[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
IT'S 6 P.M. WELCOME TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING HIS OWN AND COMMISSION MEETING. OF TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1320 24 THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU I'VE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING IS AN ADVISORY BOARD FOR CERTAIN ITEMS TO THE CITY COUNCIL TONIGHT. WE HAVE ONE OF THOSE ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA. UH, THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING COMPONENT ATTACHED. SO IF YOU HEAR TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, FILL OUT ONE OF THE SPEAKERS CARDS. THOSE CARDS ARE ON THE TABLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ROOM THERE, GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS THE ITEM THAT YOU HERE TO SPEAK ON. THEN, WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS WITH US. WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE CITIZENS ARE INVOLVED IN GOVERNMENT IN MCKINNEY. WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE TO OUR FIRST ITEM, WHICH WOULD BE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK ON A NONPUBLIC HEARING ITEM THAT IS ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT. AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. ALL RIGHT, SEEING THEN WE'LL MOVE TO OUR
[CONSENT ITEMS]
CONSENT ITEMS, WHICH IS WE'VE GOT ONE ITEM TONIGHT. IT'S THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY THE 23RD 2024 . THE ITEM IS 24-1225. MEMBER SHOULD WE HAVE QUESTIONS OR CHANGES ON THOSE MINUTES? THEY HAVE ONE AMENDMENT. ON PAGE TWO, WHERE WE VOTE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING THE WORD CLOSE IS LEFT OUT. H TWO. EVERYBODY GOT THAT SOMEBODY DOES SOMEONE HAVE THAT? WE'RE GOOD, OK? ANY OTHER. UM. ONE OTHER THAT, UH UM ON PAGE TWO. THE APPLICANT'S NAME. UH, MINUTES REFLECTED AS JERRY PACE. IT MAY VERY WELL BE JARED PACE, SO IF YOU GUYS COULD CHECK THAT OUT, AND IF IT'S IF IT REQUIRES A CHANGE, JUST MAKE THAT CHANGE. IS ON THE TOP OF PAGE TWO. UH, ABOUT A THIRD OF THE WAY DOWN. THE OTHERS. ALL RIGHT MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED. WE HAVE A MOTION ON MR LEBO TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED. THANK YOU, MR CONRAD. NEW DISCUSSION. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.RIGHT? YOU GET BUMPED OFF, TERRY. OK, THAT THAT MOTION CARRIES THE MINUTES HAVE BEEN APPROVED. WE NOW MOVE TO, UH, REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. FIRST ITEM. IS 23 DAYS. 99 Z, A PUBLIC
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “GC” - Government Complex District, Located at 1400 S. College Street]
HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM PD TO GC GOVERNMENT COMPLEX. THIS IS, UM AT 1400 SOUTH. COLLEGE STREET. SORRY. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS. UM HARRY, CAN YOU UPDATE THE PRESENTATION? GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. UM ARACELI BOTEO PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. UM, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 46 ACRES OF CITY PROPERTY FROM PD TO, UH PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO GC. AND I'M GONNA SHOW HERE. THE LOCATION. UM PE D PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO GC GOVERNMENT COMPLEX. THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1400 SOUTH COLLEGE, UH, STREET. THE REQUEST IS FOR THE INTENT TO ALLOW FOR A FUTURE FOR A FUTURE PARK UNDER THE CURRENT REGULATIONS. UH, LOCA. UH UM SORRY. LOCATED IN THE U DC UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. UM, THE PROPERTY HERE. ALSO, I WANTED AND NOTE THAT SHOWS THERE IS A CEMETERY LOCATED HERE ON THE NORTH SIDE. IT'S UH, THE OLD SETTLERS. UH, CEMETERY. I WANTED TO NOTE THAT THIS IS PART OF THE REZONING REQUEST. THAT IS IT IS, AS IT IS IN, UH, CITY PROPERTY, BUT THERE IS NOT GONNA BE ANY DEVELOPMENT AT THIS LOCATION. JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE TO POINT THAT OUT, UM, WITH THAT, INFORMATION, SAID STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. JUST HAVE A I'M I'M CURIOUS. WAS THIS PROPERTY HAS THIS BEEN ALWAYS PD AS CITY OWNED PROPERTY. THIS HAS BEEN A PD. AS FAR AS I CAN SEE ON THE ORDINANCE BACK FROM PROBABLY[00:05:03]
1991. MAYBE A LITTLE BIT FURTHER THAN THAT. BUT YES. THE NEED THE NEED TO REZONE IT. TO GC IS, UM.IS BECAUSE THERE'S A PLAN TO BUILD ADDITIONAL FACILITIES ON IT NOW OR IS IT JUST IN THE FUTURE? SO ALTHOUGH THE, UH CURRENT PD ALLOWS FOR GC, THE INTENT IS TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOP UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WERE NEWLY ADOPTED IN, UH NOVEMBER OF 22 THROUGH THE U DC, WHICH IS MORE OF A MODERNIZED ZONING DISTRICT, UM, FOR THE CURRENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. SO JUST TO EXPAND ON THAT, UM, OLD P DS BACK IN THE EIGHTIES AND NINETIES WOULD REQUIRE YOU'D HAVE TO DO CONCEPT PLANS AND SITE PLANS AND YOU'D HAVE TO TAKE EVERYTHING TO CITY COUNCIL. AND SO THIS BRINGS IT INTO A MORE MODERNIZED DISTRICT AND HELP STREAMLINE THE PROCESS. AND SO IT ALLOWS US TO, UM, STILL UTILIZE IT AS A MUNICIPAL FACILITY. BUT UNDER CURRENT REGULATIONS THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION? YES CAN YOU GO TO THE LAST EXHIBIT THE CEMETERY EXHIBIT? UM, CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE OF THE BLUE LINE. AND THE. GREEN LINE BECAUSE ONE OF THE THEY'RE NOT IN CONGRUENCE WITH EACH OTHER. SO THIS WAS AN EXHIBIT THAT WAS PROVIDED AS INFORMATIONAL. UM, THERE'S NOT THIS EXHIBIT IS NOT GONNA BE USED FOR ANY OF OUR REVIEW PROCESSES. BUT THIS JUST KIND OF SHOWS WHERE THE CEMETERY IS LOCATED HERE ON THE GREEN AND KIND OF THE CEMETERY BOUNDARY SHOWN HERE IN THE APPROXIMATE DELINEATION WHERE THAT BLUE BOUNDARY LINE IS, AND THEN JUST KIND OF THE PINK AREA WHERE IT'S KIND OF SEPARATED FROM THE REST OF THE PROPERTY. IT SAYS THAT 25 FT BUMPER, BUT IT DOESN'T INCLUDE ALL OF THAT BLUE LINE, WHICH IS THE APPROXIMATE DELINEATION OF SYMMETRY. SO I'M GONNA HAVE TO REFER BACK TO OUR, UM OUR OUR PARKS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER. UM MAYBE TO KIND OF PROVIDE SOME, UH, INFORMATION OR, UM, GIVE US SOME INSIGHT ON THIS PARTICULAR EXHIBIT AS FAR AS WHAT THE DIFFERENCES ARE INTENDED FOR THIS EXHIBIT. UM JENNY, DO YOU MIND? GOOD EVENING, UM JENNY BAKER PARKS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER FOR THE CITY . MCKINNEY UM, KIND OF THE GENESIS OF THIS WHOLE, UM, ZONING REQUEST IS WE SUBMITTED PLANS AND ARE WORKING ON A DOG PARK AND, UM, PLAY ZONE AREA KIND OF AN EXTENSION OF TOWN LAKE AND WE, UM, OBVIOUSLY KNOWING, UM, THE CEMETERY, YOU KNOW, WITHIN THE VICINITY. WE HAVE ALSO COMMISSIONED AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY. UH, THAT WE ARE WORKING WITH THE THC RIGHT NOW. SO THIS IS JUST A VERY, UM JUST KIND OF A ROUGH EXHIBIT FOR THE ZONING. UM BUT WE ARE WORKING, UH, ON THAT STUDY RIGHT NOW. WE DON'T HAVE THE FULL REPORT YET, BUT THERE WILL BE A FULL REPORT AND THEN WE FULLY INTEND TO HAVE A 25 FT BUFFER SURROUNDING THE CEMETERY ITSELF. UM THEY WILL BE DOING YOU KNOW, SOME ON SITE, YOU KNOW, DIGGING AND MAKING SURE THERE ARE NO LIMITS BEYOND WHAT WE KIND OF THINK. IS THE CURRENT CEMETERY PROPER? SO WE'RE JUST GONNA MAKE SURE WE STAY OUT OF THAT AREA. UM YOU KNOW, WE WILL PROBABLY PUT UP SOME SIGNAGE.
WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE HISTORICAL GROUP HISTORIC GROUP AND, UM, JUST KIND OF BRING AWARENESS TO IT. AND, UM, YOU KNOW, DEFINITELY HONOR IT, BUT WE WILL BE STAYING OUT OF IT WITH OUR DEVELOPMENT. WELL, I KNOW THIS IS AN INFORMATIONAL ONLY, BUT YOU SEE WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. I DO. I DO. AND I. I THINK THE BLUE LINE BASED ON THE EXHIBIT IS PER RECORDED DOCUMENT LIKELY RECORDED AGAINST TITLE THAT THEY IDENTIFIED IN THE GREEN IS BASED ON THEIR FIELD INVESTIGATION AND WHAT THEY'VE HIRED THE CONSULTANT TO ACTUALLY GO OUT AND PERFORM, AND THAT'S THEIR FINDINGS TO DATE AND THEN THE BUFFER OFF OF THAT. I THINK THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BASED ON THE EXHIBIT. AND CERTAINLY THIS IS BY NO MEANS AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT THAT THAT WE, UM THAT IS READY AS PART OF OUR STUDY. THIS IS MORE JUST AND WE SHOULD HAVE. TAKEN A CLOSER LOOK AT IT AS FAR AS PREPARATION OF THE ZONING DISTRICT, BUT THOSE LINES WILL BE CLEANED UP. HM? SORRY UM, AND MAYBE ENTIRELY TOO EARLY TO ASK THIS, BUT YOU HAVE A 25. FT BUFFER IS THERE AND LIKE LANDSCAPE BUFFER? IS THERE ANY SORT OF LIKE FENCE OR ANYTHING THAT'S GONNA BE PLANNED FOR THAT? I JUST NOT NECESSARILY A LANDSCAPE BUFFER. UH, WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT ANY FENCING YET, BUT THAT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT WE CAN TALK ABOUT , UM, WHERE WE ARE IN OUR PLANS.
UM YOU KNOW, WE HAVEN'T WE MAYBE 50% THROUGH IN OUR DESIGN PLAN, SO WE STILL HAVE A WAYS TO GO ON OUR END. SO WE'RE NOT QUITE SURE HOW THE CEMETERY IS GONNA INTERFACE. YET WITH OUR YOU KNOW, PARK DEVELOPMENT, BUT WE DO WANT TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE THAT IT'S FORMALIZED A LITTLE BIT. SURE, OK, I JUST DOG PARK NEXT TO NO, NO, NO, NO, THEY'LL DEFINITELY BE SEPARATION. YEAH, PLENTY OF SEPARATION THERE. YOU'RE WELCOME. WILL THERE BE SOME KIND OF STUDY OR SURVEY.
[00:10:06]
OUTSIDE THE 20 FT. CEMETERY BUFFER. TO BE SURE, THERE'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT. YEAH, THE ENTIRE SITE HAS BEEN SURVEYED ALREADY SCANNED LIKE THERMALLY OR WELL, NOT THERMALLY, BUT WE HAVE DONE A BOUNDARY AND A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. BUT THEY ARE GOING TO DO , UM, LIKE AN ACTUAL DIGGING, UM AROUND THE CEMETERY TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NOTHING BEYOND WHAT WE THINK THESE THERE COULD BE. YOU KNOW, AND BASED ON WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. TO YOUR POINT THAT WE COULD HAVE THAT SITUATION NOW, IF THE RECORDED DOCUMENTS SHOW THE BLUE LINE BUT AN ON SITE VISIT SHOWED THE GREEN LINE. THEY DON'T MATCH UP, SO WE COULD HAVE A SITUATION WHERE IT'S THAT PART OF THE CEMETERY THAT'S BEING USED IS OUTSIDE OF THE BLUE LINE. SO WHEN YOU SAY A 25 FT BUFFER IS THAT FROM THE BLUE LINE OR FROM WHERE THE DETERMINATION OF THE CEMETERY IS, IT'LL BE WHERE THE NEW DETERMINATION IS. ABSOLUTELY SO IF IT UM YOU KNOW IF THERE ARE THINGS THERE OUTSIDE OF KIND OF WHAT WE CONSIDER THE AREA TO BE, WE WILL DEFINITELY STAY.WELL. UM, WELL OUT OF THAT. VERY GOOD. ANYONE ELSE? MR. WHATLEY? YOU GOOD? I'M GOOD, OK? THANK YOU. THANK YOU BOTH. OR IS THERE AN APPLICANT OR ARE YOU SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF BOTH SPEAKING AND ANY CLARIFICATIONS FROM OUR PARKS DEPARTMENT AS THEY'RE THE ONES INITIATING THE APPLICATION, OK? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS PROPOSED REZONE PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. YES, MA'AM. MY. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS BETH BENTLEY AND, UM, I OWN PROPERTY AT 508. NORTH CHESTNUT HERE IN MCKINNEY, UM. SO CONCERNING, UM, THE CEMETERY. I JUST WANTED TO JUST ALL TO YOUR ATTENTION TO PARTICULAR ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION. THIS MAY HAVE ALREADY BEEN COVERED. UM, JUST IN CASE JUST FOR THE RECORD, UH, LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 713.009. LOCAL POSSESSION AND CONTROL OF OR ABANDONED CEMETERY. AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT FROM THE TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION, I BELIEVE THAT THESE TOGETHER WORKING IN TANDEM THAT THEY WOULD APPLY TO THE MARKER, NAMED AS OLD SETTLERS CEMETERY AT WILSON CREEK. AND I WILL MAKE SURE I GET THE EXACT UM, CONCERNED CITIZENS CAN PROTECT HISTORIC CEMETERIES BY DOCUMENTING THEIR LOCATIONS AND BOUNDARIES. IF A CEMETERY'S BOUNDARIES ARE NOT CLEARLY ESTABLISHED IN THE COUNTY, DIED RECORD, CONSIDER RECORDING ITS EXISTENCE THROUGH A NOTICE OF EXISTENCE FORM OR THE HTC DESIGNATION. THIS MAY BE THE SINGLE MOST VALUABLE ACT OF PRESERVATION FOR ANY CEMETERY. THE DESIGNATION PROCESS MAY HAPPEN AT ANY TIME. AND SO WHILE BOTH THE HTC DESIGNATION AND THE NOTICE OF EXISTENCE FORMS RECORD THE CEMETERY BOUNDARIES WITH THE COUNTY CLERK, THE DESIGNATION PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CRITICAL INFORMATION. THAT THE NOTICE OF EXISTENCE FORMS DO NOT OFFER AND SO THEY PROVIDED. TWO ADDITION TWO TYPES OF NOTICE, BUT FOR BURIALS DISCOVERED, UM I'M SORRY IN ALL CASES, HOWEVER, AND I THINK THIS IS WHAT KIND OF SEALS IT FOR ME IS BALANCE COMMON SENSE WITH PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS. AND SO WITH THAT , UH, JUST WANT YOU ALL TO CONSIDER THAT IT IS VERY LIKELY THAT THE PERSONS WHO ARE BURIED THERE ARE DECEASED SLAVES. AND TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THIS ACREAGE BEEN RESEARCHED TO ENSURE THAT THE CEMETERY DOES NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE CURRENTLY DESIGNATED MEETS AND BOUNDS? AND THEN ARE YOU ABLE TO ENSURE THAT THE CEMETERY WILL NOT BE IMPACTED? I HEARD, UM, STAFF SAY THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE AND THEN, UM, THERE WAS ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION THAT THERE WAS A POTENTIAL FOR IT TO BE. AND SO I'M ASKING THAT THIS, UM BE TABLE FOR FURTHER, UM, DIRECTION. UH, FURTHER RESEARCH ON WHAT EXACTLY IS THERE IN ON THE PROPERTY? THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS ITEM. IF I MAY. MORE OF A QUESTION. REQUEST TO GIVE US YOUR YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND WE'LL LET STAFF ADDRESS YOUR
[00:15:03]
QUESTION, PROBABLY AFTER OUR MEETING, BUT YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO ASK IT ON THE RECORD HERE. IF YOU WILL FACE US OF THESE CAMERAS CAN SEE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MICROPHONE PICKS UP WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. MY NAME IS LARS RAY. I LIVE AT 208 WILSON CREEK PARKWAY, THE INTERSECTION OF COLLEGE AND PARKWAY. THIS IS MY FRONT VIEW. WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. WE HAVE A PARTICIPATED IN PLENTY OF DIFFERENT ZONING AND BUILDING REQUESTS FOR ALL THE PROPERTIES AROUND THIS PARK AREA. THERE'S A BIG VACANT LOT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS ON COLLEGE STREET. WE PARTICIPATED IN THAT IN EVERY TIME WE'VE PARTICIPATED. WE'VE MADE A REQUEST THAT INCLUDING ALL OF THE THINGS THAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT. THAT TRAFFIC BE CONSIDERED AS WELL. WERE SOME OF THE FRONT LINE NEIGHBORS THAT RE REPORT 911 CALLS FOR A CAR ACCIDENTS ON A REGULAR BASIS, AND IT HAPPENS QUITE A BIT. AND AS WE ARE GOING TO EXPAND, OBVIOUSLY THE PARK THAT'S A NO BRAINER THAT'S GOING TO INCREASE TRAFFIC. AND SO WE WOULD LIKE TO, OR I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT IS A CONSIDERATION IN THE OVERALL PURVIEW OF THE PLANNING OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH THESE PARKLANDS. THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. WE'RE GOING TO CALL YOU GIVE THAT TO TERRY. WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE STAFF BACK UP AND ADDRESS. I THOSE QUESTIONS AND THEN MAYBE SOME OTHER SO, UM, SIT TIGHT. DON'T LEAVE THE ROOM. ANYONE ELSE? WISH TO ADDRESS PLANNING ZONING ON THIS ITEM. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. YOU HAVE A MOTION BY MR LEBEAU TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU, MR WHATLEY. ANY DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. THAT MOTION CARRIES THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT'S BEEN CLOSED MEMBERS HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF. ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST. WELL, I AGREE WITH, UH LADY ABOUT BEING SURE THE BOUNDARIES ARE PROPER AND THERE'S NOTHING FIND OUT THAT LATER. IT IS TOO LATE. NOT SURE WE SHOULD TAKE ACTION ON THIS TONIGHT. ALTHOUGH WE'RE JUST A RECOMMENDING BOARD. ANYONE ELSE? OR OR JENNY. AND I HAVE A TIMING QUESTION. COULD YOU COME BACK UP? REGARDING THE TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT OR SOMETHING HAPPENING ON THE SITE. CAN YOU GIVE US SOME INDICATION OF WERE YOU GUYS ARE? YEAH ABSOLUTELY. SO LIKE I SAID, WE'RE WE'RE DOING THE ARCH ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY NOW. UM YOU KNOW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALSO ALSO PRELIMINARILY DESIGNING THE PARK AND AS WE GET ALONG FURTHER IN THE STUDY, IF WE NEED TO ADJUST OUR BOUNDARIES OR ADJUST OUR DESIGN, I SHOULD SAY OUR DESIGN, NOT OUR BOUNDARIES. IF WE NEED TO ADJUST OUR DESIGN TO BASICALLY MARRY UP WITH THE REPORT. WE WILL ABSOLUTELY DO THAT. UM YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE TH C. YOU KNOW, AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, SO, UM YOU KNOW IT. IT IT. IT'S SOMETHING YOU KNOW WE WANNA PROTECT OUR OUR CULTURAL RESOURCES. UM, YOU KNOW, AS WELL. SO UM, THE TWO WILL BE DONE IN TANDEM. DO YOU KNOW HOW LONG YOUR STUDIES WILL TAKE? UM WING. OK, THE STUDY IS ABOUT 75% DONE. SO IT'LL BE ANOTHER. OR MAYBE ABOUT ANOTHER MONTH OR TWO. YEAH. IN LOOKING AT YOUR THIS COLOR EXHIBIT. IT SHOWS PARKING NEAR SHOWS AN ENTRANCE WEST OF CEMETERY AND PARKING. UM . IS THIS FAIRLY ACCURATE OR IS THIS CONCEPTUAL ONLY THIS IS CONCEPTUAL. OK? IF IT WERE TO VARY WOULD IT VERY MUCH FROM THIS PLAN. NO UNLESS WE NEEDED TO TWEAK IT OR MAKE MODIFICATIONS BASED UPON THE REPORT. OR BASED UPON FURTHER CITY REVIEWS. THEY'VE NOT GONE. UH, WE'VE NOT GONE THROUGH FORMAL CITY REVIEWS YET, OK? OTHER THAN JUST PREVE MEETINGS AND MEETINGS WITH HISTORICAL COMMISSION AND OTHERS. IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MISS BENTLEY? TO BE PLUGGED INTO THAT PROCESS.UM YOU KNOW, HONESTLY, THAT I'M NOT SURE. UM WE'VE NEVER GONE THROUGH THIS PROCESS BEFORE. UM BUT IT'S CERTAINLY ANY OF OUR REPORTS, YOU KNOW, WILL BE PUBLIC DOCUMENTS THAT WE CAN
[00:20:01]
CERTAINLY CORRESPOND ON OK? THE NEXT QUESTION RELATES TO TRAFFIC , TRAFFIC STUDIES AND IMPACT ANALYSIS. YES, UM THERE WAS SOME MENTION ABOUT FENCING. UM AND NO ACROSS THE STREET THAT AT THE I GUESS THE OLD SETTLERS CEMETERY. THERE IS A FENCE AROUND THERE. AND SO WHEN YOU START MIXING THE TWO, YOU'VE GOT PARKING THAT'S IDENTIFIED. BUT THEN WHEN PEOPLE GET IN A HAIRY, THEY'RE RUNNING LATE. AND SO ALL THE, UH PAVED PARKING IS TAKEN UP, AND SO WE'LL JUST PARK RIGHT HERE. SO IS IT ANY THOUGHT FOR SURE OF PUTTING A FENCE AROUND? THAT CEMETERY TO MAKE SURE THAT NO ONE ENCROACHES A PARKS ON THAT AREA. IF THIS GETS APPROVED, WE WOULD GO INTO C PLAN WHICH WOULD BE THOROUGHLY REVIEW ALL THE INFORMATION MAKING SURE THAT THE SITE MEETS ALL REGULATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST. IT WAS JUST TO KINDA, UM ALIGN MORE WITH THE MODERN SONY WHICH, ALTHOUGH, UM, THE PD A LITTLE BIT OLDER. IT DOES ALLOW FOR GC, UH, GOVERNMENT COMPLEX, SO THE USES WILL STILL BE PERMITTED WE BUT SITE PLAN WOULD BE WHERE WE WOULD RESOLVE ALL THESE CONCERNS REGARDING THE BOUNDARIES AND SETBACKS AND ENSURE THE REPORT. WHATEVER COMES ABOUT THAT STAFF CAN APPLY THAT TO THAT AS WELL TO MEET ALL THOSE REQUIREMENTS. AND WE CAN CERTAINLY LOOK AT ADDING FENCING AND ALSO TO MY TO MY KNOWLEDGE, WHICH IS VERY LIMITED. SO PLEASE, THERE IS NO TYPE OF SIGNAGE THERE. THAT, UH, THAT SAYS THAT'S A CEMETERY. OH, IS IT? IS IT OK? THANK YOU THAT THAT'S WHY I SAID TO MY LIMITED KNOWLEDGE. I THINK WE WERE LOOKING AT MAYBE LOOK DOING SOME MORE EDUCATIONAL SIGNAGE. UM YOU KNOW, MAYBE JUST BRINGING MORE AWARENESS AND FORMALIZING IT A BIT BECAUSE IT'S KIND OF HARD TO SEE RIGHT NOW. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS IS, UH, GOING TO BE A PARK. AND THERE'LL BE, UH, PARKS DEPARTMENT BE CARING FOR THE PARK. WILL THEY ALSO BE CARING FOR THE CEMETERY? UH, WE DIDN'T. WE DID NOT MAINTAIN CEMETERIES.I'M SORRY. WHAT? WE DO NOT MAINTAIN ANY OF THE CEMETERIES. SO THERE WON'T BE ANY PERPETUAL CARE, MOWING OR ANYTHING AT THE PARKS MAINTENANCE. ONE OF YOU. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. UH, PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. WILL THERE BE A TRAFFIC STUDY DONE ON WILSON CREEK? I WAS IN DIRECTED BY ENGINEERING THAT THERE WAS ANY, UH, TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIRE, BUT IF IT WERE TO BE REQUIRED THAT WOULD BE AT THE CY PLAN LEVEL, AND WE WOULD MAKE SURE THAT ONE WAS PROVIDED REQUIRED. OK, VERY GOOD. ANYONE ELSE? WHAT'S WHAT'S THE COMMISSION'S FLAVOR? WHAT'S YOUR PLEASURE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE. ITEM 230099 Z. UNTIL, UH 1ST MARCH MEETING. DOES THE AGENDA. AGENDA. LET YOU DO THAT. YOU HAVE ROOM ON THE AGENDA. TABLE UNTIL OUR, UH, FIRST MEETING IN MARCH. UH, THIS WOULD PUSH IT BACK TO A DIFFERENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. BUT IF THAT IS SOMETHING IF IT'S THE WILL OF THE COMMISSION TO TABLE THAT IS PERFECTLY FINE. BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'D BE ABLE TO DO IT TO A DATE CERTAIN IF THE REASON FOR TABLING IS TO COMPLETE THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY, WE DO NOT HAVE A DEFINED TIMEFRAME FOR THAT, SO I'D BE HESITANT TO JUST PUT IT ON AN ADDITIONAL MEETING. UM THE OTHER THING I WOULD NOTE ON THE TABLING IS, UH, TWOFOLD ONE. THE PROP THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY WHILE IT IS GOING FROM PD TO GC. THE ALLOWANCES ON THE PROPERTY ARE NOT CHANGING. AND WHAT IT'S DOING IS IT'S UN ENCUMBERING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY IN TERMS OF THE PROCESS THAT IT HAS TO FOLLOW. UH, CURRENTLY WITH THE ZONING, IT'S FOLLOWING A 19 NINETIES PROCESS AND PROCEDURE THAT WE NO LONGER USE HERE IN THE CITY, SO REZONING IT TO THE MODERN GC ALLOWS THEM TO FOLLOW THE STANDARD PROCESSES THAT WE SEE TODAY. UM AND IF THIS WERE A PRIVATE APPLICANT, UM I CAN UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN OVER THE BOUNDARY FOR THAT CEMETERY OR THIS IS A CITY OWNED PROPERTY. IT'S A CITY PARK. MAINTAINED PARK. UM AND THE CITY. DOES THAT ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF BOTH PARK AND CEMETERY. SO UH, THE CONCERNS ABOUT, UH, ENCROACHMENT AND PROTECTION THAT WOULD ALL COME THROUGH OUR CITY PARKS DEPARTMENT, WHICH IS, OF COURSE, UM, WORKING ON THE WILL OF THE COUNCIL. UM SO WE HAVE A LITTLE
[00:25:05]
BIT MORE CONTROL AND CERTAINTY OVER HOW WE'RE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE BOUNDARIES WHEN THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES. AND THEN ONCE THAT ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY IS COMPLETE , UM, OUR PARKS DEPARTMENT WILL WORK IN TANDEM WITH OUR CITY LEADERSHIP. TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE PROTECTING IT AT THE WILL OF THE COUNCIL. AND I HAVE CONFIDENCE THAT THAT WILL HAPPEN . BUT WE'RE RECOMMENDING BODY TO THE COUNCIL. AND THIS IS A CEMETERY. A VERY OLD CEMETERY.THAT'S ON A LOT OF UNKNOWNS. I JUST DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. ABSOLUTELY. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO, UH NEED TO AMEND YOUR MOTION AND REMOVE THE DATE CERTAIN. SO AMENDED. UM.
MOVED TO TABLE DESIRED THE MOTION ON THE ABOUT TO TABLE THE ITEM INDEFINITELY. UH, JENNY OR JENNIFER? WILL WE RE NOTIFY ARI? OK? YES. GOOD. OK, SECOND. SECOND BY MR WHATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? I THINK THEY DISCUSSION IS MORE IS LESS ABOUT THE USE AND MORE ABOUT WHAT'S THERE CURRENTLY, UH, REGARDING THE CEMETERY AND ALSO, UH, RESIDENTS IN THE AREA CONCERNS ABOUT TRAFFIC. UM SO JUST THAT'S YOU ADD THAT UP, AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S GONNA GET TABLED.
OCEAN AND A SECOND ALL THOSE, UH, I'M SORRY, TERRY. UM PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES.
UH, MY VOTE OF FIVE IN FAVOR AND ONE AGAINST THE MOTION CARRIES THE ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED INDEFINITELY AND WE WILL RE NOTIFY REGARDING WHEN THE ITEM COMES BACK UP. OR THOSE THAT HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT TRAFFIC. CAN THEY CONTACT YOU OK? VERY GOOD. MR ARNOLD. THANK YOU FOR JUMPING IN. APPRECIATE THAT. THAT IS OUR LAST PUBLIC HEARING ITEM TONIGHT. WE DO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS, PLANNING AND ZONING ON ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ON OUR AGENDA. SOMETHING LIKE TELLING US HOW WONDERFUL WE ARE. NO. OK, MEMBERS, ANYTHING STAFF, KATE ANYTHING THANKS. WE APPRECIATE YOU GUYS. WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION TO ADJOURN MOTION BY MR CONRAD TO ADJOURN. THANK YOU, MR. BUT ANY DISCUSSION PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES. UH, IT IS 628 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.