[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for 2010 Sloan Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Located on the Southeast Corner of State Highway No. 5 (North McDonald Street) and McIntyre Road]

ALRIGHT THAT MOTION IS APPROVED. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO OUR PLANT CONSIDERATION FOR TONIGHT. WE HAVE. THREE PLANTS ON THE AGENDA. ONE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. THAT IS ITEM 22 DAYS. 0089 CVP CONVEYANCE PLANT FOR 2010 SLOAN ADDITION. LOTS OF WENT INTO BLOCKADE. THIS IS ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STATE HIGHWAY FIVE. IN MCINTYRE ROAD. MR BENNETT. ANYTHING WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT. WITHDRAWING THIS ITEM. NO SIR. THE APPLICANT DECIDED TO WITHDRAW THAT EARLIER TODAY, OKAY? AND THEY'RE GOING TO BE WORKING THROUGH SOME COMMENTS AND POSSIBLY COME BACK WITH THE NEW PLOTS IN MIDDLE IN THE FUTURE, OKAY? THANK YOU, JAKE. THE NEXT TWO ITEMS. UH

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary-Final Plat for Urbane Duo Addition, Located Approximately 270 Feet North of Plateau Drive and on the East Side of State Highway 5]

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for The Estates at Craig Ranch West Addition, Lots 41R and 2, Block E, Located on Northwest Corner of Piper Glen Road and Collin McKinney Parkway]

COME TO US WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS BY STAFF WILL TAKE THESE TOGETHER.

FIRST ITEM IS 22 DAYS, 0099 PF ELIMINATE FINAL PLANT FOR URBANE DUO ADDITION, THIS IS 270 FT.

NORTH OF PLATEAU DRIVE. ON THE EAST SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY FIVE. THE NEXT ITEM IS 22 DEATHS. 010 TO CONVEY ITS PLANT FOR THE STATES THAT CRAIG RANCH WEST EDITION. LOTS 41 ARE AND TO BLOCK E. THIS IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PIPER GLEN ROAD. AND COLLIN MCKINNEY PARKWAY MEMBERS HAVE QUESTIONS OR WE HAVE A MOTION. LIKE A MOTION TO PROVE ITEMS. 220099 PF AND 220102 CV HE WITH. CONDITIONS AS NOTED IN STAFF REPORT MOTION BY MR MAN'S EITHER APPROVE. THE PLANT CONCERN ITEMS WITH CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 2ND 2ND MANAGE TO WOODRUFF. ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES WILL NOW MOVE TO THE REGULAR AGENDA.

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “RG18” - General Residence District to “PD” - Planned Development District, to Allow Multi-Family and Commercial Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 950 Feet East of Hardin Boulevard and on the North Side of McKinney Ranch Parkway]

THESE WILL BE THE ITEMS THAT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. FIRST ITEM IS 22-0016. CONSIDERE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM OUR G 18 GENERAL RESIDENTS TO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO ALLOW MULTI FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL USES IN THE MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS 950 FT. EAST OF HARDENED BOULEVARD ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MCKINNEY RANCH PARK LATE SHEFFIELD. THANK YOU, THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 12.4 ACRES GENERALLY FOR MULTI FAMILY AND

[00:05:06]

COMMERCIAL USES AND TO MODIFY SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITH THIS REZONING REQUEST. UM THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AS I MENTIONED. THE MULTI FAMILY USES THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY IS R G 18 THAT ALREADY ALLOWS FOR THOSE MULTI FAMILY USES.

WITH THIS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INTRODUCE COMMERCIAL USES ON THE SITE FOR THOSE NEEDED NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES. WITH THAT THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING AT LEAST A MINIMUM OF 5000 SQUARE FEET FOR THOSE COMMERCIAL SERVICES ALONG MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY.

APPLICANTS ALSO REQUESTING TO MODIFY SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. A FULL LIST OF THOSE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE IN THE PACKET FOR YOU FOR REFERENCE, SO MOTHERS MODIFICATIONS INCLUDES THE SPACE LIMITS DENSITY. IN PARKING REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICALLY FOR MULTI FAMILY USES. STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THESE MODIFICATIONS AS THEY ARE IN LINE WITH SIMILAR MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY, ALSO IN LINES WITH INITIATIVES OF THE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE NEW CODE, MCKINNEY OR THE CODE OVERHAUL. FOR THE EXCEPTIONAL QUALITY THAT APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO ENHANCE THE SITE AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 3000 SQUARE FOOT OF INTERNAL OPEN SPACE AS WELL AS INCREASING THE TYPICAL LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE FROM 20 FT TO 25 FT. GIVEN THAT THE PROPOSED REQUEST LINES CURRENTLY WITH WHAT'S ALLOWED ON THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY IN TERMS OF USES, WHILE ALSO INTRODUCING COMMERCIAL SERVICES TO THIS AREA ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THIS REZONING REQUEST IN AUSTIN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN MEMBERS. QUESTIONS OF STAFF. KEELIN AS FAR AS THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH OF THIS GOTTA STEP BACK AS FAR AS TWO STORIES TO THE NORTH SIDE AND ALLOW THREE STORIES TO THE FRONT SIDE IS FOR SOME MULTI FAMILY. THAT'S CORRECT. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING THAT WITHIN 100 FT OF THAT NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE. TO ALLOW FOR THE TWO STORY MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TODAY AND THEN AFTER THAT, 100 FT THRESHOLD THEY'RE REQUESTING TO HAVE THE THREE STORY MULTI FAMILY THAT'S ALSO IN LINE WITH THE EXISTING STORAGE FACILITY THAT'S TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY. VERY SOMEWHERE THAT ANY BALCONIES WOULD NOT BE ORIENTED TOWARDS THE NORTH. THAT'S CORRECT.

APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THAT NO BALCONIES, I WILL BE FACING THOSE EXISTING RESIDENTS ON THAT SECOND STORY. SO THE FACT 1000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL TALKING ABOUT? SCREENING ON THE ON THE SOUTH SIDE. HOW IS THAT GOING TO WORK THIS SO WE VISIBLE WHAT? WHAT? WHAT IS THE SCREENING AND THAT'S GOING TO BE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CERTAINLY SO TYPICALLY FOR WE ARE KIND OF MIXING TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF USES SO TYPICALLY FOR MULTI FAMILY. ANY PARKING THAT IS VISIBLE FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY IS REQUIRED TO HAVE SOME SORT OF SCREENING DEVICE THAT CAN BE A MASONRY WALL WROUGHT IRON FENCE WITH EVERGREEN SHRUBS. IT CAN ALSO BE A COMBINATION WITH AN EARTH BERM. APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO DO A LIVING SCREENING, WHICH IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S ALLOWED FOR THE COMMERCIAL SCREENING DEVICES. SO LONG MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO DO TYPICAL LIVING SCREENING TO SCREEN ANY PARKING THAT'S VISIBLE, AND THAT WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S REQUIRED FOR THE NON RESIDENTIAL PARKING COVER. THE VISIBILITY OF THE COMMERCIAL SPACE. SO THE, UM THE TYPICAL MULTI FAMILY PARKING IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THE THREE FT AT THE TIME OF PLANTING THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE NON RESIDENTIAL SPACES IS TYPICALLY REQUIRED TO HAVE WE'VE TWO FT AT THE TIME OF PLANTING FOR THAT SCREENING WILL BE ALLOWED TO SEE THE NON RESIDENTIAL USES. THAT'S BEING PROPOSED. WHILE THEY WERE MULTI FAMILY PORTIONS ARE STILL BEING SCREENED. WOULD BE INTERESTING WHEN WE ARE THE APPLICANT LOVE TO SEE A SITE PLAN HOW THIS THING PLAYS OUT. REALLY? OTHER QUESTIONS. ANYONE.

THANK YOU. IS THERE AN APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? THINK. THANKS. MR CHAIR COMMISSION. MY NAME'S BILL DAHLSTROM 23 23 ROSS AVENUE. I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. I'LL HAVE A FEW SHORT WORDS, AND THEN I'LL INTRODUCE ZACH JOHNSON WITH FAIRFIELD, WHO'LL PROVIDE MORE DETAIL. BUT AGAIN, WE THANK YOU

[00:10:01]

FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME FORWARD WITH YOU. WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK CAITLYN. JENNIFER FOR THEIR HELP ON THE STAFF REPORT AND WORKING WITH HELPING US THROUGH THIS PROCESS. THE STAFF REPORT BASICALLY LAYS OUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT AND JUSTIFICATION. UM AGAIN. WE ALL KNOW WHERE THE SITE IS OFF. MAKE MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY JUST EAST OF HARDEN, AS WAS STATED IN THE OPENING AGAIN. THE PROPERTY IS OWNED R G 18, WHICH STAFF HAS SAID, UM DOES ALLOW MULTI FAMILIES TODAY. LAST 24 UNITS AN ACRE. WE'RE BASICALLY ASKING FOR A MINOR INCREASE TO ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL 13 UNITS TO ALLOW US TO DO A BETTER DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY. BRING IN THE MULTI FAMILY BRING IN THE RETAIL AS WELL ALONG THE FRONTAGE. ALSO PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL ENHANCEMENTS THAT GO BEYOND WHAT'S REQUIRED THERE TODAY, SUCH AS THE 25 FT SETBACK AT THE BACK. WE'VE HAD SEVERAL MEETINGS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH OF US AS WELL WOULD LIKE TO THANK THEM FOR THEIR SUPPORT. I THINK THERE IS A LETTER FROM THE IN YOUR PACKET AND, UH, THERE THERE. INVOLVEMENT IN THIS APPLICATION. THERE IS OUR SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN. AGAIN. TO THE NORTH IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAYS AT THE SOUTH. THE HUGE STADIUMS ACROSS THE STREET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THAT, SO IF YOU CAN VISUALIZE THE TRANSITION FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL YOU HAVE FIRST OF ALL THERE, ALLIE. THAT ARE 25 FT OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE AREA AND THEN ARE TOWN, HOME STYLE DEVELOPMENT WITH TWO STORIES AND THEN 100 FT. AWAY.

THEN WE HAVE OUR THREE STORY WE HAVE MADE MANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS PLAN FROM THE FIRST TIME WE SUBMITTED IT, AND THAT WAS MUCH OF IT WAS A RESULT OF OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE RETAIL IS ALONG THE FRONTAGE. DOES THIS HAVE A GREAT. THE RETAILERS IN THIS LOCATION, SO THE RETAIL PARKING WOULD BE IN THIS LOCATION. UM AGAIN, AS WAS STATED THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ARE J. R. G 18 ALLOWS MULTI FAMILY BY RIGHT 24 UNITS PER ACRE, PROPOSING A PLAN DEVELOPMENT. NO MORE THAN 25 UNITS, AN ACRE 311 UNITS. OF COURSE, WE'LL HAVE THE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED STYLE AT THE BACK THAT ARE TWO STORY MULTI FAMILY AND THEN THE RETAIL AND THEN ARE ENHANCED LANDSCAPING. SO AT THIS POINT, UM, WELL AND THEN WE ALSO AGAIN AS A RESULT OF OUR DISCUSSIONS, THE LOWER SECTION SHOWS. THE SINGLE FAMILY TO THE RIGHT SHOWS THE SETBACK THE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE BUFFER ARE TWO STORY LIMITATION. AND THEN OUR THREE STORY AS OPPOSED TO THE R G. 18, WHICH ALLOWS AGAIN NON RESIDENTIAL USES DOES ALLOW UP TO 50 FT. SO WE THINK THAT THIS IS A BETTER SITUATION IN TERMS OF THE FORM THE BUILDING FORUM. A THERAPY LIKE TO TURN IT OVER TO A ZACH JOHNSTON FROM GOD. FAIRFIELD WHO WILL PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE ACTUAL PROJECT AGAIN. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, CHAIRING COMMISSIONERS ZACH JOHNSTON, 73 01. NORTHEAST H 1 61. IRVING TEXAS, 7539. WANTED TO, YOU KNOW, BUILDING A GREAT JOB AND GIVING YOU GUYS AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT AND WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO DO HERE. I THINK I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS KIND OF DIAL IT BACK FOR A SECOND. YOU KNOW, WE STARTED THIS JOURNEY ABOUT NINE MONTHS AGO AND STARTING WITH OUR DISCUSSIONS AND KIND OF OUR INTERNAL DESIGN AND WHERE WE SORT OF KICKED OFF. THOUGHTS ON THIS. WE LOOKED AT BY RIGHT PROJECT HERE IN SOME OF THE EXISTING LIMITATIONS WITH OUR G 18 KEPT US TO THE TWO STORY MINIMUMS. IT DIDN'T ALLOW US TO DO SO. OF THE MIXTURE. COMPONENT. HERE. AT THE END OF THE, WE FELL. LIKE IT. WE WERE TO GO THE PDP WE COULD DESIGN SOMETHING THAT WAS JUST MORE WITH. OVER THE LAST SIX MONTHS. WE'VE WORKED HAND IN HAND WITH THE NEIGHBORS OF ELDORADO. POINT. UM WITH CAITLIN AND. HAD A NUMBER OF MEETINGS. EVERYBODY. OF ALREADY DISCUSSED. HERE, BUT LARGELY WHAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF HERE. IS THE. OF ALL OF THE.

MEETING AND THAT FEED SO TALKED SOME OF THE. BUT. DELAYED THINGS OUT. YOU KNOW, THIS IS EVOLVED TO WHAT YOU SEE TODAY AND AGAIN, I THINK WHERE WE ARE. THE REQUEST THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR ISN'T SO MUCH A DENSITY REQUEST. IT IS AN INCREASE IN DENSITY OF 12 UNITS.

ON THE SITE. BUT IN TURN WERE ABLE TO DO IS REALLY CREATE MORE OPEN SPACE BY CREATING THE THREE

[00:15:01]

STORY, UM, COMPONENT OF THE PROJECT HERE. IT ALLOWS US TO KIND OF CREATE SOME NICE GREEN SPACE AND SOME SOME SOME OPEN KIND OF COMMUNAL SPACE FOR THE TENANTS AND THEN ALSO INCORPORATE THE MIXED USE COMPONENT. AND SO HOPEFULLY WE FEEL LIKE WE'RE KIND OF OFFERING UP SOME NICE TRADE OFFS AND WHAT WE FEEL IS A BETTER PROJECT. I'M CERTAINLY HAPPY THAT ANSWER ANYTHING ABOUT THE PROJECT ITSELF. SPECIFICALLY FAIRFIELD, THE COMPANY THAT I WORK WITH, UM WE ARE A NATIONAL BUILDERS. SO ONE THING IS, WE ARE NOT ONLY THE DEVELOPER WERE ALSO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. WE ALSO MANAGE OUR PROPERTIES. SO IT IS A SHOP THAT YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE HERE THROUGHOUT THE DURATION LIFECYCLE OF THE ASSET. SO, UM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAVE AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPERTY OF THE PLAN OR THE COMPANY ITSELF. COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR YOU. NORTH SIDE. EVERYTHING IS BACK UP THEIR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. ARE THOSE ALL GOING TO BE TWO STORY. BEFORE IT GOES TO THE AROUND THE FIRE LAYING THERE. EVERYTHING TO THE NORTH THAT YOU KIND OF SEE THAT CENTRAL SPACE TO MAKE SURE SO THESE SOUNDS RIGHT IN HERE.

YES THESE ARE ALL DESIGNED AS TWO STORY TOWN HOMES. OKAY THANK YOU. UM AND SO WE'RE ORIGINALLY GETTING THE URGE 18 ZONING. YOU'RE ALLOWED TWO STORY BUILDINGS WHAT WE DID, AND THROUGH THE COURSE OF DISCUSSING HOW WE CAN BRING SOME DENSITY OFF THAT NORTHERN BORDER AS WE'RE DESIGNING THESE ALWAYS TOWN HOMES, AND SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE I BELIEVE WE'RE DOWN TO 20 TOWN HOMES THERE THAT BACK UP ALL FRONT LOADED PARKING WE MENTIONED BEFORE AN AGREEMENT TO PRECLUDE ANY BALCONIES OVERLOOKING THE SECOND LEVEL. THE END OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE'VE ALSO HAD SOME AGREEMENTS IN TERMS OF HOW WE CONTROL THE LIGHTING OUT THERE TO ENSURE THAT THERE AREN'T ANY BLACK, UH , BUILDING LIGHTING. IT'S KIND OF BLASTING IN THE BACKYARDS OF FOLKS TOO. UNIT MIX. WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT HERE UNIT EXPIRES. I WOULD TELL YOU TODAY . THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL PLAN THAT WE'VE TRIED TO DIAL IN AS MUCH AS WE CAN. YOU KNOW, I WOULD.

I'LL TELL YOU WERE PROBABLY IN THAT 60 TO 65% RANGE OF ONE BEDROOM APARTMENTS, PROBABLY 30 TO 35 UPWARDS TO 40% IN TWO BEDROOMS. THAT FINAL MIXES GET TAILORED AS WE GET INTO THE FINAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN OF THE BUILDINGS, THOUGH. THREE STORY THREE BEDROOMS. YOU CAN DO ANY THREE BEDROOMS HERE. WE DON'T HAVE THREE BEDROOMS PLAN TODAY. THERE'S SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE TOWN HOMES AS TO WHETHER OR NOT WE ORCHESTRATE SOME THREE BEDROOM TANDEMS IN THERE. UM, BUT THAT ALL THAT ALL KIND OF TO BE DETERMINED. I ASKED HIS. IT'S A FLAT 1.5 PARKING RIGHT, SO RIGHT, JUST MAKING SURE WE HAVE ENOUGH PARKING THAT WE'RE SURE AGREEING TO HEAR THESE TOWN HOMES TODAY ARE DESIGNED TO HAVE TWO CAR GARAGES FOR EACH OF THEM. UM AND THEN, OBVIOUSLY WE'VE GOT THE GARAGE PARKING, WHICH IS WHICH HAS BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF TO GET THE KIND OF ALL THE COVERED ATTACHED GARAGE PARKING. AND THEN WE ALSO DO HAVE COVERED CARPORTS AND SO I THINK WE'RE DOING OUR BEST TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE PARKING CODES OUT THERE. UM AND ALL THE REQUIRED PARKING NEEDS FOR US TO KISS OF DEATH IS TO NOT HAVE ENOUGH PARKING ON THESE PROJECTS ARE VERY COGNIZANT OF THAT. LAST QUESTION AND LET EVERYBODY ELSE HAVE IT. I APOLOGIZE FOR TAKING YOUR TIME BUT COMMERCIAL SIDE WE GOT THE FOOTBALL FIELD ACROSS THE STREET. BUT WHAT'S YOUR VISION FOR THE COMMERCIAL THAT SO LONG? THERE IS HEAVILY TRAFFICKED AREA. ABSOLUTELY. WE'VE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THAT INTERNALLY. UM, THE RETAIL WORLD HAS CHANGED OVER THE PAST 24 MONTHS FOR A LOT OF US HERE. PERSONALLY I THINK YOU PROBABLY ARE LOOKING AT LOCAL TENANTS OR SOMETHING LIKE THIS. I THINK YOU HAVE A HARD TIME GETTING COMMERCIAL TENANTS. UM IN A SPOT LIKE THIS FROM A FROM A DRIVE BY TRAFFIC STANDPOINT.

UM FOR US. THIS THIS RETAIL. WE WANTED TO BE SYMBIOTIC FOR THE RESIDENTS WHO WANTED TO BE AMENITIES FOR RESIDENCES, AND SO WHERE WE CAN DIAL IN SERVICES AND THINGS THAT WE ENVISION THE PEOPLE FROM OUR BUILDINGS BEING ABLE TO WALK TO AND UTILIZE AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. THAT'S YOU KNOW, THAT'S OUR INTENT. UM AGAIN, IT'S FROM. IT'S A SMALLER TENANTS STANDPOINT. IF WE CAN GET RESTAURANTS IF WE CAN GET COFFEE SHOPS IF WE CAN GET THINGS LIKE THAT, WHERE PEOPLE CAN COME IN AND UTILIZE THE SERVICES THAT'S THAT'S REALLY OUR NUMBER ONE GOAL WITH IT. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS. I DID HAVE A QUESTION JUST TO CLARIFY THE CURRENT ZONING ALLOWS. 298 DWELLING UNITS, RIGHT? CURRENT ZONING, SO IT'S YOU'RE PROPOSING. ADD HOW MANY 3 11 3 11, OKAY? NEXT QUESTION. THE THREE STORY PORTION OF YOUR PROPOSED SITE PLAN WOULD BE WHERE. IT WOULD REALLY BE THESE BUILDINGS HERE. SO THE ONLY THE ONLY TWO STORY COMPONENT IS ON THE NORTHERN BORDER STREET ORDERING ELDORADO POINT. THE REST OF IT WOULD BUMP UP TO THREE STORIES HERE. BACK HERE. OKAY AND TO REPEAT AGAIN, THE

[00:20:07]

BALCONIES. OR OR OR NOT ALLOWED ON THAT NORTHERN BOUNDARY. WE RESTRICTED BALCONIES OR PATIOS ON THE SECOND LEVEL OF THE TOWN HOMES PROPOSED BUILDINGS HERE. UNITS WITHIN THE THREE STORY BUILDINGS, THEY WOULD STILL CONTAIN BALCONIES. BUT IF I CAN DIAL BACK HERE. THE CONCEPT THERE IS JUST FROM THE SITE POINT OF VIEW. UM AS YOU'RE WALKING THROUGH THIS ALLEYWAY OR IF, IN FACT YOU'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE ANY OF THE SCREEN SPACE HERE, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE VISUALLY SEEING WHAT'S HAPPENING ON THE BOTTOM OF THE THIRD LEVEL. ON THESE UNITS HERE, SO THAT'S PART OF THE REASON WHY WE CREATED THIS BUFFER ZONE HERE, UM WHAT OTHER SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT POINT TO NOTE WHAT WE HAVE PROPOSED. NONE OF YOU HAVE THIS ALLEYWAY HERE. YOU HAVE THIS. BUFFER YARD. WE ALSO RIGHT NOW HAVE SET THESE BUILDINGS BACK ABOUT ANOTHER 15 PLUS FEET. UM FROM THE ACTUAL WALL THAT WE HAVE HERE THAT CREATES SOME ADDITIONAL GREEN SPACE, WHICH ARE GOING TO BE PRIVATE YARDS FOR THESE TOWN HOMES AND SO NOT WE'RE NOT IN THIS INSTANCE. WE'RE NOT PUTTING OUR BUILDINGS DIRECTLY TO THE SETBACK THAT'S PROPOSED HERE. IS TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA BUFFER. THANK YOU, MR JOHNSTON. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.

UM WE MAY HAVE QUESTIONS WHEN WE GET THROUGH THE PUBLIC. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AUTUMN IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ANYONE. A NEW ONE. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. OF EMOTION AND MR MEN'S SIDE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SECOND, MY MISTER WATLEY ANY DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. THAT MOTION CARRIES THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED MEMBERS QUESTIONS ONE. QUESTION FOR STAFF. YES, SIR. SO THE 5000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL COULD BE A CHALLENGE. WHERE THE.

FUTURE. NOT EVEN TODAY, BUT EVEN INTO THE LONG TERM PREACHER MCKINNEY RANCH. YES THE QUESTION COMES DOWN TO YOU KNOW, WHAT DO THEY DO? WHAT DO YOU HOW DO YOU PREPARE? TWO QUESTIONS ONE. CAN WE STRIKE IT? THEY ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE TO DO THE 5000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL OR COMMERCIAL AND IF NOT THEN HOW DO WE PROTECT THEM? IN THE FUTURE? THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK TO GET AN ORDINANCE IF THEY WANT TO CONVERT THIS TO ANOTHER USE. THIS IS A LITTLE SEGMENT. 75 OVER TO HARDEN DOESN'T GET A LOT OF TRAFFIC, AND IT DOESN'T HAVE VISIBILITY AT ALL. WORRIED ABOUT GIVING SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO BE EMPTY, RIGHT. SO WITH THE MOTION TONIGHT, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE TO STRIKE THAT REQUIREMENT, YOU CERTAINLY CAN DO SO AND THAT WOULD BE CARRIED ON TO CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL. UM STAFF FEELS THAT SOME AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL HERE WOULD PROVIDE THOSE SERVICES TO THE PROPOSED RESIDENTS IN THE AREA AND ALSO PRESERVING SOME OF THE HARD CORNER ALONG HARD HARDEN AND MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY AS WELL. SO STAFF FEELS IT SOME OF THESE , UM COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS WOULD PROVIDE THOSE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, WHICH DOES ALIGN WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UM AND SO, BUT IF THAT'S THE COMMISSION'S COME ON. I THINK THE TIMING OF YOUR QUESTION MR WOODRUFF IS ACTUALLY REALLY, UM. SERENDIPITOUS EXPOSED. WE ACTUALLY HAVE THE SPHINX REZONING REQUEST ON THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT AS WELL. AND PART OF THEIR REQUEST IS TO REMOVE THAT COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENT, UM FOR THEIR MULTI FAMILY PROJECT BECAUSE WHEN IT WAS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, THERE WAS THIS EXACT SAME DISCUSSION WITH THE COUNCIL. SO I THINK PNG HAS TWO OPTIONS. TONIGHT CAITLIN COVERED THE FIRST ONE, WHICH IS IF YOU WANT TO MAKE THE MOTION. TO STRIKE THAT COMMERCIAL COMPONENT BECAUSE YOU FEEL AS THOUGH IT'S NOT VIABLE. YOU CERTAINLY CAN INCLUDE THAT IN YOUR MOTION. THE OTHER OPTION IS TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU WITH COMMENTARY TO THE COUNCIL THAT YOU WOULD ALSO BE SUPPORTIVE OF THE REQUEST WITHOUT THEIR COMMERCIAL AND THEREFORE IT COULD BE IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL . AS IS THEY WOULD KNOW THAT IF THE COMMERCIAL REMOVAL WAS SOMETHING THAT THEY WERE COMFORTABLE WITH. THEY'D HAVE THAT OPTION OF MAKING THAT MOTION ON THEIR FLOOR AS WELL.

HOPE THAT MAKES SENSE WHAT I'M SAYING. IT SEEMS LIKE THE VALUE THE LADDER FOR US IS THE BETTER

[00:25:02]

SO THAT WE'RE NOT IF WE IF WE SAY WE STRIKE IT NOW COUNCIL DOESN'T AGREE WITH IT, THEN THEY DON'T WANT THE APPLICANT HAD TO START OVER. SO IT'S PROBABLY BETTER THAT WE ABSOLUTELY AND YOU'LL SEE WHAT THIS SPEAKS REQUEST LATER TONIGHT ARE 3 80 VILLAS. UM YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE MODIFIED THE LANGUAGE TO ALLOW FOR THE COMMERCIAL BUT NOT REQUIRE IT. UM, I THINK CAITLYN COVERED IT REALLY WELL. 5000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL REALLY IS NOT THAT MUCH COMMERCIAL, SO WE DID THINK THAT THAT WAS STILL A REASONABLE AMOUNT TO EXPECT, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS IN THE STADIUM TO THE SOUTH. HOWEVER IF IT IS YOUR DESIRE THAT YOU THINK, HEY, WE'LL BE OKAY WITH IT. WITHOUT THAT. WE CAN CERTAINLY INCLUDE THAT IN THE MINUTES. WE CAN ALSO INCLUDE IT IN OUR BOARD SUMMARY TO COUNSEL WHEN IT GOES TO THEIR MEETING. THANK YOU. Q THE QUESTIONS ANYONE? SAID I HAD A QUESTION IT RELATES TO THE COMMERCIAL PARKING IN THERE BEING THAT CLOSE TO THE STADIUM. WELL WE HAVE PEOPLE COME IN. FOR ALL THESE DIFFERENT GAMES.

YOU'RE GONNA HAVE PARKING RIGHT THERE. NOT GOING TO BE TIED INTO APARTMENT COMPLEX. ON THAT MCKINNEY RANCH. IT'S I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MAKES A CONCERN. CONCERNED ABOUT PARKING. AT A EVENT AT THE STADIUM BEING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. QUESTION YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD GOOD QUES, UM AS A PRIVATE PROPERTY. THE APPLICANTS CERTAINLY HAS THE ABILITY TO PUT UP THEIR OWN PARKING ENFORCEMENT SIGNS TO SAY, YOU KNOW, THIS IS FOR RETAIL USERS ONLY. AND THEY WOULD THEY WOULD. IT WOULD BE ON THAT THAT PRIVATE DEVELOPER TO MONITOR AND DO TOWING OR TICKETING OR WHATEVER IT IS THEY WANTED TO DO, BUT ABSOLUTELY THAT SPILLOVER PARKING IS COULD BE A CONCERN. BUT IT'S A PRIVATE PROPERTY SO THAT PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD BE ABLE TO HANDLE IT AS THEY NEEDED TO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR ARNOLD. ANYONE ELSE? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. UM PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. CAVEAT. AND WITR THEM TO LOOK AT REMOVING THE 5000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENT. I LIKE THE ITEM I APPRECIATE STAFFS. UM WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT HERE IN THE TWO STORIES OF THE BACK. IN THE BUFFER TO THE RESIDENTS, AND GETTING THE LETTER GOES A LONG WAYS. WHERE'S THAT GOES UM. I, LIKE THE 5000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL ADDED TO IT. THERE'S A LOT OF MULTI FAMILY FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD AND VERY LITTLE RETAIL IN THE AREA, AND IT'S NOT MUCH TO FEEL THAT'S UP TO COUNCIL AND THEIR PART IN THE APPLICANT AND STAFF TO DISCUSS BUT I WAS SUPPORTED EITHER WAY AND APPRECIATE THE WORK OF ALL PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET IT TO THIS TO BE LESS INTRUSIVE ON THE SINGLE FAMILY TO THE NORTH.

THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? WE'VE SEEN NODDING OF HEADS DOWN HERE, SO WE'RE GETTING ALRIGHT MOTION FROM MR WOODRUFF SECOND TO PROVE THE ITEMS. FIRST TRIUMPH RECOMMENDATIONS SECOND BY MR MAN'S I'M MR WOODRUFF ALSO ENDED THE COMMENT THAT HE WOULD ENCOURAGE STAFF TO CONSIDER REMOVING THEIR COMMERCIAL COMPONENT. DURING THEIR DELIBERATIONS. MR. WOODRUFF, YOU AGREE WITH THAT COUNCIL? COUNCILORS COUNCILOR COUNCILOR DISCUSS THAT. ALSO IF YOU HAVE SUBMITTED A LETTER ONLINE REGARDING THIS ITEM, PLEASE KNOW THAT IT DOES GO TO THE CITY COUNCILORS PART OF OUR MINUTES AND PART OF OUR RECOMMENDATION. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR WOODRUFF SECOND AND MR MEN'S I ANY MORE DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. JUST MOTION CARRIES AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JULY 1920 22 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS TO TWO DAYS. 0043 Z

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “C” - Planned Center District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “LI” - Light Industrial District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Located approximately 1,500 feet North of Wilmeth Road and 450 feet East of U.S. Highway 75 (North Central Expressway)]

PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. MR BORG. RESUME THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SEAPLANE CENTER IN CC COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. THAT'S WHY YOU CAME BACK IN THE ROOM. WELCOME. OVERLAY DISTRICT TO L I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND CC COMMERCIAL QUARTER OVERLAY DISTRICT. THIS IS 1500 FT. NORTH OF WILMOTH ROAD, 404 150 FT EAST OF US HIGHWAY 75. MR BENNETT. THANK YOU, MR CHAIRMAN. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER FOR THE CITY MCKINNEY. UM THE PROPERTY OWNER . ALL TRADES INDUSTRIAL

[00:30:04]

PROPERTIES IS REQUESTING THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BE REZONED FROM SEA PLANTS CENTER TO ALLY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MCCLARY DRIVE AND READ, BUT BOULEVARD JUST EAST OF US, 75. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THE SITE AS PART OF THE OAK HOLLOW DISTRICT WITH A PLACE TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT MIX. THE YOLK HOLLOW DISTRICT IS MEANT TO BE AN EMPLOYMENT BASE. WITH NON RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH CREATES AND MAINTAINS JOBS FOR MANY RESIDENTS IN THE AREA. BASED ON THE DESCRIPTION OF THE OAK HOLLOW DISTRICT, THE RETAIL OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUSINESSES IN THE DISTRICT CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY'S TAX BASE, AND THE BUSINESSES COULD BENEFIT FROM THE PROXIMITY OF THE U. S. 75. THE SUBJECT. SORRY. THE SURROUNDING AREAS FILLED WITH OTHER LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TYPE USES, SUCH AS MORTON BUILDINGS, TRACTORS BY COMPANY DINA KRAFT LANDMARK EQUIPMENT AND FREEDOM POWER SPORTS. THE PROPOSED BUSINESS IS A MULTI TENANT OFFICE AND SHOWROOM DEVELOPMENT IN THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FOR THE BUSINESS EXTENDS ONTO A COUPLE OF TRACKS TO THE NORTH AND NORTHWEST. THE OTHER LOTS ARE CURRENTLY ZONED.

TO ALLOW FOR OFFICE WITH SHOWROOMS AND REZONING. THIS LOT WOULD ALLOW FOR THEM TO DEVELOP CONSISTENTLY. IT IS STAFF'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED TO REZONE SHOULD NOT HINDER ADJACENT PROPERTIES. AND THE REASON TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WILL MORE CLOSELY FOLLOW THE COMPLAINT DESIGNATION. DUE TO THE ESTABLISHED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL NATURE OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, AS WELL AS THE ALIGNMENT WITH THE COM PLAN STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE ISLAND BE APPROVED IN ALL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, JAKE. QUESTIONS OF STAFF. JUST TO CLARIFY ITS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH. THERE'S LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH AND THEN THE OTHER, UM, PROPERTY THAT WHOLE TRADES OWNS IS THE C THREE TO THE NORTHWEST. THAT PROPERTY AND THESE OTHER TWO WILL DEVELOP VERY SIMILARLY INCONSISTENTLY. ANYONE ELSE? JAKE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH AS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. JOHN LAMBERT BILLING REPRESENTING ALL TRADE, INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES. UM TENANT GO FOR WHAT JAKE WAS SAYING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPARENTLY OWNED C WE'RE LOOKING TO DEVELOP THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH, WHICH IS OWNED ALLY. IN THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST OF THAT, WHICH IS C THREE. AND THIS COMPONENT OF WANTING TO GO FROM CETA ALLY IS TO ALLOW FOR OFFICE SHARE ROOM. AND THAT WOULD THEN MATCH WITH WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO DEVELOP FOR ALL THREE LOTS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS DIFFERENT THAN NOW. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. SO I HAVE A QUESTION.

IS THERE A CURRENT PLAN FOR. THESE, UH, THIS OR THE ADJACENT LOTS. WE DO A POLITICAL PLAN PUT TOGETHER. BUT. ULTIMATELY THE DEVELOPMENT WILL HINDER ON IF WE CAN ACTUALLY HAVE OFFICE SHOWROOM AS PART OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THANK YOU. IN YOUR LETTER OF INTENT. YOU'VE GOT ALL TRADES DASH MCKINNEY TELL US ABOUT ALL TRADES. SO ALL TRADES IS A DEVELOPER THAT DOES MULTI TENANT OFFICE SHORTHAND PROPERTIES. AND. YOU KNOW, THERE ARE USUALLY TWO STORY BUILDINGS VARY IN DEPTH. BUT THERE ARE ALWAYS MULTI TENANT MEANT FOR AND HE SORT OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL TRADES. UM KIND OF KEEP IT OPEN TO ANY TENANT AS LONG AS IT FITS WITHIN WHAT'S ALLOWED FOR THE USE. GOOD. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU, JOHN. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'VE COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONED. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. CLOSE TO PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVED THE ITEM PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF EMOTIONAL MR MAN'S AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AN IMPROVED THE ANIMUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND MAN, MR WATT LEASE OR ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR ABOUT. THE MOTION CARRIES THE AUTUMN WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JULY 1920 22 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. MR LAM, YOU'RE CLOSER. NEXT TIME IS TO DEATH 0050 Z

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District and “ML” - Light Manufacturing District to “PD” - Planned Development District, to Allow for Multi-Family Residential and Commercial Uses, and to Modify the Development Standards, Located on the Southwest Corner of U.S. Highway 380 (University Dr) and Throckmorton Street]

PUBLIC HEARING. REQUEST TO REZONE HIS SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND

[00:35:07]

ML LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT OF PD. LAUGHTER MULTI FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES IN THE MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS THE ONLY SOUTHWEST CORNER OF U. S.

HIGHWAY 3 80 THROCKMORTON STREET. LEXI. YES. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS FOR THE 3 80 VILLAS PROJECT JENNIFER MENTIONED EARLIER THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE IN APPROXIMATELY 14.3 ACRE. PROPERTY LOCATED IN SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 3 80 THROCKMORTON STREET FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND LIGHT MANUFACTURING TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMMERCIAL AND MULTI FAMILY USES. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND PERMITS FOR COMMERCIAL AND MULTI FAMILY USES. WELL, A SMALL PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS ALSO ZONED LIKE MANUFACTURING. SO THE PORTION THAT IS CURRENTLY LIKE MANUFACTURING IS THE SMALL PORTION OVER HERE. UM THE PREVIOUS PD WAS COMPLETED IN 2017 AND DID NOT INCLUDE THIS LIGHT MANUFACTURING PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE 2017 PD INCLUDED REQUIREMENTS FOR A MINIMUM AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT ON TRACK ONE WHICH IS TWO. REDUCE IT TO 3 80 HERE, UM. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REMOVE THAT REQUIREMENT FOR THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL WITH THE NEW PD. UM THE PREVIOUS REQUIREMENT WAS AT LEAST 12,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL ON THAT TRACKED ONE ADJACENT TO 3 80. THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO RETAIN THE POSSIBILITY FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON TRACKED ONE SO IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE FUTURE. BUT THERE IS NO LONGER THAT REQUIREMENT FOR THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE 2017 ORDINANCE ALSO INCLUDED A REQUIREMENT FOR A MINIMUM OF FOUR LIVE WORK UNITS TO BE INCLUDED ON THAT TRACKED ONE SIDE AS WELL AS PART OF THE MIXED USE PORTION OF THE PROJECT . THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING TO REMOVE THE LIVE WORK UNIT REQUIREMENT IN THE LIVE WORTH LAND USE ENTIRELY. THE REQUEST IS TO PERMIT MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE SITE IN ORDER TO BETTER SUIT THE SITE AND ACHIEVE THE DESIRED PRODUCT. THEY'RE LOOKING FOR THE REST OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND IN THE STAFF REPORT MATCH WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN 2017, SO WE'RE NOT CHANGING SETBACKS, NOT CHANGING PARKING REQUIREMENTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. UM THE SECOND PART OF THE REQUESTS, AS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY WAS THAT THE 2017 ORDINANCE DID NOT INCLUDE TRACKED THREE THAT IS CURRENTLY ZONED FOR LIGHT MANUFACTURING USES. AS IT STANDS NOW, THE TRACK'S OWN ML IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE DEVELOPED WITH THE REST OF THE PROPERTY, SO THE DESIRE IS TO REZONE TO P D TO MATCH THE CURRENT ZONING SO IT CAN DEVELOP IN HARMONY WITH THE REST OF THE PROPERTY. JUST FOR A RECAP OF THOSE CHANGES FROM THE 2017 ORDINANCE. WE WERE JUST BE LOOKING TO UM, REMOVED THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENT FOR THE COMMERCIALS THAT NO LONGER HAVE THAT 12,000 SQUARE FOOT REQUIREMENTS. REMOVE THE LIVE WORK USE REQUIREMENT.

THE UNIT MINIMUM AND INCLUDE THAT M L PORTION TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE PD. SO SINCE THE PROPOSAL TO PERMIT THE MULTI FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL ON THE SITE ALLIANCE WITH THE COP PLAN DESIGNATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, AND IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORING MULTI FAMILY USES. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ITEM AS IT STANDS AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, LEXI QUESTIONS YOU WANT. THANK YOU, SIR. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. GOOD EVENING CHAIRMAN COMES THROUGH. MY NAME IS TAKING WACHOVIA ADDRESS. 30 30 LBJ FREEWAY SUIT THAT IN $50 ZIP CODE 75 234. UM LEXUS. ADEQUATELY EXPLAINED WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE HERE WITH APPLICATION BEFORE YOU JUST PRIMARILY TWO THINGS WE'RE TRYING TO BRING IN THAT PORTION OF PROPERTY THAT IS CURRENTLY LANDLOCKED AND MAKE IT PART OF OUR DEVELOPMENT. TO BE ABLE TO MAKE IT MORE EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT AND THAT ALSO TRYING TO AH, ELIMINATE THE RETAIL THAT WOULD COMPLY WITH THEIR REQUIRES AND DESIRES OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN THEY APPROVED OUR PROJECT FEW WEEKS BACK. WITH THAT I HAVE FOR QUESTIONS. THAT FRONT TRACK.

IT'S GOT THE CHALLENGES CREEK BETWEEN TRACK ONE AND TWO AND THREE. CORRECT CORRECT. AND THEN THEIR ACCESS AS FAR AS FROM 3 80. IS AN APPEAL WITH NO VISIBILITY IF YOU'RE HEADED,

[00:40:05]

EASTBOUND, CORRECT. MR WONDERFUL TRACKS TWO AND THREE. PLAYING THREE STORY. MULTI FAMILY ON THOSE AS WELL. SO ON THE. ON TRACK THREE. IT'S UH, TOWN HOME STYLE DEVELOPMENT. AND TRACKED TO ON THAT ON THE EDGE THAT BORDERS THE REST OF THE SINGLE FAMILY. LOTS IS ALSO TOWN HOME STYLE UNITS. SO THERE ARE THE REASON I ASKED BECAUSE IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEE TO IT SAYS THAT 50% OF THE UNITS WITHIN TRACK TWO AND THREE SHALL HAVE DIRECT GROUND FLOOR ACCESS.

CORRECT SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, UM YOU KNOW YOU'RE NOT GOING TO A THREE STORY, MULTI FAMILY AND YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO MEET THAT THRESHOLD, SO WE'LL MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT THRESHOLD IS. SURE. WITH THE COMPETENCE THAT THE WAY IT'S CURRENTLY DESIGNED, AND THE TOWN HOME STYLE UNITS COMBINED WITH THE FLAT THAT WE HAVE WE MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. GOT YOU. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS. ANYONE. HAS THERE. BEEN ANY, UM, COMMUNICATION WITH THE RESIDENTS TO THE EAST? HOMEOWNERS TO THE EAST OF TRACK, TOO. AH FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. YES WE DID HAVE SOME OUTREACH. UM, BECAUSE THAT'S PART OF PART OF THE WHOLE PROCESS OF GETTING OUR FINANCING IN PLACE. IT'S TO GET THAT WHOLE PROCESS WHICH OUT TO THE COMMUNITY. WE DID THAT PRIOR TO GOING TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. UM TO THAT HAS BEEN DONE. FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT IN CONCENTRATION. YES. THE RESIDENTS TO USE IS THAT THE MCKINNEY HOUSING AUTHORITY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THEIR OWN. THERE'S STILL WORK. OOPS. SORRY.

OKAY SO THE MISSION HOUSING AUTHORITY THAT ONE THE PROPERTY AROUND HERE? UM ALL THIS IS ALL VACANT LOT. WE DID APPROACH SO THE OWNERS HERE AT THAT TIME WERE TRYING TO ACQUIRE THIS AS WELL. BUT THEY WHEN WE PUT THE PROJECT TOGETHER, WE HAVE PUSHED THEM AND LET THEM KNOW WHAT THE DESIGN OF OUR PROJECT WAS. IS MY QUESTION TO THE APPLICANT IS UMS THAT YOU HAD ANY CONVERSATION WITH THE PEOPLE TO THE EAST. AND YOU POINTED TO AH, THE SOUTH. AND YOU POINTED TO WEST. EAST IS GOING TO BE OVER BY THE ROCK MARTIN STREET. UPSIDE OF THAT NOW. THE TOP SIDE OF THAT MAP AS WE THAT'S YEAH, WE ALSO BECAUSE PART OF THE PROJECT'S WAS APPROACHING RESIDENTS ALL AROUND THE DEVELOPMENT. AND MY COLLEAGUE ACTUALLY WENT DOOR TO DOOR TO GET PEOPLE AND SHOW THEM. OUR PRIMARY PLANS TO THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IN THE AREA TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE THAT BUYING AND UNDERSTANDING AS TO WHAT IS COMING TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS JUST GONNA BE A TECHNICAL QUESTION. YOU SAID YOU DO IT THE DOOR, BUT YOU STILL NOT HAVE NOT ANSWERED. DID YOU GET BUY IN FROM THE RESIDENTS TO THESE YES, WE DID. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. ALRIGHT. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. ADAM.

IF YOU'RE IN THE AUDIENCE AND WOULD LIKE TO COME SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS REZONE. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS GRACE BROWN. AND I ACTUALLY REPRESENT , UM, I SAY REPRESENTATIVE THE INDIVIDUALS, RESIDENTS. COULD YOU GIVE US YOUR ADDRESS? ALSO YES, IT IS GOING TO BE 5 20. NORTH MCDONALD'S AND I'M A REPRESENTATIVE OF MR AND MRS WALDO W. TURNER SR AND THE RESIDENTS THAT WERE ASKING ABOUT ON THE EAST AND RIGHT HERE THAT WHAT'S UP TO THE HOUSING DISTRICT AS WELL. RIGHT AT THE CREEK. ARE THOSE PROPERTIES THAT BELONG TO THEM? WE HAVE NOT HAD ANYONE CONTACT US CONCERNING THIS. AND THAT'S WHY WE ARE HERE THIS EVENING TO FIND OUT EXACTLY WHAT'S GOING ON. WE WOULD LOVE TO BE IN CONTACT WITH THE REPRESENTATIVE AND WITH THE BUILDER AND WITH THE DEVELOPER AS ASAP. THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION. I AM HEALED A FAR 14 OH NINE SANCTUARY LANE MCKINNEY. AND ALLEN. THE PROPERTY AT THE CORNER OF RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE GREEN AREA

[00:45:05]

THERE. AND I HAVE NOT BEEN APPROACHED. UH HAVE TENANTS. IT'S A DUDE. EXCUSE ME A DUPLEX.

I DON'T KNOW IF THE TENANTS HAVE BEEN APPROACHED. IF THEY HAVE BEEN THEY HAVE NOT CONTACTED ME.

AND I WAS CURIOUS TO SEE WHAT WAS PLANNED. ACROSS THE STREET FROM US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? MOVING CLOSE TO PUBLIC HEARING OF A MOTION BY MR MAN'S ON TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. GOODBYE, MR WOODRUFF. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED WHEN I HAVE QUESTIONS. PNC MEMBERS OF STAFF OR THE APPLICANT MEMBERS.

DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING? OKAY, OKAY. SO I DID WANT TO HELP ADDRESS SOME OF THE COMMENTS OR CONCERNS FROM RESIDENTS AS WELL AS SOME QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR THE APPLICANT. I DO WANT TO HIGHLIGHT FOR THE COMMISSION THAT THE ZONING ON THIS PROPERTY WAS APPROVED IN 2000 AND 17. AND SO WHEN THE APPLICANTS, REFERRING TO OUTREACH AS PART OF THE OVERALL PROJECT, THEY'RE REFERRING TO THE AVERAGE THAT THEY DID IN 2000 AND 17. FOLLOWING THE APPROVAL OF THE ZONING IN 2000 AND 17. THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE CITY TO OBTAIN SOME THC A HOUSING TAX CREDITS, WHICH WERE APPROVED A RESOLUTION WITH THE COUNCIL SEVERAL MONTHS AGO. AS PART OF THAT RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT OR NO OPPOSITION. THE COUNCIL MADE THE COMMENTARY AT THAT POINT ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENT ON TRACK ONE SO FOLLOWING THAT DISCUSSION WITH THE COUNCIL. THE AFGHAN HAS COME BACK FORWARD TO SAY, HEY, WE ARE STILL PROPOSING THE SAME ZONING THAT WAS APPROVED IN 2000 AND 17 WITH THOSE TWO MINOR MODIFICATION, THREE MINOR MODIFICATIONS. ONE BEING THAT THE COMMERCIALS NO LONGER REQUIRED ALONG THAT 3 80 FRONTAGE TO BEING THAT THE LIVE WORK UNITS ON THAT TRACKED ONE IN 3 80 FRONTAGE ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED. IN THREE IS TO SLIGHTLY INCREASE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE OVERALL PROJECT BY INCLUDING THAT TRACKED THREE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY ZONED FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USES. SO THE OVERALL INTENT AND HEART OF THE ZONING IS NOT CHANGING FROM WHAT WAS DONE IN 2000 AND 17 IS STRICTLY TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE COUNCIL WHEN THAT THC A RESOLUTION CAME FORWARD RELATED TO THE COMMERCIAL AND CLEANING UP A FEW ITEMS THAT WILL HELP THEIR OVERALL DEVELOP ABILITY, SO I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT THEIR NOT PROPOSING TO MAKE ANY DRASTIC CHANGES TO THE SITE. OVERALL, JUST SOME CLEANUP THAT DID REQUIRE THE REZONE THANK YOU. THAT REMOVES SOME QUESTIONS THAT WERE COMING UP. I APPRECIATE THE CLARIFICATION BECAUSE I WAS 2017. I REMEMBER AS FAR AS THAT GOES AND THE ONLY NEW THING HERE IS HEALTH OR TRACK THREE, WHICH IS TAKEN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FURTHER AWAY FROM OTHER RESIDENTS. UM MANY OF THE SOME OF THE INDIVIDUALS NOTED THAT WAS CONCERNED AND WE REPRESENTATIVE HAVE RENT HOUSES IN THIS LOCATION AS FAR AS THAT GOES, BUT I DON'T THINK NECESSARILY RESIDENTS OF THAT, BUT THIS IS A CLEANUP AS DIRECTED BY CITY COUNCIL, UM, TO ALLOW THIS PROJECT TO GO FORWARD AND DOES NOT BRING ANY THING THAT'S NOT ALREADY ZONED INSTRUCTION TO THE CITIZENS IN THE AREA, SO I'M SUPPORTIVE OF THE CLEAN UP HERE. ELSE. EXCUSE ME ANYONE ELSE? MR ARNOLD JUST TO CLARIFY. SO IN YOUR COMMENTS THAT LOOKS LIKE THE STAFF REPORT. IS REFLECTIVE OF THOSE WISHES OF CITY COUNCIL. THAT'S CORRECT. THANK YOU. MR CHAIRMAN IN SUPPORT OF IT. MARK. CONCERN IS OUTWEIGHS THROUGHOUT MARTIN STREET. AND RIGHT NOW, UM EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE AIRPORT ROAD COMING OFF WITH 3 80. THERE'S A LOT OF CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC AND THROCKMORTON. COMING OUT FOR 3 80. TO GO OVER TO VIRGINIA. TRY TO KISS THAT LIKE THERE. AND I'M JUST CONCERNED ABOUT MULTI FAMILY PUTTING MORE TRAFFIC ON THROUGHOUT MARK. IT WILL BE MY ONLY CONCERN. ANYONE ELSE? OTHER COMMENTS. GOOD, OKAY? MAKE A MOTION TO PROVE THE ITEM PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION MANAGED TO MEN'S EITHER APPROVED THE ANIMUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND BY MR WOODRUFF THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES THE ITEM WILL BE

[00:50:08]

SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE SEPTEMBER 19 JULY 1920 22 MEETINGS. THE NEXT TIME ON OUR AGENDA IS TO DASH 00540 PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST.

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “AG” - Agricultural District to “LI” - Light Industrial District, Located Approximately 698 Feet South of Harry McKillop Boulevard and West of Country Lane]

REASON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THIS IS 700 FT.

SOUTH OF HARRY MCKILLOP BOULEVARD ON THE WEST. IN WESTERN COUNTRY LINE. LEXI. S SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED IN THE ITEM TABLED INDEFINITELY DUE TO A NOTICING ERROR. SO ANOTHER WAY TO SAY THAT THE THERE WAS A OH, THE CITY IS REQUIRED TO NOTICE NOTIFIED ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE AREA. THERE WAS A AN ERROR MADE IN THAT NOTIFICATION. THE STAFFERS RECOMMENDING THE ITEM BE TABLED IN THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED.

IF YOU'VE MADE THE EFFORT TO BE HERE TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONING, YOU'RE WELCOME TO, BUT PLEASE KNOW THE ITEM. WE'RE GETTING A RECOMMENDATION BY THE STAFF TO TABLE THE ITEM. SEEING NO ONE RUSHING TO THE PODIUM. WE NEED TO MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM INDEFINITELY. MOTION MEMBERS TO MAN'S OUT TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ADMIN DEFINITELY. 2ND 2ND BY MR WOODRUFF. ANY DISCUSSION. THESE CASTOR ABOUT THANK YOU, LEXI. AND MOTION CARRIES ON AN ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED INDEFINITELY.

THE NEXT ITEM WILL BE, UM AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM ANY SUBJECT, NOT ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT. WE'RE HEARING YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME TO THE PODIUM AND HAVE SOME MIC TIME. YOU'RE WELCOME. ONE, OKAY? AH COMMISSION MEMBERS AND STAFF WHO HAVE COMMENTS. ACCOLADES

[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]

BIRTHDAYS, ERIC ANYTHING. ALWAYS A PLEASURE. ALWAYS A PLEASURE. HEARTFELT COMMENTS THERE FROM ERIC. CAITLYN. ANYTHING. STEPH THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO. WE APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. THE MOTION TO ADJOURN MR WOODRUFF TO ADJOURN THIS AUGUST BODY. 2ND 2ND. MISTER WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? FOR THOSE IN FAVOR. SAY AYE, THOSE SAME SIGN MOTION CARRIES MISS REMY'S 6 57 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Jun 28, 2022 Planning & Zoning Commission on 2022-06-28 6:00 PM

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item