[CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:29] COMMISSION. NOW, IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK REGARDING ANY ITEM, KINDLY COMPLETE A SPEAKER CARD. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE, THERE ARE SOME RIGHT OUT IN THE LOBBY. AND WHEN YOU APPROACH, KINDLY TURN YOUR CARD INTO A CITY STAFF MEMBER PRIOR TO THE AGENDA ITEM BEING CALLED. WHEN IT IS YOUR TURN TO SPEAK, WE KINDLY ASK THAT YOU LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES. AND THE COMMISSIONERS ALSO ASK THAT YOU FOCUS ON THE ISSUE, THAT YOU TREAT EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT AND THAT YOU'RE CONCISE IN YOUR COMMENTS. WE DO WANT TO ASK, WE DO WANT TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS OF MCKINNEY. AND YOUR COMMENTS DO BECOME PART OF THE CITY'S PUBLIC RECORD. WHEN YOU DO APPROACH TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM, YOU WILL ALSO ASK THAT YOU LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES, AND YOU CAN ONLY SPEAK ONCE ON ANY AGENDA ITEM. SO AT THIS TIME, WE WILL MOVE TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENT. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THE NON PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS? OKAY. MOVING ON. WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE [CONSENT ITEMS] CONSENT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. SO WE HAVE ITEM 26-0756 WHICH IS MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 28TH, 2026. DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT ITEMS? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED I SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KASIM. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY, I. YOU DO LOVE IS DOING SOMETHING. IF YOU'LL DO A MANUAL VOTE AND THEN I'LL GET YOU LOGGED IN. OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK, A FIRST WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KASIM. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THIS MOTION, KINDLY RAISE YOUR HANDS AND SAY I. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. 7 TO 0. [26-0023SP Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Design Exception to a Site Plan for Traditional Multi-Family Residential (Franklin Branch Apartments), Located at the Southwest Corner of Farm to Market Road 1461 and Baxter Well Road] WE'LL NOW MOVE TO THE REGULAR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. ARE YOU WAITING ON ME? YOU FIRST. I GOT RECUSED FROM THE FIRST AND THIRD. OKAY, SO JUST NOTING THAT COMMISSIONER TIM MCWILLIAMS IS RECUSING HIMSELF FROM ITEM 26-0023SP. THAT ITEM IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A DESIGN EXCEPTION TO A SITE PLAN FOR TRADITIONAL MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL FRANKLIN BRANCH APARTMENTS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FARM TO MARKET ROAD 1461 AND BAXTER WELL ROAD, MISS BELL. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. EMILY BELL, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS A DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUEST LOCATED AT FM 1461 AND BAXTER ROAD. FOR YOUR ADDITIONAL REFERENCE. THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY ZONED AND ANNEXED EARLIER THIS YEAR. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS MF36 AND THIS IS GOING TO BE A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT HERE. TYPICALLY SITE PLANS ARE APPROVED AT THE STAFF LEVEL. HOWEVER, WHENEVER THERE IS A DESIGN EXCEPTION, SPECIFICALLY IN THIS CASE, A DESIGN EXCEPTION TO SECTION 206 C THREE. REGARDING SCREENING, IT IS REQUIRED TO BE HEARD AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO DO A DESIGN EXCEPTION ALONG THIS LINE. PROPERTY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERN PORTION LOCATED HERE ON YOUR SCREENS IN GREEN. REQUESTING TO DO NO SCREENING HERE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ALSO ENCUMBERED IN FLOODPLAIN AS WELL. LOCATED IN BLUE, SHOWN IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION AND ON THE NORTHERN PORTION. BECAUSE OF THE FLOODPLAIN, THE APPLICANT IS ALSO RECEIVED A STAFF LEVEL EXCEPTION BASED ON [00:05:03] SECTION 206 THREE. DISCUSSING FLOODPLAIN DESIGNATIONS WITH NATURAL SCREENING. SO THE APPLICANT IS NOT ABLE TO DO SCREENING HERE, BUT THEY ARE DOING TRADITIONAL MASONRY SIX FOOT TALL ALONG THE REST OF THE PROPERTY. BASED ON THE NATURAL SCREENING, IN ADDITION TO THE FLOODPLAIN AND THE EXTENSION OF IT JUST BEING 20 TO 30FT OF DEVIATION, THE APPLICANT IS NOT INTENDING TO HARM ANY OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES AND AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MISS BELL. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? THE I WAS READING IN THE NOTES THAT THEY WERE CONNECTING PART OF THE SCREEN OR THE FENCE TO THE BUILDING. IS THAT IS THAT GOING TO BE? CAN YOU SHOW ME ON THE MAP WHERE THAT'S GOING TO BE? I WASN'T QUITE SURE, OF COURSE. SO LET ME. SEE ON THIS. BUT IT IS LOCATED IN THE LIGHT BLUE RIGHT HERE. SO THE YELLOW SECTION IS ABOUT 20 TO 30FT OFF THE FLOODPLAIN. IF IT WAS IN THE FLOODPLAIN, IT WOULD BE HEARD ONLY AT THE STAFF LEVEL AND BE APPROVED. BASED ON THAT, IT IS NEEDING TO BE HEARD HERE. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? IS THE APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING? YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS NICK WALSH WITH THE NRP GROUP. WE ARE HERE FOR THIS DESIGN EXCEPTION. AND THANK YOU TO EMILY FOR YOUR HARD WORK ON THIS. AS SHE MENTIONED, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS REQUIRED TO SCREEN WITH A SOLID MASONRY SCREENING DEVICE ALONG ALL OF THE REAR AND SIDE PROPERTY LINES, AND THAT IS NORMAL PROCEDURE HERE. THE ONLY REASON THAT WE ARE IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT IS BECAUSE A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO THE FLOODPLAIN, AND THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT'S ADJACENT TO THE FLOODPLAIN, IT THE LINE OF THE FLOODPLAIN MEANDERS ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE. AND SO THERE'S APPROXIMATELY THIS 165 FOOT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY LINE HERE WHERE THE FLOOD ACTUALLY MEANDERS. AND SO YOU CAN SEE IT THERE IN RED. SO THE FLOODPLAIN IS 25FT AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. SO THE ONLY THING YOU ARE APPROVING IS THE RED PORTION. SO WE CAN'T PUT A WALL THERE FROM A CONSTRUCTABILITY STANDPOINT. OH, I BROKE IT. OKAY, THAT DOESN'T WORK. THAT'S OKAY. THERE'S A SLIDE THERE THAT SHOWS THE IF YOU GO DOWN FOR ME, THERE'S A SLIDE HERE. YOU CAN SEE THOSE ARE THE GRADES AT THE AT THE BUILDING THAT GO INTO THE FLOODPLAIN. SO YOU CAN'T IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO PUT A WALL THERE. AND THEN IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, AND I'M HAPPY TO SHOW YOU THIS BECAUSE IN 100 DEGREE HEAT, I DID GO OUT ONTO THIS SITE AND DID TAKE PICTURES FOR YOU TO SEE. THERE'S MORE THAN SUFFICIENT SCREENING FROM THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY IN TERMS OF THE NATURAL SCREENING ALONG THAT CREEK. AND PUTTING A SIX FOOT WALL HERE AGAINST THOSE TREES WILL NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE. IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT ONE. THIS IS WHEN YOU ACTUALLY GO OVER THE PROPERTY LINE DOWN INTO THE CREEK AREA, AND YOU STILL CAN'T EVEN SEE THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. AND LAST THING I'LL LEAVE YOU WITH IS THAT NEIGHBORING PROPERTY IS NOT IN THE CITY, AND THEY HAVE DE-ANNEXED FROM THE CITY'S ETJ, SO THEY WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU ALL. AND IT'S A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, SO THEY DON'T CARE IF THEY SEE US, FRANKLY. SO I WILL I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. BUT AGAIN, YOU'RE JUST APPROVING THAT 165 FOOT PORTION OF THE SITE PLAN. MR. WALSH, COULD YOU STATE YOUR ADDRESS FOR US FOR THE RECORD? SURE. I'LL SUBMIT A CARD. YEAH, OKAY, I'LL GO AHEAD. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. WALSH? SO THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY, EXCEPT FOR THIS LINE THAT'S RIGHT THERE, I GUESS ON THE EASTERN BOUNDARY WILL HAVE THE TRADITIONAL SCREENING. IT'S JUST THIS AREA RIGHT THERE ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN. YEAH. WHERE THERE'S THE FLOODPLAIN. YOU CAN'T PUT THE FENCE IN THAT. THE CITY WOULDN'T WANT THAT. WE WOULDN'T WANT TO TRY TO DO THAT EITHER. IT'S EVERYWHERE ELSE THAT'S GOING TO HAVE THAT SOLID MASONRY ALONG THE SIDE AND REAR LINES. AND THEN THE DECORATIVE FENCE WITH THE MASONRY ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAYS. OKAY. AND THE ADJACENT LANDOWNER TO THE EAST, THAT'S IN THE ETJ THERE A STORAGE FACILITY, IS THAT RIGHT? SO THE, THE LANDOWNER, IF YOU GO UP ACTUALLY, IF YOU DON'T MIND FOR ME, PLEASE. SO THE LANDOWNER, IF TO DO. OKAY. RIGHT THERE THEY THAT'S A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. THEY'VE ACTUALLY DE-ANNEXED FROM THE ETJ. SO THEY'LL NEVER BE BROUGHT INTO THE CITY AS THEIR PLAN. BUT THEY ARE. THEY BUILD SOLAR PANELS AND BATTERIES THERE. SO IT'S JUST A COMMERCIAL KIND OF FACILITY. OKAY. I WAS WONDERING IF THEY EVER DID COME IN AND CLEAR OUT. THEN YOU'D HAVE A CLEAR SIGHT [00:10:06] LINE ALL THE WAY TO ALMOST. YEAH. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY IF THEY WANTED TO COME IN AND CLEAR OUT ALL THOSE TREES, YOU CAN'T GET RID OF THE CREEK. RIGHT? SO IT WOULDN'T MAKE ANY SENSE. IT'S NOT GOING TO GET THEM ANYTHING. SO IN TERMS OF THINKING JUST FUTURE PROOFING, YOU KNOW, IF SOMETHING WERE TO CHANGE, YOU STILL WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO GET RID OF THAT CREEK. YEAH. AND THAT'S WHAT THAT GREEN LINE IS. BY THE WAY, THAT IS THE CREEK THAT RUNS THROUGH THERE. THAT IS FRANKLIN BRANCH. YEP. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS ITEM, KINDLY APPROACH. CASING IS THERE NONE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE ITEM SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTE. I KNOW WE'RE STILL DOING. I DON'T KNOW MINE. IT'S MINE. MINE'S A PROBLEM. NO. OKAY, SO WE'LL DO THAT MANUALLY AGAIN IF EVERYONE CAN RAISE THEIR HAND. I, I AND THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY SEVEN, 6 TO 0. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM, WE'RE BACK. ITEM 26-0013SUP. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, [26-0013SUP Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Specific Use Permit Request for Passenger Vehicle Fuel Sales (Wildwood Marketplace), Located on the South Side of Future Laud Howell Parkway and Approximately 700 Feet West of County Road 201] ACT ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A PASSENGER VEHICLE FUEL SALES. WILDWOOD MARKETPLACE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE, A FUTURE LORD HOWELL PARKWAY AND APPROXIMATELY 700FT WEST OF COUNTY ROAD. 201 MR. BENNETT, GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION JAKE BENNETT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF MCKINNEY. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A GAS STATION WITHIN THE PROPOSED WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT. AND CEP IS REQUIRED PER THE P D FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. WHILE PROPERTY WHILE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH AND EAST IS ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES, THERE IS FLOODPLAIN THAT IS EXISTING. THAT KIND OF WRAPS AROUND THE SOUTH AND EAST EDGES OF EDGES OF THIS PROPERTY. THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS BEYOND 250FT FROM THE PROPOSED FUEL PUMPS, AND THERE'S ALSO AN ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY THAT'S LOCATED IN BETWEEN THE TWO USES. NO DESIGN EXCEPTIONS ARE BEING REQUESTED TO DEVIATE FROM THE TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. WHERE IS THE FLOODPLAIN THAT YOU WERE JUST MENTIONING? YEAH, I'LL KIND OF DRAW IT ON HERE. SO IT KIND OF WRAPS AROUND SOMEWHAT LIKE THAT. SO AND THIS IS THE PROPERTY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY I BELIEVE CURRENTLY IS IN WITH THE WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN. BUT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO RECLAIM PORTIONS OF IT FOR THIS COMMERCIAL SITE. OKAY. SO I'LL GO THROUGH THEM. YEAH, THEY'LL GO THROUGH THAT WHOLE PROCESS. IT'LL BE REVIEWED BY OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MR. BENNETT? IS THE APPLICANT HERE THIS EVENING? YES, MA'AM. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION. MY NAME IS SHANE SEABOLT. I'M THE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER FOR REPUBLIC PROPERTY GROUP. WE ARE PARTNERED WITH THE LANDOWNER ON THIS PROJECT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP IN THE PRESENTATION. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. STATE YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE. YES. 400 SOUTH RECORD STREET, SUITE 1200, DALLAS, TEXAS. THANK YOU. HAVE Y'ALL STARTED THE PROCESS WITH FEMA YET OR WAITING? YES, MA'AM. WE'VE WE'VE SUBMITTED OUR FLOODPLAIN STUDY, OUR FLOOD STUDY TO THE CITY, WHICH HAS BEEN APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEERING. WE'VE ALSO SUBMITTED TO FEMA AND RECEIVED OUR APPROVAL IN THE SUMMER AS WELL. OKAY. THANK YOU. YEP. COLOR ON TOP OF IT. YES, MA'AM. WE'RE WE WE ARE LOOKING TO RECLAIM THE FLOODPLAIN THAT THIS SITE CURRENTLY SITS ON, AS WELL AS TO THE SOUTH HERE AS WELL. SO WE'LL BE COMMERCIAL THERE, SHOWN ON THE WEST AND COMMERCIAL SOUTH OF THIS PROPOSED MARKET AS WELL. OKAY. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? THANK YOU. MR. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. [00:15:02] SEEING IS THERE ARE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS SNP. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION BY VICE COMMISSIONER BUETTNER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE MOTION A SECOND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, KINDLY RAISE IS ALL. WE'RE WORKING NOW. WE'RE WORKING. WE'RE ALL GOOD NOW. ALL RIGHTY. TECHNOLOGY, TECHNOLOGY, I TELL YOU, FINALLY CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY? AND THAT MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. 7 TO 0. OKAY. MR. MCWILLIAMS, COMMISSIONER MCWILLIAMS IS [26-0074Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Zone the Subject Property from to “MF36” - Multi-Family Residential District, Located on the South Side of Baxter Well Road and Approximately 1,200 Feet West of FM 1461] GOING TO BE RECUSING HIMSELF FROM THIS ITEM. ITEM 26-0074Z. THIS IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO ZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM. 2MF36 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BAXTER WELL ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1200FT WEST OF FM 1461. MR. BENNETT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU AGAIN. THIS IS A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY ZONING LOCATED ON ALONG BAXTER WELL ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED OFF OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTIONS OF THE 380 BYPASS AND FUTURE LAKE FOREST. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE ON THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ZONING SHOULD HELP ESTABLISH RESIDENTIAL USES TO SUPPORT CURRENT AND FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. ALONG THE 380 BYPASS CORRIDOR AND SURROUNDING ARTERIALS, WHILE OFFERING A TRANSITION FROM INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES TO POTENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH AND WEST. AS AN FYI, THIS CASE WILL BE COUPLED WITH AN ANNEXATION WHEN IT IS FORWARDED FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR. BENNETT. IS THIS GOING TO BE A CONTINUATION OF THE ONE THERE TO THE IMMEDIATE EAST THAT WE JUST I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT ON THAT AND WHAT THEIR INTENT IS. SO. YEAH. AND WHERE IS THE 380 BYPASS COMING THROUGH HERE? YEAH. SO IT'S GOING TO BE TO THE SOUTH. SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE IT. I'LL DRAW IT IN HERE. BUT IT'S THAT SILVERISH GRAY THAT'S TO THE SOUTH OF THE PIN THERE. OKAY. GOTCHA. RIGHT IN. YEAH. OKAY. AND THEN THIS IS LAKE FOREST RIGHT THERE. RIGHT. I WAS THINKING IT WAS A LITTLE BIT FARTHER SOUTH OF THE OF WHERE THIS IS, BUT IT'S IN CLOSE PROXIMITY. YEAH. THAT'S RIGHT. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MR. BENNETT. IS OUR APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT JAKE? I BELIEVE SO, YES. HELLO, EVERYONE. IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. MY NAME IS CAITLIN ROGERS AND I'M WITH NEXUS DEVELOPMENT. I AM THE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER AND PART OWNER. AND THIS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT THAT WE ARE LOOKING TO HAVE NOT ONLY ANNEXED BUT PROVIDE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING AS WELL. OKAY. AND I AM LOOKING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. AND AGAIN, WE'RE LOOKING TO PARTNER WITH THE COMMUNITY AND ADD VALUE TO THE COMMUNITY AS WELL. MISS ROGERS, CAN YOU STATE YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE, FOR THE. ABSOLUTELY. IT'S FIVE ADDRESS. ABSOLUTELY. IT'S 5235 BAXTER ROAD, MCKINNEY, TEXAS. THANK YOU. ABSOLUTELY. ARE Y'ALL ARE Y'ALL DOING THIS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE APARTMENTS JUST TO THE EAST, OR IS IT A DIFFERENT PROJECT? IT IS A SEPARATE PROJECT. HOWEVER, WE ARE PARTNERED IN MEMBERSHIP TO WORK TOGETHER TO PROVIDE HOUSING. THAT IS OUR GOAL. OKAY. IS IT ALSO CONNECTED WITH MCKINNEY HOUSING FINANCE CORP. IT IS NOT CONNECTED TO THE MCKINNEY HOUSING FINANCE. HOWEVER, IF YOU'RE LOOKING TO ADD THAT PIECE OF ANY KIND OF PERCENTAGE, WHETHER IT BE 5 OR 10% TO SUPPORT TO ADD, YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO. IF NOT, THEN WE CAN LEAVE IT OFF THE TABLE. I WAS JUST CURIOUS. GOT IT. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? THANK YOU. ABSOLUTELY. IT'S MY PLEASURE. YOU GUYS HAVE A BLESSED DAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. SO IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SPEAK AND SHARE YOUR CONCERNS OR COMMENTS, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING IS THERE ARE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRAIG TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM I SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KASIM. KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. AND THIS MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY 6 TO 0. I NEED TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM THE NEXT ITEM. OKAY. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER CRAIG. WELCOME [00:20:04] BACK, COMMISSIONER MCWILLIAMS. OKAY. COMMISSIONER CRAIG HAS RECUSED HIMSELF FROM ITEM [26-0086Z Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider/Discuss/Act on a Request to Rezone the Subject Property from “PD” - Planned Development District to “C2” - Local Commercial District, Located on the South Side of Eldorado Parkway and Approximately 200 Feet East of South Custer Road] 26-0086Z. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, DISCUSS, ACT ON A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO C TWO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EL DORADO PARKWAY AND APPROXIMATELY 200FT EAST OF SOUTH CUSTER ROAD. MR. BENNETT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU AGAIN. FINAL ITEM TONIGHT. ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A REQUESTED REZONING FROM PD TO C TWO. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF EL DORADO PARKWAY BETWEEN CUSTER AND STONEBRIDGE PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST AND WEST ARE CURRENTLY ZONED C. TWO PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE ALSO ZONED FOR NON RESIDENTIAL USES. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED C TWO ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. ALLOWS ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL USES TO DEVELOP ALONG EL DORADO ALONG THE EL DORADO FRONTAGE, AND SHOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ANY OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. AS SUCH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU JAKE. SO ONE ADDITIONAL USES WILL BE ALLOWED BY THE C TWO THAT THE PD DOES NOT. YEAH. SO THE PD MOSTLY FOCUSES ON OFFICE RELATED USES. SO C TWO IS GOING TO OPEN THAT UP. MORE TO RETAIL RESTAURANT. THOSE TYPICAL COMMERCIAL USES THAT WE'LL SEE INCLUDING ALONG CURRENTLY ALONG CUSTER WITHIN THAT CURRENT RED C TWO. AND THEN TO THE EAST DRIVE THRUS, THOSE KIND OF THINGS AS WELL. OKAY. YEAH. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR MR. BENNETT? IS OUR APPLICANT HERE? YES, MA'AM. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. MY NAME IS RANDY HEWLETT. OFFICE AT 1700 REDBUD, SUITE 300, HERE IN MCKINNEY. I'M HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, REQUESTING YOUR FAVORABLE APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM. THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 9.79 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EL DORADO PARKWAY. AS MR. BENNETT NOTED, THE PROPERTY IS PART OF THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE GLOBE LIFE PARCEL. THE APPLICANT IS PLANNING TO DEVELOP THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES THAT WILL INCLUDE A PARK ON THE WEST SIDE, SIMILAR IN CONCEPT TO THE APPLICANT'S DISTRICT 121 DEVELOPMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ALMA AND THE SAM RAYBURN TOLLWAY. WE AGREE WITH THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT AND REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE APPROVAL, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR. NO. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY. SO THIS ITEM DOES HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED TO IT. IF YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU WISH TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, KINDLY APPROACH. OKAY. SEEING IS THERE NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCWILLIAMS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS ITEM? SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. KILEY, CAST YOUR VOTES. OKAY. THIS MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY 6 TO 0. OKAY. AT THIS TIME, ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING MATTERS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA? TO THE COMMISSION AND OR STAFF? HAVE ANY COMMENTS? WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. I MOVE TO ADJOURN. OKAY. COMMISSIONER BUCKNER, WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. REASON TO WAIT FOR CRAIG TO COME BACK. I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY. COMMISSIONER CRAIG, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BUCKNER TO ADJOURN AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HAMMOCK. SO WE'RE ABOUT TO CAST OUR VOTE. THE OTHER MOTION DID PASS. OKAY, PLEASE. AND THE MOTION TO ADJOURN CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.