[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
EVENING AT SIX PM. WELCOME TO THE CITY. MCKINNEY'S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF TUESDAY. AUGUST 23RD 2022 THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. AND WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU ARE HERE TONIGHT, AND YOU PLAN ON SPEAKING ON AN ITEM. OR AT ONE OF OUR OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK BEFORE YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE YELLOW SPEAKERS CARDS. THEY'RE LOCATED ON THE TABLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ROOM. AH TERRY, IS THAT RIGHT? THEIR TABLE OUT THERE STILL TABLE YELLOW CAR, PUT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND THE ITEM THAT YOU'RE SPEAKING ON AND THEN WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS YOUR CONCERNS WITH US. WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE CITIZENS IN BEING INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS OF GOVERNING MCKINNEY, SO WITH THAL WE WILL STICK TO THE THREE MINUTES THAT YOU HAVE ALLOTTED. UM PLEASE BE CONCISELY RESPECTFUL IN YOUR COMMENTS. AND WE'LL MAKE IT HOME AT A DECENT HOUR TONIGHT. FIRST ITEM THAT. WE'LL COVER WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON ANY NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM TONIGHT. AN EXAMPLE OF THAT WOULD BE MINUTES FROM OUR LAST MEETING OR ONE OF THE PLANT CONSIDERATIONS WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US TONIGHT. SO IF YOU HEAR DENIED, AND I WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON ONE OF THOSE ITEMS, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT. SEEING NO ONE JUMP UP, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM.
[CONSENT ITEMS]
CONSENT AGENDA. ADAM 22 DAYS 079 FOR THE MINISTERS OF REGULAR MEETING OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF AUGUST AND 9 2022 MEMBERS THAT ARE QUESTIONS AND THOSE SETS OF MINUTES. MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. WE APPROVED THE MINUTES EMOTION MOMENT TO WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES SECOND LAST MEETING SECOND, HAMISTER WHAT LEE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES. THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST PLANNING ZONING[PLAT CONSIDERATION UNDER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 212]
COMMISSION MEETING HAS BEEN APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM WOULD BE PLANT CONSENT ITEMS. WE'LL TAKE THESE, UM IN ONE MOTION ALREADY THE CAPTIONS. FIRST ITEM IS 22 DAYS. YOU'RE 147 PF CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANT FOR LOT ONE BLOCK A OF THE MCKINNEY BLUFF EDITION. THIS IS IN THE MCKINNEY, TJ ON THE EAST SIDE OF 18 27. 500 FT. NORTH OF SERIOUS STATE ROAD. STAFFERS RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL. THE NEXT ITEM IS 22-0151 PF. CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANT FOR LOT ONE BLOCKADE OF THE INDEPENDENCE VILLAGE EDITION. THIS IS THE IN THE MCKINNEY TJ, ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY AND INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY. STAFFERS RECOMMENDING US APPROVAL OF THIS PLANT. NEXT ITEM IS 22 DAYS. 0152. PRELIMINARY FINAL PLAN FOR HIDDEN LAKES. THIS IS ONLY SOUTH SIDE OF U. S. HIGHWAY 3 80. 1000 FT WEST OF CUSTER ROAD IN STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THIS APPROVAL OF THAT AS WELL. THE APPLICANTS HAVE BEEN I NOTICED CORRECT CORRECT. MEMBERS OR THEIR QUESTIONS OR MOTIONS ON THE QUIET CONSENT ITEMS. MAKE A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE FOR LACK OF CONFORMANCE. THE THREE ITEMS LISTED UNDER PLAQUE, CONSENT ITEMS, MOTION AND MR MAN'S EYE TO DISAPPROVE. THE THREE PLANTS PER STAFF. RECOMMENDATIONS. 2ND 2ND BY MR CANDLES OR ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION CARRIES. NOW[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Design Exceptions to a Site Plan for the McKinney Municipal Complex, Located on the Northwest Corner of Virginia Street and Throckmorton Street]
MOVE TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. THESE WILL BE THE ITEMS THAT HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS. WITH EACH FIRST ITEM WILL BE 22-0061 SP. PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST. ON DESIGN EXCEPTIONS TO A SITE PLAN FOR THE MCKINNEY MUNICIPAL COMPLEX. THIS IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER. VIRGINIA PARKWAY AT THROCKMORTON STREET. MISS SHEFFIELD, DO YOU HAVE THE FLOOR ? THANK YOU. SO THE CITY IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT TO CITY HALL MUNICIPAL COMPLEX ON APPROXIMATELY 8.8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VIRGINIA STREET AND THROCKMORTON STREET. SITE PLANS TYPICALLY CAN[00:05:01]
BE APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL WITHIN THE MTC, MCKINNEY, TOWNSEND OR DISTRICT. HOWEVER THERE ARE A VARIETY OF SITE DESIGNS AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS THAT THE CITY IS ASKING FOR DESIGN EXCEPTIONS TO COMPLETE LIST OF THOSE DESIGN. EXCEPTIONS ARE IN THE STAFF REPORT FOR YOUR REFERENCE. CURRENTLY CITY DEPARTMENTS ARE LOCATED ALL OVER THE CITY THROUGH LEASED OR OWNED SPACES, AND SO FOR THE VISION FOR THE CITY HALL IS TO BE ABLE TO CREATE A CENTRALIZED GATHERING SPACE AND HOPEFULLY CATALYST FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF HIGHWAY FIVE. THE PROPOSED COMPLEX IS PROPOSED TO PROVIDE APPROXIMATELY 175 SQUARE FEET. OF CITY DEPARTMENTAL OFFICES, CONFERENCE ROOMS, AS WELL AS A NEW CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND INTERNAL PLAZAS. STAFFERS OF THE OPINION THAT THE ALTERNATE SITE DESIGNS WILL NOW FOR FUTURE EXPANSIONS, UM FOR THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX AND ENSURE THAT THE OVERALL CHARACTER AND FORM CAN CONFORM TO THE NTC. UM AS SUCH STAFF HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF STAFF.IT WAS EASY. IS THERE AN APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? THEY ARE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, YES.
MISS JACKSON. ARE YOU PRESENTING TONIGHT ON BEHALF? DID YOU KNOW YOU WERE PRESENTING? DENYING MS JACKSON DID NOT SIR PATRICIA JACKSON, FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY . I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I ALSO HAVE MEMBERS OF OUR DESIGN TEAM HERE FROM THE COMBINED EFFORTS OF LIKE PLATO, PLUS PARKHILL, SO WE'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE EXPERTS. QUESTIONS. ANYONE. NO. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. THE TEAM DID GIVE A SNEAK PEEK THIS MORNING AT A CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EVENT. AND IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE PROPOSED FACILITY, IT'S QUITE A SIGHT. YOU NEED TO TAKE THE TIME TO TAKE A LOOK. AND REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON OVER THERE. IT'S REALLY IT'S FASCINATING TO SEE HOW PARTS OF MCKINNEY OR CHANGING WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AUTUMN IF YOU COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THESE PROPOSED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS TO THE MCKINNEY MUNICIPAL COMPLEX, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. THE MOTION. WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVEMENT FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROMOTION AND MR MAN SAI TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE OTTOMANS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND MAN, MR WOODRUFF ANY DISCUSSION? THIS IS THIS IS PRETTY COOL. REALLY IS. UH, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. THE MOTION CARRIES A VOTE OF SIX AND FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST THE SITE PLAN FOR THE MCKINNEY MUNICIPAL COMPLEX HAS BEEN APPROVED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. PRETTY GOOD.
ALL OF THE KEEN I SAW THERE, SEVEN OF US, AND ONLY SIX VOTES WERE COUNTED. MR ARNOLD, IS THAT YOU? POINTED THAT OUT. VERY GOOD. WE'RE GOOD. DO YOU WANT TO RECORD HIS VOTE? YEAH.
HOW WOULD WE REPLAY THE TAPE. YOU WANT TO VOTE? THE FINAL VOTE MOTION BY MR MAN'S EYE TO PROVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE. IMPROVE THE ITEMS SECOND BY MR WOODRUFF. WAS IN FAVOR. PLEASE VOTE. I RIGHT, RIGHT. RIGHT? NEXT ITEM IS 21-0053 S P A PUBLIC HEARING. TO
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Variances to a Site Plan for Craig Ranch Corporate Center Multi-Family Residential Development, Located on the Southeast Corner of Van Tuyl Parkway and Grand Ranch Parkway]
DISCUSS VARIANCES TO ASSIGN PLAN FOR CRAIG GRANTS CORPORATE CENTER MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VAN TILE PARKWAY IN GRAND RANCH PARKWAY.MR BENNETT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR CHAIRMAN, GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. JAKE BENNETT,
[00:10:01]
PLANNER FOR THE CITY, MCKINNEY. THIS IS A PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR THE CORPORATE CENTER MULTI FAMILY PROJECT. AS YOU KNOW, SITE PLANES ARE TYPICALLY APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL, HOWEVER, WITH VARIANCES REQUESTED FOR A SITE PLAN TO GAIN APPROVAL. WE BRING THOSE IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION. THE SITE PLAN FOR PHASE ONE OF THE CORPORATE CENTER MULTI FAMILY PROJECT WAS BROUGHT TO P AND Z IN MAY FOR THE SAME TWO VARIANCES, WHICH THEY'RE REQUESTING TONIGHT FOR PHASE TWO. UM, AND THAT SITE PLAN WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BACK IN MAY. THE FIRST OF THE TWO VARIANCES REQUESTED IS TO NOT PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPED MEDIANS AT THE ENTRANCES OF THE MULTI FAMILY SITE. THESE ARE CURRENTLY REQUIRED PER CODE. BUT STAFF IS IN FAVOR OF THE VARIANTS DUE TO THE URBAN NATURE OF THE CRAIG RANCH, MULTI FAMILY PRODUCT. THE SPLIT ENTRANCES AND EXITS ARE TYPICALLY SEEN IN GARDEN STYLE DEVELOPMENTS, BUT IT'S NOT SOMETHING TYPICALLY FOUND IN CRAIG RANCH. WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS WILL HINDER THIS DEVELOPMENT NORTH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS. THE SECOND OF THE TWO VARIANCES IS TO NOT PROVIDE THE SCREENING WALL ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. AND I'LL JUST SHOW THAT ON HERE. STEPH IS ALSO IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST BECAUSE OF THE CITY'S LINEAR PARK, WHICH IS ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY. THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT HAS INDICATED THAT THERE ARE THAT THEY ARE IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST. SO THAT THE NEIGHBORING OFFICES AND MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS CAN UTILIZE THE LINE OF YOUR PART BETTER. IT SHOULD ALLOW FOR A MORE OPEN AND COMMUNITY FEEL ALONG THE LINEAR PARK CORRIDOR. IT IS THE OPINION OF THE PARKS AND REC DEPARTMENT THAT THE WALL WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE PARK. FOR THESE REASONS, STEPH ONCE AGAIN RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN WITH THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR BENNETT. ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS? I BELIEVE I READ THAT. SORRY THERE'S TWO VARIANCES, BUT FOR VERY VISION YOU'RE REQUIRING RECOMMENDING, UM WE'RE AT A POINT WHERE WE CAN IMPROVE THE SITE PLAN WITH CONDITIONS.THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE TYPICALLY DO AT THE STAFF LEVEL. INSTEAD WE'VE INCLUDED ALL OF THOSE REVISIONS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO NEED TO MAKE WITH THIS, UM STAFF REPORT AND IT'S BEEN COMMUNICATED TO THE APPLICANT. THAT'S CORRECT. YEP, THEY'RE AWARE ANYONE ELSE? GREAT THANK YOU, SIR. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. I DON'T THINK THAT THEY MADE IT TONIGHT, OKAY? UM THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS IF YOU YOU HEAR, DENYING AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS P AND Z REGARDING THESE VARIANCES, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. MOVIE CLOSED. THE PUBLIC HEARING APPROVED THE ITEM WITH THE TWO VARIANCES REQUESTED IN THE FOUR REVISIONS, NOTED MR MILLIONS. I'D CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ATOM. S PER REVISIONS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. A 2ND 2ND BY MR WATLEY.
THANK YOU THERE. ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES THE. PROPOSED SITE PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM IS 22 DAYS, 006 TO ZERO PUBLIC HEARING. AND TO
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from "C" - Planned Center District and "CC" - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to "LI" - Light Industrial District and "CC" - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Located Approximately 370 Feet North of Wilmeth Road and on the East Side of U.S. Highway 75]
CONSIDER REQUESTS TO REZONE THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY FROM SEAPLANE CENTER IN CC QUARTER COMMERCIAL OVERLAY TO L I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. AND CC COMMERCIAL OVERLAID DISTRICT. THIS IS 370 FT. NORTH OF WILMOTH ROAD ON THE EAST SIDE OF U. S. HIGHWAY, 3 80. LEXI. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE AND APPROXIMATELY 19.63 ACRE PROPERTY. DOOSAN TO RED BIRD AND THE HIGHWAY 75, SLIGHTLY NORTH OF WILMOTH FROM PLANTS CENTER TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY HIS OWN PLAN CENTER, WHICH IS THE LEGACY LEGACY ZONING DISTRICT, MAINLY FOR COMMERCIAL USES ALONG REGIONAL HIGHWAYS OR LARGE ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO REZONE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL MAINLY TO ALLOW WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE WITH SHOWROOM USES ON THIS PROPERTY. THE REQUEST FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING ON THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY ALIGNS WITH THE EMPLOYMENT MAKES PLACE TYPE OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THIS AREA AND SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED SURROUNDING USES.ADJACENT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY HAVE SIMILAR ZONING AND ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIAL USES. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS MAP HERE. THERE ARE SEVERAL PROPERTIES IN THE AREA THAT ARE EITHER ZONED L I ALREADY INCLUDING THE RECENTLY RE ZONED PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. AND THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES TO THE EAST. UM DUE TO THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ITS
[00:15:06]
COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS IN THE GROWING INDUSTRIAL AREA STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED OWNING REQUEST AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS.ACTUALLY THANK HER THEIR QUESTIONS OF STAFF. ONE. THANK YOU, SIR. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. TWO. DO YOU HAVE THE PRESENTATION. BECAUSE YOU SHOULD BE OKAY? ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, MR CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS DAVID MARTIN, 27 28, NORTH HARWOOD STREET AND DALLAS HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT CREATION, JOINED BY REPRESENTATIVES OF CREATION AND THEIR IN HOUSE DESIGN TEAM LG AND THEIR ENGINEERS PG. I'LL TRY TO BE QUICK. I THINK STAFF COVERED MOST OF IT. THERE'S THE PROPERTY WITH WHICH WE ARE FAMILIAR WITH YOUR YOU KNOW THAT THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED PLANNED CENTER DISTRICT. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE AND LEXI MENTIONED THIS JUST THE GENERAL TRANSITION OF THIS AREA TO INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY TO THE NORTH ZONE, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND ALSO PD FOR TRACTOR SUPPLY PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS ON A COMBINATION OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND DEVELOPED WITH WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION AND LAND TO THE SOUTH IS. WITH TRUCK AND TRAILER PARKING. FOR THOSE REASONS WE FILL UP LIKE THIS REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR OFFICE SHOWROOM AND WAREHOUSE USES WILL MEET OUR CODE REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING. HERE'S A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, YOU'LL SEE THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK AND LANDSCAPING ALONG CENTRAL AND ALSO INTERIOR TO THE SITE.
YOU'LL NOTICE THAT ALL TRUCK TRAFFIC OR ANY TRUCK TRAFFIC AND LOADING WOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE AND SCREEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW. THESE BUILDING SPACES ARE ALSO UNIQUE COMPARED TO WHAT YOU MIGHT THINK OF WITH THE TYPICAL WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION. SITE AND THAT THEY CAN BE DEMISED INTO SMALLER, MULTIPLE TENANT SPACES TO ACCOMMODATE OFFICE SHOWROOM TYPE TENANTS AND ALSO INCLUDE DESIGN FEATURES IN TERMS OF COLOR AND ARTICULATION AND ENTRANCES THAT THE DEVELOPER CAN SPEAK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT. FOR THOSE REASONS WE LIKE STAFF, WOULD YOU FEEL LIKE THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS A MIXTURE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES HAS ACCESS TO 75 AN INCREASED LEVEL OF AESTHETICS AND LANDSCAPING. UM FOR THOSE REASONS, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THE RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL, HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. I'M ALSO HAPPY TO INTRODUCE THE APPLICANT WHO CAN TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE PROJECT. AND THE DEVELOPER IN GENERAL, IF LIKE. QUESTIONS. YOU WON. I DID HAVE A QUESTION, MR MORTON. IF YOU COULD GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN, I THINK IT'S TOO SLIGHT RIGHT THERE. THE IN BUILDING A WE WHICH FACES 75. U S 75 CENTRAL. WHAT WHAT WERE THO THOSE DRIVING BY ON THE SERVICE ROAD. SURE SO WE DO HAVE SOME CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS OF PAST OF OTHER PROJECTS THAT THE DEVELOPERS DEVELOPED. HAPPY TO GO FORWARD TO THOSE ARE HAPPY TO BRING UP THE DEVELOPER TO TALK ABOUT THAT. THAT'S MORE IMPORTANTLY, IS IT ARE THERE GLASS FEATURES IS THAT A TILT WALL PANEL? YEAH, IF IT'S OKAY, I'LL INTRODUCE TAYLOR MEECHUM, WHO I THINK FILLED OUT A CARD. WITH THE FOR THE. TALK MORE ABOUT THAT. 49 25. GREENVILLE AVENUE, DALLAS, TEXAS. UM I MIGHT JUST SHOW YOU TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION DIRECTLY BUILDING IT. YES, IT'S THAT THAT OBVIOUSLY THAT BUILDING IS GOING TO HAVE OBVIOUSLY THE MOST EXPOSURE THE MOST TRAFFIC ON HIGHWAY 75. IT WILL ARGUABLY HAVE THE BIGGEST RENTS LIKE DAVID SAID. THIS IS VERY MUCH A FRONT PARK REAR LOAD OFFICE SHOWROOM UPFRONT AND FOR ALMOST A RETAIL HYBRID TYPE OF TENANT. UM THAT HAS SOMEWHERE WHERE THEY YOU KNOW, THEY'RE THEY'RE ABLE TO IT'S A PICKUP CENTER OR, YOU KNOW IT'S PLUMBING FIXTURES OR SOMETHING FOR THE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL NEARBY, AND THEN THERE'S LOADING AND UNLOADING IN THE BACK. SO WITH SOME OF OUR PROJECTS, YOU'LL SEE WE HAVE SOME EXAMPLE I'LL SKIP TO SOME OTHER ONES. FIRST THIS IS A PROJECT THAT WE HAVE IN MESQUITE, YOU'LL SEE TWO STORY GLASS HERE LINES. UH YOU KNOW CONTRAST COLORS. UM WE TYPICALLY HAVE THIS ON ALMOST ALL OF OUR PROJECT. OF IT BEING A PD. OR SEE YOU. P WE LIKE THOSE FEATURES THAT'S IMPORTANT TO US AS A DEVELOPER AND AS A DESIGNER. THIS. THIS MESQUITE WAS ALSO ACTUALLY JUST TO NOTE WAS REZONED CASE AS WELL ON ON A HIGHWAY HIGHWAY, 80 AND 6 35 SO A LOT OF EXPOSURE, A LOT OF VISIBILITY AND IMPORTANT FOR THE
[00:20:05]
CITY TO SEE THAT AS WELL. THIS IS ANOTHER ONE IN HALTOM CITY ALSO REZONED CASE YOU CAN SEE WITH THIS DARK COLORS OF GLASS. ADDITIONAL STEEL, TEXAS LIMESTONE, WHICH IS YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT WE KIND OF LIKE RIGHT NOW AND EVEN ON SOME OF THE LARGER BUILDINGS, WE TRY TO KEEP SOME OF THOSE SAME FEATURES. SAME THING HERE. UM THIS WAS ALSO A REASONED CASE IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH. UM AND THE SAME FEATURES THAT HAVE ALREADY MENTIONED. AND THIS JUST TO NOTE. YOU KNOW, THIS IS MORE OF A BULK BUILDING WERE A LOT OF THOSE DESIGN FEATURES AREN'T REALLY NEEDED. WE STILL TRY TO ACHIEVE THOSE ANYWAY AND WE THINK THAT THAT'S THAT'S BETTER FOR THE PROJECT BETTER FOR THE AREA BETTER FOR THE NEIGHBORS. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.WELL, THAT'S NOT A QUESTION IN FRONT OF US TONIGHT. IT WAS JUST AN INQUISITIVE MIND WANTING TO KNOW. YEAH WE APPRECIATE IT. DESIGN TEAM TAKES A LOT OF PRIDE IN IT. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ANYONE OKAY ? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONED, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. I'LL MAKE A MISSION. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION MEMBERS KIRKENDALL TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE ANONYMOUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND MR TAYLOR, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE. AND THE MOTION CARRIES THE ITEM WHERE WE SENT TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ELECTION. AT THE SEPTEMBER 2020 22 MEETING. THANK YOU. NEXT TIME TO TWO DAYS. 00740 PUBLIC
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards and to Allow for Commercial and Auto Related Uses, Located Approximately 330 Feet South of North Brook Drive and on the West Side of U.S. Highway 75 (Central Expressway)]
HEARING REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD. AND CC COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. OVERLAY DISTRICT TO PD. THIS IS TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL AND AUTO RELATED USES. THIS IS 300 FT. SOUTH OF NORTHBROOK. DRIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF US ALWAYS 75. ALRIGHT, LET ME PULL IT. OKAY SO THIS ONE IS THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 2.27 ACRE PROPERTY . CURRENTLY ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO A NEW PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE ALLOWED USES. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY IS ON PD LIKE I MENTIONED WITH AN UNDERLYING ZONING OF PLANTS CENTER WITH THE ADDITION OF PERMITTING MANY WAREHOUSES AND OR SELF STORAGE ON THE PROPERTY. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO REZONE TO A NEW PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW SPACE LIMITS AND USES SIMILAR TO THOSE OF OUR C THREE ZONING DISTRICT OR REGIONAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT, WITH THE ADDITION OF SELECT AUTO RELATED, USES, A FULL LIST OF THE PROPOSED USES IS AVAILABLE IN THE STAFF REPORT . UM MANY OF THE PROPOSED USES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE THREE ZONING LIKE I MENTIONED THERE ARE SOME HIGHER INTENSITY AUTOMOTIVE USES, INCLUDING THE REQUESTS SUCH AS THE BODY SHOP REPAIR USE. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS IN AN AREA ALONG US 75 THAT IS ALREADY HEAVILY POPULATED WITH AUTOMOTIVE AND SERVICE USES, INCLUDING THE ADJACENT EXISTING BRANDON THOMAS SUBARU CAR DEALERSHIP AND THE MINI WAREHOUSES DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE SITE. DUE TO THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH USES IN THE AREA STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE HIGHER INTENSITY USES PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE P D, AS WE DO NOT THINK THEY WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO NEARBY DEVELOPMENTS. UM FOR SOME MORE CONTEXT ON THIS PARTICULAR PARTICULAR REQUEST. THE APPLICANTS INDICATED AN ATTEMPT TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING THOMAS COLLISION CENTER THAT IS CURRENTLY TO THE WEST OF THIS SITE. RIGHT OVER HERE CURRENTLY , UM, INTO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH MINIMAL CHANGES TO THE SITE OVERALL, AS INDICATED BY THE APPLICANT, THE FACADE WILL BE RENOVATED TO COORDINATE WITH BOB THOMAS FORD TO THE NORTH, BUT THE SITE WILL OTHERWISE REMAIN UNAFFECTED BY THE CHANGE IN YEARS, GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL USES IN THE PDR CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION OF COMMERCIAL CENTER AND THAT THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND AUTOMOTIVE USES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT BUSINESSES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AS PRESENTED, AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, LEXI QUESTIONS ANYONE STAFF. THANK YOU. IS THERE APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? MR CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOB ROEDER 1700 RED BUD SUITE 300 IN MCKINNEY ON BEHALF OF THE[00:25:03]
APPLICANT, THOMAS THREE LLC. I THINK. LEXI GAVE YOU A VERY THOROUGH REPORT ON WHAT WE'RE SEEKING TO DO. AH! I MENTIONED TO A NUMBER OF YOU SINCE YOUR LITTLE SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTENT IS TO MOVE THE COLLISION CENTER OPERATION INTO THIS BUILDING BE NO RENOVATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING OTHER THAN SOME FACADE CHANGES. AND THEY EXIST.INCLUSION CENTER WILL BE TURNED INTO A HEY, TRUCK MAINTENANCE. FACILITY. AND THAT IS ALREADY PERMITTED IN ON THE NORTH BOOK DRIVE LOCATION WHERE THE MAINTENANCE OR WHERE THE COLLISION CENTER PRESENTLY IS. SO WE'RE JUST TRYING TO MOVE THE PIECES AROUND ON THE BOARD A LITTLE BIT. AND WOULD REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATIONS. CITY COUNCIL. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR ROEDER. THEIR QUESTIONS OF OUR APPLICANT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'VE COME TONIGHT, EDWARD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING APPROVED THE PROPOSAL REZONING REQUEST WITH THE SPECIAL ORDINANCE PROVISIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. EMOTIONAL MR WOULD HAVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE ANIMUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING THE SPECIAL ORGANS PROVISIONS. SECOND MEMBERS.
KIRKENDALL. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES THE HONORABLE BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE SEPTEMBER 20. 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM. TONIGHT IS 22 DAYS. 0087 Z, A PUBLIC HEARING.
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “C2” - Local Commercial District, Located on the Southwest Corner of Virginia Parkway and South Independence Parkway]
TO REZONE A PROPERTY FROM PD TO SEE TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT . THIS IS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY IN SOUTH INDEPENDENTS PARKWAY, MR BENNETT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR CHAIRMAN. THIS APPLICATION IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY IN VIRGINIA PARKWAY FROM PD TO SEE TOO THE EXISTING PD ALLOWS FOR OFFICE IN SIMILAR USES ON THE SITE. IN THE WATER OF INTENT. THE APPLIQUE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE INTENT TO REZONE IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR A DAYCARE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ADDITION TO THE OFFICE. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE AERIAL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. MUCH OF THE SURROUNDING AREA IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ALREADY. IN ADDITION TO THE RESIDENTIAL THAT JACK IN JUNE FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IS NEARBY TO THE SOUTH. THE POLICE TYPE DESIGNATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE COMPLAINT SUBURBAN LIVING WHILE THE SUBURBAN LIVING PLACE TYPE FOCUSES MOSTLY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. UM. LOW INTENSITY USES THAT COMPLEMENT THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS IS ALSO ENCOURAGED STAFF'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED REZONE IS COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS LOCATION AT THE CORNER OF TWO MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. WE'LL ALSO BEING NEARBY TO A SCHOOL. AS SUCH STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REZONING REQUEST IN ALL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, JAKE QUESTIONS ANYONE DISAPPEARED E TWO C TWO AND YOU MENTIONED LOW INTENSITY USES. AND THIS IS A DESCRIPTION OF TAKING WHAT IS UNDERLYING OFFICE TO A DAYCARE, BUT GOING TO SEE TO ALSO OPENS IT UP FOR DRIVE THROUGHS BECAUSE WE CAN. IT DOES ALSO OPENING UP FOR DRIVE THROUGHS. WOULD WE CONSIDER THAT LOW INTENSITY? I WOULDN'T SAY THAT THAT'S TOO LOW INTENSITY. THERE IS OTHER COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, MAYBE, BUT THEN FOR THE DAYCARE USE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK FOR AN S U P OR THE DAYCARE USE WANT TO BE PERMITTED AT ALL? BUT THE FAST FOOD DRIVE THRU WOULD BE PERMITTED AT THAT TIME THEY HAVE TO. THEY HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH FROM AN S U P FOR DAYCARE, BUT NOT A DRIVE THROUGH. THEY WOULD FOR A DRIVE THROUGH AS WELL. SO IN MORE NOT IN C TWO AND C TWO. THEY WOULD BE PERMITTED BY RIGHT TO HAVE THE DAYCARE ON SITE. TUESDAY. SORRY I WAS JUST SAYING C TWO IS WHAT WE ENCOURAGE APPLICANTS, UM , TO DO ON HARD CORNERS OF MAJOR ARTILLERY, ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. THAT'S TRADITIONALLY WHAT WE'VE BEEN WITH SOME SO IT'S GONNA BE A DAYCARE AND AN OFFICE. IS IT? COMBINED LIVE THAT QUESTION DESCRIPTION. I'LL LEAVE THAT QUESTION UP TO THE APPLICANT. THEY ARE HERE TONIGHT, AND THEY CAN GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL ON HOW FAR IN THE PROCESS THEY ARE THAT DAYCARE AND OFFICE UM WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT TONIGHT IS JUST THE REASON OTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE? JAKE THANK YOU[00:30:01]
, SIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU, JAKE. UM MY NAME IS ELLIOT BOGERT AND WITH TRIANGLE ENGINEERING AT 17, 82, WEST MCDERMOTT DRIVE AND ALLEN, TEXAS. APOLOGIES I DON'T BELIEVE I FILLED OUT A SPEAKER CARD. I CAN FILL ONE OUT AT THE END OF THIS. SO WE ARE PLANNING ON REZONING THIS PROPERTY FROM P D 2001. AH 02024 WITH THE PREDOMINANT ZONING DEFINITION OF A 12 C TWO. THIS REZONING APPLICATION WOULD ALLOW US TO EXCUSE ME. WOULD ALLOW US TO CONSTRUCT A COMBINATION OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICES ALONG WITH EITHER DEACON, DAYCARE OR RETAIL. UM I WANT TO EMPHASIZE O CONSTRUCT ANY TYPE OF DRIVE THROUGH. AH, ANY TYPE OF DRIVE THROUGH BUSINESS. AT THIS INTERSECTION. AGAIN. I BELIEVE JAKE. UH GIVE A PRETTY GREAT PRESENTATION THAT COVERED PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING THAT I WANTED TO SPEAK ABOUT, AND I'LL BE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE'LL GO BACK TO MY ORIGINAL QUESTION TO STAFF. YOU'RE DOING AN OFFICE BUILDING AND A DAYCARE. THESE BUILDINGS COMBINED AND CAN GIVE US A DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THEY ARE SEPARATE RIGHT NOW. WE DO NOT PLAN ON COMBINING THEM.THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE. WE ARE STILL KIND OF FLUSHING OUT THE INTRICACIES OF A CONCEPT PLAN AT THIS TIME. BUT WE CAN DIVE INTO THOSE DETAILS WHEN WE GO THROUGH A SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. ANYONE ELSE? OTHER QUESTIONS. MR BOGART. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THEM IF YOU COME TONIGHT. I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS PROPOSED REZONED. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE SIDE OF THIS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE ANIMUS FIRST HALF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND, MISTER WATLEY. ANY DISCUSSION? YES. MR MAYOR. CONCERN HERE IS FINE WITH THE APPLICANT, BUT WITH THE DRIVE THROUGH FAST FOOD BEING IN THE SAME ZONING AS A DAYCARE. IN AN APPLICANT COMING IN TO RESIDENTS AND SAYING WE'RE GOING TO PUT A DAYCARE, BUT ONCE I GET THE ZONING, THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT WITHIN THAT ZONING. IS MY LONG TERM CONCERN WITH C TWO. I THINK THERE'S A DIFFERENT INTENSITY OF USE BETWEEN FAST FOOD AND A DAYCARE. AND THAT I STILL GO BACK THAT I BELIEVE IN S U P IS EVENTUALLY NEEDED FOR THOSE. BUT. DULY NOTED MR ARNOLD JUST TO CLARIFY AND ANOTHER QUESTION. SO A DRIVE THROUGH WITH THIS NEW ZONING WOULD REQUIRE AN ISSUE P. IT WOULD NOT. I THINK WHAT MR BENNETT WAS REFERRING TO WAS THE C ONE ZONING DISTRICT IN A C ONE ZONING DISTRICT. DAYCARE WOULD REQUIRE THAT ADDITIONAL S U P WHEREAS WITH THE C TWO ZONING DISTRICT, A DAYCARE AND ALSO DRIVE THROUGHS WOULD ARE ALLOWED BY RIGHT AND HISTORICALLY, SITES THAT DO SIT ON THE INTERSECTION OF TWO MAJOR ROADWAYS. UM STAFF HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN COMFORTABLE WITH THAT C TWO ZONING, THEREBY ALLOWING THAT DAYCARE WITHOUT THE NEED FOR THE SCP, AND THAT'S THE ONE ZONING OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THANK YOU FOR THAT. OTHER COMMENTS. WHY WOULD YOU HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND? UM MOTION IS HAS CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE ANIMUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. YES. NO. THE MOTION PASSES BY BOAT OR SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST YOU WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. OUR FINAL ACTION AT THE SEPTEMBER 2020 22 MEETING. THE LAST. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM 22 DAYS. 0079 Z. PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST TO REZONE
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “RS-60” - Single Family Residence District and “TMN” - Traditional McKinney Neighborhood Overlay District to “DR” - Duplex Residential District and “TMN” - Traditional McKinney Neighborhood Overlay District, Located Approximately 250 Feet North of Jefferson Street and on the East Side of Rockwall Street]
A PROPERTY FROM RS 60 SINGLE FAMILY. AND TRADITIONAL MCKINNEY NEIGHBORHOOD TO DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND TRADITIONAL MCKINNEY NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS 250 FT.NORTH OF JEFFERSON STREET ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROCK WALL STREET. TAXI. SO THIS ONE IS, UM THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE AN APPROXIMATELY 10.72 ACRE PROPERTY FROM OUR 60 OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO D. R FOR DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP DUPLEXES ON AN INFILL LOT DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE EXISTING CHURCH ADJACENT TO THE DRAINAGE CULVERT. DUPLEX USES ARE GENERALLY CONSIDERED PART OF A HEALTHY HOUSING MIX TO PROVIDE A VARIETY OF HOUSING OPTIONS TO RESIDENTS FOR THE CITY OF THE KIDNEY. UM THEY ARE ALSO
[00:35:05]
CONSIDERED PART OF THAT MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING STOCK THAT WE'D BE LOOKING FOR IN TERMS OF MCKINNEY DESIRING DIVERSITY OF HOUSING TYPES TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR RESIDENTS. AS ONE OF MCKINNEY'S OLDEST NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS AREA REFLECTS A WIDE VARIETY OF LOT SIZES AND HOUSING STYLES. ALTHOUGH DUPLEXES ARE NOT EXISTING ON IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT LOTS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THERE ARE THERE ARE MIXED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT LARGE, WITH SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND OTHER PLACES OF WORSHIP. IT IS STAFF'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED DUPLEXES COULD PROVIDE A LOW INTENSITY HOUSING TYPE THAT IS COMPATIBLE TO THE CHARACTER OF THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE BUFFER OF THE CHURCH AND THE EXISTING CULVERT ON SITE. THE REQUEST IS ALSO COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT CALLS FOR URBAN LIVING AND A MIX OF HOUSING OPTIONS. I'M SO AS SUCH STUFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. PLEASE NOTE THAT A REQUEST TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY FOR DUPLEXES DID COME BEFORE PNC AND COUNCIL IN JUNE OF 2020 STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THEIR REQUEST IN 2020, FOR THE SAME REASONS, NOTED TODAY. HOWEVER THE REZONING WAS DENIED BY COUNCIL AFTER AN UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FROM PNC AND THERE WAS A VALID WRITTEN PROTESTS FROM NEARBY RESIDENTS INCLUDED IN THE 2020 CASE, WITH MAIN CONCERNS BEING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FOUR RENT HOUSING TYPES VERSUS OWNER OCCUPIED, UM BUT PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ZONING CODE DOES NOT REGULATE ANY KIND OF FOR RENT PRODUCT VERSUS OWNERSHIP PRODUCT . SO OUR REVIEW AS STAFF WE LOOK AT THE TECHNICAL SIDE OF THE REVIEW IN TERMS OF JUST FOLLOWING THE POLICIES, UM THAT HAVE BEEN PUT IN PLACE, SO WE PROVIDE THE TECHNICAL OPINION INSTEAD OF THE CONCERNS FROM THE RESIDENTS, SO PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED CITIZEN COMMENTS THAT WERE PASSED OUT BEFORE THE MEETING. WE ARE WE ALL ARE ALSO IN RECEIPT OF A WRITTEN PROTEST THAT WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF VALIDATING UM IF THE WRITTEN PROTEST IS VALID, IT WILL REQUIRE SUPERMAJORITY FOR APPROVAL FROM COUNCIL. AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU'LL HAVE. THANK YOU, LEXI. OTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE? 0.71 ACRES, APPROXIMATELY 31,000 SQUARE FEET OF LAND HERE.TRADITIONALLY. WITHIN THE NEW ZONING CODE ABOUT 2400 SQUARE FEET IS ALLOWED A LOT SIZE WORK TOWN HOME OVERALL. IN OUR MULTI FAMILY HAS BEEN 20 TO 24 UNITS PER ACRE. WHAT WE'VE BEEN IMPROVING. YES, THAT'S CORRECT. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS ANYONE? LEXI. THANK YOU. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. HELLO EVERYONE. AH MY NAME IS TOMMY. THE AND I'M HERE TO PRESENT ALI. HE'S THE OWNER. AND THANK YOU FOR HEARING US TODAY. THE GOAL FOR THIS PROJECT IS TO CREATED COMMUNITY THAT. IS BETTER, UM MORE EVOLVED, AND IT'S ALSO BETTER DEVELOPED IN THAT AREA. YEAH. AND THERE IS A PRESENTATION. CAN I ACCESS IT THROUGH HERE? OKAY OKAY. GREAT.
UM. SO NOW THIS IS. VISION I HAD AS A DESIGN THEIR MODERN VISION OF FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT VR. AH WILLING TO WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND WITH THE CITY TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING, UH, THAT FITS WITHIN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD BETTER. NO. SO AS MENTIONED THE KILOGRAM FREEVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH IS ON THE NORTH SIDE, AND THERE ARE TWO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ON THE SOUTH SIDE DIVIDED BY THE COLVERT. YEAH. THE ACCORDINGLY ARE IN PROCESS OF UPDATING THE CULVERT AND REPLIED THE PROPERTIES RIGHT NOW. THERE ARE 45 TRACKS THERE ON BUILDABLE AND TO CHANGE THAT WE HAD TO, UM HMM. CHANGE THE PAINTS IN THE WATERWAY THAT WAS CAUSING FLOODING. UH THEY'RE RETAINING WALL IN THE LEFT PICTURE IS THE SLANTED AND FALLING AND THERE WAS SOME EROSION THAT WAS HAPPENING ON THE PROPERTIES. AND THAT ALL RIGHT ADJACENT TO THIS, COLBERT.
SO THIS IS HYDROLOGY STUDY OF WHAT IT USED TO BE BEFORE THE CHANGES, AS YOU CAN SEE, UH,
[00:40:09]
PART OF THE PROPERTY AND THE NEIGHBOR PROPERTIES AND THE STREET WAS ON THEIR FLOOD ZONE.SO TODAY. UM THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE DONE. UH, WE HAVE WIDENED THE CONCRETE FOR EASIER PASSAGE VAGUE. UM. RE GRADING TO OUR LOVE FOR 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN OUR PROPERTY AND DO EROSION CONTROL. SO NOW THIS IS THE PROPOSED PLAN FOR THREE LOTS, UM, THAT YOU CAN SEE THE CULVERT ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND THE BLUE AREA IS REPRESENTING VERY 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE IS GOING TO BE UM. THE GOAL FOR US IS TO REASON THESE PROPERTIES TO CREATE A MORE DENSE IN THE AREA SO WE CAN GET A BETTER USE OF AH, THE PROPERTIES. UH AND ALSO MAKE MORE PROFIT BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN SPENDING A LOT OF MONEY ON THE COLD WORST. AND THAT'S THE PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. SO. WE'RE GOING TO REZONE AND POTENTIALLY, AND YOU'RE GONNA HAVE THREE LOTS AND REPLAY IT LATER. UH THEY'RE IN PROCESS OF REPLAY. SO THERE ARE THIS WE HAVE DONE. UH THEY NEEDED A NOTE FROM THE ENGINE FROM ENGINEER THAT EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DONE.
AND THE ENGINEER DID THE SITE VISIT LAST WEEK. THERE ARE WRITING THE NOTE TO THE CITY SO THEY RE PLEDGE SHOULD HAPPEN. SOMETIMES SOON SO THAT WE WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT SIX UNITS OF DUPLEXES, I THINK IN 2020 HAD MENTIONED POTENTIALLY FORWARD, BUT I'M GUESSING THAT WAS BEFORE THE HYDROLOGY REPORTS FLOOD. SO YEAH, IT'S 33 DUPLEXES. SO SIX UNITS TOTAL. YEAH. THE FLOODWAY.
IT'S LEFTOVER. THERE'S SOME BIG REMAINDER. ROUND THE LOT. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GIVE YOU THAT AND WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN ADDITIONAL FLOODWAY. THEN YOU KNOW THE BIG CIRCLES THAT LIKE THREE LOT TO LOT ONE. SO THAT'S UH DEPENDING ON. I GUESS HE CAN ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. THE OWNER YEAH. SO YEAH. THE CALL WOULD THAT WE HAD PASSING ON THE SOUTH SIDE BELONG TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY AND BASED ON WHAT THEY HAVE DONE FOR THE AIRPORT. THEY CAUSED THE AREA TO BE FLOODED.
ACTUALLY THE BORDER IT RISE THAT BY NINE INCHES SO WE DIDN'T KNOW THIS WHEN WE PURCHASE THE LOTS.
WHEN WE WERE APPLYING FOR REZONE AND REPLIED, ADDING, WE FOUND OUT THAT THIS PROBLEM ACTUALLY EXIST. AND SO WE HAD TO HIRE HYDROLOGISTS. WE HAD TO HIRE ENGINEERS. SO WHAT IS HAPPENING IS THAT BASED ON THE ENGINEERING WORK AND THE HYDROLOGY REPORT THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY.
UH THEY CAME UP WITH ACTUALLY GUIDELINE. THERE WAS A PINCH ON THE CULVERT WE HAD TO REMOVE IT WITH, YOU KNOW, WE REMOVED THE COURT DEPENDS DEPENDS RIGHT NOW THE COLLEGE IS WIDER THAN WE BUILD A FLUME. SO THE WATER CAN PASS. THEN THAT AREA THE BLUE AREA THAT YOU SEE, IT'S GOING TO BE INCLUDED IN LARGE ONE AND LOCK THREE. AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE MAINTAINING IT, BUT ACTUALLY, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE BUILT ON TOP OF THAT LOT THAT'S PROPOSED TO BE THERE IN CASE THAT 100 YEAR FLOOD JUST THREE DAYS A WEEK WILL HAPPEN IN DALLAS AREA HAPPENS HERE. IT CAN ACTUALLY SAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND BASED ON WHAT WE DID, UH, LINDSAY STREET, IT WAS FLOODED AND MAYBE STILL, CITY NEEDS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. BUT DEFINITELY WILL SAVED ROCK WALLACE STREET. FROM THE FLOODING BECAUSE THE PINCH CAUSED THE FLOODING ACTUALLY.
BACK IN THE WATER WOULD HAVE BACKED UP TO THE ROCK WALL STREET. AND THE VIDEO. I MEAN A LOT AND LOTS OF THE NEIGHBORS THEY ACTUALLY ARE GOING TO ENJOY THE BENEFIT OF WHAT WE DID. FOR SOME REASON, I DON'T KNOW WHY. THEY THINK WE ARE GOING TO BE BUILDING A MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT UNIT OVER THERE. IT'S ONLY DUPLEXES ONLY THREE DUPLEXES TOTAL OF SIX. THAT WE ARE GOING TO BUILD ON TOP OF IT. IS THAT PERFECT FEAST SIMPLE TO SELL. ARE YOU GOING TO HOLD THOSE AND RENT THEM? WHICH WAS MY RETIREMENT PLAN? SO YOU'RE YOU'RE PLANNING TO HOLD HIM AND
[00:45:04]
RENT THEM AND I THINK FROM WHAT I HEAR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY IS GOING TO DO FOR THE CITY HALL BECAUSE THIS IS LIKE 34 BLOCKS DOWN. AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS TO ACTUALLY REVITALIZED AND I'M SURE SYRIAN MCKINNEY IS GOING TO GO THERE, AND THE CONCEPT IS JUST YOU KNOW, TO HAVE A MODERN LOOK. BUT IF THAT'S NOT WHAT CITY WANTS, WE CAN JUST WORK WITH THE CITY PLANNER, HOWEVER, THEY WANTED, BUT OVERALL, I THINK THAT AREA NEEDS TO BE REVITALIZED, GOT LOTS OF POTENTIAL BUT THE NEIGHBORS EVEN THEN, WHEN I WAS FIXING THE AREA, AND I WAS SPENDING MONEY OUT OF MY OWN POCKET, I SPEND OVER $100,000. $30,000 FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES. THEY CAME EVERY DAY, NOT LETTING ME NOT ALLOWING ME TO FIX THE PROBLEM THAT THEY DIDN'T BELIEVE THAT IT'S GONNA BE FLOODED AND WE HAD THIS STUDIES. BOTH CITY AND HYDROLOGY THAT I HAD. I HIRED AND FOR SOME REASON, THE NEIGHBORS THEY ARE OPPOSED TO ANY CHANGE. THEY DON'T WANT. YOU KNOW A NEW LOOK IN THAT AREA. THEY WANT TO KEEP IT AS ACTUALLY THEY WANT TO JUST HAVE EMPTY LOT SO THEY CAN PASS FROM THAT SIDE TO THIS SIDE OF IT. AND THE CHURCH. THEY WANT TO USE IT AS A PARKING LOT. THEY'VE BEEN USING IT BEFORE I PURCHASED IT. THEY USE IT AS A PARKING LOT, AND NOW THEY ARE GOING CROSS STREET. AND SO I DON'T KNOW THE INTENTION WHAT IT IS, BUT OVERALL, UH I THINK IT'S BENEFICIAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALL THE NEIGHBORS. I'M NOT GOING TO BUILD, YOU KNOW THEY'RE BUDGETING LIKE FOR EVERY DUPLEX AROUND 5 TO $600,000. SOMETHING YOU KNOW. NICE FANCY LUXURY FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, TOO. AND IT WILL REVITALIZE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. HOPEFULLY. WHEN DID YOU PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY TWO YEARS AGO. SO THE APPLIED ONCE FOR THIS AND I WAS IMPRISONED AT THE MOMENT, BUT LOTS OF NEIGHBORS. THEY THOUGHT IT'S GOING TO BE MULTI FAMILY. IT'S GOING TO BE APARTMENT COMPLEX. SO YOU PURCHASED THE PROPERTY WITH THE INTENT OF PUTTING DUPLEXES THERE FOR YOUR RETIREMENT? YES I CHECKED THE ZONING A LOT TO DO THAT. SO THAT WAS OUR PLAN. WE TALKED TO THE CITY PLANNER HERE EMAIL. THEY SAID. THIS IS TO BUY THE FIVE LOTS MAKE IT TO FOUR. BUILDABLE LARGE LARGER LOTS AND APPLY FOR THE REZONING. HE DID IT AT THE SAME TIME, BUT ALL OF A SUDDEN THE REPORT THAT THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE FLOODED. IT JUST SURFACED. IT WASN'T NOBODY KNEW ABOUT IT. AND IT SEEMS THAT CITY OF MCKINNEY, THEY HAVE DONE SOME CHANGES FOR THE AIRPORT. AND BECAUSE THIS AREA THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD, BOTH SIDES TO GO UNDER WATER FOR NINE INCHES AND THE INVESTMENT THAT I DID. IT SAVED A LOT. I'M GOING TO SIT AND I'M NOT GOING TO SAY ALL OF IT, BUT IT'S SAVED LOTS OF NEIGHBORHOOD LOTS OF NEIGHBORS FROM THEIR HOUSES. BIN FLOODED BY RAIN WATER. AND I TALKED TO THE NEIGHBORS. THEY SAY THEY HAVE BEEN LIVING HERE. 30 YEARS 50 YEARS, 20 YEARS NEVER WAS FLOODED. BUT WITH THE CLIMATE CHANGE IS GOING TO HAPPEN. HMM AND I THINK IT WAS A STEPPING RIGHT DIRECTION. AND IT'S NOT YOUR INTENT TO ACTUALLY RESIDE HERE, RIGHT? YOU'RE JUST GONNA RENT THEM OUT. SO, UH, MHM CAN'T RESIDE IN SIX OF THEM. MAYBE IF I WANTED FOR MY RETIREMENT ARE GOING ONE. THEN THE REST IS GOING TO BE JUST, YOU KNOW, SUPPORTING MY FAMILY. BUT NO, I CAN ONLY GO LIVE IN 11 UNIT. NOT ALL. FOR YOU INTEND TO LIVE IN AT LEAST ONE OF THE UNION. ME OR I HAVE TWO SONS. YES, THAT'S THE PLAN. BUT AND I JUST WANT TO ADD THIS AFTER THE ATTITUDE OF THE NEIGHBORS THAT I SEE. I DON'T KNOW. I MEAN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR SOME REASON, THEY ARE NOT AT EASE. WITH EACH OTHER. I MEAN, I WAS TRYING TO FIX THE CALL THAT ALL OF THEM, YOU KNOW, THEY JUST GATHERED NOT LETTING ME FIXING THE CORE, AND I KEPT TELLING THIS IS NOT ME. THIS IS THE CITY OF MY KIDNEY. THIS BELONGS TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AND I'M JUST TRYING TO FIX THE PROBLEM FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND YEAH, WE HAD EVEN JUST FIXING THIS CALL THAT WE HAD ISSUES WITH THE NEIGHBORS. OTHER QUESTIONS. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. WE DO[00:50:04]
HAVE MATT RICHARDSON HERE, MATT, WE IF YOU COULD COME UP, WE'VE SPENT SOME TIME TALKING ABOUT DRAINAGE AND SOME ENGINEERING. TOPICS MATT RICHARDSON CITY MCKINNEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.YES SIR. THANK YOU. UM SO A COUPLE OF THINGS I WANT TO TOUCH ON NUMBER ONE, THE CITY DID NOT DO ANYTHING. THE AIRPORT DID NOT DO ANYTHING TO CAUSE ADDITIONAL FLOODING. ASSOCIATED WITH THE AIRPORT. THERE WAS A LARGER AREA STUDY DONE A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO THAT THAT LOOKED AT THE DRAINAGE AREAS THAT FLOAT TOWARDS THE AIRPORT, OF WHICH THIS AREA FLOWS TOWARDS THE AIRPORT. THE AIRPORT DOESN'T FLOW TOWARDS THIS FLOW TOWARDS THIS AREA. UM AND WITH THAT STUDY, WE DID IDENTIFY THAT. AS IS COMMON IN A LOT OF THESE OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS ON THE EAST SIDE OF TOWN. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS THAT WAS BUILT 50 PLUS YEARS AGO. IT IS UNDERSIZED. IT CANNOT CONVEY. UM THE STORM THAT TODAY WE WOULD ASK THAT DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO CONVEY, SO THAT'S WHAT THAT STUDY IDENTIFIED WAS THAT THERE WAS AN EXISTING PROBLEM. ASSOCIATED WITH THE 100 YEAR DESIGN STORM. I WANT TO EMPHASIZE TO ON THAT THAT WE DESIGNED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FOR A 100 YEAR STORM A STORM THAT THEORETICALLY HAPPENS ONCE EVERY 100 YEARS. YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN IN THE NEWS THESE DAYS THAT INTENSITIES FOR STORMS ARE GOING UP. UM MAYBE WE SEE 100 YEAR STORM IS A LITTLE MORE OFTEN THAN WE USED TO. UM BUT IT STILL MIGHT NOT BE SOMETHING THAT EVEN IN THE LAST 2030 YEARS, WE MIGHT NOT HAVE SEEN THAT STORM. BUT BASED ON THE DATA THAT WE BASE THESE ENGINEERING STUDIES ON IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS AREA WOULD FLOOD. UM GO BACK TO THAT PREVIOUS EXHIBIT HERE. UM IT IS POSSIBLE THAT IN THE EXISTING CONDITION UNDER THAT DESIGN STORM, WE COULD HAVE SEEN ROADWAY FLOODING, AS IS SHOWN IN. UM THIS EXHIBIT. BUT WITH THE GRADING PLANS THAT WERE APPROVED THROUGH MY TEAM IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WITH A FLOOD STUDY. THAT WAS DONE IN ASSOCIATED IN ASSOCIATION WITH THOSE GRADING PLANS. WE DID LIMIT THE FLOODING TO THE AREA SHOWN HERE. BASED ON THE STUDIES WE HAVE DONE SO. UM. I WANT TO TOUCH ON THAT. IF THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT IT. I'M HAPPY TO TRY TO ANSWER THOSE. SO IS THIS PLANTED OUT TODAY TO THESE THREE LOTS, OR IS IT STILL THE FIVE? AS OF RIGHT NOW, TODAY, I BELIEVE IT IS STILL OFFICIALLY THE FIVE BECAUSE ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF FILING THE PLAT THAT SHOWED THE NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT. UM, THAT YOU SEE. YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS A NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY HERE. ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF FILING THAT PLATT WAS DOING THE GRADING WORK THAT ACTUALLY CONTAINS THE FLOODPLAIN AREA INTO THAT DRAIN ACHIEVEMENT . SO FILE THAT PLATT THEN HOW IT GETS THEY SOLVE THESE OFF LATER ON, I'LL SELL THEM OFF 123 LOTS TO SEPARATE OWNERS. HOW DOES THAT GET MAINTAINED IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS? UM BECAUSE THIS IS ATTACHED TO A DRAINAGE CHANNEL THAT IS IN A THAT THAT IS LOCATED IN A CITY RIGHT OF WAY. THE CITY MAINTAINS THE CONVEYANCE OF WATER. WE ENSURE THAT THE CULVERT STAY CLEAR THAT WATER CAN FLOW THROUGH THAT MAIN CHANNEL. BUT ANYTHING IF THERE'S ANY DEBRIS THAT KIND OF COLLECTS IN THE OVERFLOW AREA. I'M GOING TO CALL IT THAT WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO CLEAN UP THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO MOW THE GLOBE TO MOW THE GRASS WITHIN THAT AREA. STILL UM, AND TO DO THINGS LIKE THAT, SO WE, THE WATER SWATH AREA IS NOW THE RESPONSIBILITY CITY EVERYTHING IN BLUE FOR THEM FOR RUN OFF AGAIN. THE CITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRIMARY FOR THE PRIMARY CONVEYANCE OF WATER , SO WE'RE MAINLY LOOKING AT UME MAIN CHANNEL THAT ONE THAT THAT THAT RUNS RIGHT THERE, SO THERE'S THAT LARGER SWATH. THAT IS ON THE ACTUAL LOT. THAT'S GONNA BE THE HOMER OR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNDERLYING PROPERTY OWNER TO ULTIMATELY MAINTAIN THAT AREA TO SPLIT THESE UP AND GET THIS A SEPARATE PLATT AND IT WILL BE ADDRESSED AND PROTECTED IN THAT CORRECT THERE WILL BE A DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY. STILL, THERE ARE STANDARD NOTES THAT WE PUT ON PLATTS THAT INDICATE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS ULTIMATELY STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT MAINTENANCE. SO THEY DID THIS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY. CORRECT THEY THEY TURNED IN FLOOD STUDIES TO THE CITY. THEY TURNED A GRADING STUDIES TO THE CITY THAT WERE ULTIMATELY APPROVED AND PERMITS ISSUED BY THE CITY MONITORED THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS UNDER THE
[00:55:03]
HAVE WE HAVE, UM, UM UM, INSPECTORS IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THAT MONITOR WORK LIKE THIS? YES. SO ON THE MAP THAT YOU HAVE THERE NOW. UH THE BLUE AREA WOULD THAT BE LINDSAY STREET? OH, I FORGET WHAT STREETS THESE ARE HERE. THE BLUE AREA. HERE IS LINDSEY STREET.YES OKAY. THANK YOU, LINDSEY STREET. THERE WE GO. SO CONSIDERING THE APPLICANTS DONE THIS WITH HIS MONEY, UM AND THERE'S STILL REMAINING ISSUES THROUGH A LOT OF PART OF THE ELDER TOWN SIDE. IS THIS WHAT'S EXPECTED FROM GOING FORWARD THAT HAS LOTS DEVELOP OVER HERE. THE PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS WILL BE FIXING THE DRAINAGE. IT DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION IN THIS ONE. I CAN'T. I CAN'T SPEAK DIRECTLY TO WHAT THE APPLICANTS. UM WHAT? WHAT THE APP WHAT THE APPLICANTS INTENT WAS ONCE THE PLATT CAME IN, AND WE IDENTIFIED THAT. YES THERE WAS THIS DRAINAGE AREA HERE. IT WAS, EITHER IT WAS EITHER A QUESTION OF YOU CANNOT BUILD ANYTHING ON THOSE TWO LOTS. OR YOU CAN TRY TO MAYBE CONTAINED THIS A LITTLE BETTER SO YOU CAN MAYBE RECLAIM ONE OF THOSE LINES. WHEREAS IF THIS WAS UM. IT IS. IT IS RARE TO BE RIGHT NEXT TO A CHANNEL LIKE THIS. THAT IS THAT IS OVERFLOWING LIKE THAT. MOST OTHER SITUATIONS ON THE EAST SIDE OF TOWN. IT'S NOT QUITE A SITUATION LIKE THIS. JUST UNCOMMON. AS A BANKER. I'M WANTING TO KNOW IF I NEED A HYDROLOGY REPORT ON EVERY LOT NEXT TO A WATERWAY. THIS SPECIFIC SITUATION BEING RIGHT NEXT TO A SIGNIFICANT CHANNEL LIKE THAT IS FAIRLY UNCOMMON. IF THERE'S WATER IN A ROADWAY. TYPICALLY IT'S TYPICALLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE CURBS OR WITHIN A ROADSIDE DITCH IF THERE'S A ROADSIDE DITCH GOING ALUMINUM PLUMBER THEN? AH THIS WAS NOT A MAPPED FEMA FLOODPLAIN , SO IT DID NOT INVOLVE FEMA. IT WAS JUST UNDER UNDER CITY REGULATIONS. SOMETHING FLOOD WOULDN'T SEE IT. WELL, I CAN SAY FOR A FACT. THAT THAT PART IN THE BLUE I'VE WALKED IN THAT WATER WHEN IT FLOODED. AND I'VE LIVED IN THAT MUD WHEN IT WAS THERE. AND SO, UH, THAT'S NOT ANYTHING NEW. AND SO IT WOULD BE HARD TO PURCHASE THAT PROPERTY AND NOT KNOW THAT THAT EXISTED. BECAUSE. THAT'S A WHAT WE CALL IT. 100 YEARS FLOODPLAIN ABOUT DO WHEN I LOOK AT MY AGE, WE'RE ABOUT DUE FOR FLOOD. BECAUSE I'VE LIKE I SAID. I GUESS IT WOULD BE ADJACENT TO LOCK ONE FACING LINDSEY. THAT WOULD BE WHERE I GREW UP. SO I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THAT. AND ANYONE TOP THAT IN THE ROOM. HMM? NO, OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS REAL QUICK, BUT ALL OF THIS WORK STARTED. AFTER THE DENIAL FROM COUNCIL BACK IN 2020 . I DON'T RECALL WHEN THE ZONING DENIAL WAS ANYTHING THAT ENGINEERING HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN WAS RELATED TO THE PLATTE TO JUST CLEAN UP THE PLANTING FROM FIVE LOTS INTO THREE. SO WHAT'S THE TIME FRAME ON THAT? THAT WAS 2021. I PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED IN 2021. YES. OTHER QUESTIONS. BUT WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. NO PROBLEM VERY MUCH. OKAY WHERE ARE WE? PUBLIC HEARING? ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. SO IF YOU HEARD IT ON AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING THIS PROPOSED REZONE, YOU MAY COME TO THE PODIUM. ANYONE? YES, MA'AM. EVENING, EVERYONE. MY NAME IS KIMBERLY PALMER AND I AM THE RESIDENTS IN THE ROCKWELL COMMUNITY. FIRST I WANT TO SPEAK TO WHAT DEVELOPERS HAS STATED IN REGARDS TO THIS PARTICULAR PLOT OF LAND. THIS WASN'T JUST A BARREN SPOT. AH IT WAS USED AS A COMMUNITY AREA FOR THE CHURCH THAT SITS RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO IT. WE'VE HAD EASTER EGG HUNTS THEIR CAKE WALKS. OH EVEN HORSE HORSES WERE WRITTEN IN THIS AREA, SO IT'S BEEN A TERRIBLE PART OF OUR COMMUNITY. UM IT'S FAR AS US NOT WANTING HIM TO BE THE STATEMENT HE MADE ABOUT US NOT WANTING HIM TO BE IN THE AREA. WE DON'T MIND HIM BEING IN THE AREA. WE JUST WOULD LIKE OUR AREA TO CONTINUE TO BE A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL FAMILY, UM DISTRICT BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT THE DUPLEXES BECAUSE
[01:00:06]
THEY'RE RENTERS. THEY'RE NOT INVESTED IN THE COMMUNITY. THEY'RE THEY'RE TEMPORARILY TEMPORARILY FOR HOUSING AND THEY'RE GOING TO COME AND GO. WE WOULD LOVE FOR HIM TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL HOMES. AND HE'S GOT THREE LOTS. SO THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT WILL, UM BECOME PART OF OUR IDENTITY. WE ARE ALREADY OF DIVERSE COMMUNITY ALREADY. AND UH, OUR FOCUS IS LEGACY AND OWNERSHIP. LEGACY INVOLVES LIVING INTENTIONALLY AND AIMING TO BUILD INTO THE NEXT GENERATION FURTHER SUCCESS . AN EXAMPLE OF LEGACY IS FAMILY PROPERTY THAT HAS BEEN HANDED DOWN FOR GENERATIONS. LEGACY IS WHAT DEFINES OUR ROCKWALL NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S NOT JUST THE WORD THAT DESCRIBES WHERE WE LIVE. IT IS LITERALLY A REALITY FOR US AND OUR COMMUNITY.GENERATIONS OF FAMILIES STARTED THEIR ATTENDING CHURCH THERE AND STILL LIVE THERE. AS WE WERE GATHERING SIGNATURES TO PROTECT TO PROTEST THE REQUEST FOR THE DUPLEX DISTRICT. WE COULDN'T HELP BUT TO REMINISCE ABOUT THOSE THAT HELPED LAY THE SINGLE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF OUR COMMUNITY. WE DON'T WANT THEIR WORK TO BE IN VAIN. WE STAND FOR THEM, AND WE SPEAK FOR THOSE THAT AREN'T ABLE TO SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES. WE ALSO WANT TO CONTINUE TO ENSURE THEIR EFFORTS BY FIGHTING FOR WHAT THEY WORKED HARD TO ATTAIN. WEEKS HIS OWNERSHIP FAMILY CONNECTION AND IDENTITY. THAT AREA IS ONE OF FIVE HISTORICALLY BLACK COMMUNITIES. AND LIKE I SAID, WE BECOME MUCH MORE DIVERSE AND WE AS AS A COMMUNITY. WE WANT OUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TO REMAIN WE WERE GETTING, UM, THE SIGNATURES WE MET WITH A 95 YEAR OLD LADY NAME MARY LOU DOUGLAS. AND SHE.
I WAS VERY SURPRISED TO KNOW THAT THEY RE RE APPLIED FOR DUPLEXES. AND HER MAIN THING WAS SHE WANTED THE FAMILIES TO REMAIN WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES BECAUSE SHE'S OLDER, AND SHE DIDN'T WANT THE CONGESTION AND SHE DOESN'T GET AROUND MUCH, SO HER GOAL IS TO KEEP IT SINGLE FAMILY AND SHE'S ONE OF VERY MANY WHO MADE THAT SAME STATEMENT. SO WE RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT YOU PLEASE CONSIDER THAT AS YOU VOTE. PLEASE CHOOSE TO KEEP OUR SINGLE FAMILY COMMUNITY OVER CHOOSING PROFIT. THANK YOU, MISS PALMER. ANYONE ELSE? YES. GOOD NIGHT. I AGREE WITH MS PALMER AND I STAND IN WHAT SHE SAYS, UM TO KEEP THE COMMUNITY A SINGLE FAMILY HOME COMMUNITY. I HAVE MYSELF I'M SPEAKING ON A PERSONAL NOTE. I BELIEVE IT THERE FOR OVER 40 YEARS I WAS RAISED THERE. I'M SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE HOUSE, AND WE LIVED DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET OF THE PROPERTY THAT HE IS TRYING TO GET REZONED. LIKE I SAID, I HAVE LIVED THERE PERSONALLY MYSELF FOR OVER 40 YEARS. I HAVE RAISED MY CHILDREN. MY GRANDCHILDREN AND WE ACTUALLY HAVE OWNED ARE PROPERLY FOR 100 SINCE 19 OH, SIX. AND IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE DO KEEP IT AS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE'RE ACCUSTOMED TO THE QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD. WE'RE NOT OPPOSED TO HAVING, UM, NEW HOMES BUILT THERE BECAUSE WE HAVE SEVERAL ON THAT STREET THAT HAS BEEN BUILT OVER THE YEARS THAT HAS MADE AN NEIGHBORHOOD MUCH NICER, SO WE'RE NOT OPPOSED TO HIM DOING ANYTHING LIKE THAT. AND THE FACT THAT HE'S SAYING THAT WE'RE TRYING TO PEOPLE HAVE BEEN HE'S STOPPING, TRYING TO KEEP HIM FROM GOING FORWARD WITH THE DRAINAGE AND SO FORTH. I'LL JUST HAVE TO DISAGREE BECAUSE MOST OF THE PEOPLE THERE ARE WORKING PEOPLE OR ELDERLY PEOPLE THAT THAT ARE NOT THERE WHEN HE'S DOING WHATEVER HE'S DOING, UM AND AS FAR AS FLOODING. MR WALDMAN CAN ATTEST THIS. I LIVE DOWN THE STREET FROM HIM WHEN WE'RE GROWING UP. UM WHEN WE WERE YOUNGER, THERE WAS A DITCH THAT RAN JUST A REALLY LITERALLY A DITCH THAT RAN THAT AND WHICH DID OPPOSED FLOODING WHEN WE WAS YOUNGER, BUT OVER THE YEARS THEY HAVE UPGRADED THAT COVERED THAT BROUGHT IN BIGGER. UM I DON'T KNOW THE ROUND THINGS AND THEY'RE COVERED THAT UP, AND SO THERE HAS BEEN NO FLOODING. IN 30 40 YEARS THAT I'M AWARE OF NOW THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT 100 YEARS. OKAY, IT COULD BE. IT COULD BE COMING UP ON IT. BUT I JUST DON'T SEE THAT BEING IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AS LONG AS I HAVE, SO I'M JUST ASKING, AND I'M I'M STANDING HERE, UM THIS IS STRONGLY OPPOSING BRINGING IN DUPLEXES THAT COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE UNDESIRABLES AS OUR CHILDREN FREELY AND MY GRANDCHILDREN NOW AT THIS POINT , FREELY PLAY, YOU KNOW IN THE STREETS, NOT INDUSTRIES, BUT OUTSIDE PLAN. UM AND I JUST
[01:05:08]
ASKED. YOU JUST KEEP THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS IT IS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. SHE DIDN'T GIVE US HER NAME OR HER ADDRESS. ANGELA. HOW? ALEX HENDERSON. ANYONE ELSE? UM, WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT. MY NAME IS JONAS PALMER. I'M A RESIDENT OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. I LIVED THERE FOR 23 YEARS I'VE BEEN ALIVE. NO PASTOR WORLEY HERE. I LIVE NEXT TO MISS HENDERSON HERE AND MY MOTHER GOT UP AND TALKED. AND IF I'M BEING TRUTHFUL IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THE THINGS THAT THIS MAN HAS SAID ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD I CAN HONESTLY SAY I HAVEN'T SEEN HIM ONCE. HAVEN'T SEEN HIM. ASK ANY OF THE NEIGHBORS ABOUT WHAT WE DESIRE ABOUT WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO ACTUALLY HAVE PUT THEIR LIKE BASEBALL SAID, LIKE WE'VE SAID WE WOULD NOT MIND HOMES.DUPLEXES RENTED MYSELF. I'VE RENTED AROUND DUPLEXES THROUGHOUT MY YEARS OF LIVING WHEN I WAS IN COLLEGE, SO I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IT'S LIKE LIVING. AFTER ENTERS LIVING NEXT TO RENTERS, AND I CAN SAY IT'S NOT THE MOST PLEASANT EXPERIENCE. SOMETIMES YOU GET SOMEONE GOOD.
WHO WANTS TO TAKE CARE OF THE PROPERTY? BUT I MYSELF HAVE LIVED IN THE HOME OR RENTERS BEFORE HAVE NOT CARED ABOUT THE PROPERTY. I'M NOT CARED ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND I'VE SEEN THE GRASS OVERGROWN. I'VE SEEN THINGS IN THE SHED FALLING APART AND I HAD TO GET OUT THERE AND DEAL WITH THEM MYSELF. WE DON'T SEE THESE PEOPLE. SO IF WE DON'T SEE HIM NOW, CHANCES ARE WE'RE NOT GOING TO SEE HIM WHEN THIS WHEN THESE DUPLEXES THAT DESIRE TO PUT UP OR PUT UP SO IT'S GOING TO BE US CLEANING UP BEER BALLS IS GOING TO BE US CLEANING UP GLASS OFF THE GROUND. IT'S GOING TO BE US HAVING TO CONTINUE TO TAKE CARE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD LIKE WE'VE BEEN DOING. IN REGARDS TO THIS FLOODING. I'VE LIVED THERE LIKE I SAID, AND I WALKED THROUGH THE WATER I'VE PLAYED IN IT. I'M DONE ALL KINDS OF THINGS AND THAT FLOODWATER AND IT'S NEVER BEEN A PROBLEM. I'VE NEVER HEARD ANYONE COMPLAIN ABOUT IT. MY GRANDPA'S 80 IN MY GRANDMA'S PUSHING THE SAME AGE NEVER HEARD THEM COMPLAIN ABOUT. IT HAS NEVER BEEN AN ISSUE IN THE AIRPORT. BEING THERE HAS NOT PUSHED ANY WATER ANY UNNECESSARY WATER. INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE HYDROPLANE STATISTICS SAY SO. I PERSONALLY THINK THAT. WE DON'T MIND HOMES, BUT WE WOULD LIKE TO RESPECT TO KEEP OUR NEIGHBORHOOD THE WAY IT WAS WHEN MY GRANDFATHER WAS GROWING UP WHEN HIS FAMILY WAS GROWING UP. THEY'VE BEEN ON THAT PROPERTY THAT ROCKWELL PROPERTY AND ALL THESE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DOWN OFF IN THE RUN. THEY PUT THE HISTORIC NAMES ON TOP OF OUR STREET SIGNS FOR A REASON. IF THEY DID THAT, THEN IT NEEDS TO CONTINUE TO BE THAT TYPE OF RESPECT FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND DOING THAT WILL BE PUTTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING NEIGHBORHOODS OR HOMES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR PALMER.
APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE? YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME TODAY. I WAS NOT PLANNING TO SPEAK, BUT I AM HERE. I'M A TEXAS REAL TOUR. I HELP THIS GENTLEMAN PURCHASE.
GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. MY NAME IS IMAN AND 581 TALLY CIRCLE. UM FAIRVIEW. HE'S THE GENTLEMAN IS ALSO MY DAD TAKES HIS REAL ESTATE HELPED THEM PURCHASE THE HOUSE. WE CAME TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY WITH MY BROTHER, WHICH IS THE ARCHITECT . WE WENT TO THE CITY EMAILS BACK AND FORTH. MENTIONING THAT THERE IS NO PROBLEMS WITH THE LOT AND I LOOKED ON THE MAP, AND IT'S MY RESPONSIBILITY. FEMA DOES NOT HAVE THIS UNDER ANY KIND OF FLOODPLAIN, UNFORTUNATELY, HAVE TO REPURCHASE THE PROPERTY. WE WERE NOTIFIED THAT THE AIRPORT WAS BUILT AND THE SLOPE IS THAT WAY, SO STOPPING THE FLOW IS BASICALLY A WHICH IS HORROR.
PAUSING SLOWING DOWN THE FLOW OF WATER LIKE THE GENTLEMAN MENTIONED, WHICH HAS CAUSED A LOT OF PROBLEMS. YOU HAVE LIVED THERE. WE'RE NOT. WE HAVEN'T BEEN IN THE UNITED STATES FOR THAT LONG, BUT WE KNOW THIS COUNTRY IS ABOUT IMPROVEMENT AND GETTING BETTER. YOU HAVE LIVED THERE FOR 40 YEARS AS UNFORTUNATE THAT YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE WATER IN THE STREETS LIKE THAT, AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT ANY LONGER, AT LEAST AN ORDINARY BEFORE. I KNOW I'LL BE YOUR NEIGHBOR AND MY KIDS WILL PROBABLY IF YOU COULD , IF YOU COULD ADDRESS US, PLEASE. YES THANK YOU KNOW THAT , UM I'LL PROBABLY WILL BE THEIR NEIGHBOR AND I'LL PROBABLY LIVE IN THE SAME STREETS IS DOWN. AND PROBABLY GOING TO TAKE OVER AT ONE POINT IN LIFE. AND I WANT MY KIDS TO HAVE NOT GO THROUGH THE SAME PROBLEMS THAT THEY HAVE. I KNOW YOU'RE IMPROVING A LOT IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS WOULD BE A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR EVERYONE TO DO BETTER AND IS NOT NO LONGER ABOUT PEOPLE WHO ARE 95 80 70 THAT DON'T LEAVE THEIR HOUSES ABOUT THE NEW GENERATION . THE KIDS THAT ARE COMING. MY KIDS ARE GOING TO GO TO THAT SCHOOL. I WANTED TO BE HEALTHY. I WANTED TO BE ABLE TO WALK PROPERLY WITHOUT BEING WORRIED ABOUT ANY OF THOSE THINGS. THERE ARE ALREADY MULTIPLE OTHER DUPLEXES, NOT NEIGHBORHOOD. I
[01:10:06]
HAVEN'T COUNTED BUT THERE IS AT LEAST MORE THAN 2030 OF THEM. I'M SORRY. I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION ON TOP OF MY HEAD. UM OWNERS THAT USUALLY TAKING GREAT CARE OF THEIR PROPERTY, BECAUSE IF THEY WANT NEW RENTERS TO GO TO THAT PROPERTY AND RENTED AGAIN, THEY GO THERE THEY TAKE CARE OF IT. RENTERS ALSO, THEY BY, UM THE PROPERTY COMES WITH THE INSURANCE AND EVERYTHING. THE OWNER BUYS HOME WARRANTY. SO IF THERE'S ANY PROBLEMS WITH THE FOUNDATION WITH THIS STRUCTURE WITH THE A C UNIT IS GOING TO BE TAKEN CARE OF. BY HOME WARRANTY, THE GRASP THE MAINTENANCE OF GRASS. THAT IS THE LEAST OF OUR WORRIES, I WOULD SAY. UM. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I HAVE AND THE LAST THING. DOWNLOAD. I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE USED THAT IN THE PAST FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES, WHICH WHICH WE APPRECIATE. BUT THE THING IS THAT IS A PRIVATE LOT. AND SOONER OR LATER, SOMEONE'S GONNA BUILD THEIR SOMEONE'S GOING TO PUT A WALL UP . WE DO NOT WANT TO GO AGAINST WHAT THE COMMUNITY WANTS. BUT UM , IS NOT A PUBLIC PROPERTY AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE. THAT AT THE LAST THING IS NOT ABOUT PROFIT IS ABOUT FUTURE. THANK YOU.THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE? ANYONE ELSE? MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. HAVE IT. THANK YOU. I'M LOOKING AT YOU. YOU'RE GONNA YOU WANNA SAY SOMETHING? MEMBER OF THE CHURCH RIGHT NEXT DOOR THERE. FOR TWO YEARS, AND IF YOU COULD COME UP UP TO THE PODIUM. YOU HAD A LOOK LIKE YOU WANTED TO SAY SOMETHING AND WHERE. A MEMBER OF THE CHURCH RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THAT PROPERTY, AND WE GO ON 143 YEARS COMMITMENT OCTOBER THAT SHOWS UP PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, LOT OF PEOPLE WORKING, STEPPING AT CHURCH AND EVERYTHING THAT THE CHURCH IS OLD, BUT AS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE FLOODPLAIN NOW WAY THEY'VE GOT PROPERTY IT FIRST RIGHT INTO THE CHURCH NOW, JUST A SLOPE TO THE CHURCH, AND THAT'S GOING TO CAUSE PROBLEMS FOR US. YOU WERE ABLE TO GET ANOTHER PLACE TO MOVE TO AND RIGHT NOW. WE'RE JUST TRYING TO DO WHAT WE CAN TO MOVE GRAB ACROSS THE STREET, BUT WE KNOW RIGHT NOW HANDS ARE TIED. AND UH, WE JUST TRYING TO HOLD OUT. WE SEE WHAT WE CAN DO.
AND. I'M NOT. I DON'T LIVE ON BHAGWAT STREET BLOOD BEEN GOING AT THAT CHURCH WILL 0.3 YEARS AND I KNOW THAT PEOPLE DO LIVE ON THERE, AND I'VE SEEN THE WORD FLOWS, NOT FLOOD WATER STANDARD SOMETIMES, BUT THAT'S BAD. IT NEVER FLOOD. THANK YOU, SIR. COULD WE GET YOUR YOUR NAME? YOU COULD GIVE US YOUR NAME WOULD ASK YOU THEY WOULD ASK YOU ALL RIGHT IN YOUR ADDRESS. 12 11 JANUARY. 11, EAST VIRGINIA. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION. BYE MR MANZANITA, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING A SECOND BY MR WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
THE MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED AND AS PART OF THE RECORD IF YOU WROTE A, UM A LETTER OR AN EMAIL TO THE CITY STAFF. PLEASE KNOW THAT WE'LL GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS PART OF OUR MINUTES. ALSO AS WAS REFERENCED IN THE STAFF OF WHAT WE DID RECEIVE A WRITTEN PROTEST FOR A ZONING CHANGE THAT'S BEING CONFIRMED. UM FOR ACCURACY BY CITY STAFF, AND THAT IS A UM, SOMETHING THAT IS FORWARDED ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL. AND IF THAT IS ACCURATE AND CITIZEN. THE SIGNATURES ARE VALID. THAT'S AN ITEM FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE UP NOT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. SO JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. WE'VE JUST CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE HAVE NOT ACTUALLY VOTED ON THIS ITEM. PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. WE ARE NOW WE'LL HAVE SOME DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT OR THE CITY STAFF. AND ALSO ENTERTAIN MOTIONS. SO WHO'D LIKE
[01:15:02]
TO GO FIRST? QUESTION FOR STAFF. SORT OF THE CURRENT ZONING RS. 60. WHAT IS THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE? LET ME PULL UP. 6000. YEAH. SO THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO DEVELOP SINGLE FAMILY, UM, ON THE LOTS AS THEY ARE SHOWN HERE SO AS THEY ARE CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF PLANNING THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO DEVELOP. AND THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO 55 UNITS 5.5 UNITS IF THEY WERE TO BUILD SINGLE RIGHT NOW. THE OPPOSING THREE DUPLEXES. SIX UNITS IF WE TOOK THE 30,000 SQUARE FEET ROUGHLY. 0.7 ACRES GET ROUGHLY FIVE 5.5 UNITS ON THAT STAND ALONE. THE PROPERTY THERE CAN BE HOME. I THINK THE MINIMUM OF ITS JENNIFER, DO YOU HAVE THAT OR OKAY? HAVEN'T PULLED UP FOR TRYING TO DO MOSTLY DEPEND ON THE MINIMUM LOT WITH REQUIRED AND THERE WOULD NEED TO BE DIRECT ACCESS TO A PUBLIC STREET . SO THAT WOULD BE THE MAIN CONCERN. BUT IF YOU HAVE THE SPECIAL INFORMATION PULLED UP SO RS 60 REQUIRES A 6000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOT AREA AND THEN THE LOT WIDTH IS REQUIRED TO BE 50 FT IN THE LOT DEPTH IS REQUIRED TO BE 100. SO THAT IS WHERE THE SITE CONSTRAINTS HAPPEN, IS MAKING SURE THAT THEY HIT THE WIDTH AND THE DEPTH CURRENTLY. SINGLE FAMILY. ALONG WITH ALL OF THE FLOODPLAIN ITEMS THAT ALSO NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.SO THE LOTS THAT ARE THERE NOW ARE LIKELY NOT CONFORMING TO WHAT R S 60 R. NOT THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION, LIKE FIVE LOTS, AND THERE ARE SO THEY'RE NOT THEY ARE SO THEY HAVE A COUPLE LOTS MAY NOT BE THE BEST MAP TO SHOW IT. LET ME PULL UP. SO THIS ONE BEST SHOWS THAT, UM THERE ARE A COUPLE OF LOTS THAT ARE FRONTING ONTO THE ALLEY. THEY WOULD NEED DIRECT STREET ACCESS LIKE THAT LOT IN THE CENTER WOULD NOT CONFORM AND IT LOOKS LIKE MOST ALL OF THOSE LOTS ARE TOO SMALL TO DEVELOP AS THEY ARE. THEY WOULD NEED TO BE REPLANTED. THEY COULDN'T POTENTIALLY WITH A THREE LOTS. EVEN WITH THE FLOOD AND THE RESTRICTIONS AND THINGS THEY COULD ALSO DO ACCESSORY DWELLINGS TO THE BACK. UM, IT AND THIS IS WHERE WE'RE WE'VE SOMEHOW QUASI TURNED ZONING INTO UM. AS FAR AS INTENSITY OF USE AND WHAT FITS A LOT AND WHAT FITS SOMETHING TO WE DON'T WANT TO RENDER. SO LET'S ZONE THEM OUT, UM, IN THOSE CASES, BECAUSE WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS 30,000 SQUARE FEET, PLUS WHERE YOU APPROVE ALL THE TIME. 11,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, SO THAT WOULD BE SIX LOTS. FIVE WE PUT TOWN HOMES ON 2400 SQUARE FEET THAT SORT 10 TOWN HOMES, POTENTIALLY IF THE LAYOUTS RIGHT BUT YOU KNOW, WE'RE WORKING OUT THIS LAYOUT TO SAY, WELL, THEY ONLY GET THREE SINGLE FAMILY. SO THIS DENY THE DUPLEX. THE IDEA IS ON 30,000 SQUARE FEET, THE TENT CITY INTENSITY OF SIX UNITS IS NOT ANYTHING OVERWHELMING FROM WHAT WE HAVE ANOTHER ZONING OR OTHER LOCATIONS. THE INTENSITY IS NOT THERE AS FAR AS NEIGHBORHOOD IT COMES DOWN TO ARE WE TRYING TO ZONE OUT RENTERS OR NOT? AND THEN WE GIVE OURSELVES AS FALSE SINCE THAT IF WE TAKE AWAY DUPLEXES OR TAKE AWAY TOWN HOMES OR TAKEN AWAY RENTERS BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE DEMOGRAPHICS OVER HERE ALREADY 50% OF THE HOMES ALREADY RENTERS. I LOANED MONEY ALL THE TIME TO INVESTORS THAT BUY SINGLE FAMILY FOR RENT. THE WEST SIDE'S CHANGING AS IT IS, AND IT'S GOING TO BECOME MORE OF A PLAY FOR INVESTORS OVERALL. EVEN IF WE GET BIG MONEY IN THERE AS FAR AS WALL STREET AND THOSE THAT GO TO IT, YOU LOOKED UP. I LOOKED AT REALTOR .COM. HOMES OVER THERE FOR SALE THE FIVE WITHIN THIS AREA. 975,000. THE AVERAGE MEDIAN INCOME OVER THERE IS 50,000 HOUSEHOLDS, 70,000. WE CAN'T AFFORD $400,000 HOUSES 1 70,000 IN INCOME. IF WE CONTINUE DOWN THE PATH OF BEING RESTRICTIVE. SINGLE FAMILY ONLY ON LARGE LOTS. WE WILL END UP ZONING OUT THE COMMUNITY. IT'S OVER THERE NOW THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO AFFORD TO LIVE WITH WEIGHT PRICES ARE GOING AS FAR AS SAYING. THE RENTERS ARE GOING TO BE THE ONES THAT DAMAGE THIS AREA. 50% OF THE HOMES ARE ALREADY RENTING. WE CAN'T STOP SOMEBODY ELSE FROM BUYING ANOTHER HOME AND BEING A RUNNER.
SORRY. THE COMMENTS ANYONE. I WAS NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS LAST TIME. I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS NOW. I WOULD NOT VOTE TO SUPPORT HAVING DUPLEXES IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. NOR WOULD I VOTE AGAINST. ALL THE FOCUS FROM THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WHO ARE TRYING TO PRESERVE THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.
[01:20:08]
THEY'RE NOT ASKING FOR IT. FOR THERE NOT TO BE ANY DEVELOPMENT , BUT JUST TO MAINTAIN ITS CURRENTLY ALLOWED. ON THOSE SO I'M IN FAVOR OF. APPROVING THIS THINK YOU KNOW WE HAVE A HOUSING SHORTAGE. DON'T YOU KNOW ON THE EAST SIDE OF TOWN? IT'S A IT'S A HIGH INTENSITY PURPOSE. YOU CAN GO BUILD. THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES HERE AND YOU CAN RENT THOSE, UM, I SEE THAT NO DIFFERENT THAN THEIRS. SIX UNITS THAT THEY'RE RENTING VERSUS THREE UNITS. AND YOU KNOW, AS WE WENT THROUGH, AND WE WENT TO AT AN EVENT THIS MORNING, AND THIS CITY CHAMBER PUT ON AND TALKED ABOUT THE EAST SIDE AND THE GROWTH OF THE EAST SIDE AND THE CHANGES THAT ARE COMING EAST SIDE THERE'S GOING TO BE CHANGES, AND ONE OF THE ONES THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.TODAY IS 50. RENTAL AND THERE'S A LACK OF AFFORDABILITY OF HOMES THERE AND I THINK WE'RE GOING TO SEE SOME CHANGES OVER THERE AND THIS IS PROBABLY STEP AN EARLY STEP, BUT SOMETHING IS GOING TO BECOME MUCH MORE FREQUENT OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF FEW YEARS AS WE SEE THE REDEVELOPMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF TOWN, SO I'M IN FAVOR FOR THIS. JUST JUST LOOKING AT, UH. WHAT THE RESIDENTS HAVE TRIED TO DO. IN THE COMMUNITY. AS FAR AS SINGLE FAMILY. RESIDENTS. IT IS REALLY UPGRADED THE ROCKWALL COMMUNITY. AND NOTHING AGAINST, UM. THE DUPLEX IS THAT THEY WANT TO BUILD THEIR BUT WHEN YOU DRIVE THAT AREA THE DUPLEXES THAT YOU SEE ACTUALLY BROUGHT DOWN THE PROPERTY VALUE. IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. WASN'T A GOOD PRODUCT HADN'T BEEN KEPT UP. AND IT WORKS AGAINST THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT ARE WORKING HARD TRYING TO KEEP THEIR HOMES UP. ON THE ROCK WALL STREET. THERE ARE NO DUPLEXES ON ROCK WALL. AND THAT IS THE MAIN STREET IN AND OUT OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. SO FOR THE RESIDENTS SAKE. I'M GONNA VOTE.
NO. I'M GONNA VOTE. YES I MEAN, I THINK WE'RE CAUSING OUR OWN BEING OUR OWN WORST ENEMIES AND KEEPING OUR COMMUNITY OVER THERE AS FAR AS AFFORDABILITY. WITH JUST A SINGLE FAMILY. WHEN THE SINGLE FAMILY GOES UP OVER THERE, IT'S GOING TO BE A HALF MILLION DOLLARS PLUS ANYMORE.
IT'S NOT GONNA BE AFFORDABLE IN ANY MANNER. THE INTENSITY OF SIX UNITS ON 30,000 SQUARE FEET IS NOT INTENSE. UM IN THAT MATTER AT ALL RESPECT THEIR PROPERTY RIGHTS AS FAR AS DOING THAT, AND I DON'T TEND TO USE SEE TO TRY TO ZONE OUT RENTERS AND TREAT THEM AS SECOND CLASS CITIZENS. I WILL SAY I'M GONNA VOTE AGAINST EXCUSE ME. I'M SO SORRY. GO AHEAD WITH THE FLOODPLAIN IN THERE. IS THAT REALLY 30,000? WHERE FEET BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE, UH, APART ON LINDSAY STREET. THAT WOULD BE SUCH. NEXT TO LOT ONE IS NOT USABLE. CHANGES. I DON'T LOOK AT THIS AS TRYING TO ZONE OUT RENTERS AT ALL. I LOOK AT IT AS PRESERVING HISTORIC NATURE OF THE COMMUNITY AND SUPPORTING THE PEOPLE IN THAT COMMUNITY THAT WOULD JUST LIKE TO STAY SINGLE SINGLE FAMILIES, SO THAT'S HOW HOW I SEE THIS, AND I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY HOW ALARMED CITIZENS BUT YOU KNOW, IT'S INTERESTING. YOU CAN STILL RENT AND SINGLE FAMILY SO THEY CAN GO BUILD THREE HOMES THERE AND RENT THOSE OUT ABSOLUTELY FAMILIES IN THERE . SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. IS IT APPROPRIATE TO DROP IT DUPLEX IN THE MIDDLE OF A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S THE ULTIMATELY WHAT WE'RE REVIEWING HERE AND ALSO POINTING OUT THAT YOU KNOW, THE PERSON WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY CAME IN KNOWING WHAT IT WHAT IT WAS IMMEDIATELY I BELIEVE APPLIED FOR A RE ZONE AND IT WAS DENIED ON PND. IT WAS DENIED AT COUNCIL LEVEL. THEY PROCEEDED WITH THE ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT THEY'VE MADE, AND NOW I'VE BROUGHT THAT BACK, BUT THIS IS ALREADY COME THROUGH PNC AND COUNCIL ONCE BEFORE. AND HAS BEEN DENIED. IT WOULDN'T BE THE FIRST TIME OR THE LAST TIME WE WILL REHEAR A CASE AS FAR AS THAT GOES ON THOSE PARTS AND I CAN SEE CONSIDERING THAT THEY GOT STUCK WITH $100,000 BILL PLUS TO FIX DRAINAGE AND AS A BANKER. I WOULDN'T HAVE. THERE'S NOTHING I WOULD HAVE PULLED THAT WOULD HAVE TOLD ME THERE WAS A FLOOD IF IT'S NOT IN FEMA. THERE'S NO DUE DILIGENCE YOU WOULD HAVE DONE UNTIL YOU HAD ACTUALLY GONE TO THE CITY FOR THE PERMIT. AS FAR AS THAT GOES AND THE FLOODING CONFUSES THE
[01:25:01]
ISSUE OVERALL, BUT I MEAN THEY CAN STILL BUILD. AS A DENIAL. THREE SINGLE FAMILIES WITH SEPARATE INDEPENDENT DWELLINGS IN THE BACK AND RENT SIX UNITS IN THE AREA AND HAVE SOMETHING THAT'S COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THAN THE AREA. BUT I MEAN, IF YOU JUST LOOK AT THE DEMOGRAPHICS HOMES THAT ARE COMING AVAILABLE. THE PRICE POINTS WHICH THEY'RE COMING AVAILABLE. IT'S NOT FOR THAT COMMUNITY OVER THERE, AND THAT COMMUNITY IS GOING TO DISAPPEAR UNDER THE PRICE PRESSURES THAT ARE GOING TO COME TO MARKET IF WE CONTINUE TO RESTRICT SUPPLY EVEN MORE, AND WE'VE HAD OUR CASE OF THE MISSING MIDDLE STAFF PRESENTED IT. IF WE'RE NOT WILLING TO DO IT WITHIN THESE AREAS, IT'S GOING TO DISAPPEAR AND WE'RE EITHER GONNA DO 600,000 SQUARE FEET OF APARTMENTS AND CRAIG RANCH THAT WE JUST APPROVED. WE'LL DO SINGLE FAMILY, AND THERE'S NOTHING IN BETWEEN. SO THE INTENSITY IS EITHER HIGH OR SPREAD OUT LIKE THIS, BUT WE'RE MISSING A GAP. ERIC. SO I APPRECIATE MY COLLEAGUE'S POINTS ARE VERY VALID. AND I HOPE THE RESIDENTS HERE THOSE AS WELL BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT. HOWEVER I STILL DON'T SUPPORT THIS PROJECT BECAUSE I JOINED THIS COMMITTEE TO BE ABLE TO BRING A LITTLE BIT OF HEART TO SOME OF THESE DIALOGUES. THE FACTS ARE CLEAR. I AGREE WITH YOU 100. AND THERE IS GOING TO CREATE A PROBLEM HERE, PROBABLY BY MY NO VOID OF IT. IT'S HERE, BUT I WANT YOU ALL TO RECOGNIZE THAT YOUR VOICES ARE HEARD, AND I KNOW THIS WILL GET PASSED ON IT FORWARD. MAYBE ANOTHER PROJECT THAT COMES ALONG THAT MIGHT BE WORSE, BUT STOLEN, NO VOTE. VERY GOOD. ANYONE ELSE? SUPPORT THE STAFF IN THIS ITEM. I THINK MR MAN'S I BROUGHT UP SOME GOOD POINTS. AH IT'S A IT'S A DIFFERENT PLACE. UM I DO SUPPORT THE STAFF POSITION IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND I'M GOING TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE STAFF AND THE APPLICANT REQUEST. SO DO WE HAVE A MOTION MOTION THAT WE DENY THIS ITEM MOTION, MS KIRKLAND ALL TO DENY THE ITEM AS PER APPLICANT REQUEST 2ND 2ND MEMBERS TO WALLY'S OR ANY DISCUSSION. CAST YOUR VOTE. YES TO THAT. NO CORRECT.SO THE MOTION THE MOTION CARRIES VOTED FOR IN FAVOR AND THREE AGAINST THE MOTION WAS TO DENY THE APPLICANT REQUEST. THIS ITEM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WITH A NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE OCTOBER 4 2022 MEETING ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THIS MISS ARNOLD DID WANT TO NOTE FOR THE RECORD TWO THINGS WITH THE NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THIS WILL REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE BY THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL, REGARDLESS OF THE VALIDATION OF THE WRITTEN PROTESTS THAT WE RECEIVED. I ALSO WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE DID LISTEN AND HEAR THAT. THIS ITEM WILL BE GOING TO THE OCTOBER 4TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, WHICH IS, UM ONE WEEK AFTER A TYPICAL PANSY ADAM AGO OUR APPLICANT IS GOING TO BE OUT OF TOWN ON THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING, SO WE'VE BUMPED IT TO THE FOLLOWING WEEK. SO JUST MAKE SURE YOU KNOW THAT ON YOUR CALENDARS. THERE GOES TO THE CITY COUNCIL AGAIN AT THE OCTOBER 4TH OCTOBER 4TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. RIGHT? OKAY THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARING. ADAMS NOW WOULD BE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A. FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS ON ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ONLY AGENDA. MIGHT CALL THAT OPEN MIC. ALRIGHT MEMBERS.
[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]
COMMENTS QUESTIONS. I JUST WANT TO SAY HOW MUCH I APPRECIATE WHEN PEOPLE COME IN, AND I KNOW I'VE SAID IT BEFORE, BUT IT REALLY DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHEN FOLKS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOODS COME IN AND TALK ABOUT ITEMS THAT ARE IMPORTANT TO THEM ON ALL SIDES. ONE OF THE THINGS WE TOTALLY AGREE ONE OF THE THINGS WE SAY AND WE START THE MEETING IS IT'S IMPORTANT THAT THE CITIZENS BE INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS, AND IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE CITIZENS BE INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS. SO WE APPRECIATE EVERYONE BEING HERE WILL CATCH YOU AFTER THE MEETING, OK? STAFF ANYTHING. NO NOTHING. THANK YOU GUYS. FOR WHAT YOU DO. WE APPRECIATE YOU, MATT. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE VERY MUCH. MEMBERS. WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION MOTION. MR KIRKENDALL, SECOND BY SECOND, EKSTROM, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CATCH YOUR BOAT? THE MOTION CARRIES MYSTERY MEAT. 7 29,* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.