Jun 02, 2020 City Council Work Session on 2020-06-02 3:00 PM

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:10]

THE AFTERNOON. WE'RE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF 2 22 NORTH TENNESSEE STREET IN THE GREAT CITY OF MCKINNEY. AGAIN WITH PUBLIC COMMENTS. HAVE SOME HERE. MARIA THROATS. OH,

[PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS]

AND IF YOU WILL GO UP TO THE PODIUM RIGHT OVER THERE. PARTIALLY ONE. I JUST THINKING HERE. YOU COULD HEAR YOU. DEAR MAYOR FULLER. MY NAME IS ARYA ROSE. I AM WRITING TO YOU BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT YOU. SHE REMOVED A BARRIER IF THE. GETS REMOVED EITHER MY BROTHER OR I WILL SURE WE GET RAN OVER. I ALSO WORRY FOR MY NAME NEIGHBORS. SAFETY YOUR CITIZEN, ARE YOU ROSE SEVEN YEARS OLD. SECOND GRADE OF ELEMENTARY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I AM 24 FOR ONE. DESERT ROSE.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALLOWING MY DAUGHTER TO SPEAK. SHE WAS VERY EXCITED. SO, UH, MAYOR CITY COUNCIL. MY NAME IS DESIREE ROSE. I LIVE AT 50 NO TO GREENVILLE, ROOM 75069 DISTRICT ONE IN CONTINUATION OF MY DAUGHTER'S THOUGHTS AS IN MY NEIGHBOR'S REGARDING THE PROPOSED CONNECTION BETWEEN GREENVILLE ROTO AIRPORT, I WISH TO OPPOSE THE OPENING OF THE SPECIFIC CONNECTION. I STRONGLY FEEL THAT REMOVING THE BURIAL LOCATED AT THAT JUNCTION WILL EXPONENTIALLY INCREASED TRAFFIC. SPEED'S, TOO ARE NARROW AND UNEVEN ROAD. THERE WILL BE AN INCREASE IN NOISE POLLUTION. WITH LOW VISIBILITY ARE REALLY ALREADY AND MORE TRAFFIC ON OUR STREET. THERE IS A GREATER SAFETY RISK TO OUR CHILDREN. IN ADDITION, SEVERAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. OUR CLOSE PROXIMITY TO GREENVILLE ROAD. ANY REDEVELOPMENT OF THE ROAD WOULD FURTHER ENCROACH ON ALREADY LIMITED SPACE, INCREASING DANGER AND LOWERING PROPERTY VALUES. AS A MOTHER TO TWO SMALL CHILDREN, ONE WHICH IT WILL START WALKING TO WEATHERMEN ELEMENTARY VERY SOON. IT IS PARAMOUNT THAT WE CONSIDER EXTENDING LOUISIANA STREET TO AIRPORT DRIVE IN LIEU OF OPENING. GREENVILLE ROAD. THIS ACTION POSES THE LEAST IMPACT AND WILL HELP SAVE CARTER CHILDREN AND ENSURE COMMUNITY HARMONY. PLEASE CONSIDER COMMENTS AND THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. JUSTIN WAYNE ROSE. GOOD AFTERNOON.

JUST A ROSE 15 0 TO GREENVILLE. I ALSO WISH TO OPPOSE LIFTING THE BARRIER. AS WHAT MY DAUGHTER AND MY LIFE HAS ALREADY SAID. IT'S NOT ONLY THESE BRIEF MENTIONS, BUT ALSO.

I EVEN HAD A AMAZON CARRIER WHILE I WAS WORKING ON MY FENCE MOVING INTO OUR HOME, WHICH WE'VE BEEN UH, GETTING OUR ROUTES INTO THE GROUND FOR ABOUT A YEAR NOW. JUST DISCOVERED THAT HER PROPERTY LINES AREN'T EXACTLY WHERE THEY. OUR REPRESENTATIVES AS THE FENCE. INADEQUATELY REPRESENTS. SO, UH, I WAS. ON MY PROPERTY, BUT THE MAILMAN AMAZON GUY HAD COME AND WE JUST STARTED CHATTING. HEY, HAD A PACKAGE TO DELIVER TO OUR NEIGHBORS. AND

[00:05:04]

ANYWAY, THAT'S THOSE MY PRIMARY CONCERNS SAFETY NOISE POLLUTION. YEAH. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. ALEX BENTLEY. HELLO, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY NAME IS ALEX. BEVERLY AND I LIVE AT 1500 GREENVILLE ROAD. I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS MY OPPOSITION TO REMOVING THE BARRIER BETWEEN GREENVILLE ON AIRPORT ROAD. I DO ENDORSE AS AN ALTERNATE TO REMOVING THE GREENVILLE BARRIER, THE OPTION TO EXTEND LOUISIANA STREET COMPLETELY TO AIRPORT DRIVE. A LITTLE BIT ABOUT MYSELF. I'M A VETERAN OF THE U. S. NAVY I SERVED ABOARD THE USS TRUMAN AND AIRCRAFT CARRIER AFTER LEAVING THE NAVY WITH THE SERVICE RELATED INJURY. I GOT A MASTER DEGREES MASTERS DEGREE IN PHYSICS. I CURRENTLY WORK FOR THE HIGH SCHOOL, ADVANCED PLACEMENT PHYSICS TEACHER AND AN ADJUNCT PROFESSOR THROUGH RITUAL IN COLLEGE FOR THE DOLE CREDIT ENROLLMENT HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM. MY WIFE, DR CYNTHIA BUBBLY COULD NOT MAKE IT TODAY, ALTHOUGH SHE WAS ALSO ADAMANTLY AGAINST THE REMOVAL OF THE GREENVILLE BARRIER, CYNTHIA'S A THERAPIST AND AS AN ESSENTIAL WORKERS, SHE HAS BEEN PUTTING THE NEEDS AND. OF THE MENTAL WELL BEING OF OUR CLIENT'S ABOVE HER OWN SAFETY DURING THIS WHOLE PANDEMIC AND DISTRESS THAT SHE COULD NOT BE HERE TODAY. MY FIRST OPPOSITION TO REMOVING THE GREENVILLE BARRIER WILL BE THE INCREASED PROPENSITY TO SPEED ON THE OPEN STRAIGHT LINE PATH TO AIRPORT DRIVE NEAR THE END OF GREENVILLE ROAD, ACCORDING TO THE WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE, IF A PEDESTRIAN IS HIT BY A CAR TRAVELING UNDER 20 MILES PER HOUR, THEY HAVE A 90% CHANCE OF SURVIVAL. HOWEVER IF A PEDESTRIAN IS HIT BY A CAR GOING ABOVE 30 MILES PER HOUR, THEY HAVE A 15% CHANCE FOR LESS OF SURVIVING THE CURRENT DIVERSION TO IN LOW ROAD FROM GREENVILLE ROAD FORCES CARS TO SLOW DOWN AROUND TURNS AND INTERSECTIONS, MAKING FOR MUCH SAFER INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CARS AND PEDESTRIANS. MY WIFE IS AN AVID JOGGER WHO LIKES WHO, SEVERAL TIMES A WEEK RUNS DOWN GREENVILLE ROAD TO OLD SETTLERS PARK. ADDITIONALLY MY CLOSEST NEIGHBORS EACH HAVE YOUNG CHILDREN WHO ENJOY PLAYING OUTDOORS AND IN THE SAFETY OF THEIR FRONT YARDS. REMOVING THE GREENVILLE BARRIER IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THE SAFETY OF MY WIFE AND NEIGHBORS, CHILDREN AND YOU MUST KEEP THE GREENVILLE BURYING PLACE. THEIR LIVES ARE IN YOUR HANDS. MY OTHER OPPOSITION IS LIKE GREENVILLE IS SUCH A NARROW NEIGHBORHOOD ROAD THAT CANNOT HANDLE INCREASED THROUGH TRAFFIC TO AIRPORT ROAD. THERE ARE ABOUT 40 HOMES ALONG THE NARROW GREENVILLE ROAD THAT WILL BE EXPOSED TO INCREASE TRAFFIC AND SPEEDS, WHICH WILL PUT SO MANY MORE LIVES IN DANGER WHILE NEGATIVELY IMPACTING QUALITY OF LIFE FOR YOUR CONSTITUENTS. OPENING UP THE SMALL ROAD TO MAJOR TRAFFIC IN SUCH A SHORT SIGHTED DECISION WHEN WE HAVE BETTER ALTERNATIVES, AS STATED BEFORE THE BEST ALTERNATIVE FOR ALL SIDES IS TO EXTEND LOUISIANA STREET COMPLETELY TO AIRPORT DRIVE WITHOUT CHANGING REEDVILLE ROAD. THIS ROUTE WILL CREATE A DIRECT PATH FOR TRAFFIC FROM MCDONALD STREET TO AIRPORT DRIVE WHILE NOT IMPACTING ANY EXISTING HOMES. WE WILL GET THE BENEFITS OF INCREASED CONNECTIVITY, BETTER TRAFFIC FLOW AND NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY WITHOUT RISKING THE LIVES OF PEOPLE ON GREENVILLE ROAD. ALTHOUGH THIS WILL REQUIRE MUCH EFFORT AND WORK TO COMPLETE. THE BEST SOLUTIONS ARE THE ONE THAT ARE DIFFICULT AND THOUGHT OUT, NOT RUSHED.

SHORT TERM ANSWERS TO COMPLEX PROBLEMS. THANK YOU. I DON'T SHOW ANYBODY ELSE BUT IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? TO THE ENDS ON OUR AGENDA, NOTES. WE WILL MOVE ON.

TEO DISCUSSING REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS OPPORTUNITY, OF COURSE FOR COUNSEL TO ASK QUESTIONS OF PRESENT STAFF. WHILE THEY HAVE TAKEN THE TIME TO BE HERE TODAY. HOPEFULLY.

JUST THE TIME NEEDED OVERTIME TONIGHT. QUESTIONS STAFF ON ANY OF THE REGULAR GENT ITEMS.

[DISCUSS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS]

[00:10:08]

ROBIN SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHARING A PUBLIC COMMENT. LATER. UNITED ARE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.

THERE IS AN AGENCY THAT HIS HOUSE THAT KID MY CONCERN IS THAT WISE LITTLE. FUNDING FOR THE AGENCY. THAT IS, HOW'S MCKINNEY SO MUCH FUNDING AGENCIES OUTSIDE THE CITY? IT CERTAINLY IS THAT. RESIDENTS WHO ARE FINANCIALLY STRUGGLING, MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO TRANSPORTATION MAY NOT BE ABLE TO GET TO THESE AGENCIES THAT ARE OUTSIDE AND WE SHOULD REACH UP THIS FUNDING. TO HIS AGENCY THAT ESSENTIALLY LOCATED IN MCKINNEY, SO THAT OUR RESIDENTS CAN GET ACCESS TO THAT FUNDED EMERGENCY AID. SO THE DISCUSSION MADE. IT'S PROBABLY NOT FOR YOU. UNLESS YOU CAN GIVE US HER EXPLANATION. ON MORE REASONING FOR THEIR LITTLE ALLOCATION OF FUNDING MORE SO, ESPECIALLY FOR MY COUNSEL ON HOW TO RESHUFFLE THAT FUNDING TO THE AGENCIES AT OUR HOUSE. AND I HAVE SOME VERY SERIOUS THOUGHTS I HAD AS WELL. SOME REDISTRIBUTION, BUT OKAY? FOR ME WHEN WE START WITH. SPINELLI IS GONNA STEP BECAUSE HE'S ASSOCIATED WITH 20. WHAT WAS THE THOUGHT PROCESS YOU WOULD ENTER TO TURN ME IN SO I WILL.

I WILL TALK JUST BRIEFLY ABOUT THE ABOUT THE PROCESS. AND IF THERE ARE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, THEN I DO HAVE. OTHER STAFF ON OUR TEAM. IT'LL BE ABLE TO FIST SO IN THAT IN THE PROCESS THAT WE HAVE. I DO WANT TEO STATE THAT THIS WAS NOT JUST AH, PROCESS WITH MCKINNEY. WE DID THIS PARTNERSHIP WITH OUR WITH OUR NEIGHBORING CITIES. THIS IS NOT A CDBG PROGRAM, EVEN THOUGH IT IS A CARES ACT TYPE OF FUNDING RESOURCE, BUT. THE ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES ARE EXPERIENCED IN FEDERAL FUNDED PROGRAMS AND SO WITH THE LARGEST FIT THE LARGEST CITIES IN COLLIN COUNTY, WE DID COME TOGETHER FOR THIS PROCESS. THERE WAS IN THE TIME I WILL STATE THAT IT WAS A QUICK TURNAROUND TIME IN TERMS OF BEING ABLE TO A FIST COLLIN COUNTY WITH THIS FUND, BUT IT WAS A VERY DELIBERATE AND ALSO VERY DETAILED PROCESS.

THE DELIBERATIONS THAT WE HAD WITH THE CITIES WITH A 6.5 HOUR PROCESS IN ONE DAY OF BEING ABLE TO LOOK AT THE APPLICATIONS. THERE WAS A VERY DETAILED R F Q PROCESS. WE PROVIDED TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, ALSO FOR THOSE THAT COULD NOT ASSIST, ATTEND THE TRAINING. WE DID PROVIDE THAT WITH A RECORDING AS WELL. AND THEN WE ALSO HAS SIGNIFICANT OUTREACH INTO THE COMMUNITY. IT WAS A SCORING PROCESS THAT WE HAD, WHERE APPLICANTS HAD TO PROVIDE FUNDING RESOURCE IS AS WELL A STANDARD REQUIREMENT THAT YOU WOULD SEE IN AN R RESCUE AND IN THAT WE DID DETERMINE. BASED NOT ONLY ON CAPACITY WHERE WE DID NOT WANT TEO ENSURE, OF COURSE, THAT WE WERE BEING PREFERENTIAL IN TERMS OF TREATMENT. WE LOOKED AT A OF

[00:15:03]

THAT SAME SERVICES THAT MAYBE EVEN FARTHER AWAY FROM OUR CITY. IT COULD BE PROSPER. IT COULD. IT COULD BE ANNA OR EVEN PRINCETON. AND SO THOSE ARE JUST SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD IF WE WERE TRYING TEO TO MAKE THIS DETERMINED NATION AND WE KNOW THAT YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY IN MAKING THAT DETERMINATION. WHAT WE'RE PROVIDING TO YOU IS WHAT WAS PROPOSED. THANK YOU, I GUESS MINE. UNDERSTANDING. I GUESS I WAS CONFUSED. OUR ALLOCATION OF FUNDS. OUR ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO KID YOU WERE TO START ANY RESIDENT FROM YOUR RUN DOWN. IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE NOT SERVING MAKIN YOU WERE CERTAIN COUNT COUNT. THAT IN FOUR CITIES SO WE HAVE IN THE FLORIDA CITIES WE HAVE NOT ONLY MCKINNEY BUT ALSO FRISCO ALSO, ALLEN AND THE CITY OF PLANO AND SO IN. LOOKING AT THIS. IT WAS IMPORTANT THAT THE CAT TO THE COUNTY AS WELL THAT WE WERE SERVING COLLIN COUNTY, AND SO WE DID HAVE AN EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THE ZIP CODE, SO NOT ONLY IF EACH CITY RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS OWN ZIP CODES WERE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR OTHER ZIP CODES THAT ARE OUTSIDE. AND THIS IS ALSO A VERY IMPORTANT POINT THAT WE KNOW THAT THERE ARE OTHER SMALLER CITIES AGAIN. IT MAY NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE TYPE OF FEDERAL FUNDING BUT THEY STILL HAVE THE RESOURCES TO BE ABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE TO THE FUNDING THAT'S AVAILABLE FROM THE COUNTY. WE ASSURED THAT THAT MONEY WAS OTHER ORGANIZATIONS ARE GOING TO SPEND MONEY IN MONEY OUT. I'M SORRY. COULD YOU REPEAT? HOW ARE YOU? SURE. THOSE ENTITIES.

COME OUT. CHARITIES, JUICE. THEY ALL. REQUIRED TO GIVE MONEY OUT CERTAIN TO HAVE SPREAD OUT ACROSS THE WHOLE COUNTY. ALL RIGHT. YOU SURE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO. SO EXCUSE. SO IN THAT MECHANISM, WE ALSO AND I DO WANT TO ALSO STATE THAT JUSTUS WERE COMING BEFORE YOU TODAY. WE ALSO HAVE OTHER STAFF THAT ARE GOING TO THEIR PERSPECTIVE COUNTY. GIVE ME. COUNCILMAN AS WELL TO BE ABLE TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS. SO IN THAT REGARD, WE DO HAVE DISTRIBUTION WHERE WE'RE AS COMMITTEE WERE ALSO OVERSEEING. THERE. THERE ARE RESOURCES IN WHICH THEY WILL HAVE TO DO REPORTING WE WILL BE DOING QUALITY CHECKS THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS A WAY THAT WE HAVE THE APPLICATION STARTED JUST THIS PAST MONDAY. AND SO WE ARE CONTINUOUSLY HAVING THOSE QUALITY CHECKS TO ENSURE THAT THEY'RE BEING EQUITABLE AND NOT JUST WITH THE LARGER CITIES BUT ALSO WITH THE SMALLER ONES AS WELL. SO THEY ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED. TIO HAVE THIS BASED ON PERFORMANCE EVEN THOUGH THERE MAY BE AN ALLOCATION.

THAT MAY BE DISTRIBUTED TO THEM. IT IS STILL BASED ON PERFORMANCE, AND SO BECAUSE AGAIN, IT'S FEDERAL FUNDING THEY HAVE TO BE ABLE TO MEET. NEED IF WE HAVE RESIDENTS, YOU KNOW THAT HAVE CONCERNS OR COMPLAINING AS A COMMITTEE. WE WILL HAVE TO ADDRESS THAT AS WELL. SURELY THAT AT FIRST GLANCE, I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS PEOPLE THINK IS KENNY, REPRESENTING 20% OF POPULATION IN COUNTY ON MCKINNEY BASED, NOT PROFITS RECEIVED LESS THAN 3% OF FUNDING. PEOPLE WILL RECEIVE THAT IS. GETTING 20 POPULATION RECEIVED 3.

[00:20:03]

AND I DO I DO WANT TO TONIGHT AND I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU UNDERSTAND THAT. YOU KNOW WE ARE. I WILL SAY THAT WITH THE ORGANIZATION'S ONE OF THE CRITERIA QUESTIONS THAT WE HAD.

IS THAT WHAT TYPE OF PRESENT DO YOU HAVE? IN COLLIN COUNTY? AND SO THE SO WE DO HAVE AGENCIES THAT WERE NOT AWARDED FUNDING AND WE TOOK THAT ALSO INTO CONSIDERATION AS WE'RE LOOKING IN THE PROCESS OF THE ORGANIZATION COMMUNITY LIFELINE. WE ALSO KNOW AT THE TIME THAT THERE WAS A TRANSITION WHERE THEY WERE FOCUSING MORE ON FOOD DISTRIBUTION AND BEING ABLE TO PROVIDE FUNDING RE FORCES. WE HAVE IN THIS PROGRAM TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE. FOOD CARDS, GIFT CARDS IF YOU WILL TO BE ABLE TEO TO HAVE MORE OF THAT NEED AND SO IN OUR PROCESS OF VIEWING COMMUNITY LIFELINE WE AS A COMMITTEE FELT THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THEM WITH EVEN MORE OF A DISTRIBUTION IN THAT ROLE, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT. THEIR PRIORITIES WERE AT THAT. YOU KNOW, IN THAT CAPACITY OF WHAT THEY WERE DOING IN THE COMMUNITY, WE ALSO KNOW AS WE SAID TO THAT. IN THE PROCESS OF BEING ABLE TO HAVE THE FUNDING.

WE HAVE THIS INITIAL FUNDING OF 30 MILLION. WE HAVE A TOTAL OF 4500 FOOT GIVE YOU 45 MILLION THAT WILL BE ABLE TO HAVE AND SO WE HAVE ALSO WILL BE INDICATING TO THE AGENCIES THAT EVEN THOUGH THERE MAY BE AN ALLOCATION THAT DISTRIBUTED IF WE FEED THAT THEY'RE NOT PERFORMING THAT WE CAN MOVE THOSE RESOURCES AROUND BECAUSE WE'RE NOT GOING TO LOOSE LENDING. WE'RE ALSO GOING TO PROVIDE THAT TO THE GREATEST NEED. BY THE SAME TOKEN, IF WE DO SEE BASED ON PERFORMANCE THAT WE NEED TO ADJUST WITH THE NEXT PROCESS OF FUNDING THAT WE'RE ABLE TO HAVE, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO SEE. I NEED TO BE ABLE TO INCREASE AND STATING THAT THAT'S JUST A PROCESS THAT THE COMMITTEE WAS LOOKING AT AT THE TIME. YOU THINK. I HAVE EVERY FAITH THAT 6/2 HOURS GUESS LIBERATED AND THE PARTY CONCERNED WITH HOW TO GET THINGS OUT OF IT REALLY SHOULDN'T MATTER. BOUNDARIES IS ITS BORDERS. TOGETHER. BUT I KNOW THAT THEY APPLIED FOR A 300,000 RECEIVED IT. 3,000,003 MILLION THEY RECEIVED 200,000. YOU DID. DID YOU REALLY FEEL THEIR CAPACITY WAS ONLY TWO.

SHOULD BE $200,000. IN THAT IN THAT ROLE, I COULD ONLY SPEAK. I CAN'T SPEAK FOR JUST MYSELF, BUT WE'RE AGAIN. WE WERE COMING TO THAT CONCLUSION WITH THE COMMITTEE. SO IN THAT IN THAT CAPACITY, WE FELT THAT AGAIN WITH A LARGER ORGANIZATIONS THAT WE WERE TRYING TO BE EQUITABLE ACROSS THE BOARD BASED ON THE PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION AND THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED TO THE LARGER ORGANIZATIONS. IT DID NOT DID NOT. IT WASN'T IN THE STATE THAT THEY WERE NOT CAPABLE OR THAT THEY HAD A SMALLER, MEANS, BUT WE WERE LOOKING AT IT IN TERMS OF BEING EQUITABLE WITH A LARGER ORGANIZATIONS IN THAT WAY AND ALSO IN THAT REGARD, KNOWING ALSO THAT. YOU WITH COUNCIL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE ABLE TO ADJUST AND WE WOULD DO THE WILL, THAT YOU WOULD ASK US TO DO AT THAT TIME. I THINK I THINK YOU MADE A VALID POINT.

I THINK UNLESS REACHING GRANT ALLOCATION. WAS COMMUNITY LIFELINE THAT CAME IN FRONT OF THIS COUNCIL AND SAID IF THEY WERE TRANSITIONING FROM. HELPING IN REGARDS OF RENT AND MOVING MORE TOWARDS HELPING WITH FOOD. YOU GUYS DEPEND INTO CONSIDERATION. AND I THINK WHOLEHEARTEDLY. YOU'VE RUN A GREAT PROGRAM IN ALL THE YEARS THAT I'VE KNOWN YOU CDBG GRANT FUNDING. AND SO. IF YOU WERE A PART OF THOSE DELIBERATIONS, RECEIVED 6.5 HOURS AND YOU AND STAFF BRING THIS TO US, AND YOU'RE OKAY. THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES WHEN WE HAVE TO TRUST THAT I'M HAVING YOU ALL IN OUR STAFF HERE WHAT YOU ALREADY DO. AS I LOOK AT THIS. YOU HAVE STAFF TELLS ME THIS IS OKAY. I'M INCLINED TO TRUST THAT THIS IS OKAY. YOU ARE OVERSEEN, AND YOU TELL ME THAT THERE'S SOME OVERSIGHT TO THIS. YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO MONITOR THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS. I WILL STAY ON TOP OF THAT AND MAKE SURE THAT THOSE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED. WAY TOO

[00:25:09]

INITIALLY LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE. WHEN I LOOK, LOOK HERE, SEE? HOW ARE ONLY NON PROFIT IN THE CITY OR. ENOUGH. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE OUR RECEIVING PROBLEMS COMPARED TO THE REST. I WANT TO KNOW WHY. AGAIN I'M TRUSTED STAFF. YOU HAVE TO TRUST THE PROCESS. THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL.

AND I THINK THERE'S. ROBINSON DISCUSSION. WE HAVE WHAT WE HAVE IN OUR LATER WHETHER WE DO.

BUT I THINK THE MOST IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY FOR RESIDENTS AND PEOPLE WATCHING THIS TO KNOW THAT. THAT'S WHERE THE MONEY IS JUST WHO'S AL, WHO'S DISTRIBUTING MONEY? GEOGRAPHICALLY IT'S NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF WHERE THE MONEY WILL GO, AND I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT BECAUSE OTHERWISE SEE. WE DON'T WANNA HAVE A CONVERSATION NOW ABOUT WE FEEL. COMFORTABLE LEAVING AS ITS DUTY AS A COUNSEL THINKS THAT AT LIFE. IT IS. TO HANDLE. OR I MEAN, I KNOW THAT I'M I'M FULL DISCLOSURE, VERY PIOUS AND OTHER PEOPLE RUNNING LATE TONIGHT HAVE TRYING TO SPACE THEM. I KNOW WHAT THEIR WORKERS ON, UH. TO ME. THERE'S SUCH A LARGE DISPARITY. BUT I THINK WE NEED TO LOOK AT THAT NUMBER.

AND POSSIBLY RAISE THAT NUMBER IS UNLIKE YOU TRUST COMMUNITY, TRUSTED STAFF AND I DON'T THINK IT NEEDS TO BE MADE. BUT. DISPARITY SO GREAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT 2000. THESE OTHER GROUPS ARE GETTING AMAZING FOR TWO MILLION WHERE 20% OF POPULATION. THAT NUMBER LEADS AND WE'RE 20 OTHER POPULATION AGAIN. AS A FRIEND. YOU HAVE NO ISSUE, BUT THE POPULATION WERE AND WE ARE. DISTRIBUTING. IT'S FOR ANOTHER METHOD PERCENTAGE POPULATION THAT ARE ARCTIC COATS, PERIOD. PAGEANTS COAST, 27. I THINK MY CONCERN IS THAT YOU KNOW, WE'RE TALKING POPULATION, WHICH IS ONE THING. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT CAPACITY OF AN ORGANIZATION TO BE ABLE TO MEET THOSE NEEDS, WHICH HAS REALLY POPULATION CONCERNS OF WHAT WE REPRESENT. BECAUSE WE HAVE A STAFF THAT HAS HIS COURSE THAT TEST THOSE THINGS. THEY DIDN'T MEET THOSE DOWN ETHICS WHEN IT COMES TO CAPACITY TO BE ABLE TO MEET CAPACITY BECAUSE IT'S NOT JUST THE POPULATION BECAUSE MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT'S NOT JUST MAKIN YOU A SERVANT IN THOSE FOUR CITIES. NOT JUST THE POPULATION OF THE CANDY THAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE PAST SERVICE. SO. STAFF SAYING THAT BASED ON THE SCORE CARDS THAT EVERYONE HAD TO MEET. THEY DIDN'T HAVE PASSED TO MEET THAT. BUT AGAIN THERE SIX COS YOU GUYS WANTED TO DIVIDE SIX MILLION. SIX ORGANIZATION JUST GIVE EVERYBODY A 1,000,000 SAY. DO IT AND YOU'RE DOING A DISSERVICE. CATHOLIC CHAIRS HAS MORE GAS IN THEIR ORGANIZATIONS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE FORCE.

THEY JUST THEY HAVE A BIG ORGANIZATION TO DO. I'M GONNA JUMP IN HERE FOR A 2ND. I KNOW ONE THING. THAT MEANS A LOT OF THIS IS RIGHT HERE IN OUR BACKYARD. FOR OVER 30 YEARS. WE KNOW THE PEOPLE. NO. I GOT 200,000 WHICH I UNDERSTAND SCORECARDS, AND SOMETIMES THEY COME OUT A LITTLE BIT WHERE YOU FALL AS THEY DO. BECAUSE APPARENTLY OUR WORK AND HOW MANY WORKING THERE IN THE PAST I GET IT. THEY'VE MOVED ABOUT THAT YOUR REASON THEY STEPPED UP THEIR GAME. THEY'RE SERVING WAR. OUR COMMUNITY. THIS IS IN OUR BACKYARD. I DON'T THINK THE NUMBERS ARE RIGHT. I THINK WE NEED TO ALLOCATE MORE MONEY FOR THEM. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT NUMBER IS, BUT I THINK BETWEEN EVERYBODY HERE COULD FIGURE THAT OUT AND MOVE FORWARD. I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO PAY FOR THIS ALL NIGHT, BUT WE NEED TO JUST MOVE ON. GO AND GET ON THE MIC. SO WHAT? WE'RE GONNA INCREASE IT MEAN NUMBER 500,000 ON THIS FIRST ROUND. AN ARBITRARY NUMBER. REALLY? I CAN'T TELL YOU THAT. I. THE STAFF MEMBERS REACH IN EACH ORGANIZATION. WHAT NASTY HOW THAT PLAYS OUT. DO YOU TAKE OTHER EVERY OTHER PEOPLE AND WE TAKE IT FROM ME, THE KAPPA CHARITY, OR 100,000 FROM THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS JEWISH.

DONATE YOUR. ANDI I JUST WANTED TO REITERATE WHAT WHAT MISS BEST SAID, AND THAT ALSO THE

[00:30:08]

I'M NOT INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS AND UNDERSTANDING THAT DEEPER. I HEAR THAT THOUGH I WOULD BUT I JUST HEARD FROM YOU IS THAT. SPACE ON THE POPULATION OF THE POPULATION IN OTHER CITIES THAT WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRENT, I WOULD HEAR THAT IS IT WAS DETERMINED THAT $200,000 WILL BE DISTRIBUTED IN OUR CITY OF EMBER CITIES WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT. THAT'S CORRECT. OH THE TOTAL AMOUNT THAT THAT WE'RE GETTING FOR OLIVE FOR ALL OF THE CITIES THAT WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR SIX ABOUT 6.9 MILLION. UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING. THAT'S THAT'S THE FOUR CITIES TERRORISM BEFORE CITIES BEFORE TOURNAMENT CITIES ARE DISTRIBUTE THAT SIX POINT, MESSER WHERE THE FOR ENTITLEMENT CITIES ARE DISTRIBUTING $30 MILLION. SO OF THAT OURS IS OURS WITH SIX POINTS. YES, OKAY. BACK TO THE 6.9 PEOPLE WITH THIS STATEMENT MADE BEFORE THEY STILL HERE. $200,000 IS THE CAPACITY. UH, ONE CHERRY IN THE CITY. MISHANDLING THIS CITY AND THE OTHER FOUR CITIES, WHICH IS NOT A CASE OF $6.9 MILLION IS BEING DISTRIBUTED FOR THIS OF YOUR CITIES. BUT I THINK THE MESSAGING. IT'S NOT HERE. PEOPLE HEARING. AND IN OUR THOUGHT WAS, WE'RE AS STAFF ASSIGNING AND STAFF WITH IT IN THE COUNTY ARE ASSIGNING. THOSE RESIDENTS, SO THE RESIDENTS THAT AARON MCKINNEY THAT APPLY FOR ASSISTANCE THE MAJORITY OF THOSE, DEPENDING ON WHAT THE DEMAND IS, WE'LL PROBABLY GO TO COMMUNITY LIFELINE BECAUSE THEY HAVE A PRESENCE IN OUR CITY AGAIN. WE WERE NOT LOOKING AT THIS JUST FROM A MCKINNEY CENTRIC. STANDPOINT SPEAKING UP. THANK YOU. JUST CLEAR. ALL OF THIS MONEY IS MCKINNEY. IT'S FOR 75697. AND 75424 SO IT'S THOSE MCCANN EASE ZIP CODES AS WELL AS OTHER ZIP CODES THAT ARE IN COLLIN COUNTY. WE CAN WE CAN HAVE A COFFEE OF THE MOUNTAIN TONIGHT. THAT MIGHT BE. JUST VISUALLY HELPFUL FOR FOLKS TO SEE WHAT AREAS OF THE COUNTY THAT THE CITY OF MCKINNEY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. SO ALL THE OTHER MONEY IS ALLOCATED TO OTHER. I THINK OTHER ENTITY CORRECT BASED ON THEIR POPULATION CENTERS, YOUR POSSIBLE POPULATIONS. THIS $6.9 MILLION. HIS ALLOCATED TWO HOURS IT CODES. BRANDON IS BECAUSE THAT JUST THAT'S GREAT, BUT NO MATTER, THE AGENCY WE'RE NOT SPENDING ANY OTHER THIS MONTH. OUTSIDE OF THOSE. THAT IS CORRECT. SO FOR THE ALLOCATION FOR THE 6.9 MILLION, THEY'RE SPENDING THEIR MONEY IN THESE CUBS. IF I COULD JUST CLARIFY THE NOTION THAT. MOST OF THEM CANDY AFRICANS WOULD GO TO LIFE. WHICH IS ONLY ALLOCATED 200,000. THAT'S WE'RE GONNA WE'RE GONNA FLY. RESIDENTS MAKE UP MORE RIGHT.

SO FOR WE WOULD NOT. A SIGN RESIDENTS FROM OTHER CITIES, OTHER ZIP CODES THAT WE'RE

[00:35:07]

FELT DID NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY OR WE'RE IN THE RIGHT CIRCUMSTANCE TO ADMINISTER THIS FUNDING AGAIN. THIS IS A FIVE MONTH PROGRAM. WE'RE LOOKING AT GETTING 45. 30 MILLION, PERHAPS $45 MILLION OUT THE DOOR. VERY QUICKLY. WE HAD 1500 APPLICATIONS THE FIRST DAY, SO THAT'S FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE STANDPOINT, THAT THAT'S WHAT WE WERE LOOKING AT. SIR. YES.

SO, YES, BY INCREASING WHAT DO YOU DO? BY INCREASING IT. ARE YOU INCREASING THEIR ADMINISTRATION? FEED THAT THEY'RE GETTING. I DON'T KNOW IF WE'RE SERVING THE SAME ZIP CODE. AND ALL THIS MONEY IS STILL SERVING THE SAME PEOPLE.

IF NOW IF THEY RUN OUT OF THOSE PODS. WAY BEFORE AND THEY'RE SERVING OUR RESIDENTS, AND THEY RUN OUT OF THOSE ONES. WHEN WE COME BACK, YOU CAN'T. SHE SAID. WE ARE DOING, BOY SO IF THEY RUN OUT OF FUNDS AND OTHER PEOPLE STILL HAVE FUNDS WE CAN COME BACK AND WORK FOR. THAT'S CORRECT. WE HAVE 50% THE WAY THE CONTRACTS WILL BE WRITTEN IS THE INITIAL ALLOCATION IS FOR 15% OF WHAT THEY'RE ELIGIBLE FOR. IF THOSE FUNDS ARE NOT MOVING QUICKLY, WRITE 58 50% SO THEY'LL BE GIVEN 50% AT CONTRACT AWARD. AND THEN IF THOSE FUNDS AREN'T AREN'T MOVING, OR THERE ISN'T AS MUCH DEMAND FOR THAT AGENCY AS THE COMMITTEE THOUGHT THAT THEY WOULD HAVE THEN THOSE FUNDS CAN BE REALLOCATE ID. FOUR. WHAT'S THAT? THEY DON'T USE IT. THAT'S CORRECT. OR WE CAN KEEP THEM WHERE THEY ARE AND IF THEY DID SUPPLEMENTED WITH ANOTHER AGENCY. AND THAT'S THAT PROCESS OF BEING ABLE TO MONITOR BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT WE'RE NOT JUST SITTING AGAIN. IT'S JEN AI HAD INDICATED. WE ONLY HAVE A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME TO BE ABLE TO MOVE THINGS FUNDING PROCESS TO BE ABLE TO BENEFIT THOSE AND SO STAFF WILL HAVE A WILL, OF COURSE, HAVE TO BE ON TOP OF IT TO ENSURE THAT NOT ONLY IS THAT WORKING FOR THE AGENCY. AND THAT IS NOT HAVING AN END. YOU BURDEN BUT THAT ALSO THAT WE'RE MEETING THE PEOPLE AS A POINT OF THEIR NEED. I'D BE IN FAVOR OF TAKING $300,000 FROM CATHOLIC CHARITIES, MAKING THEIR NUMBER TWO MILLION. 666,600. TAKEN THAT 300,000 ADD IN ITS COMMUNITY LIFE. MAKING THEIR NUMBERS $500,000. NO PROBLEM. YOU PROBABLY HAVE NO PROMISE THAT BUT I CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM ALSO TAKING MAYBE 200 FROM THAT 100 FROM THE. FROM JEWISH FOR THE OFFENSE. TWO LARGER GET. I MEAN THOSE CALF ONE POINT TO THOSE GUYS POINT. CAPTAIN IS IN THERE. I JUST WONDER IF THERE'S A REASON WHY YOU GOT SO THAT ARGUMENT OLD THAT THERE'S A REASON WHY THAT EVERYONE GOT THEIR MONEY ALLOCATED THE WAY IT IS, BUT WE'RE JUST GONNA TAKE SOMEBODY AND CHIPPED IT ANYWAY. MILES WILL TAKE IT FROM PEOPLE LIKE MOST GIVEN TO PEOPLE, AT LEAST WE'VE GOT A CONSENSUS. ONE THOUGHT IS THAT YOU MIGHT COUNSEL MIGHT CONSIDER IS TO BE FAIR BECAUSE YOU'RE DEALING WITH CATHOLIC CHERRIES, JEWISH CHARITY'S GROUP. YOU KNOW, MAYBE YOU ARRIVED AT 301 100 EACH, OR YOU

[00:40:04]

THAT'S WHAT I'M PUSHING FORWARD FOR ACCESSIBILITY. DESPAIR WAY JUST AGREED THAT IT'S 500. THEN LET'S STAND FIGURE OUT WHERE YOU COME FROM. DOES THAT WORK FOR EVERYBODY TO START COMPLETELY WORK? EVERYBODY FUCK IT. THANK YOU FROM A DIFFERENT ANGLE. I'M ALL IN FAVOR OF EVERYTHING. EVERYONE SAY HERE BUT. I'M LOOKING AT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THAT I HAVE BEEN, AND I'M NOT SEEING IT. HOUSE STAFF. THEY COULD POINT ME TO. A PROVISION THAT SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT 6.9 MILLION SPENT ON THESE COATS. WHAT I'M SAYING. DOCUMENT STORY. I'M LOOKING AT HIS LAWYER. WHAT I'M SEEING. IS THAT IS GOING THIS YEAR. NOT STAYING SHORT TO ME RIGHT NOW. YOU CAN GO AHEAD. BUT I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT BEFORE WE GET CERTAIN. THAT'S WHAT. CHARLIE SAYS, CERTAINLY LIKE TO SEE THAT CONFIRMED IT WAS. THAT IS WHAT THE COUNTY'S DIRECTION WAS BASED, WAS ALL BASED ON. POPULATION $55 PER PERSON. I WILL BE COUNTING VILLAGE COUNTRY LOST PAPER THERE EXIST AND WAY DO YOU HAVE THE ALLOCATION ON THAT? THE COUNTY YOU KNOW DIRECTED US TO DO AND THIS IS BASED ON. POPULATION SO THERE IS IN, I HESITATE TO EVEN BRING THIS UP, BUT THERE IS A KIND OF ANOTHER THING THAT MAY HAPPEN. SO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY HAS AN IOWA WITH THE COUNTY FOR $6.9 MILLION TO ALLOCATE FUNDS TO THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, BUT ALSO THESE OTHER ZIP CODES. SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THE DEMAND. IN OUR AREA IS NOT $6.9 MILLION. AND THE MONEY GETS SPENT EVERY WELL, WHERE ELSE IN THE COUNTY? DO WE WANT TO GIVE THE 6.9 MILLION OR WHATEVER'S LEFT OF IT BACK TO THE COUNTY OR. IS THERE? IS THERE ON APPETITE OR A POSSIBILITY THAT THAT MONEY COULD BE REALLOCATE ID FROM THE COUNTY TO OTHER AREAS OF THE COUNTY THAT NEED IT MORE THAN MCKINNEY DOES. MY CONCERN IS MCKINNON ATE MORE THAN SIX POINT. WAY CONCEAL WITH THAT, YES, YES, SIR. AND THAT WAS YES. AND THAT WAS THAT WAS BASED AT 6.9 BASED ON POPULATION FROM KELLER ASSURES AND I GO SPECIFY THAT WAS FOR THE OTHER. AMOUNT OF MONEY. THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT. I WOULD THINK THAT EVERY CITY IF THE MONEY IS. NOT USED IN THEIR COMMUNITY THAT EVERYONE'S ULTIMATE DESIRE IS FOR MONEY TO GO. IT'S NOT. ENDS UP AT KENNY APPLIES NEEDS $4 MILLION.

CERTAINLY EVERYTHING WE WANT TO POINT TO GO WHERE IT IS NEEDED. WHAT WILL PROBABLY BE THE CASE MAY BE UP TO THEM. I HOPE THEY'RE EXACTLY THE SAME. BUT. I'LL BE GOOD. I THINK WE HAVE CONSENSUS TO JUST INCREASING. PLEASE DON'T TAKE THAT AS ANY DISRESPECT FOR THE JOB THAT YOU'VE DONE. I DON'T FIND THIS BASICALLY 6.9. DOES ANY OF THAT MONEY GOES TO THESE CHARITIES HELP DISTRIBUTE. THIE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE IS LIMITED TO 10% OF DIRECT SERVICES THAT

[00:45:01]

YOU KNOW, PER DOLLAR, BASICALLY, AND WE'RE ALSO MAKING SURE THAT AS THEY GO ALONG, AND AS THEY'RE PROVIDING THAT DIRECT SERVICE THAT THEY DON'T ASK FOR THAT 10% UP FRONT THERE, NOT SAYING OH, WE NEED $50,000 TO FUND THIS POSITION FOR THE NEXT FIVE MONTHS. THEY GET 10% OF WHATEVER IT IS THAT THEY HAVE PROVIDED IN DIRECT SERVICES. UP TO 10% OF THAT OF THE CHURCH'S PROPERTY AS THEY ARE WITH THE STAFF. BUT THEY ARE NOBODY IS. NOBODY IS INCREASING SOURS AND PAID ON ANOTHER. CORRECT FOR EXPENSIVE THEY HAVE. THEY'RE TAKING THIS BUSINESS. AND, UH, AND THEY WILL RECEIVE EVERY VERSION OF JUST HER SALARY. THAT'S CORRECT. THAT'S QUITE 10% CHANGES THE OUT. LOOK AT ALL THIS. YOU JUST LIKE MAN, THAT'S A LOT OF CHARITIES.

UTILIZED. HELP THEM, THEN STOPPED. I KNOW IT'S A REIMBURSEMENT, THAT'S OURS. IN IN IN COMMUNITY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, WE GET 20% FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, SO 10% AND IN THE CITIES ACTUALLY GET 5. SO THE NONPROFITS GET 10% OF THE CITY'S GET 5% FOR OUR COST OF ADMINISTERING IT, LIKE ANSWERING THE HELP LINE AND DOING THINGS LIKE THAT S SO OUR TOTAL ADMIN COST FOR THIS GRANT TO THE COUNTY IS 15. WHICH IS ABOUT 5% LOWER THAN THE STANDARD. AND TO ADDRESS THE QUESTION THAT YOU HAD THE CONTRACT THAT WE THAT WE PROVIDED EYES A TEMPLATE THERE. WE DON'T HAVE THE DETAILS AGAIN OF EACH GRANT ORGANIZATION BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT MADE THAT FINAL DETERMINATION, BUT UNDER THE SCOPE OF WORK IS WHERE THE DETAILS THAT WE WILL PROVIDE THAT WOULD STAY THESE ZIP CODES THAT YOU'RE REQUIRED TO SERVE.

AND THE DETAILS ARE BASED ON THAT DISTRIBUTION THAT WE WERE REFERRING TO EARLIER. I JUST WANT A STATEMENT. WORK. SO THE UNDER HIS EXHIBIT A IS WHERE WE WOULD HAVE THE DETAIL IN THAT SECTION. THERE IS USE OF FUNDS AND SO UNDER THE USE OF FINDS IS WHERE WE WOULD PROVIDE NOT ONLY THE THEATRE MOUNT. BUT WHAT THAT DISTRIBUTION WOULD BE AND THEN ZIP CODES WOULD BE INCLUDED. SO WE DID NOT HAVE IT IN THERE AT THE TIME, BUT FOR EACH AGENCY ONCE WE HAVE THE FINAL CONTRACT. THAT'S WHERE WE WOULD HAVE THAT DETERMINATION, AND THAT'S WHERE THAT'S THAT'S HOW IT WOULD BE EXECUTED. CORRECT. IT IS THAT IT IS A DRAFT. IF YOU WOULD LIKE IT IF.

THAT IS FINE, MR. PHILLIPS CONCERT STIPULATE THAT IN THEIR MOTION IN THE MEETING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MIKE. NIGHT. THANK YOU. 90 CENTS OF EVERY DOLLAR GOING TO NATIONAL CHARITIES. IT'S ACTUALLY JUST POSSIBLE THAT HIS 23% 90% OF EVERY MANY CENTS OF EVERY DOLLAR. MAKE SURE THEY HEAR THAT. THAT'S A, UH, THESE ORGANIZATIONS HAVE PASSED. YOU PUT THAT MONEY OUT. THESE ORGANIZATIONS I'VE GOT. OF LIFE FOUNDATION. I MAKE MY WIFE WORKED FOR FREE, SO THERE'S NO SALARIES, NO OVERHEAD, BUT A LARGE ORGANIZATION THAT IS OUT REACHING EDDIE AND THE WAY THAT THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN. THERE IS RIZZO HAD EXPENSIVE ASSOCIATE WITH THAT HORSE. AND HOPEFULLY PEOPLE IT'S UP TO 10% BY THE WAY, HAVE 5% AVAILABLE AND WE WILL. REVERSE EXPENSE IF WE SPEND SPEND 3% REVERSE 3% 2% WILL GO TO THE COMMUNITY.

PEOPLE, THOSE THINGS THANK YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD. I. I LIKE 20 YEARS OR ONE. RIGHT AWAY. GET

[00:50:19]

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE RIGHT AWAY ABANDONMENT. I'M HAPPY TO TRY TO ANSWER RIGHT NOW. QUICK QUICK, A QUICK OVERVIEW SO. WE BRING UP THE IMAGE HERE FROM PRISON. SO THIS IS A REQUEST FROM UM UM ENCORE WIRE TO ABANDON THE EXISTING. PORTION OF ELM STREET THAT RUNS BETWEEN THAT THAT THAT RUNS BETWEEN THEIR EXISTING PLANT AND THEIR NEW DISTRIBUTION CENTER. THEY'RE BUILDING NORTH OF THE EXISTING ELM STREET. UM. THEY HAVE EXPRESSED TO US IN THE PAST, EH, EH? A DESIRE FOR THE SAFETY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC, AS WELL AS FOR THEIR OWN WORKERS HAVE UNENCUMBERED ACCESS BETWEEN THE NEW DISTRIBUTION CENTER AND THE EXISTING PLANT, SO THEY HAVE PROPOSED TO THE CITY TO HAVE THAT RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONED. IN EXCHANGE FOR THAT THEY ARE BUILDING A NEW ALIGNMENT OF ELM STREET, WHICH IS SHOWN. ON THIS EXHIBIT AND WILL BE COVERED A LITTLE BIT. MAURINE THE PRESENTATION. YOU HAVE A LITTLE LATER ON TO TWO. STILL GIVE THAT. CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN AIRPORT DRIVE AND HIGHWAY FIVE.

SO THE ABANDONMENT ACTION TONIGHT IS THE FORMAL IS AN ORDINANCE THAT IS ABANDONING THE ROADWAY PROVIDES FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY TO ON YOUR WIRE, BUT IT IS IT IS.

IT IS CONDITIONED. TO NOT BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL ENCORE FINISHES. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ELM STREET AND THAT THE NEW ELM STREET IS. AND THE NEW ELM STREET IS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY.

I THINK THERE'S A THINK DISCUSSION. ONE WAS ACTUALLY ON A WORK SESSION. OH, OKAY, SO YEAH, IT WAS CONFUSING. THANKS FOR THE NO. NO PROBLEM. I WILL BE HERE. IF THERE IS MORE. GARY DOES THE WORK SESSION ITEM. THERE'S MORE. I'LL BE HERE TO DISCUSS THE THAT WAS. I DON'T UNDERSTAND. FROM LET THE BARRIER AND THERE'S A LOT GOING ON. WE UNDERSTAND ANY ANY OTHER THEY'RE NOT. 20 0459. THE RESOLUTION TO TURN INTO A PUBLIC NECESSITY REQUIRES YOUR PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC USE DOMAIN, SO SHE MISSED COMPLEX. THAT IS THIE. FUCKING YOU PROBABLY DISCUSSED LAST SESSION. YES, SIR. WEI HAVE A SPECIFIC QUESTION. WHAT CAN YOU SAY PUBLICLY? UM. WE HAVE MADE AN OFFER FOR THAT LAND FOR THE USE FOR A MUNICIPAL COMPLEX. THIS LAND IS ADJACENT TO AN AREA THAT WE'RE WORKING WITH SOME PRIVATE DEVELOPERS. UM. TO DEVELOPMENT OF A THE EAST SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY FIVE REDEVELOPMENT OF THAT AREA. UM, AND SO THIS WOULD BE USED FOR PART OF THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX. THAT'S ABOUT ALL WE CAN SAY AT THIS POINT. WE MADE ANY. WE TRIED TO PURCHASE ANY OTHER PROPERTIES. A GARDEN IN PHYSICAL CONFLICT. WE'VE GOT PUSHED BACK FROM THE OWNERS. MR SYMBOL WE ARE IN NEGOTIATES WITH SEVERAL PROPERTY OWNERS. WE DO ALREADY OWNS PROPERTY. OVER IN THIS AREA OF TOWN. DO OUR BEST TO NEGOTIATE A FAIR PRICE FOR THE PROPERTY BASED ON APPRAISALS. THIS ONE. WE COULD NOT GET TO THAT POINT, SO IT'S GOING INTO THE EMINENT DOMAIN PHASE. WHAT. YOU RECALL THE BOND ISSUE WAS SUCCESSFUL FOR A NEW CITY KIDDING CITY HALL PENIS COMPLEX. AND IT'S GOING TO BE ON THE SIDE. ALWAYS ALWAYS DONE. ARTIE DILIGENCE WE'VE TRIED. SIR WE'VE DONE WITH EVERY OTHER PROPERTY OUT HERE IN THIS AREA. THAT IS OUR MARCHING ORDERS ON ALL ACQUISITIONS, TOO. MAKE A PRICE THAT'S BASED ON APPRAISAL. THANKS. QUESTION. RIGHT. WELL,

[20-0441 Consider/Discuss Eastside Roadway Connectivity between State Highway 5 (McDonald Street) and Airport Drive]

[00:55:07]

YOU CAN SEE, THOUGH ELM STREET DOES PROVIDE CUT THROUGH WHAT THEIR ULTIMATE CAMPUS BOUNDARY WOULD BE. AND SO THEY'VE MADE A REQUEST TO RELOCATE ELM STREET AS SHOWN HERE IN BLUE. UM THE, UH. BEFORE THE STAFF AGREED TEO TO THIS REQUEST, WE DID A TRAFFIC STUDY TO OBSERVE EXISTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS TO MAKE SURE THAT A RELOCATED ELM STREET THAT GENERALLY TRAVELS FROM WEST AND NORTH DOESN'T SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAVELLING AROUND THAT THAT IN THAT AREA. SO WE KIND OF ANALYZE BOTH TRAVEL PATTERNS THAT YOU SHOW HERE ON THE SCREEN. SO ON THE LEFT IF THEY'RE COMING FROM THE SOUTH ON AIRPORT AND COMING WEST ON ELM AND THEN GOING EITHER NORTH, SOUTH OR CONTINUING WEST, WHAT DID THAT TRAFFIC LOOK LIKE? AND THEN? CONVERSELY FOR COMING FROM THE NORTH, COMING DOWN ELM AND WHAT WE SAW WAS GENERALLY MOST OF THAT TRAFFIC IS HEADING FROM THE SOUTH WEST TO THE NORTHEAST. SO STAFF FELT THAT THIS JUST REALIGNMENT DID NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT EXISTING TRAVEL PATTERNS. AND SO WHAT WE DID WAS ORDERED IN DESTINATION STUDY, SO THAT TOOK ACCOUNT THE TRAFFIC THAT WAS COMING FROM EACH INTERSECTION, BUT ALSO IN LOOKED AT WHAT THE TRAFFIC THAT WAS ORIGINATED FROM WITHIN THE, UM. THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT AND THE BUSINESSES AREAS AS WELL. ONE OF THE THINGS THE RELOCATION ELM STREET ALLOWS FOR US TO DO IS CONNECT GARISH AND BUMP OF STREETS ON THE AERIAL PHOTO ON THE LEFT. YOU CAN SEE GARISH, UM. GARY STREET IS OVER HERE, EAST WEST STREET AND THEN BUMP ASSES A NORTH SOUTH STREET, BOTH OF THOSE CURRENTLY TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY. THE ENCORE WIRE OWNS. IN 2010. UH UNCLE WIRE CAME TO THE CITY AND ASKED FOR THE CITY TOO. VACATE THE RIGHT AWAY A BUMP A STREET WHERE IT CURRENTLY TERMINATES AT THE RESIDENTIAL AREA ALL THE WAY DOWN TO ELM STREET. SO THIS AREA RIGHT HERE ON THE EXHIBIT ON THE RIGHT. AND SO THE CITY TAME SOME UTILITIES MINTS, BUT WE DID GRANT THAT RIGHT AWAY VACATION AND THEN ONE OF THE THINGS ON CORE WIRE AGREED TO DO WAS TO CONNECT. GARISH AND BUMPER STREETS TOGETHER AT SOME FUTURE DATE AND SO IN YELLOW. HERE. I'M GONNA HIGHLIGHT OVER IT. THEY SAID THEY WOULD MAKE THAT CONNECTION POINT FOR INTERNAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, BUT AGREEMENT SAID. THAT ALIGNMENT COULD ALSO CHANGE IF THE CITY DESIRED. YES, SIR.

JUST. THAT'S NOT AN EXISTING STREET POST. THAT'S ONE THAT WILL BE BUILT. THAT WAS THE PROPOSAL THE TIME 2010 THEY SAID. WE'LL CONNECT FROM THIS POINT TO THIS POINT JUST ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF ENCORE WIRES PROPERTY. REGIS TRICKLE IN THAT BOTTOM LEFT WHERE THE WHERE THE COACH BARRIER IS, THAT WAS WELL. THIS IS A SEPARATE BARRIER THAN THE ROSE PROPERTY. THIS IS THIS IS STILL COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THAN THE OTHER ISSUE. BUT RIGHT NOW THERE'S A DEAD END RIGHT

[01:00:04]

WE ANTICIPATE THAT SOME OF THE RESIDENTS HERE MAY HAVE SIMILAR CONCERNS WITH MAKING A CONNECTION TO WHAT THEY PREVIOUSLY HAD WAS A DEAD END STREET. SIR. MAYOR. THAT IS BUMPY STREET, MURRAY STREET. THAT IS WHERE SHOULD HEAL AND WAS A VILLAGE APARTMENT GETTING FOCUSED. THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, RIGHT? DOUBLE WORD STOPS. JUST WERE ALL THOSE WERE ALSO CURRENTLY DEAD END STREETS. CORRECT, BUT INEFFECTIVE IN IT GARISH THE RESIDENTS FEEL. I MEAN, YOU ONLY HAVE A FEW TRUCKS TODAY THAT GO TO THE PUMP STATION SO.

S O. WE ANTICIPATE THAT THERE MAY BE SOME CONCERN FROM RESIDENTS. BUT WHEN WE MAKE THOSE CONNECTIONS, SO, UM WHAT WERE OR PLANNING IS NEXT STEPS WITH COUNSEL CONCURRENCES.

OBVIOUSLY, AS WE TALKED ABOUT BRIEFLY A FEW MINUTES AGO IS THERE'S A RIGHT WAY ABANDONMENT FOR COUNSEL'S CONSIDERATION TONIGHT, CONDITIONAL ABANDONMENT OF ELM STREET BASED ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW L'M STREET BEING ACCEPTED. AND THEN ENCORE WIRE WOULD RECEIVE OLD ELM STREET AND THEY WOULD KNOW HOW LONGER HAVE THAT. SEPARATION BETWEEN THE CAMPUS BUT ALSO THE STAFF WOULD REACH OUT AND AS WE'RE FINISHING UP THE DESIGN PLANS, WE'RE GONNA HAVE THE ROADS, THE CONNECTIONS TO BOMB FISHING, GARISH DESIGNED, BUT BEFORE WE MOVE, THE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE REACHING OUT TO THE RESIDENTS THROUGH SOME SORT OF MEANS QUITE FIGURED OUT HOW YES, IT'S REALLY CAN'T CLOSE A MEETING DURING THESE TIMES. FLYERS ARE PROBABLY OF SOME SORT. WE MAY HAVE A VIRTUAL PUBLIC HEARING, BUT KNOWING THAT NOT EVERYBODY HAS INTERNET ACCESS, YOU KNOW, WE'RE THINKING IF WE PROVIDE THE FLIERS WITH COMMENT, CARDS OPPORTUNITY HERE BACK FROM THE RESIDENTS AND HAVE THAT DIALOGUE WITH HIM IF THEY'RE CONCERNED. SO I WANT TO STOP THERE AND BEFORE WE MOVED TO THE NEXT AREA ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREENVILLE ARE ELM STREET PROJECTS IN THE ELM STREET RELOCATION ENCORE WIRE. SO. PAGE FOUR. SO DARK OR THE LIGHT BLUE IS. THEIR FACILITY RIGHT NOW. YES, SIR, AND THEN THE BLUE AND WHITE IS THE PROPERTY THAT THEY CURRENTLY OWN RIGHT NOW. CORRECT? OKAY, SO WHAT THEY'RE WANTING TO DO IS TAKE THAT ROAD AND THEN JUST COME ALONG THAT PROPERTY LINE. YEAH IT WAS KIND OF RIGHT IN THAT AREA RIGHT TO START THERE AND DO THAT CONTINUE TO BUILD. THAT'S CORRECT FACILITY AND EXPAND OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS.

YEAH. I MEAN, THEY'RE CURRENT PROJECT WILL USE UP MUCH OF THAT AREA BETWEEN THE NEW ELM STREET ON DH OLD ELM STREET. SEE? 1000. YEAH, EXACTLY. IT'S A LARGE FACILITY. SO HERE'S THE SITE PLAN. HERE'S THE FOOTPRINT OF THE EXISTING ARE THE NEW BUILDING RIGHT HERE. AND SO YOU DO HAVE SOME AREA UP IN HERE THAT COULD BE FOR FUTURE EXPANSION. ARE USING US FOR SOME TRUCK PARKING AND WHATNOT. SO BUT YES, THEY TRIED TO MAXIMIZE THE USE OF THAT SITE BY THE POSITION OF ELM STREET NOW. THEY STILL OWN. COVERED IN LEFT SIDE. THEY'RE GOING ON BOTH SIDES OF THAT. YES, THERE ARE SOME SMALL TRACKS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ELM STREET AS WELL. IN THE FUTURE TO BUILD ON THE LEFT SIDE. THAT IS MY CONCERN. WELL EXPAND AGAIN.

ALSO WE'RE MOVING ANOTHER STREET. THAT'S NOT THEY'VE DONE THEIR BEST TO LEAVE. THOSE TRACKS IS DEVELOPED TRACKS BUT NOT SIZE TRACKS, WHICH WOULD BE. SOMETHING BESIDES THAT THEY WOULD WANT IT AT ALL. YES, NOT LARGE ENOUGH FOR THEIR PURPOSES. IS THERE ANY IS THERE SOME? WHAT? PLAYING NORTH THAT? YES, SIR. THIS AREA. RIGHT UP IN HERE IS ALL FLOODPLAIN.

[01:05:07]

BARS. FIRST LAW THING, IT'S IN YOUR PROJECT. IT OPENS UP CONNECTIVITY BUMP IS, I THINK THAT NEW PROJECT WE HAVE HABITAT COMMUNITY. IT'S GOING TO PUT SOME MORE HOUSES, THERE'S MORE TRAFFIC. THERE'S GOOD CONNECTED TO BE HAD THERE. THIS IS THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SITE HABITAT FOR COMMUNITY. SIGHT. THE CONTAINER HOMES THAT WE IMPROVE. THAT'S CORRECT HOMEOWNERSHIP WOULD BLOCK TRAFFIC. THERE'S ACCESS ONE WAY IN ONE WAY OUT OF THAT CORNER. IS HELP WITH CRIME ACTIVITIES IN THESE AREAS. YOU KNOW, WITH THAT ACCESS WITH YOU GUYS COULD BE ABLE TO GET IN, AND THEY ALSO HELP WITH OUR SCHOOL AUDITIONS. WE HAVE A HARD TIME GETTING BUSES INTO THOSE STREETS. WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON HAVING MORE ACCESS INTO THAT AREA. I THINK ACCESS WOULD BE A POSITIVE THING. I DON'T I DON'T SEE ANY NEGATIVES, REALLY TO IT. I DON'T SEE ANY POTENTIAL FOR INCREASE IN CRIME. I THINK IT WOULD BE. YOU KNOW, FOR MY PERSPECTIVE, A CONVENIENCE FOR THE ENTITIES THAT YOU MENTIONED, THOUGH I DO RECOGNIZE THAT THERE PROBABLY WILL BE SOME HOMEOWNERS THAT WOULD RATHER HAVE A DEAD IN ST.

THAN NOT, BUT FROM A POLICING PERSPECTIVE. I DON'T I DON'T SEE ANY NEGATIVES FROM POLICE IN PERSPECTIVE, ESPECIALLY THAT AREA WOULD STOP VILLAGE OFFICE, CARY, RIGHT? THAT LACK OF ACCESS ALLOWS FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY SOMETIMES TO TAKE PLACE IN THOSE CORNERS. I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY TRUE. YES SO WOULD HAVE IT A HIGHWAY THAT COULD HAVE TRACKED OPEN THEM SOMETHING THAT VISIBILITY COULD HELP YOU GUYS TEAR SOMETHING. ACTIVE. I THINK SO. AND I THINK OVERALL, IT'S AH, YOU KNOW, IN THE HOLE IN THE GREATER WHOLE, IT'S AH POSITIVE FOR THE AREA.

SHIT.

OKAY, AS WE MOVE NORTH ON WE LOOK AT THIS AREA FOR POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT. UM YOU KNOW, WE HAVE AN EXISTING SEOP PROJECT PLANNED OFF OF HIGHWAY FIVE LOUISIANA STREET THAT WILL RECONSTRUCT LEAH LOUISIANA STREET REESTABLISH ON INTERSECTION IN GREENVILLE IN LOUISIANA AND CONTINUALLY LOUISIANA. UM. ON TO THE EAST. SO YOU HAVE MORE OF A DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PARK. UM. WE ALSO HAVE VIRGINIA STREET. THAT'S THEIRS, AND IT'S IN NEED OF WORK AS WELL. IT'S WE DON'T HAVE AH PROJECT IDENTIFIED FOR THAT YET LOUISIANA STREET PROJECT. WE'RE RECEIVING FEDERAL FUNDS TO HELP PAY FOR ABOUT THREE POINT 5,000,003 3.0.6 MILLION DOLLARS FROM FEDERAL FUNDS TO HELP COVER THE COST ON THAT PROJECT. ON THE WEST SIDE. THE ONLY ACCESS YOU HAVE TO THIS AREA IS HIGHLIGHTED BY THE LITTLE BLUE DOT OVER HERE. THAT'S IN LOW IN THE ROAD. THE ACCESS OFF OF IN LOW ROAD THE ASPHALT ROAD WAY THEY'RE VERY NARROW. YOU KNOW, IT'S IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT. IT CONNECTS TO ANTHONY TO THE SOUTH. COMES DOWN THIS WAY. NEXT, ANSON ANTHONY OR COMES UP AND CONNECTS TO GREENVILLE. UM

[01:10:05]

ARE OUR MASTER PLAN CALLS FOR THAT, TOO? EVENTUALLY CROSS THE TRACKS THERE AND PROVIDE ANOTHER CONNECTIVE CONNECTION POINT. TIO HERE, UM. WE HAVE TO CROSS THE TRACKS, SO THAT'S A BIG CHALLENGE IN ITSELF, DOING WITH DARK SOMETHING WE'LL HAVE TO TACKLE AND FIGURE OUT. CAN'T WE MAKE HAPPEN OR NOT? UM, IT. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TRACKS AND HIGHWAY FIVE. IT'S SUCH THAT IT'S SO CLOSE. YOU COULDN'T GO OVER THE TRACKS AND MAKE IT DOWN BY HIGHWAY FIVE, SO WE HAVE TO BE IN AT GRADE CROSSING DARK REQUIRES THAT IF YOU WANT TO DO IT AT GRADE CROSSING, YOU HAVE TO GIVE UP TO EXISTING CROSSINGS. SO WE REALLY DON'T HAVE TO GIVE UP ELSEWHERE IN THE CITY, SO THAT WOULD BE A BE A CHALLENGE, BUT WE NEED TO START CONVERSATIONS WITH THE IMF. IF LOUISE ARE LAMAR IS AN. THE AREA WE WANT TO PURSUE FOR THAT. THAT CONNECTION, THERE IS ANOTHER CONNECTION FARTHER NORTH. OFF OF RAILROAD BROAD AND SHORT STREET SO, BUT THAT LITTLE BIT MORE SECURITISED TOUGH TO GET TO NORTH OF THIS AREA. SO, UM.

ON THE EAST SIDE. THIS IS WHERE. OUR RESIDENTS CAME HERE TO LET US KNOW ABOUT. WE HAVE, UM, START WITH THE NORTH WORK OUR WAY. SOUTH VIRGINIA. STREET COMES ACROSS AND AS YOU LOOK AT THE END OF THAT MAGENTA LINE, THAT'S WHAT YOU SEE IN THAT PHOTO THAT TOP PHOTO. IT'S BARRICADED. THERE IS NO ROADWAY CONNECTION. THERE'S ACTUALLY A BIG BOX CULVERT THERE. SOME DRAINAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CREEK. THAT'S THERE. AND SO IF WE'RE GOING TO MAKE A CONNECTION THERE. COMPLETELY DOABLE. YOU JUST GOTTA DO SOME LEG WORK AND REALLY LOOK INTO WHAT THE BEST ALIGNMENT IS, BUT WE COULD MAKE THAT HAPPEN. CHALLENGE SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS POINTED OUT ON GREENVILLE BY OUR RESIDENTS, THE ROSE FAMILY AND. OUR RESIDENTS THERE, AND SO AS WE LOOK TO MAKE THESE CONNECTIONS, WE NEED TO BE VERY. THOUGHTFUL AND CONSIDERATE WITH ANY TYPE OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT THAT WE WOULD WANT TO MAKE. THEN IF YOU HAVE TO MOVE SOUTH.

WE, UH. WE HAVE GREENVILLE THAT COMES OUT TO AIRPORT AND YOU CAN SEE AND THE THINGS BOTTOM PHOTO THERE WAS A STREET CONNECTION THAT WAS MADE IS BARRICADED. WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO OPEN THAT UP RIGHT NOW. THAT IS ONLY LIKE 18 FEET WIDE, IT WOULD NEED TO BE RECONSTRUCTED.

TO MAKE IT USABLE FOR TRAFFIC COMING IN AND OUT WAY WOULDN'T PROMOTE JUST REMOVING THAT BARRICADE AS IS SO I WAS LIKE THAT. THAT IS A GREAT QUESTIONS BEFORE MY TIME. UM, THE. I THINK THE ORIGINAL PLANS WHEN THEY BUILT AIRPORT SHOWED THAT CONNECTION, BUT THE COUNCIL MEMBER MISS CARS AT THE TIME REQUESTED WE CAN'T FIND FORMAL ACTION THAT WAS TAKEN WAS MORE THINK OF A SETTING LIKE THIS. HEY, STAFF. WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE THIS CONNECTION. AND THAT'S WHAT THEY DID. THAT'S KIND OF THE RUMOR I'VE HEARD FROM FROM THE YEARS PRETTY ACCURATE, OKAY BEFORE YOUR TIME, BUT BEFORE, NOT MUCH IS BEFORE HISS. SO ANYWAY, SO THOSE ARE THOSE ARE YOU KNOW IN IN LOW ROAD TO THE SOUTH, THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES ON THE EAST SIDE.

AND SO. VERY, VERY HIGH LEVEL. WE'VE STARTED TALKING TO MY KOWSKI WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT. YOU KNOW, AS WE'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH SOME OF THE STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT WHAT CAN WE DO OVER HERE? AZZAM MENTIONED VIRGINIA ON THE NORTH. THERE'S NOT A LOT OF OPTIONS THERE TO DO ANOTHER CONNECTION BECAUSE OF THE CREEK THAT'S JUST IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF VIRGINIA. WE THINK WE COULD MAKE THAT WORK. WE SHOULD HAVE PUT IT IN OUR PLANS AND, YOU START THAT DESIGN PROCESS START WORKOUT WITH STAKEHOLDERS AND COME UP WITH SOME CREATIVE WAYS TO MIMIC A MINUTE MINIMISE IMPACTS TO RESIDENTS. NOW THE SOUTHERN CONNECTION TO GREENVILLE, UM. WE HAVE A COUPLE DIFFERENT OPTIONS THAT WE'VE JUST TOYED AROUND WITH STAFF. LEVEL ONE IS YOU WOULD CONNECT GREENVILLE AND HAVE IT COME ALL THE WAY UP. AND TIE INTO THE PROJECT THAT WE'RE DOING OVER ON THE WESTSIDE. BUT IS OUR RESIDENTS HAVE POINTED OUT? UM. A LOT OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES THERE, YOU KNOW, THAT

[01:15:05]

UM AND AS YOU KNOW, AGAIN, AS WE MENTIONED EARLIER WITH COUNSEL CONCURRENCE. LET US CONTINUE TO WORK WITH STAKEHOLDERS. TALK ABOUT THE APPROPRIATE CONNECTIONS THAT WE DIDN T MADE WAY UNDERSTAND THE RESIDENTIAL CONCERNS THERE WOULD BE A STAKEHOLDER WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONVERSATIONS BOTH LONG. GREENV IN VIRGINIA, AND THEN WE WOULD START TO PLAY IN THESE PROJECTS IN OUR FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN. WHO WITH THAT ALL ANSWERING QUESTIONS. WE HAVE THE IDEA, REBUILD AND THEN TAKING A TURN TO THE NORTH WEST. CONNECTING STILL. CERTAINLY DISRUPTING ROAST BECAUSE THEY'RE OVER THERE. UH THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF RESIDENTS. STRETCH THERE ARE I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT NUMBER, BUT THERE ARE WHEN YOU GET TO THE. THE EAST OF THAT STREET. THERE WAS NOT QUITE AS MANY DENSE HE'S NOT QUITE AS THERE AS YOU HAVE FARTHER WEST. BUT YES, THERE ARE. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF HOMES THAT ARE IMPACT IN THAT AREA. YOU TALK ABOUT IMPACT IN RESIDENCE. WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WIDENING THE STREET. ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS OPENING? THE END OF THE STREET AND CONNECTED WHAT TYPE OF IMPACT TALKING HAVING SO THIS IS THE CHALLENGE, BUT IT'S GREAT QUESTION. THIS IS THE CHALLENGE WE HAVE WHEN WE WHEN WE REBUILD ANY STREET.

ALMOST ANY STREET EAST OF 75. YOU KNOW THAT WE HAVE THESE 40 FOOT RIGHT FOOT, 40 FOOT WIDE RIGHT AWAYS THAT ALLOWS FOR VERY MINIMAL STREET WITH SO. WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MOMENTUM, THOUGH, IS 24 FEET WIDE. WE'D LIKE TO PUT A SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET OR THE OTHER. AND YOU KNOW WHERE DIFFERENT DIFFERENT STREETS SOME HAVE A LITTLE BIT WIDER RIGHT AWAY. SOME HAVE NARROWER WE TRY TO GET TO THAT MINIMUM FOOTPRINT OF THAT, TOO.

FOOT WIDE STREET WITH THIS SIDEWALK. LEFT FOUR FOOT FIVE FOOT SIDEWALK IS ON THE BACK OF CURB. IT'S NOT THE MOST IDEAL, BUT IT'S BETTER THAN NOT HAVING ANY SIDE. WALK IT ALL SO BUT YES, SO THAT'S THAT'S THE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT WE'D MADE. I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE RIGHT AWAY IS OUT THERE, BUT PROBABLY PRETTY NARROW LOOKING AT THE EXISTING GREENVILLE.

IT'S BUILT THAT CONNECTS THE AIRPORT LOOKING GRATEFUL. LOOKING AT THE WAY IT'S LAID OUT TODAY. CAN I NEED FROM ABILITY OUT THEIR WRINKLES, REALLY NOT MYSTERY ABILITY. IS TELLING ME IT'S GONNA BE A SMALL STREET. IT'S GONNA BE A SMALL STREET, BUT OTHERWISE YOU HAVE TO TAKE CHARGE. WE WOULD PROBABLY TAKEN RIGHT AWAY FROM INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES AND A LOT OF THOSE PROPERTIES. THERE'S NO KURBAN GUTTER THERE. AND SO THEY'RE USED TO PULLING UP IN PARKING. YOU KNOW, THEY'VE DEVELOPED PARKING ADJACENT TO THEIR HOUSE OFF THE STREET. WE START TO IMPACT THAT AS WELL. THAT'S SOME OF THE NEGATIVES THAT WE DO ON SOME PROJECTS.

IT'S A TRADE OFF. PUT EVERYTHING OFF TYPE. GOING TO STUDY THOSE THOSE THREE ALIGNMENTS? YES. IT'S GREAT. SOLVED. IT'S SURE SURE DOES AFFECT THE RESIDENTS. THIS ONE PROPERTY OVER HERE ON THE EAST OF THE PARK IS IT HAS BEEN A CHALLENGE IS SEVERAL DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS HAVE COME IN AND LOOK AT IT. NO ONE'S BEEN IN OR MAKE ANYTHING WORK. MAYBE THIS POTENTIAL FOR THE PARK'S MAJKOWSKI HAS GRAND IDEAS. YOU ALL KNOW THAT. HE'S TALKED ABOUT IT. WE WERE ABLE TO ACQUIRE THAT PROPERTY AND MAKE THAT ACTUALLY OUR CONNECTION.

NOW WE HAVE A REALLY FANTASTIC GATEWAY INTO FROM THE EAST SIDE. UM IT STILL LEAVES IN HIS MIND ENOUGH USABLE SPACE SOUTH OF THAT. DOTTED LINE TO STILL DO SOME SORT OF PARK FACILITY THERE. ESO WOULDN'T BE WASTED SPACE. WE WOULDN'T BE TAKING THOSE FIELDS AWAY. THAT'S ANOTHER CHALLENGE. WE ARE GOING THROUGH THE SOFTBALL FIELDS OVER THERE. DON'T WORRY ABOUT THAT YET, SO I WANTED TO, UM. BUT A LL PART OF DISCUSSION AND THAT'S WHAT STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DO IS WE WOULD BE EVALUATING ALL FOUR OF THESE STREETS. WHAT VIRGINIA WHAT'S THE BEST OPTION WE COULD COME WITH WITH THE SAME DOWN HERE? WE'VE GOTTEN A LITTLE BIT MORE ROOM TO WORK WITH. ON THE GREENVILLE, LOUISIANA CONNECTION S O, YOU KNOW WHAT THE WORST AGAIN

[01:20:01]

IT WOULD BE A FUTURE PROJECT FUNDED IN A LATER YEAR BASED ON FUNDING AVAILABILITY. YES. MAKE PASS ME RIGHT FOR ONE THAT MATCHES THE ALL THREE HAVE HAVE CONNECTED, THE BEST OPTION IS TO ATTACK. THAT ONE. WHICH WAY HAVE AGREED. IT'S ALREADY THERE. LOOK, YOU WANTED THAT TURN RIGHT THERE. WITHOUT WIDENING THE REST OF THE ROAD WAY. WE DON'T HAVE THAT WE CAN GO IN THERE AND MAKING IMPROVEMENT AT THAT SMALL CORNER. OPEN IT UP, RIGHT WE HAVE, WE WOULD HAVE TO ACQUIRE RIGHT AWAY, PROBABLY FROM SOMEBODY. IS PROBABLY HAVE ENOUGH RIGHT AWAY TO MAKE THE ATTORNEY MOVEMENTS WORK. AND THEN YOU KNOW IF YOU GOT SAY, YOU KNOW, 2 300 FEET TO THE WEST, WE WOULD TAKE HER BACK DOWN TO THE EXISTING FOOTPRINT.

THAT'S THERE. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE RECEIVED SEVERAL DIFFERENT REQUESTS. MR SANCHEZ WAS MADE.

THIS ISN'T COMMENTS SEVERAL MONTHS AGO ABOUT YOU KNOW, HE WAS SOMEHOW ELECTED AS A REPRESENTATIVE SOMETHING BECAUSE HE WAS AFRAID TO TALK BEFORE COUNCIL OF SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES ABOUT THAT THE OPENING OF THAT ROAD. WE HAD A COUPLE OF PEOPLE AND SO WE WOULD LIKE THE STAFF HAVE BETTER CONCLUSION OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO, AND SO RESIDENTS CAN PLAN AND UNDERSTAND WHAT'S IN FRONT OF THEM AS WELL. LIKE MY CASKET TALKED ABOUT. THE IDEA BEING PART OF A GRAND BOULEVARD. ENTRANCE INTO OUR YEAH. CONTENTIOUS IS TO STUDY THREE OPTIONS. THANK YOU GUYS. JUST CLEARED BY THE ROAD THAT IS GOING TO KILL ME. RIGHT IS THAT THE BOOK THAT WILL BE MOVED BY A CAR? THEY'RE GOING TO PAY 100% OF THE COST OF MOVING THAT. HELPING THAT DOING THAT CORRECT. THAT IS CORRECT. AND THEN ON THESE IS CONNECTED, YOU KNOW, MOVING THE BARRIERS IS THIS LITTLE GIRL SAID. MANY, PROBABLY HUNDREDS, NOT THOUSANDS OF CITIZENS LIVE ON STREETS THAT OPENED UP TO BIGGER AND, YEAH, I MEAN, WE JUST WATCH HER KIDS A LITTLE MORE. WEI HAVE SO I KNOW. I KNOW THAT'S NOT REALLY WHAT YOU WANT. IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT TO HEAR, BUT THAT'S THE PROGRESS OF THE CITY WAY THAT TO ME IS CERTAINLY BEST. ROUND TWO GO WITH IS THAT CRIME JUST CONNECTIVITY OF EVERYTHING AROUND THEIR WAY ALL LEARN TO ADAPT, AND I THINK THAT THAT'S JUST WHAT. HAVE HAPPENED OVER THERE AS WE TRY TO CONNECT. ALL OF OUR EASTSIDE AND BETTER. SIDE OVER THERE BECAUSE I THINK GOOD THINGS WILL HAPPEN IS THAT THE DIRECTION IS TO GO AHEAD AND YOU KNOW, JUSTICE, MR. SHIM WELL ALLUDED TO A SMALL PROJECT TO INCREASE THE WIT OF GREENVILLE CONNECTION AIRPORT AND REMOVE THAT BARRIER NOW IS WE'RE STILL STUDYING THE OTHER PIECES. I THINK THAT'S WHAT. I THINK WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY. NOW WE HAVE A ROAD. THAT IS BUILT TO CONNECT TO AIRPORT.

SOMEBODY JUST PUT UP A PAIR. WE HAVE THE ABILITY WITH MINIMAL MOVE THAT ROPE. FIX THE CONNECTIVE ISSUE WITH TURNING THERE. MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE OWNER'S ON THE CORNER DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THERE'S MANY RESIDENTS ON THAT QUARTER. THAT HEART ORDER THERE. WHATEVER.

AND WE CAN ADD SOME SPEED BUMPS. I'M IN FAVOR OF ADDING SPEED BUMPS THROUGH GREEN. AND THROUGH VIRGINIA, BECAUSE WHEN TALKING TO MARKET SPIRITUALISTS MAIN CONCERN IS THE SAFETY OF THE CHILDREN. ON THAT FOOT. YEAH. SO WE'RE GONNA OPEN UP TO CONNECT TO SPEEDING IS A CONCERN OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS THAT I. WE CAN ADD SOME CREATIVE SPEEDBOATS TO KEEP THAT OTHER AT A RESIDENTIAL LEVEL. AND STILL HAVE THAT CONNECTIVITY AND WE CAN DO THAT AND NOT HAVE A FIVE YEAR PLAN. YOU GOT STUDIED THE OTHER CONNECTIVE ITY TO BE OUR GATEWAY. WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO OPEN UP SOME CONNECTED. GREEN IF COUNCIL PASSED, SO I WOULD I WOULD ONLY BE IN FAVOR OF THAT SPEED BECAUSE THERE'S NO SIDEWALKS ON ON THAT ROAD, WHICH MAKES IT BUT I THINK ULTIMATELY WHAT WE WANT IS. LONG TERM. IT CAN'T BE THAT LONG. BUT DO YOU FEEL IS IN THE LEAD NOW FOR THAT CONNECTIVE RIGHT NOW THERE'S NO BEATING, OPENING ON AIRPORT AT THIS POINT, SO IF WE DID PUT THAT MAKE THAT CONNECTION, YEAH,

[01:25:04]

THROUGH THE PARK. SINCE THE GIVES US PEOPLE YOU REALLY NEED TO DO AND ENCROACH ON. ACTUALLY IMPACT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE'S A CONCERN THAT I HAVE CHEERS. I HEARD THAT I HAVE IS THAT WE WILL BE DOING THE STREETS ARE VERY STREET STREET AS I WANT. WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO REDO GREEN STREET AND ALL OF THESE STREETS ARE CIA. BUT THAT . SOME OF WHAT? WE'RE GOING TO COME DOWN THE STREET AND WIDEN THIS TRIP, BUT I'M SAYING THAT AT THE END CAP RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS AND EVERYTHING ELSE IN THIS FOOT PRINT WILL BE COACH. AND BROUGHT TO OUR STAND. JUST UNTIL THEN. CAN I QUESTION THAT WAY, AGREED TO NOT DO ANYTHING TO STUDY. TO THE STUDY IDENTIFY THEM. EXACTLY. STEADY. FRIDAY. YEAH, IT'S NOT EVEN A PROJECT ON OUR RADAR RIGHT NOW. SO, YOU KNOW. QUESTION IS VERY ANYWAY, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I KNOW WE'RE DOING IT ON PROPOSED DRUG BUDDIES. TO THE NORTH. I'M USING THAT. THEY DON'T THINK SLOW DOWN TRAFFIC, CENTRAL FOOTPRINTS SO SMALL TALKING ABOUT STREETS THAT ALREADY I THOUGHT IT OUT THAT WAY. I FEEL WE HAVE. TO YEAH, WE COULD LOOK IT DEFINITELY LOOK AT THE ABILITY PUT. ONE OF THOSE IS PART OF THE PROJECT ACTUALLY, OVER LOUISIANA, UH, IN GREENVILLE, THAT WHY THAT WILL BE A ROUNDABOUT. SO WE ALREADY INTRODUCING HIM INTO THIS AREA.

UM OVER AS YOU GO FARTHER EAST, SOME OF THE RIGHT AWAYS THAT EVEN SMALLER, WE WOULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO SEVERAL. THOSE THOSE THOSE HOUSES ON THE INTERSECTIONS WHEREVER WE DECIDED TO PUT THAT SO. COME ON. WE NEED THIO PROGRAM, A PROJECT TO MOVE THIS FORWARD AND RIGHT NOW, OUR C I P SO WE PUT IT IN C I P WI WOODSTOCK STARTING OCTOBER AND WE WOULD HAVE IT DONE. WE COULD PROBABLY HAVE A ROADWAY ALIGNMENT. 6 TO 8 MONTHS, DEPENDING ON HOW WE COULD MEET WITH THE PUBLIC AND GET STAKEHOLDER INPUT. WE ALSO NEED TO BE WORKING WITH THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY IN THE RED AREA TO MAKE SURE WHATEVER ALIGNMENTS WERE COMING UP WITH WORK WITH WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO MAKE SURE. SO I MEAN, WE'RE LOOKING AT SIX MONTHS TO 12 MONTHS. IF EVERYBODY STILL. PRIORITISE MAKING THAT, YOU KNOW. AH, FOCUS OF THEIRS. MR. VERY NICE. LOOK AT CONTINUING PARALLEL. STRUCTURES ON THE PARTY. FOLLOW MAYBE AROUND OR. UH UH. IT WAS NOT A THOUGHT THAT THE THREE LINUS THAT WE SHOWED WE'RE JUST

[01:30:02]

[20-0442 Update on McKinney Business Support Efforts]

WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE HITTING THE BUSINESSES THAT ARE HIT THE HARDEST. A MEANINGFUL AND IMPACT. IMPACTFUL UTILIZE. THE RESOURCE IS OF ALL OF OUR DEPARTMENTS AND THEIR STRENGTHS.

FLEXIBLE SIMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE, SIMPLE AND EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES AND THE ABILITY TO TRACK PERFORMANCE. WHERE WE STAND TODAY. IT'S SORT OF EASY TO BREAK DOWN THESE EFFORTS INTO A FEW DIFFERENT FACES. SHORT TERM. IT'S ESSENTIALLY MARCH TO JUNE BEGINNING UNTIL WHERE WE ARE TODAY. MID TERM, PROBABLY THE NEXT FOUR MONTHS AND THEN LONG TERM IS MAYBE FALL AND ON THE SHORT TERM PROJECTS FROM SORT OF THAT LOCAL FINANCIAL DIRECT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. MCKINNIE. STRONG T SHIRT SALES. THE REVENUES, WHICH WILL HELP LOCAL BUSINESSES AND THEN THAT $1500 GRANT PROGRAM. THE MIDTERM IS ROUND TWO OF THE GRANT PROGRAM THAT WILL TALK ABOUT LATER AND THEN THIS LARGER GRANT PROGRAM THAT WE CAN UTILIZE THE CARES ACT FUNDING FOR OUR BUSINESS SUPPORTING STIMULUS TEAM, THOUGH, IS ALSO THINKING LONG TERM AND WE UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN WE GET TO SEPTEMBER THERE MIGHT BE NEEDS OUT THAT THERE WERE NOT EVEN THINKING ABOUT NOW BASED ON HOW BUSINESSES ARE REACTING AND RESPONDING TO COVE, IT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE OUT THERE. THEY'RE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE RIGHT NOW, BUT WE WILL KEEP YOU UPDATED. THEY INCLUDE A POSSIBLE REVOLVING LOAN FROM PROGRAM EXPANSION OF THE TOURIST PROGRAM AND OTHER OPTIONS. WE ARE TRYING TO BE FLEXIBLE.

WE'RE TRYING TO STAY IN CONTACT WITH OUR BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND ADAPT TO THEIR NEEDS. ACROSS.

ALL OF THESE IS THAT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORTING PROGRAMMING THAT'S OCCURRING AT THE STAFF LEVEL. IF YOU TAKE THOSE FINANCIAL PROGRAMS AND THINK ABOUT HOW THEY'RE FUNDED, THIS DIAGRAM MIGHT HELP OUT A LITTLE BIT. THIS SHOWS KIND OF THE FOUR BUCKETS OF MONEY THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT, AND THE TYPES OF PROGRAMS THEY CAN FUND. SO THE M CDC PROMOTIONAL REVENUES HELPED FUND THE MCKINNEY STRONG T SHIRT SALES IN THE GRANT PROGRAM. IT COULD FUND A REVOLVING LOAN PROGRAM. IT DOESN'T MEAN WE'RE PROPOSING THAT TODAY, BUT IT COULD. WE'VE GOT THE CARE. ZACK FUNDING ANY D C POSSIBLE REVENUES, AND THERE'S MAYBE A SLIGHT ERROR HERE BECAUSE TECHNICALLY, THE M E D C REVENUES COULD ALSO ALIGNED TO THE GRANT PROGRAM.

AND THE T SHIRT SALES OWES ITS VERY SIMILAR USES OF FUNDS. AND THEN THE TRES, WHICH IS

[01:35:04]

UNFORTUNATELY THAT IS NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE. WE WANT TO BE REALLY THOUGHTFUL ABOUT HOW WE USE THAT MONEY. THIS IS SORT OF ONE OF THOSE VERY OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS THAT TALKS ABOUT THE CARE ZACK FUNDING IN GENERAL AND THE ELIGIBLE PURPOSES. I PUT THIS HERE TO SAY THAT IT KIND OF SHOWS. THE REALLY OVERALL INTENT OF THIS WAS KIND OF HELP, LIKE MORE DIRECT EXPENSES. IF YOU READ THIS, YOU DON'T REALLY SEE THE WORD BUSINESS GRANT. BUT WHEN YOU GET INTO SOME OF THE OTHER FAA CUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS, IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT THE CARES ACT FUNDING CAN PROVIDE GRANTS TO SMALL BUSINESSES. THE GUIDANCE RIGHT NOW IS FAIRLY GENERAL. BUT IT DOES NO DOUBT THAT THOSE GRANT SHOULD REIMBURSE COSTS OF BUSINESS INTERRUPTION CAUSED BY REQUIRED CLOSURE SO WE CAN PULL A LOT FROM THAT IN TERMS OF HOW WE DESIGN OUR PROGRAM. WE ALSO KNOW THAT THIS CARES ACT FUNDING CAN'T BE USED TO REPLACE GOVERNMENT REVENUE. SO. WHEN WE DID OUR $1500 PROGRAM. WE ALLOWED PEOPLE TO SUBMIT WATER BILLS FOR EXPENSES. WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FUND WATER BILLS OUT OF THE CARE ZACK PROGRAM. WE ALSO WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO FUND PORTIONS OF RENT THAT MAYBE GO TOWARDS PROPERTY TAXES. AND WE KNOW THAT WE CAN'T USE THE MONEY FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. AS WE LOOK AT THIS BUCKET OF MONEY AND KNOW THAT IT'S COMING FROM A COUNTY SOURCE. THERE MIGHT BE SOME POTENTIAL TO ALIGN WITH SOME OF OUR NEIGHBORS AND ALIGN OUR PROGRAM PARAMETERS SO THAT YOU KNOW WHETHER YOU HAVE A BUSINESS IN ALAN OR FRISCO WERE KIND OF OFFERING THE SAME THING.

WE'VE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH OUR NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES TO EXPLORE THAT OPTION. AND IF WE LEARN MORE ABOUT THE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS, AND THEY GET REALLY COMPLICATED, WE MIGHT BE LOOKING AT 1/3 PARTY AGENCY REVIEW VERSUS AN IN HOUSE REVIEW. SO NEXT STEPS TO PUT IT ALL TOGETHER. WE ARE WORKING ON THE CARES AT GRANT DILIGENTLY. WE HOPE TO HAVE PROGRAM PARAMETERS TO YOU AT YOUR NEXT MEETING. WE KNOW THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A LARGE GRANT AMOUNT. WE KNOW IT'LL BE A REIMBURSEMENT. WE KNOW THAT BUSINESSES WILL HAVE TO DEFINE A HARDSHIP. WE'VE BEEN WORKING REALLY HARD ON CRAFTING THAT AND WORKING WITH THEIR NEIGHBOURS, SO WE'LL TALK MORE ABOUT THAT AND GET THAT HOPEFULLY UNDERWAY BY THIS SUMMER. WE DON'T WANT TO JUST WAIT UNTIL THEN. UNTIL THEN, WE'D LOVE TO START AROUND TWO OF THE $1500 GRANT PROGRAM THAT WE DID IN MAY. TO DATE WE HAVE FUNDED OVER 337. $1000 TO 229 BUSINESSES AND MCKINNEY SO THAT HOPEFULLY HAS MADE A GREAT IMPACT. WE DO KNOW THAT THERE WERE A NUMBER OF UN SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS, FOLKS WHO STARTED AND DIDN'T FINISH. THERE WERE A FEW PEOPLE WHO REACHED OUT AND SAID, HEY, I DIDN'T KNOW I WOULD HAVE APPLIED, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW. AND WE ALSO DIDN'T HIT OUR HOME BASED BUSINESSES AT THAT TIME LAST THURSDAY AT THE M C, D. C. THEY APPROVED AROUND TWO OF THE FUNDING THAT WOULD USE THE REMAINING FUNDS OF $670,000. SAME GRANT MAXIMUM OF 1500 WOULD ALLOW HOME BASED BUSINESSES, BUT THEY WOULD NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE FULL 1500. THEY WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR $1000. NONPROFITS AROUND WHO WOULD NOT BE ELIGIBLE AS WE'VE MOVED TO THE PROCESS. THERE ARE A LOT OF OTHER RESOURCE IS AVAILABLE TO NON PROFITS AT SOME BUSINESSES DON'T HAVE. AND WE WOULD EXPAND THE EXPENSE PERIOD FROM MARCH TO JUNE. SO THAT IS AN INORDINATE AT WORK SESSION. WE WILL CONTINUE TO WORK ON THE MIDTERM PROGRAM OF THE CARE, ZACK DOLLAR AND OUR BUSINESS SUPPORT AND STIMULUS TEAM WILL CONTINUE TO MEET ON A REGULAR BASIS TO MONITOR AND WATCH THOSE LONG TERM PROGRAMS. THAT IS ALL AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. I THINK YOU PROBABLY WORK HE'S DOING. TEAM EFFORT. SHOULD SOMETHING FASCINATED ME? HOW DO YOU SEPARATE PROPERTY TAXES FROM EACH OF THE REPAIR ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TASK, AND I'M NOT SURE THAT THAT TO ME THAT'S GONE. AGAINST THE FINE LINE THAT YOU CAN'T REALLY SAY. YOU HAVE TO GO TO EVERY RENTAL PLACE THAT JUST INCLUDE IT'S YOU KNOW, IT'S DEFINITELY ONE OF THOSE CHALLENGES. SO FOR THE $1500 GRANT PROGRAM, THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT'S M C. D. C FUNDING. SO WE DON'T HAVE THAT PROVISION THERE, SO WE'RE GOOD. WE'RE GOOD THERE. FOR THE CARE ZACK FUNDING. THAT'S WHY WE HAVE TO BE REALLY THOUGHTFUL ABOUT HOW RESTRUCTURING THE PROGRAM CAUSE WE'RE REALLY TRYING TO STRIKE A BALANCE OF. NOT A CHALLENGING GRANT APPLICATION S O. WE DEFINITELY ABSOLUTELY NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES AND BE AUDITABLE, BUT WE IT NEEDS TO

[01:40:06]

EXPENSES BUT IF YOU REMEMBER WAY BACK WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE BUSINESSES THAT MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO PAY RENT, AND THEY COULD SUBMIT THE RENT BILL, SO. IT'S NOT REIMBURSABLE WHAT WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT AS OUR ADMINISTRATION TEAM IS ALLOWING HOME BASED BUSINESSES TO SUBMIT EXPENSES FOR THEIR UTILITIES ON LEE AND FUNDING THOSE AT 50. TRYING TO STRIKE A BALANCE BETWEEN IS A HOME BASED BUSINESS. IT IS YOUR PLACE OF RESIDENCE SO WE DIDN'T QUITE FEEL COMFORTABLE COVERING A MORTGAGE. BUT SOME OF THE UTILITIES AIR PROBABLY HELPING THE BUSINESS. SO RIGHT NOW, THE WAY OUR PARAMETERS ARE DRAFTED IS THAT IF YOU WERE A HOME BASED BUSINESS YOU CAN SUBMIT AN APPLICATION. YOU HAVE TO VERIFY YOUR BUSINESS IDENTITY, PROBABLY BY UPLOADING A TAX FORM OF SOME KIND. AND THEN YOU CAN SUBMIT YOUR UTILITY EXPENSES, WHICH IS THE SAME UTILITY BUCKET THAT BUSINESSES GET TO SUBMIT FOR, BUT WE'RE ONLY GOING TO GIVE YOU 50% OF THAT AMOUNT INSTEAD OF 100. SO. THAT BRINGS UP ANOTHER QUESTION. THAT'S FINE. YOU'RE ROCKING THE FOREST, ESTABLISHING THAT IT ACTUALLY IS A BUSINESS. I MEAN, THEY'RE NOT JUST KILLING THEM GREAT. HAVEN'T YOU DO THAT? WHAT KIND OF STEPS DO YOU DO TO ENSURE THAT TRULY IS A BUSINESS? RIGHT. SO THERE'S YES. SCHEDULE C OR I'M LEARNING THIS AS I GO TO SEW A SCHEDULE CRK 11 IS USUALLY USED. IF YOUR SOLE PROPRIETOR THE OTHERS IF YOU'RE IN A PARTNERSHIP. SOME MAY HAVE LIKE A TAX I D NUMBER SOME MAY USE OR SOCIAL PEERED HAMMERS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING TOWARDS THAT SCHEDULE C OR K ONE TO BE AN UPLOADED DOCUMENT TO DO. VERIFICATION OF THIS, OKAY? QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.

WE'RE GONNA MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION UNLESS ANYONE FEELS A NEED FOR HAS ACCOUNT BE A

[COUNCIL LIAISON UPDATES REGARDING THE VARIOUS MCKINNEY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS]

[EXECUTIVE SESSION]

TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 55171 CONSULTATION, ATTORNEY AND HE WORKS AT A SPECIAL SESSION. RECORD SESSION AGENDA PARK VIGIL. TURNING POINTS, ADVICE AND ASSISTED BY THE DELIBERATION OF DISCUSSION, SAID ITEMS. SECTION 55171 PENDING OUR CONSTIPATED LITIGATION PETITION SEES GARLANDS KEEP PLAYING BRIDGE IN THE WORLD SHARE WATER RATES AND BUY MORE TEXT IN THIS WATER DISTRICT. YOU SEE DR NUMBER 46662 PUBLIC QUESTIONS IN TEXAS. YES THE OPERATION HELP A PLAINTIFF VERSUS CITY CAN'T TOUCH DEFENDED CIVIL ACTION BEFORE TO O T V 00353 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VS THE STATE HIGHWAY FIVE LLC. LOST MORE AMERICAN TEXAS C SECTION 5517 TO DELIBERATIONS ABOUT REAL PROPERTY MUNICIPAL FACILITIES. SECTION 55187 DELIBERATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MATTERS. TP SEE BYRON NELSON SALESMANSHIP DEFINITELY QUALIFIED. OLD CENTER, NORTH TEXAS FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION WILL BE ACTUALLY SET UP FOR YOU. HERE NOW.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.