[CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:07] MCKINNEY'S PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING FOR TUESDAY, JANUARY THE 13TH, 2026. THE COMMISSIONERS AT UC SEATED BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL AND WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL. THERE ARE SOME ITEMS TONIGHT THAT WILL BE HEARD ONLY BY PLANNING AND ZONING. AND THEN THERE ARE SOME ITEMS THAT MIGHT BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL. I WILL ADVISE YOU IF THE CASE IS GOING TO BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL, OR IF IT WILL BE HEARD ONLY BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. IF YOU ARE HERE TONIGHT AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM, IF YOU DID NOT DO SO, PLEASE GRAB ONE OF THE YELLOW SPEAKER CARDS AND COMPLETE THAT AND TURN THAT IN PRIOR TO APPROACHING. WHEN IT IS YOUR TURN TO SPEAK, PLEASE STATE YOUR FIRST NAME AND YOUR LAST NAME FOR THE RECORD. AND THEN WE DO KINDLY ASK THAT YOU LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES. YOU MAY ONLY SPEAK ONE TIME ON EACH AGENDA ITEM. AS COMMISSIONERS, WE DO REQUEST THAT YOU ARE COURTEOUS, THAT YOU TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT, THAT YOU FOCUS ON THE ISSUES AND THAT YOU ARE CONCISE IN YOUR COMMENTS. I DO WANT TO STRESS TO EACH OF YOU THAT YOU'RE IMPORTANT IS IMPORTANT TO US, AND IT DOES BECOME PART OF THE CITY RECORD. WE ALL WANT TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF MCKINNEY. SO AT THIS TIME, WE'LL NOW MOVE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE NONPUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON ANY OF THE NONPUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS? OKAY. SEEING IS THERE [CONSENT ITEMS] ARE NONE. WE'LL NOW MOVE TO THE CONSENT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT ITEMS, WHICH INCLUDES THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 9TH, 2025? MADAM CHAIR, I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OUR LAST MEETING. COMMISSIONER LEBEAU'S MADE THE MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTES. AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY WITH A VOTE OF 5 TO 0. THAT BRINGS US TO THE END OF OUR CONSENT ITEMS. WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS, AS WELL [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Design Exception to a Site Plan for Office, Retail, and Restaurant Uses (Urban Garages), Located on the Northwest Corner of US Highway 380 (West University Drive) and Lakefront Road (County Road 856) (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)] AS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. SO THE FIRST ITEM IS ITEM 250064 SP CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACT ON A DESIGN EXCEPTION TO A SITE PLAN FOR OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES. URBAN GARAGES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF US HIGHWAY THREE, 80 WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE AND LAKEFRONT ROAD. COUNTY ROAD 856. JAKE. YES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MISS WOODARD. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. SO STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM ACTUALLY BE TABLED IN THE PUBLIC HEARING, CLOSED OR TABLED INDEFINITELY IN THE PUBLIC HEARING, CLOSED THERE. DURING THE LATEST REVIEW, STAFF REALIZED THAT THERE IS NO DESIGN EXCEPTION THAT'S ACTUALLY REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM, SO IT WILL NOT BE COMING BACK IN THE FORM OF A SITE PLAN. SO AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR JAKE. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE INDEFINITELY. ITEM NUMBER 25 0064 SP CAN WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK? SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WATLEY. AND THAT ONE WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. OKAY. NEXT ITEM, ITEM 250099Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property to “MR” - Mixed Residential District, Located on the North Side of Bloomdale Road and Approximately 540 Feet West of FM 1461 (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)] HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO MR. MIXED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BLOOMINGDALE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 540FT WEST OF FM 1461. YES. THANK YOU AGAIN. THIS IS ANOTHER REQUEST TO TABLE WITH THIS SCENARIO. THE APPLICANT DID NOT PLACE THE NOTIFICATION SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORRECT TIME FRAME AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE, SO WE'RE REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM BE TABLED TO THE NEXT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. SO JANUARY 27TH AND [00:05:03] THE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO THAT DATE AS WELL. THANK YOU. AND THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION. YES, MA'AM. YEP. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THIS ITEM? SINCE IT'S REQUESTED TO BE TABLED, I'LL MOVE TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO THE JANUARY 27TH MEETING. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER BEUTNER TO MOVE THIS TO THE JANUARY 27TH MEETING. SECOND, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTES. AND THAT ITEM WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY AS WELL. SO IF YOU'RE JUST JOINING US, WE'RE JUST GETTING WARMED UP. SO NOW WE'RE ABOUT TO GET [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Variances to a Site Plan for Auto Repair Garage (Tovi Motors), Located at 1004 South McDonald Street] INTO THE BULK OF OUR MEETING FOR THIS EVENING. OKAY. OUR NEXT ITEM, ITEM 20 2-0118 SP THREE. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON VARIANCES TO A SITE PLAN FOR AUTO REPAIR GARAGE TOBY MOTORS, LOCATED AT 1004 SOUTH MCDONALD STREET. JAKE. THANK YOU AGAIN. SO THIS PROJECT MAY BE MAY LOOK A LITTLE FAMILIAR TO YOU AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED BACK IN 2023 BY PNC. THIS IS A PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR A VEHICLE REPAIR FACILITY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY FIVE AND GARAGE STREET. TYPICALLY, SITE PLANS ARE APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. HOWEVER, WHEN CERTAIN VARIANCES ARE DESIGNED, EXCEPTIONS ARE REQUESTED. SUCH AS THESE. THEY ARE BROUGHT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR ACTION. THIS SITE PLAN WAS REVIEWED UNDER CHAPTER 146 OF THE OLD CODE. SINCE IT WAS SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF OUR CURRENT UDC. PREVIOUSLY, SEVEN DESIGN EXCEPTIONS WERE APPROVED BY PNC FOR A MIX OF ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING, ARCHITECTURAL AND SCREENING CHANGES. THIS CASE COMES BACK WITH AN ADDITIONAL REQUEST TO REMOVE SCREENING FOR THE OVERNIGHT STORAGE OF VEHICLES. UNDER THE OLD CODE, ALL VEHICLE REPAIR FACILITIES WERE REQUIRED. DESIGNATED AREAS FOR OVERNIGHT STORAGE OF VEHICLES AWAITING REPAIR. THE APPLICANT HAS EXPRESSED THEIR INTENT TO ONLY STORE VEHICLES INSIDE THE BUILDING AND OUT OF THE VIEW OF THE PUBLIC, FOR SCREENING AND SAFETY PURPOSES. DESIGNATED AREAS FOR OVERNIGHT STORAGE OF VEHICLES ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR UNDER THE UDC, SO SCREENING WOULD NOT CURRENTLY BE REQUIRED HAD THIS CASE BEEN SUBMITTED. AFTER THE ADOPTION OF THE UDC. STAFF ALSO UNDERSTANDS THE REQUEST TO PROTECT VEHICLES BY STORING THEM INSIDE. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE ADDITIONAL DESIGN EXCEPTION OR VARIANCE SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES OR HAVE ANY ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC. AS SUCH, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YES, MADAM CHAIR, I HAVE A QUESTION. WHY IS STAFF RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS GARAGE BAYS FACING HIGHWAY FIVE? YES. SO WE DON'T APPROVE THAT FOR ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE CITY. SO THERE ARE, YOU KNOW, I GUESS OPPORTUNITIES FOR WHERE THEY CAN PROVIDE THAT OR WHERE WE'D BE RECOMMENDING, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. IN THIS SCENARIO, THERE IS NO WAY FOR THEM TO NOT ORIENT THEM TOWARDS ANY PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, SINCE IT'S SURROUNDED ON THREE SIDES. AND THEN IF YOU LOOK TO THE WEST, THERE'S RESIDENTIAL, SO WE'D RATHER HAVE THEM ORIENT THESE BAY DOORS TOWARDS MCDONALD STREET, AS OPPOSED TO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST. AND THERE'S ALSO THEY'RE ALSO UTILIZING A VERY SIMILAR LAYOUT AS A WHAT IS CURRENTLY ON SITE. IT'S CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, BUT THERE WAS AN APPROVED OR AN EXISTING CAR WASH THERE PREVIOUSLY. SO THEY'RE USING A SIMILAR LAYOUT TO WHERE THE EXISTING BUILDING IS TODAY. I HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE COMMENT TO MAKE. I'LL DO IT WHILE JAKE'S HERE. I GUESS IT'S NOT REALLY A QUESTION, BUT I WANT TO BE SURE EVERYBODY KNOWS IN EARLY DECEMBER, THE TRS ONE BOARD RECOMMENDED AND THE COUNCIL PASSED AND ACCEPTED AUTHORIZATION FOR HIGHWAY FIVE CORRIDOR STUDY THAT INCLUDES THIS PROPERTY. AND I WOULD JUST THINK, WHY WOULDN'T WE WAIT FOR THE STUDY TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE WE MAKE ALL THESE VARIANCES ON A PROPERTY? OKAY. IS IS THAT A QUESTION THAT YOU WOULD LIKE ANSWERED? I GUESS I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE AN ANSWER FOR IT. YEAH. SO I DON'T THINK THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE ANY CORRIDOR STUDY THAT'S UNDERWAY. SO THERE IS NO TIME FRAME FOR THAT. AND THOSE TIME FRAMES, OUR TIME FRAMES DON'T REALLY DICTATE PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT TIME. I'M SPEAKING [00:10:03] OF THE ONE COMMITTEE BOARD AND WE AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL THAT IT BE FUNDED FOR HIGHWAY FIVE CORRIDOR STUDY. AND I BELIEVE IT WAS UP FOR COUNCIL TO APPROVE IT AT THE LAST MEETING. AND I THINK IT DID. OKAY. SO THAT'S WHAT I'M SPEAKING OF. YEAH. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION LUCAS REILLY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER LEBEAU, FOR RAISING THAT QUESTION. JUST FOR THE REST OF THE COMMISSIONERS AND EVERYBODY ELSE. YES. SO STAFF DID REQUEST FUNDS FROM TRS ONE BOARD TO FUND A REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND STUDY, BASICALLY A SMALL AREA PLAN FOR HIGHWAY FIVE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE MTC. LOOKING AT THE CORRIDOR, WHICH TO YOUR POINT WOULD INCLUDE THIS PARCEL. I AGREE WITH JAKE'S INTERPRETATION. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS A LONG RANGE PLAN LOOKING AT IN THE NEXT TEN, 15, 20 YEARS, WHAT WOULD DEVELOPMENT LOOK LIKE? WHAT COULD REDEVELOPMENT LOOK LIKE FOR PARCELS? PRIMARILY WHERE WE SEE REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL VERY RIPE. AND SO TO DEFINE THAT IT WOULD BE PROPERTIES THAT THE PARCEL ITSELF IS WORTH MORE THAN WHATEVER THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE. IF THERE ARE IMPROVEMENTS, THIS PROPERTY WOULDN'T FALL UNDER THAT DEFINITION, UNDER THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT THAT'S ALREADY UNDERWAY. AND SO OVER THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING THAT PLAN, NEXT, 12, 18, 24 MONTHS, THERE WILL BE SEVERAL LIKELY SEVERAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS THAT WE MIGHT BRING BEFORE YOU, DEPENDING ON THE SPEED AND PACE OF PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. IT MAY BE THAT IF WE'RE FAR ENOUGH IN THAT PLAN, WE WE DISCUSS SOME OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAN HAS AT THAT POINT. BUT I THINK IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE, NOTHING THAT'S PROPOSED JUMPS OUT AT ANY OF US ON THE STAFF LEVEL AS SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE VASTLY IN CONFLICT WITH WHAT WE SEE AS POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT ALONG THIS CORRIDOR. HOW LONG DO YOU THINK THIS NEW STUDY IS GOING TO TAKE TO COMPLETE? SO RIGHT NOW, AS SOME OF YOU KNOW, OUR PLANNING MANAGER FOR LONG RANGE HAS RESIGNED HER POSITION. SHE WAS SUCCESSFUL IN GAINING A DIRECTOR POSITION IN ALLEN. SO WHILE WE'RE ONLY SOMEWHAT UPSET, WE'RE ALSO VERY EXCITED FOR HER. AND SO THAT'S PUT A LITTLE BIT OF A PIN IN THAT PROJECT. WE'RE ALSO GETTING THE THE TRS BUDGET AMENDED, BUT WE WILL GO THROUGH AN RFQ PROCESS FOR A CONSULTANT LATER THIS WINTER OR EARLY SPRING. AND THEN ONCE WE GET THAT KICKED OFF, IT COULD BE ANYWHERE FROM 18 TO 24 MONTHS TO GO THROUGH THAT PLANNING PROCESS. I THINK THE FIRE STUDY IS GOING TO BE COMPLETED DECEMBER. THE DOWNTOWN FIRE SUPPRESSION. YEAH, YEAH, I THINK THE PHASE ONE. YEAH. THE LEADER. PHASE ONE. YEAH. YES. THANK YOU. ABSOLUTELY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE TRS ONE FUNDING FOR THE WI FI PLAN? DO WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? I DO, YEAH. JAKE, I WAS LOOKING HERE AT THE LETTER OF INTENT. I THINK ALSO IN THE INFO THAT WE RECEIVED BY EMAIL, THERE'S A WHOLE LIST OF ABOUT WHAT, EIGHT ITEMS THAT ARE REQUESTING VARIANTS. I THINK YOU JUST MENTIONED THE ONE REGARDING THE OVERNIGHT PARKING. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. THE OTHER SEVEN WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BACK IN 2023. OKAY. SO THEY'RE JUST BEING RE LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. HOWEVER THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY PNC. SO THE ONLY ADDITIONAL ONE THAT HAS NOT YET BEEN APPROVED IS JUST THE SCREENING FOR THE OVERNIGHT STORAGE, WHICH AGAIN, THEY'RE DOING AWAY WITH AS PART OF THIS PLAN. AND THEY WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED UNDER THE CURRENT UDC BECAUSE THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED UNDER THE OLD CODE. THAT'S WHERE THAT REQUIREMENT COMES INTO PLACE. OKAY. YEAH. AND WHERE IS THESE? ARE THEY PROPOSING TO HAVE THE OVERNIGHT VEHICLE STORAGE. SO EXCUSE ME. THE PARKING OR STORAGE OF THE VEHICLES IS NOT CHANGING. SO THE ENTIRE SITE LAYOUT IS STAYING THE SAME. THE ONLY THING THAT'S CHANGING IS THEY'RE REMOVING A MASONRY WALL, WHICH WOULD BE KIND OF AROUND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER. AND THEN THE EASTERN KIND OF SOUTHEASTERN CORNER AS WELL. SO THERE WOULD BE A SIX FOOT TALL MASONRY WALL THAT WOULD BE ALL THE WAY UP TO ESSENTIALLY THE PROPERTY LINE FOR THE SCREENING OF THOSE SPACES. AGAIN, THEY'RE DOING AWAY WITH THAT WITH THIS PLAN. OKAY. ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT HAS LET US KNOW THAT THE INTENT FOR ANY VEHICLES THAT DO HAVE TO STAY THE NIGHT IS THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE PUT INSIDE OF THE BAYS THEMSELVES TO PROTECT THE VEHICLES, WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE SCREENING OF THEM AS WELL, BECAUSE THEY'LL BE BEHIND THE BAYS ALREADY. OKAY, EACH ONE OF THE BAYS WILL BE LARGE ENOUGH OR DEEP ENOUGH TO FIT TWO VEHICLES AS OPPOSED TO JUST ONE. YEAH. OKAY, JAKE. GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD. SO THE SO THE CODE HAS CHANGED. RIGHT. AND SO THE RESIDENTS THAT LIVE BEHIND THIS PLACE, ARE THEY AWARE OF THE [00:15:01] CURRENT CHANGES IN THE CODE AND THE FACT THAT THIS BUSINESS PLANS TO ALLEVIATE A WALL THAT WAS GOING TO BE PUT THERE. YES. SO AGAIN, THE ONLY PORTION THAT WOULD BE KIND OF ON THE WESTERN SIDE IS THE VERY SOUTHWESTERN CORNER WHERE THE BUILDING ENDS AND KIND OF WRAPS AROUND THOSE REALLY JUST THE THREE PARKING SPACES THERE. BUT THEY RECEIVE THE PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONS BOTH BACK IN 2023 FOR THE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS WE HAD THEN, AS WELL AS THIS ROUND AS WELL. OKAY. YEAH. JAKE, MY QUESTION WAS IF YOU WOULD JUST REFRESH MY MEMORY. WHEN WE DISCUSSED THIS IN 2023, WE TALKED ABOUT EMPLOYEE PARKING AND WHERE THEY WOULD. DO YOU REMEMBER THE DISCUSSIONS ON THAT? VERY VAGUELY, BUT YES, I DO REMEMBER THAT. OKAY. SO I GUESS MY NEXT QUESTION IS HOW ARE THEY GOING TO HANDLE. YEAH. ALL KIND OF DEFER TO THE APPLICANT ON THOSE REALLY. THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES OR PARKING SPACES THAT ARE BEING TAKEN AWAY WITH THIS PLAN, WHEREAS PREVIOUSLY THEY WERE REQUIRED TO DEDICATE, I BELIEVE, 5 OR 6 PARKING SPACES AS OVERNIGHT STORAGE, EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY HAVE NOT BEEN USED FOR THAT. THE ONLY CHANGE WITH THIS REQUEST IS JUST TO REMOVE THAT REQUIRED SCREENING THAT WAS REQUIRED UNDER THE OLD CODE. SO THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IS NOT CHANGING WITH THIS REQUEST. AS IT AS A AS RELATED TO THE PREVIOUS PLAN. BUT I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT ON WHAT THEY FORESEE HAPPENING WITH THEIR EMPLOYEE PARKING OR ANY OVERNIGHT STORAGE. THANK YOU. JAKE. AND I DO REMEMBER FROM 2023 WHEN WE DISCUSSED IT LAST TIME. WE ALSO DISCUSSED THAT OUR PARKING RATIOS DO TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT. SO THE PARKING RATIOS THAT ARE JUST ACROSS THE CITY IT IS TO ENCAPSULATE EMPLOYEES IS TO ENCAPSULATE THE PEOPLE THAT ARE COMING. SO IT IS PARKED AT A RATIO THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE EMPLOYEES AND PEOPLE COMING FOR SERVICES AT THIS LOCATION. THANK YOU. SO THERE'S NO SCREENING ALONG CHESTNUT BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE BUILDING BASICALLY UP TO THE THE SIDEWALK. AND OR THEY'RE GOING TO BE IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS GOING TO BE LANDSCAPING IN BETWEEN. THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME LANDSCAPING. I'LL PULL UP THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. YOU CAN SEE THERE ARE SOME ORNAMENTAL TREES, AS WELL AS SOME SHRUBS THAT ARE BACK TO ON THE WESTERN SIDE TO HELP KIND OF SOFTEN THE LOOKS OF THAT BUILDING. BUT REALLY, THE ENTIRE LOT IS GOING TO BE SCREENED WITH WITH THE BUILDING ALL THE WAY UP TO WHERE IT ENDS DOWN THERE IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER. YEAH. AND THERE'S ONLY A COUPLE OF DOORS THAT WOULD LOOKS LIKE THAT WOULD BREAK THAT. YES. THERE ARE TWO DOORS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED BACK THERE. I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT ON WHAT THEY FORESEE USING YOU. UTILIZING THOSE FOR ALL OF THE BAY DOORS, THOUGH, ARE GOING TO BE ON THE EASTERN SIDE. SO IF THEY HAVE ANY DELIVERIES AS WELL AS OTHER OPERATIONS, THAT'S GOING TO BE TAKING PLACE ON THE EASTERN SIDE. SO OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU JAKE, IS OUR APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING? I BELIEVE SO, YES. HELLO. DID YOU COMPLETE ONE OF THE SPEAKER CARDS ALREADY? WE'LL GET IT WHEN I GET AFTERWARDS. OKAY. THANK YOU GUYS. THANK YOU. CHANGE THE COLOR ON ME. I THOUGHT THEY WERE YELLOW. YES. GO AHEAD, STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE. 4021 MILDENHALL IN PLANO, TEXAS, 75093. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I REALLY DON'T. SO ARE THE WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT THE DOORS THAT ARE ON FACING CHESTNUTS. ARE THOSE GOING TO BE USED FOR JUST EMPLOYEES COMING AND GOING OR ARE THEY CUSTOMERS ARE GOING TO BE SHUTTERED, SHUT OR LOCKED MOST OF THE TIME OR WHAT'S THE. YEAH, THOSE DOORS ON THE WEST SIDE FOR FACING CHESTNUT ARE FOR MORE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. THEY'RE NOT REALLY MEANT FOR ANY BUSINESS USE. OKAY. THOSE DOORS WOULDN'T OPEN FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN AN EMERGENCY. THAT'S WHAT I ASSUME I JUST WANT. THANK YOU. HOW MANY EMPLOYEES DO YOU CURRENTLY HAVE RIGHT NOW? THIS GOING IN, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE AT LEAST 3 OR 4 EMPLOYEES. JUST NOT SURE EXACTLY, BUT AT LEAST 3 OR 4 EMPLOYEES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. NO PROBLEM. THANK YOU. SEEING AS THIS ITEM HAS A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED, I WOULD LIKE TO OPEN IT UP TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYBODY WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ISSUE. OKAY. SEEING AS [00:20:02] THERE'S NONE, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU. MR. WATLEY MOVES TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEBEAU. CAST YOUR VOTE FOR CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION REGARDING THE ITEM ITSELF? I JUST HAD A COUPLE OF COMMENTS OF DISCUSSION, AND I DIDN'T FEEL IT WAS APPROPRIATE UNTIL WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. MY CONCERN IS, IS THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE A REPAIR GARAGE. I THINK A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, WE PASSED A FACILITY BEING BUILT THAT'S GOING TO BE SOUTH OF HERE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ROAD, AND IT WAS GOING TO BE AN OIL CHANGE GARAGE THERE, AND ENDED UP TURNING IT INTO A USED CAR LOT. AND I THINK THAT HIGHWAY FIVE HAS 7 OR 8. OF THOSE. WE HAVE ENOUGH OF THOSE. SO I JUST WANTED TO GET THAT ON THE PUBLIC RECORD THAT IF IT'S GOING TO BE A REPAIR PLACE. YES. BUT I THINK IF WE'RE GOING TO ADD ANOTHER, ENDED UP PUTTING ANOTHER CAR DEALERSHIP ON HIGHWAY FIVE, I THINK THAT THAT'S THAT'S ENOUGH. SO I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION THAT IF ANY KIND OF AUTOMOBILE SALES, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK BEFORE Y'ALL FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. SO WE WILL WE WILL BE ON THE LOOKOUT. BUT THIS CAN ONLY BE A MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION? I MOVE THAT WE PASS THIS ITEM PER STAFF APPROVAL. OKAY. COMMISSIONER WATLEY HAS MOVED TO APPROVE SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMACK. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTE. AND THE ITEM PASSES 4 TO 5. OKAY, MOVING ON [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for Passenger Vehicle Fuel Sales (Murphy Oil USA), Located on the Southwest Corner of North Central Expressway (US Highway 75) and Virginia Parkway] TO OUR NEXT ITEM. ITEM 250016 SUP. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR PASSENGER VEHICLE FUEL SALES. MURPHY OIL USA LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, US HIGHWAY 75 AND VIRGINIA PARKWAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU AGAIN. THIS IS A PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A GAS STATION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF US 75, IN VIRGINIA. THE INTERSECTION OF 75 AND VIRGINIA ALREADY HAS GAS STATIONS LOCATED ON ALL OF THE FOUR CORNERS, AND A FOURTH GAS STATION IS LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION. THE CRITERIA LISTED IN THE UDC ONLY PERMITS TWO GAS STATIONS AT EACH INTERSECTION, WITH ADDITIONAL GAS STATIONS REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF SUPS. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE UDC, AS THIS WOULD BE THE FOURTH GAS STATION ON THE FOURTH HARD CORNER AND THE FIFTH GAS STATION WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 1500 FEET ALONG VIRGINIA PARKWAY. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JAKE REGARDING THIS ITEM? I GUESS YOU KNOW, GIVEN THE LOCATION? JAKE, I'D QUESTION, YOU KNOW, WHAT MAKES SENSE IN TERMS OF DEVELOPMENT AND YOU KNOW WHAT DEMAND IS AND ALSO WHAT? BECAUSE I'M ASKING BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW. BUT WHAT WHAT IS THE CURRENT USE OF THE STATION? THE OTHER STATIONS ARE ON THE OTHER CORNERS. I KNOW A COUPLE OF THEM ARE PRETTY OLD. BUT AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEIR UTILITY IS. AND SO YEAH, SO I GUESS ALL OF THE OTHER CORNERS, THEIR OPERATIONS ALL FALL UNDER THE SAME USE, WHICH IS THE PASSENGER VEHICLE FUEL CELLS, WHICH IS WHAT WE CATEGORIZE GAS STATIONS. AND I [00:25:04] KNOW SOME OF THEM ARE OLDER. THAT DOESN'T REALLY TAKE AWAY FROM THE USE ITSELF. WE STILL CLASSIFY IT THAT WAY. AND CPS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL GAS STATIONS THAT GO BEYOND THE TWO THAT ARE PERMITTED AT EACH INTERSECTION. SO AGAIN, THIS IS GOING TO BE THE FOURTH ON THE FOURTH CORNER AT THE CENTER SECTION. SO THAT'S WHERE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION CAME IN AT. GOTCHA OKAY. THE RULE WAS PUT INTO PLACE SO THAT WE COULD HELP PROTECT OUR COMMERCIAL CORNERS. AND SO THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE DEFERENCE FOR THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, SO THAT Y'ALL CAN HAVE THAT ADDITIONAL OVERSIGHT FOR ANY ADDITIONAL GAS STATIONS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED. OKAY. THANKS. AND JUST PROTECT THEM FROM WHAT? JUST FOR DIFFERENT USES. SO HARD CORNERS ARE SOME OF OUR BEST COMMERCIAL LOCATIONS AND ESPECIALLY VIRGINIA AND 75. SO WE JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU GUYS GOT A SECOND SET OF EYES ON LOOKING AT IT. THANK YOU. DOES THIS WELL, THIS MIGHT BE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT, BUT DOES THE SAME OWNER OR OWN THE PIECE JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THIS TRACT, OR IS THAT ALL? DEFER TO THE APPLICANT. I'M UNSURE IF THEY HAVE ALREADY PURCHASED THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY FROM THE MAIN DEVELOPER, OWNER OF THE LARGER TRACT ITSELF. I'LL DEFER TO THEM ON THAT. YEAH. I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. JAKE. IS THERE A PRECEDENT IN MCKINNEY NOW FOR FOR DENIAL OF THIS USE ON ON CORNERS AND THAT'S BEEN UPHELD? WE HAVE NOT SEEN AN SCP FOR THIS SPECIFIC SCENARIO COME THROUGH YET. THIS IS A PIECE OF CRITERIA THAT REQUIRES AN SCP THAT WAS ADDED WITH THE UDC. SO THE ADOPTION OF THE UDC FROM CITY COUNCIL. THIS IS ONE OF THE CRITERIA FOR THE PASSENGER VEHICLE FUEL SALES USE ACROSS THE CITY. WE ALSO HAVE A DIRECTIVE FROM CITY COUNCIL TO PRESERVE AS MANY CORNERS AS POSSIBLE WITH ARTERIAL ROADWAYS AS WELL AS ROADWAYS LIKE 75, IN THOSE CORRIDORS FOR MEANINGFUL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. SO THAT'S A COUNCIL DIRECTIVE MIXED WITH THE CRITERIA WITHIN THE UDC THAT WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL FOR REQUIRING SCP FOR THESE TYPES OF SCENARIOS. THANKS, JAKE. I SEE WHERE THERE IS A CUT OUT ON THE NORTHERN PART. I GUESS THAT'S SHARED WITH THE SPROUTS GROCERY STORE THERE. WHAT ABOUT ON THE EASTERN SIDE? WOULD THERE BE ANY TYPE OF ADDITIONAL CUT OUT ASIDE FROM THE EXIT POINTS THAT ARE. FURTHER SOUTH OF THAT LOT, SO THEY NOT CLOSER TO THE INTERSECTION? IT LOOKS LIKE THEY DO HAVE A CURB CUT THAT'S ALONG VIRGINIA, AND THEN THEY WILL NOT CUT OUT ONTO THE FRONTAGE OF HIGHWAY FIVE UNTIL FURTHER SOUTH. SO THEY'LL HAVE A SHARED FIRE LANE THAT CONNECTS A FEW OF THE OTHER PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH BEFORE IT EXITS THERE. BUT THERE WILL NOT BE ANOTHER DRIVEWAY LOCATION. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR JAKE? THANKS. JAKE. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? I BELIEVE SO, YES. THANK YOU. CHAIR. COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS ALAN PEREZ WITH JM CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1101 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, SOUTH ALLEN, TEXAS. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH COMMISSION. WE APPRECIATE STAFF'S COMMENTS AND WE UNDERSTAND THEIR POSITION. HOWEVER, WE'VE THE MURPHY TEAM FEELS THAT THIS IS AN IDEAL LOCATION FOR THIS USE. THIS IS THE GOING TO WORK SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION, SO IT IS IDEAL FOR TRAVEL FOR FOR COMMUTERS IN THE MORNING, GOING INTO WORK WITHOUT HAVING TO MAKE UNNECESSARY LEFT TURNS ACROSS TRAFFIC. ADDITIONALLY. MURPHY RECOGNIZES THAT THERE IS AN AGING PRESENCE FOR FUELING STATIONS IN THIS AREA, AND MURPHY'S EAGER TO TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A CLEAN, EFFICIENT NEW FUELING STATION FOR THE NEXT 30 YEARS. MURPHY DOES RECOGNIZE THAT THIS IS A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, AND WE'VE I'VE GOT A RENDERING WHICH I COULD SHARE THAT SHOWS THE UPGRADED ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT WE'RE PROVIDING BEYOND WHAT IS REQUESTED. SO WE HAVE A FULL BRICK FACADE ON THE BUILDING, [00:30:10] FULL BRICK FACADE ON THE TRASH ENCLOSURE, FULL BRICK ON THE CANOPY COLUMNS AS WELL. AGAIN, JUST JUST MOVING FORWARD. WE FEEL LIKE YOU WOULD HAVE A CLEAN, WELL LIT, SAFE, EFFICIENT FUELING STATION FOR THE NEXT 2530 YEARS. WE HAVE A CONVENIENT SEVEN PUMP CANOPY LAYOUT, SO IT'S NOT A STACKED LAYOUT. IT'S EASY TO GET IN AND OUT OF. I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS I THINK MISS HAMMACK ASKED ABOUT THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY. RIGHT. THE SAME OWNER THAT WILL BE LEASING TO MURPHY OWNS, I BELIEVE OWNS SPROUTS AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH AS WELL. SO IT'S ALL ONE OWNER. OKAY. SO Y'ALL DON'T HAVE ANY PLANS THEN FOR THAT PARTICULAR PARCEL THAT WOULD STILL BE RETAINED BY THE ORIGINAL OWNER? OR DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE THOUGHTS ARE? I, I KNOW THAT THEY HAD SALAD AND GO AT ONE POINT, BUT THAT'S TOO BAD. IT WAS MIGHT INDICATE THAT THAT'S. YEAH, THAT'S AND THERE'S A BOJANGLES I BELIEVE FURTHER SOUTH RIGHT THERE. AND AS EVERYBODY KNOWS, THERE'S SPROUTS AND OUR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES ARE SIMILAR, IF NOT BETTER THAN THOSE. YOU KNOW WE'VE WE'VE DONE SOME PRE MEETINGS WITH ENGINEERING TO ENSURE THAT WE CAN DESIGN A SITE THAT MEETS ALL OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. AS YOU CAN SEE WE'RE CONTINUING A FIRE LANE THROUGH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NO DEAD END FIRE LANES. SO THIS IS THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE PUT SOME THOUGHT INTO. AND, YOU KNOW, FROM AN ENGINEERING AND CODE PERSPECTIVE, IT'S TOP NOTCH. WHAT WOULD THE HOURS BE FOR THE CONVENIENCE STORE? GENERALLY THERE ARE 11. THEY CLOSE AT 11 P.M. AND THEY'LL OPEN UP AROUND SIX. ALTHOUGH MARKETS CAN DICTATE WHAT THEY WIND UP DOING FOR HOURS. AND THEN THE PUMPS THEMSELVES. I BEG YOUR PARDON. THE PUMPS THEMSELVES, WOULD THEY FOLLOW THE SAME HOURS SCHEDULE OR WOULD THEY? THEY DO. MURPHY DOES NOT CURRENTLY HAVE AN UNATTENDED FUELING STATION SET UP. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY ARE CONSIDERING. AND WE ASK THAT DURING CODE REVIEW WHETHER THAT WOULD AFFECT OUR DESIGN AND IF THEY DO, UNATTENDED FUEL CELLS AFTER HOURS, THE LAYOUT WOULD STILL FUNCTION THE SAME WITH ALL THE EMERGENCY STOPS, AND IT WOULD STILL BE ACCEPTABLE. OKAY. HOW MANY SQUARE FEET IS YOUR BUILDING? THE BUILDING IS 2800FT■!S. IT'S, YOU KNOW, IF YU CAN ENVISION A RACETRACK OR A IT'S NOT QUITE THAT BIG, MAYBE HALF THE SIZE. IT'S GOT PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING YOU WOULD EXPECT TO FIND IN A CONVENIENCE STORE. IT'S JUST NOT AS SPACIOUS. IT'S A LITTLE BIT SMALLER FOOTPRINT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU, MR. PRICE. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE AND YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK OR SHARE YOUR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS MATT MOORE, 301 SOUTH COLEMAN PROSPER, TEXAS 75078 I'M ACTUALLY HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERSHIP GROUP. HE COULDN'T MAKE IT DUE TO A VACATION THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY PLANNED. SO HE APOLOGIZES TO ADDRESS THE QUESTION ON THE PAD TO THE SOUTH. IT WAS SALAD. GO. THEY HAD APPROVED PLANS. OBVIOUSLY, WE'VE ALL SEEN THE NEWS OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS REGARDING THAT. SO OBVIOUSLY WE'RE WE'RE BUMMED. SO WE'VE GOT TO FIND ANOTHER TENANT. OBVIOUSLY, THIS WAS THE FORMER WYSONG HOSPITAL, THIS REDEVELOPMENT I'VE BEEN A PART OF FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW. WE FEEL LIKE, YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT A TYPICAL COMMERCIAL CORNER. THIS IS A HIGHWAY LOCATION, 75 IN VIRGINIA IS NOT VIRGINIA LAKE FOREST. SO, YOU KNOW, WE WE WE HEAR THE CONCERNS. WE FEEL LIKE THAT WITH THE TRAFFIC 75, THE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT VIRGINIA PARKWAY HAS RECEIVED AT THE INTERSECTION KIND OF WARRANT THIS LOCATION AS THEY AS THEY STATED AS WELL. SO AGAIN, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. FROM THE OWNERSHIP PERSPECTIVE, HAVE YOU HAD ANY INTEREST FROM ANYBODY ELSE WANTING TO DEVELOP IT? NO, NO. AND AGAIN, I MEAN, WE'VE REACHED OUT TO SEVERAL RETAILERS. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A LOT OF RETAIL PRESENCE AT 375. WE HAVE OTHER, YOU KNOW, QSR RESTAURANTS AT THESE OTHER CORNERS HERE. WE'VE LOOKED AT RELOCATIONS AGAIN. WE'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS PROJECT FOR SEVERAL SEVERAL YEARS. MANY DIFFERENT TENANTS HAVE LOOKED AT IT. AND HERE WE ARE TODAY. SO WISH IT WAS BETTER. BUT I [00:35:05] MEAN, WE FEEL LIKE WE'VE GOT A GOOD PARTNER AND WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SO BACK TO MY PREVIOUS QUESTION ABOUT THE UTILITY OF THE OTHER CORNERS TO THE EAST SIDE. CAN CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT AT ALL REGARDING THE CURRENT ACTIVITY AT THOSE AT THOSE CORNERS? I TRULY CAN'T. OBVIOUSLY, I'M MORE INTIMATELY FAMILIAR WITH WHAT MY EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN ON THIS CORNER WITH SCOTT OVER THE YEARS. OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, THE EAST SIDE HAS BEEN MATERIALLY THE SAME SINCE THAT TIME. I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE SUCCESS OF ANY OF THOSE OPERATIONS OR, YOU KNOW, WHAT THE HORIZON IS FOR THOSE. OKAY, I DO KNOW ON THE EAST SIDE YOU HAVE TWO DIFFERENT PUMPS. I BELIEVE ONE IS A VALERO, ONE I THINK IS AN EXXON, THE ONE THAT'S NORTH. THEY'RE A MUCH SMALLER FOOTPRINT, MUCH SMALLER, LOTS MUCH TOUGHER. UTILIZES PORTION OF THEIR PUMPS. THEY HAVE A FOOD TRUCK THAT'S STATIONED THERE A COUPLE OF DAYS A WEEK, WHICH DOES A LOT OF BUSINESS. AND OKAY, BUT THAT'S ALL THAT I'M AWARE OF OVER THERE. AND I THINK THERE WAS A QUESTION EARLIER, IF I HEARD IT CORRECTLY, ABOUT ACCESS ON VIRGINIA. THE ACCESS THAT'S SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS THERE TODAY. IT WAS BUILT AS PART OF THE SPROUTS. THERE'S NO ADDITIONAL ACCESS ON VIRGINIA THAT'S PROPOSED OUTSIDE OF WHAT'S THERE TODAY. I GUESS MORE CONCERNED ALONG THE SERVICE ROAD ON. YEAH. NO NOTHING ELSE. WE HAVE THE SINGLE POINT OF ACCESS THAT IS JUST BETWEEN THE BOJANGLES LOT AND WHAT WAS GOING TO BE. SALAD AND GO IS THE ONLY ACCESS ON 75 DUE TO TEXDOT SPACING, RIGHT. DO YOU KNOW ABOUT WHAT THE DISTANCE IS FROM THE INTERSECTION TO THAT ACCESS ON VIRGINIA, ON VIRGINIA? I WOULD SAY IT'S ROUGHLY PROBABLY 240FT ROUGHLY. IT'S USUALLY ABOUT 250. YEAH, IT'S TWO 4250. I CAN'T SEE IT ON THIS AND I DON'T RECALL OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT CORNER CUT DRIVING? I'M NOT. AGAIN, WITH US NOT HAVING DIRECT ACCESS TO 75 FROM THIS LOT. YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK THE CUT THROUGH IS IS VIABLE. AGAIN. I THINK THE THE DUAL RIGHTS ON VIRGINIA THAT HAVE RECENTLY BEEN INSTALLED WILL HELP FACILITATE THAT TRAFFIC AT THAT INTERSECTION. SO YEAH, I PERSONALLY DON'T SEE THAT CONCERN. WELL, IF YOU DEVELOP THAT SOUTHERN PROPERTY, THAT DRIVE THROUGH IS COMMON. I MEAN, IT'S VERY TYPICAL. SHARED ACCESS THROUGH THESE TYPE OF LOTS IS WELL IT GOES OUT TO 75 THERE. I'M SORRY. IT GOES OUT TO 75 THERE CORRECT. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS MR. BEAR? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. SO IF YOU'RE HERE AND IF THERE'S ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME AND SHARE ANY CONCERNS OR COMMENTS, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING AS THERE'S NONE, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REGARDING THIS ITEM BEFORE WE HAVE A MOTION? WELL, IF WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS NOW. WE CAN DO THAT. WE CAN DO THAT. YES. OKAY. AS I'M LOOKING AT HIGHWAY 75 AND THE ACCESS TO FUELING STATIONS, WHEN WE'RE COMING IN FROM THE NORTH RIGHT THERE AT 380. THAT'S REALLY YOU'VE GOT ONE STATION ON EACH SIDE, AND THEN YOU COME ON DOWN TO EXIT OFF ON LOUISIANA. AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT JAKE IS SAYING ABOUT HAVING TWO FUELING STATIONS, BUT WE ACTUALLY HAVE THREE ON THAT CORNER ALREADY. AND WE HAVE THE SAME THING ON HIGHWAY FIVE. AND WHERE EL DORADO TURNS US INTO INDUSTRIAL. WE HAVE THREE STATIONS THERE, AND THEN YOU HAVE THAT OTHER SIDE OF THE HEART CORNER WHERE IT'S A CEMETERY, YOU KNOW, AND I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF US, WHEN WE'RE TRAVELING, WE WANT TO HAVE EASY ACCESS OFF OF THE FREEWAY, GET FUEL, GET BACK ON THE FREEWAY AND KEEP GOING. AND SO I'M ACTUALLY IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM. SO THAT'S MY THOUGHT. THE COMMENT ABOUT THIS IS ON THE FOR PEOPLE ON THEIR WAY TO WORK AND THE EASE OF ACCESS. BECAUSE I KNOW, LIKE ME, I DON'T LIVE OFF OF VIRGINIA, BUT YOU WOULD HAVE TO EITHER CROSS AND GO TO RACETRAC OR GO TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY TO FUEL UP OR GET SNACKS OR WHATEVER. BUT SO THIS WOULD BE A CONVENIENT SPOT. I THINK IT'S ALSO OF NOTE THAT THEY, YOU KNOW, SPROUTS HAS BEEN DEVELOPED NOW FOR, I DON'T KNOW, YEAR, YEAR AND A HALF, TWO YEARS AND THEY HAVEN'T HAD ANY OTHER ACTIVITY ON THIS LOT. SO YOU KNOW, THIS COULD BE THE THE [00:40:06] HIGHEST AND BEST USE FOR IT GIVEN THE ACCESS AND THE. THE VISIBILITY FOR THAT CORNER. AND I'LL JUST TAG ON BECAUSE IF YOU'RE HEADING EAST ON VIRGINIA AND YOU GET TO THAT INTERSECTION OF THE SERVICE ROAD AND YOU'RE HEADING SOUTH, I WAS TRYING TO THINK, WHERE IS YOUR NEXT CLOSEST FUELING STATION? AND THERE'S NOT ONE AT ON THE SAME SIDE AT EL DORADO. SO THE NEXT ONE PROBABLY WOULDN'T BE UNTIL YOU GET INTO STACY ROAD, STACEY ROAD AND ALLEN. RIGHT. AND SO MURPHY, TO ME, STRICTLY MY VIEWPOINT, I FEEL LIKE MURPHY IS A REPUTABLE AND WELL RESPECTED CONSUMER BRAND. DEFINITELY OFFERS, YOU KNOW, GOOD COMPETITION TO RACETRAC, WHICH IS ACROSS THE STREET, WHICH SOME PEOPLE MAY VIEW RACETRAC BECAUSE OF THE NUMBER OF PUMPS. A LITTLE INTIMIDATING. BUT THEN ALSO, I THINK IT'S AN IDEAL LOCATION COMING OUT OF SPROUTS. FROM THE MORNING COMMUTE PERSPECTIVE, IT MIGHT DECREASE A LITTLE BIT OF TRAFFIC BECAUSE PEOPLE MIGHT ACTUALLY STOP AND COME OFF. VIRGINIA. SO, YOU KNOW, I SUPPORT THIS AS WELL. I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF ON IF THIS IS CATER J. THE TWO SERVICE STATIONS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY ON THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH SIDE. I KNOW THEY ARE. WE MENTIONED A COUPLE OF TIMES THEY'RE AGING. IF SOMEBODY DOES DECIDE TO REDEVELOP THEM, ARE THEY GRANDFATHERED IN WITH A SERVICE STATION OR FUEL SALES BECAUSE OF AN EXISTING, OR WOULD THEY HAVE TO COME BACK? AND SO IF THEY WERE TO REDEVELOP AND VACATE THAT USE FOR MORE THAN SIX MONTHS, IT WOULD REQUIRE A NEW SU. IT WOULD REQUIRE A SPECIFIC USE. OKAY. NOW IF THERE IS GOING TO BE ANOTHER TENANT, YOU KNOW, ON THE EXISTING SITE AS IT CURRENTLY SITS AND THE SPACE IS NOT VACATED FOR THAT USE FOR MORE THAN SIX MONTHS, THEN YES, THEY CAN JUST JUMP RIGHT INTO THOSE OPERATIONS. I WAS JUST THINKING SOMEBODY WANTED TO COME IN AND MAKE A MORE A MORE MODERN GAS STATION. WOULD THERE HAVE TO BE A CHANGE OR ARE THEY JUST AUTOMATICALLY. YEAH, IT WOULD REQUIRE A NEW UNDER, YOU KNOW, IF THEY WERE TO UPDATE THE SITE LIKE THAT DEPENDS ON THE LEVEL OF UPDATE. IF THEY WERE JUST DOING PAINT AND MAKING IT LOOK NICE, THEN THEY COULD STILL FUNCTION, AS JAKE NOTED, AS A LEGAL NONCONFORMING. BUT IF THEY WANTED TO COME IN COMPLETELY DEMOLISHED AND BRING IN A NEW SITE, THEN IT WOULD BE AN SCP THAT Y'ALL WOULD SEE. OKAY, AND THOSE LOT SIZES ARE A LOT SMALLER THAN BOTH OF THESE, RIGHT? YES, THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. JUST GOING TO LIMIT. OKAY OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS TIME DO WE HAVE A MOTION REGARDING THE PUBLIC HEARING? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE CP. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER LEE HAS MADE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THE ITEM. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. I HEARD HIM OUT OF MY RIGHT EAR FIRST. OKAY. OKAY. THIS TIME, WHEN IT COMES UP, IF YOU'LL CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY, THIS ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY 5 TO 0. AND THIS WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE FEBRUARY 3RD, 2026 MEETING. OKAY, OUR [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for a Minor Vehicle Repair (Brake Masters), Located at 12021 West University Drive] NEXT ITEM, ITEM 250019 SUP. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR BREAK MASTERS LOCATED AT 12021 WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS MENTIONED, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS AN SUV FOR A VEHICLE REPAIR MINOR. THE REQUEST REQUIRES AN SUV AS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN A C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL. THESE. THE PROPERTY COMPLIES WITH THE ZONING DISTRICT AND THE SITE REQUIREMENT STANDARDS, SPECIFICALLY AS PARKING, BUILDING HEIGHT, LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, AND THE BAY DOORS ALSO ORIENTED IN INTERNAL TO THE SITE SO THEY'RE NOT VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW HERE ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY, AND ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES ALONG THAT AREA. AS PROPOSED, THE BUSINESS ALIGNS WITH THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA, WHICH INCLUDES FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS, SIMILAR VEHICLE REPAIRS, DRIVE THROUGH BANKING, CAR WASH FACILITIES. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR RSL? IT'D BE TOO EASY ON YOU, HERE. I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION. JUST [00:45:17] QUICK. ARE THE RESIDENTS THAT LIVE ACROSS THE ROAD THERE? I GUESS IT'S PRESTWICK AROUND THIS AREA. THERE ARE SOME HOMES THERE. DO THEY ARE THEY REQUIRED TO BE NOTIFIED? YES. SO WE DO THE STANDARD TYPICAL PROPERTY NOTIFICATION WITHIN 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. WE DO THAT AT LEAST 11 TO 10 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING. OKAY. THANKS. OUR APPLICANT. YES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS JUAN VAZQUEZ, 1919 SOUTH CHARLOTTE ROAD, GARLAND, TEXAS, 75 042. HERE REPRESENTING BRICK MASTERS. BRICK MASTERS IS A NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR FACILITY. THEY'RE OUT OF ARIZONA. THEY'RE MAKING THEIR WAY INTO TEXAS. AND THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST DEVELOPMENTS HERE IN DALLAS FORT WORTH, AS THE NAME MIGHT INDICATE, THEIR MAIN PRIORITY. THEIR MAIN SERVICE IS BRICK REPAIR SERVICE MAINTENANCE. THEY ALSO DO OTHER TYPES OF MINOR AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE SERVICES, SUCH AS BATTERIES, FLUIDS, STRUTS, SHOCKS, NO MAJOR AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, NO BODY, NO ENGINE OVERHAULS, NO TRANSMISSIONS, NOTHING LIKE THAT. THERE ARE SERVICE ORIENTED FACILITY, SO THERE'S NO CARS STORED OVERNIGHT. YOU CAN DROP YOUR CAR OFF EARLY, YOU COME IN, YOU GET YOUR SERVICE, AND YOU'RE OUT IN AN HOUR TO TWO HOURS. BEING THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY PRIMARILY WORK ON BRAKES, THEY'RE THEY'RE THE MAINTENANCE USUALLY TAKES ABOUT AN HOUR TO TWO HOURS. SO THEY DON'T SEE AS MUCH TRAFFIC AS YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD. THIS IS NOT A TIRE SHOP, SO THEY ONLY SEE AN AVERAGE BETWEEN 10 TO 20 CARS A DAY. THEY HAVE EIGHT BAYS. SO THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING OUTSIDE. IF FOR SOME REASON A CUSTOMER CANNOT MAKE IT BACK IN TIME, FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEY'LL STORE THE CAR INSIDE, BUT YOU CANNOT DROP YOUR CAR OFF TO WORK ON THE NEXT DAY. YOU HAVE TO COME BACK THE NEXT DAY AND DO THAT. THEY'RE OPEN MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY, 730 TO 530. THEY'RE CLOSED ON SUNDAYS AND THEY'RE HAPPY TO BE IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR APPROVAL. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU ARE HERE AND YOU'D LIKE TO APPROACH AND SHARE YOUR CONCERNS OR COMMENTS, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING AS THERE'S NONE, DO WE HAVE A ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS OR A MOTION REGARDING THIS ITEM? A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM. MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER LEBEAU TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. SORRY, I KNOW THAT, BUT I'LL SECOND IT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEBEAU. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. AND THIS ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE FEBRUARY 3RD, 2026 MEETING. OUR NEXT ITEM. ITEM 25-0125Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property to “MF36” - Multi-Family Residential District, Located on the Southwest Corner of FM 1461 and Baxter Well Road] CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO MF 36. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FM 1461 AND BAXTER WELL ROAD. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU AGAIN. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO MF 36 IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRADITIONAL MULTIFAMILY USES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED OFF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF THE US 30 BYPASS AND LAKE FOREST DRIVE. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THIS ZONING SHOULD FURTHER ESTABLISH RESIDENTIAL USES FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE 380 BYPASS CORRIDOR, WHILE PRESERVING THE HARD CORNER FOR MORE INTENSE USES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOULD ALSO BUFFER POTENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS TO THE NORTH AND WEST FROM THE FUTURE FREEWAY AND ARTERIAL ROADWAY. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ZONING REQUEST, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU JAKE, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? THE 380 BYPASS, IS THAT GOING TO BE ON THE NORTHERN OR THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE TRACK? IT'S GOING TO BE ON THE SOUTHERN. IF YOU COULD TURN ON THAT LOCATION. THERE WE GO. SO IT'LL CUT THROUGH WITH THAT ALIGNMENT AND THEN THIS [00:50:08] IMMEDIATELY ON THE EAST SIDE. THIS IS GOING TO BE LAKE FOREST DRIVE AS WELL OKAY. SO THE RED DOWN THERE IS WHERE THE BYPASS IS GOING TO BE. YES. AND IT'S GOING TO BE FREEWAY STYLE. SO IT'S GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, 400 PLUS FEET WIDE. SO IT'S GOING TO CUT IN A LITTLE BIT NORTH OF WHERE THAT CURRENT ALIGNMENT IS FOR COUNTY ROAD 123. YEAH. THEY'VE ALREADY STARTED SOME OF THE ACQUISITION OF THOSE PROPERTIES FOR THE THREE BYPASS. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? YES, MA'AM. MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, I'M BOB RODER, 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300, IN MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, I THINK THE STAFF REPORT IS SELF-EXPLANATORY. I DID WANT TO ADD A LITTLE COLOR TO WHAT WE'RE DOING. THIS IS THE FIRST STEP IN AN ANNEXATION AND ZONING CASE THAT WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY IS NOT WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. AND SO THIS IS THE FIRST STEP, AS YOU'RE AWARE OF GETTING THROUGH THAT PROCESS. SECOND THING I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE HERE IS THAT THE APPLICANT, THE NRP GROUP, WAS SELECTED THROUGH THE RFQ PROCESS, I THINK MCKINNEY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, TO PARTNER WITH THAT ORGANIZATION TO BUILD THIS PARTICULAR TO BUILD THE APARTMENTS AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION. SO THESE WILL WILL MEET THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CRITERIA THAT MCKINNEY NEEDS ON THE WEST SIDE. VERY. I THINK THE LOCATION IS IDEAL FOR THAT, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE FUTURE THOROUGHFARE PATTERN THAT WE HAVE THERE. SO I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A TRADITIONAL MULTIFAMILY PROJECT IN OUR GROUP HAS ALREADY DONE ONE HERE IN MCKINNEY HAS BEEN WELL RECEIVED, BUT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION. WOULD RECOMMEND YOUR FAVORABLE APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU. I'M LOOKING AT THE SATELLITE VIEW. WHAT'S THE WHAT'S ON THAT PROPERTY NOW? TODAY YOU WOULD KNOW THE FRONTAGE AS BEING A NURSERY. I KNOW IT AS THE NURSERY THAT HAS ALL THE PALM TREES TYPICALLY OUT FRONT. OKAY OKAY. YEAH. AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER TRACK BACK BEHIND THAT. OKAY. BAXTER. WELL, ROAD IS THE ROAD THAT SEPARATES THIS FROM A CHURCH TO THE NORTH. GOTCHA. APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY UNITS DO THEY PLAN TO BUILD? 280 PLUS 288. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MR. ROEDER? I'M JUST GOING TO ASK HIM A QUESTION. YOU SAID THAT THIS GROUP HAS ANOTHER LOCATION HERE IN MCKINNEY. I DIDN'T HEAR THE QUESTION. YOU SAID THEY HAVE ANOTHER LOCATION THAT YES, THEY I THINK THEY DID. THE ONE HERE'S THE FIRST ONE THAT WE DID ON BEHIND THE TOYOTA HOUSE. OKAY, OKAY. YOU REMEMBER THAT ONE. YEAH. AND THAT'S. YEAH. THIS WAS THE FIRST PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WITH THE HOUSING CORPORATION. OKAY. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC. I'M SORRY, OUR APPLICANT. OOPS. SORRY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE AND YOU WISH TO SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. HI, MY NAME IS STEPHANIE WEINBERG. I LIVE AT 5861 BAXTER ROAD. BAXTER ROAD IS NOT CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING A MULTIFAMILY, HIGH DENSITY APARTMENT COMPLEX. THE FM 1461, IN ITS CURRENT STATE IS ADDITIONALLY NOT CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING IT. NOW, I REALIZE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE BYPASS AND FUTURE PLANS, BUT THE BAXTER ROAD IS WAS BUILT FOR THE 15 SOME RESIDENTS THAT HAVE SMALL ACREAGE LOTS, AND IT LITERALLY IS CRUMBLING. IT IS NO THICKER THAN MY CELL PHONE, THE ASPHALT THAT IS ON IT. SO I'M TRYING TO SQUARE HOW COUNTY ROAD THAT WAS BUILT FOR JUST A FEW RESIDENTS COULD EVER SUPPORT MULTIFAMILY. NOW I REALIZE THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD COME IN AND BE REQUIRED TO MOST LIKELY BUILD THE ROAD ADJACENT TO THEIR PROPERTY. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ADDITIONAL MILE AND A HALF WHERE THE US [00:55:05] RESIDENTS, YOU KNOW, BOUGHT OUR LAND? WE REALIZE THAT DEVELOPMENT WOULD COME AROUND US. WE'RE NOT NAIVE TO THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, ESPECIALLY AFTER WE'VE ALL FOUGHT THE BYPASS. BUT. THIS ZONING IS NOT DOES NOT FIT THE FABRIC OF THIS LAND. AND UNLESS THE PROPER INFRASTRUCTURE IS PUT IN PLACE, IT SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED. IT'S ESSENTIALLY RIGHT NOW IN ITS CURRENT STATE, IT'S ABOUT A ONE AND A HALF LANE ROAD THAT, LIKE I SAID, THE ASPHALT IS LITERALLY THINNER THAN MY IPHONE. SO MY QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW, WHO'S GOING TO BUILD OUT THE REST OF BAXTER ROAD IF THIS IS APPROVED? I WOULD REALLY LOVE IT IF SOMEONE WERE TO COME OUT AND JUST WATCH THE SCHOOL BUS DRIVE DOWN THE ROAD IN ITS CURRENT STATE, IT'S FULL OF POTHOLES. LITERALLY. THE SCHOOL BUS TAKES UP THE ENTIRE ROAD. I'VE I'VE HAD TO, ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS, REVERSE MY CAR AT THE INTERSECTION OF 1461 AND BAXTER. WELL, JUST SO THAT THE SCHOOL BUS COULD COULD MAKE A SAFE TURN ONTO BAXTER WELL ROAD. SO, YOU KNOW, WE'VE WATCHED I'VE LIVED OUT THERE SINCE 2012 AND WE'VE WATCHED SO MUCH BUILDING COME IN WITHOUT PROPER INFRASTRUCTURE AND IT IS JUST NOT SAFE. SO I WOULD ASK THAT YOU PLEASE GIVE CONSIDERATION TO APPROVING APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT THAT FITS WITH THE FABRIC OF THE LAND. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, MISS WEINBERG. THIS ITEM HAS A PUBLIC HEARINGS. IF YOU'RE HERE AND YOU'D LIKE TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. HELLO. CALEB BLANTON 5435 BAXTER ROAD. OUR PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY PICTURED UP THERE. IT'S ADJACENT TO THIS DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE. I'D LIKE TO ECHO THE PREVIOUS RESIDENTS COMMENTS ABOUT THE BUS, BECAUSE THE BUS USED TO COME PICK OUR KIDS UP ON THAT ROAD AND WE WERE ALWAYS WORRIED. WE ALWAYS SAW PEOPLE TRYING TO LEAVE THEIR HOMES AND HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, BACK UP JUST TO MAKE ROOM FOR THE BUS. THEY RECENTLY HAD A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT BUILT ON RIDGE ROAD ON THE OTHER SIDE OF BAXTER. WELL, IF YOU KEEP HEADING WEST. AND SINCE THAT HAPPENED, SO MANY DELIVERY TRUCKS AND BUSSES AND SO MUCH TRAFFIC IS ALREADY COMING DOWN THAT VERY NARROW ROAD THAT WE WE DO WORRY ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE SAFETY INVOLVED, THE INFRASTRUCTURE, THE CAPACITY FOR SOMETHING LIKE THIS. THE OTHER I GUESS THE OTHER CONCERN IS A LITTLE MORE PERSONAL. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, WE DO INTEND TO, YOU KNOW, BUILD A U-PICK AND THERE'S, THERE'S SOMEBODY JUST DOWN THE ROAD FROM US THAT THAT JUST WROTE A BOOK ABOUT AGRITOURISM. AND IT DOES FEEL LIKE A VERY UNIQUE SPOT IN MCKINNEY THAT'S SORT OF ONE FOOT IN THE COUNTRY, ONE FOOT IN THE CITY. AND, YOU KNOW, I GUESS ONE WAY TO PUT IT IS THERE'S NOTHING UNIQUE BY NATURE ABOUT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX. BUT, YOU KNOW, THE SOLAR SOLAR PROJECTS THAT I WANT TO DO THERE AND THE OTHER PROJECTS, THE FARM PROJECT, THERE'S THERE'S FRESH EGGS, FARM FRESH EGGS BEING SOLD RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD AS WELL. SO IT DOES FEEL LIKE A SPECIAL SPOT IN MCKINNEY. AND IN A WAY, THIS WOULD SORT OF DILUTE THAT UNIQUE VALUE. SO I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY IT FOR ME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. BLANTON. IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. GO AHEAD AND GO. I WASN'T GOING TO, BUT THAT'S MY CAR. MY NAME IS DARREN RIGGS. I LIVE AT 5935 BAXTER WELL ROAD. AND SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. I KNOW IT'S A PRETTY THANKLESS JOB. I'VE DONE SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR IN PAST YEARS, SO. BUT THANK YOU AND THANK YOU FOR THE TIME. YEAH, THE APARTMENT COMPLEX IS NOT UNIQUE BY NATURE. KIND OF GOES AGAINST ONE OF THE VERY MCKINNEY TENETS THAT WE ALL PROFESS TO HAVE. WE'VE LIVED OUT THERE FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. ALL THE ACREAGE OUT THERE IS FIVE, TEN AND 20 ACRE TRACTS. AND SO 15, 20 RESIDENTS OUT THERE. I DO ECHO THE ROAD. IT'S NOT SAFE. IT NEEDS CHANGE. [01:00:04] 1461 IS NOT SAFE. IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN THAT FAR ON LAKE FOREST, AS YOU HEAD NORTH, YOU HAVE NO IMPROVED SHOULDERS. AND SO HOW THERE HASN'T BEEN DEATHS, A LOT OF DEATHS ON THAT ROAD. I HAVE NO EARTHLY IDEA. BUT ADDING MORE TRAFFIC TO THAT AND IN ADDITION, GOING SOUTH, THE ROADS CONTINUE TO BE REBUILT. WE HAVEN'T EVEN GOT LAKE FOREST SQUARED AWAY, SO THERE'S A LOT OF STUFF ALL AROUND THERE THAT IS CURRENTLY BEING WORKED ON AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE WORKED ON, AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO ZONE THIS AND GET STARTED ON MULTIFAMILY. I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S THE RIGHT USAGE FOR THE LAND. BLOOMDALE FARMS, WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT FURTHER TO THE WEST. IT'S BEEN A LITTLE BIT OF A DUMPING GROUND. THAT'S THE AREA IN WHICH WE ALL LIVE. WE GOT THE BYPASS COMING, EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE A LOT OF OTHER GREAT ALTERNATIVES. BLOOMDALE WAS CHOSEN. SO IT'S GOING TO BE IN MY BACKYARD NOW. I'VE GOT A FORCED SEWER MAIN THAT'S GOING TO BE IN MY FRONT YARD. AND MULTIFAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD. THE DEVELOPMENT FURTHER TO THE WEST ALREADY ADDS A LOT OF TRAFFIC. WE'VE GOT CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES, WE'VE GOT DELIVERY VEHICLES. AND THEN THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME IS DUE NORTH. THAT'S ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 1461 AS IT MAKES ITS WAY BACK AROUND. THAT'S A DEVELOPMENT TO AND YEARS AGO WHEN THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WAS PUT IN PLACE. YOU GUYS APPROVED THE CITY APPROVED A DEAL, A PACKAGE THAT WOULD CREATE SCREENING, THAT WOULD CREATE LARGER HOUSES CLOSEST TO US, AND THE SMALLER HOUSES CLOSER TO 1461. SINCE THAT TIME, THE DEVELOPERS SOLD THAT PACKAGE TO SOMEBODY ELSE. IT DIDN'T COME BACK IN FRONT OF PNC, AND THAT'S ALL CHANGED. YOU'LL SEE THAT HERE SOON WHEN THEY START THEIR SECOND AND THIRD PHASE. MY TIME'S UP, I APPRECIATE IT. I UNDERSTAND THAT SOMETHING WILL COME. I JUST DON'T THINK MULTIFAMILY IS IT. THANK YOU, MR. RIGGS. THANK YOU. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU'D LIKE TO SHARE YOUR CONCERNS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. HI. EXCUSE MY NERVES. I'LL JUST READ BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY ONE. TELL US YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. MY NAME IS TESHA BLANTON. I LIVE ON BEXWELL ROAD AT 5435. I'M HERE, RESPECTFULLY, TO OPPOSE THE ZONING CHANGE THAT WOULD BRING THIS AREA INTO CITY LIMITS AND ALLOW. OOPS. HOLD ON, HOLD ON, ALLOW HIGH DENSITY APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT. MCKINNEY. WE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT IT BEING UNIQUE BY NATURE, BUT PEOPLE MOVED HERE NOT JUST FOR HOUSES, BUT FOR OPEN LAND, QUIET ROADS, THE WILDLIFE AND SPACE DEBRIS. THAT'S WHY WE PICKED THIS AREA. BUT TODAY I'LL BE OKAY. TODAY THE CHARACTER IS BEING REPLACED BY SOMETHING THAT'S FAR TOO FAMILIAR. CONCRETE TRAFFIC AND OVERCROWDING. WE'RE IN DANGER OF BECOMING JUST ANOTHER OVERBUILT SUBURB INSTEAD OF THE COMMUNITY WE WERE PROUD TO CALL HOME. FIVE ACRE MINIMUM LOTS ALONG BAXTER ROAD WERE NOT AN INCONVENIENCE. THEY WERE INTENTIONAL. THEY WERE DESIGNED TO PRESERVE THE RURAL FEEL, PROTECT GREEN SPACE AND PREVENT OVERCROWDING. FAMILIES INVESTED IN THIS AREA BECAUSE OF THAT PROMISE. CHANGING IT NOW BREAKS THAT TRUST WITH PEOPLE WHO CHOOSE TO LIVE HERE AND BUILD THEIR LIVES AROUND THOSE ZONING PROTECTIONS. OH GOD, I'M SHAKING. I'M SORRY. HIGH DENSITY APARTMENTS DON'T BELONG ON BAXTER WELL ROAD. THE INFRASTRUCTURE SIMPLY ISN'T BUILT FOR IT. THESE ROADS WERE DESIGNED FOR LOW TRAFFIC, RURAL LIVING, NOT HUNDREDS OF ADDITIONAL CARS OR PEOPLE. DELIVERY TRUCKS, RIDESHARE VEHICLES AND EMERGENCY CALLS. WE ARE ALREADY SEEING INCREASED TRAFFIC. IF THIS ZONING CHANGE IS APPROVED, CONGESTION WILL BECOME UNAVOIDABLE. ROAD DAMAGE ACCELERATES AND SAFETY RISKS. SAFETY RISKS WILL INCREASE FOR EVERYONE WHO USES THESE ROADS AND ONCE DEVELOPMENT STARTS, IT NEVER STOPS. APARTMENTS TODAY BECOME MORE ZONING REQUEST TOMORROW. MORE DENSITY, MORE BUILDINGS, MORE STRAIN ON SCHOOLS, WATER DRAINAGE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES. WHAT BEGINS? ONE CHANGE TURNS INTO A PERMANENT LOSS OF EVERYTHING THAT MADE THIS AREA SPECIAL. WE'RE NOT SAYING MCKINNEY SHOULD STOP GROWING, BUT GROWTH MUST BE THOUGHTFUL. IT SHOULD [01:05:04] HAPPEN WHERE INFRASTRUCTURE IS ALREADY EXIST AND WHERE DENSE HOUSING MAKES SENSE. NOT IN AREAS SPECIFICALLY PRESERVED FOR OPEN LAND AND LOW DENSITY LIVING. BAXTER ROAD IS ONE OF THE LAST PLACES IN MCKINNEY THAT STILL REFLECTS WHAT THE CITY USED TO BE. IF WE ALLOW IT TO BE ABSORBED INTO THE CITY AND TURNED INTO APARTMENTS, THIS PIECE OF MCKINNEY IS GONE FOREVER. WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOU TO PROTECT THE FIVE ACRE ZONING AND PROTECT OUR COMMUNITY, AND VOTE NO ON THE ZONING CHANGE. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING AND SERVING OUR CITY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU HAVE COMMENTS OR CONCERNS THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE, KINDLY APPROACH. HELLO. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. I APPRECIATE YOUR SERVICE AND FOR PROTECTING US. I LIVE ON 5513 BAXTER ROAD. I'VE BEEN LIVING THERE FOR MANY YEARS. I CAME TO MCKINNEY, I CLAIMED MCKINNEY, MY HOME. EXCUSE ME. TELL US YOUR NAME, PLEASE. SANDRA ORTEGA, THE KING. THANK YOU. I'VE BEEN LIVING HERE FOR MANY YEARS, I CHOSE MCKINNEY. MCKINNEY IS MY HOME. I CALL IT MY HOME. I FIRST WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHEN THE NOTICES WERE SENT OUT. I NEVER RECEIVED A NOTICE ABOUT ANY OF THIS. THE FIRST TIME I HEARD ABOUT IT WAS WHEN I SAW THE SIGNS GO UP THAT THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. SO I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHERE THOSE NOTICES ARE THAT THIS SUPPOSEDLY COMPANY OR BUSINESS SENT OUT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. YOU'VE ALREADY HEARD OUR NEIGHBORS SAYING THAT CANNOT TAKE EXTRA TRAFFIC. IT CANNOT. NOW IS IT NECESSARY TO HAVE APARTMENTS THERE? I DON'T THINK SO. BECAUSE JUST WHAT? 1000FT DOWN ON LAKE FOREST, YOU HAVE MULTIPLE APARTMENTS AND THEY'RE STILL EMPTY. SO WHAT I SEE IN THE FUTURE IS EMPTY APARTMENTS, AND MAYBE THEY'RE GOING TO BE ENDING UP AS GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED. I DON'T WANT THAT IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD. I CAME TO MCKINNEY. I OWN MCKINNEY. MCKINNEY IS MY HOME, I LOVE MCKINNEY. I WOULD LIKE FOR IT TO STAY AT LEAST BLOOMDALE FARM. PLEASE LET US KEEP THE WAY WE BOUGHT IT. I'M SURE YOU FEEL THE SAME WAY ABOUT YOUR HOME. YOU DON'T WANT SOMEONE COMING IN AND DESTROYING THE STUFF AROUND YOU. WE DON'T EITHER. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS ORTEGA. TAKING. IF YOU WERE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU HAVE COMMENTS OR CONCERNS THAT YOU'D LIKE TO SHARE, KINDLY APPROACH. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS JOHN KING. I LIVE ON 5513 BAXTER WELL ROAD. FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO OPEN BY GIVING MY APPRECIATION AND THANKS FOR YOUR ORGANIZING AND MAINTAINING THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS WHERE WE WERE ABLE TO GIVE OUR CONCERNS AND VOICE OUR PUBLIC OPINIONS. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY, AS SOMEONE WHO HAS LIVED THERE FOR 25 YEARS OR SO, I HAVE PERSONAL EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS FROM MY PEERS TESTIMONIES IN REGARDS TO THE CHANGES THAT HAVE OCCURRED. I HAVE SEEN A GREAT DEAL OF CHANGE HAPPEN IN THE LAST TEN YEARS, MORE THAN I'VE EVER SEEN IN THE PAST 20 YEARS OF MY LIFE. NOT ONLY THAT, BUT I CAN ALSO PERSONALLY ATTEST TO THE STATE OF THE ROADS AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S BEEN BUILT AROUND THERE. WHEN I WAS GROWING UP, BUSSES DID IN FACT USED TO GO UP AND DOWN THE ROADS AND DROP OFF CHILDREN ON THE VERY STREETS OF THEIR HOUSES RECENTLY. I CAN SEE THERE'S A VERY CLEAR REASON WHY THEY ARE NO LONGER CAPABLE OF DOING SO. WHILE THERE HAS BEEN ATTEMPTS TO IMPROVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE, IMPROVE THE ROADS, IT'S BEEN PALTRY AT BEST, KIND OF A BASIC NECESSITIES IN A WAY, AND IS FREQUENTLY DEGRADED OVER TIME, USUALLY TO STANDARDS THAT NO ONE WOULD DEEM ACCEPTABLE. NOT ONLY THAT, BUT I HAVE ALSO SEEN THAT THE CONSTRUCTION THAT'S BEEN GOING ON HAS BEEN PROCEEDING AT A VERY RAPID PACE, BUT HASN'T NECESSARILY WHAT I WOULD THINK HAS BEEN JUSTIFIED. AND WHAT IS PRODUCING. THERE'S MORE TRAFFIC, YES, BUT I DON'T SEE MANY MORE RESIDENTS THAT ARE COMING TO LIVE IN MCKINNEY FOR THESE PROPOSED HOUSES, WHETHER IT'S THE APARTMENT COMPLEXES BEING BUILT ON THE STREET, ON LAKE FOREST OR TO THE WEST OF THIS PROPOSED SECTION, WHICH IS NEW NEIGHBORHOODS, I WOULD SAY MOST OF THEM AREN'T INHABITED EITHER, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THEY WERE COMPLETED AT LEAST 3 TO 4 MONTHS AGO. WELL, THAT CAN CHANGE OVER TIME. I DO THINK THAT BUILDING MORE WOULD BE ESSENTIALLY JUMPING THE GUN FOR SOMETHING THAT ISN'T GOING TO BE FULFILLED FOR YEARS, POTENTIALLY. AND NOT ONLY THAT, WITH THE ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL BE GOING ON, IT WILL MAKE THE AREA EVEN LESS APPEALING TO ANYONE WHO MIGHT WANT TO MOVE HERE FOR THE PURPOSES OF RECEIVING WHAT IS, I GUESS YOU COULD SAY, [01:10:01] ADVERTISED BY THE CITY OF MCKINNEY IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA. MY OTHER MAJOR CONCERN IS, AS MORE CONSTRUCTION IS GOING ON, IS MORE DEVELOPMENT HAS PROGRESSED THAT NOT ONLY THAT, WE'RE GOING TO SEE THINGS THAT AREN'T NECESSARILY APPROVED BY THE STATE OF MCKINNEY AS AN EXAMPLE OF IT. I HAVE SEEN DIFFERENT BUSINESSES SUCH AS FOOD TRUCKS, FIREWORKS STATIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT THAT I DO NOT BELIEVE ARE APPROVED IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM TO BE PUT IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE POPPED UP AND AS FAR AS I CAN TELL, THEY WEREN'T ACTUALLY INVESTIGATED OR MOVED UP UNTIL THIS RECENT CHANGE. WHICH TELLS ME THAT SO LONG AS DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES, WE WILL HAVE MORE AND MORE PEOPLE THAT WILL BE ATTRACTED TO ANY SORT OF POTENTIAL POPULATION THAT WILL BE PUTTING UP THINGS THAT AREN'T STRICTLY LEGAL, FURTHER DEGRADING THE VALUE OF THE CITY OR I MEAN THE THE LOCAL AREA AS IT IS NOW, SOMEONE WHO'S LIVED THERE ALL MY LIFE AND HOPES TO LIVE THERE FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. I DON'T NECESSARILY THINK THAT THE PROPOSAL IS GOING TO PROVIDE ANY SORT OF BENEFIT, NOT ONLY TO THE PEOPLE WHO ALREADY LIVE THERE, BUT TO THOSE WHO WISH TO DEVELOP IT FURTHER. AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, MR. KING. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH AT THIS TIME. MADAM CHAIR, I'LL MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING BY COMMISSIONER LEBEAU. SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WATLEY. ANY VOTE REGARDING CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. SORRY. OKAY. THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY, 5 TO 0. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION FROM COMMISSIONERS, ANY COMMENTS ANYONE WISHES TO? I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. AND JAKE, THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT NOTICES. COULD YOU. YEAH OF COURSE. SO ONE THING THAT I THINK WILL CLEAR UP A LOT OF THIS INFORMATION IS ESSENTIALLY THE ENTIRETY OF BAXTER WELL, ROAD AND ALL THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE IN THERE, THEY'RE IN OUR ETJ THEY ARE NOT IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY JURISDICTION. WE DO NOT SEND PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONS OUTSIDE OF OUR CITY LIMITS, WHICH IS WHY THEY DID NOT RECEIVE THEM. ANY PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE WITHIN OUR CITY LIMITS DO RECEIVE THOSE. AGAIN, THAT'S A STATE REQUIRED THING. SO IT'S NOT LIKE WE PICK AND CHOOSE WHO GETS THEM AND WHO DOESN'T GET THEM. IT IS ETJ VERSUS THE CITY OF MCKINNEY LIMITS. JUST CAN YOU JUST CLARIFY ETJ? I KNOW WE'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE ACRONYMS THAT THERE MIGHT BE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IF ESSENTIALLY WE HAVE PLATTING RIGHTS, IF PROPERTIES WERE TO SUBDIVIDE. BUT IF THEY DON'T ANNEX AND ZONE LIKE THIS PROPERTY IS PROPOSING TO DO, THEN THEY ARE ALMOST ENTIRELY UNDER THE COUNTY'S JURISDICTION. SO ALL OF THE ROADWAYS THAT ARE OUT THERE, THOSE ARE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE COLLIN COUNTY. AGAIN, THIS WAS KIND OF SAID EARLIER. AS THIS AREA DEVELOPS, THE INFRASTRUCTURE, ROADWAYS, WATER, SEWER, ALL OF THAT IMPROVES. AND CITY ROADWAYS ARE BETTER IMPROVED AS OPPOSED TO COUNTY OWNED. WHAT IS THAT TIMETABLE? WHAT IS THE TIMETABLE FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT THERE? SO IT IS BASED ON DEVELOPMENT. SO THE CITY DOES NOT GO OUT AND ACTIVELY DO ROADWAY PROJECTS LIKE THIS. IT'LL BE SOMETHING THE DEVELOPER WILL ACTUALLY HAVE TO SIGN UP FOR AND DO THE CONSTRUCTION THEMSELVES AND PAY FOR IT THEMSELVES. SO WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT, THE ROADWAYS, WATER AND SEWER ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO IMPROVE FOR THE AREA. AS FOR THE TIMETABLE FOR THE 380 BYPASS, I BELIEVE TXDOT IS LOOKING AT 8 TO 10 YEARS ON THAT BEFORE IT'S COMPLETED. AND THEN WITH FM 1461, WHICH IS FUTURE LAKE FOREST, AGAIN, THAT'S DRIVEN BY DEVELOPMENT. I IMAGINE, OR BASED ON THE NUMBER OF PROPOSED UNITS WITH THIS PROJECT, THEY MAY BE REQUIRED TO DO A TIA, WHICH IS A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, AND LOOK AT OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS. SO NOT ONLY IMPROVING BAXTER WELL ROAD ALONG THEIR FRONTAGE, BUT POTENTIALLY FURTHER TO THE WEST, CLEAR TO RIDGE DEPENDING ON WHAT THAT TIA SAYS, AS WELL AS FM 1461 AND THE OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THAT AREA AS WELL. WELL, THIS IS BEING ANNEXED. SO DOES THAT CAUSE ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROADS THAT WOULD BE STANDARD, YOU KNOW, WITH IT BEING ANNEXED, THOSE PORTIONS OF ROADWAY I BELIEVE WOULD BE UNDER THE CITY'S JURISDICTION INSTEAD OF THE COUNTY'S. AND SO THEY WOULD BE HELD TO OUR DESIGN STANDARDS, WHICH, AGAIN, ARE A LITTLE BIT SUPERIOR COMPARED TO COLLIN COUNTY. THAT'S JUST FOR THE FRONTAGE ALONG WHERE ON THIS TRACK. YEAH. SO DEPENDING ON IF THEY HAVE TO DO A TIA, WHICH [01:15:06] AGAIN IS A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, THEY MAY BE REQUIRED. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH WOULD BE BAXTER WELL ROAD OR FM 1461. THAT'S NOT JUST THEIR FRONTAGE BUT POTENTIALLY FURTHER SOUTH, FURTHER WEST DEPENDING ON WHAT THAT TIA SAYS. SO THE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S OVER A LONG RIDGE AT BAXTER. WELL, WERE THEY NOT REQUIRED TO DO ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON BAXTER? WELL, NOT CURRENTLY AGAIN, DEPENDING ON WHAT A TIA SAYS WITH THIS PROJECT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SURROUNDING IT, AT SOME POINT IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND IMPROVED AGAIN. WHAT'S CURRENTLY OUT THERE IS NOT A WHOLE LOT OF RESIDENTIAL. IT'S NOT VERY DENSE, WHICH IS WHY THE ROADWAY, WHICH AGAIN IS UNDER COLLIN COUNTY, IS THE WAY IT IS CURRENTLY. BUT AS MORE DENSE PROJECTS COME IN, REDEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE BETTER INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO MEET THE CITY'S CODE. FM 1461. IS THAT STATE OR IS THAT COUNTY FM 1461 THAT WOULD BE STATE. AND THEN WHERE IT'S RENAMED TO LAKE FOREST IS WHEN IT'S UNDER UNDER THE CITY'S JURISDICTION LEAVE. YEAH. SO IT'S NORTH OF I GUESS IT'S THAT BLOOMDALE. NOW THAT'S FM 1461, WHICH IS STATE. YES. SO THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY THERE, MAYBE TO GET THE COUNTY COMMISSIONER INVOLVED TO MAYBE DO SOMETHING FOR BAXTER. WELL, FOR THE FOR THE HOMEOWNERS, BUT POTENTIALLY FOR THE REST OF IT, IF IT'S NOT HAVING TO BE IMPROVED PER OUR REQUIREMENTS AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. YEAH, THAT'D BE SOMETHING TO REACH OUT TO COLLIN COUNTY ABOUT. JAKE, I'M VERY SORRY. WHEN I ASKED YOU TO COME UP, I HAD TWO QUESTIONS, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE WE GOT ACTIVELY INVOLVED. MY SECOND QUESTION IS, IS THERE ZONING ON THIS PROPERTY NOW? THERE IS NOT PART OF THE ANNEXATION PROCESS WHICH MR. ROEDER HAD OUTLINED IS THAT THERE HAS TO BE A ZONING THAT IS ESTABLISHED. THE ZONING PORTION GOES TO BOTH PNC AND CITY COUNCIL, WITH PUBLIC HEARINGS ON BOTH THE ANNEXATION PORTION, WHICH THIS PROJECT OR THIS CASE WILL BE COUPLED WITH. WHEN IT MOVES FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL, IT'S ONLY REQUIRED TO BE HEARD BY CITY COUNCIL. SO WHEN THIS PROJECT MOVES FORWARD, IT'LL BE COUPLED TOGETHER WITH THE ANNEXATION REQUEST. THE ANNEXATION REQUEST ITSELF IS NOT REQUIRED. A PUBLIC HEARING AT PNC, THOUGH. OKAY. AND WOULD YOU JUST REPEAT FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE HERE THAT THIS WILL GO ON TO CITY COUNCIL, WHATEVER. YES, IT WILL GO ON TO CITY COUNCIL PENDING THE VOTE THIS EVENING. IT'LL BE THE FEBRUARY 3RD MEETING WOULD BE THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE FINAL PUBLIC HEARING AND VOTE THERE. OKAY, SO THAT'S THE FEBRUARY 3RD MEETING, CORRECT? FEBRUARY 3RD. YEAH. DEPENDING ON PNC ACTION PRIOR TO THAT. OKAY. BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT GET A NOTICE, THEY WILL NOT GET WELL, THE NOTICE AHEAD OF CITY COUNCIL IS WHAT WE CALL LEGAL NOTICE. THEY ARE POSTED IN THE WITHIN THE NEWSPAPER AS OPPOSED TO PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONS AHEAD OF PNC MEETINGS, WHICH ARE SENT DIRECTLY TO MAIL DIRECTLY TO PROPERTY OWNERS. AGAIN, ONLY IF THEY'RE IN THE CITY LIMITS. OKAY, I JUST WANTED TO GET THAT OUT THERE SO THE RESIDENTS WILL KNOW THAT. AND AGAIN, THAT'S AS REQUIRED PER THE STATE OF TEXAS. SO IT'S NOT SOMETHING WE MANDATE. THANK YOU JAKE, I APPRECIATE YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR JAKE? ALRIGHT. THANKS, JAKE. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION REGARDING THIS ITEM? ITEM 20 5-0125Z. I THINK MAYBE WE SHOULD HAVE SOME DISCUSSION. SO I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THE QUESTION I ALWAYS ASK MYSELF IS, YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE THE PROPERTY OWNERS RIGHTS? AND, YOU KNOW, BUT IN THIS CASE, IN THIS CASE, I THINK IT IT CAUSES ME TO SAY, WHY DOES PLANNING AND ZONING EXIST? I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THOSE CASES. SO YES, PROPERTY OWNERS DO HAVE A RIGHT TO TO DO WHAT THEY, THEY WANT WITH THEIR PROPERTY UNLESS THEY'RE IMPINGING ON PEOPLE AROUND THEM. AND I'M SEEING A LOT OF PEOPLE HERE THAT ARE GOING TO BE IMPINGED UPON UNLESS OTHER PEOPLE TAKE ACTION TO IMPROVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE. SO FOR THAT REASON, I'M NOT I'M AGAINST THIS DEVELOPMENT. I TEND TO AGREE. I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, I KNOW WE HAVE A DEFINITE NEED FOR HOUSING. LOW. LOW INCOME HOUSING, I GUESS IS [01:20:04] WHAT THIS WOULD FALL UNDER. CORRECT? I THINK I'M SAYING THAT RIGHT. AFFORDABLE. AFFORDABLE. I KNEW THAT WASN'T EXACTLY THE RIGHT WORD. THANK YOU. I KNOW THERE'S A NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. I MEAN, THERE'S NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT. BUT I DO QUESTION WITH THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS EXISTING. IS THIS THE RIGHT SPOT FOR IT? YEAH. IS THERE ANOTHER SPOT THAT IT WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT MORE APPROPRIATE BECAUSE IT WOULD HAVE BETTER ROADS, BETTER ACCESS? I WAS ACTUALLY OUT AT THIS SITE NOT LONG AGO FOR FOR WORK AND BAXTER WELL ROAD IS IT'S A MESS. AND GETTING UP TO 1461 THERE. IT'S A PRETTY GOOD LITTLE INCLINE. THE ROAD IS KIND OF AT A LOWER. BAXTER WILL KIND OF TAKES A LOWER GRADE THERE. SO IT'S IT'S KIND OF A MESS. AND IT WOULD BE IT WOULD BE A CHALLENGE FOR, YOU KNOW, RESIDENTS OR DEVELOPMENT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? SEEMS LIKE AMAZON CAN GET ON ANY ROAD AND MAKE IT ANYWHERE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT KIND OF TIRES THEY HAVE. THAT MAY BE THE PART OF THE PROBLEM TO. I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT I APPRECIATE ALL OF THE HOMEOWNERS WHO DID COME OUT THIS EVENING WILLING TO COME OUT AND SHARE YOUR CONCERNS. YOU KNOW, WE REALLY DO APPRECIATE IT WHEN PEOPLE COME AND EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. SOMETIMES THINGS GO ONE WAY VERSUS THE WAY THAT YOU, YOU KNOW, WOULD, WOULD HOPE. BUT REGARDLESS, NOTHING HAPPENS IF YOU DON'T COME OUT AND AT LEAST SHARE YOUR OPINION OF WHAT YOU, YOU KNOW, KIND OF WHAT YOU FEEL. YOU KNOW, MY IN-LAWS HAVE A LOT OF LAND. THEY HAD A LOT OF LAND. THAT'S MY MY FAMILY'S. THEY'RE DECEASED. BUT, YOU KNOW, I CAN DEFINITELY EMPATHIZE WITH KIND OF THAT FEELING. YOU KNOW, A LOT OF YOU WERE SPEAKING. I WAS THINKING I WAS LIKE, WOW, WHAT IF, YOU KNOW, SOMEONE WANTED TO COME AND BUILD X, Y, OR Z AND TAKE PART OF LAND WHERE, YOU KNOW, THEY HUNT, WE JUST GO OUT WITH THE GRANDKIDS, GO OUT AND, YOU KNOW, ARE OUR KIDS. AND SO. INFRASTRUCTURE IS IS KIND OF ONE OF MY HOT BUTTONS. AND YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE APPROPRIATE INFRASTRUCTURE IN ORDER TO SUPPORT ANY DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY, THAT'S GOING TO MAKE EVERYBODY MISERABLE WHEN IT'S NOT. AND, YOU KNOW, AS WAS SHARED, YOU GUYS ARE IN THE ETJ AREA. SO THAT DOESN'T FALL WITHIN CITY OF MCKINNEY'S BOUNDARIES IN TERMS OF ROAD IMPROVEMENT, SEWER LINE EXPANSIONS, THINGS LIKE THAT. YOU'VE BEEN MAKING DO TO THIS POINT. SOMETHING'S EVENTUALLY GOING TO HAPPEN OUT THERE IN TERMS OF WHAT'S GOING TO GET DEVELOPED. I THINK YOU GUYS ALL ARE AWARE OF THAT, BUT I AGREE WITH THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS THAT HAVE SHARED THEIR CONCERNS. I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS IS NECESSARILY THE APPROPRIATE LOCATION BASED OFF OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE CONCERNS THAT ARE OUT THERE. MAYBE THE DEVELOPERS HAVE PLANS TO COME IN AND IMPROVE ALL OF THAT OUT THERE. I DON'T KNOW. I HAVEN'T HEARD THAT. I DIDN'T SEE THAT IN THE PLAN. SO. SPEAKING TO THE HOMEOWNERS, I WOULD SUGGEST GETTING IN TOUCH WITH YOUR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND GETTING THAT, YOU KNOW, SEE WHAT YOU KNOW, LIKE THEIR PHONES UP, LIKE THEIR EMAILS UP. AND BECAUSE, LIKE I SAID, THE ROADS ARE A MESS. I WAS OUT THERE. SO WE'LL DO IT AGAIN. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW IF WE DO ANY GOOD, BUT YOU KNOW. MADAM CHAIR. YES. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. PLEASE. MAKE A MOTION TO DENY THIS ITEM. REZONING. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEBO TO DENY THE ITEM. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTES. ARE WE MAKING A MOTION TO DENY OR DENY A MOTION TO DENY. OKAY. DO YOU NEED US TO REDO? AS LONG AS EVERYONE WAS GOOD WITH THEIR VOTES, I COULDN'T HEAR YOU. MOTION PASSES 3 TO 2. THE VOTES. THE VOTE PASSED TO DENY THE REQUEST WITH THREE. TWO. OKAY, SO THAT ITEM HAS BEEN DENIED. 3 TO 2. AND AS SUCH, THAT WILL STILL WILL STILL GO BEFORE. [01:25:11] IT'LL STILL GO BEFORE CITY COUNCIL. IT WILL NOW HAVE A SUPERMAJORITY REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IT AT THE COUNCIL MEETING. OKAY. AND THAT COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “AG” - Agriculture District to “I1” - Light Industrial District, Located on the Southeast Corner of State Highway 5 (North McDonald Street) and Wilmeth Road] FEBRUARY THE 3RD, 2026. OKAY. OUR NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 25137Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STATE HIGHWAY FIVE, NORTH MCDONALD STREET AND WILMOTH ROAD. JAKE. YES. ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A PROPOSED REZONING FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY FIVE AND WILMOTH ROAD FOR I-1 FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES, SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ALREADY ZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL USES, AS THE SURROUNDING AREA HAS ESTABLISHED ITSELF AS AN INDUSTRIAL CENTER WITHIN MCKINNEY. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA. THE COMP PLAN DESIGNATES THIS ENTIRE GENERAL AREA AS THE EMPLOYMENT MIXED PLACE TYPE, WHICH SUPPORTS THE INCLUSION OF A NUMBER OF INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED REZONING AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE, YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JAKE REGARDING THIS ITEM? I HAD A QUESTION. I KNOW IN THE PAST I HAVEN'T DRIVEN OUT THERE RECENTLY, BUT IN THE PAST, HAVE THERE WERE THAT LITTLE FARMHOUSE IS THERE WAS AN OLDER LOG CABIN THAT WAS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE. I THINK IT WAS LIKE COLIN MCKINNEY'S LOG CABIN OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. HAS THAT NOW BEEN MOVED OR. NO, IT WASN'T CALLED A MCKINNEY'S. WELL, WHOSE WAS IT? THERE WAS SOME. WAS IT THROCKMORTON'S OR IT WASN'T COLLIN MCKINNEY WELL, IT WAS SOMEBODY IT HAD A MARKER AND I REMEMBER IT WAS IT WAS THERE. HAS THAT BEEN MOVED NOW? I HONESTLY HAVE NO IDEA. I CAN REACH OUT TO OUR HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER AND SEE, BUT IT MAY BE DICTATED BY EITHER THE STATE OR THE COUNTY. SO OF COURSE THEY WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW ALL THOSE RULES. RULES IF THERE IS AN HISTORICAL MARKER. YEAH, IT SEEMS LIKE IT. LAST TIME I WAS THROUGH THERE, IT MAY HAVE BEEN MOVED NOW, BUT OKAY. I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF THERE WAS ANY CONCERNS THERE FOR HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE. I WISH I HAD AN ANSWER FOR YOU, BUT I DON'T ON THAT ONE. SO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? OKAY. THANK YOU. JAKE, IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? HI. IRIS WITH KIMLEY-HORN, 2600 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, RICHARDSON, TEXAS. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE HISTORICAL MARKER? SINCE WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT THAT, YES. I BELIEVE WE WILL HAVE TO REACH OUT TO THE TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION TO SEE BEST NEXT STEPS TO RELOCATE OR. YEAH, I'M JUST NOT SURE IF IT'S STILL THERE OR NOT. I KNOW THERE WAS PREVIOUSLY. I THINK IT STILL IS THERE? YES. STILL IS. YES. OKAY. OH, OKAY. THE PROPERTY OWNER, THAT WAS THE ONLY HOUSE THAT COME TO THE MICROPHONE. THE MICROPHONE. OKAY. THERE. YOU HAVE TO COME. OKAY. STATE HIS NAME AND CAN YOU, CAN YOU COME TO THE MIC, SIR, IF YOU DON'T MIND. SORRY. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. DAVID ROBERTSON COMPANY, 6060 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, DALLAS 75206. REPRESENT THAT PROPERTY OWNER. THE THE SAME GROUP THAT SOLD THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE HOPEWELL THE SAME GROUP THAT'S UNDER CONTRACT WITH CROWE, WHICH IS ALL THE WAY THROUGH CITY APPROVALS, THE WILMOTH ROAD EXTENSION. AND WE'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN ALL OF THAT. OKAY. AND THEN WHAT WERE YOU SAYING ABOUT THE LOG CABIN? IT'S OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT IT BURNED DOWN YEARS AGO, AND THEN THAT SMALL LITTLE HOUSE WAS BUILT, I THINK, IN THE LATE 60S, EARLY 70S. AND THE COOPER FAMILY, WHICH WAS THE DESCENDANT OF COLEMAN KINNEY, THAT'S WHO LIVED THERE. AND THEN WHEN THEY MOVED AWAY, WE BOUGHT IT FROM THEM. OKAY. OKAY. SO THERE'S STILL A MARKER, BUT THE YEAH, THE MARKER IS THERE. BUT THE THE CABIN, I MEAN, I'VE BEEN IN MCKINNEY 25 YEARS AND THERE WAS NEVER THE HISTORICAL STRUCTURE OUT THERE, JUST THAT OLD HOUSE. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO, I DON'T WANT TO CAUSE ANY CONTROVERSY, BUT I WAS ALWAYS TOLD THAT COLIN MCKINNEY'S HOUSE WAS DOWN BY FINCH PARK, AND I GOT TWO COUNCIL PEOPLE SHAKING THEIR HEAD BACK THERE. YEAH, I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS WAS WHAT WE UNDERSTOOD, BUT I [01:30:06] WON'T SAY HOW LONG I'VE BEEN IN MCKINNEY, BUT IT'S BEEN LONGER THAN THAT. OKAY, I WON'T ARGUE WITH YOU. I'M JUST TELLING YOU WHAT THE PEOPLE HAVE TOLD US. SO CAN I. CAN I MAKE ONE MORE COMMENT? BECAUSE I KNOW WE NEED TO MOVE ON, BUT I THINK THERE WAS A A MEETING HELD IN THAT HOUSE DOWN BY FINCH PARK, AND IT WAS ON A COLD DAY, AND THEY DECIDED TO START A FIRE IN THE FIREPLACE. AND THEY ENDED UP BURNING THE HOUSE DOWN. AND THAT STORY GOT CROSSED. I BELIEVE COUNCILMAN BAYLOR IS SAYING, YOU'RE RIGHT. I STAND CORRECTED. IT WAS YOU. ALL RIGHT, SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR TELL ME YOUR NAME? TERRENCE. DAVID TARRANT. TARRANT. THANK YOU FOR MR. TARRANT. DO YOU NEED ME TO FILL OUT A CARD? YES, PLEASE. THANK YOU AGAIN. ALL GOOD? YES, SIR. GOOD. I HAD TWO WIVES. YOU CAN REAPPROACH. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? COMMISSIONER LEBOW? NO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL GOOD. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU ARE HERE REGARDING THIS ITEM AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. SEEING AS THERE ARE NO PEOPLE COMING UP IN THE AISLE, DO WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION FROM COMMISSIONERS OR MOTION REGARDING THE PUBLIC HEARING OR THIS ITEM? I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND PASS THIS AGENDA ITEM FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WATLEY TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THE ITEM SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. KINDLY VOTE. AND THE ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY 5 TO 0. AND THIS WILL BE PASSED ON TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE FEBRUARY 3RD MEETING. OKAY. OUR LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM [Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “C1” - Neighborhood Commercial District, Located on the Southwest Corner of South Hardin Boulevard and Aspen Drive] 250151Z. TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD. COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH HARDIN BOULEVARD AND ASPEN DRIVE. MR. BENNETT? YES, MA'AM. LAST ONE, I PROMISE. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HARDIN BOULEVARD AND ASPEN DRIVE TO THE C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED, AS IT IS IN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT THAT SERVES THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE APPLICANT OWNS THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH AND INTENDS TO INTEGRATE THIS PROPERTY INTO A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, WHILE ALSO MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO CONTINUE SERVE THE AREA. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ANY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? SO THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT THAT'S THERE, THEY INTEND TO MAINTAIN THAT AND IT'S JUST GOING TO BECOME. THAT'S CORRECT. SO I'LL KIND OF DEFER TO THE APPLICANT. BUT IN SHORT, THE DEVELOPER THAT OWNS THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY, THEY'RE TRYING TO DO A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, JUST RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE THERE. THIS PROPERTY, IT WAS SQUARED OFF BUT KIND OF NOW SEPARATED DUE TO ASPEN DRIVE FROM THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE SCHOOL. SO THIS ACTUALLY HAS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING ON IT, BUT IT'S NEVER GOING TO BE DEVELOPED AS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. IT'S JUST GOING TO BE MAINTAINED AS A DRAINAGE EASEMENT. HOWEVER, WITH IT HAVING THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL THAT KICKS IN BUFFERS, SCREENING REQUIREMENTS, SETBACKS, ALL OF THAT. SO THAT'S MOSTLY THE INTENT FOR THE THE REZONING REQUEST TO SEE ONE. THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH ACTUALLY CORRESPONDS TO OUR C3 DISTRICT. SO WHICH IS MUCH MORE INTENSE. I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY INTENDED DEVELOPMENT ACTUALLY ON THIS TRACT. THE INTENT IS JUST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR JAKE? THANK YOU. JAKE, IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? GOOD EVENING. I'M CASEY [01:35:06] MCBROOM WITH CROSS ENGINEERING, 1720 WEST VIRGINIA STREET. AND HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER YOU DON'T HAVE. ALL RIGHT. SORRY TO MAKE YOU WALK UP HERE. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU ARE HERE AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. ALL RIGHT. SEEING IS THERE ARE NONE. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION FROM COMMISSIONERS? MADAM CHAIR, I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER LEBOW TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTE. OOPS. AND THAT ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY, 5 TO 0. AND IT WILL GO ON TO CITY COUNCIL AT THE FEBRUARY 3RD, 2026 MEETING. OKAY, AT THIS TIME, WE CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING MATTERS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA? AND DOES THE COMMISSION OR STAFF HAVE ANY COMMENTS? I [COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS] HAVE ONE FROM STAFF. I WANTED TO INTRODUCE ALL OF YOU ALL TO OUR NEW PLANNING TECHNICIAN, CHARLOTTE NELSON. SHE JUST STARTED WITH. SHE'S BEEN WITH THE CITY FOR A WHILE, BUT SHE'S JUST STARTED WITH OUR TEAM RECENTLY, SO JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU GUYS PUT A FACE TO A NAME. AWESOME. WELCOME, CHARLOTTE. CHARLOTTE, ANY OTHER COMMENTS? YES, MADAM CHAIR, I THINK WE PROBABLY NEED TO ADJOURN BEFORE WE GIVE COLLIN MCKINNEY ANOTHER HOUSE AND SEVERAL OTHER FAMILIES. WELL, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THAT IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IT, CITY OF MCKINNEY IS IS GOING TO BE HOSTING THEIR FIRST HISTORIC HALF MARATHON. HALF MARATHON IS 13.1 MILES. I HAVE NEVER RUN ONE BEFORE, BUT I HAVE SIGNED UP TO RUN IN IT AND SO I'VE BEEN TRAINING FOR THAT AND I LOVE IT BECAUSE IT COVERS ALL OF MCKINNEY. THAT WAS ONE OF MY REASONS FOR DECIDING TO SIGN UP. I WAS LIKE, WELL, IF I GET TIRED, AT LEAST I KNOW WHERE I'M GOING TO BE, WHERE I HAVE TO RUN TO. AND SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO GET OUT AND SUPPORT IN, IN SOME WAY, SHAPE OR FORM. SO THAT IS LAST WEEKEND IN MARCH. SO HISTORIC MCKINNEY HALF I BELIEVE IS THE WEBSITE. IF YOU HAVE ANY INTEREST OR KNOW ANYONE WHO IS A RUNNER. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING? SO MOVED COMMISSIONER WATLEY AND SECOND, SECOND AND COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. WE ARE ADJOURNED AT. TAKE A VOTE. WE'LL TAKE A VOTE. YES. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? WE ARE * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.