURSELVES TO A MAJORITY. WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE STATUE, AND NOW IT SEEMS LIKE WE WANT TO PROTECT THE MINORITY OPINION WHEN WE'RE NOT BUT THE FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE OPPORTUNITY THAT WE HAVE, AND HERE IF WE ENVISION WHAT, UM EAST, MCKINNEY LOOKS LIKE AND FIVE OR 10. YEARS AFTER THE MOVE OF CITY HALL AFTER REDEVELOPMENT EFFORTS ARE MADE IN THIS AREA. I THINK WE DO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO HONOR AND RECOGNIZE THE COMMUNITY. THAT HAS. THAT THIS THIS GOES THROUGH AND DO THAT, IN A WAY THAT REPRESENTS THE COMMUNITY THAT IT'S BEEN A PART OF OR THAT THIS ROAD LEADS TO AND SO I THINK WE MISSED AN OPPORTUNITY MORE SO THAN KIND OF DETERMINING LOOKING BACKWARDS AT THIS. UM. THE STREET NAME. I THINK IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO REALLY SHOWCASE. UM THE EAST MCKINNEY AND POTENTIALLY SOME OF THE PEOPLE WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THAT UM TO THIS COMMUNITY, AND THAT CAN WE CAN FIND A WAY TO REMEMBER IN THIS WAY, SO DID YOU JUST SAY THAT THE MAJORITY RECOMMENDED MOVING THAT STATUE? IS THAT WHAT JESUS SAID? I'M SAYING THAT THE MAJORITY DIDN'T AND WE ARE THE MAJORITY RECOMMENDED NOT MOVING, AND WE HELD TO THIS IDEA OF MAJORITY RULE. AT THAT TIME THAT IN A 65. WE WERE. THE RESPONSE WAS, THE MAJORITY SAYS, LEAVE IT, LET'S LEAVE IT, AND NOW THE MAJORITY SAYS, CHANGE IT AND IT'S VERY MUCH. YOU KNOW, THE MAJORITY IS DISMISSED. MEAT CAN WE LOOK AT SOME OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE THROCKMORTON PLACE RESPONSES. STILL BOTH FROM INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES, WHICH. IT LOOKS LIKE OVERWHELMINGLY IS IN SUPPORT OF NAME CHANGE, CORRECT. AND THE OTHER IS A THERE'S A CHART. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS ONE. THERE'S A SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPLEMENTAL CHARGE BUT IN PLACE RESPONSES. IT LISTS 11 PROPERTIES FROM END OF INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES AND ALL 11, IT SAYS IN SUPPORT. AND THEN THERE'S THE NEXT ONE IS TENANTS. AND ALMOST NO RESPONSE THERE, AND ONE OPPOSED. THAT LOOKS TO ME TO BE OVERWHELMINGLY IN SUPPORT OF A NAME CHANGE READING THAT INCORRECTLY, MORTON YEAH.THROCKMORTON PLACE IS PROBABLY 10 OF 11 HOUSING AUTHORITY PROPERTIES. IT IS THAT IS THROCKMORTON PLACE. THAT IS THAT'S RIGHT. 11 HOUSES COULD YOU HIT THE THROCKMORTON? PLACE RESPONSES. THERE WE GO. AND SO THAT'S WHY YOU ONLY HAVE 11 PROPERTIES BECAUSE THAT'S ALL THERE IS ON THROCKMORTON. STREET YOU'RE SAYING THROUGHOUT BOARDING PLACE, EVERY PROPERTY IS IT'S SUPPORTIVE, CHANGING OWNER PROPERTY OWNER BUT THOSE ARE ALL TENANTS TO AND WE HAD ONE TENANT. THAT IF YOU GO TO AND GO TO I'M SORRY. GO TO THE NEXT ONE WITH THE THROCKMORTON.
UM SORRY. BOB MARTIN PLACE TENANTS. WE HAD ONE AND THEY WERE OPPOSED. SO THE REST OF THEM DID NOT RESPOND. SO ALL OWNERS UM OWNERS WANTED CHANGED. THAT'S CORRECT. NOW, TENANTS JUST ONE RESPONDED AGAINST TWO. YEAH, WE HAVE TO. 22 OWNERS. MY POSITION IS GONNA REMAIN THE SAME AS I STATED THEN IT FOR ME . I'M NOT SAYING THIS IS THE SENTIMENT OF ANYONE APPEAR ON COUNCIL JUST IN GENERAL, THE GENERAL PUBLIC. HIS DISCUSSIONS BECOME SOME RIDICULOUS, IDIOTIC POLITICAL PARTISAN NONSENSE THAT YOU KNOW IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE IT, YOU'RE NOT TOTALLY TOEING
[00:25:03]
THE LINE. AND IF YOU DO YOUR YEAR OF WOKE WHATEVER NONSENSE THAT IS FOR ME. IT'S THE IT'S THE COMMUNITY THERE WANTS A CHANGED. I WANT TO CHANGE IT. AND IF THEY DON'T I DON'T. I MEAN, I DON'T I DON'T SEE THIS AS POLITICAL AT ALL. FOR ME. I UNDERSTAND IT'S BECOME POLITICAL. I LOOK AT IT IS. PEOPLE THAT HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE STREET AND IT'S IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEY WANT TO MOVE. THEY WANT TO CHANGE IT. AND IF I HAVE, SOMETHING IS BOTHERING ME IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD. I SHOULD LIKE TO THINK THAT PEOPLE WILL RESPECT THAT. BUT SO I DON'T I DON'T HIT ALL THE POLITICAL NONSENSE AROUND IT. I JUST IT'S A CONSIDERATION OF MY FELLOW HUMAN BEING IS HOW I LOOK AT IT, BUT. WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE YOU? IF YOU DON'T MIND ME ASKING WITH RESPECT IF THE MAJORITY WANTS TO RENAME IT, I SAY WE RENAME IT AND IF THEY MAJORITY OF THE OWNERS DO THE TENANTS DON'T SO IT'S NOT THAT THE TENANTS DON'T ONLY ONE RESPONDED, SO I DON'T THINK THAT'S SO I DON'T THINK THAT'S A GOOD MEASURE. ONE PERSON RESPONDS. QUITE PLACE SO. YOU HAVE 50% THAT DIDN'T RESPOND, SO IT'S OBVIOUSLY NOT AN ISSUE WITH THEM. I MEAN, IF THEY'RE NOT RESPONDING IS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO, OR THEY HAVE THAT'S MY THOUGHT IS THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT RESPONDING. THERE'S JUST NOT THIS BIG PUSH TO GET IT. YOU KNOW, AS YOU SAY, EVERYBODY WANTS TO WIN. IF EVERYBODY WANTED TO, THEN 50% WOULDN'T HAVE HELD BACK AND OBVIOUSLY OF THE ONES THAT DO CARE ENOUGH TO ANSWER THE SURVEY. ALL OF THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS SAY THEY'RE IN FAVOR OF A NAME CHANGED. THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES. THAT SOUNDS LIKE A PUSH TO ME. YOU KNOW, I WOULD JUST THINK THAT IF I OWN YOU KNOW ALL THE BUILDINGS AND ADRIATIC A IF I DID, I DON'T. BUT IF I OWNED ALL THE HOMES, AND I WAS RENTING THEM, AND THERE WAS BOTHERED ME AS THE OWNER SORT OF LIKE TO THINK THAT MY OPINION WOULD BE VALUED. MY OPINION WOULD BE WOULD BE LISTENED TO UM, IF MY ALL OF MY TENANTS ONLY ONE, RESPONDED, I SURE HOPE THAT THE APATHY WOULD NOT WOULD NOT, UM, NOT CIRCUMVENT OR OVERSHADOW ME AS THE OWNER. UM AGAIN, BUT FOR ME, THERE'S TRULY HAVE HAVE NO POLITICAL IT'S ALL MOST OPPOSITION AGAIN. I'M NOT SPEAKING OF ANYONE APPEAR BUT IN GENERAL PUBLIC MM. IT'S BECOME A TEST. ARE YOU CONSERVATIVE? OR ARE YOU NOT? AND FOR ME, IT'S JUST IT'S JUST SUCH AN IDIOTIC PLACE. WE ARE TODAY SO. IF I LOOK AT IT, IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYONE THAT RESPONDED OF OWNERS, OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY. WHAT I WOULD BE CURIOUS TO KNOW IS EACH OWNER GOT ONE VOTE. WHEN WE LOOKED AT THE BUSINESSES AND YET 17 OWNED 43 OF THE BUSINESSES. OUR MEASURE. ONE POINT WAS, AND I THINK IT WAS THE RIGHT MEASURE. EACH BUSINESS. I DON'T CARE IF I OWN FIVE OF THE BUSINESSES ATTENDED BUSINESSES. IT'S A HASSLE 10 TIMES MORE IF I OWN 10 BUSINESSES THAN IF I OWN ONE BUSINESS, SO I DON'T BUY THE IDEA THE NOTION THAT THAT ONE OWNER I MEAN, EACH OWNER GETS ONLY ONE VOTE, NO MATTER HOW MANY BUSINESSES BECAUSE WHAT WE SET UP HERE WAS, HEY, IT'S THEY HAVE TO THEY'RE THE ONES WHO IN INCUR THE HASSLE. SO WHY WOULD I GET ONE VOTE IF I OWN 20 BUSINESSES? BECAUSE I GOT 20 BUSINESSES. I GOTTA CHANGE MY ADDRESS TO CHARLIE'S 200.20, YOU KNOW? CHANGE ALL THAT? WHATEVER SO I'D LOVE TO KNOW WHAT IS IT BY BUSINESS? I DON'T CARE IF IT'S OWNED BY THE SAME PERSON AS 10. OTHERS DO WE HAVE THAT DATA? UH GO BACK WELL, THE PRESENTATION ON THE PRESENTATION JUST THE PRESENTATION. YEAH.THAT'S THE 17. THAT'S WHAT THAT'S 17 PROPERTY OWNERS. I'M CURIOUS TO KNOW. OF THE 60 40 IS WHAT WAS THE. AS A MATTER OF THEY GOT MORE THAN ONE VOTE TO ME. AS AN OWNER. ARE WE DONE? GOT 65 ENTITIES THAT ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH A HASSLE. WHAT ARE THE 65 ENTITIES SAY, OR AT LEAST THE ONES WHO RESPONDED. UNDERSTANDING OF MANY OF THEM HAVE COMMON OWNERSHIP SO EACH EACH ENTITY GETS A VOTE, NOT JUST THE SANCTUARY. I OWNED THE EVENT CENTER. I OWN MCDARBY FULLER CONTRACTING. IF I GOT TO CHANGE THE ADDRESS, YOU WANT EVERYONE TO HAVE A VOTE.
EVERYONE. CINDY'S RIGHT. I GET IT. I GET IT. AGAIN. THINK YOU HAVE THAT AND VICE VERSA. IF THEY HAVE THREE, AND THEY DON'T WANT TO CHANGE THAT. I WANT TO KNOW THAT TOO, BECAUSE IT MAY VERY WELL BE THAT I DON'T KNOW. COULD YOU GO TO THE NEXT ONE TO SEE IF I PULLED UP EXACTLY WHICH
[00:30:04]
ONE DOES SORRY ABOUT THAT? THAT'S WHAT NO TENANTS AND THAT'S GOT 11 PROPERTY OWNERS 32. WITH THAT THAT PROPERTY ENTERS BY BUSINESSES, AND THAT IS UM, THAT IS WITHOUT THE 30.BUT THAT IS WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. IF I BELIEVE YOU'VE GOT 66% 43% AND THAT RESPONDED AND 22 34 THAT DID NOT. IT ENDED UP BEING HERE. SO IF WE IF EVERYONE THAT'S GOING TO BE IMPACTED AND HAS A BUSINESS HAS TO GO THROUGH THAT HASSLE THIS SLIDE TELLING ME THAT 50% SAY THEY WANT TO CHANGE IT IN 17% SAY THEY DON'T PRETTY MUCH. YEAH YEAH, I HAVE 30. YOU HAVE 34% THAT SAY THERE ARE FOUR UM THERE. THERE'S NO YOU HAVE 32. THAT IS 49% THAT IS IN THE 17. THAT'S NOT FOR LEMON.
AND THAT'S JUST PROPERTY OWNERS . THAT IS NOT THE TENANTS THAT IS JUST THE PROPERTY OWNERS. IF THE NAME OF THIS STREET WAS DINGLEBERRY STREET WITH NOBODY WILL BE TALKING. THERE WOULD BE NO POLITICAL NONSENSE ABOUT IT. IT WOULD JUST BE LIKE THE NAME OF THE STREET OR NOT. BUT THE MOTION BECAUSE THERE'S LOTS OF STREETS THAT PEOPLE WANT TO CHANGE. THE NAME MIGHT NOT LIKE THE NAME WE'RE CHANGING THIS FOR POLITICAL REASONS. THAT'S ALL WE'RE DOING. WE'RE CHANGING IT FOR POLITICAL REASONS. SO I GUESS THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S JUST ASSIGNING A PREFERENCE OF OUR NEIGHBOR AS A POLITICAL PREFERENCE. I MEAN, I JUST DON'T SEE IT THAT WAY MYSELF. BUT UM I THINK WE, YOU KNOW, WE USE THE MAJORITY. TO DETERMINE THE OUTCOME OF ONE THING. AND AS WAS SAID BY SOMEBODY UP HERE WE'RE NOW SAYING, YOU KNOW, LET'S DON'T BUT ABANDONED THE MAJORITY NOW BECAUSE THE MAJORITY IS NOT IN THE SAME CREATING THE SAME OUTCOME. SO IT SEEMS PRETTY SELECTIVE. I WOULD. DON'T THINK THAT THAT SHEDS A GREAT LIGHT ON OR PROCESS IF WE BY MAJORITY ON ONE AND NOW SAYING, LET'S IGNORE MAJORITY WHEN IT'S 50 TO 17, BUT AGAIN. THAT'S JUST THAT'S JUST MY VIEW ON IT. SO AS. I'M GOING TO MY VOTE'S GOING TO BE BASED ON THE NUMBERS PERIOD. NO POLITICAL NOTHING BASED ON THE NUMBERS. I CAN'T STRUGGLE WITH THIS. UM, BECAUSE I SEE THE MAJORITY. I UNDERSTAND THAT. UM BUT ON THE OTHER HAND, I THINK WE'RE PUTTING IN AN UNDUE BURDEN ON THE BUSINESSES AND THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON THAT STREET THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE TO CHANGE THEIR ADDRESS, LIVED THERE FOR A LONG TIME THAT MAYBE ELDERLY AND NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES TO GO GET THEIR THEIR ADDRESS CHANGED. AND THAT'S WHAT I STRUGGLE WITH. AND I JUST SEEMS TO ME THAT WE COULD DO SOMETHING ELSE FOR THAT. THAT AREA OF TOWN. AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE PEOPLE OVER THERE THAT HAVE MADE SUCH A DIFFERENCE AND THE REGIONS OVER THERE. THEY MADE SUCH A DIFFERENCE. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I STAND. UE DISCUSSED THIS BEFORE. I RESPECT EVERYTHING THAT'S BEEN SAID THE ALL REMEMBER A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO, AND IT MAY HAVE BEEN EIGHT OR 10 THAT DALLAS WANTED TO NAME THE STREETS. CESAR CHAVEZ, YOU'LL REMEMBER THEM. DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT STREET THEY RENAMED? CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. NOT 75 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. THEY HAD A SEPARATE STREET NAMED CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. YOU KNOW HOW STUPID WAS THAT IN THE FIRST PLACE? SO THAT WAS LIKE BEGGING FOR A NAME CHANGE NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO, SO THAT WAS REALLY A WIN FOR THOSE PEOPLE. NOW I WONDER ABOUT A LITTLE PARALLEL RIGHT HERE, YOU KNOW, CALL DOMINO'S YOU KNOW, I LOVE AT 308 THROCKMORTON PLACE. THEN THEY PUT THE REAL WAY, THROCKMORTON AND THEN THE GUY THREE AWAY.
THROCKMORTON DRIVE IS GETTING THEIR PIZZA AND THEY'RE SAYING, WHERE IS IT? SO I THINK THERE MIGHT BE AN ELEMENT. MAYBE NOT OF THE PEOPLE IN THROCKMORTON PLACING. I WISH WE HAD A DIFFERENT NAME FROM A PRACTICAL STANDPOINT, AND IF THAT'S THE CASE, I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND IT.
IT SEEMS A LITTLE BIT PECULIAR TO ME THAT THE PEOPLE ON THROCKMORTON PLACE WOULD HAVE SUCH A UM A REALLY MORE MAGNIFIED DESIRE TO CHANGE THAN THOSE ON THROCKMORTON GIVEN.
IT'S THE SAME FELLA EXCEPT THAT THEY FEEL LIKE A MARGINALIZED STEPBROTHER, BECAUSE YOU KNOW THERE. IT'S CONFUSING TO ANYONE WHO DOESN'T LIVE. THERE IS CONFUSING TO ME. I ALSO DON'T WANT TO MAKE IT EASY. TO CHANGE NAMES OF STREETS BECAUSE THIS COUNCIL DOESN'T NEED TO BE
[00:35:06]
SPENDING A LOT OF TIME ON THAT. YOU KNOW, I DON'T REALLY THINK IT SOLVES ANY REAL PROBLEM BY AND LARGE AND IF YOU KNOW IF COUNSELOR ROGERS GOD BLESS HIM, CAUSE I KNOW WHAT STREETS HE LIVES ON. DOESN'T LIKE HIGHGATE ALL OF A SUDDEN, THEN YOU KNOW, I DON'T REALLY CARE. YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT IT, REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE MAJORITY WANTS, SO I WANT TO MAKE IT A RELATIVELY HIGH HURDLE TO DO THIS, UM, TO BE ABLE TO CHANGE THE NAME BECAUSE AGAIN, I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S PRODUCTIVE FOR THE CITIZENS OF MCKINNEY THAT WE'RE SPENDING A GREAT DEAL OF TIME ON IT. SO THAT'S WHAT I WOULD SAY. I'M NOT MARRIED ANY OF THEM, BUT I DO UNDERSTAND ON A MORE PRAGMATIC REASON WHY THROCKMORTON PLACE OUGHT TO BE CHANGED. I WONDER WHETHER THAT'S NOT A MOTIVATION. I THINK IT IS. UM SO THAT'S WHAT I'VE GOT. THANK YOU. SO WE HAVE 100% OF THE OWNERS ANTHRAX BORN IN PLACE REQUESTING TO BE CHANGED. WE HAVE A PRACTICAL CAN ALL IMAGINE THERE'S A PRACTICAL ISSUE WITH THROCKMORTON PLACE MORE THAN STREET. UM. AGAIN 100% OF THE OWNERS WANT TO CHANGE IT. SO WE CAN SIT HERE AND TALK ABOUT WHAT HASSLE IT IS, BUT COULD SAY I'M WITH THEM ON THAT BECAUSE I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THAT I'M JUST RESPONDING TO ANOTHER, BUT I WOULD SO WHAT ABOUT CHANGING MORNING PLACE TO NOW WHAT DO WEE REPLACED NAME. I MEAN, COME BACK . WE JUST COME BACK WITH SOME. YEAH WHETHER YOU ALREADY MOVED DINGLEBERRY DINGLEBERRY IS NOT GOING TO WORK, UM DODI OR WATLEY. YOU KNOW? WEB. I MEAN, A LOT OF OPTIONS TYPICALLY HAS HAPPENED IN THE PAST IS THAT Y'ALL MAKE A DECISION ON WHETHER OR NOT A STREET GETS CHANGED OR NOT, AND THEN IT GOES OUT INTO A GROUP OF YOU AND COMES UP WITH THE NAME TYPICALLY, AND THEN THEY COME BACK WITH THAT. AND THEN THAT'S VOTED ON. IT'S USUALLY CONSENSUS APPEARED TO CHANGE. UH PLACE THROCKMORTON PLACE. MM THAT WOULD BE LESS DISRUPTIVE. I DON'T HAVE DISRUPTIVE IT MAY IT MAY SOLVE SOME ISSUES THAT MAY EXIST OVER THERE. SATISFIES THE 100% OF THE OWNERS THAT LIVE ON IT. YES, SIR. GOOD WITH HER. THE QUESTION. YOU GIVE IT THAT. YOU GOOD WITH THAT? CARLY. THIS IS DON'T COME BACK TO ME WHEN YOU DON'T GET YOUR PIZZA, OKAY? ACTUALLY, THEY MAY START GAME WILL START GETTING A PIZZA. ALL RIGHT. SO YOU HAVE CONSENSUS ON THAT ON THAT CHANGING BORN IN PLACE, AND WE PUT THROCKMORTON STREET PLACE, DISCUSSION TO BED AND JUST I'M SURE WE'LL HAVE A ROBUST ONE WHEN THE NEW NAMES COME ALL RIGHT. GOING. THAT WAS[COUNCIL LIAISON UPDATES Regarding various City Boards & Commissions]
THE ONLY ITEM CANCEL THE A'S ON UPDATES REGARDING VARIOUS CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. ANYBODY ALL MY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ARE GREAT. DOING GOOD. I WANT TO REITERATE WITH CHARLIE SAID, CHIEF WE ALL DO. OBVIOUSLY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT BEING ABLE TO BRAG ABOUT BEING ONE OF THE TOP TWO SAFEST CITIES IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, ESPECIALLY AS CHARLIE POINTED OUT WHEN WE PUT IT PUT ANY CITY THAT HAS THE, UH, THE COUNTY SERVING ALL CITY JAIL IN ITS BACKYARD. I'M SURE THAT THAT ADDS A BURDEN, POTENTIALLY AND SO. REALLY FANTASTIC. WHAT A WHAT A PROUD THING TO BE ABLE TO SAY ABOUT OUR COMMUNITY AND IT'S ONLY POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF YOU AND THE DEPARTMENT. JUST MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THE BDC MEETING THIS MORNING. CAN'T IMAGINE HOW HELP. WELL, A JOB THEY'RE DOING AT THE AND IT'S NOT ONLY ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF PROJECTS THAT ARE COMING IN. IT'S THE QUALITY OF THE PROJECTS. IN THEIR PROJECTS IN IN IN THE IN THE LINE RIGHT NOW. THAT. WILL MAKE BIG CHANGES IN MCKINNEY. I THINK AND GET US INTO TWO THINGS WE'RE NOT INTO YET. SO HUGE THINGS. AND SO IN THE NEXT, UM I GUESS IN THE NEXT FOUR OR FIVE MONTHS WE'RE GONNA SEE SOME THOSE COME TO FRUITION.SO MAIN STREET. AMY WHAT A GREAT , YOU KNOW, ARTS AND BLOOM THAT WE HAD THIS AWESOME AS ALWAYS.
WHAT A GREAT JOB YOU AND THE BOARD TO DO. ALL RIGHT, WELL WITH THAT WE'RE GOING TO MOVE
[EXECUTIVE SESSION]
INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION OF COURT SECTION 55171 CONSULTATIONS WITH ATTORNEY ON ANY WORKSTATION SPECIAL SESSION. REGULAR SESSION ITEMS REQUIRING CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT ADVICE AND[00:40:01]
ASSIST SEDATED. ACQUIRE THE DELIBERATION DISCUSSION, SAID ADAMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HOIST LOST NORTH AMERICA OF TEXAS. ELSIE AND CITY MCKINNEY, TEXAS FIRST AMENDMENT OF FACILITIES AGREEMENT FOR THE TUCKER HILL EDITION. SECTION 55174 PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE , ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND 55187 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MATTERS.MCKINNEY HUB 1 21 CHAPTER. 3 80 AGREEMENT. ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES 3 60 L. L. C. NO YOU DOING QUESTION JUSTIN. DOLLAR READY? MOTION TO ADJOURN MOVED TRYING TO END AN OLD MAN FAVOR RETURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.