[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:05]
VERY GOOD. GOOD EVENING. IT'S SIX PM WELCOME TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. TUESDAY FEBRUARY THE 14TH 2023 THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL. SOME OF THE ITEMS ARE TONIGHT WILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING FEW HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS FOR YOU. THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE IF YOU HERE TONIGHT DIDN'T PLAN ON SPEAKING ON AN ITEM. BEFORE YOU COME TO THE PODIUM IF YOU WILL FILL OUT A YELLOW SPEAKERS CARD. GIVE THAT TO THE STAFF ON YOUR WAY UP. WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, YOU'LL SEE A TIMER ON THE SCREEN TO THE LEFT. YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS CONCERNS. WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE BECAUSE IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE CITIZENS OF MCKINNEY BEING INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS OF GOVERNMENT. SOME ITEMS WILL NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON THOSE ITEMS AS WELL AND SEND THOSE TO CITY COUNCIL. THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS WILL BE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM. THAT'S ONLY AGENDA THAT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST MEETING, WHICH WAS JANUARY THE 24TH 2023. SO IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT, IT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE NIGHT OF IT. IT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC CARING. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT SEEING NONE THERE. ONE MOVE, TRY CONSENT ITEMS. FIRST ITEM IS 23-0071. MINISTER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2023. MEMBERS IN FRONT OF YOU. THERE IS A
[CONSENT ITEMS]
CORRECTED VERSION. THERE WERE SOME DATES SOME NUMBERS THAT NEEDED TO BE CHANGED. NOTHING SUBSTANTIAL. MY CORRECT IN SAYING THAT SO IF YOU HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS OR CHANGES TO THE MINUTES LET'S HEAR THOSE. IF NOT , WE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. AS CORRECTED. MAKE A MOTION TO IMPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED MOTION BY MR WOODRUFF TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED. SECOND MAN, MISTER WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.NICE. THANK YOU, TERRY FOR HELPING. MOTION CARRIES, UH, THE NEXT
[PLAT CONSIDERATION UNDER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 212]
ITEM WE'LL HAVE WE HAVE 12345 PLANTS. UH EVERYBODY IS AGREEABLE. WE'LL TAKE THOSE IN ONE MOTION. I'LL READ THE CAPTIONS AND THE ITEM NUMBER OKAY WITH THAT. THE FIRST ITEM WOULD BE 22-0192 P F TWO CONSIDER PRELIMINARY FINAL PLANT FOR A CITY PARK PLACE EDITION.THIS IS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STACY ROAD AND MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY. STAFFERS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS. NEXT TIME IS 23 DAYS. HEROES ARE 13 FP. FINAL PLANT FOR LOTS 1 TO 7 BLOCK A OF THE MCKINNEY 3 80 NORTH RETAIL EDITION. THIS IS THE NORTH SIDE OF UNIVERSITY, DR 800 FT. WEST OF HARDENED BOULEVARD STAFFERS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. WITH CONDITIONS AND NEXT PLAN IS TO THREE DAYS 0015 F P FINAL PLAN FOR THE WILLOW WOULD PHASE EIGHT EDITION. THIS IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD, 2 78. 2400 FT, EAST OF MCDONALD ROAD OR STATE HIGHWAY FIVE STAFFERS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS. THE NEXT PLAN IS TO THREE DAYS 0019 C. V P ADVANCED PLANT FOR A ROSE CITY EDITION. THIS IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF U. S. HIGHWAY 3 80. 900 FT EAST OF LAKE FOREST DRIVE STAFFERS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. WITH CONDITIONS AND THE, UM LAST PLANT IS 23 DAYS, 00 TO ONE PP. THE PRELIMINARY FINAL. PLENTY PRELIMINARY PLANT FOR PARCEL. THERE'S A LOT OF PEAS IN THEIR 13 A PHASE TWO LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EL DORADO PARKWAY. LITTLE 1100 FT WEST OF CUSTER ROAD, AND STAFFERS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
WITH CONDITIONS SO WE COULD HAVE A MOTION OR QUESTIONS. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE PLATTERS RED PER STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS WITH APPROVAL OF CONDITIONS NOTED IN STAFF REPORTS OF EMOTIONAL MR MAN'S AND APPROVE THE PLAN ITEMS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION WITH CONDITIONS SECOND BY MR LEBOW'S OR ANY DISCUSSION. CAST YOUR VOTE. MOTION CARRIES THE. UM FLIGHTS
[00:05:15]
HAVE BEEN APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM NEEDS WILL BE OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. SO IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT UM PLEASE PAY ATTENTION. FIRST ITEM IS 22 DAYS. 0019 ISSUE P A PUBLIC HEARING TO[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request to Allow for a Self-Storage Facility (Best Box), Located Approximately 275 Feet East of Custer Road and on the South Side of Silverado Trail]
CONSIDER. A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUESTS TO ALLOW FOR A SELF STORAGE FACILITY. BEST BOX THIS IS 275 FT. EAST OF CUSTER ROAD, AND SO ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SILVERADO TRAIL, MR BENNETT YES . THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR CHAIRMAN, GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER ONE FOR THE CITY, MCKINNEY. UM THIS IS A REQUESTED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR SELF STORAGE FACILITY LOCATED OFF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CUSTER ROAD AND SILVERADO TRAIL. DUE TO A NUMBER OF CITIZEN COMMENTS, REFERRING TO THIS PROJECT IS A VERY INSIDE DID WANT TO JUST CLARIFY THAT THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST AND THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. THE EXISTING PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT REQUIRES THAT AN S U. P B APPROVED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF SELF STORAGE FACILITY. THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS BORDERED BY 11 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES WHILE THE WEST PROPERTY LINE BORDERS THE BORDERS, UNDEVELOPED LAND, WHICH IS OWNED FOR COMMERCIAL USES AT THE HARD CORNER OF TWO ARTERIAL ROADWAYS. THE LAYOUT OF THE PROPOSED SELF STORAGE FACILITY SHOWS THAT ALL ACCESS POINTS TO THE UNITS ARE LOCATED. INTERIOR OF THE SITE. UM, IN BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS AND AWAY FROM ANY OF THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THIS IS ALSO WHERE THE SOUL LOADING ZONE IS LOCATED. THE PROPOSED SELF STORAGE FACILITIES, APPROXIMATELY 275 FT FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF CUSTER ROAD. WHICH ALLOWS FOR USES THAT ARE MORE INTENSE TO DEVELOP ON THE FRONTAGE OF CUSTER ITSELF, WHILE ALSO ACTING AS A BUFFER FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST. IT IS STEPS PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED SELF STORAGE FACILITY WILL NOT HAVE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. ALTHOUGH NOT A FACTOR IN STAFFS. EVALUATION OF THE S U P REQUEST, WE WANTED TO NOTE THAT FIVE SELF STORAGE FACILITIES ARE LOCATED WITHIN A TWO MILE RADIUS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND FOUR OF THESE ARE WITHIN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. UM CORPORATE LIMITS.WELL, ONLY ONE IS LOCATED WITHIN FRISCO. WITH THAT I WILL SEND FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
TALK ABOUT THE SITE PLAN FOR A SECOND. JUST TO VERIFY. I THINK I HEARD YOU SAYING THIS SO ONE STORY BUILDING AND THEN RELATED TO THE GARAGES TO OPEN. I'M ASSUMING IT'S GOING TO BE OPEN TO THE GARAGE IS NOT A CONDITION. YEAH SO GARAGE DOOR IS GOING TO BE FACING ON THIS MIDDLE ROAD THAT'S SPLITTING THE TWO BUILDINGS, THEN THAT'S CORRECT, AND THERE'S ALSO GOING TO BE SOME INTERIOR TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED UNITS AS WELL. ALL OF THOSE WILL BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE AS WELL. UM, WHERE THAT LOADING ZONE IS AT NONE OF IT'S GOING TO BE ACCESS FROM THE OUTSIDE. THOSE ARE FIRE LANES WHERE NO ONE CAN PARK AND LOAD AND UNLOAD IN THAT AREA. SPECIFICALLY TO THE ONE IN THE WALL TO THE EAST THAT BACKS UP TO THE RESIDENTIAL. THAT'S JUST GOING TO BE A WALL, NO ENTRANCES. NO ENTRIES TO THE UNITS ALONG THERE. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS. UH STAFF. DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY UNITS ARE GOING TO BE IN THIS? ALTHOUGH REFERRED TO THE APPLICANT ON THAT? I DON'T THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE NECESSARILY REQUIRE THE CYCLING OR THE S U P STAGE. THANK YOU, JAKE. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? YES, THEY ARE. CASEY GREGORY 2000 NORTH MCDONALD STREET, MCKINNEY FOR ESSENTIAL ASSOCIATES. APPRECIATE STAFFS, UH, SUMMARY OF THE SITE AND WHAT WE'RE PLANNING ON DOING HERE. UM THIS IS CURRENTLY ZONED AS A P D . AND THE BASED ZONING IS C PLANT CENTER. WHICH IS ROUGHLY EQUIVALENT TO C THREE ZONING, WHICH IS THE MOST PERMISSIVE COMMERCIAL LEARNING THAT CITY HAS UM, WE DO FEEL THAT THIS IS YOU KNOW A GOOD APPROPRIATE USE. AH, BEST BOX IS A THEY HAVE SEVERAL FACILITIES ELSEWHERE IN THE STATE. THEY DO A GOOD LOOKING PRODUCTS THAT ARE NOT GOING TO COME IN AND BE A BAD NEIGHBOR. THAT'S NOT WHO THEY ARE. UM AS I SAID, IT'S A ONE FLOOR FACILITY. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY TALLER THAN ANYTHING AROUND THERE. IF YOU WERE LOOKING AT THE FACILITY FROM THOSE HOUSES TO THE EAST, WHAT YOU WOULD SEE WOULD BE A ROW OF LANDSCAPING, A FIRE LANE AND THEN THE BACK OF THE BUILDING THAT WILL HAVE NO DOORS OR
[00:10:01]
LOADING ZONES OR ANYTHING. IT'S STRICTLY A FIRE LANE. THERE'S NO REASON FOR ANY CUSTOMER TO USE THAT. THAT FIRE LAND. UM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT THEY MAY HAVE. SO I HAVE A QUESTION. SURE IS. IS THIS GATED ? YES YES, SIR. SILVERADO IT WILL BE GATED, UM AT TWO LOCATIONS WELL, THREE LOCATIONS REALLY? STAFF WANTED US TO KEEP THE ACCESS TO THE MEDIAN ON THE NORTH SIDE. THE SILVERADO TRAIL OPEN. SO YOU CAN ACCESS THE MEDIAN OPENING FROM THAT CENTER FIRE LANE, BUT THERE ARE GATES ALONG THE FIRE LANES. AH, SO. AT BOTH POINTS ON THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH. SO THOSE INTERIOR FIRE LANES ARE NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. IT'S I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN DRAW ON THIS. THE GATES ARE THERE. THERE. THERE. THERE IS AN EXISTING FOR STAFF, BUT RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST. THERE IS AN EXISTING WALL. YES THERE'S AN EXISTING SCREENING WALL.WE'RE NOT GOING TO TOUCH THAT SCREENING WALL. AT ALL. WELL WE WILL ADD TREES AND BUSHES ALONG THAT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. INSIDE OF YOUR ON OUR PROPERTY? YES. HOW MANY UNITS ARE THERE GOING TO BE? THEY DON'T HAVE IT. EXACTLY UNIT COUNT AT THE MOMENT. UM I BELIEVE THERE'S IT'S CURRENTLY ABOUT 90,000 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA, BUT OF THAT, I THINK THEY'RE ANTICIPATING 70 TO 75,000 U SQUARE FEET OF ACTUAL STORAGE SPACE. JUST DEPENDS ON HOW THEY GET SPLIT UP. YOU HAVE AN ESTIMATE? I APOLOGIZE. I DO NOT HAVE A HARD, FAST NUMBER FOR YOU. QUESTION WHO WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE THOSE GATES LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT NORTHEAST GATE IT WOULD BE AH! THE STAFF. FIRE DEPARTMENT AND. I ASSUME WHEN YOU READ A STORAGE UNIT, YOU GET A CODE OR SOME KIND OF ACCESS.
SO IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A CUSTOMER. NOT JUST ANYONE COMING THROUGH. SO IT'S A GATED TO PREVENT OR IT WOULD PREVENT ANY CUT THROUGH OR ANY ANY TRAFFIC THAT DID NOT NEED TO BE IN THOSE GATES WOULD NORMALLY BE CLOSED. YOU'VE BEEN. YOU'VE SAVED THE FRONT FRONTAGE CHURCH CUSTER WITH ITS SIGNIFICANCE, SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF DEPTH IN ORDER TO CONTINUE TO DO RETAIL ACROSS THE FRONT THERE. THAT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THERE IS A CURRENT CASE FOR THAT PROPERTY DONE BY ANOTHER GROUP. FOR A MEDICAL TYPE USE. DO YOU CHANGE YOUR CODES QUARTERLY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, FOR YOUR TENANTS APOLOGIZE. I AM NOT THE UH, I DO NOT WORK FOR THE STORAGE FACILITY. I'M CIVIL ENGINEER FOR THEM. I DON'T KNOW THEIR EXACT YOU KNOW? REGULATIONS FOR TWO YEARS OR WHATEVER. I'M SURE THEY DO. CHANGE THEM REGULARLY OR THEY HAVE SOME TYPE OF, YOU KNOW, INDIVIDUAL ACCESS. BUT I DON'T KNOW FOR SURE WHAT THEY'RE STANDARDS ARE. OTHER QUESTIONS.
ANYONE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. A COUPLE OF THINGS WE HAVE RECEIVED A NUMBER OF COMMENTS IN THE CITY'S PORTAL. PLEASE KNOW THAT YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. AS PART OF OUR MINUTES. THOSE OF YOU WATCHING ON TV. SO WE WILL NOT READ THOSE WE WILL FORWARD THOSE AS PART OF OUR PACKAGE THAT GOES TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
WITH THAT THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON THEM. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED SITE PLAN. I'M SORRY. PROPOSED ISSUE P. PLEASE COME TO THE VALIUM. YES, MA'AM. EVERYONE. THIS IS MY FIRST TIME DOING IT. SO THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME APOLOGIZE. I'M GONNA READ THROUGH MY PHONE. SO SHOULD I GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED? THIS WEEK. SO MY NAME IS JOHANNA BAHAMA. I'M A RESIDENT OF THE CREEK SIDE CRACK RANCH IN MCKINNEY, RIGHT BY THE COMMUNITY WHERE THIS WOULD BE BUILT, SPEAKING TODAY TO OPPOSE THE REQUEST FOR A SELF STORAGE
[00:15:06]
FACILITY. WITH THE ZONE CHANGE. HERE ARE A FEW REASONS THAT MY WHOLE COMMUNITY HAS DISCUSSED AND BROUGHT TO YOU ALL AS TO WHY ONE THERE IS ALREADY AN ANOTHER BUILT SELF STORAGE FACILITY. UM ABOUT 10.1 MILES AWAY FROM THE PROS AREA, SO THERE'S REALLY NO NEED TO HAVE ANOTHER ONE.SECONDLY THE BUILDING ITSELF WILL CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL DETRIMENT TO THE PUBLIC. GOOD. AND TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL AREA THAT I'M A PART OF UM, THE STORY TO TELL FACILITIES ARE DESIGNED TO BE VISIBLE ATTENTION GRABBING STRUCTURES THAT ARE BRIGHTLY LIT . THAT COULD ATTRACT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT SOME FENCES, BUT THAT'S STILL OF VERY HIGH CONCERN FOR OUR COMMUNITY. UM DO YOU KNOW THE HIGH NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT ARE CONSTANTLY CONSTANTLY SPEEDING THROUGH THAT AREA? WE DO NOT NEED MORE TRAFFIC. IT IS ALREADY HAD A LOT OF ACCIDENTS. IT'S VERY HIGH TRAFFIC AND WE'RE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. WE MUST RECOGNIZE THAT A STORAGE FACILITY OF THE STRUCTURE WILL GENERATE CONSTANT TRUCK AND TRAILER TRAFFIC OR ANY OTHER TYPE TYPE OF TRAFFIC INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE HAVE CHILDREN THAT USE THAT AREA FOR BUS STOPS AND OTHER CHILDREN ARE RUNNING AROUND AND WE DO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S A SAFE PLACE FOR OUR KIDS. THIS IS ALSO JUST AN AESTHETIC CONCERN. SELF STORAGE FACILITIES IS UNATTRACTIVE AND WE BELIEVE THAT THIS WILL DETRACT FROM THE VISUAL APPEAL OF OUR COMMUNITY. WE ALSO ARE VERY CONCERNED FROM THE ASPECT OF THERE HAVE BEEN STUDIES THAT SHOW THAT THE PRESENCE OF HIS SELF STORAGE FACILITY CAN DECREASE NEARBY PROPERTY VALUES. THIS TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL SEE VALUE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES IN THE AREA, INCLUDING WHERE WE ARE AND SO WE WOULD REALLY, REALLY REQUEST YOU ALL TO LOOK AT ALL OF THE MESSAGES THAT OUR COMMUNITY IS SENT AND OUR CONCERNS FOR THE SAFETY FOR JUST THE AESTHETICS FOR OUR VALUE OF OUR PROPERTIES. UM SO PLEASE, IF YOU COULD CONSIDER THAT WE WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR MARTIN. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE VERY MUCH. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? THANK YOU . MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT MR MAINS I TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING 2ND 2ND BY MR WATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
ALRIGHT THAT EMOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED, WILL NOW HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT AND OR THE CITY STAFF WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST? OR EMOTIONS. WE GOT TO A NUMBER OF LETTERS IN FROM THE CONCERN CITIZENS IN THE NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIAL AND UM, IT'S GOOD WITH THEM TO VOICE THEIR OPINION AS THEY ARE HERE AS FAR AS SOME OF THEIR CONCERNS RELATED TO A SELF STORAGE YOU KNOW, THE INITIAL CONCERN WAS THAT THERE'S MORE SELF STORAGE IN THE AREA AND I DON'T THINK IT'S OUR PLACE TO DETERMINE. WHEN THE MARKET SAYS THERE'S CERTAIN ENOUGH OF SOMETHING AS A BANKER, YOU CAN CERTAINLY SAY THERE'S TOO MANY BANKS AND DRUGSTORES OR ANYTHING ELSE, BUT THAT'S NOT A PLACE HERE. IT'S MORE ABOUT THE INTENSITY USE OF IT. THE BRIGHT LIGHT RELATED TO A SELF STORAGE. WE HAVE A LIGHTING ORDINANCE. UM, THAT PROTECTS RESIDENTS FROM COMMERCIAL LIGHTING OR OTHER LIGHTING, BLEEDING TO THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. LIGHTING HERE WOULD BE PROBABLY LESS INTRUSIVE THAN ACTUALLY SEAT THREE ZONING. THAT'S ALSO WITH THE TRAFFIC STUDIES. WHAT WE'VE SEEN WITH OTHER SELF STORAGE IS THAT THERE ONCE OR FULL THAT TRAFFIC IS NOT A HIGH INTENSITY, ESPECIALLY NOT NEAR AS HIGH INTENSITY AS A RETAIL SHOPPING CENTERS SUCH AS A C THREE. UM THAT DEMANDS DAILY TRAFFIC TO CERTAIN LEVELS OF THAT. THE ATTRACTIVENESS. IT'S A SINGLE STORY. WE SEE A LOT OF THREE STORIES, AND THAT'S ALWAYS CONCERNED WHEN THE THREE STORY WANTS TO BE RIGHT NEXT TO RESIDENTIAL BUT AS A SINGLE STORY BUILDING WITH THE SCREENING TO IT AND THE NARROWNESS OF IT. WE'RE ONLY GOING TO HAVE A SMALL AMOUNT OF FRONTAGE RELATED TO THIS AS FAR AS WHAT'S HIGHLY VISIBLE. AND DECREASE IN PROPERTY VALUES. WE ACTUALLY HAVE SEEN RESIDENTS OVER BY THE STADIUM WON'T THE SELF STORAGE IN ORDER TO BUFFER IT FROM THE STADIUM AND OTHER PLACES AND NORMALLY IT'S A VERY QUIET NEIGHBOR THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT LOUD PARTIES BEING BEHIND YOU VERY OFTEN OR ANYTHING. SO WHY REALIZE THEIR CONCERNS. I JUST WANT TO RELAY THAT MOST OF THESE CONCERNS. I THINK YOU'LL FIND IF THIS IS BUILT, UM, ARE NOT GOING TO COME OF NUTRITION, AND IT'S ACTUALLY A MORE COMPATIBLE USE NEXT TO RESIDENTIAL THAN C THREE. SO I'LL BE SUPPORTING IT. RIGHT? THE COMMENTS, QUESTIONS.
[00:20:09]
THUNDER. WE HAVE EVERY POINT THAT I WANT TO HIT ON. I THINK THE BIGGEST ONE I THINK I GOT TO LOOK AT IS THAT IT IS ONE STORY AND THE ONE STORY WILL HELP BUFFER. WHAT'S THE REMAINING TWO UNDER 75 FT. ROUGHLY TO THE WEST THAT WILL BE DEVELOPED OUT. IF IT'S MEDICAL OF ITS RETAIL. IT'S JUST GONNA BE A GOOD BUFFER, AND, YOU KNOW, ONE STORY BUILDING BACKING UP TO THE RESIDENTIAL. I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THIS AND VADEN IN FAVOR AS WELL. OTHERS. MAKE A MOTION TO PROVE THE ITEM FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. EMOTION MEMBERS TO MILLIONS ARE TO APPROVE. THE ISSUE P REQUEST AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND SECOND BY MR LEBOW. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY THIS MOTION IS APPROVED IN THE AUTUMN WILL BE SENT TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. UM AT THE MARCH 7 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND THIS WILL HAVE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. MARCH 7 2023. NEXT ITEM IS 22-0022 S. U P[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit to Allow for Telecommunications Tower Uses, Located on the South Side of Collin McKinney Parkway and Approximately 1,250 Feet East of Piper Glen Road]
THREE A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER USES. THIS IS ONLY SOUTH SIDE OF COLUMN. MCKINNEY PARKWAY. 150 FT EAST OF PIPER GLEN ROAD. THANK YOU BEFORE I GET STARTED. I DIDN'T WANT TO MENTION THAT I PASSED OUT A CITIZEN COMMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED REQUEST THAT WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE PACKET FOR CITY COUNCIL WHEN THAT IS FORWARDED. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS BEING PROPOSED TO ALLOW FOR HIGH RISE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COLUMN, MCKINNEY PARKWAY AND DIRECTLY WEST OF THE TP, TPC CRAIG RANCH GOLF COURSE. PROPOSED TOWER IS A 115 FOOTMAN APPLE WITH A FOUR FT LIGHTNING ROD. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING A SIX FT TALL MASONRY SCREENING WHILE WITH EVERGREEN TROUBLE AROUND THE PROPOSED TOWER AND THE ASSOCIATED GROUND EQUIPMENT. AT THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED TOWER UNTIL COMMUNICATION STRUCTURE HIGH RISE FOR NON RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 125 FT, AND IT IS REQUIRED TO BE SET BACK FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES, A DISTANCE EQUAL TO THE HEIGHT OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS STRUCTURE. WITH THIS PROPOSED REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO LOCATE THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY . WITH THIS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS ASKING TO REDUCE THAT SEPARATION THAT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM THE 115 FT TO APPROXIMATELY 30 FT. UM. LOCATING THE TOWER IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER WOULD ALSO ALLOW FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY TO DEVELOP WITH THE COMMERCIAL USES. THE LOCATION OF THE TOWER IS APPROXIMATELY 230 FT, AWAY FROM THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY SO TWICE THE HEIGHT OF THE TOWER. UM GIVEN THESE FACTORS STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THESE SETBACK REDUCTION REQUEST. AS A REMINDER OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996. THIS DOES LIMIT THE CITY'S AUTHORITY TO REGULATE ZONING EARLY AND USE DECISIONS ON WIRELESS. UM SERVICE FACILITIES FOR THINGS SUCH AS DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PROVIDERS OR MAKING DECISIONS BASED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ON PROPOSED ARE SUPPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OR HEALTH.EFFECTS OF THE RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS. STAFF HAS EVALUATED THE REQUESTS BASED ON THE SPECIFIC USE CRITERIA AND FEELS THAT THE PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER LOCATION SHOULD NOT INTERFERE OR NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS. THE PROPOSED TOWERS BEING PROPOSED AS I MENTIONED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD AGAIN ALLOW FOR THAT REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY DEVELOPED AS COMMERCIAL USES, UM AND AGAIN IS TWICE THE HEIGHT IS LOCATED TWICE THE HEIGHT AND DISTANCE FROM THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. WITH THESE THINGS IN MIND STAFF RECOMMENDS A PROPOSED APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE OF REQUEST STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN QUESTIONS ANYONE? THANK YOU. APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN COX MY NAME IS JAY GROGAN. 28. OH EIGHT FAIR AMOUNT IN DALLAS. UM MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. I AM HERE ON BEHALF OF THE SALESMANSHIP CLUB HAVE BEEN A MEMBER FOR 20 YEARS AND I'M HERE TO SOLVE SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS
[00:25:03]
WHEN WE WANT TO SOLVE A PROBLEM FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IMPROVE CELL COVERAGE OUT THERE SECOND.I WANT TO MAKE MY TITLE SPONSOR 18 T HAPPY SO THAT THEIR EXECUTIVES CAN USE THEIR PHONES WHEN THEY GET OUT TO THAT GOLF TOURNAMENT. AND THIRD AND LAST WE WANT TO WE WANT TO TRY TO CREATE A LITTLE EXTRA BENEFIT FOR THE FOR THE KIDS AND THE FAMILIES THAT WE SERVE AT THE SALESMANSHIP CLUB AND TAKING THIS ASSET, CREATING A LITTLE REVENUE MAKING CELL COVERAGE BETTER, WE THINK IS A WIN FOR EVERYBODY. UM LOVE TO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANKS TO CAITLIN AND HER STAFF ARE WORKING WITH US SO CAREFULLY, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE FORGOT OUR SIGNAGE LAST TIME, SO THANK YOU ALL FOR STAYING WITH US. THIS IS SALESMANSHIP CLUB OVER THE A LOT. WE DO INTERESTING. WE OWN IT THROUGH THROUGH IT THROUGH A DIFFERENT ENERGY. YES. THE DISTANCE. THIS TOWER WILL SERVE AS APPROXIMATELY HOW FAR MOST OF THESE TOWERS. WHAT ABOUT A MILE AND A HALF? THAT'S KIND OF A NORMAL COVERAGE, JUST KIND OF A RULE OF THUMB WOULD COVER ALL THE CRAIG RANCH CORPORATE OFFICE CENTER. VERY IMPORTANTLY, IT WILL COVER THE CRAIG RANCH CORPORATE OFFICE CENTER. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. AUTUMN IF YOU'VE COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED ISSUE. P.
PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT QUICK NOTE. WE DID RECEIVE CORRESPONDENCE THROUGH THE CITIZEN'S PORTAL. PLEASE KNOW THAT YOUR UM LETTER WILL BE GOING TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS PART OF OUR MINUTES. ALL RIGHT. I'LL MAKE A MOTION. TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND APPROVED.
CASE 220022 S U P THREE EMOTIONAL, MR LOBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE OTTOMANS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. WOULD HAVE SECONDS EMOTION. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY? YEAH. THE MOTION CARRIES THE AUTUMN WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FEBRUARY 21. 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND IT WILL HAVE A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. THE
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Located on the Northeast Corner of Carlisle Street and Virginia Parkway]
NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS TO TWO DAYS. 0145 Z. PUBLIC HEARING. UH. TO ROOT CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM PLANE DEVELOPMENT PD THIS IS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CARLISLE STREET AND VIRGINIA PARKWAY. MR BENNETT. YES THANK YOU AGAIN, MR CHAIRMAN COMMISSION. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CARLISLE ROAD IN VIRGINIA PARKWAY FROM PD TWO. PT THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IS RELATIVELY SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING ZONING OF THE PROPERTY. THE MAIN CHANGES TO THE ZONING ARE THE PROPOSED HEIGHT AND DENSITY. WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE EXISTING MAXIMUM HIGH ALLOWED IS THREE STORIES AND 43 FT AND THE MAXIMUM DENSITY IS 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. AS PROPOSED. THE NEW ZONING WOULD PERMIT FOUR STORIES AT 55 FT AND 34 UNITS PER ACRE ON SUBJECT PROPERTY.THE M F 30 ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH WAS APPROVED AS PART OF THE UDC IN NOVEMBER, ALLOWS A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 30 UNITS PER ACRE AND MANY OF THE EXISTING NON URBAN MULTI FAMILY PRODUCTS THAT WE SEE LAND BETWEEN 22 28 UNITS PER ACRE JUST FOR COMPARISON. UM HOWEVER, THERE ARE SOME PARTS OF THE CITY SUCH AS CRAIG RANCH AND NEAR THE MCKINNEY TOWN CENTER, WHERE WE DO SEE SOME HIGHER DENSITIES AND THERE'S IN THOSE AREAS. DUE TO THE PROPOSED DENSITY STAFF IS UNABLE TO OFFER A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AT THIS LOCATION . STAFF WOULD ALSO LIKE TO NOTE THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS RECENTLY RE ZONED IN FEBRUARY OF 2022. AS PART OF THAT 2022 REZONING THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY PROPOSED TO MIX OF COMMERCIAL AND MULTI FAMILY USES , WITH THE DENSITY OF 34 UNITS PER ACRE AND MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OF 55 FT. WHICH IS WHAT THEY'RE CURRENTLY PROPOSING. HOWEVER IT IS ON THE ENTIRE TRACK AND NO LONGER HAS THOSE COMMERCIAL USE IS ON THE FRONTAGE. WITH THE APPLICANTS. CONCURRENCY COUNCIL ULTIMATELY APPROVED THE 2022 ZONING, UM GOING DOWN TO THE THREE STORIES AT 43 FT IN HEIGHT AND, UM, ONLY 24 UNITS BREAKER, AND THEY DID THAT ACROSS THE ENTIRE SITE AS A OPPOSED TO THE COMMERCIAL USES ALONG VIRGINIA.
SO MY WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU, JAKE. QUESTIONS OF MR
[00:30:07]
BENNETT. YES SIR. UM I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S QUESTIONS BUT TRYING TO RECAP BECAUSE WE'VE GOT HISTORY WITH US ALMOST TWO YEAR TO THE DATE AS FAR AS THIS SO THIS TRACK CAME BEFORE US AND IT WAS FOUR STORY IN THE BACK COMMERCIAL TO THE FRONT. THAT'S CORRECT. THIS BODY APPROVED THAT SENDING IT TO CITY COUNCIL WITH JUST THE COMMENT OF POTENTIALLY LOOKING AT REMOVING THE COMMERCIAL AND TAKING IT TO THREE STORY THAT'S CORRECT. CITY COUNCIL OF THE MEETING I REWATCHED ALMOST A YEAR AGO, I GUESS TO 15 UM THE APARTMENTS, APARTMENTS OF THIS OF THE SIX COUNCIL MEMBERS SPOKE RELATED TO THE ITEM APARTMENTS ARE NOT THE ISSUE. THE QUESTION WAS, WHETHER THEY'RE GOING TO KEEP COMMERCIAL GO THREE STORY INSTEAD OF FOUR STORY. SOME OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS NOTED THAT THEY HAD NO ISSUES WITH FOUR STORY SOME HEAVY ISSUES GOING FOUR STORY KEEPING COMMERCIAL THERE IS NOTHING RELATED TOWARDS THAT WAS QUOTED I SOURCE FOR HIS NEGATIVE APARTMENT. BUT THE DENSITY AND STORAGE SEEMED VERY AMONG THE COUNCIL. THE CURRENT COUNCIL IS THE SAME COUNCIL THAT HEARD IT LAST TIME AND THERE WAS A MIX OF BACK AND FORTH, BUT NO DEFINITIVE THING, BUT AT THAT TIME IT WAS THOUGHT THE PROJECT WOULD WORK AND JUST THREE STORY NO COMMERCIAL. THAT'S CORRECT. THREE STORY NO COMMERCIAL ACROSS THE ENTIRETY OF THE TRACT. UM THAT VOTE WAS 5 TO 2 IN FAVOR OF THAT PRODUCT, AS OPPOSED TO THE FOUR STORY 55 FT 34 UNITS PER ACRE WITH ON JUST A PORTION OF THE TRACK 3.5 ACRES WITH THE FRONT ACRE AND A HALF AS COMMERCIAL USES, SO THEY DECIDED TO GET RID OF THE COMMERCIAL USES AND GO DOWN TO THREE STORIES DOWN TO 24 UNITS BREAKER ACROSS THE ENTIRE TRACKING, AND SO KEEPING THAT COMMERCIAL WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW ABOUT WHAT COUNCIL MEMBERS WOULD FINALLY APPROVE WHETHER THEY ARE COMPLETELY AGAINST FOUR STORY OR NOT. CONSIDERING THE FACT THAT WAS KIND OF A NEGOTIATION AT THE PODIUM AT THAT TIME, AS FAR AS THAT GOES MANY WERE FOR SEEMED EVEN GOING WITH THE FOUR STORY NOT AN ISSUE, CONSIDERING THE AMOUNT THE COUNCIL'S TALKED ABOUT THE NEED FOR THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT AND AFFORDABILITY AND DIVERSITY WITHIN THE CITY RELATED TO HOUSING, SO IT WAS JUST DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW WHAT THE FINAL APPROVAL WOULD HAVE BEEN IF ONLY FOUR STORY WAS AN OPTION. THAT'S CORRECT. OK SO THE COUNCIL HAS SEEN THIS BEFORE THEY HAVE APPROVED IT AS APARTMENTS. THEY HAVE APPROVED IT AS APARTMENTS. BUT WITH THIS PROPOSAL THAT IS GOING UP TO THE FOUR STORIES AND 34 UNITS BREAKER, AS OPPOSED TO THREE STORIES THAT 24 AND I GET, SO SEE IT AGAIN IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS AND GET THE COMMENT AGAIN. YES. ANYONE ELSE HAVE COMMENTS? QUESTIONS, MR BENNETT? JAKE THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. CLICK IT HERE TONIGHT. MR CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I'M BOB ROEDER 1700 RED BUDS SUITE 300 MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT WHO IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPER OF THIS PROPERTY AND WAS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPER WHEN WE BROUGHT THIS THROUGH THE LAST TIME UNLIKE THE WAY I USUALLY APPROACH THESE THESE CASES I WANT TO START WITH A MACRO, SET OF MACRO COMMENTS HERE. THIS IS A VERY SMALL SITE. IT'S A LITTLE OVER FIVE ACRES. BUT IT CAN HAVE AN OUTSIZED IMPACT. ON OUR COMMUNITY. WHEN WE BROUGHT THE PROJECT TO YOUR LAST TIME. THIS WAS PLANNED TO BE A 9% TAX CREDIT PROJECT THAT HAD A VARIETY. OF TYPES OF APARTMENTS THAT WOULD LEASE ANYWHERE FROM MARKET VALUE DOWN TO 60% OF AVERAGE MEDIAN INCOME, WHICH WE CALL AM I BUT THERE WAS NO REQUIREMENT THAT YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC NUMBER. UM THAT WAS APPEALING, BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD A HOUSING STUDY DONE IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THAT SAYS WE ARE WOEFULLY SHORT. ON WHAT WE CALL WORKFORCE, HOUSING OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THIS PROJECT AND THIS LOCATION WAS PLANNED TO SOLVE THAT ISSUE OR PARTIALLY SOLVED THAT ISSUE. THE APPROVAL OF THE TAX CREDIT. UH PORTION DIDN'T MAKE. AND SO MY CLIENT HAS STAYED WITH THE PROJECT. AND NOW HAS GOTTEN APPROVED FOR A 4% TAX CREDIT PROJECT. WHICH MEANS THAT 100% OF THE UNITS THAT ARE PLANNED FOR THIS SITE. WILL BE OFFERED AT THE 60% AM I WHICH IS A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN THE[00:35:04]
PRICE OF BEING ABLE TO LIVE IN THIS COMPLEX. IN ADDITION IN ORDER TO QUALIFY ABOUT TWO THIRDS OF THESE UNITS UNDER THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE TWO BEDROOM, TWO BATH OR THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH, SO IT'S DESIGNED PRIMARILY FOR FAMILIES. WORKING FAMILIES. THAT'S THE MACRO FIVE ACRE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OUR HOUSING PROBLEM IN MCKINNEY. THE DETAILS ARE THESE. TODAY WE ARE UNDER A NEW CODE THAT YOU THAT THE COUNCIL ADOPTED IN NOVEMBER OF THIS LAST YEAR. AND UNDER THAT NEW CODE. THEY HAVE A SINGLE MULTI FAMILY CATEGORY CALLED M F 30. AND UNDER THE M F 30. THE DENSITY THAT IS PERMITTED AS A MATTER OF RIGHT.IS 30 UNITS TO THE ACRE. UNLIKE WHAT WE HAD BACK BEFORE THE CODE PASSED, WHICH WAS 24 UNITS TO THE ACRE. SO IF WE WERE TO COME IN TONIGHT WITH A STRAIGHT ZONING REQUEST ON THIS PROPERTY WE TAKE THE FIVE POINT OH 83 ACRES, WE WOULD BE ENTITLED TO 152 UNITS UNDER THE CURRENT CODE. NOT 220 THAT WAS APPROVED BEFORE BUT 100 AND 52 UNITS. WHAT WE'RE ASKING TO DO IS TO EXTEND THE NUMBER OF UNITS FROM 152. 100 AND 72 OR WERE SEEKING TO ADD ONLY 20 UNITS. TO WHAT WOULD BE APPROVED OR WHAT WE WOULD BE ENTITLED TO UNDER THE M F 30. SMALL NUMBER OF UNITS AND MAKES A BIG IMPACT. WHEN YOU GO TO FIGURE THE NUMBER OF UNITS PER ACRE. BECAUSE WHEN WE'RE ONLY DEALING WITH FIVE ACRES AS OUR BASE, AND YOU ADD 20 UNITS THAT BUMPS IT FROM 30 TO 34 UNITS. THE DIFFERENCE IS TWO THIRDS OF AN ACRE. IF WE HAD TWO THIRDS OF AN ACRE, MORE PROPERTY HERE. WE COULD GET 172 UNITS AT 30 MINUTES TO THE ACRE. BUT WE DON'T HAVE THAT LUXURY, SO WE'RE SEEKING TO EXPAND THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT WE WOULD BE ALLOWED UNDER THE M F. 30 BY 20. IT'S IMPORTANT IN THESE KINDS OF PROJECTS THAT YOU HAVE ENOUGH OPEN SPACE. TO PROVIDE THE AMENITIES THAT FAMILIES REQUIRED . YOU HAVE TO HAVE OPEN PLAYGROUNDS. YOU HAVE TO HAVE SWIMMING. YOU HAVE TO HAVE A NUMBER OF THOSE THINGS AND WE'RE PROVIDING. WE'RE PROPOSING TO PROVIDE MORE AMENITIES. THEN WHAT ARE REQUIRED AS THE MINIMUMS UNDER THE CODE. BUT IN ORDER FOR US TO KEEP THAT OPEN SPACE AND MAKE THIS A GOOD HABITABLE PLACE. FOR THE WORKING CLASS THAT THIS IS DESIGNED TO SUPPORT WE NEED TO GO TO FOUR STORIES. YEAH, THE DIFFERENCE.
YES, BASICALLY 10 FT. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 45 FT. AND 55. FT IS WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR.
AND I'LL NOTE THAT UNDER THE YOUR NEW CODE, THE MF 30 DOESN'T HAVE A NUMBER OF STORIES LIMITATIONS. IT ONLY HAS A NUMBER OF FEET LIMITATIONS, SO IT'S NOT LIMITED TO THREE STORIES. IT'S LIMITED TO 45 FT. THE REALITY IS WHEN YOU START MEASURING ITES OF A OF APARTMENT PROJECTS. AH YOU KNOW, YOU'RE GONNA PROBABLY FOR WHAT WE'RE WANTING TO DO. WE'RE GOING TO COME IN SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 51 53 FT IN HEIGHT. BUT WE'RE SEEKING TO HAVE 55 BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE FIELD. SO I GUESS MY PROPOSAL TO YOU IS VERY SIMPLE.
WEAKENING WELL, LET ME LET ME ADD ONE OTHER THING. THERE HAS BEEN AN INITIATIVE AND EACH OF YOU HAVE PARTICIPATED IN IT, AT LEAST IN THE ZONING CASES THAT BROUGHT THROUGH IN THE LAST YEAR OR YEAR AND A HALF WHERE WE'RE SEEKING TO HAVE THE MARKET RATE. APARTMENT PROJECTS SET ASIDE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE. OF THEIR UNITS. FOR A 60% AM I AH, OPPORTUNITY. BUT TRADITIONALLY THAT HAS BEEN SOMEWHERE AROUND 5. SO IF WE HAD A 300 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX. THAT IS PRETTY TYPICAL OF WHAT YOU SEE. THAT'S NOT THE URBAN HIGH RISE. 5% OF THAT IS ONLY 15 UNITS.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF NEW APARTMENT COMPLEXES THAT MARKET RAID WE'RE TAKING 5% OR EVEN 10% OF THOSE AND DEPLOY THEM FOR A SAFETY PERCENT. I AM I VERSUS THIS 15 ACRE TRACK. WE CAN GET 72 UNITS. ALL AT ONE TIME. SO AGAIN, I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE MACRO ARGUMENT. THE MACRO ARGUMENT IS QUITE SIMPLY THIS. THIS IS A VERY SMALL PROJECT. IT CAN HAVE A VERY OUTSIZED IMPACT ON THE BENEFIT OF THE ENTIRE CITY. LET ME STOP THERE, AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY DETAILS OR OTHER QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. THANK YOU, MR ROEDER. QUESTIONS OF THE
[00:40:05]
TICKET. YEAH HAS THERE BEEN ANY ANY LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF ADDITIONAL HEIGHT AT THAT LOCATION? I'M NOT SURE. WHAT FROM THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES FROM THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES WOULD BE THE VIEW. WELL THE PROPERTY IS, THE STAFF REPORT NOTED, IS SURROUNDED BY IT'S GOT THE LUTHERAN CHURCH TO THE WEST ACROSS THE STREET. IT'S GOT A CHURCH TO THE NORTH. IT'S GOT A CHURCH AND A VACANT LAND TO THE SOUTH ACROSS VIRGINIA STREET. INTO THE INTO THE EAST OR THOSE OLD EXISTING APARTMENT UNITS THAT ARE PROBABLY 40 YEARS OLD OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. WE WE REALLY HAVEN'T CONSIDERED, UH AND NOR HAVE WE HAD ANY COMMENTS FROM THE NEIGHBORS ABOUT THAT, CREATING AN ADVERSE IMPACT. AND FURTHER TO YOUR QUESTION ABOUT IMPACTS. WE HAVE DONE A TRAFFIC STUDY ON THE DIFFERENCE THAT GOING TO 100 AND 72 UNITS MAKES OVER EVEN OUR 120 UNITS THAT WE HAD IN OUR PRIOR PROJECT. AND WHAT THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS IS THAT WE HAVE INCREASED THE TRAFFIC. I AM PEAK HOURS. WE'VE INCREASED THE NUMBER OF CARS BY 19. PMP TRAFFIC. WE'VE INCREASED THE NUMBER OF CARS BY 22. SO IN MY WORLD, THAT'S A MINIMUS CHANGE. THANK YOU. SO LET'S TALK ABOUT IT 60% AM I CAN YOU GIVE US A DESCRIPTION OF WHAT? 60% YOU KNOW WHAT? THAT DOLLAR RANGES TODAY? SO WE CAN KIND OF CALCULATE WHAT TYPE OF EMPLOYEE WOULD LIVE HERE? I CAN'T. BUT LET ME INVITE THE DEVELOPER MR WHO'S UP HERE? IF THAT'S OKAY, LET HIM GIVE YOU THAT DETAIL, OKAY? OKAY? GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. TOM, WHO THE PRESIDENT CEO PLAYED IN USA 1, 34 55 NOEL ROAD. DALLAS. SORRY ABOUT THAT. SO THE QUESTION REGARDING OUR INCOME LEVELS AT THIS 60% OF AM I LET'S START OFF AND TALKING ABOUT THE RENT STRUCTURES. SO WHEN WE CAME HERE ALMOST EXACTLY A YEAR AGO, RIGHT , TRYING TO GET APPROVAL FOR THE REZONING FOR 120 UNIT DEAL WE WENT BACK AND FORTH ON IS A FOUR STORY THREE STORY 433 STORY WITH THE COUNCIL. YOU KNOW IT TOOK A WHILE TO LAND WHERE WE LANDED, RIGHT? WE WERE UNSUCCESSFUL AND GETTING APPROVAL FOR THAT TRANSACTION. UNFORTUNATELY, WHY IS THAT BECAUSE IT DIDN'T SCORE HIGH ENOUGH. THIS IS UNDER 9% PROGRAM. IT'S A VERY COMPETITIVE PROGRAM. AND THEY ONLY ALLOCATE AND OUR NORTH TEXAS REGION ABOUT 11 OR 12 DEALS. OKAY WE WERE LIKE, RIGHT ON THE BUBBLE. WE DID NOT GET AWARDED. SO WE KNOW THE NEED FOR WORKFORCE HOUSING IN OUR CITY IS TREMENDOUS. WE SAID WE'VE GOT TO FIND ANOTHER WAY TO GET THIS DONE. OKAY WE'RE TENACIOUS ABOUT WHAT WE DO. WE PUT A VERY HIGH END PRODUCT. AND WE SAID TO OURSELVES, WHY DON'T WE DO THE SAME THING THAT WE DID IN ANOTHER CITY? ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO? THE SAME THING HAPPENED WHERE THE SITE FOR A 9% TRANSACTION. WE DIDN'T GET AWARDED. AND SO WE SAID WE GOTTA FIGURE THIS OUT. WE GOT TO GET THIS DONE. MET WITH THE CITY, THE CITY, SAID GENIUS YOUR GENIUS, OKAY? AND IN FACT, YOU'RE GONNA BE ABLE TO PUT MORE UNITS ON THE GROUND THAN YOU WERE BEFORE. YEAH, EXACTLY. THEY SAID THIS IS AMAZING. OKAY, THIS IS AMAZING. SO BEFORE HERE. MCKINNEY 120 UNITS. NOW WE CAN PUT MORE UNITS ON THE GROUND 172 UNITS. AT FOUR STORY ALL THAT 60% OF AM I. NO MARKET RATE UNITS. WE HAVE ENOUGH MARKET RATE UNITS IN OUR CITY. $2 SQUARE FOOT RENTS. TO 10 SQUARE FOOT RANTS. DAVID'S GETTING THAT AND CRAIG RANCH TODAY. OKAY THAT'S VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE. SO FOR OUR OUR UNITS AT THE 6% AM I FOR A ONE BEDROOM. IT'S STILL NOT CHEAP. OKAY, IT'S STILL NOT CHEAP. FOR ONE BEDROOM STILL GOING TO BE $1000 A MONTH. OKAY? AND THEY CALL THIS WORKFORCE HOUSING RIGHT? OKAY BUT IT'S HALF THE PRICE OF THE MARKET RATE UNITS COST. OKAY SO WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE? THIS IS ON AN INCOME LEVEL, DEPENDING ON ON YOUR FAMILY SIZE, YOU COULD HAVE INCOMES RANGING FROM 45,000 TO 70,000. AND YOU COULD LIVE HERE. OKAY, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE BENEFITING HERE. IT'S A SMALL[00:45:02]
DENSITY INCREASES BOB SO ELOQUENTLY EXPLAINED WHICH I DON'T KNOW HOW HE DOES WHAT HE DOES, BUT BUT HE DOES, AND HE DOES A VERY GOOD JOB OF DOING WHAT IT DOES. OKAY SO IT'S A SMALL INCREASE IN DENSITY. THAT'S ALL WE'RE ASKING FOR. YES. IS THERE A DRAWING OF ANY ANY TYPE THAT YOU HAVE OF THIS PROJECT? DO YOU HAVE THE RENDERING DO I'M ALWAYS RELUCTANT TO SHOW HIM BECAUSE YOU KNOW YOU DON'T MAKE YOUR DECISIONS BASED UPON THEIR HAPPY TO GIVE YOU WHAT I BROUGHT. BUT I WILL TELL YOU THIS, UH, DR LEBO. THIS PROJECT WILL BE ONE IN WHICH. AS THE GENERAL PARTNER. FIELD OF THE PROJECT. AND I BELIEVE THIS IS AN ELEVATION THAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THEM. SO IT'S A I THINK IT'S VERY GOOD LOOKING HE WOULD NEVER SUSPECT THAT TO BE A WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT. WHAT'S THE SETBACKS IN VIRGINIA FOR IT? THE REQUIRED, I THINK IS 20 FT ARE SETBACKS OVER 50. CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE RELATIONSHIP OF MCKINNEY HOUSING AUTHORITY? THEY'RE GONNA IN THE LAND OR THEY JUST FINANCING PARTNER. HOW DOES HOW DOES THAT DO IS DESCRIBE A TYPICAL PROJECT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IS PRESENTLY BEING NEGOTIATED WITH HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, SO I CAN'T . I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR THEM. BUT THE TYPICAL STRUCTURE IS THE WAY THAT THESE THINGS ARE ABLE TO COME IN UNDER MARKET RIGHTS IS THEY BECOME NOT TAXABLE. THEY GET EXEMPT FROM ADVIL ON TAX AND THE WAY YOU DO THAT IS YOU HAVE THE LAND OWNED BY THE HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, SO THE DEVELOPER BUYS IRELAND GIVES IT TO THE HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION OR CONTRIBUTES TO THE PROJECT. HOUSING HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION ACTING ACTS AS THE GENERAL PARTNER OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SO THEY HAVE THE CONTROL AND THOSE ARE THE TWO COMPONENTS THAT IT TAKES TO QUALIFY THIS AS A QUOTE. NON PROFIT. ORGANIZATION, OKAY? THE DEVELOPER THEN WOULD ACT AS THE LIMITED PARTNER. AND WOULD BASICALLY WHATEVER MONEY IS NOT PROVIDED THROUGH THE SALE OF TAX CREDITS OR THROUGH THE FINANCE CORPORATIONS DEBT. THE DEVELOPER WOULD PUT UP THE EQUITY. AND ACCESS TO THE G. C AND THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF IT GOING FORWARD, THEN? YES. FATHER I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE MASONRY SCREEN BEING REPLACED WITH A TUBULAR STEEL FENCES. WHAT THIS SAYS. I THINK WE WENT BACK TO A MASONRY SCREEN. I'M NOT SURE THAT YOU HAVE THE LATEST LOOK AT MINE. AND I'M ALMOST CERTAIN THAT WE DID. YES NUMBER SEVEN, AT LEAST IN THE LAST SET OF DEVELOPMENT REGULATION SAYS A SIX FT TALL MASONRY WALL BE ALONG THE REAR INSIDE PROPERTY LINES. WE DON'T HAVE THAT. THAT'S. THAT'S MY BAD THEN. SO I JUST DIDN'T PUT THE NEWEST ONE. THEY'RE IN THERE, BUT IT IS A SIX MONTH OLD MASONRY SCREENING DEVICES. ISSUES. THE NEWS. TRYING TO GET AWAY WITH THE DOCTOR, BUT THEY WOULDN'T LET WAS READING OFF THE LETTER OF INTENT. OTHER QUESTIONS. COMMENTS ANYONE? THANK YOU, MR ROEDER. THANK YOU. AND THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. AUTUMN IF YOU'VE COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS, UM, PROPOSED REZONED, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. HILDA FAR 14 OH NINE SANCTUARY LANE. IN MCKINNEY AND I AM ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE CHURCH IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH. THE CHURCH WAS BUILT IN 1985 AND HAS BEEN CONSISTENT. PLACE OF WORSHIP, AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW FROM THE DEVELOPERS. WHAT DISTANCE WITH THE NEAREST STRUCTURE. BE. TO THAT SIDE OF OUR CHURCH. AND I DIDN'T HEAR ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT. NOT NECESSARILY OPPOSED TO ANY OF IT. AH! THREE STORIES SOUNDS BETTER THAN FOUR STORIES IS JUST . FOR WHAT I THINK APPEARANCE MIGHT BE, BUT IT WOULD CERTAINLY, UH TOWER OVER UM, OUR CHURCH. NOT NECESSARILY YEAH. RECONSTRUCTION THAT LUTHERANS[00:50:03]
HAVE DONE ACROSS THE STREET. BECAUSE IT'S A WAY UP THERE. BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE A SOMETHING IS GOING TO GO IN THERE. AND WE CAN WONDERED ABOUT WHAT IT WAS. FOR MANY YEARS AND HAVE REGRETTED BECAUSE AT THE TIME THIS WAS PURCHASED BY OUR CHURCH, WE COULD HAVE BOUGHT THE WHOLE THING FOR 40,000. GOOD AND SO THE LEADERS AT THAT TIME I DIDN'T SEE ANY NEED TO OR EVERYTHING THAT ANYTHING WOULD EVER DEVELOP. BUT ANYWAY, IT CERTAINLY HAS. AND I KNOW SOMETHING'S COMING. AND IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO HAVE APARTMENTS AND COMMERCIAL SURROUNDED BY THE OTHER APARTMENTS IN THE CHURCHES. AND I JUST WANTED TO KNOW IF I COULD GET A DISTANCE BEFORE THAT, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FENCE OR WHATEVER HE'S GONNA BUILD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS FAR. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE ONE SECOND HOLD ON ONE SECOND.ANYONE ELSE HERE TONIGHT? THAT WOULD LIKE TO, UM, SPEAK ON THIS PROPOSED REZA.
CHAIRMAN. COMMISSIONERS I'M DAVID CRAIG 68 50, TPC DRIVE, SUITE ONE. OH, FIVE. MCKINNEY, TEXAS. 75070. I'M SPEAKING TO YOU TONIGHT BECAUSE I PUT THE PARTNERS IN THIS PROPERTY. I NO LONGER HAVE OWNERSHIP IN IT. IN 1983. AND YOU'RE RIGHT, MY DEAR. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. HAS NEVER BEEN VIABLE FOR THIS PROPERTY, AND, UH AND WE HAVE BEEN GREAT NEIGHBORS TO THREE CHURCHES, NOT JUST ONE TO THE NORTH. UM BUT NOW WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY. TO SELL TO SOMEONE THAT'S GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN OUR COMMUNITY. YES I'VE AGED ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I WANT TO ACCOMPLISH IN LIFE. IS TO BE ABLE TO HELP PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND YOU CAN CALL THAT WORKFORCE HOUSING, BUT I WILL TELL YOU THE WORKFORCE HOUSING IS CLASS A PRODUCT. YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A UNIT UM, THAT DOESN'T HAVE IN A MY 60% AM I IS THIS DOES BUT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR. PEOPLE OF 45,000 TO 125,000. UM SALARY. HOUSING OF THIS QUALITY IS SOMETHING SPECIAL. AND IT'S NEEDED IN THIS COMMUNITY. UM 20 UNITS IS WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. UM AND I WOULD HOPE THAT WE COULD ACCOMPLISH THIS. FROM THIS BODY. I'M GRATEFUL FOR YOUR EFFORTS. AND YOUR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR CRAIG. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE AND WE APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY AS WELL. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM? CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MR MAN'S I CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. THINK ABOUT MR WOODRUFF. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
OKAY THE MOTION CARRIES THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED, WILL NOW I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS OF THE STAFFING OF THE APPLICANT. UH, OKAY. WELL, IF WE HAVE THE APPLICANT TALK ABOUT A POTENTIAL SITE PLAN VERY GOOD. MR ROEDER, IF YOU OR YOUR, UM FIRST YEAR SITTING BY. UH MRS FAR, THE CLOSEST BUILDING WILL BE ABOUT 85 FT. INSIDE THE FENCE INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE. JUST TO GIVE YOU A SENSE OF SCALE. THERE WILL BE A 10 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THEN THERE WILL BE, UH, A ROW OF PARKING. AND THEN THERE'LL BE A FIRE LINE AND THEN ANOTHER ROW OF PARKING AND THEN SIDEWALKS AND WHATNOT BEFORE THE BUILDINGS START. AND THE MAJORITY OF THE BUILDINGS ARE ALONG THE CARLISLE STREET SIDE. IT'S AN L SHAPED STRUCTURE. SO WHERE YOUR CHURCHES MOST OF YOUR CHURCH IS NOT GONNA REALLY SEE ANY UM, BUILDINGS WITHIN THAT DISTANCE. THERE ARE OTHER
[00:55:01]
QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. WELL, WE HAVE THEM UP HERE. SO ALL OF THE INTEREST TOO. THE BUILDINGS WILL BE OFF OF CARLISLE CORRECT. THERE ARE TWO ENTRANCES. MR WHITELEY, THE MAIN INFERENCES OFF OF CARLISLE. THERE'S THERE IS A RIGHT IN RIGHT ALCOHOL OF VIRGINIA STREET, BUT THERE'S NOT A MEDIUM THERE. SO THAT WOULD BE A SECONDARY ENTRANCE. BUT CARLISLE WILL BE THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. SO CAN YOU KIND OF SHOW ME ON THIS MAP WHERE THE RIGHT IN AND RIGHT OUT ON GOING TO BE. IT WILL BE RIGHT AROUND IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER IS THE RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT. IN THE MAIN ENTRANCE WILL BE UP HERE IN THE NORTHWEST AREA. ANYONE ELSE? OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. MR FARR. WHAT WE'LL DO IS WHEN WE GET THROUGH. WE'LL HAVE SOMEONE SAW YOUR HAND. COME UP. WE'LL HAVE SOMEONE GET YOUR QUESTION ANSWERED, OKAY. YES, MA'AM. I MEAN, WE'VE SEEN THIS CASE A YEAR AGO, UM AND CITY COUNCIL SAW THE CASE. I THINK THE ONLY THING THAT COMES IN QUESTION OUT THERE IS A THREE STORY FOR STORY AND THAT WOULD QUITE CLEAR THROUGH THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS THEIR PREFERENCE. AS FAR AS THAT GOES, IT'S GOING TO BE THE SAME COUNCIL THAT SAW IT LAST YEAR, SO I HAVE NO OBJECTIONS HERE BECAUSE AN ULTIMATE DECISIONS CAN BE MADE BY THE ELECTED OFFICIALS ON OUR COUNCIL RELATED TO THIS. IT'S A NEEDED PRODUCT THAT THEY'VE DISCUSSED THEMSELVES. UM EVER. I WOULD PREFER THREE STORIES OVER FOUR STORIES, BUT I ALSO WOULD PREFER EVERY SELF STORAGE UNIT B ONE STORY INSTEAD OF THREE STORIES WHERE WE SEE AND FOR OUR TALLEST BUILDINGS TO BE SELF STORAGE IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT ITSELF. BUT UM, SO IT'S JUST COMING DOWN TO OPTICS THERE. I DON'T THINK THE INTENSITY OR THE DENSITY BEING ON VIRGINIA THAT CLOSE TO 75 THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT SHOWS MAKES THAT MUCH DIFFERENCE. I UNDERSTAND STAFF VIEWPOINT ON WATER. POLICY IS AND WHAT WE HAVE APPROVED, BUT IT IS A SMALL FIVE ACRE SITE AND THERE'S NOT TOO MANY PLACES THAT THROUGH MARKET YOU CAN AFFORD TO DO WORKFORCE HOUSING OR THAT YOU CAN ACTUALLY DO IT AND NOT BE UP AGAINST RESIDENTIAL. AND HAVE EVEN A LARGER THAN THE BATTLE OF BUILDING CONFIDENCE IN WHAT'S GOING TO BE THERE AND BUT THAT IT NEEDS. I'M SUPPORTIVE OF SENDING IT UP WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO COUNSEL AND HAVING THEM MAKE THE ULTIMATE DECISION AS TO DENSITY AND THREE STORY FOR STORY. I WOULD CONCUR WITH MR MAN'S I, YOU KNOW, UH, I GOT THE FUN OF BEING LEADERSHIP MCKINNEY RIGHT NOW, AND WE GOT CHOSEN AS A PROJECT DIVIDED UP INTO SIX DIFFERENT PROJECTS IN MIND WAS TO FIGURE OUT ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING. IT'S BEEN A TWO MONTHS. FUN YOU KNOW, LEARNING PROCESS WITH MY GROUP, AND WE'VE MET WITH A LOT OF DIFFERENT GROUPS HERE IN MCKINNEY. AND AFFORDABLE . HOUSING IS NOT ONLY TOUGH TODAY, BUT IT'S ONLY GONNA GET TOUGHER AS IT GOES THROUGH BECAUSE OUR LAND PRICES AND CONSTRUCTION PRICES ARE GETTING UP THERE. WHERE IT'S GOING TO BE HARD TO HAVE THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT GOING FORWARD, NOT SAY IT'S IMPOSSIBLE, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE TOUGHER. AND WE HAVE A LOT OF YOU KNOW AT 60% AM I 45 TO 65,000 ROUGHLY THE RANGE. YOU KNOW YOU GOT TEACHERS, FIREMEN, YOU KNOW, YOU GOT ALL THE SERVICES THAT WE TALKED ABOUT, AND WE KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE WE EMPLOY IN THE CITY. WE NEED THEM TO HAVE A PLACE TO LIVE. AND SO AS YOU KNOW MY LEARNING LESSONS. I WON'T PREACH THEM TO ALL TO THIS, BUT, YOU KNOW, I THINK YOU KNOW FOR AN EXTRA 20 UNITS. WE COULD GET MORE EVEN BE UP FOR MORE. SO, UH, EXTRA 20 UNITS HERE. I'M DEFINITELY IN FAVOR AND MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS PRODUCT.THERE'S ANYONE ELSE. I SEE THE NEED FOR THE PRODUCT. I JUST GOT MIXED EMOTIONS ABOUT THE DENSITY AND HEIGHT. AND REALLY GIVES ME PAUSE. ABOUT THE TRAFFIC NUMBER OF CARDS COMING OUT THERE ON VIRGINIA. AND THE WAVE RIGHT NOW WE HAVE THOSE SIGNAL LIGHTS. IT'S GONNA BE TOUGH CROSSING OVER TO MAKE A LEFT TO GO BACK TO 75. SO THOSE ARE THINGS THAT GIVE ME POLICY. I DON'T KNOW WHO THAT I SUPPORTED, AND NOT UNTIL I PUSHED THE BUTTON. YEAH. THERE WILL BE A TRAFFIC STUDY AND THEN AND POTENTIAL LIGHT WILL COME UP AT ANOTHER FORMAT. ANOTHER I'M PRETTY SURE THAT'S A DECISION IS NOT IN FRONT OF US, BUT IT'S A VALID POINT. YEAH POINT WE DO HAVE A NEED ALL THE STUDIES SHOW
[01:00:04]
AND NEED FOR ATTAINABLE HOUSING. UM THE STAFF IS IN A POSITION OF HAVING A CODE AND ORDINANCE THAT THEY GO BY. DONE EXCELLENT JOB, ALL OF YOU WITH WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US. HOWEVER. THERE IS A NEED FOR ATTAINABLE HOUSING, AND THIS IS AN EXCELLENT LOCATION TO FIVE ACRE SITE. IN THIS PROJECT.WORKS WELL ON THIS SIDE. I SUPPORT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST. MR CHAIR. I JUST SAY ONE OTHER THING. I'M GLAD THIS GOES ON TO COUNSEL. YES, YEAH. ANYONE ELSE REST GIVEN THE YOU KNOW, GIVEN THE NEED AS STATED, AND ALL THE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE. I DON'T. I DON'T SEE THAT THE HEIGHT DIFFERENCES IN THIS LOCATION. RELEVANT DIFFERENCE. SO, YOU KNOW. FOR THAT REASON, I ALSO SUPPORTED. ANYONE ELSE? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE, ACTUALLY GO, SO I GUESS WOULD BE THE OPPOSITE. SO WHAT DO WE GOT TO DO HERE? RIGHT? EACH OTHER. HMM. MAKE IT MAKE A MISSION TO PROVE. BUT THE APPLICANT RECOMMENDATION OF APPLICANTS REQUEST REQUEST. EMOTION BY MR WOODRUFF TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PER APPLICANT REQUESTS. 2ND 2ND MY MINISTER. MEN'S I DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? ANY DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES BOTERO'S SIX IN FAVOR AND ONE AGAINST THE ITEM WILL BE SENT TO CITY COUNCIL. FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE MARCH 7 2023 MEETING WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. THAT IS THE LAST PUBLIC HEARING ADAM.
WE HAVE WE HAVE A FEW MORE THINGS ON OUR AGENDA. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE IS CERTAINLY HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM NOT ONLY AGENDA SO IF YOU WERE HERE. AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING IS ONLY COMMISSION. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT SEEING NONE.
[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]
STAFF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? ANY UPDATES? DO, UM SO. LEXI SCHRADER HAS ACTUALLY MOVED OVER TO OUR LONG RANGE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEAM OVER IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. HOWEVER WE NOW HAVE RODRICK PALMER, WHO IS GOING TO BE ONE OF OUR NEW DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNERS, SO YOU'LL BE SEEING MORE OF HIM. SO WELCOME, RODERICK. WELCOME TO DELTA. TO KNOW WHO HE WAS VERY GOOD. ANYTHING ELSE? MR ARNOLD, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FOR US? OKAY, MEMBERS, ANYTHING. MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MOTION TO ADJOURN. STILL ABO SECOND NINE. I MR. WOODRUFF IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON ADJOURNING ON VALENTINE'S NIGHT? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. HMM. MOTION CARRIES IT IS* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.