Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for a Major Vehicle Repair Facility (Classic Collision), Located on the Northwest Corner of Redbud Boulevard and Wilmeth Road

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for a Major Vehicle Repair Facility (Classic Collision), Located on the Northwest Corner of Redbud Boulevard and Wilmeth Road]

TO THE REGULAR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. SO FIRST ITEM ON REGULAR ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM 25-0014. SUP. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS. ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR FACILITY. CLASSIC COLLISION LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF REDBUD BOULEVARD AND WILMOT ROAD. MR. BENNETT? YES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS IS A PROPOSED CIP FOR A MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR FACILITY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILMOT AND REDBUD. THE GENERAL SURROUNDING AREA IS INHERENTLY INDUSTRIAL, WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION CONSISTING OF HEAVY MACHINERY, RENTAL AND SALES, OUTDOOR STORAGE AND WAREHOUSING. THERE ARE NO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES LOCATED WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AS PART OF THE SCP. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO UTILIZE A SEMTECH FENCE TO SURROUND THE OVERNIGHT VEHICLE STORAGE AREA. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED VEHICLE, MAJOR VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP, SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE PROPOSED SCREENING DEVICE MEETS THE INTENT OF THE UDC. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED SCP AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR. BENNETT. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JAKE? JAKE, WHAT TYPE OF FENCING IS THAT? I DIDN'T LOOK IT UP, I WASN'T FAMILIAR. YEAH, IT'S CALLED A SEMTECH FENCE. IT'S A POLYETHYLENE WITH STEEL REINFORCEMENTS. IT'S GOING TO BE FULLY OPAQUE, OPAQUE, AND IT'S MOLDED TO APPEAR AS IF IT'S A MASONRY WALL. IT'S JUST TO BE SURROUNDING THE OUTDOOR STORAGE OF THE VEHICLE, THAT AREA. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? JAKE,

[00:05:01]

IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? YES, MA'AM. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION. MY NAME IS OWN BARTLETT.

ADDRESS 18333 PRESTON ROAD, SUITE 350. DALLAS, TEXAS. 75252. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF SIXTH DEVELOPMENT AND OUR CLIENT, CLASSIC COLLISION. THEY'RE ONE OF THE MAJOR COLLISION CENTERS IN THE UNITED STATES. AND THEY ARE GROWING WITH OVER 300 STORES ACROSS 18 STATES.

THEY'RE BASED OUT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, AND THIS LOCATION IS ONE OF THE FIRST IN THE DFW AREA. IT'S A 17,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. WE ARE PROPOSING ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE ENCLOSED BUILDING. AND AS JAKE MENTIONED, SCREENING AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE TRASH ENCLOSURE WILL BE MASONRY. THERE ARE TWO POINTS OF ACCESS OFF WILMOTH ROAD AND REDBUD. ON REDBUD WE ARE ALSO PROVIDING COMPLETING THE STREET FROM THE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TO THE NORTH DOWN TO THE INTERSECTION. OUR ELEVATIONS REFLECT COHESIVENESS WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES WITHIN THE AREA, WHICH ARE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND A QUICK TRIP TO OUR WEST. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? Y'ALL OWN THE TRACK THERE. THAT'S AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER.

THAT LITTLE JUT OUT THERE, DO Y'ALL OWN THAT AS WELL OR SO THAT'S ACTUALLY DRAINAGE.

THAT'S A DETENTION BASIN FOR THE ENTIRE AREA THERE. SO OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AWESOME.

THANK YOU. COMMISSION. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEBOW TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THE ITEM. I SECOND THAT MOTION SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG.

KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THIS MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 2ND, 2025 MEETING. NEXT ON THE

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/ Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Commercial Uses and a New and Unlisted Use (Non-Profit and Community Service Center) and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 300 Feet North of West White Street and on the East Side of Redbud Boulevard]

AGENDA ITEM 20 5-0083 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL USES AND A NEW AND UNLISTED USE, WHICH IS NONPROFIT AND COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER AND TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 300FT NORTH OF WEST WHITE STREET AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF REDBUD BOULEVARD. MR. YES. THANK YOU AGAIN. THIS IS A PROPOSED REZONING FOR A PD IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE MAIN INTENT OF THE REZONING IS TO ESTABLISH A USE THAT IS NOT LISTED IN THE UDC. WELL BASED ZONING OF C-2 IS TO BE ALLOWED. THIS USE IS PROPOSED TO BE CALLED NONPROFIT AND COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER. THE DEFINITION ESTABLISHES SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS RELATING TO OVERNIGHT STAYS AND ESTABLISHES A PARKING RATIO AS WELL. THE NEWLY PROPOSED USE SHOULD HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON, AS THE PRIMARY FUNCTION WILL BE. OFFICE USES FOR A MIX OF DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS ALL OCCUPYING THE SITE, ONE CENTRAL LOCATION. THE SURROUNDING AREA PRIMARILY INCLUDES EXISTING NON RESIDENTIAL AND MULTIFAMILY USES, AND STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED PD SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ADJACENT PROPERTIES. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. JAKE, I HAD A QUESTION.

SO PRIOR TO THE NEW UDC, HOW WERE NON-PROFITS AND COMMUNITY CENTERS CLASSIFIED? SO THIS IS KIND OF A STANDALONE USE. THERE ARE, I GUESS, A MIX OF USES THAT COULD CLASSIFY THAT, WHETHER IT'S JUST OFFICE HERE, IT'S KIND OF A MIX OF USES ALL UNDER ONE DEFINITION. SO YES, IT'S IT'S PRIMARILY OFFICE, BUT THERE ARE LIKE HEALTH CLINICS AND ALL KIND OF LET THE APPLICANT KIND OF DESCRIBE THE FULL DEFINITION OF WHAT ALL WILL BE HAPPENING ON SITE AS FAR AS THE OPERATIONS, BUT WE LOOKED AT IT FROM THE STAFF STANDPOINT AND DECIDED THAT IT WOULD BE BEST TO CREATE A STANDALONE USE FOR WHAT WOULD BE OPERATION OR OPERATING ON THE PROPERTY. THANK YOU. DID YOU SAY THERE WILL BE OR WILL NOT BE AN OVERNIGHT STAY? THERE

[00:10:07]

WILL NOT BE ANY OVERNIGHT STAYS ALLOWED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? JAKE, YOU MENTIONED THE APPLICANT MIGHT BE HERE. YES. HE'S HERE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS MARTIN SANCHEZ, 210 ADRIATIC PARKWAY HERE IN MCKINNEY, TEXAS, SEVEN FIVE. 742. MY APOLOGIES. I WAS ABOUT TO COUGH THERE. COUNCIL COMMISSIONER, I APOLOGIZE. WE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH STAFF ON THIS PROJECT. THEY DID A VERY, VERY EXCELLENT JOB ON PUTTING TOGETHER THIS PARTICULAR PD SO THAT WE COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH WHAT IT IS WE'RE DOING. MOST NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FALL UNDER A VERY SINGULAR CATEGORY, SO THEY USUALLY FALL UNDER OFFICE OR A RETAIL CENTER, ETC. AND THAT'S REALLY KIND OF WHY THEY DID.

THE CITY DID NOT HAVE THIS PARTICULAR UDC CATEGORY. IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE, WE WERE PULLING TOGETHER A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS UNDER ONE LARGER NONPROFIT APPROACH. AND SO THAT'S WHY STAFF AND WE AGREED, FELT LIKE IT WAS APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME TO ADD THAT CATEGORY TO THE UDC ITSELF, WHERE IT KIND OF ENCOMPASSED A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS UNDER ONE ROOF. THE WHOLE GOAL IS TO BE MORE EFFICIENT IN HOW THEY PROVIDE SERVICES TO THOSE IN NEED, AND IT REALLY IS TO ESTABLISH SYNERGY AND TO ESTABLISH COLLABORATION AND TO BE ABLE TO IMPROVE THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES TO THOSE THAT ARE COMING IN NEEDING THAT EXTRA LITTLE HELP, IF YOU WOULD. THERE WILL BE NO OVERNIGHT STAYS. THIS IS NOT A HOMELESS SHELTER WHATSOEVER. THIS IS REALLY TO TRY TO FOCUS ON THOSE FOLKS THAT UNFORTUNATELY FIND THEMSELVES THAT ONE PAYCHECK AWAY, SO TO SPEAK, AND MIGHT NEED A LITTLE HELP TO JUST KIND OF GO THROUGH THE NEXT COUPLE MONTHS AND GET BACK ON THEIR FEET. WE'VE WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS, INCLUDING THE ISD. WE'VE MET WITH THE BOARD MEMBERS OF THE ISD AND EVEN THE SPECIAL PROGRAM STAFF, WHO ARE VERY EXCITED ABOUT BEING ABLE TO ALSO HAVE A PRESENCE AT THE FACILITY BECAUSE IT HELPS US HELP THEIR STUDENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES WHO MIGHT BE IDENTIFIED AS POTENTIAL IN NEED.

SO WHAT ARE SOME OF THE SERVICES THAT YOU'LL BE PROVIDING? SO CURRENTLY WE ARE HAVING A CLINIC HEALTHCARE CLINIC THAT WILL BE PROVIDED THERE. WE ALSO HAVE A VERY EXTENSIVE FOOD DISTRIBUTION FACILITY THAT WILL DEAL WITH NOT ONLY BULK DISTRIBUTION, BUT ALSO CONTINUE TO TO DELIVER FOOD SUBSTANCES OUT TO INTO THE COMMUNITY. IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE HAVE ONE HEART. MCKINNEY WILL BE PART OF THE THE OPERATIONS, AND THEY REALLY WILL BE KIND OF THE CENTRAL FOCUS IF YOU WOULD CASE MANAGEMENT. YOU KNOW, JOHN SMITH COMES THROUGH AND MIGHT NEED MIGHT IDENTIFY SELF-IDENTIFY I NEED X BUT IN REALITY THEY COULD USE A LITTLE BIT OF A, A LITTLE BIT OF C, A LITTLE BIT OF Y. AND IT'S ONLY THROUGH THAT INTAKE PROCESS WHERE WE GET TO UNDERSTAND WHERE THE FAMILY STRUCTURE IS, AND THAT INTAKE IS WHAT ALLOWS US TO SAY, LOOK, OUT OF THE 37 SERVICE PROVIDERS THAT ARE IN MCKINNEY OR COLLIN COUNTY, LET'S GET YOU CONNECTED IN THE APPROPRIATE PLACES SO THAT YOUR WHOLE FAMILY STRUCTURE CAN ACTUALLY MOVE FORWARD IN A MORE SUCCESSFUL MANNER. AND SO ONE MCKINNEY WILL BE THE INTAKE. BUT AGAIN, THOSE ARE JUST OFFICE USES. WE ARE NEGOTIATING WITH SAINT PAUL VINCENT ON A ON A FREE PHARMACY THAT WILL BE PART OF THE CLINIC. WE HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO ACTUALLY GET THAT DONE, BUT WE'RE PRETTY CLOSE. SO WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT THAT AS WELL. WE'RE ALSO PROVIDING LOW COST FLEX SPACE FOR AS MANY NON-PROFITS THAT THAT CAN POSSIBLY THAT NEED SPACE. A LOT OF TIMES YOU MIGHT HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS STARTING THEIR NONPROFIT AND THEY WANT TO FOCUS ON X, Y, AND Z, BUT BY THE TIME THEY DO THE RAMP UP OF THE BUSINESS PLAN AND SECURE LOCATION AND ALL THOSE COSTS, IT BECOMES PROHIBITIVE. MAYBE A GREAT IDEA, BUT HOW DO THEY ACTUALLY GO IMPLEMENT THAT? SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE THERE FOR, IS TO HELP THEM BE ABLE TO IMPLEMENT THAT THEIR PARTICULAR NICHE. AND SO WE WILL WORK THEM INTO THE OVERALL PROGRAMING IN ORDER FOR TO FACILITATE THAT SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION. AWESOME. THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM. MR. SANCHEZ. YES, SIR. IS THIS GOING TO BE A

[00:15:01]

ONE STORY OR TWO STOREY, TWO STOREY, SIR, TWO STOREY, TWO STOREY? AND I KNOW YOU TALKED ABOUT FOOD IN IN BULK. SO IS IT GOING TO BE ANY DOCK SPACE OR LOADING. SO WE'VE BEEN WORKING VERY VERY CLOSELY WITH NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK. AND IN TERMS OF WHETHER WE WILL NEED DOCK SPACE OR NOT, NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK IS PROVIDING A GOOD AMOUNT OF THE EQUIPMENT, THE SHELVING, THE ACTUAL FORKLIFTS, IF YOU WOULD, THEIR MANPOWER. THEY'RE NOT AN ACTUAL ACTUAL FORKLIFT.

THE INDIVIDUALS THAT YOU SEE, LIKE AT HOME DEPOT, SO TO SPEAK, AND THEY'RE NOT NEEDING DOCK SPACE. THEY WILL HAVE ROLL UP DOORS. WE HAVE TWO VERY SPECIFIC ROLL UP DOORS THAT ARE IN THE FAR NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING, AWAY FROM EVERYTHING ELSE, AWAY FROM THE STREETS, ETCETERA, SO THAT WE CAN BRING IN FOOD AND PALLETS. AND THEN FROM THERE IT'LL GO INSIDE FOR A SORTING, ETC. THE FACILITY WILL ALSO HAVE FULL BLOWN REFRIGERATION AND FREEZING FREEZER SPACE WHERE YOU ACTUALLY GO IN. AND WE CAN HAVE REFRIGERATED FOODS AS WELL.

SO HOURS OF OPERATION GENERALLY 8 TO 5 SO FAR. YES SIR. IT'S GOING TO BE NORMAL HOURS OF OPERATION. WHAT YOU WOULD EXPECT IN ANY OFFICE ENVIRONMENT 8 TO 5. WE MIGHT HAVE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE DISCUSSED ARE SOME SOME EVENING CLASSES, JOB TRAINING, WHETHER IT BE FINANCIAL LITERACY, THOSE TYPES OF PROGRAMS, BUT ALSO ON A LIMITED BASIS, NOTHING BEYOND YOUR TYPICAL 8:00 KIND OF ACTIVITY CLOSED ON SUNDAYS. SOME PROGRAMING, POSSIBLY ON SATURDAY MORNINGS. BUT FOR THE MOST PART IT'S AN OFFICE KIND OF ENVIRONMENT. THANK YOU SIR. YES SIR. HOW BIG OF A BUILDING ARE Y'ALL ENVISIONING BUILDING? SO RIGHT NOW, THE WAY WE LOOK AT IT FROM A LAND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE IS KIND OF THAT MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT, RIGHT? BECAUSE UNTIL IT'S DESIGNED, WE DON'T KNOW. BUT THAT MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS ABOUT 20, 22,000FT■!S. SO IFE DOUBLE THAT, IF IT'S AN EXACT DOUBLING RIGHT, WE CAN HAVE 44, 45,000FT■!S. TO PUT THAT INTO PERSPECTIVE, MOST OF OF THE FOLKS IN THIS ARENA HAVE EITHER VISITED OR HEARD OF, LIKE SERVE DENTON AND SERVE DENTON IS A GREAT KIND OF MODEL FOR THIS. THEIR FACILITY IS ABOUT 57,000FT■!S. SO THAT KIND OF PUS IT INTO PERSPECTIVE ABOUT HOW BIG IT WOULD BE. BUT THE TWO STORY ASPECT OF IT ALLOWS US TO TO REALLY PROGRAM IT MUCH MORE EFFICIENTLY RATHER THAN IT BEING SPREAD OUT. SO DOWNSTAIRS WILL BE THINGS THAT ARE VERY KIND OF DAILY CENTRIC. UPSTAIRS MIGHT BE PURE OFFICES, RIGHT? EITHER THESE MICRO OFFICES OR GROUP OFFICES ETCETERA, ETCETERA. ALL RIGHT. THANKS.

WHAT ABOUT ACCESS TO THIS, TO THIS, TO THIS PARCEL. IS THERE NEW IS THERE A NEW DRIVE THROUGH PLANNED? THERE WILL BE, SIR, ON REDBUD. IT HAS DIRECT ACCESS. SO WE WILL ACTUALLY TAKE ACCESS DIRECTLY ON REDBUD. IT'S INTERESTING YOU BRING THAT UP BECAUSE I THINK IT MERITS THE DISCUSSION. AND THE IMPORTANCE FOR ME TO HIGHLIGHT THIS LAND IS ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. THE THE HIGHER GOVERNANCE BODY OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IS CALLED THE GRACE PRESBY. THIS IS EXCESS LAND THAT THEY AND SO MANY OTHER CHURCHES OF ALL KINDS OF DENOMINATIONS ARE EXPERIENCING, THAT THEY HAVE EXCESS ASSETS. WHAT DO THEY DO WITH THIS LAND? THIS WAS A WAY WHERE THEY COULD REPURPOSE IT BACK INTO THE MISSION OF THE CHURCH, IF YOU WOULD. SO WE WERE ABLE TO WORK WITH THEM. AND THE REASON I'M TELLING YOU THIS STORY IS THAT THE CHURCH IS SO INTEGRALLY INVOLVED IN THE IMPLEMENTATION AND SUCCESS OF THIS IS THAT, IN ADDITION, FOR US HAVING OUR ACCESS OUT TO REDBUD, WE ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO TAKE A SECOND POINT OF ACCESS THROUGH THE FIRE LANE SYSTEM FOR THE CHURCH ITSELF.

IN THE ACQUISITION CONTRACT, THEY'VE GRANTED US A SECOND POINT OF ACCESS AS AN EASEMENT AS WELL AS WE'RE PROPOSING. ULTIMATELY, WHEN WE GET TO SITE PLANNING, A SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT BECAUSE IT'S COMPLEMENTARY USES, THEY HAVE THEIR BIG PARKING DEMAND ON SUNDAYS AND SOMETIMES ON WEDNESDAYS. WELL, ON SUNDAYS THE FACILITY WILL BE CLOSED AND SO WE CAN SHARE THOSE RESOURCES WITHOUT ADDING MORE PAVEMENT, ETCETERA, ETCETERA, WHICH GOES BACK TO ALLOWING US TO HAVE AS MUCH BUILDING AS POSSIBLE. SO THERE'S NO CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP.

WHAT'S THAT? SO WE WILL THERE WILL BE A CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP. SO THE, THE GRACE PRESBY IS ACTUALLY SELLING THE PROPERTY AT A MUCH DISCOUNTED RATE IN ORDER TO GET THIS ACCOMPLISHED.

THE PARTNERS THAT ARE ALL INVOLVED TRYING TO GET THIS ACCOMPLISHED ARE THE GRACE PRESBY, OUR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, WHICH IS SANCHEZ CHARITIES AND ALL, AND THE CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS, WHICH WILL NOW HAVE A PRESENCE HERE IN MCKINNEY. AN EVEN BIGGER PRESENCE, THE CATHOLIC CHARITIES, BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN RUNNING FACILITIES AND

[00:20:04]

HAVE THESE EXTENSIVE PROGRAMS AND EXPERIENCE, WILL ACTUALLY BE THE ACTUAL OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF THIS FACILITY LONG TERM. THANK YOU. SO SOMEHOW OR ANOTHER, WE MANAGED TO BRING THE PRESBYS, THE CATHOLICS, THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, OURSELVES, AND WE DIDN'T CAUSE A HOLY WAR. SO THAT'S KIND OF COOL. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. SANCHEZ? THANK YOU. I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY? SEEING AS THERE IS NO ONE, DO WE HAVE A MOTION OR ANY DISCUSSION? MADAM CHAIR, I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE. ITEM 25 0083Z. OKAY. SECOND, WE HAVE A FIRST BY COMMISSIONER WATLEY AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER. VICE COMMISSIONER. BUETTNER. RIGHT. ALL RIGHT, CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THE MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0, AND THIS ITEM ALSO WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 2ND, 2025 MEETING. OKAY. NEXT ITEM 20 5-0103Z.

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Commercial Uses and to Modify the Development Standards, Located on the Northwest Corner of North Central Expressway (U.S. Highway 75) and Laud Howell Parkway]

LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, US HIGHWAY 75 AND LORD HOWELL PARKWAY. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. CAITLIN SHEFFIELD, CHIEF PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 39.5 ACRES FROM PD TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. CURRENTLY, THE PROPERTY ALLOWS FOR A VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL USES. WITH THIS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE TO PD WITH A BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF C THREE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. IN THAT REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR HOSPITAL, MEDICAL OFFICE AND CLINIC USES TO 12 STORIES 210FT. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALLOWS FOR MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 20 STORIES, 270FT, SO WE ARE REDUCING THAT MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWANCE FOR THIS CORNER. ADDITIONALLY, WITH THE REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INCREASE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG HIGHWAY 75 AND LOT PARKWAY FROM 25FT TO 30FT. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS REQUEST. WE DO FEEL THAT IT'S GOING TO FURTHER ALLOW FOR THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY AND THE PROPOSED END USER FOR THE SITE, AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. CAITLIN. SO WHAT WAS THE WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR LOWERING THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OR MAXIMUM HEIGHT. AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. WAS THERE WAS THERE A REASON ANOTHER REASON THAT THEY WERE HAVING TO DO ANOTHER NEW PD OR SO. THE CURRENT PD DOESN'T ALLOW FOR HOSPITAL USE, AND SO THE C3 BASED ZONING DISTRICT WOULD ALLOW FOR THAT USE. BUT THE C3 BASED ZONING DISTRICT ONLY ALLOWS FOR MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 55FT. AND SO THE PD REQUIREMENT, OR THE PD REQUEST IS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THAT MAXIMUM HEIGHT EXTENSION TO WHAT THE HOSPITAL NEEDS FOR THIS SITE. THANK YOU.

IN TERMS OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, I DIDN'T MENTION THAT ONE. IT'S CURRENTLY REQUIRED 25FT AND THEY'RE INCREASING THAT TO 30FT OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR CAITLIN. THANK YOU CAITLIN, IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? YES. MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION I'M BOB RODER, 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300, IN MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, I WILL NOTE JUST AT THE BEGINNING THAT THIS THAT THE NEXT CASE COMING UP IS SORT OF A COMPANION CASE TO THIS ONE. YOU'VE READ YOUR PACKET AND YOU PROBABLY UNDERSTAND THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS PART OF A 111 ACRE PD THAT WAS INTENDED ORIGINALLY TO BE A VERY COMPLICATED SORT

[00:25:01]

OF PATTERN BOOK, MIXED USE COMMUNITY. MY CLIENT HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SELL THIS PROPERTY TO A MAJOR MEDICAL PROVIDER FOR A HOSPITAL COMPLEX. AND SO WE'RE COMING BACK IN AND TAKING THE 39 ACRES AND SEEKING TO REZONE IT. I WILL TELL YOU, THIS STARTED OUT TO BE VERY, VERY COMPLICATED. I WANT TO COMMEND THE STAFF. IT'S TAKEN US A NUMBER OF MONTHS, BUT WE'VE GOT IT ALL WHITTLED DOWN TO WHERE IT'S A VERY SIMPLE CASE FOR YOU NOW. AND SO GOOD WORK ON THEIR PART. WE BASICALLY ARE ADOPTING ASKING TO ADOPT THE C3 ZONE. WE'RE LOOKING FOR JUST A COUPLE OF MODIFICATIONS. ONE IS THE HEIGHT. AND AS YOU KNOW, AND PERHAPS YOU'RE AWARE THAT BAYLOR IS ADDING HEIGHT TO THEIR BUILDING. SO HOSPITALS THESE DAYS DON'T NECESSARILY SPREAD OUT. THEY THEY GO VERTICAL. AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE HERE. AND THIS WILL BE A A MAJOR REGIONAL COMPLEX IN ADDITION TO HEIGHT. AND CAITLIN ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. WE'RE PROPOSING TO CHANGE YOUR DISTANCE THAT THAT EACH PARKING LOT HAS TO BE TO A TREE. AND WE'RE DOING THAT SO THAT WE CAN FURTHER AGGREGATE TREES ALONG THE BUILDING, AROUND THE BUILDING AND SOME OF THE MORE HEAVILY TRAFFICKED PEDESTRIAN AREAS TO PROVIDE SHADE FROM THE TEXAS SUN IN THE SUMMERTIME. WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO REDUCE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED. WE JUST WANT TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY ABOUT WHERE WE CAN PUT THEM. BUT WITH THAT, I THINK IT'S A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD CASE. AND I WOULD REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR. REUTER. ANY QUESTIONS? FOR MR. REUTER? THE THE CLOSURE HAS BEEN APPROVED, RIGHT? YES. I MEAN, WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING THE FINAL OMER FILED. DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION REGARDING FUTURE WIDENING FOR LORD LORD HOWE AT ALL? I DO NOT I KNOW IT'S A FOUR LANE DIVIDED ROAD RIGHT NOW, SO THERE'S ROOM TO PUT ADDITIONAL LANES IN THE MEDIAN. AND IT WILL BE NEEDED.

YEAH. HOSPITAL? ABSOLUTELY. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE AND YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING AS THERE IS NOT ARE NONE. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION OR IS THERE A MOTION REGARDING THIS ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG. SECOND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD. KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTES.

OKAY. THIS THIS ITEM PASSES 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 2ND, 2025 MEETING. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 25-0108Z.

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Multi-Family Residential and Commercial Uses, and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 940 Feet North of Laud Howell Parkway and on the East Side of Trinity Falls Parkway]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES AND TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 940FT NORTH OF LORD HALL PARKWAY AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF TRINITY FALLS PARKWAY. MISS SHEFFIELD, THANK YOU. CAITLIN SHEFFIELD, AGAIN, CHIEF PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 28.7 ACRES OF LAND. THIS IS GENERALLY FOR COMMERCIAL USES AS WELL AS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. CURRENTLY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED PD AND THAT ALLOWS FOR A VARIETY OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES WITHIN THE LIMITS. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING. SIMILAR TO THE LAST REQUEST, A PD WITH A BASE ZONING OF C3 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WITH THAT, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INCLUDE THAT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE AS ALLOWED USE BY RIGHT WITHIN THIS ZONING. ADDITIONALLY, SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT FOR HOSPITAL, MEDICAL OFFICE AND CLINIC USES TO 12 STORIES 210FT SPECIFICALLY FOR THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEIGHT. THE CURRENT ZONING ALLOWS FOR A MINIMUM OF

[00:30:04]

THREE STORIES, 45FT UP TO A MAXIMUM OF SIX STORIES 75FT. AN APPLICANT IS PROPOSED TO MIRROR THAT REQUIREMENT IN THIS REQUEST AS WELL. IN TERMS OF DENSITY FOR THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE CURRENT PD, THERE IS NOT A REQUIREMENT FOR DENSITY. WITH THIS PD REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO LIMIT THE DEVELOPABLE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE TO 50 UNITS. IN TERMS OF SCREENING, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO NOT HAVE TO SCREEN ADJACENT TO USES. SO TYPICALLY FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, WE DO REQUIRE A SIX FOOT MASONRY WALL ON ALL REAR AND SIDE PROPERTY LINES TO INTEGRATE THE DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSING TO NOT PROVIDE THAT REQUIREMENT. SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS REQUEST, STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE CHANGES BEING PROPOSED WITHIN THIS PD. WE FEEL LIKE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS WILL FURTHER ENHANCE THE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE THE HOSPITAL MEDICAL OFFICE CLINIC CAMPUS THAT'S PROPOSED HERE AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MISS SHEFFIELD. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR CAITLIN? ARE THERE ANY, I GUESS, STANDARDS OR LIMITS ON WHAT TYPE OF USE ON ON SO MANY ACRES OR IS IT JUST YOU COULD WHAT'S ALLOWABLE ON ON ALL OF IT. YES. WHAT'S ALLOWABLE ON ALL OF IT. SO FOR THE MULTIFAMILY CURRENT ZONING IT ALLOWS IT IT ALLOWS THAT USE ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROPERTY.

STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF ALLOWING BOTH THE COMMERCIAL ASPECT WITH THE C3 DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALSO CONTINUING THE ALLOWANCE ON A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THERE IS AN APPROVED MULTIFAMILY SITE PLAN, AND SO ADDING THAT MULTIFAMILY USE WILL HOPEFULLY LIMIT ANY LEGAL NONCONFORMITIES IN THE FUTURE. SO CONTINUING THAT USE BETWEEN CURRENT ZONING AND ZONING PROPOSED. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. COME BACK UP MR. REUTER. BOB REUTER, 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300, MCKINNEY KATELYN'S. DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB OF PRESENTING THIS. I WANT TO ADD A LITTLE CONTEXT TO IT, IF I MIGHT. THIS WAS PART OF THAT 111 ACRES. THAT IS A PATTERN BOOK OR URBAN BASED CODE. AND SO A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE TALK ABOUT IN TERMS OF MULTIFAMILY THAT WE'RE SEEKING HERE WERE ALREADY PERMITTED UNDER THAT CODE. AND SO WE ARE BASICALLY WE HAVE BASICALLY DONE A FEW THINGS THAT HAVE DRAWN IT BACK. WE HAVE CHANGED THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS TO 50 UNITS PER ACRE. IT WAS UNLIMITED IN THAT CODE. WE ARE GOING FROM AN URBAN STYLE MULTIFAMILY TO A TRADITIONAL STYLE MULTIFAMILY. WE ARE KEEPING THE THREE STORY MINIMUM SIX STORY MAXIMUM FOR THOSE KINDS OF DENSITIES. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE STRUCTURED PARKING IN ALL PROBABILITY AND WHATNOT. SO WE ARE WE'RE KEEPING WITHIN THE SAME SCHEME THAT WAS ALREADY THERE. LET ME LET ME POINT OUT A LITTLE FACT FACTOID THAT YOU WOULD BE INTERESTED IN. THIS IS THE 39 ACRES IN OUR LAST CASE. LET ME GET A COLOR HERE THAT WORKS FOR ME. OOPS. OF THE 29 ACRES THAT THAT IS HERE. THE HOSPITAL USE WILL PROBABLY TAKE SOMETHING LIKE THIS. ABOUT 12 TO 13 ACRES. AND SO IT'S IT'S DIRECTLY ADJACENT. OKAY. THERE IS ALREADY A SITE PLAN APPROVED FOR THE FIRST PHASE OF MULTIFAMILY UP HERE. AT THE TOP OF THIS, I'M NOT QUITE SURE WHAT'S NORTH AND SOUTH BECAUSE ALL THESE ROADS RUN. THEY DON'T RUN. TRUE. SO THAT'S SO I THINK THE REALITY IS YOU'RE GOING TO SEE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT COMPLETED IN HERE, PROBABLY ONE MORE PHASE. AND THEN YOU'LL SEE THIS. AND THE HOSPITAL USE THIS AS PART OF THE HOSPITAL USE. SO WHAT WE HAVE DONE IN THE FOR THIS ENTIRE PROPERTY, AGAIN, TO MAKE IT SIMPLE, WE'VE ADOPTED C THREE, BUT WE'VE ADDED MULTIFAMILY AS AN ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USE. WE'RE PROPOSING THE SAME EXCEPTIONS TO THE C THREE FOR HEIGHT. THE PARKING TREES. WE DON'T REALLY HAVE A SETBACK ISSUE ON TRINITY FALLS PARKWAY LIKE WE DID ON LOT

[00:35:05]

HOUSE. SO THAT'S NOT ADDRESSED HERE FOR THE MULTIFAMILY. WHAT WE'VE DONE IS TONED IT DOWN 50 UNITS PER ACRE, DENSITY 3 TO 6 STORIES IN HEIGHT BECAUSE IN THE URBAN EXISTING PD THAT WE HAD HERE TO WORK WITH, AS YOU KNOW, IN THE URBAN CONTEXT, YOU REALLY DON'T PUT PERIMETER SCREENING WALLS AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF. AND SO WE ASK THAT THOSE BE REMOVED FROM THIS.

THE REALITY IS I'M LOVING THESE COLORS HERE. LET'S SEE. THE REALITY IS THIS IS A HUGE DETENTION OR RETENTION FACILITY. SO THE ADJACENCY THERE IS NOT GOING TO BOTHER ANYBODY. THIS PROPERTY UP HERE IS YET TO BE DEVELOPED. BUT THE LIKELIHOOD IS IT WILL NOT BE A SINGLE FAMILY TYPE DEVELOPMENT JUST GIVEN ITS LOCATION. SO WE THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE TO REMOVE THE SCREENING WALL PERIMETER SCREENING WALL REQUIREMENT. THAT'S THAT'S AGAIN A VERY STARTED AS A VERY COMPLICATED CASE. THANKS TO THE STAFF, WE WERE ABLE TO COOK IT DOWN AND GET IT VERY SIMPLE. SO I AGAIN APPLAUD CAITLIN AND HER TEAM FOR THAT. BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. I HAVE A QUESTION.

THE AREA IN GREEN. BOB, WHAT'S AN EXAMPLE OF A HOSPITAL USE? WHAT IS WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? WELL, THIS WILL BE THE REALITY IS THE 39 ACRES THAT'S READ IS PRETTY THIN, IS PRETTY NARROW.

AND SO THIS GIVES THEM THE DEPTH THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO PUT A MAJOR HOSPITAL FACILITY WITH MOBS. AND SO THAT WOULD JUST BE A DEEPER BUILDING IS WHAT YOU MEAN A DEEPER IT'LL BE A DEEPER CAMPUS. GOTCHA. YEAH. MR. WHAT IS THE PROPOSED SCREENING ALONG TRINITY FALLS PARKWAY? ARE YOU PROPOSING ELIMINATING HAVING TO ELIMINATE SCREENING ALONG THERE AS WELL? WELL, ON TRINITY FALLS PARKWAY, OF COURSE, NO SCREENING IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT'S THE FRONT STREET. NOW. WE STILL HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE STREET TREES REQUIREMENTS AND ALL THAT, BUT THERE WILL NOT BE A WALL THERE. OKAY? THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK WILL BE EXACTLY AS IT WOULD BE ANYWAY. THAT'S RIGHT. WE'RE NOT MESSING WITH ANY OF THAT. THANK YOU, TRINITY FALLS. EXCUSE ME.

SO, MR. ROEDER, JUST MY ATTEMPT TO KIND OF POKE THE BEAR JUST A LITTLE BIT. I GUESS IN THAT AREA WHERE YOU HAVE THE RED DRONE, THERE WON'T BE A MAJOR SUPERMARKET GOING THERE, AS WE WERE ONCE TOLD. YEAH, COMMISSIONER, YOU DO A GOOD JOB OF POKING THE BEAR. I CAN ALMOST ASSURE YOU THERE WILL NOT BE A SUPERMARKET THERE. BUT YOU KNOW THAT YOU REZONED ALL THIS AREA OVER HERE. YEAH, AND THERE'S LIKELY TO BE A SUPERMARKET THERE. OR THERE MIGHT BE ONE RIGHT HERE. SO THERE'S STILL PLENTY OF DEVELOPABLE LAND OUT THERE, EVEN IF WE'RE TAKING SOME OF IT FOR HOSPITAL USE. AND YOU SHOULD BE GLAD I AM. MR. POKING THE BEAR BACK. THAT SEEMS LIKE A MUCH BETTER USE OF THE LAND, THE HOSPITAL, THAN A GROCERY STORE, SO DEPENDS UPON HOW HUNGRY YOU ARE AT THE TIME. SO ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR POKES FOR MR. ROEDER? OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED. SO AGAIN, IF YOU ARE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR DO WE HAVE A MOTION REGARDING THIS ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. DO WE HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WATLEY? THERE'S A LITTLE FASTER.

OKAY, KINDLY. IT'S NOT ALL I HAVE IN FRONT OF ME. IS THE SCREEN STILL? THERE YOU GO.

OKAY. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. SEE, THE ITEM PASSES WITH A VOTE OF 7 TO 0. AND IT WILL ALSO BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THEIR DECEMBER 2ND, 2025

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property to PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Multi-Family Residential and Industrial Uses, Located at the Northeast Corner of North Central Expressway (U.S. Highway 75) and Spur 195]

MEETING. ALL RIGHT, NEXT ITEM. ITEM 250132Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS,

[00:40:10]

ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES. LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, US HIGHWAY 75 AND SPUR 195. MISS BOTELHO, GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS MENTIONED, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS TO TO ZONE APPROXIMATELY 141 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED HERE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LORD HOWELL AND HIGHWAY 75. THE INTENT IS FOR A MIX OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES.

THESE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERLYING ZONING. SOME MF 36 AND I-1 DISTRICTS. THE SITE, AS MENTIONED, IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY 75, WHICH PROVIDES EXCELLENT LOCATION FOR ACCESS TO THE REGIONAL HIGHWAY AND VISIBILITY. THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD ALSO BE LOCATED PARTIALLY IN THE FLOODPLAIN. IT IS UNDER THE FLOODPLAIN PLACE TYPE, SO ANY RECLAMATION OR FLOOD MANAGEMENT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SUPPORT ANY FUTURE INFRASTRUCTURE AND MOBILITY CONNECTIONS FOR THIS SITE. I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THERE WAS A REVISED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REGULATION THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU. I JUST WANTED TO NOTE SOME CORRECTIONS ON THE ZONES PER WHAT IT'S OUTLINED ON THESE STANDARDS. MULTIFAMILY WILL BE PERMITTED ONLY UNDER ZONE ONE AND NOT TWO. JUST TO CORRECT THAT INFORMATION. THIS FORM ALIGNS WITH THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED THROUGH THE ANNEXATION FACILITY AGREEMENT THAT WAS PROVIDED TO CITY COUNCIL AND WAS APPROVED THIS YEAR. AGAIN, THE PROPOSED MIX SUPPORTS THE DISTRICTS VISIONS FOR COORDINATED EMPLOYMENT AND RESIDENTIAL GROWTH WITHIN THE AREA, AND ALIGNS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FLOODPLAIN TYPE OBJECTIVES. FOR THIS REASON, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MISS MATEO. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ARACELI? JUST REAL QUICK. ZONE TWO AND ZONE ONE. WHICH ONE IS MULTIFAMILY ALLOWED AND WHICH ONE'S NOT? SO JUST TO KIND OF DRAW HERE. CAN I DO ANNOTATIONS? OKAY. I'M GOING TO ERASE THAT. OH. IS THE ANNOTATIONS ON. OH APPRECIATE IT. YOU'RE WELCOME. OKAY. SO IT'S DIVIDED BY ZONE ONE HERE. AND ZONE TWO. SO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WOULD BE PERMITTED ON ZONE ONE AND ZONE TWO. BUT ONLY MULTIFAMILY WOULD ONLY BE PERMITTED ON ZONE ONE. ZONE ONE OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU SAID IT IS STILL PARTIALLY WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN. I KNOW THEY'VE GOT THE TWO BIG DETENTION PONDS. SO YES, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE FLOODPLAIN PLACE TYPE, WHICH PUTS IT IN THE A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IN THE FLOODPLAIN. SO ANY TYPE OF INCREASE, YOU KNOW, USE OF THE LAND WOULD REQUIRE SOME RECLAMATION AND ALSO REVIEW BY OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR ANY ADDITIONAL LAND OR TO PROVIDE ANY FLOOD STANDARDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE. HAVE THEY ALREADY APPLIED FOR A LOAN OR OR I WOULD HAVE TO DEFER TO THE APPLICANT FOR THAT INFORMATION, YES. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR SALLY? JUST ONE. THAT'S A BIG PARCEL OF LAND. I'M JUST CURIOUS WHAT WHAT'S THE PURPOSE OF EXCLUDING ONE'S OWN? AS NOT NO MULTIFAMILY? IS THERE A PARTICULAR REASON FOR THAT? I'D HAVE TO DEFER ON THE APPLICANT, BUT FROM THE STAFF'S PERSPECTIVE, I THINK THE INTENT IS TO DO INDUSTRIAL. SHOULD INDUSTRIAL NOT FALL THROUGH ON ZONE ONE, THEN IT WOULD GO BACK.

IT WOULD ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY ON THAT AREA, I SEE. OKAY. THANK YOU. YEAH NO PROBLEM SIR THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I SEE OUR APPLICANT STARTED APPROACHING. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS HEATHER SCHENKEL. I'M WITH DAIKI LAW AND I AM REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT. STAFF DID DO A GREAT JOB OF PRESENTING THIS, AND SHE DID ANSWER THE QUESTION REGARDING THE MULTIFAMILY AND THE THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. I WILL SAY THAT THE LOWER ENCLOSURE HAS BEEN OBTAINED FOR THE FLOODPLAIN. AND BECAUSE OF THE SHUTDOWN, WE'RE JUST WAITING TO RECEIVE THAT LETTER. BUT THAT FLOODPLAIN WORK HAS ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED. AND SO THAT THAT'S ALREADY BEEN TAKEN CARE OF. AND AGAIN, AS SHE MENTIONED, THE THE ZONING REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ANNEXATION FACILITIES AGREEMENT THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN ADOPTED BY COUNCIL, AND WE ARE REMAINING CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS AGREED TO. AND SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO ADD. IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER FURTHER QUESTIONS, I COULD TRY TO

[00:45:03]

ASSIST YOU WITH THOSE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT, MISS SCHENKEL? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO AGAIN, IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION OR DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY VICE CHAIRMAN BEUTNER. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTES. THIS ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY AND WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE DECEMBER 2ND, 2025 MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM IS ITEM 20 FIVE. DASH

[Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow for Commercial and Auto Garage Uses (Luxury Auto Garages), and to Modify the Development Standards, Located Approximately 290 Feet South of Virginia Parkway and Approximately 220 Feet West of South Hardin Boulevard]