[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
GOOD EVENING AT SIX PM, WELCOME TO THE SEAT OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING IS ONLY COMMISSION MEETING. TUESDAY MAY THE 10TH 2022 THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. AND WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL. SOME OF THE ITEMS HEARD TONIGHT WILL BE HEARD ONLY BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND OTHERS.
WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. I WILL ADVISE THE AUDIENCE. THE CASE WILL GO INTO THE CITY COUNCIL OR WILL BE HEARD ONLY BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. YOU WANNA WISHING TO SPEAK TONIGHT? PLEASE COMPLETE ONE OF THE SPEAKERS CARDS PRIOR TO COMING TO THE PODIUM. AND WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND THE BENEFIT OF THOSE WATCHING AT HOME ON THEIR TELEVISION SET. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU BE INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS OF GOVERNMENT IN MCKINNEY. I WANT TO STRESS THAT WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY IS IMPORTANT TO US, AND IT DOES BECOME PART OF OUR PUBLIC RECORD. WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE TO OUR AGENDA. THE FIRST ITEM WOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO SPEAK ON A NON PUBLIC ITEM TONIGHT. EXAMPLE OF THAT WOULD BE THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. MINUTES OF, UM, APRIL 26TH OR ONE OF OUR PLANTS. SO IS THERE ANYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON A NON PUBLIC
[CONSENT ITEMS]
HEARING ITEM? ALRIGHT SEEING NONE WILL THEN MOVE ON TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA. FIRST ITEM IS TWO MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 26 2022.MEMBERS QUESTIONS MOTIONS ON THE MINUTES. MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT ITEMS. EMOTIONAL, MR MAN'S OUT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. 2ND 2ND ABOUT MR WOODRUFF. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY, THE CONSENT AGENDA HAS
[PLAT CONSIDERATION UNDER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 212]
BEEN IMPROVED, WILL NOW MOVE TO OUR PLANTS MEMBERS, STAFFERS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ALL THE PLANTS. SO WHAT WE'LL DO IF YOU HAVE A PULL DOWN OR A PLANT YOU WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS WHAT DO THOSE NOW OTHERWISE. I THINK WE'LL READ THE CAPTIONS ON EACH PLANT AND THEN HAVE A MOTION TO TAKE ACTION. ARE THERE ANY PULL DOWNS ON THE PLANTS TONIGHT? VERY GOOD. FIRST PLANT HAS 22-0051 CVP. CONVEYANCE PLANT FOR LIFE AND FOR ARE ONE BLOCK A OF THE MCKINNEY LOGISTICS CENTER. THIS IS PHASE TWO ADDITION. 150 FT SOUTH AS PER 1 95 ON THE WEST SIDE OF SAID HOW WE FIVE NEXT PLAN IS TO TWO DAYS 0053 PF LUMINARY FINAL PLATFORM , LOTS OF ONE AND TWO BLACK, A STORYBOOK EDITION. THIS IS ONLY EAST SIDE OF SOUTH CUSTER ROAD. 630 FT SOUTH OF SELL STONEBRIDGE DRIVE. NEXT PLAN IS TO DASH 0054 PF. LIMONENE FINAL PLANT FOR A LOT OF THREE BLOCK A WILMOTH CENTRAL ADDITION, THIS IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TAYLOR BURKE DRIVE. 600 FT WEST OF NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. NEXT PLAN IS TO TWO DAYS. 0058 PF PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANT FOR M 75 INDUSTRIAL PARK EDITION. THIS IS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUCH DRIVE AND HARRY MCKILLOP BOULEVARD FM 5 46. MEMBERS. WE HAVE EMOTION. LIKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLAN. CONSIDERATION ITEMS ON THE GINGER WITH CONDITIONS NOTED IN EACH STAFF REPORT. MOTION AND MR MAN'S ARE TO APPROVE THE CAN SEE AN ITEM'S I'M SORRY. THE PLANT CONCERN ITEMS. FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. SECONDS SECOND BY MR WOODRUFF. REALLY DISCUSSION. IS CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan for Encore Wire - XLPE Plant, Located Approximately 850 Feet South of Elm Street and Approximately 650 Feet West of Millwood Road]
PASSES THE PLAQUE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS HAVE BEEN IMPROVED THE FIRST ITEM NOW WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING. IT'S 21-0. 108 SP PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VARIANTS TO A SITE PLAN FOR ENCORE WIRE. EXCEL PE PLANT. THIS IS 850 FT. SOUTH OF ELM STREET. 650 FT. WEST OF MILLWOOD, DRIVE, CHAIRMAN. EVENING COMMISSIONERS. KATE STRICKLAND, PLANNING MANAGER FOR CITY OF MCKINNEY. SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT A. 6 35,087 SQUARE[00:05:05]
FOOT MANUFACTURING FACILITY, INCLUDING OFFICES AND WAREHOUSE. USES ON APPROXIMATELY 4.57. OF THE ACRES HERE. IT'S ABOUT 850 FT. SOUTH OF ELM STREET AND 650 WEST OF MILLWOOD, TYPICALLY, AS YOU ALL ARE WELL AWARE SITE PLANS CAN BE APPROVED AT A STAFF LEVEL. HOWEVER THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THREE VARIANCES FROM SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. WHICH DO REQUIRE CONSIDERATION FROM Y'ALL AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN THAT THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED TO THE CITY. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES FROM OUR SECTION 146-1323 SECTION, WHICH IS FENCES, WALLS AND SCREENING.JUST TO PUT IT LIGHTLY. THEY'RE REQUESTING VARIANCES TO ALLOW FOR NO H VAC SCREENING ON TOP OF THE BUILDING, AND THEY'RE ALSO ASKING FOR VARIANCES FROM THE FENCING REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR A SIX FT. BLACK VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH EVERGREEN SHRUB NG RATHER THAN OUR MASONRY WALL REQUIREMENTS TO SCREEN FOR BETTER ORIENTATION TOWARDS THE RESIDENTIAL HERE TO THE WEST.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED ALL OF THIS. AND THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED ADDITIONAL VINYL AND THE EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND THE H VAC SCREENING REQUIREMENT IS A SYRIANS THAT WE HAVE SEEN FROM THIS SITE REQUEST AS SUCH STAFF DOES LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS WHENEVER IT COMES TO VARIANTS IF IT'S UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES. THAT THERE'S NO ADVERSE IMPACT TO OUR CURRENT OR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, KEEPING IN SPIRIT WITH THE ZONING REGULATIONS AND THAT THE ZONING WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE. WITH THAT BEING, SAID STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THESE VARIANCES AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. CAITLIN OF QUESTIONS OF STAFF. SO THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THIS SIDE AND THE RESIDENTIAL BACK TOWARDS THE WEST IS ALSO A RAILROAD. THAT IS CORRECT. THERE IS A RAILWAY BETWEEN THIS SITE AND THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST. AND THIS BUILDING IS PLACED TOWARDS THE EAST OF THE SITE.
THAT'S CORRECT. THE BUILDING IS HERE AND THEN THE H VAC UNITS WOULD BE ON TOP OF THE BUILDING.
ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU, SIR. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. OH, GOOD EVENING, MR CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS IRELAND. SAMUELSSON WITH WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LOCATED AT 2901 DALLAS PARKWAY IN PLANO. WE ARE THE CIVIL ENGINEERS FOR THE SATS HELP TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS TO CHAD. QUESTIONS OF MR SAMUELSON. I THINK. WAS EASY, EASY. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. ADAM, IF YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED VARIANTS. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. BEING NONE. MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC CARING AND APPROVE THE ITEMS. WITH THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS, AS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
MOTION MANAGED DOMAINS AND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE AUTUMN. SECOND INCLUDING THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN IN THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS CONTAINING THE STAFF REPORTS, SECOND ALICE CROCODILES OR ANY DISCUSSION PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION CARRIES THE SITE PLAN. UM HAS BEEN APPROVED. SO WE'RE NOT. IRELAND YOU GUYS ARE GOOD. THIS IS NOT GOING TO
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “C2” - Local Commercial District, Located on the Southeast Corner of Virginia Parkway and Coit Road]
CITY COUNCIL. NEXT ITEM IS 22 DAYS. 00 TO ONE Z TWO PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM PD TO SEE TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY IN COURT ROAD. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER FOR THE CITY, MCKINNEY. THIS APPLICATION IS A REQUEST TO REASON. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. QUITE AND VIRGINIA FROM PD PLAYING DEVELOPMENT. TO SEE TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.MOVE AHEAD IN THE PRESENTATION. MM. CURRENTLY THE EXISTING PD ALLOWS FOR MANY OF THE SAME COMMERCIAL USES AS AS THE C TWO DISTRICT, THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED IN THEIR LETTER OF INTENT THAT THE REASON FOR THE REZONE IS IN ORDER TO BETTER UTILIZE THE SITE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES. WORKING AT THE AERIAL EXHIBIT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
[00:10:03]
, YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS COMMERCIAL EXISTING ACROSS VIRGINIA PARKWAY. THERE IS MULTI FAMILY TO THE SOUTH, UNDEVELOPED LAND ACROSS COURT TO THE WEST, AND THERE IS A DETENTION BASIN TO THE EAST, WHICH BUFFERS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. BOTH AND MCKINNEY AND FRISCO LARGE AMOUNT A LARGE AMOUNT OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS. CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF MORE COMMERCIAL IN THIS AREA. IT'S SAFEST VEHICLE MILES FOR RESIDENTS. ROAD MAINTENANCE FOR THE CITY AND SHOULD RESULT IN ECONOMIC PROFIT FOR THE FUTURE BUSINESSES ON THIS QUARTER AND FOR THE CITY. IT IS STAFF'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE PROPOSAL REZONE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT LAND USES AND IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS OCCASION AT THE CORNER OF TWO MAJOR ONTARIO ROADWAYS. AS SUCH STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REZONING REQUEST, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF STAFF.JACOB, THIS. NO. WE WERE JUST LOOKING AT ZONING AT THIS TIME, BUT WITH A REGULAR STANDARDS, THERE WOULD BE SOME SCREENING TO THE REAR OF THIS PROPERTY. ONE CONSTRUCTED TO THE RESIDENTS TO THE EAST, WHERE THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS ABOUT DETENTION BASIN IS OWNED WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. SO A SIX FT MASONRY OR. LANDSCAPE BUFFER OR WALL WOULD BE PROVIDED ALONG THE THERE ALREADY IS SOME SIX FT MASONRY WALL TO THE SOUTH , WHERE THE MULTI FAMILIES THAT THAT'S ON THE MULTI FAMILY PROPERTY SO THEY WOULD JUST PROVIDE SOME EXTRA SHRUBS OR SOMETHING UP AGAINST THAT. OTHER QUESTIONS. JAKE THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC. I'M SORRY. IS THERE APPLICANT HITTER TONIGHT? ALMOST LIKE YOU OFF EASY, DIDN'T WE? UM MY NAME IS GENERAL NIXON WITH KIMMY HORN ASSOCIATES, 13 4 55 NOEL DRIVE IN DALLAS. AND I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT WHO IS ALSO HERE, AND WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, JEFF. ARE THERE. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? ANYONE. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. SO EASY. THIS IS, HMM. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON HIM IF YOU HEARD IT ON AND WE LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS, UH, PROPOSED UM, REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. SEEING NONE. ON THE COMMOTION WITH PARTICULARLY HEARING AND APPROVED THE SITE OF MASS PER STEPH RECOMMENDATIONS. MR KIRK AND CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ANIMUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND MAN, MR TAYLOR. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR ABOUT. THIS MOTION CARRIES OUT AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JUNE 7 20 TO 2022 MEETINGS. Q. THE NEXT ITEM WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO SHARE COMMENTS REGARDING MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA.
[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]
ALRIGHT SEEING 91 HOUR MOVED TO STAFF COMMENTS. STAFF, CAITLIN ANYONE. IT'S ARNOLD HAVE ONE THING AND IT IS JUST A HEADS UP THAT WE ARE GEARING UP FOR SOME OF OUR FINAL, UM, REVIEW AND OUTREACH ASSOCIATED WITH THE CODE OVERHAUL PROJECT SO THAT NEW CODE MCKINNEY UPDATED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR THE CITY. SO BE ON THE LOOKOUT IN THE COMING MONTHS FOR SOME ADDITIONAL WORK SESSIONS, EITHER STAND ALONE WITH P AND Z OR JOINT WORK SESSIONS WITH PLANNING AND ZONING AND CITY COUNCIL AS WE GET INTO SUMMERTIME VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. MEMBERS. ANYONE HAVE A COMMENT. STAFF THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE AND DOING WHAT YOU DO. WE APPRECIATE YOU MAKE IT LOOK EASY UP HERE, BUT WE KNOW HARD WORK.GOES INTO THESE ITEMS, AND WE DO APPRECIATE IT. VERY MUCH WITH THAT. WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MR WOODRUFF, 2ND 2ND, MISTER WATLEY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND SAY AYE, THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MISS RAMEY AT 6 14 AND WE ARE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.