IT WAS. COUNCIL, THE. AFTERNOON TODAY IS TUESDAY. APRIL 23 2024, WE'RE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 222
[CALL JOINT MEETING TO ORDER]
[00:00:18]
, NORTH TENNESSEE STREET. GREAT CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS IS A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLAN AND ZONING. MR MAYOR. THANK YOU, COUNCIL. WE UH DO HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT, UH,[PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS]
PLANNING AND ZONING AND WE ARE READY FOR THE PRESENTATION. UH, PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS. I DO NOT SHOW ANYONE HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. THERE ARE NONE. WE WILL MOVE RIGHT INTO, UH, 241468[Update on the ONE McKinney 2040 Comprehensive Plan]
AN UPDATE ON THE ONE MCKINNEY 24 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANS. KELLY YOU'RE DOING THE PRESENTATION. I AM. THANK YOU ALL FOR HAVING ME TONIGHT. CAN EVERYBODY HEAR ME? OK? PERFECT THANK MAYOR COUNCIL CHAIR AND COMMISSION. UH MY NAME IS HAYLEY ANGEL. AND I AM A PLANNING MANAGER HERE AT THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AND TONIGHT I'M HERE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE ONE MCKINNEY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. TONIGHT'S GOAL IS JUST INFORMATIONAL. UH, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ISN'T SOMETHING THAT COMES BEFORE YOU WANT TO BUY BIWEEKLY BASIS. UM, SO I WANTED TO TAKE SOME TIME TODAY TO GO THROUGH WHAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS VERY BRIEFLY A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT WE HAVE DONE SINCE IT WAS ADOPTED IN TWO. 18 AND THEN KIND OF A LOOK AT WHAT OUR TEAM TRIES TO PROJECT AHEAD AS WE LOOK FORWARD INTO THE LONG RANGE PLANNING REALM, UM SO I WILL JUMP RIGHT IN. THE COMPONENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. I KNOW THAT YOU ALL ARE ALL USED TO SEEING IMAGES FROM THE LAND USE DIAGRAM AND THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN. UH, BUT REALLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STARTS WITH PUBLIC OUTREACH AND THE VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES. I WILL SHOW YOU IN A SECOND, AN IMAGE TO KIND OF ENCAPSULATE ALL THAT GOES INTO THE PUBLIC OUTREACH, BUT ESSENTIALLY THAT ALL CULMINATES IN THE VISION WHICH I HAVE ON THE SCREEN HERE BEFORE YOU, UH, YOU CAN SEE THAT'S HOW WE GOT THE NAME ONE MCKINNEY. IT WAS THROUGH THE VISIONING PROCESS, AND IT IS THROUGH OUT THESE VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES THAT THOSE ACTUALLY INFORM THE PREFERRED SCENARIO AND THE OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT YOU ALL ROUTINELY SEE, SO I'LL TOUCH ON THESE BRIEFLY THROUGHOUT THE PRESENTATION. UM, BUT THIS IS AN OVERALL SUMMARY OF THE PUBLIC OUTREACH THAT WENT INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEN IT WAS ADOPTED IN 2018, SO EACH ONE OF THESE POINTS REPRESENTS SOME SORT OF MEETING A SET OF INTERVIEWS. UH, COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE SO ON AND SO FORTH, AND I PUT THIS HERE TO ILLUSTRATE NOT JUST TIME AND EFFORT THAT STAFF PUT INTO IT, BUT REALLY, TO HIGHLIGHT THE AMOUNT OF TIME EFFORT AND ENERGY, THE COMMUNITY AS WELL AS COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS PUT INTO HELPING CRAFT THIS OVERALL PLAN. VIEW THE OUTCOMES. AND ALL OF THAT PUBLIC OUTREACH CULMINATES IN WHAT WE CALL THE PREFERRED SCENARIO. UH, SO THE MAP ON THE SCREEN IS A VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF WHAT THE PREFERRED SCENARIO IS, BUT IT PROBABLY DOESN'T DO IT. TOO MUCH JUSTICE. UM ESSENTIALLY THE PREFERRED SCENARIO BREAKS THE CITY DOWN. INTO 17 DIFFERENT DISTRICTS, BUT FURTHER ON IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THERE ARE ACTUALLY INDIVIDUAL CHAPTERS FOR EACH DISTRICT. EACH DISTRICT TOOK A DEEPER LOOK AT A DISTINCT DIRECTION, A DISTINCT IDENTITY DISTINCT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS, AND SO IT WENT WELL BEYOND THE STANDARD LAND USE DIAGRAM. AND FROM THE OUTSIDE. I AM FAIRLY NEW TO MCKINNEY. I'M UNDER MY FIRST YEAR. UH, WHAT I NOTICED FIRST ABOUT THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS THAT LENDS A GREAT AMOUNT OF FLEXIBILITY AS YOU ACTUALLY GO THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND AS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AGES, YOU HAVE CRITERIA OTHER THAN THE LAND YOU DIAGRAM TO KIND OF REVIEW EACH DECISION AS IT COMES UP. BUT OF COURSE, THE LAND USE DIAGRAM IS IMPORTANT. UM SO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY TOOK THE APPROACH OF UTILIZING WHAT WE CALL PLACE TYPES AS OPPOSED TO STRICTLY UNUSED DESIGNATIONS. AND TRADITIONALLY, WHEN YOU LOOK AT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND YOU SEE LAND USE IS SPREAD ACROSS THE CITY. YOU MIGHT EXPECT A STRICT DIVISION OF LAND USES. UH SO YOU'RE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WILL BE SEPARATE FROM YOUR COMMERCIAL, WHICH IS SEPARATE FROM YOUR OFFICE, WHICH IS SEPARATE FROM YOUR INDUSTRIAL. I AM SURE AS YOU ALL HAVE DRIVEN AROUND, YOU KNOW THAT. DIVISIONS AREN'T NECESSARILY THAT DISTINCT. YOU KNOW, YOU MAY HAVE AN OFFICE NEXT TO A RETAIL CENTER NEXT TO, UM YOU KNOW, MEDICAL OR DENTAL OFFICE. AND SO THOSE DIVISIONS JUST AREN'T NEARLY THAT DISTINCT. UM SO THE PLACE TYPE DESIGNATION DOES TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION. LAND USE CERTAINLY OF IT ARE ALSO TRIES TO SPEAK TO AN OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. SO A LITTLE BIT MORE. YOUR SHOPPING CENTER MAY HAVE MULTIPLE USES, BUT WE CAN LOOK ON THE OUTSIDE. I KNOW IT'S A SHOPPING CENTER, RIGHT? UM, SO AGAIN, THIS IS A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY AS YOU ALL ARE CONSIDERING DECISIONS, UH, TO BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE OVERALL CHARACTER AND IDENTITY[00:05:03]
OF A DISTRICT THROUGH THIS PLACE TYPES. THE OTHER THING THAT THE LAND USE DIAGRAM DOES INCORPORATE IS WHAT WE CALL THE CITYWIDE DECISION MAKING CRITERIA. AND SO THIS IS A LIST OF CRITERIA WHERE, IF A REQUEST COMES FORWARD FOR A ZONING CASE, AND PERHAPS IT DOESN'T STRICTLY ALIGN WITH THE DESIGNATED PLACE TYPE, IT IS A LIST OF CRITERIA THAT YOU ALL CAN USE TO EVALUATE TO SAY, DOES THIS STILL MEET THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE DISTRICT AND THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? NO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GETS THEIR LAND USE DIAGRAM. 100% CORRECT RIGHT MARKETS CHANGE. YOU KNOW, THE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS THAT COME FORWARD ARE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT. SO THIS DECISION MAKING CRITERIA WAS INTENTIONALLY ADDED TO BE SURE THAT THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE DYNAMIC. UH, INFLUENCE THROUGHOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN, OF COURSE, IS JUST AS IMPORTANT AS THE OTHER PIECES.THIS IS A WAY OF MAKING SURE THAT OUR ROADWAYS HAVE THE CAPACITY TO HANDLE THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ITSELF, AND IT DOES INCLUDE EXISTING AND PROPOSED THOROUGHFARES. SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL ARE. I'M SURE FAMILIAR WITH VERY BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO WHAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS, AND SO AS I TRANSITION TO TALKING ABOUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THOSE FIVE YEARS SINCE ADOPTION, I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I AM BEING CLEAR IN THE LANGUAGE THAT I USE, AND I WANT TO WALK THROUGH THE TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF CHANGES THAT WE TYPICALLY SEE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND WHEN WE REFER TO AN AMENDMENT THAT'S GOING TO BE THOSE PERIODIC REFINEMENTS THAT ARE TYPICALLY MINOR. YOU MIGHT SEE TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS MADE. SOMETIMES THERE'S JUST A NEED FOR CLARIFICATION. WE'VE SEEN THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION THAT SOMETHING MAYBE NEEDS A LITTLE BIT MORE DESCRIPTION. LANGUAGE. ALSO IF THERE ARE ANY ENGINEERING OR PLANNING STUDIES THAT HAVE OCCURRED, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE ARE ACCURATELY UPDATED AS TIME GOES ON. THESE AMENDMENTS. UH, HERE WE GO. ALWAYS SOMETHING WITH TECHNOLOGY. NO WORRIES. UM SO, YEAH, SO AMENDMENTS BECAUSE OF THEIR MINOR SCALE REALLY SHOULDN'T OCCUR IN ORDER TO SUPPORT A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL OR TO ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF A VERY SPECIFIC SECTION OF THE COMMUNITY. AMENDMENTS ARE INTENDED TO CHANGE THE OVERALL VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND A LOT OF THIS IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT DOESN'T INCORPORATE A WIDE BREADTH OF PUBLIC INPUT.
WE REALLY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE BASIC TENANTS AND THAT FOUNDATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY, SO AMENDMENTS ARE SMALLER IN SCALE FOR THAT REASON. A TRUE UPDATE IS WHERE WE WOULD TAKE A STEP BACK AND LOOK AT THOSE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. AND SO THE EXAMPLE OF WHAT I SHOWED FOR THE ADOPTION IN 2018. THAT IS A TRUE UPDATE. THAT GIVES YOU A SENSE OF THE SCALE THAT WE WOULD EXPECT WITH THAT. UPDATES ARE GONNA USUALLY OCCUR EVERY 7 TO 10 YEARS. UM THIS REALLY DEPENDS . SO THIS IS BEST PRACTICE WITHIN THE PROFESSION TO START LOOKING EVERY 7 TO 10 YEARS, BUT IT REALLY DOES DEPEND ON THE NEED OF THE COMMUNITY. YOU MIGHT HAVE CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE IF THEY ARE LARGE SOCIO-ECONOMIC, OR MARKET TRENDS THAT HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, YOU MIGHT SEE PEOPLE LEAN TOWARDS THAT SEVEN. IF YOU HAVE ONGOING PLANNING PROCESSES THAT ARE PERHAPS MORE IMPORTANT AND WOULD EVENTUALLY ROLL INTO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, YOU MIGHT ACTUALLY EXTEND ABOUT 10. I THINK STAFF'S INTENT WITH LOOKING AT THAT 7 TO 10 YEAR TIME FRAME IS JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE INTENTIONALLY MAKING THAT CHOICE ABOUT WHEN THAT UPDATE DOES OR DOES NOT HAPPEN. AND SPEAKING OF AMENDMENTS. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS A LIVING DOCUMENT, SO WE DO EXPECT IT TO CHANGE IN THAT MINOR REALM AS TIME GOES ON, UM SO I'VE GOT A LIST HERE OF THREE DIFFERENT AMENDMENTS THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN OCTOBER OF 2020. THERE WAS AN AMENDMENT THAT DID A LOT OF REFINEMENT SO JUST THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION, REALIZING THAT MAYBE THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE CLARITY ADDED TO THE PLACE TYPES REFINING THE LAND USE DIAGRAM AND DECISION MAKING CRITERIA AGAIN A NATURAL THING THAT WE WOULD EXPECT AS YOU START TO IMPLEMENT. THEN HE REALIZED MAYBE, UH THERE COULD BE MORE DEFINITION ADDED IN NOVEMBER. 22 WE REALIGN, UH MY REALIGNMENT OF THEIR AFFAIRS AS ROADWAYS GET CONSTRUCTED AND BUILT NO FINAL ALIGNMENT, AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR DOCUMENTS ARE UPDATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT.
FINALLY IN DECEMBER OF 23. SO REALLY RECENTLY WE DID ADD THE 380 CORRIDOR AS WELL AS FOR 399 TO THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN. UM AND I'LL ADD A LITTLE BIT MORE ONTO THIS AND IN A SECOND, BUT AGAIN, JUST WANTING TO ILLUSTRATE THERE ARE NORMAL CHANGES THAT HAPPEN WITHIN THE REALM OF THE COMP PLAN. UM AND TO PAIR WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT HAPPENED IN DECEMBER. WE HAVE AN ONGOING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. UM, I SAY, ONGOING FOR STAFF BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON IT. UM THE INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC WILL GO OUT IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS
[00:10:01]
ABOUT WHAT TO EXPECT FROM THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS, BUT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE SPENT SOME TIME, UH, LETTING YOU ALL KNOW WHAT THE EXPECTED PLAN AND PATH IS FOR THIS AMENDMENT.SO WHILE WE UPDATED THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR THE 380 CORRIDOR AND SPUR 399, WE DIDN'T TAKE A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THE LAND USES AROUND THE CORRIDOR. PART OF THIS WAS BECAUSE WE WANTED TO BE SURE THAT ONCE WE KNEW FINAL ALIGNMENT THAT THAT INFORMATION WAS CLEAR IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THAT INFORMATION WAS OUT THERE FOR THE PUBLIC. WE KNEW THAT WITH THE ACTUAL LAND USES AND EVALUATION OF DISTRICTS, WE WOULD WANT TO TAKE A DEEPER LOOK, AND THAT WOULD TAKE MORE TIME. AND SO WHAT YOU'LL SEE ON THE SLIDE THERE. YOU KNOW, WE ARE EVALUATING LAND USES. UM, THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT WE EXPECT A LOT OF CHANGE.
THAT JUST MEANS THAT WE'RE READY TO OPEN THE BOOK AND SAY, HOW DO WE AS A COMMUNITY THINK THAT THESE CHANGES ON THE ROADWAY ALIGNMENTS, IMPACT OR NOT THE DISTRICTS THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE THE NEW ROADWAYS RUN THROUGH THEM. AND IT ALSO GIVES US A CHANCE TO DO SOME OF THOSE PERIODIC REFINEMENTS THAT WE NORMALLY DO. PART OF THAT IS REVIEWING PLACE TYPES AGAIN AS MARKETS CHANGE AND AS WE IMPLEMENT, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S CLARITY IN THIS PLACE TYPES SO YOU MIGHT SEE SOME ADDITIONAL CHANGES OUTSIDE OF THAT. AND OF COURSE, WE'LL BE SURE TO BE CLEAR ABOUT THOSE AS THEY HAPPEN. SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS THAT WE WOULD EXPECT WITH THIS ONE. WE ARE LOOKING TO LAUNCH A SURVEY THAT WILL START THAT INITIAL FEEDBACK PERIOD OF UNDERSTANDING HOW THE COMMUNITY IS GOING TO VIEW THE IMPACTS OF THIS CHANGE. AND ONCE WE HAVE KIND OF TAKEN IN ALL THAT INFORMATION, UH WE WILL HAVE AN OPEN HOUSE TO REPORT BACK TO THE COMMUNITY TO SAY THIS IS WHAT WE HEARD FROM YOU. ALL THESE SEEM TO BE THE CONCERNS. DID WE GET IT RIGHT WHEN WE TRIED TO SYNTHESIZE THAT INFORMATION? UH AND THEN WE WILL HAVE A FEEDBACK PERIOD AFTER THAT, SO THERE WILL BE THREE ROUNDS OF FEEDBACK THAT WE GO THROUGH BEFORE WE HAVE AN AMENDMENT THAT WILL EVENTUALLY COME TO YOU ALL. AND SO WE DO ANTICIPATE THAT THAT WILL HAPPEN THIS FALL. IT WILL BE BEFORE YOU ALL THIS FALL. UH, THE ACTUAL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS. LIKE I SAID, WE'LL START IN A FEW WEEKS. ANOTHER PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WE DON'T DIG INTO, OFTEN IN IN A PUBLIC SETTING IS THE IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX, AT LEAST NOT SO DIRECTLY . UM YOU KNOW, THE LAND USE DIAGRAM IS A REALLY CRITICAL PART OF BEING SURE THAT WE ARE IMPLEMENTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT THERE ARE PLENTY OF THINGS THAT WE CAN DO OUTSIDE OF THAT TO ENSURE THAT THOSE VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES ARE ARE BEING MET. SO WHAT I'VE DONE HERE IS I PICKED OUT JUST A FEW TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF VARIETY.
UH AND THE FIRST ONE THAT I HAVE SELECTED IS ACTUALLY THE, UH, ADOPTION OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. UH, YOU KNOW, I KNOW THAT STAFF PUT A LOT OF EFFORT INTO THIS. YOU ALL PUT A LOT OF EFFORT INTO THIS, AND SO DID THE COMMUNITY. AND IT WAS A REALLY CRITICAL STEP IN BEING SURE THAT ALL OF THE GOALS THAT WERE SET OUT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE MAN UH, PLAN COULD ACTUALLY BE MET THROUGH OUR ZONING ORDINANCE AND OUR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. YOU SEE OTHER THINGS IN HERE AS WELL. AN UPDATED FISCAL IMPACT MODEL LOOKING AT OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM NOW THAT WE LAID OUT ALL OF THAT DEVELOPMENT IN 2018, WHERE IT WAS GONNA BE MAKING SURE WE WERE PLANNING FOR THAT INFRASTRUCTURE. AND THEN I'VE ALSO GOT SEVERAL EXAMPLES HERE TALKING ABOUT PARKS AND OPEN SPACE REPAIR AND REHABILITATION FOR OUR EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS IN CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS FOR FINANCING FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT.
UM AND SO WHEN I HAVE SELECTED THESE PART OF WHEN I WANTED TO ILLUSTRATE IS THAT YOU KNOW, PLANNING MAY THANK YOU. UH, PLANNING MAY ULTIMATELY BE THE KEEPER OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THAT WE'RE THE ONES THAT BRING IT BEFORE YOU. BUT SO MANY DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS HAVE A HAND IN ENSURING THAT IT IS ACTUALLY IMPLEMENTED AND ENSURING THAT AS WE GROW AND DEVELOP, UH YOU KNOW WE'RE DOING SO APPROPRIATELY. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON. SINCE 2018 IS A VERY HIGH LEVEL. UM YOU KNOW, I TALKED ABOUT THE AVERAGE LIFESPAN BEING ABOUT 7 TO 10 YEARS. AND SO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT BE THINKING IS WHAT DOES THAT MEAN FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS? UM AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE WANTED TO KIND OF LIFT UP THE HOOD AND LET YOU ALL KNOW IS KIND OF HOW WE GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS OF LOOKING AHEAD. AND JUST A QUICK REMINDER THAT THE 10 YEARS IS A NICE ROUND NUMBER FOR ME TO NOT HAVE TO DO A LOT OF MATH, AND IT IS ALL SUBJECT TO COMMUNITY NEED AND CONTEXT. WE'LL KEEP DOING ROUTINE AMENDMENTS. THAT'S AN IMPORTANT PART OF MAKING SURE THAT ALL OF THE INFORMATION AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS UP TO DATE AND RELEVANT FOR CITIZENS AND DEVELOPERS. ONE OF THE THINGS WE DO IS WE ALSO LOOK THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX. JUST AS I EXPLAINED PREVIOUSLY, UM, THE IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX IS ALSO KIND OF DYNAMIC. SO WHAT YOU'LL SEE IS THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT FIVE YEARS AGO WE THOUGHT WERE REALLY IMPORTANT, VERY QUICKLY DID NOT BECOME AS
[00:15:02]
IMPORTANT AND THERE ARE PLENTY OF THINGS THAT ARE NOT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX THAT PERHAPS OVER THE COURSE OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS HAVE BECOME IMPORTANT. BUT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO GO THROUGH AND TAKE AN ASSESSMENT OF WHAT IS LEFT AND SAY, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE NEED TO KEEP AN EYE ON AND WATCH HOW IT GROWS AND CHANGES? AND THEN FINALLY, WE WILL BE LOOKING TOWARDS THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. UM AND IN THE WAY THAT THIS WILL LOOK FOR STAFF FOR A WHILE IS WE ARE GOING TO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT AS WE COME TO THAT 7 TO 10 YEARS WHERE AT LEAST BEING INTENTIONAL ABOUT ONCE A YEAR, SITTING DOWN AND LOOKING AND SAYING, YOU KNOW, HAVE THE CONDITIONS CHANGED ENOUGH, YOU KNOW, IS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STILL SERVING ITS ITS JOB AND DOING ITS DUTY AND DO WE NEED TO START CONSIDERING WHAT AN UPDATE MIGHT LOOK LIKE, UM AND SO WE'RE STARTING TO HIT THAT REALM, AND SO YOU SEE ON BUDGET YEARS COMING UP, WE MIGHT START BRINGING THAT UP. THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT WE'RE 100% TO THAT POINT, BUT WE WILL BE ACTIVE IN MAKING SURE THAT WE ARE EVALUATING IT. UM, SO THAT WAY WHEN WE ARE READY TO MOVE FORWARD, WE HAVE ALL OF THE INFORMATION. UH, AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT IT MIGHT MEAN TO LOOK THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX. UH, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WE KIND OF LOOSELY HAVE OUR EYE ON, UH, IS A REFERENCE TO THE STATE HIGHWAY FIVE CORRIDOR AND IN 2018. WE LISTED THIS AS SOMETHING THAT WAS IMPORTANT AND OBVIOUSLY THE CONDITIONS AROUND STATE HIGHWAY 55 OR EVER CHANGING, UM, A LOT OF PUBLIC INVESTMENT. UM BUT FOR AN EXAMPLE, STAFF IS KEEPING AN EYE ON THIS AND NOT WAITING TO SEE DOES IT MAKE SENSE FOR THIS TO TURN INTO SOMETHING THAT IS ACTIONABLE? OR IS THIS GOING TO BE ONE OF THOSE IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES THAT EVENTUALLY BECOMES LESS AND LESS IMPORTANT? I HAVE A SUMMARY OF EVERYTHING THAT I'VE JUST WENT THROUGH. UH, AGAIN. THIS IS THIS IS TRULY INFORMATIONAL. UH, WE DON'T GET A CHANCE TO STAND UP HERE VERY OFTEN AND KIND OF RECAP, UH, THE WORK THAT WENT INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE FIVE YEARS THAT HAVE HAPPENED SINCE THEN? WE WANTED TO MAKE A POINT TO LET YOU ALL KNOW WHAT WE ARE LOOKING TOWARDS, AS WE LOOK ACROSS THE NEXT FEW YEARS. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR YOU ALL OR RECEIVE ANY FEEDBACK YOU MIGHT HAVE AS WELL.SO HE IN 2018 WE ADOPTED THAT IN 2019 SOMETIME AROUND MID YEAR SB 152. WAS PASSED WITH THE INFINITE WISDOM OF OUR STATE LEGISLATORS, HAVE WE, UM I KNOW WE HAVEN'T VISITED THIS. WOULD THAT NOT BE AN EVENT THAT WOULD CAUSE US TO GO BACK AND LOOK? QUESTION. NOW WE HAVE FOUR OR FIVE YEARS OF SEEN THE TRAGEDY. YES I MEAN, I THINK THAT THE STATE LEGISLATIVE ENVIRONMENT IS CERTAINLY ONE OF THE THINGS OVERALL THAT WE'RE CONSIDERING NOT JUST IN THE PAST, BUT I KNOW THAT THERE ARE CONTINUED STATE LAW CHANGES THAT MAY BE CHANGE HOW WE MIGHT LOOK AT WHAT IS GUARANTEED TO BE WITHIN OUR GROWTH BOUNDARY. RIGHT UM, AND SO THAT'S ONE OF THE FACTORS THAT STAFF IS CONTINUALLY WATCHING TO MAKE SURE IF THIS HAS GOTTEN TO A POINT WHERE WE FEEL LIKE THE COMP PLAN ISN'T SERVING US ANYMORE, BECAUSE THAT'S THE OTHER BALANCE, TOO.
UM SO PART OF THE FACTORS WE CONSIDER CERTAINLY OF THE QUESTIONS. I'VE GOT A COUPLE WITH WHEN WE ADDED THE 380 BYPASS AND THE SPUR 399 DID. NO THERE IS FLEXIBILITY IN EACH OF THE THOROUGHFARES AS FAR AS THIS IS EITHER, LIKE A COULD BE A FOUR OR SIX LANE. IS THERE ANY, UM CONCRETE CHANGES WE MADE TO OTHER THOROUGHFARES TO SAY, SINCE YOU HAVE GOT A BYPASS THAT GO ALONG BLOOM. DALE THAT'S GOING TO BE A HEAVY TRAFFIC, THEN. AND I'LL JUST USE WILMOUTH AS THE EXAMPLE BECAUSE WE PUT IT AS A FOUR LANE, BUT THAT THAT WILL NEVER BE HAVE A NEED TO BE A SIX LANE OR THE ROADS THAT ARE RUN PARALLEL TO THE NORTH OF THE BYPASS. THAT WE ADJUST. THOSE THOROUGHFARES BASED OFF THE ADDITIONAL LOAD THAT WE'RE ABLE TO. THROUGH THAT AREA. YEAH IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. AND SO FOR CLARITY'S SAKE, I KNOW THAT YOU ALL KNOW THIS. BUT UM, THE 380 CORRIDOR AND FOR 399 WERE DECISIONS BY TEXT DOT SO THAT'S ALL SET IN A LINE. SO YOUR QUESTION IS ABOUT HOW OUR SYSTEM CONNECTS TO THAT SYSTEM. UM AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT ENGINEERING DID LOOK AT. THERE WERE SOME REALIGNMENTS THAT HAPPENED BACK IN DECEMBER AND A FEW OTHER MINOR CHANGES AROUND THAT, UM, I WAS GOING TO TRY TO FIND MY QUICK LIST TO SEE IF THERE WERE ANY OTHER MAJOR CHANGES. I REMEMBER SOME ADJUSTMENT. TO CONNECT TO 380.
BUT AS FAR AS THE DESIGNED WIDTH OF THOSE THOROUGHFARES. WE EVALUATE THAT IN ANY WAY OR MAYBE, AS WE ARE LOOKING AT DENSITY OF DIFFERENT LAND USES EVALUATING THAT, AND I SAY THAT I LIKE OUR FOUR LANE ROADWAYS AND I FEEL LIKE WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SIX LANES ON VIRGINIA, AND IT
[00:20:02]
JUST CARRIES MORE TRAFFIC TO PEOPLE AT FRISCO, AND THAT'S SOMETHING I HEAR. A LOT OF PEOPLE SAY JUST MAKING LARGE ROADWAYS BECAUSE WE CAN MAKE LARGE ROADWAYS DOESN'T SEEM LIKE A SOLUTION. SO AM I SUPPOSED TO PUSH THE BUTTON? NO THERE I AM. I'M LAUGHING. I DIDN'T KNOW. UM SO WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT WAS MADE LATE LAST YEAR, THERE WAS NO REDESIGNATION OF RIGHT OF WAY . LIKE THE CROSS SECTIONS. UM, BECAUSE OF THE BREES DESIGNATIONS OF 3, 8300 AND 99.AND ONE THING THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED IS UPDATED TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING, WHICH IS USUALLY WHAT WOULD IMPACT THOSE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY. WITS WE WOULD GET THAT TRAVEL TO VAN MODELING. IT WOULD TELL US THE LEVEL OF SERVICE. ON THE NEW CONFIGURATION OF ROADWAYS AND OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WITHIN KIND OF START TWEAKING. OK IF THE LEVEL OF SERVICE OF WILL METH IS NOW AT LEVEL OF SERVICE, F, MAYBE IT DOES NEED TO EXPAND TO A SIX LANE THAT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED WITH THE REDESIGNATION OF 380. IT'S SOMETHING THAT OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS DEFINITELY KEEPING AN EYE ON. BUT WITH THAT UPDATE THAT WAS DONE LATE LAST YEAR.
UM, I DO NOT RECALL THAT THERE WAS ANY RE, UM DESIGNATIONS OF THOSE MTP THOROUGHFARES. UM I KNOW. THE MAYOR WAS ASKING ABOUT. ALL THE CONTROL THAT WE HAVE LOST. I KNOW WE ANTICIPATE POTENTIAL OF LOSING MORE, UM, WITH LOT WIDTHS AND LOT SIZES AND ALL THOSE THINGS THAT MAY COME AS WELL. I MEAN, WHAT DOES THAT DO TO EVEN THIS DOCUMENT IN TERMS OF TRYING TO FIGURE OUT SO I DON'T KNOW THAT IT NECESSARILY IMPACTS THE ULTIMATE VISION THAT THE CITY HAS FOR ITSELF. IT IS IT MORE HAS AN IMPACT ON HOW WE ACTUALLY IMPLEMENT IT THROUGH OUR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE STRATEGIES THAT THE CITY MAY LOOK AT DOING TO HELP, UM, MAINTAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE CONTROL AND AUTHORITY ON DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE HAPPENING IN THE E TJ, AND THAT'S WHAT WE CONTINUE TO WRESTLE WITH. BUT KEEPING IN MIND THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS A VISIONING DOCUMENT. IT IS WHAT WE HOPED TO WHAT WE HOPE TO SEE. AND WHEN WE ARE ALL GROWN UP, IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY OUTLINE THE SPECIFIC RULES, REGULATIONS AND STRATEGIES THAT THE CITY MIGHT USE IN ORDER TO, YOU KNOW, MITIGATE FOR SOME OF THE CHANGES THAT HAVE HAPPENED IN THE E TJ.
UM ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DEFINITELY ASKED OURSELVES IS WITH THE NEW, UM E TJ RELEASE BILL AND PROPERTIES RELEASING FROM RE TJ. DO WE REMOVE THEM FROM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THAT FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ARE EARLY. UM THINKING ON. THAT IS PROBABLY NOT BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING NECESSARILY IN STATE LAW THAT REQUIRES US TO DO THAT. UM BUT IT'S SOMETHING WE'VE BEEN TALKING WITH OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT ABOUT IS THERE A LEGAL OBLIGATION FOR US TO REMOVE THAT FROM OUR FROM OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OR ARE WE OK KEEPING IT IN THERE? AND JUST KNOWING THAT IF EVER WE GET CHALLENGED BY SOMEBODY WHO'S DONE AN E TJ RELEASE THAT CITY DOESN'T NECESSARILY HAVE A LEG TO STAND ON. SO THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WILL BE INCORPORATED IN THIS ROUND OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS, BECAUSE IF WE HAVE A LEGAL OBLIGATION TO REMOVE THEM FROM OUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, THEN WE CERTAINLY WILL. BUT IF NOT, THEN WE MAY ACTUALLY CONTINUE TO SHOW THEM AND IF THE COURTS DECIDE IN A DIFFERENT WAY THAT THOSE E TJ RELEASES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS THEY'RE BEING CHALLENGED AS RIGHT NOW, THEN THEY'RE STILL ON THE BOOKS FOR US. HOW DOES AM ALL OVER THE PLACE TODAY BECAUSE I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT FROM THIS. HOW HOW DO WE IN THE LAND USE PLAN IN TERMS OF LIKE PREDICTING COMMERCIAL USES, UM WHICH I KNOW IT JUST GENERALIZES AREAS AND STUFF AND WE'RE NOT BUT DO WE EVER SET A GOAL FOR LIKE HOW MUCH RETAIL SPACE WE'RE GONNA HAVE COMPARED TO THE RESIDENTIAL ROOFTOP. DOORS WE HAVE THAT SORT OF THING. AND DO WE EVER LOOK AT THAT? BECAUSE I LOOK AT CITIES THAT HAVE DEVELOPED BEFORE US AND YOU DRIVE TO PLANO AND YOU SEE A LOT OF EMPTY CORNERS. AND TO ME. THAT'S THAT'S A RISK OF YOU KNOW? EVERYBODY USED TO GO TO RETAIL CORNERS. NOW WE ALL BUY FROM AMAZON TIMES CHANGE AND YOU'VE GOT SIMILAR FACTORS THAT ARE GOING TO DRIVE THAT TYPE OF CHANGE. HOW ARE WE EVALUATING? HOW MUCH COMMERCIAL SPACE IS ADEQUATE, SO THAT THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. IT'S A BIG QUESTION. UM I WILL TELL YOU IN THE OLD DAYS AND IN THE OLD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BEFORE THIS ONE, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACTUALLY SPELLED OUT A RES. NON RES SPLIT. IT WAS 6040 WE WANTED 60% RESIDENTIAL 40% NON RES IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, AND WE ACTUALLY LEARNED THAT THAT'S SOMEWHAT OF AN ANTIQUATED APPROACH TO HAVE JUST SUCH A BASIC SPLIT. IT IS ONE OF THE BEAUTIES THAT THAT THE NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS BUILT IN IT WITH THOSE DISTRICTS, EVERY DISTRICT MAY HAVE A LITTLE BIT
[00:25:04]
OF A DIFFERENT SORT OF, UM, MARKET, UM OR VISION OR GOAL OR BRAND THAT MAY BE A LITTLE BIT LESS. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE, UM UH, AVIATION DISTRICT. THERE'S RESIDENTIAL ENVISIONED IN THAT PARTICULAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT AND THAT'S BY DESIGN BECAUSE IT'S GOT THE AIRPORT AND A LARGE AMOUNT OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPING AROUND IT. UM BUT INCLUDED IN THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS ACTUALLY, UM, SOME MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND WHAT WE TRY TO INCORPORATE IS WHAT WE FELT LIKE WE PARTNERED WITH, UM, A MARKET ECONOMIST, UM, TO SAY HEY WITHIN EACH ONE OF THESE DISTRICTS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THIS IS THE POTENTIAL MARKET CAPTURE FOR COMMERCIAL, WHETHER IT BE RETAIL OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL, AND SO IF YOU ACTUALLY GO INTO EACH ONE OF THOSE SUMMARIES FOR EACH ONE OF THOSE DISTRICTS, IT WILL GIVE YOU THAT BREAKDOWN OF THE POTENTIAL MARKET CAPTURE AND THEN INCLUDED WITH THE ZONING CASES THAT COME BEFORE YOU AS THAT FISCAL MODEL THAT FISCAL ANALYSIS AND IT GIVES YOU A LITTLE BREAKDOWN OF HOW CLOSE OR HOW MUCH OF THE MARKET WE ANTICIPATE THAT REZONING MAY OR MAY NOT CAPTURE. IT IS NOT A SCIENCE BY ANY MEANS, ESPECIALLY STAFF PLANNERS. WE DO OUR BEST TO PUT OUR MARKET CAPS ON. BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT WE DO. UM AND SO WE ARE CONSTANTLY PAYING ATTENTION TO, UM, WHETHER OR NOT WE THINK WE'RE GETTING CLOSE TO OVER SATURATION OR THERE'S STILL MARKET POTENTIAL. A LOT OF TIMES WHEN YOU SEE US COME IN AND TALK ABOUT A REZONING AND POTENTIAL FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.SOMETIMES IT'S BASED OFF OF THAT FISCAL MODEL THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. BUT YOU KNOW WELL, TOO, THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN CORNERS THAT EVEN THOUGH THE DISTRICT'S CALLS FOR COMMERCIAL AND THAT THERE'S POTENTIAL IN THE DISTRICT FOR COMMERCIAL THAT PARTICULAR CORNER HAS ACCESS OR VISIBILITY OR FLOODPLAIN ISSUES THAT MAKE THAT NOT VIABLE, AND SO IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO SIMPLY STATE YOU KNOW, AS A BLANKET STATEMENT , WE KNOW WE WANT THIS VERSUS THIS FOR COMMERCIAL AND NON RESIDENTS. IT'S WHY WE HAVE THE DECISION MAKING CRITERIA AND EVERY ZONING CASE IS EVALUATED ON ITS OWN MERITS. UM, SO THAT WAS A LONG RAMBLE. PARTS BUT VERY BIG QUESTION. WE'VE DONE OUR BEST TO TRY AND HELP PROVIDE SOME OF THAT CONTEXT FOR PNC AND COUNCIL WITH THOSE REZONING REQUESTS, BUT, UM IT'S AN ART, NOT A SCIENCE. SOMETIMES WHEN IT COMES TO THAT. UM, IS THE PRIORITIES IN ANY ORDER. IS IT JUST EVERYTHING ON HERE? UH, SO IF YOU GO INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE CLAIM ITSELF, IT DOES HAVE CATEGORIES THAT ARE BROADLY LISTED. AND SO THAT'S THE ORDER THAT YOU'LL SEE THEM IN. UM, BUT IT'S NOT IN LIKE A MOST IMPORTANT TO LEAST I THE LAST THING I'LL SAY, BECAUSE YOU USED IT AS AN EXAMPLE WITH HIGHWAY FIVE IS UM DO THINK THAT WE'VE GOT A BIG OPPORTUNITY THERE WITH UM, TRYING TO BRING ABOUT SOME DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THAT CORRIDOR. AND I KNOW WE DID STUDIES ON IT RIGHT BEFORE THIS. WE HAVE A T THAT WAS DESIGNED WITH THAT IN MIND AND OF USING IN THE WAYS THAT WE ANTICIPATE IT BEING PATHWAY INTO OUR DOWNTOWN, UM, SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD BE ONE TO MOVE UP WHATEVER PRIORITY LIST WE HAVE SO I'LL JUST ADD THAT IN THERE SINCE IT'S ON, IT'S ON THERE, AND YOU CIRCLED IT IN RED ON THE PRESENTATION, SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DID YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I DO. YES, I APOLOGIZE. OUR JENNIFER, DO YOU HAVE ANY AT THIS TIME? DO YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENTAL CODES LIKE MR BAER WAS SAYING. RELATED TO HIGHWAY FIVE COURT OR IS THERE ANY SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS? SO IN THAT I'M IN THIS AWKWARD PLACE WHERE I WANT TO ADDRESS YOU, AND THEN NOBODY CAN HEAR ME. UH, SO, UM, SO WE DO HAVE OBVIOUSLY IT IS, UM, A PART OF THE TMN AND THE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT AREA, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING THAT LOOKS ONLY AT THAT CORRIDOR OR SITS BOUNDARIES FOR HOW FAR OFF OF THE BACK OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.
UM, WE WOULD CONSIDER THAT DIFFERENT. UM SO NOT SPECIFICALLY. R. DO YOU HAVE ANY? UM SPECIFIC EXAMPLES. OF ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN TURNED DOWN. YOU KNOW, UH WHETHER THE ZONING REQUEST OR DEVELOPMENT IDEAS HAVE BEEN PUT FORWARD BY OWNERS. THAT THAT YOU TOLD. HEY THIS. THIS DOESN'T THIS DOESN'T FIT THE MASTER PLAN. SORRY. I THINK IT EASY ANSWER YES. SURE PLENTY OF TIMES. UM AND A LOT OF TIMES THOSE COME FORWARD IN WHAT WE CALL OUR PREVE A SO THEY
[00:30:03]
WOULDN'T NECESSARILY COME AS A FORMAL SUBMITTAL, UM OR SOMETHING THAT WOULD EVEN HIT THE FLOOR OF PNZ OR COUNCIL. SO THOSE PREVE MEETINGS ARE WHAT WE CALL UM OR I KIND OF TELL FOLKS, YOU'RE KICKING THE TIRES. THEY'VE GOT A POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT THEY WANT TO FILTER THROUGH STAFF AND NOT JUST PLANNING BUT ENGINEERING BUILDING INSPECTION PARKS OR ARBORIST, UM OR URBAN NOW WE JUST RETITLED IT. UM SO SURE. WE CERTAINLY DO. AND AT THE END OF THE DAY IF SOMEBODY'S COMING FORWARD WITH A REZONING REQUEST, WHAT OUR RESPONSIBILITY IS AS A STAFF IS TO LET THEM KNOW WHAT OUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE, BECAUSE ULTIMATELY, THE DECISION ON WHETHER OR NOT A REZONING IS APPROVED IS NOT OURS, BUT WE TRY TO BE VERY FORTHRIGHT WITH SOMEBODY WHO'S COMING IN AND SAYING, HEY, WE WANNA BUILD A CONCRETE BATCH PLANT RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD OR SOMETHING DESIGNATED FOR RESIDENTIAL. WE WOULD VERY CLEARLY SAY. HEY, WE DON'T IT'S NOT DESIGNATED IN A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT IT AS A STAFF LEVEL. WE LIKELY WOULDN'T RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF IT, AND THEY CAN TAKE THAT INFORMATION AND DECIDE HOW THEY WANT TO MOVE FORWARD FROM THERE. SOMETIMES THEY END UP IN FRONT OF F OF YOE RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF IT, AND THEY'LL HAVE WHAT WE ALWAYS CALL THEIR DAY IN COURT FOR ULTIMATE DECISION, BUT YES, WE DO USE IT VERY OFTEN WITH THAT. OK, THANKS. DID. WE HAVE NO MORE QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. RIGHT.THAT IS THE ONLY ITEM OUR AGENDA. IF THERE'S ANY MEMBER COMMENTS ONE FEELS SO COMPELLED.
[JOINT MEMBER COMMENTS]
I HAVE ONE NON SEQUITUR COMMENT. MR. MAYOR WHEN I WAS LEAVING FOR THIS MEETING, I WAS LEAVING MY OFFICE WHICH IS DOWNTOWN HERE ON THE SQUARE, AND I SAW A SMATTERING OF TOURISTS. AND THEY ALL WERE WEARING CAROL AND SHIRTS AND I GOT TO TALKING TO THEM AND, UM, HE WAS THE MAYOR OF CARROLLTON SUB CITY COUNCIL PEOPLE, UM SOME OTHER CITY STAFF , BUT THEY WERE FULL OF ADMIRATION AND WONDER FOR MCKINNEY, TEXAS, TALKING ABOUT EVERYTHING. THEY WERE SEEING THINGS THEY WERE HEARING, AND SO, UH, IT WAS KIND OF A GOOD MOMENT. I JUST WANTED TO SHARE ABOUT WITH EVERYBODY. I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY'S WORKING IN THIS ROOM TO HELP PUSH THAT FORWARD. YES ALL RIGHT, WELL ON ON MY END MOTION TO ADJOURN. OK, ALL IN FAVOR ALL MOTION TO ADJOURN. OK? IN FAVOR. THERE WE ARE.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.