[CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:07] MEETING FOR TUESDAY, JUNE THE 23RD 2026. IF YOU'RE TUNING IN REMOTELY, IF YOU'RE HERE IN PERSON, WE'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR TAKING TIME TO COME OUT TODAY. THE COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU SEE SEATED BEFORE YOU HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND WE SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THE CITY COUNCIL. NOW, SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT YOU HEAR THIS EVENING WILL ONLY BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, WHILE OTHERS WILL BE FORWARDED ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADDITIONAL DETERMINATION. IF THERE IS AN ITEM, AN AGENDA ITEM THAT IS GOING TO BE FORWARDED ON TO CITY COUNCIL, I WILL LET YOU KNOW OF THAT. WHEN WE GET TO THAT ITEM. NOW, IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM, WE DO ASK THAT YOU KINDLY FILL OUT A YELLOW SPEAKER CARD AND TURN IT IN PRIOR TO THAT AGENDA ITEM BEING CALLED. WHEN IT IS YOUR TURN TO TO SPEAK, KINDLY STATE YOUR FIRST AND YOUR LAST NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I WILL REMIND YOU OF THAT WHEN YOU APPROACH. AND THEN WE DO ASK THAT YOU LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES. THE COMMISSIONERS DO ASK THAT YOU TREAT EVERYONE WITH RESPECT, THAT YOU FOCUS ON THE AGENDA ITEM, AND THAT YOU'RE CONCISE IN YOUR COMMENTS. WE DO WANT TO STRESS THAT YOUR OPINION IS IMPORTANT TO US, AND IT DOES BECOME PART OF THE CITY'S PERMANENT RECORD. WE ALL DO WANT TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF MCKINNEY. SO AT THIS TIME, WE WILL MOVE ON TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENTS. I'D LIKE TO KNOW, DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THE NON PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS? [CONSENT ITEMS] OKAY. SEEING AS THERE ARE NONE, WE WILL NOW MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. THIS INCLUDES ITEM 26-0594, WHICH ARE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 9TH, 2026. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEBO TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM JUNE 9TH, 2026? SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WHATLEY. PLEASE ASK FOR YOUR PATIENCE. IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYWHERE IN MCKINNEY TODAY AND OTHER PLACES, INTERNET IS LIKE MOVING REALLY KIND OF SLOW. SO KIND OF CAST YOUR VOTES. OH. DO I SIGN IT? OKAY. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0. NOW WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR [23-0061SP2 Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on Design Exceptions to a Site Plan for Religious Assembly (The Parks Church), Located on the Northeast Corner of South Tennessee Street and East Davis Street (REQUEST TO BE TABLED)] REGULAR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. THIS FIRST ITEM, ITEM 23-0061SP2. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER. DISCUSS, ACT ON DESIGN EXCEPTIONS TO A SITE PLAN FOR RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY. THE PARKS CHURCH, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH TENNESSEE STREET AND EAST DAVIS STREET. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM CHAIR. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY STAFF, IS REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM BE TABLED IN THE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO THE NEXT MEETING, WHICH WILL BE JULY 14TH. THE APPLICANT DIDN'T QUITE HAVE ALL OF THEIR EXHIBITS QUITE READY FOR TONIGHT. SO THAT'S THE REASON WE'RE REQUESTING A TABLE, BUT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. JAKE, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. BENNETT? OKAY. SEEING IS THIS ITEM HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO BE TABLED. I KNOW WHEN THE MEETING STARTED, NOBODY HAD SUBMITTED A SPEAKER CARD. DID ANYBODY SLIP IN THAT MIGHT NOT BE ACCOUNTED FOR? OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO NOT. WELL, WE DIDN'T OPEN PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. YES. THANK YOU. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEBO TO CLOSE THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO TABLE THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO IT'S TABLE THE ITEM TO THE JULY 14TH DATE AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO SAID DATE, JULY 14TH. OKAY, SO TABLED TO THE JULY 14TH MEETING AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THAT TIME. CORRECT? SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WHATLEY. OKAY. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. SO AGAIN THIS ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE JULY 14TH MEETING, AT WHICH TIME WE [26-0006SUP Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for Auto, Motorcycle, Truck, or Boat, Rental or Sales (Enterprise), Located Approximately 650 feet South of Justice Road and on the East Side of James Pitts Drive,] WILL REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA, ITEM 26-0006SUP, [00:05:05] CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR AUTO, MOTORCYCLE, TRUCK OR BOAT RENTAL OR SALES ENTERPRISE. LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 650FT SOUTH OF JUSTICE ROAD AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF JAMES PITTS DRIVE. AWESOME. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR, AND GOOD EVENING, COMMISSION DESTINY REYNOLDS, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU. IF I CAN GET TO MY RIGHT, SLIDE, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS AN SUP FOR A PROPOSED ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR THAT REQUIRES AN SUP DUE TO BEING AN AUTO RENTAL OR SALES USE IN A C PLAN CENTER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG JAMES PITTS DRIVE AND WILL NOT HAVE ANY DIRECT FRONTAGE ONTO NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. ADDITIONALLY, ADDITIONALLY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ACCESS WILL BE LOCATED BEHIND ANY OF THE MAIN ENTRANCES OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL, HOTEL AND RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY THAT ARE CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY. STAFF FEELS THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ADJACENT LAND USES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS. WITH THE LOW INTENSITY NATURE OF THE PROPOSAL, COMBINED WITH NOT COMPETING WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT'S MAIN ENTRANCES. GIVEN THAT THE PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THE SITE AND USE MEETS ALL APPLICABLE CITY CRITERIA, STAFF FEELS THAT THE REQUEST IS APPROPRIATE AT THIS LOCATION. I WILL ALSO NOTE THAT STAFF HAS RECEIVED ZERO LETTERS IN OPPOSITION OF THE PROPOSED USE, AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS, AND WE ALSO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS? IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? YES THEY ARE. THANK YOU. KINDLY. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL DOGGETT WITH CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1610 MAPLE LEAF DRIVE IN WYLIE, TEXAS. I'M ALSO JOINED BY A COUPLE FOLKS FROM ENTERPRISE AND AND ALSO DEVELOPER JOSH GARDNER WITH FIRST HARTFORD. AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM AND BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. THANK YOU, MR. DOGGETT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? IS THE ONLY POINT OF ACCESS GOING TO BE OFF OF JANE'S PIT, OR IS THERE GOING TO BE A SHARED ACCESS FROM AN EXISTING DRIVE OFF OF JAMES PITTS? AND WE'RE NOT TAKING ANY ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINTS OFF JAMES. OKAY. SO JUST THAT ONE. YES, MA'AM. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPRECIATE IT. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING IS THERE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO APPROVE THE ITEM SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTE. I'M THE CULPRIT. I'M THE CULPRIT. IT'S NOT MY FAULT. DO YOU OR ARE YOU SUPPORTIVE OF. YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. WHAT'S GOING ON? OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JULY 21ST, 2026 [26-0023Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property to “PD” - Planned Development District, Generally to Allow Single Family and Modify the Development Standards, Located on the West Side of County Road 161 and Approximately 1,350 feet North of County Road 124] MEETING. OKAY. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM 26-0023Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO ZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT GENERALLY TO ALLOW SINGLE FAMILY AND MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 161 AND APPROXIMATELY 1350FT NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 124. DIRECTOR REILLY, HOW ARE YOU DOING? GOOD. GOOD EVENING, LUCAS REILLY, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING. I'M FILLING IN FOR ARI THIS EVENING. SHE'S OUT OF TOWN, SO I HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THIS CASE. AS STATED, THIS IS A REZONING CASE AND IT. EXCUSE ME. IT'S A ZONING CASE [00:10:04] FOR AN ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES. LOCATION, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP HERE IS OVER IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. IT IS ON COUNTY ROAD 161, WHICH IS FUTURE RIDGE JUST NORTH OF WILMOTH. IF YOU'LL REMEMBER, THE PROPERTY JUST TO THE NORTH OF THIS WAS JUST ANNEXED AND REZONED OR EXCUSE ME, IN ZONE MF36 JUST A COUPLE MONTHS AGO. THIS PROPERTY IS REQUESTING THIS DEVELOPMENT IS REQUESTING A PD THAT WOULD BE GENERALLY FOR SINGLE FAMILY USES. IT. GENERALLY THE PD CONFORMS TO OUR R3 AND R5 RESIDENTIAL ZONES, BUT THEY ARE REQUESTING SOME DEVIANCIES FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IN THOSE ZONES, NAMELY A REDUCTION IN THE FRONT SETBACK TO FIVE FOOT FROM 15 IN R3, A REDUCTION IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK SO THAT THEY COULD HAVE ZERO AND TEN, EXCUSE ME, ZERO AND SIX FOOT SIDE YARD SEPARATION RATHER THAN OUR REQUIREMENT OF ZERO AND TEN. AND THEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH THAT, A DIFFERENCE IN HOW THEY PLANT THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES, THEY WOULD LIKE TO CLUSTER THOSE RATHER THAN PLANT THEM BECAUSE THERE'S NOT ROOM IN FRONT OF THE HOUSES WITH A FIVE FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK RATHER THAN THE 15. AND THEN THEY'VE ALSO REQUESTED REDUCTIONS TO THE STANDARD SCREENING AND BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS, PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. THE DISTRICTS ARE REALLY INTENDED TO PROVIDE ENHANCED PUBLIC BENEFIT OR UNIQUE DESIGN SOLUTIONS IN THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. WE'VE NOT ALWAYS HELD NECESSARILY TRUE TO THAT. I THINK THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF DEVELOPMENTS THAT HAVE COME THROUGH THAT HAVE A UNIQUE DESIGN, A UNIQUE ASPECT THAT QUALIFY FOR PD. THE ARGUMENT THAT I HAVE FROM STAFF THIS EVENING IS THAT THIS IS NOT THAT THIS IS PRIMARILY ASKING FOR REDUCTIONS IN OUR STANDARDS AND USING A PD AS THE VEHICLE FOR THOSE REDUCTIONS. FOR THAT REASON, STAFF DOES RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THIS REQUEST. WE FEEL THAT THE FRONT YARD SETBACKS OF 15FT ALLOWED IN R3 IS ABOUT AS NARROW AS WE'D LIKE TO GO FOR A SINGLE FAMILY PRODUCT ON SEPARATE LOTS, PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THOSE SHADE TREES THAT ARE. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS INDICATE ARE NECESSARY PROVIDES THE WALKABILITY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE'D LIKE TO SEE ON DAYS LIKE TODAY, WHEN IT GETS TO BE REALLY HOT, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE SIDEWALKS ARE COVERED WITH THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES. SO FOR THAT REASON, WE ARE RECOMMENDING DENIAL. THE APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. DOES THAT DOES THAT CHANGE IN STAND OFF ON THE ON THE FRONT. FRONT. IS IT DOES THAT IMPACT THE UTILITIES OR STREET ACCESS OR OUTSIDE OF THE FRONT YARD? SETBACK IS ALL OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. SO ALL THE UTILITIES SHOULD BE BETWEEN BACK OF CURB AND RIGHT OF WAY LINE. SO THE STANDARD RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH WILL STILL BE REQUIRED, WHICH ACCOMMODATES UTILITIES. THAT FRONT YARD SETBACK IS JUST FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE FRONT FACADE OF THE BUILDING. AND SO IT'S BASICALLY DETERMINING WHAT YOUR FRONT YARD IS. THE REASON THAT WE HAVE A MINIMUM OF 15 PRIMARILY IS SET BY STATE LAW. WITH THE STATE LAW CHANGE THAT HAPPENED LAST YEAR THAT THAT GAVE US THE SMALL LOT ZONING DISTRICT, THE R3 THAT WE'VE ADOPTED IN OUR CODE, AND THAT SET THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AT 15. PREVIOUSLY, OUR NARROWEST FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT WAS 20FT. AND SO WE'VE ALREADY NARROWED THAT DOWN TO THE NEW STATE LAW MINIMUM OF 15 IN THE R3 DISTRICT. SO CAN YOU CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THE TOTAL SETBACK WOULD BE OFF THE CURB? IT VARIES BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTHS REQUIRED. ENGINEERING WOULD WOULD HAVE A BETTER ANSWER. I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY WOULD BE. I THINK GENERALLY IT'S A 50 FOOT, IF NOT 60. AND SO YOU HAVE THE THE WIDTH OF THE ROAD. USUALLY THERE'S EIGHT, TEN, 11FT BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB TO THE PROPERTY LINE THAT THAT'S WHERE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ARE. OKAY. LUCAS. ALONG WITH THAT, WHAT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE REQUIRED? WOULD IT BE A CR? 161 YES. SO THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BUILD THE IMPROVEMENTS IN FRONT OF THEIR PROPERTY PER THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN. THEY DO HAVE HALF THE ROAD. ONE SIDE ON THIS TRACK THOUGH, BECAUSE OF THE CEMETERY NEXT DOOR, ISN'T THERE A POSSIBILITY THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DEDICATE THE ENTIRE PORTION OF THE ROAD? SO THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. WE'VE ACTUALLY HAD A LOT OF INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS ABOUT JUST THAT TODAY. THE CITY OF MCKINNEY HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY. ANYTIME WE ANNEX PROPERTY ADJACENT TO A COUNTY ROAD, STATE LAW DICTATES THAT WE HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY AS A MUNICIPALITY TO TAKE THE FULL RIGHT OF WAY WITH AND ANNEX IT AND MAINTAIN IT. IN THIS CASE, THESE COUNTY ROADS ARE REALLY A PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT OF WAY. THE PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY COME TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE COUNTY ROAD, AND THAT ROAD IS NOT NECESSARILY DEDICATED ON ANY PLAT BY RIGHT OF WAY. IN SOME CASES IT IS. [00:15:05] AND IN OTHER CASES IT'S NOT. AND SO IT'S UP TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. WE NEED TO ANNEX THE REST OF THAT RIGHT OF WAY, AND THEN IT WOULD BE UP TO US TO MAINTAIN THAT ROAD ONCE THIS ANNEXATION. AND THIS IS CURRENTLY IN THE ETJ. SO THIS WOULD BE, HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING, ANNEXING INTO THE CITY. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. AND THEN ONE MORE QUESTION. THE THE MODIFICATIONS THAT THEY'RE ASKING AT LEAST TWO OUT OF THE THREE, NOT THE THE SCREENING, BUT THOSE ARE SPECIFICALLY AS IT RELATES TO THE R-3 LOTS, RIGHT. I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT, BUT I THINK IT'S FOR ALL OF THE ALL THE LOTS. BUT IF I COULD BE WRONG, OKAY, I'M WRONG. SO I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT. I KNOW THEY HAVE A PRESENTATION TO REALLY OKAY, PERFECT SPECIFIC PRODUCT AND WHY THEY'RE ASKING FOR THE DIFFERENCES THAT THEY ARE. APPRECIATE IT. LUCAS, COULD YOU GO OVER THE SCREENING? MODIFICATION REQUEST? WHAT? FROM WHAT TO WHAT? AGAIN, I'M GOING TO I'M GOING TO RELY ON THE APPLICANT AS FAR AS WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. BUT OUR REQUIREMENT IS, KATE, HELP ME OUT HERE. A SOLID MASONRY FENCE ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY. SO IF IT IS GOING TO BE SCREENING AND BUFFERING, THERE IS A SOLID MASONRY REQUIREMENT. THERE'S ALSO LIVING SCREENING. AND THEN THERE'S WROUGHT IRON WITH MASONRY COLUMNS WITH EVERGREEN SHRUBS. SO THERE'S DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR THE SCREENING AND BUFFERING SECTIONS ALONG RIGHT OF WAY. THAT'S RIGHT. AND AS I SAID, ARI'S CASE, I KNOW A LOT OF IT, BUT NOT ALL OF IT. SO I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT. THEY CAN EXPLAIN WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED SCREENING. OKAY. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. REGARDING THE THE FRONT SETBACK, ARE YOU AWARE OF OTHER I GUESS OUR THREE LOTS OR SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE A SMALLER THAN 15 FOOT SETBACK RIGHT NOW OR SO. WE DON'T HAVE HARDLY ANY AREAS IN THE CITY THAT ARE ACTUALLY R-3. LIKE I SAID, WE ADOPTED THAT ZONING DISTRICT WITH THE THE ADOPTION OF STATE LAW LAST YEAR WITH THE NEW LEGISLATION. WE DO HAVE SOME AREAS IN THE CITY THAT ARE UNDER A PD THAT HAVE A NARROWER FRONT YARD SETBACK THAN 15, BUT THEY'RE NOT VERY WIDESPREAD. THEY'RE IN SPECIFIC AREAS. I THINK IN CRAIG RANCH, THERE'S A COUPLE EXAMPLES THAT ARE PART OF BASICALLY A LARGER PLAN THAT HAVE SOME SOME NARROWER FRONT YARD SETBACKS. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR LUCAS? YOU MENTIONED OUR APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING. YES. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION. MY NAME IS JOHN ARNOLD. I'M WITH SCHAUBERG COMPANY, 8214 WEST CHESTER STREET, SUITE 900, DALLAS, TEXAS, 75235. I'M JUST GOING TO KIND OF START OFF WITH ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S NOT IN OUR PRESENTATION, BUT SOMEBODY ASKED WHAT THE OFFSET FROM THE BACK OF CURB WAS GOING TO BE. SO IT'S A 50 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY. TYPICAL STREET SECTION IS 31 BACK TO BACK. SO THAT LEAVES NINE FOOT ON THAT SIDE ON EACH SIDE OF THE STREET, LEFT OVER OR NO, SORRY. 31. YEAH, NINE FOOT NINE AND A HALF, NINE, NINE AND A HALF PLUS FIVE. SO 14.5FT CURVE. SO IT WOULD BE NINE AND A HALF PLUS 15 VERSUS NINE AND A HALF PLUS FIVE. IS THAT RIGHT? OKAY. RIGHT VERSUS 20 I GOTCHA. 25 IS VERY TYPICAL WHEN YOU HAVE A 25 FOOT DRIVEWAY, FRONT ENTRY DRIVEWAY, 25 FOOT. BUT A LOT OF THE SMALLER LOT COTTAGE LOT TOWNHOMES, BROWNSTONES UTILIZE NOT HAVING A FRONT ENTRY GARAGE TO BRING THE HOMES IN TO THE STREETSCAPE. SO, YOU KNOW, BASED ON LUCAS'S PRESENTATION, WE'VE TALKED TO STAFF, WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS SINCE MARCH. THIS HASN'T BEEN A DENSITY OR LOT SIZE ISSUE. WE HAVE OUR THREE AND WE HAVE OUR FIVE. WE'RE DEVELOPERS. I'LL TAKE YOU THROUGH A PRESENTATION. BUT WE'VE DONE, YOU KNOW, 5 TO 10 PROJECTS IN MCKINNEY. WE'VE BEEN IN DFW FOR OVER 30 YEARS, DONE OVER 100 PROJECTS. AND WE DO ANYTHING FROM THESE SMALL TRACTS TO LARGE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES. AND WE'RE DOING A LARGE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY WITH THE PD. YOU KNOW, THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT IS SOMETHING THAT GOES INTO THAT PD LIKE CRAIG RANCH LIKE PAINTED TREE. WE HAVE DONE ONE SMALL ONE OFF PROJECT WITH SHORTER SETBACKS IN MCKINNEY ABOUT 7 OR 8 YEARS AGO, BUT USUALLY THIS IS WITHIN A PD. THIS SITE IS RIGHT NEXT TO A MULTIFAMILY SITE, RIGHT? RIGHT NEXT TO SINGLE FAMILY, BUT IT'S OWNED BY A SEPARATE PERSON. IT WASN'T A BIG CONGLOMERATE PD. WE ACTUALLY BUILT ROBINSON RIDGE ACROSS THE STREET. IF WE COULD OWN THIS, [00:20:04] THIS MIGHT HAVE BEEN A PORTION OF THAT THAT WAS MULTIFAMILY AND SOME OF THESE HIGHER DENSITY BROWNSTONE COTTAGE TYPE LOTS. BUT WE'RE NOT REALLY TALKING ABOUT WHAT THE DENSITY IS TONIGHT. IT'S MORE OF A PRODUCT ISSUE. THE 50 FOOT LOTS WILL BE GREAT R5 ZONING. SO I'LL BE THE 20 FOOT SETBACKS. WE'LL GO OVER THE SETBACKS ON THAT IN MY PRESENTATION. THIS IS ABOUT THE R3 ZONING. WE'RE ASKING FOR THREE VARIANCES ON THAT R3 ZONING. IT'S A PRODUCT THAT I'LL TAKE YOU THROUGH THIS, BUT IT'S A PRODUCT THAT WE'VE BEEN DOING WITH OUR PARTNER BUILDER FOR 5 TO 6 YEARS NOW, AND MULTIPLE CITIES REPEATED IN CITIES ASKED FOR IN CITIES. SO THIS IS A PRODUCT. THE MARKET'S ACCEPTED, CITIES HAVE ACCEPTED. IT JUST DOESN'T QUITE FIT THE MOLD OF R3. AND IF WE WERE DOING A BIG MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY, THIS WOULD BE IN A BIG PD AND SHOW THE PRODUCT AND WE'D HAVE WE WOULDN'T HAVE A REALLY BIG PROBLEM WITH THIS, BUT IT'S A ONE OFF PROJECT AND THIS PRODUCT JUST DOESN'T FIT COMPLETELY. WHEN WE STARTED THIS, WE HAD PROBABLY 7 TO 10 VARIANCES. WE'RE DOWN TO THREE AT THIS POINT. SO I'M GONNA TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT OURSELVES. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCT. SO AGAIN, WE'RE SCOREBOARD COMPANY. WE'RE LOCALLY OWNED, PRIVATELY OWNED COMPANY. BEEN IN DFW FOR OVER 40 YEARS NOW. DONE OVER 130 DIFFERENT PROJECTS, 30 DIFFERENT MUNICIPALITIES WERE STRICTLY DFW. WE'VE GOT 19 PLUS ACTIVE PRODUCT PRODUCT PROJECTS AND DEVELOPED ABOUT 7000 LOTS. SO NEAR THIS PROJECT IS PROVIDENCE COVE. WELL, THAT'S NOT THAT NEAR. THIS IS OUR CURRENT PROJECT THAT WE'RE WORKING ON IN MCKINNEY RIGHT NOW. IT'S 50S AND 60S. IT'S ABOUT A 94 LOTS GRAND HOMES AND WINDSOR HOMES, OUR HOME BUILDER, ARE IN THIS PROJECT PRESERVE AT LAKE FOREST. THIS WAS A SMALLER DEAL. WE DID AROUND 2020 18 OR 20 SHOREWOOD TERRACE. THIS WAS A TOWNHOME PROJECT. THIS UTILIZED A SHORTER FRONT YARD SETBACK BECAUSE WE HAD REAR ENTRY LOTS. IT WAS TOWNHOMES AND THIS PRODUCT IS VERY SIMILAR TO A TOWNHOME. IT'S JUST DETACHED, ROBINSON RIDGE, WHICH IS ACTUALLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS PROJECT. WE DEVELOPED THAT IN STARTING IN 2004, AND I THINK WE FINISHED IT IN 20 1617. WELL BEFORE I STARTED WITH THE COMPANY. I ACTUALLY PAVED THAT WHEN I USED TO DO CONSTRUCTION IN 2010, AND THEN I STARTED WORKING FOR SCHAUBERG IN 2012. SO THIS IS OUR PRODUCT. WE'LL GO THROUGH A COUPLE PROJECTS. WE'VE DONE CORINTH, OAK RIDGE PARK. THIS HAD ABOUT 170 OF THOSE LOTS AND 8650S AND 60, 5460 FOOT LOTS. THIS WAS ACTUALLY THE SECOND PROJECT WE DID IN CORINTH. AFTER BEING REQUESTED TO COME BACK AND DO THIS PROJECT PRODUCT FROM A PROJECT WE DID JUST ACROSS THE STREET, WINDSOR HOMES, MERITAGE. MERITAGE IS THE BUILDER ON THE 30S. YOU'LL SEE THIS PRODUCT FROM AND THEN HISTORY MAKER HOMES. THIS IS JUST DELIVERING RIGHT NOW STARTING HOMES. MONOKET MELISSA WE JUST GOT THIS ZONED IN. MELISSA. WE ORIGINALLY HAD THIS, WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS FOR MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOMES WERE ACTUALLY APPROVED ON IT THAT HE CAME BACK AND ACTUALLY ASKED US TO DO THIS 30 FOOT PRODUCT. THEY LIKED THE PRODUCT COUNT. A COUPLE COUNCIL MEMBERS CAME TO US AND SAID, LIKE THAT, LET'S DO THAT HERE INSTEAD OF A TOWNHOME. SO WE'VE REZONED THIS TO THE 30 FOOT PRODUCT, AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH THAT PROJECT. GREAT POINT IN OAK POINT, THIS IS JUST OUTSIDE OF LITTLE ELM. AGAIN, WE'RE DOING THAT PRODUCT, THIS PRODUCT THERE AS WELL, VERY WELL RECEIVED BY COUNCIL AND STAFF. ASHFORD PARK, THIS IS ACTUALLY THE THE FIRST ONE THAT WAS DONE IN CORINTH. YOU'VE GOT ABOUT 208 OF THESE THINGS. AND THEN ACROSS THE STREET, THEY REQUESTED THAT WE DO IT AGAIN. SO WE'LL SHOW YOU SOME OF THAT PRODUCT HERE IN A SECOND. SO AS WE SAID, OUR OUR PROPERTY IS IN THE ETJ JUST NORTH OF US AS FUTURE MULTIFAMILY. THAT WAS JUST ZONED LAST MONTH, MAYBE MAY, APRIL, MAY. WE WOULD BE REQUESTING TO ANNEX THIS PROPERTY THROUGH A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNCIL AND MOVE FORWARD THERE. OUR CONCEPT PLAN, AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S THE IT'S THE 50S AND THE 30 FOOT LOTS. WE'VE GOT ABOUT 78 OF THOSE 30 FOOT LOTS AND 56 OF THE 50 FOOT LOTS. SO WE KIND OF SURROUNDED THE PROJECT WITH THE 50 FOOT LOTS. AS FAR AS THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT WAS MENTIONED EARLIER, WE ARE GIVING HALF THE RIGHT AWAY PLUS AN ADDITIONAL 34. SO BASICALLY ANOTHER HALF OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO AVOID THE [00:25:07] CEMETERY TO THE SOUTH. SO WE'RE NOT GIVING THE FULL RIGHT AWAY, BUT WE'RE GIVING. THREE QUARTERS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY, WHICH PUSHES THIS PROJECT BACK IN A LITTLE BIT AND TIGHTENS THE SITE. SOME LET ME GO. OKAY. SO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AS I SAID, THE YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED ONES ARE THE ONES ON THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WE ARE DEVIATING FROM. AS YOU CAN SEE, WE MEET OR EXCEED ON ALL THE 50 FOOT LOTS. LOT DEPTH IS GOING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 100 FOOT LOT SIZE. ALL OF OUR FIVE MEET THE R5 ZONING STANDARDS ON THE R3. WE'LL BE DOING A DEEPER LOT ON THAT 30 FOOT SIDE YARDS. OUR MINIMUM LOT DEPTH WILL BE 100 FOOT MINIMUM AREAS, 3000 SQUARE FOOT. THE FRONT. WE'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED THE FRONT YARD SETBACK. IT GOES FROM 5 TO 15. REAR SETBACK IS ACTUALLY 20 FROM THE STANDARD BASE ZONING STANDARDS IS TEN. THE TEN ISN'T REALLY POSSIBLE BECAUSE THE DRIVEWAYS REQUIRED IN THE BACK AND WE NEED A 20 FOOT DRIVEWAY. WE REALLY HAVE A 20 FOOT SETBACK ON THE HOUSE NO MATTER WHAT. SO THAT'S ANOTHER REASON THIS KIND OF PUSHES FORWARD AT TEN FOOT FROM THE REAR IS KIND OF PUSHED FORWARD. AND IF WE WANT TO DO THE SAME SIZE HOUSE THAT WE'RE ALLOWED TO, THERE'S ANOTHER REASON TO PUSH TO PUSH THIS FORWARD. EVEN WITH THE STREETSCAPE AND SIDE SET SIDE YARD SETBACKS. WE'VE DISCUSSED THIS WITH STAFF. WE'RE ASKING FOR ZERO SIX INSTEAD OF A FIVE AND FIVE. THESE WILL BE OFFSET. SO ONCE ONE SIDE IS BASICALLY THE PROPERTY LINE THEN ONE SETS SIX FOOT. THIS WE'VE TALKED TO STAFF ABOUT THIS. THIS WASN'T AS BIG OF A HEARTBURN ON THE SIDES SIDE YARD SETBACKS. CORNER YARDS ARE GOING TO MEET 15 AND THE HEIGHTS 35. SO OUR VARIANCE REQUEST AS I SAID THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD IS TYPICALLY FIVE FOOT. AND THE ORDINANCE WE'RE GOING FOR ZERO SIX. WE REQUESTED THE SETBACK. MODIFICATIONS ARE LIMITED TO THE NARROW LOTS. THIS IS KIND OF LIKE A DETACHED TOWNHOME PRODUCT. START SEPARATING THEM OUT. IT TAKES A LOT OF THAT STREETSCAPE AWAY, AND THEY JUST KIND OF LOOK LIKE THEY'RE HANGING OUT THERE ON THEIR OWN. THEY DON'T HAVE THAT FEEL OF A COTTAGE LOTS IN A BROWNSTONE STYLE, AND ALLOW THEM TO ENGAGE WITH THE STREET IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN, WHILE PRESERVING THE ADEQUATE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE STRUCTURES. HVAC UNITS AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT, AND PASSABILITY THROUGH THE SIDES. THIS IS JUST A DIAGRAM OF WHAT WE HAVE. THE REAR BUILDING LINE SIDE SETBACKS IN THE FRONT BUILDING LINE FIVE FOOT. SO THE LANDSCAPING TO CLARIFY OUR REQUEST ON THE LANDSCAPING, A SHADE TREE DOESN'T FIT IN THE FRONT YARD STREETSCAPE. AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE PICTURE ON THESE, MOST OF THESE HOMES WILL HAVE. A PLANTER BED IN FRONT WITH FLOWERS AND BUSHES AND AN ORNAMENTAL TREE. MOST OF THE TIME THESE ARE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA, SO THERE'S NARROWER SPACE UP FRONT, A LITTLE SMALLER AREA TO TO MOW AND THEN MAINTAIN THE PLANT. SO THESE ARE TIGHTENED IN PUTTING PUTTING A SHADE TREE UP THERE WITH A FIVE FOOT SETBACK. THESE TEND TO GROW INTO THE STREET OR THE HOME SO THEY DON'T FIT THERE. SO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO DO IS KEEP AN ORNAMENTAL TREE ALONG THE FRONTAGE. BUT TAKE THE TREES, EVERY TREE THAT WE WOULD HAVE PLANTED FOR THE 30 FOOT LOT AND PUT THOSE EITHER IN A LANDSCAPE BUFFER UP FRONT WHERE THEY CAN BE ADDED, OR IN THE DIFFERENT OPEN SPACES DOWN NEAR THE FLOODPLAIN. SO WE WOULD BE PUTTING THE CANOPY TREES IN 78 OF THOSE. FOR THE 78 LOTS WE HAVE, PLUS THE ORNAMENTAL TREES. SO WE ARE DOUBLING UP ON TREES. THAT'S A LITTLE BETTER EXPLANATION OF WHAT WE'RE DOING THERE. SO SCREENING THE QUESTION WAS ASKED IN THE SCREENING ALONG RIDGE ROAD. WE ARE SUPPORTING DOING A MASONRY WALL WITH TYPICAL LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THE STAFF WAS JUST DISCUSSING A SECOND AGO. WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IS ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN, ACROSS THE STREET, ACROSS THE FUTURE BYPASS, THERE COULD BE COMMERCIAL, BUT WE'VE GOT A MASSIVE FLOODPLAIN AREA THERE THAT WE WANT TO USE. THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF THAT AND HAVE A TUBULAR STEEL FENCE FROM THOSE BACKYARDS INTO THOSE BACKYARDS. SEE THE SEE THE TREES. WE DON'T REALLY THINK THERE'S A NECESSITY TO BLOCK THESE HOMES OFF WITH A BRICK WALL AND THEN HAVE 300 FOOT OF FLOODPLAIN, THEN A FUTURE, THEN THEN COMMERCIAL FOR THAT BUFFER IS THERE'S A NATURAL BUFFER THERE. INSTEAD OF A HAVING A COMMERCIAL USE BEHIND THIS. AND THEN WE PLAN ON BUILDING A SIX FOOT BOARD ON BOARD AND SIX FOOT BOARD ON BOARD TO THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH. ANY [00:30:01] QUESTIONS? SO THIS IS REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCT OF THAT WE PLAN ON DOING. I'LL TAKE YOU THROUGH THOSE. AND THIS IS AN AREA WHERE THIS IS OUR ONE OF OUR CURRENT PROJECTS. THERE'S AN OPEN SPACE WHERE WE PLANTED MORE. THE CANOPY TREES. KIND OF AN EXAMPLE OF THAT STUFF AGAIN. SO I'LL JUST TAKE YOU ALL THROUGH THE HOMES. YOU CAN SEE THE PRODUCT. IF I CAN KEEP MOVING. THERE WE GO. AGAIN, APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. WE'D LOVE TO DO ANOTHER PROJECT IN MCKINNEY. I'D LOVE FOR APPROVAL. WE THINK THIS PRODUCT IS A GREAT PRODUCT. IT'S BEEN PROVEN. I THINK THE CITY WILL BE VERY HAPPY WITH IT. IT OFFERS A, YOU KNOW, ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE. I KNOW HOMES AREN'T CHEAP RIGHT NOW, BUT IT DOES OFFER AN ALTERNATIVE. THAT'S A VERY NICE PRODUCT. IT'S IN THAT 400,000 RANGE THAT PEOPLE CAN AFFORD. AND IT'S A NICE HOME THAT PEOPLE DO. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HERE. COULD YOU GO BACK TO THE TO THE CONCEPT PLAN, PLEASE? YEAH. SO THE THE TREES THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING, THEY WOULD BE DOWN KIND OF IN THAT SOUTHWEST CORNER OR AT MULTIPLE PLACES, I DON'T KNOW. CAN YOU SEE THE POINTER? WELL, I CAN'T ANNOTATE ON THE SCREEN. IF I CAN DO THIS, THAT HELPS. THERE YOU GO. THERE, THERE ALONG THE BUFFER AND THEN ALONG SOME OF THESE AREAS THAT'LL BE ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN. OKAY. SO LIKELY WE'LL DO A TRAIL THROUGH THERE AND ALL THAT. WE HAD A LOT OF THIS KIND OF PD, BUT WE'VE NARROWED DOWN OUR PD OVER CONVERSATIONS, PLAN TO DO TRAILS AND TREES AND ALL THOSE OKAY, THROUGH THAT FLOODPLAIN AREA. GOTCHA. SO THAT'S WHERE THE 78 CANOPY TREE IN THOSE DIFFERENT AREAS. YES. OKAY. AND THEN YOU'D STILL HAVE CANOPY TREES PLANTED ALONG THE 50 FOOT LOTS OR AROUND THE PERIMETER. YEAH. NOTHING. FRONT YARD SETBACK. IT'D JUST BE THE INTERIOR, WHICH WAS ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD, ESSENTIALLY. AND A LOT OF THOSE INSTANCES, EXCEPT THAT ONE MIDDLE ROAD. YEAH, EXCEPT THERE'S ONE STRETCH OF 600 FOOT ROAD THAT WON'T HAVE SHADE TREES, BUT THERE'D BE ORNAMENTAL TREES PLANTED IN THE FRONT YARD IN THAT STRETCH. YEAH. SO WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT REALLY ONE SECTION OF ROAD THAT DOES NOT SHADE TREES. AND SO BASED ON MY NOTES, Y'ALL ARE STILL GOING, Y'ALL ARE GOING ABOVE AND BEYOND THE BASE ZONING FOR THE LOT DEPTH ON, ON BOTH THE 50S AND THE 30S. YES. OKAY. IT JUST STARTS TIGHTENING UP WHEN YOU DON'T REALLY HAVE A REALLY DON'T HAVE A TEN FOOT SETBACK. YEAH. THIS PROJECT PRODUCTS THAT HAVE REAR ENTRY, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A DRIVEWAY, CARS TO PARK AND. TEN FOOT DRIVEWAY CARS IN ALL THE ALLEYS. REAR REAR TEN FOOT. DOESN'T WANT TO HAVE THAT SAME PRODUCT. WE'VE SEEN A LOT OF PRODUCTS THAT FIT THAT MOLD 15 FRONT THAT HAVE TO HAVE A 20 FOOT REAR, AND THOSE BECOME REALLY SMALL, VERY TIGHT HOMES AND THEY DON'T HAVE THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AS IT PERTAINS TO THE THE MODIFICATIONS YOU'RE REQUESTING. HOW MUCH OF THE FACT THAT THIS IS A REALLY SMALL SITE, HOW MUCH OF THAT COMES INTO PLAY? IT COMES INTO PLAY BECAUSE IT DOES GET TIGHTENED UP BY TAKING THE RIGHT OF WAY. AND WE WE DO HAVE BOUNDARIES WITH NORTH AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES, BUT EVEN IN THE PROJECTS THAT WE DID IN BRANT AND DID IN OTHER CITIES, THIS IS THE PRODUCT. THE PRODUCT IS THAT'S THE STYLE UP ON THE STREET WITH THESE PLANTER BEDS AND HAVE THAT FEEL OF A COTTAGE PRODUCT. SO YES, THIS, IT DOESN'T FIT, BUT IT'S THE SAME PRODUCT. WE'RE TRYING TO DO. EACH OF THESE PLACES, EACH OF THESE PLACES HAS A FIVE FOOT FRONT SETBACK. IS EACH ONE OF YOUR COTTAGE STYLE? THEY'RE ALL GOING TO BE TWO STORY, OR DO YOU HAVE SOME THAT ARE THREE STORY IN? OKAY. SO ALL TWO STORY. ALL TWO STORY. OKAY. THE 50 FOOT LOTS WILL BE FRONT ENTRY. YES. THE 50 FOOT LOTS WILL BE FRONT FRONT ENTRY. THAT'S JUST TYPICAL OUR FIVE. SO DO YOU HAVE A PLAN VIEW WHERE WE CAN SEE THE DETAILED LAYOUT FROM WHERE THE WHERE A [00:35:09] INDIVIDUAL BUILDING, HOW IT SITS ON THE LOT WITH THE DIMENSIONS AROUND IT. THAT'S, THAT'S PROBABLY THE BEST I HAVE TODAY. SO YOU CAN SEE IN THE FRONT, THERE'S A FRONT BUILDING LINE FOR THE PROPOSED STREET. THAT STREET'S THE RIGHT OF WAY. THAT'S NOT THE PAVEMENT. SO OKAY, THE PAVEMENT WILL BE WITHIN THAT. SO YOU'D HAVE 31 FOOT STREET, YOU'D HAVE THAT 9.5FT. THEN YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT OF WAY LINE. THEN YOU HAVE FIVE FOOT. AND THAT'S WHERE THE BUILDING STOPS. AND THEN THE GARAGE WOULD BE BASICALLY WHERE THAT MOST, MOST OF THE MOST OF THE PRODUCT, IT'LL BE VERY CLOSE TO THAT REAR BUILDING LINE. SO IT WILL BE A LITTLE SHORTER, SOME WILL BE A LITTLE LONGER, THERE'S DIFFERENT AND THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT WON'T OCCUPY THAT ENTIRE BOX BECAUSE THERE'LL BE SOME ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AND AREAS WHERE. BUT GENERALLY WE SEE FROM THE PROJECT THAT THAT ACTUALLY THE FRONT PORCH IS AT THE FIVE FOOT AND THEN THE HOUSE IS ACTUALLY FURTHER BACK BEHIND THAT. SO MOST OF THESE HAVE THAT PORCH. YOU KNOW, THE FIRST HOUSE HAS A PORCH, AND THEN THE HOUSE STARTS MAYBE NINE, NINE FEET BACK OR 9.5FT BACK. THEN THE SECOND ONE HAS THE HOUSE UP FRONT ON THE FIVE FOOT, BUT THEN THE PORCH SET BACK. SO IT DOESN'T WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE COOKIE CUTTER. WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A BOX. YEAH, I'VE SEEN A LOT OF THAT OUT IN THE ETJ, ESPECIALLY IN THIS AREA WHERE IT'S JUST, LET'S FIT THIS EXACTLY ON THE BOX. THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO GET. YEAH. AND SIMILAR TO YOUR IMAGE, WHERE YOU HAVE THE STEPS UP TO THE FRONT PORCH ON ONE WITH THE PATIO, AND THEN ON THE NEXT ONE, THE DOOR IS THERE WITH THE PLANTER BED KIND OF MIRRORING. AND WHAT IT DOES IS GIVES YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFERENTIATION THAN A TOWNHOME OR BROWNSTONE WHERE YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT AND IT'S JUST A BOX OF, YOU KNOW, FIVE HOMES PUT TOGETHER THAT DOESN'T HAVE THAT. IT'S HARD. IT'S, WE'VE DONE ENOUGH TOWNHOMES IN THE PAST TO KNOW HOW HARD IT IS TO PUT A LOT OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES ON FIVE UNIT, SIX UNIT BUILDING. THIS SEPARATES THOSE. AND EVERY HOUSE IS DIFFERENT DRIVING DOWN THE STREET AND YOU GET THAT KIND OF. YOU GET A REALLY NICE FEEL ON IT. I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, SIR. CAN YOU TALK ABOUT PARKING? IS THERE ONE GARAGE PER UNIT OR TWO ON ANY CARS AND THEN A 20 FOOT DRIVEWAY? EVEN THOUGH OUR THREES. YES. FULL SIZE GARAGE. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS FOR THOSE SETBACKS. BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE SETBACKS, RIGHT THE WAY THEY ARE RIGHT NOW, WE'D BE AT 20 FOOT AND YOU CAN'T HAVE A FULL DRIVE. SO THIS GIVES YOU THAT 24 FOOT PRODUCT AND IT GIVES YOU A FULL DROP. THANKS TO APPRECIATE IT. SO ON THIS PROJECT, THE UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE GOING TO BE IN THE REAR. USUALLY THE ELECTRIC AND GAS IS IN THE REAR. OKAY. MOST OF THESE. BUT THIS HAVING FRONT ENTRY FACING IT, MOST OF THE WATER AND SEWER WILL BE IN THE FRONT IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. BUT LIKE ELECTRIC AND CABLE AND GAS WILL BE IN TYPICALLY IN THE REAR ON THAT PROJECT. OKAY. THANK YOU. REALLY, THE ONLY YARD AREA IS GOING TO BE ALONG THE SIDE. IS THAT. YES. AND THAT'S THE SAME THING WITH MOST OF THESE TOWNHOMES. YOUR BACKYARD IS NOT A YARD BECAUSE YOU HAVE A DRIVEWAY. YOU HAVE A 20 FOOT FOOT PRODUCT AND A 20 FOOT DRIVEWAY. SO THERE'S REALLY NOT MUCH OF A YARD IN THE BACK AND IN THE FRONT. IF YOU DO A 15 FOOT FRONT, PUT A TREE IN IT, YOU REALLY HAVE THAT MUCH ROOM TO RUN AND PLAY EITHER. AND THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THIS ISN'T GOING TO LEAVE YOU A, IF YOU HAD 15 FOOT, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE LIKE I CAN PLAY ACROSS MY NEIGHBOR'S YARD ON THEIR YARD TOO, BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO BE STAIR STEPPING DOWN AS WE GO WEST TOWARDS THE FLOODPLAIN. SO YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE WALLS AND STUFF LIKE THAT. SO YOU'D BE JUMPING DOWN FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE. YOU CAN'T, YOU KNOW, MY KIDS PLAY ON OUR YARD AND THE NEIGHBOR'S YARD AND MAKE IT A FOOTBALL FIELD. WE CAN'T DO THAT HERE. YEAH. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? SORRY, SORRY. I WAS JUST SAYING, MOST OF THE PEOPLE BUYING THIS HOUSE AREN'T LOOKING FOR A YARD TO MOW OR MAINTENANCE OR OF ANY SORT. AND TYPICALLY WE'LL HAVE THE 30 FOOT WILL BE ACTUALLY SO MUCH, SO LITTLE TO MAINTAIN. AND YOU WANT THEM TO BE KEPT UP. THOSE ARE MAINTAINED BY THE. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MR. ARNOLD? THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING IS THERE ARE NONE. COMMISSIONERS. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM MODIFICATION. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO [00:40:02] CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM WITH MODIFICATIONS. IS THAT WITH MODIFICATIONS? MODIFICATIONS, THE MODIFICATIONS REQUESTED IN THE ZONING CASE, I STAFF MODIFICATIONS WOULD BE IF Y'ALL WERE GOING TO BE REQUESTING CHANGES. SO IT WOULD JUST BE THE PD AS PRESENTED. YES. OKAY. SO MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED. I'LL SECOND IT. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEBO. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. AND THIS MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0. AND THIS WILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION. IT'LL GO TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JULY 21ST, 2026 [26-0030Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “AG” - Agricultural District to “C2” - Local Commercial District, Located at 8301 W University Dr] MEETING. OKAY. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 26-0030Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO C2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 8301 WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE. GOOD EVENING. SORRY. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION EMILY BELL, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. TONIGHT YOU ARE. THERE IS A PROPOSED REZONING ON THIS PROPERTY AT 8301 WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE. REZONING IT FROM AGRICULTURAL TO C2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS JUST TO ALLOW FOR MORE COMMERCIAL USES HERE. AND THAT'S THE REASON FOR THE REZONE. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL CENTER PLACE. TYPE ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH A KEY GOAL OF ALLOWING FOR MORE COMMERCIAL AMENITIES. PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ANCHORING THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST AND THE WEST ARE TWO PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, WITH THE WESTERN PLAN DEVELOPMENT BEING THE WEST GROVE DEVELOPMENT, THE BASE ZONING OF C3 TO ALLOW FOR RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES. HERE AND TO THE EAST IS THE STONEBRIDGE RANCH PD, WHICH THIS PROPERTY PORTION IS ALLOWING FOR THE LAKE. LASEMA HOA AMENITY CENTER STAFF FINDS THIS PROPERTY IN CONFORMANCE WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AN EXTENSION OF THE COMMERCIAL USES ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF US 380 AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. MISS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR EMILY? SO THE ZONING THAT'S BEING REQUESTED, IS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE TWO PD S TO THE IMMEDIATE WEST TO THE IMMEDIATE WEST? THIS IS JUST AN HOA LAKE. AND SO CURRENTLY THIS IS JUST TO CONTINUE TOWARDS THE EAST ACTUALLY, AND ALSO TO THE NORTHEAST AS WELL, WHICH IS THE TO THE WEST IS THE WEST TO THE WEST. OH, I APOLOGIZE, THE WEST IS WEST GROVE AND THIS IS A COMMERCIAL PD AND SO YES, IT IS CONTINGENT OR CONTINUOUS WITH THAT. BUT AND THE, THE, THE STANDARDS WOULD BE CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE PD AND THE COMMERCIAL ZONING THAT'S BEING REQUESTED. ARE THEY SIMILAR? YES. THE REASON WHY IT'S ZONED OR REQUESTING TO REZONE TO C2 HERE IS JUST BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY AT 1.04 ACRES. THAT'S THE REASON WHY WE'RE NOT DOING A C3 HERE AS WELL. SO IT'LL BE CONSISTENT WITH IT FOR THE MOST PART. WELL, ACCESS TO THIS AREA JUST CONTINUE TO BE OFF OF UNIVERSITY. OR WILL IT HAVE ACCESS TO WEST GROVE ON THE WEST SIDE AS WELL? I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT WHEN IT COMES TO THE ACCESS QUESTIONS ON THAT PORTION. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. APPLICANT IS HERE. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS ALEX SIR. I'M WITH ANA CONSULTANTS, 5000 THOMPSON TERRACE, COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034. I'M THE ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ON THE PROJECT. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. REAL QUICK, I'LL ANSWER THE QUESTION THAT WAS JUST ASKED ABOUT THE ACCESS. SO WE WILL HAVE ACCESS FROM UNIVERSITY, BUT ALSO A FIRE LANE IS REQUIRED CONNECTING TO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST. THAT WAS ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WAS BROUGHT UP DURING THE PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING THAT WE HAD. THANK YOU. SO WHAT'S YOUR [00:45:03] OVERALL VISION FOR THIS? BECAUSE YOU'RE IT'S IT'S A REALLY TIGHT SPACE. I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING'S WRONG WITH, WITH THE REQUEST OR ANYTHING. I'M JUST CURIOUS MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE. SO THE OWNER IS LOOKING TO DEVELOP THIS AS A RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. SO WHAT THIS WOULD LOOK LIKE VISUALLY BASICALLY IS WE'LL HAVE A BUILDING KIND OF TOP RIGHT ON THE SITE HERE. IT'S A SMALL SITE. SO BUILDING, MEETING ALL THE C2 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ZONING FIRE LANE NEXT TO THE BUILDING AND THEN PARKING BEHIND THE BUILDING WITH FIRE LANE CONTINUING TO THE TO THE WEST TO PROVIDE FIRE ACCESS BOTH FROM THE WEST DEVELOPMENT AND UNIVERSITY. OKAY, SO, SO BASICALLY YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THE, THE STRUCTURE ITSELF, TOP RIGHT COMING DOWN AND THEN BEHIND THE BUILDING LINE. YES. AND THEN ALL THE, THE PARKING WILL BE IN THE REAR. YES. WE'RE KIND OF LIMITED IN SPACE. SO KIND OF THE RIGHT SIDE IS TAKEN UP BY THE BUILDING, THE LEFT SIDE BY THE FIRE, I GET IT. SO YOU'RE COUNTING ON CROSS ACCESS WITH THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST? YES. I BELIEVE THEY HAVE A REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE AN ACCESS. THAT'S OUR UNDERSTANDING. WHAT TYPE OF RETAIL ARE THEY PROPOSING? DO YOU KNOW WE WE DON'T KNOW AT THIS MOMENT. THAT'S SOMETHING HOPEFULLY ONCE WE WORK THROUGH THE SITE PLAN, IF ZONING IS ACCEPTED, WE WILL HAVE A BETTER IDEA. WE'LL WORK WITH CITY STAFF ON SITE PLAN. FORGIVE ME FOR MY IGNORANCE. IF IF YOU DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER, THAT'S PERFECTLY FINE. BUT WHAT? WHAT IS BEING DEVELOPED ADJACENT? I BELIEVE IT'S A CHEWY'S. I WAS THINKING THAT'S WHERE THE CHEWY'S IS. WHAT DID YOU SAY? IT'S WHAT CHEWY'S. SO THAT'D BE CORRECT. THE CHEWY'S IS GOING TO BE DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF THIS. OKAY. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MR. SIR? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING AS OR NONE COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? YEAH, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM? SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JULY 21ST, 2026 MEETING. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM 26-0041Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC [26-0041Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “ML” - Light Manufacturing District to “I2” - Heavy Manufacturing District, Located 1710 Couch Drive] HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM ML LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT TO I-2 HEAVY MANUFACTURING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 1710 COUCH DRIVE. MR. REYNOLDS, THANK YOU AND GOOD EVENING AGAIN. COMMISSION DESTINY REYNOLDS, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY FILLING IN FOR ARI ON THIS ITEM. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS A PROPOSED REZONE REQUEST FROM ML LIGHT MANUFACTURING TO I-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW FOR PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING MANUFACTURING OPERATION TO OCCUR OUTSIDE OF THE CURRENT BUILDING. THE SITE PRESENTLY OPERATES AS AN INDOOR MANUFACTURING FACILITY AND IS SEEKING TO EXPAND ITS OPERATIONS TO INCLUDE THE OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND CERTAIN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES. TO ACCOMMODATE THESE ACTIVITIES, THE PROPERTY REQUIRES REZONE FROM I TO. AS THE CURRENT AND ML LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONING DISTRICT DOES NOT PERMIT THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIAL AREA AND IS SURROUNDED BY COMPATIBLE INDUSTRIAL LAND USES. STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED EXPANSION IS LIMITED IN SCOPE, ALIGNS WITH THE EXISTING CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, AND IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MISS REYNOLDS. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT OUTDOOR ACTIVITY IS GOING TO BE? I BELIEVE THEY ARE WANTING TO DO STORAGE OF SOME PELLETS, BUT I WILL DEFER TO [00:50:03] THE APPLICANT FOR THE FULL SCOPE OF THEIR OPERATIONS. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? OKAY. SO OUR APPLICANT IS HERE. YES THEY ARE. THANK YOU. JARRETT TUCKER REPRESENTING THE PLANT MANAGER, THE MANUFACTURING FACILITY HERE IN MCKINNEY AT 1710 COUCH DRIVE. WE WERE PROPOSING THE REZONING. THE QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED IS, RIGHT NOW WE ARE FULLY INDOORS. AS WAS SAID EARLIER, ALL OF OUR MATERIAL COMES IN TO OUR LOADING DOCKS AND IS TRUCK THROUGH OUR FACILITY TO GET MATERIAL BACK TO WHERE THE MANUFACTURING ACTUALLY HAPPENS. WE ARE PROPOSING INSTALLING SILOS NEXT TO OUR FACILITY TO STORE THE RESIN, THE PLASTIC PELLET RESIN THAT'S USED IN OUR MANUFACTURING OPERATION WHILE WHILE IT'S BEING USED. SO BASICALLY IT'S BEING STORED IN SILOS AND TRANSFERRED INTO THE BUILDING, INTO OUR MACHINES AS IT'S BEING. I SEE, OKAY, HOW BIG A SILOS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT LIKE THESE OUT HERE, TWO STORY. THEY ARE THE HEIGHT OF THEM ARE A 30 FOOT, 30 FOOT TALL. AND IT'S BASICALLY A LEVEL WITH THE TOP OF OUR BUILDING. OKAY. AND SO Y'ALL ARE A REAL MANUFACTURER. YES. WE MANUFACTURE WOOD AND PLASTIC INJECTION MOLDED PLASTIC REELS FOR THE WIRE AND CABLE INDUSTRY. SO WE HAVE A FACILITY HERE IN MCKINNEY. WE HAVE ONE UP IN BONHAM, TEXAS. AND THEN ALL OF THE INTERESTING. TO KNOW TRUE MANUFACTURING GOING ON OUTSIDE IS JUST THE STORAGE OF THE PELLETS AND THEN THE TRANSFER. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MR. TUCKER? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING IS THERE ARE NONE. I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM BEFORE US. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WHATLEY TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY, 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JULY 21ST, 2026 [26-0058Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property to “R12” - Residential District, Located at 4905 County Road 317] MEETING. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA. ITEM 26-0058Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO R 12 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 4905 COUNTY ROAD. 317 MR. BENNETT ALL RIGHT. YEP. THANK YOU AGAIN, MADAM CHAIR. JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 57 ACRES OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR OF MCKINNEY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMP PLAN, DESIGNATION OF A STATE RESIDENTIAL AND TWO OTHER TRACKS ARE CURRENTLY ZONED R 12 WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED ZONING OF R 12 SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ZONING. IN ADDITION TO THE ZONING, THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO REQUESTED ANNEXATION, WHICH WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE JULY 21ST MEETING. WITH THAT, I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU JAKE. ANY QUESTIONS? OUR APPLICANT, UNSURE IF THE. EVENING. TRISTAN. POOR. I'M WITH SPIRES ENGINEERING. I'M AT 109 PARK CIRCLE MCKINNEY, TEXAS. AND YEAH, I'M THE ENGINEER REPRESENTING THE PROJECT. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COMMISSION HAS. WE RECENTLY ZONED THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH R 12, AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING REALLY CLOSELY WITH THE LOCKE RANCH DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST. THAT'S THE SAME ZONING HERE. SO BUT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COMMISSION HAS. Y'ALL ARE GOING TO DEVELOP THE THE ONE THAT'S TO THE NORTH AND WEST ALONG WITH THIS ONE. YEAH. THE ONE TO THE WEST IS ALREADY UNDER DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE NOT DEVELOPING THAT ONE. WE'VE BEEN WORKING VERY CLOSELY WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT TEAM ON THE ENGINEERING ITEMS, THE STUBS BETWEEN THE TWO DEVELOPMENTS, THE ONE TO THE NORTH, WE WE JUST ZONED IT WAS AN INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL AND R 12 PROPERTY [00:55:06] THAT WE ZONED MAYBE TWO MONTHS AGO. OKAY. YOU ALL OWN THE 2C2S AS WELL OR IS IT OWNED BY SOMEBODY DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT GROUP. BUT YEAH, THEY STILL HAVE OWNERSHIP OF THOSE TWO. AND IT'S HARD TO SEE ON THIS MAP, BUT THERE'S A FUTURE THOROUGHFARE THAT COMES UP BETWEEN THE R 12 AND THE C TWO DIRECTLY NORTH OF US. SO WE'LL ACTUALLY BE DEDICATING THAT 124 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY, AND THEN BUILDING TWO LANES OF THAT ROAD TODAY THAT COME DOWN TO CONNECT TO COUNTY ROAD. 317 OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. PACING. IS THERE NONE? COMMISSIONERS. DO WE HAVE. A MOTION? I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. DO WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM? SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONRAD. KILEY. CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY 7 TO 0, AND IT WILL ALSO BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AT THE JULY 21ST, 2026 MEETING. AT THIS TIME, WE WILL MOVE TO ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA. OKAY. DOES COMMISSION AND OR STAFF HAVE ANY COMMENTS? DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? MOTION TO ADJOURN. COMMISSIONER. BÜTTNER. MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LEBO. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTES. THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION. OKAY, THAT IS * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.