Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance Approving the Redistricting of the City’s Single-Member Council Districts and Establishing New District Boundary Lines for McKinney City Council Elections Based on the 2020 Census Data; and Providing for an Effective Date

[Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance Approving the Redistricting of the City’s Single-Member Council Districts and Establishing New District Boundary Lines for McKinney City Council Elections Based on the 2020 Census Data; and Providing for an Effective Date]

MOVE TO THE REGULAR AGENDA. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS AS PORTION AND JENNY CONSIST OF ITEMS REQUIRING INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY THE COUNCIL. FIRST ITEM IS 2 TO 0576 CONSIDERING ACT ON AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REDISTRICTING OF THE CITY SINGLE MEMBER COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND ESTABLISHING NEW DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINES FOR MCKINNEY CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS BASED ON THE 2020 CENSUS DATA AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, MR HAUSER GOOD EVENING, MR MAYOR AND COUNCIL. UM THIS ITEM NEEDS NO EXPLANATION. WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON IT FOR SOME TIME NOW.

AND I APPRECIATE YOUR HARD WORK . WE HAVE MR SEQUENCED ON THE PHONE IF NEED BE FOR QUESTIONS.

RELATING TO THE PROCESS OR THE MAPS THAT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED. THOSE MAPS ARE ON THE WALL OVER HERE, AND AS YOU KNOW, HOPEFULLY , THE PUBLIC IS AWARE THAT WE'VE HAD LOTS OF DRAWING SESSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THOSE MAPS. BUT WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS TONIGHT. AND MR. SEEK MISSED AVAILABLE. CAN YOU HEAR US, OKAY. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. WELL, WE'VE HAD A WHOLE LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS ITEM. I. HAVE A STRONG SUSPICION WILL HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE. UM THOUGH WE CERTAINLY DON'T NEED TO. IF THAT IS THE WILL UM BUT YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN A COUPLE OF COMMENTS MADE. WAS ANYONE HAVE A QUESTION FOR MARK BEFORE WE BEGIN? SO I THINK, UM. YOU KNOW, IT'S DISCUSSION ABOUT A ABOUT DELUDING THE MINORITY VOTE. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT FIRST OF ALL, WE HAVE NOT HAD A MINORITY MAJORITY DISTRICT. WE'VE HAD SOMETHING THAT WE WE'VE ALWAYS LOOKED AT AS CLOSE TO THAT IN DISTRICT ONE FOR SURE. AND I THINK ALL OF THE MAPS ARE WITHIN A FEW PERCENTAGE POINTS OF MAINTAINING THAT SAME MINORITY VOTE, SO I THINK THERE IS. THERE'S A LOT OF MISINFORMATION I AND I SAY THAT BECAUSE I'VE GOTTEN CALLS AND WHATNOT WERE PEOPLE WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE HAVE TAKEN A MINORITY OF MY MAJORITY DISTRICT, AND WE HAVE CHANGED IT TO BE COMPLETELY DILUTED. AND I THINK THE NUMBERS ACTUALLY BARED OUT TO SHOW A DIFFERENCE OF JUST A FEW 100 BETWEEN SOME OF THE MAPS THAT ARE IN QUESTION. OF MINORITY RESIDENTS IN DISTRICT ONE. IF YOU'RE ON MAP, A REVISED VERSUS MAP D. I MEAN, WE'RE TALKING AGAIN. JUST SEVERAL 100. PEOPLE WHICH REPRESENTS LESS THAN A PERCENTAGE POINT, SO I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF GRAVE MISUNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE NUMBERS ACTUALLY ARE. AND UH SO I'LL JUST START THERE. UM SOMEONE ELSE WANNA JUMP IN WITHD HAVE TALKED MORE ABOUT THIS ISSUE AND PROBABLY ANY OTHER ISSUE, AND THAT'S PROBABLY BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN DOING IT FOR A YEAR. BUT IT'S ALSO BECAUSE I THINK IT IS AN EXTREMELY IMPORTANT IMPORTANT AND I DON'T WANT TO DIMINISH. A FEW PERCENTAGE POINTS HERE THERE BECAUSE I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR ABOUT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, UM YOU'VE ALL HEARD MY ARGUMENTS . AND I ACTUALLY DEBATED ON WHETHER OR NOT TO MAKE HIM AGAIN TONIGHT, BUT I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT THAT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE DOING. THE CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT WE'RE DOING AND WHAT CHOICES WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US BECAUSE THEY ARE CHOICES THAT WE HAVE. WE'RE REALIGNING OUR COUNCIL DISTRICT MAPS TO BALANCE THE POPULATION BETWEEN THE FOUR DISTRICTS. UM, BUT THE BACKDROP TO THAT IS THE COUNCIL DISTRICTS EXIST FOR ONE REASON. IT'S NOT TO BE MORE RESPONSIVE TO VOTERS, ALTHOUGH THAT'S CERTAINLY BENEFIT. IT'S NOT TO PRETEND TO BE STATISTICIANS OR DEMOGRAPHERS UP HERE EVERY 10 YEARS. THAT WE GET TO DO THAT. THEY EXIST TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION ON THIS COUNCIL. A LITTLE HISTORY THAT 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT WAS PASSED IN 1975, TEXAS, CAME UNDER THE PRECLEARANCE REQUIREMENT FOR THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT. DURING THAT

[00:25:02]

TIME IN 1975 TO 19 6 76 CITY OF DALLAS, LOST A LAWSUIT OVER THEIR REPRESENTATION WITH CITYWIDE COUNCIL MEMBER DISTRICTS. AND DECIDED TO CREATE EIGHT SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS AS PART OF THEIR SETTLEMENT. A YEAR AFTER. UH THE APPROACHED THE CITY OF MCKINNEY IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY MOVED TO ITS EXISTING STRUCTURE OF FOUR SINGLE MEMBER COUNCIL DISTRICTS. CAREER GOES OUT AT THE TIME, SAID QUOTE THE ELECTION YEAR WAS KICKED OFF. WITH THE CHARTER REVISION ISSUE, THE VOTERS DECIDED IN FAVOR OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS FROM MCKINNEY BY A VOTE OF 260 TO 37.

THE BOOK VOTERS APPROVED DIVISION OF THE CITY INTO FOUR COUNCILMAN'S DISTRICT. THERE WERE NOT MINE. THE PROPOSALS PLANNING TOOK TWO YEARS AND INCLUDED IN APPROVAL FROM THE U.

S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. NOW THE REASON THAT END QUOTE I SHOULD SAY THE REASON IS TO ULTIMATELY COMPLY WITH THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION ON OUR COUNCIL. EVERY CENSUS CYCLE SENSE. WE'VE DRAWN MAPS WERE REDRAWN THESE MAPS TO DISTRIBUTE THE POPULATION AND WE HAVE THESE MAPS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. UP UNTIL 20. 11 THE LAST TIME WE DREW MAPS, THERE WAS A PRECLEARANCE REQUIREMENT. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WOULD APPROVE THE MAP TO COUNCIL DREW TO ENSURE THAT WE DIDN'T DIMINISH OR A ROAD. THE MINORITY VOTING POWER OF DISTRICT ONE. UM I THINK THAT IS CALLED A WRECKED THEY EVALUATED WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS ANY RETROGRESSION THAT OCCURRED. THIS YEAR. WE DON'T HAVE A PRECLEARANCE REQUIREMENT.

CASE LAWS HAVE CHANGED. IN 2013 , UNDER A SUPREME COURT CASE CALLED SHELBY VERSUS HOLDER.

SUPREME COURT READ REMOVED THE PRECLEARANCE REQUIREMENT FOR ALL JURISDICTIONS. SO THIS MAP DOESN'T HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. WE GET TO DRAW IT AND WE ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF IT. NO. I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT THE NUMBERS THAT I'M USING BECAUSE THESE ARE COMPLEX. AND IT'S HARD WHEN WE'RE NOT ALL LOOKING AT THE SAME NUMBERS ARE NOT ALL LOOKING AT THE MAPS. WE EVALUATE THIS BASED OFF OF THE TOTAL POPULATION. THE CENSUS HAD US AT A POPULATION OF ABOUT 195,000 DIVIDED EQUALLY INTO FOUR COUNCIL DISTRICTS. THAT'S ABOUT 48,000. PEOPLE. TOTAL POPULATION PER COUNCIL DISTRICT. ONE OF THE WAYS WE EVALUATE. THE DISTRIBUTION. OF DEMOGRAPHICS INTO THOSE COUNCIL DISTRICT IS THROUGH WHAT'S CALLED VOTING AGE POPULATION. THAT IS A SMALLER NUMBER. OBVIOUSLY OF EXCLUDES KIDS, BUT WHAT WE CAN DO WITH THAT NUMBER UM, IS COMPARE. DIFFERENT. DISTRIBUTIONS BASED OFF THE DEMOGRAPHIC MAKEUP, AND SO WHEN I USE A PERCENTAGE TONIGHT, I WILL TYPICALLY BE TALKING ABOUT THE VOTING AGE POPULATION PERCENTAGE. OF A GROUP. WHEN I USE A TOTAL NUMBER, I'LL BE TALKING ABOUT THOSE THAT TOTAL POPULATION, SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE AND POINT OUT THAT THOSE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NUMBERS THAT WE USE TO EVALUATE THIS. THERE IS A TERM THAT'S CALLED MAJORITY MINORITY , UM, THAT THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF DRAWING OF SOME OF THESE COUNCIL DISTRICTS OR SOME OF THESE OTHER DISTRICTS AROUND THE COUNTRY, BUT THAT WAS SO THAT YOU HAD A MAJORITY OF ONE GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT HAD A SIMILAR VOTING INTERESTS THAT OTHERWISE WOULD NOT FIND REPRESENTATION IN A POTENTIAL CITYWIDE ELECTION. BUT IF YOU DREW THEM INTO ONE MAP WHICH WE WERE. LARGELY ABLE TO DO, UM THEN THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE A INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF AN ELECTION. THE SECOND WORD IS PLURALITY. AND THAT IS WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE A MAJORITY MINORITY OF ONE GROUP ANYMORE, BUT YOU DO HAVE A PLURALITY OF TWO GROUPS, THE GROUPS THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT OUR HISPANICS AND AFRICAN AMERICANS. SO WHEN THIS PROCESS STARTED MR SEAQUEST PRESENTED TO MAPS HE PRESENTED VERSIONS A AND B. WE CREATED VARIATIONS OF THOSE MAPS BASED ON SOME OF OUR PRIORITIES, AND THEN IT RESULTED IN C AND D WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT C AND D AND OUR LAST MEETING AND BUT WITH UH AND IN OUR LAST MEETING, WE STARTED TALKING ABOUT A AGAIN. UM, THERE ARE OTHER MAPS. YOU CAN SEE THEM ALL UP THERE. WE'VE LOOKED AT AND THERE ARE PROBABLY WAYS TO IMPROVE THE ONES WE HAVE. BUT THIS IS WHERE WE ARE. SO TONIGHT I'M GONNA SPEND MOST OF MY TIME TALKING ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAP A AND WE CAN CALL IT MAP REVISED, BUT THE REVISION

[00:30:06]

DOESN'T MAKE A WHOLE LOT OF IMPACT ON THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF IT . AND MAP D, WHICH WAS THE VARIATION THAT I THINK IS THE BEST ONE THAT'S IN FRONT OF US. UM SO. WHEN I LOOK AT IT FROM DISTRICT ONE'S PERSPECTIVE. IN 2011. WHEN DISTRICT ONE WAS DRAWN. IT HAD A PLURALITY. OF AFRICAN AMERICAN AND HISPANIC VOTING AGE POPULATION. 50.1% MADE UP DISTRICT ONE. SINCE THAT TIME WE'VE ADDED ABOUT 3 TO 4000 PEOPLE IN THE DISTRICT ONE AND THAT NUMBER HAS GONE DOWN TO 49.27% OF THE VOTING AGE POPULATION IS MADE UP OF HISPANIC OR AFRICAN AMERICAN PEOPLE. 49.27 OF THE VOTING AGE POPULATION. NOW. THE TWO MAPS THAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US THAT ARE OPTIONS MAP A, WHICH ADDS ABOUT 12,000 PEOPLE. TAKES THAT PERCENTAGE THAT THAT THAT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS AND HISPANICS TO 43.52. IT'S ALMOST A 6% DIFFERENCE FROM WHERE WE ARE TODAY. MAP D, WHICH ALSO ADDS A SIMILAR NUMBER OF PEOPLE AND ACHIEVES THE 48,000 THAT WE NEED TAKES IT TO 46.47 DIFFERENCE OF A LITTLE LESS THAN 3% FROM WHERE WE ARE IN A DIFFERENT SORT OF A LITTLE LESS THAN 3% OF WHERE MAP A WOULD TAKE US. THAT'S TWICE THE IMPACT BETWEEN MAP AND MAP DE SOTO TO DIMINISH THAT. IS I THINK OVERLOOKING, UM, A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE. WE DON'T HAVE TO. DO THIS. WE DON'T HAVE TO DILUTE THE MINORITY VOTING POWER BY TWICE. WHAT? WHAT WE HAVE AN OPTION FOR WE HAVE A CHOICE IN FRONT OF US. UM. ANOTHER COMPONENT OF WHY WE HAVE A CHOICE IN THIS. DISTRICT ONE HAS 12,000 TO FEW PEOPLE. IT IS ADJACENT TO DISTRICT TWO. THAT HAS 10,000 TOO MANY PEOPLE. MATT DE FACILITATES THE DIRECT TRANSFER OF THOSE PEOPLE. THE MAP THAT. HEAPS ARE MINORITY VOTING POWER AS STRONG AS WE CAN. ALLOWS FOR A DIRECT TRANSFER OF POPULATION BETWEEN DISTRICT TO DISTRICT ONE. THEY ARE ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER. THE TRANSFER IS DIRECT. AND THE POPULATIONS LOOK AS SIMILAR AS POSSIBLE. IT SEEMS PRETTY SIMPLE. BUT. WE WANT TO MAKE IT HARDER. WE WANT TO CREATE AN UNDUE IMPACT FOR DISTRICT THREE IN THIS SCENARIO BECAUSE MAPS A AND C RATHER THAN TAKE THAT DIRECT TRANSFER POPULATION THAT DOESN'T DIMINISH THE MINORITY VOTING POWER. WE ULTIMATELY BRING IN AND COMPLICATE THIS TRANSFER. MAP A AND C TRANSFERS DOESN'T GO FROM DISTRICT TO DISTRICT ONE. IT TRANSFERS THAT POPULATION FROM DISTRICT TO DISTRICT THREE. AND THEN A DIFFERENT POPULATION FROM DISTRICT THREE TO DISTRICT ONE. IT IS A LARGE AND UNNECESSARY IMPACT. AND THE REASON I SAY IT'S A LARGE IMPACT. AS IT STANDS, DISTRICT THREE NEEDS TO ADD 5000 PEOPLE 5000 NEW VOTERS 5000 NEW PEOPLE. IN DISTRICT THREE REPRESENTS ABOUT 10% OF THE ULTIMATE SIZE OF THAT DISTRICT. 48,000 PEOPLE 53,010. WHEN WE TRANSFER 12,000 VOTERS 12,000 PEOPLE OUT OF THAT DISTRICT. THAT MEANS THAT DISTRICT THREE NEEDS TO ADD 17,000 PEOPLE. IT WAS LIKE 35% NEW DISTRICT. AND WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO DO IT IF WE DIDN'T WANT TO DILUTE THE MINORITY VOTING POWER. WE HAVE A CHOICE. WE'RE MAKING. THIS MORE DIFFICULT THAN WE NEED TO. ANOTHER IMPACT IS ON. THIS IS OVERALL SIZE AND GROWTH. UNDER MAPS A AND C DISTRICT ONE. BECOMES ONE OF THE LARGEST DISTRICTS. AND PUTS THE MAJORITY OF THE FUTURE GROWTH. BASICALLY ALL OF PAINTED TREE AND THE MAJORITY OF NORTHERN MCKINNEY INTO DISTRICT ONE. WHAT THIS WILL DO IS IT WILL FURTHER DILUTE THE MINORITY VOTING POWER OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS. WE CAN'T CALCULATE THAT. D MAKES DISTRICT

[00:35:05]

ONE SMALLER. AND IT ULTIMATELY SHARES THAT GROWTH. WITH DISTRICT THREE. SIMILARLY DISTRICT THREE HAS AN UNDUE IMPACT FROM MAPS A AND C IT DOESN'T HAVE GROWTH POTENTIAL.

IT IS SURROUNDED. AND HAS NO OPEN LAND FOR GROWTH. AND SO IN 10 YEARS WHEN WE'D REDRAW THESE MAPS, WE WILL HAVE TO TAKE BACK POPULATION THAT WE THAT THE DISTRICT THREE ULTIMATELY GAVE UP IN ORDER TO FIND THAT GROWTH. SO. I OBVIOUSLY PREFER MAP D HAVE. I'VE CHAMPION DID HAVE VOTED FOR IT. UM WHY I PREFER IT IS BECAUSE IT BEST RETAINS PEOPLE IN THEIR CURRENT DISTRICTS. UM THAT'S THAT'S ACTUALLY TWO OF THE CRITERIA THAT WE STARTED. WITHIN THIS PROCESS. NUMBER FOUR ON OUR LIST WAS, ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT EXISTING DISTRICTS WILL HAVE TO BE ALTERED TO REFLECT REFLECT NEW POPULATION DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE CITY. ANY DISTRICTING PLAN SHOULD BE BASED ON EXISTING DISTRICTS. DISTRICT THREE HAS TO CHANGE. IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO ADD AT LEAST 10% MORE. BUT MAPS A AND C REQUIRE THAT IT ADDS 35% MORE. THAT IS NOT ALIGN WITH OUR RESOLUTION. CRITERIA. UM THE SECOND ONE THAT'S ON THERE IS CONSIDERATION MAY BE GIVEN TO THE PRESERVATION OF INCUMBENT CONSTITUENT RELATIONS BY RECOGNITION OF THE RESIDENTS OF INCUMBENT AND THEIR HISTORY AND REPRESENTING CERTAIN AREAS. ALSO. A PRIORITY THAT WE SAID AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS PROCESS THAT WE ARE COMPLETELY IGNORING SO THAT WE CAN DILUTE THE MAJORITY. THE MINORITY VOTING INTEREST IN DISTRICT ONE. THESE ARE CHOICES WE ARE MAKING.

THE SECOND REASON I PREFER MAP D IS IT PROTECTS THE MINORITY VOTING POWER? ENTIRE REASON WE DO THIS THE ENTIRE REASON WE HAVE DISTRICTS. AND WHILE WE I CAN'T DRAW A MAP THAT PERFECTS THAT. WE CAN CONTINUE TO KEEP IT A PRIORITY. WE CAN AVOID. SHRINKING THAT PERCENTAGE. BUY TWICE AS MUCH. THIRD IS IT BEST SHARES THE GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES AS I MENTIONED. ULTIMATELY. I DON'T QUESTION THE IDEA THAT IT CAN BE IMPROVED. THERE WERE CRITICISMS OF IT REGARDING ITS INCLUSION OF CERTAIN AREAS OF COMMERCIAL IMPACT. BUT ULTIMATELY IT IS THE BEST MAP WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US TODAY. UM AND I'LL JUST ADD THAT WE HAD A BACK AND FORTH FOR A LONG TIME ON C AND D. AND I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT SOMETHING THAT WHEN A IS BROUGHT UP, IT IS NOT A COMPROMISE BETWEEN THE TWO IT IS A WORSE VERSION OF C. FOR DISTRICT ONE. IT IS A WORSE VERSION OF C FOR DISTRICT THREE, AND IT'S THE WORST VERSION OF THESE. IT'S THE WORST VERSION OF THE MAPS THAT WE HAVE. FOR THIS CITY. AND SO THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS. YEAH I JUST WOULD ADD THAT. OF COURSE, THAT'S YOUR OPINION ON THE WORST MAP, AND I HAVE TO SAY, JUST TAKE GREAT EXCEPTION AND OFFENSE TO THE COMMENT THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO DO THIS AND YOU SAID YOU SAID PROBABLY FIVE TIMES IF WE DIDN'T WANT TO DILUTE. THE MINORITY DISTRICT. MY I TAKE GREAT OFFENSE TO THAT, BECAUSE THE REASONS THAT I HAVE FOR CONSIDERING ANOTHER MAP. HAS ZERO TO DO WITH WANTING TO DILUTE THAT CHARACTERIZATION IS OFFENSIVE AND RECKLESS AND IRRESPONSIBLE IN MY OPINION. IT'S NOT A MATTER OF WANTING TO DILUTE WHEN I LOOK AT IT FOR ME . I LOOK AT THE, UM CERTAINLY THE MINORITY POPULATION AND, UH AND ALL THESE DISTRICTS IS ABSOLUTELY ONE OF THE MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR CRITERIA FOR ME, AND SO WHEN I LOOK AT IT, AND I THINK WE GO FROM 730,300 AND ONE MINORITY POPULATION. I'M NOT. I DON'T WANT TO DISCOUNT DROPPING . UM 300 PEOPLE. UH BUT I ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT I'VE INCREASED BY TWO POINTS OVER IN DISTRICT THREE, A MINORITY POPULATION HAVE INCREASED IT IN OTHER DISTRICTS. WE ARE SEEING OUR CITY BECOME VERY DIVERSE AND ALL OF OUR DISTRICTS, BUT JUST THE CHARACTERIZATION OF MAKING A CHOICE BECAUSE WANTING TO DILUTE I CAN'T SAY IT ANY STRONGER THAN REALLY OFFENSIVE. UM. THAT ASIDE SOME OF THE THINGS FOR ME, WHICH HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WANTING TO DILUTE A MINORITY VOTE. IS YOU KNOW, I'VE ALWAYS I HAVE AN ISSUE AND HAVE HAD AN ISSUE FOR AS LONG AS I'VE BEEN IN THE CITY

[00:40:06]

THAT AS LONG AS DISTRICT THREE HAS CARVED OUT THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN IN A PART OF DISTRICT ONE THAT PRETTY MUCH I COULD WALK 100 HOMES OVER THERE, AND MOST ARE GOING TO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE IN DISTRICT ONE. THEY DON'T REALIZE THEY'RE IN DISTRICT THREE. I WAS A COMMENT MADE BEFORE WE ACTUALLY I'D SLEEP THAT STAND ALONE. I FEEL THAT HISTORIC DOWNTOWN IS A IS A REAL IMPORTANT PARTNER SEATS VERY VALUED. BUT. LOCATION IN OUR CITY ASSET OF OUR CITY. I HAVE ALWAYS FELT IT WAS A DISSERVICE TO CARVE IT OUT OF DISTRICT ONE. THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY I'VE HAD AN ISSUE WITH WITH THE MAP AND I AND I SAY THIS HATING THE IMPACT THAT IT HAS ON YOU. DOCTOR FELT THIS BECAUSE YOU KNOW, I OF COURSE VALUE YOU A LOT. I WORKED VERY HARD ON YOUR CAMPAIGN. I HOPE TO BE IF YOU RUN AGAIN, I'D BE DOING THE SAME THING. THE NEXT TIME YOU RUN, AND I HATE IF THERE IS A NEGATIVE IMPACT FOR YOU I CAME TO A PLACE FOR ME WHERE I WANTED TO MAKE A DECISION BASED ON WHAT I THOUGHT WAS BEST MOVING FORWARD. IF I TOOK ALL OF US OUT OF THE EQUATION AND WAS JUST MAKING THE DECISION BASED ON WHAT IS INTUITIVELY THE RIGHT DISTRICTS? WHAT? WHAT ACHIEVES THE NUMBERS . WHAT HAS VERY VERY YOU KNOW, HAD TO HAVE VERY LITTLE IMPACT ON MINORITY, UM, POPULATION IN THE DISTRICTS, UM, ALSO TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION SOME OF THE COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE ASPECTS OF THE DIFFERENT DISTRICTS BUT AGAIN ALSO TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION FOR ME, UM CARVING OUT. ARGUABLY A, UH I WON'T USE THAT ADJECTIVE JUST CARVING OUT HISTORIC DOWNTOWN HISTORIC PART OF SERVICE TO THEM TO HAVE TWO REPRESENTATIVES IN THAT AREA. I DON'T SEE THAT AS A DISSERVICE. I THINK IT'S AN ADVANTAGE FOR THEM BECAUSE WE'VE GOTTEN A LOT OF FEEDBACK FROM THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. HAVING TWO REPRESENTATIVES ON COUNCIL FOR THEM IS A GOOD THING, AND THERE'S A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT WE'VE GONE THROUGH ALREADY. TALKING ABOUT THE MANAGEMENT OF CONCERNS OF THOSE CONSTITUENTS AND HAVING THAT DIVIDED BETWEEN TWO REPRESENTATIVES. I DON'T SEE THE DISSERVICE LET LET ME BLACK OF CONGRUENCE C AND THE GOALS FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE TWO REPRESENTATIVES FIVE REPRESENTATIVES YEAH, PRESENTED TO DOWNTOWN. THEY'VE ALWAYS HAD FIVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM DOWNTOWN. I WOULD SAY THAT WITHOUT GETTING INTO SPECIFIC. I WANT TO BRING UP SOME OF THESE ISSUES RIGHT NOW. BUT BUT THERE ARE THERE ARE ISSUES IN HISTORIC DOWNTOWN ON THE SQUARE. THAT ARE VERY IMPORTANT. TWO MEMBERS OF DISTRICT ONE AS WE KNOW, DISTRICT ONE TODAY. THAT MAY NOT BE AS IMPORTANT TO MEMBERS OF DISTRICT THREE IN THEIR ENTIRETY BECAUSE DISTRICT THREE IS NOT JUST THAT AREA AND IF IT WAS JUST THAT AREA BE ONE THING, BUT THERE'S ALSO OVER TO THE WEST SIDE OF CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, WHICH MAY NOT HAVE THE SAME.

PRIORITIES SAME CONCERNS FOR CONDITIONS THAT MAY EXIST IN HISTORIC DOWNTOWN. AND WITHOUT.

GOING DEEPER INTO THAT SUBJECT. I'LL LEAVE IT AT THAT. I DO BELIEVE THAT UM. NUMBER ONE. I BELIEVE THAT IF DISTRICT THREE WAS NOT, INCLUDING THAT THERE'S NOT AN OUNCE OF ME THAT BELIEVES THAT DR DRE FELT THIS WOULDN'T BE REPRESENTING THAT PART OF THE CITY AS DILIGENTLY IN HIS VIGILANTLY AS SHE IS RIGHT NOW. THERE IS NO PART OF ME THAT WOULD YOU KNOW IF I WAS A DISTRICT PERSON, UM I SEE NO BOUNDARY DISTRICT WISE AND MY UR ANY ANY ASPECT OF THE COMMUNITY AND IF YOU'RE NOT IF DISTRICT THREE WAS NOT DOWNTOWN. WOULD THERE BE ANY LESS CONCERN FROM YOU FOR THAT AREA, WHETHER IT BE ANY LESS PERFORMANCE FROM YOU? I THINK YOU CAN MAKE THE ARGUMENT BOTH WAYS, THEN SO WHY WOULD YOU REMOVE THE REPRESENTATION? IF THE REPRESENTATION HAS BEEN GOOD , SO FAR, WHAT? WHAT IS THE NEED TO CHANGE IT AT THIS POINT, IF IT'S ALREADY ESTABLISHED THE WAY IT IS I TOTALLY AGREE IF I WAS FOR ME IF I WAS MAKING A DECISION WITH WITH YOU AND THE CURRENT COUNCIL PERSON IN PERPETUITY I WOULDN'T MAKE THE DECISION TO CHANGE IT. I WOULD LEAVE IT. BUT BUT BUT WE'RE NOT MAKING A DECISION BASED ON KNOWING WHO'S GOING TO BE REPRESENTING IN ONE YEAR TO YEAR , FOUR YEARS, EIGHT YEARS WE'RE MAKING A DECISION FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS. SO IF IT IF THAT WAS THE DECISION BEFORE US TODAY, THAT COUNCILWOMAN FILTERS WOULD BE REPRESENTING THAT AREA. PERPETUITY. UM. AND ME MAKING DECISION THAT I'VE THAT I AM MAKING WOULD CHANGE THAT. I WOULDN'T BE MAKING THE DECISION. BUT I'M NOT DOING IT. MY THOUGHT IS NOT ABOUT CURRENT COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE CURRENT PERSONALITIES. CURRENT

[00:45:02]

COMMITMENT, CURRENT ANYTHING IT'S ABOUT. ALL OF 77 PEOPLE, NOT ON COUNCIL JUST LOOKING AT THE DISTRICTS. STAND ALONE. WITH WHOEVER MAYBE IN REPRESENTING SO I DISAGREE. I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY, WHEN YOU'RE RUNNING FOR THIS SEAT, IT IS A UNIQUE POSITION BECAUSE THERE IS YOU KNOW THAT SECTION EAST OF HIGHWAY FIVE. YOU HAVE TO GO CAMPAIGN WITH THOSE FOLKS. AND IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO WIN DISTRICT THREE WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, EAST OF 75 PRIORITIES EAST OF 75. BECOME YOUR PRIORITY WHEN YOU RUN FOR THIS SEAT. AND I THINK THAT'S A GOOD THING. I DON'T SEE THE NEED TO CHANGE THAT. I, YOU KNOW, JUST TO MAKE A FEW MORE. POINTS AND WE'VE BEAT THIS HORSE TO DEATH FOR SURE, BUT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT A FEW PERCENTAGE POINTS.

AND THERE YOU'RE RIGHT. IS IT A FEW PERCENTAGE POINTS? YES, THAT DILUTES MINORITY. WHAT VOTE? THERE ARE A FEW PERCENTAGE POINTS. BUT MY RACE MR TORRES KNOWS THIS BETTER THAN ANYONE.

THE CAMPAIGN. THE WINNING OF THIS SEAT CAN BE SWAYED BY TWO OR 3% PERCENTAGE POINTS. AND TO SUGGEST THAT THAT DOESN'T MATTER WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT NOT DILUTING THEM. MINORITY VOTE IT MATTERS HUGELY. WE ALREADY HAVE A DISTRICT THAT IS LOSING GROUND. SO MY QUESTION TO THIS COUNCIL IS WHAT IS THE LEGACY YOU WANT TO LEAVE BEHIND? THAT'S MY QUESTION WHEN I'M LOOKING AT NOT JUST THE ENTIRE CITY FOR DISTRICT THREE AS WELL, BECAUSE MY PRIORITIES FOR DISTRICT THREE IS THAT WE MAINTAIN AN OPPORTUNITY TO GROW THAT WE KEEP NORTH OF 3 80 THAT WE KEEP EAST OF 75. THOSE WERE MY PRIORITIES . NONE OF THAT IS REPRESENTED IN THE MAPS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. ON A N C. REVISED A AND C. NONE OF THOSE ARE MET THERE. UM BUT A HUGE IMPACT ON DILUTING OUT THE MINORITY VOTE. WHERE YOU WHETHER YOU WANT TO, OR YOU'RE INTENTIONALLY DO IT OR NOT, UNINTENTIONALLY, YOU COULD BE VOTING TO DILUTE IT OUT FURTHER AND THIS IS ALREADY IN AN AREA WHERE WE ARE COMING IN TO GENTRIFY. TRUE THE EAST SIDE OF MCKINNEY, WE HAVE ESTABLISHED THAT WE'RE GONNA PUT THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX THERE. WE HAVE TUFTS GOING ON OVER THERE. WE ARE GOING TO SEE HUGE GENTRIFICATION ON THE EAST SIDE , SO PEOPLE ALREADY FEEL LIKE THEY'RE LOSING THEIR HOMES. THEY'RE LOSING THEIR POWER. THEY'RE LOSING THEIR VOICES. AND NOW WE'RE GONNA ADD TO THAT WE'RE GOING TO DILUTE OUT YOUR VOTE. AND SO WHETHER IT'S INTENTIONAL OR UNINTENTIONAL. THE LEGACY WE LEAVE BEHIND FOR DISTRICT ONE IS WE DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR VOICE OR YOUR POWER IN THIS CITY. THAT'S HOW THE RESIDENTS FEEL. I APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS FROM HAVING A MINORITY PERSPECTIVE. THAT'S WEST OF 75. FROM WHAT I'VE HEARD FROM THE MINORITY POPULATION EAST OF 75 IS WE ARE LOSING GROUND. WE ARE LOSING POWER. WE ARE LOSING OUR VOICE IN THIS CITY, AND THAT IS THE LEGACY WE ARE ABOUT TO IMPLEMENT IF WE ARE GOING TO BE VOTING FOR ANY OTHER MAP OTHER THAN D, I THINK WE SHOULD BE STRINGENT. DO WE HAVE TO DO IT? WE DON'T HAVE TO. JUSTIN HAS GONE THROUGH THAT EXTENSIVELY. ALREADY. WE ARE NOT MANDATED BY ANYONE TO CONSIDER IT JUST BECAUSE WE'RE NOT MANDATED DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULDN'T STRONGLY. CONSIDER WHAT IS AHEAD OF US THE FUTURE OF THIS CITY. IT'S GOING TO BE CHANGING DRAMATICALLY. WHATEVER WE CAN DO TO PRESERVE THE MINORITY PERSPECTIVE, THE MINORITY VOTING POWER THEIR VOICES BEING HEARD THEIR CHOICE FOR REPRESENTATION IS WHAT WE SHOULD DO. MY BIGGER SPHERE IS AS WE ALLOW DISTRICT ONE TO LOOP UP AND TAKE OVER ALL OF WHAT WILL BE PAINTED TREE IN AUBURN HILLS. IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE VERY STRONG CANDIDATES COME OUT OF THOSE AREAS AND THEN NOT EVEN ANYTHING EAST OF 75 WILL HAVE A REPRESENTATION. THAT'S WHAT THAT'S ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE THAT WE HAVEN'T REALLY CONSIDERED. BUT WE ARE LOSING GROUND. I CANNOT. I CANNOT, BUT LET ME THAT MAKES IT THAT MUCH OF AN IMPACT ON OUR FUTURE. SO YOU ARE YOU'RE A MINORITY. ONE DISTRICT THREE DISTRICT THREE BY TAKING OUT THE I'LL USE THE TERM PENINSULA RIGHT NOW, THE PART THAT EXTENDS OVER BEYOND THE ONLY PIECE THAT'S CARVED OUT OF DISTRICT ONE IS DISTRICT THREE. IF WE PUT THAT IN DISTRICT ONE WERE SAYING THAT THAT DILUTES THE MINORITY VOTE, WHICH IN OTHER WORDS WOULD MEAN THAT THERE IS, OF COURSE, LESS MINORITY IN THAT PENINSULA. NOT JUST THAT, BUT YOU'RE NOT JUST ONE, BUT BUT LET ME BUT LET ME KNOW, BUT I WANT TO STICK TO THIS PENINSULA. THIS PENINSULA. AS HAS MUCH LESS OF A MINORITY VOTE IN IT. YES. SO YOU WON DISTRICT THREE. WHEN YOU WHEN YOU SAY THAT YOU ONLY WON BECAUSE OF THAT PART OF DISTRICT THREE BECAUSE, BUT THAT'S A STRONG VOTER GROUP. A STRONG ROTOR GROUP. THAT IS, IT'S NOT A MINORITY MAJORITY OF POPULATION AND YOU AND YOU WON THAT AND I BELIEVE YOU WANT, OF COURSE, BECAUSE YOU ARE QUALIFIED AND YOU ARE AWESOME. AND YOU ARE GREAT COUNCIL PERSON. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHY YOU WANT IT FOR SURE , BUT I DON'T THINK IT WOULD BE

[00:50:01]

ACCURATE POINT TO THAT PENINSULA AND MAKE THE ARGUMENT THAT LOSING THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW YOU TO HAVE BEEN ELECTED. I DON'T I DON'T SEE THAT. NO BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S THAT EASY FOR THE MAJORITY OF MINORITIES WHO RUN FOR OFFICE. I'M GONNA BE HONEST . THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS THAT CAME INTO PERFECT PLACE FOR ME TO WIN THE SEAT. I DON'T THINK YOU MAKE IT VERY EASY FOR ANYONE ELSE EAST OF 75 TO COME UP AND TAKE THIS POSITION. YOU'RE GONNA MAKE IT HARDER. AND TWO OR THREE OR 4% POINTS MAKES A HUGE BUT WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THREE OR FOUR. WHAT ARE YOU HAVE THE EXACT NUMBER? I THINK, UM 15,00S WHAT THAT SWINGS AN ENTIRE ELECTION. CAN'T SWING AN ENTIRELY DIDN'T HEAR THOSE NUMBERS WELL, 126 THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAP A AND DEED AND WHAT IN POPULATION AND VOTING AGE POPULATIONS AND CITIZEN VOTING AGE POPULATION, BLACKS AND HISPANICS FOR THOSE TWO GROUPS FOR THE POPULATION IN VOTING AGE POPULATION, AND WE DIDN'T I DIDN'T EVEN TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE ACTUAL REGISTERED VOTERS BECAUSE IF YOU DO THE ACTUAL REGISTERED VOTERS, YOU CAN'T EVEN THERE'S NO WAY TO EVEN GET CLOSE TO EVEN PROBABLY 40. MINORITY DISTRICT. YOU'RE NOT EVEN CLOSE. JUST TRYING TO BE CLEAR ABOUT WHAT NUMBERS YOU'RE USING. I JUST ADDED THE BLACKNESS. HISPANICS OF THOSE TWO IS THAT VOTING AGE POPULATION OR POPULATION POPULATION BECAUSE THE VOTING AGE POPULATION AND WE CAN GET THESE NUMBERS OUT. IT IS A 2.95% DIFFERENCE. BETWEEN MAP A REVISED IN MY SEAT IN MY D. IF YOU TAKE 2.95% ARE YOU COUNTING THE BLACKS AND HISPANICS ARE ONLY COUNTY IN AFRICAN AMERICANS AND HISPANICS. THE NUMBERS THAT I DO THE NUMBERS AND I SEE THAT THE NUMBERS THAT'S THE ABSOLUTE NUMBER SO HE'S TALKING ABOUT. HE'S TALKING ABOUT RIGHT? I'M TALKING ABOUT THAT THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ELECTIONS HAS VERY RECENTLY. SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE DIFFERENT SAYING HISPANIC TOTAL VOTER VOTING AGE POPULATION DISTRICT ONE FOR THOSE OUT THERE, NOT LOOKING AT THESE SAME NUMBERS IS 29.1% IN MAP D AND IS 28.46% AND MAP A SO ON THE VOTING AGE POPULATION, IT'S JUST OVER A HALF A PERCENTAGE POINT ON HISPANIC. SO WE SHOULD WE SHOULD BE TALKING. ACCURATE NUMBERS THERE. MR MAYOR, UM, JUSTIN, AND YOU'RE A HAVE BOTH COME OUT THAT THEY'RE ADVOCATING FOR MAP. D UM, YOU HAVEN'T COME OUT WITH WHAT YOU'RE ADVOCATING FOR. WHEN WE STARTED THE LAST MEETING, WE WERE BETWEEN C AND D. AND THEN IN THE LAST MEETING THAT WE TALKED ABOUT THIS YOU BROUGHT IN A MAP. A WHAT YOU'RE ADVOCATING FOR YES, I AM ADVOCATING FOR MAYBE A REVISED REVISED SORRY. COUNCILMAN ROGERS BROUGHT UP A REVISED WHEREAS A WAS PRESENTED AS THE GOOD MAP. WHY A REVISED BECAUSE OF THE FUTURE RESIDENTS THAT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR A COUNCIL MEMBER THAT IS CURRENTLY IN DISTRICT FOR THE BE PLACED OUT. OKAY SO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAP A MAP A REVISED HAS TO DO WITH A COUNCIL MEMBER WHO CURRENTLY OWNS SOME LAND THERE THAT MAY MOVE THERE IS MOVING THERE HAS A HOMESTEAD BEING BUILT IN ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS IS TO NOT DISTRICT OUT. SOME REMEMBER THANKS FOR CLEARING THAT UP. UM LET ME SAY A FEW THINGS SINCE I'M TALKING. UM WHEN I MOVED TO MCKINNEY IN 1996 THE EAST SIDE WAS HE RATHER MEANINGFUL PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION. UH IN THE EAST SIDE, I WILL DEFINE AS I ALWAYS HAVE EAST OF THE TRACKS SOUTH OF 3 80 , NORTH OF AIRPORT EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD. AS MCKINNEY GREW FROM 35,000 PEOPLE WHEN I MOVED HERE TO THE ROUGHLY 2 10 THAT WE'RE AT NOW. IT'S A LESS PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION RIGHT? BECAUSE IF WE LOOK AT WHERE IS THE GROWTH, THERE HASN'T BEEN MUCH GROWTH THERE ON THE EAST SIDE AS I DEFINE IT VERY LITTLE RIGHT. BUT HERE'S THE THING. MM HMM. THAT IS WHERE THE MINORITIES WERE HISTORICALLY IN OUR TOWN WHERE THE MINORITIES NOW IS WORTH 2 10. I WOULD, AND I'M NOT THE DEMOGRAPHER AND I CAN'T SAY I'VE LOOKED AT THIS STUFF GRADUALLY, BUT I HAVE LOOKED AT SOME OF THE BREAKOUTS.

AND WHEN I REMEMBER I REMEMBER LOOKING AT THE AFRICAN AMERICAN POPULATION IN MCKINNEY, AND IT'S ALL SPREAD OUT. AND I WOULD MAKE THE CASE THAT A LOT OF THE MULTI FAMILY THAT WE'RE BUILDING HAS A RELATIVELY HIGH PERCENTAGE OF AFRICAN AMERICAN AND HISPANIC POPULATION. OKAY I WOULD SAY

[00:55:08]

THAT'S PROBABLY TRUE AND WHERE WE BUILDING MULTIFAMILY. PRETTY MUCH ALONG HIGHWAYS. WE'RE NOT PUTTING IT. IN THE EAST SIDE, RIGHT? SO. THAT'S WHY WE COME UP WITH MAP D. IF WE'RE TRYING TO HONOR A MAJORITY MINORITY DISTRICT TO THE BEST WE CAN THAT'S WHY WE'VE GOT MAP D NOW THE TWO BIG DEBATES HERE SEEM TO ME TO ME BETWEEN SYMMETRY. AND HONORING THAT THAT PAST LEGACY.

THEORETICALLY THE WAY I LOOK AT IT AS A FIDUCIARY FOR THE TAXPAYER, THE CITY MCKINNEY'S I COULD WE COULD GET BEAT UP ON EITHER WAY, RIGHT? SOMEONE COULD BEAT US UP ON EITHER WAY, RIGHT ? OH MY GOD. LOOK AT THIS THING. YOU DID THIS GERRYMANDERING. WHATEVER OR LOOK WHAT YOU DID.

YOU DIDN'T HONOR THE MAJORITY MINORITY AS BEST YOU COULD. THE WORST OPTICS FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. IT IS THE LATTER. YOU SAYING YOU DIDN'T DO THE BEST JOB TO HONOR THE MAJORITY MINORITY? I REALLY, REALLY BELIEVE THAT AS WE PROCEED WITH THIS THING, WE HONOR THAT WE HONORED THE MAJORITY MINORITY TO THE BEST EXTENT WE CAN. IS IT GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN ELECTION? I DON'T KNOW. I DON'T KNOW THAT CAN NEVER BE PROVEN, BUT WHAT I DO KNOW IS THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY BECAUSE IN THE LAST 24 HOURS, I'VE RECEIVED MORE EMAILS THAN I EVER HAVE ON ANY ISSUE THAT WE'VE COME UP WITH. AND THAT'S THIS AND EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. HAS SAID DON'T VOTE FOR MAP A MAP. SEE SF COME DOWN ON COMPLETELY. I WILL TAKE A SYMMETRY. I WILL TAKE COMPANIES BY AND LARGE BEING IN MAP. D AND IN DISTRICT ONE, BECAUSE THAT'S JUST A BOWL OF WARM AIR. COMPANIES DON'T VOTE AND I GUARANTEE YOU THE ONE COMPANY THAT I KNOW OF. THAT I CAN THINK OF, BESIDES POPEYE'S CHICKEN OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT THAT'S GOING TO WIND UP IN DISTRICT ONE IS TRACKS US. IF THEY'VE GOT A PROBLEM, CHANCES THEM CALLING ALL OF US BORDER ON 100% THEY'RE NOT GOING TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT DISTRICT THERE IN WE ALL GET THOSE CALLS. SO. MR TREVINO. I'M NOT A LAWYER. I THINK IF YOU WIND UP FILING A SUIT, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO GO ANYWHERE FROM EVERYTHING I'VE READ AND I'VE TRIED TO READ UP A LOT ON THIS THING, BUT YOU'RE FREE TO DO IT, BUT JUST THE OPTICS OF YOU SAYING IT. OR WHAT I'M TRYING TO AVOID FOR THE CITY MCKINNEY. THANK YOU, MR BEAR. SO I WANTED TO SAY A COUPLE OF THINGS. UM, DOCTOR FELT AS YOU WERE SAYING. WHERE IT WAS BEING SET DOWN THERE THAT WITHOUT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT THAT THAT YOU WOULD HAVE HAD A TOUGHER TIME AND JUST STATISTICALLY, YOU WOULD NOT HAVE ONE YEAR RACE WITHOUT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. AND I THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE, UM ON ON OUR RADAR THAT THAT IS A COMPONENT OF THIS UM, HOW ARE YOU ABLE TO SAY THAT? BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW WHO WHO DON'T WE DON'T KNOW. SHE WON HER RACE BY ABOUT 195 VOTES. AND SHE ONE PRECINCT ONE BY ABOUT 205, OKAY? UM, STAND CORRECTED. THE. MR MAYOR. I'M NOT TRYING TO BE OFFENSIVE TO AN INDIVIDUAL OR TWO. YOU CERTAINLY NOT TO. YOU HAVE TRIED TO BE VERY CAREFUL WITH MY WORDS IN THIS. BYE BYE. MY INSINUATION THAT OF UH UM.

WE'RE WANTING TO DO THIS IS WE HAVE A CHOICE IN FRONT OF US. WE DON'T HAVE TO DO THIS. AND SO IF WE MAKE THE CHOICE WE MAKE THAT CHOICE WILLINGLY. AND SO THAT IS OUR INTENT TO DO IT IS THAT WE MAKE A CHOICE WILLINGLY IN THIS. WE DON'T HAVE A DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT STEPS OVER OUR SHOULDERS AND REQUIRES PRECLEARANCE. AND SO THAT WAS NOT AN OFFENSE TO YOU. IT WAS SIMPLY STATING THAT WE HAVE A CHOICE IN FRONT OF US. AND IF WE CHOOSE TO DIMINISH THAT VOTE WE CHOOSE IT OURSELVES. UM. I DO WANT TO ADDRESS ONE THING YOU MENTIONED ABOUT. WE'RE LOOKING FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD OF TIME, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT AND KIND OF IN OUR CRITERIA POINTS THIS OUT. IF DR FELTUS DECIDES TO RUN AGAIN AND REPRESENT HER DISTRICT AGAIN, SHE REPRESENTS THAT DISTRICT FOR SIX YEARS OF THOSE 10 YEARS THAT WE'RE DRAWING THIS MAP FOR. I DON'T THINK THAT WE SHOULD UM, DISCOUNT THAT SERVICE THAT THAT THAT 60% OF THIS TIME PERIOD OF SERVICE BECAUSE THE OUTCOME AT THE END OF THE 10 YEAR PERIOD ULTIMATELY HAVE A DIFFERENT REPRESENTATIVE. UM THE THIRD THING I WANTED TO MENTION UM AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE THIS VERY

[01:00:03]

CLEAR THIS. THE HISTORIC DISTRICT HAS NEVER BEEN PART OF DISTRICT ONE. AND SO I JUST I WANT TO CLARIFY THAT BECAUSE USING WORDS LIKE CARVING IT OUT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT THAT THE WAY THIS POPULATION CENTER HAS GROWN, ESPECIALLY OVER THE LAST 20 YEARS IS ALL OF THE DISTRICTS USED TO HAVE CONNECTIVITY TO THE POPULATIONS EAST OF 75. BUT AS POPULATIONS HAVE MOVED WEST THOSE DISTRICTS HAVE CONTINUED TO EVOLVE WEST. AND SO IF WE WOULD SEE AN OVERLAY OF THE DISTRICT FROM 1980 WHEN WE FIRST DREW THESE TWO NOW YOU WOULD SEE THIS MIGRATION OF ALL THE DISTRICTS MOVING EAST TO WEST BECAUSE OUR POPULATION GROWTH HAS HAPPENED TO THE WEST. IT'S THE SAME THING THAT HAPPENED IN 2010, WHERE DISTRICT THREE AND DISTRICT ONE NEEDED TO ADD POPULATION AND THEY TOOK IT FROM DISTRICTS FOR AND DISTRICTS TO. WE'RE DOING THE SAME THING THIS TIME IT'S GOING TO CONTINUE TO HAPPEN AS LONG AS WE HAD POPULATION TO THE WEST, BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE AND BE CLEAR. THE HISTORIC DISTRICT HAS NEVER BEEN PART OF DISTRICT ONE CONFUSION ABOUT PEOPLE IN THE WHO LIVE IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT BEING IN DISTRICT ONE IS NOT BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN THERE BEFORE. WE'LL PIGGYBACK OFF OF WHAT DOCTOR FELT HAS SAID ABOUT TWO REPS BEING GOOD FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. ONE IS OBVIOUSLY THE CONTINUITY OF IT BECAUSE THAT DISTRICT OR THAT AREA HAS ALWAYS BEEN PART OF DISTRICT THREE. BUT ALSO EAST OF 75 HAS EXPOSURE TO A LOT OF UNIQUE THINGS, AND THOSE UNIQUE THINGS COME WITH UNIQUE DEMANDS OF A COUNCILMAN COUNCIL PERSON THAT HAS LIMITED OAS. IT HAS UNIQUE INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES. WE HAVE ALLEYWAYS THAT I GET MORE CALLS ON. THEN ALMOST ANYTHING ELSE.

WE ARE SUBJECT TO CREEKS WITHOUT H OAS. WE HAVE A STORAGE PRESERVATION, AND THAT'S JUST TO NAME A FEW. KEEPING THE HISTORIC DISTRICT AND DISTRICT THREE IS GOOD FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, AND IT'S GOOD FOR DISTRICT ONE. UM I WANT TO SAY SOMETHING ELSE WHEN WE TALK ABOUT HOW FEW PERCENTAGE POINTS DIFFERENCE WE ARE. WE'RE GOING FROM 49.27. AND WE HAVE A CHOICE ABOUT THAT IN 2010 WHEN THEY WERE FACED WITH THIS SAME DILEMMA. THEY CAME OUT THE EXISTING MAP. FOR DISTRICT ONE. SO THE MAPS THAT EXISTED IN 2000 THAT WAS STILL THERE AT THE END OF 2010. HAD A PLURALITY OF HISPANIC AND AFRICAN AMERICAN VOTERS OF 56.5% SO THAT IS BEFORE REDISTRICTING IN 2010.

COUNCIL DREW A MAP. THEY DREW THAT PERCENTAGE ALL THE WAY DOWN TO 47.7% AND IF YOU WOULD SEE THEIR MAP, I WISH I COULD HAVE IT UP HERE TO SHOW IT TO YOU. THEY HAD DISTRICT ONE AT THE SOUTH. WEST CORNER OF CUSTER. AND 3 80. THE ENTIRE NORTH SIDE. OF OUR CITY AND DISTRICT ONE.

THAT WAS THE PLAN. AND THAT HAD A 47.7% PLURALITY OF HISPANIC AND AFRICAN AMERICAN VOTING POPULATIONS. THE CITIZENS SAID. WE WANT YOU TO TRY TO MAINTAIN THIS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THEY ADJUSTED THAT MAP. THEY DREW THE MAP WE HAVE, WHICH THEY CALLED PLAN H, BUT IT'S THE MAP WE HAVE TODAY AND AT THE TIME THAT THEY REDREW THAT MAP. IT WAS 50.1% AND AFRICAN AMERICANS, SO THEY MADE A CHOICE 10 YEARS AGO AT THE REQUEST OF CITIZENS TO SHIFT THEIR POPULATION. THIS PERCENTAGE THAT WE KEEP TALKING ABOUT BY 2.4% TO MAINTAIN AS MUCH AS THEY COULD, AND THAT HAS BEEN GOOD FOR THE DELUSION. OF MINORITY VOTING POWER IN MCKINNEY BECAUSE OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS, DISTRICT ONE WENT FROM 50.1, WHICH WAS WHAT THEY DREW IT AT TWO AS IT EXISTS BEFORE WE REDISTRICT. AT 49.27. THAT'S GOOD. WHEN WE DECIDE. TO DRY IT OUT A MAP OF 43. AND A HALF PERCENT AND THEN WE HAVE ALL OF THE GROWTH THAT DELUSION IS GOING TO GO MUCH FURTHER THAN IS NECESSARY. AND WE DON'T ACCOMPLISH A WHOLE LOT BECAUSE OF IT. THE LAST THING I WANT TO POINT OUT JUST FROM THE STANDPOINT OF WHY THESE DELUSIONS HAPPEN THE AREAS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SWITCHING. ONE AREA THAT WE'VE TALKED. A LOT ABOUT IS THE AREA AROUND BAYLOR, EVERYTHING WEST OF LIKE FOREST THAT INCLUDES THE AUBURN HILLS, AND THE HEATHER WOULD

[01:05:06]

DISTRICTS THAT IS A POPULATION A TOTAL POPULATION OF ABOUT 8676 PEOPLE IN THIS CENSUS. IT HAS A HISPANIC AND AFRICAN AMERICAN VOTING AGE POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF 23.8. SO DISTRICT ONE, WHICH HAS THAT 49.27 COMBINED WITH THIS AREA AT 23.8. MIX. POORLY IN TERMS OF. DELUDING THE MINORITY VOTING AGE POPULATION. PERCENTAGE THAT THE DOGLEG THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE DOGLEG ALONG. I CALL IT THE DOG LIKE BECAUSE IT'S KIND OF STICKS OUT THERE ALONG 1 21. IS A TOTAL POPULATION OF 6819 PEOPLE. IT HAS A HISPANIC AND AFRICAN AMERICAN VOTING AGE POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF 37, A HALF PERCENT. IT LOOKS A LOT MORE LIKE DISTRICT ONE. AND THAT'S WHY WHEN YOU ADD THE MAPS LIKE B , WHICH WAS IN MR SEAQUEST ORIGINAL THING AND HOW WE REVISED IT TO D. WE DON'T DILUTE THE MINORITY VOTING POWER AS MUCH WITH THOSE MAPS AND IT'S BECAUSE WE'RE ADDING POPULATIONS THAT LOOK MORE LIKE DISTRICT ONE AND JUST TO THROW IT IN HERE. I DON'T HAVE THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS TOTAL POPULATION AND PERCENTAGE, BUT THE LITTLE AREA THAT WE ADDED IN MAP D THAT IS AROUND THE RAYTHEON CAMPUS HAS A VOTING AGE POPULATION OF HISPANIC AND AFRICAN AMERICANS, PERCENTAGE OF 34.5% AND SO ULTIMATELY THOSE AREAS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO DISTRICT ONE THAT LOOKED LIKE DISTRICT ONE DO A BETTER JOB OF NOT DILUTING THE MINORITY VOTING POWER WITHIN DISTRICT ONE. OR CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION? THERE WAS A CHANGE.

2010 OR WHENEVER 11 WHAT WAS THE CHANGE, TOO? THREE. THREE AND ONE. THERE. THAT THE PENINSULA WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, WE ENDED UP WITH MAPPING H. I'VE GOT THOSE MAPS IF WE WOULD LIKE TO PUT THEM ON A SCREEN. THERE WAS A CHANGE OF YEAH. SOME WHAT'S AN EFFORT SIGNIFICANCE BUT IT WASN'T. I THINK I THINK COUNCILOR BELLA IS CORRECT. IT WAS CHANGING ONE. DISTRICT ONE DISTRICT ONE WAS, UM ALL EAST OF 75, NORTH OF 3 80. I BELIEVE EAST OF WHAT LOOKS LIKE UM TENNESSEE AND THEN SOUTH OF VERY CLOSE TO THE SIMILAR BORDER THAT THAT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT HAS.

NOW THE DISTRICT THREE HAS NOW KIND OF THAT. MORE OF A SQUARE. YEAH, THE THAT'S RIGHT. SO THE BLUE LINE WAS THE EXISTING LINES , AND THIS WAS THE 2010 PLANTS. MADE IT MORE COMPACT. SO CHANGE ABOUT 40% OR SOMETHING. YEAH IT SHRUNK THE AREA THAT INCLUDES ME. IT ADDED ME INTO DISTRICT ONE. BUT I BELIEVE THAT LINE IS PROBABLY DRAWN AROUND. I DON'T KNOW WHAT PREDATED IF IT WAS PRECINCT ONE EXISTED AT THAT POINT. AND WE DREW THE BOUNDARY TO MATCH PRECINCT ONE OR PRECINCT ONE WAS DRAWN TO MATCH THAT BOUNDARY. BUT THAT BOUNDARY MATCHES PRECINCT LINE. OTHER COMMENTS. NO COMMENTS. I'LL MOVE TO, UM THAT WE APPROVE THE REDISTRICTING OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS AS OUTLINED IN MAP A REVISED I'LL SECOND. WE ALL GOT KICKED OUT OF HER. I GOT KICKED OUT OF MY MEETING. HMM. IT'S COMING BACK. WHAT'S THAT? GENTLEMEN. NO. YES. NO. I AM

[01:10:02]

VERY, VERY CONFLICTED. I KNOW WE BEAT THIS TO THE GROUND, BUT THERE ARE SOME COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE TODAY THAT THAT CERTAINLY HAVE ME. RETHINKING. MY POSITION ON A SPECIFICALLY ON THE ON THE ON THE GROWTH. UM. OR LACK THEREOF . ABILITY FOR GROWTH IN THE, UH IN DISTRICT THREE. WITH THE MAP THAT WE HAVE. I'M NOT PREPARED TO VOTE FOR IT. AT THIS POINT.

I'M GOING TO SAY NO. YES. NO. YES. THAT MOTION DOES NOT PASS. THE ONLY OTHER MAP THAT'S BEEN DISCUSSED WITH ANY MERIT OR ANY REAL, UM ADVOCACY IS D. I WILL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE MAP D. SECOND DEBT. I STILL HAVE AN ISSUE WITH BAPTISTE BASED ON THE ARGUMENTS THAT I'VE MADE BEFORE. SO I'M NOT PREPARED TO VOTE FOR D EITHER. UNFORTUNATELY, LET'S DO A VOICE VOTE THAT COULD HAPPEN. MIRA FULLER. NO. PROTIUM NO. YES. YES. NO. WHAT'S THE SCORE RIGHT NOW? NO. NEXT I GET A VOTE, EMPRESS, OR DO I ABSTAIN ON THIS ONE? I VOTED? YES, ON MY COMPUTER, BUT YEAH, HE DIDN'T CALL MY NAME. BUT YOU KNOW WHAT WE HAVE IS WE NOT THE MOTION HAS PASSED. AND I AND I CERTAINLY REALIZED THAT APPARENTLY, I WAS A COULD HAVE ANY ONE OF US.

COULD HAVE HAD A DIFFERENT VOTE AND CHANGE THE COURSE OF IT. BUT THERE WERE THINGS SAID TONIGHT THAT THAT GIVES ME PAUSE AND I HAVE TO GO WITH WITH MY WHAT? I WHAT I FELT TONIGHT AND SOME OF THEM SOME OF THE ARGUMENTS THAT WERE MADE. I DON'T HOWEVER, THERE WASN'T ARGUMENTS MADE THAE OTHER ISSUES THAT I HAVE FROM THE CORPORATE SIDE TO HISTORIC DOWNTOWN TO INTUITIVENESS. SO I GUESS WHAT THIS DOES IS FORCES INTO YET A LITTLE MORE DIALOGUE. NOT TONIGHT. WE DON'T HAVE TO MAKE THIS DECISION TONIGHT. SO UM, KIND OF GETTING WORRIED WOULD STILL BE HERE WHEN WE REDISTRICTED. THREE. WE MAY WE MAY VERY WELL, BUT LISTEN, I CAME HERE WITH A VERY I CAME HERE VERY SET ON A CERTAIN MAP AND ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT I WAS OFFENDED, JUSTIN, YOU MADE SOME POINTS THAT THAT CERTAINLY GIVES ME PAUSE AS AS YOU DID AS WELL. DOCTOR FILTER SO SORRY THAT I AM THE ONE WHO IS GOING TO CAUSE US A DELAY AND HAVE TO REVISIT THIS AGAIN. I WILL SAY FOR THE PERSON THAT THREATENED A LAWSUIT. UM DON'T EVER DO THAT. THAT'S A BEGINNING. WE'RE GONNA DO SOMETHING. DO IT DON'T THREATEN BECAUSE I KNOW I THINK THAT THAT'S NOT A DIALOGUE. IT'S NOT A DIALOGUE. BUT I THINK FOR EVERYONE UP HERE WE DON'T RESPOND TO THAT KIND OF THING.

UM IT'S. IT WAS ACTUALLY QUITE QUITE RIDICULOUS BECAUSE THE ABILITY TO FILE SUCH A LAWSUIT WOULD REQUIRE THAT THERE WAS A VIOLATION OF SOME KIND, WHICH, OF COURSE THERE IS NOT. AND I BET YOU THAT YOU'RE NOT AWARE THAT THE AMOUNT OF, UM, DIFFERENTIAL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT , FOR EXAMPLE IN THE HISPANIC VOTE IS LESS THAN A HALF PERCENT. THAT'S HARDLY A DILUTION. THAT WOULD THAT WOULD BRING IN A FEDERAL LAWSUIT. SO WE WILL MOVE ON, AND I APOLOGIZE, BUT WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. YES SO I MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THE ITEM. OH, I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. I OPPOSED NAY. OKAY? TO OUR NEXT MEETING, AND I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST IF WE COULD A YET ONE MORE WORK SESSION IF WE COULD, WHERE WE COULD ALL GET TOGETHER AND TRY TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION IN A MAP THAT WE CAN ALL AGREE TO, AND THAT WOULD REQUIRE, OF COURSE, GUNNER, HOPEFULLY BEING AVAILABLE AGAIN AND GUNNER. IF YOU'RE ON THE PHONE, I THINK YOU ARE APOLOGIZE FOR ALL THE TIME THAT YOU HAVE SAID THROUGH THIS DISCUSSION.

[01:15:05]

CAN WE HAVE THE ARCHITECTS COME BACK TO THE NEXT MEETING AS WELL? 220973 CONSIDER AND ACT ON

[Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance Amending the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Budget and Amending the 2023-2027 Capital Improvements Program, to Provide Funds For Professional and Construction Services Related to the McKinney Municipal Complex Project (FC1707) and Appropriating the Transfer of TIRZ1 Bond Funding to the Respective City Funds]

ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022 2023 ANNUAL BUDGET AMENDING THE 2023 2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROVIDE FUNDS PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RELATED TO THE BEGINNING MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PROJECT AND APPROPRIATING THE CHANCE FOR OF TOURIST BOND FUNDING TOURS, ONE BOND FUNDING TO THE RESPECTIVE CITY FUNDS. HELLO GOOD EVENING COUNCIL.

PATRICIA JACKSON, FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR THE CITY. THIS ORDINANCE AMENDS THE FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR 2022 2023 AS WELL AS AMENDS THE C I P BUDGET FOR 2023 THROUGH 2027. IT ALSO ALLOCATES FUNDS OUT OF THE TOURS. ALL OF THIS IN CONJUNCTION FOR THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, WHICH IS THE MCKINNEY MUNICIPAL COMPLEX OR CITY HALL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. MR. HOLLOWAY IS ALSO HERE THIS EVENING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THE ORDINANCE. IF YOU HAVE ANY. ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS? ENTERTAINING MOTION. MOVED TO APPROVE. THIS ITEM. I WILL. SECOND CAST YOUR VOTES. STILL NEVER PULLED OUT, KEEPS GIVING ME HERE, BUT I JUST DIDN'T. YES. YES. ALL RIGHT, 220974 CONSIDER AND ACT ON RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Phase 2 GMP Amendment to the Existing Contract with Pogue Construction Company, LP for Services Related to the Design and Construction of the McKinney Municipal Complex Project (FC1707)]

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PHASE TWO GMP AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT WITH POPE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LP FOR SERVICES RELATED TO THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE MCKINNEY MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PROJECT. GOOD EVENING AGAIN. PATRICIA JACKSON, FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR THE CITY AND A PROUD MEMBER OF AN AMAZING AND TALENTED PROJECT TEAM. WE HAVE SOME MEMBERS OF OUR PROJECT TEAM WITH US TONIGHT. WE HAVE MEMBERS FROM OUR DESIGN TEAM WITH LIKE FLATOW AND PARKHILL JOINT VENTURE THERE, AS WELL AS OUR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, POWER CONSTRUCTION, AND WE ALL ARE GOING TO BE READY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. IN ALL OF MY 17.5 YEARS WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, I HAVE NEVER BEEN HAPPIER TO PRESENT AN ITEM AS I AM THIS ONE FOR THE CITY HALL. WE HAVE PROGRAMMED THIS THING MANY, MANY TIMES AND WE ARE SO HAPPY AND EXCITED TO BRING TO YOU TODAY TO ASK FOR YOUR FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION IN THE NEXT STEP OF BRINGING THIS MONUMENTAL PROJECT. TO LIFE. THIS PROJECT WILL BE BENEFICIAL FOR THE CITIZENS AND STAFF ALIKE WITH NEW CUSTOMER SERVICE INTERFACES, WORK AND COLLABORATIVE SPACES. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, INCLUDING MULTIFUNCTIONAL AREAS, A CONFERENCE CENTER AND PUBLIC GATHERING VENUES. OUR PROJECT TEAM WENT THROUGH VERY SPECIFIC AND WELL DEFINED PUBLIC BIDDING PROCESSES FOR CITY PROJECTS AND RECEIVED MORE THAN 200 DIRECT SUBCONTRACTORS. BID EXCUSE ME WITH MULTIPLE BIDS IN ALL MAJOR TRADES. THOSE BIDS WERE STRINGENTLY EVALUATED AND THE LOWEST IN QUALIFIED AND MOST RESPONSIVE BIDS OR WHAT MAKES UP THE GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY. DEMOLITION WORK AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS ARE ALREADY IN PROCESS ON THE SIDE WITH THE PHASE ONE WORK THAT YOU APPROVED PREVIOUSLY. WE ARE CURRENTLY ASKING FOR YOUR APPROVAL FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A GMP GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH POKE CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY $104 MILLION SO THAT CONSTRUCTION MAY BEGIN IN EARNEST IN THE TEAM AND I ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR SURE. MOVE TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. SECOND. CAST YOUR VOTES. YEAH. THIS IS YES, SHE'S ASKING HER. YOU YES. LET ME SEE IF I

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Resolution Approving Funding Amounts for Fiscal Year 2023 Season Grant Arts Organizations]

CAN. ADAM 2 TO 0740 CONSIDER AND ACT ON THE RESOLUTION APPROVING FUNDING AMOUNTS FOR FISCAL YEAR . 2023 SEASON GRANTS ARTS ORGANIZATIONS SEASON GRANT ARTS ORGANIZATIONS. ANDREW HOW ARE YOU DOING? WELL THANK YOU. MAYOR. CITY COUNCIL. ANDREW JONES, INTERIM DIRECTOR.

MCKINNEY MAIN STREET PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, THE MARKETING ARTS COMMISSION REVIEWS AND AWARDS GRANTS SUPPORTING THE ARTS AND MCKINNEY. FOR THIS CYCLE. 11

[01:20:02]

GRANT APPLICATIONS WERE PRESENTED AND RECEIVED HER ABOUT ONE DOOR FOR EXACTLY $196,125 IN GRANT REQUESTS THAT PROVED OF FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR 23 INCLUDES 200,000 IN TOTAL FOR THE GENERAL FROM THE GENERAL FANTA SUPPORT THE ARTS IN MCKINNEY, THE ARTS COMMISSION MADE, UM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE AS YOU CAN SEE HERE IN THE OUTLINED RESOLUTIONS. YOU'RE DOING A GREAT JOB, BY THE WAY, ALL RIGHT? IT WAS A GREAT SUCCESS WITH OCTOBERFEST AND YOU'VE REALLY STEPPED UP. APPRECIATE IT. QUESTIONS. ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL MAKE YOUR MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS ITEM. SECOND IT'S CASTRO VOTES. ON FAVOR. I POST YEAH. 220007

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit for a Day-Care (Children of America), Located at 4021 South Custer Road, Accompanying Ordinance (REQUEST TO TABLE)]

ISSUE P TWO. THERE'S REQUESTED TABLE. THIS ITEM IS CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A DAYCARE. CHILDREN OF AMERICA LOCATED 4021 SOUTH COASTER ROAD.

THEY HAVE REQUESTED A TABLE. JENNIFER. YES SIR. ACTUALLY STAFF IS REQUESTING THE TABLE NG , UH, FOR LACK OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE NOTIFICATION SIGNS POSTING ON THE PROPERTY, SO WE ARE REQUESTING THAT THE ITEM BE CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 1ST COUNCIL MEETING. THE MOTION THAT THIS BE TABLED AND CONTINUE TO THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. ON SECOND. ON FAVOR OPPOSED. RIGHT?

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request to Allow for a Hospital (Luxury Recovery), Located at 8951 Collin McKinney Parkway, and Accompanying Ordinance]

220015 S U P TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A HOSPITAL LOCATED 89 51 COLIN PARKWAY AND ACCOMPANYING ORDINANCE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR LUXURY RECOVERY BY ALL TECHNICAL ACCOUNTS PER OUR CITY ZONING ORDINANCE. THIS IS DEFINED AS A HOSPITAL BECAUSE THERE IS LIMITED OVERNIGHTS DAY. AND HOWEVER, WHICH DOES REQUIRE CONSIDERATION OF AN S U P FOR APPROVAL AS PART OF THAT S U P. THE APPLICANT HAS TIED DOWN SOME REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS FACILITY WOULD BE LIMITED TO THREE ROOMS . NO SURGERIES WILL BE PERFORMED IN NO FOOD PREP. QUITE FRANKLY, THIS IS A POSTOPERATIVE CARE FACILITY, AND THE ONLY REASON THAT IS DESIGNATED AS A HOSPITAL IS BECAUSE IT HAS THAT LIMITED OVERNIGHTS DAY. SO STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE S U P. WE FIND THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS PARTICULAR OFFICE PARK WHERE WE'VE GOT A VARIETY OF PERSONAL SERVICE THE MEDICAL USES ALREADY IN AND AROUND THE SOUTHERN HILLS OFFICE PARK, AND SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS ALSO REVIEWED THE REQUEST AND IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. JENNIFER. MY UNDERSTANDING ON THIS WHOLE LUXURY RECOVERY IS THAT WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT AMBULANCES. WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT ANY KIND OF URGENT CARE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. BUT IMPLANTS OR SOMETHING, AND PEOPLE COMING TO SLEEP IT OFF. IS THAT REAL COSMETIC? YEAH I KNOW THAT THE SCP IS FOR A HOSPITAL. BUT THAT IS BECAUSE OUR ZONING ORDINANCE DEFINES A HOSPITAL IS SOMETHING THAT HAS THAT OVERNIGHT STAY COMPONENT, BUT WE CAN BE PRETTY SURE THERE'S NOT ANY AMBULANCE, TRAFFIC OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. COMING IN HERE. IT'S GOING TO BLEND IN NICELY TO THE ENVIRONMENT. YES, SIR. THANK YOU . SURE, WE CAN'T CALL IT A HOTEL AND GET THE, UH, TAXES. NICE IDEA IS THE APPLICANT HERE? ABOUT BEING A HOTEL. HELLO MY NAME'S SAM THORNE. ALL THE MCKINNEY RESIDENT 80 85 OH, NINE AVENUE ROAD, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR NAPKINS. THE INTEREST IN TURNING INTO A HOTEL. NO FUN JUST HELPED US OUT ON OUR REVENUE, OKAY? YEAH THANKS, SIR. THE PUBLIC HEARING. I DO NOT SHARE THAT ANYONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. BUT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? PLEASE MAKE YOURSELF KNOWN. SEEING NONE ENTERTAINING MOTION. REMOVE THAT WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THIS ITEM. ALL IN FAVOR. I OPPOSED IS YOURS WORKING YET, RICK OR NO, IT IS OKAY, SO I'LL GO BACK TO THE BOARD ON THE NEXT

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “AG” - Agricultural District to “C1” - Neighborhood Commercial District, Located approximately 900 Feet West of Hardin Boulevard and on the North Side of Virginia Parkway, Accompanying Ordinance]

BOAT. 2201007 Z TO CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT ON REQUEST TO REZONE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURE DISTRICT TO SEE ONE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 900 FT. WEST OF HARDENED BOULEVARD NORTH SIDE OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. THIS IS A TRACK THAT IS JUST UNDER ONE ACRE IN SIZE, AND IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, BUT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE IT TO SEE ONE LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OR I'M SORRY, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE TRACK ITSELF SITS RIGHT IN FRONT OF A CITY OF MCKINNEY WATER TOWER IS A VERY SMALL SITE. IT'S ABOUT 0.67 ACRES IN SIZE AND IS DESIGNATED ON THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, A SUBURBAN LIVING, WHICH COULD ALLOW FOR SOME SMALL LEVEL OF SUPPORTING COMMERCIAL USES WHEN WE REVIEWED

[01:25:03]

THIS AGAINST THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS LOCATION, MID BLOCK, WE DO FEEL THAT THE C ONE ZONING REQUEST IS APPROPRIATE AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS ALSO RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS.

THE APPLICANT HERE. GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. CASEY GREGORY 2000, NORTH DONALD STREET HERE IN MCKINNEY. AH. APPRECIATE YOU LOOKING AT THIS. I APPRECIATE STAFF THERE THAT SUMMARY WE ACTUALLY DID LOOK AT DOING RESIDENTIAL TYPE USES ON THE SITE. BUT DUE TO THE FRONTAGE TO THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND THE SMALL SIZE OF THE SITE, WE REALLY JUST COULDN'T MAKE IT WORK. SO SMALL COMMERCIAL USES ARE PROBABLY THE BEST AVAILABLE OPTION FOR THE SIDE. IT'S A WONKY PIECE OF LAND BAN. IT REALLY IS. YOU KNOW, WE KIND OF HOPED THAT MAYBE THE CITY OF MCKINNEY WOULD HAVE BOUGHT IT WITH THE WATER TOWER. BUT I DON'T KNOW. WHAT DO YOU WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO GO THERE? SMALL OFFICE OR RETAIL? OKAY, VERY, VERY LIMITED BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE MUCH SPACE DEPARTMENT . NOT MUCH YOU CAN DO AND IT'S YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY, THE SIGHTLINES AREN'T GREAT TO THE NORTH. AND YOU KNOW, IT'S A SO I COMMEND YOU ON BEING CREATIVE AND GETTING SOMETHING DONE. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, SIR. THE PUBLIC HEARING. CERTAINLY ONE. I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. SEEN NONE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THIS ITEM. I'LL SECOND CAST YOUR VOTES. ITEM 220100 Z TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property From “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “C2” - Local Commercial District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Located Approximately 575 Feet North of Craig Drive and on the West Side of U.S. Highway 75 (Central Expressway), and Accompanying Ordinance]

HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY FROM PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TWO CC CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL OVER THE DISTRICT TO SEE TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND CC CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT APPROXIMATELY 575 FT.

NORTH OF CRAIG DRIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF U S HIGHWAY 75 ACCOMPANYING ORDINANCE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. THIS IS A 1.86 ACRE TRACT. KNOWN AS THE ELDORADO PARK EDITION OR REZONING REQUEST. YOU'VE ACTUALLY SEEN A COUPLE OF OTHER SITES IN AND AROUND THIS TRACT COMING IN AND REQUESTING THIS C TWO ZONING AS WELL. THE CURRENT PD ON THIS TRACT IS QUITE LIMITING. IT'S VERY SPECIFIC TO ONLY ALLOW RETAIL USES, AND THIS PDS WAS PUT IN PLACE AS THIS AREA WAS DEVELOPING AS IT HAS NOW FULLY DEVELOPED, AND WE ARE SEEING CHANGES IN TENANTS AND USES THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE TO A STRAIGHT ZONING DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS FOR A LITTLE WIDER CAST OF POTENTIAL TENANTS. SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS REQUEST THEY ARE LOOKING TO REZONE TO SEE TO ALLOW FOR A CLINIC, A DIALYSIS CLINIC ON THE TRACT THAT IS CURRENTLY NOT ALLOWED UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING SO TRACKED OBVIOUSLY IS ALONG US 75 COMMERCIAL ZONING. IT'S COMPLETELY APPROPRIATE AND STAFF'S OPINION AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS ALSO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. JENNIFER THIS JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THOSE TWO HOTEL PROPERTIES. IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY? SO THE WAY I LOOK AT IT, THAT'S A VERY LOW IMPACT AREA. I MEAN, YOU'VE GOT BELTS THERE. YOU'VE GOT THAT RESTAURANT THAT CHANGES A BUNCH AND UM AH. UM, DIALYSIS CLINICS GET SOME TRAFFIC. DURING BUSINESS HOURS, BUT IT'S A PRETTY LOW IMPACT USE. I THINK I WOULD AGREE. OTHER QUESTIONS. RIGHT IS THE APPLICANT HERE? TRYING TO CLEAN UP A LOT OF STUFF. AREN'T YOU JUST HAVE A LOT OF CASES THESE DAYS? THANK YOU AGAIN. CASEY GREGORY 2000 NORTH OF DALLAS STREET. UM APPRECIATE STAFFS REPORT. IT IS FOR A KIDNEY DIALYSIS CENTER, AND THEY WILL BE BRINGING YOU A SITE PLAN FLAT HERE SOON AS WE GET THIS ZONE DONE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. THIS IS PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? SEEN NONE ENTERTAINING MAKE A MOTION THAT WOULD CLOSE PUBLIC CLEARING IMPROVE THIS HOME. CAST YOUR VOTES. FINAL ITEM. 220095 Z TO CONDUCT A

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “C2” - Local Commercial District, Located on the Southwest Corner of Eldorado Parkway and Stonebridge Drive, and Accompanying Ordinance]

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON REQUEST TO REZONE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO SEE TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. LOOK LOOK AT ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL DORADO PARKWAY. AND STONEBRIDGE DRIVE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. THIS ISN'T 11.5 ACRE TRACT, THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STONEBRIDGE AND ELDORADO. HERE WE GO. SO THE APPLICANT IS

[01:30:04]