Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for The Lot 1C, 2C, and 3C, Block A, of Wysong Hospital Addition, Located on the Southwest Corner of Virginia Parkway and North Central Expressway (US Highway 75).

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for The Lot 1C, 2C, and 3C, Block A, of Wysong Hospital Addition, Located on the Southwest Corner of Virginia Parkway and North Central Expressway (US Highway 75).]

THAT MOTION CARRIES THE MINUTES I'VE BEEN APPROVAL NOW MOVE TO OUR PLANT CAN SIT ITEMS. I NEED TO STEP DOWN FOR THIS. ALL RIGHT, TERRY. MR WOODRUFF IS GOING TO STEP DOWN ON THE ON THIS ITEM. THIS PLANT'S FIRST PLANT WILL BE 22 DAYS. 0229 CVP CONVEYANCE PLANT FOR THE LOT.

ONE C TWO C THREE C BLOCK A OF THE WYSONG HOSPITAL EDITION. THIS IS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY. IN NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. UM. GOING TO TAKE THESE SEPARATELY TONIGHT MEMBERS. WE HAVE SOME QUESTIONS ON SOME OF THESE SOLAR'S. LET'S SEE IF WE CAN HAVE UM ONCE WE HAVE THE STAFF REPORT WILL SUPER HAVE QUESTIONS. HI GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS ARI. WHAT THEY FOR THIS PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A CONVENIENCE PLAN TO IN ORDER TO SUBDIVIDE TO 33.15 ACRES INTO THREE LOTS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY IN NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF STAFF ANYONE? THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. MEMBERS STAFFERS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DO WE, UM, HAVE EMOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE 22 OH 2 TO 9 CVP, BASED ON STAFF RECOMMENDATION, WITH CONDITIONS NOTED AND STAFF REPORTED EMOTIONAL MR MAN'S EITHER TO APPROVE THE PLANT. WITH CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. SECOND THANK YOU, MR WATLEY. AS THERE ANY DISCUSSION. CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. THE FIRST PLAN HAS BEEN

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for Water Tower Addition, Lots 11R-1 and 11R-2, Block A, Located on the Northwest Corner of S Custer Road and Falcon View Drive]

APPROVED. THE NEXT PLAN IS TO DASH 0234 CVP CONVEYANCE PLANT FOR WATER TOWER EDITION. LOTS OF 11 ARE ONE AND 11 ART TO BLOCK A LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH CUSTER ROAD AND FALCON VIEW DRIVE. SHREDDER. SO THIS IS A REQUEST FOR CONVEYANCE PLATZ ON THE CORNER OF CUSTER AND FALCON VIEW, SO LOOKING TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 2.12 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS FOR THE

[00:05:01]

PURPOSE OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OF THE PLATINUM WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. HAVE A QUESTION. UM SO. WHEN IS WHEN IS IT TIME THAT THIS? UM THIS PLANT WILL GET PUBLIC VIEW. WHEN WOULD THAT OCCUR? I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT? WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO MY QUESTION IS WHEN WILL THEY WERE HEARING WITH AD FOR THE FOR THE FOR THE PLATFORM PLAN OVER THE SITE PLAN? YEAH OKAY. SO THERE IS A SITE PLAN 30 SUBMITTED FOR THE HARD CORNER. UM IN THE PD DOES NOT CURRENTLY REQUIRE THAT IT COMES BEFORE PNC OR COUNCIL. BUT IF SOMEBODY IS INTERESTED IN WE CAN DEFINITELY PROVIDE THEM THE INFORMATION ON WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED. SO IT IS PUBLIC INFORMATION THAT'S AVAILABLE THROUGH OUR WEBSITE. NO, THANK YOU. SO WHEN THE CURRENT ZONING GO AHEAD, COME BACK. HE'S GOING UP. UH, SO THE CURRENT ZONING, I THINK HIS QUESTION IS, THERE MAY BE SOME CONCERNS FROM SOMEONE IN THE AREA. IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO WEIGH IN ON THAT? PROPOSED WATER TOWER OR ZONING AND IN PLACE. INSIDE THE PD TO ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN WITH NO PUBLIC INPUT. YES SO THE PD IS IN PLACE THAT IT IS. THE SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. OKAY? WHEN WE'RE DEALING WITH PLATZ AND SITE PLANS. THOSE ARE CONSIDERED ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS, MEANING THE USES ARE ALREADY PERMITTED. UM AND SO AS WE MAKE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, OR THEY'RE PRESENTED EITHER APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL OR PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IF THE SITE PLAN OR PLATT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE, WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THEM. SO THERE'S NOT NORMALLY COME WITH A PUBLIC HEARING BECAUSE THEY'RE CONSIDERED ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS . SO THE PLANT THAT'S BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED IT. IT DOES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. UM THEIR NEXT STEP WITH SOUNDS LIKE LEXI. THERE'S ALREADY A SITE PLAN IN PLACE THAT'S BEEN APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. SO IF THERE'S A PERSON WHO WANTS TO GAIN MORE INFORMATION WE CAN MAKE IT AVAILABLE TO THEM. IT'S ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE, BUT THERE WOULD NOT LIKELY BE A PUBLIC HEARING.

UM, FOR THE PUBLIC AT THIS POINT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, JENNIFER. OTHER QUESTIONS.

YOU WON DO WE HAVE A MOTION? APPROVE THE ITEM WITH BASED ON STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS WITH THE CONDITIONS AND STAFF REPORT. MR MANZANO APPROVE THE AUTUMN. UM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING THOSE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. SECOND SECONDLY, MR LEBOW, ANY DISCUSSION PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION CARRIES. THE PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED. THE NEXT

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for The Lot 1 and 2, Block A, of Mera at Craig Ranch Addition, Located on the Southwest Corner of Collin McKinney Parkway and Alma Road]

ITEM IS 22 DAYS, 0 TO 3. FIVE CVP CONVEYED SPLINT FOR LOT ONE AND TO BLOCK A OF MIRROR AT CRAIG RANCH EDITION. THIS IS ONLY SOUTHWEST CORNER. COLLIN MCKINNEY PARKWAY AND ALMA ROAD.

SORRY. SELLING AGAIN. THIS IS AGAIN LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COLLIN MCKINNEY PARKWAY AND ALMA ROAD. THIS IS A CONVEYANCE PLUS TO SUBDIVIDE 12.9 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS. STAFF RECOMMENDS A APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. MEMBERS QUESTIONS ANYONE. OKAY, MOTIONS. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION WITH CONDITIONS NOTED AND REPORT STAFF REPORT. MR MAINS EITHER APPROVE THE ANIMUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, INCLUDING THOSE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. 2ND 2ND MAN. MR. WOODRUFF. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT MOTION CARRIES. THAT PLAN IS

[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Preliminary Plat for Province Woods, Located in the McKinney Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), On the East Side of Trinity Falls Parkway and approximately 1,834 feet South of Olympic Crossing]

APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM IS 22 DAYS, 0239 P. P. A PRELIMINARY PLANT FOR PROVINCE WOODS. THIS IS IN THE MCKINNEY EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. E T. J ON THE EAST SIDE OF TRINITY FALLS PARKWAY, 1800 FT SOUTH OF OLYMPIC CROSSING. LEXIE THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 57.5 ACRES INTO 104 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO WAIVE THE 30 DAY REVIEW REQUIREMENT IN ORDER TO HAVE ANOTHER 30 DAYS FOR REVIEW DUE TO MORE TIME NEEDED ON A CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION AND THE APPLICANT

[00:10:03]

SIDE. YOU HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH THE WAIVER LETTER FOR THE REQUEST. UM AND WITH THAT EXTRA 30 DAYS, THE ITEM WOULD BE REVIEWED AT THE JANUARY 10TH 2023 YEARS. OKAY, MEMBERS, QUESTIONS. WHAT ACTION DO WE NEED TO TAKE, IF ANY RIGHT NOW? UM SO THE OPTION WOULD BE TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR THE WAIVER. APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR THE WAIVER. I THINK A SIMPLE ACTION OF TABLING THE ITEM TO THE JANUARY 10TH APPROVING THE WAIVER AND TABLING THE ITEM TO JANUARY 10TH WOULD BE PRETTY CLEAN. QUESTIONS. NOTIONS TABLE. ITEM 2 TO 0 TO, 39 PP. MOTION BY MR LOBO TO TABLE. TABLE THE ITEM UNTIL THE JANUARY 10 2023. PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. AND ALSO ATTACH THE LETTER REQUESTING WAIVER OF THE RIGHT FOR ACTION. SO I GOT TO CLEAR SECOND. BYE, MR. WOODRUFF. YOU NEED DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. NOW THE MOTION

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Site Plan for McDonald Street Multifamily, Located at 3352 North McDonald Street (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)]

CARRIES THAT ADAM HAS BEEN TABLED. NOW WE'LL MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC HEARING. ITEMS. THE FIRST ITEM IS 21-0085. S P A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A SITE PLAN FOR MCDONALDS STREET, MULTI FAMILY. THIS IS AT 353352. NORTH MCDONALDS STREET, MR BENNETT VERY MUCH. MR CHAIRMAN. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED IN THE ITEM TABLE TO THE JANUARY 10TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DUE TO A NOTIFICATION ERA. I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. MEMBERS QUESTIONS. GOOD, OKAY? THANK YOU, JAKE.

THANK YOU, UM WE HAVE RECEIVED, UM WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ON THIS ITEM. IF ANYONE IS HERE TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ONLY SYTEM. PLEASE KNOW THAT YOU'RE WELCOME TO DO THAT. BUT WE ARE GOING TO UH, SEEK A MOTION TO TABLE THE ITEM UNTIL THE JANUARY 10TH PLANNING HIS OWN COMMISSION MEETING. BUT IF YOU MADE THE EFFORT TO BE HERE, YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO COME TO THE PODIUM. THIS IS ON SITE PLAN FOR MCDONALDS STREET MULTI FAMILY. ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD.

CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST TO BE TABLED TO THE JANUARY 10TH 2023 MEETING MOTION, MR WOULD HAVE DISCLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND TABLE THE AUTUMN TO JANUARY. 10 2023 DO WE HAVE A SECOND? TAKEN BY MISTER WATLEY. ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY THE MOTION CARRIES THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED. WE WILL RE NOTIFYING. PRIOR TO THE NEXT PLANNING HIS OWN COMMISSION

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Site Plan for Hidden Villas Townhomes, Located on the Southeast Corner of Bush Drive and El Lago Drive]

MEETING. THE NEXT TIME, UM IS 22 DAYS 0039 SP OF PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS A SITE PLAN FOR HIDDEN HILLS. I'M SORRY. HIDDEN VILLAS, TOWN HOMES. THIS IS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. BUSH DRIVE AND EL LAGO DRIVE, MR BENNETT. THANK YOU AGAIN, MR. CHAIRMAN BENNETT , PLANNER FOR THE CITY MCKINNEY . THIS IS A PROPOSED PLAN FOR HIDDEN VILLAS TOWN HOME PROJECT. THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUS DRIVING EL LAGO DRIVE. THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF 108 UNITS THAT WILL BE DEVELOPED TO RESEMBLE A TOWN HOME PRODUCTS. HOWEVER, THE PROJECT IS CONSIDERED MULTI FAMILY DUE TO THE DUE TO MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS BEING ON ONE LOT. UM, THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY PERMITS MULTIPLE FAMILY USES. AS YOU KNOW, SITE PLANS ARE TYPICALLY APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. HOWEVER, ONE VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED AS PART OF THE APPLICATION. WE BRING THOSE IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION FOR ACTION. THE VARIANCE THAT IS BEING REQUESTED FOR THIS PROJECT IS TO NOT PROVIDE A SIX FT TALL MASONRY SCREENING DEVICE ALONG THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. HMM. THIS PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO FLOOD PLAIN AND A COMMON AREA WITH MATURE TREES. AND ALONG THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE RESTRICTS THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANY STRUCTURES, INCLUDING WALLS AND FENCES. DETENTION PONDS WILL ALSO FURTHER SEPARATE THE SITE FROM THE RED WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE IS THE UNIT THAT'S GOING TO BE CLOSEST TO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

IT IS CURRENTLY 128 FT FROM THAT PROPERTY LINE, THE CLOSEST UNIT TO THE NON SCREENED PORTION IS 185 FT. SO IT'S PRETTY FAR OFF THAT WESTERN PROPERTY LINE THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE SIDE IS

[00:15:03]

THE ONLY SECTION NOT TO BE SCREENED, ACCORDING TO CODE ALL OTHER REQUIRED SCREENING IS PROVIDED ON SITE. SECTION 1 46 1 32, THE SECTION OF THE PREVIOUS CODE THAT COVERS FENCES, WALLS AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS ALLOWS APPLICANTS TO REQUEST VARIANCES TO THE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. P AND Z CAN GRANT VARIANCES BASED ON THE FOUR CRITERIA WHICH ARE OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. AS YOU CAN SEE THE REQUEST THE REQUESTED VARIANTS MEETS ALL FOUR OF THE CRITERIA INSTEAD OF JUST ONE. IT IS STEPS OPINION OF THE PROPOSED VARIANTS WILL NOT BE DONE. TO THIS SIDE OR ADJACENT PROPERTY AND MEETS THE INTENT OF THE SCREENING VARIANTS SECTION AS SUCH STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE VARIANTS. THANK YOU, JASON. OTHER QUESTIONS. DO YOU MARK? YEP, WE'RE LOOKING AT YES. SO UM, THIS IS THE SECTION THAT IS PROPOSED NOT TO BE SCREENED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS IS THERE IS A POND AND A COMMON AREA. WITH A WALKWAY AROUND THE POND. THERE'S ALSO MATURE TREES ON THAT SITE, UM, WHICH WILL HELP SCREEN THIS FROM PROPERTIES ACROSS THE POND. YOU GUYS EVER LOOK AT. BRING HIM THE FENCE ON THE INSIDE, CALLED TO THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE PART OF THE DETENTION PLANTS. SO BECAUSE OF THE GRADING OF THE SITE, THE SITE STEPS DOWN FROM EAST TO WEST, SO IT'S FALLING DOWN TOWARDS THE DETENTION PONDS AND THE POND ON THE OTHER SIDE. UM THOSE ARE RETAINING WALLS THAT ARE THESE DASH LINES WILL DO A DIFFERENT COLOR. THAT ARE RIGHT ALONG HERE. AND IN HERE. THOSE ARE ALL RETAINING WALLS, UM, WITH WROUGHT IRON FENCE. THAT'S SIX FT. TALL ON TOP OF THEM, SO THEY ARE SCREENING. TO SOME EXTENT, THE BACK PATIOS OF THOSE UNITS. YES. OTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE? NEVER QUESTION THE SO THAT THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCES THAT IS THAT A COST SPECIFICALLY A COST. ISSUE NO, IT'S NOT. SO THERE IS THE EASEMENT THAT YOU CAN SEE A DIFFERENT COLOR FOR THIS AS WELL. THAT CUTS THROUGH RIGHT HERE. UM IT'S A T P AND L IS MEANT THAT DOESN'T ALLOW ANY . IT DOESN'T PERMIT ANY STRUCTURES WITHIN THAT EASEMENT. UM AND THAT CONTINUES ON TO THE OTHER PROPERTY LINE. UM ANOTHER REASON FOR IT IS, YOU KNOW IT'S ADJACENT FLOODPLAIN. IT'S ADJACENT TO A COMMON AREA. YOU KNOW, SO THANK YOU. IS IT MULTI FAMILY FOR RENTERS AND MULTI FAMILY FOR NO. THE OWNERSHIP IT'S ESSENTIALLY TOWN HOMES FOR RENT AND THE UNIONS THEMSELVES ARE GOING TO RESEMBLE TOWN HOMES. AS YOU CAN SEE, BASED ON THE SITE PLAN. IT'S CONSIDERED MULTIPLE FAMILY BECAUSE OF THE MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS ON THE SAME LOT, SO AESTHETIC ZONING ALREADY EXISTS AS FAR AS THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY IN PLACE. THEY ARE FREE TO DO THE MULTIPLE FAMILY USES ON THE PROPERTY. THE ONLY ACTION BEING TAKEN TONIGHT IS FOR THAT SCREENING VARIANTS. AND AGAIN, IT'S JUST ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. EVERYTHING ELSE IS SCREENED, ACCORDING TO COAT. OTHER QUESTIONS. JAKE. THANK YOU IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? OKAY, VERY GOOD. GOOD EVENING.

SEAN GRAHAM, LIQUIDITY ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEER. UH CLIENT WAS ABLE TO JOIN US. HE CAME DOWN WITH COVID AS I'M RECOVERING FROM IT, SO UM I DON'T THINK I WANTED THAT. I DON'T HAVE A SEPARATE PRESENTATION. BUT JUST A CLARIFICATION THERE NOT FOR RENT PRODUCT THEY WILL BE FOR SALE. THE TOWN HOMES THAT IS BUT WE DID REACH OUT TO ENCORE TO SEE IF THERE IS A WAY FOR US TO ADD THE SCREENING WALL IN THERE. REPLIED WITH EMAILS THAT THEY ARE DONE IN FAVOR OF THAT. SO IT'S NOT THAT WE WANTED DIDN'T WANT TO COMPLY IT JUST TRYING TO WORK WITH ENCORE. AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THIS IS AN ITEM THAT HAS A PUBLIC HEARING. WITH IT. SO IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS PROPOSED UM, SITE PLAN. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. HELLO MY NAME IS MICHAEL MURRAY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE OF FOR THE HOMEOWNERS THAT OWN THAT PROPERTY ACROSS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF A LAGO. AND THE REASON FOR THAT SCREEN REASON IT SHOULD BE A MASONRY SCREENS TO KEEP THE HEADLIGHTS FROM THE PARKING LOT SHINING INTO THE HOUSES. WE ALREADY HAVE THAT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD FROM TWO OTHER APARTMENTS THAT YOU'VE BUILT OR ALLOWED TO BE BUILT. UM ALONG MCKINNEY RANCH ROAD THAT SHINE DOWN INTO OUR, UH, SUBDIVISION

[00:20:02]

AND THIS IS A REAL NUISANCE WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE THAT SCREEN THERE. YOU ARE AWARE AGAIN, SIR, YOU'RE YOUR PROPERTY PROPERTY IS JUST EAST ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL LAGO. IT'S ABOUT ROUGHLY THREE ACRES IN THERE. THAT'S A PROPERTY. IT'S COMMON AREA FOR THE A. AND THERE ARE TREES IN THERE. BUT STILL YOU GET HEADLIGHTS SHINING THROUGH THE TREES AND THINGS AND IN THE EVENING THAT SHINE DIRECTLY WILL SHINE DIRECTLY INTO THE HOUSES BECAUSE THE APARTMENTS ARE UPHILL. FROM OUR THE HOUSES THAT ARE IN THAT SUBDIVISION. OKAY, VERY GOOD. NOW WE'RE ORIENTED AS TO WHERE YOU'RE WHERE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? UM I WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT. NO ONE ELSE. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. EXPOSED TO PUBLIC HEARING MOTION BY MR MAINS AND CLOSER PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. SECOND MAN, MISTER WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING? CAST YOUR VOTE. HMM. OKAY THE MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW IS HAVE SOME QUESTIONS, POSSIBLY OF STAFF AND ALSO OF THE APPLICANT MEMBERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST. QUESTION OF STAFF, MR WOODRUFF.

YOU CLEARLY EXPERIMENT LIGHT AS THAT EASEMENT THERE THAT LOOK LIKE YOU CAN BUILD A WALL. BUT CLEARLY WE COULD IS THERE ANY THOUGHT TO PUTTING A LIVING SCREENING WALLOP? YES. SO. RIGHT NOW. THERE'S A CANOPY TREES PROPOSED. I BELIEVE IT'S ONE PER 40. MAYBE ONE PER 30 BECAUSE IT'S MULTIPLE FAMILY, UM OR CONSIDERED MULTIPLE FAMILY. THOSE ARE REQUIRED. I BELIEVE ONE FOR 30 AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE, SO THERE'S GOING TO BE, UM PLENTY OF, UH. TREES PUT IN THERE. UM THERE'S ALSO GOING TO BE LANDSCAPING UP CLOSER TO THE UNITS. UM LIKE I SAID EARLIER, BECAUSE OF THE GRADIENT OF THE SITE, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME PRETTY HEFTY RETAINING WALLS AND BECAUSE THESE UNITS ARE PUSHED BACK SO FAR, IT'S UNLIKELY THAT ANY SCREENING WALL WOULD SUFFICE AND CUTTING DOWN ANY OF THE HEADLIGHTS SHINING OVER FOUND BECAUSE OF THE GREED WHEN I ASKED THE QUESTION, LITERALLY MOST STEPS GOING NORTH SOUTH, RIGHT? HE'S RIGHT DRY. SO IT'S NOT GONNA BE THAT BIG A DEAL, BUT THIS AREA RIGHT THROUGH HERE AS PEOPLE COME DOWN THIS DR, WHICH COMES DOWN TODAY , TAKE THE SHORTCUT AT TIMES MYSELF. IT SEEMS LIKE A WEEKEND AND I POPPED UP. I APOLOGIZE. I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. I COULDN'T GET OPEN ON MY COMPUTER AT HOME. UH, IT'S A BIG FILE, I GUESS. SO JUST CURIOUS WHAT WE CAN DO HERE. MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE HAVING GOOD LANDSCAPING THERE SO THAT THAT EAST WEST DRIVE AS PEOPLE COME WESTBOUND ON THAT. THAT'S WHERE YOU'RE GONNA GET THOSE HEADLIGHTS. MAJORITY OF IT, OKAY. I STILL CAN GET PAID ONE FOLD UP, BUT I CAN'T GET EIGHT PAGES TO THIS AND IT'S A HEFTY FILE. THAT'S WE COULDN'T INCLUDE ALL EIGHT PAGES ON THE PRESENTATION, SO THAT'S WHY I WAS LEFT OFF. IF YOU TELL ME THIS WAS GOOD LANDSCAPING THERE. I BELIEVE YOU ALL WITH THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT IF THEY ARE OPEN TO PROVIDING ANY EXTRA SHRUBS OR ORNAMENTAL TREES, CANOPY TREES, ANYTHING LIKE THAT. GREAT IF YOU COME UP YOU COME UP WITH A GREAT TOO CONVERSATION WITH YOU. ONE THING WE'RE SORRY. ONE THING WE'RE DOING IS, UM IF YOU CAN SEE WHERE OUR POND HAS THE BIG CURVE ON IT. THERE'S EXISTING TREES. THERE WOULD HAVE A PRETTY GOOD CANOPY ON HIM THAT WE'RE TRYING TO PRESERVE. THAT'S PROBABLY THE BIGGEST BANG FOR THE BUCK. AS FAR AS VISUALLY SCREENING IS KEEPING THOSE TREES THERE. RIGHT WHERE THE PRIVATE DRAFT CURVES.

UM WE CAN CERTAINLY LOOK AT EM. ADDING SMALL LANDSCAPING ON THE OUTSIDE OF THAT CURVE AT THAT PARTICULAR RESPONSE THAT COULD HELP IN THE PORTION THAT'S NOT SCREENED BY THE POND. EXISTING TREES. WHAT WE WHO ARE YOU ADDRESS THAT? IS THERE SOMETHING WE CAN BE ADDRESSING A MOTION? I ASKED FOR IT TO BE SCREENED IN THIS GENERAL AREA HERE OF SOME ADDITIONAL ENHANCED LANDSCAPING AND THE AREAS WHERE IT'S APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION OF ENHANCED LANDSCAPING AND WHATEVER AREA YOU WERE LIKE TO SEE IT. THANK YOU. HMM. OTHER QUESTIONS. SO IS IT ANY WAY THAH

[00:25:08]

THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. TO GET SOMETHING IN THERE THAT THEY WOULD APPROVE US. BE COMFORTABLE WITH AND I GUESS THAT'S TO JENNIFER. I THINK I'LL DEFER THE APPLICANTS DESIRE AGAIN, IF THERE'S COMFORT WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THAT THE ITEM CAN BE APPROVED WITH THE NOTION THAT ENHANCED LANDSCAPING BE PROVIDED IN THOSE KEY LOCATIONS, UM THE TYPE OF LANDSCAPING, UM, COULD CERTAINLY BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND THE HOMEOWNERS. UM YOU COULD MAKE THAT MOTION TONIGHT. IF YOU WANTED TO. YOU COULD ALSO TABLE IT TO ACTUALLY HAVE IT. TIED DOWN IN THE ACTION AT A FUTURE DATE. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? IT'S A DIFFICULT PIECE OF TRACK TO DEVELOP. UM CONSIDERING THE TOPOGRAPHY IN IT, UM THE SIX FT FENCE WOULD NOT STOP THE HEADLIGHTS FROM JUST BECAUSE OF THE HEIGHT OF IT OVER. PLUS, IT LOOKS LIKE THE ENTRANCES TO THE HOMES ARE IN THE REAR OF THEM, NOT TOWARD IT. UM AND WHEN WE GET TO WORRYING ABOUT HEADLIGHTS, MY WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD, ANYBODY MAKING A TURN OR LEAVING AND I KNOW IT'S DARK IN THE MORNING AND DARK AT NIGHT, BUT HEADLIGHTS ARE INEVITABLE WITHIN ANY HOME WITH ANY TRAFFIC IN ANY SUBDIVISION HERE, SO I'M FINE WITH IT NOW I'LL ACCEPT IF THEY WERE GOING TO BE ADDED MOTION, BUT I THINK IT'S JUST GETTING TO BE A LITTLE BIT OVER. RIDGE CONCERNED HOW MUCH I THINK THE APPLICANTS PUT INTO THIS ALREADY. ANYONE ELSE? THEIR THOUGHTS. I DON'T HAVE A MOTION. I'M LIKE A MOTION TO APPROVE FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION WITH THE ENHANCEMENT OF ADDING, MAKING SURE OR ADDING SO, UM LANDSCAPING IN THE AREA. I'M HERE. CHILD, THE BEST DESCRIBED BY JENNIFER DO YOU WANT TO PUT AT THE CURVE OF THE FIRE LANE WHERE IT INTERSECTS WITH THE EASEMENT? I'LL SECOND THAT. COULD YOU SCOTT, JENNIFER, SO ELEGANT. THE CURVATURE OF THESE MEN IS WELL, THAT'S GOOD ON THE WEST SIDE. ALRIGHT I'LL TAKE A STEP AT IT. SO THEIR EMOTIONAL MR WOODRUFF TO APPROVE THE ITEM. AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. WITH THE ADDITION OF ENHANCED LANDSCAPING. THE NORTH NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. STILL SECOND GOOD.

WE'RE STILL ABOUT SECONDS THAT MOTION ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE. ALRIGHT, THAT MOTION. HAS BEEN APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM IS 22 DAYS. 0077 SPF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A VARIANCE TO A SITE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan, Located at the Southeast Corner of Ridgeline Drive and South Ridge Road]

PLAYING. THIS IS ONLY SOUTHEAST CORNER. ORIGINAL LINE DRIVE IN SOUTH RIDGE ROAD. SCHRADER. SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO OUR LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE CORNER OF RIDGELINE DRIVE AND SOUTH RIDGE ROAD. SO TYPICALLY, SITE PLANS ARE REVIEWED. AT THE STAFF LEVEL . HOWEVER THE APPLICANTS REQUESTED A VARIANCE, WHICH REQUIRES CONSIDERATION BY PNC TONIGHT. THE APPLICANT IS SATISFIED ALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT FOR PROVIDING A 20 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE REAR ROAD FRONTAGE OF CROWN AVENUE. WHICH IS THIS FRONTAGE RIGHT HERE. THEY ARE REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE 20 FT BUFFER ONLY ALONG THE FRONTAGE FROM 20 FT TO 10 FT IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE LOADING SPACE. IS THIS CORNER OF THE SITE? IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THIS IS NOT A LOADING DOCK. IS THERE NO BAY DOORS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE CONNECTED WITH THE LOADING SPACE. CODE DOES REQUIRE THE CORNER LOTS, OBSERVED THE 20 FT LANDSCAPE. BUFFER ON ALL FRONTAGE IS WELL RIGHT AWAY IS LESS THAN 60 FT CAN NORMALLY HAVE THAT 10 FT LANDSCAPE OFFER INSTEAD. SO IF WE DIDN'T HAVE THE FRONTAGE ON THE OTHER MAJOR ROADWAYS AND THAT CROWN AVENUE FRONTAGE WOULD BE PERMITTED TO BE 10 FT. BUT SINCE WE HAVE THE ADDITIONAL UM , FRONTAGE IS THAT REQUIRE THE LARGER BUFFER THAT LARGER BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE SITE. UM IT SHOULD BE

[00:30:03]

NOTED AS WELL THAT EVEN WITH THE REDUCTION ALONG CROWN AVENUE ON THE REAR THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN IS DEVELOPING WITH THE INTENT OF THE STANDARD 20 FT BUFFER IN ALL AREAS, NOT ADJACENT TO THE LOADING SPACE. SO THE MAJORITY OF THIS BUFFER AND THIS AREA IS ABOUT 22 OR SO FEET WIDE WHILE THE BUFFER ADJACENT TO LEND THE LOADING SPACE IS 10 FT, CONSIDERING THE BUFFER PIERCE CONSISTENT WITH THE REST OF THE SITE DESIGN AND THE CONSTRAINTS OF THE SITE, BEING SURROUNDED BY FOUR STREET FRONTAGE IS STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THE PROPOSED VARIANTS WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT. AS SUCH STUFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIANTS AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, LEXI QUESTIONS THE QUESTION. SO, UM.

WHAT WOULD THIS LANDSCAPE PLAN LOOK LIKE YOU THINK ON THIS EAST SIDE. ALONG CANON DRIVE. WITHOUT THAT EXCEPTION WITHOUT THAT VARIANCE IN RECENT MASKING IS BECAUSE THERE IS A WHOLE ROW OF HOMES THAT FACE THAT. YES SO AS OF RIGHT NOW, THE 10 FT BUFFER IS SHOWN ON HERE IS THAT DASH LINE BUT IN THIS AREA, I THINK I HIGHLIGHTED IT HERE, BUT THE REST OF THIS AREA IS ABOUT 22 OR 23. FT WIDE ALREADY, SO THE MAIN THING THAT WOULD NEED TO HAPPEN WAS THE APPLICANT. WE JUST NEED TO MOVE THE LOADING SPACE TO ANOTHER LOCATION OR REMOVE IT AND THEN THEY WOULD MEET THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT. TO THE WAIVERS FOR THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE BUILDING. ONE THIRD I WAS DAVID TOWARDS THE NORTH. IT'S GOING TO BE 20 FT. STILL BY THIS. BASICALLY YES. SO THEY'RE REQUESTING IT FOR THE ENTIRE FRONT OF SINCE WE DON'T HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY IN OUR CODE TO SAY JUST A PORTION, BUT THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT WOULD BE REQUESTING? YES. FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES. IT IS GOING TO BE ADDITIONAL GRASS. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO MAKE ANY MORE ADDITIONAL DOUBLE ROWS OF TREES, SO IT'S JUST CLARIFICATION THAT THE AUDIENCE IS IT'S REALLY JUST ADDITIONAL. FIVE FT. 10 FT OF GRASS IN THE TREE LINE IS GONNA GO STRAIGHT.

YES SO THEY ARE MEETING ALL THEIR LET ME ERASE HERE SO YOU CAN SEE IT, BUT THEY ARE MEETING ALL THEIR STREET THREE REQUIREMENTS WITH THE TREES THAT ARE CURRENTLY ALONG THAT FRONTAGE SO NONE OF THOSE WOULD BE CHANGING. BUT THE REST OF THE BUFFER WOULD JUST BE LIVING MATERIALS SO GRASS AND THAT AREA THESE ARE 10 CANOPY TREES TO BE PLANTED IN THE REAR. YES. OTHER QUESTIONS. NEW ONE. THANKS LEXIE'S OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. HER FEAR HERE, BUT YOU COME UP HERE, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING, BRIAN HAMBURGER WITH WINKELMANN AND ASSOCIATES. BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS PROPOSED REDUCTION IN THIS LANDSCAPING? AH! AND LIKE HE WAS LIKE HE WAS SAYING THAT THE TREE THAT YOU SEE THE SERVICE SIDE THE LOADING ZONE. VERY THING THAT WOULD CHANGE. IT WOULD MOVE BACK FIVE FT IN THE LOADING NEXT TO THE LOADING ZONE, SO THERE'S STILL A TREE THERE WHERE WE'RE PUTTING THE LOADING ZONE. SO.

ANYONE ELSE? QUESTIONS BROWN. THANKS FOR BEING HERE. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC CARING COMING TO NINE. AND YOU LIKE TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS, UM , PROPOSED SITE PLAN. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. GOOD EVENING MYSELF, GIRL. I LIVE ON THE LOT 10 RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE ON GROUND AIR NEW SO AH, I WOULD BE ALMOST LOCATING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CROWNING ANYWHERE. UM MY HOUSE WOULD BE FACING STRAIGHT TO THE THIS SIDE PLANT RIGHT NOW, UM I DON'T KNOW. LOADING ZONE WOULD BE JUST RIGHT ACROSS THE NEXT TWO HOUSES TO ME, UM, ON THE LEFT SIDE ON THE ON NORTH CORNER. SO. UM MY PROPERTY ADDRESSES 3955 CROWN. OUR NEW, UH. ALREADY WE HAVE LIKE BECAUSE OF THE CORNER LORD OF THERE ARE SOUNDS LIKE NOISES FROM THE ROAD ROADSIDE. BEING A LOADING ZONE OVER THERE WOULD KEEP UP. KEEP IT LIKE THE NIGHT TIME OR ANY TIME IT WILL MAKE IT MAKING SOUND BECAUSE BEDROOM IS JUST RIGHT FACING THOSE HOUSES ARE ON THAT SIDE, SO THAT'S ONE OF THE CONCERNS WILL AND I DON'T KNOW. I CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE PLAN OR

[00:35:05]

ANYTHING HERE, BUT WHEN I ASK IS LIKE, IS THERE GOING TO BE A PRIVACY WALL? FACING TO THE SIDE PLAN, OR WILL THERE BE ANY PRIVACY BETWEEN CROWN NEW HOUSES VERSUS THIS VERSUS THIS SITE? WE'LL HAVE STAFF COME UP AND ANSWER YOUR QUESTION AND ANY OTHERS THAT WE HAVE TONIGHT.

OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. RIGHT? JUST TO NOTE IF YOU HAVE WRITTEN A LETTER RELATED TO THE SIGN AND PLEASE KNOW THAT IT WILL GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL. NOT TRUE. APOLOGIZE IT HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND PLANNING AND ZONING, BUT WE DO HAVE CONFERENCE OF ANY WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE THAT YOU MAY HAVE SENT ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK TONIGHT? THE COMMOTION. DO YOU CLOSE THE PUBLIC FORUM MOTION, MR WOULD HAVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. 2ND 2ND BY MR BUCKNER. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING? CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST? YOU WANT. QUESTION FOR STAFF. ISN'T COMMENTS THAT LIVES BEHIND THIS. USUALLY WE HAVE SOME FENCING OR SCREENING BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL. IS THERE ONE HERE AND IF NOT GENERALLY, WHAT'S THE PRACTICE HERE? THERE IS NOT A SCREENING WALL ON THIS SITE CURRENTLY, SO GENERALLY, WE DO REQUIRE SCREENING WALLS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL. BUT SINCE THIS IS SEPARATED BY THE RIGHT OF WAY OF CROWN AVENUE THAT IS NOT CURRENTLY REQUIRED. THEY ARE PROVIDING THE STREET TREES. BUT THERE IS NO WALL CURRENTLY. IS THERE. I CAN'T GET IT TO PULL UP ON MINE. SCREEN RIGHT NOW, BUT IS THERE A WALL ON THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE OF AREAS THAT THE BACKUP OF THE GARAGES? SO THESE ARE THE FRONT OF THE HOMES? THAT WOULD BE THE FRONT RIGHT THERE? SO THIS IS JUST LOOKING AT THIS. THIS PLAN. UM THESE RESIDENTS WOULD BE LOOKING AT THE BACK SIDE OF THIS BUILDING. AND WITH TREES IN FRONT OF THE BACKSIDE IS HEARD MENTION OF THE LOGAN, DOC. BUT WHERE? WHERE IS THAT? SO THE LOADING ZONE IS LOCATED RIGHT HERE. SO IT'S THIS LITTLE DASHED AREA TOWARDS THE BOTTOM. SO IT WOULD JUST BE A LOADING SPACE. THERE'S NOT OF A DOOR FOR LARGE UNLOADING SO OTHER THAN THAT THERE WOULD BE NO TRAFFIC BEHIND THIS BUILDING. CORRECT THERE IS THE ENTRANCE HERE, BUT THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY TRAFFIC THAT WE'D BE LOOKING AT. THIS IS ONLY AN EXISTED WHEN THE TOWN HOMES WERE CONSTRUCTED. REZONED THIS LATELY IS FOR ITS COMMERCIAL. NO SO THEY'RE PART OF THE SAME PLAN DEVELOPMENT. LET'S SEE. HOW LONG IS THAT ZONING BEEN IN PLACE? WOULD YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW I WOULD HAVE TO DOUBLE CHECK, BUT I BELIEVE IT'S FROM THE NINETIES FROM THE NINETIES IN PLACE FOR A WHILE. 1991 1991. THE ZONING HAS BEEN IN PLACE, OKAY? OTHER QUESTIONS. NOPE. COMMOTION TO APPROVE HER STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROMOTION MEMBERS TO WOODRUFF TO APPROVE THE ANIMALS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND, MR TAYLOR, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION CARRY ASSISTS, VARIANTS TO SITE PLAN. HAS BEEN APPROVED.

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District to “PD” - Planned Development District and “CC” - Corridor Commercial Overlay District, Located on the Southwest Corner of Bloomdale Road and U.S. Highway 75 (Central Expressway)]

THE NEXT ITEM. 22 DAYS. 0117 Z PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD IN CC COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. OVERLAY DISTRICT TWO P D. THIS IS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOOMINGDALE ROAD IN U. S HIGHWAY 75, MR BENNETT. THANK YOU AGAIN, MR CHAIRMAN. THIS IS AN APPLICATION OF REASON. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOOMINGDALE IN 75. THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED PD, UM WITHIN THE CURRENT PD. THERE'S A BASE OWNING OF SEAPLANES CENTER. WHICH THE SEAT PLAN CENTER ZONING DISTRICT IS ONE OF OUR LEGACY DISTRICTS AND TRANSLATES TO THE C THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IN THE NEW UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. UM THE C THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IS WHAT IS GOING TO UH, WELL, INFLUENCE THIS. PDE ESSENTIALLY ONE SECOND, MR UMBARGER. DID YOU TAKE THAT OUTSIDE? THANK YOU. MR

[00:40:05]

FRANKLIN. NO DISRESPECT TO YOU, SIR. SORRY JAKE. THAT'S FINE. WE WANTED YOU TO HAVE EVERYONE'S UNDIVIDED ATTENTION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS A COMMERCIAL CENTER PLACE TYPE IN THE COLUMN. CROSSING DISTRICT, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE IN ORDER TO REMOVE THE REQUIRED LAYOUT IN VERTICAL MIXED USE CONCEPT.

THESE COMPONENTS HAVE PROVEN DIFFICULT TO DEVELOP RECENTLY. THE PROPOSED PD ALLOWS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO DEVELOP AS MORE TRADITIONAL COMMERCIAL IN AWHILE, FLEXIBILITY IN THE LAYOUT. THE COMMERCIAL USES PROPOSED ALIGN WITH THOSE ALREADY PERMITTED ON THE SITE, THOUGH THE APPLICANT IS ALSO KEEPING THE ESPLANADE WHICH IS CURRENTLY REQUIRED IN THE EXISTING P D. AH YES, THE ESPLANADE WILL BE AN OPEN AND LANDSCAPED AREA BETWEEN THE PROPERTY AND THE MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE. BASED ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DESIGNATION RELEASE RELATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED USES PROPOSED ESPLANADE AND THE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, JAKE MEMBERS QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. IS THERE ARE APPLICANT HERE? YES. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. DOUG MOSUL WITH LAND PLAN DEVELOPMENT 58 50 GRANITE PARKWAY IN PLANO, TEXAS.

REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNER C. C C. PARTNERSHIP THIS EVENING. WE'RE OBVIOUSLY IN AGREEMENT WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE THIS EVENING. THANKS. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT ANYONE HOW DEEP IS YOUR TRACK THAT'S ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD AS FAR AS TO THE SOUTH. AH! IT'S A GOOD COUPLE, 100 FT. JUST TO THE SOUTH. THAT SOUTHERN DIMENSION FROM 75. TO THE WEST PROPERTY LINE IS. YES JUST OVER JUST OVER 200 117 PLUS ANOTHER 84. LET'S HEAR PRETTY SCARED. QUESTIONS ANYONE? THANK YOU APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE VERY MUCH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. COMING DOWN AND WOULD LIKE TO AWAY IN ON THIS, UM, PROPOSED REZONED. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. SEEING NO ONE RUSHING TO THE PODIUM. I HAVE A MOTION. MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC AREA NOTION. MR LABORDE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. 2ND 2ND ON THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE.

OKAY THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN APPROVED MEMBERS. DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF STAFF? YOU WON. WE HAVE EMOTION TAKE ACTION ON THE ITEM. THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. EMOTIONAL MR MEN'S OUGHT TO APPROVE THE ITEMS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND AND MR WOODRUFF OR ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

THE MOTION IS APPROVED, THE ITEM WILL BE SENT TO CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JANUARY 3RD 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SIR THANK YOU

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards, Located at 1570 Heritage Drive]

THE NEXT ITEM TWO TWO DASH. 01350 PUBLIC HEARING. THERESA ON A SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PD TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS AT 15 70. HERITAGE, DR SCHRADER. YES SO THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM P D TO PD TO MODIFY A COUPLE OF THE

[00:45:06]

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DUE TO A MINOR SITE CONFIGURATION CHANGE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO MODIFY THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 10 FT. TO SORRY FROM 15 FT TO 10 FT THAT WOULD BE ALONG THIS PROPERTY LINE. AND REDUCE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT ALONG THE SAME PROPERTY LINE FROM 15 FT. TO 10 FT STAFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUEST. THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS PROVIDE SCREENING ALONG THE SAME SOUTHERN BOUNDARY IN THE FORM OF A SIX FT 6 FT. RUDDER IN FRONT WITH EVERGREEN SHRUBS, SO THE REDUCTION IS SET BACK AND BUFFER AREA SHOULD NOT BE A DETRIMENT TO THE EXISTING SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT. NOW, SUCH STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS.

ANYONE TO THE SOUTH OF THIS. WE HAVE A ANOTHER MULTI FAMILY PROJECTS A COUPLE OFFICES.

SKINNY LATTES THAT SIT TOWARDS WHITE STREET OR SOMETHING BELOW. SO THIS PROPERTY. RIGHT HERE IS MULTI FAMILY. THIS IS A CHURCH. THIS IS ALSO A CHURCH AND THIS LITTLE TINY LOTTA'S OFFICES.

OTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE? THANK YOU. LEXI IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? DEAR CASEY GREGORY SANCHEZ ASSOCIATES SET 2000 NORTH MCDONALDS STREET HERE IN MCKINNEY APPRECIATE STAFF FOR THAT OVERVIEW. I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. QUESTIONS OF OUR APPLICANT . ANYONE THIRD TIME HERE YOU GUYS ABOUT? THIS WAS WE'RE ALMOST DONE. WE PRETTY MUCH HAD CIVIL APPROVED AND THEN ISSUE POPPED UP, OKAY, VERY GOOD. COMING AROUND THE TURN THINKING YOU'RE GOING TO WIN THE RACE AND YOU BLOW A TIRE. YEAH, THAT'S EXACTLY MR ROEDER THAT EVER HAPPENED TO YOU? HMM? THANK YOU, CASEY. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IF YOU HEARD IT ON IT WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED REZONED. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. MOVE MAKE A MOTION WE CLOSED. THE PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVE THE ITEM WITH THE VARIANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE TO THE SOUTH. MOTION MEMBERSHIP MAN'S AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE ITEMS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING THE VARIANCE TO THE LANDSCAPING.

SECOND THINKING ABOUT MISTER WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION CARRIES ON AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JANUARY 3RD 2023 MEETING. HER LAST PUBLIC HEARING OF THE NINETIES TO TWO

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit for Automobile Dealership Sales (Hendrick’s Auto Dealership), Located at 2601 North Central Expressway]

DAYS. 0112 S U P SPECIFIC USE PERMANENT FOR AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP. HENDRIX AUTO DEALERSHIP. THIS IS A 2601 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. SHEFFIELD THANK YOU. AND SO THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP A BMW OF MCKINNEY, UM, A HENDRIX AUTO DEALERSHIP ON APPROXIMATELY 14 ACRES. THIS IS AT THE SOUTH. WEST CORNER OF WILMOTH ROAD AND U. S HIGHWAY 75 OF THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY IS THE U. C PLANS CENTER DISTRICT WITH THAT DISTRICT. IT DOES REQUIRE THAT SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR AUTO DEALERSHIPS. THIS REQUEST. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE ORIENTATION OF OVERHEAD DOORS HAVE CIRCLED BEFORE YOU.

WITH THIS APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO SCREEN THOSE OVERHEAD DOORS WITH EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND CLUSTERING OF KINA. BE TREES ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY. GIVEN THAT SOFT SCREENING DEVICE OR THAT LIVING SCREENING STUFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY CONCERNS WITH THAT PROPOSED REQUEST. WHEN CONSIDERING COMPATIBILITY OF THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IN THE SURROUNDING USES, HAS FOUND THAT THE SECTION OF HIGHWAY 75 CORRIDOR THAT THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS ON HIS LARGELY UNDEVELOPED. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING AS I MENTIONED TO DEVELOP ON APPROXIMATELY 14 ACRES, LEAVING APPROXIMATELY 53 ACRES LEFT ON THIS CORNER FOR DEVELOPMENT IS CURRENTLY COMMERCIALLY ZONED PROPERTY. ADDITIONALLY THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE TO THE NORTH OF WILMOTH ALSO COMMERCIALLY ZONED PROPERTY AND IS APPROXIMATELY 21 ACRES. THAT SAID STAFF'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT. ANY ADJACENT PROPERTY OR THE CITY'S OPPORTUNITY TO REALIZE AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL ON THIS SECTION OR THIS U. S. HIGHWAY CORRIDOR. AS SUCH, STAFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO THIS REQUEST AND WILL STAY IN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS ANYONE? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR ROEDER. YOUR TURN. NO

[00:50:09]

BLOWN TIRES ON THIS ONE. OKAY BOB ROTOR 1700 RED BUD SUITE 300 MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. I BELIEVE MR SHEFFIELD HAS GIVEN YOU A VERY THOROUGH DESCRIPTION OF WHAT WE'RE SEEKING TO DO HERE. THIS WOULD BE A BMW DEALERSHIP HIGHLY SOUGHT AFTER A LONG TIME IN THE MAKING. THIS SITS ON THE CORNER OF A MUCH LARGER TRACT. AND AS YOU'RE AWARE OF THIS TRACT IS NORTH OF THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, RETAIL DEVELOPMENT THERE WITH LOWE'S AND TARGET AND ALL OF THAT. UM WE SEE THIS AS AN APPROPRIATE USE FOR THIS LOCATION. WILDERNESS WILL CONTINUE TO BE A ANY EAST WEST THOROUGHFARE. SO ANY TRAFFIC THAT'S GENERATED ON THE NORTH EDGE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE EASILY HANDLED BY THAT ROAD SYSTEM. HAS MISS SHEFFIELD SAID.

WE'VE PAID ATTENTION TO THE VARIANCES THAT WE'RE REQUESTING . AND I THINK WE MET STAFFS. UH SATISFACTION MET THOSE TWO STAFF SATISFACTION SO I WOULD QUESTION IS FAVORABLE. RECOMMENDATION OF THIS. I THINK WE HAVE TO TAKE THIS TO THE CITY COUNCIL ALSO. ANY QUESTIONS QUESTIONS ANYONE? I HAVE ONE. A SERVANT IS THE OVERHEAD DOOR. WHY WHY DO YOU HAVE TO HAVE A VARIANCE FOR THE OVERHEAD DOOR? THE THERE'S A PROHIBITION OF OVERHEAD DOORS FACING A RIGHT OF WAY. AND EVEN THOUGH THESE ARE SET WAY, WAY BACK OFF THE OFF THE RIGHT OF WAY. THERE'S NO. THERE'S NO LIMIT TO HOW FAR BACK YOU HAVE TO BE. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE HAVE TO SCREEN THOSE. OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU COME TONIGHT, I WOULD LIKE TO AWAY IN ON THIS PROPOSED S U P. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE ITEM PERVERSE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. THE MOTION BY MR MAN'S EYE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IMPROVE THE OTTOMANS FIRST DRAFT RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT. I'M GOOD WITH THAT. SECOND BY MR LEBOW ANY ANY DISCUSSION? IT IS WORTH MENTIONING. THIS COMPANY HAS OWNED THIS PROPERTY FOR A LONG TIME, AND THEY ARE A TOP NOTCH.

UM, DEALER AND DEVELOPER AND THIS THIS WILL BE A CLEAN OPERATION. FOR THAT FOR THAT SITE. ABOUT NASCAR. NASCAR. THAT'S RIGHT. YEAH. SEE NOW YOU'RE PUTTING TOGETHER THE WHOLE BLOWN TIRE THING. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM AND THE SECOND. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION. KEEP TERRY IS THAT THIS ONE AND THAT WAS QUICK. THE MOTION CARRIES THE ANIMAL WE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ELECTION. WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. THE DECEMBER 2020 22 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. ONE DECEMBER 2020 20 TO THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. OKAY THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. WE DO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON AN ITEM THAT IS NOT ONLY AGENDA.

YOU HAVE THOSE THOUGHTS? PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT, SHANE NONE. STAFF ANYTHING.

[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]

NOTHING ANYONE. MISS ARNOLD. I BELIEVE THIS IS THE LAST BND MEETING OF THE YEAR. SO WISHING EVERYBODY HAPPY HOLIDAYS HAPPY NEW YEAR AND WE WILL SEE YOU IN JANUARY. VERY GOOD. WRITE WROTE . WE APPRECIATE WHAT YOU GUYS DO VERY MUCH. ENJOY YOUR THE DAYS OFF YOU HAVE. IF YOU'RE TRAVELING TRAVEL SAFELY, WE NEED YOU BACK. OKAY, WE NEED YOU BACK. MEMBERS TRAVEL SAFELY SPEND TIME WITH YOUR FAMILY SAY LOVE YOU MORE THAN YOU KNOW. AND WE APPRECIATE EVERYTHING THAT EVERYBODY DOES FOR US HERE WITH THAT. WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MAKE A MOTION TO THE GERMANS REMEMBER TO TAILOR TO ADJOURN THIS MEETING. SECOND BY MR WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT MOTION CARRIES IT IS 6 57

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Dec 13, 2022 Planning & Zoning Commission on 2022-12-13 6:00 PM

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item