May 12, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission

26-0021SP Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Design Exception to a Site Plan for a Proposed Warehouse (McKinney Couch Drive Industrial), Located Approximately 105 ft. North of Recovery Way and on the East side of Couch Dr.

26-0027Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “BN” - Neighborhood Business to “TR1.8” - Townhome Residential District, Located at 1001 North Tennessee Street.

26-0037Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “MF36” - Multi-Family Residential District, Located Approximately 1,100 Feet East of Custer Road and Approximately 280 Feet South of Eldorado Parkway

COMMISSION AND STAFF COMMENTS

Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:09]

COMMISSION MEETING FOR CITY OF MCKINNEY FOR TUESDAY, MAY THE 12TH, 2026. THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND THEY SERVE AT THE PLEASURE WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK REGARDING ANY ITEM THAT'S ON THE AGENDA, KINDLY COMPLETE A YELLOW SPEAKERS INFORMATION CARD AND TURN IT IN PRIOR TO APPROACHING OR PRIOR TO SPEAKING. WHEN YOU DO COME UP, KINDLY STATE YOUR FIRST AND YOUR LAST NAME FOR THE RECORD. WHEN IT IS YOUR TURN TO SPEAK, WE KINDLY ASK THAT YOU LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT YOUR COMMENTS DO BECOME A PART OF THE CITY'S RECORD, AND WE DO WANT TO HEAR YOUR COMMENTS. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THE COMMISSIONERS REQUEST THAT WE ALL TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT, THAT WE FOCUS ON THE ISSUE, AND THAT WE ARE CONCISE IN OUR COMMENTS. AND LAST, WE ALL WANT TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. SO AT THIS POINT, WE'LL NOW MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENTS. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THE NONPUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS? OKAY. NOW WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE INFORMATION SHARING ITEMS ON

[INFORMATION SHARING ITEMS]

THE AGENDA. SO THIS IS ITEM 26-0410. UPDATE ON 2026. MCKINNEY BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBER APPOINTMENTS. HELLO MISS. OOPS. OKAY GOOD EVENING. I AM TANISHA SPARKMAN, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY, AND I'M HERE TO PROVIDE YOU ALL WITH AN UPDATE ON THE CURRENT BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENT PROCESS. AS YOU MAY KNOW, THIS IS A TIME OF YEAR THAT MCKINNEY RESIDENTS THAT ARE INTERESTED IN SERVING ON A BOARD OF COMMISSION HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY, AS WELL AS THOSE INCUMBENTS WHO ARE WISHING TO REAPPLY TO CONTINUE SERVICE. ON AUGUST 25TH, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BEGIN THE PROCESS OF APPOINTING NEW MEMBERS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, WITH THE TERM BEGINNING OCTOBER 1ST, 2026, AND APPLICATION SUBMISSION PERIOD IS CURRENTLY OPEN AND THE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION IS FRIDAY, JUNE 19TH. IF YOU ARE AN INCUMBENT WISHING TO REAPPLY, USE THE CURRENT EMAIL ADDRESS THAT YOU HAVE ON FILE. LOG IN AND UPDATE YOUR APPLICATION AS NECESSARY, AND INTERVIEWS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN JULY. THERE WILL BE FOUR INTERVIEW SESSIONS, AND THOSE APPROVED APPLICANTS WILL BE CONTACTED TO CONFIRM THEIR SCHEDULE. ALL NEW AND REAPPOINTED MEMBERS MUST COMPLETE OPEN GOVERNMENT TRAINING, AS WELL AS ANY BOARD SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THEIR TERM, WHICH WOULD AGAIN BEGIN ON OCTOBER 1ST, 2026. AND THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A SHEET ON YOUR SEAT IN FRONT OF YOU THAT HAS A CHART THAT LISTS ALL OF THE COMMISSION MEMBERS, YOUR YOUR TERM EXPIRATION, AND YOUR ELIGIBILITY FOR REAPPOINTMENT.

AND THAT IS THE CONCLUSION OF MY PRESENTATION OR MY UPDATE RATHER. AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MISS PARCHMAN. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR. TINNITUS? NO.

[CONSENT ITEMS]

OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO THE CONSENT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT ITEMS WHICH WOULD BE ITEM 26-041 ONE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 28TH, 2026.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEBO TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG. KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTES.

OKAY. THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY, 7 TO 0. WE'LL NOW MOVE TO THE REGULAR ITEMS ON

[26-0021SP Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Design Exception to a Site Plan for a Proposed Warehouse (McKinney Couch Drive Industrial), Located Approximately 105 ft. North of Recovery Way and on the East side of Couch Dr.]

THE AGENDA. THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 26-0021SP CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A DESIGN EXCEPTION TO A SITE PLAN FOR A PROPOSED WAREHOUSE. MCKINNEY COUCH DRIVE INDUSTRIAL, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 105FT NORTH OF RECOVERY WAY AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF COUCH DRIVE. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION DESTINY REYNOLDS, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY STAFF, RECOMMENDS THAT YOU CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM INDEFINITELY. THE APPLICANT HAS DECIDED TO NOT PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY AND THEY ARE WITHDRAWING THEIR APPLICATION. THANK YOU, MISS REYNOLDS. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO STAFF HAS MADE THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS ITEM BE WITHDRAWN. FIRST, WE DO NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

SEEING AS THERE IS NONE, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WITHDRAW THE ITEM. OKAY. A MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND

[00:05:05]

WITHDRAW THE ITEM. ITEM TWO SIX. IT NEEDS TO BE TABLED IN TABLE AND DEFINITELY NOT WITHDRAW TABLE INDEFINITELY. OKAY. THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE INDEFINITELY FOR ITEM 26-0021SP BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD.

KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. AND THE MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. ITEM

[26-0027Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “BN” - Neighborhood Business to “TR1.8” - Townhome Residential District, Located at 1001 North Tennessee Street.]

26-0027Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM BE IN NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS TO TR 1.8 TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 1001 NORTH TENNESSEE STREET. MISS ROBINSON, GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION CHAIR ROBINSON, DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM BE N NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS TO TR 1.8 TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED TR 1.8 DISTRICT COVERS POINT THREE ACRES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH KENTUCKY STREET. WITHIN THE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT AREA. THE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT AREA INCLUDES THE MCKINNEY TOWN CENTER, HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT, TRADITIONAL MCKINNEY NEIGHBORHOOD, THE MAIN STREET PROGRAM AREA, AND THE HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT ZONE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN THE HISTORIC TOWN CENTER OF THE ONE MCKINNEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS DESIGNATED AS THE RESIDENTIAL SUB PLACE TYPE. THE TOWN CENTER DISTRICT CONSISTS OF THE COMMUNITY'S HISTORIC COMMERCIAL CORE AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. THE TOWN CENTER DISTRICT CONSISTS OF THE COMMUNITY'S HISTORIC COMMERCIAL CORE AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS WEST OF THE STATE HIGHWAY FIVE. SPECIFICALLY, THE RESIDENTIAL SUB PLACE TYPE DESCRIBES THE ESTABLISHED URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS SURROUNDING DOWNTOWN. THE TR 1.8 TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT PERMITS ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX, TRIPLEX AND QUAD PLEX USES. THIS REZONING ALLOWS THE APPLICANT TO DEVELOP DENSER, SINGLE FAMILY USE TYPES THAT ARE IN LINE WITH THE CITY'S VISION FOR THE RESIDENTIAL SUB PLACE TYPE OF THE HISTORIC TOWN CENTER. GIVEN THAT THE REQUEST ALIGNS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND USES OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES, STAFF SUPPORTS THE PROPOSED TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL ZONING. I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MISS ROBINSON. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS ROBINSON? IS OUR APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING? YES, I BELIEVE SO, MA'AM. GOOD EVENING. I'M CASEY GREGORY WITH SANCHEZ ASSOCIATES AT 2000 NORTH MCDONALD STREET HERE IN MCKINNEY, REPRESENTING THE PROJECT. I WILL NOTE SOME OF THE DOCUMENTATION SAID IT WAS ON TENNESSEE STREET. THIS IS ACTUALLY ON KENTUCKY, NOT TENNESSEE. BUT I APPRECIATE THE PLANNING STAFF. I THINK THEY'VE DONE A WONDERFUL JOB. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. CAN YOU KINDLY STATE THE CORRECT ADDRESS, PLEASE? IT IS 1001 NORTH KENTUCKY STREET. THANK YOU. SO WHAT'S THE CURRENT STRUCTURE USED FOR? THERE'S CURRENTLY A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE DEMOLISHED, AND IT'D BE REPLATTED INTO. 2 OR 3 RESIDENTIAL LOTS. I SEE. OKAY.

THANK YOU. SO QUESTIONS FOR THE ACCESS FOR THOSE 2 OR 3 LOTS, WOULD ALL ACCESS BE OFF OF KENTUCKY, OR WOULD SOME ACCESS BE OFF OF THE ALLEY FROM THE REAR? OKAY. THAT ANY ACCESS, IF THE LOTS WERE LESS THAN 50 FOOT IT WOULD HAVE TO COME FROM THE ALLEY. OKAY, THAT'S MY QUESTION.

THANK YOU. SO THE PRODUCT THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT PUTTING AT THIS LOCATION, IS IT SIMILAR TO THE ONES THAT IT'S ON THE CORNER OF KENTUCKY AND WHITE STREET, OR IT'S GOING TO BE SMALLER? I'M NOT SURE. I KNOW THAT THAT DEVELOPMENT KENTUCKY WHITE. OKAY. IT'S GOING TO BE IT'S SOUTH OF WHERE? DIRECTLY SOUTH. YEAH. IT'S ANTICIPATED TO BE LIKE A TOWNHOME TYPE PRODUCT, PROBABLY 25 FOOT WIDE LOT TYPICAL. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR

[00:10:06]

APPLICANT? I WAS I LOOKED AT THAT LOCATION AND THE ALLEY JUST SEEMS LIKE THAT ACCESS WOULD BE A LITTLE DIFFICULT, BUT. WELL, AND ENGINEERING HAS POINTED OUT THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO USE ALLEY ACCESS, WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE TO REBUILD THAT ALLEY TO SOME EXTENT. SO THAT'LL JUST BE PART OF THE PROCESS. THANK YOU. YEAH. FOR THE ZONING EXHIBIT. THERE'S AN ALLEY ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE TRACT, AS WELL AS NORTH THAT CONNECTS CONNECTS TO KENTUCKY. SO YOU'D HAVE ALLEY ACCESS ON THE NORTH AND WEST SIDES. THAT'S CORRECT. EXCUSE ME. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING IS THERE NONE? DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE ITEM 26-0027Z. I'LL SECOND THAT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEBO. KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY.

THIS MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JUNE 2ND, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 26-0037Z.

[26-0037Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “MF36” - Multi-Family Residential District, Located Approximately 1,100 Feet East of Custer Road and Approximately 280 Feet South of Eldorado Parkway]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO MF36 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1100FT EAST OF CUSTER ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 280FT SOUTH OF EL DORADO PARKWAY. MADAM CHAIR AND FELLOW COMMISSIONERS, I'D LIKE TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM THIS ITEM AND ABSTAIN FROM ANY DISCUSSION OR VOTE RELATED TO IT. SO NOTED. THANK YOU. CAITLIN SHEFFIELD, CHIEF PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. SO WE HAVE SOME UPDATED MAPS FOR YOU THAT WILL EXPLAIN THROUGHOUT MY PRESENTATION. SO THE FIRST ONE FOR YOU IS JUST A SNAPSHOT OF THE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH THE CITYWIDE ZONING MAP. THIS MAP IS TO DENOTE THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY DISTRICT AND OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND IS DESIGNATED AS THE PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLACE TYPE.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF EL DORADO PARKWAY, NORTH OF STONEBRIDGE DRIVE AND EAST OF CUSTER ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. IT DOES FOLLOW THE O TWO OFFICE DISTRICT IN THE STONEBRIDGE GENERAL MASTER PLAN.

THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A STRAIGHT ZONING OF MF 36 REQUEST BEFORE YOU TONIGHT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 14 ACRES IN SIZE. CURRENTLY, THE PROPERTY COULD BE DEVELOPED AS MULTIFAMILY UNDER THE EYES OF THE SB 40 CHANGES THAT HAPPEN WITH STATE LAW LAST YEAR. HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED TO MODERNIZE THE ZONING DISTRICT, BRING IT UP INTO OUT OF THE PD AND INTO A STRAIGHT ZONING. OF THAT MF 36 STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE CHANGE AND THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING. FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, IT WOULD BE SUPPORTIVE OF A HORIZONTAL MIXED USE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT WITH ALL THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES EXISTING AND PROPOSED ALONG EL DORADO AND STONEBRIDGE. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REQUEST AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MISS SHEFFIELD. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR KATELYN? CAITLIN, COULD YOU SHOW WHERE THE ACCESS ROADS ARE GOING TO BE ON THIS? YES. SO HERE IS AN AERIAL OF THE PROPOSED SITE. THERE IS AN EXISTING MUTUAL ACCESS DRIVE THAT EXTENDS FROM THE TOP OF EL DORADO DOWN TO STONEBRIDGE.

HERE. IT'S NOT IT'S NOT SHOWING UP. WILL YOU CHANGE IT TO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MISS SHEFFIELD? GOOD. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? THANK YOU.

[00:15:09]

MADAM CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. I'M BOB ROGERS, 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300.

MCKINNEY. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, WE'VE REVIEWED ALREADY A VERY ROBUST STAFF REPORT ON THIS PROJECT OR ON THIS PROPOSAL. AS CAITLIN MENTIONED THERE, MY CLIENT COULD BUILD OR MY CLIENT, A USER COULD BUILD MULTIFAMILY ON THIS NOW UNDER HOUSE BILL OR SENATE BILL. 840 AS A MATTER OF RIGHT, WE THINK IT'S BETTER TO GO UNDER YOUR STRAIGHT MF 36 ORDINANCE. THAT'S CONFUSING, EASIER TO ADMINISTER AND WHATNOT. BASICALLY, THE, THE, THE NUMBER OF UNITS PER ACRE, THE PARKING, ALL OF THOSE THINGS ARE CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE SENATE BILL MODIFICATIONS THAT YOU MADE TO YOUR OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, TO WHAT MF 36 IS. FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, IT'S EASIER TO UNDERSTAND YOUR MF 36 ORDINANCE, AND WE THINK IT WOULD BE EASIER TO WORK WITHIN THAT CONTEXT. SO I WOULD REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. THANK YOU, MR. ROEDER. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? YES, BOB, WHAT WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE TO THAT ACCESS ROAD TO SERVE THIS? MF 36 THE ACCESS ROAD IS REALLY.

WHILE IT'S A PRIVATE DRIVE, IT'S A IT'S A IT'S A VERY WIDE THOROUGHFARE, A VERY WIDE DRIVE.

SO I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GOING TO NEED BE ANY IMPROVEMENTS THERE. THERE'LL BE SOME IMPROVEMENTS ON EL DORADO PARKWAY, PROBABLY DECEL LANE, THAT KIND OF STUFF. MAYBE ON STONEBRIDGE THAT WOULD REQUIRE THAT THAT WOULD BE SHOWN UP IN A T A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. THERE IS PROPOSED TO BE A CONNECTION BACK TO THE NORTH EAST CORNER. THERE IS A FIRE LANE THAT GOES BACK IN THERE. SO THAT'D BE A SECOND POINT OF ACCESS. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL OF THAT IS, YOU KNOW, DOCTOR LEBO WOULD COME ABOUT WHEN THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSAL COMES IN, AND ALL OF THAT WOULD BE DETAILED AND SHOWN AT THAT TIME. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION, MR. ROEDER.

SO REGARDING THE THE SAME ACCESS ROAD AS IT COMES OUT ONTO STONEBRIDGE RIGHT NOW, THE WAY THAT YOU GUYS ARE ENVISIONING IT, IT WOULD JUST BE A ONE WAY HEADING WEST TOWARDS CUSTER, OR WOULD THAT MEETING BE OPENED UP SO THAT THERE COULD BE CROSS TRAFFIC, BECAUSE THERE'S A LIGHT THERE AT STONEBRIDGE AND CUSTER ALREADY? AND WOULD THERE BE BE ANOTHER LIGHT THAT WOULD NEED TO GO IN THERE BASED OFF TRAFFIC? THAT'S WAY AHEAD OF WHERE WE ARE IN THE PROCESS? MR. WOODARD THAT, AGAIN, WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE D. I A AND SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS. THE EXISTING ACCESS. THERE IS A FULL ACCESS TODAY. YES. SO IT WOULD LIKELY REMAIN AS SUCH WITH ANY OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY ENGINEERING AND MR. ROEDER'S POINT STAFF WILL MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT ALL THE TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT IMPLICATIONS, SO WE WILL CATCH THAT AT SITE PLAN. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, MR. ROEDER? ARE THERE ANY DO YOU HAVE ANY EXPECTATIONS FOR TIMING, ANY TIMING, TIMING OF THE PROJECT, TIMING OF OF A SITE PLAN TIMING? YEAH. I THINK THAT THE PROJECT WOULD MOVE ALONG QUITE SMARTLY. PROBABLY GET A SITE PLAN IN HERE SOMETIME IN THE SUMMER. SUMMER. OKAY. THANKS, BOB. YEAH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THIS ITEM HAS A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERN, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING IS THERE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. I SECOND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KASIM. SO ITEM 26-0037Z. THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE IT. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY.