Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:02]

OKAY WE'LL GO AHEAD AND START WELCOME TO THE STRATEGIC PRIORITIZATION SESSION. WE'RE

[Discuss Prioritization of the City Council Strategic Goals]

CITY COUNCIL MEETING. WE'RE IN THE CITY HALL AND, UH, AND IT IS EIGHT OH, FOUR. OH, NO. YOU'RE FRIDAY THE WHAT IS TODAY, 17. MARCH HAPPY PATRICK'S DAY. AND THEN I'LL JUST TURN THE TIME OVER TO PAUL GRIMES. OUR CITY MANAGER. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. GOOD MORNING COUNCIL. STAFF THAT ARE HERE. OF COURSE, THIS IS THE SECOND OF THE TWO STEP PROCESS THAT WAS ADOPTED LAST YEAR FOR THE FIRST TIME IS A TWO STEP PROCESS AS PART OF OUR STRATEGIC GOAL SETTING EXERCISE BACK ON FEBRUARY 17TH A MONTH AGO. HARD TO BELIEVE IT'S BEEN THAT LONG. ALREADY THE COUNCIL IDENTIFIED A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT EITHER REAFFIRMED PRIORITIES OR ADDED SOME ADDITIONAL THINGS. AND THEN, UM, WHAT WAS ADOPTED LAST YEAR AND WE CARRIED IT FORWARD. THIS YEAR IS A SECOND. SESSION THAT ALLOWS THE COUNCIL TO SHARE WITH US. WHAT ARE THE PRIORITIES RELATIVE SPEAKING RELATIVE TO ALL THE OTHERS, WHICH ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT ONES THAT YOU'D LIKE TO EMPHASIZE OR FOR STAFF TO FOCUS ON IS VERY HELPFUL FOR US TO KNOW WHAT THE COUNCIL'S RELATIVE PRIORITIES ARE, AND I THINK IT'S PROBABLY HELPFUL FOR YOU TO GET AN IDEA WHERE EVERYBODY IS AS A BODY, THE COUNCIL AS A BODY. EVEN EVERY EVERY COUNCIL PERSON WILL HAVE INDIVIDUAL PRIORITIES, AND WE UNDERSTAND THAT WE RESPECT IT, AND WE DO OUR BEST TO TRY TO ADDRESS ALL OF THEM. BUT AS A BODY TO LET US KNOW WHICH ARE THE ONES THAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT IN CASE YOU CAN'T GET TO EVERYTHING, AND THIS EXERCISE IS VERY HELPFUL. SO YOU ALSO DID A SURVEY DID A SURVEY TWICE WE HAD TO REDO IT. WE APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE. IT'S VERY HELPFUL WILL SPEND A GOOD PART OF OUR TIME SPEAKING ABOUT THAT, BUT I WON'T BE LABOR THIS BECAUSE WE'VE BROUGHT THE GREAT DOG THOMAS BACK. HE DUG UP. WE WERE JUST JOKING ABOUT. IT ALWAYS BRINGS INTERESTING WEATHER, SO HE BROUGHT SOME INTERESTING WEATHER AGAIN. BUT THIS TIME IT'S SUNNY OUTSIDE, SO WE'LL CELEBRATE. WE WON'T TALK ABOUT THE TEMPERATURE, BUT WE WILL TALK ABOUT THIS SONG. ANYWAY DOG IS HERE AND HE WILL BE FACILITATING THIS PROCESS THIS MORNING. I THIS IS ENTIRELY UNDER YOUR CONTROL, SO I DON'T ENVISION THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE A VERY LONG SESSION. BUT IT WILL TAKE SOME TIME. AND WE WANT TO GIVE YOU ALL THE TIME THAT YOU THINK YOU NEED. SO THE ONLY THINGS WE HAVE AN 11 30 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CDC, SO WE'RE BACK STOPPED BY THAT, BUT WE'VE GOT FROM NOW UNTIL THEN, IF YOU CHOOSE TO DO SO. SO WITH THAT, MR THOMAS. THANK YOU, PAUL. AS I SAID, IT'S GOOD TO BE BACK IN MCKINNEY. EVERY TIME I COME. THERE'S ALWAYS SOME UNIQUE TWIST OR WHETHER OR EVENT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. BUT FORTUNATELY, I DID GET HERE BEFORE ALL THE CRAZINESS STARTED YESTERDAY AFTERNOON, SO THE ONLY DOWNSIDE WAS THAT IT WE COULDN'T WATCH THE BASKETBALL GAME BECAUSE EVERYBODY WAS ON THE WEATHER CHANNEL. SO YOU KNOW, WATCHING WHAT WAS HAPPENING AS WELL. SO UM, AS PAUL MENTIONED, THIS IS SOMETHING WE DID LAST YEAR.

ALTHOUGH WE DID IT A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY. WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE CHANGES WE DID THIS YEAR AND DISCUSSION WITH STAFF AS WELL. ALL. BUT WHAT I WANT TO DO TODAY IS KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH. WHERE WE LANDED AT THE END OF THE FIRST SESSION A MONTH AGO, AND SO THERE'S A VARIETY OF SOME TWEAKS AND ADJUSTMENTS THAT WERE SUGGESTED THAT CAME OUT OF THE CONVERSATIONS, ESPECIALLY ESPECIALLY AS RELATED TO THE LANGUAGE OF YOUR PRIORITIES. AND YOU ACTUALLY ADDED A FEW PRIORITIES, SO I TOOK THE LIBERTY OF KIND OF CRAFTING THAT SHOOTING A DRAFT REPORT TO THE STAFF. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO BE BROUGHT THAT BACK FOR YOUR KIND OF BLESSING TODAY, SO THAT'S WHAT KIND OF WORK OUR WAY THROUGH THOSE AS WE GO THROUGH THE MORNING AND THEN THIS YEAR LATTE WELL WILL MAKE YOU SAY LAST YEAR. WHAT WE DID IS ONCE YOU HAD ALL THE PRIORITIES NAILED DOWN, THEN YOU VOTED ON YOUR PRIORITIES AND PRIORITIZED PRIORITIES, SO TO SPEAK. AND SO THERE WAS A DISCUSSION WITH STAFF ABOUT AN INTEREST AND MAYBE DOING SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THIS YEAR, AND SO WE WANT TO GET SOME FEEDBACK ON THAT. WE HAD A LITTLE BIT OF A WRINKLE ON THAT. SO WE APOLOGIZE THAT THAT THAT RESULTED IN YOU HAVING TO DO A SURVEY TWICE, BUT THIS YEAR IT WAS LOOKING AT MORE STAFF WANTED TO GET A LITTLE MORE GRANULAR AND GETTING A FEEL FOR THE INFORMATION ON SOME OF THE METRICS THAT THEY USE IN TERMS OF TRYING TO TRACK OR THE OBJECTIVES THAT THEY USE TO KIND OF TRACK YOUR PRIORITIES. SO WE'VE GOT THE RESULTS OF THAT SURVEY COMPLETED SURVEY ON THAT ONE TO GO THROUGH TODAY SO WE CAN TALK THROUGH THOSE AND THAT I THINK, HOPEFULLY WILL GENERATE SOME INTERESTING CONVERSATION AMONGST ALL OF YOU BECAUSE IN SOME CASES, IT'S VERY CLEAR WHERE YOU ARE AS A BODY. IN OTHER CASES, YOU'RE A LITTLE MORE KIND OF SPREAD OUT, AND SO WE'LL JUST KIND OF WORK OUR WAY THROUGH THAT. AND THEN AT THE END OF TODAY, WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS JUST TALK THROUGH ALL RIGHT, AS WE'VE GONE THROUGH THIS PROCESS LAST YEAR, AND THIS YEAR, UM HOW DO YOU WANT TO MAYBE LOOK AT IT NEXT YEAR? DO YOU WANT TO STILL DO THE SAME SORTS OF THINGS YOU WANT TO DO?

[00:05:05]

DO YOU LIKE THE WAY WE DID? THE PRIORITIZATION THIS YEAR IS SAID TO GIVE STAFF MORE THOUGHTS AND PERSPECTIVE AS WELL. SO IT WAS KIND OF A TEST YEAR FOR AROUND TWO, AND WE'LL JUST KIND OF WORK OUR WAY THROUGH IT AT THAT STAGE. SO WITH THAT IN MIND, UM, I JUST WANT TO BRING YOU BACK TO WHERE WE STARTED. UM WHEN WE DID THIS A MONTH AGO, WE HAD SIX GOAL AREAS. WE STILL HAVE SIX GOAL AREAS. WE HAD 29 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND LAST YEAR THE PREVIOUS YEAR'S PLAN THAT HAD 31 SO IT WOULD ACTUALLY REDUCE A FEW OF THOSE, AND THIS YEAR AS I SAID, WE'LL TALK ABOUT ADDING SOME AND THEN WITHIN THAT PLAN, THERE IS 158 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES THAT THE STAFF IS TRACKING THAT RELATE TO EACH OF THESE VARIOUS PRIORITIES UNDER THE SIX DIFFERENT GOAL AREAS, AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE FOCUSING A LOT TODAY AS WELL. UM AND WHEN WE WENT WHEN I WENT THROUGH ALL THE DISCUSSIONS WITH YOU IN ADVANCE OF THE MARCH 17TH OR THE FEBRUARY 17TH SESSION, EVERYBODY HAD A PRETTY GOOD WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF THAT. YOU'VE ALL BEEN THROUGH THIS PROCESS BEFORE THEY WERE KIND OF FRESH IN YOUR MIND IN THE PROCESS OF THE EFFORTS, SO THAT WAS REALLY HELPFUL TO GET A SNAPSHOT. AS WE THEN LOOKED AT IT LAST MONTH. UM WE ENDED UP ADDING A FEW STRATEGIC PRIORITIES, A COUPLE OTHERS AND WE'LL WALK THROUGH THOSE TODAY WITH SOME SUGGESTED LANGUAGE THAT WE WANT TO GET YOUR BLESSING ON. UM WE STILL HAVE 158 OBJECTIVES AND RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT TRACKING MECHANISMS THAT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON WHAT WE GET TODAY, AND THE FEEDBACK WE RECEIVE ON SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU HAD A CHANCE TO KIND OF WEIGH IN ON AS WELL. SO WE'LL SEE WHERE THAT KIND OF SHAKES ITSELF OUT. BUT THERE'S SOME SOME MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. UH OVERALL, AND I THINK MOST FOLKS SAID HEY, WE HAD A LOT ON HER PLATE, AND WE THINK WE'RE KIND OF HEADING THE GENERAL DIRECTION. MAYBE IT'S MORE OF A TWEAKING ADJUSTMENT THAN A MASS REDO. SO I THINK YOU KNOW THAT THAT WAS CERTAINLY IMPRESSION.

WE WALKED AWAY, AS DID STAFF AND ALL BASED ON YOUR FEEDBACK AS WELL. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT, ACTUALLY, THIS IS THE THIRD YEAR THAT I THINK I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH MCKINNEY AND THERE'S BEEN SOME DISCUSSIONS ABOUT HOW DO WE MAYBE TALK ABOUT THE MAYBE A POTENTIAL OF A PREAMBLE IF YOU WILL, TO THE SIX GOALS. AND UH, MENTIONED THIS. CHARLIE HAS BEEN SOMEONE WHO WAS RAISED THIS EVERY YEAR AND WE'VE KIND OF WORKED OUR WAY THROUGH THAT. AND SO BASED ON THE FEEDBACK I HAD GOTTEN LAST MONTH, I SUGGESTED THIS AS A POTENTIAL PREAMBLE TO THE SIX GOALS ONCE AGAIN, TYING IT BACK INTO YOUR TAGLINE OF UNIQUE BY NATURE. BUT ALSO KIND OF CAPTURING THE THOUGHTS AND IMPRESSIONS THAT WE HAD HEARD FROM ALL OF YOU WITH REGARDS TO MAYBE. WHAT DO YOU WANT TO INCORPORATE? IF YOU DECIDE TO DO A PREAMBLE, SO I'VE GOT THAT, BUT I ALSO WANT TO SAY WHEN WORKING WITH TREVOR. WE ACTUALLY DID PUT A QUESTION OUT THERE AND THERE WASN'T A WHOLE LOT OF INTEREST AT THE END OF THE DAY. I'M DOING THE PREAMBLE. SO MY FIRST TASK FOR YOU THIS MORNING IS IN LIGHT OF WHERE YOU WHERE YOU LOOKED AT. THE POSSIBILITY OF A PREAMBLE WAS NOT RATED. VERY HIGHLY, UM DO YOU WANT TO INCORPORATE THAT? AND SO IS THE LANGUAGE YOU'VE GOT TOGETHER KIND OF CAPTURE THAT, OR DOES IT DOES IT NEED TO BE CHANGED OR ADJUSTED THINGS OF THAT NATURE, AND AS I SAID, THERE ARE SEVERAL ORGANIZATIONS THAT I WORK WITH THAT HAVE PREAMBLE EITHER TO THEIR PRIORITIES. ANOTHER GOLD AREAS. IN SOME CASES, THEY HAVE A PREAMBLE TO THEIR INDIVIDUAL VALUES. THAT KIND OF PROVIDES A ENCAPSULATES WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH THERE. SO I KIND OF FIRST QUESTION OF THE DAY RIGHT OUT OF THE BLOCKS IS DO YOU WANT TO INCORPORATE A PREAMBLE? IT'S BEEN SOMETHING WE WERE DISCUSSED FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, BUT IT'S REALLY UP TO YOU AND HOW YOU WANT TO PROCEED. SO CHARLIE, YOU LOOK LIKE YOU'RE SHOPPING AT THE BEST TO SPEAK, SO WE'LL START THERE. I'LL BE HAPPY TO SPEAK. I JUST WANTED TO SAY BUILDING AND BEING BETTER NEIGHBORS. BY B. Y. COLON PERIOD. RIGHT ABOVE THAT SIGN.

THIS SOUNDS LIKE A LAWYER BUREAUCRAT WROTE ALL THIS STUFF . IT'S A PROCESS BY COMMITTEE.

YEAH, AND I CAME UP WITH THE CONCEPT OF BUILDING AND BEING BETTER NEIGHBORS. BECAUSE I WATCHED RAINY ROGERS WENT UP. FIRST CAME ON COUNCIL AND EVERY TIME SOMEONE COMES UP WITH THE PROJECT, AND WE'VE GOT A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT COLORS SHIRTS SITTING ON THE OTHER SIDE, RAINY SENDS THEM HOME TO TALK TO THEIR NEIGHBORS. AND THEN I REALIZE WHERE DOING MORE THAN JUST FROM MCKINNEY AND THAT WE'RE BEING BETTER NEIGHBORS OUTSIDE. IT'S VERY SIMPLE. IT'S ONLY HERE FOR REMINDER TO THE FOLKS ON COUNCIL AND REMIND THE FOLKS WHO COME TO COUNCIL MEETINGS VARY. SIMPLE CONCEPT IS THAT WE WANT GOOD NEIGHBORS IN MCKINNEY, AND I THINK YOU GET THERE WITH THOSE VERY SIMPLE WORDS RIGHT ABOVE THAT. YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO CHANGE THAT SIGN. THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. THANK YOU. SO I'LL SAY SOMETHING. UM FIRST OF ALL, I DON'T LIKE THE PREAMBLE AND MOST ANYBODY WHO KNOWS ME KNOWS WHY I WOULDN'T LIKE IT. UM AND JUST JUST HERE BEGINNING KIND OF

[00:10:05]

BOTHERS ME AND THE FACT THAT YOU , UM 158 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES. AND IT JUST SEEMS LIKE I MEAN, HOW WAS STAFF TO PROBABLY HAVE A STAFF? SUPPOSED TO FIGURE OUT AND REMEMBER 158. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES THROUGH THE ONE STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS WHOLE PROCESS WHEN YOU WHEN YOU'RE WHEN IT'S THAT BIG AND THESE POOR STAFFS ARE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW WHAT WHAT ARE ARE THESE AND HOW HOW. HOW HOW DO THEY RELATE TO ME? AND I AM I SUPPOSED TO KNOW EVERY ONE OF THEM AND TO ME, IT SEEMS WAY BIG AND TOO MUCH, AND THAT'S WHY I'M REALLY NOT APPRECIATIVE OF THESE THESE WHOLE SESSIONS TO BEGIN WITH. OKAY? BUT. THE COMMENTS BEFORE WE KIND OF DEALT THROUGH THAT I CAN. I CAN CERTAINLY REACT TO THAT. AND YOU KNOW THAT MAY GENERATE SOME DISCUSSION. SO WE THREE YEARS AGO WE STARTED WITH WHEN I STARTED WORKING WITH YOUR PLAN. YOU'VE HAD THE SIX PILLARS . THOSE HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR A WHILE AND YOU'VE HAD IN THE BALLPARK OF UM, THE ONES THE 29 30 SOMEWHERE IN THAT AREA. THOSE HAVE TRADITIONALLY BEEN THAT'S KIND OF MY SENSE. I CAN'T SAY IT BEFORE THREE YEARS BACK, BUT AT LEAST WHAT I'VE SEEN, BUT YOU'VE BEEN IN THAT BALLPARK. UM YOUR MEASURES YOUR OBJECTIVES THAT STAFF TRACKS THIS, UM, IS THOSE HAVE ALSO BEEN GENERALLY IN THAT BALLPARK. YOU OBVIOUSLY SAW WE REDUCED THEM LAST YEAR A LOT.

THAT WAS PARTLY THE PRIVATIZATION PROCESS TO TRY TO GET DOWN ON THAT EFFORT. WHAT I WILL TELL YOU IS THAT SIX GOALS IS A FAIRLY TYPICAL 5 TO 6 GOALS OR PILLARS, AND MANY ORGANIZATIONS CALL THEM OR FAIRLY COMPARABLE. AND FOR AN ORGANIZATION OF THIS SIZE SOMEWHERE AROUND 25 TO 30 PRIORITIES, I WOULD TELL YOU IS FAIRLY TYPICAL FOR AN ORGANIZATION OF THIS SIZE, SO THAT'S NOT AN UNMANAGEABLE NUMBER OF WHAT I WOULD NORMALLY SEE AS WE DO THESE TYPES OF RETREATS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. AND WE INHERIT PLANS AT VARIOUS STEPS. WE KIND OF STEP IN WHEREVER THEY'RE AT. AND WHAT WE CAN DO TO HELP YOU, MAYBE ENHANCE THOSE PLANS GOING FORWARD. SO WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS GENERALLY YOU'RE IN THE IN THE MEDIA AND IF YOU WILL, WITH REGARDS TO ORGANIZATIONS, I WILL. I KNOW AS A FORMER CITY MANAGER WHEN WE DID OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING AND MY FORMER COMMUNITY THE FIRST YEAR WE HAD NO PLAN AND I STAFF LIKE MOST STAFFS ARE ALL HIGH TYPE A PEOPLE AND WE ENDED UP WITH A GAZILLION OBJECTIVES AND IT BECAME UNWIELDY AND VERY QUICKLY . WE SAID, HEY, WE GOT TO SCALE BACK THE NUMBER OBJECTIVES. LET'S GET FOCUSED. AND THEN WE STARTED DOING PRIORITIZATION WITH OUR COUNCIL. SO WE KNEW WHICH ONES FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT GOALS, SO WE DID.

SCALE IT DOWN. SO I GUESS I WOULD DEFER TO PAUL AND THE TEAM ABOUT WHETHER THE TRACKING I MEAN MANY OF THE STUFF THAT THEY TRACK. I SUSPECT YOU'RE TRACKING REGARDLESS. AND SO IT JUST SUPPORTS WHAT YOU'RE DOING, AND YOU CAN SHOW THAT IN A PORTAL THAT YOU HAVE, BUT I'LL DEFER TO THEM AS FAR AS IT IS 29. TOO MANY 158 TOO MANY, BECAUSE THANK YOU TEMPORARY COMMENTS. I APPRECIATE IT. STAFF LIKES THE FACT THAT WE HAVE ELECTED OFFICIALS TELL US IT MAY BE TOO MUCH FOR STEP. THAT'S GOOD THAT YOU'RE MINDFUL OF THAT. I WILL ASSURE YOU REASSURE YOU THE NUMBER OF OBJECTIVES. THESE ARE OBJECTIVES THAT OUR STAFF PUT TOGETHER. YOU MEASURE WHAT'S IMPORTANT. RIGHT IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S IMPORTANT TO BE ABLE TO MEASURE IT, AND THE COUNCIL HAS A PRIORITY, AND THESE ARE THE BIG SIX. THESE ARE THE SIX PILLARS AND THEN WITH THAT, THEN YOU GO ONE LAYER DOWN AND YOU COME UP WITH YOUR SORT OF YOUR STRATEGIC GOALS. WHICH IS OUR PRIORITIES FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS. THAT'S HOW WE SHAPE OUR BUDGET, ETCETERA. WE HAVE TO BE ABLE TO REPORT AND UNDERSTAND AND KNOW IF WE'RE ACTUALLY HELPING YOU ACHIEVE THOSE GOALS. THOSE PRIORITIES SO WE COME UP WITH THE MEAT ON THE FRAMEWORK. RIGHT WE'RE YOU'RE HANDING US A SKELETON. WE GOT TO HANG THE MEAT ON IT, AND THAT'S WHERE STAFF GOES BACK AND SAYS, OKAY, THESE ARE OBJECTIVES THAT THAT IN OUR PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATION AND JUDGMENT, AND WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT WHAT WE DO IN OUR WORKSHOP. UM THESE ARE HOW WE CAN MEASURE IF WE'RE ACTUALLY HELPING MOVE THE BALL IN THAT DIRECTION. SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO TRACK HIM? WE DO. BUT WE REPORT HIM TO YOU. AND WE'RE ACCOUNTABLE TO YOU FOR IT. IF YOU CHOOSE TO LOOK AT AND REVIEW THOSE THINGS SOME FOLKS DON'T BECAUSE IT'S TOO MUCH DETAIL OTHER FOLKS DO AND THEY SAY, GEE , THESE ARE KIND OF IMPORTANT MEASURES TO KNOW IF WE'RE MOVING THAT POLE. SO THAT'S HOW THE RELATIONSHIP WORKS BETWEEN THE DETAIL AND THE PRIORITIES. AND THEN WHAT? YOUR YOUR MAJOR GOALS THAT YOU YOUR WORK PLAN FOR US THAT YOU WANT US TO DO, AND WE HAVE TO BE ABLE TO MEASURE THOSE IF WE DON'T, THEN WE'RE NOT VERY ACCOUNTABLE. WE'RE NOT AS ACCOUNTABLE AS WE SHOULD BE TO OUR ELECTED BODY, SO I CAN ASSURE YOU IT'S NOT TOO MUCH FOR US. WE ARE STAFF KNOWS WHAT WE PUT FORWARD. WE KNOW WHAT OBJECTIVES BECAUSE THEY'RE THE ONES WHO CAME UP WITH HIM. UM

[00:15:04]

AND THAT HELPS US PREPARE BUDGET . IT'S THOROUGHLY AS POSSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE MEETING THE COUNCIL'S OBJECTIVES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE GOALS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. SO I HOPE THAT HELPS.

I UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S DETAIL AND WHATEVER, BUT IT IS VERY I THINK IT'S AN IMPORTANT EXERCISE AND PROCESS FOR THE COUNCIL TO GO THROUGH TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE IN ALIGNMENT THAT WHAT YOU'RE TELLING US. YOU WANTED OUR WORK PLAN. THAT WE CAN TELL YOU. WE KNOW HOW TO MEASURE IT.

HERE'S HOW WE EXPECT THE TRACK. IT MEASURED AND REPORTED BACK TO YOU TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE CONTINUING SHOW YOU WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE MOVING THAT BALL FORWARD. OKAY I WILL SAY THAT I DON'T COME FROM A CORPORATE BACKGROUND. THAT'S PROBABLY WHERE I, UM I HAVE MY OWN MY OWN COMPANY AND MY OWN LITTLE HANDFUL OF EMPLOYEES. AND SO THAT WOULD BE. YOU HAVE YOUR OWN WAY OF TRACKING YOUR OWN. YEAH BUT IT'S PROBABLY MAYBE A SIMPLER WAY. BUT IT'S THE SAME THING. REALLY THANK YOU. WHAT THE OTHER THE OTHER COMMENT TO ADDRESS. WHAT PAUL IS SAYING IS THAT THERE ARE MANY ORGANIZATIONS THAT DO WHAT ARE CALLED PRIORITY BASED BUDGETING.

THERE ARE A LOT OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT DO VERY GREAT JOBS ON STRATEGIC PLANNING. AND THEN THEY DO THEIR BUDGET AND THE STRATEGIC PLANS ON ONE SIDE OF THE SHELL FROM THE BUDGETS ON THE OUTSIDE ITSELF. THEY DON'T RELATE. YOU'RE KIND OF IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT PROCESS. THOSE THAT DO PRIORITY BASED BUDGETING LITERALLY TAKE THE STRATEGIC PLAN. BREAK IT DOWN BY CORE SERVICES DETERMINED HOW THOSE CORE SERVICES IMPACT YOUR GOALS AND PILLARS AND THOSE THAT IMPACT THEM TO A GREATER DEGREE . TYPICALLY IF YOU'RE GOING TO BUDGET REDUCING, OR YOU'RE TRYING TO ALLOCATE YOUR RESOURCES GET HIGHER DOLLARS THAN THOSE THAT HAVE A VERY MINOR IMPACT ON YOUR STRATEGIC PLAN. AND SO THAT WAY THEY BRING SOME FOCUS TO THEIR BUDGETING, BECAUSE HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU GO THROUGH A BUDGET PROCESS? WHERE YOU'RE GONNA BE CUTTING SOMETHING, AND EVERY NO MATTER WHAT YOU CUT, YOU'RE ALWAYS GOING TO HAVE SOME SUPPORT GROUP THAT'S GOING TO COME IN AND SAY, DON'T CUT THIS BECAUSE THE SKY IS GOING TO FALL DOWN AND BECAUSE WE USE THESE SERVICES, AND THEY'RE ALL TRUE TO THE EXTENT BUT THE POINT OF HAVING A STRATEGIC PLAN GIVES YOU AS POLICYMAKERS SOME FOCUS ABOUT WHAT YOU SAID IS IMPORTANT AND WHAT YOU TOLD STAFF IS IMPORTANT. SO WHEN PUSH COMES TO SHOVE, IF YOU'RE WEIGHING THESE ISSUES, THEY'VE GOT SOME DIRECTION ABOUT HOW TO ALLOCATE RESOURCES, BOTH CAPITAL AND HUMAN TO ACCOMPLISH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES THAT YOU GUYS HAVE ESTABLISHED, SO I CAN'T SAY YOU'RE ENTIRELY IN A PRIORITY BASED BUDGETING PROCESS WITH THE CONCEPT OF LINKING YOUR PRIORITIES, AND YOUR STRATEGIC PLAN WITH YOUR BUDGET IS VERY MUCH AT PLAY HERE. SO THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO GET THROUGHOUT. AND IT'S A BIG ORGANIZATION A LOT OF DIFFERENT TENTACLES, SO THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS TO TRACK. UM BUT, AS I SAID, I ALWAYS REFER TO THE STAFF. IS IT TOO MUCH TO TRACK BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT THEM TRACKING INFORMATION THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, WHICH IS? I THINK PARTLY WHAT TREVOR AND THE TEAM WANTED TO DO THIS YEAR TO GET SOME FEEDBACK ON THE OBJECTIVES TO SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT'S IMPORTANT TO YOU AND HOW WE MEASURE SOME OF THIS STUFF. THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD DOUG'S COMMENTS, UM AND DOUG DOESN'T HAVE THE BENEFIT OF SITTING IN OUR BUDGET MEETINGS THAT WE DO WITH EVERY DEPARTMENT THROUGHOUT THE CITY, ALL OF THE POWER IZATION INFORMATION, OBJECTIVE INFORMATION GOALS UP TO THE SIX PILLARS. IS A DEPARTMENT IS MAKING A REQUEST DURING THE BUDGET MAKING PROCESS . THEY HAVE TO TIE IT BACK TO A SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE GOAL OR PRIORITY. AND THEN IF YOU ALSO REMEMBER ON OUR AGENDAS THAT ARE CREATED ON A BIWEEKLY BASIS, EVERY AGENDA ITEM GENERALLY SPEAKING, IS TIED TO A SPECIFIC PILLAR AT THE VERY LEAST, SO I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT CONTEXT ABOUT THE BUDGET. AND THEN I KNEW THAT. YEAH, I GOT YOU. WHICH IS HOW IT SHOULD BE. YOU SHOULD BE. IF YOU'RE SPENDING MONEY, IT OUGHT TO BE IN THE AREAS THAT YOU WANT TO ACCOMPLISH, AND THAT'S WHAT THIS PROCESS HOPEFULLY BRINGS ABOUT. YEAH AND NOT TO BEAT A DEAD HORSE ON THIS, UM BUT IT IS NOT UNMANAGEABLE AT THE DEPARTMENT LEVEL IF WE HAVE 15 OR MORE OPERATING DEPARTMENTS, 8 TO 10 ON AVERAGE, NO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, MORE PUBLIC SAFETY, PROBABLY FEWER, BUT IT IS NOT UNMANAGEABLE IN THE PART OF THE STAFF. OKAY PIVOT. IF THAT'S OKAY AND GO BACK TO THE COMMENT ON THE PREAMBLE, THAT'S ALRIGHT. MY CONCERN WITH IT IS THAT IT SEEMS. I DON'T WANT TO USE THE WRONG WORD HERE, BUT THE NEIGHBORLY THING WHILE I THINK IT'S A GOOD GOAL COMES OFF AS A BIT PRETTY CHEAP. AND, UM I CAN SEE HOW WE MAKE A LOT OF DECISIONS THAT CANDIDLY MAKE SOME PEOPLE WINNERS AND MAYBE SOME LOSERS, AND THE LOSERS CAN SAY, WELL, THAT'S NOT VERY NEIGHBORLY. LIKE YOU CANNOT SEE IT DESCENDING INTO SOMETHING THAT IS MORE OR LESS. WE GET BEAT ABOUT THE HEAD WITH BASED ON EVERY DECISION THAT WE MAKE, SO YOU KNOW WHEN WE LOOK AT OUR STRATEGIC GOALS, IT'S THEY'RE NOT PREACHY. THEY'RE NOT SAYING DO IT THIS WAY, AND MY CONCERN IS INCORPORATED DESPITE IT GOOD INTENTIONS. I WOULDN'T HAVE GOOD

[00:20:06]

RESULTS. I THINK YOU THINK TOO MUCH. AND SECONDLY, I'LL TRADE YOU. FOR MODEL. WE CAN PLAY ALL TIME FAMILY SUCKS UP THERE. ALL RIGHT, SO LET ME TRY TO HELP LAND THE PLANE HERE. AS I SAID, MY, UM AS YOU KNOW YOUR BODY OF SEVEN AND SO WE TRY TO GET A SENSE OF WHERE YOU ARE COLLECTIVELY. AND SO, UM, WE THOUGHT WE'D ASK YOU AND IT DID NOT SEEM TO BE, UM, SUPPORT TO DO THIS, SO I JUST KNOW IT'S BEEN SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN DISCUSSED EVERY YEAR. I THINK HE HAD, YOU KNOW, EITHER MAKE A DECISION ONE WAY OR THE OTHER TO PROCEED OR NOT PROCEED. IF I'M LOOKING IF A STRAIGHT OUT VOTE, IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THEIR SUPPORT TO PROCEED. WITH THE PREAMBLE, BUT THAT'S A CLARITY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ON THE SAME PAGE. WHETHER IT'S THAT ONE OR SOMETHING ELSE. YEAH. I MEAN, I DON'T SEE THESE BINARY ANSWERS, SO JUST BECAUSE I RATED IT AS A LOW PRIORITY THAT'S IN COMPARISON TO THE AIRPORT. I MEAN, NOT NOT NECESSARILY. DO I WANT TO DO IT OR NOT, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WELL , I THINK YOU'VE GOT TO STEP PROCESS HERE. NUMBER ONE. IS THERE A DESIRE TO DO A PREAMBLE? AND THEN IF SO, IF THAT'S NOT THE RIGHT ONE IS THAT SOMETHING SIMILAR TO WHAT CHARLIE HAS SUGGESTED. SO I GUESS FROM A AND I REALIZED YOU DON'T HAVE TO YOUR COLLEAGUES HERE. UM, BUT YOU WANT TO HOLD OFF ON THAT AND COME BACK WHEN THE MAYOR GETS HERE A LITTLE BIT LATER. I DON'T THINK DR I FELT THIS IS GOING TO BE HERE AT ALL TODAY. RIGHT? SO I GUESS THE QUESTION IS. HOW DO YOU WANT TO DEAL WITH THIS ISSUE? EITHER VOTE ON IT, YOU SAY? YEAH, YOUR NAME YOU WANT TO DO A PREEMIE WANT TO SO THAT WE CAN KIND OF FIGURE OUT IF IT'S SOMETHING LIKE THIS OR SOMETHING SHORTER OR WHERE YOU DON'T WANT TO, BUT I KNOW IT'S BEEN AN ISSUE THAT'S COME UP, AND WE'RE JUST TRYING TO HELP YOU LAND A PLANE ON THIS ONE. WHAT I'M SEEING IS I SEE THIS AND THANK YOU DOGGIES. UM WHAT JUSTIN WAS ALLUDING TO IS THE COUNCIL IS A BODY HAS INDICATED THAT THIS ISN'T A PARTICULARLY HIGH PRIORITY DOESN'T MEAN THEY WON'T DO IT. YOU MIGHT. I MEAN, IT DEPENDS ON YOU PROBABLY HAVE TO BRING IT UP FOR A VOTE. BUT WHEN I LOOK AT THESE NUMBERS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NUMBERS, NOBODY RATED IT HIGHER THAN THREE FOR RESIDENT OF ONE, MEANING THE LOWEST OF PRIORITIES TO TWO AMENDED TO RELATIVE TO ALL THE OTHER THINGS. THIS IS NOT REALLY THAT BIG OF A PRIORITY. THAT HOWEVER, DOES NOT MEAN AS I INTERPRET JUSTICE COMMENTS THAT THEY WOULDN'T DO IT, OR THERE ISN'T SOME LANGUAGE THAT THEY WOULD AGREE TO. BUT PROBABLY NOT WAS NOT TO SPEND SPEND TOO MUCH TIME ON IT IS WHAT I'M HEARING. I TEND TO AGREE WITH PAUL THAT WE SHOULDN'T SPEND TOO MUCH TIME ON IT BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING WE PUT ON THE AGENDA. VOTE YES OR NO AND MOVE ON. OKAY? OKAY? AND I PROMISED THE REST OF THEM PROBABLY WON'T BE THAT HARD EDGED IN TERMS OF DOCTORATE. SO WE TALKED ABOUT THIS ISSUE AND REALLY, TO YOUR POINT RANDY ABOUT YEAH. COURSE WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT WORK PRETTY GOOD. I FAIR. FAIR COMMENT. CHARLIE AS I SAID, I HATE TO START OFF WITH AN EDGY, EDGY DISCUSSION. BUT THAT'S OKAY. GENERALLY SPEAKING , I THINK YOU'RE GOING TO FIND MUCH MORE SYMMETRY IN TERMS OF THE COUNCIL'S PERSPECTIVE. UM BUT REALLY, TO YOUR POINT RAINY , WE GET THE SENSE OF YOU KNOW, YOU GOT THESE 29 PRIORITIES OR WHEREVER WE SHAKE OUT TO BE, YOU KNOW, ARE THEY ALL EQUAL? IT'S KIND OF LIKE A SOPHIE'S CHOICE.

WHICH CHILD DO YOU SAVE? YOUR PUSH COMES TO SHOVE, AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO GET A HANDLE ON AND SO THE OTHER ASPECT IS FROM STAFFS. PERSPECTIVE IS, YOU KNOW WHICH ONES DO I FOCUS ON? WHERE DO I YOU KNOW, PUSH COMES TO SHOVE. HOW DO I MAKE SURE THAT I'M MEETING YOUR NEEDS COLLECTIVELY IN THAT REGARD, SO WHAT WE ENDED UP DOING AS I SAID LAST YEAR, WE ACTUALLY HAD YOU RANK YOUR PRIORITIES THIS YEAR AND TALKING WITH STAFF THERE WAS DISCUSSION ABOUT. WELL, HOW DO WE GET OUR ARMS AROUND TRACKING THAT A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY? SO THIS THIS YEAR IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY. IT REALLY IS TRACKING A SENSE OF SOME OF THE THINGS AND THEMES THAT CAME OUT. THAT MIGHT END UP AS OBJECTIVES . UM AND MANY OF MY STAFF FOR MANY OF THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT I DO THIS, THE COUNCIL'S PURVIEW IS ESTABLISHING THE PILLARS AND THE PRIORITIES AND THE STAFF'S PURVIEW IS ESTABLISHING THE OBJECTIVES. BUT THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF KIND OF COMMON GROUND THERE BECAUSE WE WERE IF THEY'RE GOING TO BE TRACKING YOUR PRIORITIES. THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE THE STUFF THAT THEY'RE TRACKING MAKES SENSE TO YOU. AND THAT THAT LEVEL OF ACCOUNTABILITY SO WE DO HAVE SOME OF THIS KIND OF SHARED AREAS OF CONVERSATION. I THINK THAT'S WHAT STAFF WAS TRYING TO GET A HANDLE ON THROUGH THIS

[00:25:01]

YEAR'S PRIORITIZATION PROCESS. AND SO WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO IS REALLY WALKED THROUGH THOSE PRIORITIES. FIRST MAKE SURE THERE'S AGREEMENT ON THE LANGUAGE THAT WE HAVE ESTABLISHED BASED ON THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT CAME OUT OF LAST ONCE MEETING, AND THEN WE'LL JUST KIND OF WALK THROUGH SOME OF THE FEEDBACK WE'VE GOT, BECAUSE THAT MAY HAVE SOME BEARINGS WITH REGARDS TO YOUR ULTIMATELY PRIORITIES. SO WE'LL JUST DO THIS IN THE SAME ORDER THAT WE HAVE YOUR YOUR STRATEGIC PLAN. UH CITY COUNCIL GOAL NUMBER ONE IS DIRECTION FOR STRATEGIC AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. THOSE ARE YOUR EXISTING STRATEGIC PRIORITIES. COMING OUT OF YOUR PLAN AND WHAT I'VE DONE HERE IS IF BASED ON FEEDBACK WE HAD FROM LAST MONTH SESSION. WE TRIED TO INCORPORATE THOSE COMMENTS INTO YOUR STATEMENTS OF PRIORITIES AND TO YOUR POINT, A LOT OF THOSE WILL CHANGE AND GET TWEETS FROM YEAR TO YEAR. SO IT'S OKAY. YOU HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING MASSIVE CHANGES. YOU DO HAVE TO PRIORITIES THAT YOU ADDED IN ONE OF YOUR GOAL AREAS , BUT FOR THE MOST PART YOU WANTED TO YOU WANT TO TWEAK IT. SO IN THIS CASE, GOLD PRIORITY NUMBER ONE YOU WANTED TO INCORPORATE HIGH SPEED DIGITAL CONNECTIVITY. SO I'LL JUST KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH ALL THE CHANGES THAT YOU MADE. SECOND WAS FINE. THE THIRD ONE WANTED TO ADD TO BECOME A LIVE WORK AND PLAY COMMUNITY. IT WAS FINE. THE FIFTH ONE WAS FINE. SO LET'S STOP THERE FOR A SECOND AND JUST KIND OF WALK THROUGH THAT TO MAKE SURE WE YOU'RE COMFORTABLE WITH WHAT YOU HAD SUGGESTED. THE ADDED OR TWEET IN THE EXISTING PRIORITIES, AT LEAST ON THIS SHEET KIND OF WORK THROUGH SHEET BY SHEET. SO NUMBER ONE THAT MAKES SENSE TO EVERYBODY BASED ON WHAT WE HEARD LAST MONTH. AS I UNDERSTAND. YOU'VE GOT A SPECIAL YOU'VE GOT SOME INITIATIVE GOING ON WITH SOME HIGH SPEED WORK GOING, SO I THINK THAT WAS CAPTURE THAT AS PART OF YOUR PRIORITY. ALL GOOD WITH THAT. THE WAY THEY WERE. NO NO RIGHT NOW. RIGHT NOW WE'RE JUST ESTABLISHING CHANGES TO THOSE THE WAY RANDY HOW THAT SHOOK OUT LAST YEAR WHEN THIS COUNCIL VOTED ON THEM. UM THEY WERE RESHUFFLED. IN THE ORDER THAT YOU SEE THEM. THEY WERE VIEWED AS HIGHEST PRIORITY, LOWEST PRIORITY WITHIN EACH GOAL AREA. OKAY SO WE HAVE NOT CHANGED THAT AT THIS POINT, BUT THE THINGS IN RED WERE BASED ON FEEDBACK. WE RECEIVED IT LAST MONTH'S, UH, SESSION TO TWEAK OR ADD THINGS TO YOUR TO YOUR EXISTING PRIORITIES. EFFECTIVELY SO IF YOU LOOK, IT'S HARD FOR YOU TO LOVE RATINGS. IT'S RIGHT BEHIND YOU. BUT EACH OF THESE ROLL UP UNDER THE SIX PILLARS HERE, SO THIS IS PILLAR ONE DIRECTION FOR STRATEGIC AND ECONOMIC GROWTH EFFECTIVELY REAFFIRMED WHAT YOU HAD LAST YEAR WITH THE CHANGES IN RED, RIGHT? SO MY QUESTION IS, IS THAT WHAT WE'VE GOT IN RED MAKES SENSE. I MEAN THAT THAT'S WHAT WE HEARD, AND WE ADDED TO THOSE PARTICULAR ONES, OKAY? IS THAT THE CASE WITH ONE C AS WELL? COMFORTABLE WITH ADDING THAT. OKAY? UM. SO IN ESSENCE, SO WE'RE CLEAR ON THIS AND STAFFS CLEAR THESE WILL BECOME YOUR NEW PRIORITIES IN YOUR UPCOMING PLAN , AS STATED HERE UNLESS WE MAKE CHANGES, AND WE'LL GO THROUGH THESE SEX OR PRIVILEGE, THE THINGS WE'RE GOING TO BRING BACK IN MAY FOR YOU TO RATIFY WITH THE THOSE REMEMBER THE MEAT ON THE BONES THAT FROM THE OBJECTIVE, WE'RE GOING TO BRING THAT BACK TO YOU. BUT IT WILL HAVE THIS LANGUAGE BAKED IN. AND THAT WILL WILL GO. WE'LL GO PILLAR BY PILLAR AS WE GO FORWARD. SO WHAT WE ENDED UP DOING THEN, AS I SAID, WORKING WITH STAFF AND THE SURVEY RESULTS OF THE SURVEY THAT YOU ALL PARTICIPATED, AND, UM THERE WERE A VARIETY OF MEASURES ARE OBJECTIVES THAT STAFF WANTED TO GET YOUR RELATIVE THOUGHTS ON. AND SO WHAT I TRY TO DO IS THESE ARE THE RESULTS OF YOUR VOTING.

SO YOU YOU SAW YOUR OWN RESULTS. YOU SAW YOUR OWN RESULTS OR INPUT, BUT YOU DIDN'T SEE THOSE OF YOUR COLLEAGUES AS WELL. WE DON'T KNOW WHO SAID WHAT WE ARE AND HOW AND THIS IS REALLY JUST THE ROD NUMBERS. SO WHAT I'VE DONE IS THOSE ITEMS THAT ARE IN GREEN OFF TO THE FAR RIGHT REPRESENT, YOU KNOW, A WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FOUR OR ABOVE AND SO THAT GIVES YOU A PRETTY GOOD, YOU KNOW, SUPPORT OF THE OF THE COMMISSION, AND SO YOU CAN KIND OF TRACK WHAT I'VE DONE AS WELL.

IF I HAVE INCORPORATED THE THINGS IN GREEN FROM THE ACTUAL SCORES. THAT MEANS I THINK THERE'S A PRETTY STRONG TENDENCY. YOU'RE YOU'RE ALL KIND OF IN THE SAME SPOT, SO TO SPEAK . YOU MAY HAVE AN OUTLIER HERE OR THERE, BUT THE PREPONDERANCE OF DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION OR THE COUNCIL SEEMS TO MAKE A LOT OF SENSE. SO YOU KNOW A LOT OF HIGH PRIORITIES OR MEDIUM TO I'M OKAY WITH A SCORE OF THREE. SO FROM A KEY YOU'LL SEE THIS KIND OF METRIC GOING FORWARD AND ALL THE DIFFERENT SLIDES WHERE I THINK THERE IS SYMMETRY THERE, AND I THINK THAT GIVES STAFF

[00:30:04]

SOME REAL STRONG DIRECTION OF WHERE YOU STAND AS A GOVERNING BODY ON SOME OF THESE PROJECTS OR ISSUES SO THAT BRIAN NELSON, THE LOUD HOW PARKWAY THE INCENTIVES FOR THE THINGS LIKE THAT. THAT GIVES SOME DIRECTION TO THEM THAT YOU'RE ALL KIND OF ON THE SAME PAGE AND THEY CAN, THEY CAN MOVE FORWARD ACCORDINGLY. AND AS WE START MOVING DOWN FOR THOSE THAT I PUT IN ORANGE, AND I'VE GOT A COUPLE OTHER SLIDES HERE, THAT'S WHERE WE'RE BELOW FOUR, SO THERE'S A LITTLE LESS SYMMETRY. AND THEN AS YOU CAN SEE YOUR SPREAD OUT A LITTLE BIT MORE AS YOU RELATE TO SOME OF THESE REACTIONS ABOUT HOW INDIVIDUALLY YOU RANK THEM, SO IT'S A LITTLE LESS CLEAR WHERE IN THE CASE OF MANAGING AND COORDINATE THE IMPACTS OF THE U. S 3 80 ALIGNMENT. FOUR OF YOU HAD RATED GAVE IT AN EFFORT OF FOUR. BUT YOU'RE SPREAD OUT ON THE BALANCE OF THAT. SO THAT'S WHY I PUT THOSE IN YELLOW JUST TO SAY OKAY. IS EVERYBODY KIND OF UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE, AND ANYTHING THAT KIND OF GOES, I THINK FROM ABOUT 3.4 UPWARD I PUT IN ORANGE AND THEN THOSE THAT ARE BELOW THAT I JUST LEFT. YOU'LL JUST SEE BLACK, BUT THEY WILL, UM, JUST SENSE THAT THERE'S NOT A LOT OF ALIGNMENT ABOUT WHERE THE COUNCIL WANTS TO GO. SO, UM I THINK FROM STAFF PERSPECTIVE, THEY LOOK AT THOSE IN GREEN. THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO TRACK THOSE THINGS PRETTY STRONGLY SO THEY CAN MAKE SURE THAT YOUR MEETING OR THEIR MEETING YOUR DESIRES AND EXPECTATIONS. AND THESE THINGS ALL RELATE TO THINGS THAT GO BACK TO THESE TYPES OF PRIORITIES. THE CASE. SELECT ONE THE 11 D, FOR AN EXAMPLE SHOOK OUT TO BE YOUR HIGHEST RANKING ON THIS ONE. AND SO THEY'LL HAVE TO FIGURE OUT HOW THEY'RE GOING TO MEASURE THAT TO IMPROVE THAT EFFORT, BECAUSE THAT WAS THAT WAS SYMMETRY BACK TO YOUR PRIORITIES, AND I'D LIKE TO BECAUSE THIS ONE FOR US, WE NEED A LITTLE BIT MORE CLARITY OR UNDERSTANDING FOR THE FIRST ONE, WHICH IS THAT IS THE HIGHEST SCORE. I BELIEVE IN THE ENTIRE SURVEY. YES SO AND ANYBODY ON THE COUNCIL CAN WEIGH IN AND TELL US WHAT YOU WHAT? BECAUSE IT WAS PRETTY STRONG CONSENSUS, EITHER FOUR OR FIVE AND ONE PERSON AND IT IS A THREE. WHAT EXACTLY DO YOU MEAN BY BETTER COORDINATION BETWEEN THE CDC IMMEDIACY AND CITY ADMINISTRATION. I'D LIKE TO UNDERSTAND THAT BETTER. BECAUSE WHAT WE WILL HELP INFORM US WHAT TYPES OF THINGS WE DO OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT YEAR OR TWO. TO ADDRESS THAT SINCE THAT'S YOUR HIGHEST PRIORITY SHOULD BE GIVEN EXAMPLES OR SAMPLES. ABSOLUTELY. BUT GIVEN EXAMPLE OF WE'VE GOT ON HERE. EXTENSION OF A LOT OF HELP PARKWAY WE DON'T HAVE ON HERE. THINGS. LIKE THE STRUGGLES THAT WE EXPERIENCE THROUGH E T J DEVELOPMENT. BUT I FEEL LIKE THE DTC IN THEIR LANDOWNING. FUNCTIONALITY COULD BE A BETTER PARTNER IN THOSE GOAL OBJECTIVES. BUT INSTEAD WE'RE OWNING LAND BELONG 1 21 THAT IS ZONE DOING JUST SITTING THERE THINGS LIKE THAT TO ME OR UNDERSTAND THAT'S VERY HELPFUL. MHM. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY THAT THE CITY STAFF HAS A REALLY GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH THE M E. D. C AND E. D. C. I THINK WE ENJOY VERY WORKING RELATIONSHIP. WE'VE WORKED TOGETHER WITH THE BDC ON PROJECT BLUE SKY. WE HELPED ORGANIZE AND PREPARE THE DEAL TERMS FOR THAT PROJECT WORKING AS A TEAM. UM THE C D. C I MEAN, YOU HAVE TO TELL ME BUT IT'S IN THE 6.5 YEARS THAT I'VE BEEN HERE. I THINK WE'VE WORKED EXTREMELY WELL WITH THE M C, D C AND THE M E. D. C ON A NUMBER OF THINGS. IT'S NEVER PERFECT, I SUPPOSE, BUT IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO. EXACTLY ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IS IN APRIL. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A JOINT MEETING. THAT JOINT MEETING IS ALL THREE AND JOINT IS THE RIGHT TERM, BUT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A TRIPARTITE MEETING WITH ALL THREE ENTITIES. TO MAKE SURE THAT THE COUNCIL THE C, D, C AND THE D C BOARDS AND COUNCIL ARE ALSO IN ALIGNMENT SO THAT THE STAFF OF ALL THREE OF THOSE ENTITIES ALSO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE SORT OF A UNIFIED STRATEGY IS. IS IT AS MUCH AS YOU CAN HAVE ONE? I MEAN, THAT'S A LOT OF PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF DIFFERENT VIEWS, BUT WE DO WANT TO HAVE I THINK THOSE ARE IMPORTANT TO HAVE. I THINK WE SHOULD DO THOSE EVERY YEAR AND WE'RE GOING TO ENDEAVOR TO DO THAT. IF YOU IF THE COUNCIL SAYS NO, NO, NO, WE WANTED EVERY QUARTER. IT'S HARD TO SCHEDULE THREE ENTITIES, BUT WE COULD DO IT IF YOU WANTED TO.

IF THAT'S PRIORITY, BUT IF ONCE A YEAR IS ENOUGH, OR TWICE A YEAR THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO KNOW. UM I THINK THAT WILL BE HELPFUL TO STAFF IN FAIRNESS TO THE STAFF BECAUSE HE EATS STAFF TAKING DIRECTION FROM THEIR BOARD. AND SO SOMETIMES THEY NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S ALIGNMENT THERE. AMONG THE BOARDS THE POLICY MAKING SIDE. UM, BUT I MEAN, WE WORK ON A NUMBER OF THINGS IF YOU IF WHAT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF YOU THINK THERE ARE SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF

[00:35:06]

THINGS THAT HAVEN'T GOING AS WELL AS THEY SHOULD. THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO KNOW TOO. OKAY AND ON THAT POINT YOU'LL SEE LATER UNDER OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE. THERE ARE SOME SUGGESTED CHANGES TO YOUR COUNCIL'S PRIORITIES ABOUT MAYBE HOLDING THESE TYPES OF JOINT MEETINGS WITH YOUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TO ASSURE ALIGNMENT BETWEEN YOUR STRATEGIC PLAN SO THAT STAFF HAS CLARITY AND YOUR BOARDS THAT YOU'RE POINTING HAD CLARITY ON WHERE YOU AS A POLICY BOARD. THEY ARE TRYING TO TAKE THE ORGANIZATION IN THE COMMUNITY. I DON'T KNOW THAT I JOINT TRI PARTY MEETING NEEDS TO OCCUR QUARTERLY OR MAYBE ANNUALLY, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME YES. WHETHER IT IS IN OUR, UH YOUR REGULAR COURSE OF BUSINESS OR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION JUST KIND OF SOME UPDATE ON WHERE DEALS ARE HOW WE ARE WORKING TOGETHER SO THAT I CAN MAKE A BETTER JUDGMENT OF THAT, BECAUSE WHAT ENDS UP HAPPENING IS WE GET RUSHED OUT STONES CONSIDERING THIS WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT IT? AND JUST KIND OF REACTING TO ONE SPECIFIC ITEM RATHER THAN IS THIS THE DIRECTION OF THE APPROACH THAT WE ARE TAKING JUST LEAVES US WITH. KIND OF TRANSACTIONAL RESPONSES RATHER THAN HOLISTIC DIRECTIONAL RESPONSES. I THINK THAT THE JOINT MEETING IS IMPORTANT. I'M GLAD WE'RE GOT DOWN THE COUNTER. I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE IT WAS I THINK JUSTIN'S COMMENT ABOUT OWNING THE LAND ON 1 21, AS OPPOSED TO PERHAPS INVESTING IN LAND.

INDEED, T J DO EXACTLY ZONING THAT WE WANT. IS REALLY AN IMPORTANT THING THAT NEEDS TO BE LITIGATED THERE TO DETERMINE BECAUSE IT IS JUST HOLDING ONTO THE LAND AND I GET IT. I WAS PART OF IT, BUT IT DIDN'T REALLY RESONATE WITH ME WHEN I WAS ON THERE, THAT THAT WAS AN IMPORTANT PART. BUT IT IS, YOU KNOW, THE MM ROAD DEVELOPMENT SITUATION LAST YEAR I THOUGHT WAS RIFE WITH A LOT OF, UM PROBLEM, PERHAPS COULDN'T COULD HAVE. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER. AND HAVING A JOINT MEETING MAY WELL BE A PART OF THAT. SO I THINK THAT. YOU KNOW , I'M BELIEVING HE'S ON THE CBC, AND IT SEEMS LIKE I DO A LOT OF TALKING WITH THEM ABOUT WHAT COUNCIL WANTS, BUT I'M JUST ME AND THE REST OF THE COUNSELOR TO GET A SHOT AT THAT. I THINK SO.

E. D. C SO LOOKING OVER GREAT CLOSE TO START THERE. YOU'RE SAYING LEAST ONCE A YEAR. IS THAT WHAT I'M HEARING ONCE A YEAR? SEEMS LIKE A GOOD IDEA TO ME. ALRIGHT PAUL, ARE YOU CLEAR ON THAT ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT? I'M SORRY. LITTLE FEEDBACK. PROBABLY I'M CLEAR. ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? CHARLIE? I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAD ANYTHING TO ADD TO THAT. RED. JUST IN THOSE MEETINGS. I WOULD LIKE, UM LESS OF A FORMAL AGENDA AND JUST TELL ME WHAT YOU'RE DOING. MORE DISCUSSION, THEN HAVING. THREE CHECK BLOCKS THAT WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH, UH, KIND OF LIKE TO SEE YOU. OPEN DISCUSSION ABOUT ALL THE PROJECTS THAT ARE IN THE WORKS THAT WE CAN TALK ABOUT PUBLICLY IF IT'S PUBLIC MEETING , UH SO THAT WE CAN FIND OUT EXACTLY WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS. WHAT'S IMPORTANT TO THEM? YEAH I THINK SO. THE PUBLIC PART OF THE MEETING. ABSOLUTELY I THINK THAT'S VERY HELPFUL FOR NOT ONLY THE PUBLIC TO SEE THAT DISCUSSION AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THOSE PRIORITIES ARE. THERE WAS CERTAINLY ON A PROJECT SPECIFIC BASIS, WE WOULD HAVE TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. FOR THOSE, BUT I THINK YOU UNDERSTAND THAT.

OKAY? I'M SORRY. BRICK JUMPING. NO. IMPORTS TO HAVING MORE. BECAUSE WE DO. YEAH. A LOT OF TIMES WE DON'T SEE THE DEALS UNTIL THEY'RE ALMOST VARIED. AND SO IT'S GOOD TO SEE THE PROGRESSION HOW WE ARE IN EACH DEAL AND GET THAT INFORMATION. UM OF COURSE I'M THE LIAISON FOR THE DC SO I SEE THAT ANYWAY, BUT THE OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS STAND AND SO I AGREE WITH HIM. COME.

ALRIGHT WELL CAPTURE THIS STUFF WITH STAFF, AND THEY CAN FIGURE OUT HOW TO BEST FIGURE OUT THE WAY TO GET YOUR ARMS AROUND THAT THEN AS WELL. UM BYRON NELSON. PRETTY STRONG SENTIMENT. I THINK

[00:40:03]

STAFFS PROBABLY GOT CLARITY ON THAT. BUT I'LL DEFER. NO YOU'VE GOTTA. I THINK YOU'RE IN A FIVE YEAR EXTENSION RIGHT NOW. YOU GOT A FIVE YEAR DEAL, I THINK WITH THEM YES. FIVE YEARS. WE'RE COMING UP ON YOUR THIRD YEAR, RIGHT? YES BEFORE THIRD, VERY FIVE. THAT'S CORRECT, OK? UM ABOUT HOW PARKWAY EVERYBODY CLEAR ON WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE DIRECTION FROM FROM THE COMMISSION ACCOUNTS COUNCIL. WE TALKED A LITTLE ABOUT ABOUT THE E T J INCENTIVES PRETTY STRONG SENTIMENT THERE BETWEEN FOUR RATINGS OF FOUR AND TWO ON HIGHEST PRIORITY IN THE NEXT HIGHEST PRIORITY. UM ANYTHING THAT STAFF NEEDS ON CLARITY ON THAT. NO. AND THEN THIS CONCEPT OF PROMOTING LIVE WORK AND PLAY . UM PRETTY STRONG SENTIMENT THERE. UM TIGHT, TIGHT RESPONSES WITH ALL SEVEN OF YOU FROM A THREE OR ABOVE. AND ONCE AGAIN, WE INCORPORATED THAT INTO YOUR PRIORITY STATEMENT. ONE C SPECIFICALLY, AND I KNOW WHEN I SPOKE TO ALL OF YOU BEFOREHAND IN THE ADVANCED INTERVIEWS ALL OF YOU TALKED ABOUT WE'VE GOT THE LIVE IN THE PLAY. WE DON'T HAVE AS MUCH OF THE WORK SO THAT GETS BACK TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT AND HAVING PRIMARY JOBS AND OTHER TYPES OF JOBS WHERE FOLKS CAN CAN LIVE WORK AND PLAY HERE IN MCKINNEY, SO HOW YOU TRACK THAT MAYBE NUMBER OF PRIMARY JOBS OR SECONDARY JOBS, THINGS LIKE THAT. UM I KNOW THE 3 80 ISSUE IN THE ALIGNMENT STUDY CAME OUT SHORTLY BEFORE WE MET LAST MONTH. AND THAT ONE'S A LITTLE BIT ALL OVER THE LOT. SO COLLECTIVELY, IT GETS A LOWER SCORE. I'VE GOT AN ORANGE, BUT IS THERE ANYTHING ANYBODY WANTS TO CHIME IN ON THAT COMMENT? I REALIZED THAT THAT'S A F DOT PROJECTS THAT YOU'VE GOT SOME INVOLVEMENT, BUT IT'S NOT TOTALLY UNDER YOUR CONTROL. YOU KNOW THE WAY I PERCEIVED THAT IS THAT, YOU KNOW. WHAT WE CAN DO NOW TO IMPACT THAT AND THAT'S GOING TO BE A MULTI GENERATIONAL THING WHEN IT'S DONE, AND IT AIN'T GONNA BE MOVED. AND SO IT JUST SEEMED LIKE A HOT FIRE BURNING FOR THIS YEAR TO ME TO SEE THAT WE DO WHAT WE CAN YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION WITH TUCKER HILL FOLKS ABOUT NOISE, MITIGATION AND THINGS THAT CAN BE DONE. UM . IN THAT'S GONNA IMPACT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD FOR A LONG TIME. AND CERTAINLY THERE IS OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS ARE GOING TO BE IMPACTED. ANOTHER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES ARE GOING TO BE ALONG THAT BYPASS, AND SO IT JUST SEEMED TO ME AS I ANSWERED THAT QUESTION THE WAY I ANSWERED, IT WAS THAT WE? WE DON'T SIT BACK ON THAT. WE KEEP ACTIVELY THINKING ABOUT IT AND TACTICALLY DOING WHAT WE CAN TO MAKE IT THE BEST FOR MCKINNEY AS WE MOVE FORWARD. OKAY, THIS. ON THIS ITEM. THE ALIGNMENT IS GOING TO HAVE A PROFOUND IMPACT ON OUR THOROUGHFARE, PLAN, OUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND I KNOW THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS STARTING THOSE EFFORTS. UM BECAUSE WE'LL HAVE TO MODIFY THOSE PLANTS, TOO. INSERT THAT NEW ALIGNMENT CHANGED. ALL OF THOSE PLANS BASED ON THE IMPACT THAT ROAD THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. SO. I AGREE THAT IT IS A PRIORITY TO COORDINATE THOSE THINGS. IN ADDITION, AND I TOOK THE NOTE ON THAT NOISE, MITIGATION FOR NEIGHBORHOODS AND IMPACTS ON EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS AS WELL, BUT AS FAR AS THE CONFERENCE IS PLANNED GOES, IT'S GOING TO IT'S GOING TO NEED A CHANGE. BASED ON THAT ALIGNMENT. YOU SAID THAT BETTER THAN I DID. BUT I THINK WE'RE EXACTLY ON THE SAME PAGE THAT, UM YOU KNOW THIS IS GOING TO BE LITIGATED DURING THIS CALENDAR YEAR AND THEN WHILE IT WON'T BE BUILT, IT WILL BE DIE WILL BE CAST AS TO WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE. SO TO THE EXTENT WE CAN POSITIVELY IMPACT THAT FROM A KID, THAT'S ALL. WHEN IS OUR NEXT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? DO. AND WILL THAT BE 2060? THEY'RE USUALLY EVERY 10 YEARS. BEST PRACTICES EVERY 10 YEARS, AT LEAST, BUT I'LL LET HIM WEIGH IN ON THAT. YEAH, WE DO. SENSITIVE THINK EVERYBODY GETS THAT PAUL IS RIGHT. BEST PRACTICES EVERY 10 YEARS. WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING LOCKED IN FOR BUDGET YET THAT WOULD DO THE FULL CAN'T PLAN SORT OF REFRESHED, BUT WE DO AMENDMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME TO KEEP IMPORTANT COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN REFRESHED. ADDITIONALLY WHAT WILL LOOK AT BECAUSE AND OVERALL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE IS A BIG DEAL. WE WILL LOOK TO SEE IF THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES STILL

[00:45:02]

MAKES SENSE FOR MCKINNEY. IF THEY DO, IT MIGHT BE OKAY TO DO SORT OF SMALLER AMENDMENTS VERSUS THE FULL OVERHAUL. BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING YOU KNOW. WE WENT THROUGH THE 2040 PLAN. THAT WAS A BIG EFFORT. IT'S A GREAT ASSET FOR US. WE JUST WENT THROUGH. THE UDC WILL PROBABLY KIND OF SEE HOW THINGS FLOW FOR A LITTLE BIT BEFORE GETTING THAT NEXT UPDATE ON THE CALENDAR.

IT'S MORE CURIOSITY THAN A PRIORITY. ALL RIGHT. SOME OTHER RESPONSES AS RELATED TO DIRECTION FOR STRATEGIC AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. THERE WERE SOME DISCUSSIONS ABOUT HOUSING AND THE CITY HALL PROJECTS. UM SO, AS I SAID, A LITTLE BIT OF ON THE MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING PROJECTS A LITTLE BIT OF DISPARITY ABOUT YOU KNOW WHERE YOU KNOW WHERE THAT KIND OF SHAKES OUT IN TERMS OF YOUR TARGETS ON YOUR GLOBAL HOUSING STRATEGY. AND THEN CLEARLY SOME PRETTY STRONG DIRECTION. ALTHOUGH A LITTLE BIT OF DISPARITY WITH REGARDS TO PROGRESS ON THE CITY HALL PROJECTS AND ALL THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS THAT ARE HAPPENING AROUND, YOU KNOW THAT THAT TOPS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. UM. SO I'LL GO TO STAFF ON THIS ONE ON THE YOU'VE GOT A COUPLE OTHER HOUSING ISSUES. I THINK ON THIS ONE AND THE BOTTOM YOU CAN SEE LOWER SQUAD. I DIDN'T HAVE THE ANYTHING THAT WAS KIND OF BELOW. UH THREE. I THINK IT WAS 3.1 IN THIS CASE, 3.7 ANYTHING BELOW THAT I DIDN'T REALLY HIGHLIGHT BECAUSE THERE'S NOT REAL STRONG CONSENSUS ON THOSE ITEMS, BUT AS IT RELATES TO YOUR HOUSING, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT STAFF WANTS TO ADD OR RECEIVED DIRECTION ABOUT CLARITY AND HOW THEY WANT TO ADDRESS UM THE COUNCIL'S DISCUSSIONS ON THE GLOBAL HOUSING STRATEGY AND SPECIFIC TARGETS ABOUT HOW YOU'RE TRACKING THAT. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD, UM, ONLY HAVE THEN DOING KIND OF HOUSING PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL. UM SOMEHOW, YEAH, ONCE A YEAR, I WOULD ANTICIPATE THAT WE WOULD DO THAT AGAIN THIS YEAR. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE A LOT OF WORK UNDERWAY WITH THE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST, WHICH HAS YET TO BE DEVELOPED, UM, THE NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION STUDY, WHICH WE ARE GETTING IN DRAFT FORM, SO WE HAVE A LOT OF SORT OF THINGS BUBBLING IF THERE IS SPECIFIC DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL, WE DEFINITELY WANT TO HEAR IT. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ON THE RIGHT TRACK. WITH YOUR PRIORITIES. SO ANYWAY, WE CAN FISSILE TATE THAT DISCUSSION. WE ARE HAPPY TO DO SO. I THINK THIS IS ALWAYS AN INTERESTING. ONE WHEN WE START TALKING ABOUT HOUSING IS BECAUSE THE CITY DOESN'T BUILD HOUSES. UM WE DON'T REALLY CONTROL. UM AND I'M TALKING ABOUT OWNERSHIP HOUSES, NOT RENTAL HOUSES, BUT WE DON'T REALLY CONTROL WHAT PEOPLE ARE DOING. AND WHEN THE DIRT COST 101 $110,000 AN ACRE AND INSIDE THE CITY, YOU CAN'T BUILD ANYTHING. THAT'S AFFORDABLE THAT WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HOW'S IT AND SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ANSWER IS BECAUSE WE BEEN 108 YEARS NOW AND NOTHING'S REALLY IMPROVED. HOUSING HAS JUST GOTTEN MORE AND MORE EXPENSIVE IN THE CITY OF MAKENI FOR THE LAST EIGHT YEARS, AND WE ALWAYS HAVE THAT UP THERE, BUT I DON'T KNOW REALLY SEEN ANYTHING THAT WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO DO FOR EIGHT YEARS. SO I DON'T KNOW WHY WE MEAN IS THERE REALLY TRULY ANYTHING WE CAN DO? UM WHEN IT COMES TO HOUSING LIKE THAT. I WOULD. I WOULD RESPONDED, AND KIM EITHER WAY AND CAMERA BODY ELSE FOR THAT MATTER. I THINK IF YOU LOOK BACK, AND I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS IN FRONT OF ME BRAINY, BUT IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS THAT WE EITHER FINANCE CORPORATION PARTICIPATED IN UM OR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, WHICH WE WILL HELP FROM TIME TO TIME WITH THE NCDC MONEY OR OR FORMAL HOUSING. UNITS THAT WERE REFURBISHED AND REHAB. I THINK YOU'LL SEE THAT THERE'S ACTUALLY BEEN QUITE A BIT OF PROGRESS THERE, AND THAT CONTINUES TO BE A PRIORITY, ALBEIT YOU KNOW, THESE AREN'T THE EASIEST PROJECTS TO SITE LOCATIONS. YOU JUST ADOPTED A NEW TOOL WITH THE PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION, FOR EXAMPLE, MOVE THE NEEDLE IN TERMS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE MIDDLE IS A DIFFERENT CHALLENGE ALSO MADE SOME CHANGES. TO MORE CHANGES TO HELP MAKE MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING PRODUCT MORE VIABLE. BUT ITS LAND USE. IT'S SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE REQUIRE. THAT THAT MAY BE MADE MISSING MIDDLE HARDER TO REACH, AND NOW WE'RE MAKING THEM MORE REACHABLE. SO IT'S GRADUAL TAKES

[00:50:05]

TIME. SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT AND SAY WE HAVEN'T MADE MUCH PROGRESS, I UNDERSTAND THAT BECAUSE IT'S YOU KNOW, IT'S GRADUAL, INCREMENTAL. BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT IN THE BIGGER PICTURE, I DO THINK WE ARE DOING QUITE A BIT AND WE'RE GOING TO PROBABLY BE BRINGING MORE STRATEGIES FORWARD. CAN MAYBE YOU CAN ADD ANYTHING THAT I MAY HAVE MISSED GOOD POINTS ALL AROUND. AND UM, COUNCILMAN MAYOR PRO TEM ROGERS. YOU'RE RIGHT. THE STUDY IS NOT THE END ALL BE ALL IS RELATED TO HOUSING. UM IT IS A COMPLICATED ISSUE AND GENERALLY IN HISTORICALLY, CITIES HAVE NOT BEEN AT THE FOREFRONT OF TACKLING IT. IT SPEND YOUR HOUSING AUTHORITY.

IT'S BEEN THE FEDERAL TAX CREDITS. IT'S BEEN THE STATE WHAT WE ROLL. I WOULD BECOME PRETTY HELP FORWARD. ESPECIALLY OVER THE LAST. I'M SICK. BOTH CAMP. FEEL LIKE CORPORATION.

WHAT KIND OF HEAD OF THE REGION NO LISTENING. I NEED TO CHECK. THAT MOVIE BOXES ON A IS DOING APART. WHEN I READ THIS. IT'S MORE ABOUT HOW NEW ABOUT THIS MISSING MILK PROJECT PRODUCT COULD BE. OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP HAS CLEARLY BEEN IDENTIFIED IN MCKINNEY IS A CHALLENGE FOR YOUR ENTRY LEVEL. HOMES IN MIDDLE HOUSING CAN HELP THAT AND THAT COULD BE A TOWN HOME. IT COULD BE A DUPLEX WHERE YOU ON THE DUPLEX, AND YOU CAN RENT OUT THE SITE NEXT TO YOU. SO YOU'RE EARNING SOME INCOME AND THAT CAN ELEVATE YOU TO SORT OF THE NEXT LADDER IN THE HOUSING AREA. WE HAVE DONE A LOT IN OUR CODE TO MAKE MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING A LITTLE BIT EASIER TO DEVELOP, AND I THINK NOW WE HAVE STARTED LOOKING AT. ARE THERE OTHER TOOLS THAT THE CITY CAN USE? AND IF THERE'S NOT ARE THERE PARTNERSHIPS WE CAN MAKE WITHOUT OUR ENTITIES AND AGENCIES. ONE THING THAT WE'VE DONE WITH THE HELP OF CDC OVER THE LAST YEAR, CDC WE HAVE SORT OF A QUARTERLY HOUSING LUNCH, AND IT IS MHM REPRESENTATIVES. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. STAFF COUNCILMAN BELLER ATTENDS THE CHAMBER ATTENDS. IT'S A GROUP OF ABOUT 10 TO 15 OF US. THEY'VE BEEN SITTING DOWN AND AT LEAST MAKING UNDERSTANDING KIND OF WHAT ALL THE PARTNERS ARE DOING, AND THAT HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIAL BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF CROSS CONNECTS THAT WE CAN MAKE TO FORWARD SOMETHING LIKE THIS, BUT IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A FULL CITY THING. WE CAN'T DO IT ALL. WE CAN LEVERAGE PARTNERSHIPS TO TRY TO GET SOMETHING DONE BECAUSE THE THING THAT ALWAYS COMES BACK TO ME, IS WHEN YOU WHEN YOU DEVELOP A PRODUCT THAT'S LOW.

AND AFFORDABLE. HOW DO YOU KEEP THE PEOPLE WHO ARE BUYING IT FOR REBELS? IF I WANT TO COME IN AND BY TWO OR THREE OF THEM BECAUSE THEY'RE CHEAP, AND NOW I'M GOING TO RENT THEM OUT. AND SO AND THEN THAT JUST DOESN'T REALLY HELP. WHAT YOU YOU'RE RIGHT, I IT IS A COMPLICATED ISSUE, AND WE'RE TRYING TO EXPLORE WHAT TOOLS WE MIGHT HAVE IN OUR TOOLBOX TO SEE IF WE CAN ADDRESS THAT SORT OF THING. MOST OF TIME. THOSE ARE DONE THROUGH DEED RESTRICTIONS IN SOME WAY, SHAPE OR FORM A GRANT OR SOME DOLLARS, THEN YOU THAT'S IN PERPETUITY OR FOR SOME DEFINED PERIOD OF TIME. THE OTHER ISSUE TO ADDRESS HERE AND YOU'VE GOT AN APPROPRIATELY IN THIS BOX.

SOMETIMES PEOPLE HAVE HOUSING IN DIFFERENT PILLARS, BUT, UM MOST OF THE TIME IN MY EXPERIENCE OF WORKING WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONCE THEY'VE DECIDED WHERE THEY WANT TO BE IN THE MARKET, AND THEN IT'S A MATTER OF WHAT YOUR TAX AND YOUR UTILITIES AND WHATEVER ELSE THAT ALL LOOKS TO BE. UP IN THAT SAME BUCKET OF CONCERN IS LABOR AND WORKFORCE AND SO ESPECIALLY IN THE KIND OF POST COVID AND THE WORK FROM HOME AND YOU KNOW ALL THE IMPLICATIONS OF THAT FINDING PEOPLE THAT ARE CLOSE, THEY CAN FILL THE JOBS FOR YOUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

GOALS ARE PRETTY CRITICAL. SO WE'RE SEEING A LOT OF CITIES THAT EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT THEIR PRIMARY ROLE, REALIZING THAT CAN'T BE SUCCESSFUL IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IF THEY DON'T DEAL WITH SOME SORT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS PART OF THAT KIND OF HOLISTIC STRATEGY. AND I WILL TELL YOU RAINY ALL OVER THE COUNTRY. NOBODY'S GOT THIS FIGURED OUT. IT IS. IT IS ALL OVER THE LOT. EVERYBODY'S THROWING A LOT AGAINST THE WALL AND TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT. AND WHAT WORKS IN ONE COMMUNITY MAY NOT WORK IN ANOTHER COMMUNITY, SO IT'S A TOUGH NUT TO CRACK.

THERE'S NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, BUT IT'S DEFINITELY A PART OF YOUR OVERALL ECONOMIC WELCOME STRATEGY. AND YOU ALL SAID THAT YOU WANT PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO WORK HERE AS WELL. SO I THINK IT'S LIKE IT'S IN THE RIGHT BUCKET REMARK ON THIS THAT YOU KNOW IN THE JUST COMPLETED, I GUESS MY 13TH MONTH ON COUNCIL, BUT IN THAT TIME WE STARTED THE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST, WHICH IS A COMPONENT FOR THE MISSING MIDDLE BECAUSE IT ALLOWS FOR OWNERSHIP OF THE STRUCTURE, IF NOT THE LAND, WHICH WILL MITIGATE THE COST. WE DID THE PFC. WHICH WE'VE GOT OUR FIRST PROJECT GOING, SO FROM WHERE I SIT. I'VE SEEN THAT WE'VE MADE PROGRESS, BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S A

[00:55:05]

LONG ROAD TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THAT COME OUT OF THAT SEAT COME OUT OF THE GROUND. YOU KNOW THE MISSING MIDDLE TO ME, AND I THINK IT COULD BE A VERY OPAQUE TERM IS THE ADVENT OF OWNERSHIP AND, YOU KNOW, I THINK CONDOS ARE HARD, BUT IF THEY'RE NOT AS HARD AS I THINK THEY ARE, THAT'S SOMETHING I WOULD LIKE TO SEE. YOU KNOW, WE'VE MADE SOME PROGRESS ON TOWN HOMES AND THINGS LIKE THAT, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT SOMEONE CAN COME AND BUY HIM UP AND RUN THEM OUT.

BUT IF THEY ARE INDIVIDUALLY PLANTED FOR OWNERSHIP EVENTUALLY CAN SETTLE TO SOMEONE WHO IS OWNER OCCUPIED, AND I THINK IT'S BETTER THAN THE TRADITIONAL MULTI FAMILY HOUSING, SO IT IS SOMETHING THAT I THINK WE'VE MADE PROGRESS ON. BUT I'D LIKE TO SEE THE FOCUS ON WHAT I HAVE TO FIND THE MISSING MIDDLE AND I THINK IS UNDERSTOOD. CHARLIE YOUR LIGHTS ON IS THAT FROM BEFORE WERE NOT YES, THAT'S FROM BEFORE HAPPY TO REPORT. I DIDN'T MISS YOU ALL RIGHT? UM I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY CLARITY ON THE CITY HALL AND SURROUNDING INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. AND ANYTHING STAFF NEEDS ON THAT. I THINK YOU KNOW, I THINK EVERYBODY'S ON THE SAME PAGE KNOWING THAT ONE EVEN THOUGH IT KIND OF THAT'S THAT WAS HIGHER, PROBABLY IN HIGH PRIORITIES IN THE PAST. NOW YOU'RE COMING OUT OF THE GROUND. SO NOW IT'S A MATTER OF MANAGING THE PROJECT.

SO ANYTHING ELSE IN THIS SHEET THAT I WANT TO TALK THROUGH. I KNOW YOU MADE ADJUSTMENTS. YOU KNOW THE PURSUIT OF THE CORPORATE CORPORATE CAMPUS THAT GETS BACK TO THE PRIMARY JOB COMPONENT. YOU KNOW, THAT SHOOK OUT. UM YOU KNOW, A LITTLE LOWER, BUT STILL, YOU KNOW, ABOVE ABOVE THREE. AH, UM. SAME THING WITH FOOD DESERTS. UM AND THEN THE CONCERNS OF GENTRIFICATION. THESE ARE ALL THINGS THAT KIND OF WERE IDENTIFIED IN SOME OF MY COMMENTS WITH YOU. THEY COME UP DURING OUR DISCUSSIONS LAST MONTH. BUT ANYTHING ANYBODY WANTS TO COMMENT ON THAT BEFORE WE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. YES IF YOU NEED FOR YOUR REVIEW, THIS WAS SLIDING ONE. GOTCHA YEAH. GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO SEE THAT. UM AND PAUL, DID YOU EXPLAIN TO THE MAYOR ABOUT KIND OF THE WAY THE COLOR SCHEMES ARE IDENTIFIED? NOT ALL RIGHT. SO MAYOR, THOSE IN GREEN ON THE FAR RIGHT WHERE FOUR AND ABOVE, OBVIOUSLY AND WHERE THEY'RE GREEN IN THE RANKINGS. THERE'S PRETTY MUCH SYMMETRY AMONGST THE COUNCIL VOTING. UM ANYTHING THAT DIDN'T THAT WAS BELOW FOUR, BUT ABOVE LIKE, 33.29, I THINK WAS THE HIGHEST I WENT WITH. I PUT AN ORANGE TO THE RIGHT, MEANING IT'S NOT AS HIGH RANKING AND THEN WHEN THEY'RE SHAKING, SHAKE OUT LIKE IN YELLOW. YOU CAN JUST SEE THE DISPARITY OF THE COUNCIL IS A LITTLE BIT BROADER. AND WE'RE KIND OF TALKING THROUGH. YOU KNOW WHERE WHAT THAT MEANS TO STAFF AND CLARITY. SO THE STAFF KIND OF KNOWS WHERE YOU'RE AT AS A GROUP. OKAY? YEP. ALRIGHT, SO THAT WAS SLIDE NUMBER ONE THAT WAS SLIDE NUMBER TWO. THERE'S ANOTHER SLIDE HERE , NOT AS MUCH THERE BUT THE LAST PIECES THAT FIT UNDER THE ECONOMIC, STRATEGIC AND ECONOMIC GROWTH WERE WORKFORCE HOUSING, WHICH WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT. AND THEN THE GROWTH RATE OF MULTI FAMILY, WHICH WAS A COMMENT THAT WAS RAISED IN MY PREVIOUS CONVERSATIONS WITH YOU , BUT THEN AGAIN THIS MORNING AS WELL, WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE, BUT THERE'S NOT A LOT OF SYMMETRY AND THOSE RESPONSES. SO UM, I'M NOT SURE FROM STAFFS PERSPECTIVE . THEY'RE THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO A WHOLE LOT WITH THAT, BECAUSE THERE'S NOT CLARITY. ANYBODY WANT TO REACT TO ANY OF THEIR EITHER STAFF OR FROM THE COUNCIL. OKAY? HEIGHT. SO THE BALANCE OF THIS FALL THAT MEETS YOUR NEEDS? YOU WANT TO STAMP YOUR OKAY? YEAH LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, AS AND YOU'RE RIGHT AS FAR AS WE WERE, I THINK MCKINNEY DOES MORE IN THE WAY OF HOUSING THAN MOST ANY OTHER CITY. BUT IT'S REALLY INTERESTING WHEN YOU GO BACK THE PRIORITIES ALL OVER THE PLACE WHEN IT COMES TO HOUSING. YEAH SO YOU DON'T HAVE A CONSENSUS ON THIS COUNCIL? THAT'S CLEAR. YEAH, THAT'S VERY CLEAR. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE WAY WE NEED THIS IS A PRIORITY BECAUSE YOU COULD NOT GET MORE DIVERSE DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES WIDER WOULD SUGGEST THAT THERE IS LESS CONSENSUS, RIGHT, AND YOU KNOW THAT IS THERE IN LAY THE CHALLENGE FOR STAFF AND FOR THE COMMUNITY AND COALESCING AROUND CANDIES. THESE ARE WE KNOW THESE ARE DELEGATE PROJECTS AND DELICATE SUBJECTS.

THAT'S AWESOME ONES ARE ONE AND FIVE, AND I'LL TELL YOU RANDI FROM LIKE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE COMMISSION, THE COUNCIL'S IN PREVIOUS YEARS, AND THIS YEAR I LOST SURPRISED WITH THIS BECAUSE YOU'RE ALL OVER THE LOT AS A BOARD AND I WILL TELL YOU SO FORMER CITY MANAGER FALLSBURG IT'S LIKE, WHAT DO WE DO WITH THIS? SCOTT COUNCIL CAN'T FIND SYMMETRY IN WHERE IT'S AT AND IT'S MANIFEST ITSELF IN THESE RESPONSES. YEAH SO I DON'T KNOW IF I MENTIONED IT HERE. THERE THERE. I DO WORK UP AND IN CONNECTICUT AND CONNECTICUT IS DEALING WITH THE COST OF HOUSING OF TAXES AND CONNECTICUT ARE JUST PHENOMENAL. AND SO WHAT THE STATE HAS DONE THEY'RE SAYING EVERY TOWN THEY HAVE MORE TOWNS AND CITIES. EVERY TOWN HAS A PERCENTAGE OF THEIR HOUSING

[01:00:06]

STOCK THAT HAS TO BE AFFORDABLE. AND IF THEY DON'T HIT THAT, MARK THE STATE HAS A LAW THAT ALLOWS A DEVELOPER COMMAND AND BE ABLE TO BUILD AN ESSENCE. WHATEVER THE ZONING DESIGNATION IS, IF IT'S IN YOUR DOWNTOWN, IT'S AN INDUSTRIAL OR WHATEVER AND BUILD AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE CITY HAS TO BASICALLY TAKE IT. SO EVERY CITY IN CONNECTICUT IS THEY ARE. THEY ARE TAKING THIS LACK OF CONSENSUS LIKE YOU'VE GOTTEN SAYING WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANYBODY PUT ANYTHING IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE GOTTA GET OUR ARMS AROUND WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO, SO IT'S REALLY FORCED THE CONVERSATION AND IT'S CREATED QUITE A BIT OF PANIC. NOW. I DON'T SEE THAT HAPPENING IN THE LONE STAR STATE ANY MORE THAN I DO IN FLORIDA, BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT GIVES YOU A SENSE OF DISPARITY. BECAUSE ALL OVER THE COUNTRY NOBODY KNOWS THE BEST WAY TO DO IT. BUT IN IN SOME CASES THE STATE IS SAYING, IF YOU DON'T DO IT, WE'RE GONNA LET THE DEVELOPERS HAVE FREE WILL IN YOUR COMMUNITY, AND IT'S CREATING QUITE A BIT OF CONTROVERSY. SO I DON'T KNOW FOR STAFF PERSPECTIVE. HOW YOU HOW YOU INTERPRET THAT BEYOND WHAT YOU'VE BEEN TRYING TO DO, BUT, YEAH, THERE'S STILL A LOT OF CONVERSATION ABOUT WHAT THAT SHOULD LOOK AND FEEL LIKE TO YOUR POINT RAINY. OKAY? ALRIGHT SO, UM, THE BALANCE OF THE WE DID NOT INCORPORATE ALL THE OTHER. THE OTHER OBJECTIVES THAT STAFF IS TRACKING AND PART OF THOSE THINGS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER TODAY, BUT THEY WILL. THEY MAY GET TWEAKED OR ADJUSTED BECAUSE THEY'RE MOST OF THEM. WHAT THEY'RE TRACKING RELATES TO YOUR EXISTING PRIORITIES, SO THOSE WILL LARGELY GO FORWARD, BUT THEY'LL THEY'LL DO A RESHUFFLE WITH THAT . BUT GENERALLY SPEAKING, WE DIDN'T ASK YOU TO VOTE ON ALL THOSE AS WELL. OKAY SO OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE AND MAYOR. WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE GOING GOAL BY GOAL OR PILLAR BY PILLAR AREA AND THEN WE'RE STARTING WITH THE EXISTING STATEMENTS. THEN WE'RE GOING TO ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO BASED ON WHAT WE HEARD LAST MONTH, AND THAT'S THE NEXT SLIDE COMING UP. UM SO THERE WERE IT WAS JUST YEAH. SO I'LL JUST GO TO THE SLIDE, SO IN TO SEE, UM THERE WAS A RECOMMENDATION AT THE LAST SESSION TO ADD IN NEW TECHNOLOGIES. AND THEN IN TWO D GETS BACK TO THE POINT. WE HAD SOME CONVERSATION ABOUT, UM ADDING JOINT MEETINGS. UM AND SOME CONVERSATION AMONGST YOUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS SO THAT THE PLANS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS ADOPTED FOR MCKINNEY FIRST ARE FULLY INTEGRATED INTO YOUR RESPECTIVE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, SO THEY AT LEAST KNOW WHERE YOU ARE AS POLICYMAKER BOARDS. SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR IS BLESSING IS WHETHER THIS IS YOU KNOW, NUMBER ONE. DO WE HEAR YOU CORRECTLY AND NUMBER TWO? ARE YOU OKAY WITH WHAT'S BEEN SUGGESTED, OR DO YOU WANT TO MAKE ANY TWEAKS IN THE SPACE AT THE END OF THE DAY COMING OUT OF THIS SESSION TODAY YOU WILL HAVE NEW PRIORITIES OR TWEETS PRIORITIES . WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THE WORDING IS APPROPRIATE. SO LET'S JUST TAKE TO SEE. IS THAT OKAY? THE WAY IT WAS SUGGESTED. EVERYBODY ON BOARD WITH THAT. AND TWO D I STILL THINK IS WORTHY, BUT I THINK THE INTENT WAS, UM IS THERE A DESIRE TO HAVE SOME TRAINING SOME STAFF AND DISCUSSIONS AMONGST YOUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TO REVIEW YOUR STRATEGIC PLAN? MCKINNEY FIRST WITH THEM, SO LET THEIR WORKING IN HOPEFULLY LOCKSTEP WITH WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH AS THE HIGHEST LEVEL POLICY BOARD TO D IS EFFECTIVE. WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT. EARLIER ON THE VERY FIRST THE SINGLE HIGHEST OBJECTIVE MAYOR. YOU ARE HERE BUT WAS UM ENCOURAGING BETTER COORDINATION, I THINK WAS THE TERM BETWEEN THE GCC D. C IN THE CITY ADMINISTRATION. TWO D IS CLEARLY ANOTHER WAY OF SHOWING THAT THAT THAT'S A PRIORITY. JUST IN A DIFFERENT WAY. SO WE TALKED ABOUT SOME THINGS THAT I HAD ASKED COUNSEL TO GIVE SOME SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OR SOME WHAT DO THEY MEAN BY BETTER COORDINATION AND THEY WERE VERY HELPFUL AND CERTAINLY JOINT MEETINGS OR AT LEAST ONE A YEAR, MAYBE TWICE WILL BE IN ORDER AND OTHER THINGS THAT WE CAN DO TO ENSURE THAT THERE'S BETTER COLLABORATION AND COORDINATION BETWEEN THE GCC C AND THE CITY ADMINISTRATION AT THE STAFF LEVEL. BUT ALSO AT THE BOARD LEVEL POLICY MAKING LEVEL.

TWO D GET YOU WHERE YOU WANT TO BE. THE ONLY REMARK I'D MAKE IS THAT YOU KNOW, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT CDC AND E. D. C AND WE TALKED ABOUT P AND C. BUT BEYOND THAT, I'M NOT CONFIDENT THAT WE NEED TO HAVE JOINT MEETINGS WITH OTHER BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS THAT'S UNDERSTOOD. THE ONLY ONE YOU MIGHT WANT TO CONSIDER ONLY BECAUSE IT AFFECTS SO MUCH THE LOOK OF YOUR COMMUNITY IS YOUR YOUR PLANNING AND ZONING AND PLANNING AND ZONING. OH I'M SORRY. I MISSED THAT. I HEARD THIS CITY. I THOUGHT IT WAS C D. C AND E D. C. I'M SORRY. YEP. SO DO YOU WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THEN IT'S SUPPOSED TO, BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, THAT'S A BLANKET STATEMENT ON ALL YOUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. OKAY? SAID IT'S THE END OF THE DAY. THESE ARE YOUR STATEMENT, SO YOU'VE GOT TO FEEL

[01:05:15]

COMFORTABLE WITH WHAT THEY WHAT THEY REFLECT. AND IF THERE. WHAT YOU DIDN'T NAME THEM SPECIFICALLY, I WOULD. I WOULD MAYBE SUGGEST TO KEEP IT FAIRLY BROAD BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY BASED ON THE PRIORITIES OF THE DAY. YOU MAY YOU MAY END UP WITH SOMETHING THAT IS A AN EMERGING EVENT AND HOUSING, FOR EXAMPLE, I ASSUME WE HAVE A HOUSING AUTHORITY HERE, RIGHT? SO IF YOU DON'T SPECIFY IT, THEN TO YOUR EXPECT , MAYBE JUST LEAVING ABROAD GIVES YOU THE FLEXIBILITY TO ADDRESS IT. MAKES SENSE. OKAY? UM WE ADDED TO OTHER SUGGESTED.

PRIORITIES. YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF WORK THROUGH TO E AND TWO F. ONCE AGAIN THIS CAME THESE CAME FROM THE CONVERSATIONS LAST MONTH ABOUT WHAT YOU WANTED TO CONSIDER AS ADDITIONS. SO THAT'S THE FIRST TIME YOU'VE SEEN THESE AND SOME YOU WORDING. I'M YEAH, I'M GONNA GET YES. SO IT'S TO TREVOR'S POINT. UM LET ME I'M GONNA GO BACK AND FORTH A LITTLE BIT ON TWO E. THERE WAS A QUESTION ASKED THAT I'VE HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW IT GETS TO DIVERSITY AND CULTURE AND BOARDS. IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY GET TO THE, UM THE TRAINING AND THE TYPE OF THINGS BUT THERE WAS NOT A LOT OF IT'S ABOUT 3.14. SO YOU KNOW, I'M KIND OF IN THE MID PACK. UM BUT YOU WERE KIND OF ALL OVER THE LOT WITH REGARDS TO THAT. SO IT WAS INTERESTING BECAUSE THAT'S ONE WHERE THERE WAS A SUGGESTION TO EAT TO ADD THIS AS A PRIORITY, AND THEN WE GOT SOME IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK ABOUT WHERE ARE YOU AS A BOARD ON THAT ISSUE? SO UM, TO TREVOR'S POINT, YOU KNOW I WAS GOING TO COME TO THAT. BUT YOU KNOW THAT'S THE LANGUAGE AS WE'VE SUGGESTED IT AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE RESPONSE ON THAT. SO IT'S REALLY KIND OF GOING BACK TO YOU. IF IT'S IMPORTANT, YOU'RE IT'S KIND OF STRAIGHT OUT. THREE OF YOU HAD INDICATED THE LOWER SCALE WITH, UM YOU KNOW, THREE OF YOU ARE FOUR OF YOU FROM MID PACK TO HIGHER SO THAT GIVES YOU SOME FEEDBACK OF WHERE YOU ARE AS A GROUP. SO GOING BACK TO THAT STATEMENT. DO YOU WANT TO KEEP IT CHANGE IT.

ELIMINATE IT. AS A PRIORITY BECAUSE IT WILL CERTAINLY BE AT THE END OF THE DAY OF SOMETHING THAT WILL EITHER BE IN YOUR PLAN OR NOT BEING YOUR IN YOUR PLAN AS A COUNCIL PRIORITY.

OKAY? MHM. GOTCHA. OKAY. I THINK WHEN YOU PUT IT ON A ON A PRIORITY LIKE THIS, THOUGH, YOU MIGHT RECOGNIZE THE DEFICIENCIES THAT ARE CREATED BY NOT HAVING THAT THAT DISTRIBUTION SO THAT WHEN WE MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT DOWNTOWN OR ABOUT. YEAH EAST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT, AND WE HAVE UM, NOBODY THAT LIVES EAST OF 75 ON THE BOARDS THAT ARE MAKING THOSE DECISIONS THEY'RE HARDER TO MAKE . AND SO IT'S NOT THAT WE NEED TO APPOINT THE ONE PERSON THAT APPLIES, BUT MAYBE WE NEED TO FIND WAYS TO FOSTER MORE APPLICATIONS ARE MORE INVOLVEMENT. AND SO I DON'T THINK THAT THE TAKING AWAY THE THAT. ACCEPTING THE GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY IS HOW. MEANS THAT YOU NECESSARILY HAVE TO TAKE SOME LESSER LEVEL OF. CAPABILITY. BUT IT MAY IT MAY ANECDOTALLY ON AN INDIVIDUAL YEAR, BUT I THINK YOU

[01:10:04]

COULD LOOK AT IF WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF REPRESENTATION EAST OF 75 . WE'RE MAKING DECISIONS THAT AFFECT EAST OF 75 THAT WE'RE BETTER OFF BY HAVING A BOARD THAT LOOKS, UM THAT INCLUDES THAT REPRESENTATION. I DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH SAYING THAT NOT SAYING THAT YOU HAVE TO PICK THE ONE PERSON THAT THAT APPLIES SAYING THAT THAT'S BETTER FOR US ARGUMENTS OR ORDER. WHERE INDIVIDUALS ON COUNCIL MADE VERY SPECIFIC, HANGING THEIR HEAD ON A DECISION BASED ON GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF THAT THERE WASN'T SOMEONE A CERTAIN HISTORY. TO ENFORCE THAT. TO MEDIA. YOU CAN DO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET AS MUCH PARTICIPATION. SO WE HAVE A CONVENTION TO CHOOSE FROM FROM ALL DISTRICTS. FANTASTIC. SO REASONABLE. BUT IT'S WALKING.

LOCATION. THIS DOESN'T ASK THAT WE MAKE THE DECISION IT SAYS TO IMPLEMENT ENHANCED METRICS TO SUPPORT AN IMPROVEMENT TO THAT. AND SO THOSE ADVANCED METRICS CAN BE ENSURING THAT OUR APPLICATION PROCESS IS, UM MORE WIDELY SHARED. THAT THAT THAT PARTICIPATION, YOU KNOW? YEAH, UP ON IT. I'M JUST SAYING FOR MYSELF. THAT WAS THAT WAS ALWAYS SPEED. WHAT PART OF THIS.

SELECTION THIS FIRST IMPORTANT. PUSH. WOULD POINTING LANGUAGE SOMETHING LIKE ENHANCED METRICS.

UM. JUST SAY TO IMPROVE INSTEAD OF TO SUPPORT TO IMPROVE DIVERSITY, REPRESENTATION AND PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND EXPERIENCES THAT BECAUSE THAT GET EVERYBODY IN THE SAME BOX.

WITHOUT YOU KNOW, THE TO SUPPORT IMPROVED KIND OF IMPLIES THAT THAT'S THE ULTIMATE GOAL AND A LITTLE DIFFERENT LANGUAGE THAN JUST BASICALLY, UM, YOU KNOW, AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE YOUR DIVERSITY REPRESENTATION. I'M JUST SEEING IF THERE'S A THERE'S A COMMENT IF THERE'S A DIFFERENT LANGUAGE , DIFFERENT ADJECTIVES TO YOU KNOW THAT MIGHT GET YOU ALL THERE. I KNOW. I KNOW. IN THE CONVERSATIONS OF THE ADVANCED CONVERSATIONS WE'VE HAD THERE WERE SOME DISCUSSIONS ABOUT REPRESENTATION AND WHAT THAT LOOKS AND FEELS LIKE WHICH MANIFESTED ITSELF IN THE CONVERSATION WE HAD LAST MONTH THAT GOT TO THIS STATEMENT. BUT AT THE END, AS I SAID, THIS IS YOUR STATEMENT, NOT MINE, SO YOU HAVE TO BE COMFORTABLE WITH WHAT IT SAYS. OR DOESN'T SAY. EITHER I SEE WITH THIS IS THE ONLY GONE THROUGH BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ONCE, BUT WE IDENTIFY PEOPLE BASED. WE SEE THE STREET NAME, BUT THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN MUCH TO US BECAUSE STREETS OF ST THEN WHERE IS IT, YOU KNOW, UM, BUT WE SEE A DISTRICT BUT THE NEW DISTRICT. YOU DON'T SHAPED DIFFERENTLY, AND I'LL JUST I'M JUST THINKING OF DISTRICT ONE. IT'S SHAPED LIKE A CRESCENT THAT WRAPS AROUND THE CITY, AND SO SOMEONE WHO LIVES IN AUBURN HILLS IN DISTRICT ONE MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT AGENDA THAN SOMEONE WHO LIVES ON THROCKMORTON AND YOU KNOW, SO I'M NOT. I DON'T KNOW. IN OTHER WORDS, HOW WE DO THIS. WE HAVE TO INCORPORATE SOMETHING THAT WOULD SHOW THE MORE SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION. SOMEONE LIVES IN BEYOND THE DISTRICT IN MY OPINION. WOULDN'T IT JUST BE SOMEONE. HAD ALREADY HAPPENED.

SOMEONE DIGITAL REPRESENTED. THERE NEEDS TO BE REPRESENTATION ON THE BOARD. IN THAT A CERTAIN AREA RIGHT NOW OR HEARTBURN. NOTICE DISTRICT. THE OTHER QUALIFIED. SUBMIT APPLICATIONS AND ALL THAT ADVOCATE. I'M VERY HAPPY. BUT ANY DESTRUCTIVE APPLICATIONS WITH. THERE'S LIKE PROBABLES. FRANK DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE. BUT BUT THAT THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT THAT ADVOCATING A SUCCESSFUL WHEN I MEAN YEAH, BUT THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. IT'S LIKE WE'RE WE'VE BEFORE YOU GOT HERE. WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT THE E D C U M N C. D. C BUT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE, I HAVE ZERO INPUT ON ANYTHING, NOT ONLY A ZON I'M NOT A AND SO DECISIONS GET MADE

[01:15:06]

, IN LARGE PART THAT THAT IMPACT THE CITY PRETTY DRASTICALLY. AND I'VE I'VE GOT NO, I GUESS, UM, RESPONSIBILITY IN THAT, AND I'VE GOT NO, UM, WAY TO CHANGE THAT, AND I'VE GOT NO WAY TO RESPOND TO MY CONSTITUENCY TODAY. WHEN I I'VE GOT NOWHERE TO EFFECT THAT THAT'S NOT TRUE. FIRST OF ALL MORE MONEY. HE'S GOT AN INDOOR DISTRICT ONE THE C. I THINK THE SAME. IT WASN'T WHAT IT SAID.

BUT IT WAS CLOSE. BUT THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN GOOD. I MEAN, WHEN YOU WHEN YOU PUT A, UH YOU KNOW A COPPER EXTRUDING PLANT NEXT TO CITIZENS AND CONTINUE TO GROW THAT IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A GOOD THING. WHEN WE MEASURED JUST BY DOLLAR AMOUNT. BUT BUT WHAT I'M SAYING IS LIKE I DON'T GET TO ATTEND MEETINGS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING. AND IN TERMS OF THINGS LIKE DIRECTION. UM, HAVE VERY LITTLE WAY TO AFFECT CHANGE IN THAT. OF COURSE, THAT'S THAT'S THE RESULT OF MATH, MR MR MURDERS IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND TURNING YOUR MIC ON WHEN YOU'RE SAYING THANK YOU, THAT'S OBVIOUSLY JUST THE PRODUCT OF MATH. THERE'S TWO LIAISONS. TO A BOARD AND COMMISSION AND WE'VE GOT SEVEN COUNCIL MEMBERS, SO THERE'S NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO BE REPRESENTATION OF FOUR. THAT WOULD BE OF COURSE, A QUORUM, SO THERE'S FOUR DIFFERENT DISTRICTS. SO YOU KNOW I DON'T I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT WILL EVER CHANGE THERE WILL ALWAYS FOUR WILL ALWAYS BE A QUORUM AS LONG AS THERE'S SEVEN, SO IT'S FOUR DISTRICTS AND THEY WILL ALWAYS ALL BE ON ALL BOARDS. SO I'M JUST SAYING THE LIAISON SYSTEM DOESN'T WORK. LIKE WHATEVER IT'S SUPPOSED TO DO. IT DOESN'T WORK FOR THOSE OF US THAT DON'T GET ANY INFLUENCE ON ON THOSE BOARDS. BECAUSE YOU KNOW, WE GO OUT AND WE TRY TO RESPOND TO CONSTITUENT ISSUES. WE YOU KNOW A BIG THING IN DISTRICT ONE IS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT'S THAT WAS ONE OF THE REASONS I PUT UP TO THE CANDIDATES THAT HAVE PUT UP FOR ABC BECAUSE I THINK THAT THEY BRING X STRONG AMOUNT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT. BACKGROUND AND MINDSET. TO UM TO THAT BOARD, AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT'S NEEDED BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I HEAR FROM MY CONSTITUENTS . BUT I HAVE NO WAY TO AFFECT THAT CHANGE WHEN THERE ARE SEVEN PEOPLE UP. AND I'M JUST KIND OF LEFT WITH YEAH, I DON'T YOU KNOW, I DON'T CERTAINLY DON'T WANNA GET INTO DON'T GET THAT. I DON'T KNOW THAT THE APPLICANTS THAT WERE BEING GET INTO THE APPLICANTS THAT DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, BUT THAT'S EXCITING. BUT THAT'S THAT'S MY POINT IS, IS WHEN WE SAY GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT DISTRICT ONE GETS HEARD. IN THESE IN THESE ISSUES BECAUSE WE HAVE NO OTHER WAY IN WHICH DISTRICT ONE GETS HURT.

ZERO LIAISON SYSTEM DOESN'T WORK. LIKE IT. IT'S JUST SO. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION, WHETHER THAT IS BECAUSE SOMEONE LIVES IN A CERTAIN AREA BECAUSE THEY HAVE A CERTAIN EXPERIENCE. OR IF IT'S JUST IN RESPONDING TO THE CONSTITUENTS THAT ONE OF VOICE AND OPINION I THINK THAT IT CALL IT IMPROVED, LIKE YOU SAID THAT THEY WERE JUST TRYING TO ENSURE THAT WE GET THIS. BECAUSE THIS IS A GOOD IT'S NOT THE ONLY GOOD BUT IT IS A GOOD THAT WE CAN HAVE. I ADVOCATED FOR THAT ON OUR PARTS DEPARTMENT BECAUSE ONE OF THE BIGGEST THINGS I ALWAYS HERE FROM DISTRICT ONE CONSTITUENTS IS ABOUT PARKS. AND THERE'S NOBODY FROM DISTRICT ONE. THERE WASN'T ON PARKS THERE IS THERE IS NOW. BUT THERE WASN'T AND IT'S HARD TO SAY OKAY , HERE'S MY INSIDE TRACTOR PARTS. I'M NOT A PARK LIAISON. UM IT WE DIDN'T HAVE ANYBODY TO POINT TO, LIKE, GO TALK TO THIS PERSON BECAUSE THEY'RE IN YOUR DISTRICT THERE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT THEY'RE THE BEST PERSON TO TALK TO ABOUT THIS. JUST IT MAKES FOR A DISCUSSION JOINTED RESPONSE TO THOSE AREAS. AFTER THOSE DISTRICTS THAT THEY ELECT PEOPLE. UH MR REPRESENTATIVE, AND THEN THAT DISTRICT REPRESENTED IN FACT CHANGE IN WHICH THAT THEY EXPECTED TO BE DONE. SO I THINK THAT THAT THERE'S VALUE IN SAYING THAT IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CONSIDER. I'M NOT SAYING IT'S THE ONLY THING I JUST WAS MAKING A POINT . YOU SAID IT WAS THE LOWEST THING YOU'D EVER CONSIDER. BUT THAT, LIKE I JUST SAID, WAS IN THE TWO EXAMPLES I GAVE FOR SKILL SET. RIGHT AND QUALIFICATIONS AND THAT SO I WILL PICK QUALIFICATION OVER. I'M NOT SAYING BUT I THINK THAT WHAT WHAT WE'RE SAYING HERE IS IMPLEMENT ENHANCED METRICS TO RECOGNIZE THAT WE HAVE A DEFICIENCY IN IT. AND WHAT CAN WE DO TO ADDRESS LOT OF TIME IS I REALLY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE STATEMENT UP THERE. JUST I JUST

[01:20:02]

WANT TO POINT OUT UM, THAT I MY PERSONAL OPINION ON THE GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION, BUT I JUST HAVE TO SAY SOMETHING. JUSTIN IS THE FACT THAT YOU SEEM TO THINK THAT THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN COMMUNICATE OR GETTING INFORMATION FROM A BOARD IS THROUGH A LIAISON OR HAVING A BOARD MEMBER ON. I MEAN, I IF I GOT A PROBLEM WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT, I'M TALKING TO THE CITY MANAGER. I'M TALKING TO APART, DIRECTOR IF I GOT A PROBLEM WITH AND I'M NOT ON, YOU KNOW, I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM. I MEAN, WE'RE THE CITY COUNCIL. THAT'S THAT'S OUR REPRESENT. I MEAN, WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE THAT OUR YOU KNOW OUR VOICES HEARD AND OUR CITIZENS VOICES ARE HEARD. SO DON'T DON'T LET THE FACT THAT YOU DON'T HAVE A LIAISON ON THE BOARD OR THAT YOU'RE NOT. ARE YOU NOT A LIAISON OR YOU DON'T HAVE SOMEBODY ON THE BOARD THAT YOU'RE IN YOUR DISTRICT. I MEAN, THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF SILLY TO THINK THAT YOU DON'T HAVE ANY INPUT, SAYING THAT IT'S MORE HELPFUL, THOUGH, WHEN YOU HEARD , BUT IT'S NOT. I MEAN TO ME, I IF I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT AND I'M CALLING THE SHOULD THE MANAGER OR COMMON PARKS, DIRECTOR OF THE CDC ON THE CDC. I'M DOING THAT AS WELL.

I'M JUST SAYING THAT IT WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT EFFECTIVE CHANGE AND YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT , YOU KNOW, ENSURING THAT THOSE PRIORITIES ARE IN THAT IN THAT BOARD MEETING OR IN THAT EXECUTIVE SESSION BECAUSE THEY, D C AND C D. C DO SO MUCH THAT ARE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO TRANSACTIONAL. DEALS THAT IT'S HARD TO DO THAT WHEN I'M NOT ALLOWED TO BE IN THOSE EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETINGS. YEAH, I WOULD DISAGREE. I DISAGREE. WHAT'S OKAY, JUST LET ME SUGGEST BRINGING US BACK TO THE END OF THE DAY. AS I SAY ONLY THE COUNCIL WILL ADOPT A SERIES OF PRIORITIES. THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT CAME OUT OF THE CONVERSATION AND BY A PRIORITY, IT MEANS THIS IS YOU KNOW, IN A PERFECT WORLD, THIS IS WHAT WE'D LIKE TO ACCOMPLISH. IT SHOULD BE ASPIRATIONAL. UM SO THAT YOU'VE GOT SOME DIRECTION OF WHERE YOU'RE TAKING THE ORGANIZATION AND WHAT YOU'RE ASKING STAFF TO DO. SO I GUESS THE QUESTION IS, IS THE LANGUAGE THAT WE NUMBER ONE. DO YOU WANT TO DO THIS AS IT RELATES TO TWO E. AND IF SO, IF YOU WANT TO HAVE WHAT I'VE HEARD YOU ALL SAY YOU WANT TO HAVE GREAT COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN PERFECT WORLD.

THEY MAY REPRESENT ALL ASPECTS OF YOUR DISTRICTS AND THAT HAPPENS. I DON'T KNOW THAT IT IT IN. IT IMPLIES YOU NECESSARILY APPOINT THAT BUT GETTING BACK TO WHAT PAUL SAID EARLIER. IF YOU DON'T TRACK IT, YOU DON'T KNOW WHERE IT'S AT. SO YOU KNOW, IT MAY BE A SENSE OF WHERE WHERE YOUR REPRESENTATION LIES IN YOUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. SO YOU'RE AT LEAST TRACKING THAT.

UM I THINK WHAT I'M HEARING YOU ALL SAY AS YOU WANT TO HAVE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, GETTING BACK TO CHARLIE'S POINT OF BEING NEIGHBORLY, YOU KNOW, YOU WANT TO HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE TOUCH THESE THINGS. SO THE QUESTION REALLY, TO YOU IS THAT SOMETHING THE COMMISSION WANTS TO DO. AND IF SO, HAVE WE APPROPRIATELY CAPTURED IN TWO E AS IT'S WORDED TODAY, OR IS THERE SOMETHING WE MIGHT WANT TO CHANGE? CAN I WEIGH IN ON THIS? BECAUSE I'VE BEEN LISTENING TO CONVERSATION, AND FIRST OF ALL, IT'S A GOOD CONVERSATION. THESE ARE CONVERSATIONS THAT I HEAR THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. IT'S GOOD FOR YOU TO HAVE THESE AT THIS POINT. UM WHAT I'M HEARING, THOUGH, IS THAT THE LANGUAGE AS PRESENTED IS MAYBE A LITTLE TOO CATEGORICAL. OR STRONG. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, THAT'S THE CASE. AND IF THAT IS YOU JUST GO AHEAD AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS LANGUAGE, BUT THERE MAY BE SOME ALTERNATIVE LANGUAGE THAT CAN MOVE US PAST THIS ISSUE. IT IS WHAT I'M HEARING IS THAT UM, THE COUNCIL CERTAINLY WOULD WANT TO CONSIDER BROADER DIVERSITY ON THE ORIGIN COMMISSIONS AS POSSIBLE COURSE WITHOUT GIVING UP ON VACATIONS AND EXPERIENTIAL . YOU WANT PEOPLE SOME UNIQUE VARIANTS THAT THEY CAN BRING TO THE TABLE. AND CERTAINLY SOME GEOGRAPHIC, UM, CONSIDERATION AS WELL. YOU COULD SIMPLIFY THE LANGUAGE AND JUST LOVED CONSIDERED PROFESSIONAL AND EXPERIENTIAL DIVERSITY, ONSET BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. YOU'RE CONSIDERING. DOESN'T MEAN YOU'RE COMMITTED TO IT IF YOU'RE NOT READY. MEASURES BUT IT ISN'T RIGHT NATURE BRINGING THAT FORWARD DOES SAY THAT THIS IS IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENTIAL, MEANING SOMEBODY'S PERSONAL EXPERIENCES BECAUSE THEY BRING THAT TO THE TABLE AS WELL AS THEIR GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION. YOU CONSIDER THOSE ITEMS. LIKE THAT? PUTTING CONSIDERING THERE IS SUPPOSED TO SUPPORT AND THAT'S ALL. I MEAN, WE CONSIDER ALL THOSE UP THERE ANYWAY. YOU KNOW, WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE A STATEMENT HERE. IT'S MORE THAN WHAT YOU HAVE TODAY. UM IF AGAIN IF YOU THINK THAT'S TOO WATERED DOWN, THEN TELL ME SAY, WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT? WE GET IT. WE'RE GOING TO STICK WITH THIS LANGUAGE, MAYBE MAKE SOME TWEAKS TO IT, BUT IT IS IN A WAY TO MOVE. TO MOVE ON, PERHAPS WITH SOME LANGUAGE THAT IS MORE THAN WHAT YOU HAVE TODAY, AND IT'S BRINGING IT FORWARD AS A MR TEACHER GOAL THAT YOU HAVE IN PLACE WORKS FOR

[01:25:05]

ME. GREAT. SO WHAT I'M HEARING IS CONSIDERED GEOGRAPHIC, PROFESSIONAL AND EXPERIENCE APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. I THINK THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. EXPERIENTIAL DIVERSITY, EXPERIENTIAL CITY BOARD DIVERSITY, CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. ON CITY BOARDS. SO CONSIDER GEOGRAPHIC PROFESSIONAL. YOUR GRAPHICAL, PROFESSIONAL AND EXPERIENTIAL DIVERSITY CITY ON BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS CORRECT. DOES THAT WORK? REPORTS THAT WORK FOR YOU AS WELL. OKAY ALL RIGHT. SO THAT WILL BE A NEW A NEW PRIORITY. I WANT TO APOLOGIZE. I HAVE TO LEAVE. 10 O'CLOCK, THERE WILL BE IT. OKAY? ALL RIGHT, AND THAT GOOD DIALOGUE I DON'T WANT TO GET AND I WILL TELL YOU YOU'VE GOT BASED ON SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS IN THE OTHER AREAS. YOU HAD MORE TIME IN THIS IN THESE TWO BUCKETS TO SPEND. SO I WAS OKAY WITH THE ALLOCATION AT THE TIME THERE, UM, THE OTHER GOAL THAT WERE THE OTHER PRIORITY THAT WAS SUGGESTED AT LAST MONTH'S MEETING WAS THE TWO F IMPLEMENTING A QUOTE UNQUOTE SMART CITIES APPROACH TO DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CITY'S OPERATIONS. IN SUPPORT OF ACHIEVING OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE. AND I THINK YOU'VE GOT A WHOLE KIND OF SMART CITY STUFF GOING ON. SO IS EVERYBODY KIND OF UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT LOOKS AND FEELS LIKE AND IS THAT IS THE COUNCIL GOOD WITH ADDING THAT AS ANOTHER PRIORITY. OKAY, SO THAT'S GOOD AS SUCH. THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD, IS THIS ISANS PROBABLY GONNA BE IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WILL MAKE INCREMENTAL PROGRESS TOWARDS IT, BUT IT'S DEFINITELY NOT SOMETHING YOU GO OFF THE SHELF AND BUY AND THEN IMPLEMENT IN THE SAME PRETTY MUCH PERIOD. YEAH WE WILL GET WILL GET SMARTER AS WE CITY FOR A WHILE WILL GET SMARTER AS WE DROVE. YOU WANT THAT IN PRINT PARENTHETICAL AFTERWARDS? YEAH. MOVE AWAY FROM BEING A ALRIGHT WE'RE GONNA ADD TO EAT AND TO F AS AS OUTLINED HERE, UM SO NOT. I DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING MARKED IN GREEN BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE ANY FORCE OR ABOVE AND EVERYTHING WAS 3.29 WAS YOUR HIGHEST SCORES . I DIDN'T PUT AN ORANGE, BUT THIS WAS JUST SOME FEEDBACK AND THE CONVERSATIONS. THAT MIGHT BE HELPFUL AS YOU DEAL WITH YOUR PRIORITIES HERE. SO THE SMART CITY OBVIOUSLY WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THE ROLLOUT THAT'S GOING TO BE AROUND YOUR PRETTY SPREAD OUT ON WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE.

THAT'S PROBABLY NOT SURPRISING GIVEN WHERE YOU ARE AND THAT THAT INITIATIVE JUST JUST KIND OF TAKING ROOT YET. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE DIVERSITY AND CULTURE AND THE BOARDS AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. AND YOU'VE GOT THE SOLID WASTE CONTRACT GOING ON. SOME SPREAD OUT ON CODE COMPLIANCE AND WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT. I WANT TO COME BACK AT THE END OF THE DAY ABOUT THE PRIORITIZATION PROCESS, BECAUSE AT THE END WE DID SOMETHING LAST YEAR WE DID A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY THIS YEAR. WE WANT TO KIND OF WHAT KIND OF TALK ABOUT THAT THE NEXT STEPS, BUT THERE IS A SENSE OF YOU KNOW WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE AND FEEL LIKE IT'S GONNA BE A VALUE TO YOU? BUT I KNOW I'M TALKING WITH ALL OF YOU. THERE WAS A SENSE THAT WAS MORE IMPORTANT FOR STAFF THAN IT WAS TO YOU SO WE CAN WE CAN REACT TO THAT A LITTLE BIT LATER. BUT ANYTHING THERE THAT YOU WANT TO REACT TO ON OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE AND THOSE COMMENTS. OKAY? THE SAME SORT OF THING.

THE OTHER GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ASSUMING WILL PROBABLY CREATE SOME NEW OBJECTIVES AS IT RELATES TO YOUR TWO NEW GOALS ARE TO NEW PRIORITIES THAT ARE ADDED THERE. UM, THE AIRPORT.

THOSE ARE YOUR EXISTING GOALS, AND THERE WERE NOT ANY PRIORITIES. THERE WERE NOT ANY CHANGES SUGGESTED. A LOT OF CONVERSATION, BECAUSE LARGELY WHAT YOU'VE GOT COMING UP IN YOUR UPCOMING ELECTION. UM AND YOU'RE ALL PRETTY, YOU KNOW, PRETTY PRETTY STRONG SEDIMENT OF THE COUNCIL THAT YOU KNOW YOU'RE IN THE RIGHT STEP IN TERMS OF TRYING TO PURSUE COMMERCIAL AIRPORT SERVICES AND WITH THAT OLD, YOU KNOW, MORE THAN THE RESULT OF THAT. I SAID, NOT A WHOLE LOT OF LOT OF CHANGE IN THAT ONE. OKAY, UM UNDER FINANCIALLY SOUND GOVERNMENT.

THOSE WERE YOUR EXISTING PRIORITIES. AND I DON'T BELIEVE THERE WERE ANY. THERE WEREN'T ANY CHANGES, SO I'LL GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THAT AGAIN. FIRST. AND UM. PRETTY STRONG SEDIMENT. UM GRADE FOUR AND PRETTY TIGHT NUMBERS FOR MOST OF YOU. IN TERMS OF INCREASING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TAX BASE. THAT'S WHEN CONSISTENT FROM YEAR TO YEAR. UM AND NOT SO MUCH AS RIGHT NOW, YOU'RE STILL ON A GROWTH MODE. SO ALL THAT MONEY AND ALL THOSE RESOURCES ARE ALL

[01:30:02]

KIND OF HAPPENING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY. IT'S NOT IN THE FOREFRONT DIDN'T SCORE THREE IN TERMS OF RESPONSES FOR I WANT TO ASK YOU A QUESTION ON THAT. WHAT IF I CAN DUCK BECAUSE THAT ONE KIND OF MADE ME STOP IN MY TRACKS A LITTLE BIT. WHAT WHAT IS A SUSTAINABLE INITIATIVE EXAMPLE. THAT WOULD BE THERE FOR A SLOWDOWN IN GROWTH BECAUSE I CAN UNDERSTAND THE SLOWDOWN IN GROWTH. YOU KNOW, I YOUR YOU CAN HAVE THAT THERE COULD BE THINGS THAT STOP AT COVID, RIGHT? YOU KNOW, BUT WHAT WOULD THE SUSTAINABLE INITIATIVE LOOK LIKE ? THAT WOULD PREPARE US FOR THAT? I JUST HAD NO IDEA. OKAY? IF I CAN MAKE A GOOD EXAMPLE MIGHT BE, UM, THE TRANSITION THAT THE COUNCIL, THE CDC AND THE DID IN RELATION TO THE ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT IF WE HAVE TO SLOW DOWN AND PROPERTY TAX GROWTH, BUT SALES TAX, FOR INSTANCE, STAYED, THE SAME WILL STILL BE ABLE TO REINVEST INTO ROADS AT MAYBE A SLOWER CLIP, BUT NOT AS SLOW AS IF WE WERE FULLY LEANING ON THE PROPERTY TAX SIDE OF THE LEGEND. THAT'S JUST KIND OF AN AD HOC EXAMPLE.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE THAT I'VE USED IN THE PAST. YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOU KNOW WHEN YOU THINK SUSTAINABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IT'S BUILDING THINGS THAT CAN BE REUSED AS THE MARKET CHANGES. SO IF I GO THE EXAMPLE I'VE SEEN MANY TIMES IF I GO BUILD A 7 11 WITH, YOU KNOW, FOUR GAS PUMPS OUT IN FRONT OF IT IF THAT MODEL OF CONVENIENCE BUSINESS THERE'S NOT A WHOLE LOT I CAN DO WITH THE 7 11. THAT'S THAT'S VALUABLE. BUT IF I BUILD A STRUCTURE THAT REUSABLE FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF USES THAT STAY NABLE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.

SO IF THE MODEL OF WHAT'S IN IT TODAY, SEASON THREE OF THE MONTH. THE BUILDING ITSELF TO BE REUSED. DOWNTOWN MCKINNEY IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF THAT. IT'S REGENERATED ITSELF MULTIPLE TIMES OVER THE YEARS USED TO BE THEATERS AND HARDWARE HARDWARE STORES. AND UM, I THINK THERE WAS A SERIES OF PENNIES DOWN HERE AT ONE TIME THAT STOPPED BEING THE MODEL, BUT IT'S REJUVENATED INTO WHAT IT IS TODAY, WHICH IS VERY SUCCESSFUL WHERE THE 7 11 ENDS UP IN AN EMPTY BOX OR A YOU KNOW? PAYDAY LOAN OR SOMETHING. YEAH YOU KNOW, MY OFFICE IN THE OLD HOTEL, AND SO THAT'S A GREAT POINT. CERTAINLY I'M ALL FOR THAT. NO MORE CONTEMPORARY EXAMPLE. MAYBE FLOYD'S AND DUNCAN DONUTS FOR THE BLOCKBUSTER NOW YOU KNOW, SO AH, YOU'RE CERTAINLY THAT'S I THINK THE IDEA THAT HAS MARRIED GIVE YOU GIVE AN EXAMPLE WHERE I'VE SEEN SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN A DIFFERENT COMMUNITY AND WORKING WITH ON STRATEGIC PLANNING. THEY ARE LARGELY RESIDENTIAL. AND SO THEY'RE WORRIED, ALTHOUGH THEY'VE BEEN GROWING LEAPS AND BOUNDS AND RESIDENTIAL GROWTH THEY'RE WORRIED ABOUT AT THE END. IS THAT GOING TO PAY FOR THINGS? YOU KNOW THE PLAN? IT WAS. IT WAS A PLANNED COMMUNITY, SO THEY'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING AT LAND USE CHANGES AND EFFORTS TO INCREASE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AND OTHER TYPES OF COMMERCE.

THAT WOULD HAVE CREATED A MIX. SO YOU KNOW THAT SUSTAINABILITY CAN BE A BIG INITIATIVE CAN INCORPORATE A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO NECESSARILY BE ENVIRONMENTAL.

AND THERE, BUT AS I SAID, RIGHT NOW, YOU'VE BEEN YOU'VE BEEN ON A PRETTY UPWARD GROWTH PATTERN FOR A WHILE, AND YOU STILL GOT ROOM TO GROW. BUT AT SOME POINT THAT THAT WILL STOP AND THEN YOU'VE GOT TO BE ABLE TO BALANCE IT, SO I THINK THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET OUT THERE.

CAN LOOK AND FEEL DIFFERENTLY TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE. OKAY? EVERYTHING ELSE ON THIS GOAL AREA. THE THING THE EXISTING SINCE THOSE HAVEN'T CHANGED, MOSTLY MOSTLY OBJECTIVES WILL REMAIN THE SAME. ATTRACTING THOSE QUALITY OF LIFE. YOUR EXISTING. AND I'M GOING TO GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE BECAUSE THERE'S ONLY A MINOR CHANGE IN THIS LANGUAGE. IT WAS HAD TO DO WITH NUMBER ONE INSTEAD OF GOING BACK TO DEVELOP CHANGE TO CONTINUE WE'RE COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. YES I'M I'M NOT REALLY THAT FAMILIAR WITH THE COLLECTIVITY. PART OF IT ARE WHEN IT SAYS CONNECTIVITY. WHAT IS THE ULTIMATE GOAL WHEN YOU TAKE CONNECTIVITY THAT WAS IN THE THAT WAS THERE YOU GO THROUGH. WELL, NO, UH. FIVE F. YEAH. YEAH CONNECTIVITY IS TO PARKS THAT NOW I'VE ALWAYS HEARD THAT CONNECTIVITY AND I THINK THE GOAL WAS WHEN WE HAD A MAYOR WHO BIKE HAD A BICYCLE THAT HE WANTED EVERY HE WANTED TO BE ABLE TO GET ALL YOU KNOW, TO RIDE THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE PART. AND SO NOW WE'RE NOT THE WORLD. WE'RE NOT REALLY INTERESTED IN IN THE BACK TROLL HITTING ALL THE PARKS AS MUCH. UM SO WHAT? WHAT IS THE CONNECTIVITY PART THAT WE NEED TO BE SO STEVE'S NOT HERE TODAY, SO I'LL JUMP IN OUR PARK MASTER PLAN DOES STILL

[01:35:04]

HAVE CONNECTIVITY OF OUR PARKS, AND THEY USED TO CALL IT THE STRING OF PEARLS WHERE THEY USED THE GREENWAYS OF WILSON CREEK AND EASTPORT, THE TRINITY. TWO. TO HAVE HIKE AND BIKE TRAILS THAT CONNECT YOU KNOW, FROM TOWN LAKE PARK TO BODY WING PARK TO THE YOU KNOW, FUTURE GREAT BRANCH PARK. THEY'RE ALL CONNECTED SO THAT YOU HAVE THAT NETWORK OF TRAILS THAT DOES CONNECT A LOT OF OUR PARKS AND SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES. SO THAT IS STILL IN THE PLAN, AND I THINK THAT'S A VALUABLE PART OF THE PLAN. UM I DON'T LIVE IN MCKINNEY, BUT I COME TO MCKINNEY WHEN I WANT TO GO ON A NICE WALK WITH THE FAMILY OR A BIKE RIDE BECAUSE THE TRAILS ARE GREAT. UM AND THAT'S I THINK WHAT THAT IS SPEAKING TO IS TRYING TO CONNECT SOME OF THE CIVIC FACILITIES.

WHAT I WILL ADD TO. THAT IS IN OUR SURVEY COMMUNITY WIDE SURVEY, WHICH WERE JUST NOW DOING BY THE WAY WE JUST FINISHED THE RANDOMLY SAMPLED SURVEY. NOW THAT'S JUST OPENED UP JUST SO YOU KNOW, FROM THE PUBLIC TO GO IN AND DO A SELF SELECTED SURVEY GO ONLINE AND DO THE SURVEY IF THEY WISH, WHICH IS VERY IMPORTANT TO US BECAUSE IT LETS YOU ALL KNOW THE ONLY SCIENTIFIC SURVEY THAT WE DO. IN THE CITY, AND IT'S DONE EVERY OTHER YEAR. IT'S THROUGH A NATIONAL CITIZEN NATIONAL COMMUNITY SURVEY. BY THE NCS IN THEIR PARTNER THEY REQUIRED BY POCO, SO THEY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING. THEY HAVE LOTS OF COMMUNITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY, AND IT'S REALLY GREAT INFORMATION, BUT ONE OF THE HIGHEST RESPONSES WE GET FROM RESIDENTS IS OPEN LANDS AND CONNECTIVITY, MAINTAINING THAT BASICALLY MAKING SURE THAT PEOPLE THEY STILL LIKE TO IF THEY DON'T BIKE, THEY WALK OR JOG LOT OF JOGGERS. A LOT OF FOLKS DO THAT, AND THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS THEIR PARKS, AND THEY LIKE TO BE ABLE TO DO IT OFF STREET. OR NOT HAVE TO DO IT LIKE, YOU KNOW, CROSSING BUSY ROADWAYS, AND THEY REALLY, REALLY SITE CONNECTIVITY AS A HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE FEATURES, SO THAT'S WHAT WE GET IN THE SURVEYS, AND THAT'S BEEN CONSISTENT. THAT'S A THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO THE RESIDENTS BASED ON THE FEEDBACK WE'RE GETTING IN THE SURVEYS. I'LL BOYS SEEN IT INTERCONNECTED WITH BUSINESSES LOOKING TO RELOCATE TO THE CITY AND HAVING THE WALK ABILITY FEATURE OF THE CITY. AND I'VE ALWAYS BEEN A PROPONENT OF TRYING TO MAKE IT INTERCONNECTED , TRIED TO FIND WAYS WHERE I COULD WALK AROUND MY BICYCLE DOWNTOWN AND MRS MANY STREETS AS POSSIBLE. SO. I THINK IT SERVES MORE THAN JUST AN ENTERTAINMENT FUNCTION. I THINK IT'S ATTRACTIVE TO BUSINESSES. THEY'RE LOOKING FOR WALKABLE CITIES AS WELL. OKAY? THANK YOU.

THE OTHER ISSUE THAT AS RIGHT NOW, AS YOU'RE GROWING, I DON'T KNOW YOUR DEMOGRAPHICS NUMBERS.

UM BUT THERE'S A GROUP CALLED WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. AND WHAT THEY FIND IS THAT AS YOU'RE DEVELOPING YOUR RESIDENTIAL YOUR COMMERCIAL, YOUR RECREATIONAL ASPECTS THAT MORE PEOPLE AND A NUMBER OF YOU TALKED ABOUT THIS IN THE ADVANCED INTERVIEWS ARE BEING LESS AUTO CENTRIC THAT BEING ABLE TO BE MULTI MODAL TO BE ABLE TO BE ABLE TO GET ON A BIKE OR ELECTRIC SCOOTER OR TO WALK OR WHATEVER THE CASE WOULD BE, AND THAT'S WHAT KIND OF WALKABLE COMMUNITIES LOOKS AT IS HOW HOW WELL YOU ARE CONNECTED TO THE VARIOUS CENTERS OF ACTIVITY, WHETHER THEY COMMERCIAL, RECREATIONAL OR CULTURAL. UM AND THERE ARE ACTUALLY THERE'S A STATE THERE'S DIFFERENT. LEVELS YOU CAN GET LIKE LIKABLE COMMUNITIES. BRIAN'S LEVELS AND YOU KNOW, GOLD LEVELS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND A LOT OF COMMUNITIES ARE TRYING TO ENCOURAGE THAT AS PEOPLE BECOME LESS AUTO CENTRIC , AND THEY WANT TO GET BACK TO THIS LIVE WORK AND PLAY ANY DEATH. UM SOME CASES IT MAY BE THE ZONING WHERE YOU ALLOW YOUR RESIDENTIAL UNIT ABOVE YOUR COMMERCIAL UNIT, AND PEOPLE HAVE LIVED WORK COMBINATIONS WHERE THEY ACTUALLY HAVE A CONDO OR WHATEVER ABOVE IT, AND THEN THEY GO DOWN. THAT MEAN OPPOSITES. RIGHT SO ALL THAT KIND OF GETS TO LIFESTYLE AND HOW HOW THE COMMUNITY IS PREPARING TO DEAL WITH THOSE ISSUES SO CONNECTED IN THIS CASE CLEARLY IS QUALITY OF LIFE. I THINK IT IT TALKS MORE PART SPECIFIC FACILITIES AND EDUCATION CENTERS. UM AND YOU KNOW COMMERCIAL, IT'S REALLY TRYING TO GET HOW INTERCONNECTED ARE YOU SO IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO AVOID BEING A ROAD TO RAPE, THAT'S CHARLIE'S EXTENT YOU CAN DO THAT. UM. REALLY THE ONLY CHANGE ON THIS ONE. WAS AT THE BEGINNING. BECAUSE A NUMBER OF YOU SPOKE ABOUT HOW PLEASED YOU ARE WITH THE CURRENT DIRECTION OF YOUR PARK SYSTEM AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRESERVATION . SO IT WASN'T IT WASN'T YOU KNOW, DEVELOP NOW IT'S A MATTER OF JUST BUILDING ON AND CONTINUE SO THAT THAT MAKES SENSE LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT FIVE B BECAUSE OF ME MENTIONS CULTURAL ARTS, AND I WAS ONE OF THE THINGS I LISTED WAS AN INCREASED BUDGET FOR OUR ARCH. COMMISSION AND I WAS AT THE ARTS MEETING LAST NIGHT. AND THERE WAS A

[01:40:07]

GENTLEMAN ASKING FOR A GRANT DID NOT STAY IN THE ROOM FOR THE VOTE. BUT THEY'RE ABOUT TO BE OUT OF FUNDS FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR , WITH THE BUDGET COMING UP AGAIN IN SEPTEMBER. THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO WORK WITH. AND THE BUDGET REMAINED AROUND $200,000 SINCE I'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL, BUT YOU ALL KNOW THAT THE TOWN'S INCREASED AND I DON'T THINK IT'S FAIR TO THE ARTS COMMISSION OR TO THE COMMUNITY THAT WE'RE NOT INVESTING MORE IN THE ART. IN ORDER TO KEEP UP WITH WHAT'S EXPECTED OF A CITY. OUR SIDES. UH HUH. AND WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE MCKINNEY INTO AS FAR AS A BETTER PLACE TO LAY OFF. THROUGH OUR ARTS. AND SO ONE POINT THAT OUT TO YOU THAT WE'VE GOT A SHORTFALL THERE. COME. SO YOU HAVE IT A PRIORITY QUESTION I THINK CHARLIE IS RAISING IS THE ACTION MATCH THE PRIORITY? WHAT WOULD YOU FEEL THAT WAY THAT WE'RE NOT INVESTING IN OUR ARTS? THE RELATIVE TERM, SO I MEAN, FOR SOME PEOPLE, THEY WOULD SAY WE'RE INVESTING IN OFFER, AND SOME PEOPLE WOULD SAY, DON'T SPEND ANY MONEY ON ART BECAUSE THAT'S NOT A CITY FUNCTION. I HAPPEN TO THINK THAT'S HOW YOU STITCH THESE ARE THE FAB. THESE ARE THE RELATIVELY SMALL INVESTMENTS TO WEAVE THE FABRIC OF A COMMUNITY AND YOU CAN DO IT FAIRLY INEXPENSIVELY WAS JUST TYPING A NOTE TO OUR WIZARD CFO , UM, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE GREAT MARK HOLLOWAY AND I WAS GOING TO TELL HIM MAYBE IT'S A FORMULAIC APPROACH LIKE WE DID IN THE OTHER ONE IS WE COME UP WITH A FORMULA ON A PER CAPITA BASIS, AND AS WE GROW AS A COMMUNITY, WE HAVE MORE MONEY. IN THE BUDGET FOR ARTS, BUT IT'S ALL ABOUT BUDGET PRIORITIES FOR THE COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL SAYS . WE WANT TO EMPHASIZE THIS. WE WANT MORE MONEY IN THE BUDGET, AND WE'LL ENDEAVOR TO DO THAT IN THE BUDGET PROPOSAL, AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE TO TELL US THAT'S OKAY INCREASE THE AMOUNT. LAST YEAR, THERE WAS A PERCENTAGE AND SOME THOUGHT BEHIND IT SO, BUT THE NOTION OF SOME RATIO TO CONTINUE THAT INCREASED FUNDING TO BE IN LINE WITH THE GROWTH OF OUR COMMUNITY IS SOMETHING WE SHOULD DEFINITELY LOOK AT AS WELL, I CERTAINLY SUPPORT THAT, BUT I WOULD PUSH BACK A LITTLE BIT. WE YOU KNOW, FROM OUR MAIN STREET ALL THE MAIN STREET EFFORTS AND ARE. THAT ALL THE DIFFERENT EVENTS THAT DIFFERENT SPONSORED EVENTS NOT NOT JUST VISUAL ARTS, BUT CULTURAL ARTS. MUSIC ARTS ALL THAT STUFF. I THINK WE ACTUALLY DO A PRETTY GOOD JOB AND MAKING SURE THOSE THINGS EXIST IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND I HAVE SEEN THOSE GROWING AS OVER THE LAST YOU KNOW, EVER SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE, UM, BUT CERTAINLY ALL THAT SAID I WOULD LOVE ALSO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE FUNDING ARTS AND HAVING A FORMULATED APPROACH, SO IT DOESN'T GET DOESN'T GET LOST AS WE DEAL WITH OTHER THINGS, SOMETHING THAT'S JUST CONSISTENT. METRIC, BUT BUT I FEEL IT'S A CITY WE ACTUALLY DO. PRETTY MUCH I MEAN, WE WE'VE GONE OUT OF OUR WAY TO GET SOME DESIGNATIONS TO PUT EMPHASIS ON THOSE THINGS. WHETHER WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CULTURE ARTS DISTRICT MUSIC FRIENDLY CITY TMR CONCERT THAT WE'VE NOW DONE AND ALL OF THE DIFFERENT PARTS AND BLOOMS AND THOSE EVENTS AND ARE BLACK HISTORY MONTH. OR EVENT. I THINK WE I LOVE WHAT WE'RE DOING, AND CERTAINLY I'M ALWAYS GOING TO BE UP FOR DOING MORE.

ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT I POSED MR HAUSER LAST NIGHT DURING THE MEETING WAS WHETHER OR NOT TURNS. FUNDING MIGHT BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY OF THE ART. THAT IS BEING PLACED IN OR PERFORMED. AND EITHER OF THE TWO TOURS ZONES AND MARK WAS KIND ENOUGH TO RESPOND TO ME AFTER HOURS LAST NIGHT, AS LONG AS IT WAS COUNTLESS PROJECT, AND IT WAS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT. UM AND I KNOW THERE'S SOME TALK ABOUT SOME ARTWORK IN FRONT OF THE NEW CITY HALL. I OBVIOUSLY THEY DON'T HAVE THE BUDGET FOR IT RIGHT NOW. BUT UH AND I'M NOT SURE IF WE COULDN'T REACH INTO SOME CHARGE FUNDING FOR PROJECTS LIKE THAT. YOU KNOW, I I'M THE OTHER LIAISON TO THE ARTS. AND I'M ALSO THE LIAISON TO C D. C. SO I SEE THE APPLICANTS COME FREQUENTLY BEFORE BOTH COMMISSIONS AND ASKING FOR MONEY , AND I SUPPOSE IF I WERE ONE OF THOSE APPLICANTS, I DO THE SAME THING, BUT I THINK THAT, UM. THOSE APPLICANTS PERHAPS OUGHT TO DISCLOSE WHO THEY'RE

[01:45:07]

REQUESTING FUNDING FROM FROM THE CITY SO THAT IT CAN BE ASCERTAINED. THIS ISN'T THEIR ONLY SHOT AT IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT. YEAH I WAS GOING TO JUST ADD THAT WHILE THE ARTS COMMISSION HAS A FINITE BUDGET, THEY FOLKS DO GO TO THE CDC AND THEN OTHER ENTITIES FOR FUNDING AS WELL. UM SO JUST BE MINDFUL OF THAT, BUT AGAIN, THIS IS A PRIORITY. THE CITY COUNCIL IS AT YOUR DISCRETION. HOWEVER YOU WANT TO LAND ON THIS COUNCIL IS ALSO USED HOTEL MOTEL TAX THE MURAL ON THE SILOS 300. WHAT I WAS GOING TO MENTION INVESTMENT IN PUBLIC ARE USING THAT RESOURCE. OKAY AND I WOULD BE ALL FOR REQUIRING COMPLETE DISCLOSURE OF ANY OTHER GRANTS THAT YOUR QUESTION OF ANY CITY ORGANIZATION OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER. BRIDGE PROJECT THAT COMES BEFORE ANY COMMISSION. CHARLIE I'VE SEEN A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT WAYS. OTHER COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY. SOME DON'T YOU KNOW, HAVE RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCEMENTS HERE.

DO YOU IN TEXAS? OKAY IN SOME STATES LIKE THEY ALLOCATED THOSE RESOURCES. TO THE ARTS PROGRAMS AND SOCIAL SERVICE THAT WAY, YOU'RE NOT JUST KIND OF SUPPORTING THE PD. YOU'RE SUPPORTING THE BETTERMENT OF YOUR COMMUNITY. AND SO SOME COMMUNITIES HAVE DONE THAT WAY.

OTHER COMMUNITIES HAVE SAID. FOR EVERY THOSE THAT ARE REALLY INTO THE PROGRAM. YOU MENTIONED MY ARTWORK IN FRONT OF CITY HALL AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. SOME COMMUNITIES HAVE ADOPTED ORDINANCES THAT FOR EVERY PUBLIC FACILITY EXPENDITURE THAT THEY MAKE. IF IT'S A NEW FACILITY OR MAJOR RENOVATION, THEY TAKE A PERCENTAGE OF DOLLARS THAT WILL HAVE TO BE SLANT ON PUBLIC ART OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO THERE'S ANY NUMBER OF WAYS TO DEAL WITH THAT OTHERS BECOME, YOU KNOW, SUPPORTING OF AGENCIES AND APPLICATION PROCESS WHERE ALL THE DIFFERENT GROUPS COME THROUGH TO TRY TO LEVERAGE DOLLARS ELSEWHERE. SO UM, I DON'T THINK THAT THE WAY THE WAY WORDING IS PRETTY BROAD RIGHT NOW. I THINK YOU'VE GOT KIND OF A BLANK SLATE AS TO HOW YOU'VE DONE IN THE PAST AND WHAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO DO IN THE FUTURE. SO COME ALRIGHT, SO LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT RESPONSES HERE. UM AND IN THIS BUCKET BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE RIGHT THERE AT FIVE.

C YOU TALK ABOUT YOUR DOWNTOWN SPECIFICALLY WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS A JEWEL OF YOUR OF YOUR COMMUNITY. SO NOT SURPRISINGLY, THE ITEMS THAT SHOOK OUT UNDER CONTINUING COMMITMENT TO THE STORK DOWNTOWN AND THE REDEVELOPMENT OF ALL THE PROPERTIES THAT YOU OWN AS YOU MOVE INTO YOUR NEW CITY HALL COMPLEX. NOT SURPRISINGLY, ROSE TO THE TOP ON THIS CATEGORY AS WELL WITH PRETTY STRONG SUPPORT ACROSS THE BOARD FOR THOSE TOP TWO INITIATIVES. UM. AND TALKED ABOUT CONTINUING PRETTY STRONG SUPPORT AND WHERE YOU'RE GOING WITH REGARDS TO THE WAY IN WHICH YOU'RE DEVELOPING PARKS AND THE PROCESS AND THE ACQUISITION OF GREEN SPACE AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES. VERY STRONG. YOU KNOW, THERE'S TOP THREE IN GREEN ARE PRETTY STRONG. CONSISTENT WITH YOUR YOUR PRIORITIES. UM YEAH. AND THEN, UM, SMALL TOWN FEEL STRONG 3386 LITTLE LITTLE SPREAD OUT AMONGST TALENT LOOKS AND FEELS, AND THAT'S NOT SURPRISING GIVEN KIND OF THE NEBULOUS, NEBULOUS NATURE OR WHATEVER SMALL TOWN FEEL MIGHT LOOK AND FEEL DIFFERENTLY TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE. AND THEN I KNOW RAINY. YOU HAD THE QUESTION ABOUT CONNECTIVITY. THIS IS SPECIFICALLY ON PARK TO PARK CONNECTIONS. ALSO PRETTY GOOD 3.43, BUT A LITTLE MORE SPREAD OUT IN TERMS OF THE INTEREST THERE. STAFF PERSPECTIVE THAT YOU WANT ANY CLARIFICATION FROM THE COUNCIL ON THIS ONE. WHEN COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. EVERYBODY GOOD. YES, SIR. OKAY. UM. THERE ARE TWO OTHER COMMENTS THAT CAME THROUGH AND THE DISCUSSIONS AND YOU SEE YOUR SPREADING OUT THERE BELOW THREE'S YOUTH SPORTS BASED COMMUNITY PARK. AT THE PARK PROJECT, A SENSE OF WHEREVER WHERE HE'S AT ON THOSE AS WELL. COMMENTS ON THOSE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO SINCE THOSE HAVE NOT LARGELY CHANGED THOSE OBJECTIVES WILL BE AFFIRMED IN THAT CATEGORY AS WELL. UM YOUR LAST AREA SAFE AND SECURE COMMUNITY. UM, THIS IS YOUR EXISTING PRIORITIES. AND THERE WERE NO SUGGESTED CHANGES THAT CAME OUT OF LAST MONTH'S MEETING ON THAT, SO THOSE WOULD CONTINUE ASSUMING THAT YOU'RE ALREADY TO RE BLESS THOSE AS YOU ARE. THE MISSION PRIORITIES AND THIS PILLAR. AND WE ACTUALLY DIDN'T HAVE ANY METRICS THAT CAME OUT OF THAT. EVERYBODY SEEMS TO BE PRETTY COMFORTABLE. THERE IS SOME CONVERSATIONS THAT CAME AT THE DISCUSSION LAST MONTH, BUT THERE

[01:50:01]

WERE NO METRICS THAT NECESSARILY CAME UP THAT LOOKED AND FELT DIFFERENTLY. SO BOTTOM LINE IS THOSE WILL CONTINUE AND IN PLACE AS WELL. SO, UM. I LIKE TO WHEN WE GO THROUGH YOUR PLANNING EFFORT, ALWAYS LIKE TO GO BACK TO THREE QUESTIONS THAT I ASK YOU ALL AS PART OF THE ADVANCED MEETINGS THAT I HAD WITH YOU. AND THOSE ARE WHAT DO YOU WANT TO CHANGE ABOUT MCKINNEY? WHAT DO YOU WANT TO KEEP THE SAME ABOUT MCKINNEY? AND AT THE END OF THE DAY WHENEVER YOU'RE DONE WITH YOUR TIME ON THE COUNCIL, WHAT'S THE LEGACY THAT YOU WANT TO LEAVE? BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY, THOSE THREE ITEMS OUGHT TO BE REFLECTED IN SOME WAY, SHAPE OR FORM ON YOUR STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS. SO JUST AS A YOU'VE SEEN THESE SLIDES BEFORE , BUT JUST WANNA JUST THREW HIM AGAIN TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE COMFORTABLE THAT WE HAVEN'T MISSED ANYTHING. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTIES AND YOUR COMMITMENT TO THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN. TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT CONNECTIVITY AND BEING LESS AUTO CENTRIC. TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT ZONING CHANGES AND THE FOOTPRINT OR WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. THAT MAY BE AN AREA. UM I THINK, PATRICK , YOU RAISED A QUESTION ABOUT WHAT IS THE SUSTAINABILITY EFFORT LOOK LIKE AND WE TALKED ABOUT REUSING A PROPERTY ISN'T FACILITIES. CERTAINLY TALKED ABOUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. AND I DON'T KNOW THE TEXT DOT ROADWAY TRASH PROBLEMS CAME UP, BUT THAT WAS SOMETHING AND ANY OF THE PLAN, BUT IT WAS CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT ONE OF YOU HAD RAISED DURING DISCUSSIONS AS WELL. THANKS YOU WANT TO CHANGE YOUR PRETTY COMFORTABLE WHERE IT WAS, UM, DISCUSSION ABOUT MULTI FAMILY. A LOT OF WHOLE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT DISCUSSIONS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WORKFORCE HOUSING. WHETHER YOU'RE DEDICATING A PERCENTAGE OF THOSE OR NOT. UM AND I KNOW YOU'VE GOT IN YOUR TRANSPORTATION AND NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND INITIATIVES THAT DEAL WITH TRAFFIC. UM AND YOU KNOW YOU'RE ALL GETTING YOUR ARMS AROUND WHAT THE HOUSING COSTS LOOK TO BE HERE AS WELL. UM AND THERE'S SOME CONTINUED DISCUSSION ABOUT BUSINESS FRIENDLY WORK ABOUT HOW DO YOU CONTINUALLY MAKE THAT WORK FORWARD? MM. SO WHAT DO YOU WANT TO KEEP THE SAME? THE HISTORIC SQUARE. YOU CAN SHOW YOUR SUPPORT OF THAT AND ACTUALLY BURY THE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT CHANGING THE USES AND THE REINVESTMENT IN THE DOWNTOWN IS OK IN PLACE. BUSINESS FRIENDLY REPUTATION IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HAVING YOU IN THE C, D. C AND THE E P A ON THE SAME PAGE. THE COMMITMENT TO YOUR PARK SYSTEM. AND THEN COMMUNITY PRIDE. AND THEN THIS CONCEPT OF MAINTAINING THE SMALL TOWN FIELD . THREE OF YOU HAD INDICATED THAT DESPITE ALL THE GROWTH AND ALL THE CHANGES THAT YOU'RE FACING, HOW DO YOU KEEP YOUR IDENTITY? IN THE MIDST OF ALL THAT. AND THEN THIS IS KIND OF WHAT I CALL THE LEGACY QUESTION AT THE END OF THE DAY, WHENEVER YOU'RE DONE WITH YOUR PUBLIC SERVICE TIME HERE IN MCKINNEY, WHAT DO YOU WANT TO BE PROUD OF THAT YOU HELPED ACCOMPLISH? THAT CLOUD PROJECT, WHICH IS UNDER PLAY, TALKED ABOUT THE YOUTH SPORTS CENTER AND THE APEX CENTER. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES. MAY PICK SOME CHANGES ABOUT ARTS AND CULTURE DEVELOPMENT. BUT WE KNEW PROJECTS ON THE EAST SIDE WERE CITY HALL AND TOUGHS. COMING INAIRPORT DISCUSSIONS. THE TREMENDOUS GROWTH OF YOUR TAX BASE OVER YOUR TIME. AND THE FACT THAT YOU ARE IN THE MIDST OF PRIESTS. PRETTY SIGNIFICANT SOCIAL CHANGES AND COVID CHANGES AND EVERYTHING ELSE GOING ON THAT YOU NAVIGATED THAT VERY WELL HERE. SOME OTHER LEGACY RESPONSES AFFORDABLE WORKFORCE HOUSING OPTIONS. SETTING THE FOUNDATION SO THAT YOU CAN BE SUCCESSFUL. GOING FORWARD ONCE GROWTH DOES STOP. YOU'VE DEALT WITH THIS PAST YEAR AND COMMITMENT NOW TO HOW YOU'RE GOING TO FINANCE, ROAD AND HIGHWAY EXPANSIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS. AND IF THERE'S A VALUE TO YOUR TAXPAYERS CONCUSSION ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT THERE'S ACCESSIBILITY TO ACCESS TO FOOD. AND SHOPPING FOR DIFFERENT PARTS OF YOUR COMMUNITY. THIS WHOLE CONCEPT OF LIVE WORK AND PLAY. AND YOUR PARK SYSTEM. ANOTHER SLIDE. OUR NELSON TOURNAMENT.

REDEVELOPMENT OF THIS BUILDING AND OTHERS DOWNTOWN. THE REVENUE AND THE VALUE THAT YOU BRING IN TERMS OF YOUR TAX RATE ONCE AGAIN, NAVIGATING COVID CRISIS. HAVING GOOD STAFF. THAT YOU STARTED LOOKING AT HOW YOU CHANGE, MULTI FAMILY AND CAR DEALERSHIP PROJECTS AND APPROVAL THROUGH YOU. DID YOU LDCS AND YOUR COM PLANTS? AND I THINK THAT WAS IT. YEAH. SO THE GOAL HERE WAS TO, UM MAKE SURE THAT THE THINGS THAT YOU WANTED TO CHANGE KEEP THE SAME OR YOUR

[01:55:03]

LEGACY ARE REFLECTED IN YOUR PLANS. I THINK YOU'VE GOT IT COVERED. BUT THIS IS YOUR CHANCE. IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT WE DIDN'T NECESSARILY TALK ABOUT AS IT RELATES TO YOUR MCKINNEY FIRST PRIORITIES, ANYTHING THAT NEEDS TO COME UP THAT HASN'T BEEN ADDRESSED YET. HAVE A QUESTION? UM. THE PART ABOUT THE YOUTH PARKS PROJECT. DIDN'T WE HAVE ONE OF THOSE UP NEAR MEYERS PART THAT WAS IN THE WORKS. SO THEY USE SPORTS. WE DID PURCHASE A LARGE PROPERTY THAT'S UP NEAR IRWIN PARK. SO ALL THE WAY UP THERE TOMORROW. SO WE OWN THAT PROPERTY, AND I KNOW KOWSKI AND THE PARKS DEPARTMENT ARE LOOKING AT PLANS TO GO FORWARD. SOMETIMES THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS WITH AN R F. Q. I BELIEVE TOO. WORK ON DEVELOPMENT OF THAT , BUT IT IS INTENDED TO BE A LARGE REGIONAL SPORTS PARTY. I THOUGHT WE HAD SOMEONE WHO WAS ALREADY LOOKING AT IT. THERE WAS INITIALLY THAT FIRM WHO BUILT THE FACILITY IN MESA, ARIZONA. UM, WAS KICKING THE TIRES. UM.

THEY HAVE SOME ISSUES IN MESA, ARIZONA, SO THEY MAY NOT BE THE PERSON WE PARTNER WITH. THEY MAY BE WE WERE GOING TO OPEN IT UP TO ANYONE WHO WOULD BE INTERESTED IN PROVING THEIR QUALIFICATIONS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. THANK YOU FOR FOLLOWING UP JUMPING IN BECAUSE THE HILTON WAS HOME WITH A SICK CHILD TODAY, SO COMPETING LUCKY. UM BEFORE WE TURN OVER TO KIND OF HAVE PAUL TALKED ABOUT KIND OF WHERE THIS GOES FROM HERE AND THE STEPS I JUST WANTED TO SPEND A LITTLE TIME WITH WITH THE COUNCIL ABOUT WHAT WE DID LAST YEAR ON THE PRIORITIZATION PROCESS. WHAT WE DID THIS YEAR IN THE PRIORITIZATION PROCESS AND JUST HAVE A BIT OF A DIALOGUE IN THE EFFORT. SO TWO YEARS AGO, WE WERE JUST KIND OF FINISHED. THE PLANET CAME BACK TO YOU AND IT WENT INTO YOUR BUDGET. AND THEN LAST YEAR, THERE WAS A DESIRE TO TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR PRIORITIES AND KIND OF RANK YOUR PRIORITIES, WHICH WE DID. WE HAD A CONVERSATION LIKE WE HAD HERE TODAY ABOUT WHAT THAT LOOKED AND FELT LIKE THIS YEAR, THERE WAS A DESIRE BY STAFF TO KIND OF GO A LITTLE MORE GRANULAR, AS OPPOSED TO THE HIGH LEVEL SINCE THE BOARD HADN'T CHANGED AND THE PRIORITIES HAVEN'T CHANGED THAT MUCH YET, BUT THIS MIGHT BE AN INTEREST TO AT LEAST GET SOME FEEDBACK ON SOME THINGS THAT THEY HAD, UM SO THAT WE GOT INTO THE WEEDS ON SOME OF THEIR OBJECTIVES THAT WE DON'T NORMALLY DO AT THESE MEETINGS, AND SO I JUST WANTED TO HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THE BOARD ABOUT YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT UM, DO WE WANT? DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE A PRIORITIZATION PROCESS? AND IF SO, IS IT LOOKS LIKE MOREOVER, WE DID THE FIRST YEAR DOES IT LOOK LIKE MORE OF WHAT WE DID THIS YEAR? OR DOES IT IS A COMBINATION OF THE TWO OR IS IT LOOK ENTIRELY DIFFERENT ALTOGETHER? SO UM, YOU KNOW, THIS IS KIND OF MEANT TO HELP YOU BUILD CONSENSUS AND WHERE YOU WANT TO GO, AND WE'VE KIND OF BROUGHT A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO YOU. SO WE THOUGHT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO GET YOUR YOUR THOUGHT ABOUT WHAT WORKS OR DOESN'T WORK FOR YOU AS IT RELATES TO YOUR PRIORITIZATION OF YOUR STRATEGIC PLAN, SO OPEN IT UP FOR ANY THOUGHTS. I WILL ALSO SAY IN MY CONVERSATIONS WITH ALL OF YOU, THERE WAS SOME SENSE THAT WAS HELPFUL TO GET A SENSE OF WHERE YOU WERE AS A GROUP, BUT THERE WAS GENERALLY A SENSE THAT IT WAS MORE IMPORTANT TO STAFF AND I HEARD THAT PAUL SAID THAT THE BEGINNING IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO THEM TO GET A SENSE OF WHERE YOU ARE, SO THEIR STANDPOINT, THAT'S EXTREMELY HELPFUL. BUT WHAT THAT LOOKS AND FEELS LIKE IT'S REALLY THE NATURE OF THE CONVERSATION. SO TURN IT OVER TO YOU IN TERMS OF THOUGHTS AND IMPRESSIONS ABOUT WHAT WORKS OR DOESN'T WORK OR HOW YOU MADE ME WANT TO PROCEED WITH REGARDS TO ANY PRIORITIZATION EFFORTS GOING FORWARD. I THINK YOU YOU KIND OF ANSWERED MY QUESTION AS TO WHY WE HAVE THESE EVERY YEAR AND THAT IS ALL. THINGS HAVEN'T REALLY CHANGED. AND SO I DON'T THINK IT'S A IT'S NECESSARY TO HAVE THESE EVERY YEAR. I THINK IT'S ABOUT EVERY OTHER YEAR IS PROBABLY MORE APPROPRIATE BECAUSE LIKE AS YOU SAID, NOTHING'S REALLY CHANGED FROM LAST YEAR TO THIS YEAR, YOU KNOW , LITTLE COUPLE OF THE RED THINGS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

AND IS IT WORTH THE MAN HOURS TO MAKE THOSE LITTLE TINY CHANGES AND. MY ANSWER WOULD BE NO. SO THAT'S THAT'S JUST THE WAY I FEEL. I TRULY ENJOYED THE CHANCE TO LOOK BACK AT ONCE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE AND I'M REALLY PROUD OF YOU GUYS. SH YOU KNOW WE'RE SO BUSY PUTTING OUT THE DAILY FIRES AND ONE EVER IS ON NEXT WEEK'S AGENDA THAT YOU NEVER HAVE THE TIME TO LOOK BACK AND FOCUS. WHAT YOU HAVE ACCOMPLISHED, AND YOU GUYS HAVE DONE A GREAT DEAL , AND I DON'T THINK THAT THERE'S ANY DOUBT IN PARTICULAR FOR RAINY THAT YOU'VE LEFT THE CITY FAR BETTER THAN WHERE YOU FOUND IT. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK OVER THE YEARS, BUT I DO

[02:00:02]

THINK IT HOLDS A GOOD PURPOSE BECAUSE REMINDS US TO WANT IT IS WE WANT TO FOCUS ON GOING FORWARD AND SO I HAVE ENJOYED THE PROCESS. THANK YOU. WHAT WHAT I WOULD TELL YOU IS THAT THAT AND YOUR RESPONSE OR ANY THAT IF YOU GO BACK A YEAR AGO, AND ACTUALLY TWO YEARS AGO, WE HAVE MADE SOME CHANGES IN YOUR PLAN BASED UPON THINGS THAT WERE HAPPENING IN THE COMMUNITY, FOR EXAMPLE, WE MADE A LOT OF CHANGES IN THE PUBLIC SAFETY ARENA LAST COUPLE OF YEARS AGO BECAUSE OF WHAT WAS HAPPENING WITH SOCIETY THAT HAD AN IMPACT ON YOUR OWN COMMUNITY, AND THAT MANIFESTS ITSELF DIFFERENTLY IN EVERY PLACE. WE WORK THROUGH. BUT ALSO THERE MAY BE THINGS THAT CHANGE FROM YEAR TO YEAR THAT ULTIMATELY WILL CHANGE THE PERSPECTIVES OF THE COUNCIL. UM AND SO WE TYPICALLY DO THESE IN A YEAR TO YEAR BASIS WE ALWAYS RECOMMEND IF THERE'S ANY CHANGE YOUR COMPOSITION THAT YOU DO THAT WE HAVE THAT A YEAR AGO. WE HAD A COUPLE OF NEW MEMBERS AS WELL BECAUSE THIS REPRESENTS YOUR COMPOSITION AND HIS NEW MEMBERS COME OR GO OFF THE OFF THE COUNCIL. THEY COME IN WITH THEIR OWN SENSE OF PRIORITIES, SOME OF WHICH MAY BE VERY MUCH SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU'RE DOING ALREADY AND OTHERS. THEY MAY HAVE A WHOLE ANOTHER AREA THAT THEY WANT TO ADVANCE AND DISCUSS AND SO AS AS YOUR COMPOSITION CHANGES WE TYPICALLY RECOMMEND AT LEAST YOU DO THAT. UM BUT IT'S THIS IS YOUR PROCESS, NOT MINE. WE'RE HERE TO HELP YOU FACILITATE THAT AND WE JUST WANTED TO HAVE THAT KIND OF APPROACH. SO I DON'T KNOW. REACT TO THAT. WHAT ABOUT THAT? INTERESTING MINDS. THIS THING HAS YOU DON'T HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION TODAY. CERTAINLY IT MAY BE SOMETHING THAT YOU DECIDE NEXT YEAR. BASED ON THE ENVIRONMENT AT THE TIME, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE AT LEAST ONE NEW COUNCIL MEMBER SEATED IN JUNE EARLY JUNE, I SUPPOSE, AND THAT COUNCIL MEMBER MAY SAY, BOY I'D LIKE TO HAVE AND IT MAY BE THAT THE COUNCIL SAYS EVERY TWO YEARS AFTER A NEW LOCAL ELECTION, IF YOU WILL IS THE BEST TIME TO DO THE PRIORITIZATION, AND THAT IN THE IN BETWEEN YEARS WE JUST DO THE REGULAR GOAL SETTING. YOU COULD DO THAT, OR YOU COULD AT THE TIME WHEN YOU'RE IN ONE OF THOSE IN BETWEEN YEARS. YOU MIGHT SAY YOU KNOW WHAT WE NEED TO DO A PRIORITIZATION BECAUSE THE COUNCIL'S NEEDS TO HAVE THIS CONVERSATION. IT REALLY IS A FUNCTION OF THE DYNAMIC ON THE GOVERNING BOARD. AT THAT TIME, SO I MEAN, I THINK IT'S FOOD FOR THOUGHT FOR YOU AND WILL ADDRESS THAT QUESTION CLOSER IN FOR THE NEXT YEAR. IF THAT'S OKAY UNLESS YOU WANT TO GIVE US DIRECTION NOW, BUT I'M NOT SENSING THERE'S OVER OVERWHELMING CONSENSUS, AND YOU GOT TO PEOPLE THAT AREN'T HERE TO SPEAK OUT THEMSELVES. SO CUT. UM AND SO AS PART OF THAT CONVERSATION, THINK THROUGH. AS I SAID LAST YEAR, WE HAD YOU RANK YOUR PRIORITIES, WHICH WAS DIFFERENT THAN WE DID THIS YEAR . AND SO WE WANTED TO KIND OF SO AS THAT SHOULD BE PART OF YOUR CONVERSATION AS WELL. TYPICALLY PRIORITIZATION IS OF YOUR PRIORITIES. BUT AS I SAID, WE WANT TO DO WE WANT TO GET FEEDBACK A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY HERE, SO THAT'S ANOTHER POINT FOR CONVERSATION THEMSELVES, OKAY? WELL LET ME LET ME GO BACK TO THEN, PAUL. IN TERMS OF WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? I CAN TELL YOU WILL CAPTURE THE NOTES AND RECORD WHAT CAME OUT OF THESE CONVERSATIONS SPECIALIST RELATES TO YOUR PRIORITIES. THOSE WILL GET TURNED BACK OVER TO PAUL AND THE TEAM AND THEN I'LL TURN OVER TO YOU ABOUT. YOU KNOW WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE AS IT RELATES TO YOUR STUFF, THE OBJECTIVES AND THEN HOW IT COMES BACK TO THE COUNCIL AND THEN THANK YOU PROCESS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, DOUG. SO THE NEXT STEP THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS ARE GOING TO START HAPPENING NOW. JOE AND HIS GROUP JOSH SAYING OVER HERE, JOSH IS OUR PERFORMANCE MANAGER. HE'S GOING TO BE WORKING WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS TO ASSEMBLE THEIR MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES THAT ARE ROLLED UP INTO EACH ONE OF THESE PRIORITIES. ARE THESE THESE GOALS, THE PILLARS. AND THEN, OF COURSE, THE PRIORITIES WE TALKED ABOUT TODAY. EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE SMART IN TERMS OF SPECIFIC, MEASURABLE, ATTAINABLE, REALISTIC AND TIMELY AND HIS JOB AND JOBS JOBS TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT THAT WE CAN TRACK ALL OF THOSE AND PRESENT THAT INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO EVALUATE AND CONSIDER THAT IS OUR AND WILL BE BRINGING THAT BACK TO YOU IN MAY, TYPICALLY FOR YOU TO VOTE ON THE COUNCIL WILL VOTE ON THAT. AND THEN THAT WILL BE THE SORT OF THING THAT WE TOOK UNDER OUR ARMS, AND WE SET OFF TO PREPARE A BUDGET, MAKING SURE THAT THAT BUDGET IS REFLECTIVE OF THOSE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND SMART OBJECTIVES IF YOU WILL FOR US TO MOVE FORWARD ON NOW. ALWAYS IMPORTANT TO POINT OUT STRATEGIC PLANNING . SOMETIMES ELECTED OFFICIALS GET NERVOUS WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT STRATEGIC PLAN BECAUSE THEY FEEL LIKE THEY'RE LOCKED IN. WELL, GI, I'M LOCKED IN. NO WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO DO ALL THE BLOCKING AND TACKLING WERE ALSO THERE. WE RECOGNIZE THAT THERE ARE THINGS THAT COME OUT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR COME UP THROUGHOUT THE YEAR THAT MAY BECOME A PRIORITY WILL DO OUR BEST. OF COURSE TO KEEP YOU APPRISED. YOU MAY SAY THIS IS OUR HOT ITEM, AND I KNOW THAT WASN'T ON THE STRATEGIC PLAN, BUT IT JUST CAME UP, OF COURSE. THAT IS, I THINK WE'VE BEEN DOING THAT AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO THAT. THIS DOES NOT FORECLOSE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHER THINGS

[02:05:04]

THAT MAY COME UP THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE YEAR. BUT IT DOES HELP US UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR RELATIVE PRIORITIES ARE WHAT WE NEED TO BE WORKING TOWARDS. UM AND I DON'T KNOW THAT I MISS ANYTHING, JOE. IN TERMS OF THE TIMING OF THIS, JOSH ANYTHING SO THE NEXT STEP IS AROUND. MAY YOU'RE GOING TO BE GETTING THE STRATEGIC PLAN WILL SEND IT OUT TO YOU IN ADVANCE. YOU CAN REVIEW THOSE AS QUESTIONS AND THEN IT WILL BE TEED UP FOR YOU TO RATIFY TO VOTE ON AND THEN WE MOVE ON DOWN THE ROAD, SO TO SPEAK. ANYTHING ELSE FROM STAFF THAT I MAY HAVE MISSED. IN THE MEANTIME. THANK YOU, DOUG. THANK YOU, COUNSEL FOR THIS. I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. I KNOW THAT IT'S NOT NECESSARILY THE MOST EXCITING THING RIGHT AWAY TO SPEND YOUR FRIDAY MORNING, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE ARE WE GOING TO DO ON A FRIDAY MORNING, SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.

AND YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, DOUG. PLEASURE THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT AND I'M SURE AS WE CONTINUE WHATEVER THAT SCHEDULE IS, IT WILL SURE BE YOU. YOU'VE DONE A GREAT JOB, AND I THINK YOU'VE EARNED THE TRUST AND RESPECTIVE EVERYBODY ON THE COUNCIL AND CERTAINLY STAFF OR THEY WOULDN'T CONTINUE TO RECOMMEND. YOU BUT. GREAT JOB. THANK YOU APPRECIATE THAT. IT'S FUN TO WORK WITH MULTIPLE YEARS TO KIND OF SEE THE EVOLUTION OF THINGS GOING AND YOU OBVIOUSLY KNOW THAT THE PERSONALITIES AND THE PROJECTS AS WELL, SO IT'S MY PLEASURE AND HONOR TO BE PART OF AFFILIATED WITH YOUR PROCESS HERE, SO THANKS SO MUCH FOR YOUR TRUST AND COMMITMENT, SO WE SHOULD THE BEST CONTINUED SUCCESS. MOTION TO ADJOURN, I GUESS.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.