Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:08]

GOOD EVENING. AT 6 P.M. WELCOME TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22ND, 2020, FOR THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE, YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THAT SAME CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT, IF THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO AN AGENDA ITEM AND YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THAT ITEM, A FEW HOUSEKEEPING NOTES. IF YOU WILL, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE YELLOW SPEAKER CARDS. THESE ARE ON THE TABLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ROOM. FILL THAT OUT BEFORE YOU COME TO THE PODIUM. PLEASE GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS THE ITEM NUMBER THAT YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON, AND THEN IF YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR POSITION ON THAT ITEM, CHECK THAT BOX AS WELL. WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS AND YOUR CONCERNS WITH US. WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE CITIZENS BE INVOLVED IN GOVERNMENT IN MCKINNEY. WITH THAT, WE WILL MOVE INTO OUR AGENDA. THE FIRST ITEM WILL BE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM THAT IS ON OUR AGENDA, BUT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. AN EXAMPLE OF THAT WOULD BE THE MINUTES OF ONE OF OUR LAST MEETINGS. SO IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON AN ITEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING COMPONENT ATTACHED, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT ITEM WILL BE OUR

[CONSENT ITEMS]

CONSENT AGENDA. AND WE HAVE TWO ITEMS ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA. ITEM 24-210 EIGHT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION OF OCTOBER THE 8TH, 2024. AND ITEM 24-210 NINE MINUTES OF A REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER THE 8TH. MEMBERS DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR MOTIONS ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA TONIGHT? MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 8TH, AS WELL AS THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ITEMS 24, 20, 108 AND 2420 109. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. WOODARD TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 242108 AND 24-109. SECOND. SECOND BY MISS HAMMACK. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. I. WAS THAT MOTION CARRIES ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA HAS BEEN APPROVED. WE'LL NOW MOVE INTO OUR REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. THESE WOULD BE THE ITEMS THAT WOULD HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING COMPONENT. THE FIRST ITEM, A24-0004MA

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Certain Amendments to Chapter 150, entitled “Unified Development Code,” of the Code of Ordinances, City of McKinney, Texas to: (1) correct typographical errors and make nonsubstantive editorial changes to: (a) Article 1 (General Provisions) and particularly to Sections 108B (Maintenance), (b) Article 2 (Zoning Regulations) and particularly to Sections 203A (Standard Procedures), 203E (Plan and Permit Procedures), 204 (Zoning Districts), 205 (Use Regulations), 206C (Screening), 206D (Commercial Garbage/Recycling Containers and Enclosures), 206E (Vehicle Parking and Loading), 206F (Architectural Standards), (c) Appendix 2A (Approved Plant List), and (d) Article 9 (Terms and Definitions) particularly to Section 902 (Definitions); (2) Make Certain Substantive Changes to: (a) Article 2 (Zoning Regulations) and particularly to Sections 205B.5 (Table of Uses), 205G.2 (Accessory Uses Definitions and Standards), 206A (Landscaping), 206C.3 (Screening Requirements), 206E.3 (Parking Calculations), 206E.7 (Driveway and Parking Surfacing Material); (b) Article 9 (Terms and Definitions) particularly to Section 902 (Definitions); to Chapter 150 (Unified Development Code) (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)]

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 150 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OF CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS IS FOR TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS AND EDITORIAL CHANGES TO SECTION 108 B ARTICLE 2203A TOLD YOU WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO. I'M SO SORRY.

3206D2006E. VEHICLE PARKING AND LOADING. 2006F ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS SECTION 902 DEFINITIONS. ARTICLE TWO ZONING REGS. SECTION 205B5. TABLE OF USES. ETCETERA 6.3 SCREENING REQUIREMENTS AND SECTION 902 DEFINITIONS. CHAPTER TO CHAPTER 150 MR. SHEFFIELD, I'M VERY SORRY, SIR. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CONTINUED AND THE ITEM TABLED TO THE NOVEMBER 12TH, 2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. THIS WILL ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME FOR STAFF TO COMPLETE THOSE AMENDMENTS AND BRING THOSE BEFORE YOU AND COUNCIL, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ANYONE. KATELYN, DO YOU HAVE ANY UPDATE? JUST IN THE EVENT SOMEONE IN THE AUDIENCE IS HERE TO SPEAK ON THAT AND IS JUST NOW SEEING THAT THE TABLING REQUEST ANYTHING YOU CAN UPDATE US ON OR WE'RE STILL WORKING ON IT, STILL WORKING. SO A LOT OF THE ITEMS THAT WE PRESENTED AT THE LAST WORK SESSION FOR THE COMMISSION WILL BE INCLUDED IN THOSE, AS WELL AS SOME OF THOSE NON-SUBSTANTIVE TYPO ERRORS OR ORGANIZING THE DEFINITIONS AND

[00:05:03]

ALPHABETICAL ORDER. THINGS OF THAT NATURE. OKAY, SO THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF IS TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM UNTIL NOVEMBER 12TH, WHICH WOULD BE THE NEXT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. RIGHT? CORRECT. OKAY, MEMBERS, ANY QUESTIONS? JUST FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE, IF YOU HAVE COME TONIGHT AND WE'RE PLANNING ON ADDRESSING, PLANNING ZONING ON THIS ITEM, AND WE WILL BE LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO TABLE THE ITEM, BUT YOU'RE CERTAINLY WELCOME. IF YOU MADE THE EFFORT TO BE HERE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS ITEM.

OTHERWISE, YOU CAN COME BACK ON NOVEMBER THE 12TH. ANYONE? OKAY. VERY GOOD. SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLING ON THEM UNTIL NOVEMBER THE 12TH.

I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION. MOTION BY MR. LEBEAU. SECOND, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE.

THE ITEM UNTIL NOVEMBER THE 12TH. JESSE. SECOND, SECOND. MR. CONRAD. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES.

I. BUT THAT MOTION CARRIES. THE ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED AND WILL BE HEARD AGAIN AT THE NOVEMBER 12,

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District and “C” - Planned Center District to “PD” - Planned Development District to Allow for Multi-Family Residential Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located on the Southeast Corner of Wilmeth Road and Community Avenue]

2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM IS 23-0069Z5 PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST TO CONSIDER A REASONABLE PROPERTY FROM PD AND C PLAN CENTER TO PD TO ALLOW FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AND TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THIS IS ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WILMOTH ROAD AND COMMUNITY AVENUE. SORRY. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. GOOD EVENING. ARACELI BOTELHO, PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS IT MENTIONED, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS A ZONING REQUEST OF APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND C PLAN CENTER DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AND ALSO MODIFY SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. AS MENTIONED, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WILMOTH IS THE PRESENTATION. YEAH. AS WE'RE GETTING THOSE MAPS UPLOADED HERE, IT'S LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WILMOTH ROAD AND COMMUNITY AVENUE. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE IN THE MAP, THE PROPERTY IS HAS COME BEFORE YOU BEFORE THIS WAS ACTUALLY PRESENTED BACK IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR. THE APPLICANT SINCE THEN HAD RECEIVED A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, BUT SINCE THEN HE HAS COME BACK TO MODIFY A COUPLE OF ITEMS HERE. ONE WAS THE OVERALL BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE PROPERTY. BEFORE IT HAD BEEN NOTED AS APPROXIMATELY 18 ACRES, BUT NOW IS BEING PRESENTED AS 15 ACRES. WE HAVE WORKED DILIGENTLY WITH THE APPLICANT SINCE THEN, AND HE IS ALIGNING WITH WHAT CURRENTLY WE ALLOW FOR AN MMF 30 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE. SO THE ONLY CHANGE WOULD BE THE ACREAGE FROM 18 ACRES TO 15 ACRES. AND ALSO THEY ARE CAPPING THE UNITS TO 460. BEFORE THEY HAD REQUESTED 25 DWELLING UNITS PER THE ACRE. SO THEY'RE NOT PROPOSING ANY UNIT PER ACRE RATIO. SO THAT'S ONE OF THE CHANGES HERE BEING PROPOSED TONIGHT. THE APPLICANT'S CONTINUES TO PROPOSE THE 1.75 PARKING SPACE PER UNIT IN LIEU OF THE TWO SPACES PER DWELLING PER DWELLING UNIT. STAFF, AFTER REVIEWING THE CONSIDERATIONS, HAS NO CONCERNS REGARDING THE MODIFICATIONS GIVING WITH THE DECREASE IN THE DEVELOPABLE DEVELOPABLE AREA AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS? ANYONE. HAVE ONE, SO CURRENTLY THE APPLICANT COULD BUILD 469 UNITS, 416 ON THE 18.7 ACRES. SAY THAT AGAIN. I'M SORRY, 469 UNITS WOULD BE ALLOWED NOW. YES. SO THEY ARE FALLING WITHIN THE LINES OF THAT 29 TO 30 UNITS PER ACRE. SO THE 460 CAPPED UNITS WOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CODE IF THEY WERE TO, TO A STRICT ZONING. SO WHILE THE ACREAGE WENT DOWN A LITTLE BIT, THE NUMBER OF UNITS HAS GONE DOWN. ALSO, I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE 25 I CAN. THE APPLICANT PROBABLY CAN

[00:10:09]

SPEAK TO IT A LITTLE BIT MORE, BUT THIS WAS THE AMOUNT OF UNITS THAT WAS ANTICIPATED AT THE 18 ACRES AS WELL. SO THERE'S NO REAL CHANGE IN DENSITY WITH THIS NEW PROPOSAL FOR 69 TO 460, AND NOT MANY. IT'S NINE. CORRECT. IT IS LESS. IT IS LESS. YES. OKAY. VERY GOOD. ANYONE ELSE? THE APPLICANT HERE? YES, SIR. THERE HE IS. MR. ROGER, CAN WE ASK QUESTIONS SO WHAT DO YOU. WHO ARE YOU? I'M JUST A CITIZEN. OKAY, WE'LL HAVE YOU IN A MINUTE. YEAH, WE'LL HAVE YOU UP IN A MINUTE. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE APPLICANT COME UP AND MAKE A PRESENTATION, AND THEN THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. THEY WILL HAVE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS. OKAY. MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, I'M BOB RODER, 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300. MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, I THINK THE STAFF HAS GIVEN YOU A GOOD PRESENTATION ON WHAT WE'RE SEEKING TO DO. A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND HERE. PARDON ME. THE 18 ACRES INCLUDED AN AREA FOR STORM WATER DETENTION, AND THERE IS SOME OTHER DEVELOPMENT BEING DONE BY THE OWNER OF THE MASTER TRACK TO OUR EAST THAT WOULD ALSO NEED DETENTION. SO WE DECIDED THAT WE WOULD DO A JOINT DETENTION AREA AND THE DEVELOPER TO OUR EAST WANTED TO MAINTAIN AND MANAGE THAT. SO WE TOOK THAT THREE ACRES OUT OF OUR PROPERTY. THAT WAS GOING TO BE DETENTION. AND IT'S GOING IN ANOTHER CASE THAT YOU'LL SEE LATER, PROBABLY NEXT YEAR. SO THAT'S THE REASON FOR THE REDUCTION FROM THE 18 TO THE 15. THE WE ALSO WANTED TO WE TALKED ABOUT GOING A STRAIGHT MISS 30 ZONING, WHICH WE THOUGHT WOULD BE COOL, EASY FOR STAFF TO MANAGE. BUT YOU ALL HAVEN'T YET CHANGED YOUR PARKING RATIOS FOR MULTIFAMILY. AND SO WE'RE HAVING ESSENTIALLY TO DO A PD TO GET THE 1.75 PARKING SPACES PER UNIT, WHICH IS WHAT YOU ALL ARE RECOMMENDING. I THINK IS AS A CHANGE TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. SO THAT DROVE US INTO THE PD ARENA. ONCE WE GOT IN THE PD ARENA AFTER TALKING WITH MISS STRICKLAND, WE AGREED THAT WE WOULD CAP THE UNITS EVEN THOUGH WE WOULD BE ENTITLED TO MORE UNDER THE MF 30. WE DECIDED WE AGREED WE WOULD CAP THE UNITS AT SOMETHING CLOSE TO WHAT WE WOULD HAVE DONE UNDER OUR OLD PLAN. SO OTHER THAN THAT, THE CHANGES ARE I MEAN, THERE ARE NO OTHER REAL CHANGES. THE ACCESS TO THIS PROPERTY WILL BE PRIMARILY OFF OF WILMOTH, ALTHOUGH WE WILL HAVE ACCESS OFF OF COMMUNITY. ALSO, THERE'S A THERE WILL BE A SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT OFF OF WILMOTH SHARED WITH THE DEVELOPER TO THE EAST. WE ARE NOT SEEKING ANY MODIFICATIONS TO YOUR REQUIREMENTS FOR SCREENING WALLS AND ALL THOSE THINGS. SO WE'RE WE'RE ABIDING BY BASICALLY THE MF 30 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA WHAT THE UNIT MIX IS GOING TO BE AT THIS POINT, OR NO? AS TYPICAL IN MCKINNEY, I WOULD ASSUME THAT WE WOULD BE HEAVILY IN THE ONE BEDROOM UNITS SIMPLY BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE DEMAND IS. QUESTION. YES, SIR. SO IS THERE ANY KIND OF A BUILD PLAN AVAILABLE FOR THESE 460 UNITS? ANY TYPE OF WHAT KIND OF A PLAN, A CONCEPT PLAN, YES. I DON'T I DON'T THINK I DON'T THINK WE'RE PREPARED TO SHOW ONE AT THIS POINT IN TIME. BUT THESE WILL BE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A MAXIMUM OF THREE STORIES. WE HAVE THE, YOU KNOW, MR. BUETTNER ON, FOR EXAMPLE, ON COMMUNITY DRIVE, WE HAVE TO HAVE A WALL THERE, SCREENING WALL. WE HAVE TO HAVE THE LANDSCAPE TREES IN THE ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY. ONE EVERY 20 FOOT ON CENTER. WE HAVE A, I THINK, A 15 TO 20 FOOT LANDSCAPE SETBACK OFF THE ROAD. SO WE'LL HAVE WHAT I WHAT I CONSIDER TO BE A LOT OF BUFFER THERE. AND AS YOU'RE AWARE, THESE APARTMENTS DON'T BUILD ON THE PROPERTY LINE. THEY TYPICALLY PUT THEIR PARKING THERE AGAINST THE PROPERTY LINE, ALTHOUGH THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO. BUT SO WE HAVE A BUILDING SETBACK ON THIS. SO THIS THIS ZONING CHANGE IS INTENDED TO ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY. YES. SO WHEN WILL WHEN WILL A CONCEPT PLAN BE

[00:15:04]

AVAILABLE. WELL WE TYPICALLY WE GO THROUGH THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ZONING AND THEN WE GO THROUGH THE SITE PLAN PROCESS. AND I THINK THAT COMES BACK. DOES THAT COME BACK THROUGH THE P AND Z? ONLY IF THERE'S A DESIGN EXCEPTION WILL IT COME BACK TO P AND Z. OKAY. THE SITE PLAN WOULD BE ADMINISTRATIVE OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE SPECIFIC CONCERNS YOU HAVE THAT YOU WOULD WANT US TO ADDRESS. NO. JUST GIVEN THAT WE'RE YOU KNOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ALLOWING MULTIFAMILY CONSTRUCTION THERE AND TO REZONE FOR THAT. JUST CURIOUS WHAT THE CONCEPT WOULD LOOK LIKE. OKAY, A LITTLE BIT OTHER BACKGROUND TO THIS PROPERTY DOES ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY UNDER ITS CURRENT ZONING. SO BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE DOING IS BRINGING THE STANDARDS UP BECAUSE THE OLD ZONING I THINK I DID IN 84 OR SOMETHING WAY BACK THEN, PROBABLY BEFORE YOU WERE BORN, BUT PROBABLY NOT. BUT NO, WE'RE TRYING TO BRING THEM IN LINE WITH THE CURRENT STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU. YEAH, YOU MENTIONED THE PROPOSED THREE STORY. I THINK THE PD OR THE PROPOSED PD REGULATIONS SAYS IT CAN BE UP TO FOUR STORIES OR Y'ALL, ARE Y'ALL PLANNING ON 3 OR 4 OR WE'RE GOING TO WHATEVER THE MF 30 IS AND I'LL DEFER TO MISS STRICKLAND. THERE'S A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 55, BUT THEY COULD DO A THREE STORY AS WELL.

OKAY, OKAY. BOB, DID YOU SAY THAT THE THREE ACRES THAT YOU REMOVED WAS THAT THAT WAS AT SPECIAL FLOOD AREA? YES. AND IT WAS A HEAVILY TREED YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALSO SOME TREES. IT WAS IN THE BASICALLY THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, SOUTHEAST THIS RIGHT HERE, NORTH IS TO OUR RIGHT ON THIS DIAGRAM. SO IT WOULD BE THAT THAT CARVE OUT ON THE LOWER LEFT HAND SIDE OF THIS SLIDE. OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT ANYONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKAY.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ANYONE WHO TURNED IN A CARD YOU DID. ARE YOU ANTHONY WALKER? YES. THANK YOU. SO IS THIS ONE I ASK QUESTIONS OR IS THAT LATER? WELL, YOU A COUPLE OF THINGS. YOU CAN IF YOU HAVE SOME THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS YOU CAN SHARE THOSE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, WE'LL TAKE THOSE DOWN. WE'LL GO THROUGH OTHERS THAT THAT ARE HERE TO SPEAK. AND THEN WE'LL COME BACK UP WITH THE APPLICANT AND THE CITY STAFF AND ADDRESS THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE RAISED IN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF FOR SOME REASON A QUESTION IS NOT ANSWERED, THAT'S NOT THE INTENT OF THIS BODY. WE WANT YOU TO HAVE YOUR ANSWERS. YOU CAN STAY WITH THE STAFF MEMBER WHEN WE GET THROUGH, AND MAKE SURE THAT WHEN YOU LEAVE HERE, YOU'RE COMFORTABLE WITH THE ANSWER THAT YOU GOT. THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU AGREE WITH THE ANSWER, BUT THAT MEANS YOU GOT AN ANSWER.

WELL, THE REASON I ASK IS BECAUSE THE ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS WOULD KIND OF FEED INTO MY STATEMENT, BUT I GUESS WE HAVE TO DO IT IN THE ORDER YOU PRESCRIBE. OKAY, LET'S DO THIS. COULD YOU TWO THINGS GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND THEN SPEAK A LITTLE CLOSER TO THE MICROPHONE. SORRY. IS THAT BETTER? THAT'S BETTER. OKAY. MY NAME IS ANTHONY WALKER. I LIVE AT 2101 SUMMIT DRIVE, WHICH IS RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER, RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET ON THAT CORNER IS WHERE I LIVE. SO I APOLOGIZE, I GUESS I MISSED I HEARD THEM MENTION THAT THIS WOULD HAD ALREADY BEEN REZONED. MAYBE I MISSED AN EARLIER MEETING WHERE IT GOT REZONED TO MULTIFAMILY. I ASSUME I'M JUST GOING TO HAVE TO ASSUME, SINCE I'M NOT ASKING QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW, THAT FROM WHAT I HEARD A MINUTE AGO, EXCUSE ME, THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE SIMILAR TO THE APARTMENT COMPLEX THEY'RE TRYING TO FINISH UP ON THE RIGHT, ACROSS THE STREET ON THE OPPOSING CORNER THAT'S GOING TO COME ONLINE SOON. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO ADDRESS BECAUSE TO THE WEST, THEY'VE DONE A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. I THINK THOSE ARE MOSTLY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, MAYBE SOME DUPLEXES AND SUCH.

BUT AND THEY WIDEN THE ROAD. THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC COMING DOWN FROM THERE. I NOTICED IN THE LAST FEW YEARS TO THE NORTH ON WILMOTH, THEY PUT IN LIKE 6 OR 7 COMPLEXES AND A LOT OF THOSE LOOK LIKE THEY'RE EITHER DONE OR COMING ONLINE. AND AS HE MENTIONED, THE MAIN ACCESS FOR THIS NEW ONE IS GOING TO BE ON WILMOTH. AND THE ONE THAT'S ALMOST FINISHED, THEIR MAIN ACCESS IS ONTO WILMOTH. AND THIS IS CREATING A TRAFFIC JAM ALREADY. AND THESE APARTMENT COMPLEXES, THE NEW APARTMENT COMPLEX HASN'T EVEN COME ONLINE YET. AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO PLOP ANOTHER ONE RIGHT THERE AND HAVE ITS MAIN ENTRYWAY THERE AS WELL. AND THERE HISTORICALLY, SINCE I'VE LIVED THERE FOR 12 YEARS, PARKING HAS BEEN AN ISSUE BECAUSE ALL THE SCHOOLS

[00:20:03]

CLUSTERED RIGHT AROUND THERE. THERE'S A HIGH SCHOOL RIGHT THERE. SO THEY HAD TO PUT UP SIGNS. YOU KNOW, BEING VERY RESTRICTIVE. AND FOR A WHILE THE POLICE HAD TO GET INVOLVED TO, YOU KNOW, DISSUADE PEOPLE FROM PARKING THERE. SO I'M KIND OF I DON'T KNOW, I HERE I DON'T KNOW A LOT ABOUT YOUR SPECIFICATIONS AND STUFF AND I DON'T KNOW THE ACRONYMS, BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE REDUCING THE PARKING TO SOME EXTENT TOO. SO, YOU KNOW, THAT'S ANOTHER FEAR THAT PARKING IS GOING TO BECOME A BIGGER ISSUE THAN IT ALREADY IS. I'M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE TRAFFIC. AND THEN THERE'S JUST ONE OF MY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT MAYBE I CAN ASK LATER IS, YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF PLANNING WENT INTO THIS AS FAR AS INFRASTRUCTURE? BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE WE'RE ON THE VERGE OF BEING OVERCROWDED IN THIS AREA. AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE WIPING OUT ALL THE GREEN AREAS AND, YOU KNOW, I HAVE NO IDEA ON THE STRAIN OF PUBLIC SERVICES, BUT ME PERSONALLY, IN MY SUBDIVISION RIGHT THERE, WE'VE HAD CONSTANT ISSUES WITH ELECTRICITY GOING OUT. AND FROM WHAT LITTLE I CAN GLEAN, IT'S BECAUSE THE SYSTEM IS OLD AND OVERLOADED. SO, YOU KNOW, THAT BRINGS IN CONCERNS FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ALL THESE APARTMENT COMPLEXES BEING CREATED, RIGHT HERE. I THINK I COVERED EVERYTHING. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. WALKER. WHAT WE'LL DO IS AGAIN, HAVE OTHERS THAT ARE HERE TO SPEAK HAVE THEIR THEIR TURN. AND THEN WE'LL ADDRESS QUESTIONS WHEN WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. THIS IS 23-069Z. MR. SINGH. YES. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU.

LETTING ME TALK TO I MEAN JUST INDIVIDUAL. I JUST LIKE HIM. I LIVE ACROSS THE STREET VERY CLOSE TO THE SUBDIVISION. I WALK EVERY DAY. EVERY EVENING. THEY'RE NEAR THE POLICE STATION.

SO WE NEED TO BE VERY CAREFUL ALLOWING THESE APARTMENTS TO COME IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. WE NEED TO ONLY SO FAR, ONE POSTCARD WE RECEIVED LAST SATURDAY. WE LIVE SUMMIT POINT PHASE TWO, A LITTLE BIT SOUTH OF THE GENTLEMAN HERE. LIKE WE LIVE LIKE A NEW SUBDIVISION IS REALLY CROWDED. AS HE SAID, ELECTRIC IS THE ISSUE. TRAFFIC IS THE ISSUE. FIRE DEPARTMENT TRUCKS, THE SIREN IS THE ISSUE. PLUS WE NEED TO EXPLAIN THE CITIZEN OF THAT AREA WHAT IT WILL BRING TO THE AREA. IT WILL INCREASE THE PROPERTY VALUE. OR IS IT GOING TO DECREASE THE PROPERTY VALUE? WHAT AMENITIES ARE COMING? IS SOMETHING ELSE WITH IT COMING? SOME MORE BUSINESSES ARE COMING.

LIKE ANY GYM OR ANYTHING, OR JUST A RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT COMPLEX. SO I REQUEST THE COUNCIL MEMBER NOT TO DO RUSH. JUST TO ASK. SEND THOSE CARDS SOME MORE. THIS IS THE FIRST CARD WE RECEIVE. I TALKED TO LIKE 510 OF MY NEIGHBORS. I'M LIVING THERE ALMOST 20 YEARS IN THE SUBDIVISION AND NONE OF THEM IS AWARE OR FULLY PREPARED TO SEE THE APARTMENT COMPLEX, JUST LIKE EAST OF MCKINNEY HIGH, MCKINNEY NORTH. THAT APARTMENT COMPLEX IS VERY CLOSE TO THE ROAD. IT'S JUST WAITING TO HAPPEN. ACCIDENT. LIKE THE NEW APARTMENT COMPLEX, THEY'RE BUILDING UP ALREADY. THEY ALREADY BUILT UP. THEY ARE NOT LIKE A 20 FOOT FROM THE ROAD, FROM THE COMMUNITY, FROM THE COMMUNITY AVENUE. THEY ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE ROAD. AND IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE, THESE ARE NEW PROPOSED, WILL BE CLOSE TO THE ROAD. THIS WILL BE ISSUE. SO WE NEED TO WE NEED TO POST MAIL. THESE MORE TO THE CITIZEN OF THAT AREA. SO EVERYONE KNOWS ESPECIALLY THE HOMEOWNERS KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF RENTAL LIVE THERE, BUT THEY DON'T KNOW MUCH BECAUSE THEY ARE, YOU KNOW, THE PROPERTY VALUE WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT CRIME WISE, LIVING COST WISE, SALE PURCHASE WISE. SO HIGH SCHOOL IS CLOSE BY. SO I WOULD REQUEST TO HAVE SOME MORE TIME BECAUSE I JUST HEARD THIS TIME AND I HAD TO TAKE A LEAVE TO COME HERE TODAY. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I SEE THIS ONE IN THE P.O BOX. SO AS A HOMEOWNER THERE FROM THE LAST 20 YEARS, I KNOW I IS CROWDED ALREADY, BUT WE NEED TO HAVE SOME MORE TIME. WE NEED TO ADD TO HOA THE SANGER SANGER HOA, SANGER POINT. THEY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION. THEY NEED TO BE SENT A LETTER. WHAT THEY ARE THINKING. SO ALL THE PLEASE. I APPRECIATE IF YOU CONSIDER MY REQUEST. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. SINGH. THANK YOU SIR. ANYONE ELSE HERE? ANOTHER. ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS PROPOSED ZONING? YES, MA'AM. I JUST TURNED IN MY CARD. OKAY. RUTH INGRAM. HI, MY NAME IS RUTH INGRAM. I'M AT 604 TWIN KNOLL. I'M OFF HIGHWAY FIVE IN WILMOTH.

[00:25:11]

MY CONCERN ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL IS YOU'RE INTRODUCING MORE MULTIFAMILY HOMES IN THIS AREA.

THAT SCHOOL, MCKINNEY, NORTH SCOTT JOHNSON, THEY ARE PACKED. I MEAN, PACKED TO THE BRIM. THEY ARE THEY DON'T HAVE ANY MORE ROOM FOR ANY MORE KIDS COMING IN. AND WE'RE BUILDING MORE APARTMENTS OVER THERE AT WILMOTH AND HIGHWAY FIVE RIGHT BEHIND MY HOME. AND THEY'RE SO THEY'RE PROPOSING MORE FAMILY MULTIFAMILY. SO WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THESE KIDS GOING TO SCHOOL? THERE'S GOING TO BE SO MANY KIDS AND THERE'S NO. THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY ROOM. THERE'S GOING TO BE MORE AND MORE FIGHTS IN THAT SCHOOL. SCOTT JOHNSON IS ALREADY BAD ABOUT FIGHTING. SO IS MCKINNEY NORTH. MY SON GOES TO MCKINNEY NORTH. HE'S LEARNING TO DRIVE, AND THERE'S GOING TO BE TOO MUCH TRAFFIC BETWEEN ALL THESE MULTIFAMILY HOMES. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THESE KIDS GETTING IN CAR WRECKS BECAUSE THERE'S TOO MUCH TRAFFIC RIGHT THERE ALREADY. SO THAT'S MY CONCERN IS ABOUT THE CHILDREN. HOW MANY WHAT ABOUT THE SCHOOLS? ARE Y'ALL BUILDING MORE SCHOOLS BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAVE THREE HIGH SCHOOLS, AND ALL THREE HIGH SCHOOLS ARE PRETTY MUCH PACKED. AND IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOLS, I MEAN, THERE'S NO OTHER MIDDLE SCHOOL OVER THERE, BUT SCOTT JOHNSON. AND THAT'S THE SCHOOL. THAT'S JUST IT'S CHAOS ALREADY TRYING TO GET INTO THAT SCHOOL. AND THEN YOU HAVE THE MCKINNEY NORTH, WHERE PARENTS HAVE TO WAIT FOR AN HOUR TO PICK UP THEIR KIDS. AND NOW YOU'RE GOING AN ADDITIONAL HOUR TO PICK UP THE CHILDREN, BECAUSE IT IS GOING TO BE A LOT OF TRAFFIC. AND IT'S VERY DANGEROUS INTERSECTION RIGHT THERE AT WILMOTH AND COMMUNITY, I SEE A LOT OF KIDS COMING OUT OF THE SCHOOL GETTING IN WRECKS. WHEN MY SON'S WHEN HE STARTS DRIVING, HE'S GOING TO BE NEWLY DRIVING. SO THAT'S MY CONCERN IS HOW WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO WITH ALL THESE CHILDREN THAT COME IN WITH NO PLACE TO PUT THEM? AND THEN THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? ANYONE ELSE? WELL, WE WILL DO IS WE WILL LOOK FOR A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN ADDRESS QUESTIONS WITH STAFF. AND ALSO THE APPLICANT. BUT WE WILL REFRAIN FROM DOING IS ANSWERING QUESTIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE. AGAIN IF YOU IF YOUR QUESTION IS NOT ANSWERED, YOU FEEL FREE TO STAY AROUND AFTER THE MEETING AND TALK TO THE STAFF TO GET AN ANSWER. BUT IN ORDER TO KEEP THE MEETING MOVING, WE'LL LIMIT CONVERSATIONS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMBERS, THE STAFF AND THEN THE APPLICANT. AND THEN WHEN WE GET THROUGH WITH THOSE QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES, WE WILL LOOK FOR A MOTION ONE WAY OR ANOTHER TO SEND THIS ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL. SO WITH THAT, IF THERE'S ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK THAT HASN'T HAD A CHANCE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. AND MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LEBEAU TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND BY MR. WHATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. I THANK. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. NOW WE'LL HAVE QUESTIONS OF EITHER THE STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST. STAFF ARE. YOU'RE UP? YES, SIR. SORRY, I'VE GOT SOME QUESTIONS. SURE. IS WILMOTH ROAD FINISHED? AS ACCORDING TO THE FUTURE PLAN. I BELIEVE A PORTION OF THAT ROAD. I KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN SOME DISCUSSIONS WITH ENGINEERING. CAN YOU HEAR ME? THE WIDTH. SAY THAT AGAIN. THE WIDTH. THE COLLECTOR SIZE OR THE WIDTH OF THE ROAD? IS IT. IS IT FINAL? FINAL PHASE? I DON'T KNOW, FOR THIS PARTICULAR AREA, BUT I KNOW A PORTION OF, OF THAT ROAD IS EXTENDING WITH ANOTHER CASE, BUT NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF FOR THIS CASE I WOULD HAVE TO REFERENCE OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. AND THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT PARKING. YES. CURRENTLY THE CURRENT PARKING IS ONE PER BEDROOM. IS THAT CORRECT? SO THE WHAT THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSING. NO. THE CURRENT THE CURRENT IS TWO TWO SPACES PER UNIT, TWO SPACES PER UNIT. AND WE'RE GOING TO 175 ON THE NEXT 1.75. YES. AND HOW ABOUT THE POSTING POSTING FOR THE REZONING? THE POST I'M NOT SURE ABOUT MINIMUM MINIMUM REQUIRED TIME. OH, FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONS. IT'S ABOUT 15 DAYS TIME FRAME FROM WHEN WE NOTICE BEFORE MEETING DATE. SO AS WELL AS THE PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION WITH

[00:30:03]

THE CARDS, WE ACTUALLY ENSURE THAT THERE'S ACTUALLY SIGNS POSTED ALONG THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LINE AS WELL. WE HAVE VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT AND PHOTOS THAT SHOW D IN THE REQUIRED TIME. LINES ARE NOT REQUIRED, THEY'RE JUST EXTRA. ISN'T THAT RIGHT? NO, THE SIGNS ARE REQUIRED. THE CARDS.

THE CARDS ARE REQUIRED AS WELL, AND THEY HAVE MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS ABOUT DELAYS IN MAILING. I'M SORRY ABOUT DELAYS IN MAILING. I CAN'T CONTROL THE POST OFFICE UNFORTUNATELY, SO THAT IS WHY WE TRY TO ENSURE THAT WE SEND IT OUT WITH ENOUGH TIME THAT IT WILL REACH ALL PROPERTY OWNERS. SO IT DIDN'T GO OUT REAL QUICK FOR SOME OF THESE PEOPLE. SNAIL MAIL RIGHT? IS THERE A PARKING ALONG THE STREETS RIGHT NOW? I MEAN, YOU MENTIONED PARKING BEING A PROBLEM. THEY DON'T STORE PARKING ALONG THE STREETS. IS NOT ALLOWED. IS THAT RIGHT? SO AS FAR AS THE SITE CURRENTLY, I'M NOT CERTAIN I MAY HAVE TO REFER BACK TO THE APPLICANT, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED. I DON'T KNOW IF PEOPLE ARE PARKING ALONG THE STREETS, ALONG COMMUNITY IN WILMOTH I THINK IS THE QUESTION. THERE SHOULD BE NO PARKING ALONG COMMUNITY. YEAH, I DIDN'T SAY PARKING IS NOT PERMITTED ALONG ARTERIALS, WHICH WILMOTH AND COMMUNITY ARE BOTH DESIGNATED ARTERIALS. YEAH. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SO THIS WAS THE ZONING CHANGE WAS ACTUALLY APPROVED IN JANUARY. SO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAD MADE A MOTION FOR A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. BUT THE ITEM WAS TABLED. AND SINCE THEN WE'VE COME BACK AND THERE HAVE BEEN AT LEAST THE ONE CHANGE REGARDING THE REDUCTION OF THE PROPERTY SIZE AND CAPPING IT AT 460 UNITS, WHICH DOES ALIGN WITH WHAT IS EXISTING UNDER OUR STRAIGHT ZONING, MF 30 AND AS WELL AS RIGHT NOW, THE PROPERTY UNDER ITS CURRENT ZONING DOES ALLOW FOR MULTI-FAMILY USES FOR THE MAJORITY. THERE'S A PIECE OF IT THAT'S PLANNED CENTER RIGHT. IT'S A PD AND C PLAN CENTER, BUT IT FOLLOWS THE UNDERLYING ZONING OF RG 18 WHICH UNDER CURRENT STANDARDS WOULD ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY UNDER THE MR. ZONING DISTRICT. HOW MANY UNITS ARE CURRENTLY APPROVED. SO THEY ARE 18. SO FOR TRADITIONAL IT WOULD ALLOW FOR UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING OF RG 18 WHICH FOLLOWS THE MULTIFAMILY OR EXCUSE ME THE MR. MIXED RESIDENTIAL. IT COULD ALLOW FOR UP TO 24 UNITS PER THE ACRE. AND WE'RE PLANNING 29.

WELL THEY'RE CAPPING IT AT 460. SO INSTEAD OF ADDING A UNIT COUNT TO AN ACRE RATIO, THEY'RE JUST CAPPING IT AT 460 UNITS. SO ROUGHLY ABOUT 29 UNIT TO THE ACRE. SO ABOUT FOUR MORE TIMES 15, ABOUT 60 MORE. IF THE MATH SERVES. 16 SO 25 UNITS PER ACRE FOR 18.7 ACRES IS 469 UNITS.

CURRENTLY ALLOWED. SO 24 TO THE ACRE. OKAY, I THINK WE'RE SAYING THE SAME THING, BUT WE'RE SAYING IT DIFFERENTLY. YES. YEAH, 469 UNITS TOTAL WOULD BE ALLOWED TODAY. AND THAT ZONING WAS APPROVED WHEN SINCE 1986, I BELIEVE UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTY, NOT WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE CASE COMING THROUGH ZONING. YES. THE CURRENT ZONING FROM 1986, ROUGHLY 1986, I BELIEVE. YES, 18 WOULD ALLOW FROM 1985 85. OKAY. SO BEFORE US IS JUST BRINGING THIS UP TO STANDARDS AND MAKING IT MF 30 REGULATIONS. SO IT'S ALIGNING WITH OUR CURRENT ZONING MF 30 UNDER THE CODE, WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. TRAFFIC.

TRAFFIC NEAR THE SITE WAS BROUGHT UP MORE THAN ONCE. IS THERE A PROCESS IN PLACE FOR TRAFFIC STUDIES OR TRAFFIC COUNTS PRIOR TO THIS DEVELOPMENT, OR ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT BEING APPROVED AT WHAT PART OF THE PROCESS DOES THAT COME INTO PLAY? SO THAT WOULD COME AT THE SITE PLAN. SO IF THE PROPERTY IS APPROVED FOR THE REQUESTED ZONING, IT WOULD THEN FOLLOW THE SITE PLAN PROCESS. IF THERE'S ANY REQUIREMENTS, USUALLY FROM OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, THEY WOULD TAKE CARE OF THE TRAFFIC INFORMATION AND THEY HAVE THEIR

[00:35:04]

OWN MEASURES OF WHAT WOULD TRIGGER A REQUIREMENT FOR TRAFFIC STUDY. OKAY. VERY GOOD.

OTHER QUESTIONS. A QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT. SURE. PLEASE. THANK YOU. THERE WAS A REFERENCE TO OTHER USES ALLOWED. AND YOU YOU POINTED OUT THAT YOU YOU DO NOT HAVE A SITE PLAN TODAY. CAN YOU ADDRESS POTENTIALLY OTHER USES THAT MIGHT COME IN THAT YOUR CLIENT MIGHT DEVELOP A PROPERTY AS WELL? I'M REPRESENTING THE PROPOSED PURCHASER. SO THE ONLY THING MY CLIENT IS INTERESTED IN DOING IS DEVELOPING THIS MULTIFAMILY PROJECT. BUT THE PLAN CENTER ZONING THAT IS THERE TODAY, IF NOTHING ELSE HAPPENED, WOULD ALLOW ANY NUMBER OF RANGES OF COMMERCIAL AS WELL AS MULTIFAMILY. SO YOU COULD HAVE A STRING OF CHICK FIL A'S AND ANYTHING ELSE. YOU THINK THOSE ARE ALL ALLOWED UNDER PLAN CENTER ALONG COMMUNITY AND ALONG WILMOTH. SO I MEAN, AND TRAFFIC I THINK IS BAD EVERYWHERE IN MCKINNEY. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT Y'ALL, BUT I THINK JUST WITHIN THE LAST TWO MONTHS, DRIVING ON CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY IS LOCKED.

BOTH DIRECTIONS. I DON'T I DON'T KNOW HOW IT GOT THAT WAY. SO QUICKLY. BUT ONE THING ABOUT MULTIFAMILY IS, UNLIKE OTHER TYPES OF COMMERCIAL. USES THAT COME AND GO ALL DAY LONG, THE PEAKS FOR MULTIFAMILY ARE TYPICALLY IN THE MORNING WHEN PEOPLE GO TO WORK OR TAKE CHILDREN TO CHILDCARE, OR THEY'RE IN THE EVENING WHEN PEOPLE COME HOME AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IS PRETTY GOOD ABOUT TRYING TO REGULATE THEIR BEGINNING HOURS AND ENDING HOURS SO THAT THEY'RE NOT HITTING THE RUSH HOUR PEAKS THAT HAVE BEEN THE NORM IN MCKINNEY FOREVER. SO THAT COUPLED WITH THE FACT THAT THIS IS A RESTRICT, THESE ARE BOTH RESTRICTED STREETS.

SOMEBODY MENTIONED MAYBE MAYBE YOU MISS HAMMOCK THAT YOU CAN'T PARK ON COLLECTOR STREETS. AND THIS THIS COMPLEX IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ALL OF THE PARKING INTERNALLY. THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? IT DID. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ONE QUICK QUESTION ON YOUR LETTER OF INTENT ITEM FIVE IS SPEAKS TO PROVIDING TWO AMENITIES IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM. THAT'S TWO ABOVE AND BEYOND THE MINIMUM REQUIRED IN THE UDO. AFTER REZONING. CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.

AND I THINK THAT TAKES US TO SEVEN. I'M NOT NOT SURE, BUT I'D HAVE TO GO CHECK IT OUT. BUT THANK YOU. HOW MANY ACRES IS ALREADY ZONED COMMERCIAL OR APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL. WELL THAT ENTIRE TRACT. AND I'D HAVE TO GO BACK AND LOOK. BUT IT'S WELL OVER 100 ACRES. AND THE OWNER OF THAT TRACT IS ALSO THE OWNER OF THE BMW PLACE. SO. AND THAT OWNER HAS OWNED THE TRACK FOR QUITE A WHILE. BUT ON THIS 15 ACRES, HOW MUCH OF IT IS HOW MUCH ON THIS 15 ACRES, HOW MUCH OF IT IS CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED FOR COMMERCIAL? I THINK IF ANYTHING, MR. LEBOW, IT WAS JUST A VERY SLIVER ON THE WEST. I MEAN, ON THE EAST SIDE. AND MAYBE THAT MAP SHOWS IS THAT MAP INTENDED TO SHOW? YEAH, THE BLACK OUT THE BLACK. OKAY. I THINK. YEAH. EXACTLY. OKAY.

YEAH. THAT'S THE PIECE CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL. OKAY. IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, MOST OF IT TO THE EAST EAST OF THAT. EAST OF THAT BLUE LINE. YEAH. THE EAST PART IS ZONED ONLY COMMERCIAL BETWEEN THE BLUE LINE AND COMMUNITY IS ZONED THE RG 18 TODAY BASED OFF OF THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT OF THE EXISTING RG 18 TRACT. IT'S APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES. THREE THREE. THAT IS COMMERCIAL.

SOMEBODY MADE A COMMENT ABOUT THESE MULTIFAMILY RESEMBLING THE MULTIFAMILY ACROSS WILMOTH. IS THAT TO THE NORTH? THESE ARE DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS. THE ONE ACROSS WILMOTH I THINK WILL TURN OUT TO BE A VERY NICE LOOKING PROJECT, BUT I WOULD EXPECT THAT THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OF THIS ONE WILL BE DIFFERENT. OTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE? MR. ROEDER THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY DISCUSSIONS? MOTIONS. THE WAY I SEE IT, IT CAN ALREADY BE DEVELOPED AS COMMERCIAL OR MULTIFAMILY. SO WE'RE NOT MAKING THAT MUCH OF A CHANGE. BRINGING IT UP TO PARKING STANDARDS THAT

[00:40:04]

WE'RE LOOKING AT ADOPTING AND BRINGING IT UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS OF MF 30. DO YOU AGRE? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. BUCKNER TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PER APPLICANT REQUEST. I'LL SECOND IT. SECONDED BY MR. LEBEAU. ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. I. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES BY A VOTE OF SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST.

THAT WILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AT THE NOVEMBER 19TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THAT WILL BE IN THIS ROOM IN THE SAME, SAME PROCESS, WILL TAKE PLACE AT THE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to modify the Development Standards and Allow for Commercial Uses, Located on the Northeast Corner of Collin McKinney Parkway and Piper Glen Road]

CITY COUNCIL LEVEL. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS 24-0081Z. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD TO PD TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USES. THIS IS ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MCKINNEY PARKWAY AND PIPER GLEN ROAD. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. AGAIN. ARACELI BOTELLO, PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS MENTIONED, THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THE INTENT IS TO REZONE TO ALLOW FOR GENERAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USES SPECIFICALLY TO INCLUDE THE USE OF CLINIC, MEDICAL AND DENTAL USES. COMFORTABLE IS STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THE REQUEST AS THE PROPERTY PROPOSES THAT THE USES THAT THEY PROPOSE ALIGN WITH WHAT'S EXISTING IN THE AREA, AND THERE ARE NO OTHER ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE STANDARDS THAT WERE ARE CURRENTLY IN PLACE. OTHER. OTHER THAN ADDING THIS ADDITIONAL USE, THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ARI. ANYONE QUESTIONS? CAN YOU SAY DENTAL OR MEDICAL CLINIC? IS THAT THE SAME AS LIKE A MEDICAL OFFICE OR IS THAT A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT USE. SO DENTAL AND MEDICAL ARE OFFICES. CLINIC IS LIKE KIND OF LIKE THE CLINIC THAT YOU GO TO SEE A DOCTOR WITH MULTIPLE DOCTORS IN THE AREA OR IN THE, IN THE, IN THE, IN THE BUILDING. SO ALL THESE USES ARE INTENDED FOR TYPE OF MEDICAL OFFICE USE. OKAY.

I'LL MAKE SURE IT WASN'T A DIFFERENT USAGE THAN WHAT. YEAH. ANYONE ELSE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE AN APPLICANT HERE? YES, SIR. MR. ROEDER, THANK YOU. BOB ROEDER, 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300. MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, I THINK, AS ARI SAID, THE ONLY THING HISTORY HERE, I DID THE ORIGINAL ZONING BACK A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. I ASSUMED THAT THE TERM OFFICE INCLUDED MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES, AND I FOUND OUT THAT IT DIDN'T. WHEN WE GOT READY TO PULL A PERMIT, WHEN MY CLIENT GOT READY TO PULL A PERMIT TO FINISH OUT A MEDICAL OFFICE. SO IF YOU'RE DOING ANY TYPE OF PROCEDURES, LIKE A DENTIST WOULD DO, THAT WOULD REQUIRE YOU TO BE IN A CLINIC IN THE MEDICAL OFFICE AND DENTAL CLINIC. THE BIGGEST DISTINCTION, I THINK YOU CAN DRAW ABOUT THAT VERSUS A HOSPITAL WOULD BE GENERAL ANESTHESIA IS NOT ALLOWED IN THESE SITUATIONS. YOU DON'T HAVE EMERGENCY CARE AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF. SO THESE THE PARTICULAR USER IS. IS A PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY CLINIC. BUT BECAUSE YOU DO SOME PROCEDURES IN THERE WE HAD TO GO THE CLINIC ROUTE. NOW THIS ZONING WOULD ALLOW OTHER TYPES OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL USES IN THIS SAME PROPERTY, BUT THEY WOULD STILL BE THE KIND OF THING YOU'D SEE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS CENTER. SO I'D I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS? I'VE GOT ONE DENTIST ON THE TABLE HERE.

QUESTIONS I UNDERSTAND, RUSS. SORRY, BUT I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION. SO THE CURRENT PERMIT WOULD ALLOW FOR WHAT KIND OF BUSINESSES TO BE ON THAT? WELL, IT'S ZONED OFFICE. AND SO YOU CAN DO ANY TYPE OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. THAT'S WHAT I THINK OF YOU KNOW A, A COUNSELOR ANYTIME,

[00:45:10]

ANYTHING LIKE THAT. OKAY. THANKS. THAT'S THAT'S A GOOD ANSWER. MY QUESTION. THANK YOU.

MR. ROEDER. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IF YOU'VE COME TONIGHT, TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE AT COLUMN MCKINNEY PARKWAY AND PIPER GLEN ROAD, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE 0081Z BY PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LEBEAU TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION, SECONDED BY MR. WOODARD. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSIO? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WAITING ON YOU, CAITLYN. I. THIS MOTION CARRIES BY A VOTE OF SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST, AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AT THE NOVEMBER 19TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. NOVEMBER 19TH.

GENTLEMEN. ONLY KIDDING. NOVEMBER. THE 11TH. I'M SORRY. NOVEMBER THE 5TH. NOVEMBER THE FIFTH. THIS GOES TO CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER THE 5TH, ON WHAT'S GOING TO. THAT'S NOVEMBER THE 22ND. NOVEMBER THE 5TH. I APOLOGIZE FOR THE CONFUSION. NOVEMBER THE FIFTH, WITH A

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Properties from PD - Planned Development District and AG - Agricultural District to “I1” - Light Industrial District, Located on the North Side of McIntyre Road and Approximately 1780 feet East of the Intersection of North McDonald Street and McIntyre Road]

FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS 24-0087Z. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONE OF A PROPERTY FROM PD AND AG TO L1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MCINTYRE ROAD, 1780 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH MCDONALD STREET AND MCINTYRE ROAD. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. AGAIN. ARACELI BOTELLO, PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS MENTIONED, THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 143 ACRES FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND AGRICULTURAL TO I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. SORRY, LET ME MAKE SURE. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED TO ALLOW FOR PRIMARILY LIGHT MANUFACTURING USES. THE ORDINANCE ESTABLISHED FROM 1986, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE OAK HOLLOW DISTRICT AND CALLS FOR LARGELY AS DEFINED BY EMPLOYMENT, MIXED PLACE TYPE, WHICH CALLS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES. OFFICE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT TYPES AND OTHER BUSINESSES. THE PROPERTY IS ALSO SITUATED AND I HAVE A MAP HERE. I WANTED TO SHOW SITUATED WHERE THERE ARE POTENTIAL RIGHT OF WAYS HERE THAT ARE GOING TO BE POTENTIALLY EXPANDED. WILMOTH ROAD AND AIRPORT DRIVE HERE NOTED ALONG THESE AREAS THROUGH THE PROPERT. THIS WOULD BE A POTENTIALLY FOR A SIX LANE RIGHT OF WAY. THE PROPERTY IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN FLOODWAY, WHICH IS ALL THIS RIGHT HERE. AND THEN FLOODPLAIN. ALL THIS RIGHT HERE. SO NOTING THESE ALSO THAT THE PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO SOME TYPE OF SOME RESIDENTIAL USES, SOME MULTIFAMILY AND SOME SINGLE FAMILY. BUT THESE ARE BUFFERED BY THE EXISTING KIND OF TRINITY OR EXCUSE ME, EAST FORK RIVER ALONG THIS AREA. AND IT CREATES ALSO A NATURAL BUFFER ALONG THIS SECTION OF THE PROPERTY HERE TO THE WEST, KIND OF PROVIDING SOME BUFFER BETWEEN THOSE RESIDENTIAL USES. AND THEN AFTER CONSIDERATION OF ALL THIS INFORMATION, GIVEN THAT THE PROPERTY WAS ALSO NOTED AS PER THE PREVIOUS CONCEPT PLAN AND WHAT THE CONCEPT PLAN, EXCUSE ME, CONCEPT PLAN ASKS FOR TODAY, THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY IN THIS NATURAL BUFFER AREA ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST, AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. CAN YOU JUST SPEAK TO AGAIN WHAT'S ALLOWED BASED ON THE CURRENT PD? BECAUSE I BELIEVE YOU SAID MANUFACTURING USES AND OTHERS COULD BE MORE NOXIOUS, I'D SAY, THAN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. SO RIGHT AS, AS CURRENTLY ZONED, THE PROPERTY ALLOWS FOR PRIMARILY

[00:50:06]

LIGHT MANUFACTURING USES ON THE SITE. AS FAR AS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UNDER THE EMPLOYMENT MIXED PLACE TYPE, IT ALSO CALLS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, OFFICES, INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT TYPES AND OTHER BUSINESSES. THANK YOU. ADDITIONALLY, THE LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT ACTUALLY CORRELATES TO OUR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND THE UDC, SO THEY WOULD BE LIKE TO LIKE SIMILAR. OKAY, SO FROM PD JUST TO STRAIGHT ZONING CORRECT? YES.

THANK YOU. THERE ARE SOME OFFICE USES PERMITTED AS WELL. OKAY. THANK YOU. SORRY. ON PAGE TWO OF FOUR IN YOUR STAFF REPORT AS A REFERENCE TO A NATURAL TREE LINE THAT SEPARATES THE PROPERTY FROM EXISTING RESIDENTIAL. YOU KNOW, IF I GET THIS RIGHT, LOOKING AT TREE LINE. YES, THAT IS CORRECT.

OKAY. SO THAT WOULD BE A NATURAL TREE LINE. AND A FLOODPLAIN WITH THE EAST FORK TRIBUTARY. OKAY.

WOULD THERE BE ADDITIONAL SCREENING REQUIRED LIKE FENCING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BECAUSE IN ADDITION TO THE BUFFER, OR IS THE BUFFERS THE. SO IF THERE IS EXISTING FLOODPLAIN, IT'S ONE OF THE EXCEPTIONS FROM SCREENING, ESPECIALLY IF THERE ARE QUALITY TREES ALSO INCREASES THE EXCEPTION FOR FROM SCREENING FROM ADJACENCY. TO RESIDENTIAL USES AND. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

IS THERE AN APPLICANT HERE. YES. MR. RODERICK. YEAH. DID YOU WANT TO. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. COULD YOU PUT IT BACK WHERE YOU GOT THE MAPS THAT YOU WERE JUST LOOKING AT THESE RIGHT HERE. PERFECT.

OKAY. THANK YOU. THIS IS MY DAY, ISN'T IT? BOB RODER, 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300. MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, THE. I WANT TO BE ABSOLUTELY CLEAR SO THAT THERE'S NO MISUNDERSTANDING TODAY UNDER THE PD, A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST UP THE SOUTH, A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST PART OF THIS PROPERTY DOES HAVE AN O DESIGNATION UNDER THE PD. AND REALLY, THE REASON WE'RE HERE IS TO GET IT ALL UNDER THE L ONE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE. I THINK ARI DID A GOOD JOB OF EXPLAINING THE BUFFER SITUATION, BUT LET ME ADD A LITTLE THING, A FEW THINGS TO IT. WE HAVE A TREE ORDINANCE IN MCKINNEY AND THE TREE ORDINANCE BASICALLY SAYS YOU CANNOT REMOVE TREES FROM THE FLOODPLAIN. AND SO WHAT THIS WHAT THESE DRAWINGS ARE SHOWING IS THE LIMITS OF THE FLOODPLAIN UNDER THE FEMA MAP WITHIN WHICH I'M SURE MOST OF YOU HAVE PROBABLY DRIVEN OUT THERE. IT'S HEAVILY TREED, BUT THOSE TREES ARE GOING TO HAVE TO REMAIN WHERE THEY ARE. YOU ALSO HAVE A FLOOD HAZARD SETBACK. EROSION SETBACK, I GUESS, IS WHAT I WOULD CALL THAT IS A IT'S A FUNCTION OF SO MANY FEET BACK FOR SO MANY FEET OF DEPTH OF THE CREEK. AND THIS IS NOT A SHALLOW CREEK HERE. SO YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A FAIRLY SIGNIFICANT SETBACK FOR, FOR THE FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. THE OTHER THING I WANT TO POINT OUT, THE DIAGRAM ON THE ON YOUR LEFT SHOWS THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF WILMOTH, THE EXTENSION OF WILMOTH AND THE AND THAT IS GOING TO GO THROUGH ONE OF THE FLOOD ZONES OUT THERE. THAT'S NOT A DEVELOPABLE, DEVELOPABLE AREA, BUT THE GREEN IS THE ONLY DEVELOPABLE AREA RIGHT NOW. AND THAT BARELY GOES FAR ENOUGH NORTH TO WHERE IT HITS THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST. I THINK THE STAFF'S REPORT SAYS THAT'S A GOOD 300FT ACROSS. THERE. YOU YOU MIGHT RECALL YOU HEARD A COUPLE OF MEETINGS AGO, THE EAST GROUP'S REQUEST TO ZONE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY AND HARDIN IN THAT CASE, THEY HAD A 225 FOOT SETBACK. SO THIS BUFFER NATURAL BUFFER WOULD BE MUCH GREATER THAN THAT. AS A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THING. THESE WILL BE BUILDINGS SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU'VE SEEN NOW BEING DEVELOPED ON 121. AND THAT THAT'S ACROSS FROM THE HIGH SCHOOLS. THE NEW HIGH SCHOOL STADIUM AND ALSO THOSE THAT YOU SEE ON WILMOTH AND HIGHWAY FIVE.

[00:55:01]

SO THAT'S THE KIND OF THING WE'RE HAVING. AND THESE ARE NOT NOT NECESSARILY MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS. THEY'RE STORAGE. AND BUILDINGS LIKE THAT. YOU KNOW, SHIPPING THAT KIND OF THING. A LOT OF THESE TENANTS WILL PROBABLY BE WHOLESALERS THAT USE THE BUILDINGS FOR THEIR STOCK.

SO THAT'S THE TYPICAL MIX THAT I'M SEEING IN MCKINNEY. LET ME STOP THERE. BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. QUESTIONS? ANYONE? WHERE IS THE ZONING CURRENTLY? YOU SAID IT'S DOWN IN THE SOUTH. IT'S IN. IT'S IN THE SOUTH WEST PORTION. THANK YOU, MR. ROEDER. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE AT NORTH MCDONALD AND MCINTYRE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. YES, SIR. HELLO. MY NAME IS ANDREW INGRAM.

I LIVE AT 604 TWIN KNOLL DRIVE. I'M ACTUALLY BUTTING UP AGAINST THAT PROPERTY RIGHT THERE. WHAT? THAT DOES NOT SHOW WHAT THE MAP DOES NOT SHOW IS THE VOLUME OF WAREHOUSES THAT ARE ALREADY BUILT. AND A LOT OF OUR VACANT ALL THE WAY DOWN HIGHWAY FIVE, ALL THE WAY DOWN WILMOTH FURTHER BETWEEN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE APARTMENT COMPLEX, THERE'S ANOTHER APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT'S SCHEDULED TO BE GOING IN. SO YOU'RE BUTTING UP AGAINST THAT CREEK ON BOTH SIDES. WE'RE THE ONLY NEIGHBORHOOD ANYWHERE NEAR THIS. THE NEXT CLOSEST WOULD BE THE WILLOWWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD.

FURTHER DOWN ON HIGHWAY FIVE TO THE NORTH, AND THEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO PRESS ELEMENTARY. MY PROBLEM WITH THIS IS THE IMPACT ON PROPERTY VALUES, THE FACT THAT HIGHWAY FIVE, GRANTED, IT'S A STATE ROAD. IT'S NOT A CITY OR A COUNTY ROAD IS TWO LANE. WE'VE ALREADY GOT MASSIVE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS AT THAT LOCATION. WILMOTH AND HIGHWAY FIVE. YOU'VE GOT 18 WHEELERS THAT ARE RUNNING UP AND DOWN BOTH HIGHWAY FIVE AND WILMOTH ROAD, GOING FROM ONE OR HIGHWAY 5 TO 75. BECAUSE OF THE WAREHOUSES THAT ARE CURRENTLY THERE. THERE, IT STARTED WITH A BLOCKBUSTER WAREHOUSE THAT CLOSED AND HAS BEEN TAKEN OVER BY UPS AND A STORAGE UNIT. SO YOU'RE ADDING IN 18 WHEELER TRAFFIC TO AN ALREADY CONGESTED AREA. YOU'RE ADDING IN ISSUES TO THE ONLY SINGLE FAMILY UNIT THAT'S THERE. AS FAR AS TRAFFIC AND PROPERTY VALUE, YOU'RE DESTROYING WHAT THE CITY OF MCKINNEY CALLS UNIQUE BY NATURE, BY GOING RIGHT UP AGAINST THE CREEK AND THE WOODED AREAS THERE. YES, THERE ARE SOME MASSIVE, MASSIVE TREES THAT HAVE BEEN THERE LONG BEFORE MY NEIGHBORHOOD WAS ITS IMPACT ON THE WILDLIFE THERE. WE HAVE HAWKS, WE HAVE POSSUMS, WE HAVE ARMADILLOS. WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO GO? INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, PROBABLY. WE'VE ALREADY GOT PROBLEMS IN OUR LANDSCAPE NOW BECAUSE THE ARMADILLOS. SO I'M VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED TO THIS, YOU KNOW, PUT ANOTHER RESIDENTIAL AREA. LIKE I SAID, WE'RE IT.

THERE'S NOTHING NEAR US EXCEPT FOR WAREHOUSES AND THE GOLF COURSE. SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, MR. INGRAM. ANYONE ELSE HERE TONIGHT TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARIN. SECOND, BY MR. CONRAD, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? EXCUSE ME. ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. CONRAD.

YOU GOOD? OH, I SORRY. WITH THAT MOTION CARRIES THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. NOW WE HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT STAFF. THANK YOU. ARI, WHAT ARE THE EXISTING BY RIGHT? WHAT CAN BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY BEFORE THIS APPLICATIO? SO RIGHT NOW IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED. IT ALLOWS FOR LIKE I HAD MENTIONED LIGHT MANUFACTURING USES. THERE IS A LIST ON YOUR

[01:00:04]

REPORT. IT KIND OF OUTLINED THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF USES FOR THIS ONE. BUT ALSO THERE WAS AND I FORGOT TO MENTION THAT. AND I THANK YOU FOR MR. ROEDER FOR KIND OF COMING BACK. THERE'S ALSO A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY HERE TO THE WEST, WHERE HE NOTED HERE THAT DOES ALLOW FOR OFFICE USES CURRENTLY AS OWNED. IT'S A CURRENT, SO THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL ZONING EXISTING CURRENTLY ON THE PROPERTY UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING, NOT NO. THE POINT. ANYONE ELSE ARE THE CURRENT ZONING HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE WHEN? 1986 1986. OKAY. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT, ANYONE? MR. RODERICK, IF YOU COULD COME UP, PLEASE. THERE WAS A REFERENCE TO THE CURRENT ZONING AND ALSO THE PROPOSED ZONING AND THE TREES, AND THEN A RESIDENTIAL POSSIBILITY FROM FROM YOUR CHAIR. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON YOUR REQUEST VERSUS A RESIDENTIAL ZONING? WELL, WE HAVE THIS 2040 PLAN THAT HAS LOOKED AT ALL THIS COMPREHENSIVELY. AND THIS IS CERTAINLY DESIGNATED FOR THE TYPE OF USE WE'RE SEEKING HERE. NOT RESIDENTIAL. RESIDENTIAL IS MAYBE A SECONDARY USE, BUT I WANT TO POINT SOMETHING OUT BECAUSE THE COMMENT WAS WAS WELL MADE ABOUT TRAFFIC. MY CLIENT WOULD NOT INVEST IN THIS PROPERTY AND WOULD NOT INVEST IN BUILDING WAREHOUSES OR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ON THIS PROPERTY IF IT DIDN'T HAVE A SOLUTION TO THE CURRENT TRAFFIC. MCINTYRE IF YOU'VE DRIVEN DOWN MCINTYRE ROAD, THAT'S A SUBSTANDARD ROAD, AND THAT ROAD IS NOT GOING TO BE THE ROAD THAT SERVICES THIS PROPERTY. THIS PROPERTY IS BEING DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY'S PLAN TO EXTEND WILMOTH ROAD THAT'S SHOWN UP THERE ON THE NORTH. AND WHEN THAT IS EXTENDED, THIS PROPERTY WILL THAT WILL BE THE MAIN CONNECTION FOR THIS PROPERTY, WHICH WILL TAKE, WE HOPE, THE TRUCKS OFF OF HIGHWAY FIVE AND PUT THEM ON WILMOTH ROAD, WHERE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE, AND WILL ALSO TAKE THEM ON DOWN TO 380 WHERE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE. SO I NOTHING IS CAST IN STONE, BUT THE DISCUSSIONS ARE THAT THIS PROPERTY WOULD BE DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EXTENSION OF WILMOTH ROAD. THERE. SO HOPEFULLY THIS WILL BE MORE OF A BLESSING THAN A CURSE TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ALONG HIGHWAY FIVE. OTHER QUESTIONS? DO YOU ANTICIPATE ACCESS FROM THE AIRPORT ROAD EXTENSION AS WELL OR. YEAH, I MEAN, I THINK WHATEVER ROADS THERE ARE YOU WOULD WANT TO USE FOR ACCESS, BUT THE PRIMARY ACCESS I THINK WILL BE WILMOTH WHEN IT'S CONSTRUCTED. JUST BECAUSE OF HOW IT GETS TO 75. ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU, MR. RODERICK. OKAY.

ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR WE HAVE A MOTION. TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 0087C PER STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. A MOTION BY MR. LEBEAU TO APPROVE THE ITEM. 24-0087 PER STAFF RECOMMENDATIO.

SECOND. SECOND BY MR. WHATLEY. ANY DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. I. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES ON. ITEM GOES TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING AND ZONING AT THE NOVEMBER 19, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. NOVEMBER 19TH, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

OKAY, THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARING. AGENDA ITEMS. THERE IS ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS PLANNING ZONING ON ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ON OUR AGENDA. SO IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON NON AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL

[COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS]

RIGHT. SEEING NONE, NEXT ITEM WOULD BE STAFF COMMENTS. ANNOUNCEMENTS. I JUST WANTED TO GIVE A QUICK SHOUT OUT TO ARI. SHE STEPPED IN FOR ONE OF TWO OF THESE CASES FOR RODERICK. SO SHE

[01:05:05]

STEPPED IN TO HELP US OUT TONIGHT. SO THANK YOU ARI. ARI. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU STEPPING UP LIKE THAT VERY MUCH. OH, AND I ALSO WANTED TO INTRODUCE OUR NEW PLANNING TECH, BRENDA CATES. BRENDA, WELCOME. WE'RE GLAD TO HAVE YOU. IS THAT A NEW OUR NEW PLANNING TECHNICIAN. WE ACTUALLY HAVE TWO PLANNING TECHNICIANS. YOU'LL ALSO BE ABLE TO MEET OUR NEXT ONE SOON. MEMBERS. ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS? DEIRDRE, I JUST WANTED TO COMMENT ON JENNIFER'S WONDERFUL TOUR THAT SHE GAVE AS PART OF THE APA TEXAS MEETING. A COUPLE OF US WERE IN ATTENDANCE IN THAT. AND JUST THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE ABLE TO FURTHER OUR EDUCATION. SO GREAT, MISS ARNOLD. THANK YOU. YOU DO MORE THAN THAN YOU LEAD ON. WE APPRECIATE YOU VERY MUCH. YES YOU DO. WE APPRECIATE YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. WE DO NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN, A MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND, TO ADJOURN SECOND, SECOND BY. MISS WOODARD, ANY DISCUSSION, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. I, I THAT MOTION CARRIES. IT IS 708

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.