[CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:10] IT'S SEPTEMBER 23RD, 2025 6:00 PM. WELCOME TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY'S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. THE COMMISSIONERS SEATED BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING HAVE ALL BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND REQUEST THAT WE ALL BE RESPECTFUL AND CONCISE ON THE ISSUES. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE COMPLETE A SPEAKER CARD PRIOR TO THE ITEM BEING CALLED AND COME TO THE PODIUM WHEN IT'S TIME. WHEN YOUR NAME IS CALLED AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS CLEARLY IN THE MICROPHONE. AND PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES. YOU MAY SPEAK ONLY ONE TIME ON EACH AGENDA ITEM. TONIGHT I WILL ADVISE YOU WHETHER AN ITEM WILL BE HEARD ONLY BY THE COMMISSION OR PASSED ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DECISION. YOUR OPINIONS ARE IMPORTANT TO US AND ARE MADE OF PUBLIC PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD. ALL OF US WANT TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF MCKINNEY. WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON NONPUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS? NONPUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS? SEEING NO ONE FOR THAT, WE'LL [CONSENT ITEMS] NEXT MOVE TO CONSENT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. DO WE HAVE ANY CORRECTIONS OR MOTION ON THE CONSENT ITEMS, SUCH AS THE MINUTES OF OUR SEPTEMBER 9TH MEETING? 2531 98. I HAVE A CORRECTION OF THE MINUTES. IT'S ON PAGE TWO. THE SECOND PARAGRAPH, STARTING WITH STEWART STOREY. THE THIRD LINE DOWN DUE TO NOTIFICATION SIGNS NOT BEING INSTEAD OF US. SO NOT BEING POSTED BY THE REQUIRED DEADLINE. THANK YOU DEIDRE. ANY OTHER CORRECTIONS THAT ANYBODY'S NOTED? OKAY. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THE APPROVAL OF MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS. SO MOVED. SECOND. CHARLES FOR THE MOTION AND DEIDRE FOR THE SECOND TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 9TH. DIDN'T SHOW UP. NO. I'M HOPING IT'S THIS. THANK YOU. SORRY ABOUT THAT. NO. THAT'S OKAY. HAS WORKED. WELL. OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR TO APPROVE THE MINUTES BY OF THE LAST MEETING WITH CORRECTIONS, PLEASE SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? PLEASE SAY THE SAME. THERE ARE NONE. THE MOTION PASSES. THE MINUTES ARE [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Single-Family Attached Residential Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 440 feet South of Standifer Street and on the East Side of Bumpas Street] APPROVED FROM OUR LAST MEETING AT 7 TO 0. VOTE. LET'S MOVE NEXT TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. THE FIRST ITEM WE HAVE IS ITEM NUMBER 25 0046 Z2. THAT IS, TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD TO PD. GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL USES. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. YES. GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS STEWART, STORY PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. GENERALLY TO MODIFY THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED USES. THE APPLICANT IS NOW SEEKING TO MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LANDSCAPING STANDARDS TO BETTER ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. THE APPLICANT IS NOT PROPOSING TO CHANGE ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FROM THE CURRENT PD. SPECIFICALLY, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REVISE THE TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT FROM ONE CANOPY TREE PER SINGLE FAMILY LOT TO ONE ORNAMENTAL TREE LOCATED AT THE FRONT OF EACH LOT. THIS MODIFICATION IS INTENDED TO ADDRESS DIMENSIONAL CONSTRAINTS AND TO PREVENT CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE BETWEEN [00:05:02] THE CANOPY TREE ROOT SYSTEM AND THE CITY'S UTILITIES. THE TOWNHOME FOUNDATIONS AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE TO MITIGATE THE REDUCED NUMBER OF CANOPY TREES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE INSTALLATION OF SIX CANOPY TREES WITHIN THE COMMON AREA ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT DIMENSIONAL CONSTRAINTS OF THE SITE, AND FINDS THAT THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL REPRESENTS A PRACTICAL SOLUTION THAT ALLOWS THE PROJECT TO PROCEED WHILE MINIMIZING IMPACTS ON THE CITY'S TREE CANOPY AND MAINTAINING THE OVERALL QUALITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REZONE REQUEST. I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. STEWART. YES. QUESTIONS OF STAFF. STEWART I HAVE A QUESTION. WAS THERE A HOLDUP ON THIS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION THAT'S BEEN CHANGED? I'M SORRY. WAS THERE A HOLDUP ON THIS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION THAT'S BEEN CHANGED. SO IT JUST GOT TABLED JUST BECAUSE WE WERE MISSING THE THE SIGNS DIDN'T GET POSTED. BUT THAT'S THE ONLY REASON I SEE. OKAY. THANKS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. STEWART. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES I BELIEVE YES, SIR. WOULD YOU COME UP, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND. GOOD EVENING. CASEY GREGORY WITH SANCHEZ AND ASSOCIATES AT 2000 NORTH MCDONALD STREET HERE IN MCKINNEY. WE REPRESENT THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. WHO IS DEVELOPING THE PROPERTY. I APPRECIATE STAFF WORKING WITH US DURING THIS PROCESS. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS. PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD CASEY. ALL RIGHT. WELL THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? PLEASE COME FORWARD TO THE MICROPHONE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS FIRST ITEM? SEEING NONE, COULD WE MOVE TO A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE APPROVE THE ITEM AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION. THANK YOU. DEIDRA. SECOND, MUHAMMAD GOT THE SECOND. LET'S GET THAT POSTED. ARE WE GOING TO DO VERBAL AGAIN? WE SHOULD BE GOOD TO GO. MOTION TO TO APPROVE 25 0046 Z2 AS PER STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. MR. THANK YOU. MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0 AND WILL BE FORWARDED ON TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION ON OCTOBER [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for a New and Unlisted Use (Hangar Home) and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 1,120 Feet North of Virginia Parkway and Approximately 640 Feet West of Virginia Hills Drive] 21ST, 2025. NEXT ITEM WE HAVE ITEM NUMBER 25 0084Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD TO PD, GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR A NEW AND UNLISTED USE. HANGER HOME NORTH OF VIRGINIA PARKWAY AND APPROXIMATELY 650 640FT WEST OF VIRGINIA HILLS DRIVE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS MENTIONED, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PD TO PD. WHILE THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED AS PD, IT ALLOWS FOR TOWNHOME USES WITH ATTACHED HANGARS. THE PROPOSED USE IS AN UNLISTED USE DEFINED AS HANGER HOMES, WHICH IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS OR HOMES ATTACHED WITH HANGERS. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE THERE IS A MODIFICATION JUST BETWEEN THE SETBACKS. INSTEAD OF A TEN FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDING, THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING A FIVE FOOT SEPARATION, BUT STILL REQUIRING THE FIVE FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK. STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THE REQUEST, AS THE PROPOSED USE ALIGNS WITH THE EXISTING USES IN THE AREA, AND NO OTHER CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE BEING PROPOSED. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ARI. YES, QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. I HAD A QUESTION I THINK IN THE LOI. THEY HAD SAID THAT THE. THIS WITH THIS WITH THIS REQUEST, THE DESIGN OF THE HOMES WILL BE MORE DIVERSIFIED AND [00:10:04] INTERESTING WITH INDIVIDUAL UNITS. CAN DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION ON THE ACTUAL DESIGN. SO I WOULD DEFER TO THE APPLICANT BASED ON THE DESCRIPTION. OKAY. THANK YOU. THAT'S. THIS LANGUAGE OKAY. THANK YOU ARI. THANK YOU SIR. CAN WE HAVE THE APPLICANT UP PLEASE? YES. SO I SHOULD HAVE JUST. PARIS. GOOD EVENING. I AM JEANNIE KLEIN. I REPRESENT THE DEVELOPER AND SPECIALIZE IN AVIATION, COMMUNITY SALES AND CONSULTING. AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. LET ME START WITH YOURS. SURE. OKAY, SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS TO KNOW, IN TERMS OF THE DESIGN, DO YOU HAVE ANY. YES, I ACTUALLY I HAVE PHOTOS TOO, OF SHOWING YOU WHAT'S EXISTING THERE, BUT I ACTUALLY THIS IS MY FIRST TIME TO DO THIS PROCESS. I ACTUALLY HAD LIKE MADE A LITTLE PAMPHLET, WHICH IS WHAT YOU HAVE HERE. IS IT OKAY? YEAH. IT'S OKAY. THAT'S OKAY. ARE THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS WHILE WE PERUSE THIS PRESENTATION? THE PREVIOUS APPROVED ZONING WAS FOR TOWNHOME UNITS. HOW MANY SINGLE FAMILY UNITS VERSUS TOWNHOME UNITS? I'M SORRY, I COULDN'T TELL WHO WAS TALKING. NO PROBLEM. SO IN OUR DEVELOPMENT, I BELIEVE THERE'S 26 RIGHT NOW. IT'S ZONED DUPLEX TYPE OF TOWNHOMES. 26. SO THE NUMBERS NOT CHANGING. WE'RE JUST CENTERING THEM ON THE LOT, MAKING THEM UNATTACHED, WHICH IS A MUCH MORE DESIRABLE UNIT COUNT THOUGH. YEAH, IT'S BETTER FOR LONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND EVERYTHING ELSE. THANK YOU. SO IS IT IS IT CORRECT TO SAY THAT YOU'RE YOU'RE WANTING TO MAKE THE HANGER UNATTACHED FROM THE HOME? IS THAT. NO, NO. AND I HAVE I HAVE ONE OF THOSE FOR EVERY ONE OF YOU GUYS IF YOU WANT ME TO, IF YOU KNOW THE THE BASIC LAYOUT OF THE HOUSE DOESN'T CHANGE. THE ONLY THING THAT'S THE HANGER, IF YOU CAN THINK OF IT LIKE A GREAT BIG GARAGE. OKAY, SO YOU HAVE A 2 OR 3 CAR GARAGE AND THESE PEOPLE HAVE A 20 CAR GARAGE. I'M FAMILIAR WITH THE. AND SO THE HOME IS JUST BUILT AROUND THE HANGER RIGHT. OH I SEE IT GOES UP 2 OR 3 STORIES HIGH AS FAR AS THE RESIDENTIAL PART GOES. SO IT'S ALL ATTACHED, MEANING THE THE HANGER IS ATTACHED TO THE HOME. IT'S ALL ONE UNIT. SO HOW IS IT DIFFERENT FROM THE EXISTING ONES? THEY ARE LIKE DUPLEX TOWNHOME STYLE. THEY'RE ZONED TO BE SHARE A COMMON WALL. OH, AND WE WOULD REALLY LIKE THAT. IT'S JUST A MUCH BETTER PRODUCT IN THE LONG TERM. MOST PEOPLE WANT A DETACHED PROPERTY ANYWAY, SO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT DETACHING THE HANGER. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT JUST FORGET THE HANGER. JUST THINK ABOUT A DUPLEX TYPE OF DOWN TOWNHOME OR SINGLE FAMILY. I SEE, THANK YOU. THANK YOU. NO. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE. THIS ITEM ALSO HAS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? PLEASE COME FORWARD TO SPEAK AT THE MICROPHONE. ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? OKAY, I SEE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I MOVE, WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE. ITEM 25 00847 SECOND. THANK YOU, CHARLES, FOR THE MOTION AND JESSIE FOR THE SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE. ITEM 25 0084. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AND ITEM IS APPROVED AT A VOTE OF 7 TO 0 AND BE PASSED ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DECISION ON OCTOBER 21ST, 2025. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. NEXT WE HAVE OUR LAST [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Multi-family Residential Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 690 Feet West of Collin McKinney Parkway and on the North Side of McKinney Ranch Parkway] PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. IT'S NUMBER 250093Z. THAT IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD TO PD, [00:15:05] GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. LOCATED AT SIX 690FT WEST OF MCKINNEY PARKWAY AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MCKINNEY RANCH PARKWAY. STUART. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN STUART. SORRY, ONE MORE TIME. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AND TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES INCLUDE AN UNDEVELOPED LOT ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL USES TO THE SOUTH, AND EXISTING CITY UTILITY SUBSTATION TO THE EAST. A MULTIFAMILY LOT CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT, AND EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST, AND EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE TYPICAL MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A REDUCTION OF THE ADJACENCY LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM 20FT TO 5FT IN WIDTH, WHERE ADJACENT TO MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND THE UTILITY SUBSTATION TO THE EAST AND WEST, AND AN INCREASE IN MAXIMUM DENSITY FROM 30 UNITS PER ACRE TO 33 UNITS PER ACRE TO OFFSET POTENTIAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE AND REQUESTED DEVIATIONS, THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED A NUMBER OF SITE ENHANCEMENTS. THESE INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF AN EIGHT FOOT TALL MASONRY WALL WHERE THE SITE ABUTS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PROHIBITION OF PATIOS AND BALCONIES ABOVE GROUND LEVEL WITHIN 100FT OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. BEING ORIENTED TOWARDS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. PROHIBITION OF OVERHEAD DOOR GARAGES WITHIN 100FT OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. BEING ORIENTED TOWARDS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND AN INCREASE IN THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF AMENITIES FROM 5 TO 7, STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY USE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. THE APPLICANT HAS DEMONSTRATED RESPONSIVENESS TO ADJACENCY CONCERNS BY INCORPORATING MEANINGFUL MITIGATION MEASURES, PARTICULARLY ALONG SHARED BOUNDARIES WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STAFF ALSO ACKNOWLEDGES THAT DIMENSIONAL CONSTRAINTS OF THE SITE AND CONSIDERS THE APPLICANT'S APPROACH TO BE A PRACTICAL SOLUTION THAT BALANCES DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REZONE REQUEST. I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU FOR PRESENTATION. STUART. DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF? STUART, CAN YOU HIGHLIGHT JUST TO CLARIFY FOR THE LANDSCAPE, PRODUCTION IS BEING REQUESTED. YES. SO THE LANDSCAPE REDUCTION IS JUST ON THE EXHIBIT ON THE SCREEN FOR EVERYONE'S FOR CLARIFICATION IS BEING HERE IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE WESTERN BOUNDARY ALONG WHERE THE EXISTING MULTIFAMILY IS. AND THEN IT'S GOING TO BE ON THE EASTERN BOUNDARY. IT'S NOT ANNOTATING CURRENTLY. THERE YOU GO. MAYBE NOT GREEN. ALL RIGHT. LET'S TRY PINK OR SOMETHING BRIGHTER. SO IT'S GOING TO BE IN THE IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE WESTERN BOUNDARY WHERE THE CURRENT MULTIFAMILY IS. AND THEN ON THE OPPOSITE IN THE I'M SORRY, THAT WAS THE WESTERN. THIS IS THE EASTERN WHERE THE UTILITY SUBSTATION. SO THAT'S WHERE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REDUCTION IS BEING REQUESTED. RIGHT. SO WHERE, WHERE IT ABUTS THE THE SINGLE FAMILY TO THE NORTH AND TO THE WEST. IT'S GOING TO BE THE THE REGULAR 20FT, REGULAR REQUIRED 20 FOOT WITH AN EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL IS MASONRY IN ADDITION TO TREES EVERY 30FT. THANK YOU. STUART, IS THERE ANY ALLEY OR ANYTHING BETWEEN THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THE ADJACENT MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT? YES, I BELIEVE THERE IS AN ALLEY ON THE EASTERN SIDE WHERE THERE'S THE SINGLE FAMILY. AND THEN I BELIEVE AT LEAST HALF OF IT ON THE NORTH HAS AN ALIAS. WELL, OR A STREET. BUT NOTHING ON THE WEST. SORRY, THERE'S NO ALLEY OR ANYTHING ON THE WEST THAT MIGHT ABSORB SOME OF THE REDUCTION IN THE. I'M SORRY. YES, THERE IS AN ALLEY ON THE EAST. YES. THANK YOU, I MISSPOKE. ANYTHING ELSE FOR STUART? IS THERE AN IS THERE A BUILD PLAN AVAILABLE? SOMETHING [00:20:04] TO SHOW US WHAT? SO FAR, STAFF HAS NOT REVIEWED ANY SITE PLAN OR ANY ELEVATIONS THUS FAR, SO I'LL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. STUART, COULD WE GET THE APPLICANT UP PLEASE? THE PRESENTATION OKAY. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY. MY NAME IS ZACH JOHNSON WITH ENDEAVOR REAL ESTATE GROUP ON THE APPLICANT SIDE, 100 CRESCENT COURT, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201. THANKS FOR TAKING THE TIME TONIGHT. WE DO HAVE A PRESENTATION. WE'LL TRY TO GO THROUGH IT RELATIVELY QUICKLY HERE, BUT I THINK WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP THERE BEFORE INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGE. HERE WE HAVE SOME INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY ENDEAVOR. SO WE'LL GO THROUGH THAT PRETTY QUICKLY. BUT ENDEAVOR HAS BEEN AROUND FOR 25 YEARS. WE ARE REALLY A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT FIRM. WE'VE INVESTED IN OVER $5.5 BILLION WORTH OF REAL ESTATE OVER THE PAST 25 YEARS. A GOOD AMOUNT OF THAT IN MULTIFAMILY. WE'VE DEVELOPED A PROCESS ABOUT 13,000 UNITS. THE COMPANY IS HEADQUARTERED OUT OF AUSTIN. AND AGAIN, THERE'S SOME INFORMATION ABOUT JUST THE COMPANY OR THESIS. WE INVEST A LOT OF OUR OWN CAPITAL INTO THESE DEALS. AND THEN JUST FROM A FROM AN INVESTMENT PERSPECTIVE, WE HAVE INDEPENDENT BUSINESS LINES THAT GO THROUGH ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE. AND SO WE HAVE A RESIDENTIAL ARM, WE HAVE A RETAIL TEAM, WE HAVE AN INDUSTRIAL TEAM OFFICE, STUDENT HOUSING, HOSPITALITY. SO AS WE APPROACH LAND, WE APPROACH IT FROM A HIGHEST AND BEST USE PERSPECTIVE. SO JUST GIVES US A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE THERE. A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES. OUR COMPANY DEVELOPED THE DOMAIN DOWN IN AUSTIN. THE DOMAIN IS ONE OF THE LARGEST MIXED USE DEALS IN THE NATION. A 300 UNIT, I'M SORRY, 300 ACRE DEVELOPMENT THAT TOOK OVER 20 YEARS TO TO TO DEVELOP AS A FEW MILLION SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE, THOUSANDS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS, MILLION PLUS SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, HALF A DOZEN HOTELS. SIMILARLY, AGAIN DOWN IN AUSTIN, PLAZA SALTILLO IS A PROJECT THAT WE DEVELOPED ON THE EAST SIDE OF 35 AND DOWNTOWN, WHICH WAS ABOUT 1000 UNITS. WE BROUGHT A WHOLE FOODS, AND IT REALLY WAS CREDITED WITH SORT OF GENTRIFYING THAT EASTERN SECTION OF AUSTIN. AND SO THOSE ARE SOME OF THE HIGHER PROFILE DEALS THAT WE'VE DONE IN THE PAST. BUT JUST TO JUMP INTO THE SITE HERE TODAY, YOU GUYS KNOW WHERE THE SITE IS. THIS IS A ZOOMED IN AERIAL, JUST TO KIND OF GIVE YOU PERSPECTIVE OF WHERE IT IS. STUART DID A GOOD JOB OF GOING THROUGH THAT. WE WENT THROUGH THE PD, SURROUNDING USES, CURRENT ZONING REALLY ALLOWS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. WE'RE LOOKING TO DEVELOP INTO MULTIFAMILY. ONE SMALL CORRECTION AND I'LL GET TO IT HERE KIND OF WHAT'S WHAT'S INCLUDED UNDER THE RG 43 ZONING. THE MF 30 BASE, WHICH IS WHAT WE WERE SHOOTING FOR. AND THEN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, WE ARE ACTUALLY LOOKING FOR A SMALL DENSITY INCREASE FROM 30 TO 31 UNITS PER ACRE. ORIGINALLY, WE HAD LOOKED FOR 33 OR MORE UNITS PER ACRE, BUT WHEN WE SET OUT TO DESIGN THIS, WE REALLY DIDN'T LOOK AT THE DENSITY. WE JUST PUT OUR BUILDINGS TOGETHER. IT ENDED UP SHOWING US 336 UNITS. IT'S JUST UNDER 11 ACRES. AND SO IT COMES OUT TO 30.9 UNITS PER ACRE. WE DIDN'T SET OUT TO REALLY EXCEED THE DENSITY, BUT THAT'S JUST HOW OUR PLAN WORKS. WE'RE HAPPY TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT, BUT DIDN'T FEEL THAT THAT WAS A MEANINGFUL INCREASE FROM 30 TO 30.9. AND THEN WE DISCUSSED STUART BRIEFLY DISCUSSED THE SETBACKS. AND SO I THINK THIS SHOWS A LITTLE BIT CLOSER. THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN OF WHAT WE INTEND TO BRING IN TO STAFF. FOLLOWING THIS ALSO SHOWS THE SURROUNDING USES. BUT YOU CAN SORT OF SEE AS YOU LOOK TO THE WESTERN, THE NORTHWESTERN AND NORTHERN BORDER, WE HAVE THAT GREEN STRIP THERE WHICH IS DESIGNED TO DESIGNATE THAT 20 FOOT PLANTING SETBACK, LANDSCAPE SETBACK, WHICH WE WOULD CONTINUE THROUGH THE SINGLE FAMILY COMPONENT. I ACTUALLY WORKED ON THE MULTIFAMILY PROJECT JUST ADJACENT TO US, TO THE WEST. I WAS THE PRINCIPAL AT THE TIME AT FAIRFIELD RESIDENTIAL WHEN WE CAME THROUGH AND BROUGHT THAT THROUGH AND GOT IT SUCCESSFULLY ZONED. SO I HAD SPENT TIME WORKING WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS TO COME TO THE CONCLUSION OF KIND OF WHAT WE DID ON THAT PROJECT TO GET IT THROUGH. AND SO I THINK A LOT OF THE HEAVY LIFTING WAS REALLY ALREADY COMPLETED ON THIS. WE AGAIN CONTINUED TO WE'LL [00:25:04] CONTINUE THAT SAME DESIGN PIECE WHICH HAS THE LANDSCAPE, THE PLANTINGS, THE TREES AND THE EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONG THE RESIDENTIAL BORDER. AND THERE IS AN EXISTING WALL BETWEEN US AND THE MULTIFAMILY COMPONENT TO THE WEST, BECAUSE AT THE TIME WHEN WE DEVELOPED PHASE ONE OR THE FIRST MULTIFAMILY PROJECT, THIS SITE WAS ZONED SINGLE FAMILY. SO WE SHARE THAT EIGHT FOOT WALL ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER. AND SO THAT EIGHT FOOT WALL WILL REALLY CONTINUE ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE EAST. I'M SORRY, THE WESTERN BORDER CONTINUE ACROSS THE NORTHERN BORDER. AND THEN WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THE SETBACKS REDUCTION, IT WOULD BE ON THE EASTERN SIDE AND THE SOUTHWESTERN SIDE. AND SO IDEALLY, YOU GUYS, I THINK YOU CAN SEE IT'S A RELATIVELY NARROW SITE. AND SO THE EXTRA 15FT THAT WE'RE ACHIEVING FROM THAT HELPS US TO JUST SPACE OUT THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE AND GET THE COURTYARDS TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE REASONABLE. SO JUST TO KIND OF DESCRIBE THIS BRIEFLY, WE HAVE A THREE STORY BUILDING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, THREE STORY BUILDING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY THAT WE DO HAVE SOME TOPOGRAPHY WHERE THE SITE FALLS FROM WEST TO EAST. AND SO WE WILL HAVE A BASEMENT CONDITION ON THE ON THE, WHICH WOULD BE REALLY A FOURTH LEVEL ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE BUILDING. AND SO EVERYTHING FACING EAST AND TO THE NORTH IS GOING TO BE THREE STORIES. THE BUILDING ITSELF IS CLASSIFIED AS A THREE STORY STRUCTURE, BUT WILL HAVE A BASEMENT CONDITION FACING THE WEST, WHICH WOULD BE AGAINST THE MUNICIPAL USE. TODAY, THE BOTTOM BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO BE FOUR STORIES, AND THAT MEETS THE RESIDENTIAL SETBACK PLANE THAT'S DESIGNED IN THE R R3 ZONING. AND THEN, AS YOU CAN SEE, SANDWICHED IN BETWEEN THE BOTTOM BUILDING AND THE MIDDLE BUILDING IS A SMALL POP UP GARAGE. AND SO TO MEET THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE MCKINNEY STANDARDS, ALL OF OUR STRUCTURED AND GARAGE PARKING IS GOING TO BE CONTAINED IN THAT SMALL STRUCTURE. AND SO IT'S DESIGNED TO BE A TWO STORY STRUCTURE WHERE YOU ENTER OFF THAT SAME LOWER SIDE AND YOU HAVE TWO LEVELS. BUT THAT'S HOW WE'VE DESIGNED, DESIGNED OUR PROJECT TO MEET THE STANDARDS. SO WE ARE MEETING THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS, THE RATIOS, THE GARAGE PARKING COVERED, PARKING REQUIREMENTS. WE'RE NOT SEEKING ANY VARIANCES THERE. THE LAST COUPLE SLIDES ARE JUST REALLY MORE ECONOMIC. I DON'T I THINK YOU GUYS KNOW ALL THIS INFORMATION, BUT EVERYBODY ALWAYS ASKS, DO WE NEED MORE APARTMENTS? WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS? AND SO JUST TO TRY TO HEAD ON, ADDRESS THOSE WE PUT TOGETHER. REALLY WHAT THIS IS, IS AN EMPLOYMENT MAP THAT TALKS ABOUT ALL THE MAJOR EMPLOYERS IN THE AREA. MCKINNEY, WE ALL KNOW, HAS A TON OF EXCITING THINGS HAPPENING. YOU OBVIOUSLY CAN SEE THE, YOU KNOW, THE LEGACY AND INTERSECTION OF TOLL ROAD AND 121 WHERE THERE'S A PLETHORA OF JOBS IN THAT AREA, BUT ALONG 121 ALONG 75, WE CONTINUE TO SEE THIS AS A REALLY IMPORTANT EMPLOYMENT CORRIDOR. MOST I THINK STRIKING IS THIS IS AN AREA WE PUT TOGETHER ABOUT JUST SOME OF THE EXCITING THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING IN MCKINNEY. AND I THINK AS A DEVELOPER AND CERTAINLY AS AN APARTMENT DEVELOPER, WE ALWAYS LOOK FOR JOBS. JOBS CREATE DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCT, AND WE WANT TO BE CLUSTERED NEXT TO OTHER GENERATORS THAT ARE PRODUCING JOBS THAT ARE GOING TO MEET PEOPLE THAT WERE, THAT WERE RENTING, THAT WERE DEVELOPING FOR, I THINK YOU GUYS KNOW THESE DEALS, BUT THE AMPHITHEATER, THE EXPANSION OF MCKINNEY AIRPORT'S SLOANE QUARTERS, WHICH IS BUILDING LUCY BILLINGSLEY'S PROJECT, THAT'S A MULTI-GENERATIONAL PROJECT, KALAHARI RESORT, WHICH IS AN ALLEN, BUT STILL WITHIN TWO MILES OF THE SUBJECT SITE, THE NEW J.W. MARRIOTT, CANNON BEACH. I MEAN, THESE ARE ALL $100 MILLION PLUS TYPE DEVELOPMENTS, SOME IN THE BILLIONS, AND EACH ONE OF THEM IS GOING TO PRODUCE JOBS. THE NEXT SLIDE TALKS ABOUT JUST WHAT THE STATED EXPECTED JOB CREATION IS GOING TO BE. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT THE EXPANSION OF THE AIRPORT, POTENTIALLY 1800 JOBS THERE, SUNSET AMPHITHEATER, 1300 JOBS. SLOAN QUARTERS IS A LITTLE BIT UNIQUE. I MEAN, IT COULD HOUSE 10,000,000FT■!S OF OFFICE, WHICH OVER THE GENERATIONS IS GOING TO BE HUGE, BUT A LOT OF THAT WILL BE SELF-CONTAINED WITH WHAT'S WHAT'S DEVELOPED ON THAT SITE. BUT AGAIN, KALAHARI RESORT 1000 EMPLOYEES JW MARRIOTT 500, CANYON BEACH 700. AND SO YOU'VE GOT OVER 5000 JOBS WITHIN TWO MILES OF THE SUBJECT SITE. AND WHEN WE LOOK AT THESE DEVELOPMENTS, WE BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE EMPLOYING AND CREATING JOBS FOR THAT ARE HIGH TARGET FOR [00:30:03] APARTMENT RENTERS. AND WE FEEL LIKE THAT IS THE DEMOGRAPHIC FOR WHAT WE'RE GOING TO CREATE HERE. AND SO GIVEN THE TIMING, MOST OF THESE ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. WE FEEL LIKE IT'S JUST AN OPTIMAL TIME TO DELIVER INTO THAT MARKET. WE'RE EXCITED TO TRY TO PROVIDE HOUSING FOR THESE DEVELOPMENTS. COUPLE OF ELEVATIONS. SO THIS IS SORT OF WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW. AGAIN, NOTHING'S BEEN SUBMITTED. BUT WE'VE DESIGNED THESE ELEVATIONS. THESE ARE SOME RENDERINGS THAT SHOW THE FRONT BUILDING. THAT'S THE FOUR STORY BUILDING. WE'RE POTENTIALLY LOOKING AT, INCLUDING LIMESTONE VENEER ACROSS THERE WITH HARDIE SIDING AND SOME OTHER MATERIALS. WE'VE DESIGNED THESE TO TRY TO FIT IN WITH THE LOCAL FLAVOR AND ALSO WHAT'S BEEN DEVELOPED NEXT DOOR. SO THERE'S A CONSISTENCY TO IT. THIS JUST GIVES YOU ANOTHER ELEVATION OF THE THREE STORY BUILDING. THIS IS THE C SHAPED BUILDING THAT OPENS UP WITH THE UNITS PULLED AWAY FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY BUFFER. AND YOU CAN SEE WE'VE REMOVED THE BALCONIES FROM THESE BUILDINGS AS WELL. AND THEN THIS IS SORT OF THE THREE STORY BUILDING TO THE NORTH. AGAIN, NO BALCONIES ON THERE. WE'VE TRIED TO CREATE SOME BIGGER WINDOWS AND THINGS, BUT THIS IS AN IDEA OF WHAT THE PROJECT WOULD LOOK LIKE. SO WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN IT UP TO ANY QUESTIONS I HAVE. ONE. WHAT IS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES THAT YOU HAVE, INCLUDING THE GARAGE? EXCUSE ME ONE MOMENT. I KNOW IT COMPLIES WITH LAW ORDINANCES. I KNOW IT DOES, INCLUDING THE GARAGE. LET'S SEE IF I'VE GOT IT ON HERE. I MIGHT NEED TO GET BACK TO YOU WITH THAT, BUT I WILL. I'LL DO A LITTLE QUICK MATH. I BELIEVE THE REQUIREMENT IS 1.75. WHICH. OOPS. EXCUSE ME. WHICH WOULD BE 588 SPACES. SO I KNOW AT A MINIMUM WE HAVE 588 SPACES, BUT 1.75 I UNDERSTAND I KNOW IT COMPLIES. OKAY, SORRY. OTHER QUESTIONS I HAVE A QUESTION. HOW HIGH DID YOU SAY THE EXISTING MASONRY WALL IS AND WHAT SIDE WAS THAT ON THAT FROM THE PREVIOUS MULTIFAMILY THAT'S ALREADY THERE. DID YOU SAY THAT'S ON THE WEST SIDE? YES. SO THE IF I CAN SEE IF I CAN WRITE ON THIS, ESSENTIALLY THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THERE. YEAH. THIS PIECE RIGHT HERE HAS AN EIGHT FOOT WALL, AS DOES THIS PIECE. SO THIS IS ALL EIGHT FOOT SOLID MASONRY OKAY. WE WOULD BE CONTINUING IT HERE AND HERE. AND THEN CONTINUING. THERE'S AN EXISTING FENCE WHICH IS A WROUGHT IRON WITH MASONRY PILLARS THAT EXISTS FROM TO RIGHT ABOUT HERE. AND WE'LL CONTINUE THAT ALONG THE EASTERN BORDER. AND THERE WAS A DIFFERENT COLOR HERE. THERE WAS A WE BUILT A HALF WALL ABOUT A THREE FOOT HALF WALL WITH LANDSCAPE ON THE FRONTAGE ON THE FIRST PROJECT. AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO DO THAT AND RUN THAT ALONG CONSISTENTLY IN THE FRONTAGE HERE. THANK YOU. OF COURSE. ABOUT DO YOU HAVE CAN YOU GIVE US A FEEL FOR WHAT THE ELEVATION VIEW WOULD LOOK LIKE LOOKING FROM, FROM WEST TO EAST? YOU KNOW, ON THE NORTHERN ON THE NORTHERN HALF OF THE PROPERTY, SORT OF FROM THE BACKYARD OF THE EXISTING RESIDENCES. POINT OF VIEW, THIS IS PROBABLY THE BEST ELEVATION FOR THAT. IF IF YOU CAN BEAR WITH ME ONE SECOND, IF YOU LET ME GO BACK HERE REAL QUICK, IF I WERE TO SHOW THAT ELEVATION THAT WE JUST LOOKED AT. IS THIS HERE? AND SO GOING BACK TO THAT. OOPS. THAT WOULD BE THIS. ELEVATION HERE. AND THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT, YOU WOULD BE THIS DOWN HERE. WE DO HAVE SIDE ELEVATIONS. THIS WOULD BE JUST FROM A FLAT PLANE VIEW. THIS IS SOMETIMES A LITTLE DIFFICULT TO SEE. BUT THIS IS THE PORTION OF THAT YOU THAT COMES OUT OR SEE THAT COMES OUT AS IS THIS. AND THEN. THIS COMPONENT HERE WOULD BE WHAT YOU SEE IN THAT SECTION. SO WOULD BE THREE STORY WITH NO BALCONIES. RIGHT? CORRECT. WELL, YOU CAN SEE ON THE THE [00:35:01] COMPONENT HERE, WE DO HAVE A COUPLE BALCONIES THAT ARE ONLY SECOND STORY BALCONIES IN THIS SECTION, BUT THAT WOULD BE SET BACK AT THE AT THE VERY EDGE HERE. SO THIS IS A COUPLE HUNDRED FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. AND THOSE ARE INSET TO COMPLY WITH THAT RESIDENTIAL SETBACK. ABSOLUTELY. YEAH. SO IT WE ACTUALLY WITH THE 20FT AND THE FIRE LANE AND THE ROAD, YOU'VE GOT ABOUT 90FT JUST GETTING TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. SO YOU'RE OVER 200FT FROM FROM THIS POINT. AND YOU HAVE AN EIGHT FOOT WALL THAT'S BLOCKING YOU FROM THAT AS WELL. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR MY SCRIBBLING THERE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? ARE WE GOING TO HAVE A LIST COME UP OKAY. YES. PLEASE STATE TURN YOUR CARD IN CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. MY NAME IS MEGAN LAW AND I LIVE AT 3421 STEAMBOAT DRIVE. AND I CAN SHOW YOU CLEAR WHERE? IF YOU GO BACK TO THE AREA, YOU TAKE THE REMOTE AND MOVE OVER. THANK YOU. I'M A TEACHER. THIS SHOULD MAKE SENSE, RIGHT? OKAY. THIS WILL WORK. SO I LIVE IN THE FAMILIES WHERE IT SAYS SINGLE FAMILY. THAT IS MY NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S EL DORADO POINT. WE HAVE MET WITH THE DEVELOPER. HE'S VERY SWEET, VERY NICE, VERY HELPFUL. BUT I WOULD JUST ASK YOU THE QUESTION. WE HAVE APARTMENTS. IF WE IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THE PICTURE, THERE'S SIX APARTMENT COMPLEXES BEING BUILT THERE. AND I KNOW IT RAISES THE QUESTION OF WHY ANOTHER APARTMENT COMPLEX. THAT'S WHAT'S ALL OVER MCKINNEY FACEBOOK. HOWEVER, IN MY BACKYARD. WHY ANOTHER APARTMENT? WE'RE BUILDING A EXTENDED STAY HOTEL RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER. AND I, TO MY OWN FAULT, WAS NOT AWARE OF THIS HAPPENING. OTHERWISE I PROBABLY WOULD HAVE MADE MY APPEARANCE A LITTLE EARLIER AS A TEACHER. ALL OF THIS IN MY BACKYARD ACROSS THE STREET FROM AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. I KNOW THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT GROWTH, RIGHT? WE'RE SEEING A DECLINE IN PEOPLE MOVING AND LIVING IN AREAS OUR SCHOOLS ARE SUFFERING. BUT I DON'T SEE THIS AS THE ANSWER. AS SEVENTH APARTMENT COMPLEX BEING BUILT. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU GUYS, BUT THE IDEA OF JUST BEING ENCROACHED UPON BY ALL OF THESE BUILDINGS, ALL OF THESE PEOPLE INVADING MY SPACE, ONLY MAKES ME WANT TO SELL MY HOME FOR WHAT LITTLE VALUE IT IS NOW GOING TO POTENTIALLY BE WORTH. SORRY. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING. YES, MA'AM. PLEASE COME FORWARD. I'M ANGELA WALSTON. I LIVE AT 3425 TELLURIDE DRIVE, MCKINNEY. I LIVE JUST BEHIND THE DEVELOPMENT PIECE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE. I BOUGHT MY HOME BECAUSE OF THE 11 ACRE FARM BEHIND ME COMING FROM EAST TEXAS. IT WAS NICE NOT TO HAVE ANYTHING BEHIND ME BUT TREES AND AND LAND AND FOOLISHLY THOUGHT THAT BECAUSE IT WAS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, IT WOULD NOT BECOME A DIFFERENT TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. I KNEW THE OTHER PARCELS OF LAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MCKINNEY RANCH THERE, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THEY SINCE THEY HAD NOTHING THERE, THEY WERE AT RISK FOR DEVELOPMENT. SO THAT WAS AGAIN AN UNFORTUNATE ASSUMPTION ON MY PART. I WANT TO AGREE WITH MICHELLE THAT WE HAVE SO MANY APARTMENTS IN THIS EXACT AREA AS IT IS, AND I JUST DON'T FEEL LIKE ANOTHER APARTMENT COMPLEX IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS SPACE. WE WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES COME IN THERE. WE ALREADY HAD SOME VERY UNDESIRABLE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE THE THE HOTEL, THE EXTENDED STAY HOTEL, THE STORAGE FACILITY AND, AND THE APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT'S ALREADY GONE IN. WE'VE ALREADY HAD THOSE INSULTS. AND SO TO HAVE THIS COME IN, WE'RE GETTING VERY DEMORALIZED OVER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND OUR PROPERTY VALUES ARE A HUGE CONCERN. AND I'D LIKE TO ECHO WHAT MICHELLE SAID, THE THE SCHOOL, MCNEAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THERE IS ALREADY VERY, [00:40:03] VERY LOW RATED. AND THE MORE APARTMENTS WE PUT IN HERE, THE LOWER IT'S GOING TO GO. I'M NOT DISPARAGING ANY ANY PARTICULAR CLASS OF PEOPLE OR SAYING ANYTHING AGAINST PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN APARTMENTS, BUT WE DO NEED SOME SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN HERE. THE THE AREA THERE IS AT THE CORNER OF ONE, 21 AND 75. THAT IS AN AMAZING AREA. YOU CAN BE ANYWHERE IN THE METROPLEX IN MINUTES JUST HOPPING ON RIGHT THERE. AND SO THE FACT THAT WE ALSO HAD THE STADIUM BUILT WHERE WE COULD HAVE HAD SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, EVERYTHING THAT'S BEEN PUT THERE HAS JUST BEEN ONE MORE INSULT TO US, AND WE WOULD JUST LOVE TO SEE WHAT LITTLE LAND IS LEFT. SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TO BE AN OPTION THERE. AND WE ALSO WANT TO SAY THAT THAT ENDEAVOR HAS BEEN GREAT. I THINK THEY ARE TRYING VERY HARD TO WORK WITH US AND THEY ARE VERY WELL PREPARED. WE WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION UNTIL TODAY THAT THIS WAS A DONE DEAL AND HAD ALREADY BEEN REZONE FOR MULTIFAMILY, AND SO WE'VE COME TONIGHT A LITTLE CONTINGENCY FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD UNPREPARED. AND SO WE UNDERSTAND THAT WE HAVE UNTIL THE 21ST OF OCTOBER TO MAKE SOME MORE PRESENTATIONS. AND WE WOULD LIKE TO DO THAT. THAT'S CORRECT. YOU HAVE UNTIL THEN, IF WE PASS IT TONIGHT, IF FOR ANY REASON. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. SOMEONE ELSE WANT TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK. SEEING NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, JAMES, WE HAVE A MOTION FROM JAMES TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, DEIRDRE. SECOND. THIS IS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO I GUESS I HAVE A QUESTION FOR FOR THE DEVELOPER. AND I SUPPOSE, YOU KNOW, I, I'D LIKE TO HEAR A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WHAT KIND OF CONVERSATIONS, WHAT KIND OF WHAT KIND OF NOTICES WERE PROVIDED TO THE RESIDENTS. AND WE'VE HEARD FROM TONIGHT AND INTO OTHERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND WHAT, WHAT KIND OF CONVERSATIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE WITH THEM, IF ANY? SURE. ALL THE NOTICES WERE PROVIDED, BUT WE HAD A MEETING WITH THE EL DORADO HOA BOARD INITIALLY. AFTER THAT, THE BOARD PUT OUT A NOTICE TO THEIR HOA AND WE DID A PRESENTATION FOR THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. SO BOTH OF THOSE MEETINGS OCCURRED. I'D SAY THE SECOND MEETING WITH THE HOA THAT WAS OPEN TO THE HOA WAS ABOUT TWO WEEKS AGO. OKAY. AND DID YOUR FIRM ALSO DO THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH THERE? NO, MY FIRM DID NOT. I WAS WITH A DIFFERENT FIRM. IT'S A GROUP CALLED FAIRFIELD RESIDENTIAL. I WAS WITH THEM AT THAT TIME, TOOK IT THROUGH THE ZONING AND THE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION, AND THEN I'VE TRANSFERRED TO A NEW FIRM SINCE AT THAT POINT I SEE. THANK YOU. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. AYE. MOTION PASSES. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. VOTE NOW. WE CAN OPEN IT UP FOR MORE DISCUSSION. YEAH. YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY I'VE LOOKED AT THIS PROPERTY BEFORE AND A COUPLE OF THINGS. ONE, IT'S IT'S A VERY CHALLENGING SITE TO DEVELOP. SO ANYTIME YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT IS THAT NARROW, JUST BASICALLY SKINNY AND DEEP FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM, THERE'S ONLY SO MUCH YOU CAN DO WHICH WHICH I BELIEVE IS THE REASON WHY THEY'RE ASKING FOR THAT SLIGHT VARIANCE. BUT, YOU KNOW, IN TODAY'S CLIMATE, IN TODAY'S MARKET, MOST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS DEVELOPED BY VOLUME. THE ONLY WAY IT CAN BE PROFITABLE IS IF YOU'RE DEVELOPING A LOT OF THEM. AND WITH TEN ACRES, I JUST DON'T SEE ANOTHER USE MORE APPROPRIATE WHEN YOU FACTOR IN THE MULTIFAMILY THAT'S RIGHT NEXT DOOR, THE THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS THAT ARE ALREADY BACKING UP TO MULTIFAMILY. I MEAN OTHER WITH THAT SITE CONFIGURATION, ONLY THING ELSE THAT COULD WORK WOULD BE LIKE SELF-STORAGE. AND I'M SURE WE DON'T WANT THAT. SO I MEAN, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM BEFORE WE HAVE THAT MOTION. COULD I HAVE STUART TO COME BACK? WITH THE CURRENT ZONING ON THAT PROPERTY? WHAT COULD GO THERE RIGHT NOW? SO [00:45:09] THE CURRENT PD HAS AN UNDERLYING ZONING OF RED ONE, WHICH FOLLOWS OUR RESIDENTIAL 43 ZONING. SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE A LARGE LOT, I BELIEVE A MINIMUM OF ONE ACRE. WOW. OKAY. I'M GOING TO MAKE THAT MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM. SECOND, HAVE A MOTION BY JAMES TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. WHO IS THE SECOND? CHARLES. CHARLES. THANK YOU CHARLES, AND THANK YOU FOR THE DISCUSSION. JAMES. HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. 25 0093Z. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. MOTION IS APPROVED 7 TO 0 VOTE AND WILL BE FORWARDED ON TO CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR OCTOBER 21ST, 2025 MEETING. THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM THAT'S NOT ON TODAY'S AGENDA? I SEE NO ONE. AND NEXT WE'LL GO TO [COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS] COMMISSIONERS. COMMENTS. STAFF, I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH TO EACH OF YOU FOR SELECTING ME TO BE YOUR CHAIRMAN THIS YEAR. THANK YOU SO MUCH, I APPRECIATE IT. IT'S BEEN AN HONOR. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I DID WANT TO NOTE THAT YOU ALREADY JUMPED AHEAD OF ME, BUT THAT Y'ALL HAVE THE ELECTION FOR CHAIR AT THE NEXT MEETING. ADDITIONALLY, I DID WANT TO NOTE THAT THIS IS STUART STARRY'S LAST MEETING WITH US. HE IS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE LEAVING THE CITY OF MCKINNEY FOR A NEW OPPORTUNITY, SO JUST MAKE SURE YOU SAY GOODBYE BEFORE Y'ALL LEAVE TONIGHT. CONGRATULATIONS, STUART. CONGRATULATIONS. WE'LL MISS YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR MENTIONING THAT MOTION. DO WE HAVE ANY MOTION? SO MOVED. CHARLES. CHARLES. MOTION TO ADJOURN. I'LL SECOND. JAMES. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? SAY THE SAME. NONE. WE ARE ADJOURNED. IT IS * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.