[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:05]
RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. IT'S 6:06 P.M. WELCOME TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2020. FOR THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE, YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU ARE HERE TONIGHT TO SPEAK ON ONE OF OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS, A COUPLE OF HOUSEKEEPING NOTES FOR YOU BEFORE YOU COME TO THE PODIUM. IF YOU WILL, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE YELLOW SPEAKER CARDS. THOSE CARDS ARE ON THE TABLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ROOM. WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS WITH US. WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. IF YOU ARE HERE TO SPEAK ON A NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, THAT WOULD BE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST MEETING OR POSSIBLY THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR MADERA MCKINNEY RIDGE PHASE TWO. IF YOU ARE HERE TO SPEAK ON ONE OF THOSE ITEMS, PLEASE COME TO THE
[CONSENT ITEMS]
PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR CONSENT ITEMS. WE HAVE THREE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT. FIRST ITEM IS 24-1847. THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION OF JUNE 11TH, 2024. AND THEN THE MINUTES. ITEM 24-184 SIX MINUTES OF THE PNC REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 23RD, 2024 AND ITEM TWO 3-0001 CP A CONCEPT PLAN FOR MADERA MCKINNEY RIDGE PHASE TWO. THIS IS ON THE EAST SIDE OF FUTURE HARDENED BOULEVARD, 600FT NORTH OF BLOOMDALE ROAD. MEMBERS. WE DO HAVE A RECOMMENDATION BY THE STAFF TO PULL DOWN ITEM 23-0001 CP. THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR MADERA. WHO WANTS TO EXPLAIN THE WHY PART? KATE, COULD YOU TAKE THAT? YES. CURRENTLY, IT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THERE IS A DISCREPANCY ON THE PLAN THAT NEEDS TO BE RECTIFIED. SO THAT THE SITE CAN MEET THE OR THE CONCEPT PLAN CAN MEET THE ZONING. SO WE WILL WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AND WE WILL BRING THIS BACK AT A LATER MEETING.PERFECT. MEMBERS, DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS OR CHANGES ON THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST TWO MEETINGS? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF A WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING. I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST TWO MEETINGS. THAT WOULD BE ITEM 24-18479241846. DO WE HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY MR. BUETTNER? ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST TWO MEETINGS.
NOW, THE MOTION CARRIES THE CONSENT ITEMS. THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST TWO MEETINGS HAS BEEN
[Consider/Discuss/Act on a Concept Plan for Modera McKinney Ridge Phase 2, Located on the East Side of Future Hardin Boulevard and Approximately 630 Feet North of Bloomdale Road]
APPROVED. WE HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE THE NEXT ITEM. MOVE TO TABLE CONCEPT PLAN MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO TABLE ITEM TWO THREE. DASH 0001CP SECOND SECOND BY MISS HAMMOCK. THANK YOU, ANY DISCUSSION AND YOU'LL NOTIFY THE APPLICANT? YES PERFECT. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. PLEASE.CALL THE. THAT MOTION CARRIES THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR MADERA. MCKINNEY RANCH HAS BEEN TABLED INDEFINITELY. MISS ARNOLD, JUST TO LET EVERYBODY KNOW WE HAVE A CHANGE DOWN HERE IN THE FRONT.
SO IF YOU SEE A NEW FACE, AS SHE PUT IT TO ME, GIVE HER SOME GRACE. SHE'S WORKING THROUGH THIS. SO, JENNIFER, THINGS WILL SLOW DOWN A LITTLE BIT NOW FOR YOU. OKAY? OKAY. GOOD OKAY. ALL
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan for a Multi-Family Development (Avanta Painted Tree), Located at the Southeast Corner of Wilmeth Road and North Lake Forest Drive]
RIGHT. WE'LL NOW MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. FIRST ITEM IS 24-0024 SP TWO PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A VARIANCE TO A SITE PLAN FOR A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. AVANTA PAINTED TREE. THIS IS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WILMOTH ROAD AND NORTH LAKE FOREST DRIVE. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. EVENING COMMISSION. SO THIS MIGHT FEEL FAMILIAR BECAUSE THIS WAS BEFORE YOU AT THE JUNE[00:05:07]
25TH, 2024 MEETING WITH A VERY SIMILAR REQUEST. PREVIOUSLY WAS REQUESTING A WOODEN FENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY LINE HERE, WHICH DID NOT MEET OUR. OUR SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY USES THAT REQUEST BEFORE PNC WAS ULTIMATELY DENIED. SINCE THEN, THE APPLICANT HAS COME BACK TO STAFF, HAS PROPOSED A NEW MATERIAL, AND THEY ARE REQUESTING A NEW VARIANCE FOR THIS PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY. SO, JUST A REMINDER, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AND I SAY PROPOSING THEY ARE NEARING COMPLETION OF 276 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THEY ARE IN OUR MULTIFAMILY COTTAGE STYLE, SO THEY ARE GOING TO LOOK AND FEEL LIKE SINGLE FAMILY, BUT THEY ARE A MULTIFAMILY PRODUCT, CURRENTLY THE APPLICANT IS NOW PROPOSING TO UTILIZE A COMPOSITE MATERIAL, WHICH THEY HAVE ATTACHED. HERE SO THE COMPOSITE MATERIAL DOES HAVE LONGER DURABILITY AND IT ACTUALLY WILL WEATHER MUCH, MUCH LONGER THAN WOOD. WILL IT ACTUALLY IS COMPARABLE TO MASONRY IN A LOT OF A LOT OF THINGS. HOWEVER, IT IS MUCH LIGHTER THAN MASONRY. ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT THE APPLICANT HAD WAS DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE RETAINING WALL THAT IS PROPOSED ON THE PROPERTY AND EXISTING DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO SUPPORT A MASONRY WALL ON TOP OF IT. SO IF THE APPLICANT, WAS ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO BUILD THIS COMPOSITE MATERIAL ON TOP OF THE RETAINING WALL TO BE ABLE TO MEET THAT SIX FOOT SCREENING REQUIREMENT, IF NOT, THE APPLICANT WOULD THEN HAVE TO BUILD A SIX FOOT SCREENING WALL IN FRONT OF THE RETAINING WALL TO MEET OUR SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. LAST TIME, STAFF'S INITIAL CONCERNS WERE THAT THE WOOD FENCE, THE DURABILITY OF THE MATERIAL AND OF COURSE, THE LONG TERM MAINTENANCE. AND SO SINCE THEN, THE APPLICANT WITH THE COMPOSITE MATERIAL BEING ENGINEERED TO BE HIGHLY DURABLE, RESISTANT TO ROT, AND OF COURSE, MOST IMPORTANTLY, RESISTANT TO MOST WEATHER, STAFF IS FINDING THAT IT IS COMPARABLE IN THE LONGEVITY. AS SUCH, ONE OF THE CONDITIONAL APPROVALS FOR THE SITE IS THAT THE APPLICANT WILL EXECUTE A SHARED WALL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR THIS PORTION OF THE WALL SO THAT ALONG THAT RETAINING WALL, WHERE THEY WOULD BE PUTTING THE COMPOSITE FENCE ON TOP OF THE RETAINING WALL UNTIL SUCH A POINT THAT IT NO LONGER THE RETAINING WALL, IT WAS NO LONGER THERE, THEY WOULD BE WORKING IN PERPETUITY WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY TO HAVE THAT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, WHICH WAS ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT PLANNING AND ZONING HAD LAST TIME WITH ALL OF THESE UPDATES, STAFF HAS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THE COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND OF COURSE, THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE, AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. OF COURSE. SO WHAT, SCREENING MATERIAL ARE THEY USING? IF ANY, ALONG THE NORTHERN BORDER ALONG WILMOT AND THEN ALONG LAKE FOREST? DO THEY NOT HAVE TO HAVE ANY TYPE OF SCREENING THERE? SO THEY HAVE THEIR WALL IS ALREADY CONSTRUCTED ALONG THERE. IT'S A FENCE. CRETE, WHICH IS A MASONRY PRODUCT. SO THE FENCE CRETE GOES HERE, HERE AND DOWN THIS WAY. SO THEY HAVE A FENCE CRETE PRODUCT THAT GOES ALL THE WAY AROUND THAT ACTUALLY MATCHES WITH THE PAINTED TREE DEVELOPMENT. THIS COMPOSITE MATERIAL, WHENEVER IT IS COMPLETED, IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE ON THIS SCREEN. YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO SEE IT BETTER ON YOUR SCREEN. IT STARTS OFF LOOKING A LITTLE BROWN, BUT IT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO START WEATHERING TO A MORE OF A GRAY COLOR. THANK YOU. IT WASN'T AN OPTION TO USE THAT SAME COMPOSITE MATERIAL BECAUSE OF THE WEIGHT. OR THEY CAN. THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS FOR THE COMPOSITE MATERIAL BECAUSE THEN THEY DON'T HAVE TO, THE MASONRY WALL WOULD BE MUCH HEAVIER. COMPOSITE IS MUCH LIGHTER. OKAY I'M SORRY, THE CONCRETE ONE, CORRECT? YES. THE MASONRY. IF THEY PUT IT ON TOP OF THE RETAINING WALL, IT WAS NOT ENGINEERED TO ALLOW FOR THAT KIND OF WALL TO BE PUT ON TOP OF IT. SO IF THEY HAVE TO MEET OUR SCREENING REQUIREMENTS, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A WALL IN FRONT OF THE RETAINING WALL, WHICH CREATES A MAINTENANCE CONCERN BETWEEN THE TWO WALLS. AND THE TRANSITION FOR THE SECTION WHERE THEY'RE WANTING TO DO THE COMPOSITE IS THE ELEVATION SUCH IT'S GOING TO MEET UP WITH THE OTHER THE ONE THERE ALONG WHERE THE FIRE STATION IS, IS IT GOING TO KIND OF MEET UP OR ARE THEY GOING TO HAVE TO TRANSITION IT OR WHAT'S THE THERE WILL BE A LITTLE BIT OF A TRANSITION. SO YOU CAN SEE ON THIS PHOTO HERE, BACK HERE, THIS WALL IS PROBABLY EIGHT FEET. SO IT'S PRETTY TALL AND SO AS YOU CONTINUE THIS HOUSE ON THE RIGHT IS ACTUALLY THE LOWEST POINT OF THE WALL. SO IT WILL MEET AND MEET ALL OF OUR REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTUALLY[00:10:05]
SCREENING. SO IT WILL MEET THAT SIX FOOT SCREENING ALONG THE ENTIRE ALL THE WAY DOWN.CORRECT. AND ALONG THE FIRE STATION PORTION, THEY ALREADY HAVE A MASONRY ROADWAY. THEY ALREADY HAVE A MASONRY WALL HER. OKAY. SO THEY ARE ALREADY MEETING THEIR REQUIREMENTS. IT'S JUST ALONG THE PORTION WITH THE RETAINING WALL THAT THEY HAVE. THE CONCERN. OTHER QUESTIONS OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? OKAY. WE DIDN'T WE DIDN'T BRING ANYTHING TO PRESENT THIS TIME. THAT'S OKAY. GIVE US YOUR NAME. AND. YEAH. SO MY NAME IS JODY HOUSE AND I LIVE AT 2022 BURNHAM DRIVE IN FORNEY, TEXAS. AND I AM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SO, WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH OWNERSHIP ON THE GRADING PROBLEM. WE WENT BACK AND FORTH WITH THE RETAINING WALL CONTRACTOR ON WHICH MATERIAL WOULD BE BEST AND HOW TO FIT IT IN. WE ALSO WORKED WITH THE MANUFACTURER OF THE COMPOSITE MATERIAL TO MAKE SURE THAT IT COULD HANDLE WIND LOADS AND BE ON TOP OF THAT WALL. SO WE'VE KIND OF BEEN WORKING BACK AND FORTH WITH BOTH ENGINEERS TO MAKE SURE IT WAS A GOOD SOLUTIO. ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS OF MISS HOUSE MENTIONED? THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT IS THAT GOING TO BE WITH THE HOA OF THE SINGLE FAMILY OR WHO'S IT WOULD BE WITH THE HOA COMPANY OF THE MULTIFAMILY PROJECT THAT WE'RE WITH? YEP GOOD QUESTION, GOOD QUESTION. ANYONE ELSE? JUST LOGISTICALLY, HOW WILL IT BE ADHERED TO. THE RETAINING THE RETAINING WALL. SO THE RETAINING WALL WAS CORD ORIGINALLY. THERE ARE HOLES IN IT TO ACCEPT THE WOOD POSTS. THAT WOULD BE WHEN THE SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTY WOULD BUILD. THERE WOULD FENCE TO SCREEN THEIR BACKYARDS. SO WE ARE GOING TO PUT A METAL POST IN THAT HOLE. AND THEN THE COMPOSITE SLEEVE GOES OVER IT. SO IT SEEMS LIKE A COMPOSITE MATERIAL SO SIMILAR. YOU COULD EITHER PUT THE WOOD POST IN OR A STEEL POST. SO IT'LL BE A SIMILAR METHOD TO A WOOD FENCE FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. OKAY KATELYN DID A WAY BETTER JOB EXPLAINING THE SCENARIO THAN I DID LAST TIME. YOU'RE DOING A GREAT JOB SO FAR.
THANKS YEAH. ANYONE ELSE MISS HOUSE? THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS. WE APPRECIATE YOU HEARING US OUT AGAIN. I DID WANT TO MAKE ONE CAVEAT. NOT ANYTHING FOR THAT ON THE STAFF REPORT. I DID WANT TO NOTE THAT, THE WALL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, IT'S NOTED AS ALONG THE EASTERN PORTION. IT NEEDS TO BE ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WHENEVER Y'ALL MAKE THE MOTION THAT IT IS FOR THE SOUTHERN PIECE, BECAUSE THEY DEFINITELY DON'T NEED ONE FOR THE EASTERN SIDE. OKAY OKAY. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PNC REGARDING THIS PROPOSED VARIANCE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE 0024 SP TWO, WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING, THE APPLICANT RECEIVING APPROVAL FOR WALL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE SCREENING WALL ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. SECOND. STRICKLAND WE DO THAT, RIGHT? RIGHT. SECOND. SECOND AMENDMENT. WOODARD. ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. ALL RIGHT. THAT MOTION CARRIES, YOUR REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED.
THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SAFE TRAVELS. BACK TO FORNEY. OH, YES, I MIGHT CRUISE AROUND DOWNTOWN. HERE. TAKE A MINUTE. THANK YOU ALL, NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS 20 4-00532. A PUBLIC
[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “C2” - Local Commercial District, Located at the Southeast Corner of Custer Road and Silverado Trail]
HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONE OF A PROPERTY FROM PD TO C2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CUSTER ROAD AND SILVERADO TRAIL. MR. PALMER? YES, THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. GOOD AFTERNOON. COMMISSION RODERICK PALMER, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 3.472 ACRES OF LAND TO C2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. ALTHOUGH THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND ALLOWS FOR COMMERCIAL USES FOUND WITHIN THE C PLAN CENTER DISTRICT, THE APPLICANT HAS EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER OVERLAY PROVIDES SEVERAL[00:15:06]
SITE CONSTRAINTS AND IS OUTDATED FOR DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AGAIN, AS YOU MENTIONED, AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CUSTER ROAD AND SILVERADO TRAIL, WHICH ARE DESIGNED AS ARTERIAL ROADWAYS ON THE CITY'S MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, GIVEN THE PROPERTY'S LOCATION AT ARTERIAL ARTERIAL INTERSECTION AND THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS WITHIN THE AREA, STAFF FEELS THE PROPOSED REZONING TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL OR C2 ZONING DISTRICT SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA AND PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU RODERICK. OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE OH, VERY GOOD. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? YES. WHAT DO YOU WANT? HELLO HI, I'M CARLOS CABRERA. I'M THE CIVIL ENGINEER OF THE PROJECT WITH NOLAN PERKINS. I LIVE AT 5117 HEATHER COURT, FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS. AND I'LL TAKE. I MEAN, WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT DOING SOME RETAIL BUILDINGS THERE, AS YOU KNOW, THE SELF-STORAGE PLACE ON THE BACK, IT'S ALREADY PRETTY FAR ALONG ON THEIR CONSTRUCTION. AND THEY'RE BUILDING THE COMMON DRIVE THAT THAT CONNECTS MCCUTCHEN'S AND SILVERADO. AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE WANTING TO BACK TO THAT STREET AND THEN THE BUILDINGS FACING, A CLUSTER. AND WE'RE PROPOSING THE FOR DURING THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION, YOU'LL SEE RETAIL, RETAIL SHELVES LIKE A NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL CENTER. YEAH YEAH, YEAH.LIKE YOUR YOUR RESTAURANTS, YOUR NAIL SALONS, THE SAME I SEEN, IN, CROSSING, IN THE BY THE COSTCO THAT TIME, YOU KNOW, ALL THOSE SHOP BUILDINGS. YEAH. YEAH, WE DID THOSE. AND IT'S THE SAME CONCEPT. QUESTIONS ANYONE? CARLOS, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. ALL RIGHT. VERY MUCH. HAVE A GOOD ONE. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'VE COME TONIGHT AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS PROPOSED REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. I. MOVE. WE AND APPROVED THE REQUEST AS PER STAFF HAVE A MOTION BY MR. BUCKNER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND SECOND BY MR. TAYLOR. THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES.
OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES BY A VOTE OF SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST. AN ITEM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION, FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE AUGUST 20 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. AUGUST 20, 2024. CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS. IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ON OUR AGENDA, YOU MAY COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT, WE WILL HAVE STAFF COMMENTS. MISS STRICKLAND, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? NOTHING FOR ME, MISS ARNOLD. THANK YOU FOR DOING WHAT YOU'RE DOING TONIGHT. WE APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. MEMBERS ANYTHING, ANY BACK TO SCHOOL WISHES FOR SOME, I GUESS. YEAH. OKAY WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION BY MR. HAMMOCK TO ADJOURN. SECOND. SECOND BY.
MISS WOODARD, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. MAKING AN ASSUMPTION THERE'S NO DISCUSSION ON THAT.
MR. TAYLOR. NOT AT THIS TIME. ALL RIGHT. THAT
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.