Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan for Warehouse Facility (Encore Wire), Located on 900 South Airport Drive (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Variance to a Site Plan for Warehouse Facility (Encore Wire), Located on 900 South Airport Drive (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)]

THAT MOTION DOES CARRY. THE MINUTES HAVE BEEN APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM WILL BE OUR REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. THESE ITEMS WILL HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS ATTACHED. THE FIRST ITEM IS 24-0079 SP A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A VARIANCE TO A SITE PLAN FOR A WAREHOUSE FACILITY. ENCORE.

WIRE. THIS IS AT 900 SOUTH AIRPORT DRIVE. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. ARACELI MATEO, PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST TO THE TO THE COMMISSION IF WE CAN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND. SORRY. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM INDEFINITELY DUE TO A NOTICING ERROR. WE WILL BE RE NOTICING AGAIN TO THE NEXT MEETING. PRIOR TO THE MEETING DATE. THANK YOU. SO IF YOU'RE IN THE AUDIENCE AND YOU'RE HERE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THE ENCORE WIRE SITE PLAN VARIANCE, WE ARE LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO TABLE THE ITEM. THERE WAS A NOTIFICATION ISSUE. THE ITEM WILL BE TABLED INDEFINITELY. THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING COMPONENT ATTACHED. SO IF YOU'VE MADE THE EFFORT TO BE HERE TONIGHT, YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO COME TO THE PODIUM. OTHERWISE, WE WILL BE LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO TABLE THE ITEM AND WE WILL RENOTICE THOSE IN THE AREA. HOW'D I DO? GOOD.

GREAT. AWESOME. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? CHAIRMAN? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM INDEFINITELY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM INDEFINITELY. SECOND. SECOND BY MISS WOODARD. YOU GOT TO SPEED UP DOWN THERE. THERE'S AN ECHO IN THE ROOM. MOTION BY MR. LOBO. SECONDED BY MISS WOODARD. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. I OH, SORRY. KATE. I'LL DO BETTER NEXT TIME. THAT MOTION

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for a Major Vehicle Repair and Automobile Storage (Hendrick Automotive), Located on the South Side of Wilmeth Road and Approximately 865 feet West of the Intersection of US Highway 75 and Wilmeth Road]

CARRIES. THE ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED INDEFINITELY. THE NEXT ITEM IS ITEM 24-0012. SUP. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND

[00:05:07]

AUTOMOBILE STORAGE FACILITY. HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE. THIS IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILMOTH ROAD, 865FT WEST OF 75 AND WILMOTH ROAD. MR. PALMER. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS. BRODERICK PALMER, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. I'M TRYING TO GET THIS TO WORK REAL FAST. SO WE CAN GET TO THE EXHIBIT THAT IS NOT. BEFORE. ALL RIGHT.

CAN I GET AN ASSIST? COOL. THANK YOU. THAT'S FINE. ALL RIGHT, SO THIS PROPERTY, AS YOU MENTIONED, IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILMOTH ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 865FT WEST OF THE INTERSECTION FOR US 75 AND WILMOTH ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND AUTOMOBILE STORAGE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE GOVERNING ZONING DISTRICT C PLAN CENTER REQUIRES THAT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT BE GRANTED FOR MAJOR AUTOMOBILE FOR MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR, AND AUTOMOBILE STORAGE BUSINESS TO OPERATE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS PART OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A SITE LAYOUT EXHIBIT DETAILING THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING, THE PARKING LOCATIONS, AND THE INTERNAL SITE CIRCULATION. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THE SITE IS DIRECTLY. THE SITE SITS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE BMW OF MCKINNEY DEALERSHIP TO THE EAST, AND IS INTENDED TO SUPPORT THE EXISTING DEALERSHIP. WHILE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS ACCESS TO A MAJOR ARTERIAL, WHICH IS WILMOTH ROAD. THAT'S RIGHT ALONG THE JUST NORTH OF HERE. THE OPERATION.

THE OPERATION OF THE SITE IS NOT DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, AS IS PROPOSED. A LOT ZONED C PLAN CENTER IS BEING PRESERVED BETWEEN WILMOTH ROAD AND THE PROPOSED COLLISION CENTER. WITH THIS SEPARATION, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY TO HELP MITIGATE THE VISUAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED USES WITH THIS REQUEST. ADDITIONALLY, THE SITE IS SITUATED DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING BMW OF MCKINNEY DEALERSHIP, WHICH ALSO HOLDS A SHIELD VIEW FROM MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND AUTOMOBILE STORAGE TO US 75. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ORIENT THE SERVICE BAY DOORS AWAY FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND STORE VEHICLES AWAITING REPAIR FOR SERVICE. BEHIND AREA ENCLOSED WITH THE SIX FOOT TUBULAR STEEL FENCE WITH MASONRY COLUMNS ALONG WITH EVERGREEN SHRUBS. THESE MEASURES WILL HELP TO MINIMIZE THE VIEW OF THE BAYS AND THE STORED VEHICLES FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. WITH THE LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED SITE BEING TUCKED BEHIND A COMMERCIAL TRACK AND PROPOSED FENCING AND LANDSCAPING FOR THE PROPERTY. STAFF FEELS THAT THE PROPOSED MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND AUTOMOBILE STORAGE USE SHOULD COMPLEMENT THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SP REQUEST AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. RODERICK. QUESTIONS? ANYONE? RODERICK, I HAVE A QUESTION. SO IN TERMS OF THE AUTOMOBILES THAT ARE BEING STORED THERE, THOSE VEHICLES THAT ARE BEING WORKED ON ARE THOSE VEHICLES THAT ARE GOING TO BE AT LIKE EXCESS RETAIL FOR THE DEALERSHIP. THANK YOU. THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. SO SOME OF THE VEHICLES FROM OUR UNDERSTANDING IS GOING TO BE OF COURSE, SOME OF THE VEHICLES THAT'S BEING WORKED ON AND THEN ADDITIONAL VEHICLES THAT MAY COME THAT THEY JUST MAY HAVE STORED ON THE SITE FOR, YOU KNOW, IF YOU HAVE A COLLISION AND THEN YOU NEED A RENTAL CAR OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, IT'LL BE CARS. THAT'S FOR THAT, OR MAINTENANCE VEHICLE CARS FROM THE DEALERSHIP. AND YOU MENTIONED THAT THE SHIELDING THERE WOULD BE A STEEL FENCE. I DIDN'T HEAR WHAT WAS THE HEIGHT ON THAT WITH THE SIX FOOT, SIX FOOT. AND THEN WE'LL HAVE THE EVERGREEN SHRUBS AS WELL. RODERICK, I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS. WHAT PREVENTS VEHICLES FROM BEING STACKED AT THE SERVICE DOORS? BECAUSE THEY SAY THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT ON THEIR LETTER OF INTENT. I'LL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK MORE. SO TO THAT. BUT FROM OUR UNDERSTANDING, IT'S THE WAY THAT THEY'RE CONDUCTING THIS. SO IT WILL BE MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR. SO IT'S NOT A QUICK LUBE. A LOT OF TIMES YOU DRIVE IN FOR QUICK LUBE AND THEN THAT'S WHERE YOU HAVE THE STACKING COMPONENT. THAT'S THAT'S WITH IT. WHEREAS FOR THE MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR YOU'RE GOING TO KIND OF DROP THOSE OFF. SO THINK OF IT MORE. SO IF YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT AND YOU NEED A MAJOR REPAIR LIKE YOUR ENGINE HAS BEEN PUSHED IN OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. OKAY.

THANK YOU. AND I HAD ONE MORE QUESTION ON THE SCREENING. IT'S A SIX FOOT TUBULAR STEEL FENCE WITH MASONRY COLUMNS AND SHRUBS. IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL SCREENING BEYOND THAT THAT COULD BE REQUIRED? I MEAN, DOES THAT FALL INTO THE NORMAL RANGE OF WHAT WE DO? THAT FALLS IN THE

[00:10:02]

NORMAL RANGE FOR WHAT WE DO. THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST OF HERE IS ACTUALLY THE LOCATION WHERE WE DID THE ZONING IN THE LAST MEETING. FOR THE MULTIFAMILY, WITH THE PD, WITH THE MULTIFAMILY THAT MULTIFAMILY WILL, IF IT COMES IN, THEN THEY'LL HAVE TO THEY'LL HAVE TO SCREEN THAT WITH A MASONRY WALL. THANK YOU. HAVE A QUESTION? THE PORTION OF THE LOT THAT THERE HAS THE FRONTAGE ON WILMOTH THAT'S GOING TO KEEP THE PLANS CENTER ZONING. YES. THE SQUARE PIECE OF PROPERTY THERE OR RECTANGULAR. YEAH. THAT'LL STILL KEEP THE C PLAN CENTER ZONING, WHEREAS IT'S NOT A PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. OKAY. PARTICULARLY, HAS THERE BEEN ANY DISCUSSION OR INTENT TO CONNECT THE FACILITY TO THE ADJACENT FACILITY TO THE EAST, TO REDUCE TRAFFIC ON THE THOROUGHFARE TO THE NORTH? THANK YOU. SO CURRENTLY IT IS NOT IT WILL BE SEPARATE, SEPARATE ENTRIES FOR BOTH OF THOSE LOCATIONS. SO THE BMW WILL BE ENTERED UPON AT THEIR ENTRANCE GATE WHERE AN ENTRANCE GATE. BUT THEIR ENTRANCE AND THIS AUTOMOBILES MAJOR AUTOMOBILE, A MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND AUTOMOBILE STORAGE WILL BE ENTERED UPON STRICTLY ALONG WILMOTH. RODERICK, DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY SPACES THEY HAVE? IT MENTIONS THAT VEHICLES THAT ARE WAITING FOR REPAIR WILL BE PARKED IN DESIGNATED SPACES, BUT ALSO COMPLETED VEHICLES WILL ALSO BE PARKED IN DESIGNATED AREAS BEHIND THE BLESS YOU BEHIND THE FENCED GATED SCREENED AREAS AND EMPLOYEE PARKING WILL ALSO BE LOCATED IN THE SAME GENERAL AREA. SO DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY TOTAL PARKING SPACES THEY HAVE ALLOTTED FOR ALL OF THAT? IT'S OVER 600 SPACES THAT THEY HAVE IN THAT AREA. THAT IS SPECIFICALLY FOR THOSE VEHICLES FOR THIS SITE. OKAY. THANKS. SO THESE SERVICE BAYS WILL BE FACING WEST AND THERE'S A THERE'S A RESIDENCES WEST OF THERE. IT LOOKS LIKE THIS. THERE'S A GOOD BIT OF OFFSET. AND THERE'S AN EXISTING DEALERSHIP. THE QUESTION IS YOU KNOW, ARE THERE ARE THERE NOISE ORDINANCES THAT PROTECT THOSE RESIDENCES? RESIDENCES? SINCE THE SERVICE BAYS ARE FACING WEST FOR FROM THE MULTIFAMILY ZONING THAT IS POTENTIALLY COMING IN. SO IT IS OUR NOISE ORDINANCE THAT'S IN THAT'S IN OUR WHAT IS IT? OUR SECTION 7120, ARTICLE FIVE OF THE NOISE ORDINANCE IS WHAT WILL PROTECT THEM. SO OUR OUR NORMAL NOISE ORDINANCE STILL HAVE TO FOLLOW BY THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? RODERICK. THANK YOU. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? YES. THEY ARE. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO BE HERE. MY NAME IS GREG HARTLEY WITH ACRO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, REPRESENTING HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP. 601 SOUTH CEDAR STREET, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA. I CAN GO AHEAD AND ANSWER A FEW OF THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASKED. I'LL START WITH THE PARKING SPACES.

SO BEHIND THE FENCE, WE ROUGHLY HAVE ABOUT 500 SPACES. SO THE INTENT IS TO KEEP ALL OF THE CUSTOMERS IN THE FRONT IN THE REAR. WE WILL HAVE NUMBERED SPACES FOR CARS THAT ARE BEING REPAIRED. SO THOSE MAY BE IN DIFFERENT, YOU KNOW, DROPPED OFF. THEN THEY'RE PULLED IN TO A SECTION OF WORK. WAIT ON PARTS, GO BACK INTO A NUMBERED SPOT AND SO ON. SO THOSE ARE ONE AREA.

THEN WE HAVE EMPLOYEES. WE ALSO HAVE LOANER CARS. AND THEN AS FAR AS THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES, THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR THE BMW TO HAVE VEHICLES THAT ARE STORED THERE BECAUSE THERE IS A THING WE CALL IT, IT'S PD PROGRAMING, DELIVERY AND INSPECTION. WHEN NEW VEHICLES COME IN THAT SERVICE COULD BE PERFORMED HERE. IT'S NOT PLANNED TO BE, BUT WE WANT TO HAVE THAT OPTION. DOES THAT ANSWER THE QUESTION ON THE PARKING? OKAY. ON THE NOISE. SO THE BAYS, THE ONLY DOORS, ALL THE BAYS ARE ARE THE WORK IS DONE INTERNAL. SO IT'S LIKE A DRIVE AISLE INSIDE. SO NO WORK IS DONE OUTSIDE THE BAYS THAT FACE TO THE WEST IS BASICALLY THERE'S ONE KIND OF ON THE NORTHERN PORTION THAT IS THE ENTRY INTO THE INTERNAL BAYS. THE OTHER ONES ARE BASICALLY DRYING AREAS UNDER A CANOPY. SO THE ONES THAT COME OUT OF THE PAINT BOOTHS, THEY COME IN, THEY'RE COMING OUT AT LIKE 400 DEGREES. SO THEY COME OUT AND SIT IN THAT CANOPY TO KEEP FROM HEATING THE INSIDE COOLED AIR. SO THAT'S WHY THAT AREA IS OUTSIDE. BUT THOSE DOORS ARE KEPT SHUT AND THEY'RE BASICALLY FINISHED VEHICLES THAT COME OUT THAT WAY. THANK YOU. AND THEN

[00:15:01]

THAT THAT ALSO OBVIOUSLY ALLEVIATES THE STACKING OF THE BAYS AND THEN THE CONNECTIVITY.

WE DO HAVE A LOCATION IDENTIFIED BEHIND THE GATE TO CONNECT THROUGH TO BMW IN THE FUTURE.

AND THE REASON WE DON'T CONNECT THE FRONT IS BECAUSE THAT AREA, IF YOU ARE OUT AT THE BMW, KIND OF ALL OF THAT AREA IS SECURED WEST OF THE OF THE BMW, WHERE CUSTOMERS WE DON'T WANT THEM BACK OF HOUSE. ALL THE CUSTOMERS STAY IN THE FRONT OF THE BMW TOWARDS FREEWAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYTHING ELSE OF THE APPLICANT, MR. HARTLEY? THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THIS PROPOSED SUP, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. I MOVE, WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE. ITEM 24 0012. SUP. I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. WATLEY TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND, SECONDED BY MR. BUCKNER. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. YES. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. THAT MOTION CARRIES BY A VOTE OF SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST, AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 3RD, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for a Drive-Through Restaurant (McDonalds), Located at 3300 Virginia Parkway.]

DECEMBER THE 3RD. THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM IS 24-0017 SUP. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE THRU RESTAURANT. MCDONALD'S. THIS IS AT 3300 VIRGINIA PARKWAY, STUART. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. STUART STORY PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNE. THE SITE IS LOCATED JUST OFF THE HARD CORNER BETWEEN VIRGINIA PARKWAY, A MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAY, AND HARDEN BOULEVARD, A GREENWAY ARTERIAL ROADWAY. IT IS PART OF A LARGER LOT THAT HAS BEEN ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL USES SINCE 2008. THE PROPOSED DRIVE THRU AND RESTAURANT WOULD JOIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BLOCK THAT INCLUDES RESTAURANTS AND A MAJOR RETAILER, WALMART. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE SUP REQUEST AND HAS FOUND THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL CITES SPECIFICATIONS ADOPTED BY THE CITY AS WELL AS MEETS ALL CRITERIA SPECIFIED FOR THE USE AS OUTLINED IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE PROPERTY'S PD PLAN. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO COMPLY WITH THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND MITIGATE PROXIMITY TO BONNIE WENK PARK.

THE APPLICANT WILL ADD A SIX FOOT MASONRY WALL ON TOP OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE, PROVIDING THE SCREENING REQUIRED BY PD STANDARDS. ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE NO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE SITE, WHICH LIMITS POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON NEARBY RESIDENTS. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND POINT OF ORDER ARE BOTH SITUATED OVER 30FT FROM THE NEAREST PROPERTY LINE AND FURTHER REDUCING ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS. CONSIDERING THAT THE SITE ADHERES TO ALL SITE SPECIFICATIONS ADOPTED BY THE CITY, MEETS THE REQUIRED CRITERIA AND ADEQUATELY MITIGATES POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS. STAFF BELIEVES THE PROPOSED DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT WOULD COMPLEMENT BOTH THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL AREA AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS, WHILE ADDRESSING LOCAL NEEDS. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SUP REQUEST AND WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU STEWART. QUESTIONS? ANYONE? I HAVE ONE QUESTION. STEWART. SO WERE THE WERE THEY'RE PROPOSING THAT THAT DOES SHARE AN ENTRANCE TO THE BONNIE WING DOG PARK ON ONE ENTRANCE. SO WHAT ARE THEIR PLANS IN TERMS OF ELIMINATING POTENTIAL ACCIDENTS THAT HAPPEN THERE WITH PEOPLE COMING OUT OF THE DOG PARK TRYING TO GET ON TO VIRGINIA, OR PEOPLE COMING IN AND TURNING INTO WHERE THE DRIVE THRU WOULD BE. I AT THE TIME, WE DON'T PARTICULARLY HAVE ANY SPECIFIC CONCERNS OF THIS BEING AN ISSUE. HOWEVER, ONCE THEY APPLY FOR A SITE PLAN, THEN OUR ENGINEERING TEAM WILL GO AHEAD AND DETERMINE WHETHER THEY NEED TO DO A TRAFFIC STUDY OR ANYTHING OF THAT SORT TO MITIGATE FOR SOMETHING LIKE THAT FROM HAPPENING. BECAUSE THAT SECTION OF VIRGINIA DOES HAVE A

[00:20:05]

HIGH AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC, ESPECIALLY IN THE MORNINGS. YOU'VE GOT IMAGINE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY JUST FURTHER UP FROM THERE. ON THE OTHER SIDE OF BONNIE WENK. SO THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC IN THE MORNINGS BETWEEN THE HOURS OF, I'D SAY, SEVEN AND 7:45 A.M, WHICH THOSE WOULD BE PRIME GO GET YOUR MCDONALD'S COFFEE AT TIME. SO JUST A CONSIDERATION FOR THE APPLICANT TO KEEP IN MIND. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. AND THOSE CONSIDERATIONS, AS I SAID, TAKE WILL TAKE PART FURTHER DOWN THE PROCESS. SO WOULD THE WOULD THE CITY BE ABLE TO REQUEST THAT DONALDS WIDEN THAT ENTRANCE THERE TO THE, TO THE EAST SIDE IF THAT WAS DEEMED NECESSARY.

YOU KNOW WITH THE SITE PLAN WOR. SO I BELIEVE THE ENGINEERING TEAM, IF THEY DEEM IT NECESSARY, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT THEY COULD REQUEST. THANK YOU. SO THIS ISN'T LIKE A FINAL SITE PLAN. THIS IS JUST TO GET THE SUP ZONING SO THAT THEY CAN PROCEED WITH THE SITE PLAN. A FINAL SITE PLAN IS THAT CORRECT? RIGHT. SO AFTER THE SUP THEY WILL GO AHEAD AND APPLY FOR THEIR SITE PLAN, WHICH WILL GENERALLY FOLLOW THIS LAYOUT. HOWEVER, THIS LAYOUT IS NOT FINAL. AND TO CLARIFY THE SUP IS DRIVEN TOWARDS THE DRIVE THROUGH USE. THE RESTAURANT'S ALLOWED BY RIGHT. THE RETAIL IS ALLOWED BY RIGHT. THE SUP IS JUST BECAUSE OF THE DRIVE THROUGH COMPONENT.

CORRECT? CORRECT. THE. THE PD FOLLOWS OUR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING, WHICH ALLOWS FOR RESTAURANTS. HOWEVER, DRIVE THRU RESTAURANTS REQUIRE AN SUP. OTHER QUESTIONS. ANYONE. THANK YOU. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? YES. ANYONE FROM. YES. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS BECK.

READ. I AM HERE WITH ON BEHALF OF MCDONALD'S. WE ARE A THIRD PARTY PERMIT EXPEDITER LOCATED AT 1008 MACON STREET IN FORT WORTH. I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. ANYONE QUESTIONS? NOPE. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. IT WASN'T THAT EASY. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS SUP ON VIRGINIA PARKWAY, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE SUP PER STAFF REQUEST. I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. AS PER STAFF REQUEST. SECOND.

SECOND BY MR. CONRAD. ANY DISCUSSION? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OH, SORRY. KATE. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. MOTION CARRIES BY VOTE OF SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST. THAT ITEM WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION ON DECEMBER THE THIRD. DECEMBER 3RD, 2024. THE NEXT ITEM IS. 24-0096Z. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REZONE OF A PROPERTY FROM AG AGRICULTURE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Properties from “AG” - Agriculture District to “I1” - Light Industrial District, Located on the South Side of Bloomdale Road and Located on the East and West Side of Cypress Hill Drive]

TO L1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. THIS IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BLOOMDALE ROAD AND ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF CYPRESS HILL DRIVE. MR. PALMER. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU AGAIN, CHAIRMAN, AND GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS. LET ME GET THIS UP HERE FOR THE. TO GO ONE MORE. ALL RIGHT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE REZONE APPROXIMATELY 22.417 ACRES OF LAND FOR INDUSTRIAL USES. THE PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED IN THE OAK HOLLOW DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ONE MCKINNEY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH FURTHER IDENTIFIES THE PROPERTIES AS EMPLOYMENT MIX, PLACE TYPE. THE EMPLOYMENT MIX PLACE TYPE IS THE CHARACTER DEFINING PLACE TYPE WITHIN THE OAK HOLLOW DISTRICT, AND IS INTENDED TO BUILD UPON THE EMPLOYMENT BASE WITHIN THE AREA.

THE PROPOSED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL REZONING REQUEST ALIGNS WITH THE VISION OF THE OF THE EMPLOYMENT MIX PLACE TYPE AND ALLOWS FOR USES COMPATIBLE TO THE USES ALLOWED ON THE ADJACENT LOTS.

[00:25:03]

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED ALONG A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL BLOOMDALE ROAD, WHICH IS HERE, AND A FUTURE MAJOR ARTERIAL AIRPORT DRIVE, WHICH WILL COME ALONG. THERE, WHICH ARE DESIGNED IN IDEAL TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES. WHILE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN AN AREA THAT THE CITY OF MCKINNEY ANTICIPATES TO DEVELOP PRIMARILY WITH INDUSTRIAL USES AND IS CONTIGUOUS TO PROPERTY CURRENTLY ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DIRECTLY TO THE, WHICH IS DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH. STAFF PAID CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD THAT SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH OF THIS PROPERTY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SEPARATED FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD BY A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL ROADWAY THAT'S BLOOMDALE, WHICH IS ANTICIPATED TO BE 130FT IN WIDTH ONCE THE FUTURE WIDENING HAS BEEN COMPLETED. WITH THE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH AND REQUIRED SETBACKS ALONG BLOOMDALE ROAD. ANY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PROPOSED WILL BE APPROXIMATELY OF 150FT MINIMUM FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTY LINES. ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY. ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY OF MCKINNEY'S UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT ANY LOADING DOCKS AND BAYS BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 200FT FROM ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USE OR ZONED SETBACK, A MINIMUM OF 75FT FROM ANY PUBLIC STREET OR FRONT PROPERTY LINE, AND BE ORIENTED AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL ZONES OR USES. THIS WILL THIS WILL THIS, THIS WILL HELP MITIGATE THE VISUAL IMPACT AND PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL USES FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY USES AND THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WITH THE PROPERTY'S CONFORMANCE WITH THECOMPREHENSIE COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS IN THE GROWING INDUSTRIAL AREA, THE SEPARATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE BY BLOOMDALE ROAD, AND THE PROTECTIONS REQUIRED BY THE UDC. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. RODERICK. MEMBERS HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF. YEAH. RODERICK, COULD YOU COULD YOU DRAW IN WHERE THE THREE WATER LINE EASEMENTS ARE? SAYS 115FT INTO THE SITE? THE WATER LINE EASEMENTS ARE GOING TO BE ALONG THE REAR OF THEIR PROPERTY. STRAIGHT ACROSS ALL THE WAY. I SAID.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? RODERICK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? YES, THEY ARE. EVENING, Y'ALL. MY NAME IS BETSY. I AM WITH THE DEVELOPER OF AN INDUSTRIAL 659 WALNUT HILLS CIRCLE, DALLAS, TEXAS. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT US OR OUR COMPANY. WE'VE DESIGNED THIS PROJECT IN PARTICULAR TO BE VERY SENSITIVE TO THE HOA. WE AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH OF US, WE MET WITH THE HOA AND ITS DIRECTORS BEFORE THIS MEETING. AND THE TWO THINGS THAT WE REALLY WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT WERE IS THE FIRST THING THAT I DON'T KNOW IF OUR IS OUR SITE PLAN INCLUDED IN HERE. YEAH, YOU CAN KEEP GOING. THIS IS JUST A LITTLE BIT ABOUT US, OUR COMPANY. THINGS WE'VE DONE IN THE PAST. BUT SO AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE SITE, PLAN, WE HAVE DELIBERATELY TRIED TO PUSH ALL TRUCK TRAFFIC ONTO CYPRESS HILL DRIVE. CANDIDLY, BECAUSE THAT IS THE MOST LOGICAL ROUTE FOR TRUCKS TO GO. THESE BUILDINGS ARE SMALL IN NATURE, SO UNLIKE THE BIG BOX DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH OF US, WE ARE IMAGINING THERE'S GOING TO BE VERY LITTLE TRUCK TRAFFIC. CANDIDLY, IT'S GOING TO BE YOUR PLUMBING COMPANY OR TILE TILE GUY OR FLOORING COMPANY. THOSE ARE THE END USERS THAT WE ESTIMATE EXPECT FOR THIS BUILDING, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE DEPTH OF THE BUILDING. IT'S INCREDIBLY SKINNY. IT'S SKINNY. CANDIDLY, BECAUSE OF THE VERY LARGE WATER LINE AND EASEMENTS THAT ARE COVERING THE ENTIRETY OF THE TRUCK COURT, WE HAVE COMMUNICATED WITH ALL OF THE EASEMENT OWNERS AND THEY'RE FINE WITH US PAVING. OBVIOUSLY, WE CAN'T PUT ANY BUILDINGS OVER THOSE EASEMENTS. WE ALSO, AS YOU CAN SEE FROM OUR SITE PLAN, ARE GOING TO DO OUR UTMOST TO TRY TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREE LINE SO THAT WHEN WE HAVE BLOOMDALE ROAD COME IN AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN WORK TOGETHER WITH THE CITY IN CONJUNCTION ON THAT DESIGN OF BLOOMDALE ROAD, WE CAN PRESERVE THAT EXISTING TREE LINE AS YOU DRIVE DOWN THERE, BECAUSE WE

[00:30:04]

LIKE TO HAVE AS MANY NATURAL BARRIERS AS POSSIBLE BETWEEN OURSELVES AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO BE CONSIDERATE OF THEM. WE WILL ALSO BE INCLUDING, YOU KNOW, ABOVE, CODE LANDSCAPING ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF OUR PROPERTIES AS WELL. I CAN STOP THERE. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANYTHING ELSE ABOUT OUR PROJECT, ABOUT OUR COMPANY, ABOUT MYSELF. WE'RE NATIONAL LOGISTICS DEVELOPER. WE WERE FOUNDED IN FEBRUARY OF 2020, AND IN THAT TIME, IN FOUR YEARS, WE'VE BUILT OR BOUGHT OVER 17.5 MILLION SQUARE FEET ACROSS THE UNITED STATES. IN THREE YEARS. WE'VE DONE NORTH OF 5,000,000FT■S IN DFW ALONE. SO HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

QUESTIONS, GINA. SORRY. GO BACK TO THE FRONT ELEVATION PAGE. I THINK THAT'S YEAH. THERE. THE.

WHICH ONE? THIS. OKAY, SO THOSE ARE EXAMPLES OF SO THESE ARE PROJECTS WE'VE DEVELOPED WITHIN DFW SPECIFICALLY. SO COPPELL YOU CAN SEE COPPELL BEHIND THE WATER FEATURE THAT WE'RE BUILDING THERE. THAT'S GOING TO BE A RETENTION POND WITH A FOUNTAIN AND A RUNNING TRAIL AROUND IT.

WE HAVE TWO COMMERCIAL PADS ON THE FRONTAGE AND THEN 330,000FTS OF LOGISTICS BEHIND IT. TRINITY WEST AND DALLAS, THAT'S FIVE MINUTES WEST OF DOWNTOWN AND SINGLETON. THAT'S ONE POINT 9,000,000FT■S. THAT'S PRIMARILY BUILD TO SUITS. ADDISON. WE'RE CONVERTING AN OLD OFFICE TO AN OFFICE BUILDING, GUTTING IT AND MAKING IT FUNCTIONAL. LOGISTICS SPACE. OLAM COTTON WAS A BUILD TO SUIT AN ALLIANCE FOR A LARGE COTTON COMPANY. WYLIE DISTRIBUTION CENTER, THAT IS A 270 IN WYLIE AND THEN IN FORNEY. WE HAVE ONE POINT 1,000,000FT■S. THAT'S JUST A HANDFUL OF THE PROJECTS WE'VE DONE AROUND. BUT IF YOU GO TO THE FIRST IMAGE ON THIS PRESENTATION, YOU'LL SEE A CONCEPTUAL RENDERING THAT WE PROVIDED FOR THIS. YEAH. FOR. NOPE. ONE MORE PLEASE. YEAH. FOR THIS SPECIFIC BUILDING. NOW ALL ESTHETICS. EVERYTHING. SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN CODE. AND IF THERE'S ANYTHING PARTICULAR THAT YOU HATE, JUST LET US KNOW. SO THE NORTH END OF THIS WILL THE NORTH END OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, THE SIDE FACING THE RESIDENCES THAT THAT WILL, WILL THAT LOOK LIKE EMPLOYEE PARKING OR WILL THAT LOOK LIKE. YEAH. SO IT'LL IT'LL BE ALL AUTO PARKING. SO NONE OF THE TRUCK COURT, NONE OF THE TRUCKS WILL FACE THE RESIDENCES. SO IF YOU. SORRY, I KEEP ASKING YOU TO MOVE AROUND. BUT IF YOU GO TO THE SITE, PLAN, YOU'LL SEE THAT ALL OF THE FRONTAGE AND THE FACADES AND EVERYTHING YOU SEE, THAT'S IN THE KIND OF THE CORNERS AND THE ESTHETICALLY PLEASING ELEMENTS ARE ALL FACING THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND SO THERE WILL BE NO TRUCKS PARKED IN FRONT OF THE FRONTAGE AND FRONT CORNERS OF THOSE THREE BUILDINGS ALONG THE FRONTAGE, WITH PARKING ON EITHER SIDE OF A DRIVE AISLE WITH YOUR TRUCK COURTS ALL IN THE REAR. YEAH. SO THAT IMAGE YOU SHOWED WOULD BE WHAT'S FACING. THAT WOULD BE WHAT THAT WOULD BE WHAT'S FACING AS YOU'RE DRIVING DOWN BLOOMDALE. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS. ANYONE? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WHAT WE'LL DO IS HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN WE MAY HAVE QUESTIONS. WE MAY CALL YOU BACK UP FOR SOME MORE QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS PROPOSED. REZONE, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. ANYONE? YES, SIR. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS GARY LANG. I LIVE AT 708 OSAGE DRIVE. MY HOUSE IS ONE OF THEM. THAT GOES TO THE GREENBELT BEHIND THIS. I AM ALSO THE HOA PRESIDENT. NOT THAT THAT MATTERS. I'M HERE FOR THE RESIDENTS, RIGHT? MY NEIGHBORS.

I POSTED THIS AFTER WE HAD OUR MEETING WITH THESE GUYS ON OUR FACEBOOK PAGE AND GOT MOSTLY POSITIVE FEEDBACK. SOME OF THE CONCERNS YOU KNOW, IS WHAT YOU'VE HEARD IS ABOUT THE LANDSCAPING. AND ONE OF THE BIG DEALS, WELL, I'VE GOT TWO ISSUES AT THE MOMENT. ONE OF THE BIG DEALS IS THIS TRAFFIC CIRCLE. ONE, WE'RE NOT GREAT BRITAIN GUYS. YOU KNOW WHAT THESE TRAFFIC CIRCLES FOR, YOU KNOW, AND THEN TWO, IF THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE TRUCK TRAFFIC, YOU CAN'T TELL ME THAT YOU CAN PULL A SEMI THROUGH THAT THAT TRAFFIC CIRCLE AND NOT DAMAGE THAT THING ONE WAY OR ANOTHER OR THEIR, THEIR VEHICLES. THAT IS JUST A POOR, POOR IDEA. I'VE

[00:35:02]

SEEN THE OTHER ONE THAT THAT YOU'RE BUILDING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COURTHOUSE WITH ALL THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS AND STUFF THAT MIGHT BE BENEFICIAL, BUT I DID A LITTLE, LITTLE INVESTIGATING MYSELF, AND THERE'S NOT REALLY A WHOLE LOT OF GREAT BENEFITS TO THESE. FOR EVERY BENEFIT FOR THAT TRAFFIC CIRCLE, YOU CAN FIND ONE THAT'S THAT'S NEGATIVE AS WELL. THEY DON'T STOP ACCIDENTS. AND UNLESS YOU'RE PLANNING ON HAVING JUST CONSTANT TRAFFIC UP AND DOWN WHAT IS CURRENTLY SPUR 195, THEN THERE'S REALLY NOT A NEED FOR THAT. THE MOST LOGICAL THING, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SPEND, SPEND THE MONEY FOR A TRAFFIC LIGHT AT THE MOMENT, JUST PUT A FOUR WAY STOP THERE. THAT IS THE MOST LOGICAL THING. SO THAT'S ONE OBJECTION. THE OTHER OBJECTION WE HAVE IS, ACCORDING TO THIS RENDITION, IT APPEARS ACCORDING TO OUR PLOT THAT REORIENTING 195 RIGHT THERE CLOSER TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, IS ACTUALLY VENTURING UPON PART OF OUR PROPERTY. SO I'M AN IT GUY. ONLY PLAY AN ENGINEER WHEN I NEED TO. SO ACCORDING TO THIS PLOT, I MAY BE READING IT TOTALLY WRONG, BUT WE WOULD LIKE SOME KIND OF VALIDATION THAT THAT Y'ALL HAVE LEGIT CLAIM TO THAT PART, BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORS ALONG THE END OF THAT ROAD RIGHT THERE REALLY ENJOY WHAT LIMITED BUFFERING THEY HAVE WITH THAT TREE LINE. AND THE LITTLE BIT OF ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR HALF OF THE HALF OF THAT HOUSE LINE RIGHT THERE. SO LIKE I SAID. WHERE SOMETHING'S GOING TO GET BUILT THERE. SO WE WOULD RATHER HAVE THE LIMITED TRAFFIC FROM, FROM THIS IDEA THAN A WHOLE BUNCH OF APARTMENTS. YOU KNOW, THAT WOULD OBVIOUSLY BE A LOT MORE TRAFFIC.

SO WE'RE WE'RE ON BOARD WITH WITH EVERYTHING THE GUYS ARE, ARE DOING. WE DON'T SEE ANY REASON WHY THEY WOULDN'T DO WHAT THEY'RE TELLING US TO DO. BUT LIKE I SAID, THE PROBLEM WE HAVE IS WITH THAT TRAFFIC CIRCLE. THAT'S THE BIG DEAL. SO WE NEED SOME KIND OF FORMAL COMMUNICATION FROM Y'ALL GUYS THAT, THAT THAT IS WHERE THAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN. AND THAT WAY I CAN BRING IT BACK TO MY NEIGHBORS AND DECIDE. AND THE BOARD SAID WHETHER OR NOT WE NEED TO TALK TO A LAWYER ABOUT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU. MR. LANG. THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. WE WILL GET AN ANSWER. THE QUESTION IN FRONT OF US TONIGHT IS A IS A ZONING QUESTION. YOUR QUESTION IS CERTAINLY VALID. AND WE'LL GET AN ANSWER FOR YOU.

OKAY. ON THE ON THE ALIGNMENT OF THAT ROAD. APPRECIATE IT. WE HAVE ANOTHER CARD FROM SAM STRIKER. MR. STRIKER SAM. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS SAM STRIKER. I'M AT 1020 EVERS DRIVE. I'M IN PECAN RIDGE. I'LL KEEP THIS PRETTY SHORT. AS YOU'RE AWARE, PECAN RIDGE RECENTLY JUST WENT THROUGH A WHOLE BATTLE WITH THE ONCOR SUBSTATION THAT JUST GOT PUT TO THE WEST OF US, AND SO WE'RE ALL A LITTLE JUMPY AND A LITTLE BIT SENSITIVE TO THE IDEA OF FURTHER DEPRECIATION OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. SO WE'RE GOING TO DO ANYTHING WE CAN TO HELP PRESERVE THE VALUE AND JUST THE PRIVATE LITTLE AREA THAT WE HAVE OVER THERE IN MCKINNEY. I AGREE WITH THE PLAN TO COLLABORATE WITH LAVETTE. ULTIMATELY, LIKE WHAT GARY SAID, I THINK THIS IS A MUCH NICER AND QUIETER OPTION THAN MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. I WANT TO DO THIS COLLABORATION WITH TWO MAJOR CONTINGENCIES.

THE FIRST IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THE WE HAVE A VERY CLOSE PROXIMITY WITH OUR HOMES, WITH WITHOUT ADEQUATE COVERAGE, ACCORDING TO THIS PICTURE. I KNOW THIS IS A PROOF OF CONCEPT CURRENTLY. BUT THE CURRENT TREE LINE THAT THEY'RE SAYING THEY WANT TO HELP MAINTAIN, WHICH IS REALLY MORE ON THE CITY SIDE. FIRST OFF, CAN'T BE GUARANTEED ALL OF WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO MAINTAIN IN TERMS OF THE TREE LINE ARE BASICALLY OVERSIZE WEEDS. SO MOST OF THOSE WILL GET CLEARED OUT AND THEY WOULD BE IN THE MEDIAN. SO YOU HAVE A VERY LIMITED SPACE THERE. AND SO WHAT WE'RE REQUESTING IS A VERY DECENT SCREENING. ON THE SIDE OF LAVETTE. SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO LOOK AT THEM. BUT THEN WE CAN LOOK AT A MORE OF A FOREST. THE SECOND BIG ISSUE THAT WE HAVE IS 18 WHEELERS USING BLOOMDALE. CURRENTLY WE DO HAVE SEMIS USING BLOOMDALE AND MAKING KIND OF DANGEROUS TURNS INTO THIS AREA. CYPRESS HILL OR. YEAH. AND WE WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO WORK WITH THE CITY AND WITH LAVETTE TO FIND A WAY TO DETER THEM FROM USING THAT ROAD. THAT'S ALSO A SCHOOL ZONE. WHICH I KNOW THEY WOULD ALSO LIKE TO AVOID. BUT THAT'S ANOTHER BIG CONCERN THAT

[00:40:04]

WE HAVE IS 18 WHEELERS COMING UP, 75 AND THEN TURNING RIGHT ONTO BLOOMDALE AND GETTING STUCK AT REALLY HARD TURN SITUATIONS. THE SMELL, THE NOISE AND THE SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY ARE ALL CONCERNS AS WELL, OBVIOUSLY. BUT ULTIMATELY WE THINK THAT THIS IS A GOOD OPTION AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO COLLABORATING WITH THEM AND WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THANK YOU, MR. STREICHER. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS PROPOSED REZONE? ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, BY MISS WOODARD. ANY DISCUSSION ON CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. OH, SORRY. KATELYN. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I. I. THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. THAT MOTION CARRIES. A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED.

WE HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR OF THE APPLICANT. I HAVE A QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION EARLIER. IN LIGHT OF THE OTHER PROJECTS THAT YOUR COMPANY HAS DONE, WHAT DO YOU ANTICIPATE THE TRAFFIC LOAD BEING LIKE FOR THESE BUILDINGS? ARE YOU ASKING ME LIKE HOW MANY TRUCKS A DAY AND AT WHAT TIMES? IF YOU KNOW IT IS BUILT ON SPECULATIVE BASIS. SO I CAN'T TELL YOU WHAT THE END USER IS GOING TO BE DOING ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS. CANDIDLY, IT IS NOT.

THESE BUILDINGS ARE NOT DESIGNED TO BE LIKE AN AMAZON FULFILLMENT CENTER TYPE WHO WOULD NEED 24 OVER SEVEN 365. WE IMAGINE STANDARD HOURS OF OPERATION FOR A STANDARD BUSINESS. SO, YOU KNOW, THE PLUMBERS GO HOME AT 5 OR 6 AT NIGHT. THEY WOULDN'T THEY SHOULDN'T BE RECEIVING ROBUST SHIPMENTS AFTER HOURS. MOST OF THEM WILL HAPPEN DURING THE DAY. SO WE IMAGINE STANDARD BUSINESS HOURS. STANDARD BUSINESS DAYS. BUT I CAN'T I CAN'T TELL YOU CONFIDENTLY WHAT'S GOING TO BE THERE BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A TENANT IN TOW YET. OKAY. WHAT ABOUT TRAFFIC ON WEEKENDS? WOULD YOU ANTICIPATE THAT BASED OFF OF YOUR HISTORY AND KNOWLEDGE OF YOUR OTHER PROJECTS THAT YOU'VE DONE? SORRY. CAN YOU SPEAK UP A LITTLE BIT? DO YOU ANTICIPATE ANY TRAFFIC ON THE WEEKENDS BASED ON YOUR KNOWLEDGE? NO. I MEAN, MAYBE OCCASIONAL SHIPMENTS ON A SATURDAY DURING THE DAY, BUT THAT WOULD BE THE EXTENT OF IT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. OKAY. THANK YOU. THESE ARE LIKE FLEX PRODUCTS, NOT LIKE DISTRIBUTION CENTERS. CORRECT? RIGHT, RIGHT, RIGHT. IT'S PRIMARILY, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE WHO ARE SERVING THE ROOFTOPS AROUND THE NEIGHBORHOODS. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? ALL RIGHT. ANY MOTIONS? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ZONING. THE MOTION. MOTION BY MR. BUCKNER TO APPROVE THE ZONING REQUEST FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND, BY MR. WHATLEY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSIO? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WITH THAT MOTION CARRIES BY A VOTE OF SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST. THAT ITEM WILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 3RD, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. DECEMBER THE 3RD. YEAH, I THINK THIS. WHOSE WAS THIS? RODERICK. YES. SO WE HAD A QUESTION ABOUT THE ROAD, AND THAT'S NOT A RODERICK QUESTION, BUT IF SOMEONE COULD FOLLOW UP AND MAKE SURE WE HAVE THOSE ALIGNMENTS. RIGHT. WE'LL MAKE SURE TO REACH OUT TO ENGINEERING. PERFECT. WE HAVE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District, “ML” - Light Manufacturing District, and “AG” - Agriculture District to “AP” - Airport District, Located at 1915 FM 546 and Including Approximately 75 Acres of Land Located North and West of the Intersection of FM 546 and CR 317]

HIS CONTACT INFORMATION HERE. YEAH. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS 24-00100Z. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REZONE OF A PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ML LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND AG AG TO AP AIRPORT DISTRICT. THIS IS AT 1915 FM 546 AND INCLUDING 75 ACRES OF LAND OF LAND LOCATED NORTH, NORTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 546 AND COUNTY ROAD 317. MR. BENNETT. YES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION. JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 280

[00:45:05]

ACRES EAST AND SOUTH OF THE MCKINNEY NATIONAL AIRPORT TO AP AIRPORT DISTRICT. THE ONE MCKINNEY 2040 COMP PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AREA AS THE AVIATION PLACE TOP WITHIN THE BUSINESS AND AVIATION DISTRICT. THE CITY COUNCIL HAS CONTINUOUSLY LISTED THE MCKINNEY NATIONAL AIRPORT AS A LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY FOR THE CITY, AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS INCLUDED IN THE MCKINNEY NATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. THE MULTITUDE OF EXISTING ZONINGS ACROSS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY PRIMARILY ALLOW FOR INDUSTRIAL USES SUCH AS WAREHOUSE MANUFACTURING AND OFFICE. THE PROPOSED ZONING WOULD PERMIT AIRPORT RELATED USES SUCH AS AIRCRAFT HANGAR AND AIRPORT TERMINAL, WHICH WOULD PROMOTE EXPANSION OF AIRPORT RELATED DEVELOPMENT EAST OF THE RUNWAY. IN ADDITION TO PERMITTING AIRPORT RELATED USES, THE REZONE WOULD CREATE A CONSISTENT AND MODERNIZED ZONING ACROSS THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED BETWEEN THE EXISTING AIRPORT AND THE PROPOSED SPUR 399 EXTENSION TO THE EAST, WHICH WILL EVENTUALLY BECOME A 6 TO 8 LANE MAJOR REGIONAL HIGHWAY AND IMPROVE ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM OTHER REGIONAL ROADWAYS. GIVEN THE FURTHERING OF AVIATION DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE BUSINESS AND AVIATION DISTRICT AND ALIGNMENT WITH THE CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONE AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE. QUESTIONS? ANYONE? YOU SAY IT'S ABOUT 280 ACRES TOTAL. ABOUT 280 ACRES TOTAL. YEP. AND WILL ANY OF THAT BE LIKE WAREHOUSING AREA, OR IS IT ALL NECESSARY FOR THE ITEMS THAT YOU'VE LISTED? YEAH. SO THE PRIMARY REASON FOR THE REQUEST IS FOR THE AIR DIRECTLY FOR THE AIRPORT. RELATED USES. DON'T BELIEVE THAT WAREHOUSE IS A PERMITTED USE IN THE AP DISTRICT. HOWEVER, WE MAY BE LOOKING AT AMENDMENTS IN THE NEXT COUPLE YEARS FOR MAYBE ADDING A FEW ADDITIONAL USES INTO THE AP DISTRICT. CURRENTLY, IT'S NOT PERMITTED, THOUGH. GOOD QUESTION. GOOD QUESTION. ANYONE ELSE? JAKE. THANK YOU. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT? YES, SI. GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSION. MY NAME IS MITCHELL MCKINLEY AT 1508 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, MCKINNEY, TEXAS. AND I'M WITH GARVER. WE'RE THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE AIRPORT. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. ANYONE? ANY QUESTIONS. MANY FLIGHTS ARE THERE GOING IN AND OUT OF THE AIRPORT NOW? COMMERCIAL OR PRIVATE? COMMERCIAL. CURRENTLY CONSIDERED ZERO, BUT PRIVATE. IT CAN RANGE ANYWHERE FROM 400 TO 500 OPERATIONS A DAY. A DAY. AND THAT'S A MIX OF JET TURBINE AIRCRAFT TO SINGLE ENGINED PISTON TYPE AIRCRAFT. ANYONE ELSE? QUESTION. JAKE. ALL RIGHT, JAKE, WE HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU, BUD. THANK YOU. JAKE. IS THERE ANY CALCULATIONS ON WHAT KIND OF BENEFIT THIS WILL BE ON PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE AVERAGE RESIDENT? YEAH. SO I'M SURE THERE ARE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OUT THERE. AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ZONING REQUEST OR THE REZONING REQUEST, WE HAVE PUT TOGETHER A FISCAL ANALYSIS. NOT SURE HOW IN-DEPTH IT IS. IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE. SO I'M UNSURE OF HOW ACCURATE IT IS. BUT THERE PROBABLY WILL BE FURTHER ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ON THIS IN THE FUTURE AS PROJECTS COME THROUGH. RIGHT NOW IT'S JUST A STRAIGHT REZONE. THAT WOULD BE THE REQUEST TONIGHT SHOULD BE SIGNIFICANT. I WOULD SAY SO, YEAH. I'VE GOT ANOTHER QUESTION FOR YOU. IS ALL THIS PROPERTY. DOES IT ALL FALL UNDER THE TRES TWO OVERLAY? I BELIEVE IT DOES. YEP. SO TRES WOULD BE A AN AREA OF TOWN WHERE TAX DOLLARS STAY IN THAT AREA AND GO TO BENEFIT THAT AREA. THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO, RIGHT? YES. YEAH. VERY GOOD. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. RIGHT. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU COME TONIGHT AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS PLANNING AND ZONING ON THIS ITEM. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. WE HAVE A CARD FOR MR. PAUL GRIFFIN. YES, SIR. I JUST WANTED TO STOP AND ASK A COUPLE

[00:50:11]

OF QUESTIONS. NUMBER ONE. YOUR CONTRACTOR THAT PUT OUT YOUR ZONING SIGNS, YOUR ANNOUNCEMENTS, THEY PUT THIS UP IN FRONT OF OUR PROPERTY ON COUNTY ROAD 722, SAYING THAT Y'ALL WERE GOING TO REZONE OUR OUR 41 ACRES THAT ADJOINS THIS PROPERTY TO THE EAST. AND WE HAD WE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THAT SINCE IT'S WASN'T IN PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. SO APPARENTLY YOUR CONTRACTOR GOT A LITTLE IN FRONT OF HIMSELF. THE SECOND THING THAT MY MAIN CONCERN IS, IS THAT WE'RE BUILDING THIS TERMINAL, PUTTING ALL THIS CONCRETE. YOU'VE GOT A COUPLE OF DETENTION PONDS FOR THE WATER. THAT'S GOING TO BE COMING OFF THE AIRPORT, AND IT'S GOING TO FLOW SOMEWHERE. HOPEFULLY THE CITY IS PLANNING TO PUT IT IN YOUR STORM. STORM DRAINAGE, AND IT WON'T BE ALLOWED TO RUN ACROSS OUR PROPERTY. WHEN YOU'RE WHEN YOU'RE RUNNING A G, A COMMERCIAL AIRPORT, A JOINT NEXT DOOR ACROSS THE WIRE FENCE, THE WATER'S GOING TO GO SOMEWHERE AND I DON'T WANT IT ON OUR PROPERTY AT ALL. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? WE'RE HERE. I'M HERE TO BASICALLY SUPPORT Y'ALL. I'M NOT SPEAKING AGAINST THE PROJECT.

WE'RE IN THE ETJ. WE DO NOT HAVE A VOICE, BUT WE ARE IMPACTED BY Y'ALL'S DECISIONS. SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, MR. GRIFFIN, AND WE'LL GET ANSWERS TO WE'LL CLARIFY WHAT PROPERTY IS BEING PROPOSED FOR A REZONE. SO APOLOGIZE FOR THAT OVERZEALOUS SIGN INSTALLED COMPANY, WHOEVER THAT WAS. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM? ANYONE ELSE? MOTION TO CLOSE. PUBLIC HEARING. THE MOTION IS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND.

SECONDED BY MR. LEBEAU. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, SAY AYE. AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. THE MOTION CARRIES. PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED, SO NOW WE'LL HAVE QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS OF THE STAFF AND THE APPLICANT WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST. GOOD. REGARDING MR. GRIFFIN'S CONCERN ABOUT THE WATER RUNOFF, THAT WOULD BE BE ADDRESSED DURING THE SITE PLAN. PHASE. CORRECT. YEAH. JAKE? YEAH. COULD YOU COME UP? IT'S A GOOD QUESTION. YOU'VE GOT FARMLAND OUT HERE AND WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED WOULD NOT BE FARMLAND, SO WE'D HAVE A RUNOFF QUESTION. SO HOW HOW DO WE ANSWER THAT? YEAH. SO THAT'LL BE HANDLED AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW. AGAIN THE REQUEST IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT IS A STRAIGHT REZONE. SO SITE PLAN WILL COME LATER ON. AND THEN THEY'LL ALSO GO THROUGH FULL CIVIL REVIEW WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PRIOR TO MOVING ANY DIRT ON THE PROPERTY. SO ENGINEERING WILL BE LOOKING AT WATER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINAGE, ALL THAT. SO ANY WATER THAT CURRENTLY IS NOT RUNNING OFF ONTO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY WOULD WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO AFTER DEVELOPMENT OR. THAT'S CORRECT. FULLY DEVELOPED SITE. THAT'S CORRECT. I BELIEVE IT WOULD. THE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD HAVE TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN THEIR PROPERTY OR WITHIN A CREEK. OKAY. HOW WOULD THE RESIDENTS BE NOTIFIED? WELL, I GUESS NOTIFIED FOR. FOR WHAT? SO IF WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT UNDER THE SITE PLAN, ARE THE RESIDENTS GOING TO BE NOTIFIED IN ANY KIND OF WAY? YEAH. SO GENERALLY SITE PLANS ARE TYPICALLY SITE PLANS ARE JUST REVIEWED AT THE STAFF LEVEL ALONG WITH DEVELOPMENT PERMITS AND PLATS. HOWEVER, WITH THIS PROJECT IT IS VERY LIKELY THAT THERE WILL BE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS. AND WITH THAT, THERE WILL BE PUBLIC HEARING AT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PO NOTICES, VERY SIMILAR TO THE NOTICES THAT WENT OUT AHEAD OF THIS MEETING. WE'LL HAVE TO GO OUT AGAIN AHEAD OF THE SITE PLAN BEING APPROVED.

THANK YOU. JAKE. THOSE WILL BE SENT TO PEOPLE IN THE ETJ AS WELL AS WITHIN THE CITY. IT'S TO EVERYONE WITHIN 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, RIGHT? OR IS THE NOTICES ONLY GO OUT TO

[00:55:08]

PEOPLE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO IF YOU'RE IN THE ETJ. AND IT'S NOT A ZONING REQUEST, YOU WOULD NOT GET A NOTICE OF AN OF A DESIGN EXCEPTION OR SITE PLAN.

EXCEPTION. CORRECT. PER STATE LAW, IT'S ON THE MUNICIPAL TAX ROLL. SO PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONS ONLY GO OUT FOR FOLKS THAT ARE ON THE ON THE MUNICIPAL SIDE, THE CITY SIDE, CITY LIMITS. I DO I CAN'T UNDERSCORE ENOUGH THAT POA NOTICES WOULD ONLY BE NECESSARY IF THE SITE PLAN REQUIRED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS. SO IF THE SITE PLAN IS ABLE TO FOLLOW THE LETTER OF THE STATE ZONING, THEN IT WOULD ALL BE DONE AT THE STAFF LEVEL. ALL OF THAT BEING SAID, OBVIOUSLY THE MCKINNEY NATIONAL AIRPORT IS A PRIORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL. IT'S SEEN AS A QUASI CITY PROJECT, SO THAT THAT IS OUTSIDE OF WHAT MAY OR MAY NOT OCCUR JUST AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR THE DIRECTOR OF THE AIRPORT. AS THESE PROJECTS PROGRESS. SO WE'RE TALKING STANDARD PROCESS. IT COULD FOLLOW SOMETHING SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT GIVEN THE NATURE OF THE PROJECT. QUESTION FOR YOU, JAKE. SO HOW WOULD MR. GRIFFIN BE ABLE TO OBTAIN ANY INFORMATION REGARDING THE SITE PLAN SINCE HE'S IN ETJ? YEAH. SO ALL OFFICIAL SUBMITTALS ARE LISTED ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE. WE HAVE A MASTER CASE LIST. WE ALSO HAVE A OUR PLANNING RESOURCES MAP THAT'S AVAILABLE ONLINE, WHERE YOU CAN LOOK UP PROPERTIES AND PULL UP LIKE ZONING EXHIBITS, SITE PLANS, PLATS, ANYTHING THAT'S SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. AND WHERE MIGHT A RESIDENT YOU GUYS DEAL WITH THAT EVERY DAY? WHERE MIGHT A RESIDENT FIND THAT INFORMATION? YEAH, IT WOULD JUST BE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE, ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE. ADDITIONALLY, THEY CAN ALWAYS CONTACT PLANNING DIRECTLY IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ELSE? COULD WE HAVE THE APPLICANT COME BACK UP REAL QUICK, PLEASE, SIR? SO THE QUESTION RELATES TO YOU BUILDING A AN AIRPORT. AN AIRPORT BASICALLY NEXT TO PROPERTY THAT IS NOT IN THE CITY LIMITS. AND CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY HAS WATER THAT RUNS OFF AT A NATURAL RATE. AND THEN WHEN YOU START BUILDING THAT WILL CHANGE. HOW CAN YOU ASSURE OR HELP THE NEIGHBORS UNDERSTAND? YOU'LL BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR AND YOU SEE WHERE I'M GOING. YEAH. AS JACOB MENTIONED FROM AN ENGINEERING STANDPOINT, GOING THROUGH THAT PROCESS, YOU HAD CONCRETE HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE. AND UNFORTUNATELY, IF YOU DON'T DO ANYTHING TO MITIGATE IT, IT WILL INCREASE RUNOFF THAT GOES OFFSITE. SO IN THIS PROPERTY ITSELF, FOR THIS PROJECT, THEY'RE REQUIRED. AND WE ARE REQUIRED TO KEEP ALL STORMWATER RUNOFF ON PROPERTY. SO THE DISCHARGE POINT THAT GOES OUT OF THE AIRPORT HAS TO BE THE SAME AS IT IS TODAY. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING. APPRECIATE IT. OTHER QUESTIONS.

ANYONE? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE 24 001003 AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

MOTION BY MR. LOBO TO APPROVE THE ITEM 24-00100Z. AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SECOND SECOND BY MR. WOODARD. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY I. I. THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. THAT MOTION CARRIES BY A VOTE OF SEVEN IN FAVOR AND ZERO AGAINST, AND WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 3RD, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. DECEMBER 3RD, 2024. OKAY, THE LAST ITEM ON I'M SORRY, THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Certain Amendments to Chapter 150, entitled “Unified Development Code,” of the Code of Ordinances, City of McKinney, Texas to: (1) correct typographical errors and make nonsubstantive editorial changes to: (a) Article 1 (General Provisions) and particularly to Sections 108B (Maintenance), (b) Article 2 (Zoning Regulations) and particularly to Sections 203A (Standard Procedures), 203E (Plan and Permit Procedures), 204 (Zoning Districts), 205 (Use Regulations), 206C (Screening), 206D (Commercial Garbage/Recycling Containers and Enclosures), 206E (Vehicle Parking and Loading), 206F (Architectural Standards), (c) Appendix 2A (Approved Plant List), and (d) Article 9 (Terms and Definitions) particularly to Section 902 (Definitions); (2) Make Certain Substantive Changes to: (a) Article 2 (Zoning Regulations) and particularly to Sections 205B.5 (Table of Uses), 205G.2 (Accessory Uses Definitions and Standards), 206A (Landscaping), 206C.3 (Screening Requirements), 206E.3 (Parking Calculations), 206E.7 (Driveway and Parking Surfacing Material); (b) Article 9 (Terms and Definitions) particularly to Section 902 (Definitions)]

AGENDA, 24-00042 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 150. THIS IS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO CORRECT ANY TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS, MAKE ANY NON-SUBSTANTIAL SUBSTANTIVE EDITORIAL CHANGES TO ARTICLE ONE AND ARTICLE TWO, SECTION 203E AND SECTION 200 AND 5B5. TABLE OF USES. SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. PARKING SURFACE MATERIAL, PARTICULARLY SECTION 902.

DEFINITIONS, MISS SHEFFIELD. THANK YOU. CAITLIN SHEFFIELD, CHIEF PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. TONIGHT WE ARE BRINGING BEFORE YOU SOME PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THIS EVENING I'LL GO THROUGH HIGH LEVEL. SOME OF THOSE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS THAT WE ARE BRINGING BEFORE YOU IN COUNCIL AT THE MEETING NEXT WEEK. IN YOUR PACKET, WE DID SEPARATE OUT DIFFERENT ARTICLES TO ARTICLE ONE, TWO AND NINE. FOR YOU TO

[01:00:04]