[00:00:09]
AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH THE 10TH. THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL. WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL. THERE ARE SOME ITEMS THAT ARE HEARD TONIGHT THAT WILL ONLY BE HEARD BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND THERE ARE OTHER ITEMS THAT MAY BE FORWARDED ON TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ADDITIONAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL VOTE. I WILL ADVISE THE AUDIENCE THIS EVENING IF A CASE IS GOING TO GO FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL, OR IF IT WILL ONLY BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON A PARTICULAR ITEM, WE ASK THAT YOU COMPLETE A YELLOW SPEAKER'S CARD. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE, I BELIEVE THERE MIGHT BE SOME UP HERE. YOU CAN GRAB ONE IN THE LOBBY AS WELL. AND THEN WHEN YOU APPROACH THE PODIUM, KINDLY STATE YOUR FIRST AND LAST NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. WE DO ASK THAT YOU LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES, AND YOU CAN ONLY SPEAK ONE TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM. WE DO ASK THAT YOU TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT, THAT YOU FOCUS ON THE ISSUE AT HAND, AND THAT YOU'RE CONCISE IN YOUR COMMENTS. WE DO WANT TO STRESS THAT YOUR OPINIONS ARE IMPORTANT TO US, AND THEY DO BECOME PART OF THE CITY'S RECORD, AND WE ALL DO WANT TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF MCKINNEY. SO AT THIS POINT, WE WILL GET STARTED WITH OUR AGENDA AND WE'LL MOVE TO THE PUBLIC. COMMENTS. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THE NONPUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS? OKAY. SEEING IS THERE ARE NONE. WE'LL NOW MOVE TO THE CONSENT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT ITEMS, WHICH INCLUDES THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24TH, 2026? THIS IS A REVISED COPY OF THE MINUTES. I JUST WANTED TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION. THE REVISION BEFORE YOU IS ACTUALLY CORRECTING COMMISSION MEMBER BUETTNER'S NAME. WE WERE MISSING AN L1LI LIKE THE NEW SPELLING. YES, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS REVISED. OKAY. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. I SECOND THAT MOTION AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG. KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. THAT MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS REVISED PASSES 7 TO 0. WE'LL NOW MOVE TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS WITH PUBLIC HEARINGS. SO THE FIRST ITEM, ITEM 25-0084SP2. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO TO TO CONSIDER DISCUSS ACT ON A DESIGN EXCEPTION TO A SITE PLAN FOR A WAREHOUSE. MCKINNEY AIRPORT CROSSROADS. LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 285FT NORTH OF OF COUNTY ROAD 317 AND ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF FUTURE SPUR 399 OR SALLY. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS ITEM WAS PRESENTED AT THE FEBRUARY 24TH MEETING. THE STAFF HAD DISCUSSED ABOUT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO REMOVE EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION, AND SINCE THAT MEETING, STAFF HAS MET WITH THE APPLICANT AND CONFIRMED THERE ARE 26 TREES, NOT 36. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS TO REMOVE ALL 26 TREES, WHICH STILL EXCEEDS THE 30% OF PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT. WHILE STAFF IS STILL RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE REQUEST, STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES AND APPRECIATES THE APPLICANT'S COLLABORATION TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION'S CONCERN AND THAT THEY WILL PRESENT THEIR PROPOSED CHANGES FOR CONSIDERATION. WE DO HAVE TONIGHT OUR URBAN FORESTER, IAN ERICKSON, AND OUR ENGINEER, RYAN HUNTER. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHANGES TO THE EXISTING SITE PLAN? AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. SO CAN YOU GO OVER THE CHANGES THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING OR IS THAT MORE THE APPLICANT? THE APPLICANT WILL BE ABLE TO PRESENT THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU GUYS. THEY HAVE A PRESENTATION PROVIDED OKAY. VERY GOOD. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR ARACELI? THANK YOU. ARACELI, IS OUR APPLICANT PRESENT? YES. OKAY. THEY WOULDN'T MIND COMING UP. HI.
GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. MY NAME IS JOSE GONZALEZ WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND MY ADDRESS IS 5832 COPPER CANYON, THE COLONY, TEXAS. 75056. TO START WITH, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THANK EVERYBODY HERE FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR YOUR FEEDBACK AND GIVE US ANOTHER
[00:05:04]
OPPORTUNITY TO KEEP COLLABORATING WITH THE CITY. AND THE PREVIOUS HEARING TWO WEEKS AGO, I PRESENTED MYSELF WITH ROCCO KERSEY, THE DEVELOPER FOR THE PROJECT.UNFORTUNATELY, ROCCO COULDN'T BE HERE FOR THIS MEETING TODAY, BUT HE WAS A PART OF ALL THE MEETINGS AND REALLY WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE CITY ON EVERY SINGLE STEP TO TRY TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD BE APPRECIATED BY THE CITY ON THAT. SO WITH THAT SAID. SORRY, OKAY.
SO WITH THAT SAID, AS ARACELI MENTIONED, WE'RE HERE TO ASK FOR APPROVAL OF THE REMOVAL OF 26 TREES WITHIN THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN. AS MENTIONED, THE CITY HAS AN ORDINANCE THAT RESTRICTS THE REMOVAL OF MORE THAN 30% QUALITY TREES WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN AS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY. AND WITH OUR PROPOSED SITE PLAN, WE WILL BE REMOVING ALL 26 TREES FROM THAT FLOODPLAIN. THROUGHOUT SOME COLLABORATION, WE'VE MADE SOME SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE. IN THE MAIN ONES THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HIGHLIGHT IS THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS ELECTED TO PLANT AN ADDITIONAL 44 INCH CALIPER TREES ON SITE, AND CONTRIBUTE AN ADDITIONAL FEE OF $35,857 TO THE TREE REFORESTATION FUND. THE COMBINATION OF THE ADDITIONAL TREES AND THAT FEE WOULD BE THE EQUIVALENT OF MITIGATING FOR THE FULL 26 TREES THAT ARE GOING TO BE REMOVED FROM THE FLOODPLAIN. IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE'VE ALSO MADE SOME ENHANCEMENTS TO THE SITE IN TERMS OF IMPROVED LANDSCAPE, AS WELL AS SOME SITE REDESIGN TO KIND OF HELP ADDRESS SOME OF THE FEEDBACK AND CONCERNS THAT WE HEARD OVER THE LAST TWO WEEKS. AND SO WITH THAT, I THINK ONE POINT THAT WE REALLY WANT TO TOUCH UPON REAL QUICK IS SOME OF THE FEEDBACK THAT WE HEARD WERE IF WE WERE ABLE TO EVALUATE DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES AS WE DETERMINED THE FLOODPLAIN ON THE SITE, AND IF WE COULD DO SOMETHING TO TRY TO MITIGATE, TO CREATE ANY IMPACTS TO THAT INTERNALLY, WE DID. AND THE CITY ALSO PROVIDED SOME FEEDBACK ON SOME OPTIONS THAT WE COULD EVALUATE. ULTIMATELY, THE WAY WE STARTED WITH THIS IS WE TRY TO DETERMINE IF AVOIDING DETENTION WOULD BE A POSSIBILITY IF WE MAINTAIN THE FLOODPLAIN AS CURRENTLY EXIST, AND WITH OUR FLOODPLAIN TEAM AND SOME MODELING, WE DETERMINED THAT BECAUSE THE SITE IS SO UPSTREAM ON THE OVERALL WATERSHED, WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SOME OF THE TIMING ELEMENTS THAT WE USUALLY CAN. WHEN YOU'RE CLOSER TO THE DOWNSTREAM PORTION OF THE WATERSHED. AND BECAUSE OF THAT, DETENTION WOULD STILL BE REQUIRED BECAUSE OF THE IMPERVIOUS AREA THAT IS BEING PROVIDED ON SITE, AS OPPOSED TO THE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED AREA THAT IT IS. SO ONCE WE DETERMINED THAT THE DETENTION WOULD BE REQUIRED. WE DID EVALUATE A COUPLE DIFFERENT FOOTPRINTS AND LOCATIONS FOR THE FLOODPLAIN, TRYING TO AVOID THAT EXISTING FLOODPLAIN THAT ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE, AS WELL AS REALLY HIGH AND LONG RETAINING WALLS. THAT WE'RE MAKING THE PROJECT UNFEASIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPER.
AND SO WITH THOSE CONSTRAINTS, WE DECIDED TO PROCEED WITH THE CURRENT SITE PLAN THAT DOES REMOVE THE 26 TREES, BUT PROVIDE SOME ENHANCEMENTS TO THE SITE TO TRY TO MITIGATE FOR THAT REMOVAL OF THEM. SO HERE'S A QUICK RENDERING OF SOME OF THE THE FOUR PRIMARY IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'LL BE PROPOSING WITH THIS SITE. AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THE 40 ADDITIONAL FOUR INCH CALIPER TREES THAT ARE IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM CODE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED ON SITE. THE SITE IS PROVIDING 40% PERVIOUS OR LANDSCAPED AREA, WHICH IS FOUR TIMES THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT BEING 10%. WE ARE MAKING A REDESIGN FOR THE DETENTION POND TO TURN IT INTO A WET RETENTION POND, AND TO TRY TO KIND OF ENHANCE THAT ENVIRONMENT WITH WE WILL BE ADDING A WETLAND AND NATIVE GRASSES SURROUNDING THAT POND TO KIND OF REPLICATE THAT NATURAL HABITAT FOR WILDLIFE. SO DIVING IN A LITTLE BIT DEEPER ON THOSE, THIS ILLUSTRATION SHOWS IN THE WHITE CIRCLES THE 40 ADDITIONAL TREES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED, AND THEN THE NON WHITE CIRCLES. IT'S THE TREES THAT ARE ALSO BEING PROVIDED AS PART OF THE CODE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE THAT WE'RE BEING PROVIDED. AND THEN HERE WE CAN KIND OF ALSO ILLUSTRATE HOW MUCH PERVIOUS AND LANDSCAPED AREA IS ACROSS THE SITE. AND I THINK ONE OF THE MAIN ITEMS TO POINT OUT HERE IS THE ADDED CANOPY. THE ADDED TREES WILL PROVIDE ENHANCED CANOPY COVERAGE AND SIGNIFICANT MORE LANDSCAPE AREA TO HELP COMBAT SOME OF THAT HEAT ISLAND EFFECT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED BY SOME INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS THAT DON'T
[00:10:02]
NECESSARILY HAVE THAT MUCH LANDSCAPE ON SITE. AND SO KIND OF ZOOMING IN A LITTLE BIT MORE INTO THE POND, WE DEFINITELY HEARD THE FEEDBACK IN TERMS OF THE DETENTION POND, AND WE'VE MADE SOME REDESIGNS TO REALLY TRY TO BRING BACK SOME OF THAT NATURAL HABITAT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED FOR WILDLIFE. THE POND WILL BE WET, AS SHOWN, AND WITH THE IDEA OF PROVIDING SOME FOUNTAIN IN THE CENTER, AND THEN THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE WOULD BE LINED WITH WETLAND AND NATIVE GRASSES TO REALLY ENHANCE THAT NATURAL HABITAT THAT WE'VE PREVIOUSLY SEEN IN THESE AREAS. AND THEN SIMILARLY WITH THIS, ENHANCEMENTS LIKE THE WET DETENTION POND ALSO PROVIDES A SUPERIOR LEVEL OF STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT ON TOP OF THE DETENTION BENEFITS THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED BY THE POND, WHICH ULTIMATELY WILL MITIGATE FOR FLOODPLAIN DOWNSTREAM AND ULTIMATELY CAUSE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON SOME OF THE FLOODING DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE. AND SO WITH THAT, HERE'S KIND OF A TABLE SUMMARIZING REALLY A LOT OF THE THE FOUR IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT AND SOME OF THE ENHANCEMENTS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE TO THE SITE TO TRY TO MITIGATE FOR THE REMOVAL OF THOSE 26 TREES. THE DEVELOPER HAS MENTIONED SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THIS REALLY WANTS TO CREATE A PROJECT THAT'S VERY ECOLOGICAL AND VEGETATIVE AND KIND OF NATURAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY AND OVERALL, CREATE A GREAT PROJECT FOR THE CITY. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT? I HAVE A QUESTION. I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED ABOUT WHERE THE EXISTING 26 QUALITY TREES ARE. I MEAN, I THINK I SEE THEM ON THE MAP, BUT IT'S YOUR DIAGRAM, BUT IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO I'M SORRY WE DID NOT PUT THAT SLIDE, BUT OUR PREVIOUS SLIDE ON FLOODPLAIN BLUE. THE BLUE. THERE YOU GO.SO THESE ARE THE QUALITY. THESE ARE THE QUALITY TREES AND THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN WHICH ARE THE 26 TREES. YES. AND THEN THIS EXHIBIT SHOWS THE YELLOW CIRCLES WHICH ARE THE TEN QUALITY TREES THAT WERE WE BELIEVE WERE IN THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN BUT ARE NOT THERE IN THE PROPOSED POND OR FLOODPLAIN OR PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN. AND THEN JUST TO GIVE YOU THESE ARE THE OTHER ADDITIONAL TREES OUTSIDE OF THOSE. SO THE FIRST 26 IN RED ARE THE ONES IN QUESTION, CORRECT? OKAY. YES, THAT IS CORRECT. SO SOME OF THOSE WOULD BE IN THE RETENTION POND. IS THAT IS THAT RIGHT. WILL BE IN THE RETENTION IT WOULD WANT. I MEAN IF THEY WERE TO REMAIN THEY WOULD WIND UP IN THE RETENTION POND. THERE'S SIGNIFICANT SIDE SLOPE AND GRADING OPERATIONS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE POND THERE. I SEE THAT'S WHY THEY'RE BEING WE DISCUSSED THAT AT THE LAST MEETING OKAY. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. REMOVING THEN REPLACING BECAUSE OF THAT. YEAH. BECAUSE THEY CAN'T MAINTAIN OR SAVE THEM DUE TO THE GRADING OPERATION THAT NEEDS TO OCCUR. RIGHT. WE WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY IN THE AREA. WASN'T WASN'T THERE. YEAH. YEAH. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. I SAW THAT THERE WERE TREES TO BE REMOVED. IT'S LIKE WHAT, 317 CALIPER INCHES YET YOU'RE REPLACING WITH 160 CALIPER INCHES PLUS THE THE THE FEE. THAT'S CORRECT IS THE FEE.
WAS THAT DETERMINED BECAUSE YOU'RE ONLY REPLACING 160. SO THAT'S THAT'S RIGHT. SO OUT OF 317 WE'LL SUBTRACT 160 THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED WITH THE TREES. AND THEN THE REMAINING NUMBER OF CALIPER INCHES ARE BEING TURNED INTO THE EQUIVALENT OF A FEE A FEE OKAY. AND WHAT IS IT A CERTAIN AMOUNT PER TREE. PER CALIPER INCH PER CALIPER INCH. YES. THERE'S A VALUE PER CALIPER RANGE. I THINK THE CITY, THE WAY IT CALCULATES IT, IT ULTIMATELY ADDS FOR EVERY FOUR INCHES IS THE EQUIVALENT OF $700, WHICH IS THE VALUE OF A REPLACEMENT TREE. OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION REGARDING THE WETLAND AND NATIVE NATIVE GRASSES THAT YOU WANT TO PLANT WITH RESPECT TO, LIKE HELPING TO PREVENT EROSION IN THAT AREA WHERE YOU'VE REMOVED TREES? OR THAT MIGHT BE A QUESTION FOR THE ARBORIST AS WELL. WE DO HAVE OUR LANDSCAPE TEAM HERE.
IF I COULD BRING HER UP TO THE PODIUM. HELLO. YES. STATE YOUR NAME FOR US, PLEASE. JULIA CAPPLEMAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND YOUR ADDRESS, 260 EAST DAVIS STREET. THANK YOU. YEAH.
WE SPECIFICALLY SELECTED A NATIVE SEED MIX. SO PLANTS NATIVE TO TEXAS, ALL THE SPECIES YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN ARE ALSO ON THE APPROVED PLANT LIST OF THE CITY OF MCKINNEY.
DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION IN TERMS OF HOW IT WILL HELP TO PREVENT FUTURE EROSION IN THAT
[00:15:02]
AREA AFTER REMOVAL OF THE TREES, LIKE THE ROOT? YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. SO THE ROOT STRUCTURE AND THE DESIGN OF THESE WETLAND MIXES ARE GOING TO BE A LOT DEEPER, AND THEY'RE GOING TO HELP SUPPORT SOIL A LOT MORE COMPARED TO LIKE A BERMUDA SOD, WHICH IS GOING TO HAVE A VERY THIN ROOT STRUCTURE. SO THOSE THICKER PLANTS WITH DEEPER ROOTS, THEY'RE GOING TO REALLY HELP STABILIZE THOSE STEEP SLOPES. AND HOW DO THEY COMPARE TO THE TREES THAT ARE BEING REMOVED? I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT QUANTIFIABLE COMPARISON, BUT I THINK THAT IT'S DEFINITELY A GOOD EFFORT AND GETS US DEFINITELY A LOT MORE STABILITY THAN JUST DOING A REGULAR BERMUDA SOD THERE. OKAY. THANK YOU. THE ENTIRE AREA AROUND THE POND WILL BE SEEDED WITH THESE WETLAND AND NATIVE GRASSES. YES, THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OUTLINED IN THE WHITE DASHED LINE. OKAY.THEN THE REST OF THE SITE WILL HAVE LIKE A BERMUDA TYPE GRASS. THAT'S CORRECT. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU. I'VE GOT JUST ONE QUESTION FOR OUR SALLY AS TO WHETHER THE CITY OR WHETHER STAFF AGREES THAT THE STEPS BEING TAKEN BY THE APPLICANT ARE ABOVE AND BEYOND MORE THAN WOULD BE REQUIRED. SO STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES AND APPRECIATES THE ADDED, YOU KNOW, CANOPY TREES FOR THE SITE AND THE LANDSCAPING. BUT ONE OF THE THINGS STAFF VALUES IS THE PRESERVATION OF THE QUALITY TREES WITHIN THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN. OKAY. SPECIFICALLY, ARE THEY THEY MADE SOME SPECIFIC ASSERTIONS ABOUT WHAT THEY'RE DOING THAT GOES BEYOND WHAT THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE. WERE THIS EXCEPTION GRANTED? AND IS DOES THE STAFF AGREE THAT WHAT THEY'RE PLANNING TO DO IF THEY'RE APPROVED IS BEYOND WHAT THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO DO, OR THEY APPROVED? SO I CAN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY ARE PROVIDING MORE THAN WHAT'S REQUIRED. BUT THERE'S NOTHING IN THE CODE THAT ALLOWS US TO SAY WHAT SPECIFICALLY OR HOW TO, YOU KNOW, MITIGATE FOR THESE CHANGES. SO THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IS LEFT TO THE COMMISSION TO MAKE THAT DETERMINATION. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING DENIAL AS THE VALUES PLACED ON THE EXISTING TREES ON THE POND FOR PRESERVATION OF THE TREES AND THE POND AND THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? SEEING IS THERE ARE NO ONE, NO INDIVIDUALS APPROACHING. DO WE HAVE A MOTION, MADAM CHAIR? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM I DID. I'M SO SORRY. I DID WANT TO MAKE A NOTE. SO THERE ARE TWO SPECIFIC AVENUES IN FRONT OF YOU. YOU CAN EITHER APPROVE THE ITEM AS IT WAS POSTED, OR THIS WAS AFTER THE AGENDA WAS POSTED. SO YOU WOULD HAVE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM. WITH THE CHANGES AS PROPOSED TO THE SITE PLAN. LANDSCAPE PLAN PROPOSED AND PRESENT MITIGATION PLAN AS PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT. SO IT'S EITHER AS PRESENTED BY THE AGENDA OR AS PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT. OKAY. THE MOTION IS BY THE APPLICANT OKAY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT BY A SECOND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY, 7 TO 0. MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM. ITEM 26001. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 8360 WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE. MR. BENNETT. YES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM CHAIR.
GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. GET TO THE RIGHT EXHIBIT HERE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT A MULTI-TENANT BUILDING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF US 380 AND EAST OF CUSTER ROAD. A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE PROPOSED DRIVE THROUGH COMPONENT BEING LOCATED WITHIN 200FT OF A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE. THE DRIVE THROUGH IS LOCATED BEYOND 200FT FROM THE RESIDENTIAL HOME ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, BUT IS LOCATED 165FT FROM THE SHARED PROPERTY LINE. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS BETWEEN THE DRIVE THROUGH AND THE RESIDENCE
[00:20:01]
TO THE NORTH. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE DRIVE THROUGH IS ADEQUATELY BUFFERED WITH THE OFFICE BUILDINGS, STANDARD SCREENING AND BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS OF THE UDC, AND THE RESIDENCE BEING LOCATED OVER 200FT FROM THE PROPOSED DRIVE THROUGH. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SDP AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU JAKE, THANK YOU JAKE. THE OFFICE BUILDING THERE THAT'S GOING TO BE CLOSEST TO THE RESIDENTIAL IS THAT WITHIN THE STANDARD ZONING REQUIREMENTS? YES. YEAH. SO THAT'S MEETING THE STANDARD BUFFERING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. SO IN THE SETBACK FROM THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE OKAY. WHAT IS THE SCREENING IN BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES. YEAH. SO IT'S A WROUGHT IRON FENCE WITH MASONRY COLUMNS EVERY 20FT ON CENTER AS WELL AS TALL EVERGREEN SHRUBS.SO THE FENCE ITSELF AND THE COLUMNS ARE SIX FEET PLUS. AND THEN THE EVERGREEN SHRUBS ONCE MATURE WITHIN 2 TO 3 YEARS AFTER PLANTING SHOULD ALSO BE ABOUT THAT SIX FOOT. YEAH. OKAY.
AND THE THE HOMEOWNER WAS NOTICED OR ARE THEY ETJ THERE. YES. SO I BELIEVE THEY ARE IN OUR ETJ. SO THEY WERE NOT NOTICED. ALL OF THE OTHER SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THAT ARE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS WERE NOTICED THOUGH. AND WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE GOING IN THERE, JAKE. THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS, I BELIEVE THE ONES. I THINK THEY'RE ALL ONE STORY AND I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT ON THIS. SO LESS THAN 30FT, SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 25 AND 30, LIKELY 27FT HIGH TO THE PLAN SUBMITTED. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR. YES. THERE'S ALSO A PROPOSED RETAINING WALL IN THE REAR. ASSUME THE BUILDING SET UP ABOVE THE RETAINING WALL. THAT'S THERE IS A LOW SIDE. YEAH, YEAH. SO THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL HEIGHT TO THAT WALL THAT'S BEING BEING PLACED ON THE NORTH SIDE. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR JAKE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU JAKE IS OUR APPLICANT HERE I BELIEVE SO.
IF YOU CAN KINDLY STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS PLEASE. YES. ALEX TRIMBLE WITH QUIDDITY ENGINEERING ADDRESS 7413 EASTWICK AVENUE, MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75071. THANK YOU. REALLY.
WE'RE HERE MOSTLY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. WE'VE WORKED PRETTY CLOSELY WITH JAKE, SO I THINK HE COVERED IT PRETTY SUCCINCTLY. BUT THE BIGGEST THING IS I DO THINK WE HAVE A PRETTY GOOD BUFFER HERE. TWO BUILDINGS. WE'RE DOING A BUNCH OF TREES BACK THERE, AS WELL AS STANDARD BUFFERING OF SHRUBS, LOTS OF RETAINING WALL. SO WE FEEL THERE'S A PRETTY REASONABLE BUFFER THERE BETWEEN THAT PROPERTY LINE AND AND WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING. SO YEAH HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MIGHT HAVE. AND THE TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS I JUST NOTICED THOSE ARE GOING TO BE TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS. AND THOSE ARE PART OF THE BUFFER. ONE STORY THEY HAVE THEY HAVE. SO THEY'RE ONE STORY. THEY HAVE INTERNAL MEZZANINES, BUT THEY'RE ONE STORY BUILDINGS THE SAME 27FT HIGH, ONE STORY, OKAY. THE SAME AS THE YEAH, THEY'RE OKAY. AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE INTENT IS FOR THE POINT OF ORDER TO GENERALLY FACE WESTERLY, NOT NORTHERLY.
YEP. YEAH. IT'S GOING TO BE ON THE WEST SIDE OVER THERE. SO THE POINT OF ORDER ISN'T UP AGAINST THAT SAME BOUNDARY. YEAH. GOTCHA. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. TRIMBLE. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO COME UP. COME SHARE YOUR CONCERNS OR COMMENTS. KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? SEEING AS THERE ARE NONE, DO WE HAVE ANY MOTION REGARDING THE PUBLIC HEARING OR THE AND THE ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE ITEM 260001. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. THE VOTE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY, 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED ON TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM 250131Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM C3 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND EIGHT C HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT TO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
[00:25:05]
AND EIGHT C HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STACY ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 121 SAM RAYBURN TOLLWAY. THANK YOU AGAIN. THIS IS A PROPOSED REZONING FROM C3 AND PD TO A NEW PD THAT ALLOWS COMMERCIAL USES AND MODIFIES THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 3000 LINEAR FEET OF DIRECT FRONTAGE ON 121, AND IS DESIGNATED AS THE ENTERTAINMENT CENTER PLACE TYPE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH IS INTENDED TO SUPPORT A VARIETY OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND ENTERTAINMENT VENUES. THE PROPOSED ZONING FOLLOWS MANY OF THE SAME DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ALREADY PERMITTED ON THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY. SOME NOTABLE NOTABLE ALTERATIONS TO THE BASE ZONING OF C3 ARE THE ADDITION OF A NEW USE PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND REQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. THE NEWLY PROPOSED USE OF OUTDOOR WATER RECREATION AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY IS ESTABLISHED IN ORDER TO ENCOMPASS THE OPERATIONS OF THE PROPOSED CANNON BEACH DEVELOPMENT. THE PARKING DEVIATIONS ARE DUE TO THE MIXED USE NATURE OF THE PROJECT. STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE DEVELOPER IS INTENDING TO CONSTRUCT A PRODUCT THAT PROVIDES A MIX OF USES THAT COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER AND SHARE PARKING. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A MINIMUM OF TWO REQUIRED ACRES OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE INTEGRATED ACROSS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE OPEN SPACE SHOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO ENHANCE PEDESTRIAN FLOW THROUGHOUT THE SITE. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE VISION FOR THIS PROPERTY ALONG THE 121 CORRIDOR, AND AS SUCH, RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZONING. WITH THAT, I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE. JAKE, I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. WOULD YOU GO OVER ONCE AGAIN THE SCREENING AND BUFFERING PROTECTION WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD BEHIND? YEAH. SO ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE THAT SHARED WITH RESIDENTIAL THERE WILL BE THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS FOR SCREENING. BOTH MINIMUM SIX FOOT TALL. ONE IS A CONTINUOUS MASONRY WALL AND THE SECOND IS A WROUGHT IRON OR TUBULAR STEEL FENCE WITH MASONRY COLUMNS EVERY 20FT ON CENTER, AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS SIMILAR TO THE LAST ITEM. THOSE ARE THE TWO OPTIONS, AGAIN MINIMUM SIX FEET TALL. IT'S UP TO THE APPLICANT. THOSE SCREENING DEVICES ALSO MATCH WHAT'S APPROVABLE WITHIN OUR CURRENT UDC, SO THE PD MATCHES THAT ASPECT OF IT. HOW DO YOU CONTROL NOISE? YEAH. SO WITHIN OUR CODE OF ORDINANCES WE DO HAVE A NOISE ORDINANCE. WE ALSO HAVE A LIGHTING ORDINANCE AS WELL. OUR NOISE ORDINANCE LIMITS NONRESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO 65DB WITHIN THE DAY AS MEASURED FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES, AND THEN 58DB AT NIGHT. IF ANY OF THE NEIGHBORS OR ANYONE BELIEVES THAT THE THE OPERATIONS ARE ARE IN VIOLATION OF THAT, THEN THEY CAN REACH OUT TO OUR CODE SERVICES TEAM. BUT WE DO HAVE THAT IN PLACE. SO IF THERE'S ANY PUMP EQUIPMENT OR SOME KIND OF TURBINES OR SOMETHING PUTTING OUT MORE THAN 65, THEN THE NEIGHBORS CAN RESPOND TO THAT. THAT'S CORRECT. YEP. DO WE KNOW THE DECIBEL OF THE PUMP EQUIPMENT? I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT. I THINK THEY DO HAVE A SLIDE ON NOISE WITHIN THEIR PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. TELL US ABOUT THE LIGHTING AS WELL. THE LIGHTING. SO ALL OF THE LIGHTING IS TO FACE INTERNAL TO THE SITE. NONE OF IT IS ALLOWED TO OVERFLOW INTO ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. SO THAT'S MORE REVIEWED AS PART OF OUR BUILDING PERMIT. SO A LITTLE BIT LATER ON TOWARDS THE END OF OUR PROCESSES, BUT BEFORE THE ENTIRE SITE IS APPROVED AND THEY CAN START GOING VERTICAL WITH CONSTRUCTION, THEY HAVE TO HAVE THAT LIGHTING PLAN APPROVED. OKAY. AND SO WHAT EXACTLY IS THE THE PARKING? WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT IT HAS NOW AND WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. YEAH. SO THERE'S A LIST WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. SO THERE'S A FEW DIFFERENT ONES. IT IS JUST A SLIGHT REDUCTION TO SOME OF OUR RESTAURANT RETAIL AND I BELIEVE HOTEL AS WELL. AGAIN THE VISION AND THE APPLICANT CAN HELP ANSWER THIS AS WELL. BUT IT'S MORE OF A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WHERE SOMEONE MAY BE COMING FOR ONE USE, BUT THEY'RE REALLY, YOU KNOW, MAYBE STAYING AT THE HOTEL, BUT REALLY ENJOYING THE ENTIRE WEEKEND AND GOING TO ALL THESE RESTAURANTS HERE, AS WELL AS THE SURF PARK AND CONDUCTING DIFFERENT OPERATIONS ON THE SITE. AND JAKE, I THINK YOU SAID I READ THERE IS NO PUBLIC FACING PARKING WITH THE PUBLIC FACING PARKING. I'M SORRY, I GUESS THERE. SORRY. COULD YOU IS THERE ANY PARKING FACING RESIDENTIAL? THERE IS SOME THAT'S ORIENTED TOWARDS RESIDENTIAL. ALONG THE NORTH SIDE. THE APPLICANT MAY BE ABLE TO HELP ANSWER THIS BETTER THAN I AM. WE'RE NOT TYING DOWN A LAYOUT WITH THE ZONING, BUT WE HAVE SEEN SOME PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND I BELIEVE THEY HAVE THAT ON ONE OF THEIR SLIDES AS WELL. BUT THERE IS SOME JUST EMPLOYEE PARKING THAT'S ALONG THE NORTH SIDE. ALL OF THE THE MAIN ENTRANCES AND EVERYTHING TO THE PARK ITSELF IS GOING TO BE ALONG THE SOUTH AND I[00:30:04]
BELIEVE ALONG THE EAST SIDE WITH WHERE THE HOTELS AT, EVERYTHING ON THE NORTH IS GOING TO BE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. SO IF ANYONE PARKS BACK THERE, IT'S JUST EMPLOYEES. YEP.OKAY, JAKE, YOU SAID SIX FOOT MASONRY SOLID WALL IS AN OPTION. THAT IS AN OPTION. YEP. AND IF WE'RE GOING TO REQUIRE AN EIGHT FOOT, WOULD THAT BE PUT INTO THE ZONING OR LATER. SO YOU COULD MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION WITH YOUR VOTE TONIGHT TO INCLUDE THAT AND FORWARDED ON TO CITY COUNCIL. AND THEN WHEN IT GOES TO CITY COUNCIL, WE WOULD PRESENT HERE'S WHAT THE APPLICANT PUT TOGETHER. THIS IS WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HERE. BUT THEN PNC ALSO RECOMMENDED, YOU KNOW, IF YOU WANT TO ADD IN AN EIGHT FOOT SCREENING DEVICE. AND WE COULD ADD THAT AS PART OF THE SAME THING WITH SHRUBBERY THAT WOULD HELP MITIGATE SOME NOISE.
YEAH. YEAH. YOU CAN DO THAT AS PART OF THE MOTION TONIGHT IF YOU'D LIKE TO. THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? THANK YOU. JAKE, IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? YES, MA'AM.
HI. RACHEL HENDERSON, 1412 TIMBER RIDGE DRIVE, ALLEN, TEXAS, 75002. I'M THE OWNER'S REP FOR CANNON BEACH, SO THANK YOU FOR TONIGHT. SO AT ITS CORE, CANNON BEACH IS THE INTERSECTION OF LIFESTYLE AND ADRENALINE. ALL AGES AND ALL INCOME LEVELS CAN COME TOGETHER AND ENJOY THE BEACH. CANNON BEACH OFFERS A HOLISTIC OASIS WHERE KIDS CAN ENJOY THE WAVES, CAN DIVE OFF OF OUR DIVING PLATFORMS, AND CAN EVEN LEARN HOW TO SURF FOR THE FIRST TIME WHILE MOM AND DAD ENJOY THE BEACH OR EVEN CATCH A WAVE THEMSELVES. CANNON BEACH OFFERS ALSO OFFERS A STAYCATION WITH OUR FOUR STAR HOTEL AND WHERE PATRONS CAN VISIT OUR RETAIL, RESTAURANT AND ENTERTAINMENT OPTIONS ON SITE. ALTHOUGH IT MAY SOUND NOISY, CANNON BEACH IS JUST COMMITTED TO LIFESTYLE AND RELAXATION AS IT IS TO ADRENALINE. IT IS WITH A SPA AND HOTEL ON THE SITE. IT IS IMPORTANT TO US THAT PARTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT REMAIN PEACEFUL AND RESTORATIVE, AND IN THAT WAY WE ARE ALIGNED. OUR SPA IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL AREA TO ACT AS AN ADDITIONAL BUFFER, AND OUR WAVE SYSTEM DOES NOT HAVE ANY BIG SPIKES OR BANGS. BUT WE ARE STILL TAKING PRECAUTIONS AND ADDITIONAL STEPS BY INSULATING WALLS OF OUR OPERATION BUILDINGS TO MITIGATE ANY POTENTIAL NOISES. WE'VE LISTENED TO THE NEEDS OF MCKINNEY MCKINNEY, AND WE WANT TO BE THE BEST COMMUNITY PARTNERS THAT WE CAN BE. WE'VE DONE OUR BEST TO ALIGN THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO MY COLLEAGUE, SAM. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS SAM LAWRENCE. I'M WITH CROSS ARCHITECTS. I'M A 509 BEDROCK DRIVE, MCKINNEY, TEXAS, 575070. CAN I HAVE IT RIGHT HERE? GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. SO WHAT YOU SAW PREVIOUSLY WAS JUST A VIDEO CONCEPT THAT WE ORIGINALLY HAD PRODUCED FOR THE, FOR OUR CLIENT TO TO BE AWARDED THIS PROJECT. SO SO THAT'S NOT IT WAS JUST CONCEPT JUST GIVES YOU A LOT OF IDEAS TO LOOK AT. BUT WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW WITH THE CONCEPT, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE QUESTION THAT YOU HAD ORIGINALLY ABOUT THE RESIDENTIAL SPACE TO THE BACK, YOU'LL NOTICE ON THE ON THE NORTH SIDE WE HAVE SOME FRONT FACING PARKING THAT GOES TO THAT, BUT THAT IS EMPLOYEE PARKING. AND WE'RE COMMITTED TO MAKING SURE THAT'S EMPLOYEE PARKING AND NOT USED FOR ACCESS FOR ANY PARK GOERS BACK THERE. THAT WAY YOU REDUCE FOOTPRINT, FOOT TRAFFIC AND VEHICLE NOISE AND LIGHTS GOING INTO THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS BACK THERE.
THEY WILL BE ADDITIONALLY SCREENING THAT AREA, BUT I'LL GET TO THAT TO THE END OF THE END OF THE SLIDES. THIS IS OUR CONCEPT PLAN. YOU'RE GOING TO SEE ITEMS ONE, TWO AND THREE ON.
HERE ARE OUR LARGER FLEX FLEX SPACE ENTERTAINMENT SPACES FOR THEATER, BOWLING ALLEY, INDOOR RACE TRACKS, TRAMPOLINE PARKS, THEMED ENVIRONMENTS THAT PEOPLE CAN USE WHILE THEY'RE STAYING AT THE HOTEL. NUMBER FIVE IS A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT WITH MEDC FOR AN OFFICE, MULTILEVEL OFFICE SPACE. ITEM SIX IS A POSSIBLE MULTI-LEVEL GARAGE SPACE THAT WOULD SUPPLY PARKING FOR THE WHOLE SITE. IF THAT OFFICE SPACE WERE TO GO IN. NUMBER NINE, TEN, AND 11 ARE RESTAURANT. IT'S CALLED RESTAURANT RESTAURANT ROW FOR US. RIGHT. SO THAT'S A RESTAURANT. AREAS WITH PATIOS OVERLOOKING THE BEACH AREA. AND THERE'S A NUMEROUS AMOUNT OF OTHER ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES WITHIN THIS, THIS CONCEPT PLAN. THE MAIN AREA OF COURSE, THAT EVERYBODY'S INTERESTED IN IS THE IS THE LARGE LAGOON WITH THE WAVE SYSTEM, WHICH IS DIRECTLY IN THE CENTER OF THE SITE TO THE BACK. THE BUILDINGS THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FOR THE OPERATIONS BUILDINGS THAT RACHEL MENTIONED ARE NUMBER 24 BEHIND THE WAVE LAGOON, WHICH
[00:35:02]
WILL BE INSULATED BUILDINGS SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE NOISE ISSUES DOWN THE LINE. CURRENTLY, THIS IS THE ZONING SETUP FOR THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. IT'S DIVIDED INTO A C3 AND A PD. WE WILL BE KEEPING THE BASE ZONING OF C3, BUT IT'S SPLIT INTO TWO PARCELS NOW AT 25 AND 32 ACRES WEST PARCEL C3 IN THE EAST PARCEL IS A PD AS IT SITS NOW, WE'RE SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY TO THE NORTH, MULTIFAMILY TO THE NORTHEAST, AND MOSTLY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST. THE NEW ZONING LAYOUT WILL BE ONE ONE LARGE PD ZONE TO COMBINE THIS. THIS USE OF THIS COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR TO POSITIVELY AFFECT AND ALIGN WITH MCKINNEY'S FUTURE LAND DEVELOPMENT SPACE. CANNON BEACH IS A VERY UNIQUE MCKINNEY'S UNIQUE BY NATURE, RIGHT? CANNON BEACH IS UNIQUE BY DESIGN. IT'S A VERY, VERY UNIQUE SPACE. ONE OF THE ADDITIONS WE'RE MAKING TO THE UDC STANDARDS IS OUTDOOR WATER RECREATION AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY. SO THIS IS GOING TO BE A COMMERCIAL RECREATION USE CONSISTING OF MAN MADE WATER, WATER BODY OR LAGOON DESIGNED FOR SURFING, WAVE GENERATION, AQUATIC RECREATION, SWIMMING, PADDLE BOARDING AND THE SORT. THERE WILL BE DECKS, CABANAS, FOOD BEVERAGE AREAS, VIEWING AREAS, BATHROOM FACILITIES, CHANGING ROOM, LOCKER ROOMS ALL INSIDE, INTERNAL TO THE SITE. USE MAY INCLUDE PUBLIC PROGRAMED EXPERIENCES, SPECTATOR AREAS, PRIVATE RENTAL AREAS AND SUPPORTING COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS. ADDITIONAL ADDITIONAL USES REQUESTED BY RIGHT ARE USES THAT HAVE BEEN REQUESTED TO PROVIDE A MULTI-TOUCH FACILITY ON SITE, OR MULTI-TOUCH CONSUMER COORDINATION ON SITE SO THAT PEOPLE CAN ALIGN THEMSELVES, COME STAY AT THE HOTEL AND THEN GO TO THE RESTAURANT, OR GO TO A RECREATIONAL ACCESS IN THE FLEX SPACE AREAS, OR AND MOVE THROUGH THAT THROUGH OUR PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROVIDING OVER THE WHOLE SITE. I'LL GO BACK AND SHOW YOU THAT ON THE YOU'LL SEE KIND OF ON THIS SLIDE. JAKE MENTIONED THIS. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE TO TO POINT THIS OUT. WE'LL BE PROVIDING A IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR EASEMENT IN THE SITE. THAT WILL BE THAT KIND OF PINK LINE THAT YOU SEE RUNNING EAST TO WEST FROM STACY, ACROSS TO THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. ITEM 31 IN THE MIDDLE. AND THEN FROM HIGHWAY 121 THAT RUNS WEST OF THE OFFICE BUILDING UP. SO THAT WILL BE AN IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN AREA THAT WILL HAVE IMPROVED LANDSCAPING, SEATING, BIKE RACKS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE SO THAT EVERYONE THAT IS IN THIS SPACE CAN USE THAT MULTI-TOUCH CONDITION THAT WE'RE TRYING TO SET UP FOR THE THE OVERALL SITE ENVIRONMENT, AND THAT WILL CONTINUE INTO THE NEXT PHASE. ALSO ONCE IT'S DEVELOPED. OTHER USES REQUESTED BY. RIGHT OUR SECONDARY TO SUPPLY THE SITE WITH ENERGY EFFICIENCIES THAT MOST DEVELOPMENTS DO NOT UTILIZE AND THEREFORE HAVE LARGER UNNECESSARY IMPACTS ON THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENTS. ANY USES THAT ARE ALREADY ALLOWED IN C THREE ZONING WILL BE REQUESTING BY RIGHT IN THIS PD ALSO. DIMENSIONAL STANDARD UPDATES AT THAT. JAKE MENTIONED THAT WE'RE REQUESTING THE REAR PROPERTY LINE HAS A 20 FOOT LANDSCAPE SETBACK. WE'RE REQUESTING TO A TEN FOOT DESIGN ADJUSTMENT BY CODE THAT WILL REDUCE IT TO TEN FEET, BUT WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A MASONRY OR WROUGHT IRON FENCE WITH IMPROVED LANDSCAPING THAT'S ABOVE AND BEYOND THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING OF THE BUFFER AREA, WHICH THE STAFF HAS AGREED THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE SPACE. THIS WILL ENHANCE LANDSCAPING, IT WILL INCREASE SECURITY AND REDUCE NOISE. AND YOU. SORRY, YOU MENTIONED THAT THE ABOUT THE MASONRY WALL. MY BIGGEST INTEREST ABOUT LANDSCAPING IS THAT LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDING GREEN SPACE BEHIND THAT PROVIDES ABSORPTION. THE MASONRY WALLS REFLECT SOUND, SO IT'S KIND OF A. IT'S SECOND NATURE TO WHAT YOU WOULD THINK ABOUT HOW SOUND IS ACTUALLY USED PROPERLY IN THAT SPACE. RIGHT. WE WANT TO KIND OF TAKE THE SOUND OUT. SO THE LANDSCAPING WILL BE A BIG HELP THERE. AND HEIGHT. WE ARE RESTATING IN THE PD THAT THE OVERALL PD WILL HAVE A MAXIMUM 180 FOOT HEIGHT REQUIREMENT, WHICH ALIGNS WITH THE OVERLAY CORRIDOR THAT'S ALREADY IN PLACE FOR THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. AND THAT WOULD ONLY THAT'S ONLY IN PLACE FOR THE HOTEL AND FOR THE OFFICE SPACE. OFFICE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH.DUE TO THE LARGE BODY OF WATER AND DUAL USE OF THAT BODY FOR DETENTION IN FUTURE RAIN
[00:40:07]
SITUATIONS. WE'RE ALSO REQUESTING THAT THE THAT WATER BE USED AS OPEN SPACE FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AS A QUANTITATIVE NUMBER, BECAUSE IT DOES ACT AS RETAINABLE SPACE FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. THERE WE GO. PARKING STANDARDS. THIS IS A MULTI-TOUCH SPACE LIKE WE MENTIONED, RIGHT? SO WE ARE ASKING FOR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO PARKING STANDARDS. WE'RE NOT ASKING TO CUT THE PARKING STANDARDS IN HALF. WE'RE JUST SAYING, FOR INSTANCE ON RETAIL RIGHT. RETAIL SPACES 1 TO 300. RIGHT. WE'RE ASKING IT 1 TO 250 BECAUSE LIKE WE SAID, MOST PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO COME TO THE SPACE ARE GOING TO BE AT THE HOTEL. THEY'RE GOING TO GO FROM THAT SPACE TO OTHER AREAS, AND THE WALKABLE SPACE IS GOING TO BE IMPROVED. SO WE WILL BE MAKING SURE THAT PEOPLE WANT TO GET OUT AND WALK MORE AND, AND, AND DRIVE LESS AND PARK LESS IN THIS SPACE. THE LAGOON AREA BECOMES A DESTINATION SPACE. SO THE HOTEL THEREFORE ALSO IS A DESTINATION SPACE WHERE PEOPLE WILL PARK AND HOPEFULLY STAY IN THAT SPACE AND UTILIZE THAT BY PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. AND PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION IS A MUST FOR THE CONCEPT TO BE A SUCCESS. BECAUSE OF THE HEAVY OUTDOOR NATURE OF THE SITE. SO I'LL GO INTO THE SOUND BECAUSE I KNOW THAT'S A BIG ISSUE WITH WITH SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAD FROM THE PUBLIC, AND IT'S BEEN A QUESTION. MESA, ARIZONA THE SOUND LEVELS FROM THE WAVE MACHINE AT TEN FEET AWAY, TEN FEET FROM THAT MACHINE IS 60DB, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE CHART HERE, 60DB IS NORMAL CONVERSATION. IT'S LIKE ME AND YOU HAVING A CONVERSATION, TALKING TO EACH OTHER. YOU KNOW, I MEAN MAGNITUDE OF HOWEVER MANY PEOPLE YOU WANT TO HAVE OUT THERE. BUT THAT'S THE DECIBEL LEVEL. AND I BELIEVE THAT Y'ALL'S IS 58. IS THAT RIGHT AT NIGHT, 58 AT NIGHT. YEAH. SO THE MAX IS 58 AT NIGHT. NOW THE RESIDENTIAL AREA IS 105FT AWAY FROM THE WAVE MACHINE. SO THAT DISTANCE IS GOING TO BE NEGLIGIBLE BY THE TIME THAT THAT SOUND TRAVELS, ESPECIALLY WITH THE INCREASED LANDSCAPING AND ANY FENCING THAT WE HAVE ALONG THAT AREA. THE MESA, ARIZONA OPERATION OPERATES IN A COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. THEY DON'T HAVE TO REALLY WORRY ABOUT THIS AS MUCH, BUT WE HAVE MADE CONSIDERABLE DESIGN STANDARD IMPROVEMENTS SO THAT AT THE MCKINNEY LOCATION, SOUND WILL BE ALMOST REMOVED FROM THE SITUATION. IT'LL BE NO MORE THAN THE TRAFFIC THAT THEY ALREADY HEAR FROM THE ROADWAYS THAT ARE SURROUNDING THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS. WAVE TECH UPDATES HAVE ALSO BEEN PUT IN PLACE. THEY'RE REDESIGNING THE WAVE MACHINES SOMEWHAT TO HELP WITH EVEN LESS MECHANICAL ASPECT, SO THERE'S LESS MOVING MECHANICAL METAL PARTS, AND IT'S MORE OF A OF A IT'S A SMOOTHER SYSTEM, I SHOULD SAY. SO. AND CANNON BEACH HAS DESIGNED THIS WITH THE RESIDENTS IN MIND, LIKE THEY ARE VERY RESIDENT FRIENDLY. THEY WANT TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS.THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WHAT IS BEING PUT HERE IS GOING TO MINIMALLY IMPACT THE PEOPLE AROUND THEM, AND THAT THOSE PEOPLE WILL WANT TO COME AND ENJOY THE SPACE THAT THEY'RE SITTING, SITTING NEXT TO. SCREENING FOR LIGHT AND NOISE. THAT'S ANOTHER ITEM THAT YOU GUYS HAD A CONCERN WITH. LAYERED SCREENING IS GOING TO BE THE BIGGEST IMPACT HERE. SO LIKE I SAID, WITH MASONRY OR WROUGHT IRON PLUS OVER AND ABOVE IMPROVED LANDSCAPING, VEGETATION, TREES, SHRUBS IN THIS AREA IS GOING TO DRASTICALLY MITIGATE SOUND FROM FROM IMPACTING THE RESIDENTS TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. CANNON BEACH IS PROPOSING VEGETATIVE SCREENING THAT EXCEEDS CODE REQUIREMENTS ALSO. SO ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM FOR YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION. WILL THE THE WATER AREA OF COURSE WILL BE SECURED. YES. WITH FENCING ALL AROUND. DOES THAT INCLUDE THE WHOLE BORDER TO THE NORTH OF THE RESIDENTIAL? THERE'LL BE A FENCE ON THAT SIDE, BUT THAT DOESN'T ENCAPSULATE THE WATER PARK FENCE DOESN'T GO TO THERE. THE WATER PARK FENCE WILL WRAP BY LAGOON CODE AROUND THE LAGOON AREA. AND ANYTHING THAT'S THAT IS WITHIN THAT LAGOON USABLE SPACE. IT'LL CONNECT BACK TO THE OPERATIONS BUILDINGS. SO THE SPACE BETWEEN THE OPERATIONS AND THAT EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, WHICH WE'VE HAD A DISCUSSION WITH JAKE ABOUT HOW WE COULD POSSIBLY MITIGATE EVEN, YOU KNOW, HIGHER SECURITY BACK THERE FOR THAT SPACE BY MAYBE
[00:45:04]
PUTTING A FENCE THAT CONNECTS THOSE RIGHT, WITH KNOX BOXES. SO YOU GET BACK INTO THAT SPACE EASILY. RIGHT. SO THERE ARE WAYS THAT WE COULD ADD THAT SECURITY IF THAT WAS AN ISSUE FOR STAFF. BUT AT THIS TIME, NO, THAT THAT FENCE GOES AROUND THE PARK AREA AND THEN THERE'S A GAP IN THE BACK UNTIL YOU GET TO THE FENCE THAT'S AT THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. AND YOU SAID THAT YOU WOULD YOU WOULD BE IN AGREEMENT WITH MOVING THE MAKING THE FENCE EIGHT FEET TALL AT A MAXIMUM. WELL. I THINK THAT IT'S I THINK IT IS MORE IMPACTFUL THAT YOUR LANDSCAPING IS TALLER, RIGHT. BECAUSE THE FENCE ITSELF WILL REFLECT SOUND, BUT IT WON'T ABSORB SOUND. MASONRY, ESPECIALLY MASONRY WILL WILL TAKE THAT SOUND, IT'LL BOUNCE OFF OF IT AND IT'LL PUT A PHONE IN A CUP. RIGHT. YOU PUT A PHONE IN A CUP, IT AMPLIFIES THE SOUND. RIGHT? YOU THROW SOUND COMING OFF A MACHINE INTO A MASONRY WALL, IT'S GOING TO BOUNCE BACK. IT'S GOING TO AMPLIFY THAT. SO YOU'RE GOING TO PLANT GREENERY THAT'S TALLER.I'M THINKING THAT THE DESIGN WOULD BE TO PLANT LIKE WHAT WE'RE SEEING RIGHT HERE IS HAVING SOMETHING A DENSER GREEN SPACE THAT'S ON THAT SO THAT YOU GET MORE SOUND ABSORPTION.
THAT WAY IT DOESN'T TRAVEL THROUGH. AND BECAUSE OF THE DISTANCE FROM THE WAVE MACHINE TO THAT BACK TO THEIR FENCE BEING OVER 100FT, THAT IS A LONG WAY FOR FOR ANY SOUND TO TRAVEL. SO BEING THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE 60DB NOW AT THE CURRENT DESIGN, WHICH WITH WITH THE IMPROVED DESIGN IS GOING TO BE EVEN LESS, I DON'T REALLY SEE IT BEING AN IMPACT FOR THE RESIDENTS, BUT YOU'RE CHOOSING A MASONRY WALL INSTEAD OF WROUGHT IRON. WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN THAT FAR. WE'RE JUST WE'RE PUTTING IN IN THE CODE. WHAT IS THE STANDARD FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, WHICH IS MASONRY, WROUGHT IRON OR TUBULAR FENCE? AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE INCREASED LANDSCAPING. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. I HAVE A QUESTION. IF YOU CAN GO BACK TO YOUR DIAGRAM THAT SHOWS THE ACTUAL PARK AND THE HOTEL. KEEP GOING BACK. IT WAS IN THE VIDEO PRESENTATION, ACTUALLY. OH, SORRY. YEAH. THIS ONE WON'T THIS ISN'T ACTUALLY WHAT'S GOING TO BE DEVELOPED. I CAN'T HIT PLAY ON THIS. I DON'T THINK MY QUESTION HAD TO DO WITH THE BIG VIDEO. THE VIDEO. NO, NO, NO, THAT WAS SO EARLY. EARLY ON. YEAH. WE WERE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT SOME COOL LIKE FUNCTION WHERE PEOPLE COULD HAVE, YOU KNOW, IF THEY HAVE PRO SURFERS COMING OUT THERE. RIGHT. AND THEY WANT TO SEE PEOPLE. WE WERE TALKING ABOUT HAVING SOME WAY TO HAVE A VIDEO. THAT WAS JUST A CONCEPT IDEA WE HAD. AND THEN WE WERE LIKE, NO, WE DO NOT WANT TO MAKE OUR NEIGHBORS UPSET BY HAVING THIS MASSIVE SCREEN UP THERE. SO YOU WON'T HAVE THAT SCREEN? NO, THAT WON'T, THAT WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM. OKAY. YEAH. AND THEN SO THESE ARE WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO SEE HERE. THESE ARE JUST PIECES LIKE IDEAS CONCEPTUAL IN THE VERY ORIGINAL. YEAH I MEAN A YEAR AGO. SO WE'VE COME A LONG, LONG WAY SINCE THEN GOING BACK TO THE BUILDING DIAGRAM. SO 20 BUILDING 25 IS A WAVE CONTROL ROOM. BUILDING 24. OH YEAH. 25 OKAY. 24 IS OPERATIONS. SO THE WAVE CONTROL ROOM WHAT ALL WILL BE IN THERE AND KIND OF WHAT'S THE DECIBEL OUT. SO THE WAVE CONTROL ROOM DOESN'T HAVE ANY MACHINERY IN IT. THE WAVE CONTROL ROOM IS LITERALLY A PLACE WHERE THE, THE GENTLEMAN WHO CONTROLS WHEN THE WAVES ARE RELEASED, THAT SITS AND MONITORS FROM THAT SPACE. AND THEN I BELIEVE WE'RE ALSO GOING TO HAVE A RESTROOM IN THERE. OKAY. IT'S NOT IT'S IT'S NOT A MECHANICAL SPACE AT ALL. AND THEN 34 IS WHERE YOU'RE ENVISIONING THE SPA THAT YOU MENTIONED, 34 WOULD BE ONE, MAYBE TWO STORIES FOR SPA. AND THEN TO THE IF YOU LOOK JUST WEST OF THAT, YOU SEE ALL THE LITTLE BLUE CIRCLES AND STUFF OUT THERE. WE'RE ENVISIONING LIKE A SERENE SPA EXPERIENCE.
SO WE WE CAN'T HAVE A BUNCH OF NOISE, BECAUSE IF WE HAVE A BUNCH OF NOISE, WE RUIN THAT EXPERIENCE. THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE KIND OF LIKE A A HIDDEN ENVIRONMENT GETAWAY SPACE. OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THE SET UP FOR THIS WITH BUILDING 24 THE SAME AS IN MESA, WHERE YOU'RE REFERENCING THE SOUND READINGS FROM WHERE THOSE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ARE IN A SIMILAR BUILDING STRUCTURE? IT IS. YES, IT IS A SIMILAR BUILDING STRUCTURE, BUT IN MESA IT'S ACTUALLY MORE STRUCTURE. SO WE'VE CONDENSED THE SPACE, RIGHT. WE'VE WE'VE REMOVED THE SIZE OF IT, CONDENSED IT DOWN A LITTLE BIT. AND WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE INSULATING THOSE BUILDINGS, MAKING THEM MORE SOUNDPROOF. RIGHT. AND IN MESA, VENTILATION BAFFLES THAT ALLOW AIR MIXTURE COMING IN AND OUT OF THERE RIGHT NOW THEY'RE POINTED BACK. RIGHT. THEY WOULD BE POINTED TO THE NORTH TO THOSE RESIDENTS. WE'RE GOING TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE EITHER VERTICAL OR BACK TOWARDS THE PARK SO THAT THERE'S NO SOUND NOISE OR NO NOISE TRAVELING IN THAT DIRECTION. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD BE AS OF HOURS OF OPERATION? 10 TO 9. AROUND 10 TO 9? YEAH. I'M SURE THAT. SPECIAL EVENTS, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TO GET SCOOPS AND STUFF FOR SPECIAL EVENTS, BUT THE GENERAL TERMS WILL BE IN THAT
[00:50:02]
THAT AREA. THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING THAT WOULD BE CLOSEST TO THE RESIDENTIAL, LIKE THE BACK OF THAT WAVE AREA, AND THEN THE OPERATIONS AND SPA BUILDINGS. HOW TALL ARE THOSE BUILDINGS? THE OPERATIONS BUILDING IS JUST A TYPICAL, I THINK LIKE 15FT TO THE TOP OF IT. IT'S NOT TALL AT ALL. IT'S A VERY COMPRESSED SPACE. ITEM 34 WOULD BE KIND OF LIKE A RETAIL SIZE BUILDING, MAYBE 25FT, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND AGAIN, THAT WAS PLACED THAT ALSO WAS PLACED TO KIND OF OPTIMIZE A BREAK OF SOUND BECAUSE THE LAZY RIVER, WE, WE THINK THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF FAMILIES AND KIDS AND STUFF PLAYING IN THAT LAZY RIVER AREA BACK AND FORTH. SO THAT WAS KIND OF A BREAK. SPACE ALSO KIND OF BUFFERS SOUND FROM TRAVELING BACK TO THAT AREA TO THE BACK OF THE WAVE POOL. VERY TALL. OR IS IT? NO. THE SO FOR WHERE THE WAVE MACHINE IS AT IS THERE'S FROM THE WATER UP IT'S FOUR FOOT, AND THEN THERE'S AN EXTRA TWO FOOT HEIGHT. ONCE YOU GET TO THE FRONT OF THE WAVE MACHINE THAT TRAVELS DOWN AND BECOMES SIX INCHES ABOVE THE ABOVE THE SURFACE OF THE WATER ALL THE WAY AT THE BEACH AREA.OKAY. SO MEDICI STILL OWNS AN EASTERN PORTION OF THIS AREA TO BE REZONED, CORRECT? I SUPPOSE IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING. THEY'RE ON BOARD WITH ALL THIS. EXCUSE ME. MEDICI. OH, YES. YEAH.
MAJKOWSKI. WE WE GOT ALL THIS APPROVED WITH HIM BEFORE WE MOVED EVERYTHING FORWARD 100%.
THAT WOULDN'T BE A SMART IDEA TO, LIKE, REZONE THIS LAND WITHOUT HIS APPROVAL. ANY IDEA IN TERMS OF WHO THE HOTEL TENANT MIGHT BE AT THIS POINT? WE DO NOT RIGHT NOW. AND I'M. I WOULDN'T BE PRIVY TO SAY. I DO KNOW WE'RE LOOKING AT AROUND 150 KEYS FOR THAT SPACE BEING VERY BEACH ORIENTED. YOU KNOW, THE HOTEL WILL HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PARK. WE'RE EXPECTING THAT IF YOU GO STAY AT THE HOTEL, YOU'LL BE DIRECT ACCESS OUT TO THE PARK, YOU KNOW, BY PARK PASS AND STUFF. HOW ARE YOU FACING THE PROJECT? EXCUSE ME? HOW ARE YOU PHASING THE PROJECT? PHASING RIGHT NOW IS LOTS ONE, TWO AND THREE ARE OUR INITIAL PHASE. THAT'S JUST WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW. TENDENCY WILL PUSH HOW THAT WILL BE PHASED MOVING FORWARD.
BUT CURRENTLY WE'RE LOTS ONE, TWO AND THREE BECAUSE LOTS LOT ONE OF COURSE IS THE LAGOON AND ALL THE INNER PARK WORKINGS. LOT TWO IS THE IS THE RETAIL RESTAURANT SPACE FOR REVEL OR FOR CANNON BEACH. I'M SORRY. AND THEN IT ALSO HAS A WAVE MACHINE IN THERE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THAT TECHNOLOGY, BUT THERE'LL BE A STANDING WAVE MACHINE TO THE WEST OF THE BUILDING IS PRETTY COOL. AND THEN LOT THREE COMPRISES ALL OF THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE LAGOON SPACE. HOW MUCH OF THIS I'LL SAY REVISED PLAN THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE THE VIDEO MONITOR? HAVE ADJACENT HOMEOWNERS BEEN PRIVY TO? EXCUSE ME, HOW MUCH OF YOUR PLAN HAVE THE ADJACENT HOMEOWNERS? HOW MUCH HAVE YOU SHARED WITH ADJACENT HOMEOWNERS? WE HAVEN'T. WE WERE DOING PUBLIC, AND THEN WE WANTED TO PRESENT THIS AND EDUCATE ON IT SO THAT WE COULD PROVIDE THAT AT FIRST, BECAUSE I KNOW BECAUSE I MEAN, I KNOW THE BIGGEST WORRY WITH HOMEOWNERS IS THAT SOUND AND PRIVACY AND SECURITY, RIGHT? SO CANNON BEACH IS ONE OF THE BEST CLIENTS THAT I'VE EVER WORKED FOR. I THINK THAT THEY WANT TO BE PARTNERS WITH THE CITY AND WITH THE RESIDENTS, AND WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT IS SATISFIED, THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT HAPPENS. YEAH. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. MY NAME IS VENKATESH GUDAPATI. I'M STAYING FROM THE PROPERTY. 5505 DEMI-SEC RIGHT BEHIND THE PROPERTY. THIS PROPOSED PLAN, THE MAJOR CONCERN I THINK THEY HAD JUST ADDRESSED REGARDING THE SECURITY NOISE AND LIGHT POLLUTION. PROBABLY LIKE IF THEY TAKE AS PER THE UDC, THE. WE ARE GOOD WITH THAT. AND ONE MORE. THE IMPORTANT THING THAT MOST OF OUR NEIGHBORS AND OUR COMMUNITY WAS CONCERNED REGARDING THE PROPERTY TAXES AND UTILITY BILLS. NOW OUR STREET GOT REZONED TO THE COMMERCIAL SPACE IS OUR PROPERTY TAXES AND UTILITY BILLS COMES UNDER THE COMMERCIAL SLOT OR LIKE IT WILL BE AS RESIDENTIAL. IT IS ONE OF THEM. THANK YOU. THANKS. OKAY, THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC
[00:55:01]
HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE ANY CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? I DO WANT TO AT LEAST ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WE DID RECEIVE SOME CITIZEN COMMENTS AND CONCERNS IN OPPOSITION. THEY HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE COMMISSIONERS. WE'VE ALL RECEIVED THEM AND HAVE TAKEN A LOOK AT THEM AS WELL. SO SEEING AS THERE ARE NO OTHER INDIVIDUALS HERE, DO WE HAVE A MOTION OR ANY ADDITIONAL. YEAH, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEBO. KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THIS MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. OKAY, NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA. ITEM 250176Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO R5 RESIDENTIAL. LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FM 1461 AND APPROXIMATELY 2770FT WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 166. MISS PATELLA AGAIN. GOOD EVENING. PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. AS MENTIONED, THE PROPERTY IS ABOUT 37 ACRES. THE REQUEST IS TO ZONE THE PROPERTY TO R5 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, IT'S LOCATED OUTSIDE IN OUR EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED HERE. LET ME GIVE YOU A BETTER VISUAL. LOCATED HERE, SOUTH OF FM 1461 AND THEN TO THE WEST, APPROXIMATELY 2770FT WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 166. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN OUR SUBURBAN LIVING PLACE TYPE WITHIN OUR NORTH DISTRICT, WHICH ANTICIPATES TO BE A BLEND OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. IT IS LOCATED BETWEEN TWO ADJACENT GREEN ARTERIAL, OUR ARTERIAL ROADS, ONE BEING THE FM 1461, WHICH IS THE FUTURE LOT PARKWAY, AND THEN THE SECOND BEING HERE. CAN YOU EXCUSE ME, SIR? SIR, SIR. IF YOU DON'T MIND. OKAY.THANK YOU. LET ME KNOW IF I NEED TO REPEAT ANYTHING. AND THEN THE OTHER ROADWAY HERE IS THE COUNTY ROAD 166, WHICH IS THE FUTURE LAKE FOREST DRIVE. THERE ARE SOME ADJACENT PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN RESOLD. SOME OF THESE ARE RESIDENTIAL. THERE'S ALSO A MIX OF COMMERCIAL MULTIFAMILY. JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME CONCEPTUAL ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. AGAIN, THE PROPERTY, THE REQUEST IS TO ZONE TO R5. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THE REQUEST, AS IT SUPPORTS THE STRATEGIC GOAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WILL SUPPORT THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE AREA. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ARCELLI, CAN YOU GIVE US JUST SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE R5 ZONING? YES. SO TYPICALLY R5 IS ABOUT 5000FTā !S BECAUSE THEY'RE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING MORE THAT DOESN'T REQUIRE A REAR ALLEY ACCESS. YOU'LL SEE TYPICALLY THEY'RE ABOUT 50FT WIDTH BY 100FT, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THEY WILL BE REQUIRED. PARKING TO ENCLOSE TWO CAN BE PLACED WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY 20FT LENGTH OF DRIVEWAY FOR THE PARKING. THIS KIND OF JUST THE GENERAL TYPICAL TYPE OF REQUEST FOR AN R5. SINGLE. SINGLE FAMILY. DETACHED. DETACHED. YES, THAT IS CORRECT. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR ARACELY? THANK YOU. ASK OUR APPLICANT HERE.
YES. MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. MY NAME IS RANDY HOWARD. I'M WITH ABERNATHY ROAD BOARD IN 1700. REDBUD, SUITE 300, IN MCKINNEY 75069. WE'VE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH STAFF. WE READ THE REPORT. WE AGREE WITH ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND WOULD REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE APPROVAL. AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
[01:00:03]
THERE IS AN ANNEXATION REQUEST GOING BEFORE CITY COUNCIL AS WELL, RIGHT? YES, MA'AM. YEP.ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. THANK YOU, MR. HOWARD. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE. I'M SORRY, I'M SORRY. OKAY. MY APOLOGIES. OKAY. WE. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? SEEING IS THERE ARE NONE.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM.
OKAY. COMMISSIONER CRAIG HAS MADE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. SHE BEAT YOU BY A HALF OF A SECOND.
SORRY ABOUT THAT. NO WORRIES. KYLIE, CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THIS ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY AND 7 TO 0. AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM UNDER THE AGENDA ITEM 260014Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON TRACK TWO OF THE CALVIN BOWLES SURVEY. MR. BENNETT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU AGAIN, MADAM CHAIR. SO THESE NEXT SEVEN ITEMS, THESE ARE ALL YOU KNOW, THEY'RE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT, BUT THEY'RE KIND OF THE SAME. THEY'RE PRE ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS THAT WE HAD IN 2016. THEY ESSENTIALLY TERM OUT AFTER TEN YEARS. SO THEY'VE ALL BEEN TERMED OUT FOR ABOUT A MONTH MONTH AND A HALF. AND SO WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH SEVEN ANNEXATION AND ZONINGS. SO THESE ARE THE SEVEN ZONING CASES BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.
THEY ARE LOCATED. ALL OF THEM ARE DOWN HERE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN PORTION OF MCKINNEY. AGAIN. ALL OF THEM ARE IN THE ETJ. THEY'RE ANNEXING IN. THIS IS AN EXHIBIT OF ALL SEVEN OF THE PROPERTIES, THE FIRST THREE THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT, THEY'RE ALL REQUEST TO JUST THE AG DISTRICT. SO IT WILL ALLOW THE CURRENT OPERATIONS FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND AGRICULTURE TO CONTINUE. AND THEN IF ANY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OCCURS IN THE FUTURE, IT'S GOING TO REQUIRE REZONE. SO THAT WILL BE BACK IN FRONT OF PNC AND COUNCIL WHEN THAT TIME COMES. BUT LIKE I SAID THIS FIRST ONE, IT'S AG, IT'S AT THIS PROPERTY HERE ALONG COUNTY ROAD 317. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ZONING REQUEST AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. MR. BENNETT. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? SO SO, JAKE, FOR ALL OF THESE, I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE GOING WITH THE SEVEN. I'M STILL A LITTLE VAGUE ON THE THIS THE NEED TO GO AFTER TEN YEARS. CAN CAN YOU WALK THROUGH WHAT THE TEN YEAR MARK MEANS. YEAH. YEAH. SO AGAIN THESE ARE ALL AGREEMENTS FROM 2016. THE TERM SPECIFIED WITHIN EACH OF THESE AGREEMENTS THERE IS A FIVE YEAR PERIOD AND THEN AN AUTOMATIC EXTENSION OF ANOTHER FIVE YEARS. SO THAT'S TEN YEARS. AFTER THE TEN YEARS IS UP, THE CITY IS ALLOWED TO ANNEX AND ZONE THE PROPERTY INTO OUR CITY LIMITS. AND SO THAT'S THE PROCESS THAT WE'RE BRINGING IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT. I SEE. SO IT WAS A TEN YEAR CLOCK THAT NOW YOU CAN ACT ON. YEP. IF YOU CHOOSE TO. YES. THAT'S IF THESE PROPERTIES AREN'T ALREADY ANNEXED IN. SO BACK UP TO THIS EXHIBIT. WE DID HAVE THREE OTHER PROPERTIES THAT ARE KIND OF IN HERE UP ALONG WHERE SPUR 399 IS TURNING UP NORTH. THOSE THREE PROPERTIES HAVE ALREADY BEEN ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS AND ZONED BY PROCESS OF THE THE PROPERTY OWNER. THAT WAS DONE WITHIN TEN YEARS. NOW THAT THE TEN YEARS IS UP FOR THE REST OF THESE AGREEMENTS, WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO GO AHEAD AND ANNEX AND ZONE THEM. OKAY, OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? Y'ALL WORKED WITH THE HOMEOWNER OR THE PROPERTY OWNER TO COME UP WITH THE AG ZONING AS OPPOSED TO RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, WHATEVER. YEAH. SO WE HAD PROVIDED NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES WITH NOTICES FOR OUR STANDARD PROCESS. WE SENT AN ADDITIONAL LETTER TO THE PROPERTY OWNER SAYING, HEY, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE WE'RE PROCEEDING WITH. I DON'T BELIEVE WE HEARD BACK FROM ANY OF THESE OWNERS THAT THAT WERE AGAINST WHAT WHAT WE WERE DOING, THE AG DISTRICT, LIKE I SAID, IT JUST ALLOWS THE CONTINUANCE OF THE OPERATIONS ON THERE
[01:05:01]
TODAY, WHICH IT'S AG PROPERTY, IT'S SINGLE FAMILY. IT'S DESIGNATED AS I BELIEVE IT'S A STATE RESIDENTIAL WITHIN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO IT'S LARGER LOT, IF ANYTHING WERE TO BE DEVELOPED ON THE SITE IN THE FUTURE, IT'D COME BACK TO Y'ALL IN THE FORM OF A REZONING. SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF THERE WERE LIKE, WELL, WE MAY WANT TO SELL THIS AND DEVELOP HAVE IT DEVELOP AS RESIDENTIAL. SO GO AHEAD AND DO THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING NOW. YES. SO WE DO HAVE ONE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER HAD REACHED OUT TO US AND THEY HAD WANTED TO GO AHEAD AND ZONE IT THE WAY THEY'D LIKE. AND SO THEY DID A SPLIT ZONING. IT'S KIND OF THREE WAYS WITH INDUSTRIAL. THE LARGE TRACT. YEAH. THE THE LARGER PIECE AND WE DO HAVE A COUPLE OTHERS THAT PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THEY'RE DESIGNATED AS KIND OF OUR WAREHOUSE AND MANUFACTURING DISTRICT AND EMPLOYMENT MIX. AND SO WE WENT AHEAD AND ARE WE'RE PROPOSING I ONE. SO OUR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ON SOME OF THOSE. AGAIN IT ALLOWS THE THE OPERATIONS TO CONTINUE AS THEY EXIST TODAY. BUT IT WILL ALREADY BE ZONED PER THE VISION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEN THEY DO COME IN TO DEVELOP. AND THE CITY IS KIND OF ACTING AS THE APPLICANT FOR ALL OF THESE, SO I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. I'M NOT SURE IF WE REALLY HAVE ANY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS HERE THIS EVENING. OKAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED AS WELL, OR THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR EACH OF THESE. SO WE'LL HAVE TO HANDLE THEM SEPARATELY. BUT THEY'RE ALL VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT I KIND OF OUTLINED FOR YOU.SO DON'T GO FAR. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING AND OUR APPLICANT IS NOT HERE. APPLICANT. THE CITY DOES THIS. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. ARE THERE ANY RESIDENTS OR INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? IF SO, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM.
KINDLY STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OKAY, MY NAME IS GARY JONES.
UNFORTUNATELY, I LIVE IN FAIRVIEW, SO I'VE BEEN THROUGH THIS BATTLE WITH FAIRVIEW AND MCKINNEY FOR A WHILE. I LEASE ALL THIS PROPERTY AND IT'S AN AG NOW WITH COLLIN COUNTY AND WITH TEXAS. IN 2016, YOU CAME THROUGH AND DID THE OTHER PROPOSALS, BUT THE DEAL WAS YOU WERE GOING TO FURNISH POLICE AND FIRE AND FIX THE ROADS, AND YOU HADN'T DONE ANY OF THOSE THREE. THE TRAFFIC THERE ON 317 IS UNBELIEVABLE. OF COURSE, THAT'S POOR PLANNING OF PRINCETON WITH WITH THE ROADS IS COMING THROUGH TO TRY TO RELIEVE THAT. THEY'RE PROBABLY TEN YEARS BEHIND. BUT THE CONCERN IS EVERYTHING'S ALREADY IN AG. I AT LEAST MOST OF THE PROPERTY THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT WITH THESE THREE PLACES AND TALKING TO COLLIN COUNTY AND TO TEXAS, THEY'RE THEY'RE NOT REALLY TOO EXCITED ABOUT YOUR. KIND OF REPRESENTED IN AG SINCE WE'VE ALREADY GOT IT THERE. I THINK THE QUESTION WAS, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE ROAD. YEAH. AND THE MAIN CONCERN, WE KNOW YOU DON'T FURNISH SEWER OR WATER WHEN YOU ANNEX, BUT THAT WAS THE CONCERN. HER HUSBAND'S IN INDIA. SO THEY HAD ME COME TRY TO HELP TRANSLATE FOR YOU. YEAH. HI. MY NAME IS VINEETA KUMAR AND WE LIVE ON COUNTY ROAD 317. AND OUR PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 3843, COUNTY ROAD 317, MCKINNEY, TEXAS. ACTUALLY, WE WE OUR PROPERTY IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE SOCCER PARK. THE FIRST PROBLEM WHAT WE FACE EVERY DAY, MORNING AND EVENING IS THE HEAVY TRAFFIC BECAUSE OF THE SOCCER PARK AND LOTS OF AMAZON TRUCKS GOES IN THE 317 ROAD. AND IT IS REALLY, REALLY VERY DANGEROUS TO GO INTO THAT 317 ROAD BECAUSE IT IS NOT STRAIGHT. IT IS LIKE TURNING EVERYWHERE. SO IT IS REALLY VERY DANGEROUS TO GO THERE. AND IT'S A HEAVY TRAFFIC AND THERE IS NO ROAD EXTENSION HAS BEEN DONE AND THERE IS NO ANY WATER SUPPLY. WE GET MILK AND WATER SUPPLY THERE AND WE FOR ANYTHING LIKE FOR THE ELECTRICITY RIGHT NOW WE ARE USING THE GRAYSON COUNTY. THERE IS NOTHING FROM CITY.
THERE IS NO SEWAGE FOR OUR PROPERTY. SO LIKE ME AND MY HUSBAND, WE ARE THINKING LIKE WHY WE HAVE THIS ETJ THING? BECAUSE EVEN WE TRY TO DO ANYTHING, WE HAVE TO COME TO
[01:10:05]
THE MCKINNEY AND WE HAVE TO TAKE THE APPROVAL FOR ANYTHING. LIKE EXAMPLE I'LL USE LIKE TWO YEARS AGO WE PLANNED TO DO SOME EVENT CENTER THERE, OR WE WERE PLANNING TO DO SOME COMMERCIAL STORAGES OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THERE WAS NO PERMISSION FOR THAT. WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE ETJ AND THEN WE HAVE TO GO TO THE COLLIN COUNTY. SO NOW WE ARE OUT OF ETJ. NOW IT HAS BEEN EXPIRED, RIGHT? SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY ANY FREEDOM TO DO ANYTHING IN OUR PROPERTY. WE HAVE A 10.6 ACRES OF LAND. SO THAT'S MY THING. LIKE WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SEEING ALL THOSE PRESENTATIONS AND HOW IT IS DEVELOPING. SO REALLY LIKE THE CITY HAS TO DO SOMETHING THERE FOR SEWAGE ESPECIALLY. AND THE ELECTRICITY AND THE WATER. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR SHARING YOUR COMMENTS. AND MR. JONES, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR COMING IN, SUPPORTING YOUR NEIGHBOR. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HEARING. THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT. THANK YOU. OKAY.THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF THERE'S ANYBODY ELSE HERE WHO WISHES TO SHARE ANY CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? SEEING IS THERE NONE. JAKE, I HAD A QUESTION REAL QUICK. BROUGHT UP THE CONCERN OF THE THE ROADS. AND I KNOW THOSE ROADS ARE NARROW AND CURVY AND NOT IN GOOD CONDITION. WITH THEM BEING ANNEXED, WILL THE CITY TAKE OVER ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS? WIDENING? DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE THOROUGHFARE PLANS ARE THROUGH THERE? YEAH. SO I DON'T THINK THIS ROADWAY IS ON OUR MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN. SO IT'S MORE OF A RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY OR COLLECTOR, DEPENDING ON, YOU KNOW, THE DEVELOPMENT THAT HAPPENS IN THE FUTURE.
THIS IS JUST ANNEXATION AND ZONING. THERE IS NO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THIS TIME. SO WHEN THERE IS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, IF THIS WERE TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO FURTHER SINGLE FAMILY, OR IF THERE WERE TO BE COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, WHAT HAVE YOU THAT COMES IN AND PROPOSES AN ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT, THEN WE HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS WHERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO IMPROVE THE ROADWAY, THEY WOULD BE EXTENDING WATER, THEY'D BE EXTENDING SEWER, AND IT WOULD REALLY MAKE THE ENTIRE AREA. AS DEVELOPMENT COMES, IT WILL UP THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THOSE AREAS. SO THIS IS AN AREA THAT'S BEEN AGRICULTURE FOR A LONG TIME. LARGE LOT, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. AGAIN, NO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THIS TIME. IT'S JUST ANNEXATION AND ZONING. OKAY, JAKE, I HAD A QUESTION. SHE MADE A COMMENT REGARDING, I GUESS, SOME THINGS THAT THE CITY HAD MENTIONED THAT THEY WERE GOING TO DO THE PREVIOUSLY. THAT WAS BEFORE MOST OF OUR TIME. DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION REGARDING THAT? I HAVE NO BACKGROUND ON WHAT THOSE CONVERSATIONS WERE. AGAIN, THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR TEN YEARS AND IT IS TERMED TERMED OUT AT THIS POINT. AND SO THE CITY HAS THE AUTHORITY TO GO AHEAD AND ANNEX AND ZONE THIS PROPERTY. PER THE AGREEMENT THAT WAS SIGNED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER IN 2016.
OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? THANK YOU JAKE. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A MOTION REGARDING THE PUBLIC HEARING? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEBO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. NO. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUETTNER. KYLIE, CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. THIS ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM ITEM 20 6-0015Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 4601 COUNTY ROAD 317. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU AGAIN. SO THIS IS AGAIN WITHIN THAT SAME CLUSTER OF THE THREE DOWN IN THE BOTTOM LEFT CORNER OF THIS EXHIBIT HERE. SO WE WERE LOOKING AT A PROPERTY THAT'S ESSENTIALLY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO IT. AND THE NEXT ONE WILL ALSO BE IN THIS CLUSTER AS WELL, BUT VERY SIMILAR TO THE LAST ONE STRAIGHT ZONING OF AG FOR THE PROPERTY. WE DID SEND OUT NOTICES AND EVERYTHING. SO HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU JAKE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? THANKS, JAKE. OKAY, THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? SEEING IS THERE NONE? DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. MOTION BY
[01:15:09]
COMMISSIONER BUCKNER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THIS ITEM SECOND.SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTES. THIS ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0 AND WILL ALSO BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING.
NEXT ITEM. ITEM 26--0016Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO ZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON TRACT FIVE OF THE CALVIN BOWLES SURVEY. THIRD PROPERTY IN THIS CLUSTER AGAIN RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS ITEM FOR MR. BENNETT? OKAY. THANK YOU JAKE. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM.
OKAY? SEEING AS THERE ARE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE. ITEM 26-0016Z. SECOND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER MCWILLIAMS. MCWILLIAMS. OKAY, YOU GOT IT IN THERE. I HEARD RUSS OVER HERE. SO SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCWILLIAMS. CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS ITEM IS APPROVED 7 TO 0. IT WILL ALSO BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM. ITEM ITEM 26 DASH. DASH 0017Z.
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS, CONSIDER, DISCUSS. ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND R 12 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF FM 546 AND APPROXIMATELY 2100FT WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 324. THANK YOU AGAIN. SO THIS PROPERTY THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT, IT'S ABOUT 239 ACRES. THIS IS THE ONE THAT COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK YOU HAD ASKED ABOUT JUST A LITTLE BIT AGO. THIS ONE THEY'RE SPLITTING OR PROPOSING TO SPLIT INTO THREE DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS HERE. SO THIS IS THE ONE THAT AFTER WE HAD SENT OUT THE NOTICES, THE OWNERS HAD REACHED OUT TO US AND AND ASKED IF WE WOULD GO AHEAD AND ZONE IT PER WHAT THEY WERE PLANNING TO DO ANYWAY IN THE COMING MONTHS. SO THE GREEN ALONG A FEW ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FUTURE FM 546 THAT IS I-1. SO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE LIGHT BLUE THAT'S IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER, THAT'S ACROSS THE FUTURE. FM 546. THAT'S C2. SO A LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. AND THEN WE HAVE IN THE PINK THAT IS R 12. SO ONE OF OUR LARGER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS THIS MATCHES AND I BELIEVE THIS IS THE SAME DEVELOPER AS THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST. A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO WE HAD LOCKE RANCH COME THROUGH. THEY ZONED IT FOR VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SEE HERE. I-1 NORTH SIDE FM 546.
THEY HAD A PIECE OF C-2 AT THE CORNER OF A FUTURE INTERSECTION THERE, AND THEN R 12 THE REST OF THE WAY. SO THIS IS ESSENTIALLY MATCHING THAT. WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR YOU. THANK YOU JAKE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? OKAY. THANKS, JAKE. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM.
OKAY? SEEING IS THERE. THERE IS NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. COMMISSIONER LEBO MAKES A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT VOTE CARRIES 7 TO 0. AND THAT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM. ITEM 26 0018Z. CONDUCT A
[01:20:09]
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 3843 COUNTY ROAD 317. YES. THANK YOU AGAIN. SO THIS ONE WE'RE PROPOSING A ZONING OF I ONE ON THE PROPERTY. THIS IS WE'LL GO BACK TO THE EXHIBIT.IT IS THE ONE THAT'S KIND OF A LITTLE BIT FURTHER NORTH HERE ON THE ON THE EAST SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 317. I'LL CIRCLE IT ON HERE FOR YOU GUYS. THAT ONE THERE ARE. THERE IT IS AGAIN.
IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING JUST A STRAIGHT I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FURTHERING THE VISION OF OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? I ASSUME THE PROPERTY OWNER WANTED THE I-1 ZONING ON THIS ONE, SO ONLY THE LAST PROPERTY WE HAD WORKED DIRECTLY WITH THEM. THIS ONE IS THE RECOMMENDATION IS BASED ON OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. A LOT OF THIS AREA, THIS AREA THAT'S NOT OUTLINED WITHIN THE EXHIBIT, A LOT OF THAT IS ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ALREADY. THAT'S KIND OF IN BETWEEN THE LARGE PROPERTY AND THESE PROPERTIES FURTHER TO THE WEST. SO I ONE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AS WELL AS OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THAT'S WHERE WE CAME UP WITH THAT RECOMMENDATION. NO FEEDBACK FROM THEM. YEAH. THEY'LL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE FULL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. NONE OF THESE RIGHT NOW HAVE MADE ANY OFFICIAL SUBMITTALS. WE'VE JUST MADE THE SUBMITTALS FOR THE ANNEXATION AND ZONINGS. OKAY. ALL OF THESE PROPERTIES WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH SITE PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, PLAT BUILDING PERMIT. DEPENDING ON THE USES PROPOSED, THEY MAY HAVE TO GO THROUGH A REZONE AS WELL. WE KNOW FOR SURE THE AG PROPERTIES, ONCE THEY DEVELOP, THEY'LL HAVE TO COME THROUGH FOR THAT REZONING. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, MR. BENNETT? THANKS, JAKE. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. ONE ITEM, ONE ITEM ONLY. I'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON ONE AGAIN. CLEARING ON. YOU KEEP SAYING AG EXEMPTION. SO ALL THESE PROPERTIES ARE IN COLLIN COUNTY AND THE STATE OF TEXAS. AG EXEMPTION. WHAT QUALIFY? WHAT IS I MEAN, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY'D WANT TO BE IN MCKINNEY AG EXEMPTION. THAT'S JUST THAT'S JUST A ZONING CLASSIFICATION, SIR. DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE AG OPERATIONS ARE TERMINATING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THEY'RE CURRENTLY IN AG AND THEY'LL STILL BE IN AG. IT'S JUST A ZONING. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. YOU'LL KEEP THE AG EXEMPTION FOR TAX PROPERTY TAXES. AS LONG AS THE USE STAYS THE SAME. YOU'LL KEEP THE THE YOU'LL KEEP THE EXEMPTION FOR PROPERTY TAXES AS LONG AS THE USE STAYS THE SAME.
BECAUSE SOME OF THIS THEY'RE JUST TAKING YOU KNOW, WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO ANNEX IS JUST PART OF THE PROPERTY. RIGHT. AND WE HAVE THE WHOLE PLOT IN AN AG EXEMPTION. AND I JUST DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS THE ADVANTAGE TO TRY TO GET AN AG WITH MCKINNEY. IF THERE'S NOT ANY, THERE'S NOT I MEAN, THE STATE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOUR MCKINNEY DEAL OR THAT'S WHERE THEY GET THEIR PROPERTY TAXES. ABSOLUTELY. YEAH. ONE THIRD OF THEIR COUNTY TAX IS A BIG DEAL. THOSE APPLICATIONS WILL STILL GO TO THE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT. YEAH, SIR.
APPLICATION WILL STILL GO TO THE SAME PLACE TO THE AS OPPOSED TO DANIEL WILSON AND COLLIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT. YEAH THAT'S RIGHT I DEAL WITH THEM A LOT. AND ALL THESE PROPERTY YOU KNOW THERE'S JUST NOT ONE OF THESE THIS WHOLE AREA. I HAVE ABOUT 300 ACRES OVER THERE THAT'S IN AG EXEMPTION. AND IN THIS PART OF THE WORLD, THEY'VE LEFT IT ALONE. THEY'VE YOU'VE DISCOVERED THESE SIDE OF MCKINNEY. THAT'S WHY THIS BUILDING IS HERE. MY DAD BOUGHT PROPERTY ON 317 IN 1954. SO WE DIDN'T GO TO THE EAST SIDE OF MCKINNEY. YOUR BUILDINGS HERE NOW. BUT I KNOW THE TRAFFIC IS WHAT THEY'RE SO CONCERNED ABOUT.
IT'S UNBELIEVABLE. FROM 3:00 TO, YOU KNOW, 4 OR 5:00 TILL SEVEN AND SAME THING IN THE MORNING.
THOUSANDS OF CARS TRYING TO GET TO PRINCETON. AND I KNOW THEY'RE TRYING TO SOLVE THAT WITH THE LOOP. AND I KNOW THESE LITTLE COUNTRY ROADS WILL BE OBSOLETE PRETTY QUICK. BUT I JUST DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THAT ABOUT THE AG EXEMPTION. THANK YOU. YOU'RE GOOD. THANK YOU.
THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? SEEING IS
[01:25:04]
THERE A NONE? DO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMMACK TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT MOTION CARRIES SEVEN ZERO, AND THIS WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM ITEM 26 0019Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF FM 546 AND APPROXIMATELY 760FT WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 324. ALL RIGHT, SO THIS ONE IS FOR THE SMALLER PROPERTY ON THE FAR EAST, JUST EAST OF THE LARGE 240 ACRES THAT WE JUST DID A COUPLE ITEMS AGO, RECOMMENDING AG FOR THIS ONE, BASED ON ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND EAST KIND OF SURROUNDING IT, I BELIEVE, AS WELL AS THE SOUTH IS ALREADY ZONED AG AND PART OF THE CITY LIMITS. SO THIS IS GOING TO MATCH THAT AGAIN. AGAIN, ONCE IT DEVELOPS. AND, YOU KNOW, OTHER USES ARE PROPOSED ON THE PROPERTY, IT WILL LIKELY REQUIRE REZONE AT THAT TIME. BUT WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR AG AT THIS POINT AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. MR. BENNETT. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JAKE REGARDING THIS ITEM? THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM.OKAY? SEEING IS THERE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION REGARDING THIS ITEM? MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTE. AND THIS VOTE IS UNANIMOUS. 7 TO 0. AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. HERE. LAST ITEM IS ITEM 2600200Z.
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO I-1. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 3908 COUNTY ROAD 317. THIS ONE IS GOING TO BE THE ONE ON THE FAR WEST SIDE. IT IS A SPLIT ZONING THAT WE'RE PROPOSING, SO WE HAVE FUTURE FM 546 THAT KIND OF LOOPS DOWN THERE AND CUTS THE PROPERTY UP. SO THE RED IS PROPOSED I-1, WHICH IS AGAIN COMPATIBLE WITH SOME OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS, AS WELL AS OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE GREEN THAT'S ON THE SOUTH SIDE THAT FOR OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS ESTATE RESIDENTIAL. AND IT'S PRETTY HEAVILY COVERED IN FLOODPLAIN DOWN THERE AS WELL. SO PROPOSING AG FOR THAT. AND IF SOMETHING DOES DEVELOP THERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FM FIVE, 46 WOULD TAKE A CLOSER LOOK IN THE FUTURE WITH THE REZONING. WE'RE SUPPORTIVE OF BOTH I-1 AND AG ON THIS PROPERTY AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. JAKE. THE FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY IS GOING TO BE THERE ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY. OR IS IT GOING TO CUT INTO THIS PROPERTY? IT CUTS INTO THIS PROPERTY THROUGH THE MIDDLE. OKAY. THAT'S THE THAT'S WHERE THE ROAD CENTER LINE. YES. OKAY.
THAT'S WHAT I WAS TRYING TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MISTER BENNETT? THANK YOU JAKE. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT.
IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH THE PODIUM. OKAY? SEEING IS THERE A NONE? DO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. COMMISSIONER LEBO MAKES A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE. ITEM 26-0020Z SECOND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD. KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTE. THIS MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY AND WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE APRIL 7TH, 2026 MEETING. MR. BENNETT, GREAT JOB AT PRESENTING ALL THAT FOR US. APPRECIATE IT. AT THIS TIME I'D LIKE TO SEE. ARE
[01:30:07]
THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING MATTERS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA? A TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF? HAVE ANY COMMENTS? I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY CONGRATULATIONS TO MCKINNEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, THE VARSITY BOYS, THEY WON STATE AND ALSO THE VARSITY GIRLS SOCCER VARSITY BOYS BASKETBALL TEAM. AND THEN THE VARSITY GIRLS SOCCER TEAM ALSO WON STATE. AND THAT'S THEIR THIRD CONSECUTIVE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP. SO CONGRATULATIONS TO BOTH OF THOSE TEAMS. CONGRATULATIONS. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING? MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK HAS MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUETTNER? CAST YOUR VOTES. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY AND MEETING IS ADJOURNE* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.