[00:00:05]
EVENING AT SIX PM, WELCOME TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING HIS OWN COMMISSION MEDIUM TUESDAY. DECEMBER. 1220 23 THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU CCD BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. WE ARE IN ADVISORY COMMISSION AND WE MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT AND PLAN ON SPEAKING ON ONE OF OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS, COUPLE OF HOUSEKEEPING NOTES ONE. WE'RE GLAD YOU'RE HERE. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE CITIZENS BE INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS OF GOVERNMENT HERE IN MCKINNEY, BEFORE YOU COME TO THE PODIUM IF YOU WILL FILL OUT ONE OF THE YELLOW SPEAKER CARDS. THOSE CARDS ARE ON THE TABLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ROOM THERE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROOM. GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS THE ITEM YOU'RE SPEAKING ON. AND IF YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR POSITION ON THAT ITEM, WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT. AND THEN WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, HAND THAT CAR TO ONE OF THE STAFF MEMBERS ON YOUR RIGHT AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS. WITH US WHEN THE TIMER SHOWS A YELLOW LIGHT. YOU'LL HAVE 30 SECONDS LEFT. AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE THREE MINUTES IS UP, YOU'LL HEAR A BUZZER AND IT WILL BE A REALLY BRIGHT RED. WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. WITH THAT WE WILL START OUR AGENDA IN THE FIRST ITEM WILL BE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM THAT IS ONLY AGENDA THAT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING.
COMPONENT AND EXAMPLE OF THAT WOULD BE ONE OF OUR CONSENT ITEMS OR THE MINUTES OF ONE OF OUR LAST MEETINGS. SOPHIE HERE ON ONE OF THOSE ITEMS AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND
[CONSENT ITEMS]
ZONING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT WELL, NOW MOVE ON TO OUR CONCERN ITEMS. FIRST ITEM. 23-101. THE MINISTER OF THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER THE 24TH 2023 ITEM 23-1017 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1420 23. AND THEN HIDE HIM. 23-1018 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING HIS OWN COMMISSION WORK SESSION. NOVEMBER 1420 2023 MEMBERS. WE HAVE QUESTIONS CHANGES ON THE MINUTES TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT TO THE MINUTES. THE 1017 AND THE 1018 TO NOVEMBER 14TH MEETING. FOR THE COMMISSION AND WORK SESSION. ALRIGHT ERIC WAS HERE PRESENT AND I WAS NOT PRESENT THAT DAY. OKAY? JENNIFER TERRY. GOOD. GOT IT. VERY GOOD, GOOD CATCH ANYONE ELSE? NOT VERY GOOD. WE WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THESE ITEMS. MOTION TO APPROVE MINUTES WELL MOTION TIP OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 14TH AS WELL AS THE COMMISSION WORK SESSION. 11TH 14TH. AND THEN, UH, APPROVING THE MINUTES FROM THE 24TH, THE 14TH AND THE WORK SESSION FOR THE 14TH MOTION MEMBERS WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES INCLUDING THOSE AMENDED MINUTES OF NOVEMBER. 14 REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING IN NOVEMBER. 14TH THE WORKS ISSUE MEETING. SECOND THE SECOND, MR LEBOW. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.THANK YOU. I. MIGHT HAVE BEEN BUMPED OUT THIS LOOK. I SAID MOTION CARRIES, UM WILL NOW MOVE
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act Amendments to the ONE McKinney 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Including Minor Updates to the Master Thoroughfare Plan]
TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA ITEM CS ALL THE ITEMS THAT WILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. ATTACHED WE'RE GOING TO GO OUT OF ORDER AND TAKE THE LAST PUBLIC HEARING AUTUMN ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT.AND THEN WHAT? JUMP BACK IN LINE . THAT'S ITEM 23 DAYS, 0008. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE ONE MCKINNEY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS INCLUDES MINOR UPDATES TO THE MASTER THROW FOR A PLAN. I THINK YOUR CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. MY NAME IS HALEY ANGEL, AND I AM ONE OF THE PLANNING MANAGERS HERE WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. IF YOU'LL GIVE ME JUST ONE MOMENT TO GET TO THE START OF THE POWERPOINT, AS WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD. I'M HERE TO TALK TO YOU TODAY ABOUT THE MINOR AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT MORE SPECIFICALLY TO THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN AS A QUICK REMINDER YOU ALL ARE PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL AFTER REVIEW. AND TO GIVE A HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF THE CHANGES BEFORE WE GET INTO ANY OF THE DETAILS. UM THERE ARE SEVERAL DIFFERENT THOROUGHFARES THAT
[00:05:02]
HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH RESPECTIVE PROCESSES WITH THE STATE OR COUNTING AND THEN HAVE FINALLY REACHED THEIR FINAL ALIGNMENT. SO THE GOAL TONIGHT IS TO ADD THOSE INTO THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN AND, OF COURSE, ADDRESS ANY CONNECTIONS OF OUR CITY THOROUGHFARES TO THOSE STATE OR COUNTY THOROUGHFARES AND ANY NECESSARY RECLASSIFICATIONS. I DO WANT TO MAKE A QUICK NOTE. TYPICALLY THE PREFERS TO NARROW DIAGRAM OR LAND USE DIAGRAM ARE INCLUDED IN THESE AMENDMENTS WHEN THEY COME BEFORE YOU JUST WITH THE PARTICULAR CONTEXT OF THE CASE TONIGHT. UM, STAFF HAS MADE THE DECISION TO ACTUALLY SEPARATE THOSE TWO AS YOU CAN TELL BY THE STREETS THAT ARE ON THE POWER POINT. THIS IS A LONG AWAITED DECISION, AND THEN WE FELT THAT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO GO AHEAD AND CODIFY THAT ONLY MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR BOTH THE RESIDENTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY. BUT I DO WANT TO ASSURE YOU THAT WE ARE WORKING TOWARDS AN AMENDMENT TO BOTH OF THOSE DIAGRAMS, AND THIS WILL INCLUDE THE NECESSARY PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT THAT WE WOULD NORMALLY SEE. BEFORE USE THE EXISTING MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN THAT WE THINK IT'S A LOT EASIER TO UNDERSTAND WHAT CHANGES ARE BEING PROPOSED. IF WE LOOK AT THE RED LINE, SO IN THE SLIDE BEFORE YOU THAT SOLID RED LINE ARE GOING TO BE ANY REALIGNMENTS OR RECLASSIFICATIONS, AND THEN THE DASHED LINE IS GOING TO BE WHAT'S CURRENTLY ADOPTED SO YOU CAN GET A SENSE OF THE SCALE OF THOSE CHANGES. AND THE THREE MAIN THOROUGHFARES THAT CAME THROUGH A STATE OR COUNTY PROCESS. LET ME CHOOSE A BETTER COLOR. ARE GOING TO BE THE U. S. HIGHWAY 380 BYPASS, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE. WE ALSO HAVE SPUR 399, WHICH CIRCLES AROUND THE AIRPORT BACK TO US HIGHWAY 75 AND FINALLY, THE F M 546, WHICH IS A COUNTY ROAD. THOSE ARE THE MAIN THOROUGHFARES THAT CAME DOWN FROM ANOTHER ENTITY. AND OF COURSE, YOU CAN SEE. THERE ARE SEVERAL CONNECTIONS ALONG ALL OF THOSE FROM THE CITY THOROUGHFARES AND AH! HIT SOME HIGHLIGHTS. I THINK SOME OF THE LARGEST CHANGE THAT YOU MIGHT SEE IS UP IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER. UM ORIGINALLY TELEPHONE ROAD WAS UNNAMED D AND WAS A MAJOR REGIONAL HIGHWAY AND EXTENDED ALL THE WAY DOWN SOUTH PAST THE AIRPORT, OF COURSE, WITH THE ADDITION OF THE NEW ROADS, WE NO LONGER NEED THAT CONNECTION SO YOU CAN SEE SLIGHTLY AT THE BEGINNING AND SLIGHTLY AT THE END. UM, IT DOES REMAIN. BUT WE DID HAVE TO ADD A CONNECTOR TO THE BYPASS BEAR. FINALLY IN THE AIRPORT AREA. YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS SOME RECONFIGURATION THERE JUST WHERE SPUR 399 WAS. THERE HAVE TO BE SOME REALIGNMENT TWO UNNAMED ONE, AND THAT LARGELY FOLLOWS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINES. THERE ARE A FEW OTHER MINOR CHANGES IN HERE AS WELL. FOR EXAMPLE, THE COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP, IT DOES LOOK REALIGNED, BUT THAT IS TO JUST KEEP IN LINE WITH EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY BACK PHYSICIANS, SO THAT'S TO KEEP IN PACE WITH COLLIN COUNTY. THE LAST THING THAT I'LL MENTION WE DO HAVE A PROPOSED MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN HERE IN TOTAL. IT'S EASIER TO SEE ON THIS SLIDE. BUT OF COURSE, UH, U. S HIGHWAY 380 HAS BEEN RECLASSIFIED AGAIN. IT WAS PREVIOUSLY THAT MAJOR REGIONAL HIGHWAY HAS BEEN RECLASSIFIED TO A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL WITH THE ANTICIPATED BY PATH. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ITEM, OF COURSE, AND THIS IS ACTUALLY SLATED TO GO TO COUNCIL NEXT WEEK AGAIN WITH AN INTENT OF WANTING TO HAVE THE INFORMATION PUBLISHED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AND I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.HEY, LUTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE? I DID HAVE A QUESTION THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF TALK OVER THE LAST YEAR OR SO ABOUT THE BYPASS. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE MAY HAVE BEEN IN ALIGNMENT THAT AT LEAST SOME HAVE LOCKED IN ON. CAN YOU GIVE US AN IDEA OF THE TIMING OF WHEN THAT MIGHT MIGHT BE A BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MIGHT START. YEAH I'M GONNA HAVE GARY WITH ENGINEERING COME UP. I THINK HE'S A BETTER BETTER SUITED TO ANSWER THAT FOR YOU. GOOD EVENING, UH, CHAIR AND KIND OF COMMISSION MEMBERS. GARY GRAHAM, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING. UM I WISH I HAD A GOOD ANSWER FOR YOU. TEXT ART IS CURRENTLY UM, FOR I'LL TALK ABOUT TWO PROJECTS FOR SPUR 399 EXTENSION. THEY ARE CURRENTLY ACQUIRING RIGHT AWAY AND HAVE SELECTED CONSULTANTS TO DO THE DESIGN PHASE OF THAT IMPROVEMENT. UM, WE AND ANTICIPATE THAT THE FIRST PHASE OF THAT ALIGNMENT, WHICH OVERLAPS WITH USE THIS MAP. UM HARD TO SEE, SINCE IT'S NOT REAL ZOOMED IN MAGENTA. ANTICIPATE THIS FIRST PHASE RIGHT THERE TO GO TO CONSTRUCTION IN 2025 THAT WAS PART OF THE HIGHWAY FIVE PROJECT. UM BUT THE REST OF THAT WE ARTISTIC PAINTING AT 2027 2028. SOMEWHERE IN THAT TIME
[00:10:01]
FRAME. TEXTILE HASN'T GIVEN EXACT SCHEDULE. WE'RE TRYING TO ACQUIRE THE RIGHT AWAY. FOR THE 380 BYPASS. THEY JUST IN SEPTEMBER RECEIVED THE FINALLY EYES APPROVAL, AND SO NOW THEY ARE STARTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPROVAL, SO THEY'RE STARTING RIGHT AWAY ACQUISITION. THEY HAVE NOT GIVE US ANY BREAKDOWN ON HOW THEY MIGHT CONSTRUCT THAT IN HIS SCHEDULE, UM FOR CONSTRUCTION, SO WE'RE KIND OF WAIT AND SEE ON THAT ASPECT. VERY GOOD. OTHER QUESTIONS. MR GRAHAM GOT GOT THE MAN IN THE ROOM. VERY THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU COME TO NON AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS PROPOSED CAN'T PLAN INCLUDING MINOR UPDATES. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.ALRIGHT HAVE A MOTION MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC AREA AND APPROVED 23 0 ZERO'S ALREADY.
THE APPROACH PROPOSED AMENDMENTS , MR LEBOW TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. I'M SORRY , CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRISON BY STAFF. SECOND MULTIPLE SECONDS.
WHAT'S THAT, MR CONRAD? THANK YOU ONLY HAVE TO A NICE YOU'RE DONE. HAVE EMOTIONAL, EMOTIONAL ABOUT TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE ANONYMOUS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. SECONDARY. MR CONRAD, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.
BYE. OKAY THAT MOTION CARRIES THIS ITEM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 19TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. GARY. THANK
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on an Appeal of Staff’s Decision for Alternate Compliance on a Site Plan (McDonald Business Park), Located at 3255 North McDonald Street]
YOU. OKAY WE'LL JUMP BACK TO OUR REGULAR ORDER. THANK YOU. FOR LETTING A STUDENT FIRST ISLAND WELL HERE. AND BEING CHALLENGED ON MY ORDER OF BUSINESS HERE. FIRST ITEM IS 2322 DAYS. 0069 SP 10 SP. THREE GIRL 10 SP THREE. PLEASE. HERE WE GO. YEAH. OKAY SORRY ABOUT THAT, TOO. 320-00.ONE SP THREE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF STAFF DECISION. FOR AN ALTERNATE COMPLIANCE ON A SITE PLAN. MCDONALD BUSINESS PARK. THIS IS A 3 TO 55 NORTH MCDONALDS STREET. MR BENNETT? YES THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MR CHAIRMAN. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER FOR THE CITY MCKINNEY. THIS IS AN APPEAL TO STEPH'S DENIAL OF ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MCDONALD'S BUSINESS PARK, THE APPLICANT IS CONSTRUCTING THREE MULTI TENANT BUILDINGS TOTALING 46,827 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USES. THE SITE PLAN WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN 2021, BUT CHANGES TO SOME SITE FEATURES DURING CONSTRUCTION HAVE LED TO UPDATES THAT HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT. THE SITE PLAN IS BEING REVIEWED UNDER CHAPTER 146 OF THE PREVIOUS CODE AS IT WAS SUBMITTED PRIOR TO NOVEMBER.
15TH 2022 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO MOVE OVER 10% OF THE REQUIRED CANOPY TREES FROM THE PARKING AREA TO THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. CANOPY TREES ARE REQUIRED IN THE PARKING LOT AT A RATE OF ONE PRETEND PARKING SPACES AND ALL PARKING SPACES MUST BE WITHIN 65 FT. OF A TREE. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING TO REPLACE THE LIVING LANDSCAPE AND ALL TERMINUS ISLANDS WITH DECOMPOSED GRANITE. WHEREAS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 50% OF EACH TERMINUS ISLAND WOULD WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE LIVING LANDSCAPING WITHIN THAT. WITH THE UPDATES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. NONE OF THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE BEING MET . STEPH DENIED THE ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE DUE TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES, NOT MEETING THE INTENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND AS SUCH ALL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS THANK YOU, JAKE QUESTIONS. JAKE UM, ITEM NUMBER ONE ON THE LETTER OF INTENT. IS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO MOVE FIVE TREES. AND IT WAS HARD TO TELL WHERE THEY WERE GOING TO MOVE THEM. FROM. WHERE TO WHERE. YES. YEAH IT'S GONNA BE A LITTLE BIT HARD, SINCE THIS IS TAKING THEM FROM THE FRONT. MHM I KNOW IT'S FOUR OUT OF THESE TERMINUS ISLANDS. I WANT TO SEE JERSEY. YES IF YOU COULD PLEASE, I CAN DO THAT.
[00:15:14]
YES YEAH. AND WHERE ARE THEY GOING? IT DOESN'T REALLY IT'LL. IT'LL KNOW WHERE THOSE ARE BEING MOVED TO IS AS WELL. I BELIEVE IN THE STAFF REPORT AND IN THE LETTER OF INTENT, SAID FIVE TREES WERE BEING MOVED. IN THIS CASE THERE IS ACTUALLY ONLY FOUR THAT ARE BEING REMOVED THAT ARE REQUIRED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA. YEAH.JAKE. CAN YOU? CAN YOU SHOW ME THE TERMINUS ISLAND? YES, UM. I THINK THEY'RE TRYING TO GET THIS ZOOMED IN A LITTLE BIT, AND THAT SHOULD HELP. BUT ESSENTIALLY, WE'RE ALL THOSE ARE MARKED AT IN RED ARE THE TERMINUS ISLANDS WHERE THE TREES ARE BEING REMOVED, AND THEY ARE NOW BEING PROPOSED DOWN HERE IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE, AND THOSE FOUR THERE. THANK YOU.
JAKE I HAD A QUESTION, SO I NOTICED THAT A COUPLE OF AREAS AROUND THE STRUCTURES THEY HAVE PROPOSED TO PUT LIVE OAKS AND THEY SEEM THAT THEY'RE IN PRETTY CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE. HAVE THEY GIVEN ANY THOUGHT IN TERMS OF LIKE DOWN THE LINE WHEN THOSE LIVE OAKS ARE FULLY GROWN IN TERMS OF ANY POTENTIAL DAMAGE TAKING DUE TO THE STRUCTURE, LEAVE THAT TO THE APPLICANT THAT'S NOT WE DON'T HAVE A FOUNDATION MINIMUM DISTANCE REQUIREMENT AS OF THE OLD CODE IN THE UDC THAT WAS APPROVED LAST NOVEMBER. WE DO RECOMMEND THAT ANY CANOPY TREES BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY OR A MINIMUM OF 12 FT FROM ANY FOUNDATION. BUT UNDER THE OLD CODE, UM WE DON'T HAVE THAT REQUIREMENTS. ONLY THAT TO THE APPLICANT MAN. THE QUESTIONS, MR BENNETT. THANK YOU, SIR. AFTER YOU'VE BEEN HERE TONIGHT, IF SO. THE PRAYER. HELLO STAFF. MY NAME IS JAMES BULLINGTON. I OWN THIS PROPERTY, PRIMARILY. WITH SOMEONE OTHER INVESTORS. I KNOW A COUPLE OF YOU GUYS AND MOBILE AND I KNOW CAITLIN SO ALL RIGHT. SO WHAT I'M ASKING FOR IS REAL SIMPLE. DO WE HAVE A LASER WONDERING? IS THIS A LASER? YOU CAN DRAW ON THE SCREEN HERE, JUST PICKING IN THOSE COLORS AND YOU CAN DRAW WOULD YOU LIKE TO BELIEVE THERE'S ALSO A LASER AT HOME? KIND OF OLD SCHOOL SO. THANK YOU JUST HAVE TO DRAW ON HERE. THIS JUST LIKE ONE OF THOSE COLORS, OKAY. AND HOW DO I DROP WHAT I DO? NOT ON HERE. YOU JUST WITH MY FINGER. OKAY? VERY COOL. OKAY, SO HERE'S THE SITUATION. THIS. THIS TREE RIGHT THERE. THAT'S NEXT TO A TRANSFORMER. ENCORE IS NOT GOING TO LET ME PUT A TREE CANOPY TREE NEXT TO A TRANSFORMER. SO I DON'T HAVE ANY CHOICE BUT TO MOVE THAT AND THE REASON THESE TRANSFORMERS ARE WHERE THEY'RE LOCATED. I COULDN'T MEET THEIR REQUIREMENTS TO PUT THEM ON THE AT THE WEST SIDE OF THESE BUILDINGS LIKE THAT ORIGINALLY PLANNED THEIR TOLERANCES AND THEIR REQUIREMENTS ARE SO EXTENSIVE THAT I COULD NOT. GET THAT IN THERE TO WHERE IT METHOD AND THEN I WOULD HAVE STILL HAD TO REMOVE CANOPY TREES ON THOSE THE ENDS OF EACH BUILDING AS WELL. SO WIND UP BEING EASIER.
TO PUT THOSE IN THE FRONT. SO I WANTED TO REMOVING THAT ONE THAT I JUST HIGHLIGHTED. THEN I HAD TO REMOVE LET'S SEE. YOU REMOVE THIS ONE DOWN HERE AS WELL. OKAY? THEN I HAD TO REMOVE THIS ONE. LET'S SEE. YES. SO I HAD TO MOVE TO BASICALLY FROM TERM IN SILENCE. FROM THE TRANSFORMERS, SO THAT'S A NO BRAINER THAT HAD TO GO. THERE'S NO THERE'S NO RECOURSE ON THAT WHATSOEVER.
THEN THE OTHER ONE IS ANOTHER TREE THAT HAD TO GET MOVED RIGHT HERE. BECAUSE IT WAS GOING TO BE TOO CLOSE TO THE SCREENING WALL. THE SCREENING WALL DIDN'T GET PUT EXACTLY WHERE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO WHERE THEY SHOULD HAVE PUT IT. AND SO WHAT HAPPENED WAS THE GREEN SPACE THAT WAS THERE WAS COMPLETELY DIVIDED ON EITHER SIDE, SO IT BARELY HAD 4 FT. ON EACH SIDE OF
[00:20:02]
SCREENING WALL. AND SO WE NEED TO MOVE THAT ONE. AND THEN THIS ONE RIGHT HERE. THE SLEEVE DIDN'T GET PUT IN. TO PUT A TREE THERE. SO I MEAN, I COULD PUT A CREPE MYRTLE THERE. THEY PRETTY MUCH ARE PRETTY DROUGHT TOLERANT. YOU KNOW, BUT AS FAR AS. I HAVEN'T NO IRRIGATION THERE. I WASN'T ABLE TO PUT THAT IN THERE. SO THAT'S WHY I ASKED TO MOVE THAT TREE OR JUST REMOVE THAT TREE ENTIRELY. SO WHAT WE DID WAS SEE THE OTHER ONE. THEN I MOVED ONE MORE TREE THAT WAS UP HERE BY THE MONUMENT SIGN BECAUSE IT WAS GOING TO BLOCK THE VISIBILITY. THIS SIGN.ITSELF, RIGHT? SIGN IS GOING TO BE RIGHT IN THIS AREA HERE. MY ARTHRITIS MUST BE KICKING IN BECAUSE MY LINES SURE WIGGLY AND SO, UM SO WHAT I DID WAS I HAVE ONE TREE. I WAS GOING TO PUT UP HERE BY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. BECAUSE WE HAVE IRRIGATION OVER THERE. WE WERE ABLE TO TIE INPUT A BUBBLER THERE. AND THEN THESE OTHER TREES. GOING TO COME DOWN HERE. THE BOTTOM BEHIND THIS DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. AND OVER HERE. AND OVER HERE. AND THEN OVER HERE, SO EFFECTIVELY. I WAS GONNA RELOCATE FIVE TREES. SO MY QUESTION TO YOU GUYS IS AND TO PLANNING IS IF THE OBJECT IS TO PUT TREES OUT THERE TO KEEP THE TO HELP WITH THE CITY AND KEEP THE TEMPERATURE COOL, WHICH IS WHAT I WAS EXPLAINED TO BY ADAM, THE ARBORIST. BEFORE HE MOVED TO A DIFFERENT POSITION IN THE CITY. THAT. THAT WAS ONE OF THE BECAUSE MY QUICK BECAUSE MY CONCERN AT THAT POINT IN TIME WAS LIKE CANOPY TREES. CAN CAUSE A LOT OF DAMAGE IF THEY'RE CLOSE TO BUILDINGS, AND I'M 100% AGAINST PUTTING CANOPY TREES NEXT TO BUILDINGS, AND I LIKE YOUR QUESTION, DID YOU BECAUSE THEY DO CAUSE DAMAGE. I GOT A HOLE IN MY FORMAL DINING ROOM AREA RIGHT NOW WITH MY HOUSE, BUT WE HAD TO PUNCH A HOLE IN THE FLOOR CRAWL UNDER 3 FT. AND FIX THE WATER LINE. THAT WAS KINKED BECAUSE THE ROOT GOT UP UNDER THE SEWER LINE AND PRESS THAT WATER LINE UP TO BEAM AND BENT PIPE BECAUSE THEY PINHOLE IN IT, SO THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF DAMAGE IS WHAT IT DOES FOR YOU. NOT TO MENTION THE AMOUNT OF AGGRAVATION CAUSED BY EVER TRY TO MOVE ALL YOUR FURNITURE AND IN ONE ROOM AND DINING ROOM INTO A NOTE, FIND OTHER PLACES TO PUT IT IN YOUR HOUSE WHILE YOU FIX THAT, NOT MUCH FUN. SO AND AS FAR AS THIS BUILDINGS ARE CONCERNED, MOST OF THE SPACE IN THESE BUILDINGS IS GOING TO BE OWNER OCCUPIED. SO WE'RE BRINGING I'M BRINGING IN BUSINESS TO THE CITY. YOU KNOW PEOPLE THAT ARE EITHER LEASING SPACE AND OTHER PLACES ARE NOW MOVING AND RELOCATING TO THIS CITY. PAY YOU GUYS TAXES AND HELP THIS ECONOMY IN MCKINNEY.
SO. THIS IS NOT JUST TENANT LEASE SPACE. SOME OF IT WILL BE, BUT THE MAJORITY OF IT'S GOING TO BE AN OWNER OCCUPIED. AND I WILL BE OWNING SALVADOR'S WELL. SO THAT'S THAT'S THE REASON FOR IT. AND AS FAR AS THE THIS. I WON'T I PLAN TO REMOVE ALL THIS GRASS. FROM ALL THESE AREAS RIGHT IN HERE AND PUT ROCK IT'S ATTRACTIVE. I HAVE A PICTURE I TOOK. THEY JUST PUT SOME OF IT IN. THEY JUST DID, UH, LET'S SEE THIS AREA RIGHT HERE. TOP TODAY. AND IT LOOKS NICE. IF YOU GUYS WANT TO SEE THE PICTURE ON MY PHONE. I CAN SHOW IT TO YOU. IT'S A REAL NICE LOOK, IT'S CLEAN. THE REASON I DID THAT THIS FOR TWO REASONS. ONE SAYS WATER. SECOND IT SAVES MAINTENANCE COSTS TO HAVE ALL THAT GRASS CUT BECAUSE WHEN YOU HAVE SMALL TERMINUS ISLANDS UP THERE. YOU'RE NOT CUTTING THAT WHEN YOU GOT PLANTS AND STUFF AND TREES. YOU'RE NOT CUTTING OUT WITH THE LINE WHERE YOU'RE KIDDING WITH THE WEED EATER. AND THEN YOU HAVE SOMEBODY COMING IN BEHIND YOU AND BLOWING IT. WELL, IF YOU'RE INSIDE THESE BUILDINGS CONDUCTING BUSINESS, YOUR BUSINESS ENDS AS SOON AS THAT BLOWER KICKS ON, OR THAT WE'D OR KICKS ON. SO THE GOAL WAS TO REMOVE ALL HEMORRHAGES FROM PEOPLE THAT ARE INSIDE THESE SPACES IN COMMUNICATING WITH THEIR CLIENTS. AND LEAVE ALL OF THE AND I HAVE A LOT OF GREEN. I HAVE MORE GRASS ON THIS SITE THAN MOST SITES THAT YOU GUYS HAVE IN MCKINNEY. AND SO THERE WAS NO REASON TO PUT MORE GRASS AROUND THIS BUILDING. AND HAVE MORE TO CUT MORE TO MAINTAIN. AND THEN AND HAVE TO LISTEN TO ALL THE LANDSCAPE EQUIPMENT WHILE IT'S BEING TAKEN CARE OF WHEN I HAVE ALL THAT OTHER GRASS YOU KNOW THAT IS GOING TO HELP. WITH HEAT. WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL IT, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, THERE'S GRASS IS GOOD BECAUSE IT PRODUCES OXYGEN FROM CARBON DIOXIDE TREES DO THE SAME THING.
BOTH LOWER TEMPERATURE OVERALL, AND I AGREE WITH THAT. BUT THERE NEEDS TO BE A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF. THOUGHT PUT INTO HOW MUCH GRASS HOW MUCH TREES THAT SORT OF THING YOU'RE GONNA PUT ON A SITE. AND THE LAST THING I'M GOING TO SAY ABOUT THIS IS THIS IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. I OWN IT. I
[00:25:04]
PAY THE TAXES ON IT. THE CITY DOES NOT OWN IT DOES NOT PAY TAXES ON IT. THAT'S HOW I FEEL ABOUT THIS. I FEEL THAT WHEN YOU GUYS DICTATING EVERY STEP OF THE WAY THE CITY DICTATING EVERY STEP OF THE WAY. YOU'RE TRAMPLING MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOR PRIVATE ENJOYMENT OF MY PRIVATE PROPERTY. SO I WANT YOU TO CONSIDER THAT WHEN YOU GUYS MAKE DECISIONS FOR BOTH MY STUFF AND OTHER PEOPLE'S STUFF. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO ENJOY OUR PROPERTY THAT WE PAY TAXES ON.IT'S NOT THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY THE TAXES OR TO CONTROL AND GOVERN MY PRIVATE PROPERTY. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY ON THAT. WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'VE COME TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THIS PROPOSED SITE PLAN. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ANYONE. PROMOTION OF CLOSED TO PUBLIC HEARING AND HAVE A LITTLE FUN DISCUSSION. EMOTIONAL CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING EMOTIONAL WATER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND MR TAYLOR'S OR ANY DISCUSSION ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES.
HI. WHAT'S THAT MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED MEMBERSHIP QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR MAYBE THE APPLICANT. JAKE AND THE QUESTION OF HEY, BUDDY. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S BEEN SOME CONVERSATION WITH THE STEP BACK AND FORTH WITH THIS APPLICANT. AND THIS THE APPLICANT ARE THEY AWARE OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INSIDE MCKINNEY? YES, THEY ARE. YES. OKAY SO HOW MUCH DISCUSSION HAVE YOU HAD WITH THE AFRICAN ABOUT GRASS AND LOCATION, THREES IN THOSE BEING CITY ORDINANCES? YEAH SO I THINK THE CONVERSATIONS HAVE BEEN SPLIT BETWEEN KATE AND THE APPLICANT MYSELF AND THE APPLICANT. BUT THESE ARE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS THAT EVERY EVERY DEVELOPER MOST OF ALL, AS FAR AS NON RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS THAT'S PART OF INSIDE THE ZONING ORDINANCE THAT EACH PROPERTY INSIDE. MCKINNEY HAS EVERY EVERY EVERY PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY MCKINNEY CITY LIMITS MUST FOLLOW THOSE AND IT DEPENDS ON USE A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MAY HAVE SOME DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS COMPARED TO COMMERCIAL OR OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, RIGHT? VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR. YEAH QUICK QUESTION FOR STAFF TO CLARIFY AS THE ISSUE MOVING OF FIVE TREES BECAUSE YOU MENTIONED THE 10% REQUIREMENT. CAN YOU ELABORATE ON THAT? SO THE APPLICANT MARK THIS UP FOR THE RELOCATION OF FIVE TREES, THE FIFTH ONE THAT HE HAD HAD MENTIONED IN THE STREET. AND IN THE STREET BUFFER RIGHT UP HERE. WHICH IS NOT SHOWING UP. THAT ONE IS NOT REQUIRED, SO THERE ARE ACTUALLY A COUPLE MORE TREES THAT WERE PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PLAN IN THE STREET BUFFER THAN WHAT'S REQUIRED. I BELIEVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT WAS LIKE 10 OR 12, AND THEY HAD A COUPLE MORE THAN THAT, UM, THE FOUR THAT ARE REQUIRED WOULD BE WITHIN THE PARKING AREA. SO THAT WOULD BE ALL THE OTHER FOUR TREES. JUST TO CONFIRM IT'S THE ROOM. IT'S THE MOVING OF THE TREES BEING OVER THE 10% AS WELL AS THE REMOVAL OF THE 50% LANDSCAPING. IT'S BOTH ITEMS. OKAY, THANK YOU. SO THE REASON WE'RE HERE IS MOVING THE TREES AND REMOVING OF THE GRASS AND THE PROPOSED GRAY GRAVEL. YES THAT'S CORRECT. SO, YEAH, WE HAVE MINIMUM CANOPY TREE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN PARKING AREAS, AND WE ALSO HAVE THAT MINIMUM OF 50% OF LIVING LANDSCAPING MUST COVER EACH TERMINUS ISLAND. UM AND CURRENTLY WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED AS ZERO. OKAY? OTHER QUESTIONS. ONE JUST ONE QUESTION. SO THE APPLICANT MENTIONED THAT THEY HAD A CURRENT PICTURE. OH WAS THAT IN OUR PACKET? IT WASN'T IN THE PACKET. BUT IF YOU'D LIKE TO SEE IT, I'M I'M SURE MR BULLINGTON WOULD. MHM. MIND IF I PASS IT. I CAN
[00:30:16]
GRAB IT AND BRING IT BACK TO YOU. IF YOU LIKE THAT. ANOTHER QUESTION, OK? I HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING THE CANOPY TREE THING AS FAR AS SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS . PARKING SPACES HAVE TO BE WITHIN 65 FT OF A CANOPY TREE. AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PARKING SPACE WITHIN UM, EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES YOU HAVE TO HAVE A CANOPY TREE, RIGHT? WELL IF YOU LOOK AT AT THIS THE DRAWING UP HERE. HOW DO I GET THAT BACK UP ON US? OKAY WE'RE WORKING ON IT. OKAY? UM. WE'RE ALL THIS ALL THE PARKING HEAD ENDS. AGAINST THE TOWARDS HIGHWAY FIVE. I HAVE CANOPY TREES ALL ALONG THAT SO TECHNICALLY. EVERY EVERY PARKING SPACE OUT THERE IS WITHIN 20 OR 30 FT. 20 TO 30 FT OF THE CANOPY TREE. OKAY NOW. AS FAR AS THESE QUOTE RULES ARE CONCERNED ORDINANCES THAT EVERYBODY HAS TO ABIDE BY. THAT'S NOT ENTIRELY TRUE. I CAN. IF YOU IF YOU GOOGLE, UM THE NEW PROGRAM THAT WENT ON LIKE FORESTS AND 380. THEY DO NOT HAVE CANOPY TREES, EVERY 10 FT. MORE LIKE EVERY 20 FT. NOW ARE MOSTLY PARKING SPACES WITHIN 65 FT. PROBABLY I DIDN'T I DIDN'T TAKE THE TIME TO MEASURE THOSE, BUT THEY ARE NOT. TREES. EVERY 65 FT. TERMS. THERE'S NOT A TERMINUS ISLAND EVERY 65 FT. I'M SORRY. EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES CLARIFY THAT. ALSO THAT INDUSTRIAL PART INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS THAT JUST WENT ON AND INDUSTRIAL RIGHT BEFORE YOU GET TO THE AIRPORT.ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD OF INDUSTRIAL THOSE DO NOT HAVE TERMINUS ISLANDS, EVERY 10 FT OR EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES, SO BASICALLY. THERE'S NO HARD AND FAST RULE. WITH THE CITY FROM WHAT I CAN TELL, AND I'VE BEEN BUILDING IN HERE FOR EIGHT YEARS NOW. I CAN GIVE YOU ANOTHER INSTANCE THAT THERE'S SUPPOSED TO BE A HARD AND FAST RULE ON THIS. APPARENTLY IT DOESN'T EXIST EITHER. AND THAT IS IF YOU BUILD A COMMERCIAL BUILDING IN IT. THE BACK OF YOUR BUILDING BACKS UP TO RESIDENTIAL AREA. YOU HAVE TO BUILD A 7 FT MASONRY WALL. OKAY THAT'S JUST SUPPOSEDLY A QUOTE. NO. OH VARIANTS REQUIREMENT, BUT THAT NEW EQUIPMENT RENTAL PLACE ON INDUSTRIAL THEY STILL HAVE CHAIN LINK FENCE ON THEIR WHOLE ENTIRE BACK OF THEIR PROPERTY BETWEEN THEM AND THE TRAILER PARK AND I ACTUALLY SPOKE ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO. TO THE ENGINEER IN THE CITY. THAT I WANT. I WAS GOING TO PURCHASE THAT PROPERTY AND DEVELOP IT. AND THEN I BACKED OUT OF DOING THAT. WHEN THEY TOLD ME THAT I HAD TO DO THIS LONG WALL IN THEIR SIDE IN PURCHASING IN THIS OTHER COMPANY COMES IN PURCHASES AND THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO THE WALL SO WHEN I LOOK AT THIS AS A DEVELOPER AS A SMALL DEVELOPER IN THIS CITY, THERE'S TWO THINGS THAT ARE COMING TO MIND. ONE IS WE'RE REALLY WISHY WASHY ON THESE ORDINANCES OR SOMEBODY'S GETTING KICKBACKS. I DON'T LIKE TO USE THAT WORD, BECAUSE THAT'S THAT'S ILLEGAL FOR CITY PEOPLE TO DO THAT TO GET THOSE, BUT SOMETHING'S GOING ON. AND SO I DON'T FEEL LIKE I SHOULD BE. YOU KNOW? PUT DOWN OVER A SMALL REQUEST. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE THAT'S RELEVANT TO THIS CYCLING. THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THE OTHER QUESTIONS. MOTIONS MOTION TO DENY THE REQUEST MOTION BY MR TAYLOR TO DENY THE REQUEST. SECOND OKAY? SORT OF EMOTION ON MR TAYLOR TO DENY THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. SECOND AMENDMENT MAN, MR LEBOW. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CAST YOUR VOTES. NO. NO. ONE THE MOTION.
WE'RE OUT TOTALLY OUT. OKAY, GOT IT.
[00:35:11]
NO. RIGHT? SO THE MOTION IS APPROVED. THE MOTION WAS TO DENY THE APPLICATOR REQUEST TO VOTE.THE MOTION WAS APPROVED. FIVE IN FAVOR ONE AGAINST MR ARNOLD. OR MAYBE JAKE, IF YOU COULD MEET WITH MR BULLINGTON AND TALK ABOUT NEXT STEPS OR WHAT? WHAT THE NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS WOULD BE I WOULD QUESTION YOU HAVE THE NEXT ONE. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MR BENNETT TALKED TO YOU . OKAY WE'RE GOING TO MR BULLETIN. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MR BENNETT TALKED TO YOU. OKAY LET'S SAY WHAT I GOTTA SAY. IT'S REAL QUICK. WHAT PART OF THERE'S TWO PARTS OF THIS REQUEST? ONE IS WELL, THE GRASS AND THE OTHER ONE IS THE TREES. WHICH ONE ARE YOU GUYS WERE GOING TO DENY THE MOTION AS REQUESTED. MR BENNETT WILL WILL EXPLAIN YOU EXACTLY WHAT THE NEXT STEP IS SO THE MOTION THAT WAS PRESENTED BEFORE US WAS DENIED. AND THAT WAS FOR BOTH THE TREE LOCATION. AND THE GRASS. YOU DO REALIZE THAT YOU DON'T HAVE A CHOICE IN THE IN THE TREES NOT BEING BY THE
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan for a Retail Store (Sprouts), Located at 2201 Virginia Parkway]
TRANSPORT. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON, MR BULLINGTON. THE NEXT ITEM. IS 22 DAYS 0069 SPF PUBLIC CARING TO CONSIDER VARIANTS TO SITE PLAN FOR RETAIL STORES SPROUTS. THIS IS LOCATED AT 2201 . VIRGINIA PARKWAY. MR BENNETT. THANK YOU AGAIN, MR CHAIRMAN, JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER FOR THE CITY MCKINNEY. WOULD YOU GUYS WANT APOLOGIES. THE PROBLEM OUR BOTH CAST AND DISPLAY HIM COMPLETE. SO WE WILL NEED TO DO VERBAL VOTE. TO THE MEETING, OKAY? YEAH WELL, WE'LL DO OUR VERY BEST. WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT WE GET HANDS RAISED REAL HEIGHT SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE IT GETS RECORDED PROPERLY. OKAY? I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT DISPLAYING MORE WORK, BUT YOUR MONITORS IN FRONT OF YOU SHOULD BE WORKING, JAKE, YOU SHOULD STILL BE ABLE TO SEE FROM WHERE YOU'RE AT. YES WELL, THE PRESENTATION IS NOT CURRENTLY PULLED UP. YES, I CAN SEE HERE. OKAY THERE, IT IS.SHOULD BE ABLE TO CONTROL THAT HERE JUST WON'T DISPLAY THERE. AND AS LONG AS THIS IS WORKING, IT SHOULD BE WORKING FOR EVERYBODY ELSE. OKAY? I THINK ABOUT 30 MINUTES FOR THEM TO WHATEVER HIS HAPPENED ON OUR END HERE. WE SHOULD STILL BE HERE. OKAY ALL RIGHT. UM THIS IS A SITE PLAN WITH A VARIANCE REQUESTED BY SPROUTS. FARMERS MARKET. TYPICALLY SITE PLANS ARE APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. HOWEVER ONE VARIANCES SUCH AS THESE ARE REQUESTED. THEY'RE BROUGHT IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION FOR ACTION. THE SITE PLAN WAS REVIEWED UNDER CHAPTER 146 OF THE PREVIOUS CODE CODE AS IT WAS SUBMITTED PRIOR TO NOVEMBER. 15TH 2022 THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING IN APPROXIMATELY 22,468 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL STORE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO DEVIATE FROM THE REQUIRED EACH FACTION MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING. AND HAS PROVIDED. THE SIGHTLINE STUDY SHOWING THAT THE EQUIPMENT WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THE ADJACENT RIGHTS OF WAY OR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. THE TYPICAL REQUIREMENT FOR ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT UNDER CHAPTER 146 IS A SCREENING DEVICE THAT IS A MINIMUM OF 1 FT. TALLER THAN THE EQUIPMENT. TO ADEQUATELY SCREENED THE EQUIPMENT FROM ADJACENT RIGHTS OF WAY AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT HAS MET THIS REQUIREMENT AND ONE LOCATION BUT IS REQUESTING THE VARIANTS DO NOT PROVIDE THE SCREENING DEVICES, 1 FT, TALLER THAN THE EQUIPMENT AND ALL OTHER LOCATIONS. SIGHTLINE STUDIES SHOWS THAT THE EQUIPMENT WILL NOT BE VISIBLE. AS SUCH STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED VARIANTS AND ALL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. JAKE CAN YOU MENTION THE CHANGES THAT THE APPLICANT MADE BETWEEN THE TIME THAT THE PACKET WAS POSTED? YES SO THERE WAS A PREVIOUS SIGHTLINES STUDY EXHIBIT THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO US. ONE OF THE SIGHTLINES WAS STILL SHOWING THAT IT WAS HITTING THE EQUIPMENT. SINCE THEN, THE APPLICANT IS ADDED A SMALL WALL TO FURTHER SCREEN THAT AND ALL EQUIPMENT WILL BE WILL NOT BE VISIBLE. WITH FRIENDS IN THE WEST. WHAT'S THAT? ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE EAST SIDE? ACTUALLY I BELIEVE THE EAST SIDE THAT SIDE LINE SEVEN. YES, 7075 THERE. OKAY? THERE ARE OTHER QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATIONS IN. ONE YEAH. STAFF IS NOW IN FAVOR
[00:40:14]
OF THE ITEM. CORRECT CORRECT TO THE NEW UPDATED SITE PLAN BEING SUBMITTED. THAT'S CORRECT. WE ARE RECOMMENDING BASIN CITY. JACK THANKS. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? I DON'T BELIEVE SO. OKAY? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU COME TO NINE, AND WE'D LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THIS PROPOSED VARIANTS TO SITE PLAN SPROUTS. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. SAYING NONE. ENCLOSED PUBLIC AREAS IMPROVED TO 20069 SP. EMOTIONAL MR LIBURD, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED.THE ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND MEMBERS, WOODARD. ANY DISCUSSION. I'M SORRY. ALL THOSE. WE'LL BE READY TO VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. MOTION IS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE ITEM. ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. OKAY THAT MOTION CARRIES BY VOTERS SIX IN FAVOR. FAVORITE ZERO AGAINST UM JAKE, IF YOU LET THEM KNOW THAT.
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Variances to a Site Plan for Auto Repair Garage (Tovi Motors), Located at 1004 South McDonald Street]
OF THE CHANGE IN THE EVERYBODY IS GOOD, BECAUSE THE NEXT TIME TO TWO DAYS 0118 SP TWO PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VARIANTS TO A SITE PLAN FOR AUTO REPAIR GARAGE. TOBY MOTORS. THIS IS 1004 SOUTH MCDONALDS STREET, MR BENNETT. THANK YOU AGAIN, MR CHAIRMAN. THIS IS A SITE PLAYING WITH VARIANCES REQUESTED BY TOBY MOTORS. THIS ONE MIGHT LOOK FAMILIAR AS IT WAS PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED IN OCTOBER AT A PNC MEETING. I BELIEVE IT WAS OCTOBER 10TH. UM THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCTIVE 5888 SQUARE FOOT AUTO REPAIR GARAGE ON A REDEVELOPMENT SITE LOCATED ALONG HIGHWAY FIVE. PREVIOUSLY CONCERNS FROM STAFF AND P AND Z WERE REGARDING THE SCREENING VARIANCES FOR THE OVERNIGHT VEHICLE STORAGE AND BAITERS AS WELL AS THE LACK OF LANDSCAPING ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. HMM. THE APPLICANT HAS ADVISED THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS TO INCLUDE THE ORNAMENTAL TREES ON THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE AND INCLUDED 6 FT. TALL MASONRY SCREENING WALL AROUND NEARLY ALL OF THE PARKING SPACES, NOT JUST THE DEDICATED OVERNIGHT PARTNER. AND THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE WALL IF YOU CAN SEE IT. MAYBE NOT OKAY? UM. WELL, THESE VARIANCES HAVE BEEN REMOVED SINCE THEY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT. THERE ARE OTHER VARIANCES, WHICH ARE STILL BEING REQUESTED. THE FIRST THREE VARIANCES, INCLUDING THE STAFF REPORT, OR REGARDING LANDSCAPING SETBACKS ALONG RIGHTS OF WAY.STEPH UNDERSTANDS THE NEED FOR THESE VARIANCES IN ORDER TO PROMOTE REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ON AN EXISTING LOT THAT OFFERS CHALLENGES. THE NEXT THREE VARIANTS IS INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORTER REGARDING ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS BECAUSE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE H S A OR THE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT AREA. UM, THIS PROPERTY MUST FOLLOW CERTAIN ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS. STAFF ALSO DOES NOT HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THESE VARIANCES THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED. THE LESS VARIANCE IS REGARDING THE ORIENTATION OF THE BAY DOORS TOWARDS THE RIGHT OF WAY. STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES THE CHALLENGES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE NEED TO ORIENT THE BAY DOORS TOWARDS MCDONALDS STREET INSTEAD OF TOWARD THE ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST. UH WHILE THEY'RE STILL BEING ORIENTED TOWARDS THE RIGHT OF WAY, THE APPLICANT IS NOW PROPOSING GLASS DOORS SIMILAR TO THOSE ARE REQUIRED IN THE U. U D C. THIS REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY PRESENTS CHALLENGES DUE TO THE LIMITING SIZE AND FURNITURE ALONG THREE RIGHTS OF WAY AND STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE ASPECTS PRESENTED A CHALLENGE TO REDEVELOPMENT UNDER TODAY'S REQUIREMENTS. AS SUCH STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, JAKE. JAKE, DO YOU MIND HIGHLIGHTING AT THE LAST TIME THAT THIS WAS HEARD BEFORE THE COMMISSION, THERE WAS CONCERNS IN REGARDS TO THE OVERNIGHT PARKING TO THAT? YES. SO, UM PRIOR, THERE WAS THE OVERNIGHT VEHICLE STORAGE WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. UM AND CURRENTLY, THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE PLANES TO REFLECT THAT ON THE PLANS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN THE
[00:45:04]
PRESENTATION SHOWS THEM IN TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. THOSE HAVE ALL BEEN MOVED TO THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, AND THEY ARE ALL SCREENED FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY WITH THE 6 FT TALL MASONRY SCREENING DEVICE. PREVIOUSLY THEY WERE NOT SCREENED. VERY GOOD. QUESTIONS, JAKE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THE APPLICANT SAID IS NOT HERE HE IS HE IS OKAY. GOOD. YES, HE IS.THANK YOU ALL FOR DOING THIS FOR US FOR THE CITY. UM AND FOR THE GENTLEMAN EARLIER. WOW UM YOU DON'T YOU DON'T DESERVE THAT. MY NAME IS JOHN SHTARKER. LIVIN LEONARD, TEXAS APPEAL BOX 1149 AND I WOULD ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT THIS. ONE. THANK YOU FOR WORKING WITH THE STAFF WITH THE LAST TIME WE WERE HERE WAS A LITTLE CRUNCHY, BUT WE APPRECIATE YOU GUYS WORKING WITH CHALLENGING SIDE AND EVERYBODY'S WORKED TOGETHER, AND I THINK WE'VE COME TO A RESOLUTION WHICH IS AWESOME. SO THANK YOU ALL FOR WORKING WITH US AS WELL. GOOD. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU COME TONIGHT, AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS PROPOSED VARIANTS TO A SITE PLAN, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.
ALRIGHT SEEING DONE. PROMOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE. MR TAYLOR CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVED THE ANIMUS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. YES SIR. I GOT YOU 2ND 2ND MOMENT TO RICE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. UNANIMOUS. LIKE EVERYBODY VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. SO THE ARE YOU READY? THE MOTION CARRIES. AH! THANK YOU. THANK
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Modify the Development Standards and to Allow for Single-Family Attached Uses (Westridge Townhomes), Located Generally on the North Side of Virginia Parkway and Approximately 420 Feet West of North Independence Parkway]
TOBY MOTORS FOR WORKING WITH A SHAKE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK AS WELL. NEXT TIME IS 23 DAYS.00810 PUBLIC HEARING. TO CONSIDER REASONABLE PROPERTY FROM PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PD. MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INTO ALLOW SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED USES.
THIS IS WEST RIDGE TOWN HOMES. NORTH SIDE OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY, 420. FT. WEST OF NORTHERN INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY. ALRIGHT. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS ARE WHAT THEY ARE PLANNING FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM PD TWO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENTS ON IN DISTRICT. THE INTENT IS FOR ALLOWANCE OF SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, USES AND TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE PROPERTY HAS MENTIONED IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY IN APPROXIMATELY 420 FT, UH, WEST OF NORTH INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY. AS PART OF THE ZONING REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO MODIFY THE SPACE LIMITS AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS TYPICALLY REQUIRE FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED USES SPECIFICALLY TOWN HOMES. MOST NOTABLY, YOU CAN LOOK IN YOUR REPORT. YOU HAVE NOTICED THAT THEY ARE INVERTING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FRONT SETBACKS AND WE'RE BACK SETBACKS . UM TYPICALLY FOR FRONT SETBACKS. THEY REQUIRE 20 FT.
BUT THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING 10 FT. AS FAR AS THE REAR SETBACK. IT'S BEING PROPOSED FROM 5 FT.
TO 20 FT. THAT'S KIND OF THE MOST NOTABLE MODIFICATION THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING FIRST BASED LIMITS. AS FAR AS LANDSCAPING. TYPICALLY YOU WILL SEE ONE CANOPY TREE PROVIDED ONE MINIMUM KIND OF TREAT PROVIDED PLANTED IN THE FRONT YARD OF EACH LOT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO PLANT ONE ORNAMENTAL TREE IN THE FRONT YARD OF EACH A LOT. ADDITIONALLY TO THAT KIND OF BE TREES WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED COMMON AREAS AT THE RATIO OF ONE CANOPY TREE PER RESIDENTIAL LOT. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE APPLICANTS ALSO PROPOSING TO PROVIDE EVERGREEN SHRUBS TO THE WEST ALONG THE ADJACENCY TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL THAT YOU SEE THERE ON YOUR EXHIBIT. TYPICALLY THIS IS NOT A REQUIREMENT WHEN YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY OR SONY USED DISTRICT, BUT THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING THAT AS WELL. UM GIVEN THE UNIQUENESS OF THE SHAPE OF THE LOT AND KIND OF THE LOCATION STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PROVIDED IN THE MANNER THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USERS IN THE AREA. ADDITIONAL I'M SORRY. I FORGOT TO MENTION WE DIDN'T RECEIVE ONE LETTER OF OPPOSITION . IT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU IN
[00:50:02]
PHYSICAL FORMAT THAT'S INCLUDED IN THERE FOR YOU GUYS TO LOOK AT OTHER THAN THAT, UM, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, ARI. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? ALREADY THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED R ONE. IS THAT CORRECT? CURRENTLY ZONE PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, BUT A CALLS OUT FOR, UM, THAT IDENTIFIES IT AS OUR ONE WHICH THEN OUTLINES FOR THE UNDERLYING ZONING OF END, WHICH IS OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS, BUT ALSO USES A COUPLE OF USES LISTED UNDER THERE LIKE FUNERAL HOMES. ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES INCLUDES A LIST OF ALSO USES THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED UNDER THE ORDINANCE, BUT ALSO UNDER USE IS PERMITTED UNDER BIEN NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS. LETTER OF INTENSE AS OUR ONE CURRENT. YES, THAT'S THE DESIGNATION R ONE, WHICH THEN CALLS OUT BEING AND THEN KIND OF LIST. ADDITIONAL USERS UNDER THE PD ORDINANCE, SPECIFICALLY, 1621 . OTHER QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT.THANK YOU HERE. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS JERRY SILO AND WITH THE JV PARTNERS 2121 MIDWAY ROAD IN CARROLLTON, TEXAS. WE DO REPRESENT THE PROPERTY OWNER THIS EVENING, WHICH IS D R HORTON HOMES. ARE YOU MAY GET A VERY GOOD PRESENTATION. I WANT TO RESPECT THE COMMISSION'S TIME THIS EVENING. I CAN REITERATE EVERYTHING, SHE SAID. BUT I WOULD, UH IF IT'S FINE WITH THE COMMISSION. I'LL JUST OPEN IT UP TO QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. QUESTIONS ANYONE? THAT WAS EASY.
HOPEFULLY APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THANK THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AUTUMN IF YOU COME TONIGHT, AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS PROPOSED REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT, AND FOR THE RECORD, WE DO HAVE WRITTEN COMMENTS FROM NICOLE BECHTEL 103 TO 5 GALVESTON'S PLACE. THESE COMMENTS WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS PART OF OUR MINUTES. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
CLOSED PUBLIC AREAS. MITCHELL ABOUT CLOSE TO PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND SECONDED BY MR CONRAD ANY DISCUSSION ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING? ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. ALRIGHT THAT MOTION CARRIES THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. THAT WAS UNANIMOUS. MR ARNOLD, RIGHT? OH, YEAH. I DO HAVE QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS ON THE PROPOSED REZONE ANYONE. CAN I ASK ALREADY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT UM, THE REDUCTION OF THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD. FROM 20 TO 10. IS THERE.
OTHER EXAMPLES IN THE CITY OF THAT? I BELIEVE SO, YES. FOR THIS PARTICULAR ONE, GIVEN THE DESIGN OF THE LAYOUT KIND OF THE UNIQUE SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY, GIVEN THAT IT'S ALSO THAT THE LOTS ARE LESS THAN 50, FT, WITH THEY REQUIRED TO BE ALI SERVED. SO THEN THAT KIND OF CREATES A REAR ENTRY FOR GARAGES, WHICH REQUIRES 20 FT. SO THAT 20 FT THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. WHAT KIND OF PROVIDE THAT ACCESS FOR THOSE CARS ALSO THE REDUCTION IN THE FRONT INVERTED THE 10 FT.
THEY'RE GOING TO KINDA ACCOMMODATE ALSO IS GOING TO PROVIDE THAT ACCESS FOR THOSE KIND OF TREES, ORNAMENTAL TREES TO BE PLANTED IN THAT AREA. CONTINUALLY. THROUGHOUT THE LAYOUT OF THE LINE. AND NARRATED , CLARIFY THE EVERGREEN SHRUB ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS AN EXCESS OF WHAT THEY'RE REQUIRED TO DO. CORRECT CORRECT. WE DON'T REQUIRE SCREENING FROM RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL UM HMM. ANYONE ELSE? I'M SORRY. I JUST CONSIDERED LUXURY TOWN HOMES. WHAT TO SEE KIND OF THE PRICE POINT FOR THESE WOULD HAVE TO REFER BACK TO THE APPLICANT FOR THAT QUESTION. WHILE THE PRICE POINT HASN'T SPECIFICALLY BEEN SAID THE REALITY IS IN MCKINNEY FOR A MINIMUM 2000 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE. YOU'RE PROBABLY TALKING AT LEAST $350,000. THAT'S JUST WHAT IT COSTS TO DO THINGS NOWADAYS. HAVE A QUESTION. DO YOU HAVE A
[00:55:03]
WRITTEN LETTER AGREEING TO THE ACCESS FROM THE RETAIL SIDE? WE HAVE NOT PROVIDED ONE TO THE STAFF, BUT WE CAN'T PROVIDE WHEN, UM, BUT WE HAVE. WE ARE WORKING. DEER HORN HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THAT PROPERTY OWNER FOR THE LAST FIVE OR SIX YEARS, TRYING TO JOINTLY DEVELOP THE PROPERTY AND WE CAN EASILY GET ONE FOR THE STAFF. IF THAT'S IF THAT'S A THEY HAVE A GREAT QUESTION. YES THEY HAPPEN, RIGHT? YES WE WERE. WE WORKED WITH THEM ON THE ACCESS EASEMENT, AND WE'VE ALSO WORKED WITH THEM ON THE SCREENING OF THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. GOOD QUESTION. GOOD QUESTION ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YOU HAVE A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE. HER STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF EMOTIONAL MR CONRAD TO PROVE THE ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. GOODBYE, MR LEBOW. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. WE'RE GOOD. IN THAT VOTE WAS OKAY? THE VOTE. THE MOTION WAS APPROVED, VOTED FIVE IN FAVOR AND ONE AGAINST THAT ITEM. SUNNY REQUESTS WILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AT THE JANUARY 2ND 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THE NEXT TIME IT'S 23-01030 PUBLIC HEARING. REQUEST TO REZONE A PROPERTY[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone a Portion of the Subject Property to “AG” - Agricultural District, and Zone a Portion of the Subject Property to “R5” - Residential District, Located on the Southeast Corner of FM 543 and County Road 202 and Located on the North Side of FM 543 and Approximately 160 Feet East of Lantana Drive]
PORTION OF THE PROPERTY FROM EGG AND ZONA PORTION OF THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY TO OUR FIVE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS ONLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FM 543 COUNTY ROAD, 202 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FM 5 43 160 FT EAST OF LANTANA DRIVE. SHEFFIELD BEFORE THANK YOU. CAITLYN SHEFFIELD, SENIOR PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY . SO THE CITY IS PROPOSING TO ZONE THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY AND ABORTION GENERALLY FOR SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND THE OTHER PORTION FOR AGRICULTURAL USES. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT IN ASUS ASSOCIATED CITY INITIATED ANNEXATION REQUEST FOR THE ENTIRETY OF THIS PROPERTY WILL BE HEARD AT THE JANUARY 2ND 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND THE ANTICIPATED ADOPTION AND ACTION FOR THE ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST WILL BE AT THE JANUARY 16TH 2024 MEETING. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT IN 84 ACRE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD, 22 AND F M 543. SO FOR REFERENCE ON THE MAP BEFORE YOU THAT YOU CAN SEE THE THICK WHITE LINE THAT RUNS EAST TO WEST IS COUNTY IS 543 AND COUNTY ROAD RUNS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY. UM FOR WHICH IS THE 84 ACRE. EXCUSE ME.STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE ZONE THAT PROPERTY TO OUR FIVE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND THIS IS GENERALLY FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. AND THIS ZONING ALIGNS WITH THE URBAN LIVING PLACE DE DESIGNATED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND IT ALSO ALIGNS WITH THE EXISTING INDEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THAT SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN DECEMBER OF 2021. THE PROPERTY 38 ACRES THAT IS LOCATED NORTH OF FM, 543 AND APPROXIMATELY 160 FT EAST OF LANTANA DRIVE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE ZONE THAT PROPERTY TO ADD AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT FOR AGRICULTURAL USES. STAFF FEELS THAT THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR THESE PROPERTIES ALIGNS WITH THE RECENT LAND USES AS WELL AS DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE AREA AND AS SUCH DIFFERENT APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN QUESTIONS ANYONE. THANK YOU. IS THERE APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? THE CITY IS ACTUALLY THE APPLICANT FOR THIS ONE. SO HERE IN SOME CAPACITY CAPACITY, MR CLAUDIA, YOU'RE PRESENTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. OUR TAKE THE FIFTH SENATOR. ALRIGHT UM, THANK YOU. SO THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING. ITEM IN IF YOU WERE HERE TONIGHT, AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS PROPOSED REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. RIGHT? MOTIONS. QUESTIONS.
[01:00:01]
MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC CARRYING APPROVED 230103 Z. PROMOTION MAN . MR LABORDE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEMS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MS WOODARD. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. THAT MOTION CARRIES ABOUT ABOUT OF SIX IN FAVOR. AND ZERO AGAINST THAT AUTUMN WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 19. 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. I'M SORRY. THAT'S NOT TRUE. THAT, UH, JANUARY 1620 24 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT NEXT TIME. 23-010. Z PUBLIC HEARING TO[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “AG” - Agricultural District to “C3” - Regional Commercial District, Located on the Southeast Corner of State Highway 5 (McDonald Street) and Harry McKillop Boulevard]
CONSIDER REASONABLE PROPERTY FROM AC TO C THREE. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS ONLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STATE HIGHWAY FIVE AND HARRY MCKILLOP BOULEVARD. SHEFFIELD YOU CAITLIN SHEFFIELD AGAINST YOUR PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS ONE'S A LITTLE BIT EASIER TO EXPLAIN TO YOU ALL THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO SEE THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS LOCATED AS YOU MENTIONED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STATE HIGHWAY FIVE OR MCDONALDS STREET. AND HARRY MCKILLOP BOULEVARD, GIVEN THE SIGHTS LOCATION ON THE CORNER OF PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL AND A MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAY. IT STAFF'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED ZONING ALLOWS FOR USES IN DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA AND AS SUCH THE AFRICANS APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, CAITLIN QUESTIONS. YES SIR. SCREENING WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS. ENTITY ALONG THE MAIN THOROUGHFARES. ALONG THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE. SO ANY RESIDENT OR NON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT EXCUSE ME ON THIS PROPERTY WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW OUR ZONING DISTRICT. SO TYPICALLY, WE DON'T REQUIRE SCREENING ALONG THE THOROUGHFARE UNLESS THERE'S PARKING ADJACENT TO THAT RIGHT OF WAY, AND THERE'S A NUMBER OF SCREENING USES THAT THEY CAN DO, UM, IN TERMS OF ADJACENCY SCREENING, AND THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE TO FOLLOW THAT, DEPENDING ON THE ADDUCE IT USES. THIS PROPERTY IS IMPACTED BY THE FUTURE REALIGNMENT. 399 CORRECT THAT IS CORRECT. LETTER B. IS THAT 399 GOING TO BE ELEVATED IN ANY DEGREE RIGHT? THAT AREA? I'M NOT SURE THE DESIGN CAPACITY OF THE PROPOSED 399 AND THAT'S SOMETHING OUR ENGINEERING TEAM WILL BE WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT WHEN DEVELOPMENT COMES ON THIS PROPERTY. YEAH. CITY IS NOT A D. C IS NOT HERE, ARE THEY? THERE IS A REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE APPLE SPOKE TOO SOON.YES. OKAY. THANK YOU, CAITLIN. ARE YOU HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU. MR CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. MY NAME IS SCOTT MCMANN WITH NORTH TEXAS NATURAL SELECT MATERIALS AND THE VP DEVELOPMENT FOR THEM WORKING IN COLLABORATION WITH THE ON THIS, SO I'M HERE, REPRESENTING BOTH TONIGHT IN ANSWER TO QUESTION ON THE 399 SPUR THAT COMES THROUGH THE PROPERTY. EVENTUALLY IT IS ELEVATED IN THIS LOCATION. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. IS THERE ANY ENCLOSED BUILDINGS FOR ANY OF THIS RECYCLING OR STORAGE FOR RECYCLING. IS THERE ANY ENCLOSURE? NO SIR. WE'RE STILL WORKING ON LAND USE RIGHT NOW.
SO PART OF PART OF THIS IS A FLOODPLAIN RECLAMATION SO WE DON'T HAVE HAVEN'T IDENTIFIED ANY END USERS AT THIS TIME. UM I KNOW YOU HAVE. YOU'LL BE MOVING YOUR CAR FACILITIES THERE IS THAT CORRECT? NO SIR. THIS IS THIS IS A NEW GRASSROOTS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. SO YOU HAVE ASPHALT DUMP AND BRICK DUMPS IN CONCRETE WASHOUT. CONCRETE RUBBLE STORAGE. IS THAT CORRECT? NOT AT ALL. NO, NOT FOR THIS LOCATION. THIS IS A COMMERCIAL. DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY. TO BRING SOME. LAND DEVELOPMENT TAX BASE TO THE CITY ON A PROPERTY THAT CURRENTLY IS NOT DEVELOPABLE. BUT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE NATURAL SELECT MATERIALS THERE. NO NOT THE NOT MY COMPANY, NORTH TEXAS NATURAL SELECT MATERIALS. WE DO HAVE THOSE FACILITIES YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, BUT WE ALSO SERVE AS A DEVELOPER SO THAT THOSE UM, BUSINESS PURPOSES ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WHEN IT COMES TO THIS. THANK YOU. THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION AND SERVICE. THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT, UH, FLEX TYPE SPACE. OFFICE WHERE HOUSE TYPE
[01:05:01]
USE YES, SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE CONTEMPLATED FOR THE SITE ARE LIKE FLEX USE OR TOY GARAGES, UM, CONVENIENCE STORE. YOU KNOW THAT TYPE OF RETAIL SPACE? YEAH THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY TO MY KNOWLEDGE IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONING. I DON'T THINK WE WOULD BE ALLOWED ANY TYPE OF A RECYCLING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT FOR THE SITE, AND THAT WOULDN'T BE OUR INTERESTS. WE ALREADY HAVE THAT AS YOU KNOW, UM, JUST DOWN THE ROAD FROM HERE. THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION. SURE ANYONE ELSE QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU BEING WITH THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'VE COME TO NINE AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT, SAYING NONE. EMOTION. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. EMOTIONAL MS WOODARD CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND THANK YOU, MR CONRAD. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. ALRIGHT THAT MOTION CARRIES BY BOAT WAS SIX IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM. HMM. AND YOU HAVE EMOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE OF EMOTION MEMBERS WOULDN'T TO IMPROVE THE ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 2ND 2ND. MR. TAYLOR. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. RIGHT THAT MOTION CARRIES BY VOTERS SIX AND FAVOR ZERO AGAINST THAT ITEM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ELECTION. AH THE DECEMBER 1920 23 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. NOW WE WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON AN ITEM THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]
STAFF COMMENTS. OKAY, ANYTHING YES, ARNOLD. ONCE AGAIN THANK YOU AS WE NAVIGATED SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ON OUR END. APPRECIATE YOUR FLEXIBILITY AND HAND VOTING TONIGHT. THANK YOU HOLIDAYS. OF COURSE. THIS IS OUR LAST MEETING OF THE YEAR, SO WE'LL BE BACK AT IT IN JANUARY.YEAH. STAFF THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO, AND WE APPRECIATE YOU. HAPPY HOLIDAY SAFE TRAVELS MEMBERS ANY ANYONE ELSE? VERY CHRISTMAS. YEAH. OKAY WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION MEMBERS STILL ABOUT TO ADJOURN THIS BODY. SECOND. MS WOODARD SECOND SET IN MOTION. IF YOU'RE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. HE SCREAMED ME THAT IS A UNANIMOUS VOTE. IT IS 709 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. SAFE TRAVELS. EVERYONE. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.