Recognition of McKinney Public Safety Communications Specialist Mike Smith, for 9-1-1 CPR Life Saving Efforts

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss on an Update of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER), Program Year 2021-2022]

CONSIDERATION BY THE COUNCIL TO TUESDAY, 1121 CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT FOR CONSIDERING DISCUSS ON AN UPDATE OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT SO THERE WILL BE NO ACTION HERE. IT'S DISCUSSION. GREETINGS I'M SURELY DO BEST COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, AND TONIGHT WE ARE PROVIDING A EVALUATION REPORT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, KNOWN AS CDBG LAST YEAR COUNCIL EVERY AUGUST COUNCIL APPROVES THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE CITY THAT NOT ONLY INCLUDES OUR CDBG FUNDING BUT ALSO LEVERAGING RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE, WHICH INCLUDES OUR COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT. THE REPORTING PERIOD BEGINS OCTOBER THE FIRST OF EVERY YEAR AND ENDED ON SEPTEMBER 30TH OF THIS YEAR AND SO THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO BE ABLE TO HAVE CITIZEN COMMENTS AND ALSO TO BE ABLE TO CONVEY TO YOU AND THE PUBLIC THE ACTIVITIES THAT WE HAVE COMPLETED OVER THE YEAR. SO AS WE MENTIONED, THIS IS NOT ONLY A ANNUAL REPORT, BUT IT IS ALSO A REQUIREMENT OF THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. IT IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THE GOALS AND STRATEGIES THAT WE'VE HAD FOR THE YEAR. WITH THE CDBG FUNDING PREDOMINANTLY, IT BENEFITS LOW TO MODERATE INCOME PERSONS. BUT I DO WANT TO JUST SHARE THAT OUR PROGRAM IS CITYWIDE. AND SO WE HAVE HAD OPPORTUNITIES TO BE ABLE TO ASSIST. FAMILIES UNDER PUBLIC SERVICES AND ALSO OUR HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THE ELEMENTS OF OUR CAPER REPORT INCLUDES RESOURCES, WHICH I HAD MENTIONED FINANCIAL RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE. WE ALSO WORK WITH THE MCKINNEY HOUSING, UM, AUTHORITY TO BE ABLE TO LET PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THE APPLICATION PROCESS. WE PROVIDE PUBLIC EDUCATION THROUGH OUR PROCLAMATIONS AND ALSO WORKSHOPS AND WE ALSO HAVE MONITORING OF THE AGENCIES THAT ARE ASSISTED THROUGH THIS FUNDING. UNDER OUR HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM IF WE HAVE A HOME THAT IS OLDER THAN 1978, IN ADDITION TO THOSE REPAIRS, WE ALSO ASSIST WITH LEAD BASED PAINT REMEDIATION. UNDER OUR HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM ARE REQUIRED TO ASSIST AT MINIMUM 70% OF THOSE RECIPIENTS. ALL OF OUR FUNDING, INCLUDING STAFF SALARIES, EVERYTHING THAT WE DO, OF COURSE, BENEFITS PERSONS. WE DO HAVE SEVERAL CAPS THAT TAKE PLACE DURING THIS REQUIREMENT. WE CANNOT USEXAMPLE, ANY MORE THAN 20% OF OUR GRAND ADMINISTRATION OF OUR FUNDING FOR GRANTED MINISTRATIONS MORE THAN 15% OF OUR FUNDING GOES TO PUBLIC SERVICES, AND THOSE ARE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE GOVERNMENT. FIRST CITY LOCALLY, HOW DO WE IMPACT IN TERMS OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION? WE HAVE OUR COMMUNITY GRANTS ADVISORY

[00:20:03]

COMMISSION, WHICH YOU APPOINTED , UM THERE ARE SEVEN MEMBER GROUP OF PERSONS THAT NOT ONLY ASSIST US WITH THE REQUIREMENTS , BUT ALSO THEY MAKE THE RECOMMENDATIONS TO YOU FOR THOSE ACTIVITIES THAT WE HAVE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. THIS SHOWS YOU THE DISTRIBUTION AGAIN, UM, FUNDING THE 15% THAT WE USE FOR PUBLIC SERVICES, APPROXIMATELY 64% THAT WE USE FOR OUR HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM, WHICH IS THE LARGEST AMOUNT OF FUNNY THAT WE USE. OF COURSE, THAT FUNDING IS USED LARGELY BECAUSE OF THE TYPE OF WORK THAT WE DO. WE DO EITHER EMERGENCY REPAIRS WHERE WE CAN ALSO DO RECONSTRUCTION WHERE WE ARE RECONSTRUCTING A PERSON'S ENTIRE HOUSE. ARE 20% IS USED NOT ONLY FOR MONITORING, BUT IT ALSO ASSISTS US WITH THE PUBLIC EDUCATION AND THE 1% THAT YOU HAVE THIS SPECIAL PROJECT THAT WE WERE ABLE TO COMPLETE THIS YEAR THIS PAST YEAR, WHICH INCLUDED THE NEIGHBORHOOD TOPPERS PROGRAM, AND THAT WAS UNDER THE NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY IN WHICH THE RESIDENTS HAD WANTED THAT AND SO THAT NOT ONLY ASSISTED US TO BE ABLE TO HELP THE COMMUNITY, BUT IT ALSO HELPED AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE COMMUNITIES, WHICH IS THE PRIDE COMMUNITIES THAT THAT WAS A PART OF THIS IS SHOWING YOU I'M JESSE ALLOCATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES THAT WE HAD DURING THIS PAST YEAR. WE ONLY HAD ONE AGENCY THAT DECIDED NOT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THEIR PROGRAM. AND THAT WAS THE VOICE AND GIRLS CLUB. I DO WANT TO STRESS THAT EACH TIME WE HAVE ANY FUNDS THAT WE HAVE THAT'S NOT USED. THEY'RE JUST REALLOCATE IT BACK INTO THE GRANT PROGRAM. AND WE USE THEM FOR COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT. MOST OF THE TIME. IT IS HOUSING REHABILITATION, BUT WE ALSO CAN USE THEM FOR ACQUISITION OF LAND, YOUTH OR OTHER RESOURCES AS WELL THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. AND SO I HAD MENTIONED WE HAD ONLY ONE PROGRAM THAT, UM THAT WAS NOT USED. THIS IS JUST GIVING YOU A SNAPSHOT OF HOW WE WERE ABLE TO USE THOSE FUNDS. YOU SEE THE REGULAR REALLOCATION THAT WE HAD . YOU MAY ALSO RECALL THAT WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO USE CARERS ACT FUNDS, WHICH IS OUR SPECIAL CDBG FUNDING. SO WE COMPLETED UM, THAT WE WERE REQUIRED TO AT LEAST USE 80% OF THOSE FUNDS. AH IN COMPLIANCE BY NEXT YEAR, AND WE'VE ALREADY USED 98% OF THOSE FUNDS, AND THEN WE HAVE THE RAPID REHAB RAPID REHOUSING PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE TO HELP WITH HOMELESS. UM, IN ORDER TO ERADICATE THOSE RESOURCES. IN ADDITION, WE ALSO HAVE OUR COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT, WHICH WE HAVE APPROXIMATELY 159,000 THAT WERE ABLE TO USE FOR THOSE FUNDS. AND JUST KEEPING IN MIND THAT THOSE FUNDS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO USE FOR LOW TO MODERATE INCOME PERSONS. BUT THEY ARE ALSO CITYWIDE. I'M RESOURCES. SO JUST WANTED TO SHARE WITH YOU. I'M JUST A HIGHLIGHT OF SOME OF THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS THAT WE'VE HAD. WE ASSISTED EIGHT HOMEOWNERS WOULD NEEDED REPAIRS. WE HAD OUTREACH. I ALSO MENTIONED THAT WE PLEADED AT LEAST 98% OF OUR CARERS ACT FUNDS. WE DON'T HAVE TO COMPLETE THOSE FUNDS UNTIL 2026. BUT WE'VE COMPLETED THOSE ON TIME AND, OF COURSE, AHEAD OF TIME. WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT CHANGES IN REQUIREMENTS. WE STILL MET OUR COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND WE'VE ALSO BEEN FISCALLY SOUND WITH THE USE OF FUNDS THAT WE'VE HAD, AND OUR PROGRAM IS NOT ONLY INTERNALLY REVIEWED, BUT WE ALSO REVIEWED UNDER THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND ALSO UNDER HOOD AND UNDER RESOURCES AS WELL. ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS THAT WE WANTED TO SHARE WITH YOU THAT WE WERE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT IS THAT FOR THIS YEAR WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO INTERNALLY. COMBINE OUR TRAINING WITH OUR BUILDING OFFICERS AND ALSO OUR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO GIVE THEM RESOURCES FOR FAIR HOUSING, AS WELL AS TENANTS RIGHTS AND SO THAT ASSISTED THEM. WHEN THEY GO OUT INTO THE COMMUNITY, THEY'RE ALSO ABLE TO EXPAND ON THE WORK THAT WE DO NOT JUST CODE SERVICES BUT ALSO TO ENGAGE THE PUBLIC TO LET THEM KNOW THE AVAILABILITY OF OPPORTUNITIES THAT THEY HAVE TO ASSIST THEM WITH THEIR LANDLORDS OR WITH THEIR PERSONAL PROPERTIES. WE'RE THANKFUL FOR THE MAYOR BEING ABLE TO CREATE A TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS. WE EVERY NOVEMBER HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REALLY HIGHLIGHT THE IMPACT OF HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS THROUGHOUT OUR COMMUNITY, AND WE'VE HAD GREAT PARTNERSHIP THROUGH OUR CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM WITH THE SAMARITAN IN WE'VE BEEN RENEWED NOW FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS, AND WE EXPECT THAT THAT WILL CONTINUE AS WELL THROUGH FUNDING FROM HUD. AND THIS PROGRAM HELPS WITH SUSTAINABILITY, LEVERAGING PEOPLE TO HAVE A NEW START FOR THEIR COMMUNITY. SO WE WANTED TO BE ABLE TO GIVE YOU JUST A VISUAL, UM JUST TO SHARE WITH YOU THOSE OPPORTUNITIES THAT WE HAVE TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE , WHICH IS ONE OF THE GOALS THAT YOU HAVE FOR COUNCIL MEALS ON WHEELS, HAS BEEN A RECIPIENT. IN THE PAST. WE'VE ALSO ASSISTED WITH THEM THROUGH OUR COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT. HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL. WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO

[00:25:04]

ASSIST EACH YEAR AND THEN COMMUNITIES AND SCHOOLS WITH EDUCATION. AND THEN WE CONTINUE , OF COURSE, WITHOUT PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. FOR THE FIRST TIME THIS YEAR, WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A COMMUNITY CONNECTION. FAIR HERE AT CITY HALL. THAT WAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE ABLE TO ALSO LET THE PUBLIC KNOW ABOUT THE RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE IN THE COMMUNITY, AND IT WAS REALLY A GREAT CHANCE FOR PEOPLE TO LOOK AT CITY COUNCIL TO LOOK AT CITY HALL IN A DIFFERENT WAY. THEY GOT A CHANCE TO SEE WHERE YOU GOVERN. THEY ALSO HAD A CHANCE TO HEAR ABOUT THE DIFFERENT RESOURCES AND WE ALSO HAD PEOPLE TOO. APPLY FOR FUNDING THROUGH THE TRANSIT PROGRAM AS WELL AS THROUGH CDBG. SO AS WE WRAP UP, THIS IS JUST A SAMPLE OF SHOWING YOU THE IMPACT THE VISUAL IMPACT OF OUR HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM. YOU SEE A HOME THAT WAS BEFORE AND YOU SEE HOW IT HAS BEEN TRANSFORMED. NOT ONLY IS IT ASSISTING US WITH THE HOMEOWNER , BUT IT IS ALSO PROVIDING JOB CREATION AS WE'RE IMPACTING CONTRACTORS AND WE WERE ALSO RECOGNIZED BY THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION. IN THE WASHINGTON D. C GUIDE FOR 2022. WE WERE ABLE TO DISTRIBUTE OUR WORK FOR THE CITY TO OUR CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS. SO ON BEHALF OF ALL OF OUR CDBG BENEFICIARIES, WE WANT TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING US THIS TIME TO BE ABLE TO SHARE WITH YOU THE IMPACT OF THE PROGRAM AND TO LET PEOPLE KNOW HOW ARE FUNDS ARE BEING USED. AND IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL ADDRESS THOSE AT THIS TIME.

THANK YOU, SHIRLEY. TENANTS. THANK YOU. GREAT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE DISCUSSION? YOU HEARD? WE JUST NEED A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MY COMMOTION. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC CARRY. SECOND CAST YOUR VOTES. MHM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ACTUALLY, THANK YOU. ANY OKAY? THE NEXT ITEM. 220002 RW CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARINGS TO

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Right-of-Way Abandonment of a Portion of an Unnamed Alley Located South of Louisiana Street and North of Cloyd Street, Approximately 100 Feet East of Chestnut Street, being Part of the Wilcox Subdivision, and Accompanying Ordinance (22-0002RW)]

CONSIDER AN ACT SKITTER CONSIDERING ACT ON A RIGHT OF WAY. ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN UNNAMED ALI LOCATED SOUTH OF LOUISIANA STREET NORTH OF CLOYD STREET. APPROXIMATE 100 FT. EAST OF CHESTNUT STREET, BEING PART OF THE WILCOX SUBDIVISION AND ACCOMPANYING ORDINANCE. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. UM. BUT THAT, UM. MATT RICHARDSON, REPRESENTING THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TONIGHT. THIS IS A REQUEST TO ABANDON APPROXIMATELY 2000 SQUARE FOOT SECTION OF AN UNNAMED ALLEY LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE DOWNTOWN SQUARE. UM, UM, I'M AS YOU NOTED. UM. UM THE CITY THERE ARE CITY AND FRANCHISE UTILITIES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN THIS ALLEY. SO WE ARE PROPOSING TO RETAIN A RETAIN RETAIN A UTILITY EASEMENT, UM AFTER THE ABANDONMENT OF THE ALLEY. UM CITY STAFF ACROSS, UML DEPARTMENTS. WHEN THIS REQUEST HAS COME IN, WE DID TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND HAVE NOT IDENTIFIED ANY PROPOSED USE FOR THIS ALLEY STAFF IS COMFORTABLE. UM EXCUSE ME, I'M STAFF IS COMFORTABLE RECOMMENDING YOUR YOUR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM TONIGHT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING BY BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE RIGHT NOW, MAN. I WALKED THIS ALLEY TODAY, AND THERE'S SOME PRETTY FRESH LOOKING SIGNS SAY FIRE LANE IN THERE, WHICH I CAN SEE THE USE OF A FIRE LANE. SO WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE? IN THE FUTURE IF WE ABANDONED THIS, UM SO BE SO BECAUSE OF THE SO BECAUSE OF THE UTILITIES ARE IN THERE. UM THERE WON'T BE ANY ABILITY TO BUILD ANY STRUCTURES OR ANYTHING IN THIS AREA. THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF IT WOULD PROBABLY BE FOR A OUTDOOR OUTDOOR SPACE FOR THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS. FIRE TRUCKS HONESTLY BECAUSE THERE'S A CURVE AT ONE END AND THERE'S REALLY NOT THE RIGHT RADIUS WITHIN WITHIN THE PARKING LOT ON THE NORTH END, THE FIRE TRUCKS REALLY COULDN'T GET DOWN THERE ANYWAY, RIGHT? SO OKAY? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MADAM. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? YES, SIR. OKAY? PLEASE COME UP STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE. YOU HAVE A FEW MINUTES TO PUBLIC DREAM. MY NAME IS RICHARD SUTTON. I OWN A BUILDING. DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THIS ALLEY AND LOUISIANA STREET.

IT WOULD BE THE ONE DIRECTLY ACROSS. JUST LOOK AT THE LITTLE DIAGRAM. IT'S CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY DALLAS PIANO, AND THE OTHER HALF IS VACANT AT THE CURRENT TIME. UM, I'VE OWNED THIS

[00:30:01]

PROPERTY IS A LONG TIME, AND I'VE ALWAYS WONDERED WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THIS VACANT PROPERTY DOWN HERE. I THOUGHT PERHAPS THEY WOULD MAKE IT INTO A SMALL PARK OR SOMETHING. UM I DON'T SEE ANY REASON FOR IT TO BE JUST DONATED TO SOMEONE. TO USE PUBLIC USAGE OF THAT AS A PARK. I THINK CERTAINLY FAR OUTWEIGHS THE ABILITY TO ADD SOME MORE CEILING TO THE ADJACENT RESTAURANTS. UM IF THEY WANT TO LET THE ADJACENT RESTAURANTS USE IT, THAT WOULD BE FINE IF THEY WOULD JUST LEASE IT TO HIM ON A PERHAPS A FIVE YEAR BASIS OR SOMETHING. BECAUSE WE MAY NEED THAT LAND VERY SHORTLY. UM IT DEPENDS ON WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE DECK PARK. IT'S NOT PART OF THE DECK PARK AT THE MOMENT. BUT PLANS CHANGE AND IT CONCEIVABLY COULD BE NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DECK PARK. LET ME READ THE LETTER I SENT TO SEVERAL MEMBERS ON THE BOARD. UM I AM AT A LOSS TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS PARCEL COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR ABANDONMENT IS A PERFECT LOCATION FOR A POCKET PARK. ITS SIZE. 20 BY 97 WOULD MAKE A GREAT ADDITION TO THE STREETSCAPE OF LOWER LOUISIANA AND HELPED TO INCREASE FOOT TRAFFIC IN THIS DEVELOPING AREA . COSTS WOULD BE VERY MINIMAL IS IT HAS ALREADY PAVED ALL OF IT WOULD REALLY BE NEEDED OR SOME PLANTS, SEATING AND TABLES, TURNING IT OVER TO PRIVATE OWNERSHIP WOULD DO NOTHING TO ENHANCE THE AREA, ABANDONING IT AND ALLOWING THE OWNERSHIP TO BECOME PRIVATE TERMINATES ANY POSSIBILITY OF PUBLIC USAGE. THIS IS A VERY UNDESIRABLE OUTCOME. UM I ATTEMPTED TO DISCUSS THIS WITH PAULA NASCA ON THURSDAY AS LOSERS INFORMED THAT THE PARKS DEPARTMENT WAS ALREADY PROVIDING THIS AREA WITH A NEW PARK. THE PARK SHE IS REFERRING TO IS THE DECK PARK OVER MCDONALDS STREET AND THAT ANOTHER PARK WAS NOT NECESSARY. HARD TO BELIEVE THE TRUE THE DECK PARK IS A FANTASTIC PROJECT , BUT IS ANYTHING BUT A CERTAINTY. EVEN IF IT WAS DEFINITELY WILL TAKE MANY YEARS SURE TO BE PLACED IN USE. THE PLANS ARE NOT FINALIZED. IT IS EVEN POSSIBLE THIS ALLEYWAY COULD BE REQUIRED FOR ITS CONSTRUCTION. WE WOULD THEN HAVE TO PURCHASE IT BACK FROM THE CURRENT OWNER. THE FACT THAT THE PARKS DEPARTMENT DID NOT EVEN PROPOSED THIS AREA IS A SMALL PARK IS A BIT DISAPPOINTING. IT IS AN EXCELLENT USE OF CURRENTLY OWNED ASSETS AND REQUIRES VERY LITTLE FUNDING. IT'S USED AS A PARK SHOULD LEAST BE EXPLORED BEFORE ANY ABANDONMENT OF THE ALLEY IS EVEN CONSIDERED. PLEASE EVALUATE THIS AND VOTE NO ON ABANDONMENT. IT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE ENTIRE DOWNTOWN AREA. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU, SIR.

THAT COULD YOU. ARE. SOME OF HIS COMMENTS, UM, AN UNUSUAL LITTLE SPACE ACTUALLY, THE EASTERN PART OF THIS ALLEY IS OWNED BY THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AND WHAT IS BEING ASKED IN THIS ORDINANCE IS JUST TO ABANDON THE RIGHT OF WAY . USE BY VEHICLES SO THERE IS NO OWNERSHIP TRANSFER TO ADJACENT OWNERS. SO THIS PROPERTY AND I'VE TALKED TO MATH THIS AFTERNOON WILL PROBABLY REMAIN IN ITS CURRENT STATE. WITH PAVEMENT. UTILIZED BY PEDESTRIANS, AND IT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR FIRE VEHICLES. AND WE DISCUSSED TODAY MAYBE EVEN HAVING A BARRICADE PUT UP ON THE LOUISIANA END OF IT. SO THAT PEOPLE WOULDN'T DRIVE DOWN AND DRIVE OVER THE CURB INTO LOUISIANA. I PRESUME? ONCE UPON A TIME IT WAS AN ALLEY THAT WAS USED AND DID ENTER INTO LOUISIANA. BUT OF COURSE, LOUISIANA HAS BEEN IMPROVED A COUPLE OF TIMES SINCE THEN. SO I JUST WANTED TO CLEAR THAT UP AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH THE GENTLEMAN TOMORROW IF NEED BE, BUT THE PROPERTY IS NOT BEING TRANSFERRED. IT WILL BE OKAY. IT'S JUST A RIGHT AWAY.

ABANDONMENT EASEMENTS FOR THESE SEWER LINES AND GAS LINE, TOO. SO UM, MARK, I SEE THAT THIS THING DOES NOT APPEAR TO EXTEND ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE COLLIN COUNTY FEED STORE, WHICH IS ON THE SOUTH END OF THAT. IT LOOKS LIKE IT DOES IT TO ME. OKAY UM, YOU KNOW, I WILL JUST MAKE AN ANECDOTAL REMARKED THAT THE BACK OF THAT FEED STORE DOES A LOT OF BUSINESS AND IT AIN'T PRETTY AND IT AIN'T CLEAN. IT'S A BUNCH OF TRUCKS GOING UP THERE AND GETTING STUFF. UM YOU KNOW, DEMPSEY'S THAT SEEMS, THOUGH, DOES HAVE AN INGRESS EGRESS OFF THIS THING. UH YOU KNOW WHEN YOU WHEN YOU WALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STATE OF OFFENSE THAT LETS YOU INTO THEIR FRONT DOOR, WE ALSO HAVE THE UTILITIES THERE, RIGHT SO ANY INVESTMENT FROM A PARK STANDPOINT, WOULD YOU KNOW WOULD WOULD ENDANGER WHATEVER THAT IS. IF WE HAVE TO ACCESS TO UTILITIES FURTHER LAST THING IS THAT, UH, THERE'S BEEN DISCUSSION HERE RELATIVELY INFORMALLY ABOUT WHEN THE WATER TOWER IS ADDRESSED. WE HAVE WE'RE GOING TO LOSE A LOT OF THE ELECTRIC STUFF OFF OF THERE. AND WHAT DO WE DO WITH UNDERNEATH THERE, WHICH MAYBE YOU WOULDN'T BE DEDICATED PARKLAND BUT WOULD

[00:35:05]

SERVE TO PROVIDE SOME KIND OF A RESPITE AREA THERE, CORRECT AND SO THE USE OF THIS WILL REMAIN IN HIS PEDESTRIAN AREA, RIGHT SIMILAR TO IT. PAVED ALLEY. THEY JUST WON'T BE USED BY VEHICLES ANYMORE, WHICH IS WHAT THIS ORDINANCE WILL DO. ALL THE EASEMENT STILL REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY. CORRECT CORRECT? THOSE, IRONICALLY AND THIS IS UNUSUAL. THAT EASTERN PART OF IT IS ACTUALLY OWNED IN FEE BY THE CITY. SO THE ADJACENT OWNERS COULDN'T BUILD FENCES THERE AND COULDN'T USE IT FOR THEIR OWN USE. SO OKAY, THANK YOU FOR THE EXPLANATION. IT'S KIND OF COMPLICATED, BUT IT'S OVER GUINEA. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS.

ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MR MAYOR MOVED TO YOU. WE APPROVED THIS ITEM, CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE SIGHT OF MISS SMITH AND I'LL SECOND HE'S CAST YOUR VOTES.

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on an Appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission’s Action on a Site Plan (Louisiana Retail), Located at 1719 West Louisiana Street]

NEXT ITEM IS 220044 SP TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON APPEAL OF PLANNING AND JOURNEY COMMISSION'S ACTION ON A SITE PLAN. LOUISIANA RETAIL LOOK AT 17 19 WEST LOUISIANA STREET. THANK YOU, MR. MARRY JENNIFER ARNOLD, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING.

THIS IS A REQUEST TO APPEAL AN ACTION BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON A SITE PLAN . UM TYPICALLY, SITE PLANS ARE ABLE TO BE APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. HOWEVER IF THERE ARE SPECIFIC VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED, THOSE VARIANCES CAN BE CONSIDERED AN ACT ON OR SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ENACTED ON BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THEIR AUTHORITY.

HOWEVER APPLICANTS THAT ARE IN DISAGREEMENT WITH THE ACTIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL THAT DECISION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION. SO THAT IS WHY THIS ITEM IS ON YOUR AGENDA TONIGHT. SO AS A SITE PLAN ITEM. WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT IS THE DEVELOPMENT OR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN LAYOUT OF A PARTICULAR SITE, UM, BASED ON THE ZONING ON THE PROPERTY, THE ZONING ON THIS PROPERTY ISBN NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS, WHICH IS A LEGACY ZONING OF THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, WHICH DOES ALLOW FOR A VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL USES TO DEVELOP ON THE SITE. THE APPLICANT AS PART OF THEIR SITE PLAN REQUEST WAS SEEKING A VARIANCE FOR THE TYPICALLY REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. WHEN YOU HAVE A LOT IN A CORNER CONFIGURATION, SUCH AS THIS ONE, AND I WILL HIGHLIGHT THAT THIS IS WILSON CREEK AND WEST LOUISIANA. WHEN YOU HAVE A CORNER LOT IN THIS CONFIGURATION, THE TYPICAL REQUIREMENT IS TO PROVIDE A 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON ALL SIDES , SO THAT WOULD TYPICALLY REQUIRE 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER HERE AND A 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND WILSON CREEK AS A CORNER. IT IS ALSO REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A 30 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT THE CORNER CLIP, SO THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING THE 30 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT THE CORNER CLIP, BUT THEY ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE TYPICALLY REQUIRED 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. TO A 10 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG LOUISIANA AND WILSON CREEK PLAYING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERED THIS ITEM AND RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF THE ITEM AND A 52 VOTE STAFF WAS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ITEM FOR THE REASONS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. BUT MOST NOTABLY, OUR EVALUATION IS THAT THIS PARTICULAR STRETCH OF LOUISIANA IS ALREADY LARGELY OBSERVING THAT 10 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. AND WE DO HAVE A LOT OF OLDER LOTS THAT HAVE DEVELOPED AND REDEVELOPED IN THAT TEMPLATE. LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEEMS TO BE WHAT'S IN AND AROUND THAT AREA. WITH THAT NOTE. WE WERE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AT THE TIME. WITH WITH AN APPEAL GOING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. WE DO NOT MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WE SIMPLY PROVIDE YOU WITH THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PRESENTED TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS WELL AS THEIR ACTIONS. AND WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I BELIEVE THAT OUR APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL. AND I'LL STOP WITH THAT.

SO THIS IS A PERMITTED USE UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING. YES, MA'AM. OTHER QUESTIONS PER STAFF. IS THERE A REQUIREMENT FOR SUPERMAJORITY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT ON APPEAL AN APPEAL LIKE THIS? NO, SO THERE'S NOT THANK YOU, JENNIFER NAPKIN HERE. IT'S COME UP. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR COUNCIL. MY NAME IS HOUSHANG GIOVANNI GIOVANNI CONSULTING ENGINEERS. 21 21 JERSEY LANE.

SHELTON. 75006. AND THE ENGINEER FOR THIS PROJECT, PREPARED DECIDE PLANS AND BACK IN 2019.

AT THAT TIME THE PLANS WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTS AND ALSO BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS. WE WERE READY TO START THE RECONSTRUCTION MEETING. THEN WE HIT THE COVID 19. SO WE START ON THAT ONE. UNTIL THIS YEAR, WE CAME BACK TO

[00:40:05]

THE CITY AND SAID THAT WE WANT TO HAVE THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. THEY SAID, WELL, IT'S BEEN MORE THAN A YEAR SINCE YOU SUBMITTED THE PLANS, SO WE NEED TO SUBMIT THE SITE PLAN AGAIN.

AND WHEN WE SUBMITTED DECIDE PLANS, THE NEW CITY ARE BERRIES SO THAT WE NEED TO HAVE 20 FT LANDSCAPE OFFER INSTEAD OF 2010 FT, WHICH WERE THERE ASKING NOW, 2019. BASED ON OUR LAYOUT BASED ON THE SIDES OF THE LOT. THE DEPTH OF THE LOT WITH EVERY CANNOT PROVIDE THAT. 20 FT IS GOING TO SHRINK THE BUILDING SO MUCH THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE, UH FEASIBLE TO. TO SPEND THAT MUCH MONEY FOR THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING THE BUILDINGS RIGHT NOW IT'S ABOUT 4600 SQUARE FEET. IS GOING TO BE A RETAIL AND THE DEPTH OF THE BUILDING AS OF NOW IS ABOUT 47 FT. LESS THAN THAT.

NOBODY'S GONNA LAYS IT. THE BUILDING. WE CANNOT PUT THIS ABOUT 35 FT DEPTH. EVERYBODY WANTS TO HAVE MORE THAN 50 FT. WE ALREADY ARE LESS THAN 50. FT. SO THAT'S WHY WE TALKED TO THE CITY OR BERRIES. WHAT ELSE WE CAN DO? AND HE HAS SUGGESTED THE WAY WE LOSE A FEW MORE PARKING SPACES ALONG THERE WAS LOUISIANA STREET AS YOU CAN SEE ABOUT THREE ISLANDS OVER THERE. THERE WERE PARKING SPACES. WE REVISE THEM TO ISLANDS MORE TREES OVER THERE. THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WE ARE PROVIDING. IS THE SAME AS WHAT THE CITY REQUIRED ON 20 FT LANDSCAPE OFFER. AND THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED IS 22% OF THE TOTAL SIDE, WHICH CITIES REGARD MINIMUM 10. SO IT'S NOT THAT WE ARE SHRINKING THE LANDSCAPE AREA . THE LANDSCAPE PERIOD, PROVIDING IS MORE THAN WHAT THE CITY IS REQUIRED IT JUST BECAUSE OF THE DEPTH OF THE SIDE BECAUSE IT'S TOO SMALL. WE CANNOT PROVIDE 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. AND WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK IT.

CITY COUNCIL. TWO. CONSIDER IT IS APPROVED THE CYBER ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, SIR. YOU.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? SEEN NONE TO MAKE MAKE A MOTION. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CAST YOUR VOTES. DISCUSSION. HMM. THIS QUARTER IS DEFINITELY ONE OF OUR HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS, AND IT IS ONE OF THE INTRODUCTIONS THAT MOST PEOPLE GET TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT OF OUR CITY AND INTO DOWNTOWN. AND THOUGH I RESPECT WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO AS A BUSINESS OWNER, I DO THINK THAT AS WE LOOK AT THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THAT WE HAVE IN THE AREA, UM THERE ARE DEFINITELY USES THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE.

A LITTLE BIT. DIFFERENT. AND IF WE CAN'T GET THAT, THEN THE SETBACK AT LEAST OFFERS US SOME SORT OF SHIELDING FROM VISIBILITY OF A BUSINESS LIKE A LAUNDROMAT IN THE AREA WHERE WE HAVE A VERY NICE CHURCH AND A VERY NICE HEALTH CLINIC. UM YOU KNOW, AS WE SEE OLDER BUSINESSES KIND OF PHASE OUT, YOU WANT TO SEE SOME THINGS THAT ARE INFUSED THAT ARE A LITTLE BIT MORE WELCOMING TO THE COMMUNITY. SO FOR THAT REASON, I'M NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT. I FIND IT REMARKABLE AND IT'S JUST VERY FRUSTRATING. UM FROM MY STANDPOINT IS FIVE YEARS AGO. SO THE. THE CITY PLANNER SAID OKAY . YEAH, WE DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM BUILDING THIS THING, BUT FIVE YEARS AGO, THEY WOULDN'T THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BANK THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BANK BECAUSE THE BANK SAID, HEY, WE WANT TO KEEP THE SAME ENTRANCE AND THEY SAID NO, YOU CAN'T KEEP THE SAME ENTRANCE. SO INSTEAD OF HAVING THIS, WE COULD HAVE HAD A BANK THERE. AND THAT'S THE FRUSTRATING THING ABOUT SOMETIMES JUST SEEING WHAT WHAT OUR CITY DOES, AND SO WE'RE GOING TO FEND OFF WHATEVER WE FEND OFF WHEN WE COULD HAVE HAD A NICE BANK THERE FIVE YEARS AGO AND PAYING TAXES AND SERVING THE PEOPLE AND THIS IS WHAT THIS IS WHAT WE GET. JUST GET IT. WE GET TO FEND OFF AND UNTIL SOMETHING YOU KNOW COMES UP OR THEY JUST BUILD WHAT THEY CAN BUILD AROUND. UM BOARD ORDINANCES AND PLANNING SO. IT'S VERY FRUSTRATING AS A CITY COUNCILMAN. I TEND TO AGREE, AND I CAN GO BACK. REMEMBER THAT CASE THAT CAME THROUGH YEAH. AND THERE WAS AN ENTRANCE ALREADY THERE. THEY WOULDN'T GIVE A VARIANCE FOR THAT ENTRANCE. NOW WE'RE GIVING THE VARIANCE FOR LANDSCAPE, SO IN FOR THAT REASON I CAN SUPPORT IT. JENNIFER, CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION? SO WHEN DID THE 20 FT LANDSCAPE. COMMANDO REQUIREMENT FOR THIS IS

[00:45:11]

BEEN AROUND FOR A LONG TIME. SO WHAT THE AFRICANS REFERENCING IS THEY DID HAVE APPROVED AND APPROVED SITE PLAN FROM 2019 SITE PLANS ON PROPERTIES THAT HAVE A STRAIGHT ZONING SUCH AS THIS ONE EXPIRE, AND WHEN THAT SITE PLAN EXPIRED, THEY WERE THEY NEEDED TO RESUBMIT. WHAT WE DID FIND WAS THAT THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN WHETHER IT BE THROUGH HUMAN ERROR OR AN OPINION OR A CALL THAT WAS MADE WHEN THAT SITE PLANE WAS APPROVED, ONLY ENFORCE THE 10 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SO WHEN THEY HAD TO RESUBMIT AND GO THROUGH THE FULL RE REVIEW, UM RECENTLY THAT REVIEW GENERATED THAT IDEA, UH, THE 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER, RECOGNIZING THAT WHAT IT PREVIOUSLY BEEN APPROVED AND EXPIRED TO NOT BE CORRECT. SO WAS IT IN PLACE AND 2007, BUT THAT HAVE BEEN IN PLACE 15 YEARS AGO. I BELIEVE THAT IT WAS I CAN CONFIRM THAT FOR YOU WHAT I CAN DO A LITTLE HISTORY CHECK, BUT IT'S THAT 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR AS LONG AS I'VE BEEN WITH THE CITY. SO MY CONCERN WITH I GUESS USING THE LANDSCAPE. VERY INTERESTING QUESTS IN AN AREA THAT I GUESS. LET ME ASK THIS QUESTION. ARE THERE ANY 20 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACKS BETWEEN 75 THE CREEK JUST TO THE EAST OF HIS HARDWARE. IN A IN A SCAN. AS PART OF OUR EVALUATION, WE DID NOT FIND ANY SO IF WE IF WE ENFORCE. ACROSS THE BOARD 20 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK. WE WOULD HINDER ANY REDEVELOPMENT THAT COMES IN THAT CORRIDOR. THAT IS DEFINITELY A PROPERTY LIKE MCKINNEY DENTIST, WHICH LIKELY GOT A LANDSCAPE VARIANTS WHEN THEY. REDEVELOPED THAT PROPERTY THAT IS CORRECT IN MY RECOLLECTION ON THE DENTAL OFFICES THAT THE 2007 ZONING ACTUALLY TIED DOWN THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK OF I BELIEVE WAS 10 FT.

YES, I HAVE A HARD TIME. FEELING LIKE WE SHOULD. AND FORCE SOME SORT OF LAND USE. THROUGH A LANDSCAPE BUFFER. UM, IF WE DON'T LIKE THE LAND USE, THEN WE SHOULD NOT HAVE THE LAND USE. IF AND I GUESS FROM FROM A PROPERTY RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE. I DON'T THINK THAT WE SHOULD JUMP IN AND TAKE THAT AWAY FROM SOMEBODY. OVER SOMETHING LIKE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT EVERYBODY ELSE HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO. LESSON, SO I AM I'M FINE WITH A LOT OF THEM. HAVE THIS LANDSCAPE BUFFER. I THINK THAT IT IT, UM IT WOULD BE ODD AND ARE WE WOULD HINDER OUR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA FURTHER. WITHOUT IT, SO. THAT'S A BUT THERE IS A KEY POINT SOMEONE TO JUST DIG DOWN ONE MORE LAYER ON THAT. UM BECAUSE THE STATEMENT. THAT HE MADE A NEW SEEM TO CONFIRM IT, I THINK IS THAT THAT REDEVELOPMENT. ON THAT ENTIRE STRETCH WOULD BE VERY, VERY DIFFICULT IF WE WERE TO ALL OF A SUDDEN ENFORCED THE 20 FT BECAUSE ALL THE PROPERTIES ARE CURRENTLY BUILT WITH THE 10 FT EASE, BUT NOW AND THOSE DEPTHS ARE WHAT THEY ARE. PROBABLY ALL THOSE LOTS ARE FAIRLY CONSISTENT. IS THAT THE THOUGHT? YES, SIR. YEP. THAT'S T I DID NOT HAVE PRIOR TO TWO MINUTES AGO. WELL, I DON'T SEE THAT. WE'RE HERE ON ANY ISSUE OTHER THAN APPEALED FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, AND WE APPOINTED THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO CARRY OUT FUNCTIONS SO THAT WE DID NOT HAVE TO RULE ON THOSE ISSUES.

AND I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING THAT MEETS WITH SECTION 1 46 1 35 F FOUR, WHICH REQUIRES UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES. EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY THAT MAKES THE APPLICATION THIS SPECIFIC ITEMS UNDULY BURDENSOME ON THE APPLICANT. I DON'T SEE ANYTHING IN THE MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING, AND SO IN COMMISSION THAT INDICATES THAT AND I DON'T SEE ANY REASON TO SET ASIDE.

WHAT ARE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS ALREADY DECIDED. THAT WAS MY THOUGHT UNTIL. IT WAS JUST STATED BECAUSE BECAUSE ACTUALLY THERE WHAT YOU'VE IDENTIFIED IS THAT THERE IS A CONDITION THAT IS UNIQUE TO THIS PROPERTY. AND IT'S ONE THAT THAT THAT COUNCIL UP UNTIL THIS POINT HAS APPARENTLY SEEN AS UNIQUE SITUATION AND HAS WAIVED THAT IN EVERY EVERY INCIDENT SO FAR, FOR EXAMPLE. LET ME ASK US. MAYBE THAT'S AN INACCURATE STATEMENT. THE CLINIC THAT WAS BUILT. THAT

[00:50:06]

WAS BUILT. OBVIOUSLY POST 2007. DOES IT HAVE A. VARIANTS ON THAT. IS THERE A 10 FT SETBACK THERE. GIVE ME ONE SECOND. LEXI AND KATE DO EITHER ONE OF YOU KNOW THAT OFF TOP OF YOUR HEAD? IF NOT, I'LL HAVE TO LOOK INTO THAT ONE. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY OTHER? VERY INTEREST GIVEN IN THE PERIOD OF TIME THAT THE 20 FT I WILL TELL YOU. I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH ANY LANDSCAPE VARIANCES SPECIFIC TO P AND Z, BUT THAT DOES NOT DISCOUNT THAT THERE COULD HAVE BEEN REZONING OF PROPERTY THAT ALL INCLUSIVE MODIFIED A NUMBER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING THAT LANDSCAPE, BUFFER OR REDUCTION OF THE LANDSCAPE. BUFFER FROM 20 FT. TO 10 FT IS NOT UNCOMMON. WE ACTUALLY SEE THAT QUITE REGULARLY. HMM IT ALSO STRIKES ME, MR MAYOR WHILE YOU'RE LOOKING AT THAT. AND JENNIFER CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT THEY HAVE TO HONOR TO LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. GIVEN THAT THERE ON THE CORNER THEY HAVE TO HONOR AND WILSON CREEK DRAWN LOUISIANA. SO ALL THE OTHER BUSINESSES WE'VE TALKED ABOUT ONLY HAVE TO HONOR ONE BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT ON HARD CORNER OF TWO ROADS. THAT'S CORRECT. IT SEEMS PROFOUNDLY UNLIKELY TO ME THAT THIS WILL EVER DEVELOP IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2 20 FT BUFFERS, UM IT JUST DOES NOW ONE OF TWO THINGS MIGHT HAPPEN IF WE DON'T APPROVE THIS. WE MIGHT GET A USE THAT IS MORE PALATABLE THAN THE VARIANCES APPROVED OR IT MIGHT ULTIMATELY REDEVELOPED WITH THE. BUSINESS JUST TO THE EAST, WHICH I BELIEVE IS THAT ALL CHANGED BUSINESS. YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW THAT I'M JUST I'M JUST KIND OF GUESSING JUST TO GIVE IT MORE LAND. THERE IS A REMARK AT THE PNC MEETING THAT I FOUND INTERESTING AND I DON'T KNOW THAT IT WAS CONFIRMED, BUT WAS IT YOU MAY BE BACK IN THE DAY WAY BACK IN THE DAY. THESE LOTS HAD MORE DEPTH BECAUSE LOUISIANA VIRGINIA WASN'T AS WIDE AS IT IS NOW AND IN THE INCREASING WIDTH OF THE ROAD. ENCROACHED ON IT. SO I REALLY STRUGGLE ON THIS BECAUSE I THINK THAT ULTIMATELY WHETHER IT'S THIS COUNSELOR, ANOTHER IS GOING TO ALLOW THIS VARIANCE ON THIS, BUT I DO GET THAT. YOU KNOW, WE, COUNCILWOMAN FELTER SAID, THIS IS A GATEWAY TO THE CITY. UM FOLKS WHO COME DOWN TO THE SQUARE, MANY OF THEM EXIT ON VIRGINIA, LOUISIANA TO COME DOWN HERE AND IT'S NOT OUR BEST. LOOK YOU KNOW ON THAT STRETCH OF ROAD AND IT'S HARD FOR ME TO BE PART OF CONTINUING THAT KIND OF THINGS SO I STRUGGLED. I DO WANT TO ASK A QUESTION OF THE AFGHAN BECAUSE I'VE UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS WAS A WAS A LAUNDROMAT. BUT THEN I HEARD YOU MAKE A STATEMENT THAT THIS IS RETAIL. AND THOSE ARE TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS. LOT OF MATTERS. COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE. LONGER MATTHEWS OUT OF QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP IN 2019 AT THAT TIME WHEN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SAID WHAT ARE YOU PLANNING, AND SOMEBODY SAYS WELL, COULD BE A LAUNDROMAT. BUT WE HAVEN'T BUILT IT. SIDE YET IS BEING IS GOING TO TAKE IT SOMETIMES, THEN THEY'RE GOING TO PUT IN THE MARKET SEE WHO'S GOING TO BE AVAILABLE. BUT NO LADDER MATCH. HE IS NOT SOMETHING THAT THEY KNOW MY CLIENT IS WORKING OUT OR THINK ABOUT IT. SO WHATEVER IS GOING TO BE FEASIBLE AT THAT TIME. WHOEVER IS GOING TO COME SOMETHING THAT WORKS WITH THE CITY SHORT. BUT LARGER MATTERS NOT. YOU'RE NOT WORKING ON THE LAND. YOUR LETTER OF INTENT, THOUGH, FROM AUGUST THAT WAS THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT IT WAS FROM THE OLD PLANS THAT WE HAD AT THAT TIME. SOMEBODY WAS INTERESTED IN LAUNDRY. MATTHEWS OKAY, LAUNDROMAT, BUT NO, IT'S NOT. WE CAN PUT IT THERE THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE A LONGER AMOUNT. NO. ACTUALLY, WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO THAT SAID CORRECT, MARK YEAH. UM. I STRUGGLE WITH THIS BECAUSE RIGHT NOW WHAT WE HAVE IS A DILAPIDATED, UH CAR WASH. AND WE HAVE A BUNCH OF OTHER BUSINESSES THAT DON'T HAVE THAT 20 FT. BUFFER AND THE SAME TIME, YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY WERE NOT BEING ASKED TO WEIGH IN ON WHAT THE USES. BUT WE'RE HUMAN, AND I'M CERTAINLY THINKING ABOUT IT. AND WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE. AREAS THAT WE HAVE WHATEVER THE CITY REQUIRES. IF THEY WANT TO ENHANCE IT, THEY REQUIRE SOME MORE COLLATERAL. GLAD TO ENHANCE IT. RIGHT NOW PROVIDED WITH THE CITY SAID THIS IS A REQUIREMENT, BUT THEY ASK FOR MORE LANDSCAPE.

YOU ARE READY TO JENNIFER. WAS IT A CORRECT STATEMENT THAT HE MADE THE STATEMENT EARLIER? THAT CITY REQUIRES 10% OF THE SITE TO BE LANDSCAPE, THEIR THEIR LANDSCAPING 22% SO 120% MORE

[00:55:02]

MARK IF WE WERE TO TABLE THIS, AND THEY WERE TO WORK WITH STAFF IT IN GRANTING A VARIANCE. IS THERE ANY OTHER RESTRICTIONS THAT WE COULD WE COULD WORK AND NEGOTIATE WITH I DON'T MEAN. TO OKAY, RIGHT. SO. SO IF THERE ARE CONCERNS ABOUT POTENTIAL USES, WE WOULD NEED TO LOOK AT DOING THE REZONING AND OBVIOUSLY TIED DOWN THE SPECIFIC USES THAT YOU WOULD HAVE CONCERNS WITH US BEING PROHIBITED OR NOT, YEAH. AND THEN WE'LL COME BACK HERE. GO TO P AND Z. THEY WOULD COME BACK TO BOTH THEIR GO TO PNG AND THEN BACK HERE, SO THEY'D HAVE TO SUBMIT A REZONING REQUEST AND GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS. MR MERRITT SUPPORT THAT I DO REALLY BELIEVE ULTIMATELY, WE CAN'T HONOR BOTH SETBACKS ON THIS THING, BUT I DO GET THE USE AND THAT IS A PROBLEM. AND HE'S SAYING IT'S NOT SO I'D LIKE TO GIVE HIM A SHAKE TO WORK WITH STAFF ON THAT. BUT THAT WOULD SO I THINK THE THAT COURSE. THE CLEAN PATH OF THAT WOULD BE A DENIAL OF THE APPEAL. AND THEN HE WOULD GO BACK TO STAFF AND WORK WITH THEM TO COME BACK FOR A REASON. SO SHE DIDN'T ATTEND A MOTION. LET'S SEE WHAT YOU WANT TO WAIT TO SEE WHAT THEY. THE EAST AGREE PROTESTANT. SORRY.

YES, MA'AM. SORRY I APOLOGIZE. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPLICANT NEW, UM, SORT OF THE PATH THAT YOU WERE WANTING TO GO DOWN ON THAT. SO WAS THE WHAT WAS THE RESPONSE THAT YOU GOT JUST BETWEEN US. DON'T TELL HIM. I THINK THEY'RE COMFORTABLE WITH THE IDEA OF MOVING FORWARD WITH REZONING IF THAT IS OF THE APPETITE OF THE COUNCIL THANK YOU. MOTION MOTION THAT WE DENY THIS APPEAL. SECOND THAT MOTION NEWSCASTER VOTES. SO PRETTY GOOD . SO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT JUST TRANSPIRED. WE DENIED THE REQUEST TO REVERSE TO APPEAL THE DECISION OF PNC, BUT YOU ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO GO BACK AND WORK WITH STAFF ON A REZONE. WE WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT THAT LOT, UM DEVELOPED AND I THINK IF YOU HAVE A DESIRE THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT YOU HAVE STATED HERE.

IN RETAIL WHATNOT. UM IF YOU WORK WITH STAFF, I THINK YOU'LL FIND FAVORABLE RESULTS FROM BOTH. THANK YOU MOVING ON TO 100098 TO 1 CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON A

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Petition to Annex (Case No. 21-0009A) and a Request to Rezone (Case No. 21-0107Z) a Portion of the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “C2” - Local Commercial District and Zone a Portion of the Subject Property to “C2” - Local Commercial District, Located on the Southeast Corner of Ridge Road and Wilmeth Road, and Related Ordinance(s) and Agreements]

PETITION ANNEX. CASE NUMBER 210009 A REQUEST TO REZONE CASE NUMBER 2101070 PORTION OF THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY FROM PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND A PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO SEE TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RIDGE ROAD AND WIN WITH ROAD. AND RELATED ORDINANCE, JENNIFER THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. YOU READ.

THIS IS A SORT OF A BUNDLED ACTION TO ANNEX ZONE AND REZONE PROPERTIES INTO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, AS YOU'LL SEE FROM THE LOCATION MAP UP HERE, AND IN FACT, I'M GOING TO GO ACTUALLY STICK ON THIS ONE. THIS IS ACTUALLY ATTEMPTING TO CLEAN UP A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT SORT OF SPLITS ITS INCORPORATION WITH THE CITY AND BEING PORTIONED IN THE TJ. SO THIS SEGMENT OF PROPERTY RIGHT HERE IS ACTUALLY A LITTLE HOLD OUT THAT IS NOT CURRENTLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY . HOWEVER THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY ACTUALLY IS IN THE CITY LIMITS, SO THE AFRICAN IS COMING FORWARD TO GET THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. UM AN ACCIDENT IN THE CITY LIMITS AND ZONED TO R C TO ZONING DISTRICT. IT IS VERY MUCH A CLEANUP ITEM FOR THEM SO THAT THEY CAN UH, TURN THE PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. SO WITH THE REQUEST THEY ARE PROPOSING TO ANNEX THEY HAVE PROVIDED THE STANDARD ANNEXATION AGREEMENT MAKING THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO ALL THIS TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF MCKINNEY AND AGAIN, ZONING IT TO THE C TWO. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS CONSIDERED THE ZONING SLASH RE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY TO SEE TWO AND ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, AS IS STAFF AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, JENNIFER. THE APPLICANT HERE. COME UP. OKAY IS ANYONE HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT? IF NOT, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? SEEN NONE ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. SECOND CAST YOUR VOTES. GOOD LUCK. ALL RIGHT. JENNIFER. I'M SEEING THIS NEXT ITEM ON MY

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “AG” - Agricultural District to “PD” - Planned Development District, to Allow for Age Restricted Residential Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 510 Feet North of Virginia Parkway and Approximately 260 Feet West of Joplin Drive, and Accompanying Ordinance]

[01:00:06]

AGENDA, BUT I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION IT WAS BEING TABLED. OR WITHDRAWN. THAT IS CORRECT.

THE APPLICANT REQUESTED TO WITHDRAWAL AFTER THE PACKAGE HAD BEEN CREATED, BUT THEY ARE REQUESTING TO WITHDRAW THE REQUEST. HAS ANYONE COME TO SPEAK ON ITEM 22011234. MADE THE TRIP. I DON'T WANT TO ADMIT IT. NOTHING. SO THAT WE NEED TO ACT ON THIS AT ALL. TO WITHDRAW

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District, “REC” - Regional Employment Center Overlay District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “C2” - Local Commercial District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Located at 7150 Craig Ranch Parkway, and Accompanying Ordinance]

WITHDRAWN, OKAY? SO WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM 220118 Z TWO. CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARINGS. IT'S OKAY.

THAT'S ALL RIGHT. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON REQUEST TO REZONE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OR REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER, OVERLAY DISTRICT AND CC CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL OVER THE DISTRICT TO SEE TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND CC CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED 71 50. CRAIG RANCH PARKWAY AND ACCOMPANYING ORDINANCE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR.

BEFORE I BEGIN, I DID WANT TO NOTE THAT THE NEXT TO ITEMS ARE COMPANION ITEMS. THE FIRST IS REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND PENDING THE ACTION ON THE REZONING. THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO SUBMITTED AN S U P REQUEST FOR A SELF STORAGE FACILITY. WE DID RECEIVE A WRITTEN PROTEST FOR BOTH THE ZONING AND THE S U P REQUESTS AND I DO HAVE THOSE HERE AND I WILL PASS THEM OUT FOR YOU IN EVALUATING THE SIGNATURES ON THAT PROTEST PETITION. IT DOES NOT MEET THE 20% THRESHOLD TO REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE BY THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.

HOWEVER I DID WANT TO MAKE SURE WE NOTED FOR THE RECORD AS THIS PROTEST WAS RECEIVED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE PACKET. OKAY SO WHY DID YOU READ FOR THIS ONE? IT IS IN THE EYES OF STAFF A FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD REQUEST. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ABOUT 3.4 ACRES IN SIZE, AND IT IS JUST OFF OF 1 21 AND CRAIG CRAIG RANCH DRIVE THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED TO REZONE FROM THE PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, WHICH CURRENTLY ALLOWS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO A STRAIGHT ZONING DISTRICT OF THE CITY. C TWO THERE'S THE DRIVER FOR THAT REQUEST IS TO MODERNIZE THE ZONING AND SORT OF RELIEVED SOME OF THE TYPICALLY REQUIRED, UM TYPICALLY APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THAT P D. THIS IS VERY COMMON. WE HAVE SEEN THAT QUITE A BIT OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS ALONG THE STRETCH OF 1 21. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO SEE TWO FOR COMMERCIAL USES. WE DO FIND THAT IT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THIS AREA AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL . THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS ALSO RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE ITEM, AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR JENNIFER THIS? OF COURSE, THIS ITEM RIGHT NOW IS THE REZONE TO SEE TOO. THAT IS CORRECT. CONSISTENT WITH THE AREA. YES, SIR. QUESTIONS FOR JENNIFER. NOT AS THE APPLICANT HERE AND DO YOU LIKE, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE ADAM? MAYOR MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, BARBARA ODOR 1700 RED BUD SUITE 300. UM HE HAVE ALREADY STATED. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING AND THEIR PALATES OF THE AREA. WE JUST SEEKING THE MATTER MODERNIZE IT FOR THIS PURPOSE.

REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE APPROVAL. QUESTIONS FOR YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION. SO, UM. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT AN OFFICE BUILDING? I WAS TRYING. I WAS TRYING TO BE BUILT HERE. IS THAT CORRECT? I'M NOT AWARE OF THAT. I KNOW THAT THERE ARE PLANS FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF CRAIG DRIVE THAT OVERLOOKS. THE GOLF COURSE. I WAS TOLD THAT OFFICE BUILDING WAS TURNED DOWN FROM FINANCING BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T THEY DIDN'T LIKE THE LOCATION.

PLANNING. SOMEBODY TRIED TO PUT AN OFFICE BUILDING THERE, AND IT WAS TURNED DOWN. BECAUSE OF THEY COULDN'T GET FINANCING BECAUSE OF THE LOCATION. LOCATION WAS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING THAT THE FINANCING PEOPLE LIKE, OKAY, I THOUGHT YOUR QUESTION WAS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION REJECTED AN OFFICE BUILDING. NO I CAN DO NOT HAVE ANY PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THAT. COUNCILMAN ROGERS. BUT I CAN I CAN TELL YOU THAT. IT DOES NOT SHOCK ME. THAT THIS LOCATION IT'S A IT'S A SETBACK LOCATIONS , SECONDARY LOCATION BEHIND THE 7 11. AND I DOUBT THAT YOU'RE GOING TO FIND A CLASS A OFFICE BUILDING THAT WOULD GO IN THERE LOOKS EVERYTHING FIT INSIDE THAT AREA THAT IS IN BASICALLY GRASS. NOW THAT THE TWO ROADS THAT LEAD OUT TO STUFF THAT THOSE ARE THOSE LEFT ALONE WHEN WE WHEN WE GET TO THE SITE, PLANET THAT THEY SGP THAT WILL BE VERY

[01:05:05]

APPARENT. BUT YES, THOSE ARE EXISTING. THOSE ARE PLANTED AND RECORDED EASEMENTS. AND SO EVERYTHING THAT YOU SEE TODAY THAT'S UNDER CONCRETE. THE NORTHERN PART, SERVES AS THE SECONDARY INFLUENCE AND EXIT FROM THE MOVIE THEATER. IN THE SOUTHERN ONE IS BASICALLY THAT SECONDARY INFLUENCE AND EXIT TO THE 7 11. NONE OF THOSE WILL NOT . NONE OF THAT WILL CHANGE THAT WILL REMAIN. YEAH. HOW HIGH CAN THEY BUILD UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING? AND HOW HIGH WILL THIS BE? UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING UNDER THE PD THAT'S CURRENTLY IN PLACE. THE HOT MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 50 FT. UNDER SEA UNDER THE SEA TO ZONING. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 50 FT TO PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THIS BUILDING IS THREE STORIES. IT'S A FLAT ROOF, SO IT WOULD BE ABOUT 38 FT SO THEY COULD BUILD SOMETHING. WITH MORE ELEVATION UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING THAT WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING. BE CAREFUL NOW. RIGHT NOW, THE ZONING CASE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT , OKAY? WE'RE NOT CHANGING.

SORRY THE USERS THAT COULD GO THERE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. WE'RE JUST MODERNIZING. THE ZONING.

THE NEXT CASES THE SGP WHERE WE TALK ABOUT THE USE OOH! SO IS WHATEVER IS BUILT, THERE HAS TO PASS. CRAIG RANCHES. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. THAT'S CORRECT. YES, AND WE WILL PRESENT TO YOU DURING THE S U P CASE. THE ELEVATIONS THAT ARE LOCKED IN AS YOU KNOW, UNDER YOUR UNDER UNDER THE STATE LAW TODAY. SINCE THIS IS NOT IN THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN AREA OF THE CITY HAS NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL OVER ELEVATIONS. BUT BECAUSE THIS IS WITHIN THE CRAIG RANCH CC AND RS MY CLIENT HAD TO GET WRITTEN APPROVAL HAD TO SUBMIT ELEVATIONS TO THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OF CRAIG RANCH AND GET WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THAT I PROVIDED THAT TO YOU MILES PRESTON ON ON BEHALF OF THE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW COMMITTEE IS HERE TO SPEAK TO THAT MATTER WHEN WE GET TO THE SGP, BUT I THINK WHAT YOU WILL SEE IS THE BUILDING'S FACADE WILL BE STONE STUCCO. IT WILL LOOK LIKE THE OTHER. BUILDINGS IN CRAIG RANCH. BUT THAT'S A PLUS FOR THIS SITE IS BECAUSE ELEVATION CONTROL OKAY? THANK YOU, BOB. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? CAN HE USE THIS STICK? SOME HOPE. WHAT IS THAT? WE OKAY? WE'RE NOT SET UP FOR PRESENTATION. BUT YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES IF YOU LIKE TO SPEAK. OKAY UM, CAN I SURE, SOMEHOW. IN THIS WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO? YEAH I WANT TO SHOW ACTUALLY, I HAVE SOME FUEL. LOOK RIGHT HERE . YOU CAN MARK ON HERE JUST ANY WAY YOU WANT. JUST CLICK. CLEAR. OKAY. GOODBYE. SO, YEAH, THIS IS MARINE. UM I LIVE IN 810.

THEY'RE BUYING WILLY. IT'S JUST BESIDE THE ROAD, WHICH COMES OUT FROM THE MOVIE THEATER ON THE MAP, OKAY? YES. SO WE LIVE JUST HERE. CAN YOU SEE? YEAH. JUST BESIDE THE ROAD. AND THIS THIS PLACE IS REALLY DANGEROUS BECAUSE WHENEVER WE COME OUT FROM HERE AND WHEN GOD IS COMING FROM HERE, THIS IS REALLY DANGEROUS. SOMETIMES WE JUST DON'T SEE THAT DISCOURAGE COMING. AND THIS PLACE IS REALLY DANGEROUS FOR EXPLORING BY ACCIDENT. AND THIS IS A. THREE STORY BUILDING AND THE SELF STORAGE SO THERE ARE MANY SELF STORAGE AROUND THAT PLACE AND NO ONE HAS ANY RESIDENTIAL AREA AROUND THAT IN 200 FT, LIKE THERE ARE TWO MORE WHICH ARE OUT OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD LIKE THIS IS 1, 21 AND THE OTHER SIDE HAS THE SAME STORAGE AND, UH, THE OPPOSITE SIDE HAS THE RESIDENT SHIP SO THIS. I NEVER SAW ANYTHING HERE IN THE PROXIMITY THAT THREE STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING. JUST NEXT TO RESIDENTIAL AREA. SO I READ A QUOTE THAT THERE SHOULD BE ONLY ONE STUDENT BUILDING WHEN IT'S NEAR TO RESIDENTIAL AREA, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHY. THIS COMES IN FIRST PLACE. SO, YEAH, I REALLY OPPOSED AND I WISH THAT YOU SHOULD BE FAIR FOR US WHO LIVE THERE. UM OUR HOME IS THERE. SO MECHANISM OUR HOME NOW, SO I WISH THAT YOU WILL CONSIDER CONSIDER THIS, BRITTANY. AND KEEP IT TO ONE STORY BUILDING.

WHATEVER IS THERE THANKS. THANK YOU. NORMALLY WOULDN'T YOU KNOW? WE DON'T RESPOND TO PUBLIC

[01:10:03]

COMMENTS, BUT I WILL TELL YOU THAT. UM WE DON'T DICTATE WHEN THERE'S CURRENT ZONING IN PLACE, AND THERE'S PD PLACE HERE. WE DON'T DICTATE THAT IT TO BE ONE STORY OR TWO STORY. WHAT DICTATES IT IS WHAT'S IN THE ZONING OR THE PD AND WHAT THAT HEIGHT ALLOWANCES. AND THAT'S SO RIGHT NOW THAT CAN BE 50 FT. SO WHICH WHICH COULD BE A FIVE STORY FLAT ROOF BUILDING. WE DON'T WE DON'T CONTROL THAT, SO I'M NOT TRYING TO GET INTO A BACK AND FORTH DISCUSSION. I JUST WANT TO GIVE YOU THAT THAT INSIGHT, BUT I GOT A DOCUMENT ABOUT THE S U P SO FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE, NO DOUBT, NO DOUBT. BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ZONING. ZONING WAS IN PLACE WHEN YOU BOUGHT YOUR HOUSE THAT THEY COULD. SOMEBODY COULD BUILD A FIVE STORY BUILDING THERE WHEN YOU BOUGHT YOUR HOUSE. UM BUT IT'S REALLY UNFAIR BECAUSE WE DIDN'T KNOW THAT WHEN WE'RE BUYING THE HOUSE THAT ANYONE CAN BUILD A FIVE SHORT BUILDING JUST JUST IN FRONT OF OUR HOUSE JUST IN FRONT OF OUR WINDOW. THAT WILL DEFINITELY DEVALUATE OUR PROPERTY. SO I JUST WANT YOU TO CONSIDER IT ONE MORE TIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE ATOM? GOOD EVENING, MR MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. UM I WOULD LIKE TO OPPOSE PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT I BOUGHT MY DREAM HOME. THIS IS MY FIRST HOME IN THE US. FIRST TIME HOMEOWNER. I BOUGHT HIM THE INTO THE MASTER PLAN OF GREAT GRANT.

THERE WAS A PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2001. AND THIS LIME. HARD LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS LAID DOWN IN THAT GRAND PLAN THAT I WENT THROUGH AS PART OF PREPARATION FOR THIS MEETING. AND YOU KNOW THE MODERNIZED, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. EVEN THAT HAS A LIMITATION, WHICH IS SAID WHICH SAYS THAT IF THE PLACE TIME DEFINITION IS OF THAT HOUSE IT NEEDS TO BE AWAY FROM A COMMUNITY LIKE THIS, RIGHT? AND THIS THIS REQUEST IS ACTUALLY GOT TWO PORTIONS, RIGHT? THEY ASSUME HE IS PART AND PARCEL OF THIS REQUEST. NOWHERE ACROSS THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, HAVE YOU APPROVED A SELF STORAGE SPACE RIGHT AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE GOVERNMENT? WOULD YOU SHOW ME ONE EXAMPLE? WHY ARE WE MAKING AN EXEMPTION FOR THIS SCENARIO ALONE? I DON'T WANT IT. I'M SURE THE ESTEEMED MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WOULDN'T WARRANT A SELF STORAGE SPACE OVERLOOKING THE ENTRANCE TO YOUR COMMUNITY ANYONE WANTED I AM PRETTY SURE THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS. THE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER DEFINITION PROVIDES OPTIONS. VIABLE OPTIONS FOR THE BUILDER. STAND UP SOMETHING THERE. THE FISCAL MODEL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY WILL ALSO STAND HOLD WOULD HOLD GOOD IF THERE IS SOME OTHER DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMING UP THE SO FOR US THIS DETRIMENTAL IT IS GOING TO DEPRECIATE OUR PROPERTY PRICES. WE BOUGHT OUR HOME INTO CRAIG RANCH MASTER BLEND AND THIS IS A DEVIATION.

AND THAT IS THE REASON WHY I'M OBJECTING THIS THANK YOU, CHEF. THANK YOU. DOES ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? HI MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. UM LIKE I'M NOT LIVING DIRECTLY FACING, BUT I'M A RESIDENT OF 8 65 PAGE, DR ONE OF THE CONCERNS. I'M INCREDIBLY OPPOSING JUST FROM A SAFETY AND THE SECURITY STANDPOINT, RIGHT? WE HAVE BEEN LIKE KIND OF A PEACEFUL COMMUNITY THERE. THANK YOU.

THANK GOD LIKE NOTHING HAS HAPPENED. UM LIKE KIND OF A BUG LEADER, BIG BURGLARY OR SOMEBODY HAS COME IN. AND KIND OF ROBBED. WITH THIS COMING IN. THAT IS A GRAVE CONCERNS FROM A SECURITY STANDPOINT, THAT SOMETHING WOULD HAPPEN RIGHT? LIKE I JUST DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN TAKEN INTO THIS. WHILE A KIND OF STORAGE IS BEING BUILT, BECAUSE WE DO SEE SOME TRAFFIC COMING IN AND WANTED PEOPLE GOING AROUND AND COMING AROUND BECAUSE THERE IS NO CONTROL WHO CAN COME IN AND WHO CAN COME OUT BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A GATED COMMUNITY THERE, SO I JUST WANTED TO POST SPECIFICALLY FROM THE SAFETY AND THEY, UM, AND SECURITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY HERE, THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU, SIR. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE OTHER? SEEN ON ENTERTAINING MOTION AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOVED THE CLOSING PUBLIC HEARING A SECOND IT'S CASH FOR VOTES. JENNIFER, I'M GONNA HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS FOR YOU IF THAT'S OKAY. SO. CURRENTLY, UM IN THE PD. WHAT WHAT EXACTLY IS ALLOWED. WE KNOW THE BUILDING HEIGHT CAN BE UP TO 50 FT. WHAT ELSE? THIS IS ACTUALLY PART OF THE ONE OF THE ORIGINAL R E. C SO IT IS A VERY COMPREHENSIVE PD. BUT THIS PARTICULAR TRACT IS DESIGNATED

[01:15:06]

TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SEAT PLANNED CENTER ZONING DISTRICT. IT WOULD ALSO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL IF IT'S VERTICALLY INTEGRATED. A LOSS OF NOTE THAT THIS AREA IS WITHIN THE QUARTER COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT WHICH WOULD ALLOW AND THIS IS THE HIGH RISE ZONE, WHICH COULD POTENTIALLY ALLOW FOR BUILDING HEIGHTS OF UP TO 12 STORIES. SO BUILDING HEIGHTS IN THIS PARTICULAR STRETCH OF 1 21 COULD, UH THE GOAL WAS FOR THEM TO GO UP.

MAYBE NOT NECESSARILY ON THIS TRACT BUT BUILDING CURRENTLY IT COULD GO UP POTENTIALLY UP TO 12 STORIES CORRECT AND THE USES ASIDE FROM OFFICE CAN BE WHAT JUST A WIDE VARIETY OF SEA PLAN CENTER WAS ONE OF OUR LEGACY ZONING DISTRICT. IT WAS THE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL, SO A VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL USES FRANTZ RESTAURANTS, FOOD, FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS, OFFICE RETAIL ENTERTAINMENT VENUES, THINGS THAT THEY LIKE. THANK YOU. UM. ANYONE ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS? AND I THINK THAT THAT'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE YOU THIS ONE LADY BROUGHT UP, UM, ABOUT TRAFFIC AND THERE IS NOTHING LOWER THAN SELF STORAGE TRAFFIC. I MEAN, IF YOU HAD ALL THE OTHER USES THAT SHE JUST HAD MENTIONED WHAT WOULD BE VASTLY MORE THAN THAN SELF STORAGE. UM, TRAFFIC. WE SHOULD VOTE ON THE ZONING. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO HEAR THE S U P AND HAVE ALL THAT DISCUSSION.

DADDY. SO IS THERE A MOTION ON THE ZONING? RIGHT NOW, THIS IS JUST A MOTION TO CHANGE IS LEARNING TO A OR DO OR STRAIGHTFORWARD C TWO MICHAEL MOTION. WE APPROVE THE ZONING.

ALL SECOND CAST YOUR VOTES. IT'S NOT COMING UP. YES. IT'S NOT COMING UP. YES. RIGHT WE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for a Self-Storage Facility (Craig Ranch Storage), Located at 7150 Craig Ranch Parkway, and Accompanying Ordinance]

WILL MOVE TO THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS 220018 S U P CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE. PRIMARY QUEST FOR SELF STORAGE FACILITY LOCATED 71 50 CRAIG RANCH PARKWAY ACCOMPANYING ORDINANCE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. OKAY WITH THE ACTION ON THE PREVIOUS ITEM , THE APPLICANT IS NOW REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF AN S U P SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A SELF STORAGE FACILITY. SCAN HERE . SO UM, JUST AGAIN FOR THE RECORD, WE DID RECEIVE THAT WRITTEN PROTEST FOR THE S U. P AS WELL AFTER EVALUATION. IT DOES NOT MEET THAT 20% THRESHOLD TO REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE. BUT I DID WANT TO NOTE THAT FOR THE RECORD AS WELL WITH THE S U P REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO, UH CONSTRUCT A THREE STORY SELF STORAGE FACILITY. THAT WOULD BE, UM IN CLOSED ON THE TRACT. WHEN A STAFF EVALUATED THIS. WE OBVIOUSLY DID LOOK AT THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT, THE PROXIMITY AND THE PROXIMITY TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. WE ALSO NOTED THAT IT IS OFF OF THE HIGHWAY FRONTAGE TEXT SORT OF BEHIND THAT GAS STATION AS WELL AS THE MOVIE HOUSE THEATER. WITH THE PROPOSED LAYOUT. THE APPLICANT IS ORIENTING ALL POTENTIAL SERVICE DOORS MORE TOWARDS THE MOVIE THEATER. THERE ARE NO EXTERIOR BAY DOORS ON THE ON THE PROPERTY AND THE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS GOING IN AND OUT OF THE OFFICE ARE ORIENTED TOWARDS THE HIGHWAY. 1 21 FRONTAGE. WE CERTAINLY NOTED THAT THERE WAS QUITE A BIT OF TOPOGRAPHY CHANGE FROM THIS PARTICULAR TRACKED TO THE RESIDENTIAL AND ADJACENT TRACKS . SO ALTHOUGH THEY ARE REQUESTING A THREE STORY BUILDING HEIGHTS, GIVEN THAT CHANGE IN TOPOGRAPHY, THE VISUAL OF THAT OVERALL HEIGHT WILL BE RELATIVELY FLAT COMPARED TO THE OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE AROUND IT WITH THAT STAFF IS JENNIFER. I'M SORRY, COULD YOU CLARIFY THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE SURE THE TOPOGRAPHY AND THIS SITE IS LOWER THAN THE SINGLE FAMILY. TREMENDOUS QUITE A BIT SO MOVIE HOUSES ACTUALLY ABOUT 40 FT AND HEIGHTS WITH THE AFRICAN IS PROPOSING BELIEVE, BOB SAID IT WAS 48. FT 30. FT SORRY, 38. OKAY, SO WITH THAT TOPOGRAPHY CHANGE BETWEEN THE SINGLE FAMILY AND COMPARED TO THAT MOVIE HOUSE, UH, EATERY. IT WOULD BE LIKE AN 18 FT. THAT'S CORRECT. MR. THE MOVIE HOUSES ELEVATED ON BY ABOUT 10 OR 12 FT . RETAINING WALL OVER AND ABOVE THIS PROPERTY. THAT IS CORREOES THAT INCLUDE THE RETAINING ON THE MOVIE HOUSES UP 40 FT. PLUS THE GAINED AN ELEVATION FOR THE MOVIE HOUSES. 40 FT FROM IT'S GREAT. YEAH FROM THE FINISHED GRADE 10. IF WE'RE COMPARING IT

[01:20:01]

TO THIS, IT'S PROBABLY MORE LIKE 16 FT. 17. 20 FT. ALRIGHT. SORRY. DID I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY? SURE ABSOLUTELY. YOU UM SO WITH THAT WE HAVE ALSO WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT. AS MR ROEDER STATED, WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SEE THE ELEVATIONS THAT WERE APPROVED THE LOOK AND FEEL OF THE EXTERIOR OF THIS BUILDING WILL ACTUALLY LOOK AND FEEL MORE LIKE AN ENCLOSED OFFICE SPACE.

AND FOR THOSE REASONS STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE S U P PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONS ALSO CONSIDERED THE ITEM AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL IN A 61 VOTE. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND, OF COURSE, MR ROGERS HERE AS WELL. ANY QUESTIONS FOR JENNIFER? SO AGAIN , AS YOU STATED, FOR THIS COULD BE IN VERTICAL RESIDENTIAL COULD BE A 12 STORY. MULTI FAMILY AND SOME DRAFTED RESTAURANTS CURRENTLY. AND HOW LONG IS THAT ZONING BEEN IN PLACE SINCE 1 2021 YEARS AND 21 YEARS THAT STAFF DID MEET WITH SOME OF THE RESIDENTS THAT SPOKE TONIGHT DEFINITELY GOT SOME FEEDBACK FROM THEM ON THE TRAFFIC SAFETY TRAFFIC VOLUMES. WE PUT THEM IN TOUCH WITH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT TEAM. TO POTENTIALLY DO SOME TRAFFIC STUDIES WITHIN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT AS YOU NOTED, SELF STORAGE IS ONE OF THE LOWEST PRODUCERS OF TRAFFIC, AND THAT ACTUALLY WAS ONE OF THE FACTORS THAT WE CONSIDERED CONSIDERING THE CONCERNS OF TRAFFIC FROM THE NEIGHBORS LOWER ONE. THERE'S NOT ONE WE UNLESS YOU GO INDUSTRIAL RIGHT? OKAY THANK YOU. SENT. I THINK I THINK WE ALL HAVE A CLEAR VIEW OF WHAT'S WEIGHING ME DOWN. CAN YOU GO RIGHT TO THE ELEVATIONS AND WHATNOT? CAN'T LET ME MAKE A FEW INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS BECAUSE I WANT, I THINK PART OF THE CONFUSION WITH THE NEIGHBORS IS WE'RE TAKING IT OUT OF THE OLD CRAIG RANCH. 2001 PD. AND WE'RE NOW PUTTING IT INTO A MODERN ZONE. AND IN THEIR MINDS. I THINK I'M TRYING TO INTERPRET. WE'VE SOMEHOW TAKING THIS OUT OF THE CRAIG RANGE MASTER PLAN. BUT AS YOU KNOW THE MASTER PLAN AND ZONING OR TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, AND SO I JUST WANTED TO GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF THAT DOUBT. UM EMPRESS IF I COULD. IF YOU COULD MOVE ME TO. OH, HERE WE GO, OKAY? UM. AS I AS I MENTIONED MILES, PRESIDENT FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WILL BE HERE AND WE'LL SPEAK ON THESE ELEVATIONS. THESE ARE WHAT THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS THAT WERE SHOWN IN THE COMMUNITY PACKET THAT ARE CONTAINED IN YOUR. IN YOUR PACKET. WHAT YOU'LL NOTE IS NOW THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION. THIS IS THE ELEVATION THAT FACES THE MOVIE THEATER ANYMORE. SO THESE ARE THE TWO DOORS THAT YOU CAN ACCESS TO GO INSIDE THE BUILDING TO TAKE YOUR STUFF TO STORE IT OR TAKE YOUR STUFF OUT. THIS IS THE SOUTH ELEVATION. JENNIFER MENTIONED THAT THE YOU'LL SEE ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, THE GLASS AREA THAT IS THE OFFICE AND THAT'S WHERE PEOPLE WILL COME IN TO TRANSACT THEIR BUSINESS TO GET THEIR UNIT RENTED. AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF. THIS IS FACING 1 21 FACES 1 21. THIS IS THE EAST ELEVATION. THIS IS WHAT FACES CRAIG DRIVE. SO THIS IS WHAT THEY WILL SEE WHAT SOMEONE WILL SEE. AS I DRIVE UP TO THE INFLUENCE OF SOUTHERN HILLS, WHICH IS WHERE THESE RESIDENTS LIVE. AND THIS IS THE RESIDENT. THIS IS THE ELEVATION THAT THEY SEE FROM THEIR HOMES. NOW REMEMBER, THIS IS 12 FT. 14 FT. LOWER THAN THEIR IN THEIR HOME BY ELEVATION IS IN TERMS OF THE FOUNDATION. BUT THERE ARE NO THERE ARE NO WINDOW PENETRATIONS . THERE IS A DOOR THERE THAT'S REQUIRED BY THE FAR MARSHAL. HAVE YOU KNOW, EMERGENCY ACCESS AND WHATNOT. SO THIS IS WHAT YOU'LL SEE. YOU'LL ALSO NOTICE THAT WHEN MILES GETS HERE AND TELLS AND TALK TO YOU ABOUT IT, THIS IS THE STYLE OF THE CRAIG RANCH BUILDINGS, RIGHT STONE STUCCO ACCENT MATERIALS ALONG SO , UH, THE ONLY WAY THAT THIS PROJECT COULD GET BUILT HERE IS TO GET THAT APPROVAL. NOW. LET ME UH, I KNOW YOU'VE GOT A QUESTION, MAYOR. SO YOUR MOUTH MOVING. LET ME GO. A COUPLE OTHER THINGS HERE. UH, THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. AND. ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT WAS EXPRESSED IS THE TRAFFIC. THAT WOULD BE COMING OUT OF HERE AND. AND YOU KNOW YOU COULD HAVE AN INTERSECTION TYPE SITUATION THERE. BUT THE REALITY IS THIS DR EXIST, AND THIS DRIVE IS ALREADY BEING USED BY THE MOVIE THEATER PEOPLE TO GET OUT TO GET DOWN TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL DOWN HERE TO GO UNDERNEATH. SAM RAYBURN TOLLWAY RIGHT AND HEAD BACK EAST. SO THE LITTLE BIT OF

[01:25:09]

TRAFFIC THAT THE. THAT THIS FACILITY IS GOING TO A PLACE THESE ARE THE TWO PLACES WHERE YOU WOULD ENTER THE FACILITY. AND IF THIS IS, UH OH, BY THE WAY, THIS IS A GATE HERE, AND THIS IS A GATE HERE. SO WE THINK MOST OF THE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO COME IN HERE BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO COME PROBABLY OFF OF SAM RAYBURN TOLLWAY. IS GOING TO GO TO THE OFFICE OR IF IT ALREADY HAS A KEY FOB OR WHATEVER. MORE THAN LIKELY TO COME AROUND HERE AND GO INTO ONE OF THESE TWO THINGS WILL EXIT THIS WAY. QUITE POSSIBLY BYE. BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF TRAFFIC.

ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT WAS EXPRESSED DURING THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS THE CONCEPT OF BIG TRUCKS COMING IN HERE AND BLOCKING THIS THIS ROAD HERE AND WHATNOT. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE CURVATURE IS ON THIS WHILE WE'VE IT WHILE WE HAVE MADE THE RADIO AS SUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. THAT RADIO WILL CLEARLY NOT SATISFY A SEMI TRACTOR TRAILER RIG. PROBABLY THE BIGGEST TRUCK YOU'LL EVER BE ABLE TO GET IN THIS DRIVEWAY IS A IS A RENTAL BOX TRUCK TO MOVE YOUR KIDS FURNITURE FROM THE DORM INTO THIS FOR STORAGE. SO I THINK THAT'S ONE THING AND I GUESS SO. HOW DO I RACES? THERE WE GO. THANK YOU. OH, YOU UM. BEFORE I'M GONNA LET MILES HANDLE THAT ONE. BUT BACK ON THIS, UM THIS IS A. FULLY ENCLOSED SELF STORAGE FACILITY.

THIS IS NOT ONE THE OLD STYLE WHERE YOU GOT THE GARAGE DOORS AND EVERYBODY PULLS UP AND DOES THEIR STUFF. IT'S TOTALLY AIR CONDITIONED, HEATED. THE ONLY WAY YOU GET IN IS WITH A PASS KEY OR A KEY FOB. AND ONCE YOU'RE IN THERE, YOU HAVE TO. YOU CAN ONLY ACCESS YOUR UNITS FROM THE INSIDE. SO IT IS A VERY SECURE PLACE. IT'S NOT THE KIND OF PLACE WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE DRUG ADDICTS, CREATING A COOKING METH OR WHATEVER THEY DO. IT WILL BE. I'M SURE MAINTAIN IN A WAY THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE RODENTS AND OTHER INFESTATIONS AND WHATNOT. THERE SO I THINK IN TERMS OF A USE IS GOING TO BE A VERY GOOD NEIGHBOR. THERE ARE NO PARKING LIGHT. UH BIG PARKING LIGHT LIGHTS. NO YOU KNOW, OTHER THAN WHAT'S REQUIRED FOR LIGHTING.

THE BUILDING SHOULD BE PRETTY INTRUSIVE. UM. NO MATTER WHAT QUESTIONS DID YOU HAVE ANSWERED IT. SO I HAVE A QUESTION FROM FROM THIS RIGHT HERE. TO THE BUILDING. HOW FAR IS THAT? MR ROGERS. IT'S GOING TO BE ABOUT 100 FT. MAYBE A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN THAT. OKAY? SO FROM A HEIGHT STANDPOINT AS WELL, IF YOU HAVE A RESIDENTIAL AREA HERE, AND IT'S A TWO STORY IN THIS AREA, YES, LOOKING AT WHAT THEY STILL BE LOOKING AT THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND NOT ANYTHING ON TOP WORLD, MAYBE AIR CONDITIONING EVENTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THEY CAN'T ANSWER THAT, COUNCILWOMAN. MY GUESS IS THAT THAT'S A 38 FT ELEVATION THERE, PROBABLY IN THAT LOCATION . THEIR FOUNDATION IS PROBABLY 8 TO 10 FT. SO IF THEIR HOUSE IS A TWO STORY HOUSE, IT'S POSSIBLE THAT IN THE SECOND STORY WINDOW, THEY COULD SEE SOMETHING ON THE ROOF. THIS IS A FLAT ROOF. IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT A BUILT UP ROOF. LET ME JUST I WANT TO ARGUE WITH YOU ABOUT THAT, BUT BEING A BUILDER BECAUSE PEOPLE THINK IN TERMS OF SECOND STORY THEY STARTED IN TERMS OF HEIGHT OF THE SECOND STORY, ACTUALLY STANDING ON TOP OF 10 OR 11 FT PLATE, GENERALLY FROM THE FIRST FLOOR ON TOP OF THE 12 INCH, JOYCE IN YOUR EYEBALLS ARE ABOUT FIVE FT. SO YOU'RE GENERALLY SOMEWHERE AROUND, YOU KNOW, 17 FT. 18 FT AT MOST, WHERE YOU'RE LOOKING OUT OF A SECOND STORY, SO I THINK MORE REALISTICALLY, YOU'RE NOT LOOKING AT YOU NEVER SEE THAT. DON'T DON'T DON'T MEAN TO CONTRADICT YOU. BUT LET ME LET ME ADD SORT OF TO THAT QUESTION, THOUGH. UM IF A ONE STORY STRUCTURE WAS BUILT THERE YOU FOR SURE WOULD SEE IT RIGHT? AND YOU WOULD SEE ALL OF THE STUFF THAT'S GOING ON AND SO FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WAS BUILT THERE YOU WOULD BE LOOKING DOWN INTO IT SMELLS, STIRS AND SMELLS AND ON TOP OF THAT ROOF BETTER HOODS AND ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. I DON'T THINK ANYONE ELSE HAVE A QUESTION. I HAVE ONE QUESTION. NOW, THIS IS AN S U P SO IF WE WERE TO APPROVE THIS AND SOMEBODY ELSE THEY DIDN'T CLOSE ON IT, THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL. IF THEY DID SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN THIS PLAN, THAT'S RIGHT UNDER AS SHE PAID, YOU HAVE TO BUILD IT EXACTLY AS IT'S SHOWN. IS THAT WHAT YOU HAVE TO BE THIS

[01:30:03]

PARTICULAR DEVELOPER? SOMEBODY ELSE BUT THIS GROUP OF PEOPLE I'D BE WORRIED IF THEY GET COMFORTABLE WITH IT. YOU KNOW IF THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN NEXT? SO I THINK THAT CLEARED THAT UP, OKAY? THANK YOU, SIR. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. WOULD THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? MR MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MR GRIMES, MY NAME'S MILES PRESTON. I WORK WITH CRAIG INTERNATIONAL ON THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM OF CRAIG RANCH. AH AND I HAVE BEEN WITH CRAIG RANCH NOW, 14 YEARS AND PRIOR TO THAT 10 YEARS WITH STONE BRIDGE. WHICH AMAZINGLY ADDS UP TO 24 YEARS OF DOING THIS IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. ALL OF WHICH WAS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL FOR BOTH OF THOSE PROJECTS AND ALL SPEAK UM, FIRST WORRYING MY ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL HAT. THE STORAGE FACILITY CAME IN. AND SUBMITTED TO CRAIG RANCH FOR APPROVAL OF THEIR ELEVATIONS. WE WENT BACK TO THEM AND SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT YOU SUBMITTED? WE WANT TO SEE A LITTLE BIT MORE. ARCHITECTURE ARTICULATION. STONE SOMETHING THAT WOULD FIT MORE IN WITH CRAIG RANCH AND FRANKLY, THEY CAME BACK. WITH MORE THAN I THOUGHT THEY WOULD.

THEY DID HORIZONTAL BANDING VERTICAL BANDING OF STONE ALL AROUND THE FACILITY, EVEN ON THE SIDE THAT FACES THE MOVIE THEATER, WHICH HAS A 10 TO 20 FT. RETAINING WALL. SO THEY REALLY STEPPED UP AND THE ELEVATION I THINK IS EXTREMELY AH, GREAT AND IT AND IT FITS IN WITH WITH WITH CRAIG RANCH. AND THE SITE PLAN. UM IS REALLY THE SAME THING. WE LOOKED AT JUST A JUST TO GIVE YOU A COUPLE OF THINGS ON HERE. THE LOT THAT ONE OF THESE LOTS THAT LOT. AND A LOT TO THE WEST OF THAT LOT ARE CITING SITUATIONS. THEY'RE NOT. THE BACKYARD DOESN'T BACK UP AND THEY'RE LOOKING SOUTH TO THIS PROPERTY. THEY BOTH SIDE AND THEIR VIEW IS ON THAT LOT TO THE EAST AND THE OTHER LOT ACROSS THE CUL DE SAC. TO THE WEST. NOW DO THEY HAVE WINDOWS ON THE SIDE OF THEIR HOUSE. YES BUT IS THAT WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO SPEND A WHOLE LOT OF TIME? PROBABLY NOT . EVEN THOUGH THE ELEVATION SOMEBODY MENTIONED ON THE DISTANCE THE DISTANCE REALLY FROM THIS PROPERTY HERE, TOO, THAT IT'S ABOUT 100 AND 50 FT FROM THE OTHER HOUSE ON THE WEST SIDE THAT AGAIN SIDES UP TO THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE OF THE MOVIE THEATER. THAT'S ABOUT 200 FT AWAY. AGAIN FROM LOOKING FROM A STANDPOINT DOES IT FIT? AND FITS FITS THE USE. YOU KNOW, WE OBVIOUSLY THOUGHT SO IN APPROVED IT FROM A STANDPOINT KIND OF WEARING MY OTHER HAT FROM THE DEVELOPER STANDPOINT. COUNCILMAN ROGERS. YOU'RE RIGHT. WE HAD TWO OFFICES THAT DID NOT MAKE ON THAT PROPERTY, AND ONE OF THEM WAS BECAUSE OF FINANCING AND COVERAGE RATIO. YOU KNOW THAT DOESN'T REQUIRE ANY PARKING. YOU PUT A 30,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING THAT NEEDS 4 TO 1 PARKING. AND YOU LOOK AT THE NARROWNESS OF HAVING TO CIRCLE IT WITH A WITH A 24 FT AND MAYBE A 26 FT FIRE LANE, IT BECOMES DIFFICULT. TO PARK IT OR YOUR PARKING ALL IT ON ONE END OF THE END OF THE OFFICE BUILDING, WHICH ISN'T NECESSARILY IDEAL. THE SECOND ONE LOSS BECAUSE OF JUST THE PROXIMITY TO THE 7 11. THEY JUST DIDN'T LIKE THAT. UM. I HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MOM. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? ALREADY DOING IT IN THE SAME. OKAY, FINE. THANKS AGAIN. GUNS AND MEMBERS. MY NAME IS SANTOS JACK MAR EMANATE 305. SHORE ACRES DRIVE, MAKE ANY A COUPLE OF THINGS AGAINST THE CPS SET.

UM THAT IS THIS MOVE TO GO TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UM SO THAT IS A PLACE TIME DEFINITION FOR THE WAREHOUSE, WHICH VERY CLEARLY SAYS THEY ARE WELL DISTANCED FROM ANY NEARBY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, SO THAT'S GOOD. ALSO DEVIATION TO THAT CLASS DEFINITION OF THE CITY.

THE EXISTING SCP GARLAND STOCK ABOARD. UH WAREHOUSE OR SELF STORAGE SPACE. TO BE SINGLE STORY. ASKED IF IT IS ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE ON THE

[01:35:07]

NORTHERN SIDE. THE APPLICATION DISPOSITION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. WAS SILENT ABOUT WHAT IS THERE ON THE NORTH WAS VERY ELOQUENT IN DETAIL IN TERMS OF DESCRIBING WHAT IS ON THE WEST OR IS ON THE SOUTH. WHAT IS IN THE WEST? WHY NOT THERE? WHY THERE WAS ZERO CONSIDERATION OF WHAT IS THERE ON THE NORTH? UM 38 FT HIGH. THE GENTLEMAN WHO CAME FROM CRAIG INTERNATIONAL, TALKING ABOUT HIS ARCHITECTURAL EXPERIENCE AND STUFF. HE DIDN'T HAVE A PICTORIAL CORROBORATE WHAT HE WAS SAYING THAT IT WAS SIDEWAYS , RIGHT? THAT WAS MENTIONED BY ESTEEMED MEMBERS ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE THREE ACRE LOT WILL ALLOW 12 STORIES. I'M ALSO AN ENGINEER. I ALSO DON'T UNDERSTAND IF THEY ARE, I DON'T THINK IT WOULD FIT WITHIN THEIR FAIR AND PARKING GUIDELINES. SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT REFERENCES WHAT IF IT WAS FOR RESTAURANTS HAPPILY TAKE IT. AT LEAST I CAN GRAB MY STARBUCKS WHEN I'M DRIVING OUT. WE HAVE ENOUGH STORAGE SPACES IN AND AROUND MAKING ME WE HAVE ONE IN ONE RIGHT ON ONE TO ANYONE FURTHER NORTH AND FRAGRANCE YOU PASS GO PAST ALMA, NEAR THE ALREADY SHOWED HIM THAT IS ONE.

WE HAVE ONE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF ONE TO ANYONE AS WELL AS I STATED EARLIER. WHY WOULD WE ACTUALLY HAVE CREATE A PRECEDENT IN THE CITY OF MECCA, KNEE A. STORAGE SPACE IS WHAT DO YOU SEE WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING TO YOUR COMMUNITY? SHOW ME ONE EXAMPLE. AND I'LL TAKE IT DONE MY RESEARCH ON THIS. UM SO. AND I LIVE WITH THE THOUGHT, RIGHT? I MEAN, AS I SAID, I MAY MAKE IT IN MY HOME. UM, SO IF GIVEN A TENT, I WOULD GLADLY TAKE A SIMILAR STRUCTURE THAT WE HAVE ON THE NORTHERN SIDE, WHICH IS OFFICE COMPLEXES. ONE STORY. WE DON'T HAVE ANY COMPLAINTS. AS WE DRIVE OUT ON THE NORTHERN SIDE. WE CROSSED THE OFFICE COMPLEXES ON EITHER SIDE. WE DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES. SPORTSTER WITH THAT WE DON'T SEE ANY KIND OF TRAFFIC PILEUP OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. NO SAFETY CONCERNS WHATSOEVER. PRIMARILY RE PRIMARY REASON IS THAT MOST OF THE OFFICES ARE BARELY OCCUPATION DURING THE DAY BECAUSE TODAY IS WORLD POST PANDEMIC IS NOT ABOUT COMING BEING IN THE OFFICE ALL THE TIME, SO THAT NOTION OF I HIRED TRAFFIC IF THERE IS OFFICE COMING THERE. I DON'T THINK I WOULD BUY INTO THAT ARGUMENT FOR THE SINGLE SORTED OFFICE. IT WILL JUST LOOK LIKE AN EXTENSION OF OUR COMMUNITY, WHICH IS A GREAT WIN WIN SITUATION FOR EVERYONE CONCERNED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? YES. UME OPPORTUNITY. SO THIS PART AND ADDRESS MY NAME IS CHIC TASHFEEN . I'M FROM EIGHT MONTHS USER PINE VALLEY DRIVE. SO THIS IS OUR HOME ACTIVITY. SO AS AS IT'S MENTIONED THAT, UM THE. THE LIGHT WILL NOT BE BLOCKED.

ACTUALLY, THE MOST OF OUR WINDOWS IN OUR HOUSE THERE COULD BE FACING TOWARDS THIS. SO AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY LIKE WE HAVE THE LEAST AMOUNT OF WINDOWS IN THE OTHER SIDE, SO IT'S KIND OF LIKE BLOCKING OUR LIVES A LOT. SO IF IT WILL BE A THREE STRAIGHT BUILDING, SO THE PROPOSITION WHATEVER IS PROVIDED THAT THIS WILL NOT BE BLOCKED. IT WILL BE BLOCKED, ACTUALLY, BECAUSE MOST OF OUR WINDOWS ON THAT SIDE THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? SEEING THAT ENTERTAINING MOTION CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED SECOND. STROKE MINUS DOWN ALL IN FAVOR. I POST OKAY, DISCUSSION. UM, JENNIFER. HE HAD MENTIONED, HE SAID HE READ SOMETHING ABOUT ONE STORY, UM FOR SELF STORAGE NEXT TO HOUSES . WHAT WAS HE REFERRING TO BREAK THIS UP INTO TWO PARTS SO UNDER THE OLD ZONING ORDINANCE, ANY PROPERTY THAT WAS OWNED C PLANNED CENTER SO RECALL THAT THE PREVIOUS REZONING REQUEST THEY WERE FOLLOWING A BASE ZONING OF C PLANNED CENTER. THE SELF STORAGE REQUIREMENT WAS THAT THERE WAS SELF STORAGE AND SEE PLANTS CENTER ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL IT WOULD BE LIMITED TO A ONE STORY BUILDING HEIGHT. TWO PARTS WITH THE REZONING TO SEE TO THAT PROVISION DOES NOT APPLY. THAT'S ACTUALLY QUITE AN ANTIQUATED PROVISIONS. IT WAS MORE AKIN TO THE OLD STYLE OF SELF STORAGE. UM, THE OLD ZONING ORDINANCE FOR C TWO DID NOT DOES NOT HAVE THAT REQUIREMENT. AND I WILL TELL YOU THAT THE NEW CODE MCKINNEY THAT WAS RECENTLY ADOPTED ALSO DOES NOT HAVE THAT REQUIREMENT. SO REALLY WAS ANTIQUATED REQUIREMENT THAT HAD BEEN HELD ON TO AND THEN THE OLD ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTIES OWNED C PLAN CENTER. OKAY? ISN'T IT? AND I REMEMBER THIS FROM FROM THE ZONING CASE WAY BACK WHEN, BUT THERE IS A AU STORAGE PLACE THAT THE CORRUGATED ORANGE STORAGE PLACE OVER AND WEST WHAT IS IT CALLED WEST? THANK YOU. UM

[01:40:08]

ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL OVER THERE. AND HE WAS JUST ASKING FOR AN EXAMPLE. I BELIEVE THAT'S A THREE OR FOUR STORY. THREE STORIES STORY BUILDING. UM OVER THERE IN WEST RIDGE AREA, JUST NORTH OF THE STADIUM, RIGHT AT RIGHT. YEAH HARDER THAN AS YOU GO IN THERE. THAT'S JUST FOR THE RECORD. THERE ACTUALLY ARE QUITE A NUMBER THAT ARE NOT WELL, NOT GOING TO SAY QUITE THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER FACILITIES THAT, UNFORTUNATELY AND I REALLY IT'S VERY UNFORTUNATE THAT THERE THEY DID NOT HAVE AN ARCHITECTURE REVIEW COMMITTEE. THEY DID NOT HAVE A MILES PRESTON MAKING SURE THAT THEY WERE BUILT WITH STONE AND MASONRY FACADES, AND ALL OF THAT, THAT'S JUST A CORRUGATED METAL STORAGE BUILDING. SO QUITE RESIDENTS. SO I KEEP GOING BACK TO WHAT? WHAT YOU COULD BUILD THERE AND, UM AND MY WHOLE THING IS, IF YOU IF YOU PUT A, YOU KNOW, THREE OR FOUR STORY BUILDING NOW YOU HAVE PEOPLE LOOKING DOWN IN YOUR BACKYARDS, AND THAT'S A WHOLE ANOTHER THING THAT YOU KNOW, HE SAID. OH WE DON'T PEOPLE DON'T WORK AT THEIR OFFICE DURING THE DAY. WELL THAT'S BALONEY. THAT'S WHY PEOPLE HAVE OFFICES. I MEAN, AND YOU WOULD HAVE NO PRIVACY IN YOUR BACKYARD. BECAUSE EVERYBODY'S LOOKING FROM THEIR OFFICE. WHEN WHEN THOSE LOOKING DOWN IN YOUR IN YOUR BACKYARDS AND IN YOUR WINDOWS IN YOUR HOMES, AND SO THAT'S WHAT I KEEP THINKING. WHAT WHAT BETTER COULD YOU BE AND TO ME? THIS. REALLY? I THINK THAT ONCE IT'S BUILT. I DON'T THINK YOU'LL MIND NEARLY AS MUCH AS YOU THINK YOU WILL. AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT GOING TO LOWER YOUR VALUES OF YOUR OWN. IT WILL NOT. IT JUST DOESN'T I'M NOT SEEING IT HAPPEN ONE TIME WITH ALL THE STORAGE STUFF THAT'S BEEN BUILT IN MCKINNEY. AND I'LL ADD TO THAT. COUNCILMAN PHILLIPS BROUGHT UP NORTH OF THE STADIUM IF YOU GO TO MCKINNEY RANCH AND HARDEN YOU'RE GOING TO SEE WHAT OF THESE OLD STORAGE PLACES WITH THE IT'S. IT'S KIND OF A COMBO. YOU'VE GOT THE GARAGE DOOR THINGS ON THE EXTERIOR, THEN YOU'VE GOT A PRETTY UGLY. I THINK IT'S FAIR TO SAY TWO STORY IN INTERIOR ONE, AND I REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS BUILT OUTSIDE THERE, AND I HATED IT. EVERYBODY HATES IT. BUT HERE'S THE REALITY ON THAT PLACE. IT GETS ITS LIKE CRICKETS THERE, MAN. HERE'S WHAT HAPPENS IN TO MY GENERATION OF PEOPLE. I'M 59 YEARS OLD. I LOST MY MOTHER TWO YEARS AGO. WE INHERITED BUNCH OF BROWN FURNITURE. AND WE CAN'T THROW IT OUT BECAUSE IT WAS MOM'S, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANYWHERE TO PUT IT BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, SO WHAT WE DO IS WE GET RE RENT A STORAGE SPACE AND THEN IT JUST SITS THERE AND WE PAY RENT ON IT EVERY MONTH FOR YEARS AND IN THE PLACE. I'M REFERRING TO OVER THERE AT MCKINNEY RANCH, AND HARDEN SIMPLY REALLY GETS NO TRAFFIC, VIRTUALLY NONE. THAT'S THE BEAUTY OF IT. UH, WHAT I WHAT? HERE'S WHAT I FEAR GOES THERE. I DON'T FEAR OFFICE BECAUSE OF ALL THE THINGS THAT YOU KNOW, MR PRESTON SAID IN THE PARKING THE RATIO ALSO, IF YOU GO JUST A LITTLE BIT TO THE TO THE WEST. YOU'VE GOT EVERY FAST FOOD RESTAURANT THAT WE'VE GOT RIGHT. THERE'S WATER BURGER.

THERE'S DICKIES. THERE'S WENDY'S . THERE'S EVERYTHING, BUT THERE'S THIS NEW FULFILLMENT.

WHAT I'LL CALL THEM FULFILLMENT , FAST FOOD AND I'LL GIVE YOU TWO EXAMPLES. AND I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS EXCEPT TIED TWO EXAMPLES DUTCH BROTHERS AND SALADS AND GO THESE ARE PLACES WITH NO INTERIOR DINING THAT ARE SIMPLY DRIVE THROUGH FULFILLMENT IN AND THAT'S WHAT IT WOULD BE BECAUSE ON ON A WONKY LITTLE PIECE OF LAND LIKE THIS, I COULD SEE THEM DOING THAT PUTTING SOMETHING THERE LIKE THAT, UM AND THEN THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS IT REALLY COMES DOWN TO. I GET IF YOU TOLD ME SELF STORAGE NEAR YOU, PATRICK, I DON'T LIKE IT. BUT THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS, I DON'T HAVE THESE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS BECAUSE IN MY MIND, SELF STORAGE IS UGLY, AND I REALLY DON'T WANT IT NEAR ME. THIS ONE IS NOT GOING TO BE THAT IT'S GOING TO BE LOW TRAFFIC. THE ELEVATION OF IT IS GOING TO COMPORT. AND THEN THE LAST THING THAT WASN'T REALLY BROUGHT UP IS THAT YOU KNOW COUNCILMAN ROGERS AND OUR NEIGHBORS AND HE MAY WANT TO REMARK ON THIS, BUT WE LIVE KIND OF NEAR WHERE 1 21 IN 75 HOURS, AND FOR SOME REASON, BASED ON THE ELEVATION OF OUR LOTS, AND THEN THE NIGHT SKIES AND THE DEMONS, WHATEVER IT IS, WE GET ALL THIS NOISE AMBIENT NOISE FROM THE HIGHWAYS BECAUSE WE'RE ALMOST ON AN EQUAL DISTANCE TO THAT IN 75. THIS WILL BLOCK SOME AMBIENT NOISE FROM 1 21 THAT I KNOW YOU'RE GETTING RIGHT NOW AND CANDIDLY. TALLER BUILDING WOULD DO EVEN MORE TO BLOCK THE AMBIENT NOISE, BUT I GET THAT IT AFFECTS YOUR SITE PLANS AND TO THE FOLKS WHO HAVE THE HOUSE YOUTUBE FOLKS WHO HAVE THE HOUSE THAT I WENT AND LOOKED AT YOUR HOUSE AT THAT'S THE HOUSE THAT I WOULD THINK WOULD HAVE THE MOST CONCERNED. I STOOD IN THAT LIGHT YESTERDAY. UM I REALLY DO GET IT, BUT UM HMM. THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE ANYWHERE NEAR. I THINK AS BAD AS YOU THINK, IS WHAT COUNCILMAN ROGERS SAID. I

[01:45:01]

REALLY BELIEVE THAT IF IT WAS A FULFILLMENT, FAST FOOD PLACE, IT COULD BE A HECK OF A LOT WORSE.

AND SO FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT FROM A SITE STANDPOINT FROM A YOU STANDPOINT IN A FREQUENCY OF VISITATION STANDPOINT, I THINK IT'S OKAY AND YOU WON'T BE UNHAPPY AND WE GET UP HERE A LOT. I'LL MAKE THIS ONE. MY FINAL REMARK. WE GET UP HERE A LOT THAT WE DIDN'T KNOW. AND I KNOW YOU DIDN'T KNOW YOUR STUFF. I DIDN'T KNOW WHEN. WHEN I BOUGHT HOUSES BEFORE, TOO, AND THE CANDIDLY MANY OF THE REALTORS DON'T TELL US HERE'S ALL THE POTENTIAL PITFALLS THAT COULD BE HAPPENING, BUT IN OUR CITY THAT FRONTAGE OF THE HIGHWAYS IS TYPICALLY RESERVED FOR, YOU KNOW, RATHER COMMERCIAL USES, AND THIS IS A VERY LOW IMPACT ONE SO I THINK IT WILL BE OKAY. AND I LOVE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. I'VE ALWAYS ADMIRED THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. ANYONE ELSE? I'LL JUST SAY THIS REAL QUICK. I DEFINITELY EMPATHIZE WITH THE RESIDENTS. YOU HAVE NOT TOO FAR FROM HERE. PUBLIC STORAGE ON STACY, YOU HAVE THE ADVANTAGE STORAGE. YOU HAVE THE U HAUL. THAT'S A LITTLE BIT DOWN THE ROAD SOUTH OF THAT. AND THERE SEEMS TO BE AMPLE SELF STORAGE UNITS ALL OVER THE PLACE. AND I CAME IN WITH A NOTION THAT I WAS REALLY GOING TO VOTE AGAINST THIS PROJECT. BUT AFTER HEARING FURTHER WHAT COULD POTENTIALLY DEVELOPED AND I AM RIGHT NOW JUST SOUTH OF HARDEN AND VIRGINIA, AND THERE'S A LOT OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THEIR AREA. IF YOU GAVE ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE THIS PROJECT OVER WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN THAT AREA. I WOULD ABSOLUTELY TAKE THIS PROJECT OVER THAT. IT'S GOING TO BE VERY LOW IMPACT IN TERMS OF THE TRAFFIC. IT'S GOING TO BE VERY QUIET. THINK THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS ARE REALLY NICE? SO I'M GOING TO STAND IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT.

YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW. OFFICE BUILDING AT VIRGINIA AND 75. IT'S PROBABLY THE LARGEST INVESTMENT THAT I HAVE, AND IT'S WHERE I SPEND THE MAJORITY OF MY LIFE, AND SOMEHOW THE CITY STAFF ALLOWED A METHADONE CLINIC TO GO IN NEXT DOOR. AND I'VE GOT SOME ISSUES ON THAT ONE STILL, AH, YOU NEED TO BE VERY THANKFUL THAT YOU DON'T HAVE A METHADONE CLINIC COMING IN AS YOUR NEIGHBOR AND YOU HAVE SELF STORED WORK. NOBODY SHOWS UP. UNTIL THEY DECIDE THEY'RE TIRED OF PAYING THE MONTHLY RENTAL ON IT, SO THEY'LL COME OUT THERE ABOUT ONCE EVERY TWO YEARS, AND YOU WILL SEE VERY LITTLE TRAFFIC AND YOU'LL BE THANKFUL THAT YOU HAVE THEM AS A NEIGHBOR RATHER THAN WHAT YOU COULD HAVE. RIGHT THERE. A MOTION. MOVE TO APPROVE THIS ITEM, I'LL SECOND. ON FAVOR . I OPPOSE. 220008 AM TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT ON AN AMENDMENT ON

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Amendments to the ONE McKinney 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Including Minor Updates to the Master Thoroughfare Plan and Corresponding Updates to the Future Land Use Plan and Land Use Diagrams; and Accompanying Ordinance]

AMENDMENTS TO THE ONE MCKINNEY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, INCLUDING MINOR UPDATES OF THE MASTER. THOROUGH FOR PLANTS. THEY'RE ALL FAIR PLAN AND CORRESPONDING UPDATES OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND LAND USE DIAGRAMS. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SPECIFICALLY TO THAT MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN AS YOU READ THE AMENDMENTS BEING PROPOSED BY STAFF ARE CONSIDERED MINOR AND THEY ARE GENERALLY TO CLEAN UP TYPOS OR GRAMMATICAL ERRORS OR TO ADD CLARITY. UM, AND TO ILLUSTRATE CHANGES TO PROJECTS THAT HAVE EITHER ROADWAYS THAT HAVE EITHER BEEN COMPLETED OR WHERE ROADWAY ALIGNMENT HAS SHIFTED THROUGH EITHER WORK WITH AN APPLICANT OR THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF AN ENGINEERING STUDY. SO UH, JUST SKIP RIGHT HERE. A MAP OF THOSE PROPOSED CHANGES ARE HERE. I APOLOGIZE.

I'M NOT SURE WHY IT GOT SO PIXELATED. BUT THOSE BOLD RED LINES THAT YOU CAN SEE THERE ARE THE ONES THAT ARE REFLECTED ON THIS CHANGE ELM STREET AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF ELM STREET IS ONE OF THOSE EXAMPLES OF A ROADWAY THAT WAS RECENTLY COMPLETED. STAFF DOES NOT FEEL AS THOUGH ANY OF THESE PROPOSED CHANGES OR IN ANY WAY POLICY BLADE BASED OR ARE SUBSTANTIVE IN NATURE, AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS ALSO CONSIDERED THESE ITEMS AND IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. I WILL NOTE THAT THE PND MEETING THERE WERE SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 3 80 STUDY AND THE POTENTIAL ALIGNMENTS OF THOSE THOSE ARE AS YOU CAN SEE, NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS AMENDMENT, AS THAT PROJECT CONTINUES, WILL MONITOR IT, AND WE'LL DO A LARGER AMENDMENT WHEN ONCE THOSE ROADWAY ALIGNMENTS ARE SET WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. JENNIFER CAN YOU GO TO THE GUESS? THE OH, OVER THE PROPOSED MASTER THOROUGHFARE, PLANS SLIDE THAT YOU HAVE. MAYBE IT'S NOT ON YOUR PRESENTATION, BUT ON MARK UP.

IT'S GOT THAT. LIGHT BLUE TOWN THOROUGHFARES. YES SIR. CHANGE FROM RIGHT THROUGH HERE. YEAH.

SO. THE LARGER ONE CHANGES FROM TWO LANES TO FOUR LINES AND THE SMALLER ONE CHANGES FROM TWO LINES TO 2 TO 3 LANES. ON THE RED LINE IS CORRECT. SO THERE IS NOT ACROSS THIS TOWN THOROUGHFARE IS UNIQUE. UH ARTERIAL DESIGNATION, SO THERE IS NO CROSS SECTION FOR THAT,

[01:50:03]

BUT THEY DID WANT TO ADD SOME CLARITY THAT IT COULD BE BETWEEN TWO AND THREE LANES IN CERTAIN LOCATIONS. IT'S A GOOD POINT TO HIGHLIGHT. I KNOW THAT THERE IS EAST SIDE OF MOBILITY INITIATIVE UNDERWAY. THIS DOES NOT IN ANY WAY TRY TO INCORPORATE THAT INITIATIVE BECAUSE IT IS STILL UNDERWAY. THIS IS TRULY CLEANUPS TO ADD CLARITY ON AND THOSE TOWN THOROUGHFARES AND THE POTENTIAL CROSS SECTIONS FOR 2 TO 3 LANES OR JUST TWO LANES. THE FOUR LANE CHANGE. THE ONLY THING THAT'S ON THAT IS HOW WE FIVE. CORRECT YES, SIR. THAT IS CORRECT. THE OTHERS ARE 2 TO 3. YES SIR.

THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. WE DON'T HAVE ANY INTENTION FOR THE EXTENSION OF VIRGINIA NECESSARILY TO BE THREE LANES LIKE THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE DOING WITH THIS? NO, NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF, AND I DON'T KNOW. I THINK MATT MAY HAVE ALREADY LEFT. BUT NOT THAT I WAS MADE AWARE OF AS PART OF THIS UM YEAH , I KNOW. SOME OF THOSE STREETS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN WIDE ENOUGH TO BE THREE LINE. SURE. ESPECIALLY WHEN REGARDS TO THE NEW ONES. OKAY? THANK YOU. CHEERS. THE PUBLIC HEARING. SAY ONE LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. THEY NONE. ENTERTAINMENT WILSON MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE THIS ITEM UP HERE. BECAUSE HERE A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. ALRIGHT, HOST CARRIES.

DANGEROUSLY CLOSE. NUMBER EVENING. 22112 TO CONSIDER AN ACT. DESIGNATING THE BOARD CHAIR

[Consider/Discuss/Act on Designating a Board Chair of the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Board Number One (TIRZ1) Board]

FOR THE TAX INCREMENTAL REINVESTMENT ZONE BOARD NUMBER ONE.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR FULLER AND COUNSEL. THE TWO REMAINING ITEMS ARE FOR TOURISM. ONE ENTERS TO THE. DESIGNATION OF A BOARD CHAIR. THE BYLAWS FOR BOTH OF THOSE BOARDS STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL WILL APPOINT A CHAIR FOR THE FOLLOWING CALENDAR YEAR. SO THESE APPOINTMENTS ARE FOR 2023.

YOUR CURRENT CHAIRMAN IS COUNCIL MEMBER PHILLIPS. IT'S SIMPLER ON THE COUNCIL. I'M HAPPY TO CONTINUE IN BOTH OF THEM. SO MOVED SO I'LL SECOND I HI. OKAY? AS LONG AS FRICK IS CHAIR VICE